Item 2.
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
Forward Looking Statements:
This report includes
certain forward-looking statements that involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Those factors include the economic
environment, competition, products and pricing in geographic and business areas in which Mayflower Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Mayflower Co-operative Bank (the Bank) operate, prevailing
interest rates, changes in government regulations and policies affecting financial services companies, credit quality and credit risk management, and the other risk factors referred to in Item 1A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended March 31, 2013. The Company undertakes no obligation to release revisions to these forward-looking statements or reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report.
Critical Accounting Policies:
Accounting policies
involving significant judgments and assumptions by management, which have, or could have, a material effect on the carrying value of certain assets and impact income, are considered critical accounting policies. The Company believes the following
are critical accounting policies:
Allowance for loan losses
:
The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a quarterly basis by management and the Companys Board of Directors. Factors considered in
evaluating the adequacy of the allowance include previous loss experience, current economic conditions and their effect on borrowers, the performance of individual loans in relation to contract terms, and the estimated value of any underlying
collateral for those loans. The provision for loan losses charged to operations is based upon managements judgment of the amount necessary to maintain the allowance at a level adequate to absorb possible losses. Loans are charged off when
management believes the collectability of the principal is unlikely.
The allowance consists of general, allocated and unallocated components, as further
discussed below.
General and unallocated components:
The
general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors. An unallocated component may be maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect managements estimate of
probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
The qualitative factors are determined based on the various risk characteristics of each loan segment. Risk characteristics relevant to each portfolio segment
are as follows:
Residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines of credit - The Company generally does not generate loans with a loan-to-value
ratio greater than 80 percent and does not grant subprime loans. All loans in these segments are collateralized by residential real estate and repayment is dependent on the credit quality of the individual borrower. The overall health of the
economy, including unemployment rates and housing prices, could have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.
Commercial mortgages - Loans in
this segment are primarily income-producing properties such as apartment buildings and properties used for business operations such as office buildings and industrial facilities. The underlying cash flows generated by the properties may be adversely
impacted by a downturn in the economy as evidenced by increased vacancy rates, which in turn, could have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.
24
Construction mortgages - Loans in this segment primarily include real estate development loans for which payment
is derived from sale of the property, as well as construction projects in which the property will ultimately be used by the borrower. Credit risk is affected by cost overruns, time to sell at an adequate price, and market conditions.
Commercial loans - Loans in this segment are made to businesses and are generally secured by the assets of the business. Repayment is expected from the cash
flows generated by the business. A weakened economy, and resultant decreased consumer spending, could have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.
Allocated component:
The allocated component relates to loans
that are classified as impaired. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for residential mortgages, commercial mortgages, construction mortgages, home equity loans and lines of credit, and commercial loans by either the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. An allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value) of the
impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable
that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status,
collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management
determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the
borrowers prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected
future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, the loans obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
Large groups of smaller balance homogenous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify individual
consumer loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement.
The Company periodically may agree to modify
the contractual terms of loans. When a loan is modified and a concession that the Company would not otherwise consider is made because the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, the modification is considered a troubled debt restructuring
(TDR). All TDRs are initially classified as impaired.
Allowance for loan losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures
:
The Company also maintains an allowance for possible losses on its outstanding loan commitments. The allowance for loan losses on off-balance sheet credit
exposures is maintained based on expected drawdowns of committed loans and their loss experience factors and managements assessment of various other factors including current and anticipated economic conditions that may affect the
borrowers ability to pay, and trends in loan delinquencies and charge-offs.
Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired Investment Securities
:
Management judgment is involved in the evaluation of declines in value of individual investment securities held by the Company. Declines in value that
are deemed other-than-temporary are recognized in the income statement through a write-down in the recorded value of the affected security. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers whether the Company intends to
sell the security or will, more likely than not, have to sell the security before its fair value is recovered. If either of these conditions is met, an other-than-temporary impairment is recognized.
25
Whenever a debt or equity security is deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired as determined by
managements analysis, it is written-down to its current fair market value. Any unfavorable change in general market conditions or the condition of a specific issuer could cause an increase in the Companys impairment write-downs on
investment securities, which would have an adverse effect on the Companys earnings.
