Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
or
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                          to                       
Commission file number: 001-33631
Quicksilver Gas Services LP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  56-2639586
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
777 West Rosedale, Fort Worth, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
  76104
(Zip Code)
817-665-8620
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  þ    No  o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer  o Accelerated filer  o   Non-accelerated filer  þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company  o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  o    No  þ
The registrant has 12,269,714 Common Units, and 11,513,625 Subordinated Units outstanding as of July 25, 2008 .
 
 

 


Table of Contents

DEFINITIONS
As used in this report, unless the context otherwise requires:
“Bbl” or “Bbls” means barrel or barrels
“Btu” means British Thermal units, a measure of heating value
“LIBOR” means London Interbank Offered Rate
“Management” means management of the Partnership’s General Partner
“MMBtu” means million Btu
“MMBtud” means million Btu per day
“Mcf” means thousand cubic feet
“MMcf” means million cubic feet
“MMcfd” means million cubic feet per day
“MMcfe” means million cubic feet of natural gas equivalents, determined by using the ratio of one Bbl of oil or NGLs to six Mcf of gas
“MMcfed” means MMcfe per day
“NGL” or “NGLs” means natural gas liquids
COMMONLY USED TERMS
Other commonly used terms and abbreviations include:
“FASB” means the Financial Accounting Standards Board, which promulgates accounting standards
“IPO” means our initial public offering completed on August 10, 2007
“Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement” means the Fifth Amended and Restated Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement, dated August 10, 2007, among Quicksilver Resources, Inc., Cowtown Pipeline Partners L.P. and Cowtown Gas Processing Partners L.P.
“Omnibus Agreement” means the Omnibus Agreement, dated August 10, 2007, among Quicksilver Gas Services LP, Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC and Quicksilver Resources Inc.
“Partnership Agreement” means the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Quicksilver Gas Services LP, dated February 19, 2008
“Quicksilver” means, unless the context otherwise requires, Quicksilver Resources Inc. and its subsidiaries
“Quicksilver Counties” means Hood, Somervell, Johnson, Tarrant, Hill, Parker, Bosque and Erath Counties in North Texas
“SEC” means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
“SFAS” means Statement of Financial Accounting Standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board

2


Table of Contents

Explanatory Note
     On August 10, 2007, we completed our initial public offering, or IPO, of 5,000,000 common units representing limited partnership interests. On September 7, 2007, we sold an additional 750,000 common units upon the exercise by the underwriters of the IPO of an over-allotment option that we had previously granted to them.
     Upon the completion of the IPO on August 10, 2007, our common units began trading under the ticker symbol “KGS” and we succeeded to the assets and operations of Cowtown Pipeline LP, Cowtown Pipeline Partners LP, Cowtown Gas Processing LP and Cowtown Gas Processing Partners LP, which we refer to collectively as the KGS Predecessor. Prior to the completion of the IPO, KGS Predecessor was owned indirectly by Quicksilver Resources Inc., which we refer to as Quicksilver or the Parent, and by two private investors.
     The information contained in this report includes the activity of KGS Predecessor prior to the completion of the IPO on August 10, 2007, and the activity of Quicksilver Gas Services LP subsequent to the IPO. Consequently, the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and related discussion of financial condition and results of operations contained in this report reflect the activity for the period after the change in ownership resulting from the IPO and the period prior to the IPO.
     The information contained in this report should be read in conjunction with the information contained in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Forward-Looking Information
     Certain statements contained in this report and other materials we file with the SEC, or in other written or oral statements made or to be made by us, other than statements of historical fact, are “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations or forecasts of future events. Words such as “may,” “assume,” “forecast,” “position,” “predict,” “strategy,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “project,” “budget,” “potential,” or “continue,” and similar expressions are used to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be affected by assumptions used or by known or unknown risks or uncertainties. Consequently, no forward-looking statements can be guaranteed. Actual results may vary materially. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. You should also understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors and should not consider the following list to be a complete statement of all potential risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by such forward-looking statements include:
    changes in general economic conditions;
 
    fluctuations in natural gas prices;
 
    failure or delays in the Parent and third parties achieving expected production from natural gas projects;
 
    competitive conditions in our industry;
 
    actions taken by third-party operators, processors and transporters;
 
    changes in the availability and cost of capital;
 
    operating hazards, natural disasters, weather-related delays, casualty losses and other matters beyond our control;
 
    construction costs or capital expenditures exceeding estimated or budgeted amounts;
 
    the effects of existing and future laws and governmental regulations; and
 
    the effects of future litigation.
     The list of factors is not exhaustive, and new factors may emerge or changes to these factors may occur that would impact our business. Additional information regarding these and other factors may be contained in our filings with the SEC, especially on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K. All such risk factors are difficult to predict and are subject to material uncertainties that may affect actual results and may be beyond our control.

3


 

QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
For the Period Ended June 30, 2008
             
        Page
  FINANCIAL INFORMATION        
 
           
  Financial Statements (Unaudited)        
 
           
 
  Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income     5  
 
           
 
  Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets     6  
 
           
 
  Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows     7  
 
           
 
  Condensed Consolidated Statement of Partners’ Capital     8  
 
           
 
  Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements     9  
 
           
  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     17  
 
           
  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk     27  
 
           
  Controls and Procedures     27  
 
           
  OTHER INFORMATION        
 
           
  Legal Proceedings     28  
 
           
  Risk Factors     28  
 
           
  Unregistered Sales of Securities and Use of Proceeds     28  
 
           
  Defaults Upon Senior Securities     28  
 
           
  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders     28  
 
           
  Other Information     28  
 
           
  Exhibits     29  
 
           
        30  
  Certification Pursuant to Section 302
  Certification Pursuant to Section 302
  Certification Pursuant to Section 906

4


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
In thousands, except for per unit data — Unaudited
                                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,     Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
Revenues
                               
Gathering and transportation revenue — parent
  $ 7,199     $ 3,100     $ 13,676     $ 5,510  
Gathering and transportation revenue
    1,633       147       2,453       338  
Gas processing revenue — parent
    7,701       3,714       14,521       6,217  
Gas processing revenue
    1,447       124       2,290       391  
Other revenue — parent
    225       33       450       33  
 
