UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 6-K

Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

March, 2015

Commission File Number 0-26005

MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.

121 Richmond Street West, Suite 304, Toronto, ON M5H 2K1

[Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.]

Form 20-F [X]     Form 40-F [  ]

             [Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.]

Yes [  ]     No [X] 

[If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with rule 12g3-2(b):        N/A

This report on Form 6-K is hereby incorporated by reference in the registration statement on Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-134309) of Micromem Technologies Inc. and in the prospectus contained therein, and this report on Form 6-K shall be deemed a part of such registration statement from the date on which this report is filed, to the extent not superseded by documents or reports subsequently filed or furnished by Micromem Technologies Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

SIGNATURES    

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

   
 

MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.

   

 

By:       /s/ Joseph Fuda              
Date: March 2, 2015        Name: Joseph Fuda

 

       Title:   Chief Executive Officer

 


Exhibit Index

Exhibit
Number Exhibit Description
   
99.1 Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended October 31, 2014 and 2013
99.2 Management's Discussion and Analysis for the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2014
99.3 Form 52-109F1 Certification of Annual Filings - CEO
99.4

Form 52-109F1 Certification of Annual Filings - CFO

 





Exhibit 99.1

Consolidated Financial Statements of

MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.

For the years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013

(Expressed in United States Dollars)

 




  Collins Barrow Toronto LLP
  Collins Barrow Place
  11 King Street West
  Suite 700, PO Box 27
  Toronto, Ontario
  M5H 4C7 Canada
   
  T. 416.480.0160
  F. 416.480.2646
   
  www.collinsbarrow.com

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders of Micromem Technologies Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Micromem Technologies Inc. and its subsidiaries, which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as at October 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013 and the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended October 31, 2014, October 31, 2013 and October 31, 2012 and notes comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

Management’s Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Micromem Technologies Inc. and its subsidiaries as at October 31, 2014 and October 31, 2013, and its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the years ended October 31, 2014, October 31, 2013 and October 31, 2012 in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

Emphasis of Matter

Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 2 in the consolidated financial statements which describes the material uncertainties that cast significant doubt about Micromem Technologies Inc.’s ability to continue as a going concern.

This office is independently owned and operated by Collins Barrow Toronto LLP
The Collins Barrow trademarks are used under License.


Other Matter

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 27, 2015 expressed an unmodified (unqualified) opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


Chartered Professional Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
February 27, 2015

 




  Collins Barrow Toronto LLP
  Collins Barrow Place
  11 King Street West
  Suite 700, PO Box 27
  Toronto, Ontario
  M5H 4C7 Canada
   
  T. 416.480.0160

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

F. 416.480.2646
   

To the Shareholders of Micromem Technologies Inc.:

www.collinsbarrow.com

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Micromem Technologies Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of October 31, 2014, based on criteria established in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included under the heading “Disclosure Controls/Internal Controls” under the title “Compliance Related Reporting Matters” in the accompanying Management’s Discussion and Analysis. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2014, based on criteria established in the Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We have also audited, in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of financial position of the Company as at October 31, 2014 and 2013 and the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended October 31, 2014, October 31, 2013 and October 31, 2012, and notes comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information and our report dated February 27, 2015 expressed an unqualified audit opinion on those consolidated financial statements.


Chartered Professional Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
February 27, 2015

This office is independently owned and operated by Collins Barrow Toronto LLP
The Collins Barrow trademarks are used under License.


MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
 

  1.

Reporting Entity and Nature of Business

     
  2.

Going Concern

     
  3.

Basis of Presentation

     
  4.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

     
  5.

New Standards and Interpretations Issued but not yet Adopted

     
  6.

Fair Value Disclosures

     
  7.

Capital Risk Management

     
  8.

Deposits and Other Receivables

     
  9.

Property and Equipment

     
  10.

Deferred Development Costs

     
  11.

Intangible Assets and Patents

     
  12.

Share Capital, Stock Options and Loss per Share

     
  13.

Private Placements, Derivative Warrant Liability and Common Share Purchase Warrants

     
  14.

Bridge Loans

     
  15.

Contributed Surplus

     
  16.

Income Taxes

     
  17.

Expenses

     
  18.

Management Compensation and Related Party Transactions

     
  19.

Commitments

     
  20.

Contingencies

     
  21.

Financial Risk Management

     
  22.

Segmented Information

     
  23.   

Subsequent Events

1


MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
(Expressed in United States dollars)

    October 31,     October 31,  
    2014     2013  
             
Assets            
Current assets:            
     Cash $  935,987   $  821,283  
     Deposits and other receivables (Note 8)   872,766     234,741  
    1,808,753     1,056,024  
             
Property and equipment, net (Note 9)   21,483     13,998  
Deferred development costs (Note 10)   3,525,456     928,077  
Intangible assets, net (Note 11)   77,409     96,761  
Patents, net (Note 11)   203,504     71,595  
  $  5,636,605   $  2,166,455  
             
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity (Deficiency)            
Current liabilities:            
     Bridge loans (Note 14) $  -   $  290,014  
     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   773,832     340,122  
  $  773,832   $  630,136  
Shareholders' Equity (Deficiency)            
     Share capital: (Note 12)            
             Authorized: 
                          2,000,000 special preference shares, redeemable, voting 
                          Unlimited common shares without par value 
             Issued and outstanding: 
                          188,436,724 common shares (2013: 158,491,425) (Note 12)
$  70,802,776   $  57,755,613  
     Equity component of bridge loans (Note 14)   -     1,557  
     Contributed surplus (Note 15)   27,436,678     32,822,327  
     Deficit   (93,376,681 )   (89,043,178 )
    4,862,773     1,536,319  
             
  $  5,636,605   $  2,166,455  

Going Concern (Note 2)
Management Compensation and Related Party Transactions (Note 18)
Commitments (Note 19)
Contingencies (Note 20)
Subsequent Events (Note 23)

"Joseph Fuda" (Signed)  
Joseph Fuda, Director  
   
"David Sharpless" (Signed)  
David Sharpless, Director  

See accompanying notes.

2


MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED LOSS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Expressed in United States dollars)

For the years ended October 31,

    2014     2013     2012  

 

                 

 Costs and expenses :

                 

   Administration (Note 17)

$  325,453   $  378,497   $  694,617  

   Professional, other fees and salaries (Note 17)

  2,360,867     1,572,515     1,507,891  

   Stock based compensation (Note 12)

  379,253     368,790     430,856  

   Research and development (Note 17)

  703,671     160,920     229,840  

   Forgiveness of debt

  -     -     (42,004 )

   Travel and entertainment

  329,779     210,852     150,924  

   Amortization of property and equipment (Note 9)

  7,357     4,989     4,414  

   Amortization of intangible assets (Note 11)

  -     19,352     19,352  

   Foreign exchange loss

  58,491     12,261     7,537  

   Recovery of promissory note receivable (Note 8)

  -     -     (30,000 )

 Loss from operations

  4,164,871     2,728,176     2,973,427  

 

                 

 Other Expenses

                 

 Gain on revaluation of embedded derivatives (Note 14)

  -     (40,750 )   (176,899 )

 Warrants issued on debt settlement (Note 14)

  -     -     306,061  

 Loss (gain) on revaluation of derivative warrants liability (Note 13)

  -     3,246,502     (1,327,524 )

 

                 

Net loss before income taxes

  (4,164,871 )   (5,933,928 )   (1,775,065 )

 

                 

   Income taxes (Note 16)

  -     -     -  

 

                 

 Net loss and comprehensive loss

$  (4,164,871 ) $  (5,933,928 ) $  (1,775,065 )

 

              -  

Loss per share - basic and diluted (Note 12)

$  (0.02 ) $  (0.04 ) $  (0.01 )

 

                 

Weighted average number of shares (Note 12)

  171,534,969     146,814,466     123,375,510  

See accompanying notes.

3


MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Expressed in United States dollars)

For the years ended October 31,

                 

 

                 

 

  2014     2013     2012  

 Cash flows from operating activities:

                 

       Net loss

$  (4,164,871 ) $  (5,933,928 ) $  (1,775,065 )

       Adjustments to reconcile loss for the period to net cash used in operating activities:

           

               Amortization of intangible assets

  -     19,352     19,352  

               Amortization of property and equipment

  7,357     4,989     4,414  

               Research and development

  676,790     52,461     206,780  

               Accretion expense

  -     19,381     187,671  

               Stock based compensation

  379,253     368,790     430,856  

               Forgiveness of debt

  -     -     (42,004 )

               (Increase) in deposits and other receivables

  (235,757 )   (188,679 )   (13,728 )

               Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  454,149     (63,433 )   (393,896 )

               Loss (gain) on revaluation of derivative warrant liability

  -     3,246,502     (1,327,524 )

               (Gain) on revaluation of embedded derivatives

  -     (40,750 )   (176,899 )

               Warrants issued on settlement of debt

  -     -     306,061  

 Net cash used in operating activities

  (2,883,079 )   (2,515,315 )   (2,573,982 )

 

                 

 Cash flows from investing activities:

                 

       Purchase of property and equipment

  (14,842 )   (13,200 )   -  

       Patents

  (176,381 )   (44,825 )   (26,650 )

       Deferred development costs

  (3,872,635 )   (655,093 )   (263,133 )

       Recovery of deferred development costs

  662,290     233,290     -  

 Net cash used in investing activities

  (3,401,568 )   (479,828 )   (289,783 )

 

                 

 Cash flows from financing activities:

                 

         Issue of common shares

  6,801,619     3,697,441     2,524,155  

         Bridge loans advances

  -     -     714,359  

         Bridge loan repayments

  -     (126,044 )   (173,782 )

       Advances to related parties

  (480,304 )   -     -  

       Repayments from related parties

  78,036     -     -  

 Net cash provided by financing activities

  6,399,351     3,571,397     3,064,732  

 

                 

 Increase in cash

  114,704     576,254     200,967  

 

                 

 Cash, beginning of year

  821,283     245,029     44,062  

 

                 

 Cash, end of year

$  935,987   $  821,283   $  245,029  

 

                 

 Supplemental cash flow information:

                 

       Interest paid (classified in operating activities)

  17,071     83,493     75,142  

       Income taxes paid

  -     -     -  

See accompanying notes.

4


MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
(Expressed in United States dollars)

  Number of Share capital Contributed surplus Equity component Deficit Total
  Shares     0f Bridge loan    

 

           

Balance as at November 01, 2011

  116,149,718   $  51,774,555   $  25,986,276   $  -   $ (79,170,059 ) $  (1,409,228 )

 

           

Private placement of units for cash

  6,344,899     1,040,899     -     -     -     1,040,899  

Financing costs

- (16,457 ) - - - (16,457 )

Stock based compensation

  -     -     430,856     -     -     430,856  

Warrants issued on private placements

- (356,364 ) 66,997 - - (289,367 )

Warrants extended

  -     -     358,983     -     (1,322,879 )   (963,896 )

Warrants exercised

12,075,858 1,499,713 - - - 1,499,713

Fair value of warrants exercised

  -     558,993     (208,935 )   -     -     350,058  

Equity portion of bridge loan

- - - 1,557 - 1,557

Shares issued on conversion of bridge loan

  1,860,080     226,900     -     -     -     226,900  

Net loss and comprehensive loss

- - - - (1,775,065 ) (1,775,065 )

Balance at October 31, 2012

  136,430,555     54,728,239     26,634,177     1,557     (82,268,003 )   (904,030 )

 

           

 

                                   

Private placement of units for cash (Note 13)

16,106,957 2,910,532 - - - 2,910,532

Financing costs

  -     (35,482 )   -     -     -     (35,482 )

Stock based compensation (Note 12)

- - 368,790 - - 368,790

Warrants issued on private placements (Note 13)

  -     (863,863 )   377,234     -     -     (486,629 )

Warrants extended (note 13)

- - 264,938 - (841,247 ) (576,309 )

Warrants exercised (Note 13)

  5,953,913     822,391     -     -     -     822,391  

Fair value of warrants exercised

- 193,796 (47,675 ) - - 146,121

Warrants modified (Note 13)

  -     -     5,224,863     -     -     5,224,863  

Net loss and comprehensive loss

- - - - (5,933,928 ) (5,933,928 )

Balance at October 31, 2013

  158,491,425   $  57,755,613   $  32,822,327   $  1,557   $ (89,043,178 ) $  1,536,319  

 

           

 

                                   

 

           

Stock based compensation (Note 12)

  -     -     379,253     -     -     379,253  

Warrants extended (note 13)

- - 168,632 - (168,632 ) -

Warrants exercised (Note 13)

  27,410,717     6,801,619     -     -     -     6,801,619  

Fair value of warrants exercised

- 6,078,497 (6,078,497 ) - - -

Bridge loan converted (Note 14)

  2,517,501     302,100     1,557     (1,557 )   -     302,100  

Warrants issued on conversion of bridge loan (Note 14)

- (143,406 ) 143,406 - - -

Shares issued on settlement of accounts payable

  17,081     8,353     -     -     -     8,353  

Net loss and comprehensive loss

- - - - (4,164,871 ) (4,164,871 )

Balance at October 31, 2014

  188,436,724   $  70,802,776   $  27,436,678     -   $ (93,376,681 ) $  4,862,773  

See accompanying notes.

5



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

1.

REPORTING ENTITY AND NATURE OF BUSINESS

     

Micromem Technologies Inc. (“Micromem” or the “Company”) is incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada. The principal business address of the Company is 121 Richmond Street West, Suite 304, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

     

The Company develops, based upon proprietary technology, customized magnetic sensor applications for companies (referred to as “development partners”) operating internationally in various industry segments. The Company has not generated commercial revenues through October 31, 2014 and is devoting substantially all its efforts to securing commercial revenue opportunities.

     

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly- owned subsidiaries:

     
(i)

Micromem Applied Sensors Technology, Inc. (“MAST”) incorporated in November 2007 and domiciled in Delaware, United States. MAST has the primary responsibility for the exploitation of the Company’s technologies in conjunction with various strategic partners and customers.

     
(ii)

7070179 Canada Inc., incorporated in October 2008 under the Canada Business Corporations Act in Ontario, Canada. The Company has assigned to this entity its rights, title and interests in certain patents which it previously held, directly in exchange for common shares of this entity.

     
(iii)

Memtech International Inc., Bahamas; Memtech International (USA) Inc., Delaware, United States; Pageant Technologies (USA) Inc., United States; Pageant Technologies Inc., Barbados; and Micromem Holdings (Barbados) Inc., Barbados. All of these entities are inactive.

These consolidated financial statements were authorized for issuance and release by the Company’s Board of Directors on February 27, 2015.

6



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

2.

GOING CONCERN

   

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the “going concern” basis in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), which presumes that the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future.

   

There are material uncertainties related to conditions and events that cast significant doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time in future. During the year ended October 31, 2014, the Company reported a net loss and comprehensive loss of $4,164,871 (2013 - $5,933,928; 2012 - $1,775,065) and negative cash flow from operations of $2,883,079 (2013-$2,515,315; 2012 $2,573,982). The Company’s working capital position as at October 31, 2014 is $1,034,921 (2013 – $425,888).

   

The Company’s success depends on the profitable commercialization of its proprietary magnetic sensor technology. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in the profitable commercialization of its technology. Based upon its current operating and financial plans, management of the Company believes that it will have sufficient access to financial resources to fund the Company’s planned operations through fiscal 2015; however, the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to secure additional financing and/or profitably commercialize its technology. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

   

If the “going concern” assumption were not appropriate for these consolidated financial statements then adjustments would be necessary to the carrying value of assets and liabilities, the reported expenses and the balance sheet classifications used; in such cases, these adjustments could be material.

7



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

3.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

       
a)

Statement of compliance:

       

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS and its interpretations adopted by International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).

       
b)

Basis of measurement:

       

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for financial instruments designated at fair value through profit and loss, which are stated at their fair value.

       
c)

Functional and presentation currency:

       

These consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars (“U.S. dollars”), which is also the Company’s functional currency.

       
d)

Use of estimates and judgments:

       

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

       

Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected.

       

Information about assumptions and estimation uncertainties that have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment are as follows:

       
i)

The Company makes estimates and utilizes assumptions in determining the fair value for stock based compensation expense, warrants, the (gain) loss on the revaluation of the derivative warrant liability, the (gain) loss on the revaluation of the embedded derivatives relating to bridge loans and the bifurcation of convertible debt.

8



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

3.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION (Cont’d)


  d)

Use of estimates and judgments: (Cont’d)

       
  ii)

The Company makes estimates related to the recovery of deferred development costs based on the expectation and assumption of realizing revenues from future commercial agreements that it anticipates will develop with the companies for whom these projects have been undertaken. Changes in these expectations and assumptions could result in a change in the recoverable amount calculated.

       
  iii)

The Company applies judgement when establishing whether the capitalization criteria under IAS 38, Intangible Assets, for internally developed intangible assets.

       
  iv)

The Company makes estimates related to the useful lives of property and equipment, patents and intangible assets and the related amortization. The Company also periodically assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets. The recoverability analysis requires the Company to make assumptions about future operations. Changes to one or more assumptions would result in a change in the recoverable amount calculated and/or amortization expensed.

       
  v)

Deferred income tax assets are recognized for all deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences and carry-forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses can be utilized. At October 31, 2014, the Company has assessed that it is not probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to use deferred income tax assets based on operating losses in prior years, therefore, there are no balances carried in the consolidated statements of financial position for such assets.

       
  vi)

The Company applies judgment in assessing whether material uncertainties exist that would cause doubt as to the whether the Company could continue as a going concern.

       
  vii)

The Company applies judgment in assessing the functional currency of each entity consolidated in these financial statements.

9



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

4.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

     
a)

Basis of consolidation:

     

Subsidiaries are legal entities controlled by the Company. Control exists when the Company is exposed, or has rights to variable returns from an investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee. The financial statements of the subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date that control commences until the date control ceases.

