UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Form
10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the transition period from ______ to _____
Commission
file number 1-10927
SIMTROL,
INC.
(Exact
name of smaller reporting company as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
58-2028246
|
(State
of
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
incorporation)
|
|
Identification
No.)
|
520
Guthridge Ct., Suite 250
|
|
|
Norcross,
Georgia 30092
|
|
(770)
242-7566
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Issuer’s
telephone number)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
¨
No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated
filer
o
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer
o
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller
reporting company
x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
x
As of
August 20, 2010 registrant had 15,090,902 shares of $.001 par value Common Stock
outstanding.
SIMTROL,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Form
10-Q
Quarter
Ended June 30, 2010
Index
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December
31, 2009
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30,
2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
20
|
SIMTROL,
INC.
PART
I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIMTROL,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010 (unaudited)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
24,766
|
|
|
$
|
18,596
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
12,781
|
|
|
|
30,549
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
18,857
|
|
|
|
19,128
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
14,179
|
|
|
|
20,173
|
|
Interest
receivable
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
4,603
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
71,846
|
|
|
|
93,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate
of deposit-restricted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
29,911
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
37,861
|
|
|
|
60,176
|
|
Right
to license intellectual property, net
|
|
|
8,719
|
|
|
|
8,719
|
|
Note
receivable, net of deferred revenue of $363,789 and $400,000,
respectively
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
118,426
|
|
|
$
|
191,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$
|
351,862
|
|
|
$
|
222,457
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
69,445
|
|
|
|
100,374
|
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
26,188
|
|
|
|
29,638
|
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
|
|
72,078
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
Notes
payable, net
|
|
|
387,138
|
|
|
|
562,250
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
906,711
|
|
|
|
915,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
|
|
788,952
|
|
|
|
136,231
|
|
Deferred
rent payable
|
|
|
19,005
|
|
|
|
20,459
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
1,714,668
|
|
|
|
1,071,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
Deficit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $.00025 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
A Convertible: 770,000 shares designated; 672,664 outstanding; liquidation
value of $2,017,992
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
Series
B Convertible: 4,700 shares designated; 4,264 outstanding; liquidation
value of $3,198,000
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Series
C Convertible: 7,900 shares designated; 5,534 outstanding; liquidation
value of $4,150,000
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Common
stock, 400,000,000 shares authorized; $.001 par value; 15,090,902 and
13,725,921 issued and outstanding
|
|
|
15,090
|
|
|
|
13,726
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
80,759,533
|
|
|
|
79,832,011
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(82,371,047
|
)
|
|
|
(80,725,991
|
)
|
Total
stockholders' deficit
|
|
|
(1,596,242
|
)
|
|
|
(880,072
|
)
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
|
|
$
|
118,426
|
|
|
$
|
191,855
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
SIMTROL,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software
licenses
|
|
$
|
5,900
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
$
|
|
|
|
52,575
|
|
|
$
|
76,321
|
|
Service
and hardware
|
|
|
52,497
|
|
|
|
19,103
|
|
|
|
98,041
|
|
|
|
195,068
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
|
58,397
|
|
|
|
20,103
|
|
|
|
150,616
|
|
|
|
271,389
|
|
Cost
of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software
licenses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Service
and hardware
|
|
|
25,953
|
|
|
|
6,146
|
|
|
|
42,492
|
|
|
|
114,116
|
|
Total
cost of revenues
|
|
|
25,953
|
|
|
|
6,146
|
|
|
|
42,492
|
|
|
|
114,416
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
32,444
|
|
|
|
13,956
|
|
|
|
108,124
|
|
|
|
156,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general, and administrative
|
|
|
258,444
|
|
|
|
595,628
|
|
|
|
596,288
|
|
|
|
1,374,278
|
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
69,367
|
|
|
|
289,008
|
|
|
|
171,468
|
|
|
|
600,873
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
327,811
|
|
|
|
884,636
|
|
|
|
767,756
|
|
|
|
1,975,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from Operations
|
|
|
(295,367
|
)
|
|
|
(870,680
|
)
|
|
|
(659,632
|
)
|
|
|
(1,818,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income/(expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of debt discount-warrant fair value and note conversion
feature
|
|
|
(219,648
|
)
|
|
|
(80,408
|
)
|
|
|
(355,339
|
)
|
|
|
(80,408
|
)
|
Finance
expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(956,960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5,781
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5,781
|
)
|
Gain/(loss)
on derivative liabilities
|
|
|
1,375,601
|
|
|
|
(160,706
|
)
|
|
|
1,072,175
|
|
|
|
(101,506
|
)
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
5,838
|
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
|
|
11,691
|
|
|
|
9,810
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(24,309
|
)
|
|
|
(12,173
|
)
|
|
|
(53,087
|
)
|
|
|
(12,593
|
)
|
Total
other income/(expense), net
|
|
|
1,137,482
|
|
|
|
(255,243
|
)
|
|
|
(281,520
|
)
|
|
|
(190,478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income/(loss)
|
|
|
842,115
|
|
|
|
(1,125,923
|
)
|
|
|
(941,152
|
)
|
|
|
(2,008,656
|
)
|
Dividends
on convertible preferred stock paid in common stock
|
|
|
(38,500
|
)
|
|
|
(359,338
|
)
|
|
|
(38,500
|
)
|
|
|
(359,338
|
)
|
Deemed
dividend on convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
(72,541
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(665,404
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net
income/(loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
731,074
|
|
|
$
|
(1,485,261
|
)
|
|
|
(1,645,056
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,367,994
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income/(loss) per common share, basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
13,821,655
|
|
|
|
10,935,736
|
|
|
|
13,799,354
|
|
|
|
10,883,077
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
64,882,399
|
|
|
|
10,935,736
|
|
|
|
13,799,354
|
|
|
|
10,883,077
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
SIMTROL,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
CASH
FLOWS USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(941,152
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,008,656
|
)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common stock for services
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,255
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
23,418
|
|
|
|
38,974
|
|
Impairment
of right to license intellectual property
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18,499
|
|
Amortization
of debt discounts
|
|
|
355,339
|
|
|
|
80,408
|
|
Finance
expense
|
|
|
956,960
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
221,234
|
|
|
|
424,687
|
|
(Gain)/loss
on derivative liabilities
|
|
|
(1,072,175
|
)
|
|
|
101,506
|
|
Loss
on disposal of property
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,513
|
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
208,343
|
|
|
|
167,991
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(248,033
|
)
|
|
|
(1,166,822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
|
|
(1,103
|
)
|
|
|
(18,267
|
)
|
Redemption
of certificate of deposit
|
|
|
30,306
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net
cash provided by/(used) in investing activities
|
|
|
29,203
|
|
|
|
(18,267
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
proceeds from notes payable issuance
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
537,329
|
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
537,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease)
in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6,170
|
|
|
|
(647,760
|
)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of the period
|
|
|
18,596
|
|
|
|
997,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of the period
|
|
$
|
24,766
|
|
|
$
|
349,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinancing
of notes payable and accrued interest
|
|
$
|
646,295
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Common
shares issued for notes payable extension
|
|
$
|
3,748
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Issuance
of common stock for payment of preferred stock dividends
|
|
$
|
38,500
|
|
|
$
|
359,338
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
SIMTROL,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
Note
1 – Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
Simtrol,
Inc., formerly known as VSI Enterprises, Inc., was incorporated in Delaware in
September 1988 and, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the "Company"),
develops, markets, and supports software based audiovisual control systems and
videoconferencing products that operate on PC platforms. The Company
operates at a single facility in Norcross, Georgia and its sales are primarily
in the United States.
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared by the Company in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and the instructions to Form
10-Q. It is management’s opinion that these statements include all
adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to
present fairly the condensed consolidated financial position as of June 30,
2010, and the condensed consolidated results of operations, and cash flows for
all periods presented. Operating results for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ending December 31, 2010. The Company has
evaluated and included subsequent events through the filing date of this Form
10-Q.
Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. It is
suggested that these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
as of December 31, 2009 and for each of the two years ended December 31, 2009,
and 2008, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 26, 2010.
Certain
amounts in the 2009 condensed consolidated financial statements have been
reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the presentation in the 2010
consolidated financial statements. These reclassifications have no
effect on previously reported net loss.
Note
2 – Going Concern Uncertainty
As of
June 30, 2010, the Company had cash totaling $24,766 and negative working
capital of $837,261. Since inception, the Company has not achieved a
sufficient level of revenue to support its business and incurred a net loss of
941,152 and used net cash of $248,033 in operating activities during the six
months ended June 30, 2010. While this cash used in operations has decreased
significantly from prior year, the Company will require additional funding to
fund its development and operating activities during the third quarter of 2010
of at least $75,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the
Company received $225,000 of net proceeds from the issuance of notes payable and
entered into an agreement whereby it exchanged outstanding debt and unpaid
interest in the amount of $562,250 and $84,045, respectively (see Note 6), in a
new convertible note offering. This offering was principally used to
fund operations. Historically, the Company has relied on private
placement issuances of equity and debt. The Company has commenced
efforts to raise additional capital through a private placement of debt
securities and warrants. No assurance can be given that the Company
will be successful in raising this capital. If capital is
successfully raised through the issuance of debt, this will increase interest
expense and the warrants will dilute existing shareholders. If the
Company is not successful in raising this capital, the Company may not be able
to continue as a going concern. In that event, the Company may be
forced to cease operations and stockholders could lose their entire investment
in the Company.
Also,
anti-dilution provisions of the existing Series A, B, and C Convertible
Preferred stock might result in additional dilution to existing common
shareholders if such financing results in adjustments to the conversion terms of
the convertible preferred stock. The issuance of the convertible
notes in the first half of 2010 resulted in dilution to existing common
shareholders as terms of the convertible debt resulted in adjustments to the
conversion terms of the convertible preferred stock. (See note
6). However, if the Company was unable to obtain this additional
funding, its business, financial condition and results of operations would be
adversely affected.
Even if
the Company obtains additional equity capital, the Company may not be able
to execute its current business plan and fund business operations for the period
necessary to achieve positive cash flow. In such case, the Company
might exhaust its capital and be forced to reduce expenses and cash burn to a
material extent, which would impair its ability to achieve its business
plan. If the Company runs out of available capital, it might be
required to pursue highly dilutive equity or debt issuances to finance its
business in a difficult and hostile market, including possible equity financings
at a price per share that might be much lower than the per share price invested
by current shareholders. No assurance can be given that any source of
additional cash would be available to the Company. If no source of
additional cash is available to the Company, then the Company would be forced to
significantly reduce the scope of its operations or possibly seek court
protection from creditors or cease business operations altogether.
These
matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the
realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of
business. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments relating to the recoverability of the recorded assets or the
classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be
unable to continue as a going concern.
Note
3 – Selected Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue
recognition
The
Company follows the guidance of the ASC 605-10-599, which provides for revenue
to be recognized when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii)
delivery or installation has been completed, (iii) the customer accepts and
verifies receipt, and (iv) collectability is reasonably
assured. Certain judgments affect the application of its revenue
policy. Revenue consists of the sale of device control software and
related maintenance contracts on these systems. Revenue on the sale
of hardware is recognized upon shipment. The Company generally
recognizes revenue from Device Manager
TM
software sales upon shipment as it sells the product to audiovisual integrators,
net of estimated returns and discounts. Revenue on maintenance
contracts is recognized over the term of the related contract.
Inventory
The
Company purchases certain hardware connectivity devices to allow connectivity of
devices with different interfaces in classrooms. The inventory is
stated at the lower of cost or market value and is recorded at the actual cost
paid to third-party vendors. The Company accounts for the inventory
using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method of accounting.
Gain/(Loss) Per
Share
ASC 260
requires the presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share ("EPS"). Basic
EPS is computed by dividing loss attributable to common stockholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS
includes the potential dilution that could occur if options or other contracts
to issue common stock were exercised or converted.
The
Company currently has outstanding convertible debt and convertible preferred
stock that would lower the EPS as reported by the Company if
converted. The following table reconciles the numerator and
denominator for the calculation of diluted EPS:
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
three months ended
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
net income attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
Basic
net income attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
731,074
|
|
Convertible
debt interest
|
|
$
|
23,741
|
|
Amortization
of debt discounts
|
|
$
|
219,648
|
|
Gain
on derivative liabilities due to convertible debt
|
|
$
|
(
325,565
|
)
|
Deemed
preferred dividend on convertible preferred stock
|
|
$
|
72,541
|
|
Dividends
on convertible preferred stock paid in common stock
|
|
$
|
38,500
|
|
Net
income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
759,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
13,821,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income per basic share
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
13,821,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
preferred stock
|
|
|
34,876,086
|
|
Convertible
debt
|
|
|
16,184,658
|
|
Weighted
average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
64,882,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income per diluted share
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
The
following equity securities are not reflected in diluted loss per share for the
six months ended June 30, 2010, and the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
because their effects would be anti-dilutive:
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
Options
|
|
|
6,774,700
|
|
|
|
7,270,950
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
62,948,795
|
|
|
|
28,427,465
|
|
Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
36,059,048
|
|
|
|
22,286,656
|
|
Convertible
Notes Payable
|
|
|
18,186,954
|
|
|
|
1,529,156
|
|
Total
|
|
|
123,969,497
|
|
|
|
59,514,227
|
|
Accordingly,
basic and diluted net loss per share are identical for the six months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, as well as the three months ended June 30,
2009.
All
warrants and options to purchase common stock outstanding at June 30, 2010 had
exercise prices greater than the Company’s stock price and are not included in
the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended June
30, 2010.
Derivative Financial
Instruments
The
Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow,
market or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates all of its
financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or
contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative
financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative
instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each
reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations. For stock-based derivative
financial instruments, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model
to value the derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation
dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including
whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is
evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument
liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based
on the term of the underlying derivative instrument. See Note
9.
Note
4 – Income Taxes
The
Company files income tax returns for Simtrol, Inc. and its subsidiaries in the
United States with the Internal Revenue Service and with various state
jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2009, the tax returns for Simtrol, Inc.
for the years 2006 through 2008 remain open to examination by the Internal
Revenue Service and various state authorities.
Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
Effective
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the FASB’s guidance on accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes. In accordance with this guidance,
interest costs and related penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are
required to be calculated, if applicable. No interest and penalties
were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, no liability for
unrecognized tax benefits was required to be recorded.
NOL
Limitations
The
Company’s utilization of NOL carryforwards may be subject to an annual
limitation due to ownership changes that have occurred previously or that could
occur in the future as provided in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 (“Section 382”), as well as similar state and foreign
provisions. In general, an ownership change, as defined by Section
382, results from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders
or public group in the stock of a corporation by more than fifty percentage
points over a three-year period. Since its formation, the Company has raised
capital through the issuance of capital stock and various convertible
instruments. The Company continually performs tests for ownership
change under Section 382 and believes no ownership change, as defined by Section
382, has taken place as a result of transactions that have increased the
ownership of certain stockholders.
The
Company has not utilized any of its NOL carryforwards as it has never reported
taxable income. The Company recognized deferred tax assets of
approximately $19.8 million, primarily relating to net operating loss carry
forwards of approximately $49.1 million at June 30, 2010. The losses
expire through 2030. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets
is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in
which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company considers
projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this
assessment. At present, the Company does not have a history of income to
conclude that it is more likely than not that the Company will be able to
realize all of its tax benefits; therefore, a valuation allowance of $19.8
million is established for the full value of the deferred tax assets at June 30,
2010. The valuation allowance increased by $149,000 during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 due to losses incurred during the current year exceeding
previous losses that expired unutilized during the period. For the
six months ended June 30, 2009, the valuation allowance decreased by
approximately $736,000, due to certain net operating losses expiring
unused. A valuation allowance will be maintained until sufficient
positive evidence exists to support the reversal of any portion or all of the
valuation allowance net of appropriate reserves. Should the Company be
profitable in future periods with supportable trends, the valuation allowance
will be reversed accordingly.
Note
5 – Stockholders’ Equity
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, the Company issued
6,666 and 35,625 shares of common stock valued at $400 and $6,600 to members of
the Board of Directors for attendance at meetings. These amounts were
recorded as selling, general, and administrative expense. The Company
did not issue any shares during the three months ended June 30,
2010.
Note
6 – Notes Payable
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company completed the sale of $871,295
of Participation Interests (“Participation Interests”) in a secured master
promissory note (“Master Note”) and five-year warrants to purchase 17,925,900
shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share to accredited
private investors. The Master Note includes $646,295 of interest and
principal exchanged on February 4, 2010 from past due notes payable originated
on May 29, 2009. A total of $746,295 of the Participation Interests
were originated on February 4, 2010, $100,000 on May 18, 2010, and $25,000 on
June 30, 2010.
The net
proceeds of this offering were used for working capital and general corporate
purposes. Important terms of the Master Note include:
|
·
|
The
Master Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum, is payable
December 31, 2010 (“Maturity Date”) and can be pre-paid at any
time. Accrued interest is payable in cash on the Maturity
Date.
|
|
·
|
The
Maturity Date of the Master Note may be extended by the Company for two
30-day periods. If the Company elects to extend the Maturity
Date, the Company will pay a 5% Extension Fee at the conclusion of each
such 30-day Extension Period, payable at the option of the Company in cash
or the Company’s common stock. If the Extension fee is paid in
common stock, the common stock will be deemed to have a value per share
equal to the greater of $0.375 or the 10-day simple average of closing
prices on the Over The Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) for the 10 trading
days preceding the date the payment is
due.
|
|
·
|
The
Master Note is secured by all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents,
accounts and notes receivable, prepaid assets, and
equipment. The Master Note and Participation Interests will be
convertible into equity securities on the following
terms:
|
|
·
|
If
the Company closes a “Qualifying Next Equity Financing” before the
Maturity Date, the then-outstanding balance of principal and accrued
interest on the Master Note will automatically convert into shares of the
“Next Equity Financing Securities” the Company issues. “Next
Equity Financing Securities” means the type and class of equity securities
that the Company sells in a Qualifying Next Equity Financing or a
Non-Qualifying Next Equity Financing. If the Company sells a
unit comprising a combination of equity securities, then the Next Equity
Financing Securities shall be deemed to constitute that
unit. Upon conversion, the Company would issue that number of
shares of Next Equity Financing Securities equal the quotient obtained by
dividing the then-outstanding balance of principal and accrued interest on
the Master Note by the price per share of the Next Equity Financing
Securities.
|
|
·
|
If
the Company closes a “Non-Qualifying Next Equity Financing” before the
Maturity Date, the then-outstanding balance of principal and accrued
interest represented by a Participation Interest can be converted, at the
option and election of the investor, into shares of the “Next Equity
Financing Securities” the Company
issues.
|
|
·
|
A
“Qualifying Next Equity Financing” means the first bona fide equity
financing (or series of related equity financing transactions) occurring
subsequent to the date of issue of the Master Note in which the Company
sells and issues any securities for total consideration totaling not less
than $2.0 million in the aggregate (including the principal balance and
accrued but unpaid interest to be converted on all our outstanding
Participation Interests in the Master Note) at a price per share for
equivalent shares of common stock that is not greater than $0.05 per
share.
|
|
·
|
A
“Non-Qualifying Next Equity Financing” means that the Company completes a
bona fide equity financing but fails to raise total consideration of at
least $2.0 million,
or
the price per share for equivalent shares of common stock is greater than
$0.05 per share.
|
|
·
|
At
any time prior to payment in full of this Note, an Investor may convert
all, but not less than all, of such Investors interest in this Note (as
represented by such Investor’s Participation Interest) into that number of
shares of the Company’s common stock equal to (A) the principal balance
plus accrued but unpaid interest hereunder due and payable to the investor
in accordance with such Investor’s Participation Interest, divided by
$0.05.
|
The
Investor Warrants have a term ending on the earlier to occur of (i) the
fifth anniversary of the Investor Warrant issue date; or (ii) the closing
of a change of control event. The Investor Warrants will have a
cashless exercise feature and anti-dilution provisions that adjust both the
exercise price and quantity if subsequent equity offerings are completed where
the Company issues common stock at a lower effective price per share than the
exercise price. The Investor Warrants were valued using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions:
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
rate
|
|
|
1.79%-2.38
|
%
|
Annual
rate of dividends
|
|
|
0
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
106.0%-110.8
|
%
|
Average
life
|
|
5
years
|
|
The fair
value of the warrants, $665,993, was classified as a discount on the notes
payable issued during the six months ended June 30, 2010, and are classified as
derivative liabilities due to their re-pricing provisions. The amount
will be amortized over the life of the notes and $174,354 and $282,521 was
amortized as finance expense during the three and six months ended June 30,
2010. See Note 9.
The fair
value of the conversion feature of the notes payable, $324,482, was also
determined using Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following
assumptions:
Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
rate
|
|
|
0.22%-0.33
|
%
|
Annual
rate of dividends
|
|
|
0
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
105.5%-110.8
|
%
|
Term
of notes
|
|
6-11
months
|
|
The fair
value of the conversion feature of the notes payable was recorded as a
derivative liability due to the re-pricing provision and $173,503 of the fair
value was classified as a debt discount and will be amortized over the life of
the notes. Amortization totaling $45,294 and $72,817 was charged as
additional finance expense in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 for
the conversion feature option of the debt. The balance of the fair
value of $150,979 of the note conversion feature for those notes originated in
February 2010 was recorded as an additional finance expense because the fair
value of the conversion feature and the warrants exceeded the face value of the
notes payable. See Note 9.
Pursuant
to the terms of the Certificates of Designation of Preferences, Rights, and
Limitations (the “Certificates”) of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock,
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
of the Company, the issuance of the convertible notes payable with $0.05
conversion price in each instance during 2010 represents a Dilutive Issuance and
adjusts the Conversion Shares of each class of Convertible Preferred Stock as
follows:
|
·
|
Series
A changes from 4 shares common per one share of preferred to 6.5 shares
common
|
|
·
|
Series
B changes from 2,000 shares common per one share of preferred to 3,234
shares common
|
|
·
|
Series
C changes from 2,000 shares common per one share of preferred to 3,234
shares common
|
The
common share equivalents represented by the three Series of Convertible
Preferred Stock as of June 30, 2010, therefore, increased as
follows:
|
·
|
Series
A from 2,690,656 to 4,372,316
|
|
·
|
Series
B from 8,528,000 to 13,789,766
|
|
·
|
Series
C from 11,068,000 to 17,896,956
|
The fair
value of the increased number of common shares resulting from the change in
conversion rates of $72,541 and $665,404 was recorded as a deemed preferred
dividend in the three months and six months ended June 30,
2010.
Note
7 - Stock Based Compensation
On
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted, using the modified prospective
application, ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”), which
requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee
stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair
values. Under ASC 718, share-based payment awards result in a cost that will be
measured at fair value on the awards’ grant date based on the estimated number
of awards that are expected to vest. Compensation costs for awards that vest
will not be reversed if the awards expire without being exercised.
Equity-based
compensation expense is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of
the award, and is recognized over the vesting periods. The expenses are included
in selling, general, and administrative or research and development expense
depending on the grant recipient.
Under ASC
718, share-based payment awards result in a cost, measured at fair value on the
awards’ grant date, based on the estimated number of awards that are expected to
vest. Stock compensation expenses under ASC 718 were $97,026 and
$201,028 during the three months ended June 30, 2010, and 2009
respectively. Of these totals, $11,711 and $44,981 was classified as
research and development expense and $85,315 and $156,047 was classified as
selling, general, and administrative expense for the three months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. Stock compensation expenses under ASC
718 were $221,234 and $424,687 during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively. Of these totals $26,780 and $90,593 were
classified as research and development expense and $194,454 and $334,094 were
classified as selling, general, and administrative expensed during the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The
Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and employee
termination data within the valuation model and historical stock prices to
estimate volatility. The fair value for options to purchase 785,000
and 150,000 shares issued during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, were estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes
option-pricing model to be $27,299 and $17,603, with the following
weighted-average assumptions.
|
|
For the six months ended June
30,
|
|
Assumptions
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
rate
|
|
|
1.44
|
%
|
|
|
1.90
|
%
|
Annual
rate of dividends
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
113.4
|
%
|
|
|
107.8
|
%
|
Average
life
|
|
3.6
years
|
|
|
5
years
|
|
For the
three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, the Company did not
grant any stock options.
The
Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the
fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly
subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. The
Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different
from those of traded options, and changes in the subjective input assumptions
can materially affect the fair value estimate.
A summary
of option activity under the Company’s 1991 Stock Option Plan and the Company’s
2002 Equity Incentive Plan as of June 30, 2010 and changes during the six months
then ended are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Term (in years)
|
|
Outstanding
January 1, 2010
|
|
|
6,894,700
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
785,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Terminated
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(904,750
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
6,774,700
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
Exercisable
at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
4,772,528
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
The
weighted-average grant-date fair values of options granted during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were $0.04 and $0.12,
respectively. No options were exercised during the six months
ended June 30, 2010. The intrinsic value of the Company’s stock
options at June 30, 2010 is $0.
As of
June 30, 2010, there was $281,463 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the
2002 Equity Incentive Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized
over a weighted average period of 1.3 years.
At June
30, 2010, 18,126,800 options remain available for grant under the 2002 Equity
Incentive Plan. No options are available to be issued under the 1991
Stock Option Plan.
On
January 18, 2010, the Company granted options to purchase 785,000 shares of
stock to six employees with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of
the stock on that date. The shares vest on the one-year anniversary
of the grant date.
Note
8 - Major Customers
Revenue
from two customers and four customers comprised 95% and 91% of condensed
consolidated revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively. At June 30, 2010, related accounts receivable of $9,313 from one
of these customers comprised 73% of consolidated receivables.
Revenue
from four customers comprised 91% and 92% of consolidated revenues for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
Note
9 – Derivatives
In September 2008, the FASB finalized
Update ASC 815-40, “
Derivatives and
Hedging”, “Contracts in an Entity’s Own
Equity
”. Under the update,
instruments which do not have fixed settlement provisions are deemed to be
derivative instruments. The warrants issued to a placement agent and investors
in 2005 (“2005 Warrants”) do not have a fixed settlement provision because their
exercise price may be lowered if the Company issues securities at lower prices
in the future. Also, convertible notes and warrants issued to
investors in a private placement of convertible notes and warrants on May 29,
2009 (“2009 Warrants”) do not contain a fixed settlement
provision. (See Note 6). In accordance with the update,
2005 Warrants were re-characterized as derivative liabilities in 2009 and the
2009 Warrants were classified as derivative liabilities. The update requires
that the fair value of these liabilities be re-measured at the end of every
reporting period with the change in value reported in the statement of
operations.
In
February 2010, in accordance with the anti-dilution provisions of the 2005
Warrants to purchase 1,233,691 shares of common stock, warrant holders had the
exercise prices of the warrants adjusted from $0.375 per share to $0.05 per
share. Also, in accordance with the anti-dilution provisions of
certain warrants to purchase 2,998,667 shares of common stock that were issued
on May 29, 2009, warrants to purchase an additional 19,491,336 shares
of common stock were issued to these holders and their exercise prices were
adjusted from $0.375 to $0.05 per share. A finance expense charge of
$17,168 was recorded on that date to reflect the fair value of the exercise
price adjustments to the 2005 Warrants. A finance expense charge of
$788,812 was recorded on that date to reflect the fair value of the quantity and
exercise price adjustments to the 2009 Warrants. In conjunction with
the notes payable issued during the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company
issued warrants to purchase 17,425,900 shares of common stock with an exercise
price of $0.05 (“2010 Warrants”). The exercise price of these
warrants adjusts downward if the Company issues any future convertible debt or
equity instruments with exercise prices lower than $0.05 (See Note
6).
The
embedded conversion feature of the notes payable issued by the Company in during
the six months ended June 30, 2010 is classified as a short-term derivative
liability due to the re-pricing mechanism in the note terms and the December 31,
2010 due date of the notes.
The
Derivative Warrants and Notes Payable conversion features were valued using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2005
Warrants
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
rate
|
|
|
0.17
|
%
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
Annual
rate of dividends
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
106.0
|
%
|
|
|
113.4
|
%
|
Weighted
Average life (years)
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
Warrants
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
rate
|
|
|
1.79
|
%
|
|
|
2.69
|
%
|
Annual
rate of dividends
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
106.0
|
%
|
|
|
113.4
|
%
|
Weighted
Average life (years)
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
Warrants
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
rate
|
|
|
1.79
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
Annual
rate of dividends
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
106.0
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
Weighted
Average life (years)
|
|
|
4.6-5.0
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Convertible Notes
Payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
rate
|
|
|
0.22
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
Annual
rate of dividends
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
106.0
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
Weighted
Average life (years)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Fair Value
|
|
$
|
861,030
|
|
|
$
|
136,749
|
|
ASC
815-40 was implemented in the first quarter of 2009 and is reported as the
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principles. At January 1, 2009, the
cumulative effect on the accounting for the warrants was recorded as decrease in
additional accumulated deficit by $1,599,708. The difference was recorded as
derivative liability for $110,663. At June 30, 2009, the derivative liabilities
associated with the Placement Agent and 2005 Warrants were revalued, the $66,763
increase in the derivative liability at June 30, 2009 is included as other
expense
in the Company’s condensed consolidated
statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The
fair value of the 2009 Warrants was estimated at $450,770 at the date of
issuance and this amount was classified as a derivative liability and as a
discount on the notes payable issued on that date. This amount will
be amortized over the life of the convertible notes and $80,408 was amortized as
a financing expense during the six months June 30, 2009. The 2009
Warrants were revalued as of June 30, 2009 and the $93,943 increase in the value
of the derivative liability is included as other expense in the Company’s
condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended June
30, 2009.
At June
30, 2010, the derivative liabilities associated with the 2005 Warrants, 2009
Warrants, 2010 Warrants and the conversion feature of the notes payable were
revalued, and the $1,375,601 decrease in the derivative liability at June 30,
2010 is included as other income in the Company’s condensed consolidated
statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The
decrease in value during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was
primarily due to the decline in the Company’s stock price to $0.02 at June 30,
2010, as well as the expiration of certain warrants and the shorter remaining
term of the warrants and note payable at that date.
Note
10 - Fair Value Measurement
Valuation
Hierarchy
ASC 820
establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used
to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad
levels as follows. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs
are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs
that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly
through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on the
Company’s own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair
value. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the
hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to
the fair value measurement.
The
following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value
measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying
Value at June
30, 2010
|
|
|
Quoted prices
in active
markets
(Level
1)
|
|
|
Significant
other
observable
inputs (Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
|
$
|
861,030
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
861,030
|
|
The
derivative liabilities are measured at fair value using quoted market prices and
estimated volatility factors based on historical quoted market prices for the
Company’s common stock, and are classified within Level 3 of the valuation
hierarchy.
The
following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of our
Level 3 financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring
basis:
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
$
|
(2,143,430
|
)
|
|
$
|
(51,463
|
)
|
|
$
|
(136,749
|
)
|
|
$
|
(110,663
|
)
|
Net
unrealized gain/(loss) on derivative
financial instruments
|
|
|
1,375,601
|
|
|
|
(160,706
|
)
|
|
|
1,072,175
|
|
|
|
(101,506
|
)
|
New
derivative liabilities issued
|
|
|
(93,201
|
)
|
|
|
(450,770
|
)
|
|
|
(1,796,456
|
)
|
|
|
(450,770
|
)
|
Ending
balance
|
|
$
|
(861,030
|
)
|
|
$
|
(662,939
|
)
|
|
$
|
(861,030
|
)
|
|
$
|
(662,939
|
)
|
Note
11 – Subsequent Events
The
Company issued an additional $25,000 convertible note payable and warrants to
purchase 500,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.05 per
share on August 19, 2010. Pursuant to the terms of the Certificates
of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock, and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company, the issuance of
the convertible notes payable with $0.05 conversion price represents a Dilutive
Issuance and adjusts the Conversion Shares of each class of Convertible
Preferred Stock as follows:
|
·
|
Series
A changes from 6.5 shares common per one share of preferred to 6.54 shares
common
|
|
·
|
Series
B changes from 3,234 shares common per one share of preferred to 3,270
shares common
|
|
·
|
Series
C changes from 3,234 shares common per one share of preferred to 3,270
shares common
|
The
common share equivalents represented by the three Series of Convertible
Preferred Stock as of June 30, 2010, therefore, increased as
follows:
|
·
|
Series
A from 4,372,316 to 4,399,223
|
|
·
|
Series
B from 13,789,766 to 13,943,280
|
|
·
|
Series
C from 17,896,956 to 18,096,180
|
The fair
value of the increased number of common shares resulting from the change in
conversion rates of approximately $8,000 will be recorded as a deemed preferred
dividend in the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010.
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The
following discussion highlights the material factors affecting our results of
operations and the significant changes in the balance sheet items. The notes to
our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report and the
notes to our consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 should be read in conjunction with this discussion
and our consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
We
prepare our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As such, we are required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions
that we believe are reasonable based upon the information available. These
estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the periods presented. The significant accounting policies which
we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating
our reported financial results include the following:
|
·
|
Revenue
recognition
.
We follow the guidance of the ASC 605-10-599 which provides for
revenue to be recognized when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, (ii) delivery or installation has been completed, (iii) the
customer accepts and verifies receipt, and (iv) collectability is
reasonably assured. Certain judgments affect the application of
its revenue policy. Revenue consists of the sale of device
control software and related maintenance contracts on these
systems. Revenue on the sale of hardware is recognized upon
shipment. The Company generally recognizes revenue from Device
Manager
TM
software sales upon shipment as it sells the product to audiovisual
integrators, net of estimated returns and discounts. Revenue on
maintenance contracts is recognized over the term of the related
contract.
|
|
·
|
Capitalized
software development costs
.
Our policy on
capitalized software development costs determines the timing of our
recognition of certain development costs. In addition, this policy
determines whether the cost is classified as development expense or is
capitalized. Software development costs incurred after technological
feasibility has been established are capitalized and amortized, commencing
with product release, using the greater of the income forecast method or
on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the product. Management
is required to use professional judgment in determining whether research
and development costs meet the criteria for immediate expense or
capitalization. We did not capitalize any software and research and
development costs during either 2010 or 2009 and all assets were fully
amortized by December 31, 2006. Our research and development
efforts during 2009 and 2010 primarily involved product improvements to
our Device Manager and Video Visitation products to improve their
functionality and ease of use for end
users.
|
|
·
|
Derivative
Financial Instruments
.
We do not use derivative
instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency
risks and we evaluates all of our financial instruments to determine if
such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as
embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that
are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially
recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date,
with changes in the fair value reported in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial
instruments, we use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value the
derivative instruments at inception and on subsequent valuation
dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including
whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity,
is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative
instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or
non-current based on the term of the underlying derivative
instrument. See Note 9
to our condensed consolidated
financial statements
.
|
FINANCIAL
CONDITION
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, total current assets decreased approximately
23% to $71,846 from $93,049 at December 31, 2009. The decrease in
assets was primarily due to the approximately $248,000 of cash used to fund
operations during the period.
Total
liabilities increased $642,741 during the six months ended June 30, 2010 due
primarily to the issuance of convertible notes payable and warrants during the
current year classified as derivative liabilities due to their repricing
provisions, as well as past due accounts payable for office rent and
professional services.
See Note
2 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements regarding the
Company’s going concern uncertainty.
The
Company does not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Revenues
Revenues
were $58,397 and $20,103 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The increased revenues of $38,294 during the current
year were due primarily to higher service revenues. Current period
revenues represent a significant decrease compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and we have taken additional steps to decrease our cash used from
operating activities. The effects of inflation and changing prices on
revenues and loss from operations during the periods presented have been de
minimus. Due to our small customer base, we face the risk of fluctuating
revenues should any of our customers discontinue using our
products.
Cost
of Revenues and Gross Profit
Cost of
revenues increased $19,807, or 222%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010
compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007 due primarily to higher service
revenues during the current year.
Gross
margins were approximately 56% and 69% for each of the three months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The lower margins during the current
period are due to the higher mix of lower margin service sales during the
current period.
Selling,
General, and Administrative Expenses
Selling,
general, and administrative expenses were $258,444 and $595,628 for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in the expenses
for three-month period ended June 30, 2010 resulted primarily from a decrease in
headcount which occurred during the second half of 2009 and first quarter of
2010, as well as reduced salaries for certain personnel in order to reduce cash
used from operations. These ongoing efforts to reduce cash used from
operations have reduced cash usage significantly, but have not resulted in
positive cash flow from operations, and we require additional fundraising to
fund operations. Decreased stock-based compensation of approximately
$71,000 was due to lower stock option fair values for grants made to employees
during the current period, as well as decreases in the number of options that
vested during the period due to full vesting of prior
grants.
During
the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, stock-based
compensation of $85,315 and $156,047 was included in selling, general, and
administrative expense to record the amortization of the estimated fair value of
the portion of previously granted stock options that vested during the current
period.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research
and development costs were $69,367 and $289,008 for the three months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The reduction in expenses is due
primarily to reduced headcount, lower stock-based compensation, and lower
overhead and outside development costs due to attempts to reduce cash flow used
by operations. During the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
we did not capitalize any software development costs related to new products
under development as our research and development efforts during 2009 and 2010
primarily involved product improvements to our Device Manager
TM
and
Video Visitation products to improve their functionality and ease of use for end
users.
During
the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, stock-based
compensation of $11,711 and $44,981 was included in research and development
expense to record the amortization of the estimated fair value of the portion of
previously granted stock options that vested during the current
period. The lower stock-based compensation resulted primarily from
the lower number of options that vested during the period and the lower fair
value of grants made during the three months ended March 31,
2010.
Other
Income/(Expense)
Other
income of $1,137,482 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 consisted
primarily of $1,375,601 to record to record the gain on derivative liabilities
during the current period for the decrease in estimated fair value of warrants
and the conversion feature of our notes payable. The decrease in
value resulted primarily from a decrease in our stock price from March 31, 2010,
the expiration of certain warrants during the period, the shorter remaining
outstanding term of the warrants and notes, and the decrease in interest rates
during the period. Additionally, we recorded $219,648 expense to
record amortization of the fair value of the warrants granted
to noteholders as part of the convertible notes we issued in during the
current year. See notes 6 and 10 to our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Other
expense of $255,243 during the three months ended June 30, 2009 consisted
primarily of a $160,706 loss on our derivative liabilities during the period as
well as $80,408 to record amortization of the fair value of warrants issued to
noteholders in our May 29, 2009 private placement of convertible notes payable
and warrants. The loss on derivative liabilities during the period
was due primarily to the increase in our stock price from $0.16 at March 31,
2009 to $0.28 at June 30, 2009 as well as to the issuance of warrants to
purchase 2,998,667 shares of common stock issued in the May 29, 2009 private
placement.
Net
Income and Net Income Attributable to Common Stockholders
Net
income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $842,115 compared to a net
loss of $1,125,923 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The net
income resulted primarily to the gain on derivative liabilities due to the
decrease in our stock price and shorter remaining terms for our warrants and
notes payable. Our lower operating loss of approximately $575,000
during the current period resulted primarily from lower operating expenses were
due to efforts to use less cash from operating activities. Net income
attributable to common stockholders of $731,074 during the three months ended
June 30, 2010 and net loss attributable to common stockholders of $1,485,261for
the three months ended June 30, 2010 included $38,500 and $359,338 to record the
value of common stock dividends paid on June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, to
Series A, Series B, and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
holders. See note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Net
income attributable to common shareholders included a charge of $72,541 for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 to record the increased fair value of the
conversion feature of the preferred stock resulting from the change in the
conversion rate of our convertible preferred stock as a result of our additional
financings received in May and June 2010.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Revenues
Revenues
were $150,616 and $271,389 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The 45% decrease in revenues earned during the six months ended
June 30, 2010 were primarily due to Curiax Arraigner and Curiax Court Recording
software and hardware revenues in conjunction with a sale at one county in 2009
and two larger installations in the education market. Both sales involved
significant amounts of lower margin hardware. The effects of inflation and
changing prices on revenues and loss from operations during the periods
presented have been de minimus. Due to our small customer base, we face the risk
of fluctuating revenues should any of our customers discontinue using our
products.
Cost
of Revenues and Gross Profit
Cost of
revenues decreased $71,924, or 63%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009 due primarily to lower current
year revenues and hardware costs associated with the Curiax Arraigner and Court
Recording sales above as these sales involved a higher mix of hardware
revenues.
Gross
margins were approximately 72% and 58% for the six months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009, respectively.
Selling,
General, and Administrative Expenses
Selling,
general, and administrative expenses were $596,288 and $1,374,278 for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The 57% decrease
in the expenses for six month period ended June 30, 2010 resulted primarily from
a decrease in headcount which occurred during the second half of 2009 and first
half of 2010, as well as reduced salaries for certain personnel in order to
reduce cash used from operations. These ongoing efforts to reduce
cash used from operations have reduced cash usage significantly, but have not
resulted in positive cash flow from operations, and we require additional
fundraising to fund operations. Decreased stock-based compensation of
approximately $140,000 was due to lower stock option fair values for grants made
to employees during the current period, as well as decreases in the number of
options that vested during the period due to full vesting of prior
grants.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research
and development expenses were $171,468 and $600,873 for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. During the three months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, we did not capitalize any software development costs
related to new products under development as our research and development
efforts during 2009 and 2010 primarily involved product improvements to our
Device Manager
TM
and
Video Visitation products to improve their functionality and ease of use for end
users.
The 71%
decrease in expense during the current period resulted primarily from lower
salaries and taxes of approximately $301,000 due to personnel reductions, as
well as lower stock-based compensation of approximately $64,000 due to the lower
number of options that vested during the period and the lower fair value of
grants made during the three months ended March 31, 2010. Also, in
order to reduce cash used from operations, we have discontinued the use of
outsourced software development services, for which we incurred approximately
$17,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Other
expense of $281,520 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 consisted primarily
of $956,960 to record the finance expense associated with the issuance of
certain warrants in conjunction with the February 2010 financing as well as the
excess of the fair value of the warrants and the conversion feature of the notes
payable versus the actual proceeds received from the
offering. Additionally, we recorded $355,339 expense to record
amortization of the fair value of the warrants granted to noteholders as
part of the convertible notes we issued in February and May 2010, and $1,072,175
to record the gain on derivative liabilities during the current period for the
decrease in estimated fair value of warrants and the conversion feature of our
notes payable. The value of the derivative liabilities decreased
significantly at June 30, 2010 due to the decrease in our stock price,
expiration of certain warrants, and shorter remaining outstanding, terms and
lower interest rates at that date. See notes 6 and 10 to our
condensed consolidated financial statements.
Other
expense during the six months ended June 30, 2009 of $190,478 consisted
primarily of a loss of $101,506 recorded on our derivative liabilities as well
as $80,408 recorded to amortize the fair value of warrants issued to convertible
noteholders in a financing transaction on May 29, 2009.
Net
Loss and Net Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders
Net loss
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $941,152 compared to a net loss of
$2,008,656 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The lower loss during the
current period was due primarily to our reductions in expenses to reduce cash
used from operations. Net loss attributable to common shareholders
included a charge of $665,404 to record the increased fair value of the
conversion feature of the preferred stock resulting from the changes in the
conversion rate of our convertible preferred stock as a result of our 2010
financings.
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders of $2,367,994 for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 included $359,338 to record the value of common stock dividends
paid to Series A, B, and C Convertible Preferred Stock holders on June 30,
2009. See note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Due to a
net loss during the six months ended June 30, 2010 of $941,152, cash used in
operating activities amounted to $248,033 during the six months ended June 30,
2010, and an accumulated deficit of $82.4 million at June 30, 2010, and our
inability to date to obtain sufficient financing to support current and
anticipated levels of operations, there is a substantial doubt about the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Our revenues since inception
have not provided sufficient cash to fund our operations.
Our cash
used by operations decreased during 2010 primarily due to measures we undertook
including terminating employees and reducing the salaries of all employees by
50% effective August 14, 2009. Certain personnel have had their
salaries returned to their original levels, but until we significantly increase
revenues, we anticipate that we will continue to operate with minimal headcount
and reduced salaries for certain employees.
Historically,
we have relied on private placement issuances of equity and debt. We
need to raise additional working capital during third quarter 2010 to fund our
ongoing operations. We have commenced efforts to raise additional capital
through a private placement of debt securities and warrants. No
assurance can be given that we will be successful in raising this
capital. If we successfully raise additional capital through the
issuance of debt, this will increase our interest expense and the warrants will
dilute our existing shareholders. If we are not successful in raising
this capital, we may not be able to continue as a going concern. In
that event, we may be forced to cease operations and our stockholders could lose
their entire investment in our company.
As of
June 30, 2010, we had cash of $24,766. We currently require
substantial amounts of capital to fund current operations and the continued
development and deployment of our Device Manager
TM
product
line. This additional funding could be in the form of the sale of
assets, debt, equity, or a combination of these financing methods. However,
there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain such financing if and
when needed, or that if obtained, such financing will be sufficient or on terms
and conditions acceptable to us. If we are unable to obtain this additional
funding, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be
adversely affected. As with our note issuance for approximately $871,000 during
2010 ($225,000 new notes issuance and approximately $646,000 of note principal
and interest contributed from our May 2009 financing), such financings may
trigger certain anti-dilution provisions of existing warrants and our
convertible preferred stock and be dilutive to existing common
shareholders. See notes 6 and 10 to our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
We used
$248,033 in cash from operating activities during the six months ended June 30,
2010 due primarily to our net loss from operations during the period of
$659,632. During the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, we used $1,103 and $18,267 in investing activities primarily to
purchase new computer equipment. In the six months ended June 30,
2010, we utilized $30,306 from our certificate of deposit to pay certain past
due rent obligations as the certificate of deposit collateralized a standby
letter of credit with our landlord. The standby letter of credit has now been
drawn to zero balance and all proceeds from the certificate of deposit have been
received as of June 30, 2010.
In view
of the matters described in the preceding paragraph, recoverability of a major
portion of the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet is dependent upon our continued operations, which in
turn is dependent upon our ability to meet our financing requirements on a
continuing basis and attract additional financing. The unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and
classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to
continue in existence.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Certain
statements contained herein are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, such as statements
relating to financial results and plans for future sales and business
development activities, and are thus prospective. Such forward-looking
statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could
cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. Potential risks and uncertainties
include, but are not limited to, economic conditions, competition, our ability
to complete the development of and market our new Device Manager product line
and other uncertainties detailed from time to time in our Securities and
Exchange Commission (“the SEC”) filings, including our Annual Report on Form
10-K and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not
required as we are a Smaller Reporting Company.
ITEM
4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our
management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated as of June 30, 2010, the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation,
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer has concluded that the
Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the
period covered by this report to provide reasonable assurance that information
required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and
forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's
management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
have been no significant changes in internal controls over financial reporting
that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
Part
II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
The
following exhibits are filed with or incorporated by reference into this report.
The exhibits which are denominated by an asterisk (*) were previously filed as a
part of, and are hereby incorporated by reference from either (i) the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-18 (File No. 33-27040-D) (referred to as “S-18 No. 1”) or (ii) ) the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (referred to
as “2006 10-KSB”).
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
3.1*
|
|
Certificate
of Incorporation as amended through March 8, 2007 (2006
10-KSB)
|
|
|
|
3.2*
|
|
Amended
Bylaws of the Company as presently in use (S-18 No. 1, Exhibit
3.2)
|
|
|
|
10.9*
|
|
Triton
Business Development Services Engagement Agreement dated January 31, 2007
(2006 10-KSB)
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
13a-14(a).
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
13a-14(a).
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
SIMTROL,
INC.
|
|
|
Date:
August 23, 2010
|
/s/ Oliver M. Cooper III
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
(Principal
executive officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stephen N. Samp
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
(Principal
financial and accounting
officer)
|