                       
Total revenues
    18,205       7,118       33,390       12,489  
 
                       
 
                               
Expenses
                               
Operations and maintenance — parent
    5,312       2,228       10,262       4,945  
General and administrative — parent
    1,422       686       3,239       1,182  
Depreciation and accretion
    3,407       1,824       6,563       3,119  
 
                       
Total expenses
    10,141       4,738       20,064       9,246  
 
                       
 
                               
Operating income
    8,064       2,380       13,326       3,243  
 
                               
Other income
    1       23       6       35  
Interest expense
    2,421       211       4,839       211  
 
                       
 
                               
Income before income taxes
    5,644       2,192       8,493       3,067  
 
                               
Income tax provision
    38       57       3       97  
 
                       
Net income
  $ 5,606     $ 2,135     $ 8,490     $ 2,970  
 
                       
 
                               
General partner interest in net income
  $ 126             $ 182          
Common and subordinated unitholders’ interest in net income
  $ 5,480             $ 8,308          
Earnings per common and subordinated unit — basic
  $ 0.23             $ 0.35          
Earnings per common and subordinated unit — diluted
  $ 0.23             $ 0.35          
Weighted average number of common and subordinated units outstanding:
                               
Basic
    23,783               23,783          
Diluted
    23,924               23,924          
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In thousands, except for unit data — Unaudited
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
ASSETS
Current assets
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 607     $ 1,125  
Trade accounts receivable
    2,317       882  
Accounts receivable from parent
          800  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    972       690  
 
           
Total current assets
    3,896       3,497  
 
               
Property, plant and equipment, net
    372,633       273,948  
 
               
Other assets
    1,140       965  
 
           
 
  $ 377,669     $ 278,410  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Current liabilities
               
Current maturities of debt
  $ 1,100     $ 1,100  
Accounts payable to parent
    4,446        
Accrued additions to property, plant and equipment
    22,236       23,624  
Accounts payable and other
    3,586       2,700  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    31,368       27,424  
 
               
Long-term debt
    55,300       5,000  
Note payable to parent
    51,508       50,569  
Repurchase obligations to parent
    131,911       82,251  
Asset retirement obligations
    3,187       2,793  
Deferred income tax liability
    118       173  
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 8)
               
 
               
Partners’ Capital
               
Common unitholders (12,269,714 and 12,263,625 units issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively)
    107,072       109,830  
Subordinated unitholders (11,513,625 units issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007)
    (2,703 )     356  
General Partner
    (92 )     14  
 
           
Total partners’ capital
    104,277       110,200  
 
           
 
  $ 377,669     $ 278,410  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
In thousands — Unaudited
                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2008     2007  
Operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 8,490     $ 2,970  
Items included in net income not affecting cash
               
Depreciation
    6,478       3,088  
Accretion of asset retirement obligation
    85       31  
Deferred income taxes
    (55 )      
Equity-based compensation
    501        
Amortization of debt issuance costs
    105        
Non-cash interest expense on repurchase obligations to parent
    2,928       211  
Non-cash interest expense on note payable to parent
    1,489        
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
    (1,435 )     (104 )
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    (562 )     (246 )
Accounts receivable from parent
    5,170        
Accounts payable and other
    886       108  
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    24,080       6,058  
 
           
 
               
Investing activities:
               
Capital expenditures
    (59,434 )     (45,040 )
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (59,434 )     (45,040 )
 
           
 
               
Financing activities:
               
Proceeds from revolving credit facility borrowings
    50,300        
Repayment of subordinated note to parent
    (550 )      
Contributions by parent
          39,017  
Contributions by other partners
          167  
Distributions to unitholders
    (14,914 )      
 
           
Net cash provided by financing activities
    34,836       39,184  
 
           
 
               
Net (decrease) increase in cash
    (518 )     202  
 
               
Cash at beginning of period
    1,125       2,797  
 
           
 
               
Cash at end of period
  $ 607     $ 2,999  
 
           
 
               
Cash paid for interest
  $ 739     $  
 
               
Non-cash transactions:
               
Changes in working capital related to capital expenditures
  $ 1,312     $ (10,156 )
Repurchase obligations to parent:
               
Receivable from parent for sale of pipeline and gathering assets
  $     $ (29,509 )
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment by parent
  $ (46,732 )   $ (8,559 )
 
           
 
  $ (46,732 )   $ (38,068 )
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

7


Table of Contents

QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
In thousands — Unaudited
                                 
    Partners’ Capital  
    Limited Partners              
    Common     Subordinated     General Partner     Total  
 
                               
Balance at December 31, 2007
  $ 109,830     $ 356     $ 14     $ 110,200  
Equity-based compensation
    501                   501  
Distributions paid to partners
    (7,545 )     (7,081 )     (288 )     (14,914 )
Net income
    4,286       4,022       182       8,490  
 
                       
Balance at June 30, 2008
  $ 107,072     $ (2,703 )   $ (92 )   $ 104,277  
 
                       
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

8


Table of Contents

QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
UNAUDITED
1. ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
      Organization — Quicksilver Gas Services LP (the “Partnership” or “KGS”) is a Delaware limited partnership formed in January 2007 for the purpose of completing a public offering of common units and concurrently acquiring the assets of Quicksilver Gas Services Predecessor (“KGS Predecessor”). KGS’ general partner is Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC (the “General Partner”), a Delaware limited liability company.
     KGS Predecessor, since its inception in 2004, was comprised of entities under the common control of Quicksilver Resources Inc. (“Quicksilver” or “Parent”). The entities under common control, after having been formed by Quicksilver and giving effect to multiple contemporaneous transactions, were Cowtown Pipeline L.P., Cowtown Pipeline Partners L.P., Cowtown Gas Processing L.P. and Cowtown Gas Processing Partners L.P.
      Initial Public Offering — KGS’ initial public offering, or IPO, of 5,000,000 common units was completed on August 10, 2007 and the sale of an additional 750,000 common units was completed on September 7, 2007 pursuant to the underwriters’ option to purchase additional common units.
     As of June 30, 2008, the ownership of KGS is as follows:
         
    Percentage
    Ownership
Common unitholders:
       
Public
    27.1 %
Quicksilver
    23.5 %
Subordinated unitholders:
       
