Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

Commission File Number 000-51281

TENNESSEE COMMERCE BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(615) 599-2274

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes   x   No   o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes   o   No   x

As of November 06, 2008 there were 4,731,696 shares of common stock, $0.50 par value per share, issued and outstanding.

Table of Contents

Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.

Table of Contents

2

Table of Contents

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

TENNESSEE COMMERCE BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2007

(1) The balance sheet at December 31, 2007 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

TENNESSEE COMMERCE BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 AND 2007

THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 AND 2007

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

TENNESSEE COMMERCE BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 AND 2007

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

TENNESSEE COMMERCE BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 AND 2007

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

TENNESSEE COMMERCE BANCORP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 1 — Basis of Presentation

Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Corporation”) is the bank holding company for Tennessee Commerce Bank (the “Bank”).  In March 2005, the Corporation formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Tennessee Commerce Bank Statutory Trust I (the “Trust I”).  In June 2008, the Corporation formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Tennessee Commerce Bank Statutory Trust II (the “Trust II”). In July 2008, the corporation formed a wholly owned subsidiary, TCB Commercial Assets Services. As of September 30, 2008, the Bank, the Trust I, the Trust II and TCB Commercial Assets Services were the only subsidiaries of the Corporation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Corporation, the Bank and TCB Commercial Assets Services. The Trust I and the Trust II are not consolidated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46(R) (revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” Material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The unaudited consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2008 and for the nine- and three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, to present fairly the information included therein. They do not include all the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. Operating results for the nine- and three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Note 2 — Earnings per Share of Common Stock

The factors used in the earnings per share computation follow:

7

Table of Contents

Note 3 — Stock-Based Compensation

On January 1, 2006, the Corporation adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), which addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which a company receives employee services in exchange for equity instruments. SFAS No. 123(R) eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions, as the Corporation formerly did, using the intrinsic value method as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and generally requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method and recognized as expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of income.

The Corporation adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method which requires the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006. The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the periods ended September 30, 2008 reflect the impact of adopting SFAS No. 123(R). In accordance with the modified prospective method, the consolidated financial statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of SFAS No. 123(R).

Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of stock-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of income for the period ended September 30, 2008 included any compensation expense for stock-based payment awards vesting during the period based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R). As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the accompanying statement of income for the period ended September 30, 2008 is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS No. 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Corporation granted options to purchase 150,000 shares of Corporation common stock and 10,955 restricted shares of Corporation common stock and there were 160,000 non-vested options outstanding prior to that period with 40,000 forfeited. There was $155 stock-based expense recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

8

Table of Contents

A summary of the activity in the Corporation’s stock-based compensation plan is as follows:

The estimated fair values are computed using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, using the following weighted-average assumptions as of the grant date shown below:

The Corporation granted options to purchase 150,000 shares of Corporation common stock and 10,955 restricted shares of Corporation common stock in the first nine months of 2008. The options granted in 2008 had an estimated fair value of $4.45. The options granted in 2007 had an estimated fair value of $5.75. The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year was $4.45 for 2008 and $5.75 for 2007.

9

Table of Contents

Note 4 — Trust Preferred Securities

In March 2005, the Trust I issued and sold 8,000 of its fixed/floating rate capital securities, with a liquidation amount of $1,000 per capital security, to First Tennessee Bank National Association. The securities pay a fixed rate of 6.73% payable quarterly for the first five years and a floating rate based on a three-month LIBOR rate plus 1.98% thereafter. At the same time, the Corporation issued to the Trust I $8,248,000 of fixed/floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures due 2035. The Corporation guarantees the payment of distributions and payments for redemptions or liquidation of the capital securities. The fixed/floating rate capital securities qualify as “Tier I Capital” for the Corporation under current regulatory definitions subject to certain limitations.

The debentures pay a fixed rate of 6.73% payable quarterly for the first five years and a floating rate based on a three-month LIBOR rate plus 1.98% thereafter. The distributions on the capital securities are accounted for as interest expense by the Corporation. Interest payments on the debentures and the corresponding distributions on the capital securities may be deferred at any time at the election of the Corporation for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods (five years). The capital securities and debentures are redeemable at any time commencing after June 2010 at par. The Corporation reports as liabilities the subordinated debentures issued by the Corporation and held by the Trust I.

