UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2009
Commission File Number 001-16799
W HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
|
|
66-0573197
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation
or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
19 West McKinley Street
|
Mayagüez, Puerto Rico 00680
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
|
|
|
|
(787) 834-8000
|
(Registrants Telephone Number Including Area Code)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of l934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES
o
NO
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceeding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES
o
NO
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer
o
|
|
Accelerated
Filer
o
|
|
Non-Accelerated
Filer
þ
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company
o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). YES
o
NO
þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Common stock: 3,297,815 outstanding as of November 30, 2009.
W HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONTENTS
ForwardLooking Information
Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, especially within Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, include forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). In
general, the word or phrases may, should, will, expect, anticipate, estimate,
project, intend, continue, believe or similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. In addition, certain disclosures and information customarily provided
by financial institutions, such as analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses or an
analysis of the interest rate sensitivity of the Companys assets and liabilities, are inherently
based upon predictions of future events and circumstances. Although the Company makes such
statements based on assumptions which it believes to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that
actual results will not differ materially from the Companys expectations. Important factors which
could cause its results to differ from any results which might be projected, forecasted or
estimated, based on such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (i) general
economic and competitive conditions in the markets in which the Company operates, and the risks
inherent in its operations; (ii) the Companys ability to manage its credit risk and control its
operating expenses, increase interest-earning assets and non-interest income, and maintain its net
interest margin; (iii) fluctuations in interest rate and inflation; and (iv) the level of demand
for new and existing products. Investors should refer to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 as well as Item 1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for a discussion of such factors and certain risks and uncertainties to which the Company is
subject. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, other risks or
uncertainties arise, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary
materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Except as required by applicable
law, the Company does not intend, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update
forwardlooking statements.
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
W HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION (UNAUDITED)
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
56,035
|
|
|
$
|
68,368
|
|
Money market instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
|
|
|
589,432
|
|
|
|
1,096,465
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value with an amortized
cost of $3,812,809 in 2009 and $3,713,645 in 2008
|
|
|
3,808,935
|
|
|
|
3,670,241
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost with a
fair value of $581,213 in 2009 and $1,020,837 in 2008
|
|
|
613,894
|
|
|
|
1,037,970
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
|
|
38,752
|
|
|
|
64,190
|
|
Residential mortgage loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value
|
|
|
39,562
|
|
|
|
18,871
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $240,832 in 2009
and $282,089 in 2008
|
|
|
8,590,479
|
|
|
|
8,667,717
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
47,393
|
|
|
|
56,224
|
|
Foreclosed real estate held for sale, net of allowance of
$3,267 in 2009 and $3,104 in 2008
|
|
|
101,981
|
|
|
|
98,570
|
|
Other real estate held for sale, net
|
|
|
1,204
|
|
|
|
5,462
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
127,458
|
|
|
|
120,796
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
154,481
|
|
|
|
155,661
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
220,642
|
|
|
|
222,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
14,390,248
|
|
|
$
|
15,282,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
289,198
|
|
|
$
|
250,380
|
|
Interest-bearing and related accrued interest payable, includes $14,312
in 2009 and $109,944 in 2008 of deposits measured at fair value
|
|
|
9,924,787
|
|
|
|
10,751,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
10,213,985
|
|
|
|
11,002,173
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
2,710,424
|
|
|
|
3,204,142
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
92,000
|
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
Mortgage note payable
|
|
|
34,642
|
|
|
|
34,932
|
|
Securities purchased but not yet received
|
|
|
301,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance
|
|
|
12,005
|
|
|
|
11,759
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
79,158
|
|
|
|
72,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
13,444,089
|
|
|
|
14,367,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $1.00 par value per share (liquidation preference -
$530,838 in 2009 and 2008); authorized 50,000,000 shares; issued
and outstanding 18,156,709 shares in 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
18,157
|
|
|
|
18,157
|
|
Common stock $1.00 par value per share; authorized 500,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 3,297,815 shares in 2009 and 3,298,138
shares in 2008
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
870,603
|
|
|
|
870,450
|
|
Retained earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve fund
|
|
|
78,389
|
|
|
|
78,389
|
|
Accumulated losses
|
|
|
(23,954
|
)
|
|
|
(13,939
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income tax
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
|
|
(40,988
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
946,159
|
|
|
|
915,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
14,390,248
|
|
|
$
|
15,282,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
W HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
INTEREST INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including loan fees
|
|
$
|
115,251
|
|
|
$
|
142,115
|
|
|
$
|
235,511
|
|
|
$
|
298,588
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
22,645
|
|
|
|
5,212
|
|
|
|
69,028
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
33,241
|
|
|
|
29,507
|
|
|
|
69,106
|
|
|
|
40,970
|
|
Money market instruments
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
|
|
4,753
|
|
|
|
2,252
|
|
|
|
12,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
151,685
|
|
|
|
199,020
|
|
|
|
312,081
|
|
|
|
421,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
94,939
|
|
|
|
111,762
|
|
|
|
197,627
|
|
|
|
229,827
|
|
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements
|
|
|
28,055
|
|
|
|
53,777
|
|
|
|
57,078
|
|
|
|
113,497
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
123,621
|
|
|
|
166,216
|
|
|
|
255,948
|
|
|
|
345,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME
|
|
|
28,064
|
|
|
|
32,804
|
|
|
|
56,133
|
|
|
|
76,448
|
|
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
|
|
11,124
|
|
|
|
14,346
|
|
|
|
19,979
|
|
|
|
29,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
|
|
16,940
|
|
|
|
18,458
|
|
|
|
36,154
|
|
|
|
47,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONINTEREST INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service and other charges on loans
|
|
|
2,293
|
|
|
|
2,717
|
|
|
|
4,534
|
|
|
|
5,202
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
2,983
|
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
|
|
6,052
|
|
Other fees and commissions
|
|
|
4,948
|
|
|
|
5,687
|
|
|
|
10,077
|
|
|
|
11,489
|
|
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments and deposits measured at fair value
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
Net gain on sales and valuation of loans held for sale,
securities, and other assets
|
|
|
18,318
|
|
|
|
13,493
|
|
|
|
37,280
|
|
|
|
14,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
27,673
|
|
|
|
26,646
|
|
|
|
57,169
|
|
|
|
38,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONINTEREST EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employees benefits
|
|
|
13,432
|
|
|
|
15,915
|
|
|
|
28,644
|
|
|
|
32,862
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
3,341
|
|
|
|
6,132
|
|
|
|
6,799
|
|
Deposits insurance premium and supervisory examination
|
|
|
19,009
|
|
|
|
3,727
|
|
|
|
28,567
|
|
|
|
6,621
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
2,757
|
|
|
|
4,305
|
|
|
|
5,302
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
2,073
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
3,685
|
|
|
|
4,293
|
|
Printing, postage, stationery and supplies
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
1,756
|
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
Net loss from operations of foreclosed real estate held for sale
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Municipal taxes
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
|
|
2,473
|
|
|
|
5,524
|
|
|
|
4,784
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
3,719
|
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
7,449
|
|
|
|
8,095
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,910
|
|
|
|
7,113
|
|
|
|
11,256
|
|
|
|
14,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expenses
|
|
|
53,827
|
|
|
|
41,748
|
|
|
|
99,165
|
|
|
|
86,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE PROVISION (CREDIT) FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(9,214
|
)
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
(5,842
|
)
|
|
|
(1,346
|
)
|
PROVISION (CREDIT) FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(3,889
|
)
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
|
|
(1,128
|
)
|
|
|
(35,056
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
(5,325
|
)
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
|
(4,714
|
)
|
|
|
33,710
|
|
LESS DIVIDENDS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,227
|
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
|
18,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
|
|
$
|
(5,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,129
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,328
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
|
|
$
|
(1.61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.46
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.83
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
W HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Changes in Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
18,157
|
|
|
$
|
18,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
18,157
|
|
|
|
18,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
870,450
|
|
|
|
870,128
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
870,603
|
|
|
|
870,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve fund:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
78,389
|
|
|
|
78,389
|
|
Transfer from undivided profits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
78,389
|
|
|
|
82,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undivided profits (accumulated losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
(13,939
|
)
|
|
|
31,383
|
|
Cumulative impact of change in accounting for
financial assets and liabilities at fair value (SFAS No. 159 - See Note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year as adjusted
|
|
|
(13,939
|
)
|
|
|
36,666
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(4,714
|
)
|
|
|
33,710
|
|
Cash dividends on common stock
|
|
|
(687
|
)
|
|
|
(4,122
|
)
|
Cash dividends on preferred stock
|
|
|
(4,614
|
)
|
|
|
(18,455
|
)
|
Transfer to reserve fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,997
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
(23,954
|
)
|
|
|
43,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
(40,988
|
)
|
|
|
(5,119
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
40,654
|
|
|
|
(107,894
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
|
|
(113,013
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
946,159
|
|
|
$
|
904,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(4,714
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized net gains (losses) on securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period
|
|
|
76,616
|
|
|
|
(118,476
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net income (loss)
|
|
|
(37,086
|
)
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,530
|
|
|
|
(118,419
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized net gains on cash flow hedge derivatives -
(fixed- price purchase contract):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains arising during the period:
|
|
|
4,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total
|
|
|
43,863
|
|
|
|
(118,419
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax effect
|
|
|
(3,209
|
)
|
|
|
10,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
40,654
|
|
|
|
(107,894
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
35,940
|
|
|
$
|
(74,184
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
W HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBISIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(4,714
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,710
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (credit) for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan losses
|
|
|
19,979
|
|
|
|
29,303
|
|
Unfunded loan commitments
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
(2,028
|
)
|
|
|
(2,502
|
)
|
Foreclosed real estate held for sale
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
4,720
|
|
|
|
4,096
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Amortization of premium (discount)-net, on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
(1,782
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
|
|
4,520
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
(12,551
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Loans
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Amortization of discount on deposits
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
|
|
1,407
|
|
Amortization of net deferred loan origination fees
|
|
|
(4,392
|
)
|
|
|
(4,277
|
)
|
Net loss (gain) on sale and in valuation of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
(37,086
|
)
|
|
|
57
|
|
Called investment securities held to maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
(1,879
|
)
|
Deposits measured at fair value
|
|
|
(864
|
)
|
|
|
2,939
|
|
Foreclosed real estate held for sale
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
Other real estate held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,746
|
)
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,299
|
)
|
Capitalization of servicing rights
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
(41,828
|
)
|
|
|
(29,997
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
21,331
|
|
|
|
17,504
|
|
Decrease (increase) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
8,831
|
|
|
|
33,288
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1,031
|
)
|
|
|
(21,370
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest on deposits and borrowings
|
|
|
(30,274
|
)
|
|
|
(30,939
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
12,233
|
|
|
|
(32,334
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(48,536
|
)
|
|
|
(30,239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in interest-bearing deposits in banks
|
|
|
507,033
|
|
|
|
21,125
|
|
Net increase in federal funds sold and resell agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177,100
|
)
|
Cancellation of resell agreements over three months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429,238
|
|
Investment securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities, prepayments and calls
|
|
|
283,892
|
|
|
|
990,352
|
|
Proceeds from sales
|
|
|
1,801,355
|
|
|
|
98,343
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
(1,849,863
|
)
|
|
|
(4,570,210
|
)
|
Investment securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities, prepayments and calls
|
|
|
372,125
|
|
|
|
30,406,610
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,583,727
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities, prepayments and calls
|
|
|
51,406
|
|
|
|
4,535
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,783
|
|
Loan principal collections, net of originations
|
|
|
54,781
|
|
|
|
113,490
|
|
Purchases of derivative options
|
|
|
(2,095
|
)
|
|
|
(507
|
)
|
Proceeds from derivative instruments
|
|
|
4,395
|
|
|
|
8,061
|
|
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed real estate held for sale
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
Proceeds from sales of other real estate held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,675
|
|
Additions to premises and equipment
|
|
|
(6,734
|
)
|
|
|
(4,450
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Proceeds from sales of other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
(21,646
|
)
|
|
|
(48,715
|
)
|
Redemptions of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
47,084
|
|
|
|
21,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
1,244,972
|
|
|
|
744,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward
|
|
$
|
1,196,436
|
|
|
$
|
713,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
(Continued)
4
W HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Forward
|
|
$
|
1,196,436
|
|
|
$
|
713,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
|
|
|
(753,345
|
)
|
|
|
348,142
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements
|
|
|
(221,648
|
)
|
|
|
826,508
|
|
Repurchase agreements with original maturities over three months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(272,070
|
)
|
|
|
(1,803,575
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
(60,000
|
)
|
Repayments of mortgage note payable
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
Cash paid on matured embedded derivatives
|
|
|
(4,136
|
)
|
|
|
(7,649
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(7,526
|
)
|
|
|
(24,502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(1,208,769
|
)
|
|
|
(721,663
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
|
|
|
(12,333
|
)
|
|
|
(7,744
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS, BEGINNING OF YEAR
|
|
|
68,368
|
|
|
|
153,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS, END OF PERIOD
|
|
$
|
56,035
|
|
|
$
|
145,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits and other borrowings
|
|
$
|
276,998
|
|
|
$
|
364,812
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
11,864
|
|
Noncash activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued dividends payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
Net change in other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
40,654
|
|
|
|
(107,894
|
)
|
Securities purchased but not yet received
|
|
|
301,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans securitized and transferred to trading securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
Transfer from :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans to foreclosed real estate held for sale
|
|
|
8,128
|
|
|
|
82,438
|
|
Undivided profits to reserve fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,997
|
|
Premises and equipments to other real estate held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,181
|
|
Other real este held for sale to premises and equipments
|
|
|
4,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans originated to finance the sale of foreclosed real estate
held for sale
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
Unpaid additions to premises and equipment
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
Effect of derivative transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
10,301
|
|
Decrease in deposits
|
|
|
(2,456
|
)
|
|
|
(2,082
|
)
|
Decrease in other liabilties
|
|
|
(2,582
|
)
|
|
|
(6,581
|
)
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
(Concluded)
5
W HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1.
ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
W Holding Company, Inc. (the Company) is a bank holding company offering a full range of
financial services. The business of the Company is conducted through its wholly-owned commercial
bank subsidiary, Westernbank Puerto Rico (Westernbank or the Bank). The Company was organized
under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico in February 1999 to become the bank holding
company of Westernbank. Westernbank is a commercial bank chartered under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico effective November 30, 1994. Originally, Westernbank was organized as a
federally chartered mutual savings and loan association in 1958, and in January 1984 became a
federal mutual savings bank. In February 1985, the savings bank was converted to the stock form of
ownership. Westernbank offers a full range of business and consumer financial services, including
banking, trust and brokerage services and placing insurances. On May 19, 2008, the Company
contributed 100% of its ownership in Westernbank Insurance Corp. (WIC) to Westernbank. WIC is a
general insurance agent placing property, casualty, life and disability insurances.
In July 2000, the Company became a financial holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act
(BHC Act). As a financial holding company, the Company was permitted to engage in financial
related activities, including insurance and securities activities, provided that the Company and
its banking subsidiary met certain regulatory standards. On May 20, 2008, the Company withdrew its
financial holding company status under the BHC Act. As a result, effective on such date the
Companys activities are limited to those deemed closely related to banking by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the FRB).
Westernbank operates through a network of 48 bank branches (including 10 Expresso of Westernbank
branches) located throughout Puerto Rico, including 25 in the Western and Southwestern regions, 14
in the San Juan metropolitan area, 7 in the Northeastern region, and 2 in the Eastern region, and a
website on the Internet. On October 3, 2008, the Congress of the United States of America approved
the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, pursuant to which among other things, the amount
of deposit insurance provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC) was
temporarily increased from $100,000 to $250,000 per depositor until December 31, 2009. On May 20,
2009, President Barack Obama signed legislation that extended this temporary increase to $250,000
through December 31, 2013. Westernbanks deposits, including Individual Retirement Accounts
(IRAs), are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF), which is administered by the FDIC, up
to $250,000 per depositor.
Westernbanks traditional banking operations include retail operations, such as its branches,
including the branches of the Expresso division, together with consumer loans, mortgage loans,
commercial loans (excluding the Asset-Based Lending Unit operations), investments (treasury) and
deposit products. Besides the traditional banking operations, at June 30, 2009, Westernbank
operated four other divisions:
6
|
|
|
Westernbank International Division, which is an International Banking Entity (IBE)
under the Puerto Rico Act No. 52 of August 11, 1989, as amended, known as the
International Banking Center Regulatory Act, which offers commercial banking and related
services, and treasury and investment activities outside of Puerto Rico;
|
|
|
|
|
Westernbank Trust Division, which offers a full array of trust services;
|
|
|
|
|
Expresso of Westernbank, a division which specializes in small, unsecured consumer
loans up to $15,000 and real estate collateralized consumer loans up to $150,000;
|
|
|
|
|
and Westernbank International Trade Services, established during the first quarter of
year 2006, a division which specializes in international trade products and services.
|
In addition, Westernbank operates the Asset-Based Lending Unit, which specializes in commercial
business loans secured principally by commercial real estate, accounts receivable, inventories and
machinery and equipment.
Westernbank owns 100% of the voting shares of:
|
|
|
Westernbank World Plaza, Inc. (WWPI), which owns and operates Westernbank World
Plaza, a 23-story office building, including its related parking facility, located in Hato
Rey, Puerto Rico, the main Puerto Rican business district.
|
|
|
|
|
SRG Net, Inc., a Puerto Rico corporation that operates an electronic funds transfer
network. The assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of SRG Net, Inc. at June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, and for each of the three and six months period ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, were not significant.
|
|
|
|
|
Westernbank Financial Center Corp (WFCC), which was incorporated under the laws of
the State of Florida to conduct commercial lending and other related activities in the
United States of America. WFCC commenced operations in February 2007, was largely
inactive, and was closed during the third quarter of 2008. WFCCs main asset consisted of
a commercial loan of $34.7 million at June 30, 2008. The assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses of WFCC as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, were not
significant.
|
|
|
|
|
Westernbank Insurance Corp., a general insurance agent placing property, casualty,
life and disability insurances. On May 19, 2008, the Company contributed 100% of its
ownership in WIC to Westernbank. The assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of WIC at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, were not significant.
|
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and banking industry practices. The accompanying
unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The (unaudited) Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with the accounting policies
stated in the Companys Audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. In the opinion of management, the
unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include all adjustments (which consist of
normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial condition as of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the consolidated results of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the consolidated changes in stockholders equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows
7
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules and
regulations. Management believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information
presented not misleading. Financial information as of December 31, 2008, has been derived from the
audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company. The results of operations for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and the cash flows for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The
accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
. This Statement defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. This Statement emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement and should be
determined based on assumptions that a market participant would use when pricing an asset or
liability. This Statement clarifies that market participant assumptions should include assumptions
about risk as well as the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset. Additionally,
this Statement establishes a fair value hierarchy that provides the highest priority to quoted
prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data. The adoption of SFAS No. 157
at January 1, 2008 did not have a material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial
position or results of operations. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS
157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
, which delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157
for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), to
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial
assets and non-financial liabilities at January 1, 2008, did not have a material impact on the
Companys condensed consolidated financial position or results of operations. In October 2008, the
FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for
That Asset Is Not Active
, which clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in a market that is not
active and illustrates key considerations in determining the fair
value. FSP No. FAS 157-4 was
effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements had not been
issued. The adoption of FSP No. FAS 157-4 did not have any impact on the Companys condensed
consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities- Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
. This Statement permits an
entity to choose to measure certain financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on
an instrument-by-instrument basis. Once an entity has elected to record eligible items at fair
value, the decision is irrevocable and the entity should report unrealized gains and losses on
items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings. SFAS No. 159 establishes
presentation and disclosure requirements to help financial statement users understand the effect of
the entitys election on its earnings, but does not eliminate disclosure requirements of other
accounting standards. Eligible items that are measured at fair
8
value must be displayed on the face of the statements of financial condition. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008 and recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $5.3 million that
was credited to retained earnings and decreased deposits, other assets and deferred income tax
asset by $12.9 million, $4.2 million and $3.4 million, respectively. See Note 17.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.
This Statement enhances required disclosures
regarding derivatives and hedging activities, including enhanced disclosures regarding how: (a) an
entity uses derivative instruments; (b) derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) derivative instruments
and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash
flows. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company early
adopted the disclosure framework dictated by this Statement during 2008.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level
of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions
That Are Not Orderly
. This FSB reiterates that fair value is the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced
liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current
market conditions. This FSB provides additional guidance and utilizes a two-step process to
determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for an
asset or liability when compared with normal market activity for the asset or liability, and
whether a transaction is not orderly. If it is determined that there has been a significant
decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal
market activity for the asset or liability, transactions or quoted prices may not be determinative
of fair value. Accordingly, further analysis of the transactions or quoted prices is needed, and a
significant adjustment to the transactions or quoted prices may be necessary to estimate fair value
in accordance with SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
. This FSP is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009 on a prospective basis. Early adoption is
permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP No. FAS 157-4 in the second
quarter of 2009 did not have a material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
, which amends the recognition and measurement guidance related to
other-than-temprorary impairment (OTTI) for debt securities. This FSP requires that an OTTI shall
be recognized in earnings if the Company intends to sell the security or more likely than not will
be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If the Company does
not intend to sell the security, and it is not likely that the Company will be required to sell the
security before recovery of its cost basis, the OTTI related to credit losses shall be recognized
in earnings, and the OTTI related to all other factors shall be recorded in other comprehensive
income (loss), net of applicable taxes. An entity shall recognize the cumulative effect of
initially applying this FSP as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings, net of
applicable taxes, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009 and
should be applied to existing and new investments held by an entity as of the beginning of the
interim period in which it is adopted.
9
The FSP also requires increased and more timely disclosures regarding expected cash flows, credit
losses, and an aging of securities with unrealized losses. This FSP does not amend existing
recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity
securities. The FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15,
2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP
No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 in the second quarter of 2009 did not have a material impact on the
Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value
of Financial Instruments
. This FSP amends SFAS 107,
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
, and APB Opinion No. 28,
Interim Financial Reporting
, to require disclosures about fair
value of financial instruments in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial
statements. This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15,
2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. This FSP does not
require disclosures for earlier periods presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption. In
periods after initial adoption, this FSP requires comparative disclosures only for periods ending
subsequent to initial adoption. The Company adopted FSP No. 107-1 and APP 28-1 in the second
quarter of 2009. See Note 17.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events
, which establishes general standards
of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before
financial statements are issued. SFAS 165 reflects the principles underpinning previous subsequent
event guidance in existing accounting literature and US Auditing Standards (AU) Section 560,
Subsequent Events, therefore the Companys adoption of SFAS No. 165 should not result in
significant changes in the subsequent events that the Companys reports either through recognition
or disclosure in the condensed consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 165 requires the
Companys to disclose the date through which it has evaluated subsequent events, which for public
entities, is the date the financial statements are issued. This SFAS became effective for interim
and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 in the second
quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Accounting Pronouncements To Be Adopted
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assetsan
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140
. SFAS No. 166 removes the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity (QSPE), changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and
requires additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets and a transferors continuing
involvement in transferred financial assets. This Statement is effective for interim and annual
periods beginning after November 15, 2009, with early adoption prohibited. The adoption of SFAS No.
166 is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
. SFAS No.
167 amends the methodology for determining the primary beneficiary (and therefore consolidator) of
a variable interest entity (VIE) and will require such assessment to be performed on an ongoing
basis. Under SFAS No. 167, the primary beneficiary of a VIE is defined as the enterprise that has
both (1) the power to direct activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIEs
economic performance, and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or
10
receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. These amendments
affect all entities currently within the scope of FIN No. 46(R), as well as qualifying
special-purpose entities (QSPEs) that are currently excluded from the scope of FIN No. 46(R).
SFAS No. 167 will require a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its
involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to
that involvement. A reporting entity will be required to disclose how its involvement with a
variable interest entity affects the reporting entitys financial statements. SFAS No. 167 will be
effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. The
adoption of SFAS No. 167 is not expected to have any effect on the Companys condensed consolidated
financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168,
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
, which establishes the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (the Codification) as the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP
recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases
of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP
for SEC registrants. On the effective date of this Statement, the Codification will supersede all
then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other nongrandfathered non-SEC
accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. SFAS No. 168
is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September
15, 2009. The adoption of Statement 168 in the third quarter of 2009 will not have a material
impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
In August 2009, the FASB updated the Codification in connection with the fair value measurement of
liabilities to clarify that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the
identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using
either the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, quoted prices for
similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets, or another valuation technique
that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement. Two examples would be an income
approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is
based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the
identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability. The amendments in this
update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not
required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a
restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The amendments in this update also clarify
that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability at the measurement date
and the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market, when
no adjustment to the quoted price of the asset are required, are Level 1 fair value measurements.
This update is effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after
its issuance. The adoption of this guidance in the fourth quarter of 2009 is not expected to have
any impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
In September 2009, the FASB updated the Codification to reflect SEC staff pronouncements on
earnings-per-share calculations. According to the update, the SEC staff believes that when a public
company redeems preferred shares, the difference between the fair value of the consideration
transferred to the holders of the preferred stock and the carrying amount on the balance sheet
after issuance costs of the preferred stock should be added to or subtracted from
11
net income before doing an earnings-per-share calculation. The SECs staff also thinks it is not
appropriate to aggregate preferred shares with different dividend yields when trying to determine
whether the if-converted method is dilutive to the earnings-per-share calculation. The guidance
is effective for new share lending arrangements for interim and annual periods beginning on or
after June 15, 2009. For existing arrangements, the guidance is effective for fiscal years
beginning on or after December 15, 2009 and must be applied retrospectively for arrangements
outstanding as of the effective date. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have any
impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
2.
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
In accordance with SFAS No. 128,
Earnings Per Share
, basic earnings per share is computed by
dividing income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing income
(loss) attributable to common stockholders as adjusted to add back dividends on convertible
preferred stock, by the weighted-average number of common and potentially dilutive common shares
outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common shares represent assumed conversion of
outstanding convertible preferred stock, which are determined using the if-converted method, and
outstanding stock options, which are determined using the treasury stock method. The effect of
convertible preferred stock (33,674 shares in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, as adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split approved on November 7, 2008 and effective on
December 1, 2008) was antidilutive in 2009 and 2008. The number of stock options outstanding at
June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 113,535 and 134,369 respectively. In 2009 and 2008, no potentially
dilutive common shares resulted from the stock options because the exercise price of the options
was greater than the average market price of common stock.
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share were computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(5,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,098
|
|
|
$
|
(4,714
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,710
|
|
Less preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,227
|
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
|
18,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to common stockholders basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(5,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,129
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,328
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period basic and diluted
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
(1.61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.46
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.83
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
3.
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE
The Companys cash dividends per share declared for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RECORD DATE
|
|
PAYABLE DATE
|
|
AMOUNT PER SHARE
(1)
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 30, 2009
|
|
February 16, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.2083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2008
|
|
February 15, 2008
|
|
$
|
0.2083
|
|
February 28, 2008
|
|
March 15, 2008
|
|
|
0.2083
|
|
March 30, 2008
|
|
April 17, 2008
|
|
|
0.2083
|
|
April 30, 2008
|
|
May 15, 2008
|
|
|
0.2083
|
|
May 31, 2008
|
|
June 15, 2008
|
|
|
0.2083
|
|
June 29, 2008
|
|
July 17, 2008
|
|
|
0.2083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.2498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Dividends amounts in the table are rounded.
|
|
(2)
|
|
As adjusted to reflect the one-for-fifty reverse stock split approved on November 7, 2008 and
effective on December 1, 2008.
|
On February 17, 2009, the Companys Board of Directors announced that the Board voted to
suspend regular monthly dividends on the Companys common stock and all outstanding series of its
preferred stock, effective with the payment to be made on March 16, 2009 and applicable to
stockholders of record as of February 27, 2009, as a measure to strengthen the Companys and
Westernbanks capital positions.
Refer to Note 19 Contingencies Regulatory Matters below for a description of certain
regulatory agreements entered into with the FDIC, the Office of the Commissioner of Financial
Institutions of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (OCIF) and the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (the FRB) and the regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends imposed by
the agreements.
13
4.