Quicksilver
    47.5 %
 
       
Total limited partner interest
    98.1 %
 
       
 
       
General Partner interest:
       
Quicksilver
    1.9 %
 
       
Total
    100.0 %
 
       
     The general partner is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Parent. Neither KGS nor the general partner has any employees. Employees of the Parent have been seconded to the general partner pursuant to a services and secondment agreement. The seconded employees, including field operations personnel, general and administrative personnel, and an operational vice president, operate or directly support KGS’ pipeline system and natural gas processing facilities.
      Description of Business — KGS is engaged in the business of gathering and processing natural gas and natural gas liquids, also known as NGLs, produced in the Barnett Shale formation of the Fort Worth Basin located in North Texas. KGS provides services under contracts, whereby it receives fixed fees for performing the gathering and processing services. KGS does not take title to the natural gas or associated natural gas liquids that it gathers and processes and thus avoids direct commodity price exposure.
     KGS’ principal assets consist of a pipeline system in the Fort Worth Basin, referred to as the Cowtown Pipeline, and a natural gas processing plant in Hood County, Texas, referred to as the Cowtown Plant. The Cowtown Pipeline consists of natural gas pipelines that gather natural gas produced by KGS’ customers and delivers it to the Cowtown Plant. The Cowtown Plant consists of two natural gas processing units that extract NGLs from the natural gas stream and deliver KGS customers’ residue gas to unaffiliated pipelines for transport downstream. KGS customers’ NGLs are also delivered to unaffiliated pipelines for transport downstream.

9


Table of Contents

     As more fully described in Note 2, the KGS financial statements also include the operations of a gathering system in the Lake Arlington area of Tarrant County, Texas and a gathering system in Hill County, Texas. Each of these systems gathers production from the Fort Worth Basin and delivers it to an unaffiliated interconnecting pipeline.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
      Basis of Presentation — The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and related notes present the financial position, results of operations, cash flows and changes in partners’ capital of KGS’ natural gas gathering and processing assets.
     The financial statements include historical cost-basis accounts of the assets of KGS Predecessor, contributed to KGS by Quicksilver and two private investors in connection with the IPO, for the period prior to the closing date of the IPO.
     These unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management all adjustments and eliminations of intercompany balances necessary to present fairly the Partnership’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the periods presented have been made. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Certain disclosures normally included in financial statements have been condensed or omitted. The results of operations for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of annual results.
      Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities that exist at the date of the financial statements. Estimates and judgments are based on information available at the time such estimates and judgments are made. Although management believes the estimates are appropriate, actual results may differ from those estimates.
      Repurchase Obligations to Parent — On June 5, 2007, KGS Predecessor sold several pipeline and gathering assets to Quicksilver. These assets consist of:
    gathering lines that are part of the Cowtown Pipeline (“Cowtown Pipeline Assets”);
 
    a gathering system in the Lake Arlington area of Tarrant County (“Lake Arlington Dry System”); and
 
    a gathering system in Hill County (“Hill County Dry System”).
     At June 5, 2007, these assets were either constructed and in service or partially constructed. The selling price for these assets was approximately $29.5 million, which represented KGS Predecessor’s historical cost. KGS Predecessor collected the $29.5 million on August 9, 2007.
Cowtown Pipeline Assets Repurchase: In accordance with the Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement between KGS and Quicksilver, KGS has the option to purchase the Cowtown Pipeline Assets from Quicksilver at historical cost within two years after the Cowtown Pipeline Assets commence commercial service. A portion of the Cowtown Pipeline Assets has commenced commercial service as of June 30, 2008.
Lake Arlington Dry System and Hill County Dry System Repurchases: In accordance with the Omnibus Agreement between KGS, the General Partner and Quicksilver, KGS is obligated to purchase the Lake Arlington Dry System and the Hill County Dry System from Quicksilver at fair market value within two years after those assets are completed and commence commercial service. A portion of each system has commenced commercial service as of June 30, 2008.

10


Table of Contents

     The following table summarizes significant aspects of the assets subject to repurchase obligation (in millions):
                                 
                           
            Estimate of     Construction Costs        
    June 5, 2007     Construction Costs as     Recognized through        
    Sales Price     of June 30, 2008 (1)     June 30, 2008     KGS Repurchase
Cowtown Pipeline Assets
  $ 22.9     $ 64.3     $ 62.1     Optional at Cost
Lake Arlington Dry System
    3.6       78.0       31.8     Obligatory at Fair Value
Hill County Dry System
    3.0       60.4       32.5     Obligatory at Fair Value
Interest cost included in liability
                5.5          
 
                         
 
  $ 29.5     $ 202.7     $ 131.9          
 
                         
 
(1)   The estimates of total construction cost are subject to change based on changes in the producers’ drilling progress, material and labor costs, easement costs and other factors.
     As KGS has significant continuing involvement in the operation of the Cowtown Pipeline Assets, the Lake Arlington Dry System and the Hill County Dry System, and presently intends to exercise its purchase rights, the assets’ conveyance has not been treated as a sale for accounting purposes. Accordingly, the original cost of $29.5 million and subsequently incurred costs of $96.9 million are recognized in KGS’ property, plant and equipment and repurchase obligations to Parent. Similarly, KGS’ results of operations include the revenues and expenses for these operations. Under KGS’ credit agreement, the repurchase obligations and the imputed interest thereon are excluded from indebtedness and interest expense for purposes of covenant compliance. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, KGS recognized $2.9 million of interest expense associated with the repurchase obligations to Parent based on a weighted-average interest rate of 5.6%.
      Net Income per Limited Partner Unit — KGS’ net income is allocated to the general partner and the limited partners, including the holders of the common and subordinated units, in accordance with their respective ownership percentages, after giving effect to incentive distributions paid to the general partner.
     Basic earnings per unit is computed by dividing net income attributable to unitholders by the weighted average number of units outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per unit is computed using the treasury stock method, which considers the impact to net income and common equivalent units from the potential issuance of units. However, because the IPO was completed on August 10, 2007, the basic and diluted earnings per unit calculations are relevant only for the post-IPO period presented in the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements.
                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2008     June 30, 2008  
    (In thousands, except per unit data)  
 
Common and subordinated unitholders’ interest in net income
  $ 5,480     $ 8,308  
Weighted average common and subordinated units — basic
    23,783       23,783  
Effect of restricted phantom units
    141       141  
 
           
Weighted average common and subordinated units — diluted
    23,924       23,924  
 
           
Earnings per common and subordinated unit — basic
  $ 0.23     $ 0.35  
Earnings per common and subordinated unit — diluted
  $ 0.23     $ 0.35  
      Other Comprehensive Income — Other comprehensive income is equal to net income for the periods presented.

