Fannie Mae (QB) (FNMA) 시세

Yea that will happen if someone can get DJT away from the postal service ! Something none of the people are asking for ...

Just 8 by Friday ? Expectations getting lower. Should be 8 tomorrow. Hopefully w all the good news

Feb. 23, 2025

DOGE is accepting DMs on X

Amazing

You do you.

Nobody here gives a shite what you think newbie.

Rick, blow that new improved Whales Horn !!!

$8 by Friday.

What are you identifying as today?

Virtually no chance both seniors and warrants canceled. If they were, your stock price assumption is ridiculously low. If Seniors are not canceled there will be little remaining equity value for commons. If warrants are exercised and capital requirements dropped to 2.5% with 12b in capital raised around $20/share, you should see share price above $40. So many variables and permutations that the commons could be near worthless to north of $200/share (no srs or warrants/no cap raise).

The only people who should be afraid now are the SHORTS. With one PR or statement by DJT that he is moving forward with the privitization plan and the FNMA & FMCC stocks run from $7 to $35 in one hour. You SHORTS will be charcoal toast when this event happens. Don't under-estimate DJT, he will do what the people want and the people want the GSEs to be free from this illegal prison called the "Conservatorship".
You have been warned, SHORTY. Cover ASAP or pay big when this event happens!

Fnma/Fmcc Stock
Become Afraid
Make Fear Your Friend

Fewer steps. Declaration by pulte about release =$15-20, relist =$30, any details about lower recap or reducing warrants keeps it going.

The hedge funds know about this play, they will move quick to hit their calculated long term values. That value is currently $30 worst case short of diminished operating conditions.

-------------------------
Month 3 (around April) . FNMA and fmcc rejoin NYSE. Shares double overnight to $20-25 per share.

Totally Agreed.

So what does DOGE and Trump have to do with FNMA for the past 14 years. 10 years ago Trump was not even running for public office.
I like how people mix everything up to try and blame Trump for something that does not exist?
Do your history lesson and get your facts straight, DUDE!

Make sure you send this document to Elon Musk at DOGE. I know he said he needs this kind of data to cleanup the government.
Please do so. If you care about the price of FNMA/FMCC stock.
Thanks.

it was 2008. Congress forgot they are stealing now if they continue to keep them in Conservatorship.

Most people including members of Congress forget the fact that the GSEs are NOT government agencies but private companies taken over by the government. That is why they have not released them to this date. IMHO.

If we get positive news from the top this will be a lot higher than 9 bucks.

I wouldn't hate that...

Pulte should just release GSE's via consent agreement in FIRST week.
Then while GSE's work on capital plans, Pulte should work on capital rule and handle all crying and whining by MadMax, Parrot, Zandi etc,

The timeline in writing.

https://www.reddit.com/r/FNMA_FMCC_Exit/s/q6bEg3Few2

Nothing new, that's why investors are dumping Schwabs stock !!!

I also remember 60 Billion was stolen VIA the Net Worth sweep in Tax derivatives ? or something like that...some reserves FNMA had all along and with a wave of a magic govt wand they took it all cause you know that would have proven without a doubt FNMA was NEVER EVER in financial distress in the first place. For this reason alone I can never trust a word Obama or his administration ever said.

Excellent post.

the $50 Billion was never reported as sent to Treasury....they had to keep it quiet lest a public uproar might have occurred.(in my dreams)..

So to answer your question, the $50 Billion was on TOP of the $300 Billion, but never reported.... would be a good question for Bessent to "please clarify if
and why did $50 Billion paid as restitution to F and F was not kept at F and F to help re-build capital, fund operations, etc. etc. etc like settled DAMAGES normally stay with the injured party(s).......

Exactly, DOGE is investigating all the wasteful spending not the stealing they'd have to give it back, Not going to happen .... I would like to be wrong here?

DOGE is Trump fraud department, putting FNMA in conservatorship for 14 years when ALL HOUSING PRICE TRIPLED is a fraud.

Doge has nothing to do with this ding dong

Always redundant and meaningless? More truth and FACTS in HIS posts than you can seem to muster up, take a vote on the board, you or Navy, who has more cred and respect? (shouldn't take long to figure out.....)

Well it's a Twitter/Tic Toc based world now with memes having undue influence. People have the attention spans of a gnat. And IMO it's by design. Also my opinion but none of what's said here matters much anyway except to a few. I do appreciate your insight though. We here will all find out together and hopefully sooner than later.

