UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended
JUNE 30, 2010
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number
000-51104
CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
52-2180744
|
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
|
1804 West Street, Suite 200, Annapolis, MD 21401
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
410-280-6695
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
N/A
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
þ
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
þ
As of August 4, 2010 the number of outstanding shares of registrants common stock, par value $0.01
per share was: 1,820,548
CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
2
CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Audited)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
2,172,313
|
|
|
$
|
2,105,545
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
18,213,989
|
|
|
|
8,228,452
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
20,386,302
|
|
|
|
10,488,307
|
|
Investments in restricted stocks, at cost
|
|
|
527,000
|
|
|
|
527,000
|
|
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of
$2,000,000
at June 30, 2010 and $2,380,000 at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
183,661,524
|
|
|
|
183,101,808
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
649,728
|
|
|
|
739,479
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
804,247
|
|
|
|
680,549
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
650,345
|
|
|
|
919,299
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
2,461,957
|
|
|
|
2,461,957
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,579,478
|
|
|
|
1,452,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
210,720,581
|
|
|
$
|
200,371,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
23,381,291
|
|
|
$
|
21,024,369
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
164,671,749
|
|
|
|
157,621,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
188,053,040
|
|
|
|
178,645,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
164,772
|
|
|
|
183,958
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
644,873
|
|
|
|
599,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
188,862,685
|
|
|
|
179,429,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $.01 par value; authorized 4,000,000 shares.
Issued and outstanding: 1,820,548 shares at June 30, 2010
and at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
18,205
|
|
|
|
18,205
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
17,852,931
|
|
|
|
17,852,931
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
3,986,760
|
|
|
|
3,070,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
21,857,896
|
|
|
|
20,941,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
210,720,581
|
|
|
$
|
200,371,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Six and Three Months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans
|
|
$
|
6,291,724
|
|
|
$
|
5,586,210
|
|
|
$
|
3,168,079
|
|
|
$
|
2,876,206
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,091
|
|
Investment in stocks
|
|
|
14,150
|
|
|
|
13,010
|
|
|
|
6,975
|
|
|
|
6,075
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
23,922
|
|
|
|
7,625
|
|
|
|
14,723
|
|
|
|
5,491
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
2,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
6,329,858
|
|
|
|
5,674,748
|
|
|
|
3,189,777
|
|
|
|
2,920,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,747,032
|
|
|
|
2,342,777
|
|
|
|
860,749
|
|
|
|
1,179,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
1,747,032
|
|
|
|
2,342,777
|
|
|
|
860,749
|
|
|
|
1,179,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
4,582,826
|
|
|
|
3,331,971
|
|
|
|
2,329,028
|
|
|
|
1,741,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,033,985
|
|
|
|
799,253
|
|
|
|
586,923
|
|
|
|
269,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,548,841
|
|
|
|
2,532,718
|
|
|
|
1,742,105
|
|
|
|
1,472,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of SBA loans
|
|
|
369,872
|
|
|
|
117,534
|
|
|
|
145,283
|
|
|
|
117,534
|
|
Service charges and other income
|
|
|
246,661
|
|
|
|
207,766
|
|
|
|
125,340
|
|
|
|
106,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
|
616,533
|
|
|
|
325,300
|
|
|
|
270,623
|
|
|
|
224,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
1,463,910
|
|
|
|
1,462,393
|
|
|
|
743,169
|
|
|
|
737,797
|
|
Legal and professional
|
|
|
132,218
|
|
|
|
127,234
|
|
|
|
76,918
|
|
|
|
61,508
|
|
Rent and occupancy
|
|
|
278,907
|
|
|
|
281,036
|
|
|
|
140,369
|
|
|
|
137,619
|
|
Marketing and business development
|
|
|
48,040
|
|
|
|
24,805
|
|
|
|
26,286
|
|
|
|
18,583
|
|
FDIC insurance
|
|
|
155,602
|
|
|
|
211,612
|
|
|
|
79,771
|
|
|
|
153,585
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
71,767
|
|
|
|
67,423
|
|
|
|
36,156
|
|
|
|
33,690
|
|
Support services
|
|
|
101,809
|
|
|
|
93,737
|
|
|
|
54,628
|
|
|
|
54,533
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
63,281
|
|
|
|
55,397
|
|
|
|
31,721
|
|
|
|
27,932
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
118,073
|
|
|
|
148,199
|
|
|
|
58,720
|
|
|
|
73,550
|
|
Other
|
|
|
206,471
|
|
|
|
217,766
|
|
|
|
117,198
|
|
|
|
103,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses
|
|
|
2,640,078
|
|
|
|
2,689,602
|
|
|
|
1,364,936
|
|
|
|
1,402,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
1,525,296
|
|
|
|
168,416
|
|
|
|
647,792
|
|
|
|
294,288
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
609,374
|
|
|
|
68,495
|
|
|
|
260,071
|
|
|
|
117,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
915,922
|
|
|
$
|
99,921
|
|
|
$
|
387,721
|
|
|
$
|
176,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the Six and Three Months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
915,922
|
|
|
$
|
99,921
|
|
|
$
|
387,721
|
|
|
$
|
176,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gains on securities
available for sale, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,924
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
915,922
|
|
|
$
|
64,367
|
|
|
$
|
387,721
|
|
|
$
|
169,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
18,205
|
|
|
$
|
17,852,931
|
|
|
$
|
2,392,882
|
|
|
$
|
46,539
|
|
|
$
|
20,310,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income- June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized gains on
securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,554
|
)
|
|
|
(35,554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
18,205
|
|
|
$
|
17,852,931
|
|
|
$
|
2,492,803
|
|
|
$
|
10,985
|
|
|
$
|
20,374,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
18,205
|
|
|
$
|
17,852,931
|
|
|
$
|
3,070,838
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,941,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income- June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
915,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
915,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
18,205
|
|
|
$
|
17,852,931
|
|
|
$
|
3,986,760
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,857,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
CASH FLOWS
FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
915,922
|
|
|
$
|
99,921
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
118,073
|
|
|
|
148,199
|
|
Gain on sales of SBA loans
|
|
|
(369,872
|
)
|
|
|
(117,534
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,033,985
|
|
|
|
799,253
|
|
Provision for losses on unfunded commitments
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
268,954
|
|
|
|
(215,246
|
)
|
Change in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
(123,698
|
)
|
|
|
(91,281
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(126,540
|
)
|
|
|
228,275
|
|
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable
|
|
|
(19,186
|
)
|
|
|
18,025
|
|
Increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
38,959
|
|
|
|
193,420
|
|
Other amortization and accretion, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,742,597
|
|
|
|
1,073,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of SBA loans
|
|
|
5,575,576
|
|
|
|
1,983,727
|
|
Increase in loans, net
|
|
|
(6,799,405
|
)
|
|
|
(18,503,377
|
)
|
Increase in other real estate owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(653,000
|
)
|
Purchase of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(28,322
|
)
|
|
|
(8,257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(1,252,151
|
)
|
|
|
(17,180,907
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in non-interest bearing deposits, net
|
|
|
2,356,922
|
|
|
|
(2,905,247
|
)
|
Net increase in other deposits
|
|
|
7,050,627
|
|
|
|
28,124,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
9,407,549
|
|
|
|
25,219,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
9,897,995
|
|
|
|
9,111,794
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
10,488,307
|
|
|
|
8,964,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
20,386,302
|
|
|
$
|
18,076,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
1,766,218
|
|
|
$
|
2,324,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
620,000
|
|
|
$
|
290,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of loans to real estate owned
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
653,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total decrease in unrealized gains on available
for sale securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(35,554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. The Company and its Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly,
they do not contain all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America for complete consolidated financial statements.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
The financial data at December 31, 2009 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements
that are included in the Companys Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
financial data at June 30, 2010 and 2009 are derived from unaudited consolidated financial
statements. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) and its subsidiary, CommerceFirst Bank (the Bank). Inter-company balances and
transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows include cash on hand, non-interest bearing
amounts due from correspondent banks, interest and non-interest bearing deposits due from the
Federal Reserve, certificate of deposits with maturities of less than one year and Federal funds
sold.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current periods method of
presentation.