11


Table of Contents

Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Pronouncements Implemented
     SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, was issued by the FASB in September 2006. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurement. No new requirements are included in SFAS No. 157, but application of the Statement has changed current practice. The Partnership adopted SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008 without significant impact.
     In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 . SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. While SFAS No. 159 became effective on January 1, 2008, the Partnership did not elect the fair value measurement option for any of its financial assets or liabilities.
     On April 30, 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 39-1, Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39 . The FSP amends paragraph 3 of FIN No. 39 to replace the terms “conditional contracts” and “exchange contracts” with the term “derivative instruments” as defined in SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities . It also amends paragraph 10 of Interpretation 39 to permit a reporting entity to offset fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting arrangement that have been offset in accordance with that paragraph. The Partnership adopted FSP No. 39-1 on January 1, 2008 without significant impact.
Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented
     SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations , “SFAS No. 141(R)” was issued in December 2007. SFAS No. 141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations , while retaining its fundamental requirements that the acquisition method of accounting be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control in the business combination and it establishes the criteria to determine the acquisition date. The Statement also requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired and liabilities assumed measured at their fair values as of the acquisition date. In addition, acquisition costs are required to be recognized separately from the acquisition. The Statement will apply to any acquisition completed by the Partnership on or after January 1, 2009, but may not be applied to any acquisition completed prior to January 1, 2009.
     SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51 was issued in December 2007. The Statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (previously referred to as “minority interest”) and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as a component of equity in the consolidated financial statements. The Statement also changes the way the consolidated income statement is presented by requiring consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the Parent and noncontrolling interest. Additionally, SFAS No. 160 establishes a single method for accounting for changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation. The Statement is effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2009. Management is determining the extent of the effect, if any; this adoption will have on the Partnership’s financial statements in addition to reclassifying the Partnership’s noncontrolling interests into equity.
     The FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, in March 2008. Under SFAS No. 161, companies are required to disclose the fair value of all derivative and hedging instruments and their gains or losses in tabular format and information about credit risk-related features in derivative agreements, counterparty credit risk, and its strategies and objectives for using derivative instruments. SFAS No. 161 is effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2009, and is not expected to have a significant impact.
     In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles , which identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting

12


Table of Contents

principles (GAAP) in the United States of America (the GAAP hierarchy). This Statement is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Partnership does not expect the adoption of SFAS 162 to have an impact on our financial statements or related disclosures.
      Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 07-4, “Application of the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings per Share, to Master Limited Partnerships” (“EITF 07-4”), in March 2008, the EITF ratified its consensus opinion on EITF 07-4. EITF 07-4 addresses how master limited partnerships should calculate earnings per unit using the two-class method in SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share” (“SFAS 128”) and how current period earnings of a master limited partnership should be allocated to the general partner, limited partners, and other participating securities. EITF 07-4 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. EITF 07-4 should be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The Partnership is currently evaluating the impact that EITF 07-4 will have on its earnings per unit calculation.
3. PARTNERS’ CAPITAL AND DISTRIBUTIONS
     The KGS partnership agreement requires that KGS distribute, within 45 days after the end of each quarter, all of its Available Cash (as defined in the KGS partnership agreement) to unitholders of record on the applicable record date selected by the general partner.
     For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, KGS declared a distribution of $0.35 per limited partner unit holders of record on July 31, 2008. The aggregate distribution of available cash of approximately $8.5 million will be paid on August 14, 2008, and recognized as a reduction to partners’ capital upon payment.
     For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, KGS declared a distribution of $0.315 per limited partner unit holders of record on April 30, 2008. The aggregate distribution of available cash that was paid on May 15, 2008, was approximately $7.6 million and recognized as a reduction to partners’ capital.
     The distribution payable for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 will result in the payment of approximately $20,000 to the general partner for its incentive distribution rights.
4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
     Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:
                         
            June 30,     December 31,  
    Depreciable Life     2008     2007  
            (in thousands)  
Gathering and transportation systems
  20 years   $ 145,782     $ 106,478  
Processing plants
  20-25 years     135,358       117,571  
Construction in progress — plant
            44,281       12,636  
Construction in progress — pipeline
            27,984       20,046  
Rights-of-way and easements
  20 years     34,476       26,905  
Land
            952       952  
Buildings and other
  20-40 years     1,828       910  
 
                   
 
            390,661       285,498  
Accumulated Depreciation
            (18,028 )     (11,550 )
 
                   
Net property, plant and equipment
          $ 372,633     $ 273,948  
 
                   

13


Table of Contents

5. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
     KGS routinely conducts business with Quicksilver and its affiliates. For a more complete description of our agreements with Quicksilver, see Note 11, Transactions With Related Parties , to the consolidated financial statements in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
     During second quarter, Cowtown Gas Processing Partners, L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership, agreed to purchase land and a warehouse located in Hood County, Texas, from Parent for $0.3 million, with $0.6 million of subsequently incurred costs that remain payable to Parent as of June 30, 2008.
     The following table summarizes the general and administrative expenses, including Parent’s general and administrative expense allocated to KGS, for the periods presented in this quarterly report.
                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2008     2007  
    (in thousands)  
General and administrative expense — parent
               
Allocation of general and administrative overhead
  $ 1,126     $ 850  
Audit and tax services
    476       166  
Equity-based compensation expense
    684        
Legal services
    325        
Insurance expense
    170       46  
Management fee
          120  
Salary and benefits
    235        
Other
    223        
 
           
Total general and administrative expense — parent
  $ 3,239     $ 1,182  
 
           
     The Partnership has agreed to obtain additional easement rights for a total cost of $0.2 million, from an affiliate of an entity that beneficially owns more than 5% of KGS’ outstanding units.
6. LONG-TERM DEBT
     Long-term debt consisted of the following:
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
    (In thousands)  
Credit agreement
  $ 55,300     $ 5,000  
Subordinated note to Parent
    52,608       51,669  
 
           
 
    107,908       56,669  
Current maturities of debt
    (1,100 )     (1,100 )
 
           
Long-term debt
  $ 106,808     $ 55,569  
 
           
     For a more complete description of our indebtedness, see Note 6, to the consolidated financial statements in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
     At June 30, 2008, KGS’ borrowing capacity under the credit agreement was $139.2 million, as limited by the agreement’s leverage ratio test, which resulted in available capacity of $83.8 million.

