Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2016
Note 1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and Basis of Presentation
Medical Imaging Corp., (MIC or the Company), a Nevada Corporation was incorporated in 2000. In 2005, the Company developed a business plan for private healthcare opportunities in Canada with the objective of owning and operating private diagnostic imaging clinics. In 2009, the Company purchased Canadian Teleradiology Services Inc., which operates as: Custom Teleradiology Services (CTS). CTS provides remote reading of medical diagnostic imaging scans for rural hospitals and clinics in Canada. In early 2010, the Company modified its business plan to grow its CTS subsidiary while commencing the acquisition of existing full service imaging clinics located in the United States and exploring the development of new diagnostic imaging technology. In 2012, the Company purchased Schuylkill Open MRI Inc., which operates as: Schuylkill Medical Imaging (SMI), an independent diagnostic imaging facility located in Pottsville, Pennsylvania. In 2014, the company purchased Partners Imaging Center of Venice, LLC (PIV) located in Venice, Florida; Partners Imaging Center of Naples, LLC (PIN) located in Naples, Florida; and Partners Imaging Center of Charlotte, LLC (PIC) located in Port Charlotte, Florida.
Basis of Presentation
These consolidated financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in U.S. dollars. The Companys fiscal year-end is December 31.
Principle of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Medical Imaging, Corp., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, CTS, SMI, PIV, PIN, and PIC. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. CTS, SMIs, PIVs, PINs, and PICs accumulated earnings prior to their acquisitions are not included in the consolidated balance sheet.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, (ii) the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are published, and (iii) the reported amount of net sales, expenses and costs recognized during the periods presented. Adjustments made with respect to the use of estimates often relate to improved information not previously available. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of consolidated financial statements; accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At September 30, 2016, and December 31, 2015, cash includes cash on hand and cash in the bank.
Accounts Receivable Credit Risk
The allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained at a level sufficient to provide for estimated credit losses based on evaluating known and inherent risks in the receivables portfolio.
Management evaluates various factors including expected losses and economic conditions to predict the estimated realization on outstanding receivables.
As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the allowance for doubtful accounts from direct billings was $56,475.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 there was change in allowance from direct billings of $0 and $6,379, respectively.
As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the allowance for doubtful accounts from third party billings (Florida operations) was $275,000.
6
There was no change in the allowance for doubtful accounts from third party billings (Florida operations) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.
In connection with the acquisition of the three facilities located in Venice, Port Charlotte and Naples, Florida, the Company, in October 2014, entered into professional services agreements whereby the seller of those three facilities continued to handle the billing and collection for the imaging centers (the third party billing). The seller must still provide a full set of verification data to the Company with respect to its account receivable processing and collections so that the Company can determine the extent to which accounts submitted by the seller in connection with the third party billing have been collected or denied. Final verification will only be able to be completed after the conclusion of the services performed pursuant to the third party billing contract, which is expected during the 2016 fiscal year.
As of September 30, 2016, management does not believe an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts is necessary. Although the gross receivable balance has increased significantly, management is actively pursuing collection efforts directly with patients and insurance payers and believes that the current allowance for doubtful accounts is sufficient to cover any expected losses.
Goodwill and Indefinite - Lived Intangible Assets
The Company follows the provisions of Financial Accounting Standard (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 350,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
. In accordance with ASC Topic 350, goodwill, representing the excess of the purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired and accounted for under the purchase method, acquired in business combinations is assigned to reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination as of the acquisitions date. Under this standard, goodwill and intangibles with indefinite useful lives are not amortized. The Company assesses goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred in accordance with ASC Topic 350. If the carrying value of a reporting unit's goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, the Company records an impairment loss equal to the difference. ASC Topic 350 also requires that the fair value of indefinite-lived purchased intangible assets be estimated and compared to the carrying value. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the estimated fair value of the indefinite-lived purchased intangible assets is less than the carrying value. If the implied fair value of goodwill is lower than its carrying amount, goodwill impairment is indicated and goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. Subsequent increases in goodwill value are not recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
No goodwill impairment was recognized during 2016 or 2015.
Revenue Recognition
The Company holds contracts with several hospitals and groups of health care facilities to provide Teleradiology services for a specific period of time. The Company bills for services rendered on a monthly basis. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, CTS held six contracts; four contracts that are renewable on a year-to-year basis and two contracts that are renewable in 2016 and 2018. In accordance with the requirement of Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104, the Company recognizes revenue when: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists (contracts); (2) delivery has occurred (monthly); (3) the sellers price is fixed or determinable (per the customers contract, and services performed); and (4) collectability is reasonably assured (based upon our credit policy).