Note 2. Fair value
ASC Section 820
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure
defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Topic 820
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those
assumptions. The hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation
techniques are observable or unobservable. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels as
follows:
|
|
|
Level 1:
|
|
Quoted prices in active exchange markets for identical assets or
liabilities; also includes certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S.
government and agency securities actively traded in
over-the-counter markets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2:
|
|
Observable inputs other than Level 1 including quoted prices for
similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in less active
markets, or other observable inputs that can be corroborated by
observable market data; also includes derivative contracts whose
value is determined using a pricing model with observable market
inputs or can be derived principally from or corroborated by
observable market data. This category generally includes certain
U.S. government and agency securities, corporate debt securities,
derivative instruments, and residential mortgage loans held for
sale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3:
|
|
Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity for
financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing
models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar
techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of
fair value requires significant management judgment or
estimation; also includes observable inputs for single dealer
nonbinding quotes not corroborated by observable market data.
This category generally includes certain private equity
investments, retained interests from securitizations, and certain
collateralized debt obligations.
|
8
The Companys bond holdings in the investment securities portfolio, if any, are the only asset or
liability subject to fair value measurement on a recurring basis. No assets are valued under Level
1 inputs at June 30, 2010 or December
31, 2009. The Company has assets measured by fair value measurements on a non-recurring basis
during 2010. At June 30, 2010, these assets include $1,020,091 of impaired loans and other real
estate owned of $2,461,957 which are valued under Level 2 inputs. The remaining $1,712,608
($1,424,515 after specific reserves) of impaired loans are valued under Level 3 inputs.
The changes in the assets subject to fair value measurements are summarized below by Level:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,458
|
|
|
$
|
1,276
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,920
|
|
|
|
1,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New loans measured at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,650
|
|
Payments and other loan reductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
Loans charged-off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(438
|
)
|
|
|
(1,005
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(438
|
)
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
1,713
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,482
|
|
|
$
|
1,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments at June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009 are summarized below. The fair values of a significant portion of these financial instruments
are estimates derived using present value techniques and may not be indicative of the net
realizable or liquidation values. Also, the calculation of estimated fair values is based on market
conditions at a specific point in time and may not reflect current or future fair values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
2,172
|
|
|
$
|
2,172
|
|
|
$
|
2,106
|
|
|
$
|
2,106
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
18,214
|
|
|
|
18,214
|
|
|
|
8,228
|
|
|
|
8,228
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Investments in restricted stock
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
183,662
|
|
|
|
193,834
|
|
|
|
183,102
|
|
|
|
192,687
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
23,381
|
|
|
$
|
23,381
|
|
|
$
|
21,024
|
|
|
$
|
21,024
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
164,672
|
|
|
|
166,733
|
|
|
|
157,621
|
|
|
|
160,450
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair values are based on quoted market prices for similar instruments or estimated using discounted
cash flows. The discounts used are estimated using comparable market rates for similar types of
instruments adjusted to be commensurate with the credit risk, overhead costs and optionality of
such instruments.
9
The fair value of cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits, federal funds sold,
investments in restricted stocks and accrued interest receivable are equal to the carrying amounts.
The fair values of investment securities are determined using market quotations. The fair value of
loans receivable is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis.
The fair value of non-interest bearing deposits, interest-bearing checking, savings, and money
market deposit accounts, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and accrued interest
payable are equal to the carrying amounts. The fair value of fixed maturity time deposits is
estimated using discounted cash flow analysis.
Note 3. Net Income per Common Share
Basic earnings per share of common stock are computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are
calculated by including the average dilutive common equivalents outstanding during the period.
Dilutive common equivalent shares consist of stock options and warrants, calculated using the
treasury stock method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,820,548
|
|
|
|
1,820,548
|
|
|
|
1,820,548
|
|
|
|
1,820,548
|
|
Common stock equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
common shares and equivalents
|
|
|
1,824,467
|
|
|
|
1,824,467
|
|
|
|
1,822,660
|
|
|
|
1,822,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
915,922
|
|
|
$
|
99,921
|
|
|
$
|
387,721
|
|
|
$
|
176,504
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
All of the 126,372 outstanding warrants and options were excluded from the calculation of diluted
income per share in 2010 and 2009 because they are anti-dilutive.
Note 4. Related Party Transactions
The Company paid $12,595 during the first six months of 2010 for legal services to a firm of which
a Director of the Company is a principal. The Company also paid $25,907 during the six months ended
June 30, 2010 for computer related services to firm of which a Director is a principal. The above
transactions have been consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arms length
transactions.
Executive officers, directors and their affiliated interests enter into loan transactions with the
Company in the ordinary course of business. These loans are made on the same terms, including
interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with unrelated
borrowers. They do not involve more than normal risk of collectability or present other
unfavorable terms. At June 30, 2010 the amounts of such loans outstanding were $2.7 million.
Deposit balances of executive officers, directors and their affiliated interests totaled $14
million at June 30, 2010.
Note 5. Commitments and contingencies
The Company is a party to financial instruments in the normal course of business to meet the
financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments typically include commitments to
extend credit and standby letters of credit, which involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit
and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial
statements. Outstanding commitments as of June 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Loan commitments
|
|
$
|
8.2 million
|
|
Unused lines of credit
|
|
$
|
24.4 million
|
|
Letters of Credit
|
|
$
|
0.9 million
|
|
10
Note 6. Recent Relevant Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06-
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
amending
Topic 820. The ASU provides for additional disclosures of transfers between assets and liabilities
valued under Level 1 and 2 inputs as well as additional disclosures regarding those assets and
liabilities valued under Level 3 inputs. The new disclosures are effective for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 except for those provisions addressing Level 3
fair value measurements which provisions are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods
therein, beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 amending FASB ASC Topic 855 to exclude SEC reporting
entities from the requirement to disclose the date on which subsequent events have been evaluated.
It further modifies the requirement to disclose the date on which subsequent events have been
evaluated in reissued financial statements to apply only to such statements that have been restated
to correct an error or to apply U.S. GAAP retrospectively. The Company has complied with ASU No.
2010-09.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain information contained in this discussion may include forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are generally
identified by phrases such as the Company expects, the Company believes or words of similar
import. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks including, but not limited
to, changes in general economic and business conditions, interest rate fluctuations, competition
within and from outside the banking industry, new products and services in the banking industry,
risk inherent in making loans such as repayment risks and fluctuating collateral values, problems
with technology utilized by the Company, changing trends in customer profiles and changes in laws
and regulations applicable to the Company. Although the Company believes that its expectations
with respect to the forward-looking statements are based upon reliable assumptions within the
bounds of its knowledge of its business and operations, there can be no assurance that actual
results, performance or achievements of the Company will not differ materially from any future
results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Readers are cautioned against placing undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. The
Companys past results are not necessarily indicative of future performance. Please refer to the
Risk Factors section of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009, and other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for a
discussion of various factors which may affect our performance.
General
CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) is the bank holding company for CommerceFirst Bank, a
Maryland chartered commercial bank headquartered in Annapolis, Maryland (the Bank). The Bank was
capitalized, became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and commenced operations on June 29,
2000. The Companys common stock trades on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol CMFB. The
Company maintains five banking offices in Anne Arundel, Howard and Prince Georges counties in
central Maryland. The Company focuses on providing commercial banking services to small and medium
sized businesses in its market areas.
11
The Company assets increased modestly at June 30, 2010 from December 31, 2009 primarily with the
increase in cash and cash equivalents as the Company increased its liquidity position. Earnings
improved as the result of this asset growth and the reduction of the cost of deposits due to
re-pricing of the deposits to lower current market interest rates. The provision for loan losses
continues to remain relatively high in recognition of the effect of uncertain economic conditions
on the Companys borrowers and collateral values. Key measurements and events for the period
include the following:
|
|
|
The Companys net income was $916 thousand during the six months ended June 30, 2010
as compared to net income of $100 thousand for the six month period ended June 30, 2009
largely resulting from increased net interest income during 2010.
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, the Companys main source of income, increased by 37.5% from
$3.3 million during the six month period ended June 30, 2009 to $4.6 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
Total assets increased by 5.2% from $200 million at December 31, 2009 to $211
million at June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
Net loans outstanding increased by 0.3% from $183 million at December 31, 2009 to
$184 million as of June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
Deposits increased by 5.3% from $179 million at December 31, 2009 to $188 million at
June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income increased by 89.5% from $325 thousand for the six month period
ended June 30, 2009 to $617 thousand for the six month period ended June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses decreased by 1.8% from $2.69 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 to $2.64 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2010.
|
A discussion of the factors leading to these changes can be found in the discussion below.
Critical Accounting Policies
CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and follow general practices within
the industry in which it operates. Application of these principles requires management to make
estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements
and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information
available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the
financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions and judgments. Certain
policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and
as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than
originally reported. Estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary when assets and
liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not
carried on the financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation
reserve to be established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a
future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in more financial
statement volatility. The fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for
certain assets and liabilities are based either on quoted market prices or are provided by other
third-party sources, when available.
The most significant accounting policies followed by CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. are presented in
Note 1 to the Companys audited consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. These policies, along with the
disclosures presented in the other financial statement notes and in this discussion, provide
information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and
how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of
financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions and estimates underlying those amounts,
management has identified the determination of the allowance for loan losses as the accounting area
that requires the most subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be most subject to
revision as new information becomes available.
12
CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. believes it has developed appropriate policies and procedures for
assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, recognizing that this process requires a
number of assumptions and estimates with respect to its loan portfolio. CommerceFirst Bancorp,
Inc.s assessments may be affected in future
periods by changes in economic conditions, the impact of regulatory examinations and the discovery
of information with respect to borrowers that is not known to management at the time of the
issuance of the consolidated financial statements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General
.
The Company reported net income of $916 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as
compared to net income of $100 thousand for the six month period ended June 30, 2009. Earnings
increased during 2010 as the result of the increase in earning assets, reduction of interest
expense and the increase in gains on loan sales. The provision for loan losses was $1.03 million
during 2010 as compared to $799 thousand in 2009, an increase of $235 thousand, or 29.4%. The
Company continues to experience the detrimental effects of the weakened economy on its loan
customers through the provision for loan losses and loan charge-offs. The amount of impaired loans
was generally the same at June 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009. Net interest income increased in
2010 as compared to 2009 by $1.25 million, or 37.5%. This increase resulted primarily from
increases in earning assets and reduced cost of deposits. During the first half of 2010 and the
last quarter of 2009, a significant amount of high interest rate, longer term certificates of
deposit matured and were either re-priced at lower rates or replaced with lower rate accounts. This
resulted in increases in net interest income, net interest margin and net interest spread.
Return on Average Assets and Average Equity
. The following table shows the return on average assets
and average equity for the period shown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Average Equity
|
|
|
8.55
|
%
|
|
|
0.99
|
%
|
|
|
4.54
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Average Earning Assets
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
0.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of
Average Equity to Average Assets
|
|
|
10.36
|
%
|
|
|
11.64
|
%
|
|
|
11.03
|
%
|
Six months ended June 30, 2010
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
. Net interest income is the amount by which interest
earned on assets exceeds the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The Companys
principal interest earning assets are loans to businesses. Interest-bearing liabilities consist
primarily of savings accounts, money market accounts and certificates of deposit. Generally,
changes in net interest income are measured by net interest rate spread and net interest margin.
Net interest rate spread is equal to the difference between the average rate earned on interest
earning assets and the average rate incurred on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin
represents the difference between interest income (including net loan fees earned) and interest
expense calculated as a percentage of average earning assets.
Total interest income increased by $655 thousand or 11.5% to $6.3 million for the six month period
ended June 30, 2010. This increase in interest income was attributable to the $30.9 million
increase in average earning assets during the first half of 2010 as compared to the same period in
2009. Interest income was adversely affected by the decline in the yield of the average earning
assets from 6.7% in 2009 to 6.3% in 2010.
Interest expense decreased by $596 thousand or 25.4% to $1.7 million for the six months ended June
30, 2010 as compared to $2.3 million during the same six months of 2009. This decrease was
primarily attributable to the decrease in the cost of funds from 3.6% during the first half of 2009
to 2.1% during the first half of 2010. The decline in the cost of funds was partially offset by the
$32.7 million increase in average interest bearing liabilities during 2010 as compared to 2009.
13
The net interest income for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 was $4.6 million as compared
to $3.3 million for the same period in 2009. Net interest income increased primarily because of
the increase in average earning assets and the reduced cost of funds during the six months ended
June 30, 2010 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009.