Liquidity and Capital Resources:
The Companys primary sources of liquidity are deposits, loan payments and payoffs, investment income, principal repayments and maturities of investments,
and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston. The Companys liquidity management program is designed to insure that sufficient funds are available to meet its daily cash requirements and this management program has proven to be
successful toward that end. The Company has also established a line of credit with The Federal Reserve Bank, collateralized by certain securities issued by Government Sponsored Entities. Additionally, as a member of The Co-operative Central
Banks Reserve Fund, the Company has the right to borrow from that entitys Reserve Fund for short-term cash needs.
The Company believes its
capital resources, including deposits, scheduled loan repayments, revenue generated from the sales of loans and investment securities, unused borrowing capacity at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, and cash flows from other sources are adequate
to meet its funding commitments and requirements.
At September 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, the Companys and the Banks capital
ratios were in excess of regulatory requirements and the Company and the Bank are considered to be well-capitalized under all regulatory requirements.
Financial Condition:
At September 30, 2013,
the Companys total assets were $244.1 million, a decrease of $17.2 million when compared to March 31, 2013. During the six months ended September 30, 2013, net loans receivable decreased by $9.9 million and total investment
securities decreased by $15.0 million. These decreases were offset by an increase of $8.5 million in cash and cash equivalents.
Net loans receivable were
$129.4 million at September 30, 2013, compared to $139.3 million at March 31, 2013, a decrease of $9.9 million. This decrease was partially due to a reduction of $5.4 million in residential mortgage loans on real estate. Residential
mortgage rates increased significantly during the six months ended September 30, 2013, and refinancing activity slowed dramatically. Accordingly, the Company originated $11.8 million in residential mortgages as compared to $21.2 million
originated for the six months ended September 30, 2012. Additionally, during the six months, the Company sold $8.8 million of fixed-rate residential loans in the secondary mortgage market, producing gains of $102,000, compared to sales of $12.4
million for the prior year quarter, which resulted in gains of $377,000. This activity, combined with other mortgage payoffs and regularly scheduled amortization, resulted in a $5.4 million decrease in residential loan balances as compared to
March 31, 2013.
Additionally, during the quarter, higher than typical repayments resulted in a decrease of $3.5 million in commercial loans and
mortgages, while home equity loans and lines of credit decreased by $569,000 and net construction loans outstanding decreased by $152,000. Finally, consumer loans decreased by $241,000.
During the six months ended September 30, 2013, total investment securities decreased by $15.0 million, due in part to investment calls received totaling
$5.8 million and principal repayments of $8.1 million on mortgage-backed and related securities. Additionally, investment balances declined due to a decrease of $822,000 in the unrealized gain on securities available for sale, from $894,000 at
March 31, 2013 to $72,000 at September 30, 2013.
26
Non-performing assets are comprised of non-performing loans and real estate acquired by foreclosure.
Non-performing loans consist of loans that are more than 90 days past due and loans less than 90 days past due on which the Company has ceased accruing interest. As of September 30, 2013, non-performing assets totaled $1.4 million, compared to
$584,000 at March 31, 2013. The increase in non-performing assets is comprised of an increase of $134,000 in real estate acquired by foreclosure, coupled with an increase of $672,000 in non-performing loans. During the period, two commercial
mortgages and one home equity line of credit with balances totaling $678,000 were classified as non-performing. At September 30, 2013, non-performing assets represented 0.57% of total assets compared to 0.22% of total assets at March 31,
2013.
At September 30, 2013, the Companys allowance for loan losses was $1,212,000, which represented an allowance of 0.94% of net loans
receivable and 108.5% of non-performing loans at that date. This compares to a balance of $1,208,000 at March 31, 2013, which represented 0.87% of net loans receivable and 271.5% of non-performing loans. During the six months ended
September 30, 2013, the Company recovered $2,000 against previously charged off commercial loans, $1,000 against charged off construction mortgages, and $1,000 against residential mortgages previously charged off. Management and the Board of
the Company continue to closely monitor the loan portfolio and will continue to provide for potential losses as they become likely.
The Companys
loan portfolio is dependent on the strength of the local real estate market and further deterioration in that market or other negative economic conditions could have an adverse impact on the Companys results. In addition, commercial,
construction, and commercial real estate financing are generally considered to involve a higher degree of credit risk than long-term financing of residential properties due to their higher potential for default and the possible difficulty of
disposing of the underlying collateral. As management continues to monitor the Companys loan portfolio, higher provisions for loan losses and foreclosed property expense may be required should economic conditions worsen or the levels of
non-performing assets increase.
