Highlights:
- The Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) for Westmoreland has been updated to include
results from drilling carried out in 2012, 2023 & 2024.
- The updated Mineral Resource Estimate reports a Total Indicated
Resource of 48.1 MLbs. of U3O8 at an
average grade of 770 ppm and a Total Inferred Resource of
approximately 17.7 MLbs. of U3O8 at an
average grade of 680 ppm.
- 70% (48.1 MLbs.) of the Resource is now classified
Indicated and 30% (17.7 MLbs.) is classified Inferred.
- Update includes re-estimate of the Redtree, Huarabagoo and
Junnagunna deposits as well as an Initial Resource for Long
Pocket.
TORONTO, Feb. 28,
2025 /CNW/ - Laramide Resources Ltd.
("Laramide" or the "Company") (TSX: LAM) (ASX: LAM)
(OTCQX: LMRXF) a uranium mine development and exploration company
with a portfolio of globally significant projects, is pleased to
provide an updated Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") for the
Westmoreland Project in northwest Queensland Australia
("Westmoreland").
The updated Mineral Resource Estimate represents a 34% increase
in Indicated Resources and an 11% increase in Inferred Resources,
compared to the 2009 estimate. The updated MRE now reports
Total Indicated Resource of 48.1 million pounds of
U3O8 and Total Inferred 17.7 million pounds
across four deposits: Redtree, Huarabagoo, Junnagunna and Long
Pocket.
Laramide President and CEO Marc
Henderson commented:
"This updated MRE reiterates our long-held view that
Westmoreland is a genuinely world
class deposit. At 65-plus million pounds it ranks as one of the
largest undeveloped uranium deposits in the world and has the
potential to be a top 10 global uranium mine. It has demonstrable
attributes that support a long-life mining operation that could
support ongoing jobs and regional development in North-West Queensland while providing the
world with the raw materials required for the burgeoning Nuclear
Power industry and drive towards Net Zero. Moreover, we have
identified extensions to mineralisation and targets in the mineral
system so have a clear line of sight to adding yet more
pounds.
"Building on a few years of significant effort and work, this
update is a credit to our Australian Exploration team and all
contractors involved.
"Pending the support of the new Liberal Queensland
Government, we will look forward to quickly transitioning the
Project to a Development Phase while concurrently continuing with
high-impact exploration to further grow the resource base."
About the Westmoreland Project
The Westmoreland Uranium Project is located in far northwest
Queensland, Australia,
approximately 380km northwest of the mining township of Mt Isa. The
Project is 100% owned by Laramide Resources through its wholly
owned subsidiary Tackle Resources Pty Ltd. The Project comprises
three granted and contiguous Exploration Permits for Minerals
(EPMs) – EPM 14558, EPM 14672 and EPM 28807. Also, a Mineral
Development Licence (MDL), MDL 2026, is pending grant.
The Project area has been subject to exploration for uranium
since the 1950's and is host to numerous mineral occurrences and
deposits, including the four largest: Redtree, Huarabagoo,
Junnagunna, and Long Pocket.
Mineral Resource Statement
An update to the Mineral Resource Estimate for the Westmoreland
Uranium Project, Queensland,
Australia has been prepared by Addsion Mining Services of
the United Kingdom on behalf of
Laramide Resources Ltd. ("the issuer"). The issuer is a dual listed
entity on the TSX and ASX stock exchanges of Canada and Australia respectively, as such the estimate
is reported in accordance with National Instrument 43-101,
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, ("NI 43-101")
and prepared under Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and
Petroleum ("CIM") Definition Standards. CIM Definition Standards
for Mineral Resources (2014) and Best Practices Guidelines outline
by CIM (2019) have been followed. The estimate is also reported in
accordance with The Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration
Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves ('the JORC Code' 2012
edition.)
The updated Mineral Resource Estimate has an effective date of
January 31st, 2025, and is
reported above a cut-off grade of 200 ppm
U3O8 and comprises of:
- Indicated Resources of 27.8 million tonnes at an average grade
of 770 ppm U3O8 for 48.1 million contained
Lbs. of U3O8.
- Inferred Resources of approximately 11.8 million tonnes at an
average grade of 680 ppm U3O8 for 17.7
million contained Lbs. of U3O8.
