QED Connect Inc (PK) (QEDN) 시세

Old news. Originally it was to be QEDN and Trillium.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/QEDN/news/TRILLIUM-PICTURES-TO-BE-ACQUIRED-BY-QED-CONNECT?id=441622

Then Kate announced that NRGT had acquired Trillium in June using preferred shares.

With that in mind, ENERGY TODAY would like to announce its acquisition of media company and film studio developer, TRILLIUM PICTURES

What have they done with it since? No one knows because the Q2 2024 report was the last one Kate submitted.

https://x.com/GMSachaInchi/status/1891503479778099429

https://www.canva.com/design/DAGFJ0e2iIU/AcLg3Gj4AXATZf2j7SH8gw/view?utm_content=DAGFJ0e2iIU&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link&utm_source=viewer#22

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/NRGT/news/ENERGY-TODAY-TO-CHANGE-NAME-TO-TRILLIUM-ONE-ENTERTAINMENT?id=445306

A little odd that the label shows they're shipping to this place.

https://creole.net/

And what kind of partnership can they have with a dog breeder? They can provide them with dog food, of course, but what else?

Kate is back. Picures of FEDEX labels and sachi inchi eating dogs. I think that lawsuit is over... Maybe... For some reason, Kate is back.
NESTLE is not really an option right now because they want to buy QEDN for whatever the market cap worth is. So a reverse split would do nothing. About the only positive I can think of. Kate will pump the price up enough for some people to sell their stock and run away.

100 million

Why does this show a slap of 100k volume. On occasion. Then nothing else for the rest of the day ?

So, this was a lie? Posted on Sep 16, 2024

GMSacha Inchi $QEDN is working with OTC Markets to post financial and be back to pink current ASAP

Anyway, that's just paperwork. And most likely won't show much, if anything, in way of revenue, which is what shareholders want and have been promised since forever.

What happened to all the hyped sales of metric tons of product? And this news posted on Oct 14, 2024?

GMSacha Inchi $QEDN Deal under review. More update toward end of the week. If and when the deal will go through it has the potential of big changes

There were two follow-ups, one in October and one in November, then nothing more was heard of it.

https://x.com/GMSachaInchi/status/1889330688857461017

Kate has removed herself as CEO. It's very recent so reading the posts on the board over the past week will get you up to speed.

Change in mgmt? Oh, okay. I've been out of this loop for so long I wasn't aware. I'll have to dig into the news/disclosure weeds to catch up. Thanks for the mgmt. change info.

Crazy, huh? But I wonder if it's not just a case of a group loading up at the absolute bottom hoping that the change of management is meaningful. A possible deal would just be icing on the cake if it happens. Not a lot of risk at $.0002. Just have to hope it doesn't drop back to $.0001 and stay there.

...been ages since I've read this board. WTF?!?! >> zero volume last Friday but 447mil volume yesterday??? Conventional wisdom tells us that MAJOR frontloading took place. If that's the case, that means Kate actually has a legit deal (no head fake) and she dished out insider info to a select group. I can't believe I just said Kate might have a legit deal and not a head fake.

"We return you now to our regularly scheduled trading"

A lot of new shareholders or people averaging down? Almost $90K in trade volume today. Yikes!

This will go no where. But at least we know Kate is alive....

Let's add, "When will you catch up on your financial filing obligations and get to Current Info?"

Arrested Stockvelopement 🇬🇷 🇨🇦
@manol73
·
54m
great to see you guys are still working. can you address why your website is down?
Wineman26
@wineman26
·
53m
Update on Nestles?

The knee jerk reaction to this news is over. Where does it go from here?

As much as I'd love to see something come of this interest from Brass Roots, I'd be remiss in not recalling all the prior interest that Kate said there was from various companies only to have nothing develop.

Do they even have ten metric tons of seed available right now If so, where is it stored? Or is this a long-term arrangement based on future crops?

There's always so much information that's not made available in these forward-looking announcements. I'd love just once for a company to announce a signed contract instead of just saying a company "expressed interest".

Here’s the direct link…
https://x.com/gmsachainchi/status/1886430786716324250?s=46&t=wlOF1dfUy95X2IX_bQspiQ

GMSacha Inchi $QEDN
@GMSachaInchi
·
3m
GMSacha Inchi $QEDN is pleased to announce that Brass Root has expressed interest in purchasing 10 metric tons of premium Sacha Inchi seeds. This collaboration presents an exciting opportunity for both parties to promote health and sustainability.

Wonder no longer.

21,489,637 shares sold at $.0001.

The other 100,000 went at $.00015.

Wow..... 0.0002. Hmmm. I wonder if 0.0001 is right around the corner. Almost there.. We will soon be illiquid. Maybe kate can come out with a sacha inchi meme coin, that might get the stock price up... Trust me when I tell you, all your money is gone...

That was wise of her, since there are only a handful of days remaining to get the quarterlies submitted. Frankly, I doubt she make it.

However, the quarterlies are the least of shareholder's worries at this point.