Revenue is accounted for under the guidelines established by SAB 101,
Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,
and ASC Topic 605-45,
Revenue Recognition Principal Agent Considerations
. For CTS, the Company has the following indicators of gross revenue reporting: (1) CTS is the primary obligator in the provision of services to the Hospitals under contract, (2) CTS has latitude in establishing price, and negotiating contracts with each hospital, (3) CTS negotiates and determines the service specification to be provided to each hospital client, (4) CTS has complete discretion in supplier selection, and (5) CTS has the credit risk. Accordingly, the Company records CTS revenue at gross.
For SMI, PIV, PIN, and PIC, revenue is recognized on the date of service and recorded on an aggregate monthly basis.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales includes fees paid to radiologists for reading services, transcription fees, equipment repairs, system license and usage costs.
7
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
In accordance with ASC Topic 360,
Property, Plant and Equipment,
property, equipment, and purchased intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Goodwill and other intangible assets are tested for impairment at least annually.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.
Amortization and Depreciation
Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the straight-line method over the following useful lives:
3 - 7 years
Equipment
5 7 years
Furniture and Fixtures
3 - 5 years
Non-compete Contract
5 - 15 years
Leasehold Improvements
Stock Based Compensation
The Company follows ASC 718,
Stock Compensation
; a fair value calculation is performed by the Company to establish the grant date fair value of each award which will also be the amount recorded by the Company as stock based compensation expense pursuant to the guidance set forth in ASC 718 to produce an estimated fair value.
The Company measures all share-based payments to employees (which includes non-employee Board of Directors), including employee stock options, warrants and restricted stock, at the fair value of the award and expenses it over the requisite service period (generally the vesting period). The fair value of common stock options or warrants granted to employees is estimated at the date of grant using the binomial option pricing model (BOPM). The calculation also takes into account the common stock fair market value at the grant date, the exercise price, the expected life of the common stock option or warrant, the dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate.
The Company from time to time may issue stock options, warrants and restricted stock to acquire goods or services from third parties. Restricted stock, options or warrants issued to other than employees or directors are recorded on the basis of their fair value. The options or warrants are valued using the BOPM on the basis of the market price of the underlying equity instrument on the valuation date, which for options and warrants related to contracts that have substantial disincentives to non-performance, is the date of the contract, and for all other contracts is the vesting date. Expenses related to the options and warrants are recognized on a straight-line basis over the period which services are to be received.
There was no stock-based compensation expense to non-employees for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.
There was no stock-based compensation expense to employees for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.
There was no stock-based compensation expense to non-employees for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, and 2015.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized stock based compensation expenses from stock granted to employees of $5,000.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recognized stock based compensation expenses from stock granted to employees of $10,340.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties other than in a forced sale or liquidation.
8
The carrying amounts of the Companys financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and notes and loans payable approximate fair value due to their maturities.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB ASC for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB ASC (Paragraph 820-10-35-37) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
Level 1 Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
Level 2 pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
Level 3 pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
The carrying amounts of the Companys financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accounts payable approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
The Company does not have assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Companys functional currency for its wholly-owned subsidiary, CTS, is the Canadian dollar, and their financial statements have been translated into U.S. dollars. The Canadian dollar based accounts of the Companys foreign operations have been translated into United States dollars using the current rate method. Assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates as of the balance sheet date; income and expenses are translated using the weighted average exchange rates for the reporting period. Translation adjustments are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of stockholders equity.
The Company recognized a foreign currency loss on transactions from operations of $595, and gain of $14,046 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The Company recognized a foreign currency loss on transactions from operations of $39,846 and $3,473 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The Company recognized other comprehensive income of $28,738 and $28,633 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The Company recognized other comprehensive income of $96,917 and $85,684 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740,
Income
Taxes
. This statement prescribes the use of the asset and liability method whereby deferred tax asset and liability account balances are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.
Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 260,
Earnings
per
Share
. Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Basic and diluted losses per share are the same as all potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive.
9
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options and other commitments to issue common stock were exercised or equity awards vest resulting in the issuance of common stock or conversion of notes into shares of the Companys common stock that could increase the number of shares outstanding and lower the earnings per share of the Companys common stock. This calculation is not done for periods in a loss position as this would be antidilutive.
The information related to basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
September 30,
2016
|
|
September 30,
2015
|
|
September 30,
2016
|
|
September 30,
2015
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
$
|
(259,182)
|
|
$
|
(497,978)
|
|
$
|
(610,048)
|
|
$
|
(840,688)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding basic and diluted
|
|
25,641,481
|
|
|
24,166,481
|
|
|
25,555,237
|
|
|
24,143,183
|
EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted:
|
$
|
(0.010)
|
|
$
|
(0.021)
|
|
$
|
(0.024)
|
|
$
|
(0.035)
|
Recent Accounting Updates
The Company does not expect the adoption of any other recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on its results of operations, financial position or cash flow.