The updated estimate supersedes all previous estimates. Mineral
Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated
economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be
materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title,
taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues. It
is important to note that currently, only exploration, and not
mining for uranium is permitted in Queensland, Australia. However, it is
reasonable to expect that the policy may change in the future as
there is a historical precedent for uranium mining within the
State.
Table 1 sets out the Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources by
deposit. Readers are encouraged to review the accompanying notes
and explanatory text in support of the estimate.
Table 1 Mineral Resources by deposit for the Westmoreland
Uranium Project, Queensland,
Australia. Reported above a cut-off grade of 200 ppm U3O8.
Effective 31st January
2025.
Deposit
|
Tonnes
|
Density
g/m3
|
U3O8 ppm
|
U3O8 MLbs.
|
Indicated
|
Redtree
|
14,000,000
|
2.5
|
880
|
27
|
Huarabagoo
|
2,500,000
|
2.6
|
890
|
4.9
|
Junnagunna
|
10,000,000
|
2.5
|
640
|
15
|
Long Pocket
|
1,300,000
|
2.5
|
420
|
1.2
|
Total
Indicated
|
27,800,000
|
2.5
|
770
|
48.1
|
Inferred
|
Redtree
|
3,000,000
|
2.5
|
800
|
5.2
|
Huarabagoo
|
3,100,000
|
2.6
|
870
|
6.0
|
Junnagunna
|
3,000,000
|
2.5
|
620
|
4.2
|
Long Pocket
|
2,700,000
|
2.5
|
380
|
2.3
|
Total
Inferred
|
11,800,000
|
2.5
|
680
|
17.7
|
|
Notes To Mineral
Resource Estimate
|
1.
|
Numbers are rounded to
reflect that an estimate of tonnage and grade has been made, as
such products may have discrepancies. Tonnages are expressed in the
metric system, concentrations as parts per million (ppm),
equivalent to grammes per tonne, and contained metal as pounds
(Lbs.).
|
2.
|
The Independent
Qualified Person as defined by CIM definition Standards, and the
Independent Competent Persons as defined by the JORC code 2012
edition is Mr. Richard Siddle MSc, MAIG. Mr. Siddle is a Member of
the Australian Institute of Geoscientist (#6802) and Director of
Addsion Mining Services Ltd of the United Kingdom, Mr. Siddle has
been working continuously for Addison Mining Services as a Minerals
Resource Geologist since November 2014.
|
3.
|
Mr. Siddle completed a
site visit to the project area between the 21st and
23rd of January 2025, and inspected representative
sections of drill core, visited rehabilitated drill sites and
inspected selected outcrop geology. Discussions were held with the
issuer's technical teams and exploration and socio-environmental
considerations discussed. No items of material concern were
identified which are not discussed within the accompanying
documentation.
|
4.
|
Mineral Resources that
are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability. The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Resources in
this Mineral Resource Estimate are uncertain in nature and there
has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred
Resources as Indicated or Measured, however it is reasonably
expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be
upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.
Additional drilling, bulk density determination and improved
topographic surveys are required to increase the confidence in the
Mineral Resources; increased levels of information brought about by
further drilling may serve to either increase or decrease the
Mineral Resources. No Measured Resources are reported.
|
5.
|
Reasonable Prospects of
Eventual Economic Extraction contemplates mining by open pit mining
methods with mineral processing by conventional leaching. Mining
costs are estimated at approximately US$3/t, mineral processing at
US$30/t and general and administrative cost at US$5/t processed.
Considering a U3O8 price of US$80/Lb. a
breakeven cut-off grade of 200 ppm is used for
reporting.
|
6.
|
Pit optimization tests
showed that all mineralized material above cut-off grade within the
Redtree, Junnagunna and Huarabagoo deposit block models has
reasonable prospect of being extracted by open pit methods. At Long
Pocket an ultimate pit shell was used to constrain the estimate of
reported Mineral Resources.
|


Basis of Estimate
The Westmoreland Project has been explored periodically from the
1950s until present day. A summary of drillholes by deposit and
drilling period used to inform the estimate is summarized in Table
2. Approximately 55% of the drillholes are NQ or HQ diamond core
drillholes with the remainder being reverse circulation or
percussion drillholes. The data from the historical drilling as
well as the early phase of Laramide drilling was provided to AMS in
multiple Access databases and Excel files. In 2023 AMS conducted a
review of the dataset and compiled it into one geological database
management system and data repository using MX Deposit software.
