FSA Disciplinary-Big Food Grp
26 4월 2002 - 6:12PM
UK Regulatory
RNS Number:1352V
Financial Services Authority
26 April 2002
FSA Disciplinary Decision- The Big Food Group plc
26 April 2002
Decision
1. The FSA has decided that, on two occasions in the period December 2000 to
January 2001, The Big Food Group plc (formerly known as Iceland Group Plc)
(the "Company") contravened the requirements of paragraphs 9.2 and 9.3A of
the Listing Rules. The Listing Rules in force throughout the relevant period
were those published in May 2000. The contraventions were in respect of the
timing and content of an announcement issued by the Company on 13 December
2000 via the London Stock Exchange's Regulatory News Service ("RNS") and the
failure of the Company to make an announcement on or before 2 January 2001
in relation to a change in the Company's financial performance.
Paragraph 9.2
The Company failed, in two respects, to notify the Company Announcements
Office without delay of changes in the performance of the Company's
business and in the Company's expectation as to its performance, changes
which, if made public, were likely to lead to substantial movement in
the price of its listed securities: first, in relation to the Company's
actual trading performance between September and December 2000,
including the Christmas period; secondly, in relation to synergy benefit
expectations arising from the acquisition of Booker Plc ("Booker") in
June 2000 for the period to March 2001.
Paragraph 9.3A
The Company failed to take all reasonable care to ensure that the
announcement which was issued via RNS on 13 December 2000 was not
misleading and did not omit anything likely to affect the import of the
announcement. This was in relation to both the Company's trading
performance and the merger synergy benefit expectations.
2. The FSA considers that these failures constitute very serious
breaches of the Listing Rules and accordingly that it is appropriate in
the circumstances for its decision and the reasons for it to be made
public.
Summary of facts
Background
3. The Company is a food retailer and wholesaler in the UK market.
The Company has a financial year end of 31 March.
4. The acquisition of Booker by the Company (the "Acquisition") was
completed on 23 June 2000. Listing Particulars for the Acquisition,
issued on 26 May 2000, included expected synergy benefits of £20 million
for the period ending 31 March 2001 and £50 million for the year ending
31 March 2002.
5. Throughout the second half of 2000 market expectations as to the
Company's profit before tax for the 15 month period to 31 March 2001
were between £137 million and £140 million. The market was expecting
positive like for like ("LFL") sales growth for the second half of 2000.
Market expectations were broadly in line with the Company's original
budget for the 15-month period to 31 March 2001, which included budgeted
profit before tax of £143 million. The Company had budgeted for LFL
sales growth for Iceland Foods ("Iceland") of around 3% over that
period.
6. On 5 September 2000 the Company announced its interim results for
the 26 weeks ending 1 July 2000. This announcement stated that
"Iceland's like for like food sales in the 9 weeks to 2 September (2000)
have grown by 4.5 per cent, while Booker's like for like sales excluding
tobacco are up 2.0 per cent." In addition the Company stated in this
announcement that "all our work to date underpins our confidence in the
delivery of cost savings and trading synergies of not less than £20
million in the current trading period to March 2001, and of at least £50
million in the year to March 2002."
The 13 December 2000 announcement
7. Throughout the period September 2000 to December 2000 the actual
trading performance of the Company deteriorated significantly. By 13
December 2000 information available within the Company indicated that
LFL sales for Iceland had shown a decreasing trend over a 22 week period
and had been negative for 11 weeks. The FSA has concluded that, in
addition, by 13 December 2000 the most up to date information available
within the Company indicated that actual profit after interest before
synergies and exceptional items was 51.6% below budget.
8. By 13 December 2000 at the latest, therefore, an obligation had
arisen under paragraph 9.2 of the Listing Rules to make an announcement
informing the market as to a change in the performance of the Company's
business. The Company's failure to make such an announcement was
therefore in breach of paragraph 9.2 of the Listing Rules. This failure
was not rectified until the Company released its announcements on 22 and
31 January 2001.
9. By 13 December 2000 information available within the Company also
indicated that synergy benefits for the period to March 2001 were likely
to be at least 25% below the Company's original forecast as well as
market expectations of £20 million.