14


Table of Contents

7. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
     Activity for KGS’ liability for asset retirement obligations is as follows:
         
    Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2008  
    (in thousands)  
Beginning asset retirement obligations
  $ 2,793  
Incremental liability incurred
    309  
Accretion expense
    85  
 
     
Ending asset retirement obligations
  $ 3,187  
 
     
As of June 30, 2008, no assets are legally restricted for use in settling asset retirement obligations.
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
     KGS has agreements with Parent and other third parties to provide gathering and processing of natural gas and the delivery of natural gas and NGLs for sale in the Fort Worth Basin. The terms of these agreements range in length from one to 10 years. Quicksilver has dedicated to KGS all of its natural gas production from the Quicksilver Counties until August 10, 2017. The agreement automatically renews for one-year periods absent written notice of termination by either of the parties.
     Additionally, KGS has agreements with third parties providing for the construction of a natural gas processing plant and natural gas compression equipment. Payments are due to the third parties upon completion of specified construction, manufacturing and delivery milestones. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, $38.8 million was paid to third parties related to the construction of facilities. KGS estimates additional payments of $61.2 million will be made upon completion of specified construction, manufacturing and delivery milestones.
9. INCOME TAXES
     The State of Texas has enacted a margin tax that became effective in 2007. This margin tax requires KGS to recognize tax at a maximum effective rate of 0.7% of gross revenue apportioned to Texas. The tax rate is applied to the sum of revenues less the cost of the services sold.
     KGS recognizes taxes due under the Texas margin tax using the liability method under which deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax effects of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities using the enacted statutory tax rates in effect at the end of the period. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that the benefit from the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Income tax effects are not material for the periods presented.
     The Parent does not expect to owe consolidated Texas margin tax for 2008, thus, KGS does not expect to make a cash payment for 2008 Texas margin tax, based upon Texas filing rules. All effects of the Texas margin tax are captured in deferred income taxes.

15


Table of Contents

10. EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION
     Awards of phantom units have been granted under KGS’ 2007 Equity Plan, which permits the issuance of up to 750,000 units. The following table summarizes information regarding the phantom unit activity:
                                 
    Payable in cash   Payable in units
            Weighted Average           Weighted Average
            Grant Date Fair           Grant Date Fair
    Units   Value   Units   Value
Unvested Phantom Units — December 31, 2007
    84,961     $ 21.36       9,833     $ 21.36  
 
                               
Vested
                (6,089 )     21.36  
Issued
    6,200       24.27       137,148       25.25  
Cancelled
    (3,000 )     21.36              
 
                               
Unvested Phantom Units — June 30, 2008
    88,161     $ 21.56       140,892     $ 25.15  
 
                               
     At January 1, 2008, KGS had total unvested compensation cost of $1.9 million related to unvested phantom units. KGS recognized compensation expense of approximately $0.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008, including $0.3 million for remeasuring awards to be settled in cash to their revised fair value. Grants of phantom units during the first six months of 2008 had an estimated fair value of $2.7 million. KGS has unearned compensation of $3.8 million at June 30, 2008, which will be recognized in expense over a weighted average period of 2.4 years. Phantom units that vested during the six months ended June 30, 2008 had a fair value of $0.2 million on their vesting date.

16


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
     We are a growth-oriented Delaware limited partnership engaged in the business of gathering and processing natural gas produced from the Barnett Shale geologic formation of the Fort Worth Basin located in North Texas. We began operations in 2004 to provide these services primarily to Quicksilver, the owner of our general partner, as well as other natural gas producers in this area. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, approximately 79% of our total natural gas gathering and processing volumes were comprised of natural gas owned or controlled by Quicksilver.
Our Operations
     The results of our operations are significantly influenced by the volumes of natural gas gathered and processed through our systems. We gather and process natural gas pursuant to contracts under which we receive fixed fees per mcf of natural gas that we gather and process. We do not take title to the natural gas and associated natural gas liquids, or NGLs, that we gather and process, and therefore avoid direct commodity price exposure. However, a sustained decline in commodity prices could result in a decline in volumes produced by our customers and a resulting decrease in our revenues. Our contracts provide stable cash flows, but minimal, if any, upside in higher commodity price environments.
Operational Measurement
     Our management uses a variety of financial and operational measurements to analyze our performance. We view these as important factors affecting our profitability and review them monthly for consistency and trend analysis. On a company-wide basis, these measures are outlined below.
      Volume — We must continually obtain new supplies of natural gas to maintain or increase throughput volumes on our gathering and processing systems. Our ability to maintain existing supplies of natural gas and obtain new supplies is impacted by:
    the level of successful drilling and production activity in areas currently dedicated to our systems,
    our ability to compete with other gas gathering and processing companies for volumes from successful new wells in other areas, and
    our pursuit of new opportunities where a limited number of gas gathering and processing companies conduct business.
     We routinely monitor producer activity in the areas served by our gathering and processing systems to pursue new supply opportunities.
      Adjusted Gross Margin — Adjusted gross margin information is presented as a supplemental disclosure because it is a primary performance measure used by management to evaluate the relationship between our gathering and processing revenues and our cost of operating our facilities and our general and administrative overhead. Adjusted gross margin is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP as it does not include deductions for cash payments such as interest and capital expenditures which are necessary to maintain our business. As an indicator of our operating performance, adjusted gross margin should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income or operating cash flow determined in accordance with GAAP. Our adjusted gross margin may not be comparable to a similarly titled measure of other companies because other entities may not calculate adjusted gross margin in the same manner. A reconciliation of adjusted gross margin to amounts reported under GAAP is presented in “Results of Operations” below.
      Operating Expenses — Operating expenses are a separate measure that we use to evaluate performance of field operations. These expenses are comprised primarily of direct labor, insurance, property taxes, repair and maintenance expense, utilities and contract services, and are largely independent of the volumes through our systems, but may fluctuate depending on the scale of our operations during a specific period.
      EBITDA — We believe that EBITDA is a widely accepted financial indicator of a company’s operational performance and its ability to incur and service debt, fund capital expenditures and make distributions. EBITDA is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, as it does not include deductions for items such as interest and capital expenditures