All data collected since July 2023
was recorded digitally in MX Deposit.
Table 2: Summary of drillhole information.
Deposit
|
Drill
Period
|
No of
Drillholes
|
Minimum
Depth (m)
|
Maximum
Depth (m)
|
Total
meters
|
Mean Depth
(m)
|
Redtree
|
HISTORICAL
|
504
|
3.66
|
245.24
|
26,640.34
|
53
|
LCR2007-2012
|
126
|
13.50
|
302.70
|
8,855.00
|
70
|
ALL
|
630
|
3.66
|
302.70
|
35,495.34
|
56
|
Huarabagoo
|
HISTORICAL
|
357
|
3.66
|
216.10
|
31,785.55
|
89
|
LCR2007-2012
|
39
|
80.00
|
201.00
|
4,616.39
|
118
|
LCR2022-2024
|
30
|
37.80
|
141.10
|
3,417.80
|
114
|
ALL
|
426
|
3.66
|
216.10
|
39,819.74
|
93
|
Junnagunna
|
HISTORICAL
|
443
|
25.00
|
154.05
|
22,115.56
|
50
|
LCR2007-2012
|
41
|
50.00
|
152.40
|
4,168.40
|
102
|
LCR2022-2024
|
18
|
98.60
|
158.05
|
2,286.75
|
127
|
ALL
|
502
|
25.00
|
158.05
|
28,570.71
|
57
|
Long Pocket
|
HISTORICAL
|
83
|
9.14
|
217.93
|
4,942.60
|
60
|
LCR2007-2012
|
12
|
60.00
|
71.20
|
747.50
|
62
|
LCR2022-2024
|
65
|
42.70
|
132.70
|
3,730.10
|
57
|
ALL
|
160
|
9.14
|
217.93
|
9,420.20
|
59
|
The main deposits of interest consist of Redtree, Huarabagoo and
Junnagunna as well as the area between Huarabagoo and Junnagunna
(the Link zone). The total strike length is approximately 8 km
along an azimuth of 40 degrees. Deposit geometries are described as
follows.
- Redtree strike length is approximately 1.5 km and up to 0.6 km
width on the NW side of the dyke and 0.2 km on the SE side of the
dyke. The mineralisation occurs to up to 100
m below the surface.
- Huarabagoo strike length 2.5 km strike length and 150 m width, depth of the mineralisation up to
100 m from the surface.
- Junnagunna strike length 1.5 km strike length and up to 0.6 km
width on the NW side of the dyke and 0.3 km on the SE side of the
dyke. Depth of the mineralisation up to 120
m from the surface.
- Long Pocket is located appropriately 7 km to the E
from Junnagunna. The mineralisation area is approximately 1 km
West-East as well as North-South extents.
Estimation Techniques
The estimate was completed using Micromine Origin and Beyond
2025 software. Wireframe restricted block models, one for each
deposit, were estimated by Ordinary Kriging using increasingly
larger search radii to inform the block models until all blocks
were populated. In the first pass a minimum of three drillholes
were required within the search radii equal to approximately 1.5
times the drill spacing in the search direction. Directional semi
variograms were modelled for each deposit and used to weight the
two-meter downhole composites of original assays during grade
estimation. A combination of top-cutting and grade clamping was
applied to restrict the influence of very high-grade samples.
During grade clamping high-grade values are given their original
value inside a given distance, and outside that distance the value
is reduced, different parameters were used for each deposit based
on the grade distributions and observed continuity.
Variable anisotropy was used during implicit modelling of
wireframes and block estimation to better honour the geometry of
the deposit; typically, mineralization is steep to sub vertical
within proximity to the Westmoreland dyke system which spans the
length of Redtree, Junnagunna and Huarabagoo, rolling over to
horizontal to sub horizontal mineralization approximately
20 m from the dyke edged. At
Huarabagoo mineralization is dominantly sub vertical.
Mineralization occurs as uranium oxides (such as uraninite and
carnotite) hosted almost exclusively in the "PTW4" Westmoreland conglomerate with the underlying
"PTW3" unit acting as a base to truncate mineralization. All models
were validated through review of local and global statistics
comparing the input to the output data and by visual
inspection. Bulk Density determinations were used to inform
the model with density values of 2.5 to 2.6 g/cm3 used
within the PTW4 conglomerate.
