The
information contained in this release was correct as at
31 December 2024.
Information on
the Company’s up to date net asset values can be found on the
London Stock Exchange Website at
https://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/news/market-news/market-news-home.html.
BLACKROCK LATIN AMERICAN INVESTMENT TRUST PLC (LEI -
UK9OG5Q0CYUDFGRX4151)
All
information is at
31 December
2024 and
unaudited.
Performance
at month end with net income reinvested
|
One
month
%
|
Three
months
%
|
One
year
%
|
Three
years
%
|
Five
years
%
|
Sterling:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
asset value^
|
-6.3
|
-14.7
|
-34.6
|
2.1
|
-25.3
|
Share
price
|
-4.5
|
-13.4
|
-34.1
|
-0.9
|
-22.5
|
MSCI
EM Latin America
(Net
Return)^^
|
-4.7
|
-9.9
|
-25.1
|
15.1
|
-10.8
|
US
Dollars:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
asset value^
|
-7.7
|
-20.4
|
-35.7
|
-5.6
|
-29.4
|
Share
price
|
-5.9
|
-19.2
|
-35.3
|
-8.4
|
-26.7
|
MSCI
EM Latin America
(Net
Return)^^
|
-6.1
|
-15.8
|
-26.4
|
6.4
|
-15.7
|
^cum
income
^^The
Company’s performance benchmark (the MSCI EM Latin America Index)
may be calculated on either a Gross or a Net return basis. Net
return (NR) indices calculate the reinvestment of dividends net of
withholding taxes using the tax rates applicable to non-resident
institutional investors, and hence give a lower total return than
indices where calculations are on a Gross basis (which assumes that
no withholding tax is suffered). As the Company is subject to
withholding tax rates for the majority of countries in which it
invests, the NR basis is felt to be the most accurate, appropriate,
consistent and fair comparison for the Company.
Sources:
BlackRock, Standard & Poor’s Micropal
At month
end
Net
asset value - capital only:
|
308.76p
|
Net
asset value - including income:
|
314.41p
|
Share
price:
|
278.00p
|
Total
assets#:
|
£97.5m
|
Discount (share
price to cum income NAV):
|
11.6%
|
Average discount*
over the month – cum income:
|
12.4%
|
Net
Gearing at month end**:
|
4.8%
|
Gearing range (as
a % of net assets):
|
0-25%
|
Net
yield##:
|
8.0%
|
Ordinary shares
in issue(excluding 2,181,662 shares held in treasury):
|
29,448,641
|
Ongoing
charges***:
|
1.13%
|
#Total assets
include current year revenue.
##The
yield of 7.9% is calculated based on total dividends declared in
the last 12 months as at the date of this announcement as set out
below (totalling 27.83 cents per
share) and using a share price of 348.17 US cents per share
(equivalent to the sterling price of 278.00
pence per share translated in to US cents at the rate
prevailing at 31 December 2024 of
$1.2524 dollars to £1.00).
2023
Q4 Interim dividend of 8.05 cents per
share (Paid on 09 February
2024)
2024
Q1 Interim dividend of 7.39 cents per
share (Paid on 13 May
2024)
2024
Q2 Interim dividend of 6.13 cents per
share (Paid on 08 August
2024)
2024
Q3 Interim dividend of 6.26 cents per
share (Paid 08 November
2024)
*The
discount is calculated using the cum income NAV (expressed in
sterling terms).
**Net
cash/net gearing is calculated using debt at par, less cash and
cash equivalents and fixed interest investments as a percentage of
net assets.
***
The Company’s ongoing charges are calculated as a percentage of
average daily net assets and using the management fee and all other
operating expenses excluding finance costs, direct transaction
costs, custody transaction charges, VAT recovered, taxation and
certain non-recurring items for the year ended 31 December 2023.
Geographic Exposure
|
% of Total Assets
|
% of Equity Portfolio *
|
MSCI EM Latin America Index
|
Brazil
|
59.8
|
60.1
|
61.4
|
Mexico
|
35.7
|
35.8
|
26.6
|
Chile
|
4.1
|
4.1
|
6.2
|
Colombia
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
1.4
|
Peru
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
4.4
|
Net
current Liabilities (inc. fixed interest)
|
0.4
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|
-----
|
-----
|
-----
|
Total
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
=====
|
=====
|
=====
|
^Total assets for
the purposes of these calculations exclude bank overdrafts, and the
net current assets figure shown in the table above therefore
excludes bank overdrafts equivalent to 5.3% of the Company’s net
asset value.
