JRoon71
1 시간 전
The company would have definitely said something if scripts had really jumped in the qtr
They listed script count in the 10K. They went from 705,000 in Q3 to 663,000 in Q4.
Q1 - 726,000
Q2 - 815,000
Q3 - 705,000
Q4 - 663,000
It would appear we will dip below 50% market share in Q4 as well.
EDIT: Also, if we believe their script and revenue numbers, then average script price was $43 in Q3 and $66 in Q4. What sense does that make?
I also wonder if there is some sort of lag between timing of script counts by Symphony Health, versus how Amarin recognizes revenue.
US Scripts................Average Price
Q1.....726,000..........66.25
Q2.....815,000..........53.74
Q3.....705,000..........43.40
Q4.....663,000..........66.66
YR.....2,909,000.......57.30
JRoon71
1 시간 전
Trying to wrap my head around a few things from the financials. First, does this look correct? (especially US revenues)
..................U.S...................EU...................RoW................Other/Licensing Fee.......Total
Q1 2024....48,100,000.......1,900,000.........5,200,000.........1,300,000.....................56,500,000
Q2 2024....43,800,000.......3,500,000.........200,000............20,000,000...................67,500,000
Q3 2024....30,600,000.......4,300,000.........6,900,000.........500,000........................42,300,000
Q4 2024....44,200,000.......4,000,000........11,900,000........2,200,000.....................60,100,000
Total.........166,700,000.....13,700,000........24,200,000.......24,000,000...................228,600,000
I'm trying to understand two things:
1. How did we go from $30M US revs in Q3 to $44M US revs Q4, when script count went DOWN? Is this just a timing issue between quarters? The average between the two quarters would seem to make sense (~37.5M avg).
2. WHAT is going on in Europe?? How are revenues flat/down from Q3 to Q4? That seems illogical. Is this again some sort of timing issue, and Q1 will look great?
EDIT: Sorry for the formatting. Can't seem to make it look better than that.
rosemountbomber
4 시간 전
Your advice is probably right but let me see if I can answer the question.
1) People who bought or started buying or holding at much higher levels probably get the feeling like what is the point of selling now considering having been in it for so long. Not saying that this is the correct thing but it is a psychological phenomenon that some of us are dealing with.
2) The devil you know vs the devil you don't. The company has an FDA approved product and beginning to get into markets around the world. Versus trying to sell, take the money and buy into another stock trying to recoup this investment. To recoup this investment would require putting that money to work in riskier areas, like pre-clinical companies that not only have to produce successful trials but then maneuver FDA approval (assuming we are talking bios) or high tech stocks which can be quite risky as we have seen in the last couple of weeks.
3) The stock is trading at not quite but almost half of cash on hand, with no debt. You would think it could be auctioned off for at least $1 a share. Unfortunately, management can continue, collect their fat salaries, and just slowly drain the company.
Over the last year or a little more, the equation here has boiled down to whether EU sales can ramp faster than the drop of sales here in the US. Unfortunately up until now, it does not appear to be so. I think for someone buying the stock here at this price and if they are young and have the time to hold for a good amount of time, it may turn out to be a good opportunity. For some of us, that are old, with a very short time horizon, your suggestion may be the best alternative.
Whalatane
16 시간 전
Re chopping SG&A in half and COGS You have no idea of the API supply contracts AMRN has signed in order to delay / frustrate the entry of the generics .
These supply contracts come with penalties
Payment for Outstanding Obligations:
Most supply agreements require the terminating party to pay for any goods already produced or in production at the time of cancellation. For example, if Amarin issued a purchase order for API and then canceled, it might be liable for the cost of materials sourced or batches manufactured up to that point. This could include raw materials (e.g., omega-3 intermediates) or completed API batches that meet quality specifications.
Minimum Purchase Commitment Shortfalls:
Amarin’s agreements, such as those with Chemport or Equateq, often include minimum annual purchase requirements tied to exclusivity provisions. For instance, historical data suggests Amarin committed to purchases ranging from $5 million to $15 million annually with Chemport, contingent on regulatory approval of the API. If Amarin cancels before meeting these minimums, it might owe a penalty equal to the shortfall—essentially compensating the supplier for reserved manufacturing capacity that goes unused.
Termination Fees or Liquidated Damages:
Contracts may specify a fixed termination fee or liquidated damages to cover the supplier’s lost profits or sunk costs (e.g., facility expansions like Chemport’s capacity increase to 400 metric tons of API annually). This could be a percentage of the remaining contract value or a flat amount negotiated upfront. For example, if Amarin terminates early, it might owe a portion of the anticipated revenue the supplier expected over the contract term.
Reimbursement for Investments:
Suppliers often invest in infrastructure or process validation to meet Amarin’s needs (e.g., Chemport’s facility expansion or Slanmhor’s collaboration with DSM/Novasep). Cancellation could trigger a clause requiring Amarin to reimburse these costs, especially if the investments were made specifically for Vascepa production and can’t be repurposed for other clients.
Kiwi
lizzy241
17 시간 전
jroon, so technically speaking the reverse split is 1 for 20, not 20-1 so for example every 1000 share owned you will receive 50 shares after the reverse split. a forward split would be just the opposite, for every 1000 shares owned, you would receive 20,000. with the 1-20 there's far less dilution and will be much easier to attract quants and algos, which is a double edge sword.
The professionals will put a floor on the current price. It's anyone's guess what will happen after the RS. Price discovery will kick in. Maybe AD will add to his position. As you've mentioned in the past, he is flush with cash. Denner still has to answer to his investors since his HF is not a family office.
Forward Split (Stock Split):
This increases the number of shares outstanding by splitting each existing share into multiple new shares.
The stock price is adjusted proportionally, so the overall value of the investment remains the same.
Example: In a 2-for-1 forward split, each shareholder receives an additional share for every share they own, and the price per share is halved.
Reverse Split (Stock Consolidation):
This reduces the number of shares outstanding by combining multiple shares into one.
The stock price increases proportionally to maintain the same total value of the investment.
Example: In a 1-for-5 reverse split, every five shares are consolidated into one, and the price per share increases by five times.
Both splits do not change the total market capitalization of the company. A forward split is often used when a stock's price is very high to make it more affordable for investors. In contrast, a reverse split is usually employed when a stock's price is very low, to boost its per-share price and maintain exchange listing requirements.