In March 2022, Beijing Baosheng brought a breach of contract claim against Beijing Aipu New Media Technology Co., Ltd. (“Aipu”) in the Beijing Haidian District People’s Court and sought recovery of RMB1,783,834.04 (approximately $270,102) and related liquidated damages. On March 14, 2022, Beijing Baosheng applied for reservation of Aipu’ s property in an amount of RMB1,783,834.04 (approximately $270,102) and said application was approved by the court on March 17, 2022. On February 10, 2023, Beijing Baosheng applied for extension for reservation of Aipu’ s property in an amount of RMB1,783,834.04 (approximately $270,102). As of the date of this annual report, Beijing Baosheng is waiting for the court’s procedural approval on the extension of reservation.
In December 2022, the Beijing Chaoyang District People’s Court accepted a breach of contract case filed by Beijing Baosheng, as the complainant and Beijing Zhijin Dapeng Education Technology Co., Ltd (“Dapeng”), as the defendant. In this case, Beijing Baosheng sought recovery of RMB435,731.02 (approximately $63,271) and related liquidated damages from Dapeng. Later in February 2023, Beijing Baosheng submitted additional evidence to the court. As of the date of this annual report, Beijing Baosheng is waiting for the court’s notice on the subsequent procedures.
In November 2022, Beijing Baosheng brought a breach of contract claim against Shanghai Yituo Information Technology Co., Ltd (“Yituo”) in the Shanghai Jinshan District People’s Court and sought recovery of RMB50,843.31 (approximately $7,383) and related liquidated damages. The court held the hearings on February 14, 2023 and March 27, 2023. The court entered a judgment on April 11, 2023, ruling in favor of Beijing Baosheng. The judgment was served to Beijing Baosheng on April 24, 2023, and will become final and binding on the parties if Yituo does not file any appeals against the judgement before May 9, 2023.
In April 2022, the Beijing Haidian District People’s Court accepted a breach of contract case, filed by Beijing Baosheng as the complainant and Beijing Kaikeba Technology Co., Ltd. (“Beijing Kaikeba”), Huike Education Technology Group Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Kaikeba Technology Co., Ltd. (“HZ Kaikeba”), and Fang Yechang, as the defendants. In this case, Beijing Baosheng sought recovery of RMB34,436,345.13 (approximately $5,010,488.22) and related liquidated damages from Beijing Kaikeba, HZ Kaikeba, and Fang Yechang. As of the date of this annual report, Beijing Baosheng is waiting for the court’s notice on the subsequent procedures. On February 27, 2023, the People’s Court of Hangzhou Yuhang District ruled to accept the bankruptcy liquidation case of HZ Kaikeba and requested the creditors of HZ Kaikeba file their claims by April 21, 2023. Beijing Baosheng has filed its creditor claims involved in this case against HZ Kaikeba following the bankruptcy procedures. As of the date of this annual report, Beijing Baosheng is waiting for the bankruptcy administrator to confirm its rights as a creditor.
In April 2022, the Beijing Haidian District People’s Court accepted a breach of contract case filed by Beijing Baosheng, as the complainant, and Beijing Kaikeba, HZ Kaikeba, and Fang Yechang, as the defendants. In this case, Beijing Baosheng sought recovery of RMB4,756,957.57 (approximately $692,137.33) and related liquidated damages from defendants. As of the date of this annual report, Beijing Baosheng is waiting for the court’s notice on the subsequent procedures. On February 27, 2023, the People’s Court of Hangzhou Yuhang District ruled to accept the bankruptcy liquidation case of HZ Kaikeba and requested the creditors of HZ Kaikeba file their claims by April 21, 2023. Beijing Baosheng has filed its creditor claims involved in this case against HZ Kaikeba following the bankruptcy procedures. As of the date of this annual report, Beijing Baosheng is waiting for the bankruptcy administrator to confirm its rights as a creditor.
In April 2022, the Beijing Dongcheng District People’s Court accepted a breach of contract case filed by Beijing Baosheng, as the complainant, and Beijing Kaikeba, as the defendant. In this case, Beijing Baosheng sought recovery of RMB2,197,472.35 (approximately $319,732.23) and related liquidated damages from Beijing Kaikeba. On July 11, 2022, the court issued a civil mediation statement confirming that the parties had reached an agreement that, among others, Beijing Kaikeba agreed to pay Beijing Baosheng the service fee for the period from January 1, 2022 to March 31, 2022, in an amount of RMB 2,197,472.35 (approximately $317,974.25) in three installments by the end of 2022. As of the date of this annual report, Beijing Baosheng has not received any payment from Beijing Kaikeba. Given that Beijing Kaikeba currently has no assets, the court enforcement procedures against Beijing Kaikeba has been terminated in April 2023. In the event that the court or Beijing Baosheng locates any asset of Beijing Kaikeba, Beijing Baosheng will be able to apply for resumption of the enforcement procedures against Beijing Kaikeba.
On November 10, 2022, the Beijing Shijingshan District People’s Court accepted a contract claim case filed by Beijing Baosheng, as the complainant, and Fang Yechang and his spouse, as defendants. In this case, Beijing Baosheng requested the defendants to assume joint and several guarantee liability for Beijing Kaikeba’s debt to Beijing Baosheng in an amount of RMB2,197,472.35 (approximately $319,732.23). As of the date of this annual report, Baosheng is waiting for the court’s notice on the hearing.