The estimate was classified according to the Qualified/Competent
Persons view of the estimation confidence. Indicated Resources are
reported in areas where the spacing and quality of data are
sufficient to allow estimation to a level of confidence which can
be used for mine planning and economic evaluation. Those areas
classified as Indicated Resources are typically informed by data
with spacing 30 to 50 m and estimated
into blocks approximately one third of the data spacing.
Comparison of Previous Estimates
The previous Mineral Resource Estimate had an effective date of
May 11th 2009 and is
superseded by this estimate dated effective January 31st 2025. Differences in the
estimate are shown in Table 3.
Differences in the estimate are attributed to the following
items.
- Additional drilling and receipt of assay results post
May 2009 to January 2025 at Junnagunna and
Huarabagoo.
- Additional exploration at Long Pocket, which was not included
in the previous estimate.
- Application of more sophisticated 3D modelling techniques,
including implicit modelling which was not commonly employed in
2009, and is more adept at modelling complex geometry than
traditional cross section interpretation.
- The Redtree deposit, which has not seen further
exploration has no material change and this helps to support the
veracity of the estimates.
Table 3 Comparison to previous estimates.
2009
MRE
|
Deposit
|
Tonnes
|
Density
g/m3
|
U3O8 ppm
|
U3O8 MLb.
|
Indicated
|
Redtree
|
12,900,000
|
2.5
|
900
|
25.5
|
Huarabagoo
|
1,460,000
|
2.5
|
830
|
2.7
|
Junnagunna
|
4,360,000
|
2.5
|
810
|
7.8
|
Long Pocket
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total
Indicated
|
18,700,000
|
2.5
|
880
|
36
|
Inferred
|
Redtree
|
4,460,000
|
2.5
|
670
|
6.6
|
Huarabagoo
|
2,400,000
|
2.5
|
1,090
|
5.8
|
Junnagunna
|
2,150,000
|
2.5
|
750
|
3.6
|
Long Pocket
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total
Inferred
|
9,000,000
|
2.5
|
800
|
15.9
|
Relative Difference
%
|
|
Tonnes
|
|
Grade
|
Contained
Metal
|
Indicated
|
Redtree
|
9 %
|
|
-2 %
|
6 %
|
Huarabagoo
|
71 %
|
|
7 %
|
81 %
|
Junnagunna
|
129 %
|
|
-21 %
|
92 %
|
Long Pocket
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Indicated
|
49 %
|
|
-13 %
|
34 %
|
Inferred
|
Redtree
|
-33 %
|
|
19 %
|
-21 %
|
Huarabagoo
|
29 %
|
|
-20 %
|
3 %
|
Junnagunna
|
40 %
|
|
-17 %
|
17 %
|
Long Pocket
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Inferred
|
31 %
|
|
-15 %
|
11 %
|
Absolute Difference
%
|
|
Tonnes
|
|
Grade
ppm
|
Contained Metal
MLbs.
|
Indicated
|
Redtree
|
1,100,000
|
-
|
-20
|
1.5
|
Huarabagoo
|
1,040,000
|
0.1
|
60
|
2.2
|
Junnagunna
|
5,640,000
|
-
|
-170
|
7.2
|
Long Pocket
|
1,300,000
|
2.5
|
420
|
1.2
|
Total
Indicated
|
9,100,000
|
-
|
-110
|
12.1
|
Inferred
|
Redtree
|
-1,460,000
|
-
|
130
|
-1.4
|
Huarabagoo
|
700,000
|
0.1
|
-220
|
0.2
|
Junnagunna
|
850,000
|
-
|
-130
|
0.6
|
Long Pocket
|
2,700,000
|
2.5
|
380
|
2.3
|
Total
Inferred
|
2,800,000
|
-
|
-120
|
1.8
|
Environmental and Social Considerations
The project area is on land which has significance to the local
Indigenous people and who are the traditional custodians of the
land. While the area is remote, Laramide, through its local
subsidiary Lagoon Creek Resources has an existing Indigenous Land
Use Agreement (ILUA) in place and has maintained a working
relationship with the local indigenous groups since 2006 and has
involved them in exploration activities. An activity exclusion zone
exists at the southern end of the Huarabagoo deposit which will
require further negotiation for future access and exploration
activities.
