BERKELEY ENERGIA
LIMITED
NEWS RELEASE
|
30 January
2024
Quarterly Report December
2023
Summary:
·
Project
Update
During the quarter, Berkeley Energia
(Berkeley or Company) received formal notifications from the High
Court of Justice of Castilla y León (TSJ) which upheld the appeals
submitted by a non-governmental organisation, Plataforma Stop
Uranio, and the city council of Villavieja de Yeltes (the
appellants) to revoke the first instance judgements related to the
Authorization of Exceptional Use of the Land (AEUL) and the
Urbanism Licence (UL), and annules both the AEUL and UL.
The AEUL and the UL were granted to
the Company in July 2017 and August 2020 by the Regional Commission
of Environment and Urbanism, and the Municipality of Retortillo
respectively.
The appellants subsequently filed
administrative appeals against the AEUL and the UL at the first
instance courts in Salamanca. The administrative appeals against
the AEUL and UL were dismissed in September 2022 and January 2023
respectively.
One of the appellants subsequently
lodged appeals before the TSJ, with the TSJ delivering
judgements in December 2023
to revoke the first
instance judgements and declare the AEUL and the UL
null.
The Company strongly disagrees with
the fundamentals of the TSJ's judgement and it will submit appeals
against the TSJ judgements before the Supreme Court under Spanish
law to defend its position and take all
necessary actions to preserve its rights.
The Company has also previously
submitted a contentious-administrative appeal before the Spanish
National Court following notification from the Ministry for
Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge (MITECO) in
relation to the rejection of the administrative appeal filed by the
Company against MITECO's rejection of the Authorisation for
Construction for the uranium concentrate plant as a radioactive
facility (NSC II) at the Salamanca project.
Whilst the Company's focus is on
resolving the current permitting situation, and ultimately
advancing the Salamanca project towards production, the Company
will continue to strongly defend its position and take all
necessary actions to preserve its rights.
·
Global Nuclear
Power and Uranium Market:
Spot uranium prices continued to
demonstrate extreme upside as the near-term price indicator
increased by 27% during the quarter and ended December at US$91 per
pound. In January 2024 the uranium price surpassed US$100 per pound
and is currently ~US$100 per pound.
Price indicators reflecting the
longer-term uranium market strengthened over the quarter as the
3-year forward price increased to US$96 per pound with the 5-year
forward price increasing to US$101 per pound by the end of
December. The Long-Term Price continued to rise incrementally
reaching US$68 per pound at the end of December.
The outlook for nuclear power and
the uranium market continued to strengthen during the quarter, with
a number of important recent developments, including:
· European Union
o The
European Parliament adopted its official position on the proposed
Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA), which is designed to support Europe's
manufacturing output in technologies needed for decarbonization.
The Members of the European Parliament included nuclear fission and
fusion amongst the list of 17 technologies addressed by the
legislation.
o The
NZIA sets a target for Europe to produce 40% of its annual
deployment needs in net zero technologies by 2030 and to capture
25% of the global market value for these technologies.
· COP28
o During the World Climate Action Summit of the 28th Conference
of the Parties to the U.N. Framework Convention (COP28), more than
20 countries lead by the United States, France, Japan Republic of
Korea, United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom, launched the
Declaration to Triple Nuclear Energy. The Declaration "recognizes
the key role of nuclear energy in achieving global net-zero
greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 and keeping the 1.5-degree goal
within reach."
· Sweden
o The
Swedish government presented its climate policy action plan to meet
net zero by 2045. The climate action plan contains some 70
"concrete proposals" to achieve emission reductions in all sectors
and says "expanded nuclear power is the single most important
measure" to reduce emissions through electrification, with the
government's recently published roadmap for new nuclear "one
crucial piece of the puzzle.
The government also tabled a
proposed amendment to the country's nuclear energy regulations
(Environmental Code) which would remove the current stipulation
that any new nuclear reactor can only be authorized if it replace a
permanently closed reactor and must be built on a site where one of
the existing reactors is located. The recently-elected government
is also pursuing legislation which would address the potential
development of small modular reactors.
· Finland
o Finnish utility, TVO, initiated an environmental impact
assessment for the possible operating license extension and
potential power uprating of reactors which currently supply 15% of
Finland's annual electricity needs. The reactors can operate until
the end of 2038 and TVO is considering applying for a further
10-year extension.
·
Balance
Sheet
The Company is in a strong financial
position with A$75 million in cash reserves and no debt.