The following table shows the average balances and average rates earned or paid on of the various
categories of the Companys assets and liabilities for the six month period ended June 30 of each
year. Nonperforming loans are included in average balances in the following table:
SIX MONTHS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yields/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yields/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yields/
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
(1)
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
5.36
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,523
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
|
4.52
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,445
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
|
4.42
|
%
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
184,116
|
|
|
|
6,292
|
|
|
|
6.89
|
%
|
|
|
160,151
|
|
|
|
5,586
|
|
|
|
7.03
|
%
|
|
|
133,223
|
|
|
|
5,051
|
|
|
|
7.60
|
%
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks
|
|
|
17,748
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
%
|
|
|
6,163
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
%
|
|
|
7,976
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
2.59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
202,455
|
|
|
|
6,330
|
|
|
|
6.31
|
%
|
|
|
171,563
|
|
|
|
5,675
|
|
|
|
6.67
|
%
|
|
|
150,644
|
|
|
|
5,362
|
|
|
|
7.14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(2,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non interest earning assets
|
|
|
8,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
208,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
175,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
154,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities & Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,190
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,814
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
%
|
Money market deposit accounts
|
|
|
8,022
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
|
|
13,539
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
%
|
|
|
19,728
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
%
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
13,496
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
%
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1.44
|
%
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
142,589
|
|
|
|
1,626
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
|
|
115,811
|
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
4.01
|
%
|
|
|
90,014
|
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
5.13
|
%
|
Securities sold under agreement to
repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,040
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
164,831
|
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
%
|
|
|
132,100
|
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
|
|
3.58
|
%
|
|
|
114,659
|
|
|
|
2,542
|
|
|
|
4.45
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits and other liabilities
|
|
|
22,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
187,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
21,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
208,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
175,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
154,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income and margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,583
|
|
|
|
4.56
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,332
|
|
|
|
3.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,820
|
|
|
|
3.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Yields on securities are calculated based on amortized cost.
|
Net interest margin was 4.56% in the first half of 2010, as compared to 3.92% in the comparable
period in 2009. Interest spread was 4.17% in the first half of 2010, as compared to the 3.09% in
the first half of 2009 reflecting the greater reduction in the cost of interest bearing funds as
compared to the reduction of the earnings rates of interest earning assets. The growth in average
loans receivable as well as the re-pricing of interest bearing deposits at lower interest rates
combined to improve the net interest spread and net interest margin.
14
The following table sets forth certain information regarding changes in interest income and
interest expense of the Company. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to: (i) changes in volume (change in
volume of the asset multiplied by the prior years rate) and (ii) changes in rates (change in rate
multiplied by the current years volume).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 vs. 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
In thousand
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Interest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(100
|
)
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Investment portfolio
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
Loans receivable
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
(486
|
)
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Interest Income
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
(505
|
)
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
(1,107
|
)
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
(710
|
)
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
Securities sold under agreements
to repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Interest Expense
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
(1,107
|
)
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
(710
|
)
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Net Interest Income
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
$
|
981
|
|
|
$
|
1,251
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses.
The provision for loan losses represents the amount charged against
earnings to increase the allowance for loan losses to the level deemed appropriate by management.
The provision for loan losses and the allowance for loan losses are based on managements ongoing
assessment of the Companys credit exposure and consideration of certain other relevant factors.
The provision for loan losses was $1.03 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010 as
compared to $799 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The Company is increasing its
provision for loan losses to address identified loan concerns and in recognition of the detrimental
effect of the weakened economy. The allowance is comprised of specific and general allowance
amounts.
Non-Interest Income
. Non-interest income principally consists of gains from the sale of the
guaranteed portion of Small Business Administration loans and from deposit account services
charges. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, gains on sales of the guaranteed portion of SBA
loans was $370 thousand whereas gains on sales of SBA loans amounted to $118 thousand during the
first half of 2009. Generally, the Company desires to sell the guaranteed portion of most
additional SBA loans resulting in a continuing stream of income that may vary significantly from
quarter to quarter, depending in part upon the volume of loans actually sold. Deposit account
service charges amounted to $247 thousand during the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to
$208 thousand for the same period in 2009, reflecting higher service charges assessed on deposit
account activities.
Non-Interest Expense
. Total non-interest expenses decreased by $50 thousand during the six-month
period ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009, a 1.8% decrease. The 2009
expenses included $86 thousand of a FDIC special insurance assessment whereas no special assessment
was charged during 2010.
Income Tax Expense
. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded an income tax
expense of $609 thousand as compared to a $68 thousand expense during the same period in 2009. The
income tax expense was 40.0% of income before taxes in 2010 and 40.7% of income before taxes in
2009.
15
Three months ended June 30, 2010
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
. Total interest income increased by $269 thousand or
9.2% to $3.2 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010. This increase in interest
income was attributable to the increase in average earning assets during 2010 as compared to 2009.
The interest income was adversely affected by the decline in the yield of the average earning
assets.
Interest expense decreased by $318 thousand or 27.0% to $861 thousand for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period of 2009. This decrease was primarily attributable to
the decrease in the cost of funds. The decline in the cost of funds was partially offset by the
increase in average interest bearing liabilities during 2010 as compared to 2009.
The following table shows the average balances and average rates earned or paid on of the various
categories of the Companys assets and liabilities for the three month period ended June 30 of each
year. Nonperforming loans are included in average balances in the following table:
THREE MONTHS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yields/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yields/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yields/
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
(1)
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
5.33
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,508
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
|
4.46
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,719
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
4.64
|
%
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
184,079
|
|
|
|
3,168
|
|
|
|
6.90
|
%
|
|
|
163,937
|
|
|
|
2,876
|
|
|
|
7.04
|
%
|
|
|
137,254
|
|
|
|
2,495
|
|
|
|
7.21
|
%
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks
|
|
|
20,520
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
%
|
|
|
8,807
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
5,960
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
205,126
|
|
|
|
3,190
|
|
|
|
6.24
|
%
|
|
|
176,443
|
|
|
|
2,921
|
|
|
|
6.64
|
%
|
|
|
151,933
|
|
|
|
2,626
|
|
|
|
6.86
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(2,355
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,713
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non interest earning assets
|
|
|
8,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
211,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
179,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities & Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
737
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,535
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,541
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Money market deposit accounts
|
|
|
7,591
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
0.58
|
%
|
|
|
12,201
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
%
|
|
|
19,508
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
1.65
|
%
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
14,941
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
%
|
|
|
941
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
142,449
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
2.23
|
%
|
|
|
121,651
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
%
|
|
|
91,593
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
4.96
|
%
|
Securities sold under agreement to
repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,057
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
165,718
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
%
|
|
|
137,328
|
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
3.44
|
%
|
|
|
115,740
|
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits and other liabilities
|
|
|
23,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
189,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
21,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
211,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
179,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
155,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.63
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income and margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
4.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,742
|
|
|
|
3.96
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,393
|
|
|
|
3.64
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Yields on securities are calculated based on amortized cost.
|
16
The net interest income for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 was $2.3 million as compared
to $1.7 million for the same period in 2009. Net interest income increased primarily because of
the increase in average earning assets and the reduced cost of funds during the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the
three months ended June 30, 2009.
Provision for Loan Losses.
The provision for loan losses was $587 thousand during the three months
ended June 30, 2010 as compared to $270 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The
Company is increasing its provision for loan losses to address identified loan concerns and in
recognition of the detrimental effect of the weakened economy. The allowance is comprised of
specific and general allowance amounts.
Non-Interest Income
. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, gains on sales of the guaranteed
portion of SBA loans were $145 thousand whereas gains on sales of SBA loans amounted to $118
thousand during the same period in 2009. Deposit account service charges amounted to $125 thousand
during the three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to $107 thousand for the same period in
2009 reflecting higher service charges assessed on deposit account activities.
