ADVFN Logo ADVFN

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor 브라질 증권 거래소, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, LSE 등 주요 거래소에서의 다양한 실시간 주식 시세를 모니터링합니다.
ERHC Energy Inc (CE)

ERHC Energy Inc (CE) (ERHE)

0.0001
0.00
(0.00%)
마감 13 4월 5:00AM

개인 투자자를 위한 전문가급 도구.

주요 통계 및 세부정보

가격
0.0001
매수가
0.00
매도가
0.00
거래량
378
0.0001 일간 변동폭 0.0001
0.000001 52주 범위 0.0024
전일 종가
0.0001
개장가
0.0001
최근 거래 시간
50
@
0.0001
마지막 거래 시간
평균 볼륨(3m)
172,137
재정 규모
US$ 0
VWAP
0.0001

ERHE 최신 뉴스

기간변동변동 %시가고가저가평균 일일 거래량VWAP
1000.00010.00010.00015770.0001CS
4000.00010.00010.000110040.0001CS
129.9E-599001.0E-60.00081.0E-61721379.996E-5CS
26-0.0007-87.50.00080.00241.0E-67324730.00154391CS
52000.00010.00241.0E-65980820.00127694CS
156-0.0004-800.00050.0061.0E-69049610.0016978CS
260-0.0004-800.00050.0061.0E-611535380.00130492CS

ERHE - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the current ERHC Energy (CE) share price?
The current share price of ERHC Energy (CE) is US$ 0.0001
What is the 1 year trading range for ERHC Energy (CE) share price?
ERHC Energy (CE) has traded in the range of US$ 0.000001 to US$ 0.0024 during the past year

이동자

모두 보기
  • 가장 활성
  • % 상승자
  • % 패자
기호가격볼륨
CONNQConns Inc (CE)
US$ 0.003
(299,900.00%)
100
ONPHOncology Pharma Inc (CE)
US$ 0.001
(99,900.00%)
1.44k
STTOSITO Mobile Ltd (CE)
US$ 0.14
(69,900.00%)
278
GOOXFGivot Olam Oil Exploration LP (CE)
US$ 0.04
(19,900.00%)
662
ELIQQElectriq Power Holdings Inc (CE)
US$ 0.02
(19,900.00%)
164
KREDKonaRed Corporation New (CE)
US$ 0.0001
(-99.99%)
71.57k
ZAAGZA Group Inc (PK)
US$ 0.000001
(-99.00%)
366.67k
ABILFAbility Inc (CE)
US$ 0.000001
(-99.00%)
600
SNLPSyntrol Corporation (CE)
US$ 0.000001
(-99.00%)
150
SYHOSynergie Holdings Limited Inc (CE)
US$ 0.000001
(-99.00%)
1,000
SBESSouth Beach Spirits Inc (CE)
US$ 0.0004
(100.00%)
198.93M
AFFUAffluence Corp (PK)
US$ 0.0006
(50.00%)
196.71M
HMBLHUMBL Inc (PK)
US$ 0.0003
(20.00%)
193.54M
TONRTonner One World Holdings Inc (PK)
US$ 0.00015
(-25.00%)
183.27M
CATV4Cable TV International Inc (PK)
US$ 0.0004
(0.00%)
177.71M

ERHE Discussion

게시물 보기
RKT989 RKT989 39 분 전
Did you stop to think that PN has just recently come out and be keynote speakers at Conferences and somewhat elevated with his peers in Africa..Just maybe which you are not factoring in is that HE IS A SUCCESS and most people Africa know what is going on except shareholders.Lends itself to Krombacker's Quiet period for shareholders because of SEC rules but most over there are aware of the EEZ situation ..PN is wearing 5000 dollar suits...and is being pursued by that African group for investment advice
After this drilling in block 10 occurs I think we will be privy to the details of that and a deal revealed that was put together after Block 6 drilling..imo
👍️ 1
Peter J Peter J 6 시간 전
Keep posting, dude...

Save the world... 🤣
👍️0
ajaxxx_99 ajaxxx_99 6 시간 전
Please do not encourage anyone to invest 10K into this company. That is irresponsible. For shame.
👍️0
ajaxxx_99 ajaxxx_99 6 시간 전
Please do not encourage anyone to invest 10K into this company. That is irresponsible. For shame.
👍️0
ajaxxx_99 ajaxxx_99 6 시간 전
I know this is not new. But for crying out loud, this company was shady as of 2006. There was no outcome other than PN and his cronies getting kickbacks, and payoffs. I have posted excerpts. You can read the whole mess here As of December 31, 2006 the Company had $38,030,673 in cash. So what happened to all that money?!! Three guesses. Read below. DOJ searched and seized documents relating to communications with foreign government officials. They sold everything of value, and stuck investors with the bill. Surprize!