So the website https://gmsacha.com/ is gone. QEDN touched 0.00025 the other day. Kate has gone missing. My guess. QEDN will go down to 0.0001. Become illiquid. And that will be it.

Replying to my question as to when the quarterlies would be out. She said end of month. She was very careful not to say what month.😀

And apparently, she didn't have anything noteworthy to say.

Was she replying to you or did she just contact you out of the blue?

Apparently.

I don't blame Mora. When I think about the spelling errors and randomness of her twitter posts, it makes sense.

That's a little hard to swallow. Putting Mora in as CEO doesn't make the management team bigger, as he was already COO. Now he's both? And Kate is not an officer at all.

Mora must have told Kate to stop posting on X. So now shareholders are more in the dark about what's not happening.

This is from December 6 2024
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GeIG7SJW8AAyX1v?format=jpg&name=900x900
https://x.com/profitiskey/status/1865060829537669366

So, she's still alive, is she?

I received an email from her yesterday.

Besides going dark on Twitter and the website being down, people used to be able to email Kate. I'm guessing that's a thing of the past, too? Or maybe people just don't care anymore and have given up?

I don't know if I'd go so far as to say that. But then, I wouldn't argue strongly against the possibility. Kate hasn't tweeted anything in a couple months, either. And nothing has been filed to get back to Current Info like she said she was in the process of doing. I wonder if her plan is to just to black.

Well, that's it. No more QEDN. Money gone....

Website is gone.

gmsacha.com
is parked free, courtesy of GoDaddy.com.
Get This Domain

Nuckin' Futs

Methinks she fibbed.

I can't understand why anyone would buy this stock at this time. Kate's gone silent since these last tweets of hers.

Nov 15, 2024
GMSacha Inchi #QEDN update on acquisition and sales coming soon

Oct 18, 2024
GMSacha Inchi $QEDN is on the brink of an exciting opportunity, engaging in advanced talks with a renowned healthy brand from a top-tier, multi-8-figure company. We are positioning ourselves for a significant partnership that could pave the way for a joint venture or a buyout.
·
Oct 14, 2024
GMSacha Inchi $QEDN Deal under review. More update toward end of the week. If and when the deal will go through it has the potential of big changes $QEDN #Aquisition #NDA #Stocks #OTC
·
Sep 16, 2024
GMSacha Inchi $QEDN is working with OTC Markets to post financial and be back to pink current ASAP

None of the above has happened and there's been no follow-up on any of them.

24 Civ. 2967 (JHR) (GS)

10-02-2024

JALANDHER BANDARI, Plaintiff, v. QED CONNECT, INC., NANNY KATHARINA BAHNSEN, and DAVID RUMBOLD, Defendants.

The Honorable Gary Stein United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

The Honorable Gary Stein United States Magistrate Judge

By his submission dated July 25, 2024, pro se Plaintiff Jalandher Bandari moves for an order permitting alternative service on Defendant Nanny Katharina Bahnsen (“Bahnsen”) via postal mail to her address in Medellin, Colombia. (Dkt. No. 30). Plaintiff's motion is DENIED as moot for the reasons below and the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to issue a certificate of default as to Bahnsen.

By way of background, on April 17, 2024, Plaintiff initiated this action for securities fraud against Bahnsen; QED Connect, Inc. (“QED”), a New York “pink sheets” corporation of which Bahnsen is the CEO; and David Rumbold (“Rumbold”), a QED note holder residing in Wyoming, Illinois. (Compl. (Dkt. No. 1) ¶¶ 4, 6, 8). Plaintiff submitted affidavits of service for all three Defendants on May 22, 2024. (Dkt. Nos. 12-14). According to the affidavits, QED and Rumbold were both served within the United States via hand delivery (see Dkt. Nos. 12 & 14), while the Complaint and summons were sent to Bahnsen at her address in Colombia via UPS mail (Dkt. No. 13). Attached to the affidavit of service for Bahnsen is a document with the UPS tracking number and a notation stating the shipment was received by Bahnsen on May 9, 2024. (Dkt. No. 13).

As none of the Defendants have appeared in this action or answered Plaintiff's Complaint to date, on June 21, 2024, Plaintiff requested the Clerk issue certificates of default as to each Defendant. (Dkt. Nos. 22, 23, 25, 26, 28, 29). The Clerk issued certificates of default as to QED and Rumbold. (Dkt. Nos. 24 & 27). However, after consulting with the undersigned, the Clerk declined to issue a certificate of default as to Bahnsen because “service was not properly effectuated; there is no order giving permission for alternate service (mail).” (See Dkt. Entry dated June 28, 2024). Thereafter, Plaintiff filed the instant motion for alternative service. (Dkt. No. 30).

Upon further review of the applicable law, it is evident that the Court need not authorize alternative service of Bahnsen, as service was properly effected upon her originally under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(1). Service may be made on an individual in a foreign country under Rule 4(f)(1) “by any internationally agreed means of service that is reasonably calculated to give notice, such as those authorized by the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents” (the “Hague Convention”). Article 10(a) of the Hague Convention “authorizes the use of ‘postal channels' to effectuate service on an international litigant” under the “[c]lear precedent of this Circuit.” Zamora v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 14 Civ. 5344 (WHP) (SN), 2017 WL 2954680, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. June 21, 2017) (quoting Art. 10(a) of the Hague Convention), R&R adopted, 2017 WL 2937683 (S.D.N.Y. July 10, 2017).