Non-Interest Expense
. Total non-interest expense decreased by $37 thousand during the three-month
period ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009, a 2.7% decrease. The 2009
expenses included $86 thousand of a FDIC special insurance assessment whereas no special assessment
was charged during 2010.
Income Tax Expense
. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded an income tax
expense of $260 thousand as compared to a $118 thousand expense during the same period in 2009. The
income tax expense was 40.2% of income before taxes in 2010 and 40.0% of income before taxes in
2009.
FINANCIAL CONDITION.
General
.
The Companys assets at June 30, 2010 were $210.7 million, an increase of $10.3 million or
5.2%, from December 31, 2009. The gross loans totaled $185.7 million at June 30, 2010 and are
comprised of real estate loans of $131.3 million, an increase of $14.3 million, or 12.2%, from
December 31, 2009 and commercial loans of $54.4 million, a decrease of $14.1 million, or 20.6% from
December 31, 2009. The changes noted above reflect the effect of reclassifying approximately $9.5
million of commercial loans to real estate loans during the second quarter of 2010. The
reclassification resulted from a review by the Company of the risk profile of the loan portfolio.
The majority of the reclassified loans are to entities whose cash flow is directly or indirectly
significantly dependent upon the sale, refinance, or management of real estate assets or
collections of the entities financing of real estate. None of these loans are on non-accrual or
classified as substandard at June 30, 2010. At June 30, 2010, deposits totaled $188.1 million, an
increase of $9.4 million, or 5.3%, from December 31, 2009. Deposits at June 30, 2010 are comprised
primarily of certificates of deposit of $139.8 million, NOW and Money Market accounts of $8.3
million, savings accounts of $16.6 million and noninterest bearing deposits of $23.4 million.
Loan Portfolio.
The loan portfolio is the largest component of earning assets and accounts for the
greatest portion of total interest income. At June 30, 2010, net loans were $183.7 million, a 0.3%
increase from the $183.1 million in loans outstanding at December 31, 2009. Generally, loans are
internally generated but the Company does periodically purchase loan participations from other
local community banks. Lending activity is generally confined to our immediate market areas. The
small increase the loan balances from December 31, 2009 to June 30, 2010 resulted partially from
the sale of SBA guaranteed portions of loans in the amount of $5.6 million during the first half of
2010. Without these sales, loan balances would have increased by $6.1 million. The Company is
continuing its efforts to attract quality credits with no dilution of credit underwriting
standards. The percentage of total loans comprised of commercial real estate loans has increased as
the Company has concentrated on this type of lending. The majority of these loans are secured by
real property that is occupied by the borrowers businesses. The Company has approximately $1.6
million of acquisition and construction loans secured by residential building lots. The Company
does not engage in foreign lending activities. Loans secured by residential real estate are loans
to investors for commercial purposes. The Bank does not lend funds to consumers. The following
table presents the composition of the loan portfolio by type of loan at the dates indicated.
17
Loans receivable, net is comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
of Loans
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
of Loans
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
of Loans
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
loans
|
|
$
|
54,397
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
67,717
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
68,476
|
|
|
|
36.9
|
%
|
Real estate loans secured by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
26,649
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
21,461
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
|
22,140
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
104,728
|
|
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
|
|
79,907
|
|
|
|
47.3
|
%
|
|
|
94,947
|
|
|
|
51.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate loans
|
|
|
131,377
|
|
|
|
70.7
|
%
|
|
|
101,368
|
|
|
|
60.0
|
%
|
|
|
117,087
|
|
|
|
63.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,774
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
169,085
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
185,563
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned loan fees, net
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,080
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
183,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
166,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
183,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
|
|
The loan amounts and percentages for June 30, 2010 above reflect the effect of
reclassifying approximately $9.5 million of commercial and industrial loans to real estate
loans during the second quarter of 2010. Without the reclassification, the commercial and
industrial loans would have comprised approximately 34.4% of the total loans at June 30,
2010.
|
The following table shows the interest rate sensitivity of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2010.
Demand loans, loans without a stated maturity and overdrafts are reported as re-pricing in one year
or less. Floating rate loans are reported to reflect the period until re-pricing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Re-pricing as of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
or less
|
|
|
1-5 years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Loans with:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rates
|
|
$
|
12,700
|
|
|
$
|
30,982
|
|
|
$
|
1,657
|
|
|
$
|
45,339
|
|
Floating and adjustable
interest rates
|
|
|
70,756
|
|
|
|
69,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans receivable
|
|
$
|
83,456
|
|
|
$
|
100,661
|
|
|
$
|
1,657
|
|
|
$
|
185,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses.
The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is evaluated based upon
loan categories except for loans rated substandard, doubtful or loss, which are evaluated
separately and assigned loss amounts based upon the evaluation. Loss ratios are applied to each
category of loan to determine estimated loss amounts. Categories of loans are identified as
commercial, SBA and mortgage loans. Loss ratios are determined based upon historical losses
incurred adjusted for the effect of current economic conditions, any industry concentration or
identified weakness in an industry, credit management and underwriting policy changes and secured
versus unsecured nature of the loan category. At June 30, 2010, the range of the loss ratios used
to determine estimated losses by loan category were: commercial loans 0.9%; SBA loans
(unguaranteed portion) 6.5% and real estate loans- 0.2% to 1.9%. These loss ratios are about
0.3% higher than the ratios applied at December 31, 2009 except as to the 6.5% loss ratio for SBA
loans which remained unchanged since December 31, 2009. The loss ratios have increased because of
the amount of loan charge-offs reflecting the effect of the continuing trend of weaknesses in
economic conditions. Additional losses are estimated resulting from additional identified risks
factors, such as loans with underwriting exceptions, the level and direction of payment
delinquencies and the level of large loans. These additional loss estimates are not allocated to
the separate loan categories.
18
The Company monitors its loan portfolio for indications of weaknesses through the review of
borrowers financial condition, cash flows, loan payment delinquencies, economic factors occurring
in borrowers business sectors and other information which may come to the Company through its
contacts in the market place. The determination of the effect of the weaknesses noted on the
repayment of the loans is an ongoing process as to each borrower. The Company may set aside
specific loss reserves during this process in amounts determined on subjective bases until such
time as the collectability of the loan from the borrowers primary repayment source(s) is in doubt.
During this time, secondary and tertiary repayment sources, including liquidation of collateral,
are evaluated which may result in additional specific loss reserves being established. Independent
or internal appraisals and evaluations are performed to determine potential recovery amounts, or
range of amounts, from the loan collateral and other payment sources. Collateral values are subject
to change depending on market factors, collateral condition and method and timing of liquidation
efforts. Loans, or portions of loans, for which the Company does not expect to obtain repayment are
charged-off. In most cases, the Company has established specific reserves for the amount of the
loans losses prior to the point of charge-off.
The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is also reviewed at least quarterly using risk
ratings applied to the loans based upon rating criteria consistent with regulatory definitions.