17


Table of Contents

which are necessary to maintain our business. EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to results of operations, operating cash flow or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA calculations may vary among entities, so our computation of EBITDA may not be comparable to EBITDA or similar measures of other entities. In evaluating EBITDA, we believe that investors should consider, among other things, the amount by which EBITDA exceeds interest costs, how EBITDA compares to principal payments on debt and how EBITDA compares to capital expenditures for each period. A reconciliation of EBITDA to amounts reported under GAAP is presented in “Results of Operations” below.
     EBITDA is also used as a supplemental performance measure by our management and by external users of our financial statements such as investors, commercial banks, research analysts and others, to assess:
    financial performance of our assets without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;
 
    our operating performance as compared to those of other companies in the midstream energy industry without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis; and
 
    the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects and the overall rates of return on alternative investment opportunities.

18


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 .
     The following table and discussion relates to our unaudited condensed consolidated results of operations for the three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,  
    2008     2007  
    (In thousands, except volume data)  
 
Total revenues
  $ 18,205     $ 7,118  
 
Operations and maintenance expense
    5,312       2,228  
 
General and administrative expense
    1,422       686  
 
Adjusted gross margin
    11,471       4,204  
 
Other income
    1       23  
 
EBITDA
    11,472       4,227  
 
Depreciation and accretion expense
    3,407       1,824  
Interest expense
    2,421       211  
Income tax provision
    38       57  
 
           
Net income
  $ 5,606     $ 2,135  
 
           
 
               
Volume Data:
               
 
Volumes gathered (MMcf)
    17,127       6,613  
 
Volumes processed (MMcf)
    14,593       6,154  
 
The following table summarizes our volumes for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
                                 
    Gathering     Processing  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
            (MMcf)          
Cowtown Pipeline Assets
    14,764       6,613       14,593       6,154  
Lake Arlington Dry System
    1,700                    
Hill County Dry System
    663                    
 
                       
Total
    17,127       6,613       14,593       6,154  
 
                       
The following table summarizes the changes in our revenues:
                                 
    Gathering     Processing     Other     Total  
    (in thousands)  
Revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
  $ 3,247     $ 3,838     $ 33     $ 7,118  
Volume changes
    5,422       5,291             10,713  
Price changes
    163       19       192       374  
 
                       
Revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2008
  $ 8,832     $ 9,148     $ 225     $ 18,205  
 
                       

19


Table of Contents

      Total Revenues — Approximately $10.7 million of the increase was due to the increases in volumes that we gathered and processed in the Fort Worth Basin. This volume increase is due to the continued development of the Fort Worth Basin, particularly in the Hood County and Lake Arlington areas.
      Operations and Maintenance Expense — The increase in operating expenses is primarily due to the additional operating costs related to the continued expansion of our natural gas gathering system in Hood County and the Lake Arlington areas. However, the increase in our operating and maintenance expenses have been less significant than the increase in our throughput volumes and revenues. Operating expenses will likely increase in the future based on inflation and facility expansion.
      General and Administrative Expense — The increase was primarily the result of the expansion of our operations and the resulting increase in administrative and managerial personnel and related expenses to support that growth, as well as costs recognized in 2008 in connection with being a publicly traded partnership. General and administrative expense includes $0.3 million of non-cash equity based compensation for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, with no such expense in the same period ended June 30, 2007.
      Adjusted Gross Margin — Adjusted gross margin increased primarily as a result of the increase in revenues described above. As a percentage of revenues, adjusted gross margin has increased from 59% in the prior year quarter to approximately 63% in the current quarter, primarily due to the increase in revenues, but was partially offset by operations and maintenance expense associated with our current scale of operations and higher general and administrative expense.
      Depreciation and Accretion Expense — Depreciation and accretion expense increased primarily as a result of the higher gross cost of property, plant and equipment as a result of capital expenditures made subsequent to June 30, 2007 to expand our gathering network.
      Interest Expense — Interest expense of $2.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, was comprised of $1.5 million related to the repurchase obligation to Parent, $0.7 million related to the subordinated note payable to Parent and $0.5 million associated with borrowings from the credit agreement, of which $0.3 million was capitalized. In the quarter ended June 30, 2007, the partnership had significantly less debt.

20


Table of Contents

Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 .
     The following table and discussion relates to our unaudited condensed consolidated results of operations for the six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2008     2007  
    (In thousands, except volume data)  
 
               
Total revenues
  $ 33,390     $ 12,489  
 
Operations and maintenance expense
    10,262       4,945  
 
General and administrative expense
    3,239       1,182  
 
Adjusted gross margin
    19,889       6,362  
 
Other income
    6       35  
 
EBITDA
    19,895       6,397  
 
Depreciation and accretion expense
    6,563       3,119  
Interest expense
    4,839       211  
Income tax provision
    3       97  
 
           
Net income
  $ 8,490     $ 2,970  
 
           
 
               
Volume Data:
               
 
Volumes gathered (MMcf)
    31,678       12,130  
 
Volumes processed (MMcf)
    26,749       10,983  
 
The following table summarizes our volumes for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:
                                 
    Gathering     Processing  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
    (MMcf)  
Cowtown Pipeline Assets
    27,329       12,130       26,749       10,983  
Lake Arlington Dry System
    3,024                    
Hill County Dry System
    1,325                    
 
                       
Total
    31,678       12,130       26,749       10,983  
 
                       
The following table summarizes the changes in our revenues:
                                 
    Gathering     Processing     Other     Total  
    (in thousands)  
Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2007
  $ 5,848     $ 6,608     $ 33     $ 12,489  
Volume changes
    9,953       9,908             19,861  
Price changes
    328       295       417       1,040  
 
                       
Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2008
  $ 16,129     $ 16,811     $ 450     $ 33,390  
 
                       