Classification: 2.2 This announcement contains inside
information
For
further information please contact:
Robert
Behets
Francisco
Bellón
Acting
Managing Director
Executive
Director
+61 8 9322
6322
+34 923 193
903
info@berkeleyenergia.com
Salamanca Project
Summary
The Salamanca project is being
developed in a historic uranium mining area in Western Spain about
three hours west of Madrid.
The Project hosts a Mineral Resource
of 89.3Mlb uranium, with more than two thirds in the Measured and
Indicated categories. In 2016, Berkeley published the results of a
robust Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) for Salamanca confirming
that the Project may be one of the world's lowest cost producers,
capable of generating strong after-tax cash flows.
In 2021, the Company received formal
notification from MITECO that it had rejected the NSC II
application at Salamanca. This decision followed the unfavourable
NSC II report issued by the NSC in July 2021.
Berkeley strongly refutes the NSC's
assessment and, in the Company's opinion, the NSC has adopted an
arbitrary decision with the technical issues used as justification
to issue the unfavourable report lacking in both technical and
legal support.
Berkeley submitted documentation,
including an 'Improvement Report' to supplement the Company's
initial NSC II application, along with the corresponding arguments
that address all the issues raised by the NSC, and a request for
its reassessment by the NSC, to MITECO in July 2021.
Further documentation was submitted
to MITECO in August 2021, in which the Company, with strongly
supported arguments, dismantled all of the technical issues used by
the NSC as justification to issue the unfavourable report. The
Company again restated that the project is compliant with all
requirements for NSC II to be awarded and requested its NSC II
Application be reassessed by the NSC.
In addition, the Company requested
from MITECO access to the files associated with the Authorisation
for Construction and Authorisation for Dismantling and Closure for
the radioactive facilities at La Haba (Badajoz) and
Saelices El Chico (Salamanca), which are owned by ENUSA
Industrias Avandas S.A., in order to verify and contrast the
conditions approved by the competent administrative and regulatory
bodies for other similar uranium projects in Spain.
Based on a detailed comparison of
the different licensing files undertaken by the Company following
receipt of these files, it is clear that Berkeley, in its NSC II
submission, has been required to provide information that does not
correspond to: (i) the regulatory framework, (ii) the scope of the
current procedural stage (i.e., at the NSC II stage), and/or (iii)
the criteria applied in other licensing processes for similar
radioactive facilities. Accordingly, the Company considers that the
NSC has acted in a discriminatory and arbitrary manner when
assessing the NSC II application for the Salamanca
project.
In Berkeley's strong opinion, MITECO
has rejected the Company's NSC II Application without following the
legally established procedure, as the Improvement Report has not
been taken into account and sent to the NSC for its assessment, as
requested on multiple occasions by the Company.
In this regard, the Company believes
that MITECO have infringed regulations on administrative procedures
in Spain but also under protection afforded to Berkeley under the
Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), which would imply that the decision on
the rejection of the Company's NSC II Application is not
legal.
In April 2023, the
Company's wholly owned Spanish subsidiary,
Berkeley Minera España (BME) submitted a contentious-administrative
appeal before the Spanish National Court in an attempt to overturn
the MITECO decision denying NSC II.
Whilst the Company's focus is on
resolving the current permitting situation, and ultimately
advancing the Salamanca project towards production, the Company and BME will continue
to strongly defend its position and take all necessary actions to
preserve its rights.
Initiation of the
contentious-administrative appeal is necessary to preserve BME's
rights however, the Company reiterates that it is prepared to
collaborate with the relevant authorities and remains hopeful that
the permitting situation can be resolved amicably.
Salamanca Project Update
During the quarter, the Company
continued with its commitment to health, safety and the environment
as a priority.
Following the annual Internal Audit
(IA) of the Environmental and Sustainable Mining Management Systems
completed in the September quarter, AENOR, an independent Spanish
institution, completed the External Audit (EA) during
November.
The EA successfully verified that
the Company's management system complies with the requirements of
ISO Standards 14001:2015 "Environmental Management" and UNE
22480/70:2019 "Sustainable Mining Management", and remains
implemented in an adequate and effective manner.
The conclusions of the EA
highlighted the significant progress made towards achievement of
the Company's 2023 Sustainability Goals including
involvement in the management system at all levels
of the organisation and the
integration of Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs) into the Company's strategy.
The certification process to obtain
ISO 45001 certification for Health and Safety Management is
ongoing, with the internal audit and the integration of the SDGs
into the Company's strategy being successfully
completed.
Solar Power System Study
As previously reported, Berkeley
initiated a study evaluating the design, permitting, construction
and operation of a solar power system at the Project. This study
has been finalised, a formal application submitted to the relevant
authorities in Salamanca, and the permitting process continued
during the quarter.