The Company also maintains an allowance for loan losses against off-balance sheet credit exposures (included in other
liabilities on the balance sheet). This allowance totaled $110,000 at September 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013. This allowance is intended to protect the Company against potential losses on undrawn or unfunded loan commitments made to
customers.
During the six months ended September 30, 2013, total deposits, after interest credited, decreased by $16.5 million. This decrease was
comprised of a reduction of $6.5 million in certificates of deposit, coupled with a decrease of $10.0 million in checking and savings accounts. During the six months ended September 30, 2013, advances and borrowings outstanding remained
constant at $1.0 million.
Total stockholders equity decreased by $710,000 when compared to March 31, 2013. This decrease is partially due to a
decrease of $503,000 in the unrealized gain (net of tax) on securities available for sale and dividends declared of $0.18 per share, totaling $372,000. Offsetting these decreases was net income for the period of $73,000, proceeds from the issuance
of common stock totaling $77,000, and stock based compensation credits totaling $15,000.
Results of Operations
:
Comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:
General:
The net loss for the three months ended
September 30, 2013 was $21,000 compared with net income of $375,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, a decrease of $396,000. Net interest income decreased by $245,000, the provision for loan losses decreased by $20,000, total
non-interest income decreased by $305,000, and total non-interest expense increased by $110,000.
27
The Companys results largely depend upon its net interest margin, which is the difference between the
income earned on loans and investments, and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. As compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012, during the three months ended September 30,
2013, the Companys net interest margin decreased from 3.45% to 3.05%. This decrease in net interest margin is primarily a result of the decrease in yields on interest-earning assets.
Mayflower Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Analysis of Interest
Rate Spread
The following table reflects the weighted average yield, interest earned, and the average balances of loans and investments, and the weighted
average rates, interest expense, and the average balances of deposits and borrowed funds for the periods indicated. The yield data for loans does not include loan origination and other loan fees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance (1)
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
(Annualized)
|
|
|
Average
Balance (1)
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
(Annualized)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
132,196
|
|
|
$
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
4.74
|
%
|
|
$
|
135,380
|
|
|
$
|
1,738
|
|
|
|
5.14
|
%
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
83,306
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
1.85
|
%
|
|
|
87,929
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
2.43
|
%
|
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
|
|
|
15,689
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
9,287
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
231,191
|
|
|
|
1,959
|
|
|
|
3.39
|
%
|
|
$
|
232,596
|
|
|
|
2,277
|
|
|
|
3.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
222,408
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
%
|
|
$
|
225,607
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
%
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
4.80
|
%
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
4.80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$
|
223,408
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
226,607
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average interest rate spread (2)
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Average balances calculated using daily balances
|
(2)
|
Represents the weighted average yield earned on all interest-earning assets during the period less the weighted average interest rate paid on all interest-bearing liabilities.
|
28
The effect on net interest income as a result of changes in interest rates and in the amount of interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities is shown in the following table. Information is provided in the table below on changes for the period indicated attributable to (1) changes in volume (change in average balance multiplied by prior period
yield), (2) changes in interest rates (changes in yield multiplied by prior period average balance) and (3) the combined effect of changes in interest rates and volume (change in yield multiplied by change in average balance).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
2013 vs. 2012
|
|
|
|
Changes due to increase (decrease)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Rate/
Volume
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
(170
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41
|
)
|
|
$
|
(132
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in net interest income
|
|
$
|
(245
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62
|
)
|
|
$
|
(191
|
)
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and Dividend Income:
Total interest and dividend income decreased by $318,000, or 14.0%, to $2.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. Interest income from
loans decreased by $170,000. This decrease was due to a decrease in the average rate earned on loans, from 5.14% to 4.74% on an annualized basis, coupled with a decrease of $3.2 million in the average balance of loans outstanding. Interest and
dividend income on investment securities decreased by $149,000 as a result of a decrease in the average yield earned, from 2.43% in the quarter ended September 30, 2012 to 1.85% in the quarter ended September 30, 2013, coupled with a
decrease of $4.6 million in the average balance of investments. Income from interest-bearing deposits in banks increased by $1,000 due to an increase of $6.4 million in their average balance, offset by a decrease in the average yield earned, from
0.22% for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 to 0.15% for the quarter ended September 30, 2013.