The risk rating is adjusted, as necessary, if loans become delinquent, if significant adverse
information is discovered regarding the underlying credit and, in the case of commercial loans and
commercial real estate loans, the normal periodic review of the underlying credit indicates that a
change in risk rating is appropriate. An estimated low and high loss percentage is applied to
loans in each risk rating. These loss percentages increase as the loan risk rating increases.
Loans rated as substandard, doubtful or loss are evaluated separately and assigned loss amounts
based upon the separate evaluation. Risks factors identified beyond individual loan risks, such as
economic conditions, underwriting exceptions and loan concentrations are quantified based upon
managements estimations of loss exposure. Loss percentages used are generally based upon
managements best estimates considering losses incurred. Estimated low and high allowance for
loan loss amounts are derived by accumulating the estimated losses using the low and high loss
percentages for each risk rating and adding losses based upon separate loan evaluations and
identified other risks. The actual allowance for loan losses is compared to this range to
ascertain that it is reasonably situated within the range. In addition, on at least a quarterly
basis, the recorded allowance for loan losses (as a percent of loans) is compared to peer group
levels to ascertain the reasonableness of the estimate. At June 30, 2010, the actual allowance for
loan losses of 1.08% was higher than the low and high allowance amounts of 0.79% and 1.03%,
respectively.
The allowance for loan losses represents 1.08% and 1.28% of loans receivable at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively. The reduction in the allowance for loan losses as a percent of
loans declined at June 30, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009 primarily as the result of the
amount of loan losses recognized during 2010. There was no change in the method of determining the
allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009. Management believes
that the allowance for loan losses is adequate for each period presented.
The activity in the allowance for loan losses is shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
In thousands
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
2,380
|
|
|
$
|
1,860
|
|
|
$
|
1,665
|
|
|
$
|
1,614
|
|
|
$
|
1,615
|
|
Charge-offs- Commercial and Industrial
loans
|
|
|
(1,337
|
)
|
|
|
(963
|
)
|
|
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
Recoveries- Commercial and Industrial
loans
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs- Commercial real estate loan
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net recoveries (charge-offs)
|
|
|
(1,414
|
)
|
|
|
(1,096
|
)
|
|
|
(452
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
1,616
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,380
|
|
|
$
|
1,860
|
|
|
$
|
1,665
|
|
|
$
|
1,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net recoveries (charge-offs) to average loans
|
|
|
(0.77
|
%)
|
|
|
(0.65
|
%)
|
|
|
(0.33
|
%)
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)%
|
19
Additionally, the Company has established a reserve for unfunded commitments that is recorded by a
provision charged to other expenses. At June 30, 2010 the balance of this reserve was $57 thousand.
The reserve, based on evaluations of the collectability of loans, is an amount that management believes will be adequate
over time to absorb possible losses on unfunded commitments (off-balance sheet financial
instruments) that may become uncollectible in the future.
Asset Quality
.
In its lending activities, the Company seeks to develop sound loans with customers
who will grow with the Company. There has not been an effort to rapidly build the portfolio and
earnings at the sacrifice of asset quality. At the same time, the extension of credit inevitably
carries some risk of non-payment.
Non-accrual loan activity is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
In thousands
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Balance at the beginning of the period
|
|
$
|
2,734
|
|
|
$
|
5,819
|
|
|
$
|
1,125
|
|
|
$
|
628
|
|
|
$
|
592
|
|
New loans placed on non-accrual
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
2,427
|
|
|
|
5,046
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan restored to interest earning status
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
1,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-off: sold in foreclosure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge offs
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
Other including payments received
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of the period
|
|
$
|
2,733
|
|
|
$
|
2,734
|
|
|
$
|
5,819
|
|
|
$
|
1,125
|
|
|
$
|
628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information regarding loans classified as impaired and non-accrual follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Loans classified as impaired and non-accrual with specific reserves
|
|
$
|
790
|
|
|
$
|
2,519
|
|
Loans classified as impaired and non-accrual with no specific
reserves
|
|
|
1,943
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans classified as impaired
|
|
$
|
2,733
|
|
|
$
|
2,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses on impaired and non-accrual loans
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
|
$
|
922
|
|
Average balance of impaired, non-accrual loans during period
|
|
$
|
2,785
|
|
|
$
|
4,559
|
|
The loans classified as impaired and non-accrual with specific reserves at June 30, 2010 are
comprised of eight loans, seven of which are commercial and industrial loans totaling $510 thousand
and one real estate loan in the amount of $280 thousand. Specific reserves on the seven commercial
and industrial loans are $268 thousand and $14 thousand on the real estate loan. These loans are in
various stages of collection.
The loans classified as impaired and non-accrual without specific reserves at June 30, 2010
include: two loans outstanding to a borrower and entity controlled by the same borrower totaling
$1.0 million, after partial loan charge off of $437 thousand, secured by residential real estate
and corporate assets; two real estate loans to one borrower totaling $778 thousand, after partial
loan charge off of $106 thousand, secured by a non owner occupied house; and, five loans totaling
$165 thousand after partial loan charge offs of $425 thousand. No additional specific reserves are
applied to these loans since the estimated losses on them have been recognized as loan losses and
charged to the allowance for loan losses. All of these loans are in various stages of collections
including foreclosure actions on loans collateral.
20
At June 30, 2010, there were $11.5 million of performing loans considered potential problem loans,
defined as loans which are not included in the 90 day past due or nonaccrual categories, but for
which known information about possible credit problems causes the Company to be uncertain as to the
ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms which may in the future
result in disclosure in the past due, nonaccrual or restructured loans. The Company closely
monitors these borrowers financial status and works with the borrowers to aid in loan repayments.
Real estate acquired through or in the process of foreclosure is recorded at fair value less
estimated disposal costs. The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of the carrying
value of the real estate acquired through foreclosure using current estimates of fair value when it
has reason to believe that real estate values have declined for the particular type and location of
the real estate owned. In the event of a subsequent decline, an allowance would be provided to
reduce real estate acquired through foreclosure to fair value less estimated disposal cost. The
Company acquired through foreclosure a commercial building with a fair value of approximately $653
thousand in March 2009. The Company acquired another commercial building by foreclosure in
November 2009 with a fair value of approximately $1.8 million. The Company is leasing these
properties to others under short term leases as it offers them for sale.
Generally, the accrual of interest is discontinued when a loan is specifically determined to be
impaired or when principal or interest is delinquent for ninety days or more. During 2010, there
were no amounts included in gross interest income attributable to loans in non-accrual status.
The following table shows amounts of non-performing assets on the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
$
|
1,675
|
|
|
$
|
2,734
|
|
|
$
|
2,218
|
|
|
$
|
1,125
|
|
|
$
|
628
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual loans past due 90 days and over
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
|
2,733
|
|
|
|
2,734
|
|
|
|
5,819
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
5,195
|
|
|
$
|
5,196
|
|
|
$
|
5,819
|
|
|
$
|
1,125
|
|
|
$
|
628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total
non-performing loans
|
|
|
73.2
|
%
|
|
|
87.1
|
%
|
|
|
32.0
|
%
|
|
|
148.0
|
%
|
|
|
257.0
|
%
|
Non-performing loans to total loans
|
|
|
1.47
|
%
|
|
|
1.47
|
%
|
|
|
3.80
|
%
|
|
|
0.89
|
%
|
|
|
0.65
|
%
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
2.47
|
%
|
|
|
2.59
|
%
|
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
|
|
0.44
|
%
|
Investment Portfolio
.