The Project's location has a natural
abundance of sunlight which is conducive to solar power generation,
which will become a reliable source of low cost and carbon-free
energy for the Project. In addition to making a significant
contribution to reduce carbon emissions, the proposed solar power
system will potentially contribute to reducing the Project's power
related operating costs.
The proposed facility will have an
installed power of 20.1MW and will be able to supply up to 75% of
the power requirements at the Project. There is flexibility with
regard to storage capacity versus capital and operational costs to
ensure the optimal outcome for the Project.
The engineering, design, and cost
estimation workstreams were completed and the overall project was
delivered during the prior quarter. The environmental studies are
well advanced, and once the scope of the environmental document is
confirmed by the Administration, the Environmental Assessment will
be formally submitted.
The decision to pursue a solar power
system is in line with Berkeley's ongoing commitment to
environmental sustainability and to continue to have a positive
impact on the people, environment and society surrounding the
mine.
Exploration
During the quarter, the Company
continued with its initial exploration program focusing on battery
and critical metals in Spain. The exploration initiative is
targeting lithium, cobalt, tin, tungsten, rare earths, and other
battery and critical metals, within the Company's existing
tenements in western Spain that do not form part of Berkeley's main
undertaking being the development of the Salamanca uranium project.
Further analysis of the mineral and metal endowment across the
entire mineral rich province and other prospective regions in Spain
is also being undertaken, with a view to identifying additional
targets and regional consolidation opportunities.
Investigation Permit
Conchas
The Investigation Permit (IP)
Conchas is located in the very western part of the Salamanca
province, close to the Portuguese border (Figure 1). The
tenement covers an area of ~31km2 in the western part of
the Ciudad Rodrigo Basin and is largely covered by Cenozoic aged
sediments. Only the north-western part of the tenement is uncovered
and dominated by the Guarda Batholith intrusion. The tenement hosts
a number of sites where small-scale historical tin and tungsten
mining was undertaken. In addition, several mineral occurrences
(tin, tungsten, titanium, lithium) have been identified during
historical mapping and stream sediment sampling
programs.
Billiton PLC undertook exploration
on the IP Conchas between 1981 and 1983, with a focus on tin and
tantalum (lithium was not taken into account). Billiton's work
programs comprised regional and detailed geological mapping,
geochemistry, trenching and limited drilling.
Soil sampling programs completed by
Berkeley in the northern and central portions of the tenement
during 2021 (200m by 200m) and 2022 (100m by 100m) defined a
tin-lithium anomaly covering approximately 1.1km by 0.7km which
correlated with a mapped aplo-pegmatitic leucogranite.
Based on the results of the soil
sampling programs and information gleaned from a review of the
available historical data, a small initial drilling program was
implemented to test the tin-lithium anomaly. The drill program
comprised five broad spaced reverse circulation (RC) holes for a
total of 282m. Anomalous results for lithium (Li), tin (Sn),
rubidium (Rb), cesium (Cs), niobium (Nb) and tantalum (Ta) obtained
from multi-element analysis of drill samples were reported in the
March 2023 quarter.
The occurrence of these six elements
is observed to be largely associated with a sub-horizontal
muscovitic leucogranite unit that locally outcrops at surface. The
muscovitic leucogranite has a mapped extent of approximately 2km
(in a NE-SW orientation) by 0.4km (in a NW-SE orientation) (Figure
1) and varies in thickness from 7m to over 70m in the drill holes
(Figure 2).
Mineralogical studies have been
undertaken on 25 samples from the drilling at ALS Laboratories
(Perth, Australia) and the University of Oviedo (Oviedo, Spain), to
determine the mineral species present and understand their
characteristics and properties.
The results of the mineralogical
study carried out by ALS Laboratories on the samples of mineralised
muscovitic leucogranite indicate they are composed mainly of
plagioclase (average content of 55%) and quartz (average
content of 25%), with potassium feldspar, muscovite mica, and
Li-mica making up remainder of the rock. The samples have an
average Li-mica content of 3%.
Based on the conclusions of the
studies carried out at the University of Oviedo, IP Conchas
demonstrates exploration potential for several critical and
strategic raw materials included in the European Commission's
Critical Raw Materials Act1, particularly Li, Nb and Ta.
Results from the mineralogical study report conclude that the
Li-bearing minerals in the mineralised leucogranite are mainly
Li-rich muscovites.