Interest Expense:
Interest expense decreased by $73,000, or 27.1%, to $196,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013. Interest expense on deposits decreased by
$73,000 as a result of a decrease in the average rate paid, from 0.46% to 0.33%, coupled with a decrease of $3.2 million in the average balance of deposits. Interest expense on borrowed funds was $12,000 for both the quarters ended
September 30, 2013 and 2012.
Provision for Loan Losses:
There was no provision made to the reserve for loan losses for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, as compared to a provision of $20,000 for the quarter
ended September 30, 2012. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that management and the Board of the Company consider adequate to provide for probable losses based upon evaluation of known and inherent risks in the loan
portfolio. In determining the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses, the Company considers past loss experience, evaluations of underlying collateral, prevailing economic conditions, the nature of the loan portfolio and levels of
non-performing and other classified loans. While management uses available information to recognize loan losses, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on additional increases in non-performing loans, changes in economic
conditions, or for other reasons.
29
Non-interest Income:
Non-interest income decreased by $305,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012.
This decrease was partially due to a decrease of $241,000 in gains/losses on sales of mortgage loans, from a gain of $216,000 during the September 2012 quarter to a loss of $25,000 during the quarter ending September 30, 2013. Also, during the
quarter, gains on sales of investments decreased by $69,000, other income decreased by $6,000, and customer service fees decreased by $7,000 due to reduced return check fees collected. These decreases were offset by an increase of $11,000 in loan
origination and other loan fees, due to reduced amortization of the mortgage servicing asset. Finally, interchange income increased by $7,000.
Non-interest Expense:
Total non-interest expense
increased by $110,000 or 5.6% for the quarter ended September 30, 2013. This increase was primarily the result of merger related expenses totaling $295,000. Additionally, compensation and fringe benefits increased by $22,000 due to increased
benefit costs and the FDIC assessment expense increased by $4,000. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $210,000 in other expenses, due to the elimination of various ongoing operating costs as a result of the pending merger and
occupancy and equipment expense decreased by $1,000.
Provision for Income Taxes:
The provision for income taxes decreased by $244,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 when compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2012,
due to the decrease in net income before taxes.
Results of Operations
:
Comparison of the six months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012:
General:
Net income for the six months ended
September 30, 2013 was $73,000 compared with net income of $764,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2012, a decrease of $691,000. Net interest income decreased by $404,000, the provision for loan losses decreased by $30,000, total
non-interest income decreased by $376,000, and total non-interest expense increased by $293,000.
The Companys results largely depend upon its net
interest margin, which is the difference between the income earned on loans and investments, and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. During the six months ended September 30, 2013,
the Companys net interest margin decreased from 3.49% to 3.13%, when compared to the six months ended September 30, 2012. This decrease in net interest margin is partially the result of a decrease in the yield on interest earning assets,
in particular, loans and investments.
30
Mayflower Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Analysis of Interest Rate Spread
The following table reflects
the weighted average yield, interest earned, and the average balances of loans and investments, and the weighted average rates, interest expense, and the average balances of deposits and borrowed funds for the periods indicated. The yield data for
loans does not include loan origination and other loan fees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance (1)
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
(Annualized)
|
|
|
Average
Balance (1)
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
(Annualized)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
135,986
|
|
|
$
|
3,255
|
|
|
|
4.79
|
%
|
|
$
|
135,972
|
|
|
$
|
3,518
|
|
|
|
5.17
|
%
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
86,895
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
1.90
|
%
|
|
|
88,387
|
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
|
|
|
12,447
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
|
|
9,678
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
235,328
|
|
|
|
4,091
|
|
|
|
3.48
|
%
|
|
$
|
234,037
|
|
|
|
4,644
|
|
|
|
3.97
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
226,784
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
%
|
|
$
|
227,583
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
%
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
%
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$
|
227,784
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
%
|
|
$
|
228,583
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average interest rate spread (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Average balances calculated using daily balances
|
(2)
|
Represents the weighted average yield earned on all interest-earning assets during the period less the weighted average interest rate paid on all interest-bearing liabilities.