In June 2008, the Trust II issued and sold 14,500 of its floating rate capital securities, with a liquidation amount of $1,000 per capital security, in a private placement. The securities pay a floating rate per annum, reset quarterly, equal to the prime rate of interest published in The Wall Street Journal on the first business day of each distribution period plus 50 basis points (but in no event greater than 8.0% or less than 5.75%). At the same time, the Corporation issued to the Trust II $14.95 million of floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures due 2038. The Corporation guarantees the payment of distributions and payments for redemptions or liquidation of the capital securities. The floating rate capital securities qualify as “Tier I Capital” for the Corporation under current regulatory definitions subject to certain limitations.

The debentures pay a floating rate per annum, reset quarterly, equal to the prime rate of interest published in The Wall Street Journal on the first business day of each distribution period plus 50 basis points (but in no event greater than 8.0% or less than 5.75%). The distributions on the capital securities are accounted for as interest expense by the Corporation. Interest payments on the debentures and the corresponding distributions on the capital securities may be deferred at any time at the election of the Corporation for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods (five years). The capital securities and debentures are redeemable at any time commencing after June 2013 at par. The Corporation reports as liabilities the subordinated debentures issued by the Corporation and held by the Trust II.

10

Table of Contents

Note 5 – New Accounting Standards

In September 2006, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (“SFAS No. 157”), “Fair Value Measurements.” This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 clarifies the exchange price notion in the fair value definition to mean the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability (an exit price), not the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability (an entry price). This statement also clarifies that market participant assumptions should include assumptions about risk, should include assumptions about the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset and should reflect its nonperformance risk (the risk that the obligation will not be fulfilled). Nonperformance risk should include the reporting entity’s credit risk. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed in the financial statements on a non-recurring basis. The Corporation and the Bank both adopted SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008 and the adoption did not have a material impact on the financial statements.

In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.”  This statement provides the following: (i) revised guidance on when a servicing asset and servicing liability should be recognized; (ii) requires all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable; (iii) permits an entity to elect to measure servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value each reporting date and report changes in fair value in earnings in the period in which the changes occur; (iv) upon initial adoption, permits a one-time reclassification of available-for-sale securities to trading securities for securities which are identified as off-setting the entity’s exposure to changes in the fair value of servicing assets or liabilities that a servicer elects to subsequently measure at fair value; and (v) requires separate presentation of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value in the statement of financial position and additional footnote disclosures.  This standard is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006 with the effects of initial adoption being reported as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. The adoption did not have a material impact on the financial statements.

11

Table of Contents

Note 6 — Fair Value Measurement

The Bank has an established process for determining fair values, in accordance with SFAS No. 157. Fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models or processes that use primarily market-based or independently-sourced market data, including interest rate yield curves, option volatilities and third party information. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality (for financial assets reflected at fair value), the Bank’s creditworthiness (for financial liabilities reflected at fair value), liquidity and other unobservable parameters that are applied consistently over time as follows:

The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Bank believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies, or assumptions, to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

Valuation Hierarchy

SFAS No.157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  Below is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

12

Table of Contents

Assets

Securities - Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.  Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.  Level 1 securities include highly liquid government bonds, federal funds sold and certain other products.  Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available.  If quoted prices are not available, securities would generally be classified within level 2, and fair value would be determined by matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the entire Bank’s available-for-sale securities were valued using matrix pricing and were classified within level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.  At September 30, 2008, the Bank had no securities classified within level 3.

Servicing Assets - All separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities are initially measured at fair value. Subsequent measurement methods include the amortization method, whereby servicing assets or servicing liabilities are amortized over the period of estimated net servicing income or net servicing loss, or the fair value method, whereby servicing assets or servicing liabilities are measured at fair value at each reporting date and changes in fair value are reported in earnings in the period in which they occur. Because of the unique nature of the Bank’s servicing assets, quoted market prices may not be available. If no quoted market prices are available, the amortization method is used. The Bank assesses servicing assets or servicing liabilities for impairment or increased obligation based on the fair value at each reporting date.  At September 30, 2008, the Bank had servicing assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Interest-Only Strips - When the Bank sells loans to others, it may hold interest-only strips, which is an interest that continues to be held by the transferor in the securitized receivable. It may also obtain servicing assets or assume servicing liabilities that are initially measured at fair value. Gain or loss on sale of the receivables depends in part on both (a) the previous carrying amount of the financial assets involved in the transfer, allocated between the assets sold and the interests that continue to be held by the transferor based on their relative fair value at the date of transfer, and (b) the proceeds received. To obtain fair values, quoted market prices are used if available. However, quotes are generally not available for interests that continue to be held by the transferor, so the Bank generally estimates fair value based on the future expected cash flows estimated using management’s best estimates of the key assumptions – credit losses and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. At September 30, 2008, the Bank had interest-only strips measured at fair value on a recurring basis classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Impaired Loans – A loan is considered to be impaired when it is probable the Bank will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Individually identified impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected payments using the loan’s original effective rate as the discount rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If the recorded investment in the impaired loan exceeds the measure of fair value, a valuation allowance may be established as a component of the allowance for loan losses. At September 30, 2008, the Bank had impaired loans measured on a nonrecurring basis classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Other Assets — Included in other assets are certain assets carried at fair value, including repossessions and other real estate owned (“OREO”). The carrying amount is based on an observable market price or appraisal value. The Bank reflects these assets within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. At September 30, 2008, the Bank had repossessions and OREO measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy

Liabilities

Recourse Obligations - The maximum extent of the Bank’s recourse obligations on loans transferred is 10% of the amount transferred adjusted for any early payoffs or terminations, based on the Bank’s payment history on loans of the type transferred. At September 30, 2008, the Bank had recourse obligations measured at fair value on a recurring basis classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

13

Table of Contents

The following table presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of September 30, 2008, by caption on the consolidated balance sheets and by SFAS No. 157 valuation hierarchy (as described above) (dollars in thousands):

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2008

The Corporation may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market that were recognized at fair value below the cost at the end of the period. The following table presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of September 30, 2008, by caption on the consolidated balance sheets and by SFAS No. 157 valuation hierarchy (as described above) (dollars in thousands):

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of September 30, 2008

Changes in level 3 fair value measurements

     The table below includes a roll-forward of the balance sheet amounts for the second quarter of 2008 (including the change in fair value) for financial instruments classified by the Bank within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the determination is based upon the significance of the unobservable factors to the overall fair value measurement. However, since level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or level 3 components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources), the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology.

14

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this report may not be based on historical facts and are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements may be identified by reference to a future period or by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “foresee,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “intend,” “could,” “would,” “plan,” “forecast” or future or conditional verb tenses and variations or negatives of such terms. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, those relating to our operating results, vesting of stock-based awards, recently adopted accounting standards, fair value measurements, allowance for loan losses, business bank strategy, management’s review of the loan portfolio, loan classifications, loan commitments, interest rate risk, economic value of equity model, loan sale transactions, tax rates, liquidity, inflation,  internal control over financial reporting and our future growth and profitability. We caution you not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this report because actual results could differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in economic conditions, competition for loans, mortgages and other financial services and products, changes in interest rates, concentrations within our loan portfolio, our ability to maintain credit quality, the effectiveness of our risk monitoring systems, changes in consumer preferences, the ability of our borrowers to repay loans, the availability of and costs associated with maintaining and/or obtaining adequate and timely sources of liquidity, changes in our operating strategy, our ability to meet regulatory capital adequacy requirements, our ability to collect amounts due under loan agreements and to attract deposits, our ability to attract, train and retain qualified personnel, the geographic concentration of our assets, our ability to operate and integrate new technology, our ability to provide market competitive products and services, our ability to diversify revenue, our ability to fund growth with lower cost liabilities, laws and regulations affecting financial institutions in general and other factors detailed from time to time in our press releases and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of changes or unanticipated events, circumstances or results that occur after the date of this report.

Overview

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, throughout this Item 2)

The results of operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2007 reflected a 6.13% increase in net income and an 8.33% increase in diluted earnings per share. The increase in earnings resulted primarily from a 30.80% increase in net interest income because of higher average loan balances. Increased net interest income was partially offset by increases in non-interest expense. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, net income was $1,886, an increase of $109 or 6.13% compared to net income of $1,777 for the same period in 2007. Diluted earnings per share increased $0.03 per share or 8.33% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The nine months ended September 30, 2008 reflected a continuation of our bank’s trend of rapid asset growth, increasing by $205,905 or 22.87% from $900,153 at December 31, 2007 to $1,106,058 at September 30, 2008. Net loans increased by 25.72% or $201,647 from December 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008, while total deposits increased by 21.30% or $173,611 during that same period.