Fannie Mae
$12.50
On The Way

Hilarious!😂

Knowing our luck that’s exactly it!

Lmfao!! Ain’t that the Dam truth! Lol

...$$Good morning boys and girls...$$$Boom...$Government already paid back plus 10% interest...$$Illegal Conservatorship...$$Bazinga...$$Always redundant and meaningless. 🤠

C'ship, privatization, and the board's most infamous cherry picker .... First, the VAST majority of the commentators on the GSEs - journalists, former and current regulators, politicians, bankers, wall street investors, board posters, and just about every other commentator you can think of use "privatization" and "exiting c'ship" as quick shorthand in much longer articles, posts, or discussions basically to make arguments for or against ending the current status quo. Yes, technically there is a difference, but even before the c'ship the GSEs were considered private companies with public mandates - a hybrid which ALWAYS demanded making further distinctions for more intricate discussions of policy and corporate actions. For better or worse, whatever the consequences, exiting c'ship is by far the most common topic discussed by all of those commentators listed above which ONLY slightly simplifies an already multifaceted, complex discussion. In any case, Trump and team, in his previous and current administrations, have used both terms (privatization and exiting c'ship). Whatever definition we or anyone else uses is less than optimal without clear use by those who matter in the final decision-making process. In any case, a full-privatization would mean ridding the GSEs of the government charters.

We also have the changing landscape of existing law, new executive orders, and new proposed laws regarding executive and congressional powers, as well as those which appear to have stripped, or will strip federal agencies of their former or existing powers. If we take everything current status quo, setting aside the previous sentence, full privatization would likely mean involving Congress (charter related) and, unless the Trump admin with its majority in both houses has done or will do A LOT of canvassing and reassuring of what it wants, I cannot see them making all these promises about fixing the c'ships and then allowing the fate to fall with Congress and the extended timeline and risks to their agenda that would ensue.

I DO KNOW of the Trump admin release regarding returning federal agency powers to Congress to wit I conjecture that is the intention moving FORWARD once this administration rectifies current outstanding issues of which the GSEs are only a small part. Because Treasury and FHFA have existing agreements and where I believe the law allows for the Executive branch to end the c'ship, it could easily be envisioned where Trump directs both agencies, with loyal appointed and confirmed secretary (Bessent)/director (Pulte) to put agreements in place which effectively end the c'ship - which returns us to the privatization (hybrid) we previoulsy enjoyed as a private company with a public mandate which avoids the uncertainties involved with Congress, more quickly fixes the status quo, and more quickly makes the GSEs an effective part of the Trump adminstration's overall economic policy. Then Bessent, Pulte, Lutnick, and strong economic policy goals can make more effective use of the GSEs regarding the sovereign wealth fund and the majorities held in Congress for a more sensible, refined, and private market mandate that forms a solid backing to the housing market - determined AFTER release from c'ship.

As I see the board's most infamous cherry picker used Nats post to support the conjecture about the massive dilution (up to 99% 🤣) the government could enforce - done so by cherry picking Obiterdictum's clarification on FASB rules, let's do some cherry picking of our own from Obiterdictum. First, a long time ago I blocked and never read the cherry picker's posts; I saw this by reading Nats thread. Second, Obi's comments are from 2017 where the landscape was VASTLY different than today which is much more favorable to the GSEs and shareholder arguments (capital position), as well as the changing narrative which also is more favorable the GSEs and shareholders. Third, Obi's comments on the warrants which apply equally well today as back in 2017 (note the bolded clause):

Privatizing a Government Sponsored Enterprise: Lessons from the Sallie Mae Experience
http://fic.wharton.upenn.edu/fic/papers/05/0534.pdf

The two GSE warrants can be exercised (repurchased by the GSEs, auctioned, or otherwise sold profitably or not with proceeds used in various ways), they do not need to be exercised and can allowed to expire in 2028, the warrants can be voided by the new US Treasury and FHFA by amending or waiving the SPSPAs.
Fourth, ANY actions that would require a corporate SHAREHOLDER vote should note that neither senior preferred shares nor junior preferred shares have FULL CORPORATE voting rights. To get those voting rights would require amendments to both or either current contracts. Yes, juniors can amend their contracts to get common shares, but I find it hard to believe that the current solution the Trump admin is seeking is going to look to complicate matters any further than they already are - especially involving Congress in ending the c'ship when they are much easier ways to fix the status quo.