Sector
|
% of Equity Portfolio*
|
% of Benchmark*
|
Financials
|
23.7
|
31.3
|
Materials
|
21.7
|
17.3
|
Consumer
Staples
|
15.2
|
14.2
|
Consumer
Discretionary
|
12.9
|
1.6
|
Industrials
|
8.1
|
10.7
|
Energy
|
7.6
|
11.6
|
Health
Care
|
6.6
|
1.2
|
Real
Estate
|
2.8
|
1.1
|
Utilities
|
1.4
|
6.7
|
Communication
Services
|
0.0
|
3.8
|
Information
Technology
|
0.0
|
0.5
|
|
-----
|
-----
|
Total
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
=====
|
=====
|
|
|
|
*excluding
net
current assets & fixed interest
Company
|
Country of Risk
|
% of
Equity Portfolio
|
% of
Benchmark
|
Vale:
|
Brazil
|
|
|
ADS
|
|
7.9
|
|
Equity
|
|
1.2
|
5.9
|
Petrobrás:
|
Brazil
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
1.3
|
|
Equity
ADR
|
|
3.6
|
4.7
|
Preference Shares
ADR
|
|
2.7
|
5.2
|
Grupo
Financiero Banorte
|
Mexico
|
6.8
|
3.3
|
Walmart de México
y Centroamérica
|
Mexico
|
5.9
|
2.7
|
Grupo
México
|
Mexico
|
4.5
|
2.9
|
B3
|
Brazil
|
4.0
|
1.8
|
Rede
D'or Sao Luiz
|
Brazil
|
3.8
|
0.6
|
XP
|
Brazil
|
3.7
|
0.9
|
Rumo
|
Brazil
|
3.3
|
0.7
|
Cyrela Brazil
Realty
|
Brazil
|
3.2
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
Commenting
on the markets, Sam Vecht and
Christoph Brinkmann, representing
the Investment Manager noted;
The
Company’s NAV fell -6.3% in December, underperforming the
benchmark, MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America Index, which
returned -4.7% on a net basis over the same period. All performance
figures are in sterling terms with dividends
reinvested.1
December was
another lackluster month for emerging market equities, with the
MSCI Emerging Markets Index trading sideways (-0.3%). Notably
however, Emerging Markets outperformed Developed Markets as the
MSCI World Index fell sharply (-2.6%).
Latin America (-7.3%) was the worst performing
region within Emerging Markets for a second consecutive month,
driven largely by Brazil (-9.9%).
While the depreciation of the BRL slowed in December, following
intervention from the Brazilian Central Bank (BCB), market concerns
about worsening fiscal dynamics remain center stage.
At
the portfolio level, an overweight position to Mexico was the key positive contributor to
performance. On the other hand, stock picking in Brazil and Chile detracted from performance.
From
a security lens, an underweight position to Brazilian digital
banking platform provider, NU Holdings, was the biggest contributor
to returns for a second consecutive month. The stock fell as a
result of market volatility in Brazil and broker downgrades. As a consumer
facing bank, Nubank might suffer disproportionately from higher
rates. An overweight position to B3, the Brazilian stock exchange,
was another contributor. The stock reacted positively to news about
a share buyback program. We believe that buybacks will be a big
feature in Brazil in 2025,
considering the very cheap valuations of most stocks. Our
overweight to Walmart Mexico was also additive to relative returns,
helped by a dividend announcement in mid-December. Banorte, the
Mexican bank, was another contributor to returns over the
period.
On
the flipside, Brazilian healthcare operator Hapvida continued to
weigh on returns in December, primarily on the back of proposed
regulatory changes. These proposed changes could limit the ability
to enact price increases for health care operators. After speaking
to several companies in the sector, we believe the likelihood of
these changes to be implemented is very low and are thus holding on
to our positions.
Another detractor
over the period was Azzas 2154, the Brazilian footwear retailer,
which traded down with the Brazilian market. As a consumer
discretionary business, investors fear a future impact of rising
rates on their sales. An overweight position in EZ Tec, a Brazilian
homebuilder, also hurt performance. The stock has also been
impacted by the recent interest rate hikes from the Brazilian
central bank.
We
made some changes to the portfolio in December. In Mexico,
we
added to Grupo Mexico, a Mexican mining and transport conglomerate,
reflecting a more positive view on copper. We took profits and
reduced our exposure to Mexican airport operator Grupo
Aeroportuario del Pacífico (GAPB) simply on valuation grounds. We
also rotated some exposure from Pinfra to convenience store
operator FEMSA, on the back of relative performance. In
Brazil, we decreased our exposure
to more leveraged companies on the back of disappointing fiscal
news and higher rates. As such, we reduced our position in Rumo and
topped up in property developer Cyrela on the view that the balance
sheet of the former will be more impacted by the higher rates. We
also added to iron ore producer Vale as operations are improving
and the cheaper currency helping their cost base.
Mexico is the largest portfolio overweight as
of November end. Brazil is our
second largest overweight. On the other hand, the largest
underweight is Peru. The second
largest portfolio underweight is Chile.
Outlook
We
remain optimistic about the outlook for Latin America. While 2024 has been a difficult
year for the region, we are now entering 2025 with many asset
prices trading at attractive levels. Robust growth in the US paired
with the election of Donald Trump
has catapulted bond yields in the US higher over the recent months,
despite the reduction in rates by the US central bank. This has
been a headwind for asset prices outside the US.
However, as
contrarian investors, we always like to ask ourselves the question,
how much is already priced in?
We
believe the answer to that question is: a lot. In Brazil, many stocks trade on single-digit
multiples while paying double-digit dividend yields. For instance,
Cyrela, the Brazilian real estate developer and a big holding of
ours, trades on 4x price-to-earnings and pays an 11% dividend yield
(consensus estimates). 5-year inflation-protected bonds in
Brazil now offer a yield north of
7% and 2 year sovereign bonds have a nominal yield of circa 15%.
The Brazilian real also
declined by 23%
in 2024, making Brazilian exports much more competitive.
However, there is
a reason why Brazilian assets trade at these cheap multiples. In
Brazil, it is all about fiscal.
While one can argue that the primary deficit that the Brazilian
government has achieved in 2024 is not that bad relative to initial
expectations, the quality of the result is questionable. This
outcome was largely driven by significant pressure from financial
markets and includes numerous one-off revenues. As a result, the
Brazilian government has lost credibility and local and foreign
investors now require a much higher return to keep lending to the
government.
We
remain firm believers in our macro process. In line with our
process, we believe that these elevated rates will lead to a
decline in economic activity, less pressure on inflation and thus
lower interest rates down the line. This in turn should lift the
multiples of equities. At the same time, the currency is supported
by competitive exports and lower economic activity will keep a lid
on imports. Any improvement on the fiscal side would jumpstart a
recovery in asset prices and we think it is in the government’s
interest to bring rates down. However, as a result of these
elevated rates, we have reduced our exposure to levered companies
within the country which we believe will fare better in
2025.
Mexico is another country that struggled in
2024 in terms of asset price performance, albeit for different
reasons than Brazil. While in
Brazil it is all about fiscal, in
Mexico the government has hurt
asset price performance by announcing a highly controversial
judicial reform that raises question marks about future judicial
independence and the rule of law. Trump's election victory and his
vocal criticism of Mexico
exacerbated the challenges later in the year. However, similar to
Brazil, we believe that much of
this is already reflected in the pricing of Mexican
assets.
Due
to the volatility that Mexico has
faced in 2024, the Mexican central bank has been relatively more
cautious in reducing rates, finishing the year with its benchmark
rate still at 10%, even though inflation has receded to around 4%.
We therefore see scope for rate cuts to accelerate in 2025 and
support asset price performance. Meanwhile, Banorte, one of
Mexico’s largest lenders and a key holding of ours, trades on 7x
price-to-earnings and pays an 8% dividend (consensus estimates).
Furthermore, despite all the noise from the Northern border, we do
not see a change in the secular trend of nearshoring of supply
chains, even if Trump applies tariffs as a negotiation tactic.
Mexico therefore remains our
biggest overweight in the portfolio.
1Source:
BlackRock, as of 31 December
2024.
29 January 2025
ENDS
Latest
information is available by typing www.blackrock.com/uk/brla on the
internet, "BLRKINDEX" on Reuters, "BLRK" on Bloomberg or "8800" on
Topic 3 (ICV terminal).
Neither the
contents of the Manager’s website nor the contents of any website
accessible from hyperlinks on the Manager’s website (or any other
website) is incorporated into, or forms part of, this
announcement.