     

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated. The accounting policies have been consistently applied by the Company’s subsidiaries.

     
b)

Foreign currency translation:

     

IFRS requires that the functional currency of each entity in the consolidated entity be determined separately in accordance with specific indicators and should be measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the “functional currency”). As a result of an assessment of the primary indicators, management assessed the functional currency of the Company and its subsidiaries to be U.S. dollar (“USD”). The consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared and presented using the USD.

     

Foreign currency transactions denominated in other than U.S. dollars are translated into the functional currency on the following basis:


  i)

Monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing at the statement of financial position date.

     
  ii)

Non-monetary assets and liabilities that are measured at historical cost are translated using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction.

     
  iii)

Income and expenses for each income statement line item presented are translated at average exchange rates during the quarter in which they are recognized.

Exchange differences resulting from the settlement of foreign currency transactions are recognized directly in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss in the period in which incurred.

10



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

4.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont’d)

     
c)

Financial Instruments: Recognition, Measurement, Disclosure and Presentation:

     

The Company initially recognizes loans and receivables and deposits on the date that they are originated. All other financial assets including assets designated at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) are recognized initially on the trade date at which the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.

     

The Company derecognizes a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire.

     

Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount presented in the statement of financial position only when the Company has the legal right to offset the amounts and intends either to settle on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

     

The Company’s financial assets consist of cash and deposits and other receivables and the Company’s financial liabilities consist of accounts payable and accrued liabilities, bridge loans, derivative warrant liability and embedded derivatives in bridge loans.

     

All financial assets and financial liabilities, including derivatives, are initially measured in the statement of financial position at fair value, except for loans and receivables, investments held-to maturity and other financial liabilities, which are measured at amortized cost. Measurement in subsequent periods depends on whether the financial instrument had been classified as FVTPL, available-for-sale, held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, or other liabilities.

     

FVTPL financial assets are measured at fair value and all gains and losses are included in the statement of loss and comprehensive loss in the period in which they arise. Available- for-sale financial assets are measured at fair value with revaluation gains and losses included in other comprehensive income until the assets are removed from the statement of financial position.

11



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

4.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont’d)

     
c)

Financial Instruments: Recognition, Measurement, Disclosure and Presentation: (Cont’d)

     

The Company classifies cash as FVTPL. Deposits and other receivables are classified as loans and receivables, and are initially measured at fair value and subsequently at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and bridge loans are classified as other liabilities, and initially measured at fair value and subsequently at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method. The derivative warrant liability and embedded derivatives in bridge loans are classified at FVTPL and are measured at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss.

     
d)

Compound Financial Instruments

     

Compound financial instruments issued by the Company comprise convertible notes that can be converted to share capital at the option of the holder and the number of shares to be issued does not vary with changes in their fair value.

     

The liability component of a compound financial instrument is recognized initially at the fair value of a similar liability that does not have an equity conversion option.

     

The equity component, if the conversion feature of the convertible note is in US dollars, is recognized initially as the difference between the fair value of the compound financial instrument as a whole and the fair value of the liability component. Any directly attributable transaction costs are allocated to the liability and equity components in proportion to their initial carrying amounts.

     

Subsequent to initial recognition, the liability component of a compound financial instrument is measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method. The equity component of a compound financial instrument is not remeasured subsequent to initial recognition.

     

Interest, dividends, losses and gains relating to the financial liability are recognized in profit or loss except for borrowing costs on qualifying assets which are added to asset cost. Distributions to the equity holders are recognized in equity, net of any tax effect.

12



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

4.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont’d)

     
e)

Hybrid Financial Instruments:

     

Financial instruments with embedded derivative liabilities are accounted for as hybrid financial instruments. The Company has hybrid financial instruments when the embedded derivative conversion option right of the convertible notes gives the right to the holder to convert into common shares in Canadian dollars (“CDN”).

     

An embedded derivative is a feature within a contract, such that the cash flows associated with that feature behave in a similar fashion to a stand-alone derivative. An embedded derivative is separated from its host contract and accounted for as a derivative only when three criteria are satisfied:


When the economic risks and characteristics of the embedded derivatives are not closely related to those of the host contract;

A separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative would meet the definition of a derivative; and

The entire instrument is not measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the income statement.


 

Subsequent to initial recognition, the embedded derivative component is re-measured each reporting period using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the change in fair value recognized in statement of loss and comprehensive loss.

     
  f)

Derivative Liability

     
 

The Company’s derivative financial instruments consist of derivative liabilities in relation to its share purchase warrants.

13



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

4.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont’d)


  f)

Derivative Liability (Cont’d)

       
  i)

Derivative Warrant Liability:

       
 

The Company has issued share purchase warrants in conjunction with private placements for the purchase of common shares of the Company. Until October 2013 (Note 13(b)), a number of these share purchase warrants were issued with an exercise price in CDN, rather than USD (the reporting and functional currency of the Company). Such share purchase warrants are considered to be derivative instruments and the Company is required to re-measure the fair value of these at each reporting date. The fair value of these CDN share purchase warrants are re-measured at each financial position date using the Black Scholes option-pricing model using the exchange rates at the financial position date and measured over their remaining life. Adjustments to the fair value of the derivative warrant liability as at the financial position date are recorded in the statement of loss and comprehensive loss as (gain) loss on revaluation of derivative warrant liability. Share purchase warrants that have expired or have been forfeited are adjusted to the statement of loss and comprehensive loss as (gain) loss on revaluation of derivative warrant liability.

       
 

Consideration received upon the exercise of warrants is credited to share capital and the related amount is transferred from contributed surplus (USD warrants) or derivative warrant liability (CDN warrants) to share capital.

       
  ii)

Conversion Feature of Bridge Loans

       
 

The conversion feature on the bridge loans allows the holder of the option to convert the outstanding principal and interest from time to time to common equity. The Company, using the Black Scholes option-pricing model, accounts for bridge loans as follows:


  (ii.1)

At date of origination, the bifurcation of the total balance of the loan as debt and equity is calculated. If the conversion feature of the bridge loan is in CDN there is no equity component, resulting in an embedded derivative. Accretion expense is recorded over the term of the loan.

     
  (ii.2)

The total loan proceeds are allocated between the bridge loans and the related embedded derivative based on their relative fair value. The embedded derivative conversion feature is included under the bridge loans in the statement of financial position.

14



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

4.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont’d)


  f)

Derivative Liability (Cont’d)


  ii)

Conversion Feature of Bridge Loans (Cont’d)


 

(ii.3)

The conversion feature is revalued at the end of the reporting period and any adjustment is reflected in the statement of loss and comprehensive loss if the conversion feature is in CDN.


  g)

Loan Impairment:

     
 

Impaired loans are accounted for at their face amount net of the allowance for loan impairment. When a loan is deemed to be impaired, its carrying amount is reduced to its estimated realizable amount which is measured by discounting the expected future cash flows at the effective interest rate inherent in the loan. The amount initially recognized as an impairment loan, together with any subsequent change, is charged to the allowance as an adjustment. A write-off of the loan will occur when the loan is believed to have no reasonable expectation of collectability.

     
  h)

Intangible Assets

     
 

Costs for the general development of the Company’s sensor technology are expensed unless they meet the criteria for deferral. Expenditures are capitalized if the Company can demonstrate each of the following criteria: (i) the technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset so that it will be available for use or sale, (ii) its intention to complete the intangible asset and use or sell it, (iii) its ability to use or sell the intangible asset, (iv) how the intangible asset will generate probable future economic benefits, (v) the availability of adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the development and to use or sell the intangible asset, and (vi) its ability to measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development; otherwise, they are expensed as incurred. Commencing in 2011, the Company determined that these costs met the criteria and, accordingly, these costs have been capitalized and are tested in each reporting period for impairment. Amortization is provided on a 7 year straight-line basis. Commencing in 2014 amortization expense of intangible assets is capitalized as deferred development costs as these charges are directly related to development.

15



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

4.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont’d)

     
i)

Property and Equipment:

     

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and are amortized over their estimated useful lives at the following annual rates and methods:


Computers 30% declining balance basis
Office equipment 30% declining balance basis

  j)

Impairment of Long-lived Assets:

     
 

Long-lived assets consist of property and equipment, patents, intangible assets, and deferred development costs.

     
 

The carrying amounts of property and equipment, patents, intangible assets and deferred development costs, are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable When the carrying amount exceeds the estimated recoverable amount, the assets are written down to their recoverable amount.

     
 

The recoverable amount of long-lived assets is the greater of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use. In assessing value in use, estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. Impairment losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss.

     
 

An assessment is made at each reporting date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognized impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists, the recoverable amount is estimated. A previously recognized impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognized. If that is the case, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its recoverable amount. That increased amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of amortization, had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. Following the recognition or reversal of an impairment loss, the amortization charge applicable to the asset is adjusted prospectively in order to systematically allocate the revised carrying amount, net of any residual value, over the estimated useful life.

     
 

Gains or losses on the disposal of property and equipment, patents and intangible assets represent the difference between the net proceeds and the carrying value at the date of sale.

16



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

4.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont’d)

     
k)

Research and Development Costs:

     

Research costs are expensed in the period incurred. Development costs are expensed as incurred unless they meet the criteria for deferral. Expenditures during the development phase are capitalized if the Company can demonstrate each of the following criteria: (i) the technical feasibility of completing the asset so that it will be available for use or sale, (ii) its intention to complete the asset and use or sell it, (iii) its ability to use or sell the asset, (iv) how the asset will generate probable future economic benefits, (v) the availability of adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the development and to use or sell the asset, and (vi) its ability to measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the asset during its development; otherwise, these costs are expensed as incurred. Commencing in 2009, the Company determined that its continuing activities related to the application of its sensor technology to projects met the deferral criteria and, accordingly, these costs have been capitalized and are tested in each reporting period for recoverability. Development costs will be amortized on an appropriate basis at the time each of the developed assets is available for use.

     

Payments received from development partners on projects are recorded to deferred development costs as a recovery of cost incurred.

     
l)

Patents:

     

Patents are recorded at cost and are amortized on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives of 5 years. Patents are recorded net of accumulated amortization with amortization expense capitalized as deferred development costs since the patents are directly related to development.

     
m)

Unit Private Placements:

     

The Company uses the relative fair value approach in accounting for the value assigned to the common shares and the common share purchase warrants which it had made available in the unit private placement financings that it secured, calculated in accordance with the Black Scholes option-pricing model.

17



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

4.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont’d)

     
n)

Stock based Compensation and Other Stock based Payments:

     

The Company applies the fair value based method of accounting for all stock based payments to employees and non-employees and all direct awards of stock. Where share based payments are issued to non-employees, they are recorded at the fair value of the goods or services received in the statement of loss and comprehensive loss. If the fair value is not readily determinable the amount is based on the fair value of the equity instrument granted. Stock based compensation is charged to operations over the vesting period and the offset is credited to contributed surplus.

     

Consideration received upon the exercise of stock options is credited to share capital and the related amount is transferred from contributed surplus.

     

The fair value of stock options and warrants is determined by the Black Scholes option- pricing model with assumptions for risk free interest rates, dividend yields, volatility factors of the expected market price of the Company’s common shares and an expected life of the option or warrant issued. A forfeiture rate is estimated on the grant date and is adjusted to reflect the actual number of options that vest. In the event that vested stock options expire, previously recognized stock based compensation is not reversed. In the event that stock options are forfeited, previously recognized stock based compensation associated with the unvested portion of the stock options forfeited is reversed. The fair value of direct awards of stock is determined by the quoted market price of the Company’s stock.

     
o)

Income Taxes:

     

Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Current tax and deferred tax are recognized in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to a business combination, or items recognized directly in equity or in other comprehensive income.

     

Current tax is the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable income or loss for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.

18



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

4.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont’d)


  o)

Income Taxes: (Cont’d)

     
 

Deferred tax is recognized in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is not recognized for the following temporary differences: the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor taxable income or loss and differences relating to investments in subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities to the extent that it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future. In addition, deferred tax is not recognized for taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill.

     
 

Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to temporary differences when they reverse, based on the rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.

     
 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets and they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they intend to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realized simultaneously.

     
 

A deferred tax asset is recognized for unused tax losses, tax credits and deductible temporary differences, to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be utilized. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized.


  p)

Earnings or Loss Per Share:

     
 

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net earnings (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by adjusting the weighted average number of number of common shares outstanding for the effects of all dilutive potential common shares, which are comprised of outstanding warrants, conversion options and vested stock options. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share assumes that any proceeds received for in-the-money warrants and options would be used to buy common shares at the average market price for the period.

19



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

4.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont’d)


  q)

Changes in Accounting Standards:

     
 

On November 1, 2013, the Company adopted the following new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations which are effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013:


  IFRS 10 – Consolidated Financial Statements
  IFRS 11 – Joint Arrangements
  IFRS 12 – Disclosures of Interests in Other Entities
  IFRS 13 – Fair Value Measurement
  IAS 27 – Separate financial statements
  IAS 28 – Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures

The adoption of these accounting standards had no impact on the consolidated financial statements previously filed by the Company. As a result no reconciliations are provided for the adoption of these new standards.

5.

NEW STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS ISSUED BUT NOT YET ADOPTED

     

Certain new standards, interpretations, amendments and improvements to existing standards were issued by the IASB or the IFRS Interpretations Committee that are mandatory for future accounting periods. The standards impacted that are applicable to the Company are as follows:

     
a)

IFRS 2 Share-based Payments, the amendments to IFRS 2, issued in December 2013 clarifies the definition of “vesting conditions”, and separately defines a “performance condition” and a “service condition”. A performance condition requires the counterparty to complete a specified period of service and to meet a specified performance target during the service period. A service condition solely requires the counterparty to complete a specified period of service. The amendments are effective for share-based payment transactions for which the grant date is on or after July 1, 2014.

20



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

5.

NEW STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS ISSUED BUT NOT YET ADOPTED (Cont’d)

     
b)

IFRS 15 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which will replace IAS 11 – Construction Contracts, IAS 18 – Revenue, IFRIC 13 – Customer Loyalty Programmes, IFRIC 15 – Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate, IFRIC 18 – Transfer of Assets from Customers, and SIC 31 Revenue – Barter Transactions Involving Advertising Services. The new standard will be mandatorily effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2017, and interim periods within that year. Earlier application is permitted.

     

The core principle of the new standard is for companies to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new standard will also result in enhanced disclosures about revenue, provide guidance for transactions that were not previously addressed comprehensively and improve guidance for multiple deliverable arrangements. The Corporation is assessing the new standard to determine its impact of the Corporation’s financial statements.

     
c)

IAS 32 – Financial instruments – presentation (“IAS 32”) was amended to clarify the criteria that should be considered in determining whether an entity has a legally enforceable right of set off in respect of its financial instruments. Amendments to IAS 32 are applicable to annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014 with retrospective application required.

     
d)

IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments, was issued in November 2009 and contained requirements for financial assets. This standard addresses classification and measurement of financial assets and replaces the multiple category and measurement models in IAS 39, Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement, for debt instruments with a new mixed measurement model having only two categories:


  Amortized cost and
  Fair value through profit and loss

IFRS 9 also replaces the models for measuring equity instruments, and such instruments are either recognized at fair value through earnings or at fair value through other comprehensive income. Where such equity instruments are measured at fair value through other comprehensive income, dividends, to the extent not clearly representing a return of investment, are recognized in earnings; however, other gains and losses (including impairments) associated with such instruments remain in accumulated other comprehensive income indefinitely.

21



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

5.

NEW STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS ISSUED BUT NOT YET ADOPTED (Cont’d)

     
d)

(Cont’d)

     

Requirements for financial liabilities were added in October 2010 and largely carried forward existing requirements in IAS 39, Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement, except that fair value changes due to credit risk for liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss would generally be recorded in other comprehensive income.

     

The effective date of IFRS 9 is for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018.

The Company is currently assessing the impact of the above standards.

6.

FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

   

The following summarizes the methods and assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the Company's financial instruments where measurement is required. The fair value of financial instruments consisting of cash, deposits and other receivables, promissory note receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and bridge loans approximate their carrying amounts due to the relatively short period to maturity. Fair value amounts represent point-in-time estimates and may not reflect fair value in the future. The measurements are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and are a matter of significant judgment. The methods and assumptions used to develop fair value measurements, for those financial instruments where fair value is recognized in the statement of financial position, have been prioritized into three levels of the fair value hierarchy as follows:

   

Level 1: Values based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities.

   

Level 2: Values based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

   

Level 3: Values based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

   

The Company's financial instruments measured at fair value on the statement of financial position date consist of cash, derivative warrant liability and the conversion feature on bridge loans. Cash is measured at Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Derivative warrant liability and the conversion feature on bridge loans are measured at Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

22



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

7.

CAPITAL RISK MANAGEMENT

   

The Company’s objective when managing capital is to maintain its ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. The Company includes equity, comprised of issued share capital, equity component of bridge loans, contributed surplus and deficit, in the definition of capital. The Company’s primary objective with respect to its capital management is to ensure that it has sufficient cash resources to further develop and market its technologies and to maintain its ongoing operations. To secure the additional capital necessary to pursue these plans, the Company may attempt to raise additional funds through the issuance of equity and warrants or by securing strategic partners. The Company is not subject to externally imposed capital requirements and there has been no change with respect to the overall capital risk management strategy during the year ended October 31, 2014.

   
8.

DEPOSITS AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

   

The balance reported as Deposits and Other Receivables consists of:


      2014     2013    
 

 

             
 

Amounts receivable (a)

  450,000     187,290    
 

Advances to Officers, Directors and Employees (b)

  386,031     -    
 

Prepaid Insurance and other

  36,735     47,451    
 

Promissory note receivable (c)

  -     -    
 

 

  872,766     234,741    

 

(a)

Amounts receivable relate to milestones met at October 31, 2014 per development contracts. These amounts are recorded as recoveries of deferred development costs.

 

 

 

 
 

(b)

At October 31, 2014 Advances to Officers, Directors and Employees consisted of:

 

 

 

 
 

(i)

Advances to the Chairman of $38,084 and to a senior employee of $80,916. These advances were repaid subsequent to October 31, 2014 (Note 23).

 

 

 

 
 

(ii)

An advance to the Controller of $22,957.

The advances in (i) and (ii) above are non interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand.

23



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

8.

DEPOSITS AND OTHER RECEIVABLES (Cont’d)


  (b)

At October 31, 2014 Advances to Officers, Directors and Employees consisted of: (Cont’d)


 

(iii)

An advance of $244,074 to the President of MAST (Refer to Note 18 for the terms of this advance and to Note 23 for settlement).


  (c)

In April 2009, the Company advanced $200,000 to a private company incorporated in New Jersey, which, at that time, was also a strategic development partner of the Company. The Company and the private Company executed a promissory note with respect to the $200,000 advance stipulating the following terms and conditions:


  i)

Maturity date of September 30, 2010.

     
  ii)

Interest payable on a quarterly basis in arrears calculated from August 1, 2009 at a rate of 10%. In July 2011, the interest rate on the promissory note increased to 18%.

     
  iii)

Secured by a first priority security interest over all of the assets of the private company.

In 2012 the Company received payments totaling $30,000 against the amounts previously reserved.

At October 31, 2014 the gross balance outstanding was $145,815 including outstanding principal plus accrued interest and this amount has been fully reserved. The Company served notice to the private company that it was demanding payments under the terms of the promissory note and the security agreement and has received judgment in its favor during the year ended October 31, 2012. The Company continues to pursue collection of this fully reserved note.

 

 

  Gross     Net    
 

Balance outstanding at November 01, 2011

  111,553     -    
 

Interest accrued

  20,300     20,300    
 

Reserved

  -     (20,300 )  
 

Repayment

  (30,000 )   -    
 

Balance outstanding at October 31, 2012

  101,853     -    
 

Interest accrued

  20,105     20,105    
 

Reserved

  -     (20,105 )  
 

Repayment

  -     -    
 

Balance outstanding at October 31, 2013

  121,958     -    
 

Interest accrued

  23,857     23,857    
 

Reserved

  -     (23,857 )  
 

Repayment

  -     -    
 

Balance outstanding at October 31, 2014

  145,815     -    

24



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

9.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT


      Computers     Furniture and     Total  
            Equipment        
 

Cost

                 
 

 

                 
 

At November 1, 2011

$  40,734   $  25,989   $  66,723  
 

Additions

  -     -     -  
 

Year ended October 31, 2012

$  40,734   $  25,989   $  66,723  
 

 

                 
 

At November 1, 2012

$  40,734     25,989   $  66,723  
 

Additions

  14,839     -   $  14,839  
 

Disposals

  (6,360 )   -   $  (6,360 )
 

Year ended October 31, 2013

$  49,213   $  25,989   $  75,202  
 

 

                 
 

At November 1, 2013

$  49,213     25,989   $  75,202  
 

Additions

  16,508     -   $  16,508  
 

Disposals

  (13,436 )   -   $  (13,436 )
 

Year ended October 31, 2014

$  52,285   $  25,989   $  78,274  
 

 

                 
 

 

                 
 

Accumulated amortization

  Computers     Furniture and     Total  
 

 

        Equipment        
 

At November 1, 2011

$  30,533   $  25,989   $  56,522  
 

Amortization for the year

  4,414     -     4,414  
 

Year ended October 31, 2012

$  34,947   $  25,989   $  60,936  
 

 

                 
 

At November 1, 2011

$  34,947     25,989   $  60,936  
 

Amortization for the year

  4,989     -     4,989  
 

Adjustment for disposals

  (4,721 )   -     (4,721 )
 

Year ended October 31, 2013

$  35,215   $  25,989   $  61,204  
 

 

                 
 

At November 1, 2013

$  35,215     25,989   $  61,204  
 

Amortization for the year

  7,357     -     7,357  
 

Adjustment for disposals

  (11,770 )   -     (11,770 )
 

Year ended October 31, 2014

$  30,802   $  25,989   $  56,791  
 

 

                 
 

Net book value at November 1, 2012

$  5,787     -   $  5,787  
 

Net book value at October 31, 2013

$  13,998     -   $  13,998  
 

Net book value at October 31, 2014

$  21,483     -   $  21,483  

25



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

10.

DEFERRED DEVELOPMENT COSTS

   

The breakdown of development costs that have been capitalized is as follows:


      2014     2013    
                 
 

Opening balance

$  928,077   $  718,163    
 

Additional project costs incurred

  3,936,459     677,445    
 

Recovery of deferred development costs

  (662,290 )   (233,290 )  
 

Writedown of project costs

  (676,790 )   (234,241 )  
 

Closing balance

$  3,525,456   $  928,077    

Additions to deferred development costs includes patent amortization of $44,472 (2013 - $22,354; 2012 - $15,204), and also includes intangible asset amortization of $19,352 (2013 and 2012 - $nil).

   

To date, the Company has recovered from its development partners a portion of the costs it has incurred as deferred development costs coincident with meeting milestones as stipulated in development contracts.

   

In 2014, the Company provided a reserve against cumulative development costs incurred on one development project in that it completed the staged development phases for that contract and there was no formal commitment as of October 31, 2014 from the development partner to move forward with this project. In total, the Company recovered $300,000 from the development partner on this project, $125,000 of which was received in 2014; the net writedown in 2014 was $645,528 on this project, to reduce the carrying value to a nominal amount.

   

In 2013, the Company provided a reserve against deferred development costs previously incurred with respect to three development projects, reducing the carrying value in each case to a nominal amount. In each case, the Company had decided not to pursue these development projects.

   
11.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND PATENTS

   

Intangible assets comprise the costs which the Company has capitalized relating to the technical expertise and know-how that the Company has developed with respect to the commercialization efforts relating to its sensor technology. In 2011, the Company determined that it had sufficiently advanced its expertise and product knowledge relating to the general commercialization efforts for its sensor technology in multiple industry vertical applications.

26



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

11.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND PATENTS (Cont’d)

   

It anticipates that it will realize commercial economic benefits from the exploitation of these intangible assets in the future.

Intangible Assets

Cost

 

At November 01, 2011

$  135,465    
 

Additions

  -    
 

Year ended October 31, 2012

$  135,465    
 

 

       
 

At November 01, 2012

$  135,465    
 

Additions

  -    
 

Year ended October 31, 2013

$  135,465    
 

 

       
 

At November 01, 2013

$  135,465    
 

Additions

  -    
 

Year ended October 31, 2014

$  135,465    
 

 

       
 

Accumulated amortization

       
 

 

       
 

At November 01, 2011

$  -    
 

Amortization for the year

  19,352    
 

Year ended October 31, 2012

$  19,352    
 

 

       
 

At November 01, 2012

$  19,352    
 

Amortization for the year

  19,352    
 

Year ended October 31, 2013

$  38,704    
 

 

       
 

At November 01, 2013

$  38,704    
 

Amortization for the year

  19,352    
 

Year ended October 31, 2014

$  58,056    
 

 

       
 

Net book value at October 31, 2012

$  116,113    
 

Net book value at October 31, 2013

$  96,761    
 

Net book value at October 31, 2014

$  77,409    

27



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

11.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND PATENTS (cont’d)

   

Amortization of intangible assets for the year ended October 31, 2014 was capitalized to deferred development costs.

Patents

Cost

 

At November 1, 2011

$  62,697    
 

Additions

  26,650    
 

Year ended October 31, 2012

$  89,347    
 

 

       
 

At November 1, 2012

$  89,347    
 

Additions

  44,825    
 

Year ended October 31, 2014

$  134,172    
 

 

       
 

At November 1, 2013

$  134,172    
 

Additions

  176,381    
 

Year ended October 31, 2014

$  310,553    
 

 

       
 

Amortization

       
 

 

       
 

At November 1, 2011

$  25,019    
 

Amortization for the year

  15,204    
 

Year ended October 31, 2012

$  40,223    
 

 

       
 

At November 1, 2012

$  40,223    
 

Amortization for the year

  22,354    
 

Year ended October 31, 2013

$  62,577    
 

 

       
 

At November 1, 2013

$  62,577    
 

Amortization for the year

  44,472    
 

Year ended October 31, 2014

$  107,049    
 

     
 

Net book value at October 31, 2012

$  49,124    
 

Net book value at October 31, 2013

$  71,595    
 

Net book value at October 31, 2014

$  203,504    

Amortization of patents was capitalized to deferred development costs for the above years.

28



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

12.

SHARE CAPITAL, STOCK OPTIONS AND LOSS PER SHARE


  a)

Share Capital

       
 

Authorized and outstanding:

       
 

The Company has two classes of shares as follows:

       
  i)

Special redeemable voting preference shares, 2,000,000 authorized, none are issued and outstanding.

       
  ii)

Common shares without par value – an unlimited number authorized.


      Number of     Amount  
 

 

  Shares      
 

 

           
 

Balance at November 1, 2012

  136,430,555   $  54,728,239  
 

 

           
 

Private placement of units for cash (Note 13)

  16,106,957     2,910,531  
 

Warrants exercised (Note 13)

  5,953,913     822,392  
 

Warrants issued on private placements (Note 13)

  -     (863,863 )
 

Fair value of warrants exercised

  -     193,796  
 

Financing costs

  -     (35,482 )
 

Balance at October 31, 2013

  158,491,425   $  57,755,613  
 

 

           
 

Warrants exercised (Note 13)

  27,410,717     6,801,619  
 

Fair value of warrants exercised

  -     6,078,497  
 

Shares issued on conversion of bridge loans (Note 14)

  2,517,501     302,100  
 

Warrants issued on conversion of bridge loan (Note 14)

  -     (143,406 )
 

Shares issued on settlement of accounts payable

  17,081     8,353  
 

 

           
 

Balance at October 31, 2014

  188,436,724   $  70,802,776  

29



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

12.

SHARE CAPITAL, STOCK OPTIONS AND LOSS PER SHARE (Cont’d)

     
b)

Stock Options

     

Stock option plan:

     

The Company has a fixed stock option plan. Under the Company’s stock option plan (the “Plan”), the Company may grant options for up to 15,600,000 shares of common stock to directors, officers, employees or consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries. The exercise price of each option is equal to or greater than the market price of the Company’s shares on the date of grant unless otherwise permitted by applicable securities regulations. An option’s maximum term under the Plan is 10 years. Stock options are fully vested upon issuance by the Company unless the Board of Directors stipulates otherwise by Directors’ resolution.

     

A summary of the status of the Company’s fixed stock option plan through October 31, 2014 and changes during the periods is as follows:


      Options     Weighted    
      (000 )   average    
            exercise    
            price    
            $    
                 
 

Outstanding, November 01, 2012

  9,915     0.24    
 

Granted

  2,170     0.30    
 

Expired

  (315 )   (0.55 )  
 

Forfeited

  (295 )   (0.23 )  
 

Outstanding, November 01, 2013

  11,475     0.24    
 

Granted

  630     0.76    
 

Outstanding, October 31, 2014

  12,105     0.27    

30



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

12.

SHARE CAPITAL, STOCK OPTIONS AND LOSS PER SHARE (Cont’d)

     
b)

Stock Options (Cont’d)

     

During the year ended October 31, 2014 the Company issued a total of 630,000 stock options (2013 – 2,170,000). All options vest immediately upon issuance. This total consisted of 520,000 stock options issued to directors and officers (2013 – 1,120,000), 110,000 stock options issued to employees (2013 – 750,000) and no stock options to outside consultants (2013 – 300,000). The Company has the following stock options outstanding at October 31, 2014:


      Weighted  
      average  
      remaining  
      life  
Date of issue # Issued Strike Price (in years) Expiry Date
         
April 5, 2011 125,000 0.35 1.4 April 5, 2016
October 31, 2011 7,275,000 0.20 2.0 October 31, 2016
April 10, 2012 1,905,000 0.35 2.4 April 10, 2017
January 22, 2013 1,090,000 0.30 CDN 3.2 January 22, 2018
September 16, 2013 780,000 0.27 CDN 3.9      September 16, 2018
October 17, 2013 300,000 0.35 4.0 October 17, 2018
February 10, 2014 350,000 0.85 4.3 February 10, 2019
April 25, 2014 280,000 0.64 4.5 April 25, 2019
  12,105,000      

All outstanding options at October 31, 2014 are exercisable. In 2014, the Company recorded a total expense of $379,253 (2013 - $368,790; 2012 - $430,856) with respect to the issuance of options issued during the year, calculated in accordance with the Black Scholes option-pricing model.

In the absence of a reliable measurement of the services received from a consultant, the services have been measured at the fair value of the options granted.

The underlying assumptions in the Black Scholes option-pricing model were as follows:

    2014 2013 2012
 

Share price

$ 0.63 - 0.85 $ 0.20 - 0.36 $ 0.30
 

Volatility factor (based on historical volality)

112% - 113% 105% - 110% 99%
 

Risk free interest rate

1.60% 1.37% - 1.84% 1.31%
 

Expected life

5 years 5 years 5 years
 

Dividend yield

0% 0% 0%
 

Forfeiture rate

0% 0% 0%

31



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

12.

SHARE CAPITAL, STOCK OPTIONS AND LOSS PER SHARE (Cont’d)

     
c)

Loss Per Share

     

The calculation of basic and diluted loss per share for the year ended October 31, 2014 was based on the loss attributable to common shareholders of $4,164,871 (2013 - $5,933,928; 2012 - $1,775,065) divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 171,534,969 (2013 – 146,814,466; 2012 - 123,375,510).

     

Diluted loss per share did not include the effect of 12,105,000 stock options and 4,485,463 warrants outstanding (Note 13(c)) as they are anti-dilutive.


13.

PRIVATE PLACEMENTS, DERIVATIVE WARRANT LIABILITY AND COMMON SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS


  a)

Private Placements


  i)

In 2013 the Company completed a series of private placement financings with investors pursuant to prospectus and registration exemptions set forth in applicable securities law. The Company received gross proceeds $2,910,532 and issued a total of 16,106,957 (10,200,743 CDN; 5,906,214 US) common shares. 16,106,957 common share purchase warrants with an average strike price of $0.22 CDN; $0.27 USD were attached to the private placement completed during 2013. All warrants issued in 2013 have a 12 month term from issue date.

     
  ii)

In 2013 the Company extended the expiry dates on a total of 11,829,029 (7,315,808 CDN; 4,513,221 US) common share purchase warrants which would have otherwise expired in 2013. These warrants were extended for a period of 12 months in each case. The Company changed the strike price of 3,673,032 CDN of these warrants from $0.205 CDN to $0.215 CDN and the strike price remained unchanged for the balance of these warrants. The strike price remained unchanged for all other warrants ranging from $0.20 CDN to $0.80 CDN, $0.24 USD to $0.80 USD per warrant.

     
  iii)

In 2013 the Company calculated the relative fair value of the share purchase warrants issued in connection with private placements in accordance with the Black Scholes option-pricing model. The Company reported a total charge to share capital of $863,863 and an offsetting charge to contributed surplus of $377,234 for US dollar share purchase warrants issued and $486,629 to derivative warrants liability for CDN share purchase warrants issued.

32



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

13.

PRIVATE PLACEMENTS, DERIVATIVE WARRANT LIABILITY AND COMMON SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS (Cont’d)


  a)

Private Placements (Cont’d)

       
   

The relative fair value of these share purchase warrants was estimated using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:


 

 

2013

 

 

Share price

$0.17 - $0.58

 

 

Volatility factor (based on historical volality)

75 - 136%

 

 

Risk free interest rate

0.97 - 1.09%

 

 

Dividend yield

0%

 

 

Expected life

1 year

 


  iv)

The Company did not complete any private placements in 2014.

     
  v)

In 2014 the Company extended the expiry date on a total of 1,405,026 common share purchase warrants which would have otherwise expired in the period. These warrants were extended for a period of three to six months in each case. The strike price of 1,105,026 of these warrants was changed from $0.41 and $0.45 per warrant to $0.50 per warrant. The strike price remained unchanged for the balance of the warrants at $0.55 per warrant.

     
 

The Company calculated the charge associated with the extension of warrants in accordance with the Black Scholes option-pricing model. The Company reported a total charge to deficit of $168,632 (2013 - $841,247; 2012 - $1,322,879) and an offsetting charge to contributed surplus of $168,632 (2013 - $264,938; 2012 - $358,983) for US dollar warrants extended and $nil (2013 - $576,309; 2012 – $963,896) to derivative warrant liability for Canadian warrants extended.

     
 

The incremental fair value of these warrants extended was estimated using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:


 

 

2014 2013 2012
 

Share price

$0.50 $0.19 - $0.53 $0.12 - $0.30
 

Volatility factor (based on historical volality)

124 - 157% 75 - 161% 109 - 144%
 

Risk free interest rate

1.01 - 1.02% 1.00 - 1.11% 0.91 - 1.14%
 

Dividend yield

0% 0% 0%
 

Expected life

0.25 - 0.53 year 1 year 0.33-1.0 year

33



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

13.

PRIVATE PLACEMENTS, DERIVATIVE WARRANT LIABILITY AND COMMON SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS (Cont’d)


  b)

Derivative Warrant Liability

     
 

The following summarizes the change in derivative warrant liability:


      October 31,     October 31,     October 31,  
      2014     2013     2012  
                     
 

Balance, beginning of year

$  -   $  1,061,544   $  1,178,691  
 

Fair value assigned in warrants in units issuances

  -     486,629     289,367  
 

Fair value assigned in warrants extended

  -     576,309     963,896  
 

Fair value assigned to warrants issued on settlements of debt (Note 14)

  -     -     306,061  
 

Fair value transferred to share capital for warrants exercised

  -     (146,121 )   (348,947 )
 

CDN warrants converted to USD

  -     (5,224,863 )   -  
 

Loss (Gain) on revaluation of warrants

  -     3,246,502     (1,327,524 )
 

 

$  -   $  -   $  1,061,544  

On October 28, 2013 the exercise price of all outstanding Canadian denominated warrants was converted from CDN to USD. As a result, these warrants are no longer considered a derivative warrants liability. These warrants were revalued on October 28, 2013 in the amount of $5,224,863 and this value was removed from derivative warrant liability and recorded to contributed surplus. Until October 28, 2013, the difference between the carrying amount of these CDN warrants and the revalued amount was recorded as loss on revaluation of derivative warrants liability in the amount of $3,246,502.

