Pre-Tax IRR 61% and 5% NPV of US$104 million; Average Annual Production of 3.2
M Oz Ag Equivalent*; All-In Cash Costs of
$12.72 oz Ag Equivalent; Significant
Resource Increase
TSX.V: SCZ
VANCOUVER, Sept. 11, 2014 /CNW/ - Santacruz Silver Mining
Ltd. (TSX.V:SCZ) is pleased to announce the results of a
Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") and new resource estimate
prepared pursuant to National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101") on
its San Felipe Project located 130 km northeast of Hermosillo in Sonora State, Mexico. Highlights of the PEA, using a
US$19.91 per ounce silver base case,
include:
- Pre-tax Net Present Value ("NPV") at a 5% discount rate of US
$103.5 million and an Internal Rate
of Return ("IRR") of 60.6%;
- After-tax NPV at a 5% discount rate of US $61.2 million and IRR of 37.7%;
- Production of 24.3 million ounces of silver equivalent (after
milling and smelting recoveries);
- Average annual production of 3.2 million ounces of silver
equivalent over a 7.5 year mine life;
- Initial capital cost ("CAPEX") of US $36.3 million, including $6 million of working capital;
- Estimated all-in cash costs of US $12.72/oz silver equivalent (including site
operating costs, smelter costs, sustaining capital and NSR payments
); and
- Pre-tax payback of 1.6 years after start-up, and 2.3 years
after-tax payback.
At a 150 g/t Ag equivalent cut-off, the new resource estimate
for all veins is:
- Indicated – 1.1Mt at 76.5 g/t Ag, 2.5% Pb and 6.4%Zn = 423 g/t
Ag equiv or 15.2 Moz Ag equiv
- Inferred – 3.3Mt at 64.8 g/t Ag, 1.9% Pb and 4.9%
Zn = 326 g/t Aq equiv or 34.3 Moz Ag
equiv
Santacruz President and Chief
Executive Officer Arturo Préstamo
stated, "This Preliminary Economic Assessment is excellent news for
the Company and indicates that the San
Felipe project has strong economic parameters and is
potentially economically viable in the current market
environment. The estimated CAPEX for the project is
relatively low, and the property has significant exploration
upside. The Company will be initiating the priority studies
identified by the study team to de-risk the project immediately.
These include completing more metallurgical work, initiating
exploration drifting and trial mining to evaluate the continuity of
higher grade mineralization and ground conditions for potential
future mining."
He continued, "The significant increase in resources in the
recent estimate shows that the efforts of our exploration team are
paying off. Some of the resource areas are still open and
surface work over the last year has identified additional vein
targets. The Company believes that, similar to many vein
deposits, if a mine is developed on the current San Felipe resource there will be
opportunities to identify new resources to keep the operation going
for many years to come. With the PEA now complete, the Company will
be initiating the recommended work program to bring the project
towards pre-feasibility and will complete permitting for the
proposed infrastructure. At the same time, the Company will
continue to aggressively explore the rest of the property. In
particular, the Company will focus on those areas already
identified with high potential to further increase the resources on
the San Felipe Project."
The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes inferred
mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically
to have the economic considerations applied to them that would
enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There can
therefore be no certainty that the PEA will be realized. It is also
important to note that mineral resources that are not mineral
reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
*For the PEA, Silver Equivalent was calculated using prices of
US$19.91/oz., US$0.99/lb. and US$1.00/lb. for silver, lead and zinc,
respectively.
PEA Summary
The PEA models a combined open pit and underground mine and mill
that produces both a lead and a zinc concentrate with the lead
concentrate containing the payable silver values. Resources
on four veins, Ventana, Las Lamas, San
Felipe and Transversales are included in the analysis.
In the model, the upper parts of the Ventana, San Felipe and Tranversales veins are mined by
open-pit methods. Separate underground workings are developed
to access the lower parts of the Ventana and San Felipe veins and the Las Lamas vein.
Proposed mining is by contractor. Underground mining is
modeled to be by long-hole sub-level retreat using diesel mobile
equipment. Access to lower levels is by decline. Just
over a year of pre-production construction would be required.
The proposed 1,250 tonnes/day mill contains a crushing circuit,
ball mill and flotation circuits. Concentrates will be sold
and delivered to a smelter or concentrate trader.