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPRENSIVE LOSS, NET
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income tax, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Unrealized net losses on investment securities available for sale,
net of income tax of $143,000 in 2009 and $2,415,000 in 2008
|
|
$
|
(4,017
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,988
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized net gains on cash flow hedge derivatives (fixed-price
purchase contracts), net of income tax of $650,000 in 2009
|
|
|
3,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(334
|
)
|
|
$
|
(40,988
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
MONEY MARKET INSTRUMENTS
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, money market instruments included $589.4 million and $1.1
billion, respectively, in interest bearing deposits with other banks. At June 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008, the Company maintained $582.1 million and $1.1 billion, respectively, in interest-bearing
deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Restricted interest bearing deposits with other
banks amounted to $3.6 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. In addition, interest
bearing deposits with other banks amounting to $400,000 were pledged to the Puerto Rico Treasury
Department for Westernbanks International Division at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
14
6.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of investment securities were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies obligations (USGOs)
|
|
$
|
195,774
|
|
|
$
|
744
|
|
|
$
|
1,560
|
|
|
$
|
194,958
|
|
Puerto Rico Government and agencies obligations
(PRGOs)
|
|
|
11,212
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
206,986
|
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
|
|
206,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) certificates
|
|
|
1,768,014
|
|
|
|
6,773
|
|
|
|
8,530
|
|
|
|
1,766,257
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) issued
and guaranteed by GNMA
|
|
|
1,461,120
|
|
|
|
7,294
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
1,468,249
|
|
CMOs issued and guaranteed by Federal National
Mortgage Association (FNMA)
|
|
|
361,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,574
|
|
|
|
353,885
|
|
CMOs issued and guaranteed by Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC)
|
|
|
13,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
13,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
3,603,917
|
|
|
|
14,067
|
|
|
|
16,536
|
|
|
|
3,601,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities common stock
|
|
|
1,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,812,809
|
|
|
$
|
15,095
|
|
|
$
|
18,969
|
|
|
$
|
3,808,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRGOs
|
|
$
|
13,303
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
13,327
|
|
Corporate notes
|
|
|
21,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,116
|
|
|
|
10,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
34,739
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
11,133
|
|
|
|
23,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
|
5,085
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,308
|
|
FHLMC certificates
|
|
|
1,755
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,877
|
|
FNMA certificates
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,732
|
|
CMOs issued and guaranteed by FHLMC
|
|
|
506,326
|
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
24,022
|
|
|
|
483,735
|
|
CMOs issued and guaranteed by FNMA
|
|
|
63,413
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
63,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
579,155
|
|
|
|
2,842
|
|
|
|
24,431
|
|
|
|
557,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
613,894
|
|
|
$
|
2,883
|
|
|
$
|
35,564
|
|
|
$
|
581,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USGOs
|
|
$
|
306,259
|
|
|
$
|
1,621
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
307,880
|
|
PRGOs
|
|
|
11,122
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
317,381
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA Certificates
|
|
|
523,339
|
|
|
|
3,332
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
526,376
|
|
CMOs issued and guaranteed by GNMA
|
|
|
2,461,199
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
33,796
|
|
|
|
2,427,527
|
|
CMOs issued and guaranteed by FNMA
|
|
|
395,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,054
|
|
|
|
380,438
|
|
CMOs issued and guaranteed by FHLMC
|
|
|
14,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
13,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
3,394,358
|
|
|
|
3,456
|
|
|
|
49,822
|
|
|
|
3,347,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities common stock
|
|
|
1,906
|
|
|
|
1,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,713,645
|
|
|
$
|
6,418
|
|
|
$
|
49,822
|
|
|
$
|
3,670,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USGOs
|
|
$
|
372,311
|
|
|
$
|
793
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
373,104
|
|
PRGOs
|
|
|
13,312
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
13,148
|
|
Corporate notes
|
|
|
21,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
|
|
19,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
407,059
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
2,037
|
|
|
|
405,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
|
5,574
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5,767
|
|
FHLMC certificates
|
|
|
1,942
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
FNMA certificates
|
|
|
2,691
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,808
|
|
CMOs issued and guaranteed by FHLMC
|
|
|
551,802
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
16,987
|
|
|
|
535,603
|
|
CMOs issued and guaranteed by FNMA
|
|
|
68,902
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
68,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
630,911
|
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
17,688
|
|
|
|
615,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,037,970
|
|
|
$
|
2,592
|
|
|
$
|
19,725
|
|
|
$
|
1,020,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities available for sale and held to
maturity at June 30, 2009, by contractual maturity (excluding mortgage-backed securities), are
shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available For Sale
|
|
|
Held to Maturity
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
100,064
|
|
|
$
|
470
|
|
|
$
|
470
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
33,652
|
|
|
|
34,616
|
|
|
|
12,348
|
|
|
|
12,369
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
73,334
|
|
|
|
71,774
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,436
|
|
|
|
10,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
206,986
|
|
|
|
206,454
|
|
|
|
34,739
|
|
|
|
23,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
3,603,917
|
|
|
|
3,601,448
|
|
|
|
579,155
|
|
|
|
557,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
1,906
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,812,809
|
|
|
$
|
3,808,935
|
|
|
$
|
613,894
|
|
|
$
|
581,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
The following tables show the Companys available for sale and held to maturity investments
fair value and gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
12 months or more
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Positions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USGOs
|
|
$
|
71,774
|
|
|
$
|
1,560
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
71,774
|
|
|
$
|
1,560
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
|
980,229
|
|
|
|
8,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
980,229
|
|
|
|
8,530
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
CMOs issued and
guaranteed by GNMA
|
|
|
66,570
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,570
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
CMOs issued and
guaranteed by FNMA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,885
|
|
|
|
7,574
|
|
|
|
353,885
|
|
|
|
7,574
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
CMOs issued and
guaranteed by FHLMC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,057
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
13,057
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
1,046,799
|
|
|
|
8,695
|
|
|
|
366,942
|
|
|
|
7,841
|
|
|
|
1,413,741
|
|
|
|
16,536
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,119,606
|
|
|
$
|
11,128
|
|
|
$
|
366,942
|
|
|
$
|
7,841
|
|
|
$
|
1,486,548
|
|
|
$
|
18,969
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRGOs
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,004
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
5,004
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Corporate notes
|
|
|
2,160
|
|
|
|
2,085
|
|
|
|
8,160
|
|
|
|
9,031
|
|
|
|
10,320
|
|
|
|
11,116
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
2,160
|
|
|
|
2,085
|
|
|
|
13,164
|
|
|
|
9,048
|
|
|
|
15,324
|
|
|
|
11,133
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMOs issued and
guaranteed by FHLMC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381,386
|
|
|
|
24,022
|
|
|
|
381,386
|
|
|
|
24,022
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
CMOs issued and
guaranteed by FNMA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,002
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
18,002
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,388
|
|
|
|
24,431
|
|
|
|
399,388
|
|
|
|
24,431
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,160
|
|
|
$
|
2,085
|
|
|
$
|
412,552
|
|
|
$
|
33,479
|
|
|
$
|
414,712
|
|
|
$
|
35,564
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
12 months or more
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Positions
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
$
|
235,547
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
235,547
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
CMOs issued and
guaranteed by GNMA
|
|
|
2,365,960
|
|
|
|
33,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,365,960
|
|
|
|
33,796
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
CMOs issued and
guaranteed by FNMA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,439
|
|
|
|
15,054
|
|
|
|
380,439
|
|
|
|
15,054
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
CMOs issued and
guaranteed by FHLMC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,651
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
13,651
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,601,507
|
|
|
$
|
34,091
|
|
|
$
|
394,090
|
|
|
$
|
15,731
|
|
|
$
|
2,995,597
|
|
|
$
|
49,822
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRGOs
|
|
$
|
3,905
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
8,770
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
12,675
|
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Corporate notes
|
|
|
4,096
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
15,470
|
|
|
|
1,722
|
|
|
|
19,566
|
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
8,001
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
24,240
|
|
|
|
1,844
|
|
|
|
32,241
|
|
|
|
2,037
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
FNMA certificates
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
CMOs issued and
guaranteed by FHLMC
|
|
|
13,588
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
462,737
|
|
|
|
16,783
|
|
|
|
476,325
|
|
|
|
16,987
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
CMOs issued and
guaranteed by FNMA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,128
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
30,128
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
13,794
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
492,865
|
|
|
|
17,481
|
|
|
|
506,659
|
|
|
|
17,688
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,795
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
$
|
517,105
|
|
|
$
|
19,325
|
|
|
$
|
538,900
|
|
|
$
|
19,725
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are reviewed at least quarterly for
possible other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI). If the fair value of an available-for-sale or
held-to-maturity security is less than its amortized cost basis, the Company must determine whether
an OTTI has occurred. Under GAAP, the recognition and measurement requirements related to OTTI
differ for debt and equity securities.
For debt securities, if the Company intends to sell the debt security or will more likely than not
be required to sell the debt security before recovery of the entire amortized cost basis, then an
OTTI has occurred, and the Company must recognize through earnings the entire OTTI, which is
calculated as the difference between the fair value of the debt security and its amortized cost
basis. However, even if the Company does not intend to sell the debt security and will not likely
be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its entire amortized cost basis, the
Company must evaluate expected cash flows to be received and determine if a credit loss has
occurred. In the event of a credit loss, the credit component of the impairment is recognized
through earnings and the non-credit component is recognized through accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss). During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not
recognize OTTI on any of its available-for-sale or held-to-maturity debt securities.
19
For equity securities, the Companys management evaluates the securities in an unrealized loss
position in the available-for-sale portfolio for OTTI on the basis of the duration of the decline
in value of the security and severity of that decline as well as the Companys intent and ability
to hold these securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in
the market value. If it is determined that the impairment on an equity security is other than
temporary, an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying value of the security
and its fair value is recognized in earnings. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, the Company did not recognize OTTI on any of its available-for-sale equity securities.
The Companys investment portfolio as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, consisted principally
of U.S. Government and agencies obligations, Puerto Rico Government and agencies obligations, and
mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by GNMA, FHLMC or FNMA. In addition, the Company
does not have investments in residual tranches.
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the unrealized loss position relates to
interest rate changes and not to credit deterioration of any of the securities issuers. The Company
assessed the ratings of the different agencies for the mortgage-backed securities, noting that at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, all of them have maintained the highest rating by all the
rating agencies and reflect a stable outlook. The aggregate unrealized gross losses of the
investment securities available for sale and held to maturity amounted to $54.5 million and $69.5
million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale and the respective gross realized
gains and losses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Proceeds from sales
|
|
$
|
1,801,355
|
|
|
$
|
98,343
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
|
37,086
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Gross realized losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Unencumbered investment securities available for sale and held to maturity at June 30, 2009,
amounted to $924,676,000 and $348,292,000, respectively, after taking into account the investment
securities pledged described in Note 8.
20
7.
LOANS
The loans portfolio consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
REAL ESTATE LOANS SECURED BY MORTGAGES ON:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
5,019,311
|
|
|
$
|
5,105,663
|
|
Residential real estate, mainly one-to-four family residences
|
|
|
981,754
|
|
|
|
985,564
|
|
Construction and land acquisition
|
|
|
1,382,050
|
|
|
|
1,446,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
7,383,115
|
|
|
|
7,537,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus (less):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undisbursed portion of loans in process
|
|
|
(1,747
|
)
|
|
|
(3,214
|
)
|
Premium on loans purchased
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Deferred loan fees net
|
|
|
(26,239
|
)
|
|
|
(29,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
(27,953
|
)
|
|
|
(32,475
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans net
|
|
|
7,355,162
|
|
|
|
7,504,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER LOANS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural loans
|
|
|
707,442
|
|
|
|
721,987
|
|
Consumer loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans on deposits
|
|
|
28,639
|
|
|
|
28,753
|
|
Credit cards
|
|
|
50,272
|
|
|
|
49,301
|
|
Installment
|
|
|
694,086
|
|
|
|
649,961
|
|
Less deferred loan fees net
|
|
|
(4,290
|
)
|
|
|
(5,139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans net
|
|
|
1,476,149
|
|
|
|
1,444,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LOANS
|
|
|
8,831,311
|
|
|
|
8,949,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
|
|
(240,832
|
)
|
|
|
(282,089
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOANS NET
|
|
$
|
8,590,479
|
|
|
$
|
8,667,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009, commercial real estate loans totaled $5.0 billion. In general, commercial
real estate loans are considered by management to be of somewhat greater risk of collectibility
due principally to the size and risk concentration of such loan and for non-owner occupied
commercial real estate due to the dependency on income production or future development of the real
estate. The Companys commercial real estate loan portfolio is mostly comprised of loans to
owner-occupied borrowers in which the real estate collateral is taken as a secondary source of
repayment. At June 30, 2009, commercial real estate loans to owner-occupied borrowers amounted to
77%. Non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans are principally collateralized by property
dedicated to wholesale, retail and rental business activities.
Commercial lending, including commercial real estate, asset-based, unsecured business and
construction, generally carry a greater risk than consumer lending, including residential real
estate, because such loans are typically larger in size and more risk is concentrated in a single
borrower. In addition, the borrowers ability to repay a commercial loan or a construction loan
depends, in the case of a commercial loan, on the successful operation of the business or the
property securing the loan and, in the case of a construction loan, on the successful completion
21
and sale or operation of the project. Substantially all of the Companys borrowers and properties
and other collateral securing the commercial, real estate mortgage and consumer loans are located
in Puerto Rico.
At June 30, 2009, Westernbank has a significant lending concentration with an aggregate unpaid
principal balance of $385.7 million to a commercial group in Puerto Rico, which exceeds the
loan-to-one borrower limit. Westernbank has explored various alternatives to decrease its exposure
to this borrower to comply with the loan-to-one borrower limitation. However, due to the credit
tightening propelled by the current economic environment, efforts have not materialized.
Westernbank continues to pursue other actions in order to reduce such excess. As of June 30, 2009,
this loan relationship is not impaired. For this violation, Westernbank paid a penalty of $50,000
during 2008. There can be no assurance that the Commissioner of the OCIF will not take further
actions on this issue.
The outstanding principal balance of non-performing loans at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009
amounted to $1,539,850,000 and $1,560,031,000, respectively. The interest that would have been
recorded if the loans had not been classified as non-performing
amounted to $31,618,000 and
$27,859,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest collected and recognized
as income on non-performing loans amounted to $18,645,000 and
$22,510,000 for the six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008.
The following table presents a reconciliation of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
271,300
|
|
|
$
|
338,967
|
|
|
$
|
282,089
|
|
|
$
|
338,720
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
11,124
|
|
|
|
14,346
|
|
|
|
19,979
|
|
|
|
29,303
|
|
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
Charge-off of uncollectible accounts
|
|
|
(42,183
|
)
|
|
|
(26,816
|
)
|
|
|
(62,882
|
)
|
|
|
(42,311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
240,832
|
|
|
$
|
327,902
|
|
|
$
|
240,832
|
|
|
$
|
327,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
The following table sets forth information regarding the investment in impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Investment in impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered by a valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
815,754
|
|
|
$
|
901,146
|
|
Do not require a valuation allowance
|
|
|
679,457
|
|
|
|
570,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,495,211
|
|
|
$
|
1,471,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired non-performing loans
|
|
$
|
1,366,172
|
|
|
$
|
1,364,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance for impaired loans
|
|
$
|
97,396
|
|
|
$
|
131,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Average investment in impaired loans
|
|
$
|
1,459,416
|
|
|
$
|
1,660,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest collected and recognized as
income on non-performing and impaired loans
|
|
$
|
18,511
|
|
|
$
|
21,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company engages in the restructuring of the debt of borrowers who are delinquent due to
economic or legal reasons, if the Company determines that it is in the best interest for both the
Company and the borrower to do so. In some cases, due to the nature of the borrowers financial
condition, the restructure or loan modification fits the definition of Troubled Debt Restructuring
(TDR) as defined by the SFAS No. 15,
Accounting by Debtors and Creditors of Troubled Debt
Restructurings
. Such restructures are identified as TDRs and accounted for based on the provisions
SFAS No. 114,
Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.
The following table set forth commercial loans that fit the definition of TDR, and therefore have
been accounted for as TDR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Performing loans
|
|
$
|
21,007
|
|
|
$
|
4,768
|
|
Non-performing loans
|
|
|
140,313
|
|
|
|
118,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
161,320
|
|
|
$
|
122,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
PLEDGED ASSETS
At June 30, 2009, residential and commercial mortgage loans amounting to $1,096,129,000 (see Note
13) and investment securities available for sale and held to maturity amounting to $2,884,259,000
and $265,602,000, respectively, were pledged to secure public funds (see Note 10), individual
retirement accounts (see Note 10), repurchase agreements (see Note 11), advances and borrowings
from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) (see Note 12), interest rate swap agreements (see Note
16), and pledged to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York ($2,912,000). Pledged investment
securities available for sale and held to maturity amounting to $2,803,972,000 and $252,877,000,
respectively, at June 30, 2009 can be repledged.
23
9.
CLAIM RECEIVABLE FROM LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC.
Westernbank has counterparty exposure to affiliates of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LBHI),
which filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on September
15, 2008 in connection with certain securities repurchase agreements and derivative transactions.
Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. (LBSF) was the counterparty to the Company on certain
interest rate swap and cap agreements guaranteed by LBHI. The filing of bankruptcy by LBHI was an
event of default under the agreements. On September 19, 2008, the Company terminated all agreements
with LBSF and replaced them with another counterparty under similar terms and conditions. In
connection with such termination, the Company had an unsecured counterparty exposure with LBSF of
approximately $484,600. This unsecured exposure was written-off during the third quarter of 2008.
In addition, Lehman Brothers Inc. (LBI) was the counterparty to the Company on certain sale
of securities under agreements to repurchase. On September 19, 2008, LBI was placed in a Securities
Investor Protection Act (SIPA) liquidation proceeding after the filing for bankruptcy of its
parent LBHI. The filing of the SIPA liquidation proceeding was an event of default under the
repurchase agreements resulting in their termination as of September 19, 2008. The termination of
the agreements caused the Company to recognize the unrealized loss on the value of the securities
subject to the agreements, resulting in a $3.3 million charge during the third quarter of 2008.
Westernbank also has an aggregate exposure of $139.2 million representing the amount by which the
value of Westernbank securities delivered to LBI exceeds the amount owed to LBI under repurchase
agreements. On January 27, 2009, Westernbank filed customer claims with the trustee in LBIs SIPA
liquidation proceeding. On June 1, 2009, Westernbank filed amended customer claims with the
trustee. Management evaluated this receivable in accordance with the guidance provided by SFAS No.
5,
Accounting for Contingencies
, and related pronouncements. In making this determination,
management consulted with legal counsel and technical experts. As a result of its evaluation, the
Company recognized a loss of $13.9 million against the $139.2 million owed by LBI as of December
31, 2008. Determining the loss amount required management to use considerable judgment and
assumptions, and is based on the facts currently available. As additional information on the LBIs
SIPA liquidation proceeding becomes available, the Company may need to recognize additional losses.
A material difference between the amount claimed and the amount ultimately recovered would have a
material adverse effect on the Companys and Westernbanks financial condition and results of
operations, and could cause the Companys and Westernbanks regulatory capital ratios to fall below
the minimum to be categorized as well capitalized.
The Company expects to receive from the
LBIs SIPA trustee notices of determination (i) denying the Companys claims for treatment as a
customer with respect to the securities held by LBI under the repurchase financing agreements, and
(ii) converting the Companys claim to a general creditor claim. As such time, the Company expects
to file objections in court to this determination by the LBIs SIPA trustee.
24
10.
DEPOSITS
Deposits consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Noninterest bearing accounts
|
|
$
|
289,197
|
|
|
$
|
250,380
|
|
Passbook accounts
|
|
|
675,926
|
|
|
|
670,224
|
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
292,642
|
|
|
|
275,530
|
|
Super NOW accounts
|
|
|
18,454
|
|
|
|
18,656
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Certificates of deposit
(1)
|
|
|
8,852,205
|
|
|
|
9,672,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10,128,463
|
|
|
|
10,887,160
|
|
Accrued interest payable
(2)
|
|
|
85,522
|
|
|
|
115,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10,213,985
|
|
|
$
|
11,002,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes brokered deposits with contractual principal balance of $14.5 million and
$109.3 million and measured at fair value of $14.3 million and $109.9 million, excluding
accrued interest, at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes $32,000 and $708,000 of accrued interest payable on brokered deposits
measured at fair value at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
The weighted average interest rate of all deposits at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, was
approximately 3.61% and 4.09%, respectively. At June 30, 2009, the aggregate amount of deposits in
denominations of $100,000 or more was $919,948,000 ($891,917,000 at December 31, 2008).
Certificates of deposit include brokered deposits of $7,678,891,000 and $8,475,504,000 at June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
At June 30, 2009, the scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
3,432,327
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,795,703
|
|
2011
|
|
|
886,112
|
|
2012
|
|
|
578,143
|
|
2013
|
|
|
79,483
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
80,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,852,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009, the Company had pledged, investment securities held to maturity with a
carrying value of $7,328,000, mortgage-backed securities held to maturity with a carrying value of
$5,119,000 and investment securities available for sale with a carrying value of $59,586,000
to secure public funds, and mortgage-backed securities held to maturity with a carrying value of
$166,000 as bond requirement for individual retirement accounts.
25
11.
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
Repurchase agreements, and the related weighted average interest rates consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Repurchase agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate
|
|
$
|
2,710,424
|
|
|
|
3.91
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,204,142
|
|
|
|
3.77
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into sales of securities under agreements to repurchase the same securities
(repurchase agreements). Repurchase agreements are classified as secured borrowings and are
reflected as a liability in the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.
Repurchase agreements require the Company to deliver securities to counterparties to collateralize
the agreements. The dealers may sell, loan or otherwise dispose of such securities to other parties
in the normal course of their operations, and have agreed to resell to the Company the same
securities at the maturities of the agreements. The Company may be required to provide additional
collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities. At June 30, 2009, the Company had
outstanding $2.4 billion in repurchase agreements for which the counterparties have the option to
terminate the agreements at the first anniversary date and at each interest payment date
thereafter.
Repurchase agreements at June 30, 2009 mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
(1)
|
|
$
|
888,924
|
|
2010
|
|
|
942,000
|
|
2011
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
2012
|
|
|
409,500
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
445,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,710,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes $332.9 million of repurchase agreements which mature within 30 days.
|
26
Repurchase agreements (classified by counterparty) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Borrowing
|
|
|
of Underlying
|
|
|
Borrowing
|
|
|
of Underlying
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York
|
|
$
|
338,000
|
|
|
$
|
356,292
|
|
|
$
|
1,073,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,141,125
|
|
Salomon Smith Barney Inc. and affiliates
|
|
|
593,000
|
|
|
|
676,945
|
|
|
|
593,000
|
|
|
|
707,210
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston LLC
|
|
|
672,002
|
|
|
|
752,627
|
|
|
|
532,142
|
|
|
|
600,820
|
|
J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.
|
|
|
431,422
|
|
|
|
494,815
|
|
|
|
330,000
|
|
|
|
417,308
|
|
Barclays Capital, Inc.
|
|
|
330,000
|
|
|
|
385,715
|
|
|
|
330,000
|
|
|
|
374,508
|
|
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter
|
|
|
273,000
|
|
|
|
287,479
|
|
|
|
273,000
|
|
|
|
294,235
|
|
Merrill Lynch Government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Inc. and affiliates
|
|
|
73,000
|
|
|
|
93,063
|
|
|
|
73,000
|
|
|
|
78,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,710,424
|
|
|
$
|
3,046,936
|
|
|
$
|
3,204,142
|
|
|
$
|
3,613,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under repurchase agreements were collateralized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Securities Underlying
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
Repurchase
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Agreements
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies
obligations (USGOs) held to maturity
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
150,755
|
|
|
$
|
151,028
|
|
USGOs available for sale
|
|
|
46,350
|
|
|
|
46,676
|
|
|
|
155,341
|
|
|
|
155,142
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities (MBS)
held to maturity
|
|
|
252,877
|
|
|
|
242,964
|
|
|
|
373,940
|
|
|
|
370,710
|
|
MBS available for sale
|
|
|
2,760,502
|
|
|
|
2,757,296
|
|
|
|
2,981,040
|
|
|
|
2,936,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,059,729
|
|
|
$
|
3,046,936
|
|
|
|
3,661,076
|
|
|
$
|
3,613,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
of underlying securities
|
|
|
14,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,073,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,680,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
LINES OF CREDIT
At June 30, 2009, the Company has an available line of credit with the FHLB of New York guaranteed
with excess collateral already pledged, in the amount of $506.9 million (December 31, 2008 $467.6
million). See Note 13 for the FHLB lines of credit terms. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
the Company did not have other outstanding lines of credit agreements.
27
13.
ADVANCES FROM FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK AND MORTGAGE NOTE PAYABLE
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank and mortgage note payable, and the related weighted average
interest rates consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
ADVANCES FROM FHLB:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate convertible advances
(0.50% to 5.93%)
|
|
$
|
92,000
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
%
|
|
$
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
5.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MORTGAGE NOTE PAYABLE
|
|
$
|
34,642
|
|
|
|
8.05
|
%
|
|
$
|
34,932
|
|
|
|
8.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances and repurchase agreements are received from the FHLB under an agreement (Note 12)
whereby Westernbank is required to maintain a minimum amount of qualifying collateral with a fair
value of at least 110% and 105% of the outstanding advances and repurchase agreements,
respectively. At June 30, 2009, convertible advances were secured by residential and commercial
mortgage loans amounting to $1,096,129,000. Also, with respect to repurchase agreements and
advances from the FHLB amounting to $380.0 million at June 30, 2009, at the first anniversary date
and each quarter thereafter, the FHLB has the option to convert them into replacement funding for
the same or a lesser principal amount based on any funding then offered by FHLB at the then current
market rates, unless the interest rate has been predetermined between FHLB and the Company. If the
Company chooses not to replace the funding, it will repay the convertible advances and reverse
repurchase agreements, including any accrued interest, on such optional conversion date.
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Westernbank World Plaza, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of
Westernbank Puerto Rico, had outstanding $34.6 million and $34.9 million, respectively, of a
mortgage note, at an interest rate of 8.05% per year. The mortgage note was collateralized by a
23-story office building, including its related parking facility, located in Hato Rey, Puerto Rico.
On July 12, 2009, Westernbank World Plaza, Inc. exercised the prepayment option and cancelled the
mortgage note.
28
Advances from FHLB and the mortgage note payable by contractual maturities at June 30, 2009, mature
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending
|
|
Advances
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
December 31,
|
|
from FHLB
|
|
|
Note Payable (1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
291
|
|
2010
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
92,000
|
|
|
$
|
34,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Mortgage note payable was cancelled on July 12, 2009.
|
14.
INCOME TAXES
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code (the Code), all companies are treated as separate
taxable entities and are not entitled to file consolidated tax returns. The Company, Westernbank,
Westernbank Insurance Corp. and SRG Net, Inc. are subject to Puerto Rico regular income tax or
alternative minimum tax (AMT) on income earned from all sources. The AMT is payable if it exceeds
regular income tax. The excess of AMT over regular income tax paid in any one year may be used to
offset regular income tax in future years, subject to certain limitations. Westernbank World Plaza,
Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Westernbank, elected to be treated as a special partnership
under the Code; accordingly, its taxable income or deductible loss is included in the taxable
income of Westernbank.
The Code provides a dividend received deduction of 100%, on dividends received from wholly owned
subsidiaries subject to income taxation in Puerto Rico. The income on certain investments is exempt
for income tax purposes. Also, Westernbank International division operates as an International
Banking Entity (IBE) under the International Banking Center Regulatory Act. Under Puerto Rico tax
law, an IBE can hold non-Puerto Rico assets, and earn interest on these assets, as well as generate
fee income outside of Puerto Rico on a tax-exempt basis under certain circumstances. As a result,
the Companys effective tax rate is generally below the statutory rate. On March 9, 2009, the
Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law Act No. 7 (Act No. 7), also known as Special Act
Declaring a Fiscal Emergency Status to Save the Credit of Puerto Rico, which amended several
sections of the Code, including sections related to the IBE Act. Act No. 7, as amended by Act No.
37 approved on July 10, 2009, imposes a series of temporary and permanent measures, including a
special 5% tax on IBE net income not otherwise subject to tax under the Code. This special
assessment is effective for tax years that commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1,
2012. The imposition of this special tax is not expected to have any
effect on the Companys Financial position or results of
operations.
29
Pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 13 of January 8, 2004 (Act No. 13), for taxable years
commencing after June 30, 2003, the net income earned by an IBE that operates as a unit of a bank
under the Puerto Rico Banking Law, will be considered taxable and subject to income taxes at the
current tax rates in the amount by which the IBE taxable income exceeds 40% in the first applicable
taxable year (2004), 30% in the second year (2005) and 20% thereafter, of the taxable income of
Westernbank, including its IBE taxable income. Westernbanks IBE carries on its books securities
which are, irrespective of the IBE status, tax exempt by law. Moreover, the Act provides that IBEs
operating as subsidiaries will continue to be exempt from the payment of income taxes. For the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the provisions of Act No. 13 did not have any effect on the
Companys financial position or results of operations because the Company substained a net
operating loss.
In addition to the tax imposition on IBEs, Act No. 7, as amended by Act No. 37 approved on July 10,
2009, also imposes a series of temporary and permanent measures, including the imposition of a 5%
surtax over the total income tax liability determined, which is applicable to companies whose
combined income exceeds $100,000, effectively increasing the maximum statutory rate from 39% to
40.95% and double the property tax paid on the Companys real estate properties. These temporary
measures are effective for tax years that commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1,
2012.
Prepaid income tax amounted to $33,417,000 and $33,630,000 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. Accrued income tax payable amounted to $2,570,000 and $3,188,000 at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. Prepaid income tax is included as part of Other assets and
accrued income tax payable is included as part of Accrued expenses and other liabilities in the
accompanying condensed statements of financial condition. Under the
Puerto Rico tax code, the Company could use Prepaid income taxes to
offset future tax liability or ask the PR taxing authority to refund
the excess paid. The usage of prepaid income taxes to offset future tax liability
is not subject to time limitation. The accrued income tax payable includes a
liability for unrecognized tax benefits of $1.4 million and $2.0 million at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. The provision (credit) for income taxes for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Current provision (credit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
$
|
(454
|
)
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,001
|
)
|
U.S.
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
(11,553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
(32,554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred provision (credit)
|
|
|
(3,569
|
)
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
|
|
(2,028
|
)
|
|
|
(2,502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision (credit)
|
|
$
|
(3,889
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,258
|
|
|
$
|
(1,128
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35,056
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
The Company evaluates and assesses the relative risks and appropriate tax treatment of
transactions and filing positions after considering statutes, regulations, judicial precedent and
other information and maintains tax accruals consistent with its evaluation of these relative risks
and merits. Changes to the estimate of accrued taxes occur periodically due to changes in tax
rates, interpretations of tax laws, the status of examinations being conducted by taxing
authorities and changes to statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance that impact the relative
risks of tax positions. These changes, when they occur, can affect the income tax accruals as well
as the current periods income tax expense and can be significant to the operating results of the
Company.
Unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 mainly relate to certain expense
deductions taken in income tax returns. The reconciliation for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008 of the unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued interest and penalties, was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the beginning of period
|
|
$
|
2,004
|
|
|
$
|
1,821
|
|
|
$
|
1,958
|
|
|
$
|
43,987
|
|
Gross amount of increase in unrecognized tax benefits as
a result of tax positions taken during a prior period
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Gross amount of decrease in unrecognized tax benefits as
a result of tax positions taken during a prior period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,606
|
)
|
Gross amount of increase in unrecognized tax benefits as
a result of tax positions taken during the current period
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Amount of decrease in the unrecognized tax benefits relating
to settlements with taxing authorities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,605
|
)
|
Reduction to unrecognized tax benefits as a result of
lapse of the applicable statute of limitations
|
|
|
(607
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(607
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
June 30
|
|
$
|
1,432
|
|
|
$
|
1,866
|
|
|
$
|
1,432
|
|
|
$
|
1,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company settled with tax authorities most of
its uncertain income tax positions for $8.9 million. The resulting income tax benefit of $33.6
million was recognized as a reduction to the income tax provision in the six months ended June 30,
2008.
The total amount of net unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective
income tax rate was $1.4 million and $2.0 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. The Company classifies interests and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits
as a component of its income tax provision. The accrual for uncertain income tax positions includes
an accrual for interests and penalties of $402,000 and $475,000 at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the
31
Company increased the accrual for interest and penalties for uncertain income tax positions by $62,000. For
the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company decreased the accrual for interest and penalties
for uncertain income tax positions by $4.4 million, mainly as a result of the settlement of certain
income tax positions with tax authorities, as explained above. Interest paid on such settlement
amounted to $724,000.
The Companys primary tax jurisdiction is Puerto Rico. The Companys primary subsidiary,
Westernbank, is the entity which has recorded a liability for these unrecognized tax benefits. In
the Puerto Rico tax jurisdiction, Westernbanks open tax years are 2003 to present. For uncertain
foreign withholdings income tax positions, the statute of limitation (four years) began when
Westernbank filed the income tax returns in 2007 and 2008.
A reconciliation of the provision (credit) for income taxes computed by applying the Puerto Rico
income tax statutory rate to the tax provision as reported was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of Pre-tax Income
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of Pre-tax Income
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of Pre-tax Income
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of Pre-tax Income
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Tax provsion (credit) computed
at Puerto Rico statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(3,593
|
)
|
|
|
(39.0
|
%)
|
|
$
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(2,278
|
)
|
|
|
(39.0
|
%)
|
|
$
|
(525
|
)
|
|
|
(39.0
|
%)
|
Effect on provision of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exempt income net of related expenses
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
|
|
40.8
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
Income taxes related to unrecognized
tax benefits or income tax
contingencies,
include U.S. income tax
|
|
|
(438
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
(32,449
|
)
|
|
|
(2,410.8
|
)
|
Nondeductible expenses
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
Differential in statutory rate on
capital gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,826
|
)
|
|
|
(114.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,819
|
)
|
|
|
(283.7
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
2,128
|
|
|
|
63.4
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
69.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (credit) for income taxes
as reported
|
|
$
|
(3,889
|
)
|
|
|
(42.2
|
%)
|
|
$
|
2,258
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
(1,128
|
)
|
|
|
(19.3
|
%)
|
|
$
|
(35,056
|
)
|
|
|
(2604.5
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for
income taxes
|
|
$
|
(9,214
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Deferred income tax asset consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
92,893
|
|
|
$
|
108,984
|
|
Net operating loss carry forwards, expire through 2016
|
|
|
62,819
|
|
|
|
44,485
|
|
Unrealized losses on available for sale securities
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
Unrealized loss in valuation of trading derivative instruments
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Other
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
156,846
|
|
|
|
157,065
|
|
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
155,621
|
|
|
|
156,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan origination costs
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Unrealized gains in valuation of cash flow
hedge derivative instruments
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax asset, net
|
|
$
|
154,481
|
|
|
$
|
155,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
896
|
|
Increase in valuation allowance
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on generating sufficient future taxable income
or capital gains. The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable could be reduced in
the near term if estimates of future taxable income or capital gains are not met.
15.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ACTIVITIES
In the normal course of business, the Company becomes a party to credit related financial
instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of its customers. These
financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and commercial letters of credit. These
instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the
amount recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. The contract or
notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in
particular classes of financial instruments.
33
Commitments to Extend Credit and Letters of Credit
The Companys exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the
financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, commitments under credit card arrangements
and standby and commercial letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of
those instruments, which does not necessarily represent the amount potentially subject to risk. In
addition, the measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when
all related and offsetting transactions are identified. The Company uses the same credit policies
in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation
of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or
other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are
expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customers credit worthiness on a
case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary upon extension of
credit, is based on managements credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but
may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income producing
commercial properties. At June 30, 2009, the Company had an allowance for unfunded loan commitments
totaling $89,000 included in Accrued expenses and liabilities in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statements of financial condition. At December 31, 2008, there was no such allowance
for unfunded loan commitments as the exposures were adequately collateralized or were not
considered significant.
Commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company on behalf of a
customer authorizing a third party to draw drafts on the Company up to a stipulated amount and with
specified terms and conditions.
The Company issues financial standby letters of credit to guarantee the performance of various
customers to third parties. If the customer fails to meet its financial or performance obligation
to the third party under the terms of the contract, then, upon their request, the Company would be
obligated to make the payment to the guaranteed party. In accordance with the provisions of FIN No.
45, at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company recorded a liability of $133,000 and
$348,000, respectively, which represents the fair value of the obligation undertaken to stand ready
to perform in issuing the guarantees under the standby letters of credit. The fair value
approximates the fee received from the customer for issuing such commitments. These fees are
deferred and recognized over the commitment period. The contract amounts in standby letters of
credit outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, shown in the table below, represent the
maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under the
guarantees in the event of nonperformance by the customers. These standby letters of credit are
used by the customer as a credit enhancement and typically expire without being drawn upon. The
Companys standby letters of credit are generally secured, and in the event of nonperformance by
the customers, the Company has rights to the underlying collateral provided, which normally
includes cash and marketable securities, real estate, receivables and others. Management does not
anticipate any material losses related to these standby letters of credit.
34
The contract amount of financial instruments, whose amounts represent credit risk was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Commitments to extend credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rates
|
|
$
|
15,268
|
|
|
$
|
9,389
|
|
Variable rates
|
|
|
192,631
|
|
|
|
312,212
|
|
Unused lines of credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
90,706
|
|
|
|
152,455
|
|
Credit cards and other
|
|
|
88,384
|
|
|
|
111,978
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
30,422
|
|
|
|
31,222
|
|
Commercial letters of credit
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
4,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
418,637
|
|
|
$
|
621,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company did not record any loss allowances in
connection with risks involved in off-balance sheet credit-related financial instruments, other
than $89,000 allowance for losses on unfunded loan commitments recorded at June 30, 2009. At June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, there were no additional off-balance sheet credit-related financial
instruments other than those mentioned above.
16.
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
One of the main risks facing the Company is interest rate risk, which includes the risk that
changes in interest rates will result in changes in the value and in the cash flows of the
Companys assets and liabilities and the risk that net interest income will change in response to
changes in interest rates. The Company maintains an overall interest rate risk management strategy
that, from time to time, incorporates the use of derivative instruments to minimize significant
unplanned fluctuations in earnings and cash flows caused by interest rate volatility. Additionally,
the Company holds derivative instruments for the benefit of its commercial customers. The Company
does not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes.
The Companys interest rate risk management strategy involves modifying the repricing
characteristics of certain financial instruments so that changes in interest rates do not adversely
affect the Companys net interest margin. Derivative instruments that the Company may use as part
of its interest rate risk management strategy include interest rate swaps, indexed options and
interest rate caps. These transactions involve both credit and market risk. The notional amounts
are amounts on which calculations, payments and the value of the derivative are based. Notional
amounts do not represent direct credit exposures. Direct credit exposure is limited to the net
difference between the calculated amounts to be received and paid, if any. The fair value of a
derivative is based on the estimated amount the Company would receive or pay to terminate the
derivative contract, taking into account the current interest rates and the creditworthiness of the
counterparty. The fair value of the derivatives is reflected on the Companys condensed statements
of financial condition as derivative assets and derivative liabilities.
35
The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by the
counterparties to these agreements. The Company controls the credit risk of its financial contracts
through credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures, and does not expect any counterparties
to fail their obligations. The Company deals only with primary dealers.
Derivative instruments are generally negotiated over-the-counter (OTC) contracts. Negotiated OTC
derivatives are generally entered into between two counterparties that negotiate specific agreement
terms, including the underlying instrument, amount, exercise price and maturity. OTC contracts
generally consist of swaps, caps and Standard & Poors 500 Composite Stock Index options.
Interest-rate swap contracts generally involve the exchange of fixed and floating-rate interest
payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying principal amounts. Entering into
interest-rate swap contracts involves not only the risk of dealing with counterparties and their
ability to meet the terms of the contracts, but also the interest rate risk associated with
unmatched positions. Interest rate swaps are the most common type of derivative contracts that the
Company utilizes.
Indexed options are contracts that the Company enters into in order to receive the average
appreciation of the month end value of the Standard & Poors 500 Composite Stock Index over a
specified period in exchange for the payment of a premium when the contract is initiated. The
credit risk inherent in the indexed options is the risk that the exchange party may default.
Interest rate caps represent a right to receive cash if a reference interest rate rises above a
contractual strike rate; therefore, its value increases as reference interest rates rise. Interest
rate caps protect against rising interest rates. The credit risk inherent in the interest rate cap
is the risk that the exchange party may default.
The Company utilizes interest rate swaps (CD Swaps) to convert a portion of its long-term,
callable, fixed-rate brokered certificates of deposit (CDs) or firm commitments to originate
long-term, callable, fixed-rate brokered CDs to a variable rate. The purpose of entering into these
CD Swaps is to hedge the risk of changes in the fair value of certain brokered CDs or firm
commitments to originate brokered CDs attributable to changes in the LIBOR rate (interest rate
risk). The hedged brokered CDs are typically structured with terms of 3 to 20 years with a call
option on the Companys part, but no surrender option for the CD holder, other than for death or
disability. The extended term of the brokered CDs minimizes liquidity risk while the option to call
the CDs after the first year provides the Company with funding flexibility.
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities- Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
and discontinued the
use of fair value hedge accounting of SFAS No. 133 on these CD Swaps. This Statement allows
entities to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value with any
changes in fair value reflected in earnings. The Company elected to measure at fair value the
brokered deposits being hedged with the CD Swaps. The fair value option may be applied on an
instrument-by-instrument basis. One of the main considerations in the determination for the
adoption of SFAS No. 159 was to eliminate the operational procedures required by the long-haul
method of accounting in terms of documentation, effectiveness assessment, and manual procedures
followed by the Company to fulfill the requirements specified by SFAS No. 133 (see Note 17).
36
The Company offers its customers an equity-linked certificate of deposit that has a return linked
to the performance of the Standard & Poors 500 Composite Stock Index. Under SFAS No. 133, a
certificate of deposit that pays interest based on changes on an equity index is a hybrid
instrument that requires separation into a host contract (the certificate of deposit) and an
embedded derivative contract (written equity call option). At the end of five years, the depositor
will receive a specified percent of the average increase of the month-end value of the stock index.
If such index decreases, the depositor receives the principal without any interest. The Company
enters into an offsetting derivative contract (indexed option agreement that has a return linked to
the performance of the Standard & Poors 500 Composite Stock Index) to economically hedge the
exposure taken through the issuance of equity-linked certificates of deposit. Under the option
agreements, the Company will receive the average increase in the month-end value of the index in
exchange for the payment of a premium when the contract is initiated. Since the embedded derivative
and the derivative contract entered into by the Company do not qualify for hedging accounting,
these derivatives are recorded at fair value with offsetting gains and losses recognized within
noninterest income in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The Company also enters into derivative contracts (including interest rate swaps and interest rate
caps) for the benefit of commercial customers. The Company may economically hedge significant
exposures related to these derivatives by entering into offsetting third-party contracts with
approved, reputable counterparties with substantially matching terms. Credit risk arises from the
possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. The Companys exposure
is limited to the replacement value of the contracts rather than the notional, principal or
contract amounts. The Company minimizes the credit risk through credit approvals, limits,
counterparty collateral and monitoring procedures. Since these derivatives do not qualify for
hedging accounting, they are recorded at fair value with offsetting gains and losses recognized
within noninterest income in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, there were no credit downgrades to
counterparties of derivative contracts.
In addition, the Company designates as hedging instruments the purchase or sale firm commitments
(fixed-price purchase or sale contracts) in a cash flow hedge of the variability of the
consideration to be paid or received in the forecasted purchase or sale of investment securities
that will occur upon gross settlement of the derivative contract itself.
37
The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments, excluding accrued
interest, and the location in the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative designated as cash flow hedge:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price purchase contract
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,333
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedge:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CD swaps
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
120,525
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
Interest rate swaps with commercial loan borrowers
|
|
|
146,590
|
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
|
|
171,972
|
|
|
|
11,660
|
|
Interest rate cap used to offset exposure of
interest rate cap with commercial loan borrowers
|
|
|
43,053
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
43,251
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Purchased options used to manage exposure
to the stock market on equity indexed deposits
|
|
|
56,699
|
|
|
|
2,968
|
|
|
|
72,370
|
|
|
|
6,806
|
|
Right to offset effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
246,342
|
|
|
$
|
11,354
|
|
|
$
|
408,118
|
|
|
$
|
18,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in accrued expenses and other liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps used to offset exposure of
interest rate swaps with commercial loan borrowers
|
|
$
|
146,590
|
|
|
$
|
8,523
|
|
|
$
|
171,972
|
|
|
$
|
12,051
|
|
Interest rate cap with commercial loan borrowers
|
|
|
43,053
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
43,251
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
CD swaps
|
|
|
17,300
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right to offset effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
206,943
|
|
|
$
|
8,671
|
|
|
$
|
215,223
|
|
|
$
|
11,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded options on equity indexed deposits
|
|
$
|
54,700
|
|
|
$
|
3,353
|
|
|
$
|
69,444
|
|
|
$
|
6,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable (included in accrued expenses and
other liabilities) on interest rate swaps were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Accrued Interest
|
|
|
Accrued Interest
|
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Payable
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
CD Swaps
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
Interest rate swaps with commercial loan borrowers
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps used to offset exposure of
interest rate swaps with commercial loan borrowers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
407
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
|
$
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments and the location in
the condensed consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months
|
|
|
For the six months ended
|
|
|
|
ended June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedge:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price purchase contracts
|
|
$
|
4,333
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,333
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedge:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in net gain (loss) on derivative instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps with commercial loan borrower
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
(2,990
|
)
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
|
$
|
3,989
|
|
Interest rate swaps used to offset exposure of
interest rate swaps with commercial loan borrower
|
|
|
1,793
|
|
|
|
4,446
|
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
(2,416
|
)
|
Interest rate cap with commercial loan borrower
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Interest rate cap used to offset exposure of
interest rate cap with commercial loan borrower
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Purchased options used to manage exposure
to the stock market on equity indexed deposits
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
(1,317
|
)
|
|
|
(1,537
|
)
|
|
|
(6,046
|
)
|
Embedded options on equity indexed deposits
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
1,905
|
|
|
|
1,593
|
|
|
|
5,021
|
|
CD swaps
|
|
|
(2,185
|
)
|
|
|
(3,589
|
)
|
|
|
(3,879
|
)
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(436
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,501
|
)
|
|
$
|
(118
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the types of swaps used and their terms follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Pay floating/receive fixed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount
|
|
$
|
163,890
|
|
|
$
|
292,497
|
|
Weighted average receive rate at period end
|
|
|
5.19
|
%
|
|
|
5.06
|
%
|
Weighted average pay rate at period end
(100% floating rate over three month LIBOR, plus
a spread ranging from minus .40% to plus .03%)
|
|
|
0.93
|
%
|
|
|
2.78
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed/receive floating:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount
|
|
$
|
146,590
|
|
|
$
|
171,972
|
|
Weighted average receive rate at period end
(100% floating rate over one or three month LIBOR)
|
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
|
|
2.70
|
%
|
Weighted average pay rate at period end
|
|
|
5.24
|
%
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
39
The changes in notional amount of swaps outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2009
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
464,469
|
|
New swaps
|
|
|
|
|
Called and matured swaps
|
|
|
(153,989
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
310,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009, the maturities of interest rate swaps, embedded options and purchased
options by year were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Embedded
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
Period Ending
December 31,
|
|
Contract (1)
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
Caps
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
2009
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,259
|
|
|
$
|
1,457
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,571
|
|
|
|
16,469
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,860
|
|
|
|
8,206
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,843
|
|
|
|
8,234
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,106
|
|
|
|
11,434
|
|
|
|
11,593
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,733
|
|
|
|
10,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
310,480
|
|
|
$
|
86,106
|
|
|
$
|
54,700
|
|
|
$
|
56,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Mature within 20 days.
|
Swap agreements amounting to $17.3 million at June 30, 2009, provide the counterparties the
option to cancel the swap agreements on any interest payment date after the first anniversary
(matching the call option that Westernbank has purchased on the certificates of deposit).
At June 30, 2009, the specific collateral held by the counterparties consisted of investment
securities available for sale with a carrying value of $17.9 million.
17.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
, which
provides a framework for measuring fair value under accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy,
which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad
levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).
A financial instruments categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest
level of input that is significant to the instruments fair value measurement. The three
levels within the fair value hierarchy are described as follows:
40
Level 1 Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 1 assets and liabilities include
equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury
and other U.S. government and agency securities and corporate debt securities that are traded by
dealers or brokers in active markets.
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include: quoted prices for similar
assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or
liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for
the asset or liability; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable
market data by correlation or other means. Level 2 assets and liabilities include (i)
mortgage-backed securities for which the fair value is estimated based on the value of identical or
comparable assets, (ii) debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than
exchange-traded instruments and (iii) derivative contracts and financial liabilities (e.g.,
brokered deposits elected for fair value option under SFAS 159) whose value is determined using a
pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or
corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability for which there is little, if any, market
activity at the measurement date. Unobservable inputs reflect the Companys own assumptions about
what market participants would use to price the asset or liability. The inputs are developed based
on the best information available in the circumstances, which might include the Companys own
financial data such as internally developed pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, as
well as instruments for which the fair value determination requires significant management
judgment.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 159, which allows an entity the irrevocable
option to elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets
and liabilities on an instrument-by-instrument basis (fair value option). Upon election of the
fair value option in accordance with SFAS No. 159, subsequent changes in fair value are recorded as
an adjustment to earnings. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 resulted on cumulative adjustments of: (1)
$5.3 million increase to retained earnings; (2) $12.9 million decrease to deposits; (3) $4.2
million decrease to other assets; and (4) $3.4 million decrease to deferred income tax.
The disclosures required under SFAS No. 157, SFAS No. 159 and SFAS No. 107 have been included in
this Note.
Fair Value Option
The Company elected on January 1, 2008 to measure at fair value certain long-term, callable
brokered deposits (financial liabilities) that were hedged with interest rate swaps (SFAS 159
Brokered CDs) and were previously designated for fair value hedge accounting in accordance with
SFAS No. 133 (see Note 16). Electing the fair value option allows the Company to eliminate the
burden of complying with the requirements for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133 (e.g.,
documentation and effectiveness assessment) without introducing earnings volatility.
41
Interest rate
risk on the SFAS 159 Brokered CDs continues to be economically hedged with callable interest rate
swaps with the same terms and conditions. The Company did not elect the fair value option for the
vast majority of other brokered deposits because these are not hedged by derivatives.
The fair value of SFAS 159 Brokered CDs is obtained from non-binding third party pricing services.
The third party pricing service provider determines the fair value of the brokered deposits through
the use of discounted cash flow analyses over the full term of the CDs. The options component, the
callable feature, is valued using a Hull-White Interest Rate Tree approach, an industry-standard
approach for valuing instruments with interest rate call options. The model assumes that the
embedded options are exercised economically. The fair value of the CDs is computed using the
outstanding principal amount. The discount rates used are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates.
The fair value does not incorporate a credit risk spread, since the callable brokered deposits are
generally for amount less than the FDIC insurance.
Interest paid/accrued on SFAS 159 Brokered CDs is recorded as part of interest expense on deposits
and the accrued interest and the fair value (excluding accrued interest) of the SFAS 159 Brokered
CDs are reported within deposits in the condensed consolidated statement of financial condition.
Fair value changes are included in earnings within noninterest income in the condensed consolidated
statement of operations.
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, deposits included callable brokered deposits (see Note
10) measured at fair value with an aggregate fair value of $14,312,000 and $109,944,000, and
carrying principal balance of $14,513,000 and $109,281,000, respectively.
Changes in fair value and interest expense for callable brokered CDs measured at fair value
pursuant to election of the fair value option for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
(1)
|
|
$
|
411
|
|
|
$
|
3,269
|
|
|
$
|
864
|
|
|
$
|
(2,939
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income expense
|
|
$
|
298
|
|
|
$
|
3,426
|
|
|
$
|
1,148
|
|
|
$
|
8,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Reported in non-interest income as net gain (loss) on derivative instruments and deposits
measured at fair value in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
|
Estimated Fair Value
The information about the estimated fair value of financial instruments required by GAAP is
presented hereunder. The aggregate fair value amounts presented do not necessarily represent
managements estimate of the underlying value for the Company.
The estimated fair value of financial instruments is subjective in nature and involves
uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with
precision. Changes in the underlying assumptions used in calculating fair value could
42
significantly
affect the results. In addition, the fair value estimates are based on outstanding balances without
attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair values of
financial instruments as disclosed in these condensed consolidated financial statements as required
by SFAS No. 107,
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
:
Short-term Financial Assets and Liabilities
For financial instruments with a short-term or no
stated maturity, at prevailing market rates and limited credit risk, carrying amounts approximate
fair value. Those financial instruments include cash and due from banks, money market instruments,
certain deposits (passbook accounts, money market and checking accounts), federal funds purchased
and accrued interest.
Investment Securities Available for Sale, Held to Maturity and Trading Securities
The fair
values of most of the investment securities available for sale, held to maturity and trading
securities are estimated based on quotations received from pricing service firms and/or securities
dealers. These securities are generally classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy and
include U.S. Government and agencies obligations, Puerto Rico Government obligations, and
mortgage-backed securities. Equity securities are traded in an active exchange market and are
classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) Stock
FHLB stock is valued at its redemption value.
Residential Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
Fair value is based on the contract price at which
the mortgage loans are expected to be sold and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation
hierarchy.
Loans
Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial
characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as residential mortgage, commercial, consumer,
credit cards and other loans. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable
interest rate terms and by performing, nonperforming and loans with payments in arrears.
The fair value of performing loans, except residential mortgages and credit card
loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity dates using
estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the
loan. For performing residential mortgage loans, fair value is computed using an estimated market
rate based on secondary market sources adjusted to reflect differences in servicing and credit
costs. For credit card loans, cash flows and maturities are estimated based on contractual interest
rates and historical experience and are discounted using estimated market rates.
Fair value for significant nonperforming loans and certain loans with payments in arrears is
based on recent external appraisals of collateral. If appraisals are not available, estimated cash
flows are discounted using a rate that is commensurate with the risk associated with the estimated
cash flows. Assumptions regarding credit risk, cash flows, and discount rates are judgmentally
determined using available market information and specific borrower information.
43
Mortgage Servicing Rights
(MSRs)
The carrying amount of mortgage servicing rights, which is
evaluated periodically for impairment, approximates the fair value. MSRs do not trade in an active
market with readily observable prices. MSRs are priced internally using prices for similar assets
(which are based on discounted cash flow model with unobservable inputs). Due to the unobservable
nature of valuation inputs used by valuation model, the MSRs are classified within Level 3 of the
valuation hierarchy.
Deposits
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest bearing,
demand deposits, savings, NOW, and money market accounts is, for purpose of this disclosure, equal
to the amount payable on demand as of the respective dates. The fair value of fixed rate
certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using current
rates for certificates of deposit with similar terms and remaining maturities. The discount rate is
estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. For fair
value of SFAS 159 Brokered CDs refer to Fair Value Option section included in this Note. These
deposits are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
Resell Agreements, Repurchase Agreements, Advances from FHLB and Mortgage Note Payable
The
fair value of resell agreements, repurchase agreements, advances from FHLB and mortgage note
payable is based on the discounted value using rates currently available to the Company for
instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Derivative Assets and Derivative Liabilities
The fair value of the derivative instruments is
based on an independent valuation model that uses primarily observable market parameters, such as
yield curves, and takes into consideration the credit risk component, when appropriate. Derivatives
are mainly composed of interest rate swaps, indexed option contracts and caps. These derivatives
are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
Although most of the derivative instruments are fully collateralized, a credit spread is considered
for those that are not secured in full. The cumulative mark-to-market effect of credit risk in the
valuation of derivative instruments resulted in an unrealized gain (loss) of $69,000 and $(527,000)
as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Commitments to Extend Credit and Letters of Credit
The fair value of commitments to extend
credit and letters of credit are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements,
taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties credit standings.
44
The following table presents the estimated carrying value and fair value of the Companys financial
instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
56,035
|
|
|
$
|
56,035
|
|
|
$
|
68,368
|
|
|
$
|
68,368
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
|
|
|
589,432
|
|
|
|
589,432
|
|
|
|
1,096,465
|
|
|
|
1,096,465
|
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
3,808,935
|
|
|
|
3,808,935
|
|
|
|
3,670,241
|
|
|
|
3,670,241
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity
|
|
|
613,894
|
|
|
|
581,213
|
|
|
|
1,037,970
|
|
|
|
1,020,837
|
|
FHLB stock
|
|
|
38,752
|
|
|
|
38,752
|
|
|
|
64,190
|
|
|
|
64,190
|
|
Residential mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
39,562
|
|
|
|
39,562
|
|
|
|
18,871
|
|
|
|
18,871
|
|
Loans (excluding allowance for loan losses)
|
|
|
8,831,311
|
|
|
|
8,753,990
|
|
|
|
8,949,806
|
|
|
|
8,931,661
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
47,393
|
|
|
|
47,393
|
|
|
|
56,224
|
|
|
|
56,224
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
|
3,270
|
|
|
|
3,270
|
|
Derivatives, included in assets
|
|
|
15,687
|
|
|
|
15,687
|
|
|
|
18,371
|
|
|
|
18,371
|
|
Other
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing
|
|
|
289,198
|
|
|
|
289,198
|
|
|
|
250,380
|
|
|
|
250,380
|
|
Interest bearing
|
|
|
9,921,434
|
|
|
|
9,905,590
|
|
|
|
10,629,794
|
|
|
|
10,765,630
|
|
Embedded options on deposits
|
|
|
3,353
|
|
|
|
3,353
|
|
|
|
6,986
|
|
|
|
6,986
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
2,710,424
|
|
|
|
2,758,523
|
|
|
|
3,204,142
|
|
|
|
3,272,079
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
92,000
|
|
|
|
94,442
|
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
44,913
|
|
Mortgage note payable
|
|
|
34,642
|
|
|
|
34,642
|
|
|
|
34,932
|
|
|
|
35,401
|
|
Securities purchased but not yet received
|
|
|
301,875
|
|
|
|
301,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
96,867
|
|
|
|
98,867
|
|
|
|
127,141
|
|
|
|
127,141
|
|
Derivatives, included in liabilities
|
|
|
8,671
|
|
|
|
8,671
|
|
|
|
11,254
|
|
|
|
11,254
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12,062
|
|
|
|
12,062
|
|
|
|
12,403
|
|
|
|
12,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Credit Related
Financial Instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,585
|
|
Unused lines of credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
Credit cards and other
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
Commercial letters of credit
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
45
Financial Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The tables below presents the balance of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis, including financial liabilities for which the Company has elected the fair value
option as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale
(1)
|
|
$
|
72,806
|
|
|
$
|
3,736,129
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,808,935
|
|
Residential mortgage loans held for sale
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,315
|
|
Derivatives, included in other assets
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,687
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights, included in other assets
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered Deposits
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,312
|
|
Derivatives, included in deposits
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,353
|
|
Derivatives, included in accrued expenses
and other liabilities
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale (1)
|
|
$
|
2,912
|
|
|
$
|
3,667,329
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,670,241
|
|
Residential mortgage loans held for sale (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
Derivatives, included in other assets (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,371
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights, included in other assets (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,270
|
|
|
|
3,270
|
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered Deposits (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,944
|
|
Derivatives, included in deposits (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,986
|
|
Derivatives, included in accrued expenses
and other liabilities (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,254
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Carried at fair value prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 159.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents items to which the Company has elected the fair value option under SFAS No. 159.
|
Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis correspond to the mortgage
servicing rights, which amounted to $3,334,000 and $3,270,000 at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 the Company capitalized mortgage
servicing rights amounting to $266,000 and $225,000, respectively, and recognized an amortization
expense of them of $202,000 and $143,000, respectively. The carrying amount of mortgage servicing
rights, which is evaluated periodically for impairment, approximates the fair value (fair value is
estimated considering prices for similar assets). In 2008, there were no level 3 liabilities
measured at fair value.
There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 3 for financial instruments recorded at fair value
on a recurring basis during the three and six moths ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Financial Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair value usually result from
46
application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets. The
valuation methodologies used to measure these fair value adjustments are described above. For
assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in 2009 and 2008, that were still held on the
condensed statements of financial condition at period end, the following table provides the level
of valuation assumptions used to determine each adjustment and the carrying value of the related
individual assets or portfolios at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable
(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
758,707
|
|
|
$
|
97,881
|
|
Foreclosed real estate held for sale
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,411
|
|
|
|
3,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable (1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
772,423
|
|
|
$
|
128,983
|
|
Foreclosed real estate held for sale (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,030
|
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The impairment was
generally measured based on the fair value of the collateral in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 114. The fair values are
derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in
observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations
but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the
collateral (e.g. age and condition), which are not market observable
and have become significant to the fair value determination.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The fair value is derived from appraisals that take into consideration
prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar
locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of
the properties (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market
observable. Valuation allowance is based on market valuation
adjustments after the transfer from the loan portfolio to the
foreclosed real estate held for sale portfolio.
|
18.
SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Companys management monitors and manages the financial performance of three reportable
business segments, the traditional banking operations of Westernbank Puerto Rico, the activities of
the division known as Westernbank International, which includes the activities of Westernbank
Financial Center Corp. (Westernbank International) and the activities of the Asset-Based Lending
Unit, which specializes in asset-based commercial business lending. Other operations of the Company
not reportable in those segments include: Westernbank Trust Division, which offers trust services;
Westernbank International Trade Services Division, which specializes in international trade
products and services; SRG Net, Inc., which operates an electronic funds transfer network;
Westernbank Insurance Corp., which operates a general insurance agency; Westernbank World Plaza,
Inc., which operates the Westernbank World Plaza,
a 23-story office building located in Hato Rey, Puerto Rico; and the transactions of the parent
company only, which mainly consist of other income related to the equity in the net income (loss)
of its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
47
Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate
performance and to assess where to allocate resources. Other factors such as the Companys
organizational structure by divisions, nature of the products, distribution channels, and the
economic characteristics of the products were also considered in the determination of the
reportable segments. The Company evaluates performance based on net interest income and other
income. Operating expenses and the provision for income taxes are analyzed on a combined basis.
Westernbank Puerto Ricos traditional banking operations consist of Westernbanks retail
operations, such as its branches, including the branches of the Expresso division, together with
consumer loans, mortgage loans, commercial loans (excluding the asset-based lending operations),
investments (treasury) and deposit products. Consumer loans include loans such as personal,
collateralized personal loans, credit cards, and small loans. Commercial products consist of
commercial loans including commercial real estate, unsecured commercial and construction loans.
Westernbank International operates as an IBE under the International Banking Center Regulatory Act.
Westernbank Financial Center Corp. was incorporated to carry out commercial lending and other
related activities in the United States of America and commenced operations in February 2007. The
operations of Westernbank Financial Center Corp, was largely inactive, and was closed during the
third quarter of 2008. Westernbank Internationals business activities consist of commercial
banking and related services, and treasury and investment activities outside of Puerto Rico. As of
June 30 2009 and December 31, 2008, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
substantially all of Westernbank Internationals business activities consisted of investments in
securities by the U.S. Government or U.S. sponsored agencies and money market instruments with
entities located in the United States of America. Investment securities held by Westernbank
International amounted to $1.6 billion and $1.9 billion at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. These securities principally consisted of investment in U.S. Government agencies,
GNMA, FHLMC and FNMA. There are no investments in residual tranches. At June 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008, management concluded that there was no other-than-temporary impairment on Westernbank
Internationals investment securities portfolio (see Note 6). Money market instruments amounted to
$779,000 and $1.3 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Money market
instruments include interest bearing deposits with other financial institutions.
Intersegment sales and transfers, if any, are accounted for as if the sales or transfers were to
third parties, that is, at current market prices.
Substantially all of the Companys business activities are with customers located in the United
States of America and its territories (mainly in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico). In addition, all
of the Companys long-lived assets are located in Puerto Rico.
The financial information presented below was derived from the internal management accounting
system and does not necessarily represent each segments financial condition and results of
operations as if these were independent entities.