The Department of Geology at the
Universidad del País Vasco (Spain) has also undertaken an optical
mineralogy and petrography study on thin sections from six samples
collected from surface outcrops of the Conchas mineralisation. Four
of the collected samples are representative of the main muscovitic
leucogranite and two are the same leucogranite but completely
greisenized. The study concludes that among the mineral phases
identified within the leucogranite and greisen samples, the micas
can be considered as aluminum-rich micas and they are the only
minerals to contain Li. The micas also hosting the highest contents
of Rb and Cs.
The Company is currently advancing
plans for a second drilling campaign at IP Conchas focused on
improving confidence in the geology, continuity, and grade
distribution of the zone of multi-element
mineralisation.
Figure 1: IP Conchas
Location Plans and Geology / Drill Hole Location
Plan
Figure 2: IP Conchas Cross
Section A-A1
Oliva and La Majada
Projects
These projects comprise three
tenements within two project areas in Spain which are considered
prospective for tungsten, cobalt, antimony, and other
metals.
The Company has designed exploration
programs for both projects and communicated with the relevant
authorities to progress the pending grant of the Investigation
Permits for two of tenements.
Permitting
During the quarter, the Company
received formal notifications from the TSJ which upheld the appeals
submitted by a non-governmental organisation, Plataforma Stop
Uranio, and the city council of Villavieja de Yeltes (the
appellants) to revoke the first instance judgements related to the
AEUL and the UL, and annules both the AEUL and UL.
The AEUL and the UL were granted to
the Company in July 2017 and August 2020 by the Regional Commission
of Environment and Urbanism, and the Municipality of Retortillo
respectively.
The appellants subsequently filed
administrative appeals against the AEUL and the UL at the first
instance courts in Salamanca. The administrative appeals against
the AEUL and UL were dismissed in September 2022 and January 2023
respectively. One of the appellants subsequently lodged appeals
before the TSJ, with the TSJ delivering judgements to revoke the
first instance judgements and declare the AEUL and the UL
null.
The Company strongly disagrees with
the fundamentals of the TSJ's judgement and it will submit
cassation appeals against the TSJ judgements before the Supreme
Court under Spanish law to defend its position and take all
necessary actions to preserve its rights.
Given the current permitting
situation at the Salamanca Project, and following the
recommendation of the regional mining authorities, the Company has
applied for a temporary suspension of activity work at the C.E
Retortillo-Santidad ('Retortillo mining licence') whilst the NSC II
related and abovementioned appeals processes are ongoing. All
environmental, health and safety measures will continue to
maintained by the Company. The application is pending resolution by
the regional mining authorities.
Spanish
Politics
Following a failed vote in Congress
for the Partido Popular (PP) leader, Alberto Núñez Feijóo, to
become Prime Minister in September 2023, the Spanish Socialist
Workers' Party (PSOE) leader, Pedro Sánchez, won parliamentary
support during the quarter to be re-elected as Spain's Prime
Minister, after striking a controversial agreement with Catalan
separatists.
In exchange for supporting Sanchez's
PSOE, nationalists from the Spanish region of Catalonia secured a
commitment from the PSOE to pass an amnesty law that would pardon
those linked to a failed Catalan bid for independence six years
ago. PSOE also struck controversial agreements with other
nationalist parties, including from the Basque Country, to secure
their support.
Additional Information on the
Global Nuclear Power and Uranium Market
The outlook
for nuclear power and the uranium market continued to strengthen
during the quarter, with several important recent developments,
including:
· The
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) released its latest
nuclear power forecast up to 2050. The international nuclear
regulatory agency now foresees a high case installed nuclear
generating capacity in 2050 of 890GWe (compared with today's
369GWe), an increase over the 2020 forecast of 24%.
Large-scale reactors remain the
dominant form of nuclear power in all scenarios, including advanced
reactor designs, but the development of and growing interest in
small modular reactors increases the potential for nuclear
power.
· In
response to calls from the nuclear industry, research community and
nuclear safety regulators, the European Commission will establish
an Industrial Alliance dedicated to small modular reactors in early
2024, the European Commissioner for Energy announced.
· The
Swedish government unveiled a roadmap which envisages the
construction of new nuclear generating capacity equivalent to at
least two large-scale reactors by 2035, with up to ten new
large-scale reactors coming online by 2045.
The parliament subsequently approved
a bill that will clear the way for new nuclear power in the country
by removing the current limit on the number of nuclear reactors in
operation, as well as allowing reactors to be built on new sites.
The amendment entered into force on 1 January 2024.
Sweden and France also signed a
declaration of intent to develop long-term cooperation in the field
of nuclear energy.