Updates issued but not yet adopted
The Company does not expect the adoption of any other recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on its results of operations, financial position or cash flow.
Note 2. Interim Financial Statements
The accompanying interim unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine, month period ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.
Note 3. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is calculated using the straight - line method over the estimated useful life of the assets. At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the major class of property and equipment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
Estimated useful lives
|
Computer/Office Equipment
|
$
|
475,469
|
|
$
|
454,117
|
|
3-7 years
|
Medical Equipment
|
|
2,251,062
|
|
|
2,156,820
|
|
3-7 years
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
852,386
|
|
|
843,781
|
|
5-15 years
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
(1,420,163)
|
|
|
(998,224)
|
|
|
Net Book Value
|
$
|
2,158,754
|
|
$
|
2,456,494
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $140,550 and $137,116 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Depreciation expense was $418,298 and $409,854 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
10
Note 4. Goodwill
There was no change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the eighteen months ended September 30, 2016. As of September 30, 2016 the balance of goodwill is $1,977,670.
Note 5. Operating Lease Commitments
CTS has a lease commitment for its office space of approximately $2,450 minimum rental, and approximately $3,550 in utilities, realty taxes, and operating costs, for a total of approximately $6,000 per month. The lease renewed in April 2013 for a period of five years and will expire in March 2018. CTS has sublet the space under the original lease to the end of its original term. In accordance with ASC 840,
Leases,
(ASC 840) the Company has recognized approximately $8,000 in total sublease loss, as a result of total anticipated revenue on the operating lease being less than original lease obligations. The loss was recorded on sublease execution and amortized over its term.
CTS has a lease commitment for its new office space in Toronto, Canada of approximately $2,600 minimum rental, and approximately $3,400 in utilities, realty taxes, and operating costs, for a total of approximately $6,000 per month. The lease will expire April 30, 2021.
SMI entered into a lease commitment for its office space in Pottsville, Pennsylvania. The lease will expire on July 30, 2021. Monthly rental amounts are $5,437 per month plus approximately $1,674 in utilities, realty taxes, and operating costs.
SMI has a lease for its x-ray equipment space in Pottsville, Pennsylvania. The lease term is seven years from commitment date of October 2014. Monthly lease payments are $3,000.
SMI has a lease for use of x-ray equipment and space in Pottsville, Pennsylvania. The lease term is two years from commitment date of January 2016. Monthly lease payments are $2,000.
PIV has a lease for office space in Venice, Florida. The lease will expire September 30, 2021. Monthly rental amounts are $13,170 per month.
PIN has a lease for office space in Naples, Florida. The lease will expire January 1, 2020. Monthly rental amounts are $9,543 per month.
PIC has a lease for office space in Port Charlotte, Florida. The lease will expire June 20, 2021. Monthly rental amounts are $5,512 per month.
Expected lease commitments as of September 30, 2016:
|
|
| |
Year
|
|
Total
|
2016
|
|
$
|
175,008
|
2017
|
|
|
634,032
|
2018
|
|
|
541,032
|
2019
|
|
|
520,032
|
2020
|
|
|
405,516
|
2021
|
|
|
245,379
|
|
|
$
|
2,520,999
|
Note 6. Obligations under Capital Lease
SMI MRI Machines Capital Lease:
On December 10, 2012, the Company entered into a lease agreement with one of the sellers of SMI to lease the two MRI machines. Under the terms of the lease, SMI is to make monthly payments of $11,013, plus applicable sales tax, over a period of 48 months. In addition, SMI agreed to make a one-time lease payment of $125,000, which was paid by March 30, 2013. The Company has guaranteed all of SMIs obligations under the lease. At the end of the lease, SMI will have the option to purchase the MRI machines for a total purchase price of $1.00. The lease was accounted for as a capital lease for a total value of $555,000.
11
The gross amount of the equipment held under capital leases totals $555,000. Net book value at September 30, 2016 was $129,583 after accumulated depreciation of $425,417. Net book value at December 31, 2015 was $218,833 after accumulated depreciation of $342,167.
Amortization of the capital lease assets is included in the depreciation expense of $27,750 for the three months ended September 30, 2016, and 2015.
SMI X-ray Machine Capital Lease:
On July 3, 2014, Company entered into a capital lease agreement to lease the x-ray machine that was delivered and installed in July 2014. Under the terms of the lease, the Companys subsidiary, SMI, is to make monthly payments of $1,495, plus applicable sales tax, over a period of 60 months. At the end of the lease, SMI will have the option to purchase the MRI machines for a total purchase price of $1.00. The lease was accounted for as a capital lease for a total value of $78,250.