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Westernbank
|
|
|
Westernbank
|
|
|
Asset-Based
|
|
|
Total major
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Lending Unit
|
|
|
segments
|
|
|
Segments
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
$
|
34,074
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,074
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,074
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
19,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,902
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
121,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,119
|
|
|
|
145,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,521
|
|
Mortgage loans
|
|
|
36,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,014
|
|
Treasury and investment activities
|
|
|
48,494
|
|
|
|
29,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,970
|
|
|
|
3,010
|
|
|
|
(4,410
|
)
|
|
|
76,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
259,886
|
|
|
|
29,476
|
|
|
|
24,119
|
|
|
|
313,481
|
|
|
|
3,010
|
|
|
|
(4,410
|
)
|
|
|
312,081
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
219,850
|
|
|
|
22,713
|
|
|
|
17,630
|
|
|
|
260,193
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
(4,410
|
)
|
|
|
255,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
40,036
|
|
|
|
6,763
|
|
|
|
6,489
|
|
|
|
53,288
|
|
|
|
2,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit (provision) for loan losses
|
|
|
(20,291
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
(19,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service and other charges on loans
|
|
|
3,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
4,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,534
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
Other fees and commisions
|
|
|
7,499
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,501
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
8,193
|
|
Trust account fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
992
|
|
Insurance commission fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
892
|
|
Net gain on derivative instruments and
deposits measured at fair value
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
Net gain on sales and valuation of loans
held for sale, securities and other assets
|
|
|
32,603
|
|
|
|
4,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
49,082
|
|
|
|
4,679
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
54,593
|
|
|
|
2,767
|
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
57,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
(4,188
|
)
|
|
|
3,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income and
noninterest income
|
|
$
|
69,095
|
|
|
$
|
11,442
|
|
|
$
|
7,633
|
|
|
$
|
88,170
|
|
|
$
|
1,424
|
|
|
$
|
3,729
|
|
|
$
|
93,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
13,596,097
|
|
|
$
|
1,689,067
|
|
|
$
|
741,773
|
|
|
$
|
16,026,937
|
|
|
$
|
1,677,291
|
|
|
$
|
(3,313,980
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,390,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Westernbank
|
|
|
Westernbank
|
|
|
Asset-Based
|
|
|
Total major
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Lending Unit
|
|
|
segments
|
|
|
Segments
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
$
|
17,170
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,170
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,170
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
9,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,797
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
58,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,458
|
|
|
|
70,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,720
|
|
Mortgage loans
|
|
|
17,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,564
|
|
Treasury and investment activities
|
|
|
24,050
|
|
|
|
13,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,481
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
(2,568
|
)
|
|
|
36,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
126,843
|
|
|
|
13,431
|
|
|
|
12,458
|
|
|
|
152,732
|
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
(2,568
|
)
|
|
|
151,685
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
106,113
|
|
|
|
11,442
|
|
|
|
8,573
|
|
|
|
126,128
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(2,568
|
)
|
|
|
123,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
20,730
|
|
|
|
1,989
|
|
|
|
3,885
|
|
|
|
26,604
|
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit (provision) for loan losses
|
|
|
(13,515
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,391
|
|
|
|
(11,124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service and other charges on loans
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
2,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,293
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
Other fees and commisions
|
|
|
3,814
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,816
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
4,163
|
|
Trust account fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
491
|
|
Insurance commission fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
Net loss on derivative instruments and
deposits measured at fair value
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
Net gain on sales and valuation of loans
held for sale, securities and other assets
|
|
|
16,092
|
|
|
|
2,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
23,879
|
|
|
|
2,228
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
26,541
|
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
27,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(5,346
|
)
|
|
|
5,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income and
noninterest income (loss)
|
|
$
|
31,073
|
|
|
$
|
4,217
|
|
|
$
|
6,710
|
|
|
$
|
42,000
|
|
|
$
|
(2,654
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,267
|
|
|
$
|
44,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 and for the six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Westernbank
|
|
|
Westernbank
|
|
|
Asset-Based
|
|
|
Total major
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Lending Unit
|
|
|
segments
|
|
|
Segments
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
$
|
36,059
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,059
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,059
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
30,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,284
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
163,454
|
|
|
|
1,159
|
|
|
|
28,837
|
|
|
|
193,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,450
|
|
Mortgage loans
|
|
|
38,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,795
|
|
Treasury and investment activities
|
|
|
79,463
|
|
|
|
42,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,633
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
(1,743
|
)
|
|
|
122,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
348,055
|
|
|
|
43,329
|
|
|
|
28,837
|
|
|
|
420,221
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
(1,743
|
)
|
|
|
421,493
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
286,632
|
|
|
|
34,821
|
|
|
|
24,627
|
|
|
|
346,080
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
(1,743
|
)
|
|
|
345,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
61,423
|
|
|
|
8,508
|
|
|
|
4,210
|
|
|
|
74,141
|
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit (provision) for loan losses
|
|
|
(23,991
|
)
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
(6,843
|
)
|
|
|
(29,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service and other charges on loans
|
|
|
4,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
5,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,202
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
6,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,052
|
|
Other fees and commisions
|
|
|
8,830
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,848
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
9,768
|
|
Trust account fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
905
|
|
Insurance commission fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
816
|
|
Net gain on derivative instruments and
deposits measured at fair value
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
Net gain (loss) on sales and valuation of
loans held for sale, securities and other
assets
|
|
|
15,779
|
|
|
|
(1,450
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
36,238
|
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
35,653
|
|
|
|
2,842
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
38,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
34,533
|
|
|
|
(35,072
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income and
noninterest income (loss)
|
|
$
|
74,209
|
|
|
$
|
8,607
|
|
|
$
|
(1,786
|
)
|
|
$
|
81,030
|
|
|
$
|
39,682
|
|
|
$
|
(35,273
|
)
|
|
$
|
85,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
14,022,308
|
|
|
$
|
2,033,476
|
|
|
$
|
765,690
|
|
|
$
|
16,821,474
|
|
|
$
|
1,628,524
|
|
|
$
|
(3,167,101
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,282,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Westernbank
|
|
|
Westernbank
|
|
|
Asset-Based
|
|
|
Total major
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Lending Unit
|
|
|
segments
|
|
|
Segments
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
$
|
17,260
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,260
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,260
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
12,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,439
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
79,430
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
12,832
|
|
|
|
92,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,765
|
|
Mortgage loans
|
|
|
19,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,651
|
|
Treasury and investment activities
|
|
|
37,136
|
|
|
|
19,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,287
|
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
|
(889
|
)
|
|
|
56,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
165,916
|
|
|
|
19,654
|
|
|
|
12,832
|
|
|
|
198,402
|
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
|
|
(889
|
)
|
|
|
199,020
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
140,283
|
|
|
|
14,887
|
|
|
|
11,660
|
|
|
|
166,830
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
(889
|
)
|
|
|
166,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
25,633
|
|
|
|
4,767
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
31,572
|
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit (provision) for loan losses
|
|
|
(17,974
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3,619
|
|
|
|
(14,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service and other charges on loans
|
|
|
2,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
2,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,717
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
2,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,983
|
|
Other fees and commisions
|
|
|
4,379
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,382
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
4,865
|
|
Trust account fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
339
|
|
Insurance commission fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
483
|
|
Net gain on derivative instruments and
deposits measured at fair value
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
Net gain on sales and valuation of loans
held for sale, securities and other assets
|
|
|
13,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
24,868
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
25,341
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
26,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
38,090
|
|
|
|
(37,908
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income and
noninterest income
|
|
$
|
32,345
|
|
|
$
|
4,779
|
|
|
$
|
5,261
|
|
|
$
|
42,385
|
|
|
$
|
40,722
|
|
|
$
|
(38,003
|
)
|
|
$
|
45,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
19.
CONTINGENCIES
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has various outstanding commitments and contingent
liabilities that are not reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
In addition, the Company is a defendant in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. In the opinion of management, in consultation with internal and external legal
counsels, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
LAWSUITS
The following describes the material legal proceedings that (1) were pending as of June 30, 2009;
(2) were terminated during the period covered by this report; or (3) are pending as of the filing
of this report. Thus, the description of a matter may include developments that occurred since
June 30, 2009, as well as those that occurred during the period covered by this report.
Shareholder Securities Class Action
. In September and October 2007, three separate
complaints, entitled Hildenbrand v. W Holding Company, Inc., et al., C.A.No. 07-1886 FAB (D.P.R.),
Webb v. W Holding Company, Inc., et al., C.A.No. 07-1915 FAB (D.P.R.), and Saavedra v. W Holding
Company, Inc., et al., C.A.No. 07-1931 FAB (D.P.R), were filed in the United States District Court
for the District of Puerto Rico as putative class actions against the Company, Westernbank and
certain of their current or former officers and directors. Thereafter, all three cases were
consolidated into the Hildenbrand action.
Following the filing of motions mandated by statute, the Court appointed Felix Rivera, Jose A.
Nicolao, Fundacion Rios Pasarell, Inc. and Efren E. Moreno as lead plaintiffs in Hildenbrand.
Pursuant to an agreed scheduling order, the lead plaintiffs Consolidated Amended Complaint was
filed April 28, 2008. The complaint names as defendants the Company and Westernbank, as well as
current and former officers of the Company and Westernbank. The complaint alleges that the
individual defendants engaged the Company and Westernbank in a fraudulent lending scheme and issued
misleading information to the market, principally in connection with the timing and reporting of
impairments to loans to Inyx that are described below. Plaintiffs allege that these actions
artificially inflated the trading prices of the Companys securities. The plaintiffs brought the
action on behalf of all those who purchased the Companys securities during the period between
April 24, 2006 and June 26, 2007, claiming violation of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act (and Rule
10b-5 promulgated thereunder) by the Company, Westernbank and the individual defendants, as well as
violation of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act by the individual defendants. Plaintiffs are seeking
unspecified damages for the class arising from alleged economic losses from investing in the
Companys securities.
The Company and individual defendants filed motions to dismiss, arguing that the Consolidated
Amended Complaint lacks particularized factual allegations required to state claims for securities
fraud under Sections 10(b) and 20(a). Briefing on the motions was completed on September 10, 2008.
On March 24, 2009, the Court denied the defendants motions to dismiss. On April 7, 2009, the
Company and the individual defendants (except for a former officer of the Company and Westernbank)
filed a motion for reconsideration or, in the alternative, for certification of an interlocutory
appeal, and the former officer of the Company and Westernbank joined in that motion on April 15,
2009. Discovery was stayed while the defendants motion was pending.
51
After briefing by the parties,
the defendants motion for reconsideration and the request for certification of an interlocutory
appeal were denied by the Court on July 28, 2009.
On August 11, 2009, the Company and Westernbank filed their answer to the Consolidated Amended
Complaint, denying liability and raising numerous affirmative defenses to the claims asserted
against them. On August 25, 2009, all individual defendants, except for a former officer of the
Company and Westernbank, filed their answers to the Consolidated Amended Complaint, also denying
liability and raising numerous affirmative defenses to the claims asserted against them.
On October 13, 2009, a former officer of the Company and Westernbank filed his answer to the
Consolidated Amended Complaint, denying liability and raising numerous affirmative defenses, and
also asserting cross-claims against the other defendants, including the Company and Westernbank,
and third-party claims against numerous other current or former officers, directors, or
shareholders. In his cross-claims, the former officer of the Company and Westernbank claims a right
to indemnification for any judgment entered against him and a right to join the class as a
purchaser of Company stock during the alleged class period.
The Company, Westernbank, and several individual and third-party defendants have moved to dismiss the claims asserted by the former officer and also moved to strike portions of his answer. The former officer has responded to those motions, including a request for leave to amend.
The initial pre-trial conference is set for December 18, 2009, and preliminary dates for the end of
discovery and trial are set for May 10, 2010 and August 2, 2010, respectively, although the parties
have agreed to request an extension of these dates at the initial pre-trial conference.
The Company intends to vigorously defend this action.
Shareholder Derivative Action
. On January 11, 2008, Hunter Wylie, who claims to be a Company
shareholder, filed a shareholder derivative complaint (the Complaint), entitled Wylie v. Stipes,
et al., and W Holding Company, Inc., C.A.No. 08-1036 GAG (D.P.R.), in the United States District
Court for the District of Puerto Rico, purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain of the
Companys current and former officers and directors, and named the Company as a nominal defendant.
Plaintiff contends that since April 2006 the individual named defendants caused the Company to
overstate the value of its loan portfolio, principally in connection with the timing and reporting
of impairments to loans to Inyx that are described below, and thereby allegedly caused monetary and
reputational losses to the Company. After the Company and individual defendants moved to dismiss on
April 7, 2008, the plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on June 9, 2008, alleging breach of
fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment, violation of the Title 14, Section
2727 of the laws of Puerto Rico, and a claim for reimbursement under Section 304 of the U.S.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Amended Complaint seeks unspecified monetary damages for the Companys
benefit from the individual defendants and a court order directing the Company to alter its
governance policies. The Company and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the Amended
Complaint, arguing principally that plaintiff failed to make a pre-suit demand on the Companys
Board of Directors, and thus lacks standing to proceed with this derivative action, that plaintiff
otherwise failed to allege facts sufficient to state claims for relief, and that there is no
private right of action under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Briefing on the motions to
dismiss was completed on December 16, 2008. On February 2, 2009, the Court entered an Opinion and
Order granting the
52
motions to dismiss in part and denying them in part. The Court dismissed Count I
of the Amended Complaint (claiming reimbursement under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act) in
its entirety, dismissed Count IV (alleging unjust enrichment) as to certain defendants, and denied
the motions to dismiss as to the other counts challenged therein.
Following the Courts February 2, 2009 Order on the motion to dismiss, the Companys board of
directors formed a Special Litigation Committee (the SLC) and charged it with full and exclusive
authority to investigate, review and analyze the facts and circumstances that are the subject of
the Wylie lawsuit and to determine what action should be taken on behalf of the Company with
respect to plaintiffs claims. The SLC has engaged the law firm of Conception, Sexton & Martinez of
Coral Gables, Florida to assist in carrying out its charge. On April 22, 2009, the SLC moved the
Court to stay the case to permit the SLC time to conduct its investigation and, if necessary, take
action on the Companys behalf. On June 5, 2009, the Court granted the SLCs motion, staying the
case until August 24, 2009.
Subsequent to August 24, 2009, the Company filed an answer to the Amended Complaint as nominal
defendant, and the remaining defendants (except for a former officer of the Company and
Westernbank) filed answers to the Amended Complaint, denying liability and raising
numerous affirmative defenses to the claims asserted against them, but no other litigation
activities, including discovery, have commenced.
On December 15, 2009, the SLC filed its report with the Court under seal and moved to dismiss all remaining counts against all defendants.
The Company intends to vigorously defend this action.
SEC Informal Inquiry
- The SEC has requested information and documentation relating to
Westernbanks loans to Inyx. The Company has provided that information and the documents to the SEC
Staff on a voluntary basis.
Litigation Relating to the Inyx Loan
Westernbank Puerto Rico v. Kachkar, et al., 07-civ.-1606
(ADC-BJM) (D.P.R.) and member cases Inyx, Inc., et al. v. W Holding Company, Inc., et al, Civil No.
08-2428 (ADC-BJM) and Kachkar, et al. v. Westernbank Puerto Rico, Civil No. 08-2427 (ADC-BJM):
Westernbank filed an initial complaint against Inyx, Inc., Jack Kachkar, Inyxs Chief Executive
Officer, and certain other officers in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto
Rico on July 5, 2007, and amended the complaint on August 23, 2007. In its amended filing,
Westernbank alleges violations of the U.S. Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
(RICO) and other fraud-based claims, as well as claims related to alleged breaches of certain
loan agreements and guarantees. Westernbank, among other things: (a) seeks damages of over $142
million against the defendants under, among other causes of action, RICO; (b) requests payment of
over $142 million from the defendants on amounts due and payable under certain loan agreements; and
(c) requests that the Court order foreclosure on Westernbanks collateral. On September 20, 2007,
Westernbank moved to freeze certain of defendants assets. On July 23, 2008, a Report and
Recommendation was issued by the Magistrate Judge recommending that Westernbanks motion to freeze
assets be granted (the Asset Freeze Report and Recommendation).
53
All defendants moved to dismiss and certain defendants moved alternatively to stay or transfer the
case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in which they had, at
that time, two other cases pending. The two cases were: (1) Kachkar, et al v. Westernbank Puerto
Rico (Florida Circuit Court Case No. 07-22573-CA-40) and (2) Inyx v. Westernbank, et al. (Florida
Circuit Court 07-26412-CA-30). The first of these cases was filed on July 23, 2007, when Jack
Kachkar and Viktoria Benkovitch filed a complaint against Westernbank in the Circuit Court for the
11th Circuit of Miami-Dade County, Florida. The complaint alleges that Kachkar and Benkovitch
should not have to perform their obligations under the guarantees, security agreements, and asset
pledges they provided to Westernbank, and asserts causes of action for: (1) fraudulent inducement
and damages; (2) rescission of instruments based on fraudulent conduct and/or lack of
consideration; (3) slander of title and damages; and (4) violation of Floridas Deceptive and
Unfair Trade Practices Act. This action was subsequently removed to the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Florida under the caption Kachkar and Benkovitch v. Westernbank Puerto Rico,
Civil No. 07-22140-Cooke (the Kachkar Case). The second case was filed on August 17, 2007, when
Inyx filed a complaint against Westernbank, the Company and certain current and former officers of
the Company and Westernbank in the Circuit Court for the 11th Circuit of Miami-Dade County,
Florida. Inyx alleged that a promissory note and mortgage that Inyx provided to Westernbank during
the course of the business relationship between the parties should be rescinded, and that Inyx
should be awarded damages because Westernbank allegedly breached an oral forbearance agreement to
refrain from collecting on loans it had made to Inyx and its subsidiaries, and because Westernbank
failed to provide additional financing to these companies. This action was subsequently removed to
the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida under the caption Inyx, Inc. v.
Westernbank Puerto Rico, et. al., Civil No. 07-22409-Cooke (the Inyx Case). On September 25,
2008, the Kachkar Case was consolidated into the Inyx Case in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Florida (the Florida Consolidated Cases).
On April 17, 2008, all the transfer motions were denied. On September 5, 2008, the Magistrate Judge
issued another Report and Recommendation by which he recommended that all of the defendants
motions to dismiss be denied. On September 22, 2008, the defendants, except for Inyx, filed their
respective objections to the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation concerning the motions to
dismiss. On October 9, 2008, Westernbank filed its response to the defendants objections to this
Report and Recommendation.
On September 8, 2008, Westernbank filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the breach of
contract claims. On March 3, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued a third Report and Recommendation,
this time recommending that Westernbanks Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the breach of
contract claims be granted (the Summary Judgment Report and Recommendation). Among other things,
the Magistrate Judge recommended that defendants Kachkar and Benkovitch be personally liable under
certain personal guarantees for $100.1 million.
On October 3, 2008, all of the defendants filed their respective answers to Westernbanks Amended
Complaint. Some of the defendants (Kachkar, Benkovitch, Inyx, Inc., and Green) also filed
counterclaims. On December 2, 2008, Westernbank filed a motion to dismiss the original
counterclaims filed by the defendants Kachkar, Benkovitch, Green and Inyx pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.
12(b)(6). On January 14, 2009, defendants Kachkar, Benkovitch, Inyx and Green filed amended answers
to Westernbanks First Amended Complaint and Kachkar,
54
Benkovitch and Inyx filed amended
counterclaims. Defendant Green withdrew his counterclaim against Westernbank for alleged
defamation. The Amended Counterclaims can be categorized into five distinct groups. The primary set
of counterclaims, raised by Inyx, Kachkar, and Benkovitch, seeks enforcement of an alleged oral
forbearance and workout agreement between Westernbank, Inyx, Kachkar, and Benkovitch related to
approximately $142 million in loans that Westernbank had made to Inyx and its subsidiaries under
various written loan agreements. The second subject of the counterclaims is the claim brought by
Inyx alleging that Westernbank breached the agreements and otherwise breached an implied covenant
of good faith and fair dealing by not giving Inyx ten days to pay the amounts then outstanding
(close to $140 million), and by abruptly placing Inyx into administration in the United Kingdom.
The third set of counterclaims involves allegations that Westernbank either breached a
confidentiality agreement relating to Kachkars supposed business relationship with Mr. Saadi
Gadhafi, or tortiously interfered with that relationship. A fourth set of counterclaims revolves
around the allegation that Westernbank breached an unwritten escrow agreement allegedly entered
into on or about the 20th of June, 2007. The fifth and final set of counterclaims is composed of
Kachkars and Benkovitchs claims relating to their real estate in Florida, with respect to which
they raise claims of conversion, rescission of instruments, slander of title, and violations of
Floridas Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.
On December 23, 2008, the Florida Consolidated Cases were transferred to the District of Puerto
Rico. Subsequently, on June 23, 2009, the Court granted Westernbanks motion to consolidate Civil
Case No. 07-1606 (ADC/BJM) (Lead Case) with the two transferred Florida cases under the following
captions in the District of Puerto Rico, Civil Case Nos. 08-2427 (JAF) and 08-2428 (ADC/BJM)
(Consolidated Cases).
On February 18, 2009, Westernbank filed another motion to dismiss the amended counterclaims
pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). At the request of the Court, and notwithstanding that a motion
to dismiss was filed, on June 22, 2009, Westernbank filed its answers to the defendants Amended
Counterclaims in Civil Case No. 07-1606 (ADC/BJM).
On June 25, 2009, Westernbank filed an emergency motion to stay discovery in the pending
Consolidated Cases before the Court until a ruling on the three Reports and Recommendations and
motions to dismiss that were pending consideration in the Lead and Consolidated Cases. Pursuant to
an Order dated July 7, 2009, the Court granted Westernbanks request.
On July 24, 2009, the Court ordered the Inyx Parties to re-file their objections to the Summary
Judgment Report & Recommendation within the applicable 25-page limit. Also on July 24, 2009, the
Court granted Westernbank five (5) working days from the filing of the Inyx Parties revised
objections to the Summary Judgment Report and Recommendation to file its corresponding response to
the same. The Inyx Parties filed their Amended Objections on July 29, 2009, to which Westernbank
responded on August 5, 2009.
On August 20, 2009, the Court issued the first opinion and order adopting in full the Report &
Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on September 5, 2008, thus denying the Motions to
Dismiss filed by the Inyx Parties in Civil Case No. 07-1606. Also on August 20, 2009, the Court
ordered the Inyx Parties to file, within 5 days of the issuance of the order, a motion setting
forth the amount of the bond, if any, that should be imposed upon Westernbank in the event the
Court adopted the Asset Freeze Report and Recommendation (the August 20th Order).
55
On August 31, 2009, the Inyx Parties filed a Motion to Set Bond of $150 Million (Motion to Set
Bond). On September 1, 2009, Westernbank moved to strike the Motion to Set Bond based on the Inyx
Parties failure to comply with the time period established by the Court in its August 20th Order.
Pursuant to an order issued on that same date, the Inyx Parties Motion to Set Bond was stricken
from the record (the Order Striking the Bond Motion).
Also on September 1, 2009, the Court issued its second opinion and order, this time adopting in
full the Asset Freeze Report and Recommendation and, consequently, granting Westernbanks Motion to
Freeze Assets (the Asset Freeze Opinion and Order).
On September 9, 2009, the Inyx Parties filed a Motion for Reconsideration whereby they request the
Court to reconsider its Asset Freeze Opinion and Order (the First Motion for Reconsideration). On
September 10, 2009, the Inyx Parties filed a motion to stay the Asset Freeze Opinion and Order
pending the disposition of the First Motion for Reconsideration. On September 11, 2009, the Inyx
Parties filed a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its September 1st Order Striking the Bond
Motion (the Second Motion for Reconsideration). On September 15, 2009, the Inyx Parties filed a
motion to stay the Asset Freeze Order pending the disposition of the Second Motion for
Reconsideration.
On September 22, 2009, the Court issued a third opinion and order, this time adopting in full the
Summary Judgment Report and Recommendation, thus granting Westernbanks breach of contract claims.
On September 23, 2009, Westernbank filed a motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice against
co-defendants Colin Hunter and Steven Handley, as a result of a confidential settlement agreement
reached with them. On September 28, 2009, the Court granted this motion and entered Partial
Judgment dismissing Westernbanks claims against co-defendants Colin Hunter and Steven Handley,
without prejudice, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the confidential settlement agreement.
On September 28, 2009, Westernbank also filed its oppositions to the defendants First and Second
Motions for Reconsideration and the motion to stay the Asset Freeze Opinion and Order.
On October 1, 2009, defendants Inyx, Inc., Kachkar, Benkovitch and Rima Goldschmidt filed a motion
requesting, among other things, that the Court produce to them the confidential settlement
agreement entered into by Westernbank and co-defendants Hunter and Handley, which Westernbank had
submitted under seal to the Court on September 23, 2009, as part of the filings related to the
voluntary dismissal without prejudice of the claims against said co-defendants. On October 2, 2009,
Westernbank filed its response to the arguments raised in the motion requesting disclosure of the
settlement agreement, and produced said agreement to Inyx, Inc., Kachkar, Benkovitch and
Goldschmidt. Thus, on October 14, 2009, the Court issued an order finding as moot the motion for
disclosure of the settlement agreement.
On October 5, 2009, defendants filed a motion to strike from the record Westernbanks oppositions
to the First and Second Motions for Reconsideration, and Westernbank opposed on October 19, 2009.
The motion to strike the First and Second Motions for Reconsideration is still pending before the
Courts consideration.
56
On October 12, 2009, Westernbank filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Fraud
Guarantees executed by defendants. Defendants have until October 29, 2009, to file their response
in opposition to this motion for summary judgment.
On October 22, 2009, Westernbank filed a motion for entry of partial judgment on its breach of
contract claims pursuant to which Westernbank seeks entry of a
judgment in excess of $150 million.
On October 30, 2009, Defendants requested that the case be stayed for 45 days because their counsel
was transitioning to a new law firm and allegedly did not have access to the files during the
transition. Defendants also requested leave to file replies to in support of the First and Second
Motions for Reconsideration. Westernbank opposed the request for stay on November 3, 2009. The
Court granted leave to file the replies but denied the request for stay, as requested by
Westernbank. Defendants later requested a thirty day extension of after their counsel could gain
access to the case files to submit these replies, as well as other documents, but the Court denied
this request.
On November 6, 2009, the Court referred the case to a visiting judge for a settlement conference,
which was held on November 9, 2009. No settlement was reached during the conference.
On November 10, 2009, Defendants filed a motion to strike Westernbanks motion for partial summary
judgment on the fraud guarantees, and the Court denied this request on the same date. Defendants
filed a motion for reconsideration, which the Court also denied.
On November 23, 2009, Defendants opposed Westernbanks motion for entry of partial judgment on its
breach of contract claims. Westernbank replied on December 11, 2009.
On December 10, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to which the
Magistrate Judge recommended that Westernbanks motion to dismiss the Counterclaims be granted.
Defendants have until December 28, 2009, to file any objections to the Report and Recommendation.
The Company intends to vigorously defend this action.
REGULATORY MATTERS
The SEC has requested information and documentation relating to the Companys loans to Inyx and the
Company has provided that information and the documents to the SEC Staff on a voluntary basis.
The Company, as a Puerto Rico chartered bank holding company, and its subsidiaries are each subject
to extensive federal and local government supervision and regulation relating to its bank holding
company status and the banking and insurance businesses. There are laws and regulations that
restrict transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries. In addition, the Company benefits
from favorable tax treatment of activities relating to the Westernbanks International Division.
Any change in such regulations, whether by applicable regulators or as a result of legislation
subsequently enacted by the Congress of the United States or the applicable local legislature,
could have a substantial impact on the companies operations.
On February 27, 2008, the Board of Directors of Westernbank, the Office of the Commissioner of
Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico (the OCIF) and the FDIC reached an agreement (the Informal
Agreement) which establishes timeframes for the completion of corrective and remedial measures
which have been previously identified and are in process of completion. The Informal Agreement
provides that the Board of Directors of Westernbank will, among other things, conduct management
and loan reviews; review and make any necessary revisions to Westernbanks asset/liability and
investment policies; ensure the Westernbanks compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and
Westernbanks BSA Compliance Program; correct all apparent violations of laws and regulations;
formulate a plan to improve asset quality; submit and implement a profit and budget plan; develop
and submit a capital plan to remain well-capitalized; and establish a compliance committee to
monitor and coordinate compliance with the agreement. As described in Note 7, Westernbank has a
significant lending concentration with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $385.7 million at
June 30, 2009 to a commercial group in Puerto Rico, which exceeds the statutory limit for loans to
individual borrowers and continues to be a violation of the agreement. On May 20, 2008, a penalty
of $50,000 was imposed by the OCIF. As of June 30, 2009, this loan relationship was not impaired.
There can be no assurance that the OCIF and the FDIC will not take further action on this issue.
On November 24, 2008, Westernbank received notice from the FDIC. As a result of that notice and the
Informal Agreement described above, Westernbanks operations and activities are now subject to
heightened regulatory oversight. For instance, pursuant to Section 914 of the Financial Institution
Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), Westernbank must notify the FDIC prior to
certain management changes, and must obtain approval prior to the payment of certain severance
payments. Further, Westernbank must obtain the non-objection of the FDIC before engaging in any
transactions that would materially change the balance sheet composition of the Bank, including
growth in total assets of 5% or more or significant changes in funding sources, such as increasing
brokered deposits or volatile funding. Additionally, prior written approval of the FDIC will be
required in order for Westernbank to issue any debt guaranteed by the FDIC under the Temporary
Liquidity Guarantee Program.
57
In May 2009, Westernbank entered into a Consent Order (the Consent Order) with the FDIC and the
OCIF and W Holding Company, Inc. entered into a Written Agreement with the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System (the Written Agreement, and, together with the Consent Order, the
Orders). The Orders formalize the Informal Agreement under which Westernbank has operated since
February of 2008.
The Orders do not impose penalties or fines on the Company or Westernbank. The Orders require the
Company and Westernbank to take various affirmative actions, including, but not limited to,
strengthening the Banks and the Companys Boards of Directors by increasing the number of
independent directors; strengthening Westernbanks management team; submitting a capital, budget,
profit and liquidity contingency plans; obtaining approvals prior to paying any dividends;
submitting a written plan to reduce and monitor Westernbanks problem and adversely classified
loans; eliminating from Westernbanks books, by collection or charge-offs, all items or portions of
items classified Loss as a result of the FDICs 2008 examination; submitting loan policies and
procedures for regulatory approval; restricting credit advances to adversely classified borrowers;
establishing an adequate and effective appraisal compliance program; and maintaining an adequate
allowance for loan losses.
In addition to the aforementioned actions, the Consent Order requires Westernbank to maintain a
Tier 1 leverage ratio of not less than 5.5% as of the date of the Consent Order, 5.75% at September
30, 2009 and 6.0% at March 31, 2010. Although Westernbank satisfies the quantitative definition of a
well capitalized institution, by virtue of having a capital directive within the Consent Order, the
Bank was deemed to be adequately capitalized. Simultaneously with the Consent Order, the FDIC
granted Westernbank a renewable waiver for the issuance of
brokered deposits, and in December 2009, the FDIC granted Westernbanks request to roll over a portion of the
Banks brokered deposits through March 31, 2010, subject to
certain limitations.
No assurance can be given that the Orders would not have a material adverse effect on the
Company or Westernbank.
Section 29 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA) limits the use of brokered deposits by
institutions that are less than well-capitalized and permits the FDIC to place restrictions on
interest rates that institutions may pay. On May 29, 2009, the FDIC approved a final rule to
implement new interest rate restrictions on institutions that are not well capitalized. The rule
limits the interest rate paid by such institutions to 75 basis points above a national rate,
defined as a simple average of rates paid by all institutions for which data are available. If an
institution can provide evidence that its local rate is higher than the national rate, the FDIC may
permit that institution to offer the higher local rate plus 75 basis points. However, because the
local rates in Puerto Rico are significantly higher than the national rate, we intend to apply to
the FDIC for permission to offer rates based on our higher local rates but we can make no
assurances that such permission will be granted. Although the rule is not effective until January
1, 2010, the FDIC has stated that it will not object to the rules immediate application. The
failure of the FDIC to recognize the significant disparity between the local and national rates for
Puerto Rico institutions is likely to significantly impair our liquidity position.
58
20.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On October 23, 2009, one of the Companys largest commercial loan customers suffered an explosion
and fire at one of its storage facilities. As of
December 21, 2009, the impact of this explosion on
the commercial loan customers operations and the resulting impact on its ability to repay its
obligation to the Company could not be determined.
Subsequent events have been evaluated as of
December 21, 2009, the date the Companys condensed
financial statements were issued, and determined that other than the events described in the notes
to the condensed consolidated financial statements no events have occurred that would require
adjustments or disclosures to the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
59
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
151,685
|
|
|
$
|
199,020
|
|
|
$
|
312,081
|
|
|
$
|
421,493
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
123,621
|
|
|
|
166,216
|
|
|
|
255,948
|
|
|
|
345,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
28,064
|
|
|
|
32,804
|
|
|
|
56,133
|
|
|
|
76,448
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(11,124
|
)
|
|
|
(14,346
|
)
|
|
|
(19,979
|
)
|
|
|
(29,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
16,940
|
|
|
|
18,458
|
|
|
|
36,154
|
|
|
|
47,145
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
27,673
|
|
|
|
26,646
|
|
|
|
57,169
|
|
|
|
38,294
|
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
(53,827
|
)
|
|
|
(41,748
|
)
|
|
|
(99,165
|
)
|
|
|
(86,785
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(9,214
|
)
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
(5,842
|
)
|
|
|
(1,346
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
3,889
|
|
|
|
(2,258
|
)
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
35,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(5,325
|
)
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
|
(4,714
|
)
|
|
|
33,710
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,227
|
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
|
18,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(5,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,129
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,328
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share
(1)
|
|
$
|
(1.61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.46
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.83
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.63
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
Cash dividends declared on common shares
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,060
|
|
|
$
|
687
|
|
|
$
|
4,122
|
|
Period end number of common shares outstanding
(1)
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding on a fully diluted basis
(1)
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
|
|
3,298
|
|
Dividend payout ratio
(3)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(25.34
|
)%
|
|
|
(7.36
|
)%
|
|
|
27.02
|
%
|
Book value per share data
(1)
|
|
$
|
125.93
|
|
|
$
|
113.42
|
|
|
$
|
125.93
|
|
|
$
|
113.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on assets
(4)
|
|
|
(0.14
|
)%
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)%
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
Return on common stockholders equity
(4)
|
|
|
(4.93
|
)
|
|
|
(7.59
|
)
|
|
|
(4.66
|
)
|
|
|
8.04
|
|
Annualized operating expenses to total end-of-period assets
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
1.38
|
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
Net yield on interest-earning assets
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
|
10.76
|
%
|
|
|
10.27
|
%
|
|
|
10.76
|
%
|
|
|
10.27
|
%
|
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
|
9.49
|
|
|
|
8.99
|
|
|
|
9.49
|
|
|
|
8.99
|
|
Tier I capital to average assets
|
|
|
6.10
|
|
|
|
5.34
|
|
|
|
6.10
|
|
|
|
5.34
|
|
Equity-to-asset ratio
(4)
|
|
|
6.53
|
|
|
|
5.82
|
|
|
|
6.27
|
|
|
|
5.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Quality Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans and foreclosed real estate
held for sale as a percentage of total assets at end of period
|
|
|
11.41
|
%
|
|
|
10.48
|
%
|
|
|
11.41
|
%
|
|
|
10.48
|
%
|
Total non-performing loans as a percentage of
loans at end of period
|
|
|
17.44
|
|
|
|
18.06
|
|
|
|
17.44
|
|
|
|
18.06
|
|
Net loans charged-off to average total loans
(5)
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
1.38
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans at end of period
|
|
|
2.73
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
|
|
|
2.73
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
|
|
|
15.64
|
|
|
|
19.51
|
|
|
|
15.64
|
|
|
|
19.51
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans, excluding
loans collateralized by real estate
|
|
|
236.28
|
|
|
|
136.86
|
|
|
|
236.28
|
|
|
|
136.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Price: End of Period
(1)
|
|
$
|
14.20
|
|
|
$
|
42.50
|
|
|
$
|
14.20
|
|
|
$
|
42.50
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
14,390,248
|
|
|
$
|
15,282,897
|
|
Interest bearing deposits in banks
|
|
|
589,432
|
|
|
|
1,096,465
|
|
Investments securities held to maturity,
securities available for sale and trading securities
|
|
|
4,422,829
|
|
|
|
4,708,211
|
|
Loans-net
|
|
|
8,590,479
|
|
|
|
8,667,717
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
13,444,089
|
|
|
|
14,367,530
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
10,213,985
|
|
|
|
11,002,173
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
2,837,066
|
|
|
|
3,281,074
|
|
Total preferred equity
|
|
|
530,838
|
|
|
|
530,838
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
946,159
|
|
|
|
915,367
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Adjusted to reflect all Company stock splits and stock dividends, including, most recently,
the one-for-fifty reverse stock split approved on November 7, 2008 and effective on December
1, 2008.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Cash dividends amounts are rounded.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Common stockholders dividend declared divided by income (loss) attributable to common
stockholders.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The return on assets is computed by dividing net income by average total assets for the
period. The return on common stockholders equity is computed by dividing net income less
preferred stock dividends by average common stockholders equity for the period. The
equity-to-asset ratio is computed by dividing average equity by average total assets. Average
balances have been computed using beginning and period-end balances.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Average balances were computed using beginning and period-end balances.
|
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (MD&A) section analyzes the major elements of the Companys condensed consolidated
financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements of the Company and Notes thereto and other detailed information appearing elsewhere in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Readers should also review carefully Item 1, Forward-Looking
Statements for a description of the forward-looking statements in this report and a discussion of
the factors that might cause our actual results to differ, perhaps materially, from those
forward-looking statements.