The derivative warrant liability was revalued at October 28, 2013 (2012 – October 31) using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

    2013 2012
  Share price $0.46 $0.21
  Volatility factor (based on historical volality) 106 - 255% 81 - 153%
  Risk free interest rate 1.03 - 1.09% 1.01 - 1.03%
  Dividend yield 0% 0%
  Expected life 0.14 - 1.13 year 0.25 - 1 year

34



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

13.

PRIVATE PLACEMENTS, DERIVATIVE WARRANT LIABILITY AND COMMON SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS (Cont’d)


  c)

Share Purchase Warrants


            Weighted        
            average exercise     Proceeds  
      Warrants     price     Realized  
                     
 

Balance outstanding at October 31,2012

  19,692,968   $ 0.27        
 

Exercised

  (5,953,913 )   ($0.14 )   822,391  
 

Expired

  (85,000 )   ($0.15 )      
 

Granted

  16,106,957   $ 0.24        
 

Balance outstanding at October 31, 2013

  29,761,012   $ 0.27     -  
 

Exercised

  (27,410,717 )   (0.25 )   6,801,619  
 

Expired

  (382,333 )   (0.48 )   -  
 

Granted

  2,517,501     0.12     -  
 

Balance at October 31, 2014

  4,485,463     0.37        

The weighted average share price on the date of exercise was $0.71 (2013 - $0.22) .

14.

BRIDGE LOANS


  a)

On December 2, 2011, the Company secured $285,000 CDN of bridge (“Loan 1”) from a group of arm’s length investors with maturities of six months. The loans were unsecured, bearing interest at a rate of 2% per month (effective interest rate – 26%) and convertible at the holders’ option at $0.12 USD per unit. Each unit upon conversion included one common share and one common share purchase warrant with a one year expiry and an exercise price of $0.12 USD. The term of the loans were extended on a month to month basis in July 2012. In January 2014 these loans was converted to equity by the issuance of 2,517,501 common shares and 2,517,501 common share purchase warrants. The common share purchase warrants have a one year term and an exercise price of $0.12 USD per warrant (Note 23).

     
  b)

On September 4, 2012, the Company secured $125,000 CDN of bridge loans (“Loan 2”) from a group of arm’s length investors with maturities of six months. The loans were unsecured, bearing interest at a rate of 2% per month (effective interest rate – 32%) and convertible at the holders’ option at $0.18 CDN per unit. Each unit, upon conversion, included one common share and one common share purchase warrant with a one year expiry and an exercise price of $0.22 CDN. This loan was repaid in the quarter ended April 30, 2013.

35



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

14.

BRIDGE LOANS


  b.

(Cont’d)

     
 

A breakdown of the outstanding bridge loans at October 31, 2013 is summarized as follows:


      Loan 1     Loan 2     Total  
 

 

           
 

Loan (initial value)

  284,514     81,194     365,708  
 

Embedded derivative

  -     44,850     44,850  
 

Interest Accrued

  130,686     15,209     145,895  
 

Interest Paid

  (125,186 )   (15,209 )   (140,395 )
 

Accretion Expense

  1,557     44,850     46,407  
 

Gain on revaluation of embedded derivative

  -     (44,850 )   (44,850 )
 

Equity Portion of Bridge Loan - Conversion Feature

  (1,557 )   -     (1,557 )
 

Repayments

  -     (126,044 )   (126,044 )
 

Carrying value at October 31, 2013

  290,014     -     290,014  

In fiscal 2013 and 2014, no bridge loans were issued.

As Loan 2 was repaid during 2013 the embedded derivative recognized in fiscal 2012 of $44,850 was revalued to be $nil at the time of repayment and a gain on revaluation of $40,750 (2012 – $176,899) was recognized in the statements of consolidated loss and comprehensive loss in 2013.

A breakdown of the outstanding bridge loan at October 31, 2014 is summarized as follows:

      Loan 1    
           
           
 

Principal

  284,514    
 

Interest Accrued

  160,358    
 

Interest Paid

  (142,772 )  
 

Accretion Expense

  1,557    
 

Equity Portion of Bridge Loan - Conversion Feature

  (1,557 )  
 

Conversion to equity in 2014

  (302,100 )  
 

Carrying value at October 31, 2014

  -    

36



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

14.

BRIDGE LOANS (Cont’d)


  b.

(Cont’d)

     
 

During 2014, Loan 1 was settled by the holder who converted the outstanding balance due; the Company issued 2,517,501 common shares with an assigned value of $302,100. As a result of the conversion, the holder received 2,517,501 common shares purchase warrants exercisable at $0.12 per warrant for a period of 12 months after the conversion date (January 23, 2015). The relative fair value of the common share purchase warrants of $143,406 was calculated using the Black Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:


      2014    
  Share price $ 1.18    
  Volatility factor (based on historical volality)   120%    
  Risk free interest rate   1.04%    
  Dividend yield   0%    
  Expected life   1 Year    

In the 2012 fiscal year, bridge loans were settled by the holder converting their amount outstanding with the company issuing 1,860,080 common shares with an assigned value of $226,900. As a result of the conversion the holder received 1,860,080 common share purchase warrants exercisable at a price of $0.12 - $0.20 CDN for a period of 1 year. These common share purchase warrants were valued at $306,061 using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:


 

 

 

2012

   
 

Share price

$ 0.23 - $0.25    
 

Volatility factor (based on historical volality)

  154 - 156%    
 

Risk free interest rate

  1.03 - 1.24%    
 

Dividend yield

  0%    
 

Expected life

  1 year    

37



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

15.

CONTRIBUTED SURPLUS


 

Balance outstanding at November 01, 2012

$  26,634,177  
 

 

     
 

Stock based compensation expense relating to stock options issued (Note 12)

  368,790  
 

Common share purchase warrants

     
 

       (a) Issued (Note 13)

  377,234  
 

       (b) Extended (Note 13)

  264,938  
 

Warrants modified (Note 13)

  5,224,863  
 

Fair value of warrants exercised

  (47,675 )
 

Balance at October 31, 2013

$  32,822,327  
 

 

     
 

Stock based compensation expense relating to stock options issued (Note 12)

  379,253  
 

Common share purchase warrants

     
 

       (a) Issued (Note 13)

  -  
 

       (b) Extended (Note 13)

  168,632  
 

Transferred from equity component of bridge loan due to conversion

  1,557  
 

Warrants issued on conversion of bridge loan (Note 14)

  143,406  
 

Fair value of warrants exercised

  (6,078,497 )
 

Balance at October 31, 2014

$  27,436,678  

38



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

16.

INCOME TAXES


  (a)

The Company has non-capital losses of approximately $25.6 million available to reduce future taxable income, the benefit of which has not been recognized in these consolidated financial statements. As of October 31, 2014 the tax losses expire as follows:


      Canada     Other foreign     Total    
  2015 $  2,849,213   $  -   $  2,849,213    
  2022         7,301   $ 7,301    
  2023         9,667   $ 9,667    
  2025         14,471   $ 14,471    
  2026   2,131,530     5,254   $ 2,136,784    
  2027   1,792,449     3,459   $ 1,795,908    
  2028   9,294     55,519   $ 64,813    
  2029   1,837,023     463,610   $ 2,300,633    
  2030   2,478,623     1,886,778   $ 4,365,401    
  2031   1,493,293     48,808   $ 1,542,101    
  2032   1,654,957     333,962   $ 1,988,919    
  2033   2,005,971     160,550   $ 2,166,521    
  2034   3,148,002     3,206,207   $ 6,354,209    
    $  19,400,355   $  6,195,586   $  25,595,941    

 

In addition the Company has available capital loss carry forwards of approximately $1.5 million to reduce future taxable capital gains, the benefit of which has not been recognized in these consolidated financial statements. These losses carry forward indefinitely.

     
  (b)

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows.


    October 31,
2014
    October 31,
2013
    October 31,
2012
 
 

Non-capital losses

$  7,792,685   $  6,334,982   $  5,877,761  
 

Capital losses

  196,505     212,386     221,578  
 

Property, equipment, intangibles, patents and deferred costs

  661,960     1,926,689     1,988,956  
 

Share issue costs

  9,095     15,641     21,497  
 

 

  8,660,245     8,489,698     8,109,792  
 

Deferred tax assets not recognized

  (8,660,245 )   (8,489,698 )   (8,109,792 )
 

 

$  -   $  -   $  -  

39



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

16.

INCOME TAXES (Cont’d)


  (c)

The reconciliation of income tax attributed to continuing operation computed at the statutory tax rates to income tax expense is as follows:


 

  October 31,
2014
    October 31,
2013
    October 31,
2012
 
 

 

                 
 

Loss before income taxes

$  (4,164,871 ) $  (5,933,928 ) $  (1,775,065 )
 

  

                 
 

Statutory rate

  26.50%     26.50%     26.50%  
 

 

                 
 

Expected income tax recovery

  (1,103,691 )   (1,572,491 )   (470,392 )
 

 

                 
 

Effect on income taxes of unrecognized future income

                 
 

Tax assets relating to deductible temporary differences on:

                 
 

Non deductible expenses and other items

  112,727     888,557     (149,207 )
 

Share issue costs and other

  -     (4,361 )   (4,361 )
 

Effect of exchange rate on future tax assets carried forward from previous years

  572,542     324,880     3,071  
 

Expiry of non-capital losses

  259,122              
 

Effect of higher tax rates in foreign jurisdiction

  (11,247 )            
 

Change in deferred income tax rates and other

  -     (16,491 )   (393,446 )
 

Change in deferred tax rates not recognized

  170,547     379,906     1,013,335  
 

 

                 
 

 

$  -   $  -   $  -  

17.

EXPENSES Administration

   

The components of general and administration expenses are as follows:


      2014     2013     2012  
                     
 

General and administrative

$  69,122   $  53,494   $  66,651  
 

Rent and occupancy cost

  84,816     84,179     108,193  
 

Bad debt expense

  24,009     19,954     21,586  
 

Interest income

  (30,129 )   (19,954 )   (20,300 )
 

Interest expense

  28,640     78,677     106,442  
 

Accretion expense

  -     19,381     187,671  
 

Office insurance

  61,578     61,211     65,394  
 

Telephone

  22,537     17,272     17,380  
 

Investor relations, listing and filling fees

  64,880     64,283     141,600  
 

 

$  325,453   $  378,497   $  694,617  

40



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

17.

EXPENSES (Cont’d)

   

Professional, Other Fees and Salaries

   

The components of professional, other fees and salaries expenses are as follows:


      2014     2013     2012  
                     
  Professional fees $  420,902   $  311,330   $  183,021  
  Consulting fees   1,535,520     818,106     917,420  
  Salaries and benefits   404,445     443,078     407,450  
    $  2,360,867   $  1,572,515   $  1,507,891  

Research and Development

The components of research and development expenses are as follows:

 

 

  2014     2013     2012  
 

Project expenses incurred (recovered)

  26,882     (73,321 )   229,840  
 

Write-down of deferred development costs on specific projects

  676,789     234,241     -  
 

 

  703,671     160,920     229,840  

18.

MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

   

The Company reports the following related party transactions:


  (a)

Chairman: The Chairman receives cash compensation on a month to month basis calculated at an annual rate of $150,000 CDN.

     
 

The Chairman was not granted any stock options in 2014. In 2013 the Chairman was awarded a total of 140,000 stock options at an average price of $0.29 CDN per share (2012 - 100,000 stock options at an average price of $0.35 per share).

     
 

The total compensation paid to the Chairman during the year ended October 31, 2014 was $137,172 of cash compensation and $nil of stock based compensation (2013 - $146,599 of cash compensation and $ 21,163 of stock based compensation; 2012 - $149,565 of cash compensation and $23,697 of stock based compensation).

     
 

The Company provided a short term non-interest bearing advance of $38,084 to the Chairman in 2014. This advance was repaid subsequent to October 31, 2014.

41



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

18.

MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Cont’d)


  (b)

Management and consulting fees:

     
 

Included in professional fees, other fees and salaries as reported are management fees and consulting fees paid or payable to individuals (or companies controlled by such individuals) who served as officers, directors and employees of the Company. The total compensation paid to such parties is summarized as:


      2014     2013     2012  
 

Cash compensation

$  1,482,153   $  805,574   $  709,075  
 

Less portion capitalized to deferred development costs

  (169,664 )   (202,820 )   -  
 

 

  1,312,489     602,754     709,075  
 

 

                 
 

Stock based compensation

  325,074     195,720     401,773  
 

 

                 
 

 

$  1,637,563   $  798,474   $  1,110,848  

 

In 2014 these parties were awarded a total of 540,000 options at an average price of $0.76 CDN per share (2013 – 1,292,500 options at an average price of $0.29 per share; 2012 – 1,755,000 options at an average price of $0.35 per share)

     
  (c)

Related party deferred development cost:

     
 

In 2014 the Company was invoiced $1,843,643 by a company whose major shareholder is a director of the Company and who also serves as its chief technology officer. This individual was elected as a director on February 19, 2014 and these related party transactions disclosed are transactions incurred from this date forward. These charges have been capitalized as deferred development costs. As at October 31, 2014, included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities is $208,425 owing to this company.

42



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

18.

MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Cont’d)


  (d)

Advances:

       
 

In 2014 the following advances were provided to officers, directors and employees of the Company.

       
  (1)

The CFO was advanced $119,757 during February and March 2014. The advance was settled through repayments of $78,036 and a performance bonus awarded at October 31, 2014. The advance was unsecured, due on demand with interest charged at a rate of 1% per month on the opening monthly balance outstanding.

       
  (2)

The President of MAST Inc was advanced $244,074 on May 30, 2014. The advance was evidenced by a promissory note which included the following terms:


  a.

Non-interest bearing for the first twelve months and, thereafter, interest to be charged at a rate of 1% per month on the opening monthly balance.

     
  b.

Unsecured for the first 12 months and, thereafter, an assignment of a security interest to the full amount of the outstanding balance in favor of the Company.

     
  c.

Open to full repayment at any time.

     
  d.

Eligible for up to full offset against certain performance based incentive compensation within the first twelve months (note 23).


  (3)

A senior employee was advanced $80,916 during the year. This advance was non- interest bearing, unsecured, and due on demand. This advance was repaid subsequent to October 31, 2014.


19.

COMMITMENTS

   

The Company secured new leased premises in June 2012. The lease term is for 5 years and stipulates base monthly rental expenses of $3,800 CDN. Lease commitments are as follows – commitments less than one year of $44,000 CDN; commitments in years 2-3 total $77,000 CDN.

   

The Company has certain outstanding commitments to 3rd party subcontractors with respect to deferred development costs. These commitments are as follows – commitments less than one year of $1,799,000; commitments between years 2-5 total $934,000.

43



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

20.

CONTINGENCIES


  (a)

Legal matters:

     
 

Subsequent to October 31, 2014, the Company commenced a legal action against a former 3rd party consulting firm who previously provided services to the Company (note 23).

     
 

The Company has agreed to indemnify its directors and officers and certain of its employees in accordance with the Company’s by-laws. The Company maintains insurance policies that may provide coverage against certain claims.

     
  (b)

Disputes with vendors:

     
 

The Company has disputed amounts charged by certain third party vendors during previous fiscal years, one of which is the firm noted in (a) above, against which the Company has taken action (Note 23). The amount charged by the vendors exceeds the amount recorded as a provision by $181,780. No claims have been made by the vendors to date related to the disputed amounts.


21.

FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT


  (a)

Financial Risk Management

     
 

The Company is exposed to a variety of financial risks by virtue of its activities: market risk (including foreign exchange risk and interest rate risk) and liquidity risk. The overall risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimize potential adverse effects on financial performance. Risk management is carried out under policies approved by the Board of Directors. Management is charged with the responsibility of establishing controls and procedures to ensure that financial risks are mitigated in accordance with the approved policies.

     
  (b)

Market Risk:


  i.

Foreign Exchange Risk:

     
 

The Company currently incurs expenses in Canadian dollars. Management monitors the Canadian position of these monetary financial instruments on a periodic basis throughout the course of the year.

44



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

21.

FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (Cont’d)


  (b)

Market Risk: (Cont’d)


  i.

Foreign Exchange Risk:

     
 

The consolidated financial statements include balances that are denominated in Canadian dollars as follows:


    2014     2013  
             
Cash and cash equivalents $  328,797   $  461,727  
Deposits and other receivables   201,403     49,477  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   211,091     210,827  

 

A 10% strengthening of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar would serve to decrease the loss by $31,910 at October 31, 2014 (2013 – decrease the loss by $30,037). A 10% weakening of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar at October 31, 2014 would have had the equal but opposite effect.

     
  ii.

Interest Rate Risk:

     
 

Cash flow interest rate risk is the risk that the future cash flow of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates.

     
 

Financial assets and financial liabilities with variable interest rates expose the Company to cash flow interest rate risk. The Company’s cash and promissory note receivable earn interest at market rates. The Company manages its interest rate risk by maximizing the interest income earned on excess funds while maintaining the liquidity necessary to conduct operations on a day-to-day basis. Fluctuations in market rates of interest may have an impact on the Company’s results of operations.

     
 

The Company is not exposed to interest price risk on its interest bearing bridge loans and related party advances as the interest rate is fixed.

45



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

21.

FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (Cont’d)


  (c)

Liquidity Risk:

     
 

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its obligations as they fall due.

     
 

The Company manages its liquidity risk by forecasting cash flows from operations and anticipated investing and financing activities. Senior management is actively involved in the review and approval of planned expenditures.

     
 

All financial liabilities are due within 1 year from the balance sheet at October 31, 2014.