All bets are off when and if any relevant adminstration official clearly, specifically, and expressly states something equivalent to FULL PRIVATIZATION, again, unless that becomes a later target after releasing the companies back to shareholders by ending the c'ship.

Are you on your period today?

"Are Fannie & Freddie employees Government Employees? -

No, Fannie & Freddie employees are NOT Federal Govt Employees

because GSEs ARE NOT FEDERAL AGENCIES.

GSEs are Government-Sponsored Eenterprises (GSE)"

And that, my friend, is why the GSEs/FHFA will be at the end of D.O.G.E.'s list of things to do, if it is on the list at all.
FHFA is not pissing away taxpayers' money, they are pissing away shareholders' money and, indirectly, that of homeowners.

Schwab reminded fraud of pump and dump schemes. Shorties be aware!

"Bernie Madoff’s last victim’s are finally receiving compensation after 15 long years! That’s nothing compared to us here!!!"

There's a good hot and cold comparison. One group is receiving compensation, one group will not.

"If I was Rick I would wave my magic wand and release us."

He's buying those damn things at Dollar Tree. Need I say more?

"I see light at the end of the tunnel."

9 times out of 10 it's the f'ing train!

Could it be ?

https://x.com/salsaaddict1/status/1893706022994293096?s=46&t=xLP2LlWgJrEMUZZ7Fum-nA

https://x.com/g_buckman/status/1893687077125984740?s=46&t=L_hszGlrG7Qfo9Ksmln_mQ

From the link you provided:

Privatization is not directly related to the exercise or non-exercise of the warrants or prevention of privatization. Privatization also does not mean release from conservatorship. Privatization has more to do with ending the GSE congressional charters and ending the hybrid status of the GSEs as a private corporation with public purpose and advantages. Privatization requires a shareholder vote after release from the conservatorship.

Nats

A honeypot of wasted money. No wonder the powers to be never wanted to end the CONservatorship.

Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC.
Registered Participant Actively Trading Fannie and Freddie Mac. (Market Maker)

The Counterfeiting of Shares of Fannie Mae of Freddie Mac… page 20

https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-08-09/s70809-407a.pdf

... FANNIE / FREDDIE WERE PLACED INTO CONSERVATORSHIP UNTIL

THEY ARE STABLE ? ... WITH OBJECTIVE TO RETURN THEM

TO "NORMAL BUSINESS OPERATIONS ? "

WHEN WAS LAST TIME FANNIE / FREDDIE RECEIVED

"ANY" TAXPAYER ASSISTANCE ?





LOAN + 10% INTEREST REPAID GSE NET WORTH TOTAL NOW $154.7 BILLION ? ...

FANNNIE MAE -

As of December 31, 2024, Fannie Mae's net worth was $94.7 billion.

This was a 22% increase from the end of 2023, when its net worth was $77.7 billion

Fannie Mae's net worth increased in 2024 due to strong revenues and a business model that focuses on guaranty fees.

--- The company's revenues were driven by guaranty fees on its $4.1 trillion guaranty book of business.

--- Fannie Mae also provided $381 billion in liquidity to the housing market in 2024, helping about 1.4 million households buy,
refinance, or rent a home.

--- The majority of the liquidity provided was for single-family home purchases,
though refinances increased significantly

****************************************************************************************************************

Freddie Mac reports strongest earnings since 2021 - AI Overview

As of February 13, 2025, Freddie Mac's net worth was nearly $60 billion.

This is the result of strong earnings in 2024, including a $3.2 billion net income in the fourth quarter.

--- In the third quarter of 2024, Freddie Mac reported a net income of $3.1 billion, which increased
the company's net worth to $56 billion.

--- In the second quarter of 2024, Freddie Mac reported a net income of $2.8 billion.

--- In the fourth quarter of 2024, Freddie Mac reported a net income of $3.2 billion.

--- In 2024, Freddie Mac's net worth increased by 25%

Are Fannie & Freddie employees Government Employees? -

No, Fannie & Freddie employees are NOT Federal Govt Employees

because GSEs ARE NOT FEDERAL AGENCIES.

GSEs are Government-Sponsored Eenterprises (GSE)

**************************************************************************

Yes I read that but what does it mean really for us?