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had no investments in
securities other than investments in Federal Reserve Bank stock as required by regulation and stock
in two bankers banks. At June 30, 2009, the Company had approximately $3 million of investment
securities, consisting of a U.S. Treasury obligation which matured prior to December 31, 2009. The
Company is maintaining its liquid assets in its account at the Federal Reserve and fully FDIC
insured certificates of deposits in other financial institutions for safety and liquidity purposes.
The Company will make additional investments when interest rates have increased and the Company has
sufficient excess liquidity. The following table provides information regarding the composition of
the Companys investment securities portfolio at the dates indicated.
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Stocks
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
In thousands
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Investments in
stocks, at cost;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Reserve Stock
|
|
$
|
465
|
|
|
|
88.24
|
%
|
|
$
|
465
|
|
|
|
88.24
|
%
|
Corporate equities
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
11.76
|
%
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
11.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stocks
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The stocks in the two bankers banks are not readily marketable.
Deposits and Liquidity.
The Company currently has no business other than that of the Bank and does
not currently have any material funding commitments unrelated to that business. The Banks
principal sources of funds for loans, investments and general operations are deposits from its
primary market area, principal and interest payments on loans, and proceeds from maturing
investment securities. Its principal funding commitments are for the origination or purchase of
loans and the payment of maturing deposits, and the payment for checks drawn upon it. The Banks
most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents, which are cash on hand, amounts due from other
financial institutions including the Federal Reserve and Federal funds sold. The levels of such
assets are dependent on the Banks lending, investment and operating activities at any given time.
The variations in levels of liquid assets are influenced by deposit flows and loan demand, both
current and anticipated.
The Companys deposits consist of demand deposits, NOW accounts, money market accounts, savings
accounts and certificates of deposit. These accounts provide the Company with a relatively stable
source of funds. The Company generally target larger deposit relationships by offering competitive
interest rates on certificates of deposit of $75 thousand or more in our local markets. Deposits
from the local market areas are supplemented with out-of-area deposits comprised of funds obtained
through the use of deposit listing services (national market certificates of deposit), deposits
obtained through the use of brokers and through the Certificates of Deposit Account Registry
Service (CDARS) program. As a result, a substantial portion of our deposits, 32.9% at June 30, 2010
and 37.8% at December 31, 2009 and 44.5% at June 30, 2009, are comprised of certificate of deposit
accounts of $100 thousand or more, while total certificates of deposit represent 74.4% of deposits
at June 30, 2010 and 77.9% of deposits at December 31, 2009 and 76.4% at June 30, 2009.
The Companys reliance on certificates of deposit, including the use of larger denomination
certificates of deposit and brokered deposits, facilitates funding the growth in the loan
portfolio. The Company has relied on certificates of deposit as a primary funding source and has
used larger certificates of deposits as a funding source since its inception. While sometimes
requiring higher interest rates, such funds carry lower acquisition costs (marketing, overhead
costs) and can be obtained when required at the maturity dates desired. Substantially all of the
deposit accounts over $100 thousand are fully insured by the FDIC through differing ownership and
trustee arrangements and the temporary increase in insured deposit limit to $250 thousand (which
became permanent upon enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act on
July 21, 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act) . All of the brokered deposits and national market deposits
are fully insured by the FDIC. This insurance and the strong capital position of the Company reduce
the likelihood of large deposit withdrawals for reasons other than interest rate competition.
Interest rates on these deposits can be, but are not always, higher than other deposits products.
There is, however, a risk that some deposits would be lost if rates were to increase and the
Company elected not to remain competitive with its own deposit rates. Under those conditions, the
Company believes that it is positioned to use other sources of funds, such as borrowing on its
unsecured credit facilities with other banks or the sale of loans.
At June 30, 2010, deposits totaled $188.1 million as compared to $178.6 million at December 31,
2009. Most of the $9.4 million increase is attributable to the increases in saving account deposits
and noninterest bearing deposits. Upon enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, the prohibition of banks
paying interest on business demand accounts will be eliminated. If the Company starts to pay
interest on these accounts, its net interest margin would decline. There were $41.1 million and
$44.8 million of brokered certificates of deposit at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. Included in these brokered deposits at June 30, 2010 are $13.2 million of
certificates of deposits received in exchange for the placement of the Companys customers deposit
funds with other financial institutions under the CDARS program. Included in deposits are deposits
of officers and directors (and their affiliated entities) of $14 million at June 30, 2010.
22
As a result of the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, banks are no longer prohibited from paying
interest on demand deposit accounts, including those from businesses, effective in July 2011. It
is not clear what affect the elimination of this prohibition will have on the Banks interest
expense, allocation of deposits, deposit pricing, loan pricing, net interest margin, ability to
compete, ability to establish and maintain customer relationships, or profitability.
Deposits are summarized below as of dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
December 31:
|
|
In thousands
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
23,381
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
21,024
|
|
|
$
|
23,599
|
|
|
$
|
19,246
|
|
Interest bearing deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
185.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
|
$
|
1,247
|
|
|
$
|
2,440
|
|
Money Market accounts
|
|
|
7,316
|
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
7,841
|
|
|
|
13,049
|
|
|
|
16,268
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
16,641
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
%
|
|
|
10,379
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Certificates of deposit accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than $100,000
|
|
|
78,024
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
71,593
|
|
|
|
37,539
|
|
|
|
11,383
|
|
$100,000 or more
|
|
|
61,809
|
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)%
|
|
|
67,499
|
|
|
|
69,659
|
|
|
|
74,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
164,672
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
157,621
|
|
|
|
121,642
|
|
|
|
104,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
188,053
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
178,645
|
|
|
$
|
145,241
|
|
|
$
|
123,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below shows the maturities of certificates of deposit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
CDs of $100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDs of $100,000
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
or more
|
|
|
All CDs
|
|
|
or more
|
|
|
All CDs
|
|
Twelve months or less
|
|
$
|
51,432
|
|
|
$
|
96,693
|
|
|
$
|
53,786
|
|
|
$
|
94,725
|
|
Over twelve months through three years
|
|
|
7,142
|
|
|
|
34,764
|
|
|
|
11,139
|
|
|
|
37,587
|
|
Over three years
|
|
|
3,235
|
|
|
|
8,376
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
6,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
61,809
|
|
|
$
|
139,833
|
|
|
$
|
67,499
|
|
|
$
|
139,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below shows the source of the Companys certificate of deposits as well as the amount
equal to or greater than $100,000 at June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDs with
|
|
|
CDs with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
balances of
|
|
|
balances of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
less than
|
|
|
$100,000
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
$100,000
|
|
|
or greater
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Source
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local markets
|
|
$
|
15,937
|
|
|
$
|
42,719
|
|
|
$
|
58,656
|
|
National market
|
|
|
39,639
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
40,087
|
|
CDARS program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,215
|
|
|
|
13,215
|
|
Proprietary funding
|
|
|
6,462
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
9,184
|
|
Other brokered funds
|
|
|
15,986
|
|
|
|
2,705
|
|
|
|
18,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
78,024
|
|
|
$
|
61,809
|
|
|
$
|
139,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
CDARS program funding is reflected in the above schedule as Customers funds and Proprietary
funding. The Company, acting as agent for its customers, places customer funds in other financial
institutions under the program up to the FDIC insurance limit of $250,000. Under the CDARS program,
other financial institutions place deposits in the Company for the same amount of the customers
funds. Customers funds are comprised of deposits from these customer transactions. The Company
can obtain funding under the CDARS program by bidding for deposit funds without customers
involvement. This Proprietary funding results in traditional brokered deposits.