     
 

As at October 31, 2014, the Company reports working capital of $1,034,921 and has certain financial commitments (Note 19), the majority of which are due within one year. It must continue to raise financing in order to meet its current obligations.

     
  (d)

Credit Risk:

     
 

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Company if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from the Company’s cash and deposits and other receivables. The carrying amount of financial assets represents maximum credit exposure. The Company reduces its credit risk by maintaining its primary bank accounts at large financial institutions and assesses the credit quality of counterparties, taking into account their financial position, past experience and other factors.


22.

SEGMENTED INFORMATION

   

There is one operating segment of the business being the development and commercialization efforts with respect to the Company's proprietary sensor applications. Currently, the predominant market segment that the Company is pursuing is the North American market for such technology.

   

Geographic information – Non-current assets


      October 31,     October 31,    
      2014     2013    
                 
  Canada $  632,516   $  415,533    
  United States   3,195,336     694,898    
    $  3,827,852   $  1,110,431    

46



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in United States dollars)
 
For the years ended October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
 

23.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

   

The Company reports the following as subsequent events:


  (a)

As of February 25, 2015 the Company has raised an additional $565,714 of financing through the exercise of a total of 2,988,876 common share purchase warrants.

     
  (b)

The Company collected a total of $1,392,978 from development partners with respect to its ongoing joint product development projects. Included in the amounts is the $450,000 recorded as amounts receivable as described in Note 8 (a).

     
  (c)

The Company settled in full the $244,074 advance from the President of MAST as described in (Note 18 (d) (2)) through the award of additional performance based compensation to that officer in February 2015.

     
  (d)

The advances to the Chairman and a senior employee described in Note 8(b) (i) and (ii) were repaid to the Company in December 2014.

     
  (e)

On November 17, 2014, Micromem and MAST (“Plaintiffs”) commenced a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Dreifus Associates Limited and Henry Dreifus (“Defendants”). Plaintiffs original complaint contained five causes of action by which they sought money damages, declaratory relief and specific performance relating to certain contracts. On February 24, 2015, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint to add a claim for declaratory relief relating to a patent held by Plaintiffs. It is anticipated that Defendants will deny the substantive allegations in the amended complaint and/or seek to have the action transferred to Florida, where Defendants reside and/or maintain an office.

     
  (f)

At the Annual General and Special Meeting of shareholders held on January 30, 2015, the Company’s stock option plan was revised to increase the maximum number of options in the plan reserved for issuance from 15.6 million to 18.84 million options.

**************************************

47





Exhibit 99.2

MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2014
PREPARED AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 2015
   
 

INTRODUCTION

The following sets out the Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") of the financial position and result of operations for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2014 of Micromem Technologies Inc. (the "Company", "Micromem" or "we"). The MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes for the fiscal years ending October 31, 2014 and 2013 which are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Additional information regarding the Company is available on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com.

The Company’s shares are traded on the OTCQX under the symbol MMTIF and on the Canadian National Stock Exchange (“CNSX”) under the symbol MRM. In November 2007, the Company incorporated Micromem Applied Sensor Technologies Inc. (“MAST”) for the purpose of moving forward with the planned commercialization of its technology.

Certain information provided by the Company in this MD&A and in other documents publicly filed throughout the year that are not recitation of historical facts may constitute forward-looking statements. The words "may", "would", "could", "will", "likely", "estimate", "believe", "expect", "forecast" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

Readers are cautioned that such statements are only predictions and the actual events or results may differ materially. In evaluating such forward-looking statements, readers should specifically consider the various factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This MD&A contains forward-looking statements and forward looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation (“forward looking statements”). Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions, potentials, future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “believes”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, or “intends” or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken or achieved) are not statements of historical fact, but are “forward-looking statements”. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or developments in the Company’s business or in its industry, to differ materially from the anticipated results, performance, achievements or developments expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include disclosure regarding possible events, conditions or results of operations that are based on assumptions about future conditions, courses of action and consequences. Forward-looking statements may also include, without limitation, any statement relating to future events, conditions or circumstances. The Company cautions you not to place undue reliance upon any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. Forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, the successful commercialization of our technology, comments about potential future revenues, joint development agreements and expectations of signed contracts with customers, etc. A number of inherent risks, uncertainties and factors affect the operations, performance and results of the Company and its business, and could cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations of estimated or anticipated events or results. Some of these risks and uncertainties include the risk of not securing required capital in future, the risks of not successfully concluding agreements with potential partners on a timely basis, the risks associated with commercializing and bringing to market our technology. These risks are affected by certain factors that are beyond the Company's control: the existence of present and possible future government regulation, competition that exists in the Company's business, uncertainty of revenues, markets and profitability, as well as those other factors discussed in this MD&A report. This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking statements and reference should also be made to the Company’s Annual Information Form (prepared and filed in the form of a Form 20-F Annual Report pursuant to The Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for a description of risk factors.

1


Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward–looking statements. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements that are incorporated by reference herein, except in accordance with applicable securities law.

****************************

2



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2014
PREPARED AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 2015
(Unless other indicated dollar amounts reported are stated in U.S. dollars)
  

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

1.    OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND

5

       
2. COMPANY PROFILE AT OCTOBER 31, 2014

6

           •    Product Portfolio

8

           • Intellectual Property 11
           • Financing 11
           • Development Costs 11
           • Share Capital 11
           • Management and Board of Directors 12
           • Related Party Transactions 12
       
3. DISCUSSION OF OPERATING RESULTS – FISCAL YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2014 15
       
4. RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES 23
       
5. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES 24
       
6. COMPLIANCE RELATED REPORTING MATTERS 24
           •    Financial Instruments 24
           • Commitments and Contingencies 25
           • Disclosure controls/Internal controls 26
           • Off Balance Sheet Arrangements 26
           • Going Concern 27
           • Liquidity and Capital Resources 27
       
7. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS 28
 
TABLES    
       
1. Annual and Quarterly Financial Information 29
2. Selected Balance Sheet Information 30
3. Financing Raised 31
4. Outstanding Options and Warrants 32

3


APPENDICES

1.

Company History

33
2.

Conversion to IFRS reporting

36
3.

Critical Accounting Policies

38

*************************

4



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 31, 2014
PREPARED AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 2015

1. OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND

Micromem is a company that develops customized, proprietary sensor-based solutions for large multinational corporations. Over the past three years it has presented its technology platform to numerous companies who are seeking solutions to various and complex challenges in the measurement of operating performance and real time diagnostics in their operating systems and assets. At October 31, 2014 the Company has secured contracts to produce sensor-based technology solutions for a number of these customers. These contractual arrangements are discussed further in the body of this document.

In essence, Micromem has typically initially developed proposed technology solutions at its own cost and where a company agrees to move forward with Micromem to develop a commercial application, Micromem will negotiate a cost sharing arrangement with that company where the company will absorb the continued development costs associated with the project. Development milestones are established with the company and Micromem will invoice against these milestones in accordance with the contracted terms. Micromem’s recurring revenue stream is anticipated to be derived from product royalties, product licensing agreements and outright product sales.

While the applications for Micromem’s technology solutions are industry agnostic and cross virtually every industry vertical, the Company has identified the following industry verticals as significant immediate term opportunities to pursue – the oil and gas sector, the automotive sector, the power generation and utilities sector and other specific industrial applications. These key market segments are discussed further in Section 2 – Company Profile at October 31, 2014.

The Company’s current business activities began in 2008. Appendix 1 illustrates the Company’s development between 2008-2012 during which period it raised approximately $ 16 million in financing to support its continued development.

Additional background information of the Company is available on its website, Micromem.com and on the website of its subsidiary, MAST INC.com

*************************

5



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 31, 2014
PREPARED AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 2015

2. COMPANY PROFILE AT OCTOBER 31, 2014

In 2014, the Company successfully converted the eight targeted client driven product developments, described at our 2013 Annual General Meeting, into more formalized and ongoing working arrangements with our clients.

Profile at October 31, 2014

The Company conceives of, designs and engineers, creates, develops and delivers extremely unique sensor solutions to our clients. These sensor solutions are very small, typically employing MEMS or NEMS feature size technology. These sensor solutions are precisely driven by client requirements, typically addressing a difficult business and/or process problem. The solution typically involves integrating multiple different sensor modalities, seen in disparate market segments, different from the target client use that addresses the client’s needs. Due to the extremely small size, the final form factor allows our solutions to be deployed throughout the application space, in heretofore inaccessible ruggedized environments. The Company’s approach is to take advantage of the revenue opportunity associated with the projected trillion-sensor market.

Product Development Process

In 2014, the Company substantially advanced our client driven product development activity, taking advantage of our knowledge from previous years and leveraging the rapidly changing advances in the MEMS/NEMS technology landscape.

  1.

Securing potential clients:

       
 

The Company pursues potential clients with the goal of entering into Joint Product Development Agreements and realizing long term annuity-like revenue streams from royalty and licensing agreements relating to its technology applications and intellectual property.

       
 

The process that the Company will typically follow in securing client opportunities includes:

       
  a.

Initial discussions with prospective clients to identify their operating challenges and to assess the potential for a technology solution building on the Company’s proprietary sensor technology.

       
  b.

The Company will then reach out to its global network of leading experts in the various technology domains. Through this resource network, we are able to bring the world’s best domain experts to the client. This reduces the client’s perceived risk of moving forward with new product development and related capital expenditures.

6



  c.

The Company performs a patent analysis and freedom to commercially operate analysis in the problem space.

     
  d.

The Company will solicit third party validation of our proposed solution to assess the potential market and revenue opportunity for the Company.

     
  e.

If this analysis indicates good fundamentals, the Company proceeds with presenting the proposed product development solution to the client.

     
  f.

The Company will fund the initial costs of facilitating a Proof of Concept demonstration given that, upon successfully meeting that goal, the client participates in the follow-on development costs. The Company’s product development proposal to the client indicates the specific funding responsibility the client has in testing the product in the targeted environment, and in deriving revenue to the client through deployment of the solution into their business.


  2.

Product development process:

       
 

Once the Company has engaged a client where it will pursue a development project with that client, the typical phases of the product development process include:

       
  a.

Proof of concept demonstration: designed to demonstrate to the client that the proposed technology will perform as anticipated.

       
  b.

Engineering prototype and extended testing: Product development is refined, engineered and made more robust. The client then places the product into the field for an extended evaluation.

       
  c.

Pre-Manufacturing Prototype: Based on the client’s initial field test evaluation, changes, if any, are made to the product and it is prepared for manufacturing.

       
  d.

Manufacturing: The client provides a formal purchase order for initial manufactured product to be deployed in their business and/or process. To date, no products have reached the manufacturing stage.

       
  e.

Commercialization: Establishment of manufacturing partners, licensing and/or sale of the product to others well suited to take advantage of the global market opportunity.

The Company’s expertise is in rapidly completing the Proof of Concept demonstration. What used to take several months or initially several years can now be completed in a much shorter timeframe given the experience that the Company has developed over the past five years.

7


The joint development process is built upon protecting our intellectual property. Our clients will participate in the patenting process and the resultant patent is collaborative and protects both the Company’s intellectual property rights in the product and our client’s interest to use the product within their business space.

To date the Company has advanced its current client development projects to stages 2(a) – 2(c) as above. It has not yet successfully commercialized products to the stage where it will realize its goal of securing long term annuity-like revenue streams from royalty and licensing agreements.

Product Portfolio

The following is a summary of the products for which the Company has been engaged and which are in the various stages of the product development process described above:

  1.

Nanoparticle Detector Platform: Joint product development was initially contracted by Saudi Aramco and the proof of concept has been approved by the client. The detector platform is capable of detecting magnetic nanoparticles in a flowing oil stream at concentrations as low as 100 parts per trillion. The next steps will be to deliver manufactured versions to oil company laboratories.

     
 

In a parallel product development, MAST has begun work on ruggedizing the nanoparticle detector platform so that it can be installed and operated directly on an oil well.

     
 

The Company anticipates up to $2 million in client funding in fiscal year 2015 associated with field ruggedization, although there can be no guarantees that it will generate such funding.

     
 

The Company has filed provisional patents with the United States Patent and Trademark office (“USPTO”) for this product.

     
  2.

Magnetic Nanoparticle Interwell Tracers: In 2013 the Company began to work with Chevron Energy Company to develop and test fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles capable of behaving in a conservative manner in the application of interwell tracers. This proof of concept and the prototype engineering phases were successfully completed. The Company suggested a parallel product development program aimed at detecting existing interwell tracer chemicals in the field with on well real time detection platform technology.

     
 

The Company has filed provisional patents with the USPTO for this product.

     
  3.

In Line Real Time Interwell Tracer Detection Platform: In 2014 the Company executed a Joint Product Development Agreement with Chevron Energy Company to develop a well head real time detection platform for the detection of existing interwell tracer chemicals to measurement levels of 300 parts per trillion. The Company has obtained an exclusive license of the base line cavity ring down technology from Entanglement Technologies Inc., for use in interwell tracer detection applications. This work will progress with a laboratory demonstration of the Company’s ability to differentiate between 8-9 interwell tracers simultaneously. This will be followed by an in-field demonstration and ultimately, if successful, possible deployment of the platform throughout the client organization.

8


The Company has filed provisional patents with the USPTO for this product.

The Company has received $704,478 of funding from the client to date and anticipates up to an additional $2.3 million in client funding in 2015 associated with field-testing, followed by up to $23 million in deployment revenue thereafter, although there can be no guarantees that the Company will receive such additional funding/revenue.

  4.

IntelliboltTM Automotive Oil Pan Plug Sensor Suite: In 2014, the Company negotiated an exclusive agreement with Flextronics to commercialize, test, manufacture and market the Company’s patented oil pan plug sensor suite to automotive OEMS. The initial licensing agreement calls for the Company to receive an estimated $18 million in revenues if and when the initial deployment occurs after 2015, although there can be no guarantees that the product will be deployed or that the Company will receive such revenues.

     
 

In 2014, one of the Company’s six provisional patents related to this product was issued by the USPTO.

     
  5.

Real Time Detection of Wear Elements in Lubricating Fluids: In 2014 the Company executed a Joint Product Development Agreement with Castrol Innoventures to develop a MEMS solution for field deployment in ocean going vessels, wind turbine gearboxes, heavy duty trucks and automobiles. The goal of product development is a 50 cc form factor utilizing laser induced breakdown spectroscopy that will take in line real time oil samples and analytically determine, to precise levels of detection, the various wear elements in the lubricating fluid. In 2014, the Company successfully demonstrated the bench top Proof of Concept demonstration, ie. the initial stage in the product development process. To date, the Company has received $488,485 of funding from the client for this project. It anticipates that it will receive additional client funding in 2015 of up to $1.2 million although there can be no guarantee that it will receive such additional funding.

     
 

The Company has filed provisional patents associated with this product with the USPTO.

     
  6.

Transformer Partial Detection Platform: In 2014 the Company successfully demonstrated with Northeast Utilities the ability to detect partial discharges inside a transformer using very small sensors. Northeast Utilities accepted the proof of concept and made a progress payment of $200,000. Product development is proceeding into the next phase associated with extended engineering prototype evaluation.

     
 

The Company has filed provisional patents associated with this product with the USPTO.

9



  7.

Power Line Condition Monitoring: In 2014 the Company began development with Northeast Utilities on a low cost power line condition-monitoring device that is to be designed for pervasive deployment on distribution and transmission catenaries. The Company has filed provisional patents associated with this product with the USPTO.

     
  8.

Gas Pipeline Corrosion Detection using Autonomous Robotics: In 2014 the Company began early development with Northeast Utilities on a very small robotic platform integrated with a full suite of the Company’s sensors and designed to be deployed autonomously inside distribution gas pipelines. The sensor platform is designed to establish a corrosion profile, along with an electronic mapping and database of 100% of the pipe. The Company has filed provisional patents associated with this product with the USPTO.

     
  9.

Cement Integrity Sensor: In 2014 the Company began a joint development project with the Chevron Energy Company to develop a sensor platform that can be pumped into oil wells with cement. Once in place, these sensors will scavenge the necessary power from the environment and communicate to the surface valuable information about the ongoing quality of the cement. The Company has filed provisional patents associated with this product with the USPTO.

*************************

10


INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY:

The Company has been active in building its intellectual property portfolio during 2014 as it has furthered the above-noted development projects. We have engaged a Washington, DC based law firm to assist us in these efforts. The Company incurred $176,381 of patent related costs in 2014.

FINANCING:

During 2014 the Company successfully raised a total of approximately $6.8 million of additional financing from the exercise by warrant holders of common share purchase warrants issued in earlier private placement financings that the Company has arranged.

DEVELOPMENT COSTS:

The Company reports $3,525,456 (2013 - $928,077) as deferred development costs in its consolidated balance sheet as of October 31, 2014. These are costs that it has incurred with respect to these development projects and contracts that it continues to pursue in the immediate term and for which it expects to generate future revenue streams. These costs relate primarily to the active projects described above. The movement in deferred development costs is summarized as below:

      2014     2013  
               
 

Opening balance

$  928,077   $  718,163  
 

Additional project costs incurred

  3,936,459     677,445  
 

Recovery of deferred development costs

  (662,290 )   (233,290 )
 

Writedown of project costs

  (676,790 )   (234,241 )
 

Closing balance

$  3,525,456   $  928,077  

SHARE CAPITAL:

At October 31, 2014 the Company reports 188,436,724 common shares outstanding (2013: 158,491,425). Additionally, the Company has 12,105,000 stock options outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $0.27 per share (2013: 11,475,000 options outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $0.24 per share) and a total of 4,485,463 outstanding warrants to acquire common shares with a weighted average exercise price of $0.37 per share (2013: 29,761,012 outstanding warrants with a weighted average exercise price of $0.27 per share).

11


MANAGEMENT AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS:

At our Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on Friday, January 30, 2015, Salvatore Fuda, Joseph Fuda, David Sharpless, Steven Van Fleet, Oliver Nepomuceno, Larry Blue Alex Dey , Craig Carison and Brian Von Herzen were re-elected to serve on our Board of Directors. Messrs. Salvatore Fuda, Joseph Fuda, Dan Amadori and Steven Van Fleet continue to serve as officers of the Company. Andrew Brandt did not stand for reelection.