21


Table of Contents

      Total Revenues — Approximately $19.9 million of the increase was due to the increase in volumes that we gathered and processed in the Fort Worth Basin. Revenues are expected to increase as more of the Fort Worth Basin is developed and more reserves are produced. Additionally, our expanded facilities, including the additional processing facility to be placed into service in 2009, will likely result in more throughput and revenues for us.
      Operations and Maintenance Expense — The increase in operating expenses is mainly due to the additional operating costs related to the natural gas processing facility placed in service in March 2007 and the continued expansion of our natural gas gathering system. However, the increase in our operating and maintenance expenses have been less significant than the increase in our throughput volumes and revenues. Operating expenses will likely increase in the future based on inflation and facility expansion.
      General and Administrative Expense — The increase was primarily the result of the expansion of our operations and the resulting increase in administrative and managerial personnel and related expenses to support that growth, as well as costs recognized in 2008 in connection with being a publicly traded partnership. General and administrative expense includes $0.7 million of non-cash equity based compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2008, with no such expense in the same period ended June 30, 2007.
      Adjusted Gross Margin — Adjusted gross margin increased primarily as a result of the increase in revenues described above. As a percentage of revenues, adjusted gross margin has increased from 51% in the prior year six month period to approximately 60% in the current year six month period, primarily due to the increase in revenues, but was partially offset by operations and maintenance expense associated with our current scale of operations and higher general and administrative expense.
      Depreciation and Accretion Expense — Depreciation and accretion expense increased primarily as a result of the higher gross cost of property, plant and equipment due to capital expenditures made subsequent to June 30, 2007 to expand our gathering network.
      Interest Expense — Interest expense of $4.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, was comprised of $2.9 million related to the repurchase obligation to Parent, $1.5 million related to the subordinated note payable to Parent and $0.8 million associated with borrowings from the credit agreement, of which $0.4 million was capitalized. In the six months ended June 30, 2007, the partnership had significantly less debt.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
     Prior to our IPO, our sources of liquidity were cash generated from operations and equity investments by our owners. Our sources of liquidity after our IPO include:
    cash generated from operations;
 
    borrowings under our credit agreement; and
 
    future debt and equity offerings.
     We believe that the cash generated from these sources will be sufficient to meet our minimum quarterly cash distributions and our requirements for short-term working capital and our long-term capital expenditures for the next 12 months.

22


Table of Contents

Cash Flows
                 
    For the Six Months Ended
    June 30,
    2008   2007
    (In thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 24,080     $ 6,058  
Net cash used in investing activities
    (59,434 )     (45,040 )
Net cash provided by financing activities
    34,836       39,184  
     KGS’ cash flows are significantly influenced by the production growth in the Fort Worth Basin. As Quicksilver’s total production in the Fort Worth Basin has grown, we have expanded our gathering and processing capabilities to serve the increased production.
      Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities — The increase in cash flows provided by operations resulted primarily from increased revenues and higher profitability associated with the services we provided to the customers whose wells are connected to our system.
      Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities — The increase in cash flows used in investing activities resulted from the higher capital expenditures used to expand our gathering system and processing capabilities. We have expended $45.5 million in 2008 on processing facilities and $13.9 million on gathering assets.
      Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities — Cash flows provided by financing activities in 2008, consisted primarily of the proceeds from borrowings under our credit agreement of $50.3 million used to expand our gathering system and processing capabilities, partially offset by distributions of $14.9 million to our unitholders.
The following table presents our cash distributions for 2008 and 2007:
                     
    Attributable to the   Per Unit   Total Cash
Payment Date   quarter ended   Distribution   Distribution
                (in millions)
Pending Distributions
                   
August 14, 2008
  June 30, 2008   $ 0.350     $ 8.5  
 
                   
Completed Distributions
                   
May 15, 2008
  March 31, 2008   $ 0.315     $ 7.6  
February 14, 2008
  December 31, 2007   $ 0.300     $ 7.3  
November 14, 2007
  September 30, 2007   $ 0.168     $ 4.1  
      Working Capital (Deficit) — Working capital is a measure of our ability to pay our liabilities as they become due. Our working capital (deficit) was ($27.5) million at June 30, 2008, and ($23.9) million at December 31, 2007. However, excluding liabilities associated with capital expenditures, our working capital (deficit) was ($5.2) million and ($0.3) million at these two dates, respectively.
     The net decrease in working capital of ($3.6) million from December 31, 2007 to June 30, 2008, resulted primarily from a decrease in cash and cash equivalents and an increase in accounts payable to parent and accounts payable and other. The net decrease was partially offset by an increase in trade accounts receivable. The net working capital deficit is expected to be funded by cash generated from operations and, to a lesser extent, available borrowings under the credit agreement.

23


Table of Contents

Capital Expenditures
     The midstream energy business can be capital intensive, requiring significant investment for the acquisition or development of new facilities, particularly in emerging production areas such as the Fort Worth Basin. We categorize our capital expenditures as either:
        expansion capital expenditures, which are made to construct additional assets, to expand and upgrade existing systems, including compression, and facilities or to acquire additional assets; or
        maintenance capital expenditures, which are made to replace partially or fully depreciated assets, to maintain the existing operating capacity of our assets and extend their useful lives or to maintain existing system volumes and related cash flows.
     During 2008, we have increased gross property, plant and equipment by $105.2 million, including expansion capital expenditures of approximately $57.5 million, $0.9 million in maintenance capital expenditures and $46.8 million in capital expenditures related to assets subject to repurchase obligations. We expect that the remaining capital expenditures for 2008 to be approximately $73 million, excluding any expenditure to reacquire or develop assets subject to repurchase obligations. These expenditures will be funded through a combination of operating cash flow and borrowings under our revolving credit agreement.
Debt
See Note 6 to the 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more complete description of our debt obligations.
      Revolving Credit Facility Our revolving credit agreement required us to maintain, as of June 30, 2008, a ratio of our Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in our credit agreement) to our net interest expense, of not less than 2.5 to 1.0; and a ratio of total indebtedness to Consolidated EBITDA of not more than 4.75 to 1.0 for the quarter ending on June 30, 2008. Furthermore, this credit agreement contains various covenants that limit, among other things, our ability to:
        incur further indebtedness;
 
        grant liens;
 
