Interspeed Inc (CE) (ISPD) 시세

ISPD SEC Suspension:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=75547630

lol fine by me as well, i had no clue this used to trade at $37 a share. wondering what today will bring. if its UP could be a good sign.

Hey if they want to pump it back to $37/share that's fine by me! lol

WOW...had no idea that this thing used to trade at $37/share? Well, I think it's pretty safe to say that this is still a low floater based on todays trading activity...

GLTY! Hopefully something comes about on this one:)

TY bud, havent found much, not sure what to expect. well just see what the morning brings in!

I've been looking as well....can't find anything out here. I'm going to keep digging!

couldent find much info here either. even found they have a website but says "under construction" not sure whats going on here. but the volume today was definetly unexpected.

They have probably cleaned up their act and have some good stuff in the works. Can't find much info but I am digging.

Sounds like previous officers were pumping.

A little more info:

Securities and Exchange Commission
Litigation Release No. 17758 / October 1, 2002
Accounting and Auditing Enforcement
Release No. 1638 / October 1, 2002
SEC Charges Former Massachusetts Officers of Interspeed, Inc.
With Financial Fraud
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arthur A. Goodwin, William J. Burke and Christopher P. Whalen, (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts) (Civil Action No. 02 CV 11913 JLT)
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on September 30, 2002 it filed a civil injunctive action for financial fraud against three former officers of Interspeed, Inc., a North Andover, Massachusetts Internet hardware developer. In the suit, filed in federal court in the District of Massachusetts, the Commission alleged that the three defendants participated in fraudulent revenue recognition, causing Interspeed to engage in a $9 million fraud which inflated its reported sales between 25% and 93% from January to September 2000. One defendant, Christopher P. Whalen, has agreed to settle the matter by agreeing to a permanent injunction and payment of disgorgement and a civil monetary penalty.

The Commission's complaint names Arthur A. Goodwin of Plano, Texas (formerly of Boxford, Massachusetts), William J. Burke of Andover, Massachusetts and Christopher P. Whalen of Bolton, Massachusetts. According to the complaint, Goodwin, the company's senior vice president of world-wide sales, orchestrated the scheme to inflate revenue in order to meet analysts' revenue expectations and to boost his own bonus. The Commission alleges that Goodwin, with Whalen's assistance, arranged improper transactions with customers in which secret side letters relieved them of any obligation to pay until the goods were sold to an end-user. Accounting rules prohibit recognizing revenue on such contingent sales. The Commission also alleges that Goodwin arranged "round-trip" transactions in which funds were funneled to a customer for it to use in paying for Interspeed product. In addition, Goodwin allegedly forged a signature and falsified the terms of a contract, thereby causing a non-existent transaction to be recognized improperly on Interspeed's books for the 3rd quarter of 2000. This $6.4 million transaction constituted 92% of Interspeed's reported income for the quarter.

The Commission's complaint alleges that Burke, the company's chief financial officer, recorded the contingent sales as revenue even though he was aware of the side terms which made revenue recognition improper. In addition, the complaint alleges that Burke altered accounting records to keep Interspeed's outside auditors from discovering that the sales were shams. Through the alteration, the complaint alleges, Burke and Goodwin made it appear that Interspeed was receiving payment for the round-tripping sales in which Interspeed provided the funds to the customer.

According to the complaint, Interspeed's directors uncovered the fraudulent scheme in late September 2000, and the company restated its financial results for the first three quarters of its fiscal year ended September 30, 2000, reducing its originally reported revenue of $14 million to $5 million. Goodwin and Whalen were terminated in October 2000. Burke resigned in August 2000. Interspeed has since ceased operations.

In its complaint, the Commission requests that the court issue a final judgment permanently enjoining Goodwin, Burke and Whalen from violating or aiding and abetting violations of the antifraud, periodic reporting, record keeping and internal controls provisions of the federal securities laws, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-13 and 13b2-1, and additionally as to Goodwin and Burke, Rule 13b2-2, which prohibits officers of a company from lying to auditors as well as, for Burke, Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act, which requires maintenance of internal accounting controls. The Commission also seeks disgorgement of the bonuses and sales commissions the defendants received based on the fraudulent sales. According to the complaint, Goodwin received over $70,000, Burke received $41,000 and Whalen received $1,361. In addition, the Commission's complaint asks the court to impose civil monetary penalties. The Commission is also seeking an order permanently barring Goodwin and Burke from acting as officers or directors of any public company.

Whalen, without admitting or denying the allegations against him, has agreed to settle the matter by consenting to an injunction, to pay disgorgement of his entire revenue-based bonus of $1,361 and to payment of a civil monetary penalty of $15,000. In accepting Whalen's offer of settlement, the Commission considered Whalen's cooperation during the Commission's investigation.

Found this old article, don't know what the outcome was.

Investors Pursue Class Actions Against Interspeed, Inc. And Brooktrout, Inc., Berman DeValerio & Pease Says
Market Wire, November, 2000
Berman DeValerio & Pease LLP (www.bermanesq.com) today advised investors that Interspeed, Inc. (NASDAQ: ISPD) and Brooktrout, Inc. (NASDAQ:BRKT) face separate securities fraud class actions.

The complaint against Interspeed seeks damages for violations of federal securities laws on behalf of all investors who bought Interspeed common stock between October 4, 1999 and October 6, 2000 (the "Class Period"). The complaint against Brooktrout covers those investors who bought Brooktrout common stock between February 3, 2000 and October 6, 2000.


Both lawsuits were filed last month in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Interspeed is based in North Andover, Mass. Brooktrout is based in Needham, Mass. Boston-based Berman DeValerio & Pease has prosecuted securities fraud class actions for nearly two decades.

The Interspeed complaint charges that Interspeed issued materially false and misleading statements concerning its business and financial results that inflated its stock price during the Class Period. Specifically, the lawsuit says Interspeed improperly recorded revenue during the first three quarters of fiscal 2000. On October 6, 2000, the company said it expected to restate "unaudited results for the interim periods." In the same announcement, the company said its chief executive officer, Stephen Ide, had resigned, and that two other high-level employees had been fired. In the wake of the announcement, Interspeed's stock price fell to as low as $1 from a high of $37 during the Class Period.

Phone: (978) 688-6164 is the number listed for the company on the internet. i called and a little kid answered and told me i had the wrong number. Not sure what was up with that but i will try back again another time.

ISPD getting some very unlikely volume today. figured id go ahead and make a board! anybody notice this here today besides myself?