|
31
The effect on net interest income as a result of changes in interest rates and in the amount of interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities is shown in the following table. Information is provided in the table below on changes for the period indicated attributable to (1) changes in volume (change in average balance multiplied by prior period
yield), (2) changes in interest rates (changes in yield multiplied by prior period average balance) and (3) the combined effect of changes in interest rates and volume (change in yield multiplied by change in average balance).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended September 30,
2013 vs. 2012
|
|
|
|
Changes due to increase (decrease)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Rate/
Volume
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
(263
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(263
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(541
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in net interest income
|
|
$
|
(404
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(393
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and Dividend Income:
Total interest and dividend income decreased by $553,000, or 11.9%, to $4.1 million for the six months ended September 30, 2013. Interest income from
loans decreased by $263,000. This decrease was primarily due a reduction in the average rate earned on loans, from 5.17% to 4.79% on an annualized basis. Interest and dividend income on investment securities decreased by $290,000 as a result of a
decrease in the average yield earned, from 2.52% for the six months ended September 30, 2012 to 1.90% for the six months ended September 30, 2013, coupled with a decrease of $1.5 million in the average balance of investments. Income from
interest-bearing deposits in banks was $11,000 for both the six months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.
Interest Expense:
Interest expense decreased by $149,000, or 26.8%, to $407,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2013. Interest expense on deposits decreased by
$149,000, primarily as a result of a decrease in the average rate paid, from 0.47% to 0.34%, coupled with a decline of $799,000 in the average balance of deposits. Interest expense on borrowed funds was $23,000 for both the six months ended
September 30, 2013 and 2012.
Provision for Loan Losses:
There was no provision for loan losses for the six months ended September 30, 2013, compared to $30,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2012.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that management and the Companys Board of Directors consider adequate to provide for probable losses based upon evaluation of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. In determining
the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses, the Company considers past loss experience, evaluations of underlying collateral, prevailing economic conditions, the nature of the loan portfolio and levels of non-performing and other
classified loans. While management uses available information to recognize loan losses, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on additional increases in non-performing loans, changes in economic conditions, or for other reasons.
Non-interest Income:
Non-interest income
decreased by $376,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the six months ended September 30, 2012. This decrease was due to a reduction of $275,000 in gains/losses on sales of residential mortgage loans to the
secondary market, coupled with a decrease of
32
$117,000 in gains realized upon the on sale of investments. Additionally, customer service fees decreased by $25,000, due to a reduction in return check fees collected. These decreases were
offset by an increase of $31,000 in loan origination and other loan fees and $15,000 in interchange income on debit card transactions. Finally, other income decreased by $5,000.
Non-interest Expense:
Total non-interest expense
increased by $293,000 or 7.4% for the six months ended September 30, 2013. This increase was primarily the result of merger related expenses totaling $449,000. Additionally, compensation and fringe benefits increased by $41,000 due to increased
benefit costs and the FDIC assessment expense increased by $6,000. Other expenses decreased by $194,000 as a result of the elimination of various ongoing operating costs as a result of the pending merger and occupancy and equipment expense decreased
by $9,000.
Provision for Income Taxes:
The
provision for income taxes decreased by $352,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2013 when compared to the six months ended September 30, 2012 due to a decrease in net income before taxes. Effective income tax rates were 34.8% and
33.9% respectively in the 2013 and 2012 periods.
Interest Rate Risk Exposure and the Interest Rate Spread:
The Companys net earnings depend primarily upon the difference between the income (interest and dividends) earned on its loans and investment securities
(interest-earning assets) and the interest paid on its deposits and borrowed funds (interest-bearing liabilities), together with other income and other operating expenses. The Companys investment income and interest paid (cost of funds) are
significantly affected by general economic conditions and by policies of regulatory authorities.
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in
market prices and rates. The Companys market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in its lending, security investments, and deposit taking activities. To that end, management actively monitors and manages its interest rate
risk exposure.
The Companys primary objective in managing interest rate risk is to minimize the adverse impact of interest rate changes on its net
interest income and capital, while adjusting its rate-sensitive asset and liability structure to obtain the maximum net yield on that structure. The Company relies primarily on this structure to control interest rate risk. However, a sudden and
substantial shift in interest rates may adversely impact the Companys earnings to the extent that the interest rate earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities do not change at the same frequency, to the
same extent or on the same basis.
33
MAYFLOWER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY