VANCOUVER, Sept. 25, 2013 /PRNewswire/ - Bear Creek Mining
(TSX Venture: BCM / BVL: BCM) ("Bear Creek" or the "Company") is
pleased to announce that the Peruvian Ministry of Energy and Mines
("MEM") has approved the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
("ESIA") for the Corani silver- lead-zinc project located in
southern Peru.
Corani represents a rare asset class containing 270 million
ounces of silver and 4.8 billion pounds of combined lead and zinc
which is forecasted to produce over 13 million ounces of
silver/year at a negative cost of $0.45 per ounce of silver, net of by-product
credits, for the first 5 years of a 22 year mine life.
Subsequent steps in the advancement of the Corani project are
intended to include detailed engineering followed by construction
permits flowing from the ESIA.
Andrew Swarthout, Bear Creek's
CEO, states that "We sincerely appreciate the strong support from
the local communities and the various Peruvian Ministries,
including MEM, during the approval process. We also express
our gratitude to the Peruvian central government for establishing
investments in infrastructure along side of our life-of-mine
community investment commitments. Bear Creek is excited to move
this important project forward towards development."
Mr. Swarthout continues "We are also encouraged by recent
conversations with the Peruvian government towards the resolution
of issues regarding the Santa Ana silver project, which remains
under the conditions of the Supreme Decree issued in June 2011. The successful resolution of
these issues and returning Bear Creek's right to operate Santa Ana
is critical to the Company's ability to raise financing for the
construction of Corani. Based upon the successful acquisition
of the social license through long-term community investment
agreements at Corani, we strongly believe that the model has been
demonstrated that will establish social license at Santa Ana.
We look forward to working with the government and local
communities in reaching a resolution thereby avoiding ongoing and
future litigation while providing the opportunity for advancing
Santa Ana and providing much needed employment, investment, and
revenues in those local communities."
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its
Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the
policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for
the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
Cautionary Note regarding Technical and
Scientific Disclosure and Forward-Looking Statements:
All of Bear Creek's exploration programs and pertinent
disclosure of a technical or scientific nature are prepared by or
prepared under the direct supervision of Andrew Swarthout, P.Geo., CEO, who serves as the
Qualified Person under the definitions of NI 43-101. The
block model estimate, mine design and schedules were prepared by
Independent Mining Consultants of Tucson
Arizona. John Marek
P.E. acted as the independent qualified person as defined by
Canada's National Instrument
43-101. Additionally the methods used in determining and
reporting the mineral reserves and resources are consistent with
the CIM Best Practices Guidelines. The method used in the
resource calculation is equivalent to the method used in the
resource calculation shown in our August 23,
2006 Press Release. For this resource estimate we have
used metal prices based on a 3-year backward average and a 2-year
forward price based on the metal markets in August 2011.
Assumptions used in the mineral reserve and FS model by IMC
are: Silver Price=$18.00/oz; Zinc
Price=$0.85/lb; Lead
Price=$0.85/lb; Mixed Sulfide
Material Silver Recovery is fixed at 62% to lead con and an
additional14% to the zinc con when zinc head grade is greater than
0.7%, 10.4% Ag recovery when zinc head grade is from 0.7% to 0.5%,
6.3% recovery of silver to the zinc con when zinc head grade is
from 0.5% to 0.3% and no silver recovery to the zinc con when zinc
head grades are less than 0.3%. Zinc Recovery=67.5% to zinc
con when the zinc head grade is greater than 0.7%, 50% Zn recovery
when zinc head grade is from 0.7% to 0.5%, 30% recovery of zinc to
the zinc con when zinc head grade is from 0.5% to 0.3% and no zinc
recovery to the zinc con when zinc head grades are less than 0.3%.
Lead Recovery=75% to lead con. For Transitional Material
Silver Recovery= 38.5%+.2*Ag Grade
(g/t) (Maximum 70% recovery) to lead con and 0% to the zinc con,
Zinc Recovery= 0% to zinc con and Lead Recovery= 38%+10.9*Lead
Grade (%) (Maximum 65% recovery) to lead con. Average smelter
charges including Treatment Charges and Refining Charges ("TCRC")
and metal deducts against saleable metal: Silver= $1.52 per ounce; Zinc= $0.62 per pound; Lead= $0.41 per pound; Mining Costs per tonne=
$1.34; Process cost per tonne=
$8.00; G&A per processed tonne=
$1.20; Pit Slopes= 42 degrees in
mineralized tuff and 46 degrees in post-mineralized tuff. The
resulting mineral reserve cutoff is $10.54/tonne ore NSR. The mineral reserves
are contained within a practical mining plan that utilized the
'floating-cone" method as an initial guide for design. Mineral
reserves are established as follows:
|
Mineral
Reserves, $10.54 NSR cut-off |
|
|
Contained Metal |
|
Equivalent
Ounces |
Category |
|
Ktonnes |
|
Silver |
|
Lead |
|
Zinc |
|
Silver |
|
Lead |
|
Zinc |
|
Eq.
Silver |
|
Eq.
Silver |
|
|
|
|
Gm/t |
|
% |
|
% |
|
Million
Ozs |
|
Million
Lbs |
|
Million
Lbs |
|
Million
Ozs |
|
Gm/t |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proven |
|
30,083 |
|
66.6 |
|
1.04 |
|
0.60 |
|
64.4 |
|
690.4 |
|
399.9 |
|
115.7 |
|
119.6 |
Probable |
|
126,047 |
|
50.7 |
|
0.87 |
|
0.47 |
|
205.6 |
|
2,422.6 |
|
1,297.7 |
|
381.5 |
|
94.1 |
Proven + Probable |
|
156,130 |
|
53.8 |
|
0.90 |
|
0.49 |
|
270.0 |
|
3,113.0 |
|
1,697.6 |
|
497.2 |
|
99.1 |
The mineral resource portion of the project is contained in a
larger pit than the FS design pit, which was a floating cone using
the following input assumptions: Silver Price=$30.00/oz; Zinc Price=$1.00/lb; Lead Price=$1.00/lb; Mixed oxide material that was given 0%
recovery for the reserves was assumed to have an 85% recovery of
silver, all other recoveries remained the same. The Mineral
Resource cut-off was $9.20/tonne
which represents the internal process cutoff. All
metallurgical material types were included in the
resource.
All diamond drilling has been performed using HQ diameter
core with recoveries averaging greater than 95%. Core is
logged and split on site under the supervision of Bear Creek
geologists. Sampling is done on two-meter intervals and
samples are transported by Company staff to Juliaca, Peru for direct shipping to ALS Chemex,
Laboratories in Lima, Peru.
ALS Chemex is an ISO 9001:2000-registered laboratory and is
preparing for ISO 17025 certification. Silver, lead, and zinc
assays utilize a multi-acid digestion with atomic absorption
("ore-grade assay method"). The QC/QA program includes the
insertion every 20th sample of known standards prepared by SGS
Laboratories, Lima. A
section in Bear Creek's website is dedicated to sampling, assay and
quality control procedures.
The FS was prepared by a team of independent engineering
consultants. The mining and block model portion was prepared
by Independent Mining Consultants of Tucson Arizona, John Marek, PE acting as QP.
The process plant design was prepared by M3 Engineering, Dan Neff,
PE acting as QP. Metallurgy and Process design criteria developed
by Blue Coast Metallurgy Ltd. Chris
Martin, CEng acting as QP. And geotechnical,
environmental, infrastructure, waste stockpile and tailings designs
were prepared by Global Resource Engineering Ltd., Chris Chapman,
PE acting as the QP. Each of these individuals has read and
approves the respective scientific and technical disclosure
contained in this news release. Silver Equivalency
calculation represents the contained equivalent silver ounces
contained in the ground and is based on the resource metal prices
assumptions of $18.00/oz Ag, 0.85/lb
Pb and 0.85/lb Zn and recoveries to concentrate of 64.2% for silver
and 71.1% for lead and 51.6% for zinc. The calculation does
not take into account the net smelter payment terms for the
different metals in the two separate concentrates. The
resulting equivalency is 1 oz Ag = 19.1 lb Pb and 1 oz Ag = 26.3 lb
Zn.
Total cash cost per ounce of silver is calculated in
accordance with a standard approved by The Silver Institute, a
nonprofit international association that draws its membership from
across the breadth of the silver industry. Adoption of the
standard is voluntary and the cost measures presented may not be
comparable to other similarly titled measures of other
companies. Total cash cost includes mine site operating costs
such as mining, processing, administration, and treatment and
refining charges, but is exclusive of amortization, reclamation,
capital, exploration costs and taxes on income. Total cash costs
are reduced by lead and zinc by-product revenues, and then divided
by silver ounces sold to arrive at total cash cost of per ounce of
silver, net of by-product revenues. Previously, the Company
included reclamation costs as a component of its total cash cost
per ounce of silver.