        pay distributions; and
 
        engage in transactions with affiliates.
     Our repurchase obligations to Quicksilver, our obligations to Quicksilver under the subordinated note described below, and the capitalized or non-cash interest thereon, are excluded as indebtedness or interest expense for purposes of determining our covenant compliance.
     At June 30, 2008, KGS’ borrowing capacity under the credit agreement was $139.2 million, as limited by the agreement’s leverage ratio test, which resulted in available capacity of $83.8 million. As of June 30, 2008, KGS was in compliance with all of the covenants related to the credit agreement. Should our EBITDA continue to grow, we expect the borrowing capacity under the credit agreement to grow as well.
      Subordinated Note We made scheduled cash payments of $0.3 million due on both March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008. Interest expense of $1.5 million recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2008 was added to the outstanding principal amount.
      Repurchase Obligations to Parent On June 5, 2007, KGS Predecessor sold several pipeline and gathering assets to Quicksilver. These assets consist of gathering lines that are part of the Cowtown Pipeline (“Cowtown Pipeline Assets”) and two gathering systems in the Lake Arlington area of Tarrant County and Hill County (the “Lake Arlington Dry System” and the “Hill County Dry System,” respectively). At June 5, 2007, the assets were either constructed and in service or partially constructed. The selling price for these assets was approximately $29.5 million, which represented KGS Predecessor’s historical cost. KGS Predecessor collected the $29.5 million on August 9, 2007.

24


Table of Contents

Cowtown Pipeline Assets Repurchase: In accordance with the Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement (the “Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement”) between KGS and Quicksilver, KGS has the option to purchase the Cowtown Pipeline Assets from Quicksilver at historical cost within two years after the Cowtown Pipeline Assets commence commercial service. A portion of the Cowtown Pipeline Assets has commenced commercial service as of June 30, 2008.
Lake Arlington Dry System and Hill County Dry System Repurchases: In accordance with the Omnibus Agreement between KGS, the General Partner and Quicksilver, KGS is obligated to purchase the Lake Arlington Dry System and the Hill County Dry System from Quicksilver at fair market value within two years after those assets are complete and commence commercial service. A portion of each system has commenced commercial service as of June 30, 2008. KGS anticipates purchasing the Lake Arlington Dry System in the second half of 2008.
     The following summarizes significant aspects of the assets subject to repurchase obligation (in millions):
                                 
            Estimate of     Construction Costs        
    June 5, 2007     Construction Costs     Recognized through        
    Sales Price     as of June 30, 2008 (1)     June 30, 2008     KGS Repurchase  
Cowtown Pipeline Assets
  $ 22.9     $ 64.3     $ 62.1     Optional at Cost
Lake Arlington Dry System
    3.6       78.0       31.8     Obligatory at Fair Value
Hill County Dry System
    3.0       60.4       32.5     Obligatory at Fair Value
Interest cost included in liability
                5.5          
 
                         
 
  $ 29.5     $ 202.7     $ 131.9          
 
                         
 
(1)   The estimates of total construction cost are subject to change based on changes in the producers’ drilling progress, material and labor costs, easement costs and other factors.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
     The information regarding recent accounting pronouncements is included in Note 2 to our condensed consolidated interim financial statements included in Item 1 of this quarterly report.

25


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Estimates
     Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based on our condensed consolidated interim financial statements and related footnotes contained within Item 1 of this quarterly report. Our critical accounting estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements were discussed in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These critical estimates, for which no significant changes have occurred in the six months ended June 30, 2008, include estimates and assumptions pertaining to:
    Depreciation expense and capitalization limits for property, plant and equipment;
    Repurchase obligations to Parent;
    Asset retirement obligations; and
    Equity-based compensation
     The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions to determine certain of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are based upon what we believe is the best information available at the time of the estimates or assumptions. The estimates and assumptions could change materially as conditions within and beyond our control change. Accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those estimates.

26


Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
     We have established policies and procedures for managing risk within our organization, including internal controls. The level of risk assumed by us is based on our objectives and capacity to manage risk.
      Credit Risk
     Our primary risk is that we are dependent on Quicksilver for almost all of our supply of natural gas volumes, and are consequently subject to the risk of nonpayment or late payment by Quicksilver for gathering and processing fees. Quicksilver’s credit ratings are below investment grade, where we expect them to remain for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, this risk is higher than it would be with a more creditworthy contract counterparty or with a more diversified group of customers. Unless and until we significantly increase our customer base, we expect to continue to be subject to significant and non-diversified risk of nonpayment or late payment of our fees.
      Interest Rate Risk
     Interest rates remain near their 50-year record lows. If interest rates were to rise, our financing costs would increase accordingly. Although this could limit our ability to raise funds in the capital markets, we expect in this regard to remain competitive with respect to acquisitions and capital projects, as our competitors would face similar circumstances.
     We are exposed to variable interest rate risk as a result of borrowings we may have under our revolving credit agreement, our Subordinated Note and our repurchase obligations to the Parent.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
      Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2008, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that material information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
      Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
     There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

27


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
     Our operations are subject to a variety of risks and disputes normally incident to our business. As a result, we are and may at any given time be a defendant in various legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. However, we are not currently a party to any material litigation.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
     There have been no material changes in risk factors from those described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” included in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.

28


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits:
     
Exhibit No.   Description
   
 
*31.1  
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
 
*31.2  
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
 
*32.1  
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
*   Filed herewith

29


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: August 6, 2008
         
  QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
 
 
  By:    QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES GP LLC,
its General Partner
 
 
       
         
  By:   /s/ Thomas F. Darden    
    Thomas F. Darden   
    President and Chief Executive Officer   
         
     
  By:   /s/ Philip Cook    
    Philip Cook   
    Senior Vice President — Chief Financial Officer   
 

30


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
     
Exhibit No.   Description
   
 
*31.1  
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
 
*31.2  
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
 
*32.1  
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
*   Filed herewith

 

Kodiak Gas Services (NYSE:KGS)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 6월(6) 2024 으로 7월(7) 2024 Kodiak Gas Services 차트를 더 보려면 여기를 클릭.
Kodiak Gas Services (NYSE:KGS)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 7월(7) 2023 으로 7월(7) 2024 Kodiak Gas Services 차트를 더 보려면 여기를 클릭.