The gross amount of the x-ray machine held under the capital lease is $78,250. Net book value at September 30, 2016 was $43,036 after accumulated amortization of $35,212. Net book value at December 31, 2015 was $54,775 after accumulated amortization of $23,475.
Amortization of the capital lease assets is included in the depreciation expense of $3,913 for the three months ended September 30, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
SMI PACS/RIS System Capital Lease:
On August 19, 2014, the Company entered into a capital lease agreement to lease PACS/RIS system that was delivered and installed in December 2014. Under the terms of the lease, the Companys subsidiary, SMI, is to make monthly payments of $3,115, plus applicable sales tax, over a period of 60 months. At the end of the lease, SMI will have the option to purchase the system for a total purchase price of $1.00. The lease was accounted for as a capital lease for a total value of $162,333.
The gross amount of the PACS/RIS system held under the capital lease is $162,333. Net book value at September 30, 2016 was $100,105 after accumulated amortization of $62,228. Net book value at December 31, 2015 was $124,455 after accumulated amortization of $37,878.
Amortization of the capital lease assets is included in the depreciation expense of $8,117 for the three months ended September 30, 2016, and 2015.
SMI Copier Capital Lease:
On February 1, 2016, the Company entered into a capital lease agreement to lease computers that were delivered and installed in February 2016. Under the terms of the lease, the Company is to make monthly payments of $135, plus applicable sales tax, over a period of 31 months. At the end of the lease, the company will have the option to purchase the computers for a total purchase price of $1.00. The lease was accounted for as a capital lease for a total value of $2,968. In addition, SMI made a deposit payment of $530 that was applied to the balance owing towards the copier.
The gross amount of the Digital Printers held under the capital lease is $3,498. Net book value at September 30, 2016 was $2,721 after accumulated amortization of $777.
Amortization of the capital lease assets is included in the depreciation expense of $292 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
PV, PN, PC PACS/RIS Capital Lease:
On November 26, 2014, the Company entered into a capital lease agreement to lease PACS/RIS system that was delivered and installed in December 2014. Under the terms of the lease, the Companys subsidiary, PIV, is to make monthly payments of $3,094, plus applicable sales tax, over a period of 60 months. At the end of the lease, PIV will have the option to purchase the system for a total purchase price of $1.00. The lease was accounted for as a capital lease for a total value of $167,107.
The gross amount of the PACS/RIS system held under the capital lease is $167,107. Net book value at September 30, 2016 was $107,226 after accumulated amortization of $59,880. Net book value at December 31, 2015 was $132,292 after accumulated amortization of $34,815.
12
Amortization of the capital lease assets is included in the depreciation expense of $8,355for the three months ended September 30, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
PV, PN, PC Computers Capital Lease:
On December 10, 2014, the Company entered into a capital lease agreement to lease computers that were delivered and installed in December 2014. Under the terms of the lease, the Company is to make monthly payments of $813, plus applicable sales tax, over a period of 36 months. At the end of the lease, the company will have the option to purchase the computers for a total purchase price of $1.00. The lease was accounted for as a capital lease for a total value of $25,108.
The gross amount of the computers held under the capital lease is $25,108. Net book value at September 30, 2016 was $10,113 after accumulated amortization of $14,995. Net book value at December 31, 2015 was $16,390 after accumulated amortization of $8,718.
Amortization of the capital lease assets is included in the depreciation expense of $2,092 for the three months ended September 30, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
PV, PN, PC Digital Printers Capital Lease:
On March 15, 2016, the Company entered into a capital lease agreement to lease digital printers that were delivered and installed in March 2016. Under the terms of the lease, the Company is to make monthly payments of $423, plus applicable sales tax, over a period of 36 months. At the end of the lease, the company will have the option to purchase the computers for a total purchase price of $1.00. The lease was accounted for as a capital lease for a total value of $13,120.
The gross amount of the Digital Printers held under the capital lease is $13,120. Net book value at September 30, 2016 was $10,971 after accumulated amortization of $2,149.
Amortization of the capital lease assets is included in the depreciation expense of $1,624 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
CTS Computers Lease
On January 21, 2015, the Company entered into a capital lease agreement to lease computers that were installed on the same date of acceptance. Under the terms of the lease, the Company is to make monthly payments of $529, plus applicable sales tax, over a period of 36 months. At the end of the lease, the Company will have the option to purchase the computers for a total purchase price of $1.00. The lease was accounted for as a capital lease for a total value of $19,560.
The gross amount of the computers held under the capital lease is $19,560. Net book value at September 30, 2016 was $8,622 after accumulated amortization of $10,778. Net book value at December 31, 2015 was $12,767 after accumulated amortization of $6,230.