10. On 13 December 2000 the Company announced that it would be
hosting a visit for investment analysts the following day.
Notwithstanding the facts set out in paragraphs 7 and 9, this
announcement included the following statement:
"Iceland's management remain positive on the Group's future prospects,
and are confident that all the expected benefits of the merger with
Booker are real and achievable."
11. In light of the facts set out in paragraphs 7 and 9, this
statement was misleading and therefore in breach of paragraph 9.3A of
the Listing Rules.
12. By 2 January 2001 information was available to the Company
demonstrating that there had been a further deterioration in the
performance of the Company's business, in particular indicating that
Iceland's LFL sales over the Christmas period, regarded by the market as
a key indicator of performance, were negative and significantly below
budget.
13. d that, aAs at 2 January 2001, therefore, a further obligation
to make an announcement under paragraph 9.2 of the Listing Rulesin
relation to the Christmas trading figures had arisen. The Company took
no immediate steps to consider whether such an announcement should be
made and did not consult its financial advisers at that time. The
Company's failure to make such an announcement without delay was again
therefore in breach of paragraph 9.2 of the Listing Rules. This failure
was not rectified until the Company released its announcement on 22
January 2001.
The 22 and 31 January 2001 announcements
14. On 22 January 2001 the Company issued a trading statement
showing LFL sales for Iceland, Booker and the Company for the 26 weeks
to 29 December 2000 and for the 4 weeks to 28 December 2000. This
announcement included a statement that for the 4-week period to 28
December 2000, LFL sales were down by 1.5% for the Company and by 5.5%
for Iceland. For the 26 weeks to 29 December 2000, LFL sales were down
by 0.5% for the Company and by 1.5% for Iceland. This announcement also
referred to a further statement to be made by the end of January.
Following this announcement the share price fell by approximately 16%
from 258.5p on 21 January 2001 to 218p on 22 January 2001.
15. A further announcement was made by the Company on 31 January
2001 in which it stated that the Company had completed its initial
evaluation of the progress made following the Acquisition. This
announcement included a statement that: "The Board's current expectation
for the accounting period ending 31 March 2001 is that profit before
tax, amortisation of goodwill and exceptional items, will be
significantly below expectations and not likely to exceed £62 million."
This compared with market expectations throughout the second half of
2000 of £137 to £140 million and the Company's original budget of £143
million. The announcement also included a revision of merger synergy
benefits to the end of March 2001 from £20 million to £8 million.
Following this announcement the share price fell by approximately 20.5%
from 187.5p on 30 January 2001 to 149p on 31 January 2001, representing
a 42.4% fall on the share price immediately prior to the 22 January 2001
announcement.
Conclusion
16. The Company has informed the FSA that, following significant
senior management changes within the Company during January 2001,
improved reporting procedures and internal controls have been
introduced. The FSA has also noted the steps taken by present directors
of the Company to ensure future compliance with the Listing Rules.
17. However, the FSA regards the continuing obligation requirements
of Chapter 9 of the Listing Rules as a fundamental protection for
shareholders. These requirements are designed to promote full disclosure
to the market of all relevant information on a timely basis to ensure
that all users of the market have simultaneous access to the same
information. Observance of those continuing obligations is essential to
the maintenance of an orderly market in securities and of confidence in
the financial system. Accordingly, the FSA has decided that it is
appropriate to publish this public statement stating its serious view of
the Company's failures in this case.
18. A listed company, by its board, has a continuing obligation to
consider carefully whether changes in its financial condition, in the
performance of its business or in its expectation as to its performance
may be such that, if made public, they would be likely to lead to
substantial movement in the price of its listed securities and so
require disclosure without delay under the Listing Rules. This is an
overriding obligation and, when such changes are under consideration, a
listed company should consult its professional advisers as soon as
possible.
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
Big Food Grp. (LSE:BFP)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 6월(6) 2024 으로 7월(7) 2024
Big Food Grp. (LSE:BFP)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 7월(7) 2023 으로 7월(7) 2024
Big Food Grp. (런던증권거래소)의 실시간 뉴스: 최근 기사 0
More Big Food Group PLC News Articles