Our management team and directors, along with their 2014 remuneration is presented as below:



Individual


Position
2014 remuneration
Cash Options  Total
     
Salvatore Fuda Chairman, Director 137,172 - 137,172
Joseph Fuda President, Director 768,505 - 768,505
Steven Van Fleet President, MAST Inc., Director 231,280 17,529 248,809
David Sharpless Director - 12,521 12,521
Andrew Brandt Director - 5,008 5,008
Oliver Nepomuceno Director - 12,521 12,521
Larry Blue Director 23,877 12,521 36,398
Alex Dey Director - 15,025 15,025
Craig Carlson Director 14,866 12,521 27,387
Brian Von Herzen (1) Director - 217,394 217,394
Dan Amadori CFO 205,047 10,017 215,064

(1) Refer to additional comments below.

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES:

The Company reports the following related party transactions:

  (a)

Chairman: The Chairman receives cash compensation on a month to month basis calculated at an annual rate of $150,000 CDN.

     
 

The Chairman was not granted any stock options in 2014. In 2013 the Chairman was awarded a total of 140,000 stock options at an average price of $0.29 CDN per share (2012 - 100,000 stock options at an average price of $0.35 per share).

12



 

The total compensation paid to the Chairman during the year ended October 31, 2014 was $137,172 of cash compensation and $nil of stock based compensation (2013 - $146,599 of cash compensation and $ 21,163 of stock based compensation; 2012 - $149,565 of cash compensation and $23,697 of stock based compensation).

     
 

In 2014 the Company provided a short term non-interest bearing advance of $38,084 against monthly compensation due to the Chairman. This advance was repaid subsequent to October 31, 2014.

     
  (b)

Management and consulting fees and advances:

     
 

Included in professional fees, other fees and salaries as reported are management fees and consulting fees paid on payable to individuals (or Companies controlled by such individuals) who served as officers, directors and employees of the Company. The total compensation paid to such parties is summarized as:


 

 

  2014     2013     2012  
 

Cash compensation

$  1,482,153   $  805,574   $  709,075  
 

Less portion capitalized to deferred development costs

  (169,664 )   (202,820 )   -  
 

 

  1,312,489     602,754     709,075  
 

 

                 
 

Stock based compensation

  325,074     195,720     401,773  
 

 

                 
 

 

$  1,637,563   $  798,474   $  1,110,848  

In 2014 these parties were awarded a total of 540,000 options at an average price of $0.76 CDN per share (2013 – 1,292,500 options at an average price of $0.29 per share; 2012 – 1,755,000 options at an average price of $0.35 per share)

In 2014 the Company was invoiced $1,874,993 by a Company whose major shareholder, Brian Von Herzen, is a director of the Company and who also serves as its chief technology officer. This individual was appointed as a director on February 19, 2014 and these related party transactions are disclosed as invoiced amount from this date forward. These charges have been capitalized as deferred development costs. Included in accounts payable at October 31, 2014 is $208,425 owing to RPI.

In February to March 2014, the CFO was provided with an advance of $119,757 against monthly compensation due to him. Interest on the advance was charged at a rate of 1% per month on the opening monthly balance outstanding. He repaid $78,036 through October 31, 2014 and was awarded a performance based bonus at October 31, 2014 which was applied to the repayment of the remaining balance of the advance.

13


In May 2014, the President of MAST was provided with an advance of $244,074 against monthly compensation due to him. No interest was charged on the advance and this balance remained outstanding at October 31, 2014. In February 2015, he was awarded a performance based bonus which was applied to and eliminated the total amount of the outstanding advance.

In 2014, a senior employee was provided with an advance of $80,916 against monthly compensation due to the employee. This advance was non-interest bearing. The advance was repaid subsequent to October 31, 2014.

*************************

14



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 31, 2014
PREPARED AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 2015

3. DISCUSSION OF OPERATING RESULTS – FISCAL YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 31, 2014

(a)

Financial Position as at October 31, 2014:


      Year ended  
      October 31, 2014     October 31, 2013  
      ('$000 )   ('$000 )
 

 

           
 

Cash

  936     821  
 

Deposits and other receivables

  873     235  
 

 

  1,809     1,056  
 

 

           
 

Property and equipment, net

  21     14  
 

Deferred development costs

  3,525     928  
 

Intangible assets, net

  77     97  
 

Patents, net

  204     72  
 

 

  5,637     2,167  
 

 

           
 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  774     340  
 

Bridge loans

  -     290  
 

 

  774     630  
 

Shareholders' Equity

           
 

         Share capital:

  70,803     57,758  
 

         Contributed surplus

  27,437     32,822  
 

         Deficit

  (93,377 )   (89,043 )
 

 

  4,863     1,537  
 

 

           
 

 

  5,637     2,167  

15


Refer also to Table 1 which provides a summary of the quarterly statements of financial position for the fiscal years ending October 31, 2012 – 2014.

Commentary:

  1.

The Company’s working capital position improved to $1,034,921 at October 31, 2014 from $425,808 at October 31, 2013. During 2014 the remaining bridge loan of $290,014 outstanding at October 31, 2013 was converted by the lender into equity.

     
  2.

At October 31, 2014 the Company reports outstanding advances to officers and employees in the amount of $386,031 (2013 – nil). As of February 25, 2015, this amount has been recovered by the Company through repayment by the officers and employees in cash and through the award of performance based compensation.

     
  3.

The Company reports amounts receivables of $450,000 (2013 – nil) due from two of its current clients; these funds were collected subsequent to October 31, 2014.

     
  4.

The Company reported $16,508 of capital asset additions in 2014 (2013 - $14,839). These expenditures relate to the purchase of additional IT equipment in each year.

     
  5.

At October 31, 2013, the Company reported deferred development costs associated primarily with two ongoing client projects. During 2014 it incurred $3,936,459 of additional costs with respect to the existing and to additional client projects which it undertook. It recovered $662,290 of such costs from its clients and wrote down $676,790 of costs relating primarily to one client project where it had closed out the initial project phases for which it was contracted.

     
 

Management has satisfied itself that the projects to which deferred development costs are reported meet the criteria for deferral and management expects that it will realize future revenues against each of these projects to recover the carrying value reported.

     
  6.

The Company capitalized $176,381 of costs associated with patents in 2014 (2013 - $44,825). It significantly expanded its filings in 2014 with multiple provisional and patent pending applications and filings in North American and international jurisdictions. These applications and filings relate to the ongoing product development work that the Company has undertaken. A number of these filings are now under review with the USPTO and subsequent o October 31, 2014 the Company was granted its first sensor based patent for its proprietary oil pan plug.

16



  7.

In 2011 the Company capitalized $135,465 of costs incurred with respect to its initial development activity in sensor based platforms. This asset relates to the initial technical know-how and expertise that the Company developed in this area. It is amortizing these costs to operations over seven years on a straight line basis through 2017.

     
  8.

In 2014 the Company realized $6,801,619 from the exercise by shareholders of 27,410,651 common share purchase warrants. It also issued 2,517,501 units as settlement of the bridge loan which was outstanding at October 31, 2013 and was converted to equity in 2014. It issued 17,081 common shares as settlement of a third party supplier invoice in the amount of $8,353 as requested by that supplier.

     
 

In 2013 the Company issued 16,106,957 units to investors consisting of one common share and one common share purchase warrant per unit. It realized total proceeds of $2,910,532 from these financings. Additionally it realized proceeds of $822,391 from the exercise by shareholders of 5,953,913 warrants.

     
 

This information is highlighted in Table 3.

17



(b)

Operating Results:

The following table summarizes the Company’s operating results for the years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013:

  Years ended October 31,

2014
($000)
2013
($000)

Revenue

-                -

Administration

325 378

Professional fees and salaries

2,361 1,573

Stock-based compensation

379 369

Research and development

704 161

Travel and entertainment

330 211

Foreign exchange loss (gain)

59 12

Amortization of property and equipment

7 5

Amortization of intangible assets and patents

- 19

Total expenses

4,165 2,728

(Gain) loss on revaluation of embedded derivatives

- (41)

(Gain) loss on revaluation of derivative warrant liability

- 3,247

Net comprehensive loss

4,165 5,934

Loss per share

(0.02) (0.04)

Refer also to Tables 1 and 2 which are appended to this MD&A. Table 1 sets forth selected information from the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss for the fiscal years ending October 31, 2012-2014 and for the related quarterly information through October 31, 2014. Table 2 sets forth selected information from the consolidated statements of financial position for the fiscal years ending October 31, 2012-2014 and the related quarterly information through October 31, 2014.

18


COMMENTARY

1)

Administrative related expenses compare as follows: ($000)


    2014     2013  

 

           

General and administrative

  67     54  

Rent and occupancy cost

  85     84  

Bad debt expenses

  24     20  

Interest income

  (30 )   (20 )

Interest expense

  29     79  

Accretion expense

  -     19  

Office insurance

  62     61  

Telephone

  23     17  

Investor relations, listing and filling fees

  65     64  

 

  325     378  

(a)

The Company relocated its offices in June 2012 to lower cost premises. Current monthly rental costs approximate $7,000 per month.

   
(b)

Bad debt expense in each of 2014 and 2013 relate to interest income booked on the Unotron promissory note receivable. This relates to a project that the Company undertook in 2009-2010. The Company has a judgment in it’s the favor and continues to pursue collection of the outstanding principal and interest totaling $145,815. This balance is fully reserved.

   
(c)

Interest expense relates to the interest paid on convertible bridge loans. In 2013 we carried two bridge loans; in 2014 the remaining bridge loan was converted to equity.

   
(d)

Accretion expense relates to the convertible bridge loans, all but one of which were repaid or converted by October 31, 2013. Accretion expense is a non-cash item.

19



2)

Professional, other fees and salaries ($000)

The components of this expense category include:

    2014     2013  
             
Audit related fees   119     147  
Legal fees   287     154  
Other fees   428     191  
CEO   769     314  
CFO   205     180  
Chairman   137     144  
OTCQX related fees   12     -  
    1,957     1,130  
Salaries & benefits   404     443  
    2,361     1,573  

Commentary:

1)

Audit fees were higher in 2013 as a result of additional work required relating to various IFRS reporting related matters.

   
2)

Legal fees increased in 2014 due to additional contract related work with various clients. We incurred approximately $16,000 in additional fees with respect to one legal matter resolved in the Company’s favor in 2014. We also spent approximately $4,000 perfecting a judgment against a company to whom the Company advances funds as a promissory note in 2010.

   
3)

Other fees include the portion of the fees paid to the President of MAST which were not capitalized as deferred development costs of $45000 (2013 = $90000) financing related fees of $226000 (2013 = nil), part time accounting services of $30000 (2013 = $22000), other fees paid to 3rd party consultants of $89000 (2013 = $79000) and fees paid to other directors of $38000 (2013 = nil).

   
4)

The CEO’s annual base compensation has remained unchanged since 2008. In 2014, performance based compensation was also awarded to the CEO.

   
5)

The CFO’s base compensation remained unchanged in 2014 at $150,000CDN. His performance bonus in 2014 was $55,000 (2013: $30,000).

   
6)

The Company upgraded its listing status to OTCQX in 2014 and incurred $12,000 of related costs.

20



3)

Travel related expenses compare as follows ($000)


    2014     2013  
             
Airfare   109     69  
Hotel   82     40  
Meals   91     68  
Entertainment   1     3  
Transportation   47     31  
    330     211  

Travel and entertainment costs increased to $329,779 in 2014 from $210,852 in 2013. The Company incurred higher costs associated with its dealings with an increasing number of shareholders in 2014. MAST incurred higher travel costs in 2014 with respect to its dealings with potential and existing clients.

4)

Research and development ($000)

The components of research and development expenses are as follows:

 

  2014     2013  

Project expenses incurred (recovered)

  27     (73 )

Write-down of deferred development costs on

           

specific projects

  677     234  

 

  704     161  

In October 2013 the Company wrote down its remaining investment in GSI Westwind when that project was terminated.

In 2014 the Company wrote down its remaining investment in an oil company client project when it closed out the current phases of the development work that it had undertaken commencing in 2010. The Company recovered $300,000 of funding provided by the client through to the completion of these initial phases. While it expects that the next phases of development will commence in 2015, it decided to write down its remaining investment in the related deferred development costs on this project as of July 31, 2014.

C)

Unaudited Quarterly Financial Information – Summary


Three months
ended (unaudited)
Revenues
$
Expenses
$
Loss in
period
$
Loss per
share
$
Adjusted
loss(1)
$
January 31, 2013  - 728,564 (416,078) - (557,000)
April 30, 2013  - 591,372 (17,012) - (583,000)
July 31, 2013 - 485,137 (261,031) - (477,000)
October 31, 2013  - 923,103 (5,239,307) (0.03) (709,000)
January 31, 2014  - 552,123 (552,123) - (534,000)
April 30, 2014  - 922,183 (922,183) (0.01) (544,660)
July 31, 2014 125,000 1,727,411 (1,602,411) (0.01)  1,589,183
October 31, 2014 (125,000) 963,154 (1,088,154) (0.01) (1,052,130)

21


The quarterly expenses for the three months ended October 31, 2013 were higher than the expenses reported in Q1, Q2 and Q3 in that the Company recorded certain fourth quarter write downs to deferred development costs and paid $120,000 in salary adjustments to office staff that have been subject to a salary freeze for the past three years. The loss reported in Q4 2013 also includes a $4.2 million non-cash expense relating to the elimination of the derivative warrant liability previously reported once the Company converted all outstanding Canadian denominated common share purchase warrants to $US.

Refer also to Tables 1 and 2 for summarized quarterly information.

*************************

22



MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 31, 2014
PREPARED AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 2015

4. RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES OVERVIEW

There are a number of risks which may individually or in the aggregate affect the long-term commercial success of the Company, both known and unknown. An investment in the Company should be considered speculative due to the nature of the Company’s activities and its current stage of development:

Stage of Development of Technology:

The Company has made considerable strides in advancing its technology and in developing a product portfolio as outlined in Section 2 of this MD&A report. Our various products are in different phases of development and there remains the risk that the Company must successfully complete development work on these products to have available commercially viable products which can be licensed or sold.

Customers’ Willingness to Purchase:

We have entered into multiple joint development agreements whereby our prototype products are being subjected to rigorous testing by our partners. We expect to be successful in completing remaining development work on our product portfolio. If we are successful in doing so, our partners will then have to decide the extent to which they will adopt our technology for future use for their applications. The future revenue streams for the Company are dependent upon the rate of adoption by our customers and their willingness to do so.

Patent Portfolio:

The Company has spent a considerable amount of time and effort and incurred significant costs with respect to the maintenance and development of our intellectual property portfolio. However, given the nature of IP development, the Company is subject to continuing risks that our patents could be successfully challenged and that our patent pending files may not ultimately be granted full patent status. While we continue to make specific efforts to broaden our IP claims, this is an ongoing process and requires continued effort and vigilance. The Company does not have extensive in-house resources so as to manage its IP portfolio in this environment and has traditionally relied heavily on its patent attorneys for these services.

Financing:

The Company has successfully raised funding over the past several years to continue to support its development initiatives and fund the Company’s corporate structure and overheads. The financing environment for early stage technology companies remains challenging and there cannot be certainty that the Company will be able to continue to raise financing as it has in the past to continue to support its business initiatives.

23


To put this risk into proper perspective, however, the Company notes that it has raised an additional $6.8 million in 2014 (Table 3) It is essential to also note that the development projects that the Company is now pursuing are based on having its customers pay for development work tied to performance milestones as the Company incurs these costs.

Competitors:

The Company is subject to competition from other entities that may have greater financial resources and more in-house technical expertise.

Management Structure:

The Company is highly dependent on the services of a small number of senior management team members. If one of these individuals were unavailable, the Company could encounter a difficult transition process.

Foreign Currency Exposure:

The Company expects to sell its products and license technologies in the United States, in Canada and abroad. The Company has not hedged its foreign currency exposure, which has not been significant to date. In future, foreign currency fluctuations could present a risk to the business.

5. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our significant accounting policies are set forth in Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements. Refer to Appendix 1 of this MD&A document for Management’s discussion of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.

6. COMPLIANCE RELATED REPORTING MATTERS

(a)

Financial Instruments:

It is management's opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest rate and credit risks arising from financial instruments and that the fair value of financial instruments approximates the carrying value.

Fair values: The Company's financial instruments consisting of deposits and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and bridge loans approximate their carrying values due to their short-term maturity. The Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value on the statement of financial position date consist of cash, derivative warrant liability and the conversion feature of bridge loans.

Credit risk: Financial instruments, which subject the Company to potential credit risk, consist of deposits and other receivables. The Company does not always require collateral or other security for deposits and other receivables. The Company estimates its provision for uncollectible amounts based on an analysis of the specific amount and the debtor's payment history and prospects.

24


Foreign exchange: The Company completes transactions denominated in Canadian and in United States dollars and, as such, is exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. The Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.

Interest rate risk: Cash flow interest rate risk is the risk that the future cash flow of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates.

Financial assets and financial liabilities with variable interest rates expose the Company to cash flow interest rate risk. The Company’s cash and promissory note receivable earn interest at market rates. The Company manages its interest rate risk by maximizing the interest income earned on excess funds while maintaining the liquidity necessary to conduct operations on a day-to-day basis. Fluctuations in market rates of interest may have an impact on the Company’s results of operations.

Liquidity risk: Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its obligations as they fall due.

The Company manages its liquidity risk by forecasting cash flows from operations and anticipated investing and financing activities. Senior management is actively involved in the review and approval of planned expenditures.

All financial liabilities are due within 1 year from the balance sheet at October 31, 2014.

(b)

Commitments and Contingencies:

Commitments:

The Company secured new leased premises in June 2012. The lease term is for 5 years and stipulates base monthly rental expenses of $3800 CDN. Lease commitments are as follows – commitments less than one year of $44,000 CDN; commitments in years 2 and 3 total $77,000CDN.

