As previously disclosed, on June 28, 2023, Kaleyra, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) with Tata Communications Limited, a Company listed on BSE Limited and National Stock Exchange of India Limited (Tata Communications),
pursuant to which, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, TC Delaware Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Tata Communications (Merger Sub), shall merge with and into the
Company, with the Company surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Tata Communications (the Merger). In connection with the Merger, the Company filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) a preliminary
proxy statement (the Preliminary Proxy Statement) on August 4, 2023 and a definitive proxy statement on August 18, 2023 (the Definitive Proxy Statement).
Following the filing of the Definitive Proxy Statement and prior to the filing of this supplement to the Definitive Proxy Statement (the
Supplement), four lawsuits relating to the Merger were filed: Robert Williams v. Kaleyra, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-00952-UNA (D. Del. Aug. 30, 2023), Brian Jones v. Kaleyra, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-00951-UNA (D.
Del. Aug. 30, 2023), Minzer v. Kaleyra, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-07968 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 8, 2023) and Dan Danielian v. Kaleyra, Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-7988 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 11, 2023) (collectively, the Actions). Further, since the
filing of the Preliminary Proxy on August 4, 2023, the Company received from purported Company stockholders (i) two Section 220 books and records demands (cumulatively, the 220 Demands) and (ii) eight additional
demand letters relating to the Merger (cumulatively, the Demand Letters and together with the 220 Demands and the Actions, the Matters). The Matters allege, among other things, that the defendants named therein violated
Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder because the Definitive Proxy Statement allegedly omits or misstates certain material information. The Actions seek, among other
things, injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the Merger, rescission of the Merger if it is consummated, damages, and attorneys fees.
The Company believes that the claims asserted in the Matters are without merit and that no supplemental disclosure is required under applicable law. However,
in order to moot unmeritorious disclosure claims, to avoid the risk of the Matters delaying or adversely affecting the Merger and to minimize the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in litigation, without admitting any liability or wrongdoing,
the Company has determined to voluntarily supplement the Definitive Proxy Statement as described in this Supplement. Nothing in this Supplement shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the
disclosures set forth herein. To the contrary, the Company specifically denies all allegations in the Matters, including allegations that any additional disclosure was or is required, and believes that the supplemental disclosures contained herein
are immaterial.
The Action is not expected to affect the timing of the Companys special meeting of stockholders to be held for the purpose of
voting upon, among other things, the Merger, which is scheduled to be held on September 28, 2023, or the amount of the consideration to be paid to the Companys stockholders in connection with the Merger.
- 2 -