You must read the following discussion of the results of the operations and financial condition of the Company in conjunction with its financial statements, including the notes included in its Form 10-K filing. The Company’s historical results are not necessarily an indication of trends in operating results for any future period.

Overview

ERHC reports as a development stage enterprise as there are currently no significant operations and no revenue has been generated from business activities. The Company was formed in 1986, as a Colorado corporation, and was engaged in a variety of businesses until 1996, when it began its current operations as an independent oil and gas company. The Company’s goal is to maximize its value through exploration and exploitation of oil and gas reserves in the Gulf of Guinea offshore of central West Africa. The Company’s current focus is to exploit its only assets, which are rights to working interests in exploration acreage in the JDZ and the EEZ. The Company has entered into production sharing agreements with upstream oil and gas companies in these JDZ Blocks. The technical and operational expertise in conducting exploration operations will be provided by the Company’s participating interest in oil and gas companies.

Sale of Participation Interests

On November 17, 2005, the Company agreed to sell its 33.3% participating interest in Block 4 of the Joint Development Zone between Sao Tome & Principe and Nigeria (“JDZ”) to Addax Petroleum (Nigeria Offshore 2) Limited for $18 million. The Company retains a 17.7% participating interest in Block 4. This transaction was completed in February 2006.

On February 16, 2006, the Company sold its 15% participating interest in Block 3 of the JDZ to Addax Petroleum Resources Nigeria Limited for $7,500,000, leaving a 10% participating interest in Block 3 to the Company.

On March 2, 2006, the Company sold a 28.67% participating interest in Block 2 of the JDZ to Sinopec International Petroleum Exploration and Production Corporation Nigeria, and a 14.33% participating interest in Block 2 of the JDZ to Addax Energy Nigeria Limited for $13.6 and $6.8 million, respectively, leaving a 22% participating interest in Block 4 to the Company.

All of the sales proceeds were received by the Company during the quarter ending March 31, 2006, and such sale proceeds were accounted for as a $30,102,250 net gain from the sale of participation interest in the concession.

11
Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended December 31, 2006 Compared with Three Months Ended December 31, 2005

During the three months ended December 31, 2006, the Company had a net loss of $522,142, compared with a net loss of $1,228,984 for the three months ended December 31, 2005. Interest income increased from $4,269 in the three months ended December 31, 2005 to $543,632 in the three months ended December 31, 2006 due to the significant cash balance maintained by the Company as a result of proceeds from the sale of participation interests in the three JDZ Blocks under production sharing contracts with various consortium partners. General and administrative expenses increased from $1,230,517 in the three months ended December 31, 2005 to $1,331,898 in the three months ended December 31, 2006 due to two primary reasons: 1) legal expenses increased from $276,162 to $890,152, an increase of $613,990, primarily related to legal fees incurred in the Justice Department investigation, offset by 2) a decrease of $ 497,600 in financial consultant fees due to completion of the negotiations for the sale of participation interests in the three JDZ Blocks.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2006 the Company had $38,030,673 in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments and positive working capital of $31,567,619. Management believes that this cash position should support working capital needs for more than 12 months.