The PEA was completed by a group of independent qualified
persons (as such term is defined in NI-43-101), including
Gregory Blaylock, P.Eng, P.E. of JDS
Energy & Mining Inc., Deepak
Malhotra, Registered SME Member and President of Resource
Development Inc., Fletcher Bourke,
P.Geo., of Kuu Exploration Ltd. and Hans
Smit, P.Geo., of Hans Smit,
P. Geo. Inc. The PEA incorporates a new resource
estimated by Gary Giroux, P.Eng. of
Giroux Consultants Ltd.
A summary of the key parameters and conclusions of the PEA are
given in the table below. The 100-day average as of September 4, 2014 was used as the base case metal
price. The PEA is based on a stand-alone project
and evaluates the potential economics from the start of
construction. It does not incorporate costs before any
production decision. The PEA and new resource estimate will
be available on SEDAR within 45 days of this press release.
The reader is advised that the PEA summarized in this press
release is intended to provide only an initial, high-level review
of the project potential and design options. The PEA mine plan and
economic model include the use of inferred mineral resources.
Inferred mineral resources are considered to be too speculative
geologically to be used as the basis of an economic analysis except
as permitted under NI 43-101. There is no guarantee that inferred
mineral resources can be converted to indicated or measured mineral
resources, and as such, there can be no certainty the project
economics described herein will be achieved.
|
|
San Felipe - September 2014 PEA
Results
|
This PEA is preliminary in nature and there is no
certainty that the results of the PEA will be
realized.
|
The resources incorporated in this assessment are not
mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
|
The first year of this assessment is based almost
entirely on inferred resources and there is limited metallurgical
information
and no geotechnical information to
support the first year of the analysis.
|
The results of this study show that the project
has potential to be economic and further work to determine economic
viability is warranted
|
This study is too
preliminary to demonstrate economic viability.
|
San Felipe PEA
Production Estimate
|
|
|
Total Tonnes to
Mill
|
3.4 Mt
|
|
|
|
Average Milled per
Day
|
1250 t/day
|
|
|
|
Underground Tonnes to
Mill
|
2.4 Mt
|
|
|
|
Open Pit Tonnes to
Mill
|
1.0 Mt
|
|
|
|
Open Pit Tonnes
Waste
|
7.1 Mt
|
|
|
|
Open Pit Strip
Ratio
|
7:1
|
|
|
|
Years
Production
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
|
Ag
|
Pb
|
Zn
|
|
Grade
|
63.5 g/t
|
1.7%
|
5.1%
|
|
Metal
Mined
|
7.0 Moz
|
126.5 Mlbs
|
385.9 Mlbs
|
|
Recovery –
Sulphide (Oxide de-rated)
|
80%
|
86%
|
87%
|
|
Metal Produced in
Concentrate
|
5.5 Moz
|
107.3 Mlbs
|
328.7 Mlbs
|
|
Metals Payable after
Smelting
|
5.2 Moz
|
100.9 Mlbs
|
279.4 Mlbs
|
|
Metal
Price
|
$19.91/oz
|
$0.99/lb
|
$1.00/lb
|
|
Smelter Credit
($US)
|
$104.6 M
|
$99.9 M
|
$279.4 M
|
$483.8
M
|
|
San Felipe PEA
Economics - Life of Mine
|
|
$US
'000
|
$US
'000
|
|
Per
Tonne
Mined
|
|
Smelter
Credit
|
|
$483,784
|
|
|
$141.78
|
Smelter
Costs
|
($83,064)
|
|
|
($24.38)
|
|
Concentrate
Shipping
|
($12,571)
|
|
|
($3.68)
|
|
Total Smelter
and Concentrate Charges
|
|
($95,605)
|
|
|
($28.02)
|
NSR
(1%)
|
|
($3,540)
|
|
|
($1.04)
|
Site Operating
Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining
|
($89,138)
|
|
|
($26.24)
|
|
Milling
|
($66,004)
|
|
|
($19.34)
|
|
G&A
|
($23,380)
|
|
|
($6.85)
|
|
Total
Site Operating
|
|
($178,522)
|
|
|
($52.32)
|
Net Operating
Cash Flow
|
|
$206,118
|
|
|
$60.40
|
Initial Capital
Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining
|
(2,500)
|
|
|
|
|
Milling
|
(15,300)
|
|
|
|
|
G&A and
Infrastructure
|
(12,460)
|
|
|
|
|
Working
Capital
|
(6,000)
|
|
|
|
|
Total Initial
Capital
|
(36,260)
|
|
|
($10.63)
|
|
Sustaining
Capital Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining
|
($26,265)
|
|
|
|
|
Milling
|
$0
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure
|
(5,025)
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Sustaining Capital
|
($31,290)
|
|
|
($9.17)
|
|
Closure
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salvage
Value
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
Recoup of Working
Capital
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
|
Total Closure
Capital
|
$6,500
|
|
|
$1.90
|
|
Total
Capital
|
|
($61,050)
|
|
|
($17.89)
|
Reclamation
|
(3,000)
|
(3,000)
|
|
|
($0.88)
