Movement Industries Corporation (PK) (MVNT) 시세

The reset includes no tax on SSI or capital gains. Linh owns 600M shares. It will save him millions in taxes.

Thanks for the lengthy explanation but I was only interested how it applied to mvnt..

As long as they're not trying the Build Back Better thing we'll be fine

The term "Great Reset" refers to a concept introduced by the World Economic Forum (WEF) in 2020, primarily as a response to the economic and social disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. It’s been described as a vision for rebuilding global economies and societies in a way that addresses systemic issues like inequality, climate change, and technological disruption. But it’s also sparked a lot of debate, with interpretations ranging from optimistic reform to conspiratorial overreach, depending on who’s talking. Let’s break it down.
Core Idea from the WEF
The WEF, led by figures like Klaus Schwab, framed the Great Reset as an opportunity to "reset" the global economy post-COVID. The argument was that the pandemic exposed vulnerabilities—fragile supply chains, healthcare disparities, and environmental risks—and offered a chance to fix them. Key pillars include:
Stakeholder Capitalism: Moving beyond shareholder profit to prioritize broader societal goals, like sustainability and fairness. Think companies balancing profit with environmental and social responsibility.
Sustainability: Accelerating green initiatives, like renewable energy and carbon reduction, to combat climate change.
Digital Transformation: Leveraging tech (AI, automation, digital infrastructure) to modernize economies while addressing issues like job displacement.
Equity and Inclusion: Reducing wealth gaps, improving access to education and healthcare, and tackling systemic inequalities.
The WEF’s pitch was for governments, businesses, and civil society to collaborate on policies that create more resilient, equitable systems. They held events like Davos meetings to push this, emphasizing phrases like “build back better.”
Why It’s Controversial
While the WEF presented it as a cooperative framework, the Great Reset became a lightning rod for skepticism. Critics, especially on platforms like X, see it as a power grab by global elites. Here’s why:
Vague Language: Terms like “reset” sound dramatic, and the WEF’s broad proposals left room for interpretation. Some read it as code for top-down control, not reform.
Centralized Power Concerns: Ideas like global coordination and digital IDs (for things like vaccine tracking) raised fears of surveillance or loss of sovereignty. Posts on X often highlight distrust in institutions like the WEF, UN, or governments pushing these plans.
Economic Overhaul Fears: Suggestions to rethink capitalism—paired with phrases like “you’ll own nothing and be happy” (from a 2016 WEF video about future trends)—fed narratives of forced collectivism or property loss, even if that wasn’t the explicit intent.
Conspiracy Theories: The term got tangled in broader theories about New World Order or technocratic dystopias. Some claim it’s a deliberate plan to erode freedoms, citing policies like lockdowns or ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) frameworks as stepping stones.
What’s Actually Happening?
On the ground, “Great Reset” isn’t a single policy or event—it’s more a buzzword. Some initiatives tied to it are real but predate the term:
Green Policies: Countries are pushing net-zero goals (e.g., EU’s Green Deal), which align with WEF’s sustainability focus but aren’t new.
Tech Shifts: Digital currencies and AI regulations are advancing globally, fitting the WEF’s tech transformation angle, but driven by market and state interests, not a WEF mandate.
Social Reforms: Efforts to address inequality, like universal basic income trials, exist but vary widely by country and aren’t centrally coordinated.
However, there’s no evidence of a unified “Great Reset” plan being enforced globally. The WEF is an influential think tank, not a governing body—it can’t dictate policy. Still, its sway with leaders fuels suspicion.
The Divide in Perception
Proponents (WEF, some policymakers) see it as a call for pragmatic modernization. They argue global challenges like climate change need collective action, and capitalism can evolve without collapsing.
Critics (libertarians, populists, X users) view it as a pretext for control, whether by governments, corporations, or unelected elites. They point to real policies—like Canada’s digital ID proposals or ESG scoring—as potential slippery slopes.
My Take
The Great Reset, as pitched, is a mix of idealistic goals and technocratic jargon that’s easy to misinterpret. It’s less a conspiracy than a poorly communicated vision—one that assumes everyone trusts global institutions to play fair. But skepticism is warranted: history shows centralized plans often overpromise and underdeliver, and power tends to concentrate unless checked. The truth likely lies in the messy middle—some reforms are practical, others risk overreach, and the term itself has become a Rorschach test for people’s fears or hopes.
If you’re curious about specific claims (like digital IDs or property rights), I can dig deeper or check X for what people are saying. Want me to focus on anything in particular?