The MD&A includes the following sections:
|
|
|
DEFINITIONS: Provides a brief definition of key terms used through the MD&A.
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL: Provides a brief description of the Companys operations.
|
|
|
|
|
OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: Provides a brief summary
of the most significant events and drivers affecting the Companys financial condition
and results of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES: Provides a discussion of the Companys accounting
policies that require critical judgment, assumptions and estimates.
|
61
|
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: Provides an analysis of the consolidated results of operations
for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to same periods in
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION: Provides an analysis of the most significant balance sheet items
that impact the Companys financial statements and business.
|
|
|
|
|
REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS: Provides disclosures of the Companys and Westernbank
regulatory capital requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
RISK MANAGEMENT: Provides disclosure and analysis about the Companys main risks,
specifically credit risk, market risk and interest rate risk, liquidity risk, operation
risk, legal risk, reputational risk, and concentration risk. This section also includes
a discussion of the Companys off-balance sheet activities and contractual obligations.
|
DEFINITIONS
|
|
|
Loans receivable net
represents extensions of credit (commercial or personal)
resulting from direct negotiations between Westernbank and a borrower, and which
management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until
maturity or pay-off, net of any deferred fees or costs the allowance for loan losses.
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans extensions of credit secured by commercial real
estate properties (excludes construction loans).
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans extensions of credit secured by 1 to 4 family
residential properties.
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans extensions of credit secured by real estate made to finance
(a) land development (i.e., the process of improving land) preparatory to erecting new
structures or (b) the on-site construction of industrial, commercial, residential, or
farm buildings.
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate loans includes commercial real estate and
construction loans.
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, industrial & agricultural (C&I) extensions of credit to sole
proprietorships, partnerships, corporations, and other business enterprises, whether
secured (other than those that meet the definition of a loan secured by real estate)
or unsecured, single-payment or installment.
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans includes commercial real estate, construction and C&I
loans.
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans secured by real estate extensions of credit secured by commercial
real estate properties or residential real estate properties.
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer other unsecured extensions of credit, includes installment loans, lines
of credit, overdraft, and credit cards.
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans includes consumer loans secured by real estate and consumer
other.
|
|
|
|
|
Retail deposits includes non-interest bearing accounts, passbook accounts, NOW
accounts, money market accounts and individual certificate of deposits.
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered Deposits represents funds which Westernbank obtains, directly or
indirectly, by or through any deposit broker for deposit into one or more deposit
accounts.
|
62
GENERAL
W Holding Company, Inc. (the Company) is a bank holding company offering a full range of
financial services. The business of the Company is conducted through its wholly-owned commercial
bank subsidiary, Westernbank Puerto Rico (Westernbank or the Bank). The Company was organized
under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico in February 1999 to become the bank holding
company of Westernbank. Westernbank is a commercial bank chartered under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico effective November 30, 1994. Originally, Westernbank was organized as a
federally chartered mutual savings and loan association in 1958, and in January 1984 became a
federal mutual savings bank. In February 1985, the savings bank was converted to the stock form of
ownership. Westernbank offers a full range of business and consumer financial services, including
banking, trust and brokerage services and placing insurances. On May 19, 2008, the Company
contributed 100% of its ownership in Westernbank Insurance Corp. (WIC) to Westernbank. WIC is a
general insurance agent placing property, casualty, life and disability insurances.
The Companys financial performance is reported in three primary business segments, the traditional
banking operations of Westernbank Puerto Rico, the activities of the division known as Westernbank
International, which includes the activities of WFCC (Westernbank International) and the
activities of the Asset-Based Lending Unit, which specialized in asset-based commercial business
lending. Other operations of the Company not reportable in those segments include: Westernbank
Trust Division, which offers trust services; Westernbank International Trade Services Division,
which specializes in international trade products and services; SRG Net, Inc., which operates an
electronic funds transfer network; Westernbank Insurance Corp., which operates a general insurance
agency; Westernbank World Plaza, Inc., which operates the Westernbank World Plaza, a 23-story
office building located in Hato Rey, Puerto Rico; and the transactions of the parent company only,
which mainly consist of other income related to the equity in the net income (loss) of its
wholly-owned subsidiary. Refer to Note 18 of the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements for additional information about the Companys Segment Information.
The Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries executive offices are located at 19 West McKinley
Street, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico 00680, and the telephone number is (787) 834-8000. The Companys
Internet address is www.wholding.com.
OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Total assets at June 30, 2009 decreased to $14.4 billion, from $15.3 billion at December 31, 2008.
The decrease in total assets was mainly driven by decreases in the Companys short-term money
market instruments, investment securities and loan portfolio. Money market instruments decreased by
$507.0 million or 46%, from $1.1 billion at December 31, 2008, to $589.4 million at June 30, 2009,
due to the Companys decisions to deleverage its balance sheet to strengthen regulatory capital
ratios and to decrease its on-balance sheet liquidity due to improving financial market conditions.
During the second half of 2008, the Company decided to build up its on-balance sheet liquidity in
light of difficult financial market conditions. As a result, during the second half of 2008, the
Company increased its on-balance sheet liquidity by raising brokered deposits. In addition, during
latter part of 2008 and the first half of 2009, the Company undertook additional actions to
increase its off-balance sheet liquidity, including among other things, the posting of additional
collateral, thereby increasing its borrowing
63
capacity
with the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). During the second quarter of 2009, with the additional borrowing
capacity established with the FHLB and after much of the financial crisis had passed, the Company
decided to decrease its on-balance sheet liquidity. The investment portfolio, excluding short-term
money market instruments, decreased $285.4 million, from $4.7 billion at December 31, 2008, to $4.4
billion at June 30, 2009, due to the aforementioned deleverage strategy to strengthen the Companys
regulatory capital ratios.
Loans receivable-net decreased by $77.2 million, from $8.7 billion at December 31, 2008. Such
decrease is due primarily to the Companys decision to curtail major commercial lending since the
summer of 2007 in light of worsening economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the application of
stricter underwriting guidelines.
Total deposits stands at $10.2 billion at June 30, 2009, a decrease from $11.0 billion at December
31, 2008. The decrease of $788.0 million is mainly attributable to the decrease in brokered
deposits. During the second half of 2008, the Company decided to increase its on-balance sheet
liquidity through the issuance of brokered deposits in response to the financial crisis that
impacted the markets in 2008. During 2009, as market conditions improved, the Company decided to
decrease its level of on-balance sheet liquidity. Brokered deposits at June 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008 were $7.8 billion (76% of total deposits) and $8.5 billion (77% of total deposits),
respectively. Retail deposits at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $2.5 billion for both
periods.
Stockholders equity increased to $946.2 million at June 30, 2009, from $915.4 million at December
31, 2008. The 2009 increase was principally due to a positive variance of $40.7 million in the
accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, mainly on available for sale securities
recognized during the period as a result of a favorable interest rate movements, offset in part by
dividends of $5.3 million on the Companys preferred and common stock shares declared during the
first quarter of 2009, coupled with a net loss realized of $4.7 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009.
Net loss for the quarter and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 were $5.3 million and $4.7
million, respectively, compared to a net income of $1.1 million and $33.7 million, respectively,
for the comparable periods in 2008. Basic and diluted loss per common share for the quarter and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 amounted to $(1.61) and $(2.83), respectively, compared to
basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share of $(2.46) and $4.63 (as adjusted to reflect the
one-for-fifty reverse stock split approved on November 7, 2008 and effective on December 1, 2008),
respectively, for the same periods in 2008.
The Companys financial performance for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the same
quarter in 2008, was principally impacted by:
|
|
|
an increase of $12.1 million in noninterest expenses mainly due to an increase in
deposit insurance premiums and supervisory examination fees assessed by the FDIC;
|
|
|
|
|
a positive variance of $6.1 million in income tax expenses mainly due to a variance in
the deferred tax provision as a result of temporary differences related to the Companys
allowance for loan losses and net operating loss carryforwards;
|
64
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $4.7 million in net interest income, due principally to a decrease of $3.0
billion or 18% in the Companys average earning assets due mainly to Companys
decision to deleverage its balance sheet coupled with a decrease in net yield earned on interest
earning assets due to lower loan yields, resulting primarily by the repricing of
variable-rate construction and commercial loans tied to short-term indexes, coupled with
lower yields in money market instruments, primarily due to the reinvestment of such
instruments on a lower rate environment, offset in part by lower average interest bearing
liabilities and funding cost;
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $3.2 million in the provision for loan losses mainly attributable to the
positive result of steps taken by the Company since the middle of 2007 to mitigate the
overall credit risk underlying the Companys total commercial loan portfolio and the effect
of the continuing downturn in the economy of Puerto Rico, which has been in recession since
2006; and
|
|
|
|
|
an increase of $1.0 million in noninterest income due to gain on sales realized from the
Companys available for sale investment securities portfolio.
|
The Companys return on average assets (ROA) and the return on average common stockholders equity
(ROCE) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 were (0.14)% and (4.93)%, respectively, compared to
0.03% and (7.59)%, respectively, for the same quarter in 2008. For the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, the Companys ROA and ROCE were (0.06)% and (4.66)%, respectively, compared to 0.39%
and 8.04%, respectively, for the same period in 2008.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Company and its subsidiary conform to
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and general practices
within the financial services industry. Various elements of the Companys accounting policies, by
their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other
subjective assessments. These estimates are made under facts and circumstances at a point in time
and changes in those facts and circumstances could produce actual results that differ from those
estimates. The Companys most significant estimates are the allowance for loan losses, the
other-than temporary impairments, the valuation of financial instruments and the income tax and
contingencies accruals.
Management has discussed the development and selection of the critical accounting policies and
estimates with the Companys Audit Committee. There have not been any material changes in the
Companys critical accounting policies since December 31, 2008, except for changes in the
Other-than-Temporary Impairment (OTTI) model for debt securities as required by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board Staff Position No. (FSP) FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 which the Company
adopted during the second quarter of 2009. Refer to Note 1 of the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements for additional information about the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2
and FAS 124-2. The adoption of these FSPs did not have a significant impact in the Companys
financial condition and results of operations.
65
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
The Companys principal source of earnings is its net interest income, which is the difference
between interest income on loans and invested assets (interest-earning assets) and interest
expense on deposits and borrowings, including federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements and
advances from the FHLB (interest-bearing liabilities). Loan origination and commitments fees, net
of related costs, are deferred and amortized over the life of the related loans as a yield
adjustment. Gains or losses on the sale of loans and investments, service charges, fees and other
income, also affect income. In addition, the Companys net income is affected by the level of its
non-interest expenses, such as the provision for loan losses, compensation, employees benefits,
occupancy costs, other operating expenses and income taxes.
The Companys net interest income is subject to interest rate risk due to the re-pricing and
maturity mismatch of the Companys assets and liabilities. The Company manages its exposure to
interest rate risk through the Companys Assets and Liabilities Management Committee (ALCO). The
main objective of the Companys Assets and Liabilities Management program is to invest funds
judiciously and reduce interest rate risks while optimizing net income and maintaining adequate
liquidity levels. As further discussed under the header - Market Risk and Interest Rate Risk, the
Company uses several tools to manage the risks associated with the composition and repricing of
assets and liabilities. Therefore, management has followed a conservative practice inclined towards
the preservation of capital with adequate returns. The ALCO, which includes the entire Board of
Directors and the Companys senior management, is responsible for the asset-liability management
oversight. The Investment Department is responsible for implementing the policies established by
the ALCO.
Net interest income for the second quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009, was $28.1
million and $56.1 million, respectively, a decrease of $4.7 million or 14% and $20.3 million or
27%, respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2008. The decrease in net interest income
in 2009 was mainly due to a decrease in the Companys average net earning assets coupled with a
decrease in net yield on interest-earning assets. For the quarter and six-month period ended June
30, 2009, the Companys average interest-earning assets were $13.6 billion and $14.0 billion,
respectively, a decrease of $3.0 billion or 18% and a decrease of $2.7 billion or 16%,
respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2008. The decrease in average interest earning
assets was mainly due to decreases in the Companys investment and loan portfolios.
For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009, the Companys average investment
portfolio decreased by $2.6 billion or 36% and $2.2 billion or 30%, respectively, when compared to
the same periods in 2008. The decrease was mainly due to investment securities called during the
first half of 2008 coupled with the Companys decision to deleverage its balance sheet to
strengthen regulatory capital ratios. During the first half of 2008, approximately $5.5 billion of
callable agency securities were early redeemed through call exercises due to the drop in rate in
the long end of the yield curve. The Company partially reinvested the proceeds in mortgage backed
securities available for sale.
For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009, the Companys average loan portfolio
decreased to $8.9 billion and $9.0 billion, respectively, a decrease of $481.4 million and $499.5
million, respectively, from balances of $9.4 billion and $9.5 billion, respectively, for the
66
same periods in 2008. The decrease in average loan portfolio was due primarily to the Company decision
to curtail major commercial lending since the summer of 2007 in light of worsening economic
conditions in Puerto Rico and the application of stricter underwriting guidelines.
For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the net yield on interest-earning assets increased by 4 basis
points, from 0.79% for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 to 0.83%. The increase in net yield on
interest-earning assets in 2009 was principally due to lower rates paid on deposits, offset in part
by lower loan yields resulting primarily by the repricing of variable-rate construction and
commercial loans tied to short-term indexes and the impact of outstanding non-performing loans,
mainly due to the slowdown in the Puerto Rico economy.
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, the net yield on interest-earning assets decreased by
11 basis points, from 0.92% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 to 0.81%. The decrease in
net yield on interest-earning assets was driven by the following factors: lower loan yields
resulting primarily by the repricing of variable-rate construction and commercial loans tied to
short-term indexes; and the impact of outstanding non-performing loans, mainly due to the slowdown
in the Puerto Rico economy. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, the yield on the
Companys loan portfolio decreased by 105 basis points, when compared to the same period in 2008.
The Companys repricing mismatch of its assets and liabilities also contributed to the decrease in
net interest income.
For the quarter and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, when compared to the same periods in
2008, the overall cost of funds decreased by 42 and 53 basis points, respectively, from 4.25% and
4.41%, respectively, in 2008 to 3.83% and 3.88%, respectively, in 2009, principally due to lower
rates paid on deposits. The average interest rates paid on total deposits for the quarter and
six-month period ended June 30, 2009 decreased by 56 and 58 basis points, respectively from 4.23%
and 4.39%, respectively, in 2008 to 3.67% and 3.81%, respectively, in 2009. The decrease was
mainly driven by repricing of deposits on a lower rate environment.
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the total dollar amount of interest income
from average interest-earning assets and the resultant yields, as well as the interest expense on
average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates, as well as in a normal
and tax equivalent basis. Average balances are daily monthly average balances. The yield on the
securities portfolio is based on average amortized cost balances and does not give effect to
changes in fair value that are reflected as a component of consolidated stockholders equity for
investment securities available for sale.
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Balance(1)
|
|
|
Yield/Rate
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Balance (1)
|
|
|
Yield/Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normal spread:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including
loan fees (2)
|
|
$
|
115,251
|
|
|
$
|
8,938,256
|
|
|
|
5.17
|
%
|
|
$
|
142,115
|
|
|
$
|
9,419,618
|
|
|
|
6.07
|
%
|
Investment
securities (3)
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
215,711
|
|
|
|
3.23
|
|
|
|
22,645
|
|
|
|
3,520,753
|
|
|
|
2.59
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities (4)
|
|
|
33,241
|
|
|
|
3,746,766
|
|
|
|
3.56
|
|
|
|
29,507
|
|
|
|
2,962,254
|
|
|
|
4.01
|
|
Money market
instruments
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
|
|
727,908
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
4,753
|
|
|
|
775,286
|
|
|
|
2.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
151,685
|
|
|
|
13,628,641
|
|
|
|
4.46
|
|
|
|
199,020
|
|
|
|
16,677,911
|
|
|
|
4.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
14,408
|
|
|
|
2,440,138
|
|
|
|
2.37
|
|
|
|
16,027
|
|
|
|
2,540,784
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
|
Brokered
|
|
|
80,531
|
|
|
|
7,927,071
|
|
|
|
4.07
|
|
|
|
95,735
|
|
|
|
8,095,698
|
|
|
|
4.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
94,939
|
|
|
|
10,367,209
|
|
|
|
3.67
|
|
|
|
111,762
|
|
|
|
10,636,482
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
|
Federal funds purchased and
repurchase
agreements
|
|
|
28,055
|
|
|
|
2,539,603
|
|
|
|
4.43
|
|
|
|
53,777
|
|
|
|
5,050,190
|
|
|
|
4.28
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
44,747
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
51,252
|
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
123,621
|
|
|
|
12,951,559
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
|
|
166,216
|
|
|
|
15,737,924
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
28,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
interest-earning
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
677,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
939,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net yield on interest-earning
assets (5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.83
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of interest-earning assets
to interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105.23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105.97
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Average balance on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities is
computed using daily monthly average balances during the period.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Loan fees, net amounted to $2.3 million and $2.2 million for the three-month
period ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes available for sale securities.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes trading and available for sale securities.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Annualized net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Balance (1)
|
|
|
Yield/Rate
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Balance (1)
|
|
|
Yield/Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normal spread:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including
loan fees (2)
|
|
$
|
235,511
|
|
|
$
|
8,976,099
|
|
|
|
5.29
|
%
|
|
$
|
298,588
|
|
|
$
|
9,475,603
|
|
|
|
6.34
|
%
|
Investment
securities (3)
|
|
|
5,212
|
|
|
|
378,962
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
|
|
69,028
|
|
|
|
4,422,164
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities (4)
|
|
|
69,106
|
|
|
|
3,750,634
|
|
|
|
3.72
|
|
|
|
40,970
|
|
|
|
1,998,649
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
Money market
instruments
|
|
|
2,252
|
|
|
|
913,295
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
12,907
|
|
|
|
829,320
|
|
|
|
3.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
312,081
|
|
|
|
14,018,990
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
421,493
|
|
|
|
16,725,736
|
|
|
|
5.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
29,662
|
|
|
|
2,421,814
|
|
|
|
2.47
|
|
|
|
35,334
|
|
|
|
2,556,154
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
Brokered
|
|
|
167,965
|
|
|
|
8,044,709
|
|
|
|
4.21
|
|
|
|
194,493
|
|
|
|
7,971,654
|
|
|
|
4.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
197,627
|
|
|
|
10,466,523
|
|
|
|
3.81
|
|
|
|
229,827
|
|
|
|
10,527,808
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
Federal funds purchased and
repurchase
agreements
|
|
|
57,078
|
|
|
|
2,793,049
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
|
113,497
|
|
|
|
5,126,411
|
|
|
|
4.45
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
43,381
|
|
|
|
5.78
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
69,659
|
|
|
|
4.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
255,948
|
|
|
|
13,302,953
|
|
|
|
3.88
|
|
|
|
345,045
|
|
|
|
15,723,878
|
|
|
|
4.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
56,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
76,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
716,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,001,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net yield on interest-earning
assets (5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.81
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of interest-earning assets
to interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106.37
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Average balance on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities is
computed using daily monthly average balances during the period.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Loan fees, net amounted to $4.4 million and
$4.3 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes available for sale securities.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes trading and available for sale securities.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Annualized net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
|
69
The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense
for the major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and
distinguishes between the increase (decrease) related to changes in outstanding balances and
changes in interest rates. The changes are segregated for each major category of interest-earning
asset and interest-bearing liability into amounts attributable to (a) changes in volume (change in
volume times old rate), (b) changes in rates (change in rate times old volume), and (c) changes in
rate/volume (change in rate times the change in volume). The rate/volume variances are allocated to
changes in volume and changes in rate on a proportional basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
(7,002
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,862
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,864
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,077
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(63,077
|
)
|
Investment securities (1)
|
|
|
(28,550
|
)
|
|
|
7,642
|
|
|
|
(20,908
|
)
|
|
|
(56,453
|
)
|
|
|
(7,363
|
)
|
|
|
(63,816
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities (2)
|
|
|
6,347
|
|
|
|
(2,613
|
)
|
|
|
3,734
|
|
|
|
31,818
|
|
|
|
(3,682
|
)
|
|
|
28,136
|
|
Money market instruments
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
(3,022
|
)
|
|
|
(3,297
|
)
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
(12,108
|
)
|
|
|
(10,655
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total decrease in interest income
|
|
|
(29,480
|
)
|
|
|
(17,855
|
)
|
|
|
(47,335
|
)
|
|
|
(38,259
|
)
|
|
|
(71,153
|
)
|
|
|
(109,412
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
(620
|
)
|
|
|
(999
|
)
|
|
|
(1,619
|
)
|
|
|
(1,787
|
)
|
|
|
(3,885
|
)
|
|
|
(5,672
|
)
|
Brokered
|
|
|
(1,963
|
)
|
|
|
(13,241
|
)
|
|
|
(15,204
|
)
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
(28,323
|
)
|
|
|
(26,528
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(2,583
|
)
|
|
|
(14,240
|
)
|
|
|
(16,823
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(32,208
|
)
|
|
|
(32,200
|
)
|
Federal funds purchased and
repurchase agreements
|
|
|
(27,810
|
)
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
|
|
(25,722
|
)
|
|
|
(48,240
|
)
|
|
|
(8,179
|
)
|
|
|
(56,419
|
)
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(831
|
)
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase in interest expense
|
|
|
(30,489
|
)
|
|
|
(12,106
|
)
|
|
|
(42,595
|
)
|
|
|
(49,063
|
)
|
|
|
(40,034
|
)
|
|
|
(89,097
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in
net interest income
|
|
$
|
1,009
|
|
|
$
|
(5,749
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,740
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,804
|
|
|
$
|
(31,119
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,315
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes available for sale securities.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes trading and available for sale securities.
|
Provision For Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses is charged to earnings to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a
level that the Company considers adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on ongoing, quarterly assessments and
evaluations of the collectibility and historical loss experience of loans. The Company follows a
systematic methodology to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
Although the Company believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate, factors beyond the
Companys control, including factors affecting the Puerto Rico
economy may contribute to delinquencies and defaults, thus necessitating additional reserves.
For the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009, the Company provided for loan losses
$11.1 million and $20.0 million, respectively, as compared to $14.3 million and $29.3 million,
respectively, for the comparable periods in 2008.
70
The decrease of $3.2 million and $9.3 million in provision for loan losses for the quarter and
six-month period ended June 30, 2009, respectively, when compared to same periods in 2008, reflects
the positive results of steps taken by the Company since the middle of 2007 to mitigate the overall
credit risks underlying the Companys total commercial loan portfolio and the effects of the
continuing downturn in the economy of Puerto Rico, which has been in recession since 2006. These
steps included setting portfolio limits and applying stricter underwriting guidelines, among
others. As a result of these steps, and among other things, the Companys loan portfolio decreased
by $385.8 million, from $9.0 billion at June 30, 2008, to $8.6 billion at June 30, 2009 and the
Companys non-performing and impaired loans decreased by $120.4 million or 7% from $1.7 billion at
June 30, 2008, to $1.5 billion at June 30, 2009.
For discussion regarding Loans Charged-Off, Non-Performing and Impaired Loans, Allowance for Loan
Losses, and related ratios refer to Non-performing loans, Troubled Debt Restructurings and
Foreclosed Real Estate Held For Sale under Financial Condition.
Noninterest Income
Total noninterest income amounted to $27.7 million and $57.2 million for the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively, as compared to $26.6 million and $38.3
million, respectively, for the same periods in 2008.
The following table presents the components of total noninterest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Service and other charges on loans
|
|
$
|
2,293
|
|
|
$
|
2,717
|
|
|
$
|
4,534
|
|
|
$
|
5,202
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
2,983
|
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
|
|
6,052
|
|
Other fees and commissions
|
|
|
4,948
|
|
|
|
5,687
|
|
|
|
10,077
|
|
|
|
11,489
|
|
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
Net gain on sales of loans,
securities and others assets
|
|
|
18,318
|
|
|
|
13,493
|
|
|
|
37,280
|
|
|
|
14,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
$
|
27,673
|
|
|
$
|
26,646
|
|
|
$
|
57,169
|
|
|
$
|
38,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009, noninterest income increased by $1.0
million and $18.9 million, respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2008. The increase in
2009 was mainly driven by an increase in net gain on sales of loans, securities and other assets,
offset in part by decreases in net gain on derivative instruments and charges and fees on deposits,
loans and other securities. For the three and six-month periods ended June 30,
2009, net gain on sales of loans, securities and other assets increased by $4.8 million and $23.0
million, respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2008 due to the Companys decision to
sell certain available for sale securities during the first and second quarters of 2009.
The decrease in service and other charges on loans was mainly due to lower volume of business in
commercial loans due to the Companys decision to curtail major commercial lending, principally
related to the operations of the Asset-Based Lending Unit, in light of worsening economic
conditions in Puerto Rico. The decrease in service charges on deposit accounts was mainly due to a
decrease in the volume of transactions that require service charges. Customers
71
engaged in fewer
transactions because of the current economic environment. Other fees and commissions decreased
during 2009 due to lower merchant fees and lower automatic teller machine fees as a result of fewer
transactions.
The negative variance in net gain (loss) on derivative instruments in 2009 was mainly the result of
variances on the mark-to-market positions on derivative instruments due to changes in interest
rates.
Noninterest Expenses
Total noninterest expenses amounted to $53.8 million and $99.2 million for the three and six-month
periods ended June 30 2009, respectively, as compared to $41.7 million and $86.8 million,
respectively, for the same periods in 2008. The following table presents the components of total
noninterest expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Salaries and employees benefits
|
|
$
|
13,432
|
|
|
$
|
15,915
|
|
|
$
|
28,644
|
|
|
$
|
32,862
|
|
Equipment expenses
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
3,341
|
|
|
|
6,132
|
|
|
|
6,799
|
|
Deposits insurance premium and supervisory examination
|
|
|
19,009
|
|
|
|
3,727
|
|
|
|
28,567
|
|
|
|
6,621
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
2,757
|
|
|
|
4,305
|
|
|
|
5,302
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
2,073
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
3,685
|
|
|
|
4,293
|
|
Printing, postage, stationery and supplies
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
1,756
|
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
Net loss from operations of foreclosed
real estate held for sale
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Municipal taxes
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
|
|
2,473
|
|
|
|
5,524
|
|
|
|
4,784
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
3,719
|
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
7,449
|
|
|
|
8,095
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,910
|
|
|
|
7,113
|
|
|
|
11,256
|
|
|
|
14,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expenses
|
|
$
|
53,827
|
|
|
$
|
41,748
|
|
|
$
|
99,165
|
|
|
$
|
86,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expenses for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009 increased by
$12.1 million and $12.4 million, respectively, when compared to same periods in 2008. The increase
in total noninterest expenses for 2009 was mainly due to increases in deposit insurance premiums
and supervisory examination and professional fees, offset in part by decreases in salaries and
employees benefits and other expenses.
Deposits insurance premium and supervisory examination increased by $15.3 million for the second
quarter of 2009 and $21.9 million for the first half of 2009, as compared to the comparable periods
in 2008 due to the imposition of a special assessment by the FDIC coupled with an increase in the
regular deposit insurance premium. Recent failures of FDIC-insured institutions have significantly
increased losses to the FDICs Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF). The reserve ratio of the DIF fell
below 1.15%, the level mandated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (the Reform
Act). The Reform Act requires the FDIC to establish and implement a Restoration Plan that would
restore the reserve ratio to at least 1.15% within five years. As a result, on May 22, 2009, the
FDIC adopted a final rule imposing a 5 basis point special assessment on each insured depository
institutions assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009. The amount of the special assessment
for any institution was capped at 10 basis
72
points times the institutions assessment base for the
second quarter 2009. In addition, on November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule amending its
assessment regulations to require insured depository institutions, including Westernbank, to prepay
quarterly regular risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011.
These prepayments are due on December 31, 2009 and are in addition to the regular third quarter
2009 assessment due on that same date. In accordance with the discretion provided to the FDIC under
12 C.F.R. § 327.12(i)(1), the FDIC exempted Westernbank from prepaying its quarterly risk-based
assessment for the fourth quarter of 2009, and all of 2010, 2011, and 2012.
Salaries and employees benefits, historically one of the largest components of total noninterest
expenses, decreased $2.5 million or 16% for the second quarter of 2009 and $4.2 million or 13% for
the first half of 2009, as compared to the same periods in 2008. The decrease in 2009 was
principally attributed to the implementation of a restructuring plan during the fourth quarter of
2008, which included closing seven branches and the elimination of approximately 125 positions.
Total full time employees decreased from 1,539 at June 30, 2008, to 1,418 at June 30, 2009.
Noninterest expenses, as a group, excluding deposit insurance premiums and supervisory examination
expenses and salaries and employees benefits, decreased by $720,000 for the second quarter of 2009
and $5.3 million for the first half of 2009, as compared to 2008. This is the result of continued
strict cost control measures implemented by the Company.
Provision for Income Taxes
The Companys primary tax jurisdiction is Puerto Rico. Under Puerto Rico income tax laws, the
Company is required to pay the higher of an alternative minimum tax of 22% or regular statutory
rates ranging from 20% to 39%. Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code (PR-IRC), all
companies are treated as separate taxable entities. The Company, Westernbank, Westernbank Insurance
Corp. and SRG Net, Inc. are subject to Puerto Rico regular income tax or alternative minimum tax on
income earned from all sources. Westernbank World Plaza, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of
Westernbank, elected to be treated as a special partnership under the PR-IRC; accordingly, its
taxable income or deductible loss is included in the taxable income of Westernbank. On March 9,
2009, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law Act No. 7 (Act No. 7), also known as Special
Act Declaring a Fiscal Emergency Status to Save the Credit of Puerto Rico, which amended several
sections of the PR-IRC, including sections related to income, property, excise and sales and use
tax provision. Act No. 7, as amended by Act No. 37 approved on July 10, 2009, imposes a series of
temporary and permanent measures, including the imposition of a 5% surtax over the total income tax
determined, which is applicable to
companies whose combined income exceeds $100,000, effectively increasing the maximum statutory rate
from 39% to 40.95%. This temporary measure is effective for tax years that commenced after December
31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012.