|
Net Cash Flow -
Pre Tax
|
|
$142,068
|
|
|
$41.63
|
Environmental
Fee
|
($533)
|
|
|
|
|
Mining
Royalty
|
($14,143)
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax
|
($39,480)
|
($53,415)
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Flow -
After Tax
|
|
$88,653
|
|
|
$25.98
|
Total cash cost
(Opex, smelter, NSR and Sustaining Capital)
|
($90.54)
|
per tonne
|
|
|
|
|
($12.72)
|
per oz Ag
Eq
|
San Felipe NPV and
IRR - Base Case $USM
|
|
Pre-Tax
NPV
|
After Tax
NPV
|
Discount Rate
0%
|
142.1
|
88.7
|
2%
|
125.0
|
76.4
|
5%
|
103.5
|
61.2
|
8%
|
86.1
|
48.9
|
10%
|
76.3
|
42.0
|
IRR
|
60.6
|
37.7
|
Payback
(years)
|
1.6
|
2.3
|
Note: These tables are in part based on inferred
mineral resources which are considered too speculative geologically
to have the economic considerations applied to them that would
enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves.
*The after tax calculation considers the new Mexican tax
regime including a 0.5% environmental fee for gold/silver/platinum,
a 7.5% royalty and depreciation and amortization annually at a 10%
rate.
Risks and Opportunities
The San Felipe project is
subject to the usual risks that comparable mining projects face,
including decreases in metal prices, increases in costs and changes
in mineral title law and taxation. Mexico is considered a reasonably stable
country and recent changes in taxation are incorporated in the PEA
model. Santacruz has a good relationship with the community
of San Felipe and has an agreement
regarding surface land-use with the local Ejido. As mentioned
above, the PEA is based in part on inferred mineral resources which
are too speculative geologically to have the economic
considerations applied to them that would enable them to be
categorized as mineral reserves. Geotechnical analysis
of the rock mass indicates potentially difficult ground
conditions. The continuity of higher-grades at a stope scale
has not been confirmed. The first year of open pit production
is modeled almost entirely on inferred resources and there is
limited metallurgical information and no geotechnical information
to support this part of the model.
Opportunities include:
- Higher metal prices – Increases in metal prices from those
modeled results in significant increases in NPV and IRR;
- Higher grades – The grade of material mined may be higher if
mineralization is continuous at a stope scale, resulting in
decreased dilution and increased mining recovery;
- Increased resource in mine plan – Any combination of higher
metal prices, lower costs, higher recovery or decreased dilution
will result in more of the current resource being potentially
economic;
- Resource expansion – the San
Felipe vein area is open as is the Transversales vein.
Recent exploration has identified new vein targets;
- Copper extraction – Copper grades average in the range of 0.3
to 0.4% for the material considered in the PEA. If further
testwork can show that a copper concentrate is possible, it could
add to the project economics.
The effects of changes to various parameters can be seen on the
sensitivity tables below:
San Felipe Project Preliminary Economic Assessment 2014 -
Sensitivities:
Metal
Prices
|
|
|
|
-20%
|
-10%
|
Base
|
+10%
|
+20%
|
|
|
Ag
|
15.93
|
17.92
|
19.91
|
21.90
|
23.89
|
|
|
Pb
|
0.79
|
0.89
|
0.99
|
1.09
|
1.19
|
|
|
Zn
|
0.80
|
0.90
|
1.00
|
1.10
|
1.20
|
NPV 5% $US
M
|
pre-tax
|
28.7
|
66.1
|
103.5
|
140.9
|
178.3
|
|
|
after-tax
|
11.8
|
36.5
|
61.2
|
85.8
|
110.5
|
IRR %
|
|
pre-tax
|
22.3%
|
42.1%
|
60.6%
|
78.6%
|
96.4%
|
|
|
after-tax
|
12.1%
|
25.5%
|
37.7%
|
49.4%
|
60.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Cost
|
|
|
|
+20%
|
+10%
|
Base
|
-10%
|
-20%
|
NPV 5% $US
M
|
pre-tax
|
75.8
|
89.6
|
103.5
|
117.3
|
131.2
|
|
|
after-tax
|
42.6
|
51.9
|
61.2
|
70.4
|
79.7
|
IRR %
|
|
pre-tax
|
47.2%
|
54.0%
|
60.6%
|
67.3%
|
73.8%
|
|
|
after-tax
|
28.6%
|
33.2%
|
37.7%
|
42.2%
|
46.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
Cost
|
|
|
|
+20%
|
+10%
|
Base
|
-10%
|
-20%
|
NPV 5% $US
M
|
pre-tax
|
92.0
|
97.7
|
103.5
|
109.2
|
115.0
|
|
|
after-tax
|
52.5
|
56.8
|
61.2
|
65.5
|
69.8
|
IRR %
|
|
pre-tax
|
47.4%
|
53.5%
|
60.6%
|
69.3%
|
80.0%
|
|
|
after-tax
|
29.3%
|
33.2%
|
37.7%
|
43.2%
|
49.8%
|
Note: This table is in part based on
Inferred Mineral Resources which are considered too speculative
geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them
that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves.
Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability.
Mineral Resources:
Giroux Consultants Ltd. completed the mineral resource estimate
on the San Felipe Project on six separate mineralized structures
drilled to date: the La Ventana,
the Las Lamas, the San Felipe, the
two San Felipe hangingwall
structures and the Transversales vein. The new mineral
resource estimate was utilized in preparation of the PEA.
A summary of the new resource at various cut-offs is given in
the table below. The San
Felipe vein and two hangingwall structures are
combined in the table. In addition to silver, lead and zinc,
the veins contain low amounts of copper and anomalous gold.
Since testwork has not been able to produce an economic copper
concentrate and gold values are too low to be significant, the
values for these metals have not been considered at this time.
San Felipe Project Resource
July 2014
Vein
|
Classification
|
Cut-off
AgEq
(g/t)
|
Tonnes >
Cut-off
(tonnes)
|
Grades >
Cut-off
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Pb
(%)
|
Zn
(%)
|
AgEQ
(g/t)
|
AgEq
Ozs.
|
Ventana
|
Indicated
|
125
|
893,000
|
69.03
|
2.79
|
6.43
|
434.11
|
12,464,000
|
Las Lamas
|
Indicated
|
125
|
98,000
|
71.14
|
0.23
|
4.90
|
265.66
|
837,000
|
San Felipe
|
Indicated
|
125
|
223,000
|
86.55
|
1.59
|
4.94
|
326.66
|
2,342,000
|
Total
|
Indicated
|
125
|
1,214,000
|
72.42
|
2.36
|
6.03
|
400.77
|
15,643,000
|
Ventana
|
Inferred
|
125
|
1,582,000
|
55.48
|
2.46
|
5.56
|
373.14
|
18,979,000
|
Las Lamas
|
Inferred
|
125
|
402,000
|
92.72
|
0.35
|
5.36
|
309.24
|
3,997,000
|
San Felipe
|
Inferred
|
125
|
1,355,000
|
55.90
|
1.43
|
3.67
|
244.20
|
10,638,000
|
Transversales
|
Inferred
|
125
|
662,000
|
49.74
|
1.45
|
2.09
|
182.78
|
3,890,000
|
Total
|
Inferred
|
125
|
4,001,000
|
58.41
|
1.73
|
4.33
|
291.56
|
37,504,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ventana
|
Indicated
|
150
|
826,000
|
73.04
|
2.92
|
6.81
|
458.27
|
12,170,000
|
Las Lamas
|
Indicated
|
150
|
84,000
|
76.18
|
0.25
|
5.29
|
286.28
|
773,000
|
San Felipe
|
Indicated
|
150
|
208,000
|
90.6
|
1.65
|
5.15
|
340.66
|
2,278,000
|
Total
|
Indicated
|
150
|
1,118,000
|
76.54
|
2.48
|
6.39
|
423.47
|
15,221,000
|
Ventana
|
Inferred
|
150
|
1,443,000
|
58.97
|
2.59
|
5.92
|
395.94
|
18,369,000
|
Las Lamas
|
Inferred
|
150
|
383,000
|
95.27
|
0.36
|
5.5
|
317.54
|
3,910,000
|
San Felipe
|
Inferred
|
150
|
987,000
|
66.15
|
1.55
|
4.36
|
284.01
|
9,012,000
|
Transversales
|
Inferred
|
150
|
460,000
|
54.97
|
1.66
|
2.27
|
202.82
|
3,000,000
|
Total
|
Inferred
|
150
|
3,273,000
|
64.82
|
1.88
|
4.89
|
325.87
|
34,291,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ventana
|
Indicated
|
175
|
764,000
|
77.29
|
3.05
|
7.18
|
482.1
|
11,842,000
|
Las Lamas
|
Indicated
|
175
|