15

Table of Contents

Corporation Overview

Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc., headquartered in Franklin, Tennessee, is the bank holding company for Tennessee Commerce Bank (the “Bank”).  Organized in January 2000, Tennessee Commerce Bank has a focused strategy that serves the banking needs of small to medium-sized businesses, entrepreneurs and professionals in the Nashville metropolitan statistical area, or the Nashville MSA, as well as the funding needs of certain national and regional equipment vendors and financial services companies.  We call this strategy our “business bank” strategy. We primarily conduct business from a single location in the Cool Springs commercial area of Franklin, Tennessee, 15 miles south of Nashville. We also operate three loan production offices-one in Birmingham, Alabama, and two new offices in Minneapolis, Minnesota and Atlanta, Georgia, both of which we opened in April and May 2008, respectively. Each of the two new offices is staffed with one senior lending officer.

We offer a full range of competitive retail and commercial banking services to local customers in the Nashville MSA.  Our deposit services include a broad offering of checking accounts, savings accounts, money market investment accounts, certificates of deposits and retirement accounts.  Lending services include consumer installment loans, various types of mortgage loans, personal lines of credit, home equity loans, credit cards, real estate construction loans, commercial loans to small and medium-sized businesses and professionals, and letters of credit. We issue VISA credit cards and are a merchant depository for cardholder drafts under VISA credit cards.  We also offer check cards and debit cards.  We offer our local customers free courier services, access to third-party automated teller machines, or ATMs, and state-of-the-art electronic banking. We have trust powers but do not have a trust department.

Our Business Strategy

We execute our business bank strategy by combining the personal service and appeal of a community banking institution with the sophistication of a larger bank.  We believe this strategy distinguishes us from our competitors in efforts to attract loans and deposits of local small to medium-sized businesses and national and regional equipment vendors and financial services companies.  Further, the rapid growth within the Nashville MSA, along with several bank mergers and acquisitions, has left many business owners without significant banking relationships. We seek to take advantage of this opportunity.

We do not compete based on the traditional definition of “convenience” and currently have no plans to develop a comprehensive branch bank network.  For us, convenience is created by technology and by a free courier service for local customers which transports deposits directly from the business location to the bank.  We conduct business primarily from a single banking office with no teller line, drive-through window or extended banking hours.  We compete by providing responsive and personalized service to meet customer needs.  We provide free electronic banking and cash management tools and on-site training for business customers.  We compete for consumer business by providing superior products, attractive deposit rates, free internet banking services and access to a third-party regional ATM network.

The business bank strategy is highlighted by differences between the financial statements of our bank and more traditional financial institutions. The business bank model creates a high degree of leverage.  By avoiding the investment and maintenance costs of a typical branch network, we are able to maintain earning assets at a higher level than peer institutions.  Management targets a minimum earning asset ratio of 97%, compared to the average of 85% to 95% for all FDIC-insured banks at the end of the second quarter of 2008. At September 30, 2008, we had an earning asset ratio of 96.04%.

The business bank model is also highly efficient.  We primarily target the non-retail (service, manufacturing and professional) sector of the commercial market, which is characterized by lower levels of transactions and processing costs.  The commercial customer mix and the strategic outsourcing of non-customer functions, such as data processing, information technology and internal audit, allow us to operate with a small, highly-trained staff.  Management targets a minimum asset per employee ratio of $10,000 compared to the average ratio of approximately $4,341 assets per employee for Tennessee banks at the end of the third quarter of 2008. At September 30, 2008, our assets per employee were $13,826.

16

Table of Contents

In addition to our Nashville MSA focus, we have developed expertise in indirect lending that allows us to access a national market. Our indirect lending transactions are fixed-rate monthly installment loans originated through a third-party equipment vendor or financial services company. Our national market lending is divided into two programs based on loan size. In the first program, through an established network of vendors and financial service companies, we have opportunities to finance business asset secured loan transactions nationally for middle-market and investment grade companies. In the second program, a different network of vendors and financial service companies located in Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, California and Michigan partner with us in financing smaller transactions (generally $150 or less per transaction). Both national market programs provide geographic and collateral diversity for our portfolio.

  Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007

Net Income - Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was $1,886, an increase of $109 or 6.13% compared to net income of $1,777 for the three months ended September 30, 2007.  The increase is attributable to a $3,385 increase in interest income from $16,371 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 to $19,756 for the same period in 2008. We experienced an increase of $975 in operating expense which was the result of our overall growth, including a $48 increase in FDIC assessment at September 30, 2008 compared to the same date in 2007, as well as an increase in personnel and general operating expenses because of our growth.