Colombia is a signatory to the Hague Convention and has not objected to Article 10(a). See, e.g., Zamora, 2017 WL 2954680, at *3 (“Colombia has not objected to the use of ‘postal channels' under Article 10(a)”); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LaRocca, No. 8:21 Civ. 2536 (SCB) (AEP), 2022 WL 19561965, at *2 (M.D. Fla. July 15, 2022) (“Because Colombia does not oppose Article 10(A), it does not oppose service of judicial documents by postal channel.”). Accordingly, courts have found service by mail on defendants in Colombia to be sufficient. See, e.g., Zamora, 2017 WL 2954680, at *3 (holding “service has been effected in satisfaction of Article 10(a)” where plaintiff used certified mail to send summonses and complaint to defendants' addresses in Colombia); Evergreen Shipping Agency (Am.) Corp. v. Glob. Shipping Agencies, No. Civ. 19-4958, 2019 WL 5901506, at *2 (D.N.J. Nov. 12, 2019) (finding plaintiff effected service by sending “the summons and Amended Complaint to Defendants at their principal place of business in Medellin, Colombia via DHL”).

See Zamora, 2017 WL 2954680, at *1; Status Table: Hague Convention, available at https://www.hcch net/en/instruments/conventions/status-table/?cid=17.

The same conclusion is warranted here. The affidavit submitted by Plaintiff states the summons and Complaint were mailed to Bahnsen at her Colombia address, includes a UPS tracking number, and confirms Bahnsen received the mailing. (Dkt. No. 13). That is sufficient to show Bahnsen was properly served in this action under Rule 4(f)(1) and Article 10(a) of the Hague Convention. And while court approval of alternative service is necessary under Rule 4(f)(3), service may be effected under Rule 4(f)(1) without court intervention. See, e.g., Wood v. Carl's, No. 2:20 Civ. 2329 (APG) (BNW), 2021 WL 4851090, at *1 (D. Nev. May 5, 2021) (“Plaintiff's motion seeks authorization to effect service upon [defendant] under Rule 4(f)(1). However, no such authorization is required.”); Reintegrative Therapy Ass'n, Inc. v. Kinitz, No. 3:21 Civ. 1297 (BEN) (BLM), 2021 WL 5140195, at *4 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2021) (“under the Hague Convention, a party may serve documents in several ways that would not require a court order under Rule 4(f)(1) because they are authorized by international agreement”).

Accordingly, Plaintiff's service of Bahnsen under Rule 4(f)(1) obviates the need for him to move for alternative service under Rule 4(f)(3). Plaintiff's motion (Dkt. No. 30) is therefore DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to issue a certificate of default as to Bahnsen for the reasons stated above, provided Plaintiff's pending application is otherwise proper. (See Dkt. Nos. 28 & 29).

SO ORDERED.

No tweets since late November and the website is gone as well.

Things are not looking good for shareholders.

I think someone attempted to initiate action for securities fraud against Kate Bahnsen; QED Connect, Inc on April 17 2024. I believe that's it for Kate. I think she has giving up. It does not look good for QEDN.

Bandari v. QED Connect, Inc.

GARY STEIN, United States Magistrate Judge: By his submission dated July 25, 2024, pro se Plaintiff Jalandher Bandari moves for an order permitting alternative service on Defendant Nanny Katharina Bahnsen (“Bahnsen”) via postal mail to her address in Medellin, Colombia. (Dkt. No. 30). Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED as moot for the reasons below and the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to issue a certificate of default as to Bahnsen.

It's not. No brokerage firm would complete a trade for such a low amount. You'd have to buy 34 shares for it to amount to even a penny trade.

It's most likely either an MM completing a trade that was split up or MMs working together to even out an odd lot position they hold.

But you'd probably get a better answer if you talked to your broker.

We traded one share today. How is that even possible?

We're saved boys. Someone traded 40 dollars worth of QEDN, now we're at 0.0004.

Today's lone trade of 50 shares at $.0003 is a penny and a half.

Soon. QEDN will be 0.0001. And watch it be a 100 share trade, Essentially, a one penny trade.

And here's that "soon" again.

Sep 3
GMSacha Inchi $QEDN submitted the required documents to OTC. $QEDN should be back to pink current soon

"ASAP". Another word Kate doesn't know the meaning of.

Sep 16
GMSacha Inchi $QEDN is working with OTC Markets to post financial and be back to pink current ASAP

"Soon". That tweet was from almost a month ago.

And the original announcement was from almost two months ago.

GMSacha Inchi $QEDN
@GMSachaInchi
GMSacha Inchi #QEDN update on acquisition and sales coming soon
7:01 AM · Nov 15, 2024
·
1,957
Views https://x.com/GMSachaInchi/status/1857408586726494639