70,000
|
81.98
|
0.27
|
5.77
|
311.19
|
700,000
|
San Felipe
|
Indicated
|
175
|
192,000
|
95.17
|
1.7
|
5.39
|
355.74
|
2,196,000
|
Total
|
Indicated
|
175
|
1,026,000
|
80.96
|
2.61
|
6.75
|
446.79
|
14,738,000
|
Ventana
|
Inferred
|
175
|
1,327,000
|
62.17
|
2.7
|
6.24
|
416.36
|
17,764,000
|
Las Lamas
|
Inferred
|
175
|
356,000
|
98.63
|
0.37
|
5.71
|
329.13
|
3,767,000
|
San Felipe
|
Inferred
|
175
|
798,000
|
73.26
|
1.63
|
4.88
|
312.88
|
8,027,000
|
Transversales
|
Inferred
|
175
|
309,000
|
58.37
|
1.87
|
2.5
|
223
|
2,215,000
|
Total
|
Inferred
|
175
|
2,790,000
|
69.57
|
2.00
|
5.37
|
354.22
|
31,773,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ventana
|
Indicated
|
200
|
721,000
|
80.53
|
3.14
|
7.46
|
499.88
|
11,588,000
|
Las Lamas
|
Indicated
|
200
|
59,000
|
89.50
|
0.30
|
6.17
|
334.94
|
635,000
|
San Felipe
|
Indicated
|
200
|
175,000
|
100.12
|
1.75
|
5.65
|
372.07
|
2,093,000
|
Total
|
Indicated
|
200
|
955,000
|
84.67
|
2.71
|
7.05
|
466.27
|
14,316,000
|
Ventana
|
Inferred
|
200
|
1,220,000
|
65.34
|
2.83
|
6.54
|
436.41
|
17,118,000
|
Las Lamas
|
Inferred
|
200
|
322,000
|
103.55
|
0.39
|
5.96
|
344.41
|
3,566,000
|
San Felipe
|
Inferred
|
200
|
629,000
|
83.24
|
1.69
|
5.49
|
347.03
|
7,018,000
|
Transversales
|
Inferred
|
200
|
200,000
|
58.74
|
2.19
|
2.64
|
241.34
|
1,552,000
|
Total
|
Inferred
|
200
|
2,371,000
|
74.72
|
2.14
|
5.85
|
383.75
|
29,253,000
|
Since the veins contain different metals, a silver equivalent
value cut-off is given in the resource tables to better compare
value. The metal prices used in the silver equivalent
estimation are from a 100 day moving average as of June 3, 2014 and are listed below.
|
|
|
Factor
|
Ag
|
-
|
US$ 20.06 per
ounce
|
0.64 $/g
|
Pb
|
-
|
US$ 0.96 per
pound
|
21.16 $/%
|
Zn
|
-
|
US$ 0.92 per
pound
|
20.28 $/%
|
The recoveries used in the resource estimation for each metal
within each vein are shown below.
Vein
|
Ag
Rec.
|
Pb
Rec.
|
Zn
Rec.
|
Ventana
|
70%
|
86%
|
87%
|
Las Lamas
|
73%
|
82%
|
88%
|
San Felipe &
Transversales
|
69%
|
86%
|
79%
|
The equation used to establish Ag Equivalent is:
AgEq =
|
(Pb% * 21.16 *
Pb Rec%) + (Ag g/t * 0.64 * Ag Rec%) + (Zn% * 20.28 * Zn
Rec%)
|
|
(0.64 * Ag
Rec%)
|
Metal prices and recoveries used for the resource are different
than those used in the PEA because the resource was completed
earlier than the PEA. The new San
Felipe mineral resource estimate is supported by 55,050
metres of drilling in 260 drill holes with a total of 11,526
assays. The holes include those drilled by Santacruz in 2013
and by prior operators in the period 1999 to 2000 and 2006 to
2008. The mineral resources were defined to a maximum depth
of approximately 450 metres below surface with a total of 1,106
down-hole surveys utilized for control.