What does the “great reset” mean?

With all the shares you own you should have a direct line to them even warren buffet takes calls from his shareholders

Lets hope your right dead money for the last 4 years

I figured it out. Movement is waiting on "the great reset" Should happen by Easter weekend

Thanks my friend appreciate all your opinions 

I think the guy on the phone was pulling your legHe was probably the janitor 

Sure. indie Semiconductor
TipRanks has a 12-month price target of $6.63
https://www.tipranks.com/stocks/indi/forecast

My average cost is $3.77/share.
You can get it much cheaper now and probably for the next several months until the tech sector begins to recover!

Can you share the name of the stock, I'm out of the big board for now looking for some cheapies that look promising. 

Have a US semiconductor maker that went from a 3% loss this morning to about a 25% GAIN currently.
Not bad for a NASDAQ ticker. LOL
Guess I should have bought more this morning. 😁

Unbelievable trading today.
3000+ range for the Dow from bottom to top!!

lol

Not worried about the oil price....we have ZERO REVENUES...oil could be $100,000,000 per barrel and it wouldn't effect MOVEMENT 

Nah, We're fine

The lowest price per barrel of oil at which companies stop drilling varies depending on several factors, including the type of oil production, location, operational costs, and the financial strategies of individual companies. There’s no single universal threshold, but I can provide a range based on available data and industry insights.
For U.S. shale oil producers, particularly in regions like the Permian Basin, breakeven prices for drilling new wells typically range from $48 to $69 per barrel of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil, according to surveys like the Dallas Fed Energy Survey from recent years. Smaller or less efficient companies often need prices closer to $60–$70 to remain profitable, while larger, more efficient operators (e.g., ExxonMobil or Chevron) can sustain drilling at lower prices, around $25–$35 per barrel, due to economies of scale and low-cost assets. Below these levels, many companies halt new drilling projects because the costs of exploration, drilling, and completion exceed the revenue from selling the oil.
For existing wells, the threshold is lower since the upfront capital costs are already sunk. Operating expenses for existing wells in the Permian Basin can be covered at prices as low as $30–$38 per barrel. If oil prices drop below this range, companies may start shutting in production (temporarily stopping output) rather than drilling new wells, though some might continue if they’ve hedged their production at higher prices through futures contracts.
Globally, the picture shifts. Offshore projects, Arctic drilling, and heavy oil production (e.g., Canadian tar sands) often require $50–$70 per barrel or more to be viable due to higher extraction costs. When prices fall below these levels for an extended period—say, below $40–$45—activity in these regions tends to slow or stop entirely, as seen during the 2020 oil price crash when WTI briefly hit negative territory and Brent fell to around $20.
Historically, drilling activity has plummeted when prices linger below $30–$40 for months, as seen in 2016 and 2020. However, some companies might persist at lower prices if they anticipate a rebound, have strong balance sheets, or face pressure to maintain output. Posts on X from 2025 suggest sentiment aligns with this, noting slowdowns below $60–$62, though anecdotal claims of drilling continuing at $48 indicate variability.
So, the tipping point where most companies stop drilling new wells is roughly $40–$50 per barrel for U.S. shale, with higher thresholds ($60+) for less efficient or costlier operations. Below $30, even the most resilient producers start to pull back significantly, focusing only on maintaining existing output—if that. It’s a sliding scale, not a hard cutoff, driven by cash flow, debt, and market expectations.

Price of oil cratering.
How low will it go??
Very bad for the oil sector and those supplying equipment and services to it.

Hey Larry! 

Agree larry agree other then the wasted money which if you sold 3 1/2 years ago for profit what a waste of time which is more important

This is so sad !!