73
For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Companys provision for income taxes resulted in a benefit
of $3.9 million, compared to an income tax expense of $2.3 million recorded for the same quarter in
2008. The positive variance in the second quarter of 2009, as compared to the same quarter in 2008,
was mainly attributable to a positive variance in the Companys credit for deferred taxes due to
temporary differences related to changes in the allowance for loan losses and net operating loss
carryforwards, coupled with a positive variance in the Companys provision for current income taxes
due to lower taxable income in 2009.
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $1.1
million, a decrease of $33.9 million when compared to the tax benefit of $35.1 million for the same
period in 2008. The decrease in income tax benefit was mainly attributable to agreements reached
by the Company with local and federal authorities during the first quarter of 2008 that yielded a
benefit of $33.3 million for 2008, coupled with lower taxable income during 2009.
Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of credit, net operating and capital losses carryforwards,
and temporary differences between amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and their respective tax bases. The income tax benefit for the six-month period ended June
30, 2009 includes a deferred income tax benefit of $2.0 million, a negative variance of $474,000
when compared to a deferred income tax benefit of $2.5 million for the same period in 2008. The
variance in deferred tax for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, is mainly attributable to
temporary differences related to the changes in the allowance for loan losses (See Note 14
Income Taxes to the condensed consolidated financial statements).
The Company evaluates and assesses the relative risks and appropriate tax treatment of transactions
and filing positions after considering statutes, regulations, judicial precedent and other
information and maintains tax accruals consistent with its evaluation of these relative risks and
merits. Changes to the estimate of accrued taxes occur periodically due, among other, to changes in
tax rates, interpretations of tax laws, the status of examinations being conducted by taxing
authorities and changes to statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance that impact the relative
risks of tax positions. These changes, when they occur, can affect the income tax accruals as well
as the current periods income tax expense and can be significant to the operating results of the
Company.
The portion of the provision for income taxes related to unrecognized tax benefits amounted to
credits of $572,000 and $526,000 for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009,
respectively, compared to a provision of $45,000 and a credit of $33.5 million, respectively, for
the comparable periods in 2008. The Companys condensed consolidated statements of financial
condition include liabilities of $1.4 million and $2.0 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively, for the exposures resulting from income taxes related to unrecognized tax
benefits identified by the Company in connection with this evaluation. Uncertain income tax
positions at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 mainly relate to certain expense deductions taken
in income tax returns.
74
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Loans
Loans receivable-net, were $8.6 billion or 60% of total assets at June 30, 2009, a decrease of
$77.2 million when compared to December 31, 2008.
The following table presents the composition of the loan portfolio at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Commercial real estate loans (1)
|
|
$
|
5,015,284
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,100,483
|
|
|
|
58.8
|
%
|
Residential real estate loans
|
|
|
962,502
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
965,171
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
1,377,321
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
1,439,224
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural (1)
|
|
|
702,810
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
716,514
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
Consumer secured by real estate
|
|
|
530,621
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
494,556
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
Consumer other
|
|
|
242,773
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
233,858
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
8,831,311
|
|
|
|
102.8
|
|
|
|
8,949,806
|
|
|
|
103.3
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(240,832
|
)
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
(282,089
|
)
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans net
|
|
$
|
8,590,479
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,667,717
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes $753.9 million and $782.6 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, of the outstanding
loans of the Asset-Based Lending Unit.
|
Westernbanks commercial real estate, construction, and commercial, industrial, and agricultural
loans are primarily variable and adjustable rate products. Total Commercial loan originations come
from existing customers as well as through direct solicitation and referrals. Westernbank offers
different types of consumer loans, including secured and unsecured products, in order to provide a
full range of financial services to its retail customers. In addition, Westernbank offers VISA ()
and MasterCard () accounts to its customers.
Total Commercial Loans
As of June 30, 2009, commercial real estate and construction loans were $6.4 billion or 74% and C&I
loans were $702.8 million or 8% of the $8.6 billion loan portfolio-net, compared to commercial real
estate and construction loans of $6.5 billion or 75% and C&I loans of $716.5 million or 8% of the
$8.7 billion loan portfolio-net as of December 31, 2008. Over the last few years, the Company has
emphasized the commercial loan segment in Puerto Rico. This has enabled Westernbank to shift its
asset composition to assets with shorter maturities and greater repricing flexibility. The strategy
has also enabled Westernbank to diversify its revenue sources, while maintaining its status as a
secured lender, with approximately 89% of its loans collateralized by real estate as of June 30,
2009. As of June 30, 2009, the loan portfolios of the Asset-Based Lending Unit, amounted to $753.9
million (61% collateralized by real estate) compared to $782.6 million (60% collateralized by real
estate) as of December 31, 2008, a decrease of $28.7 million. The decrease in 2009 was mainly due
to the Companys decision to curtail lending in this line of business.
75
At June 30, 2009, Westernbank has a significant lending concentration with an aggregate unpaid
principal balance of $385.7 million to a commercial group in Puerto Rico, which exceeds the
loan-to-one borrower limit. Westernbank has explored various alternatives to decrease its exposure
to this borrower to comply with the loan-to-one borrower limitation. However, due to the credit
tightening propelled by the current economic environment, efforts have not materialized.
Westernbank continues to pursue other actions in order to reduce such excess. For this violation,
Westernbank paid a penalty of $50,000 during 2008. At June 30, 2009, this loan relationship was not
impaired. There can be no assurance that the Commissioner will not take further actions on this
issue.
At June 30, 2009, commercial real estate loans totaled $5.0 billion. In general, commercial
lending, including commercial real estate, asset-based, unsecured business and construction, are
considered by management to be of greater risk of collectibility than consumer lending, including
residential real estate, because such loans are typically larger in size and more risk is
concentrated in a single borrower. In addition, the borrowers ability to repay a commercial loan
or a construction loan depends, in the case of a commercial loan, on the successful operation of
the business or the property securing the loan and, in the case of a construction loan, on the
successful completion and sale or operation of the project. Substantially all of the Companys
borrowers and properties and other collateral securing the commercial real estate and consumer
loans are located in Puerto Rico. These loans may be subject to a greater risk of default if the
Puerto Rico economy suffers adverse economic, political or business developments, or if natural
disasters affect Puerto Rico.
Westernbank has historically provided land acquisition, development, and construction financing to
developers for residential housing projects. Construction loans extended to developers are
typically adjustable rate loans, indexed to the prime interest rate with terms ranging generally
from 12 to 48 months.
The Companys commercial real estate loan portfolio is mostly comprised of loans to owner-occupied
borrowers in which the real estate collateral is taken as a secondary source of repayment. As of
June 30, 2009, commercial real estate loans to owner-occupied borrowers amounted to 79% of total
commercial real estate loans. These loans are sensitive to the economic condition and cash flow of
the borrowers business, but are less sensitive to market conditions, capitalization rates, vacancy
rates and rental rates.
76
The composition of the Companys construction loan portfolio as of June 30, 2009 by category
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Loans for residential housing projects:
|
|
|
|
|
High-rise (1)
|
|
$
|
169,175
|
|
Mid-rise (2)
|
|
|
253,808
|
|
Single-family detach
|
|
|
227,675
|
|
Mix
|
|
|
167,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for residential housing projects
|
|
|
818,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans to individuals secured by residential properties
|
|
|
6,607
|
|
Land loans
|
|
|
302,303
|
|
Loans for commercial projects:
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitals and other healthcare services
|
|
|
58,895
|
|
Shopping malls
|
|
|
41,258
|
|
Hotels
|
|
|
43,238
|
|
Piers
|
|
|
28,849
|
|
Others
|
|
|
80,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total before net deferred fees and allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
1,380,303
|
|
Net deferred fees
|
|
|
(2,982
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction loan portfolio, gross
|
|
|
1,377,321
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(79,259
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction loan portfolio, net
|
|
$
|
1,298,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
For purposes of the above table, high-rise portfolio is composed of buildings with more
than seven stories.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Mid-rise relates to buildings up to seven stories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in
|
|
|
|
thousands)
|
|
Total undisbursed funds under existing commitments
|
|
$
|
185,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans in non-accrual status
|
|
$
|
439,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs Construction loans
|
|
$
|
32,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses Construction loans
|
|
$
|
79,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing construction loans to total construction loans
|
|
|
31.93
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses construction loans to total construction loans
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to total average construction loans for the six-month
period ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
4.54
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
77
The following summarizes the construction loans for residential housing projects in Puerto
Rico segregated by the estimated selling price of the units at June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Under $300,000
|
|
$
|
256,020
|
|
$300,000 - $600,000
|
|
|
282,714
|
|
Over $600,000
|
|
|
279,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
818,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate Loans
Residential real estate loans are mainly comprised of loans secured by first mortgages on
one-to-four family residential properties. At June 30, 2009, the Companys residential real estate
loan portfolio amounted to $962.5 million, a decrease of $2.7 million, when compared to balances as
of December 31, 2008. The reduction is mainly the result of repayments received from a portfolio
purchased from a mortgage originator group in Puerto Rico. The Companys strategic intent is to
emphasize residential real estate lending to diversify the Companys revenue source and to increase
liquidity.
Consumer Loans
The Companys consumer loan category is comprised of consumer loans secured by real estate and
other loans. The Company originates consumer loans secured by real estate in amounts up to 75% of
the appraised value of the property, including the amount of any existing prior liens. Such loans
generally have an interest rate that is variable based on market conditions. The loans are secured
with a first or second mortgage on the property, including loans where another institution holds
the first mortgage. The Companys consumer other loan category consists principally of unsecured
consumer and credit card loans. At June 30, 2009, the Companys consumer loan portfolio totaled
$773.4 million (of which $530.6 million were secured by real estate) compared to $728.4 million (of
which $494.6 million were secured by real estate) at December 31, 2008. Consumer loans generally
have shorter terms and higher interest rates than commercial and mortgage loans but generally
involve more credit risk because of the type and nature of the collateral and, in certain cases,
the absence of collateral. In addition, consumer lending collections are dependent on the
borrowers continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely effected by job
loss, divorce, illness and personal bankruptcy.
78
The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of Westernbanks total loans for the
periods indicated at June 30, 2009. Contractual maturities do not necessarily reflect the expected
term of a loan, including prepayments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MATURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After one year to five years
|
|
|
After five years
|
|
|
|
Balance outstanding
|
|
|
One year or less
|
|
|
Fixed interest
|
|
|
Variable interest
|
|
|
Fixed interest
|
|
|
Variable interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
$
|
5,015,284
|
|
|
$
|
1,812,647
|
|
|
$
|
375,266
|
|
|
$
|
465,515
|
|
|
$
|
83,811
|
|
|
$
|
2,278,045
|
|
Residential real estate loans
|
|
|
962,502
|
|
|
|
7,330
|
|
|
|
75,063
|
|
|
|
26,508
|
|
|
|
853,535
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
1,377,321
|
|
|
|
951,947
|
|
|
|
12,457
|
|
|
|
336,761
|
|
|
|
10,077
|
|
|
|
66,079
|
|
Commercial, industrial and
agricultural
|
|
|
702,810
|
|
|
|
458,832
|
|
|
|
34,037
|
|
|
|
133,042
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
76,617
|
|
Consumer secured by real estate
|
|
|
530,621
|
|
|
|
12,123
|
|
|
|
35,071
|
|
|
|
12,373
|
|
|
|
64,147
|
|
|
|
406,907
|
|
Consumer other
|
|
|
242,773
|
|
|
|
111,880
|
|
|
|
99,956
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
27,528
|
|
|
|
3,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,831,311
|
|
|
$
|
3,354,759
|
|
|
$
|
631,850
|
|
|
$
|
974,206
|
|
|
$
|
1,039,380
|
|
|
$
|
2,831,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Westernbanks loan originations come from a number of sources. The primary sources for
residential loan originations are depositors and walk-in customers. Commercial loan originations
come from existing customers as well as through direct solicitation and referrals.
It is Westernbanks policy to originate loans in accordance with written, non-discriminatory
underwriting standards and loan origination procedures prescribed in the Board of Directors
approved loan policies. Detailed loan applications are obtained to determine the borrowers
repayment ability. Applications are verified through the use of credit reports, financial
statements and other confirmation procedures. Property valuations by independent appraisers
approved by the Board of Directors are required for mortgage and all real estate loans.
It is Westernbanks policy to require Senior Lending Credit Committee (SLCC) approval for all
loans in excess of $25.0 million, including the Asset-Based Lending Unit, formerly known as
Westernbank Business Credit Division. The SLCC also reviews and ratifies all loans from $2.5
million to $25.0 million approved by Westernbanks regional credit committees. The SLCC is composed
of a majority of the members of the Companys Board of Directors and senior lending officers. All
loans in excess of $25.0 million, including the Asset-Based Lending Unit, formerly known as
Westernbank Business Credit Division, approved by the SLCC are also reviewed and ratified by the
Board of Directors of the Company. All loans in excess of $100.0 million require the approval of
the Board of Directors of the Company.
It is Westernbanks policy to require borrowers to provide title insurance policies certifying or
ensuring that Westernbank has a valid first lien on the mortgaged real estate. Borrowers must also
obtain hazard insurance policies prior to closing and, when required by the Department of Housing
and Urban Development, flood insurance policies. Borrowers may be required to advance funds on a
monthly basis together with each payment of principal and interest to a
mortgage escrow account from which Westernbank makes disbursements for items such as real estate
taxes, hazard insurance premiums and private mortgage insurance premiums as they fall due.
79
Westernbanks practice is that its production and origination of residential real estate loans are
mostly conforming loans, eligible for sale in the secondary market. The loan-to-value ratio at the
time of origination on residential mortgages is generally 75%, except that Westernbank may lend up
to 97% of the lower of the purchase price or appraised value of residential properties if private
mortgage insurance is obtained, except for certain qualified new development projects, by the
borrower for amounts in excess of 80%.
Westernbank originates fixed and adjustable rate residential mortgage loans secured by a first
mortgage on the borrowers real property, payable in monthly installments for terms ranging from
ten to forty years. Adjustable rates are indexed to specified prime or LIBOR rate. All 30-year
conforming mortgage loans are originated with the intent to sell. Westernbank has also granted
loans, mainly secured by first mortgages on one-to-four residential properties, to mortgage
originators in Puerto Rico.
Westernbank originates primarily variable and adjustable rate commercial business and real estate
loans. Westernbank also makes real estate construction loans subject to firm permanent financing
commitments.
Westernbank offers different types of consumer loans in order to provide a full range of financial
services to its customers. Within the different types of consumer loans offered by Westernbank,
there are various types of secured and unsecured consumer loans with varying amortization
schedules. In addition, Westernbank makes fixed-rate residential second mortgage consumer loans. In
July 2002, Westernbank launched a new banking division focused on offering consumer loans that now
has 10 full-service branches, called Expresso of Westernbank, denoting the branches emphasis on
small, unsecured consumer loans up to $15,000 and collateralized consumer loans up to $150,000.
Westernbank offers the service of VISA
TM
and MasterCard
TM
credit cards. At
June 30, 2009, there were approximately 21,760 outstanding accounts, with an aggregate outstanding
balance of $50.3 million and unused credit card lines available of $74.3 million.
In connection with all consumer loans originated, Westernbanks underwriting standards include a
determination of the applicants payment history on other debts and an assessment of the ability to
meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan.
Non-performing loans and foreclosed real estate held for sale
The Company places a loan in non-performing status as soon as management has doubts as to the
ultimate collectibility of principal or interest or when contractual payments of principal or
interest are 90 days overdue. When a loan is designated as non-performing, interest accrual is
suspended and a specific provision is established, if required. When a borrower fails to make a
required payment on a loan, Westernbank attempts to cure the deficiency by contacting the borrower.
If the delinquency exceeds 90 days and is not cured through normal collection procedures,
Westernbank will generally institute measures to remedy the default. For collateral dependant
loans, if a foreclosure action is instituted and the loan is not cured, paid in full or refinanced,
the property is sold at a judicial sale at which Westernbank may acquire the property. In the event
that the property is sold at a price insufficient to cover the balance of the loan, the debtor
remains liable for the deficiency. Thereafter, if Westernbank acquires the property, such acquired
property is appraised and included in the foreclosed real estate held for sale account at
the fair value less costs to sell at the date of acquisition. Then, this asset is carried at the
lower of fair value less estimated costs to sell or cost until the property is sold.
80
The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when there is a clear indication that the
borrowers cash flows may not be sufficient to meet payments as they become due, but in no event is
it recognized after a borrower is 90 days in arrears on payments of principal or interest. When a
loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all previously accrued and unpaid interest is charged against
income and interest is accounted for on the cash-basis method or for certain high loan-to-value
credits on the cost-recovery method until qualifying for return to accrual status. Generally, a
loan is returned to accrual status when all delinquent interest and principal payments become
current in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement or when the loan is both well secured
and in the process of collection and collectibility is no longer doubtful. Consumer loans that have
principal and interest payments that have become past due one hundred and twenty days and credit
cards and other consumer revolving lines of credit that have principal and interest payments that
have become past due one hundred and eighty days are charged-off against the allowance for loan
losses.
Westernbank engages in the restructuring of the debt of borrowers who are delinquent due to
economic or legal reasons, if the Company determines that it is in the best interest for both the
Company and the borrower to do so. In some cases, due to the nature of the borrowers financial
condition, the restructure or loan modification fits the definition of Troubled Debt Restructuring
(TDR) as defined by the SFAS No. 15,
Accounting by Debtors and Creditors of Troubled Debt
Restructurings
. Such restructurings are identified as TDRs and accounted for based on the
provisions SFAS No. 114,
Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan
.
81
The following table sets forth information regarding non-performing loans and foreclosed real
estate held for sale of the Company at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Commercial real estate loans (1)
|
|
$
|
913,073
|
|
|
$
|
825,504
|
|
Residential real estate loans
|
|
|
59,582
|
|
|
|
43,106
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
439,832
|
|
|
|
523,093
|
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural loans (2)
|
|
|
96,223
|
|
|
|
148,446
|
|
Consumer secured by real estate
|
|
|
25,437
|
|
|
|
14,890
|
|
Consumer other
|
|
|
5,703
|
|
|
|
4,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
|
1,539,850
|
|
|
|
1,560,031
|
|
Foreclosed real estate held for sale
|
|
|
101,981
|
|
|
|
98,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans and foreclosed real estate held for sale
|
|
$
|
1,641,831
|
|
|
$
|
1,658,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest that would have been recorded if the loans
had not been classified as non-performing
|
|
$
|
122,322
|
|
|
$
|
90,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest recorded on non-performing loans
|
|
$
|
18,645
|
|
|
$
|
25,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans as a percentage
of total loans at end of period
|
|
|
17.44
|
%
|
|
|
17.43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans and foreclosed real estate
held for sale as a percentage of total assets at end of period
|
|
|
11.41
|
%
|
|
|
10.85
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes $51.3 million and $118.2 million of loans of the Asset Based Lending Unit at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes $87.3 million and $141.2 million of loans of the Asset Based Lending Unit at June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
Total non-performing loans at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 remained relatively unchanged at
$1.5 billion. The stabilization of non-performing loans is mainly attributable to the Companys
decision to curtail major commercial lending, including construction lending, during the summer of
2007 and the application of stricter underwriting guidelines. Since the summer of 2007, as a result
of the slowdown in the economy of Puerto Rico and after determining that one of Westernbanks
largest asset-based lending relationships was impaired and that there was a significant collateral
deficiency, the Company decided to curtail major commercial lending and to make adjustments to
Companys underwriting standards designed to strengthen the credit quality of its loan portfolio.
Non-performing loans in the commercial real estate portfolio at June 30, 2009 increased by $87.6
million, when compared to December 31, 2008. The increase is mainly attributed to four loan
relationships with outstanding principal balances of $24.8 million, $24.4 million, $16.1 million,
and $14.5 million. The specific valuation allowance required for these loan relationships was not
significant as the loans are adequately collateralized. Such increase was partially offset by
commercial real estate mortgage loans that that the Company determined to return to accrual status
based on payment performance, improving financial condition, and adequacy of collateral values,
coupled with payoffs and pay downs received from impaired relationships.
82
Non-performing loans in the Companys Asset-Based Lending Unit decreased by $120.8 million from
$259.4 million at December 31, 2008, to $138.6 million at June 30, 2009. The decrease was mainly
attributed to four loans with combined outstanding principal balances of approximately $93.5
million that the Company determined to return to accrual status based on payment performance,
improving financial condition, and adequacy of collateral values, coupled with payoffs and pay
downs received from impaired relationships, coupled with charge-offs taken during the first half of
2009 and the foreclosure of one troubled loan relationship. During the six months ended June 30,
2009, no additional loans of the Asset-Based Lending Unit were downgraded to non-performing status,
when compared to December 31, 2008.
Total non-performing loans in the construction loan portfolio were $439.8 million at June 30, 2009,
compared to $523.1 million at December 31, 2008, a decrease of $83.3 million. The decrease is
mainly attributed to two loans with outstanding principal balance of $39.5 million and $27.8
million that during the first quarter of 2009 the Company determined to return to accrual status
based on payment performance and adequacy of collateral values, coupled with pay downs from the
sale of construction units from impairment relationships, offset in part by the disbursements of
previously committed amounts on non-performing construction loans. During the six months ended June
30, 2009, no additional loans of the construction loan portfolio were down-graded to non-performing
status, when compared to December 31, 2008.
Non-performing loans in the total consumer loans portfolio increased by $11.3 million at June 30,
2009, when compared to balances at December 31, 2008. Such increase was mainly due to
non-performing loans in the regular consumer loan portfolio, which are collateralized by real
estate, due to the effects of the aforementioned slowdown in the economy of Puerto Rico.
Allowance for loan losses
The Company maintains an allowance to absorb probable loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
The allowance is maintained at a level the Company considers to be adequate and is based on ongoing
quarterly assessments and evaluations of the collectibility and historical loss experience of
loans. Credit losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the allowance. Provisions for loan
losses are based on the Companys review of the historical credit loss experience and such factors
that, in managements judgment, deserve consideration under existing economic conditions in
estimating probable credit losses.
Estimates of losses inherent in the loan portfolio involve the exercise of judgment and the use of
assumptions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible
to significant revision as more information becomes available. While management utilizes its best
judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of the allowance is dependent upon a
variety of factors beyond the Companys control. Because of uncertainties inherent in the
estimation process, managements estimate of credit losses in the loan portfolio and the related
allowance may change.
The allowance consists of two components: the specific allowance and the general allowance. The
Company follows a systematic methodology in determining the appropriate level of these two
allowance components.
83
Larger commercial and construction loans that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are
subject to individual review and thus subject to specific allowance allocations. Where appropriate,
allowances are allocated to individual loans based on managements estimate of the borrowers
ability to repay the loan given the availability of collateral, other sources of cash flow, as well
as evaluation of legal options available to the Company. The review of individual loans includes
those loans that are impaired as provided in SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment
of a Loan, as amended. Any allowances for impaired loans are measured based on the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate or the fair value of
the underlying collateral. The Company evaluates the collectibility of both principal and interest
when assessing the need for loss accrual.
General allowances based on loss rates are applied to commercial and construction loans which are
not impaired and thus not subject to specific allowance allocations. The loss rates are generally
derived from two or three year historical net charge-offs by loan category adjusted for significant
qualitative factors that, in managements judgment, are necessary to reflect losses inherent in the
portfolio. These qualitative factors include: the effect of the national and local economies;
trends in loans growth; trends in the impaired and delinquent loans; risk management and loan
administration; changes in concentration of loans to one obligor; changes in the internal lending
policies and credit standards; and examination results from bank examiners and the Companys
internal credit examiners.
Homogeneous loans, such as consumer installments, residential mortgage loans, and credit cards are
not individually risk graded. General allowances are established for each pool of loans based on
the expected net charge-offs for one year. Loss rates are generally based on the higher of current
year or the average of the last two to three year historical net charge-offs by loan category,
adjusted for significant qualitative factors that, in managements judgment, are necessary to
reflect losses inherent in the portfolio. These qualitative factors include: the effect of the
national and local economies; trends in the delinquent loans; risk management; collection
practices; and changes in the internal lending policies and credit standards.
At June 30, 2009, the allowance for loan losses was $240.8 million, consisting of $98.1 million of
specific allowance and $142.7 million of general allowance. At June 30, 2008, the allowance for
loan losses was $327.9 million, consisting of $171.3 million of specific allowance and $156.6
million of general allowance.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company has not substantively changed in any
material respect of its overall approach in the determination of the allowance for loan losses.
There have been no material changes in criteria or estimation techniques as compared to prior
periods that impacted the determination of the current period allowance for loan losses.
84
The table below presents a reconciliation of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
271,300
|
|
|
$
|
338,967
|
|
|
$
|
282,089
|
|
|
$
|
338,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged-off:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans (1)
|
|
|
(12,067
|
)
|
|
|
(18,307
|
)
|
|
|
(13,119
|
)
|
|
|
(24,232
|
)
|
Residential real estate loans
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
(538
|
)
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
(18,847
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,086
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural loans (2)
|
|
|
(5,871
|
)
|
|
|
(4,911
|
)
|
|
|
(7,724
|
)
|
|
|
(10,388
|
)
|
Consumer secured by real estate
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(474
|
)
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
Consumer other
|
|
|
(4,901
|
)
|
|
|
(3,305
|
)
|
|
|
(8,941
|
)
|
|
|
(7,035
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans charged-off
|
|
|
(42,183
|
)
|
|
|
(26,816
|
)
|
|
|
(62,882
|
)
|
|
|
(42,311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries of loans previously
charged-off:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
Residential real estate-mortgage loans
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural loans
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
Consumer secured by real estate
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Consumer other
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries of loans previously charged-off
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged-off
|
|
|
(41,592
|
)
|
|
|
(25,411
|
)
|
|
|
(61,236
|
)
|
|
|
(40,121
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
11,124
|
|
|
|
14,346
|
|
|
|
19,979
|
|
|
|
29,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
240,832
|
|
|
$
|
327,902
|
|
|
$
|
240,832
|
|
|
$
|
327,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans at end of period
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
|
|
3.52
|
%
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
|
|
3.52
|
%
|
Provision for loan losses to net loans charged-off
|
|
|
26.75
|
%
|
|
|
56.46
|
%
|
|
|
32.63
|
%
|
|
|
73.04
|
%
|
Recoveries of loans to loans charged-off in previous period
|
|
|
1.85
|
%
|
|
|
3.90
|
%
|
|
|
2.58
|
%
|
|
|
3.04
|
%
|
Net loans charged-off to average total loans (3)
|
|
|
1.88
|
%
|
|
|
1.09
|
%
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
|
0.85
|
%
|
Allowance for loans losses to non-performing loans
|
|
|
15.64
|
%
|
|
|
19.51
|
%
|
|
|
15.64
|
%
|
|
|
19.51
|
%
|
Allowance for loans losses to non-performing loans,
excluding loans collateralized by real estate
|
|
|
236.28
|
%
|
|
|
136.86
|
%
|
|
|
236.28
|
%
|
|
|
136.86
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes $575,000 and $3.8 million of loans charged-off of the Asset-Based Lending Unit
during the quarter and six month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively. No commercial real
estate loans of the Asset-Based Lending Unit were charged-off during the six month period
ended June 30, 2009.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes $5.5 million of loans charged-off of the Asset-Based Lending Unit during the three
and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009. Includes $4.6 million and $9.6 million of loans
charged-off of the Asset-Based Lending Unit during the three and six month periods ended June
30, 2008, respectively.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Average loans were computed using beginning and period-end balances.
|
The allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2009 amounted to $240.8 million, compared to $327.9 at
June 30, 2008. As a percentage of total loans, the allowance for loan losses amounted to 2.73% and
3.52% at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses
to absorb probable credit-related losses inherit in its loans receivable portfolio. The allowance
for loan losses is affected by net charge-offs, loan portfolio balance, and the provision for loan
losses for each period. For the six month period ended June 30, 2009, the allowance for loan
losses was primarily impacted by $61.2 million of net-charge offs taken during the period, offset
in part by a provision for loan losses of $20.0 million taken during the period. Refer to the
discussion on the
Provision for Loan Losses
above for further details
regarding the Companys provision for loan losses.
85
The Companys net loans charge-offs for the second quarter and first half of 2009 were $41.6
million (1.88% of average loans on an annualized basis) and $61.2 million (1.38% of average loans
on an annualized basis), respectively, compared to $25.4 million (1.09% of average loans on an
annualized basis) and $40.1 million (0.85% of average loans on an annualized basis), respectively,
for the same periods in 2008. The increase in net charge-offs during 2009 was mainly due to
increases in charge-offs from the Companys construction loan portfolio. The increase in
construction loans net charge-offs in 2009 was related to the continued deterioration in the
economy of Puerto Rico that is impacting the absorption levels of existing construction projects in
Puerto Rico. Construction loans net charge-offs recorded during 2009 were mainly related to credits
with specific reserves established in prior quarters (based on recent appraisals) pursuant to SFAS
No. 114 evaluations. Commercial real estate charge-offs for the three and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2009 decreased by $6.2 million and $11.1 million, respectively, as compared to the same
periods in 2008, due to the adequacy of collateral for impaired loans outstanding during 2009. The
decrease in C&I net loans charge-offs for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, when compared
to the same period in 2008, was driven by lower charge-offs for the loan portfolio of the
Asset-Based Lending Unit.
For the second quarter and first half of 2009, charge-offs in the Companys consumer loan
portfolios increased by $1.7 million or 51% and $2.2 million or 31% when compared to the same
periods in 2008. The increase is mainly due to higher delinquencies in the consumer loan portfolio
as a result of economic conditions in Puerto Rico.
The following table presents the Companys historical loss rate by loan category for each of the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Net charge-off to average loan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
|
0.96
|
%
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
Residential real estate loans
|
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
5.43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.54
|
%
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural loans
|
|
|
3.17
|
%
|
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
|
2.28
|
%
|
Consumer secured by real estate
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
Consumer other
|
|
|
7.24
|
%
|
|
|
4.47
|
%
|
|
|
6.64
|
%
|
|
|
4.73
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net charge-offs to average loan
|
|
|
1.88
|
%
|
|
|
1.09
|
%
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
|
0.85
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accounts charged -off are submitted to the Collections Department recovery unit for
continued collection efforts. Recoveries made from accounts previously charged-off amounted to
$591,000 and $1.6 million, respectively, for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009
and $1.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2008.
86
The following table presents the allocation of the allowance for loan losses, the loan portfolio
composition percentage and the allowance to total loans ratio in each loan category, as set forth
in the Loans table above at the end of each period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans (1)
|
|
$
|
101,389
|
|
|
$
|
115,108
|
|
Residential real estate loans
|
|
|
4,377
|
|
|
|
3,948
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
79,259
|
|
|
|
110,777
|
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural loans (2)
|
|
|
37,305
|
|
|
|
38,273
|
|
Consumer secured by real estate
|
|
|
4,164
|
|
|
|
2,787
|
|
Consumer other
|
|
|
14,338
|
|
|
|
11,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
240,832
|
|
|
$
|
282,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan portfolio composition percentages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
|
56.79
|
%
|
|
|
56.99
|
%
|
Residential real estate loans
|
|
|
10.90
|
%
|
|
|
10.78
|
%
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
15.60
|
%
|
|
|
16.08
|
%
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural loans
|
|
|
7.96
|
%
|
|
|
8.01
|
%
|
Consumer secured by real estate
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.53
|
%
|
Consumer other and others
|
|
|
2.75
|
%
|
|
|
2.61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to total loans ratio at
end of year applicable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
|
2.02
|
%
|
|
|
2.26
|
%
|
Residential real estate loans
|
|
|
0.45
|
%
|
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
7.70
|
%
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural loans
|
|
|
5.31
|
%
|
|
|
5.34
|
%
|
Consumer secured by real estate
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
|
|
0.56
|
%
|
Consumer other and others
|
|
|
5.91
|
%
|
|
|
4.79
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
|
|
3.15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes an allowance of $7.0 million and $8.2 million for the Asset-Based Lending Unit loan
portfolio at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes an allowance of $25.7 million and $30.3 million for the Asset-Based Lending Unit loan
portfolio at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
At June 30, 2009, the allowance for possible loan losses was 15.64% of total non-performing loans
(reserve coverage) compared to 18.08% at December 31, 2008. The reserve coverage ratio is
impacted by the Companys business model. Specifically, as a secured lender, most of
the Companys loans are collateralized by real estate. As a result, a significant portion of the
non-performing loans did not require a specific allowance given the adequacy of collateral
coverage.