The resource estimate was completed by Gary Giroux, P.Eng. and utilized a geological
model completed by Hans Smit, P.Geo
and Fletcher Bourke, P.Geo. The
geological model has six domains; two at La Ventana (HG, LG), Transverales (VT), three
at San Felipe (SF, HW-1, HW-2) and
one at Las Lamas (LL). Assays for each domain were examined
and a top cap was applied to each variable within each
domain. Uniform 2 m composites were formed for the domain
envelopes. Variography was completed for all domains in the
La Ventana and Las Lamas zones.
Due to insufficient composites in the VT, SF and HW-2 domains,
variography from the HW-1 domain was used with the orientation
changed to fit the strike and dip of the structures. Grades
for all variables were interpolated into blocks 5 x 2.5 x 5 m using
ordinary kriging. For blocks with multiple domains
present, a weighted average was determined for the mineralized
portion. A specific gravity was established for each domain
based on 472 measurements from drill core. Estimated blocks
were classified as Indicated or Inferred based on geologic and
grade continuity.
Sampling and Laboratory
The resource is based on holes drilled with HQ-sized core.
Core was sawn in half at site and for all drill campaigns one
half sent to ALS Chemex, a fully accredited and certified
laboratory service. Samples were prepared at the ALS Chemex
facility in Hermosillo, Mexico,
and were then assayed at ALS Chemex in Vancouver, Canada. All samples were analysed
using a one assay ton fire assay with an AA finish for Au (Au-AA23)
and a 48 element ICP method for other elements (ME-MS61). Samples
with silver results above 100 g/t by (ME-MS61) were rerun using an
aqua regia digestion and ICP-AES or AAS finish (Ag-OG62). A
comprehensive QA/QC procedure was followed using standards, blanks
and duplicates.
Qualified Persons
All scientific and technical information included in this press
release has been reviewed and approved by Gary Giroux, P.Eng., Gregory Blaylock, P.Eng., P.E., JDS Energy &
Mining Inc., Deepak Malhotra, SME
Registered Member, Fletcher Bourke,
P.Geo., and Hans Smit, P.Geo who are
all independent of the Company and each of whom is a qualified
person, pursuant to the meaning of such terms in NI 43-101.
Verification
The data in the PEA has been verified by a QP and a full
description of the verified data will be available in the report
that will be filed within 45 days.
About Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.
Santacruz is a Mexican focused silver company with a producing
mine (Rosario); two advanced-stage
projects (San Felipe and
Gavilanes) and an early-stage
exploration project (El Gachi). The Company is managed by a
technical team of professionals with proven track records in
developing, operating and discovering silver mines in Mexico. Our corporate objective is to become a
mid-tier silver producer.
'signed'
Arturo Préstamo Elizondo,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX
Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this release.
Forward looking information
Certain statements contained in this news release, such as
planned production levels, exploration programs, mining methods,
capital and operating cost estimates, metal prices, tax rates,
permitting, future studies and the Company's future plans and cash
flow position, constitute "forward-looking information" as such
term is used in applicable Canadian securities laws.
Forward-looking information is based on plans, expectations and
estimates of management at the date the information is provided and
is subject to certain factors and assumptions, including, but not
limited to, certain assumptions as to production rate, capital and
operating costs, recoveries and metal costs, that the Company's
financial condition and development plans do not change as a result
of unforeseen events, that any additional financing needed will be
available on reasonable terms, that the exchange rates for
Canadian, Mexican and U.S. currencies will be consistent with the
Company's expectations, that requisite regulatory approvals
and permits will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable
terms, that future metal prices and the demand and market outlook
for metals will be sustained or will improve and that general
business and economic conditions will not change in a materially
adverse manner. Forward-looking information is subject to a
variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could
cause plans, estimates and actual results to vary materially from
those projected in such forward-looking information. Factors
that could cause the forward-looking information in this news
release to change or to be inaccurate include, but are not limited
to, the risk that any of the assumptions referred to prove not to
be valid or reliable, that occurrences such as those referred to
above are realized and result in delays, or cessation in planned
work, that the Company's financial condition and development plans
change, delays in regulatory approval, risks associated with the
interpretation of data, the geology, grade and continuity of
mineral deposits, the possibility that results will not be
consistent with the Company's expectations, as well as the other
risks and uncertainties applicable to mineral exploration and
development activities and to the Company as set forth in the
Company's Annual Information Form filed under the Company's profile
at www.sedar.com. There can be no assurance that any
forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual
results and future events could differ materially from those
anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, the reader should not
place any undue reliance on forward-looking information or
statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update
forward-looking information or statements, other than as required
by applicable law.
SOURCE SantaCruz Silver Mining Ltd.