· Norsk
Kjernkraft, submitted a proposal to Norway's Ministry of Oil and
Energy for an assessment into the construction of a power plant
based on multiple small modular reactors in the municipalities of
Aure and Heim. The company said it marks the first formal step
towards the possible construction of the country's first nuclear
power plant. Once approved by the government agency, the
environmental impact assessment phase could begin.
· Slovenia's Ministry of the Environment, Climate and Energy
presented a draft resolution on the long-term peaceful use of
nuclear energy in the country, which envisages long-term use of
nuclear energy, a second reactor at the Krško nuclear power plant
and a secure electricity supply through a mix of nuclear and
renewable energy sources, the Slovenian Press Agency
reported.
· The
Estonian government's Nuclear Energy Working Group concluded that
introducing nuclear energy to the country would help to meet
climate goals and increase energy security, with small modular
reactors deemed to be the most suitable for the country.
· The
Council of Ministers of Bulgaria have approved the construction of
two additional reactors. The target date for commercial operation
of the first reactor is set at 2033 while the second reactor would
follow 2-3 years later. The planned capacity of the two reactors
will total 2,300MWe.
· The
British government launched a roadmap for reaching its ambition for
the UK to have 24GWe of nuclear generating capacity by 2050,
representing about 25% of the country's projected electricity
demand.
· The
EURATOM Supply Agency (ESA) distributed its Annual Report for 2022
which documents various aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle within
the European Union.
According to the ESA's survey of the
103 reactors operating in 13 Member Countries as of the end of
2022, future uncovered uranium requirements through 2031 range from
a minimum of 51.9 million pounds (assuming all current supply
agreements are honoured) and a maximum of 87.5 million pounds
(assuming Russian-sourced agreements are not completed as
scheduled).
Total uranium inventories held by EU
utilities at the end of 2022 approximated 92.8 million pounds, a
decrease from the aggregate inventories held at the end of 2021
(95.7 million pounds).
During 2022, the purchases of
Russian-origin uranium declined by 16% to 5.2 million pounds as
compared to 2021 buying levels.
· Kazatomprom released its September 2023 quarter Operations and
Trading Update, which reported a slight decline in Kazakh uranium
production for the first nine months of the year (2023 - 39.8
million pounds. compared to 2022 - 40.2 million pounds), but
reconfirming the 2023 guidance at 53.3 - 55.9 million pounds.
However, the world's largest producer of uranium cautioned that
"issues associated with limited access to certain key materials,
such as sulfuric acid, remain persistent, and might potentially
have a negative impact on 2024 production."
· Orano
took the decision to expand uranium enrichment capacity at the
Georges Besse 2 Uranium Enrichment Plant, located at Tricastin,
France. The facility entered operation in 2011 reaching its current
full production capacity of 7.5 million Separative Work Units (SWU)
in 2016, based on centrifuge technology. The Orano Board approved
the planned expansion of 2.5 million SWU at a cost of €1.7
billion.
Forward Looking
Statements
Statements regarding plans with respect to Berkeley's mineral
properties are forward-looking statements. There can be no
assurance that Berkeley's plans for development of its mineral
properties will proceed as currently expected. There can also be no
assurance that Berkeley will be able to confirm the presence of
additional mineral deposits, that any mineralisation will prove to
be economic or that a mine will successfully be developed on any of
Berkeley mineral properties. These forward-looking statements are
based on Berkeley's expectations and beliefs concerning future
events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to
risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside
the control of Berkeley, which could cause actual results to differ
materially from such statements. Berkeley makes no undertaking to
subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made
in this announcement, to reflect the circumstances or events after
the date of that report.
Competent Persons
Statement
The information in this report that relates to Exploration
Results is extracted from the March 2023 Quarterly Report which is
available to view on Berkeley's website at
www.berkeleyenergia.com.
Berkeley confirms that: a) it is not aware of any new information
or data that materially affects the information included in the
original announcement; b) all material assumptions and technical
parameters underpinning the Exploration Results in the original
announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and
c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons'
findings are presented in this announcement have not been
materially modified from the original
announcement.
The information in this report that relates to the Mineral
Resource Estimate is extracted from the announcement dated 30
August 2023 entitled 'Annual Report 2023', which is available to
view on Berkeley's website at www.berkeleyenergia.com
and is based on,
and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Enrique Martínez,
a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of
Mining and Metallurgy. Berkeley confirms that: a) it is not aware
of any new information or data that materially affects the
information included in the original announcement; b) all material
assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Mineral
Resource Estimate in the original announcement continue to apply
and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in
which the relevant Competent Persons' findings are presented in
this announcement have not been materially modified from the
original announcement.
