firm, DPV. Ms. Lawley gave the potential institutional investor permission to share its material with DPV and, on January 3, 2024, Lumos entered a confidentiality agreement with DPV, which did not include a standstill provision.”
(c)
The second to last paragraph on page 27 in Section 11 — “Background of the Offer; Past Contacts; Other Matters” is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
“After continued discussions amongst the parties and finalization of its model, Mr. Uzpen sent Mr. Hawkins and Ms. Lawley a letter of intent, dated May 26, 2024, pursuant to which DPV proposed, among other things, to acquire 100% of Lumos’s outstanding common stock for $2.83 per share in cash (the “May Proposal”). The May Proposal did not include any terms relating to compensation or similar arrangements with any Lumos employee, officer or director.”
(d)
The fourth paragraph on page 28 in Section 11 — “Background of the Offer; Past Contacts; Other Matters” is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
“On August 23, 2024, Mr. Uzpen responded with a revised letter of intent for a potential merger or acquisition with Lumos for $30 million in aggregate equity value upfront, plus one CVR per share. This approximated $3.39 per Share assuming an estimated 8.84 million shares outstanding. This revised letter of intent did not include any terms relating to compensation or similar arrangements with any Lumos employee, officer or director.”
(e)
The last two paragraphs on page 29 in Section 11 — “Background of the Offer; Past Contacts; Other Matters” are amended and restated in their entirety to read as follows:
“On September 30, 2024, Foley & Lardner sent an initial draft of the tender and support agreement to Cooley.
On October 2, 2024, Cooley sent Foley & Lardner a revised draft of the tender and support agreement, which modified the time in which subsequently acquired shares would be required to be tendered in the offer, added representations and warranties of Parent and Merger Sub, added exemptions to the restrictions on transfer, modified covenants of the party to the tender and support agreement with respect to responsibility for certain expenses and qualified that the tender and support agreement would terminate in the event the Company makes an Adverse Recommendation Change.
On October 4, 2024, Foley & Lardner sent Cooley a revised draft of the tender and support agreement which modified the representations and warranties of the parties and modified covenants of the party to the tender and support agreement with respect to responsibility for certain expenses.
On October 5, 2024, Foley & Lardner sent Cooley an initial draft of the clinical trial funding agreement which proposed, among other things, a maximum loan of $7.5 million to be advanced directly to third parties for the payment of certain clinical trial expenses of Lumos for LUM-201, a 15% interest rate per annum, a first priority security interest in all of Lumos’s assets, other than certain customary exclusions, customary representations and warranties, the definition of material adverse event, customary covenants of the Company and certain events of default including the failure to make requirement payments to DPV, any representation or warranty of the Company being incorrect in any material respect, a breach by the Company. of its covenants thereunder, certain bankruptcy and insolvency events and the occurrence of a material adverse event. On October 9, 2024, Cooley sent Foley & Lardner a revised draft of the clinical trial funding agreement, which the parties continued to negotiate through October 20, 2024, including with respect to the advancement of funds thereunder, the definitions of material adverse event, permitted liens and permitted indebtedness, and the events of default thereunder.
On October 7, 2024, Cooley sent Foley & Lardner the final draft of the tender and support agreement which clarified that the party to the tender and support agreement would use their reasonable best efforts to assist Parent, Merger Sub and the Company in completing the Offer, but at Parent’s expense.”