87
The following table summarizes and segregates the Companys reserve coverage ratio by the allowance
methodology employed (specific or general allowance methodology) at June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans
|
|
$
|
1,539,850
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
240,832
|
|
Reserve Coverage Ratio
|
|
|
15.64
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans subject to specific impairment
analysis as per SFAS No. 114
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans subject to specific
impairment analysis
|
|
$
|
1,368,698
|
|
Total specific valuation allowance
|
|
|
93,204
|
|
Reserve Coverage Ratio for loans subject to
specific impairment analysis
|
|
|
6.81
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans not subject to specific impairment
analysis as per SFAS No. 114
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans
|
|
$
|
171,152
|
|
Total general valuation allowance
|
|
|
147,628
|
|
Reserve Coverage Ratio for loans not subject to
specific impairment analysis (Homogenous Coverage Ratio)
|
|
|
86.26
|
%
|
The reserve coverage ratio is impacted by the Companys business model. Most of the Companys
nonperforming loans are subject to specific reviews and to specific allowance allocations.
Specifically, at June 30, 2009, 89% of the Companys total nonperforming loans were subject to
specific impairment analysis. The Companys policies require specific impairment analysis to be
based on recent appraisals (every 18 months or on a needed basis, in conformity with market
conditions and regulatory requirements). The specific impairment analysis incorporates such
appraisals in the calculation of the specific allowances. Due to the Companys secured lender
status and the adequacy of collateral underlying the Companys nonperforming loans, the reserve coverage ratio for loans subject to specific impairment analysis
at June 30, 2009 was only 7%.
Excluding nonperforming loans subject to specific impairment analysis, the Companys reserve
coverage ratio (Homogeneous Coverage Ratio) at June 30, 2009 was 86%. The Homogenous Coverage
Ratio is also influenced by the Companys business model. Most of the loans subject to the
Homogenous Coverage Ratio are secured with either commercial or residential real estate, for which
the Companys loss experience has been relatively low. Specifically, at June 30, 2009, 92% of the
Companys loans included in the Homogenous Coverage Ratio were secured with either commercial or
residential real estate.
88
Troubled Debt Restructurings
A troubled debt restructuring is a formal restructure of a loan where the lender, for economic or
legal reasons related to the borrowers financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower
that it would not otherwise consider. The concessions may be granted in various forms, including
reduction in the stated interest rate, reduction in the loan balance or accrued interest, and
deferral of cash payments. Note, however, that a debt restructuring is not necessarily a troubled
debt restructuring even if the debtor is experiencing some financial difficulties.
As of each
of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Westernbank had
commercial loans totaling $161.3
million and $122.9 million, respectively, that met the definition of TDRs, and therefore have been accounted for as TDRs. At June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, $21.0 million and $4.8 million, respectively, of commercial loans
accounted for as TDRs were in accrual status.
The increase in TDRs was primarily due to restructuring loans necessitated by the continuing
downturn in the economy of Puerto Rico.
Impaired Loans
Loans are classified as impaired or not impaired in accordance with SFAS No. 114. A loan is
impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that Westernbank will be
unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due, according to the
contractual terms of the agreement. The allowance for impaired loans is part of the Companys
overall allowance for loan losses.
Westernbank measures the impairment of a loan based on the present value of expected future cash
flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or as a practical expedient, at the
observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral
dependent. Larger commercial and construction loans that exhibit probable or observed credit
weaknesses are individually evaluated for impairment. Large groups of small balance, homogeneous
loans are collectively evaluated for impairment; loans that are recorded at fair value or at the
lower of cost or market are not evaluated for impairment. The portfolios of
mortgage and consumer loans are considered homogeneous and are evaluated collectively for
impairment.
Historically, the Companys loss experience with commercial real estate loans, including
construction loans, has been relatively low due to the sufficiency of the underlying real estate
collateral. As a consequence, as of June 30, 2009, 45% of the impaired loans did not require an
allowance.
The following table sets forth information regarding the investment in impaired loans:
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Investment in impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered by a valuation allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans (1)
|
|
$
|
458,840
|
|
|
$
|
389,550
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
305,420
|
|
|
|
440,847
|
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural loans (2)
|
|
|
51,494
|
|
|
|
70,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total
|
|
|
815,754
|
|
|
|
901,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do not require a valuation allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans (3)
|
|
|
372,230
|
|
|
|
413,061
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
213,018
|
|
|
|
83,389
|
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural loans (4)
|
|
|
94,209
|
|
|
|
73,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total
|
|
|
679,457
|
|
|
|
570,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,495,211
|
|
|
$
|
1,471,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance for impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans (5)
|
|
$
|
40,836
|
|
|
$
|
49,121
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
45,940
|
|
|
|
64,903
|
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural loans (6)
|
|
|
10,620
|
|
|
|
16,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
97,396
|
|
|
$
|
131,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of valuation allowance
to impaired loans
|
|
|
6.51
|
%
|
|
|
8.91
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Average investment in impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
$
|
778,736
|
|
|
$
|
928,188
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
518,344
|
|
|
|
486,484
|
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural loans
|
|
|
162,336
|
|
|
|
246,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,459,416
|
|
|
$
|
1,660,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest collected and recognized as income
on non-performing and impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
$
|
13,336
|
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
3,239
|
|
|
|
4,317
|
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural loans
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
4,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,511
|
|
|
$
|
21,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes $16.0 million and $6.5 million of loans of the asset based lending division
at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes $51.4 million and $111.1 million of loans of the asset based lending division
at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes $69.6 million and $38.5 million of loans of the asset based lending division
at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes $32.8 million and $101.9 million of loans of the asset based lending division
at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Includes $1.2 million and $473,000 of loans of the asset based lending division
at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Includes $10.6 million and $12.5 million of loans of the asset based lending division
at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
90
Investments
The Companys investments are managed by the Investment Department. Purchases and sales are
required to be reported monthly to the Assets and Liabilities Committee (composed of the entire
Board of Directors of the Company, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the
Treasurer and Chief Investment Officer of Westernbank, and the Chief Accounting Officer).
The Investment Department is authorized to purchase and sell federal funds, interest bearing
deposits in banks, bankers acceptances of commercial banks insured by the FDIC, mortgage and
asset-backed securities, Puerto Rico and U.S. Government and agencies obligations, municipal
securities rated A or better by any of the nationally recognized rating agencies, commercial paper
and corporate notes rated P-1 by Moodys Investors Service, Inc. or A-1 by Standard and Poors, a
Division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. In addition, the Investment Department is responsible
for the pricing and sale of deposits and repurchase agreements.
At the date of purchase, the Company classifies securities into one of three categories: held to
maturity; trading; or available for sale. At each reporting date, the appropriateness of the
classification is reassessed. Investments in debt securities for which management has the intent
and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity and stated at cost increased by
accretion of discounts and reduced by amortization of premiums, both computed by the interest
method. Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near
term are classified as trading and measured at fair value in the financial statements with
unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Securities not classified as either held to
maturity or trading are classified as available for sale and measured at fair value in the
financial statements with unrealized gains and losses reported, net of income tax, as a component
of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until realized. Gains and losses on sales of
securities are determined using the specific-identification method. Available-for-sale and
held-to-maturity securities are reviewed at least quarterly for possible other-than-temporary
impairment (OTTI). If the fair value of an available-for-sale or held-to-maturity security is
less than its amortized cost basis, the Company must determine whether an OTTI has occurred. Under
GAAP, the recognition and measurement requirements related to OTTI differ for debt and equity
securities.
For debt securities, if the Company intends to sell the debt security or will more likely than not
be required to sell the debt security before recovery of the entire amortized cost basis, then an
OTTI has occurred, and the Company must recognize through earnings the entire OTTI, which is
calculated as the difference between the fair value of the debt security and its amortized cost
basis. However, even if the Company does not intend to sell the debt security and will not likely
be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its entire amortized cost basis, the
Company must evaluate expected cash flows to be received and determine if a credit loss has
occurred. In the event of a credit loss, the credit component of the impairment is recognized
through earnings and the non-credit component is recognized through accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss). During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not
recognize OTTI on any of its available-for-sale or held-to-maturity debt securities.
91
For equity securities, the Companys management evaluates the securities in an unrealized loss
position in the available-for-sale portfolio for OTTI on the basis of the duration of the decline
in value of the security and severity of that decline as well as the Companys intent and ability
to hold these securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in
the market value. If it is determined that the impairment on an equity security is other than
temporary, an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying value of the security
and its fair value is recognized in earnings. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, the Company did not recognize OTTI on any of its available-for-sale equity securities.
The Companys investment strategy is affected by both the rates and terms available on competing
investments and tax and other legal considerations.
The following table presents the carrying value of investments at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Held to maturity :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government and agencies obligations (USGOs)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
372,311
|
|
Puerto Rico Government and agencies obligations (PRGOs)
|
|
|
13,303
|
|
|
|
13,312
|
|
Corporate notes
|
|
|
21,436
|
|
|
|
21,436
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
579,155
|
|
|
|
630,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
613,894
|
|
|
|
1,037,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USGOs
|
|
|
194,958
|
|
|
|
307,880
|
|
PRGOs
|
|
|
11,496
|
|
|
|
11,457
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
3,601,448
|
|
|
|
3,347,992
|
|
Equity securities common stock
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
2,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,808,935
|
|
|
|
3,670,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
4,422,829
|
|
|
$
|
4,708,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
Mortgage-backed securities at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) certificates
|
|
$
|
1,766,257
|
|
|
$
|
526,376
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMOs) issued and guaranteed
by GNMA
|
|
|
1,468,249
|
|
|
|
2,427,527
|
|
CMOs issued and guaranteed by the Federal National Mortgage
Association (FNMA)
|
|
|
353,885
|
|
|
|
380,438
|
|
CMOs issued and guaranteed by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (FHLMC)
|
|
|
13,057
|
|
|
|
13,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for sale
|
|
|
3,601,448
|
|
|
|
3,347,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA certificates
|
|
|
5,085
|
|
|
|
5,574
|
|
FHLMC certificates
|
|
|
1,755
|
|
|
|
1,942
|
|
FNMA certificates
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
|
|
2,691
|
|
CMOs certificates issued or guaranteed by FHLMC
|
|
|
506,326
|
|
|
|
551,802
|
|
CMOs certificates issued or guaranteed by FNMA
|
|
|
63,413
|
|
|
|
68,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held to maturity
|
|
|
579,155
|
|
|
|
630,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
4,180,603
|
|
|
$
|
3,978,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The carrying amount of investment securities at June 30, 2009, by contractual maturity (excluding
mortgage-backed securities), are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
yield
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
US Government and agencies obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
$
|
100,064
|
|
|
|
1.29
|
%
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
23,120
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
71,774
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,958
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government and agencies obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
3.80
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
23,844
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,799
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
21,436
|
|
|
|
8.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
241,193
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
4,180,603
|
|
|
|
4.07
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,422,829
|
|
|
|
4.01
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
The Companys investment portfolio as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, consisted principally
of U.S. Government and agencies obligations, Puerto Rico Government and agencies obligations, and
mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by GNMA, FHLMC or FNMA. In addition, the Company
does not have investments in residual tranches.
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the unrealized loss position relates to
interest rate changes and not to credit deterioration of any of the securities issuers. The Company
assessed the ratings of the different agencies for the mortgage-backed securities, noting that at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, all of them have maintained the highest rating by all the
rating agencies and reflect a stable outlook. The aggregate unrealized gross losses of the
investment securities available for sale and held to maturity amounted to $54.5 million and $69.5
million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Deposits
Westernbank offers a diversified choice of deposit accounts. At June 30, 2009, total deposits,
including brokered deposits, amounted to $10.2 billion, a decrease of $788.2 million or 7%, when
compared to $11.0 billion at December 31, 2008. The decrease was mainly due to a reduction in
brokered deposits as a result of the Companys decision to decrease its on-balance sheet liquidity.
During the second half of 2008, the Company decided to build up its on-balance sheet liquidity in
light of difficult financial market conditions. As a result, during the second half of 2008, the
Company increased its on-balance sheet liquidity by raising brokered deposits. During late 2008
and the first half of 2009, the Company undertook additional actions to increase its off-balance
sheet liquidity, including among other things, the posting of additional collateral, thereby
increasing its borrowing capacity with the FHLB. During the second quarter of 2009, with the
additional borrowing capacity established with the FHLB and after much of the financial crisis had
passed, the Company decided to decrease its on-balance sheet liquidity. The Companys brokered
deposits at June 30, 2009, amounted to $7.8 billion, a decrease of $718.3 million or 8% as compared
to balances of $8.5 billion at December 31, 2008. In connection with its asset/liability
management, the Company uses brokered deposits since these deposits provide the flexibility of
selecting short, medium and long term maturities to better match the Companys asset/liability
management strategies. Typically, brokered deposits tend to be highly rate-sensitive deposits, and
therefore, these are considered under many circumstances to be a less stable source of funding for
an institution as compared to deposits generated primarily in a banks local markets. Brokered
deposits come primarily from brokers that provide intermediary services for banks and investors,
therefore providing banks, such as Westernbank, increased access to a broad range of potential
depositors who have no relationship with Westernbank and who actively seek the highest returns
offered within the financial industry. However, due to the competitive market for deposits in
Puerto Rico, coupled with generally low interest rates in the United States, the rates paid by
Westernbank on these deposits are often lower than those paid for local market area retail
deposits. The Puerto Rico deposit market is more challenging than the deposit market on the U.S.
mainland. Puerto Rico has a relatively stable population base, a number of very competitive local
banks looking to expand, and a large proportion of citizens that do not have bank accounts. Also,
the difference between the tax rate on interest earned from
bank deposits, versus the much lower tax rate on returns from investments held in local mutual
funds, preferred stock and local GNMAs makes those other investments more attractive than deposits
to some investors. These dynamics present significant challenges for gathering and retaining local
retail deposits. The result is a high cost local deposits market. The Company believes that the
benefits of brokered deposits outweigh the risk of deposit instability given that
these accounts have historically been a stable source of funds.
94
The Company offers deposits accounts through its retail branch network. Retail deposits are
principally attracted from retail and commercial customers in Puerto Rico, the Companys primary
market area, through the offering of a broad selection of deposit instruments, including passbook,
negotiable order of withdrawal, or NOW, and Super NOW, checking and commercial checking accounts
and time deposits. Retail deposits, excluding accrued interest payable, at June 30, 2009 increased
by $61.4 million when compared to balances at December 31, 2008. The increase was mainly
attributable to increases in non-interest bearing, interest bearing and savings deposits, offset in
part by a decrease in certificates of deposits. Non-interest bearing deposits increased by $38.8
million or 16% from $250.4 million at December 31, 2008 to $289.2 million at June 30, 2009, due to
increase volume of business from the Companys bank branches. Savings and interest-bearing deposits
increased from $945.8 million as of December 31, 2008, to $968.6 million as of June 30, 2009, an
increase of $22.8 million. Certificates of deposits as of June 30, 2009 decreased by $130.2 million
when compared with balances of $1.3 billion at December 31, 2008.
At June 30, 2009, the scheduled maturities of time deposits in amounts of $100,000 or more are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
3 months or less
|
|
$
|
135,171
|
|
over 3 months through 6 months
|
|
|
105,250
|
|
over 6 months through 12 months
|
|
|
121,165
|
|
over 12 months
|
|
|
73,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
435,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the average amount and the average rate paid on the following
deposit categories for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
rate
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
$
|
9,225,939
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,016,176
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
655,984
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
%
|
|
|
707,766
|
|
|
|
1.85
|
%
|
Interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
294,238
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
%
|
|
|
361,460
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
Noninterest bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
290,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
442,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,466,523
|
|
|
|
3.81
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,527,808
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
Borrowings
The following table sets forth the borrowings of the Company at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
$
|
2,710,424
|
|
|
$
|
3,204,142
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
|
|
|
92,000
|
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
Mortgage note payable
|
|
|
34,642
|
|
|
|
34,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,837,066
|
|
|
$
|
3,281,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Westernbank has made use of institutional federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements in
order to obtain funding, primarily through investment banks and brokerage firms. Repurchase
agreements are collateralized with investment securities while federal funds purchased do not
require collateral. Westernbank had $2.7 billion in repurchase agreements outstanding at June 30,
2009, at a weighted average rate of 3.91%. Repurchase agreements outstanding as of June 30, 2009,
mature as follows: $332.9 million within 30 days; $556.0 million within 31 days to one year; $942.0
billion in 2010; $25.0 million in 2011; $409.5 million in 2012; and $445.0 million for 2014 and
thereafter.
Westernbank also obtains advances from FHLB of New York. As of June 30, 2009, Westernbank had $92.0
million in outstanding FHLB advances at a weighted average rate of 2.96%. Advances from FHLB mature
as follows: $50.0 million within 30 days; and $42.0 million in 2010.
At June 30, 2009, the Company had outstanding $2.4 billion in repurchase agreements for which the
counterparties have the option to terminate the agreements at the first anniversary date and at
each interest payment date thereafter. Also, with respect to repurchase agreements and advances
from FHLB amounting to $380.0 million at June 30, 2009, at the first anniversary date and each
quarter thereafter, the FHLB has the option to convert them into replacement funding for the same
or a lesser principal amount based on any funding then offered by FHLB at the then current market
rates, unless the interest rate has been predetermined between FHLB and the Company. If the Company
chooses not to replace the FHLBs funding, it will repay the convertible advances and repurchase
agreements, including any accrued interest, on such optional conversion date.
Westernbank has counterparty exposure to affiliates of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LBHI),
which filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on September
15, 2008 in connection with certain securities repurchase agreements and derivative transactions.
Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. (LBSF) was the counterparty to the Company on certain
interest rate swap and cap agreements guaranteed by LBHI. The filing of bankruptcy by LBHI was an
event of default under the agreements. On September 19, 2008, the Company terminated all agreements
with LBSF and replaced them with another counterparty under similar terms and conditions. In
connection with such termination, the Company had an unsecured counterparty exposure with LBSF of
approximately $484,600. This unsecured exposure was written-off during the third quarter of 2008.
96
In addition, Lehman Brothers Inc. (LBI) was the counterparty to the Company on certain sale of
securities under agreements to repurchase. On September 19, 2008, LBI was placed in a Securities
Investor Protection Act (SIPA) liquidation proceeding after the filing for bankruptcy of its
parent LBHI. The filing of the SIPA liquidation proceeding was an event of default under the
repurchase agreements resulting in their termination as of September 19, 2008. The termination of
the agreements caused the Company to recognize the unrealized loss on the value of the securities
subject to the agreements, resulting in a $3.3 million charge during the third quarter of 2008.
Westernbank also has an aggregate exposure of $139.2 million representing the amount by which the
value of Westernbank securities delivered to LBI exceeds the amount owed to LBI under repurchase
agreements. On January 27, 2009, Westernbank filed customer claims with the trustee in LBIs SIPA
liquidation proceeding. On June 1, 2009, Westernbank filed amended customer claims with the
trustee. Management evaluated this receivable in accordance with the guidance provided by SFAS No.
5,
Accounting for Contingencies
, and related pronouncements. In making this determination,
management consulted with legal counsel and technical experts. As a result of its evaluation, the
Company recognized a loss of $13.9 million against the $139.2 million owed by LBI as of December
31, 2008. Determining the loss amount required management to use considerable judgment and
assumptions, and is based on the facts currently available. As additional information on the LBIs
SIPA liquidation proceeding becomes available, the Company may need to recognize additional losses.
A material difference between the amount claimed and the amount ultimately recovered would have a
material adverse effect on the Companys and Westernbanks financial condition and results of
operations, and could cause the Companys and Westernbanks regulatory capital ratios to fall below
the minimum to be categorized as well capitalized.
The Company expects to receive from the
LBIs SIPA trustee notices of determination (i) denying the Companys claims for treatment as a
customer with respect to the securities held by LBI under the repurchase financing agreements,
and (ii) converting the Companys claim to a general creditor claim. As such time, the Company
expects to file objections in court to this determination by the LBIs SIPA trustee.
At June 30, 2009, Westernbank World Plaza, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Westernbank Puerto
Rico, had outstanding a $34.6 million mortgage note, at an interest rate of 8.05% per year up to
September 11, 2009. Subsequent to September 11, 2009, the mortgage note would have borne interest
on the then outstanding principal balance at a rate per year equal to the greater of 13.05% or the
Treasury Rate plus five percentage points; or 10.05%, depending on the fulfillment of certain
conditions on the repricing date. Westernbank World Plaza has a prepayment option on the repricing
date, without penalty. The mortgage note is collateralized by a 23-story office building, including
its related parking facility, located in Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. On July 12, 2009, Westernbank World
Plaza, Inc. exercised the prepayment option and paid off the mortgage in full, thereby cancelling
the mortgage note.
The following table presents certain information regarding Westernbanks borrowings, excluding the
mortgage payable, for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Amount outstanding at period end
|
|
$
|
2,802,424
|
|
|
$
|
3,246,142
|
|
Monthly average outstanding balance
|
|
|
2,878,765
|
|
|
|
4,937,299
|
|
Maximum outstanding balance at any month end
|
|
|
3,229,055
|
|
|
|
6,000,775
|
|
Weighted average interest rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months and year ended
|
|
|
4.02
|
%
|
|
|
4.26
|
%
|
At the end of period
|
|
|
3.88
|
%
|
|
|
3.80
|
%
|
97
Stockholders Equity
Stockholders equity increased to $946.2 million at June 30, 2009, from $915.4 million at December
31, 2008. The 2009 increase was principally due to a positive variance of $40.7 million in the
accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, mainly on available for sale securities
recognized during the period as a result of a favorable interest rate movements, offset in part by
dividends of $5.3 million on the Companys preferred and common stock shares declared during the
first quarter of 2009, coupled with a net loss of $4.7 million realized during the first two
quarters of 2009.
REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS
The Company (on a consolidated basis) and Westernbank are subject to various regulatory capital
requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by
regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Companys and
Westernbanks financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework
for prompt corrective action, the Company and Westernbank must meet specific capital guidelines
that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items
as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are
also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and
other factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.
At June 30, 2009, the Company and Westernbank were in compliance with all the regulatory capital
requirements that were applicable to them as a financial holding company and state non-member bank,
respectively, (i.e., total capital to risk-weighted assets (Total Capital Ratio) and Tier 1
capital to risk-weighted assets (Tier 1 Capital Ratio) of at least 8% and 4%, respectively, and
Tier 1 capital to average assets (Leverage Ratio) of at least 4%) to be considered an adequately
capitalized institution.
At June 30, 2009, Westernbanks Leverage Ratio, Tier 1 Capital Ratio and Total Capital Ratio were
6.02%, 9.34%, and 10.61%, respectively, meeting the numerical requirements to be considered
well-capitalized. To be considered a well-capitalized institution under the FDICs regulations, an
institution must maintain a Leverage Ratio of at least 5%, a Tier 1 Capital Ratio of at least 6%
and a Total Capital Ratio of at least 10%, and not be subject to any written agreement or directive
to meet a specific capital ratio.
In May 2009, the Company and Westernbank entered into (i) a Consent Order (the Consent Order)
with the FDIC and the OCIF and (ii) a Written Agreement with the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (the Written Agreement, and, together with the Consent Order, the Orders). The
Orders build on the informal agreement which Westernbank entered into with the FDIC in February of
2008. The Consent Order includes a capital directive requiring Westernbank to maintain a Tier 1
leverage ratio of not less than 5.5% as of the date of the Consent Order, 5.75% at September 30,
2009 and 6.0% at March 31, 2010. As of September 30, 2009, the Banks Tier 1 leverage ratio was
6.32%. Although Westernbank complies with the quantitative definition of a well capitalized
institution, by virtue of having a capital directive within the Consent Order, the Bank was deemed
to be adequately capitalized. Simultaneously with the Consent Order, the FDIC granted Westernbank a
renewable waiver
98
for the issuance of brokered deposits, and in December 2009, the FDIC granted Westernbanks request to roll over a portion of the
Banks brokered deposits through March 31, 2010, subject to
certain limitations.
No assurance can be given that the Orders would not have a material adverse effect on the
Company or Westernbank.
The Orders do not impose penalties or fines on the Company or Westernbank. The Orders require the
Company and Westernbank to take various affirmative actions, including, but not limited to,
strengthening the Banks and the Companys Boards of Directors by increasing the number of
independent directors; strengthening Westernbanks management team; submitting a capital, budget,
profit and liquidity contingency plans; obtaining approvals prior to paying any dividends;
submitting a written plan to reduce and monitor Westernbanks problem and adversely classified
loans; eliminating from Westernbanks books, by collection or charge-offs, all items or portions of
items classified Loss as a result of the FDICs 2008 examination; submitting loan policies and
procedures for regulatory approval; restricting credit advances to adversely classified borrowers;
establishing an adequate and effective appraisal compliance program; and maintaining an adequate
Allowance for Loan Losses.
The principal source of income and funds for the Company are dividends from its subsidiaries.
Federal and Puerto Rico banking regulations place certain restrictions on dividends paid and loans
or advances made by Westernbank to the Company. In addition, the total amount of dividends which
may be paid at any date is generally limited to the retained earnings of Westernbank, and loans or
advances are limited to 10 percent of Westernbanks capital stock and surplus on a secured basis.
On February 17, 2009, the Company and Westernbanks Boards of Directors adopted a resolution to
suspend the payment of dividends on Westernbanks common stock and on the Companys common shares
and all of the outstanding series of its preferred shares, effective with the payment on March 16,
2009 and applicable to stockholders of record as of February 27, 2009, as a measure to strengthen
the Company and Westernbanks capital positions.
RISK MANAGEMENT
General
Effective management of risk is an integral part of the Companys business and critical to the
Companys safety and soundness. Risks are inherent in virtually all aspects of the Companys
business activities and operations. Consequently, an effective risk management program is
fundamental to the success of the Company. Risk management is an ongoing process and a state of
mind that is present at all levels throughout the Company. The Companys risk management process
involves all employees, management, senior management and the Companys Board of Directors in order
to be effective and strengthen the Companys ability to identify, measure, monitor and control
risk.
The Company has established a risk management program to monitor, evaluate and manage the principal
risks assumed in conducting its activities. The Companys business is exposed to the following
seven categories of risks: (1) credit risk, (2) market & interest rate risk, (3) liquidity risk,
(4) operational risk, (5) legal risk, (6) reputational risk and (7) concentration risk.
Risks Definition
Credit Risk arises from the potential that a borrower or counterparty will fail to perform an
obligation.
99
Market Risk & Interest Rate Risk is the risk to the Companys condition resulting from adverse
movements in market rates or prices, such as interest rates, foreign-exchange rates, or equity
prices.
Liquidity Risk is the potential that the Company will be unable to meet its obligations as
they come due because of an inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding, or the
potential that the Company cannot easily unwind or offset specific exposures without
significantly lowering market prices because of inadequate market depth or market disruptions.
Operational Risk arises from the potential that inadequate information systems, operational
problems, breaches in internal controls, fraud, or unforeseen catastrophes will result in
unexpected losses.
Legal Risk arises from the potential that unenforceable contracts, lawsuits, or adverse
judgments can disrupt or otherwise negatively affect the operations or condition of the Company.
Reputational Risk is the potential risk that negative publicity regarding the Companys
business practices, whether true or not, will cause a decline in the customer base, costly
litigation, or revenue reductions.
Concentration Risk is the potential risk to the Company of conducting its operations in a
geographically concentrated area.
Audit Committee
The Companys Audit Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors (the Board) to assist the
Board in its oversight of the risk management processes related to compliance, operations, internal
audit function, external financial reporting and internal control over financial reporting process.
In performing this function, the Audit Committee is assisted by the Companys Senior Management.
Risk Management Program
The Companys risk management program, which is approved by its Board of Directors, is designed to
balance a strong Company oversight with well-defined independent risk management functions within
each business unit. The main objective of the Companys risk management program is to ensure that
all employees, management and Senior Management and processes are organized in a way that promotes
a cross-functional approach to risk management and that controls are in place to better manage the
Companys risks and comply with legal and regulatory requirements. As a result, the Companys risk
management program has always been an ongoing process and a state of mind that is present at all
levels within the Company. The risk management program is administered by the Companys Risk
Management Committee.
The Companys senior managers of each business unit are responsible and accountable for
identifying, measuring and managing key risks within their business units consistent with the
Companys policies. The Companys Risk Management Committee is responsible for supporting
100
the Companys Chief Risk Officer in measuring and managing the Companys aggregate risk profile.
The Chief Risk Officer is responsible for establishing the Companys overall risk management
structure and providing an independent evaluation and oversight of the Companys risk management
activities. The Companys Risk Management Committee executes managements oversight role regarding
risk management. This committee has been designed to ensure that the appropriate authorities,
resources, responsibilities and reporting are in place to support an effective risk management
program. The Companys Risk Management Committee consists of various senior executive officers of
the Company, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The Companys Risk
Management Committee is responsible for ensuring that the Companys overall risk profile is
consistent with the Companys objectives and risk tolerance levels.
The Companys Internal Audit group provides an objective and independent assessment of the design
and execution of the Companys internal control system, including management systems, risk
management, policies and procedures, among other.
As part of the Companys risk management program, the Company has various risk management related
committees. These committees are jointly responsible, along with the Risk Management Committee, for
ensuring adequate risk measurement and management in their respective areas of authority. At the
management level, these committees include:
|
|
|
Assets & Liabilities Committee oversees interest rate and market risk, liquidity
management and other related matters.
|
|
|
|
Steering Committee is responsible for the oversight of and counsel on matters related
to information technology including the development of information management policies and
procedures throughout the Company.
|
|
|
|
Compliance and Risk Management Committee is responsible for the oversight of federal
and local regulatory compliance.
|
|
|
|
Delinquency Committee is responsible for the periodic reviews of (1) past due loans,
(2) overdrafts, (3) non-accrual loans and (4) adversely classified loans.
|
|
|
|
Lending Committees at different approval levels, each committee is responsible for
approving loan credits consistent with the Companys policies and procedures.
|
Executive Officers
The following officers play a key role in the Companys risk management process:
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer (the CEO) in combination with the Companys Chief Operating
Officer is responsible for the overall risk management structure.
|
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer responsible for the day-to-day operations and in combination
with the CEO is responsible for the overall risk management structure.
|
|
|
|
Chief Risk Officer responsible for the oversight of the risk management organization
as well as risk management program processes.
|
101
|
|
|
Chief Credit Risk Officer manages the Companys credit risk program.
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer in combination with the Companys Treasurer, manages the
Companys interest, market and liquidity risks programs and in combination with the Chief
Accounting Officer is responsible for the implementation of accounting policies and
practices in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the Unites States
of America and applicable regulatory requirements.
|
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer responsible for the development and implementation of the
Companys accounting policies and practices and the review and monitoring of critical
accounts and transactions to ensure that they are managed in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America and applicable regulatory
requirements.
|
Credit Risk Management
The Company is subject to credit risk mainly with respect to its loan portfolio and off-balance
sheet instruments, mainly loan commitments and derivatives. Loans represent amounts that the
Company has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off
and, therefore, the Company is at risk for the term of the loan.
Commercial lending, including commercial real estate and asset-based lending, unsecured business
lending and construction lending, generally carry a greater risk than residential lending because
such loans are typically larger in size and more risk is concentrated in a single borrower. In
addition, the borrowers ability to repay a commercial loan or a construction loan depends, in the
case of a commercial loan, on the successful operation of the business or from the cash flow
generated by the property securing the loan and, in the case of a construction loan, on the
successful completion and sale or operation of the project. Commercial lending is diversified by
product type and loan size with concentration levels established to manage the exposure.