References
1 Proposal for a REGULATION OF
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing a framework
for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw
materials and amending Regulations (EU) 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858,
2018/1724 and (EU) 2019/1020
This announcement has been authorised for release by Mr Robert
Behets, Director.
Appendix 1: Mineral Resource
at Salamanca
Deposit
Name
|
Resource Category
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
U3O8
(ppm)
|
U3O8
(Mlbs)
|
Retortillo
|
Measured
|
4.1
|
498
|
4.5
|
|
Indicated
|
11.3
|
395
|
9.8
|
|
Inferred
|
0.2
|
368
|
0.2
|
|
Total
|
15.6
|
422
|
14.5
|
Zona 7
|
Measured
Indicated
|
5.2
10.5
|
674
761
|
7.8
17.6
|
|
Inferred
|
6.0
|
364
|
4.8
|
|
Total
|
21.7
|
631
|
30.2
|
Alameda
|
Indicated
|
20.0
|
455
|
20.1
|
|
Inferred
|
0.7
|
657
|
1.0
|
|
Total
|
20.7
|
462
|
21.1
|
Las Carbas
|
Inferred
|
0.6
|
443
|
0.6
|
Cristina
|
Inferred
|
0.8
|
460
|
0.8
|
Caridad
|
Inferred
|
0.4
|
382
|
0.4
|
Villares
|
Inferred
|
0.7
|
672
|
1.1
|
Villares North
|
Inferred
|
0.3
|
388
|
0.2
|
Total Retortillo
Satellites
|
Total
|
2.8
|
492
|
3.0
|
Villar
|
Inferred
|
5.0
|
446
|
4.9
|
Alameda Nth Zone 2
|
Inferred
|
1.2
|
472
|
1.3
|
Alameda Nth Zone 19
|
Inferred
|
1.1
|
492
|
1.2
|
Alameda Nth Zone 21
|
Inferred
|
1.8
|
531
|
2.1
|
Total Alameda
Satellites
|
Total
|
9.1
|
472
|
9.5
|
Gambuta
|
Inferred
|
12.7
|
394
|
11.1
|
Salamanca Project
Total
|
Measured
|
9.3
|
597
|
12.3
|
Indicated
|
41.8
|
516
|
47.5
|
Inferred
|
31.5
|
395
|
29.6
|
Total (*)
|
82.6
|
514
|
89.3
|
Appendix 2: Summary of Mining
Tenements
As at 31 December 2023, the Company
had an interest in the following tenements:
Location
|
Tenement Name
|
Percentage
Interest
|
Status
|
Spain
|
|
|
|
Salamanca
|
D.S.R Salamanca 28
(Alameda)
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
D.S.R Salamanca 29
(Villar)
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
E.C. Retortillo-Santidad
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
E.C. Lucero
|
100%
|
Pending
|
|
I.P. Abedules
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Abetos
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Alcornoques
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Alisos
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Bardal
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Barquilla
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Berzosa
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Campillo
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Castaños 2
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Ciervo
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Conchas
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Dehesa
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. El Águila
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. El
Vaqueril
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Espinera
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Horcajada
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Lis
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Mailleras
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Mimbre
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Pedreras
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
E.P. Herradura*
|
100%
|
Granted
|
Cáceres
|
I.P. Almendro
E.C. Gambuta
|
100%
100%
|
Granted
Pending^
|
|
I.P. Ibor
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Olmos
|
100%
|
Granted
|
Badajoz
|
I.P. Los Bélicos
|
100%
|
Granted**
|
|
I.P.A. Ampliación Los
Bélicos
|
100%
|
Pending**
|
Ciudad Real
|
I.P.A. La Majada
|
100%
|
Pending**
|
*An application for a 1-year
extension at E.P. Herradura
was previously rejected however this decision has
been appealed and the Company awaits the decision regarding its
appeal.
^During quarter, the Company applied
for an Exploitation Concession from the existing IP
Almendro.
**In the March 2023 quarter,
Exploracion de Recuros Minerales S.L.U (ERM), a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Tenement Sale and
Purchase Agreement and Royalty Deed with COPROMI, to acquire IP Los
Bélicos, IPA
Ampliación Los Bélicos, and IPA La Majada.
Appendix 3: Related Party
Payments
During the quarter ended 31 December
2023, the Company made payments of $186,000 to related parties and
their associates. These payments relate to existing remuneration
arrangements (director and consulting fees plus statutory
superannuation).