Amortization of the capital lease assets is included in the depreciation expense of $1,624 for the three months ended September 30, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
Minimum future lease payments under the capital leases as of September 30, 2016 are as follow:
|
| |
Minimum Lease Payments
|
Total
|
2016
|
$
|
28,899
|
2017
|
|
114,783
|
2018
|
|
99,721
|
2019
|
|
84,201
|
2020
|
|
3,094
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
330,698
|
Less amount representing interest
|
|
26,396
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum lease payments
|
|
304,302
|
Less current portion of minimum lease payments
|
|
101,128
|
|
|
|
Long-term capital lease obligations at
September
30, 2016
|
$
|
203,174
|
13
Note 7. Promissory Notes
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company received $559,000 from forward sale of receivables. In accordance with ASC 860,
Transfers and Servicing
, (ASC 860), the sale of future accounts receivable as per the agreements does not represent a sale of accounts receivable for accounting purposes and as such, presented in the consolidated financial statements as promissory notes. The forward sales of receivables do not carry a security interest and the only recourse is against accounts receivable. The forward sales of receivables called for weekly payments of $13,000 towards the principal balance and interest. The forward sales of receivables were paid off early on February 29, 2016.
In June and December 2015, the Company has issued loans of $120,700 and $86,400, respectively. The loans terms call for a daily payment of $509, towards the principal balance and interest. The final payment is due February 14, 2017. The loans are collateralized by the Accounts Receivable of: SMI, PIV, PIN, and PIC.
In June 2015, the Company issued a loan of $147,224. The loan terms call for a daily payment of $553, towards the principal balance and interest. The loans were collateralized by the Accounts Receivable of: CTS SMI, PIV, PIN, and PIC. The final payment had an original maturity date of July 7, 2016. The note was paid off early on March 2, 2016.
On February 23, 2016 the Company sold a bridge promissory note for $100,000 to a private investor. The Note pays interest monthly at an annual rate of 12%. As an inducement to purchase the Note, the investor was also given 100,000 shares of common stock of the Company. The note is due on February 23, 2017 but may be converted into a future financing of notes sold by the Company. In accordance with ASC 470,
Debt with conversion and other options,
(ASC 470)
on issuance of the shares, the Company recognized additional paid-in capital and a discount against the notes for a total of $7,000. Amortization of the discount for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $1,750, and $0, respectively.
On February 25, 2016, the Company sold to Grenville Strategic Royalty Corp. (Holder) a note for the principal amount of $500,000. The Note pays interest monthly at an annual rate of 25%. From July 30, 2016 through to August 31, 2017, the Holder may elect to convert the Note into a temporary royalty and receive a monthly payment equal to a specified percentage of the Companys revenue for the previous month, subject to certain minimum payments, in lieu of interest payments. However, in such case the Company may still buy back the temporary royalty for the original face value of the Note. If the Note is outstanding as of August 31, 2017, then the Note may be converted into a permanent royalty based on the revenues of the Company (the Royalty) at the Holder's election, subject to certain minimum payments.
The Holder will maintain a security interest in the Company until such time as the Note is retired, the Company raises $1,200,000 in additional capital, or the Note is converted into the Royalty.
On March 22, 2016, the Company sold an additional $70,000 bridge promissory note to a private investor. The Note pays interest monthly at an annual rate of 12%. As an inducement to purchase the Note, the investor was also given 100,000 shares of common stock of the Company. The note is due on March 22, 2017 but may be converted into a future financing of notes sold by the Company. In accordance with ASC 470,
Debt with conversion and other options,
(ASC 470)
on issuance of the shares, the Company recognized additional paid-in capital and a discount against the notes for a total of $2,030. Amortization of the discount for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $355, and $0, respectively.
On July 1, 2016, the Company received $350,000 from forward sale of receivables. In accordance with ASC 860,
Transfers and Servicing
, (ASC 860) the sale of future accounts receivable as per the agreements does not represent a sale of accounts receivable for accounting purposes and as such, the transaction will be presented in the consolidated financial statements as a promissory note. The forward sale of receivable does not carry a security interest and the only recourse is against accounts receivable. The forward sale of receivables calls for twenty monthly payments of $20,000 towards the principal balance and interest starting August 1, 2016.