The Company has certain outstanding commitments to third party subcontractors with respect to deferred development costs. These commitments are as follows – commitments less than one year of $1,799,000; commitments between years 2-5 total $934,000.

Legal Matters:

As of October 31, 2014 there were no outstanding legal matters to which the Company is a party. We have agreed to indemnify our directors and officers and certain of our employees in accordance with our by-laws. We maintain insurance policies that may provide coverage against certain claims.

On November 17, 2014, the Company and MAST, as plaintiffs, commenced a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Dreifus Associates Limited and Henry Dreifus, as defendants. The plaintiffs’ original complaint contained five causes of action by which they sought money damages, declaratory relief and specific performance relating to certain contracts. On February 24, 2015 the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint to add a claim for declaratory relief relating to a patent held by the plaintiffs it is anticipated that defendants will deny the substantive allegations in the amended complaint and/or seek to have the action transferred to Florida, where defendants reside and/or maintain an office.

25


Contingencies:

In 2013 the Company recovered $181,180 of accounts payable balances recorded in previous years and relating to third party vendors whose accounts the Company has disputed. The Company has concluded that these amounts are not payable. If these amounts were successfully contested by these vendors, the Company could have an obligation for such costs.

The Company has disputed amounts charged by certain third party vendors during previous fiscal years, one of which is the firm noted above, against which the Company has taken action (Note 23). The amount charged by the vendors exceeds the amount recorded as a provision by $181,780. No claims have been made by the vendors to date related to the disputed amounts.

(c)

Disclosure Controls/Internal Controls:

The Company was classified as an accelerated filer in 2014 and, accordingly, is required to complete an external audit on its internal controls. It filed its last audit report on internal controls in 2010.

The audit report issued by the external auditors on the internal control over financial reporting dated February 27, 2015 concluded that the Company has maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2014 based on the criteria established by the regulatory authorities.

Management and the Board of Directors, primarily through the Audit Committee, have instituted review procedures on all of our periodic filings. We have established a Disclosure Committee consisting of independent directors. Committee charters have been developed and has been ratified by our Board of Directors. We engage legal counsel, as required, to provide guidance and commentary on our press releases.

Management has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures meet required standards. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in its various reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately. In spite of its evaluation, management does recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance and not absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

a.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements:

The Company has no off-balance sheet financial commitments and does not anticipate entering into any contracts of such nature other than the addition of new operating leases for equipment and premises as may be required in the normal course of business.

26



b.

Going Concern:

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the “going concern” basis, which presumes that the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future.

There are uncertainties related to conditions and events that cast doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time in future. During the year ended October 31, 2014, the Company reported a net loss and comprehensive loss of $4,164,871 (2013 - $5,933,928; 2012- 1,775,065) and negative cash flow from operations of $2,883,079 (2013-$2,515,315; 2012-$2,573,982). The Company’s working capital position as at October 31, 2014 is $1,034,921 (2013 – $425,888).

The Company’s future success depends on the profitable commercialization of its proprietary magnetic sensor technology. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in the profitable commercialization of its technology. Based upon its current operating and financial plans, management of the Company believes that it will have sufficient access to financial resources to fund the Company’s planned operations through fiscal 2015; however, the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on its ability to secure additional financing and/or to profitably commercialize its technology. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

If the “going concern” assumption were not appropriate for these consolidated financial statements then adjustments would be necessary to the carrying value of assets and liabilities, the reported expenses and the balance sheet classifications used; in such cases, these adjustments could be material.

c.

Liquidity and Capital Resources:

Liquidity:

Table 3 provides a summary of the financing that was raised during the 2012-2014 fiscal years.

We currently report negative cash flow from operations. This result will only change once we are generating sufficient revenue from either license fees, royalties or the sale of products utilizing our technology. In 2014 and subsequent to the end of the fiscal year, the Company raised significant funding from the exercise of warrants by warrant holders.

We currently have no lines of credit in place. We must obtain financing from investors or from clients in support of our development projects.

We have granted to our directors, officers and employees options to purchase shares at prices that are at or above market price on the date of grant. As presented in Table 4, there are 12.105 million options outstanding at an average exercise price of $0.27 per share.

27


Capital Resources:

We have no commitments for capital expenditures as of October 31, 2014.

7.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

     

The Company reports the following as subsequent events:

     
(a)

As of February 27, 2015 it has raised an additional $565,714 of financing through the exercise of a total of 2,988,876 common share purchase warrants.

     
(b)

It collected a total of $1,392,978 from development partners with respect to its ongoing joint product development projects with its current customers. Included in the amounts collected is $450,000 recorded as amounts receivable at October 31, 2014.

     
(c)

The Company settled in full the $244,074 advance to the President of MAST (as described above in Section 2- Related Party Transactions) through the award of additional performance based compensation to that officer in February 2015.

     
(d)

The advances to the Chairman and the senior employee (described above Section 2- Related Party Transactions) were repaid to the Company in December 2014.

     
(e)

On November 17, 2014, Micromem and MAST (“Plaintiffs”) commenced a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Dreifus Associates Limited and Henry Dreifus, (“Defendants”). The Plaintiffs’ original complaint contained five causes of action by which they sought money damages, declaratory relief and specific performance relating to certain contracts. On February 24, 2015 the Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint to add a claim for declaratory relief relating to a patent held by the Plaintiffs. It is anticipated that Defendants will deny the substantive allegations in the amended complaint and/or seek to have the action transferred to Florida, where Defendants reside and/or maintain an office.

     
(f)

At the Annual General and Special Meeting of shareholders held on January 30, 2015, the Company’s stock option plan was revised to increase the maximum number of options in the plan from 15.6 million to 18.84 million options.

*************************

28


Table 1

Micromem Technologies Inc
Management Discussion and Analysis
Annual and Quarterly financial information
October 31, 2014
($US)

Fiscal year                 Loss per share  
ending October     Interest and           (basic and fully  
31     other income     Net Loss     diluted)  
2014     -     (4,164,871 )   (0.02 )
                       
2013     -     (5,933,928 )   (0.04 )
                       
Quarter ending                    
                      
October 31, 2014     -     (1,088,154 )   (0.01 )
                       
July 31, 2014     -     (1,602,411 )   (0.01 )
                       
April 30, 2014     -     (922,183 )   (0.01 )
                       
January 31, 2014     -     (552,123 )   (0.00 )
                       
October 31, 2013     -     (5,239,807 )   (0.03 )
                        
July 31, 2013     -     (261,031 )   (0.00 )
                       
April 30, 2013     -     (17,012 )   (0.00 )
                       
January 31, 2013     -     (416,078 )   (0.00 )

29


Table 2

Micromem Technologies Inc
Management Discussion and Analysis
Selected Balance Sheet Information
October 31,2014
($US)

Fiscal year     Working     Capital                    
ending October     capital     asssets at     Other     Total     Shareholders  
31     (deficiency)     NBV     Assets     Assets     equity (deficit)  
                                  
October 31, 2014     1,034,921     21,483     3,806,369     5,636,605     4,862,773  
                                   
October 31, 2013     425,888     13,998     1,096,433     2,166,455     1,536,319  
                                 
Quarter ending                                
                                  
October 31, 2014     1,034,921     21,483     3,806,369     5,636,605     4,862,773  
                                   
July 31, 2014     262,467     23,319     2,832,160     3,978,560     3,117,946  
                                   
April 30, 2014     1,305,366     25,892     2,298,210     3,910,994     3,629,468  
                                   
January 31, 2014     1,397,049     21,771     1,353,498     3,091,426     2,772,316  
                                   
October 31, 2013     425,888     13,998     1,096,433     2,166,455     1,536,319  
                                   
July 31, 2013     (1,018,591 )   11,438     1,240,317     1,498,756     233,164  
                                   
April 30, 2013     (977,307 )   14,248     1,102,715     1,464,445     139,656  
                                   
January 31, 2013     (1,665,021 )   5,014     1,040,224     1,418,921     (619,783 )

30


Table 3

Micromem Technologies Inc
Management Discussion and Analysis
Summary of financing raised by Company
October 31,2014

Summary of financing raised by Company

    2012     2013  

  Shares     Price / share       Shares     Price / share    

 

                                   

Private placements

                                   

Q1

  2,005,022     0.107     214,478     1,967,117     0.161     316,373  

Q2

  2,178,592     0.213     464,495     5,358,704     0.159     852,809  

Q3

  708,333     0.210     148,510     2,126,603     0.158     336,504  

Q4

  1,452,952     0.147     213,416     6,654,533     0.211     1,404,846  

 

                                   

Exercise of warrants

                                   

Q1

  -           -     3,393,912     0.126     428,650  

Q2

  1,270,000     0.141     179,270     753,334     0.176     132,220  

Q3

  4,513,045     0.127     573,927     1,120,000     0.115     129,064  

Q4

  6,292,813     0.119     746,516     686,667     0.193     132,457  

 

                                   

Conversion of bridge loan

                                   

July 31, 2012

  1,120,000     0.098     109,825                    

October 31, 2012

  740,080     0.158     117,075                    

 

                                   

 

  20,280,837           2,767,512     22,060,870           3,732,923  

 

                                   

 

  2014                    

  Shares     Price / share                

                       

Exercise of warrants

                                   

Q1

  6,325,224     0.235     1,486,022                    

Q2

  6,023,399     0.232     1,400,080                    

Q3

  3,653,495     0.299     1,090,889                    

Q4

  11,408,599     0.248     2,824,628                    

 

                                   

Conversion of bridge loan

                                   

Q1

  2,517,501     0.120     302,100                    

Q2

  -           -                    

Q3

  -           -                    

Q4

  -           -                    

 

                                   

Shares issued against A

  17,081     0.489     8,353                    

 

                                   

 

  29,945,299           7,112,072                    

31


Table 4

Micromem Technologies Inc
Management Discussion and Analysis
October 31, 2014

Outstanding options            
at 10/31/2014   Strike price     Expiry date  
             
125,000   0.35     April 5, 2016  
7,275,000   0.20     October 31, 2016  
1,905,000   0.35     April 10, 2017  
1,090,000   0.30     January 22, 2018  
780,000   0.27     September 16, 2018  
300,000   0.35     October 17, 2018  
350,000   0.85     February 10, 2019  
280,000   0.64     April 25, 2019  
12,105,000   0.27        
             
Total proceeds if all options exercised:   $  3,284,800  
             
Outstanding Warrants            
             
123,276   0.75     November 11, 2014  
429,686   0.80     November 14, 2014  
600,000   0.77     December 14, 2014  
815,000   0.56     December 16, 2014  
2,252,501   0.12     January 23, 2015  
265,000   0.11     January 23, 2015  
4,485,463   0.37        
             
Total proceeds if all warrants exercised:   $  1,655,574  

32


Appendix 1

MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
AT OCTOBER 31, 2014
RECENT HISTORY: 2008-2012
  

1) Corporate Development:

The Company’s current profile began to develop with incorporation of Micromem Applied Sensor Technologies Inc. in 2008. The historical development is highlighted below;

2008: The Company’s current profile began to develop with the incorporation of MAST. MAST contracted to work with BAE Systems in Nashua New Hampshire to use Micromem’s patented MRAM design and develop a memory cell for a gallium arsenside foundry in a radiation hardened environment for military applications. In the course of that work, we determined that the Hall sensor had performance characteristics that could, on its own, be of value to the Company.

2009: We contracted with Frost and Sullivan to assess current market opportunities in the Hall sensor market. Their report suggested current market potential of approximately $2 billion.We began to market the Company’s sensor capabilities, initially through traditional public relations firms. Ultimately, the Company assumed full responsibility for promoting its technology through its own market research and solicitation, by participating in technical conferences and by developing its website content. We decided to develop, at our own cost, proof of concepts for products that we identified as having significant potential market value. We collaborated with companies in development efforts for a magnetic gold sensor, an oil condition sensor, an oil and gas aerial exploration platform, sensors designed for computer hardware systems, medical detection sensors and acoustic sensor applications. These were time consuming, difficult and expensive undertakings. Certain provisional patents were created on this work.

2010: In 2010 we were contacted by Lux Research, an independent research and advisory firm that operates internationally, and provides strategic advice and intelligence on emerging technologies. Lux was seeking a company to create small magnetic sensors for their client in down hole use in producing oil fields. MAST was engaged by Lux’s client (a major international oil company) to develop and deliver a sensor platform for detecting nanometer sized magnetic particles in a flowing oil stream at concentrations of less than one part per billion.

A second development project was secured with UK based GSI Westwind, a leading designer/manufacturer of air bearing spindles for customers who produce high speed air bearing motors.

33


2011: Through its continued development efforts, MAST had concluded that a significant market opportunity existed for it to leverage MEMS/nanofabrication methodologies and create unique combinations of sensors to provide solutions for complex unmet technology needs. MAST began its interaction with NineSigma Inc. at that time.

NineSigma is a Cleveland-based international company that has pioneered, over the past decade, an Open Innovation model, connecting innovation seeking companies to the best solutions, capabilities and partners around the world. MAST’s relationship with NineSigma has developed significantly since 2011 and has provided us with enhanced access to global Fortune 1000 companies. Through NineSigma, MAST has responded to multiple RFPs and has built up a robust sales proposal pipeline.

Micromem decided to suspend all further research and development efforts in the (MRAM) memory space, which it had begun to deemphasize commencing in 2008. This market was crowded with large competitors who had significantly greater resources to deploy. The memory market is mature and is very costly to pursue. Micromem's patents in this area were developed between 2000 and 2006 and have not been advanced since then.

2012: MAST pursued a number of projects that it had initially developed in 2010 – 11. The prototype milestones established in the GSI Westwind project were met and the Company submitted initial billings to recover a portion of the costs it had incurred. Testing began on pilot production samples.

MAST continued to advance the development work for the international energy company that it began in 2010 through the Lux Research introduction. A beta version of the product was developed for client testing. The Company submitted an initial billing to recover a portion of the costs incurred to date on this project.

MAST was successful in initiating new projects in 2012. It began development work on an oil pan plug sensor in conjunction with a major international automotive company and advanced this project to testing in the customer’s test facilities. Additionally, MAST demonstrated its breast cancer detection prototype technology in Europe for a group that was developing a franchised business model for such testing. Finally, MAST entered into negotiations with several international energy companies for use of its sensor technology for diagnostic control and monitoring systems.

2) Financing:

Between 2008-2012, the Company raised $16.968 million from private placements, from the exercise of warrants and through bridge loans.

3) Financial reporting:

The Company converted to IFRS reporting in 2011. Between 2011-2013 it raised a portion of its financing from Canadian denominated warrants which, under IFRS, was reported as a derivative warrant liability. In October, 2013 all warrants were converted to US dollars, being the Company’s functional currency and the derivative warrant liability was eliminated in the financial statements.

4) Project development cycle:

34


The Company has developed a standardized approach to dealing with client projects. It will engage a client by proposing a sensor based platform solution to a significant operating challenge or problem for which the client it seeking a solution. Its proposal to the client is a multi phased work schedule characterized as follow:

Phase 1: Initial assessment – completion of initial project plan, cost and volume estimates, product specifications and tolerances, establishing working principles.

Phase 2: Preliminary design work, specification of manufacturing processes, evaluation of manufacturing options.

Phase 3: Sensor electronics manufacturing test methods, completion of initial prototypes for beta testing by client.

Phase 4: Pilot production stage where product is certified, test protocols are established and quality processes are optimized.

Phase 5: Commercial production.

The Company will typically assume the costs associated with Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the development process. Thereafter, it looks to engage the client in a Joint Product Development Agreement where the ongoing costs of the phased activity are underwritten by the client.

The ultimate objective in this process is to secure long term annuity-like revenue streams from licensing and royalty agreements.

*************************

35


Appendix 2

MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
AT OCTOBER 31, 2014
CONVERSION TO IFRS REPORTING
  

The Company was required to convert to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) commencing with its fiscal year ending October 31, 2012 and retroactive to October 31, 2011. This conversion to IFRS reporting was completed at that time and the Company continues to report both on a quarterly basis (unaudited) and for its annual audited financial statements as at October 31, 2014. Our auditors have provided unqualified opinions on the yearend financial statements in 2013 and 2014.

IFRS reporting has principally impacted our financial reporting in several areas as described below:

  a.

The concept of functional and reporting currencies was introduced. In the Company’s case, both its functional and its reporting currency are the US dollar.

     
  b.

We are required to measure certain of our assets and liabilities at fair value – these are described as “financial instruments designated at fair value through profit & loss” (FVTPL). These financial instruments are recorded at fair value and this fair value must be updated at each quarter end.

     
  c.

Because we have raised financing through unit private placements (consisting of a common share and a common share purchase warrant), in Canadian funds, we have the underlying warrant exercisable in Canadian funds. Under IFRS reporting, the value of the warrant is reported under FVTPL as a derivative warrant liability (US denominated private placements are not afforded this treatment; in this latter case the entire private placement is recorded within the Shareholders’ Equity section of the statement of financial position). This means that for Canadian denominated warrants, we record the value of the warrants as a liability in our consolidated balance sheet. Additionally, we are required to revalue these outstanding warrants liability at each quarter end.

     
  d.

In the past we have on occasion raised financing through the issuance of convertible debt. Between 2010 and 2012 we secured nine different convertible bridge loans. We did not secure any further such loans in 2013 and at October 31, 2013 there remained outstanding one bridge loan in the amount of $290,014 which amount was converted to equity in 2014.

     
 

The conversion feature on the bridge loan is measured as an embedded derivative under IFRS reporting where the conversion price is in $CDN. This has required us to calculate and report the bridge loan in several components – the value of the debt component and the value of the embedded derivative (ie, the intrinsic value of the conversion feature itself). While these components are reported in our financial statements at October 31, 2013, the practice of raising financing through convertible bridge loans has been discontinued and this will no longer be a reporting matter to contend with in future.

36



  e.

Under IFRS, as under Canadian GAAP, reporting we continue to measure certain financing transactions using the Black Scholes option pricing model which is the established norm for all reporting issuers. The Black Scholes model is an arithmetic algorithm which is based on a number of inputs, certain of which are judgemental. In any event, we apply the Black Scholes model to value both Canadian and US denominated warrants, embedded derivatives and the intrinsic value of stock options which are granted from time to time.

In the Company’s view it is essential to recognize the following realities with respect to our financial reporting under IFRS and in utilizing the Black Scholes model for measurement purposes: the stock compensation cost associated with the periodic grant of stock options is a non-cash expense; the periodic quarterly revaluation of the derivative warrant liability which yields a gain or a loss at each quarter end in a non-cash item. The Company believes that in reviewing its financial statements, the reader must be cognizant of these items because they are significant and material non cash dollar amounts.

After October 31, 2013 the Company no longer reports a derivative warrant liability on its balance sheet and will not, accordingly, have any related gain (loss) on revaluation reported in its statement of income.

************************

37


Appendix 3

MICROMEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
AS AT OCTOBER 31, 2014
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
   

At October 31, 2014 the critical accounting policies utilized by the Company are summarized as below:

  a) Basis of consolidation:
       

Subsidiaries are legal entities controlled by the Company. Control exists when the Company has the power, directly or indirectly to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. The financial statements of the subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date that control commences until the date control ceases.

       

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated. The accounting policies have been consistently applied by the Company’s subsidiaries.

       
  b) Foreign currency translation:
       

IFRS requires that the functional currency of each entity in the consolidated entity be determined separately in accordance with specific indicators and should be measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the “functional currency”). As a result of an assessment of the primary indicators, management assessed the functional currency of the Company and its subsidiaries to be U.S. dollar (“USD”). The consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared and presented using the USD.

 
    Foreign currency transactions denominated in other than U.S. dollars are translated into the functional currency on the following basis:
       
i) Monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing at the statement of financial position date.
       
ii) Non-monetary assets and liabilities that are measured at historical cost are translated using the exchange rate at the date of the transaction.
       
iii) Income and expenses for each income statement line item presented are translated at average exchange rates during the quarter in which they are recognized.

38


Exchange differences resulting from the settlement of foreign currency transactions are recognized directly in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss in the period in which incurred.

  c)

Financial Instruments: Recognition, Measurement, Disclosure and Presentation:

     
 

The Company initially recognizes loans and receivables and deposits on the date that they are originated. All other financial assets including assets designated at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) are recognized initially on the trade date at which the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.

     
 

The Company derecognizes a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire.

     
 

Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount presented in the statement of financial position only when the Company has the legal right to offset the amounts and intends either to settle on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

     
 

The Company has the following financial assets: cash, deposits and other receivables and promissory note receivable.

     
 

All financial assets and financial liabilities, including derivatives, are initially measured in the statement of financial position at fair value, except for loans and receivables, investments held-to maturity and other financial liabilities, which are measured at amortized cost. Measurement in subsequent periods depends on whether the financial instrument had been classified as FVTPL, available-for- sale, held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, or other liabilities.

     
 

FVTPL financial assets are measured at fair value and all gains and losses are included in the statement of loss and comprehensive loss in the period in which they arise. Available-for-sale financial assets are measured at fair value with revaluation gains and losses included in other comprehensive income until the assets are removed from the statement of financial position.

     
 

The Company classifies cash as FVTPL. Deposits and other receivables and promissory note receivable are classified as loans and receivables, and are initially measured at fair value and subsequently at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and bridge loans are classified as other liabilities, and initially measured at fair value and subsequently at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method. The derivative warrant liability and embedded derivatives in bridge loans are classified at FVTPL and are measured at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss.

39



  d)

Compound Financial Instruments

     
 

Compound financial instruments issued by the Company comprise convertible notes that can be converted to share capital at the option of the holder and the number of shares to be issued does not vary with changes in their fair value.

     
 

The liability component of a compound financial instrument is recognized initially at the fair value of a similar liability that does not have an equity conversion option.

     
 

The equity component, if the conversion feature of the convertible note is in US dollars, is recognized initially as the difference between the fair value of the compound financial instrument as a whole and the fair value of the liability component. Any directly attributable transaction costs are allocated to the liability and equity components in proportion to their initial carrying amounts.

     
 

Subsequent to initial recognition, the liability component of a compound financial instrument is measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method. The equity component of a compound financial instrument is not remeasured subsequent to initial recognition.

     
 

Interest, dividends, losses and gains relating to the financial liability are recognized in profit or loss except for borrowing costs on qualifying assets which are added to asset cost. Distributions to the equity holders are recognized in equity, net of any tax.

40



  e)

Hybrid Financial Instruments:

     
 

Financial instruments with embedded derivative liabilities are accounted for as hybrid financial instruments. The Company has hybrid financial instruments when the embedded derivative conversion option right of the convertible notes gives the right to the holder to convert into common shares in Canadian dollars (“CDN”).

     
 

An embedded derivative is a feature within a contract, such that the cash flows associated with that feature behave in a similar fashion to a stand-alone derivative. An embedded derivative is separated from its host contract and accounted for as a derivative only when three criteria are satisfied:

  • When the economic risks and characteristics of the embedded derivatives are not closely related to those of the host contract;

  • A separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative would meet the definition of a derivative; and

  • The entire instrument is not measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the income statement.

 

Subsequent to initial recognition, the embedded derivative component is re- measured each reporting period using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the change in fair value recognized in statement of loss and comprehensive loss.

       
  f)

Derivative Liability

       
 

The Company’s derivative financial instruments consist of derivative liabilities in relation to its share purchase warrants.

       
  i)

Derivative Warrant Liability:

       
 

The Company has issued share purchase warrants in conjunction with private placements for the purchase of common shares of the Company. Until October 2013 a number of these share purchase warrants were issued with an exercise price in CDN, rather than USD (the reporting and functional currency of the Company). Such share purchase warrants are considered to be derivative instruments and the Company is required to re-measure the fair value of these at each reporting date. The fair value of these CDN share purchase warrants are re-measured at each financial position date using the Black Scholes option-pricing model using the exchange rates at the financial position date and measured over their remaining life. Adjustments to the fair value of the derivative warrant liability as at the financial position date are recorded in the statement of loss and comprehensive loss as (gain) loss on revaluation of derivative warrant liability. Share purchase warrants that have expired or have been forfeited are adjusted to the statement of loss and comprehensive loss as (gain) loss on revaluation of derivative warrant liability.

41


Consideration received upon the exercise of warrants is credited to share capital and the related amount is transferred from contributed surplus (USD warrants) or derivative warrant liability (CDN warrants) to share capital.

  ii)

Conversion Feature of Bridge Loans

       
 

The conversion feature on the bridge loans allows the holder of the option to convert the outstanding principal and interest from time to time to common equity. The Company, using the Black Scholes option-pricing model, accounts for bridge loans as follows:

     

 

  (ii.1)

At date of origination the bifurcation of the total balance of the loan as debt and equity is calculated. If the conversion feature of the bridge loan is in CDN there is no equity component, resulting in an embedded derivative. Accretion expense is recorded over the term of the loan.

     

 

  (ii.2)

The total loan proceeds are allocated between the bridge loans and the related embedded derivative based on their relative fair value. The embedded derivative conversion feature is included under the bridge loans in the statement of financial position.

     

 

  (ii.3)

The conversion feature is revalued at the end of the reporting period and any adjustment is reflected in the statement of loss and comprehensive loss if the conversion feature is in CDN.


  g)

Loan Impairment:

     
 

Impaired loans are accounted for at their face amount net of the allowance for loan impairment. When a loan is deemed to be impaired, its carrying amount is reduced to its estimated realizable amount which is measured by discounting the expected future cash flows at the effective interest rate inherent in the loan. The amount initially recognized as an impairment loan, together with any subsequent change, is charged to the allowance as an adjustment. A write-off of the loan will occur when the loan is believed to have no reasonable expectation of collectability.

     
  h)

Intangible Assets

     
 

Costs for the general development of the Company’s sensor technology are expensed unless they meet the criteria for deferral. Expenditures are capitalized if the Company can demonstrate each of the following criteria: (i) the technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset so that it will be available for use or sale, (ii) its intention to complete the intangible asset and use or sell it, (iii) its ability to use or sell the intangible asset, (iv) how the intangible asset will generate probable future economic benefits, (v) the availability of adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the development and to use or sell the intangible asset, and (vi) its ability to measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development; otherwise, they are expensed as incurred. Commencing in 2011, the Company determined that these costs met the criteria and, accordingly, these costs have been capitalized and are tested in each reporting period for impairment. Amortization is provided on a 7 year straight-line basis. Commencing in 2014 amortization expense is capitalized as deferred development costs as these charges are directly related to development.

42



  i)

Property and Equipment:

     
 

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and are amortized over their estimated useful lives at the following annual rates and methods:


  Computers 30% declining balance
  Office equipment 30% declining balance

  j)

Impairment of Long-lived Assets:

     
 

Long-lived assets consist of property and equipment, patents, intangible assets, and deferred development costs.

     
 

The carrying amounts of property and equipment, patents, intangible assets and deferred development costs, are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable When the carrying amount exceeds the estimated recoverable amount, the assets are written down to their recoverable amount.

     
 

The recoverable amount of long-lived assets is the greater of fair value less costs of disposal. In assessing value in use, estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. Impairment losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss.

     
 

An assessment is made at each reporting date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognized impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists, the recoverable amount is estimated. A previously recognized impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognized. If that is the case, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its recoverable amount. That increased amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of amortization, had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. Following the recognition or reversal of an impairment loss, the amortization charge applicable to the asset is adjusted prospectively in order to systematically allocate the revised carrying amount, net of any residual value, over the estimated useful life.

43



 

Gains or losses on the disposal of property and equipment, patents and intangible assets represent the difference between the net proceeds and the carrying value at the date of sale.

     
 

The Company uses the relative fair value approach in accounting for the value assigned to the common shares and the common share purchase warrants which it had made available in the unit private placement financings that it secured, calculated in accordance with the Black Scholes option-pricing model.

     
  k)

Research and Development Costs:

     
 

Research costs are expensed in the period incurred. Development costs are expensed as incurred unless they meet the criteria for deferral. Expenditures during the development phase are capitalized if the Company can demonstrate each of the following criteria: (i) the technical feasibility of completing the asset so that it will be available for use or sale, (ii) its intention to complete the asset and use or sell it, (iii) its ability to use or sell the asset, (iv) how the asset will generate probable future economic benefits, (v) the availability of adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the development and to use or sell the asset, and (vi) its ability to measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the asset during its development; otherwise, these costs are expensed as incurred. Commencing in 2009, the Company determined that its continuing activities related to the application of its sensor technology to projects met the deferral criteria and, accordingly, these costs have been capitalized and are tested in each reporting period for recoverability. Development costs will be amortized on an appropriate basis at the time each of the developed assets is available for use.

     
 

Payments received from development partners on projects are recorded to deferred development costs as a recovery of cost incurred.

     
  l)

Patents:

     
 

Patents are recorded at cost and are amortized on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives of 5 years. Patents are recorded net of accumulated amortization with amortization expense capitalized as deferred development costs since the patents are directly related to development.

     
  m)

Unit Private Placements:

     
 

The Company uses the relative fair value approach in accounting for the value assigned to the common shares and the common share purchase warrants which it had made available in the unit private placement financings that it secured, calculated in accordance with the Black Scholes option-pricing model.

44



 

basis over their estimated useful lives of 5 years. Patents are recorded net of accumulated amortization with amortization expense capitalized as deferred development costs since the patents are directly related to development.

       
  n)

Stock based Compensation and Other Stock based Payments:

       
 

The Company applies the fair value based method of accounting for all stock based payments to employees and non-employees and all direct awards of stock. For non-employees, stock based payments are measured at the fair value of the services received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued or liabilities incurred, whichever is more reliably measurable. Stock based compensation is charged to operations over the vesting period and the offset is credited to contributed surplus.

       
 

Consideration received upon the exercise of stock options is credited to share capital and the related amount is transferred from contributed surplus.

       
 

The fair value of stock options and warrants is determined by the Black Scholes option-pricing model with assumptions for risk free interest rates, dividend yields, volatility factors of the expected market price of the Company’s common shares and an expected life of the option or warrant issued. A forfeiture rate is estimated on the grant date and is adjusted to reflect the actual number of options that vest. In the event that vested stock options expire, previously recognized stock based compensation is not reversed. In the event that stock options are forfeited, previously recognized stock based compensation associated with the unvested portion of the stock options forfeited is reversed. The fair value of direct awards of stock is determined by the quoted market price of the Company’s stock.

       
  o)

Income Taxes:

       
 

Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Current tax and deferred tax are recognized in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to a business combination, or items recognized directly in equity or in other comprehensive income.

       
 

Current tax is the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable income or loss for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.

       
 

Deferred tax is recognized in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is not recognized for the following temporary differences: the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor taxable income or loss and differences relating to investments in subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities to the extent that it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future. In addition, deferred tax is not recognized for taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill.

45



 

Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to temporary differences when they reverse, based on the rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.

     
 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets and they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they intend to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realized simultaneously.

     
 

A deferred tax asset is recognized for unused tax losses, tax credits and deductible temporary differences, to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be utilized. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized.

     
  p)

Earnings or Loss per Share:

     
 

Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net earnings (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by adjusting the weighted average number of number of common shares outstanding for the effects of all dilutive potential common shares, which are comprised of outstanding warrants, conversion options and vested stock options. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share assume that any proceeds received for in-the-money warrants and options would be used to buy common shares at the average market price for the period.

     
  q)

Changes in Accounting Standards:

     
 

As of November 01, 2013 the Company adopted the following new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations which are effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013:

  • IFRS 10 – Consolidated Financial Statements

  • IFRS 11 – Joint Arrangements

  • IFRS 12 – Disclosures of Interests in Other Entities

  • IFRS 13 – Fair Value Measurement

  • IAS 27 – Separate financial statements

  • IAS 28 – Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures

The adoption of these accounting standards had no impact on the consolidated financial statements previously filed by the Company. As a result no reconciliations are provided for the adoption of these new standards.

46





FORM 52-109F1
CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Joseph Fuda, Chief Executive Officer of Micromem Technologies Inc., certify the following:

1. Review: I have reviewed the AIF, if any, annual financial statements and annual MD&A, including, for greater certainty, all documents and information that are incorporated by reference in the AIF (together, the "annual filings") of Micromem Technologies Inc. (the "issuer") for the financial year ended October 31, 2014.

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings.

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings.

4. Responsibility: The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers' Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the financial year end

  (a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that


  (i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

  (ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and


  (b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer's GAAP.



5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer's ICFR is Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).

5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A

5.3 Limitation on scope of design: N/A

6. Evaluation: The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have

  (a)

evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer's DC&P at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of DC&P at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

  (b)

evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer's ICFR at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A.


  (i)

our conclusions about the effectiveness of ICFR at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

  (ii)

for each material weakness relating to operation existing at the financial year end

  (A)

a description of the material weakness;

  (B)

the impact of the material weakness on the issuer's financial reporting and its ICFR; and

  (C)

the issuer's current plans, if any, or any actions already undertaken, for remediating the material weakness.

7. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A any change in the issuer's ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on August 1, 2014 and ended on October 31, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's ICFR.

8. Reporting to the issuer's auditors and board of directors or audit committee: The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of ICFR, to the issuer's auditors, and the board of directors or the audit committee of the board of directors any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's ICFR.

Date: February 27, 2015

/s/ Joseph Fuda
Joseph Fuda
Chief Executive Officer





FORM 52-109F1
CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL FILINGS
FULL CERTIFICATE

I, Dan Amadori, Chief Financial Officer of Micromem Technologies Inc., certify the following:

1. Review: I have reviewed the AIF, if any, annual financial statements and annual MD&A, including, for greater certainty, all documents and information that are incorporated by reference in the AIF (together, the "annual filings") of Micromem Technologies Inc. (the "issuer") for the financial year ended October 31, 2014.

2. No misrepresentations: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the annual filings.

3. Fair presentation: Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the annual filings.

4. Responsibility: The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers' Annual and Interim Filings, for the issuer.

5. Design: Subject to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have, as at the financial year end

  (a)

designed DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that


  (i)

material information relating to the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which the interim filings are being prepared; and

  (ii)

information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and


  (b)

designed ICFR, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer's GAAP.



5.1 Control framework: The control framework the issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I used to design the issuer's ICFR is Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).

5.2 ICFR – material weakness relating to design: N/A

5.3 Limitation on scope of design: N/A

6. Evaluation: The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have

  (a)

evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer's DC&P at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of DC&P at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

  (b)

evaluated, or caused to be evaluated under our supervision, the effectiveness of the issuer's ICFR at the financial year end and the issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A.


  (i)

our conclusions about the effectiveness of ICFR at the financial year end based on that evaluation; and

  (ii)

for each material weakness relating to operation existing at the financial year end

  (A)

a description of the material weakness;

  (B)

the impact of the material weakness on the issuer's financial reporting and its ICFR; and

  (C)

the issuer's current plans, if any, or any actions already undertaken, for remediating the material weakness.

7. Reporting changes in ICFR: The issuer has disclosed in its annual MD&A any change in the issuer's ICFR that occurred during the period beginning on August 1, 2014 and ended on October 31, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's ICFR.

8. Reporting to the issuer's auditors and board of directors or audit committee: The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of ICFR, to the issuer's auditors, and the board of directors or the audit committee of the board of directors any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's ICFR.

Date: February 27, 2015

/s/ Dan Amadori
Dan Amadori
Chief Financial Officer


CS Diagnostics (PK) (USOTC:FZRO)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 5월(5) 2024 으로 6월(6) 2024 CS Diagnostics (PK) 차트를 더 보려면 여기를 클릭.
CS Diagnostics (PK) (USOTC:FZRO)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 6월(6) 2023 으로 6월(6) 2024 CS Diagnostics (PK) 차트를 더 보려면 여기를 클릭.