Only preliminary environmental studies have been completed in
the area. It is acknowledged that environmental constraints will be
present should the project advance through the permitting steps to
production. Environmental constraints include species of concern
and threatened species within the region and site. However, the
exact extent and distribution is currently unknown and further
environmental studies are required to map the local distribution of
species.
Recommendations
It is noted that exploration drilling in the Link zone, between
the Huarabagoo and Junnagunna deposits, has identified uranium
mineralisation. However, the drill spacing is insufficient for
resource estimation. Further drilling is recommended to potentially
incorporate this zone in future resource estimates. Furthermore,
drilling data to the north of Junnagunna suggests the deposit
remain open and presents a compelling exploration target.
Additional recommendations to advance the project include
further environmental studies, continued exploration of satellite
prospects on the property and infill and extensional drilling at
all prospects. A gap analysis to review the steps and data required
to advance the project to Pre-Feasibility is also
advised.
Qualified/Competent Person Review
The technical information in this release relating to Mineral
Resource Estimates has been reviewed by Mr. R. J. Siddle, MSc,
MAIG Principal Resource Geologist for Addison Mining Services
Ltd. Mr. Siddle is an independent Qualified Person within the
meaning of the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources
(2014) and independent Competent Person within the meaning of the
JORC (2012). He has over 15 years' experience in the industry,
relevant experience includes undertaking mineral resource estimates
for a variety of commodities including gold and tin deposits. Mr.
Siddle has prior involvement with the project having worked as an
exploration geologist for Lagoon Creek Resources on the
Westmoreland project in 2007 and
2008.
Mr. Siddle received assistance in preparation of the Mineral
Resource Estimate from Ms. Paula
Mierzwa, Senior Geologist for Addison Mining Services. Ms.
Mierzwa worked under the supervision of Mr. Siddle and is thanked
for her valued contribution to the study.
Mr. Siddle has reviewed and verified the technical information
that forms the basis of, and has been used in the preparation of,
the Mineral Resource Estimate and this announcement, including
analytical data, drilling logs, QC data, density measurements, and
sampling. Mr. Siddle consents to the inclusion in this announcement
of the matters based on the information, in the form and context in
which it appears.
The update to Mineral Resources constitutes a Material Change
and a NI 43-101 Technical report will be filed on sedarplus.com
within 45 days of this announcement.
This announcement dated 28th February
2025 has been authorised for release to the TSX and ASX by
President and CEO of Laramide Resources.
Follow us on Twitter @LaramideRes
About Laramide Resources Ltd.
Laramide is focused on exploring and developing high-quality
uranium assets in Tier-1 uranium jurisdictions. The company's
portfolio comprises predominantly advanced uranium projects in
districts with historical production or superior geological
prospectivity. The assets have been carefully chosen for their size
and production potential, and the two large development projects
are considered to be late-stage, low-technical risk
projects. As well, Laramide has expanded its pipeline
with strategic exploration in Kazakhstan where the company is exploring over
5,500 km2 of the prolific Chu-Sarysu Basin for world
class roll-front deposits which are amenable to in-situ
recovery.
Forward-looking Statements and Cautionary Language
This release includes certain statements that may be deemed
to be "forward-looking statements." All statements in this release,
other than statements of historical facts, that address events or
developments that the management of the Company expect, are
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are
frequently, but not always, identified by words such as "expects",
"anticipates", "believes", "plans", "projects", "intends",
"estimates", "envisages", "potential", "possible", "strategy",
"goals", "objectives", or variations thereof or stating that
certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might"
or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of
these terms and similar expressions. Actual results or developments
may differ materially from those in forward-looking statements.
Laramide disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise
any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, save and except as may be
required by applicable securities laws.
Since forward-looking information addresses future events and
conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and
uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those
currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These
include, but are not limited to, exploration and production for
uranium; delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or
development projects or capital expenditures; the uncertainty of
resource estimates; health, safety and environmental risks;
worldwide demand for uranium; uranium price and other commodity
price and exchange rate fluctuations; environmental risks;
competition; incorrect assessment of the value of acquisitions;
ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external
sources; and changes in legislation, including but not limited to
tax laws, royalties and environmental regulations.
SOURCE Laramide Resources Ltd.