Appendix 4: Exploration and
Mining Expenditure
During the quarter ended 31 December
2023, the Company made the following payments in relation to
exploration and development activities:
Activity
|
A$000
|
Radiological protection, monitoring
and other assays
|
20
|
Permitting related expenditure
(including legal dispute expenses)
|
476
|
Consultants and other
expenditure
|
54
|
Payment/(return) of VAT and other
social taxes in Spain
|
144
|
Total as reported in the Appendix 5B
|
694
|
There were no mining or production
activities and expenses incurred during the quarter ended 31
December 2023.
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity or
oil and gas exploration entity
quarterly cash flow report
Name of entity
|
Berkeley Energia Limited
|
ABN
|
|
Quarter ended ("current
quarter")
|
40 052 468 569
|
|
31 December 2023
|
Consolidated statement of cash flows
|
Current quarter
$A'000
|
Year to date
(6 months)
$A'000
|
1.
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
-
|
-
|
1.1
|
Receipts from customers
|
1.2
|
Payments for
|
(694)
|
(1,601)
|
|
(a) exploration &
evaluation
|
|
(b)
development
|
-
|
-
|
|
(c)
production
|
-
|
-
|
|
(d) staff
costs
|
(346)
|
(599)
|
|
(e) administration and
corporate costs
|
(305)
|
(692)
|
1.3
|
Dividends received (see
note 3)
|
-
|
-
|
1.4
|
Interest received
|
875
|
1,668
|
1.5
|
Interest and other costs of finance
paid
|
-
|
-
|
1.6
|
Income taxes paid
|
-
|
-
|
1.7
|
Government grants and tax
incentives
|
-
|
-
|
1.8
|
Other (provide details if
material)
(a) Business
Development
|
(92)
|
(117)
|
1.9
|
Net
cash from / (used in) operating activities
|
(562)
|
(1,341)
|
|
2.
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
-
|
-
|
2.1
|
Payments to acquire or
for:
|
|
(a) entities
|
|
(b) tenements
|
-
|
-
|
|
(c) property, plant and
equipment
|
-
|
-
|
|
(d) exploration &
evaluation
|
-
|
-
|
|
(e)
investments
|
-
|
-
|
|
(f) other
non-current assets
|
-
|
-
|
2.2
|
Proceeds from the disposal
of:
|
-
|
-
|
|
(a) entities
|
|
(b) tenements
|
-
|
-
|
|
(c) property, plant and
equipment
|
-
|
-
|
|
(d)
investments
|
-
|
-
|
|
(e) other non-current
assets
|
-
|
-
|
2.3
|
Cash flows from loans to other
entities
|
-
|
-
|
2.4
|
Dividends received (see
note 3)
|
-
|
-
|
2.5
|
Other (provide details if
material)
|
-
|
-
|
2.6
|
Net
cash from / (used in) investing activities
|
-
|
-
|
|
3.
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
-
|
-
|
3.1
|
Proceeds from issues of equity
securities (excluding convertible debt securities)
|
3.2
|
Proceeds from issue of convertible
debt securities
|
-
|
-
|
3.3
|
Proceeds from exercise of
options
|
-
|
-
|
3.4
|
Transaction costs related to issues
of equity securities or convertible debt securities
|
-
|
-
|
3.5
|
Proceeds from borrowings
|
-
|
-
|
3.6
|
Repayment of borrowings
|
-
|
-
|
3.7
|
Transaction costs related to loans
and borrowings
|
-
|
-
|
3.8
|
Dividends paid
|
-
|
-
|
3.9
|
Other (provide details if
material)
|
-
|
-
|
3.10
|
Net
cash from / (used in) financing activities
|
-
|
-
|
|
4.
|
Net
increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the
period
|
|
|
4.1
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
80,039
|
78,776
|
4.2
|
Net cash from / (used in) operating
activities (item 1.9 above)
|
(562)
|
(1,341)
|
4.3
|
Net cash from / (used in) investing
activities (item 2.6 above)
|
-
|
-
|
4.4
|
Net cash from / (used in) financing
activities (item 3.10 above)
|
-
|
-
|
4.5
|
Effect of movement in exchange rates
on cash held
|
(4,343)
|
(2,301)
|
4.6
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
75,134
|
75,134
|
5.
|
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents
at the end of the quarter (as shown in the
consolidated statement of cash flows) to the related items in the
accounts
|
Current quarter
$A'000
|
Previous quarter
$A'000
|
5.1
|
Bank balances
|
75,084
|
79,989
|
5.2
|
Call deposits
|
50
|
50
|
5.3
|
Bank overdrafts
|
-
|
-
|
5.4
|
Other (provide details)
|
-
|
-
|
5.5
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal
item 4.6 above)
|
75,134
|
80,039
|
6.
|
Payments to related parties of the entity and their
associates
|
Current quarter
$A'000
|
6.1
|
Aggregate amount of payments to
related parties and their associates included in
item 1
|
(186)
|
6.2
|
Aggregate amount of payments to
related parties and their associates included in
item 2
|
-
|
Note: if any amounts are shown in items 6.1 or 6.2, your
quarterly activity report must include a description of, and an
explanation for, such payments.
|
7.
|
Financing facilities Note: the term "facility'
includes all forms of financing arrangements available to the
entity.
Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the sources of
finance available to the entity.
|
Total facility amount at
quarter end
$A'000
|
Amount drawn at quarter end
$A'000
|
7.1
|
Loan facilities
|
-
|
-
|
7.2
|
Credit standby
arrangements
|
-
|
-
|
7.3
|
Other (please specify)
|
-
|
-
|
7.4
|
Total financing facilities
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
Unused financing facilities available at quarter
end
|
-
|
7.6
|
Include in the box below a
description of each facility above, including the lender, interest
rate, maturity date and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any
additional financing facilities have been entered into or are
proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include a note
providing details of those facilities as well.
|
Not applicable
|
8.
|
Estimated cash available for future operating
activities
|
$A'000
|
8.1
|
Net cash from / (used in) operating
activities (item 1.9)
|
(562)
|
8.2
|
(Payments for exploration & evaluation classified as investing
activities) (item 2.1(d))
|
-
|
8.3
|
Total relevant outgoings
(item 8.1 + item 8.2)
|
(562)
|
8.4
|
Cash and cash equivalents at quarter
end (item 4.6)
|
75,134
|
8.5
|
Unused finance facilities available
at quarter end (item 7.5)
|
-
|
8.6
|
Total available funding
(item 8.4 + item 8.5)
|
75,134
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
Estimated quarters of funding available (item 8.6 divided
by item 8.3)
|
>10
|
Note: if the entity has reported positive relevant outgoings
(ie a net cash inflow) in item 8.3, answer item 8.7 as
"N/A". Otherwise, a figure for the estimated quarters of funding
available must be included in item 8.7.
|
8.8
|
If item 8.7 is less than
2 quarters, please provide answers to the following
questions:
|
|
8.8.1
Does the entity expect that it will continue to have
the current level of net operating cash flows for the time being
and, if not, why not?
|
|
Answer:
Not applicable
|
|
8.8.2
Has the entity taken any steps, or does it propose to
take any steps, to raise further cash to fund its operations and,
if so, what are those steps and how likely does it believe that
they will be successful?
|
|
Answer:
Not applicable
|
|
8.8.3
Does the entity expect to be able to continue its
operations and to meet its business objectives and, if so, on what
basis?
|
|
Answer:
Not applicable
|
|
Note: where item 8.7 is less than 2 quarters, all of
questions 8.8.1, 8.8.2 and 8.8.3 above must be
answered.
|
Compliance statement
1 This statement has
been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies
which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.
2 This statement
gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
Date:
30 January 2024
Authorised
by: Company Secretary
(Name of
body or officer authorising release - see note 4)
Notes
1. This
quarterly cash flow report and the accompanying activity report
provide a basis for informing the market about the entity's
activities for the past quarter, how they have been financed and
the effect this has had on its cash position. An entity that wishes
to disclose additional information over and above the minimum
required under the Listing Rules is encouraged to do so.
2. If
this quarterly cash flow report has been prepared in accordance
with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and
provisions of, AASB 6:
Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and
AASB 107: Statement of Cash
Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly cash flow
report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting
standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the
corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.
3.
Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from
operating activities or cash flows from investing activities,
depending on the accounting policy of the entity.
4. If
this report has been authorised for release to the market by your
board of directors, you can insert here: "By the board". If it has
been authorised for release to the market by a committee of your
board of directors, you can insert here: "By the [name of board committee - eg Audit and Risk Committee]". If it
has been authorised for release to the market by a disclosure
committee, you can insert here: "By the Disclosure
Committee".
5. If
this report has been authorised for release to the market by your
board of directors and you wish to hold yourself out as complying
with recommendation 4.2 of the ASX Corporate Governance
Council's Corporate Governance
Principles and Recommendations, the board should have
received a declaration from its CEO and CFO that, in their opinion,
the financial records of the entity have been properly maintained,
that this report complies with the appropriate accounting standards
and gives a true and fair view of the cash flows of the entity, and
that their opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system
of risk management and internal control which is operating
effectively.