The Companys short term liquid assets of cash and cash equivalents were $20.4 million, or 9.7% of
assets, and $10.5 million, or 5.2%, of assets at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Continued growth in deposits will be required to fund loan growth. Accordingly, the Company intends
to maintain a competitive posture in its deposit interest rate offerings. While adequate liquidity
is imperative, excess liquidity has the effect of a lower interest margin, as funds not invested in
loans are placed in short-term investments that earn significantly lower yields.
The Company has available unsecured credit facilities for short-term liquidity needs from financial
institutions of $8,500,000 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. There were no borrowings
outstanding under these credit arrangements at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
The Company believes its levels of liquidity are adequate to conduct the business of the Company
and Bank.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit
is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Company
holds collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary. The Company
has not been required to perform on any financial guarantees and has not recorded or incurred any
losses on its commitments. The issuance of letters of credit is not a significant activity of the
Company. Outstanding letters of credit at June 30, 2010 totaled $889 thousand and $774 thousand at
December 31, 2009.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend funds to customers as long as there are no
violations of any condition established in the loan contracts. These commitments include
commitments to lend funds as well as un-advanced loan funds. These commitments at June 30, 2010
totaled $32.6 million and $46.0 million at December 31, 2009. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the
commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not
necessarily represent future cash requirements.
With the exception of these off-balance sheet arrangements, the Company has no off-balance sheet
arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Companys
financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations,
liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources, that is material to investors.
24
CAPITAL ADEQUACY
The Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have established guidelines with respect to the maintenance
of appropriate levels of capital by bank holding companies and state non-member banks,
respectively. The regulations impose two sets of capital adequacy requirements: minimum leverage
rules, which require bank holding companies and banks to maintain a specified minimum ratio of
capital to total assets, and risk-based capital rules, which require the maintenance of specified
minimum ratios of capital to risk-weighted assets. At June 30, 2010, the Company and the Bank
were in full compliance with these guidelines, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Ratios
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
To be Adequately
|
|
|
To be Well
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
Total capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Tier I:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Leverage Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
The assessment of capital adequacy depends on a number of factors such as asset quality, liquidity,
earnings performance, and changing competitive conditions and economic forces. The adequacy of the
Companys capital is reviewed by management on an ongoing basis. Management seeks to maintain a
capital structure that will assure an adequate level of capital to support anticipated asset growth
and to absorb potential losses. The ability of the Company to grow is dependent on the availability
of capital with which to meet regulatory capital requirements, discussed below. To the extent the
Company is successful it may need to acquire additional capital through the sale of additional
common stock, other qualifying equity instruments, such as preferred stock (which the Company is
not currently authorized to issue), or subordinated debt. There can be no assurance that
additional capital will be available to the Company on a timely basis or on attractive terms.
Under recent guidance by the federal banking regulators, banks which have concentrations in
construction, land development or commercial real estate loans (other than loans for majority owner
occupied properties) would be expected to maintain higher levels of risk management and,
potentially, higher levels of capital. It is possible that the Company may be required to maintain
higher levels of capital than it would otherwise be expected to maintain as a result of its levels
of construction, development and commercial real estate loans, which may require us to obtain
additional capital.
Significant further growth of the Company may be limited because the current level of capital will
not support rapid short term growth while maintaining regulatory capital expectations. Loan
portfolio growth will need to be funded by increases in deposits as the Company has limited amounts
of on-balance sheet assets deployable into loans. Growth will depend upon Company earnings and/or
the raising of additional capital.
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not applicable
25
ITEM 4T CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Companys management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated, as of the last day of the period covered by this
report, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There were no changes in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Act of 1934)
during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of its business, the Company may become involved in routine legal
proceedings. At June 30, 2010, there are no such proceedings.
Item 1A Risk Factors
Not applicable
Item 2 Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a)
Sales of Unregistered Securities.
None
(b)
Use of Proceeds.
Not applicable.
(c)
Issuer Purchases of Securities.
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. None
Item 4 [Removed and Reserved]
Item 5 Other Information
(a)
Information Required to be Reported on
Form 8-K
.
None
(b)
Changes in Security Holder Nomination Procedures.
None
26
Item 6 Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description of Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
(a)
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (1)
|
|
3
|
(b)
|
|
Bylaws of the Company (2)
|
|
10
|
(a)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Richard J. Morgan and the Company (3)
|
|
10
|
(b)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Lamont Thomas and the Company (4)
|
|
10
|
(c)
|
|
2004 Non Incentive Option Plan (5)
|
|
10
|
(d)
|
|
First Amendment to Employment Agreement between Lamont Thomas and the Company (6)
|
|
10
|
(e)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Michael T. Storm and CommerceFirst Bank attached hereto (7)
|
|
10
|
(f)
|
|
Extension of Employment Agreement between Richard J. Morgan and the Company (8)
|
|
11
|
|
|
Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Income- See Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant The sole subsidiary of the Registrant is CommerceFirst Bank,
a Maryland chartered commercial bank.
|
|
31
|
(a)
|
|
Certification of Richard J. Morgan, President and CEO
|
|
31
|
(b)
|
|
Certification of Michael T Storm, Executive Vice President and CFO
|
|
32
|
(a)
|
|
Certification of Richard J. Morgan, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
32
|
(b)
|
|
Certification of Michael T. Storm, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
99
|
(a)
|
|
Amended and Restated Organizers Agreement (9)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to exhibit of the same number filed with the Companys Registration
Statement on Form SB-2, as amended, (File No. 333-91817)
|
|
(2)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
August 17, 2007
|
|
(3)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Companys to Registration Statement on Form
SB-2, as amended) (File No. 333-91817)
|
|
(4)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to exhibits 10(c) to the Companys to Registration Statement on
Form SB-2, as amended) (File No. 333-91817)
|
|
(5)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
(File No. 333-119988).
|
|
(6)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended March 31, 2007.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(e) to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended September 30, 2007.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
January 30, 2009.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 99(b) and 99(d) to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form SB-2, as amended (File No. 333-91817)
|
27
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMERCEFIRST BANCORP, INC.
|
|
Date: August 4, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/ Richard J. Morgan
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Morgan, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 4, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael T. Storm
|
|
|
|
Michael T. Storm, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Commercefirst Bancorp (NASDAQ:CMFB)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 6월(6) 2024 으로 7월(7) 2024
Commercefirst Bancorp (NASDAQ:CMFB)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 7월(7) 2023 으로 7월(7) 2024