14
A summary of the promissory notes is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Issuance Date
|
|
December 31,
2015
Balance
|
|
Notes Issued
|
|
Payments
|
|
Changes in
Discount
|
|
September 30,
2016
Balance
|
|
Maturity Date
|
21-Mar-11
|
|
$
|
7,752
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
(7,752)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
18-Mar-16
|
16-Jun-15
|
|
|
108,456
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(145,719)
|
|
|
37,263
|
|
|
-
|
|
14-Feb-17
|
16-Jun-15
|
|
|
58,581
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(58,581)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
02-Mar-16
|
04-Aug-15
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(10,000)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
05-Jan-16
|
22-Sep-15
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(125,000)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
29-Feb-16
|
22-Dec-15
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(100,000)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
29-Feb-16
|
16-Feb-16
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(2,916)
|
|
|
97,084
|
|
23-Feb-17
|
22-Feb-16
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
31-Aug-17
|
22-Mar-16
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(973)
|
|
|
69,027
|
|
22-Mar-17
|
01-Jul-16
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
(40,000)
|
|
|
(138,000)
|
|
|
322,000
|
|
01-Aug-17
|
Total
|
|
$
|
409,789
|
|
$
|
1,170,000
|
|
$
|
(487,052)
|
|
$
|
(104,626)
|
|
$
|
988,111
|
|
|
Note 8. Convertible Notes
Series B:
On December 5, 2012 and March 27, 2013, the Company sold, through a private placement to accredited investors, three year 12% convertible notes (Series B Notes) in the aggregate principal amount of $1,865,000, and $365,000, respectively. The Notes pay interest at a rate of 12% per annum, payable to the holder at 1% per month, and are convertible into common shares of the Company at $0.10 per share. In addition, each purchaser of the Notes received shares dependent on the dollar amount of Notes purchased. The total number of shares of common stock issued was 5,315,000 shares.
In accordance with ASC 470,
Debt with conversion and other options,
(ASC 470)
on issuance of the shares, the Company recognized additional paid-in capital and a discount against the notes for a total of $244,275. Amortization of the discount for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $20,356.
On December 1, 2015, the holders of $1,840,000 Series B Notes have agreed to extend the maturity date of the debt outstanding to July 1, 2017 from its original maturity date of December 31, 2015. As part of the extension the Company issued warrants to entitle the holders to purchase up to 1,840,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.07 per share at any time from December 1, 2015 to July 1, 2018. The Company has valued the warrants at $0.0058 per issued share, and recorded a total discount of $10,672 to be amortized over the extension period on a monthly basis. This is from January 2016 to July 2017, an 18-month period.
On March 31, 2016, the holders of $50,000 Series B Notes have agreed to extend the maturity date of the debt outstanding to September 1, 2017 from its original maturity date of March 31, 2016. As part of the extension the Company issued warrants to entitle the holders to purchase up to 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.07 per share at any time from March 31, 2016 to September 30, 2018. The Company has valued the warrants at $0.00278 per issued share, and recorded a total discount of $139 to be amortized over the extension period on a monthly basis. This is from April 2016 to September 2017, an 18-month period.
On March 31, 2016, the holder of $25,000 Series B Notes has agreed to extend the maturity date of the debt outstanding to September 1, 2019 from its original maturity date of March 31, 2016. As part of the extension the Company issued warrants to entitle the holders to purchase up to 25,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.07 per share at any time from March 31, 2016 to September 30, 2019. The Company has valued the warrants at $0.00583 per issued share, and recorded a total discount of $146 to be amortized over the extension period on a monthly basis. This is from April 2016 to September 2019, a 30-month period.
In accordance with ASC 480,
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity,
the Company determined that the warrants are a freestanding instrument based on the following:
·
The debt can be transferred without the transfer of the warrants.
·
The warrants can be transferred without the transfer of the debt.
·
The warrants can be exercised while debt still outstanding.
In accordance with ASC 470, if the warrants are classified as equity, then the proceeds should be allocated based on the relative fair values of the base instrument and the warrants following the guidance as in ASC 470.
For the three months ended September 30, 2016, $60,450 of accrued interest was recorded on the notes and $10,300 was paid.
15
The Details of Series B Notes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
Face Value of Notes
|
|
|
Unamortized
Discount
|
|
|
Principal
Payments
|
|
|
September 30, 2016
Balance
|
|
Maturity Date
|
03-Dec-12
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
$
|
(73)
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
24,927
|
|
01-Jul-17
|
03-Dec-12
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
(360)
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,640
|
|
01-Jul-17
|
03-Dec-12
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
(145)
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,855
|
|
01-Jul-17
|
03-Dec-12
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
(72)
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,928
|
|
01-Jul-17
|
03-Dec-12
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
(72)
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,928
|
|
01-Jul-17
|
03-Dec-12
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
(72)
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,928
|
|
01-Jul-17
|
03-Dec-12
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
(4,335)
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,495,665
|
|
01-Jul-17
|
03-Dec-12
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
(145)
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,855
|
|
01-Jul-17
|
03-Dec-12
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
(43)
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,957
|
|
01-Jul-17
|
03-Dec-12
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(5,000)
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
31-Dec-16
|
27-Mar-13
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
(46)
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,954
|
|
01-Sep-17
|
27-Mar-13
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
(46)
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,954
|
|
01-Sep-17
|
27-Mar-13
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
(125)
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,875
|
|
01-Sep-19
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,015,000
|
|
$
|
(5,534)
|
|
$
|
(5,000)
|
|
$
|
2,004,465
|
|
|
Following are maturities of the long term debt in Series B Notes for each of the next 5 years:
|
|
| |
|
|
Principal
Payments
|
2016
|
|
$
|
95,000
|
2017
|
|
|
1,890,000
|
2018
|
|
|
-
|
2019
|
|
|
25,000
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,010,000
|
Series C:
On May 22, 2014, the Company sold, through private placement to accredited investors, three year 12% convertible notes (Series C Notes) in the aggregate principal amount of $95,000.
The Notes bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum, payable to the holder at1% per month, with the principal amount due on May 31, 2017. The Notes are convertible into shares of the Companys common stock at an initial conversion rate of $0.15 per share. In addition, each holder of Series C Notes received shares dependent on the dollar amount of Notes purchased. On August 25, 2014, October 31, 2014 and February 17, 2015, the Company sold an additional $75,000, $50,000 and $20,000, respectively of Series C Notes.
The total number of shares of common stock issued was 240,000 shares.
In accordance with ASC 470 on issuance of the shares, the Company recognized additional paid-in capital and a discount against the notes for a total of $12,695. Amortization of the discount for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $1,277.
For the three months ended September 30, 2016, $7,200 in accrued interest was recorded on the notes and $4,800 was paid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Issuance Date
|
|
December 31, 2015
Face Value of Notes
|
|
Unamortized
Discount
|
|
Balance at
September 30, 2016
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2015
|
22-May-14
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
$
|
(667)
|
|
$
|
49,333
|
|
31-May-17
|
22-May-14
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
(300)
|
|
|
22,200
|
|
31-May-17
|
22-May-14
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
(300)
|
|
|
22,200
|
|
31-May-17
|
25-Aug-14
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
(1,103)
|
|
|
48,897
|
|
31-Oct-17
|
25-Aug-14
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
(551)
|
|
|
24,449
|
|
31-Oct-17
|
31-Oct-14
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
(948)
|
|
|
49,052
|
|
31-Oct-17
|
17-Feb-15
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
(491)
|
|
|
19,509
|
|
17-Feb-18
|
Total
|
|
$
|
240,000
|
|
$
|
(4,360)
|
|
$
|
235,640
|
|
|
16
Following are maturities of the long term debt in Series C Notes:
|
|
| |
|
|
Principal
Payments
|
2016
|
|
$
|
-
|
2017
|
|
|
220,000
|
2018
|
|
|
20,000
|
Total
|
|
$
|
240,000
|
Individually issued Convertible Note:
On March 26, 2014, the Company issued a $300,000 convertible note to a non-affiliate. The note pays interest at a rate of 12% per annum, payable to the holder at 1% per month. In addition to interest payments the Company will be making monthly payments of $5,000 towards the principal balance beginning June 1, 2014 for three years until the note due date of February 27, 2017. The note is convertible into common shares of the Company at $0.15 per share. In addition, the Note holder will receive 300,000 shares as part of the note agreement.
For the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, $4,992 and $6,807, respectively, of interest was recorded on the notes.
In accordance with ASC 470 on issuance of the shares, the Company recognized additional paid-in capital and a discount against the notes for a total of $25,500. Amortization of the discount for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $2,125.
Summary of the note is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Issuance Date
|
|
Face Value of Note
December 31, 2015
|
|
Payments
|
|
Unamortized
Discount
|
|
September 30, 2016
Balance
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26-Mar-14
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
$
|
(40,000)
|
|
$
|
(4,250)
|
|
$
|
155,750
|
|
27-Feb-17
|
Following are maturity of the individually issued convertible notes:
|
|
| |
|
|
Principal
Payments
|
2016
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
2017
|
|
|
140,000
|
Total
|
|
$
|
160,000
|
Note 9. Royalty Financing
On October 31, 2014, the Company entered into a royalty purchase agreement with Grenville Strategic Royalty Corp. for the amount of $2,000,000. The agreement calls for a monthly payment to Grenville based on a percentage of the total of certain revenue items and subject to a minimum payment amount. As of December 31, 2015, the Company paid a total of $446,377 in royalty payments. The amount financed is recorded net of discount to be amortized during the term. For the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company has recorded discount amortization expense of $76,766 and $78,232, respectively. The balance as shown on the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2016 was $1,927,157, net of $5,386,504 in unamortized discount.