The Company has elected to follow the Silver Institute's cash
cost standard, and has therefore excluded reclamation costs from
its calculation of total cash cost per ounce of silver.
This document contains "forward-looking information" within
the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and "forward-looking
statements" within the meaning of the United States Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This information
and these statements, referred to herein as "forward-looking
statements" are made as of the date of this news release or as of
the date of the effective date of information described in this
news release, as applicable. Forward-looking statements
relate to future events or future performance and reflect current
estimates, predictions, expectations or beliefs regarding future
events and include, without limitation, statements with respect to:
(i) the planned approval and timing of the ESIA; (ii) the planned
development of the Corani and Santa Ana projects, including the
timing thereof. Any statements that express or involve
discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs,
plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or
performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as
"expects", "anticipates", "plans", "projects", "estimates",
"envisages", "assumes", "intends", "strategy", "goals",
"objectives" or variations thereof or stating that certain actions,
events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be
taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms
and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and
may be forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements are based on the Company's or
its consultants' current beliefs as well as various assumptions
made by and information currently available to them. These
assumptions include, without limitation: (i) the presence of and
continuity of metals at the project at modeled grades; (ii) the
capacities of various machinery and equipment; (iii) the
availability of personnel, machinery and equipment at estimated
prices; (iv) exchange rates; (v) metals and minerals sales prices;
(vi) appropriate discount rates; (vii) tax rates and royalty rates
applicable to the proposed mining operation; (viii) financing
structure and costs; (ix) anticipated mining losses and dilution; *
metals recovery rates, (xi) reasonable contingency requirements;
and (xiii) receipt of regulatory approvals on acceptable terms and
in the timeframes expected by the Company, including, without
limitation, in relation to the ESIA. Although management considers
these assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently
available to it, they may prove to be incorrect. Many
forward-looking statements are made assuming the correctness of
other forward looking statements, such as statements of net present
value and internal rate of return, which are based on most of the
other forward-looking statements and assumptions herein. The
cost information is also prepared using current values, but the
time for incurring the costs will be in the future and it is
assumed costs will remain stable over the relevant period.
By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve
inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, and
risks exist that estimates, forecasts, projections and other
forward-looking statements will not be achieved or that assumptions
do not reflect future experience. We caution readers not to
place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements as a
number of important factors could cause the actual outcomes to
differ materially from the beliefs, plans, objectives,
expectations, anticipations, estimates assumptions and intentions
expressed in such forward-looking statements. These risk
factors may be generally stated as the risk that the assumptions
and estimates expressed above do not occur, but specifically
include, without limitation, risks relating to variations in the
mineral content within the material identified as mineral reserves
and mineral resources from that predicted; variations in rates of
recovery and extraction; developments in world metals and minerals
markets; risks relating to fluctuations in the Canadian dollar
relative to other currencies; increases in the estimated capital
and operating costs or unanticipated costs; difficulties attracting
the necessary work force; increases in financing costs or adverse
changes to global market conditions and the terms of available
financing, if any; tax rates or royalties being greater than
assumed; changes in development or mining plans due to changes in
logistical, technical or other factors, changes in project
parameters as plans continue to be refined; risks relating timing
and to receipt of regulatory approvals; adverse changes to
government approval processes; the effects of competition in the
markets in which the Company operates; operational and
infrastructure risks; and the additional risks described in the
Company's Annual Information Form, annual financial statements and
management's discussion and analysis for the year ended
December 31, 2012 and in the
feasibility study entitled "Corani Project, Form 43-101F1 Technical
Report, Feasibility Study" filed by the Company on December 22, 2011 filed on the SEDAR website in
Canada (available at
www.sedar.com). The foregoing list of factors that may affect
future results is not exhaustive.
When relying on our forward-looking statements, investors and
others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other
uncertainties and potential events. The Company does not
undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written
or oral, that may be made from time to time by the Company or on
behalf of the Company, except as required by law.
SOURCE Bear Creek Mining Corporation