Substantially all of the Companys borrowers and properties and other collateral securing the
commercial, real estate mortgage and consumer loans are located in Puerto Rico. These loans may be
subject to a greater risk of default if the Puerto Rico economy suffers adverse economic, political
or business developments, or if natural disasters affect Puerto Rico. Appraisals are obtained from
qualified appraisers and are reviewed by an independent appraisal review group to ensure
independence and consistency in the valuation process. Appraisal values for commercial and
construction impaired loans are updated every 18 months or on an as needed basis, in conformity
with market conditions and regulatory requirements. The Company manages its credit risk through
credit policy, underwriting, and quality control procedures and an established delinquency
committee. The Company also employs proactive collection and loss mitigation efforts. Furthermore,
there are loans workout functions responsible for avoiding defaults and minimizing losses upon
default of commercial and construction loans. The loans workout group utilizes relationship
officers, collection specialists and attorneys.
Loan commitments represent commitments to extend credit, subject to specific conditions, for
specific amounts and maturities. These commitments may expose the Company to credit risk and
subject to the same review and approval process as for loans. Refer to the -Liquidity Risk
section below for further details.
102
Since 2007, the Company has taken several steps to mitigate the credit risk underlying its
commercial and C&I loan portfolios, including setting portfolio limits and applying stricter
underwriting guidelines. The Companys Internal Loan Review
Department (ILRD) has also continued
to actively participate in the loan classification and determination of loss reserves. In addition,
the Banks credit monitoring functions, which cover all lending functions, are now required to obtain
updated appraisal reports for all adversely classified loans in excess of $1,000,000 and continue to
be involved in the credit review analysis process with enhanced communication to both, Management and the Banks ILRD.
During the third quarter of 2008, the Company reviewed all of its credit and risk
functions. This effort has resulted in a realignment of these functions and the adoption
of a Company-wide risk management process. The Company recruited a new senior officer as
Chief Risk Officer (the CRO) with reporting responsibilities to the Audit Committee.
In addition, the Company recruited and appointed a new senior officer as Chief Credit Risk Officer
(the CCRO) with reporting responsibilities to the CRO and the Audit Committee. All credit
administrative functions, (including among others, analysis, pre-closing, loan closing, credit
monitoring and review, collections and workout) will be overseen by the CCRO. A senior officer was
appointed as Chief Banking Officer and Commercial Lender, completely independent from the credit
administrative functions, to be responsible for all new originations, extension and restructuring of commercial,
construction and development loans reporting directly to the Chief Executive Officer.
In addition, during 2009 the Company strengthened its appraiser review function by creating
an Appraisal Review Division. This is an independent unit reporting to the Companys CCRO, staffed
with experienced personnel. The Appraisal Review Department responsibilities, among others, include:
(1) preparation of engagement and order appraisals; (2) revision of appraisals to ensure that appraised
values submitted are properly supported, reasonable, and in compliance with all federal and state
regulations, as well as the Companys policies and procedures; (3) preparation of written review reports;
(4) coordination with appraisers for any necessary corrections on appraisals prepared for the Company;
and (5) providing advice and assistance to loan officers in the implementation of the Companys appraisal policy.
The Company has also employed proactive collection and loss
mitigation efforts. Furthermore, there are Loan Workout functions responsible for avoiding
defaults and minimizing losses upon default of commercial and construction loans. The group utilizes
relationship officers, collection specialists and attorneys.
The Company may also have risk of default in the investment securities portfolio. The securities
held by the Company are principally fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury and
agency securities. Thus, a substantial portion of these instruments is backed by mortgages, a
guarantee of a U.S. government-sponsored entity or backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S.
government and is deemed to be of the highest credit quality.
Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are reviewed at least quarterly for possible
other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI). If the fair value of an available-for-sale or
held-to-maturity security is less than its amortized cost basis, the Company must determine whether
an OTTI has occurred. Under GAAP, the recognition and measurement requirements related to OTTI
differ for debt and equity securities.
For debt securities, if the Company intends to sell the debt security or will more likely than not
be required to sell the debt security before recovery of the entire amortized cost basis, then an
OTTI has occurred, and the Company must recognize through earnings the entire OTTI, which is
calculated as the difference between the fair value of the debt security and its amortized cost
basis. However, even if the Company does not intend to sell the debt security and will not likely
be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its entire amortized cost basis, the
Company must evaluate expected cash flows to be received and determine if a credit loss has
occurred. In the event of a credit loss, the credit component of the impairment is recognized
through earnings and the non-credit component is recognized through accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss). During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not
recognize OTTI on any of its available-for-sale or held-to-maturity debt securities.
For equity securities, the Companys management evaluates the securities in an unrealized loss
position in the available-for-sale portfolio for OTTI on the basis of the duration of the decline
in value of the security and severity of that decline as well as the Companys intent and ability
to hold these securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in
the market value. If it is determined that the impairment on an equity security is other than
temporary, an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying value of the security
and its fair value is recognized in earnings. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, the Company did not recognize OTTI on any of its available-for-sale equity securities.
The Companys investment portfolio as of June 30, 2009, consisted principally of U.S. Government
and agencies obligations, Puerto Rico Government and agencies obligations, and mortgage-backed
securities issued or guaranteed by GNMA, FHLMC or FNMA. There were no investment securities other
than those referred to above in a significant unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2009. In
addition, the Company does not have investments in residual tranches.
At June 30, 2009, the unrealized loss position relates to interest rate changes and not
to credit deterioration of any of the securities issuers. The Company assessed the ratings of the
different agencies for the mortgage-backed securities, noting that at June 30, 2009, all of them
have maintained the highest rating by all the rating agencies and reflects a stable outlook.
The Companys Management, comprised of the Companys Chief Lending Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Risk Officer, and other senior executives, has the primary
responsibility for setting strategies to achieve the Companys credit risk goals and objectives.
These goals and objectives are documented in the Companys Credit Policy Manual.
103
The Company may use derivative instruments as part of its interest rate risk management strategy
including interest rate swaps and indexed options. These transactions involve both credit and
market risk. The notional amounts are amounts on which calculations, payments and the value of the
derivative are based. Notional amounts do not represent direct credit exposures. Direct credit
exposure is limited to the net difference between the calculated amounts to be received and paid,
if any. The fair value of a derivative is based on the estimated amount the Company would receive
or pay to terminate the derivative contract, taking into account the current interest rates and the
creditworthiness of the counterparty. The fair value of the derivatives is reflected on the
Companys statements of financial condition as derivative assets and derivative liabilities.
Westernbank has counterparty exposure to affiliates of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LBHI),
which filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on September
15, 2008 in connection with certain securities repurchase agreements and derivative transactions.
Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. (LBSF) was the counterparty to the Company on certain
interest rate swap and cap agreements guaranteed by LBHI. The filing of bankruptcy by LBHI was an
event of default under the agreements. On September 19, 2008, the Company terminated all agreements
with LBSF and replaced them with another counterparty under similar terms and conditions. In
connection with such termination, the Company had an unsecured counterparty exposure with LBSF of
approximately $484,600. This unsecured exposure was written-off during the third quarter of 2008.
In addition, Lehman Brothers Inc. (LBI) was the counterparty to the Company on certain sale of
securities under agreements to repurchase. On September 19, 2008, LBI was placed in a Securities
Investor Protection Act (SIPA) liquidation proceeding after the filing for bankruptcy of its
parent LBHI. The filing of the SIPA liquidation proceeding was an event of default under the
repurchase agreements resulting in their termination as of September 19, 2008. The termination of
the agreements caused the Company to recognize the unrealized loss on the value of the securities
subject to the agreements, resulting in a $3.3 million charge during the third quarter of 2008.
Westernbank also has an aggregate exposure of $139.2 million representing the amount by which the
value of Westernbank securities delivered to LBI exceeds the amount owed to LBI under repurchase
agreements. On January 27, 2009, Westernbank filed customer claims with the trustee in LBIs SIPA
liquidation proceeding. On June 1, 2009, Westernbank filed amended customer claims with the
trustee. Management evaluated this receivable in accordance with the guidance provided by SFAS No.
5,
Accounting for Contingencies
, and related pronouncements. In making this determination,
management consulted with legal counsel and technical experts. As a result of its evaluation, the
Company recognized a loss of $13.9 million against the $139.2 million owed by LBI as of December
31, 2008. Determining the loss amount required management to use considerable judgment and
assumptions, and is based on the facts currently available. As additional information on the LBIs
SIPA liquidation proceeding becomes available, the Company may need to recognize additional losses.
A material difference between the amount claimed and the amount ultimately recovered would have a
material adverse effect on the Companys and Westernbanks financial condition and results of
operations, and could cause the Companys and Westernbanks regulatory capital ratios to fall below
the minimum to be categorized as well capitalized.
The Company expects to receive from the
LBIs SIPA trustee notices of determination (i) denying the Companys claims for treatment as a
customer with respect to the securities held by LBI under the repurchase financing agreements,
and (ii) converting the Companys claim to a general creditor claim. As such time, the Company
expects to file objections in court to this determination by the LBIs SIPA trustee.
104
The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by the
counterparties to these agreements. The Company controls the credit risk of its financial contracts
through credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures, and does not expect any counterparties
to fail their obligations. The Company deals only with primary dealers. For further details and
information in the Companys derivative credit risk exposure, refer to the Market and Interest
Rate Risk section below.
For further information on the Companys credit exposure and related analysis and ratios refer to
Loans and Non-performing loans and foreclosed real estate held for sale sections in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Section of
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Market Risk & Interest Rate Risk
Market Risk & Interest Rate Risk is the risk to a company resulting from adverse movements in
market rates or prices, such as interest rates, foreign-exchange rates, or equity prices.
Management considers interest rate risk to be the Companys primary market risk exposure. Interest
rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in net interest income due to changes in interest
rates. Consistency of the Companys net interest income is largely dependent upon the effective
management of interest rate risk. The Company does not utilize derivatives to mitigate its credit
risk, relying instead on an extensive counterparty review process. For further information on the
Companys credit exposure and related analysis and ratios refer to -Allowance for Loan Losses
above.
Interest rate risk is addressed by the Companys Assets & Liabilities Committee (ALCO), which
includes the full Board and certain senior management representatives. The ALCO monitors interest
rate risk by analyzing the potential impact to the net portfolio of equity value and net interest
income from potential changes to interest rates and considers the impact of alternative strategies
or changes in balance sheet structure. The ALCO manages the Companys balance sheet in part to
minimize the potential impact on net portfolio value and net interest income of changes in interest
rates. The Companys exposure to interest rate risk is reviewed on a quarterly basis by the ALCO.
Interest rate risk exposure is measured using interest rate sensitivity analysis to determine the
change in net portfolio value and net interest income in the event of hypothetical changes in
interest rates. For net portfolio value exposure, the Company measures the impact of immediate,
sustained and parallel 200 basis points increase or decrease (shock) in the yield curve. For net
interest rate risk exposure, the Company measures sensitivity in net interest income assuming a
gradual upward and downward interest rate movements of 200 and 100 basis points over a one-year
period. If potential changes to net portfolio value and net interest income resulting from
hypothetical interest rate changes are not within the limits established by the Companys policies,
the Board may direct management to adjust its asset and liability mix to bring interest rate risk
within Board-approved limits. In order to reduce the exposure to interest rate fluctuations, the
Company has implemented strategies to more closely match its balance sheet composition.
The Companys profitability is dependent to a large extent upon its net interest income, which is
the difference between its interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and
investments, and its interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and
borrowings. The Company is subject to interest rate risk to the degree that its interest-earning
assets reprice differently than its interest-bearing liabilities.
105
The Company manages its mix of assets and liabilities with the goals of limiting its exposure
to interest rate risk, ensuring adequate liquidity, and coordinating its sources and uses of funds.
Specific strategies have included securitization and sale of long-term, fixed-rate residential
mortgage loans, shortening the average maturity of fixed-rate loans and increasing the volume of
variable and adjustable rate loans to reduce the average maturity of the Companys interest-earning
assets. As a general rule, long-term, fixed-rate single family residential mortgage loans
underwritten according to Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Federal National Mortgage
Association and Government National Mortgage Association guidelines are sold for cash soon after
origination. In addition, the Company enters into certain derivative financial instruments to hedge
various exposures or to modify interest rate characteristics of various statements of financial
condition items. For instance, the Company enters into interest rate swaps to modify the interest
rate characteristic of certain fixed-rate brokered certificates of deposit. This structured
variable rate funding matches well with the Company strategy of having a large floating rate
commercial loan portfolio. See Note 16 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, included herein in Part I.
The tables below show the risk profile of the Company plus 200-basis point or minus 100-basis point
parallel and gradual increase or decrease, respectively, of interest rates, as of June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Interest Rate
|
|
Expected NII
(1)
|
|
Amount Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
+200 Basis Points
|
|
$
|
218,914
|
|
|
$
|
(7,618
|
)
|
|
|
(3.36
|
)%
|
Base Scenario
|
|
|
226,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-100 Basis Points (2)
|
|
|
234,346
|
|
|
|
7,814
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The NII (net interest income) figures exclude the effect of the amortization of loan fees.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Due to the low interest rate environment, the Company only modeled a 100-basis point downward
adjustment.
|
At June 30, 2009, the Companys interest rate risk profile was fairly neutral with only modest
changes expected either on a 200 basis upward rate scenario or 100 basis point downward rate
scenario. The model utilized to create the information presented above makes various estimates at
each level of interest rate change regarding cash flows from principal repayments on loans and
mortgage-backed securities and/or call activity on investment securities. Actual results could
differ significantly from these estimates which would result in significant differences in the
calculated projected change. In addition, the limits stated above do not necessarily take into
account changes which management would undertake to realign its portfolio.
The Company is also exposed to basis risk, the risk of changing spreads between certain categories
of indexed assets and liabilities. The primary risk faced by the Company is the risk that the
spread between Prime loan rates and short-term funding rates (LIBOR) will narrow over time.
Specifically, the Companys loan portfolios are primarily tied to Prime rates while the Companys
funding is primarily tied to LIBOR, thus the Companys net interest income declines in periods of narrowing spreads. During 2008, due to the financial crisis that affected the
106
banking system and financial markets, the spread between Prime rates and LIBOR narrowed significantly
causing the Companys net interest income to decrease.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will be unable to meet its obligations as they become
due because of an inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding, or the potential that
the Company cannot easily unwind or offset specific exposures without significantly lowering market
prices because of inadequate market depth or market disruptions. The Companys need for liquidity
is affected by loan demand, net changes in deposit levels and scheduled maturities of its
borrowings. Liquidity demand caused by net reductions in deposits is usually caused by factors over
which the Company has limited control. The Company monitors its liquidity in accordance with
guidelines established by the ALCO and applicable regulatory requirements. The Companys liquidity
metrics are reviewed monthly by the ALCO and are based on the Companys commitment to make loans
and investments and its ability to generate funds. The Committees targets are also affected by
yields on available investments and upon the Committees judgment as to the attractiveness of such
yields and its expectations as to future yields.
In an effort to support the Companys liquidity needs in the face of adverse market conditions, the
Company has developed a Liquidity Contingency Plan (LCP) to provide a roadmap to alternative
funding sources in the event that there are shortfalls in funding projections or if a liquidity
crisis arises. The LCP is an integral part of the Companys/Banks Liquidity Policy and is designed
to help the Company and the Bank manage routine and extraordinary fluctuations in liquidity.
The Company derives its liquidity from both its assets and liabilities. Liquidity is derived from
assets by receipt of interest and principal payments and prepayments, by the ability to sell assets
at market prices and by utilizing unpledged assets as collateral for borrowings. At June 30, 2009,
the Company had $645.5 million and $1.3 billion of cash and cash equivalent reserves and unpledged
investment securities, respectively, which could be used as collateral for borrowing, respectively.
Liquidity is derived from liabilities by maintaining a variety of funding sources, including
deposits, advances and borrowings from the FHLB of New York and other short and long-term
borrowings, such as federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements. Other borrowings limits are
determined annually by each counterparty and depend on the Companys financial condition and
delivery of acceptable collateral securities. The Company may be required to provide additional
collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities. In addition, the Company utilizes
the broker deposits market as a source of cost effective source of fund in addition to local market
deposit inflows. An adequately-capitalized bank, by regulation, may not accept deposits from
brokers unless it applies for and receives a waiver from the FDIC. The Company also uses the FHLB
as a funding source, issuing notes payable, such as advances, and other borrowings, such as
repurchase agreements, through its FHLB member subsidiary, Westernbank. This funding source
requires Westernbank to maintain a minimum amount of qualifying collateral, after application of
haircuts, with a fair value of at least 110% and 105% of the outstanding advances and repurchase
agreements, respectively. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has outstanding $92 million of advances
from the FHLB. Since 2008, the Company has been continuously reviewing its real estate residential and commercial collateral to increase
107
its ability to borrow from the FHLB. At June 30, 2009, the Companys borrowing capacity with the
FHLB was $598.9 million, with an availability of $506.9 million as of the same date.
The Company utilizes the broker deposits market as a source of cost effective deposit funding in
addition to local market deposit inflows. These deposits represent a large portion of the Companys
funding since these deposits provide the flexibility of selecting short, medium and long term
maturities to better match the Companys asset/liability management strategies. Typically, brokered
deposits tend to be highly rate-sensitive deposits, and therefore, these are considered to be a
less stable source of funding for an institution as compared to deposits generated primarily in a
banks local markets. Brokered deposits come primarily from brokers that provide intermediary
services for banks and investors, therefore providing banks, such as Westernbank, increased access
to a broad range of potential depositors who have no relationship with Westernbank and who actively
seek the attractive returns and issuer diversification.
Due to the competitive market for deposits in Puerto Rico, coupled with generally low interest
rates in the United States, the rates paid by Westernbank on these deposits are often lower than
those paid for local market area retail deposits. The Puerto Rico deposit market is more
challenging than the deposit market on the U.S. mainland. Puerto Rico has a relatively stable
population base, a number of very competitive local banks looking to expand, and a large proportion
of citizens that do not have bank accounts. Also, the difference between the tax rate on interest
earned from bank deposits, versus the much lower tax rate on returns from investments held in local
mutual funds, preferred stock and local GNMAs makes those other investments more attractive than
deposits to some investors. These dynamics present significant challenges for gathering and
retaining local retail deposits. The result is a high cost local deposits market. The Company
believes that the benefits of brokered deposits outweigh the risk of deposit instability. The
availability of additional brokered deposits depends on a variety of factors including market
conditions and the Companys and Westernbanks overall financial condition. At June 30, 2009, the
Company had $7.8 billion in brokered deposits, or 76% of total deposits. Westernbank relies
extensively on brokered deposits as a source of liquidity. Westernbank needs liquidity to, among
other things, pays operating expenses, maintain its lending activities and replace maturing
liabilities. Without sufficient liquidity, the Company may be forced to curtail its operations. The
continued access to brokered deposits depends on a variety of factors including market conditions,
regulatory matters and the Companys and Westernbanks overall financial condition.
In May 2009, the Company and Westernbank entered into (i) the Consent Order with the FDIC and the
OCIF and (ii) the Written Agreement with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(which are referred to as the Orders). The Orders build on the informal agreement which
Westernbank entered into with the FDIC in February of 2008. Concurrent with the Orders, the FDIC
granted Westernbank a waiver for the issuance of brokered certificates of deposits. The waiver
allows Westernbank to continue to issue brokered certificates of deposits. For a detailed
description of these Orders, refer to - Regulatory Capital Ratios above.
At June 30, 2009, Westernbank had total deposits of $10.2 billion, of which $675.9 million or 7%
consisted of savings deposits, $311.1 million or 3% consisted of interest bearing demand deposits,
$289.2 million or 3% consisted of noninterest bearing deposits, and $8.9 billion or 87% consisted
of time deposits and related accrued interest. Time deposits include brokered deposits amounting to $7.8 billion as of June 30, 2009. These accounts have historically been a stable
source of funds.
108
At June 30, 2009, the scheduled maturities of time deposits in amounts of $100,000 or more are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
3 months or less
|
|
$
|
135,171
|
|
over 3 months through 6 months
|
|
|
105,250
|
|
over 6 months through 12 months
|
|
|
121,165
|
|
over 12 months
|
|
|
73,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
435,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS Payments due, excluding interest, due by period for
the Companys contractual obligations (other than deposit liabilities) at June 30, 2009 are
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after one
|
|
|
Due after three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one
|
|
|
year through
|
|
|
years through
|
|
|
Due after five
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
year
|
|
|
three years
|
|
|
five years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
$
|
382,924
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
382,924
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
636,642
|
|
|
|
1,187,500
|
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
445,000
|
|
|
|
2,454,142
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
2,563
|
|
|
|
4,560
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
3,565
|
|
|
|
13,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
1,022,129
|
|
|
$
|
1,192,060
|
|
|
$
|
187,520
|
|
|
$
|
448,565
|
|
|
$
|
2,850,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The portion of the provision for income taxes related to unrecognized tax benefits amounted to
credits of $572,000 and $526,000 for the quarter and six-month period ended June 30, 2009,
respectively, compared to a provision of $45,000 and a credit of $33.5 million, respectively, for
the comparable periods in 2008. Uncertain income tax positions mainly relate to income which could
be subject to special flat income tax rates in a tax jurisdiction outside of Puerto Rico, and
certain expense deductions taken in income tax returns. For further detail on the a liability for
income taxes related to unrecognized tax benefits, refer to Note 14 to notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements, included herein in Part I Item 1.
Such commitments will be funded in the normal course of business from the Companys principal
source of funds. At June 30, 2009, the Company had $5.9 billion in time deposits that mature within
twelve months.
109
The maturity distribution of the Companys financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk
expiring by period at June 30, 2009, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After one
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one
|
|
|
year to five
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
year
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unused lines of credit
|
|
$
|
93,169
|
|
|
$
|
85,921
|
|
|
$
|
179,090
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
30,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,422
|
|
Commercial letters of credit
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
|
16,757
|
|
|
|
191,142
|
|
|
|
207,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
141,574
|
|
|
$
|
277,063
|
|
|
$
|
418,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to the nature of the Companys unfunded commitments, including unfunded lines of credit,
the amounts presented above do not necessarily represent the amounts the Company anticipates
funding in the periods presented above.
The Companys liquidity plan contemplates alternative sources of funding that could provide
significant amounts of funding at reasonable cost. The alternative sources of liquidity include the
sale of assets; including commercial loan participations and residential mortgage loans, among
others.
Operational Risk
The Company faces ongoing and emerging risk and regulatory pressure related to the activities that
surround the delivery of banking and financial products. Coupled with external influences such as
market conditions, security risks, and legal risk, the potential for operational losses has
increased. In order to mitigate and control operational risk, the Company has developed, and
continues to enhance, specific internal controls, policies and procedures that are designated to
identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels throughout the organization. The purpose
of these mechanisms is to provide reasonable assurance that the Companys business operations are
functioning within the policies and limits established by management and the Board.
The Company classifies operational risk into five major areas: Inadequate Information Systems Risk,
Operational Problems, Breaches in Internal Controls & Fraud, Unforeseen Catastrophes and New Line
of Business. The Company has specialized business areas, such as the Information Security, Legal
Department, Accounting Department, Internal Audit Function, Compliance Department, Information
Technology and Operations, to assist the different lines of business in
110
the development and implementation of specific risk management practices. In addition,management identifies, measures, monitors and controls operational risk through periodic reviews of
procedures, internal controls, fraud risk assessment process, data processing systems, contingency
plans, and other operating practices. This review helps reduce the likelihood of errors and
breakdown in controls, improve the control of risk and the effectiveness of the systems, and
prevent unsound business practices.
Legal Risk
Legal risk arises from the potential that unenforceable contracts, lawsuits, or adverse judgments
can disrupt or otherwise negatively affect the operations or condition of an organization. The
Companys management is responsible for minimizing the risks inherent in executing financial
contracts and possible lawsuits. As a result, the Company has established specific communication
guidelines, an in-house legal function and outside legal counselors. In general, these procedures
are designed to ensure the enforceability of the Companys contracts and to avoid adverse judgments
and lawsuits. For purposes of addressing the Companys Legal Risk at all levels, the Company has
segregated Legal Risk in three major areas: (1) Unenforceable Contracts, (2) Lawsuits (3) Adverse
Judgments. The Company has established comprehensive internal control policies and procedures based
on legal and regulatory requirements that are reasonably designed to ensure compliance with all
applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. In addition, the Company has specialized business
areas, such as the Internal Legal Department, Accounting Department, Internal Audit Function and
Compliance Department, that assist different lines of business in the development and
implementation of specific risk management practices.
Reputational Risk
Reputational risk is the potential that negative publicity regarding the Companys business
practices, whether true or not, will cause a decline in the customer base, costly litigation, or
revenue reductions. Management has established and continues to enhance its internal control
policies and procedures to assess, monitor and manage its reputational risk. The most significant
responsibilities fall within the Companys Senior Executive Officers, the Compliance department,
the Internal Audit department and the Comptrollers department.
Concentration Risk
The Company conducts its operations in a geographically concentrated area, as its main market is
Puerto Rico. Substantially all of the properties and other collateral securing our real estate,
commercial and consumer loans are also located in Puerto Rico. Consequently, the Company financial
condition and results of operations are highly dependent on economic conditions in Puerto Rico. The
Puerto Rico economy is in the midst of a prolonged economic recession since the second quarter of
2006. The ongoing economic environment and uncertainties in Puerto Rico may continue to have an
adverse effect on the quality of our loan portfolios and may result in a rise in delinquency rates
and charge offs, until the economic condition in Puerto Rico improves. These concerns may also
impact growth in interest and non interest income. Although management utilizes its best judgment
in providing for loan losses, there can be no assurance that management has accurately estimated
the level of probable loan losses or that will not have to increase its provisions for loan losses
in the future as a result of future increases in non-performing loans or for other reasons beyond
its control. Any such increases in our provision for
111
loan losses could have a material adverse impact on our future financial condition and results of operations. Also, a potential reduction in consumer spending may impact growth in other interest
and non-interest revenue sources.
Westernbank has a significant lending concentration with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of
$385.7 million to a commercial group in Puerto Rico, which exceeds the loan-to-one borrower limit.
Westernbank has explored various alternatives to decrease its exposure to this borrower to comply
with the loan-to-one borrower limitation. However, due to the credit tightening propelled by the
current economic environment, efforts have not materialized. Westernbank continues to pursue other
actions in order to reduce such excess. For this violation, Westernbank paid a penalty of $50,000
during 2008. As of June 30, 2009, this loan relationship was not impaired. There can be
no assurance that the Commissioner will not take further actions on this issue.
At
June 30, 2009, the Company had twenty-five relationships with an aggregate outstanding
principal balance in excess of $50.0 million. Such balances represent 35% of the Companys total
loan portfolio.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The financial statements and related data presented herein have been prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the
measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without
considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation.
Unlike most industrial companies, substantially all of the assets and liabilities of a financial
institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on a
financial institutions performance than the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rate
movements are not necessarily correlated with changes in the prices of goods and services.
Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For information regarding market risk to which the Company is exposed, see the information
contained under the caption Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations Risk Management.
Item 4T.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Control and Procedures
The Companys management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2009.
Disclosure controls and procedures are defined under SEC rules as controls and other procedures
that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports
that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure
controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or
112
submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or
persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure
controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or
overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and
procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
The Companys management identified certain material weaknesses in the Companys internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, as set forth under Managements Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, in Item 9A, Controls and Procedures, in the Companys
2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. A material weakness is a deficiency (within the meaning of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) Auditing Standard No. 5), or a
combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a
reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Companys annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Material weaknesses in internal
controls may also constitute deficiencies in the Companys disclosure controls. Based on an
evaluation of these material weaknesses, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and its Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were not
effective as of June 30, 2009.
The Company is engaged in the implementation of remediation efforts to address the remaining
material weakness in the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2008. The Companys remediation efforts related to credit quality review, appraisal report review
and financial closing and reporting outlined in Actions Relating to Material Weaknesses Remediated
as of the Date of this Filing under Item 9A, Controls and Procedures, of Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and are specifically designed to address the
material weakness identified by the Companys management. The Company will disclose any significant
further developments arising as a result of its remediation efforts in future filings with the SEC.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
As described in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, the
Company outlined certain steps to address the material weaknesses in internal control over
financial reporting that were identified as of December 31, 2008. The Company continued these
remediation efforts during the quarter ended June 30, 2009. Except for these remediation efforts,
there were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
113
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Except as described in Note 19 Contingencies, included in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q,
there are no material pending legal proceedings other than ordinary routine legal proceedings
incidental to the business of the Company to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is the
subject or of which any of their property is the subject. Management believes, after consultation
with legal counsel, that the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following are additional risk factors which should be read in conjunction with Part I, Item
1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. In
addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the
factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008, which could materially affect our financial condition and results of
operations. The risks and uncertainties described below and those described on our Annual Report
on Form 10-K are not the only ones facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties that
management is not aware of, or that it currently deems immaterial, may also impair business
operations, financial condition and/or results of operations. Except as noted below, there were no
material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
We may be restricted in paying deposit rates above a national rate, which may adversely affect our
ability to maintain and increase our deposit levels and may significantly impair our liquidity
position.
Section 29 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA) limits the use of brokered deposits by
institutions that are less than well-capitalized and permits the FDIC to place restrictions on
interest rates that institutions may pay. On May 29, 2009, the FDIC approved a final rule to
implement new interest rate restrictions on institutions that are not well capitalized. The rule
limits the interest rate paid by such institutions to 75 basis points above a national rate,
defined as a simple average of rates paid by all institutions for which data are available. If an
institution can provide evidence that its local rate is higher than the national rate, the FDIC may
permit that institution to offer the higher local rate plus 75 basis points. Westernbank is
currently considered less than well capitalized. However, because the local rates in Puerto Rico
are significantly higher than the national rate, we intend to apply to the FDIC for permission to
offer rates based on our higher local rates but we can make no assurances that such permission will
be granted. Although the rule is not effective until January 1, 2010, the FDIC has stated that it
will not object to the rules immediate application. The failure of the FDIC to recognize the
significant disparity between the local and national rates for Puerto Rico institutions is likely
to significantly impair our liquidity position.
114
Holders of our preferred stock may be able to alter the composition of our Board of Directors.
We suspended dividend payments on all outstanding series of our preferred stock in the first
quarter of 2009 and we are prohibited from paying such dividends on our preferred stock in the
future under the terms of our Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve, without their prior
written approval. While dividends on our preferred stock are noncumulative, meaning that dividends
do not accrue and accumulate if we do not pay them, holders of any series of our preferred stock
are granted certain rights in the event that, at the time of any annual meeting of our stockholders
for the election of directors, we have failed to pay or declare and set aside for payment dividends
for each of the 18 preceding monthly dividend periods for such series of preferred stock. In such
event, the number of directors then constituting our Board of Directors shall be increased by one
(if not already increased by one due to a default in preference dividends), and at such annual
meeting such holders of our preferred stock, along with the holders of any other series of
preferred stock which may have voting rights due to our failure to pay dividends, are entitled to
elect such additional director to serve on our Board of Directors. The holders of our preferred
stock would retain the ability to have such representation on our Board of Directors until the
earlier of (i) the full term for which he or she shall have been elected or (ii) the payment of
twelve consecutive monthly dividends. Therefore, if we are not able to resume dividend payments on
our preferred stock, the holders of such stock may be able to alter the composition of our Board of
Directors.
Item 6. Exhibits
10.1 Consent Order by and between Westernbank Puerto Rico and the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed on May 29, 2009).
31.1 CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 CEO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 CFO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
115
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of l934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Registrant:
W HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 21, 2009
|
By
|
/s/ Frank C. Stipes
|
|
|
|
Frank C. Stipes, Esq.
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: December 21, 2009
|
By
|
/s/ Lidio V. Soriano
|
|
|
|
Lidio V. Soriano, CPA
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
116
W (NYSE:WHI)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 12월(12) 2024 으로 1월(1) 2025
W (NYSE:WHI)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 1월(1) 2024 으로 1월(1) 2025