Note 10. Major Customers
For the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, revenue was derived primarily from medical imaging and radiology services.
There were no major customers representing more than 10% of total revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.
There were no closing balances for accounts receivable greater than 10% of total balance the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.
Note 11. Major Vendors
There were no major vendors for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.
17
Note 12. Related Party Transactions
During January 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with a company that is owned and controlled by a major shareholder, to provide consulting services. Fees payable for performance of the consulting services are $10,000 per month. In addition to the monthly fees, the consultant was paid at signing of the agreement, four million two hundred thousand (4,200,000) options to purchase common stock of the client at an exercise price of $0.15 per share with an expiry date of December 31, 2019; details of the options recognition is disclosed in Note 15. On December 28, 2015, 450,000 shares of common stock were issued as compensation of $20,250 owed and outstanding towards the 2015 consulting agreement. Fees paid to the related party consultant of $90,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were $90,000, and are included as an expense in Legal and Professional fees in the accompanying statement of operations for the period. At September 30, 2016, the Company had $966 balance owing for services rendered.
Note 13. Common Stock Transactions
On June 7, 2016, 50,000 shares were issued for services valued at $5,000 based upon the closing price of the Companys common stock at the grant date.
On June 16, 2016, the Company issued 30,000 shares of common stock of the Company as part of the bridge convertible note to a private investor. The shares were valued at $609 based upon the closing price of the Companys common stock at the grant date.
On March 22, 2016, the Company issued 70,000 shares of common stock of the Company as part of the bridge convertible note to a private investor. The shares were valued at $1,421 based upon the closing price of the Companys common stock at the grant date.
On February 18, 2016, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock of the Company as part of the bridge convertible note to a private investor. The shares were valued at $7,000 based upon the closing price of the Companys common stock at the grant date.
For the year ended December 31, 2015, 1,425,000 shares were issued for services valued at $65,465 based upon the closing price of the Companys common stock at the grant date.
For the year ended December 31, 2015, 20,000 shares were issued as part of Series C convertible note agreements. The shares were valued at $1,040 based upon the closing price of the Companys common stock at the grant date.
On December 1, 2015, the Company issued 1,840,000 warrants to holders of Series B convertible notes (see Note 8) as part of the agreements to extend the maturity dates of the notes. The warrants are exercisable at a price of $0.07 per full share at any time from December 1, 2015 to July 1, 2018. The Company has valued the warrants at a $0.0058 per issued share.
On January 27, 2015, the Company granted options as considerations for services provided by the CEO of the Company. The options are to purchase up to 4,200,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price equal to $0.15 per share. The options shall have a five (5) year term. Inputs used in Binomial Option Pricing model were as follow: stock price at grant date: $0.0517, exercise price $0.15, expected life of the option two and a half (2.5) years, volatility of 70%, and risk free rate of 0.03%. The options were recorded on the grant date at a value of $34,683.
On January 27, 2015, the Company granted options as considerations for consulting services provided to the Company. The options are to purchase up to 4,200,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price equal to $0.15 per share. The options shall have a five (5) year term. Inputs used in Binomial Option Pricing model were as follow: stock price at grant date: $0.0517, exercise price $0.15, expected life of the option two and a half (2.5) years, volatility of 70%, and risk free rate of 0.03%. The options were recorded on the grant date at a value of $34,683.
On January 27, 2015, the Company granted options as considerations for services provided by the CFO of the Company. The options are to purchase up to 1,600,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price equal to $0.15 per share. The options shall have a five (5) year term. Inputs used in Binomial Option Pricing model were as follow: stock price at grant date: $0.0517, exercise price $0.15, expected life of the option two and a half (2.5) years, volatility of 70%, and risk free rate of 0.03%. The options were recorded on the grant date at a value of $13,213.
Note 14. Income Tax
The Company follows ASC 740,
Income
Taxes
(ASC 740), which requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between consolidated financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
18
The provisions of ASC 740 require companies to recognize in their financial statements the impact of a tax position if that position is more likely than not to be sustained upon audit, based upon the technical merits of the position. ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. ASC 740 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure.
Management does not believe that the Company has any material uncertain tax positions requiring recognition or measurement in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740. Accordingly, the adoption of these provisions of ASC 740 did not have a material effect on the Companys financial statements. The Companys policy is to record interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions, if any, as income tax expense.
Note. 15. Going Concern
As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company incurred net comprehensive loss of $259,182, and $610,048 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 as well as a working capital deficit of $4,206,025. These conditions raise substantial doubt as to the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. Management plans to raise additional financing in order to continue its operations and fulfill its debt obligations in 2016, but there can be no assurances that the plan will be successful. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
Note 16. Subsequent events
The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued.
19