No one knows shit at this point except there's been zero revenues for 2 Q's filings late as usual yet there's been no pumping or dilution? We've been getting little indications shares have been issued to pay for something and folks answering their phones indicate business as usual. Who knows anything but the man behind the curtain.

Gem it seems no one knows really whats going on hopfully the OTC community comes around to pump this so we can dump

We're stuck in the muddddd till management decides to do the right thing and talk and update Shareholders.  
Feeling like they gave us the Shaft 

Tariffs should only affect companies with revenues from non-US companies.
MVNT hasn't had any revenues for at least 6 months and maybe more.
My conclusion is that tariffs should not have any direct effect on MVNT.

I asked Microsoft Edge's AI if tariffs will destroy the world.
Here's the answer I got: America is harming itself as much as, if not more than, other economies with its latest tariffs, analysts say, and recession is now a real risk for both the US and the world. So not the end of the world.
Just a potential worldwide recession. LOL

https://www.bing.com/search?q=Will+tariffs+destroy+the+world%3F&form=ANSPH1&refig=0309B71A0086469F89E53B38229F7797&pc=U531

Once again with only 2 trades, it's easy to tell which trade wasn't a "short" trade.
The first trade of the day was for 150,881 shares. The second trade was for 5,000 shares.

20250404|MVNT|150881|0|155881|O

NASDAQ in "bear market" territory now!
S&P deeply in correction territory (down ~18%)
Dow Jones only down around 12% from recent high. LOL

Greetings All,
Hope you are all doing well...

April 28th is our Federal Election...been doing some volunteering for my candidate. Have to exterminate these Liberals from office, so we can start to steer this ship in the right direction.

I never thought there was anyone worse than Trudeau...but colour me stupid...this Carney is worse and more slippery.

Wish us luck!!!
GeneO

Someone here said they know who it is ,they must need money bad to sell down here .

That's a good sign I presume. Just wish that seller would finally get rid of all their shares.
Still wouldn't help sp without some positive forwarding looking news from Linh.

Level 2 is clearly looking differnt today seems that bid gets hit and blocks reappear

Retail selling again? Wonder who that could be? LOL

Well, I think the tariff fear is subsidizing fast. Hopefully management decides to acknowledge shareholders shortly. I think the damage they've done by hiding their head in the sand will be forgotten if they start releasing news and come out with a press release, indicating some path forward. 

The interesting part was the 20k trade in between. It was a retail sale that apparently was hitting the bid and the MMs paid over bid price and took the shares.
Appears they are trying to cover all they can at this level.
Their short position is massive but with the DTCC not enforcing FTDs it's that way on most tickers. Big boards included.

Zero volume today would be quite nice imho. lol

That's what I'm hoping. LOL

Nothing will effect MVNT we're already at the bottom of the lake.

Looks like that opening trade of 2000@.0086 was shorted.
But why not that closing trade of 1000@.0093?

Put on your trading hats everyone.
Looks like it's gonna be a wild day and maybe even a wild few months. LOL

Healthcare looks like the only sector in my portfolio not getting bombed today. At least not in the pre-market.

20250402|MVNT|2000|0|23000|O

I settle for .128

Vincent Van Gogh strikes again. Could you paint us up to $1.28?

It appears to be. Yes

When will we hear something material from MVNT management?

I believe I posted last year after MVNT posted their FY 2024 fins that we wouldn't hear anything material again until FY 2025 fins are posted.

Well, hear we are at the beginning of Q4 in FY2025 and nothing material at all has been posted. I'm sticking with my prediction that nothing material will be posted by Linh until the end of September 2025 at the earliest. And it could be as late as mid-November 2025 when the next 15-day "grace period" ends. By then MVNT will have spent basically an entire year trading below a penny.

But don't give up hope completely. After all there is still FY 2026 to look forward to! LOL🤣🤣🤣

So 100K was a real retail sale? (100K not shorted)

Let hope !!!

Just needs a spark. The fuze is freeking long,

20250401|MVNT|338500|0|438500|O