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

On May 4, 2006, a search warrant issued by the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, was executed on the Company seeking various records including, among other matters, documents, if any, related to correspondence with foreign governmental officials or entities in Sao Tome and Nigeria. With the guidance of the law firm of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, ERHC Energy continues to work with the U.S. Department of Justice in connection with the Department’s investigation. The Department of Justice agreed to ERHC’s request to return to ERHC a complete copy set of all paper documents seized in the Government’s May 4, 2006 search of ERHC’s Houston office. ERHC has received a copy set of these business documents. ERHC filed suit in federal district court in Texas in June. The lawsuit sought to protect the company’s attorney-client privileged documents and to allow ERHC counsel to determine the factual basis for the Justice Department’s search warrant affidavit, which is currently under seal. Although the judge has ordered that the affidavit remain under seal, his ruling requires the Justice Department to provide a neutral “taint team” to review all seized documents and to identify those that may be privileged. The neutral taint team is charged with the responsibility to withhold from the investigating attorneys any documents that it believes to be privileged. The ruling also provides the company with the right to challenge the Justice Department’s privilege determinations in court. Since the ruling, ERHC has been in communication with the Justice Department regarding the Government’s compliance with the ordered taint team procedures, and regarding the Government’s ongoing investigation.
👍️0
RubyMartin RubyMartin 7 시간 전
Krom: Thanks for the response.
"You’re concerned about risking $10,000 on 10 million shares… but your upside target is $8 per share."
If this hits $8 I'll be well off. If I was able to purchase 10 million shares and it hits $8. then I'd be able to help other people, (friends, family, charities). But I'm not willing to risk $10,000 to do so. So I'll be doing like yourself, patiently waiting for my own ship to come in.
👍️0
ajaxxx_99 ajaxxx_99 7 시간 전
Then there is this interview. He has been super active in the last few months. HAHAHA. This guy only has 12 subscribers, though. Thank goodness. Question: Why is he suddenly everywhere after 5 years of silence? Make to to post comments on these ridiculous interviews. Once has comments shut down, so I can only imagine the responses.
👍️0
ajaxxx_99 ajaxxx_99 8 시간 전
With all of this PN is still making money speaking and is still a member of the bar in NY. NY BAR SEARCH He is still on Oil company boards. Current employerHe climbs mountains for charity (LOL). Mountain climbing for charity 2025He is still using his credentials as CEO of ERHC as if it were a successful business in 2025. It is unfathomable to me how people like him slither out of accountability and their reputations stay intact. He also gives ridiculous self-aggrandizing interviews at summits where he is paid to be a keynote VIP speaker.African oil Summit We should be less annoyed with Krom and direct our legit anger towards the real villain. [ He is STILL trying to drum up money from investors and getting paid to do so. [ These interviews are all pretty recent. So sad. He will con more people. UGANDA 2024 THIS YOU NEED TO SEE!! I recommend that people comment on the YouTube videos and expose him. I have.
👍️0
ajaxxx_99 ajaxxx_99 8 시간 전
Yet, they are still delisted. That happens to all legit companies that file on time. LOL. Look, you like this stock for some reason I cannot fathom. That's OK. But the rest of us are doing the math. This company came out of nowhere. It never had any value. It was a pump and dump and many many people were scammed. My father lost his life savings, as did many others. It is so sad, but if he had done his due diligence, it would not have happened. This company had massive red flags going back to 2017. If my dad had chosen a legit company and not have been fooled by a get-rich-quick scheme (because that is what it was), he would not have been in the desperate financial position he was in the last couple years of his life. I put little blame on the charlatans that duped him because he didn't do his homework - which frankly left me scratching my head. Make no mistake, I lost no money here, I simply inherited worthless shares. My father did, and it was a foolish investment then, and it remains so.
👍️0
ajaxxx_99 ajaxxx_99 8 시간 전
Any stock that I have to do acrobatics to buy has enough red flags I am not gonna buy it. LOL. How many years you gonna play this out? I mean by 2018 it was clear there were nigerian price vibes. Why not invest in an actual company that gives financials, doesn't get delisted, pays dividends etc? Better yet, if you feel like taking a little risk puts and calls might be for you. You would have done better in the long run.
👍️0
ajaxxx_99 ajaxxx_99 9 시간 전
It deluuluu. There is no rational explanation for this. This stock will never go anywhere, and the proof is irrefutable. Believing anything else in the face of overwhelming evidence is self-delusion. Imagine if we had all bought the same value of stock in Amazon, AT&T, Apple, or ANY other legitimate company. Where would we be today? Not talking about shorts, I can assure you.
👍️0
ajaxxx_99 ajaxxx_99 9 시간 전
I pop on here once a year because that's all it takes me to see it is still a crap investment. Not like its moving or making any money. Once a year to see that the value is still a big fat ZERO.
👍️0
ajaxxx_99 ajaxxx_99 9 시간 전
That was my point. It was ridiculous. What a load of self promotional crap.
👍️0
badog badog 10 시간 전
Getting off the CE list would mean filing detailed financials and updates, which may sound great on the surface—but that information wouldn’t just be read by longs. It would also be used by shorts to time and manage any potential squeeze. They want transparency because it helps them control the outcome.

By staying silent, ERHC keeps them in the dark. And in a dark room, the sharks don’t know which way to swim—or when the net drops.

OMG...it seems that would work for all public companies...right. Keep everyone in the dark. Why didn't all the other public companies think of that? Because If they all traveled this route that would be the end of the stock market. No one wants a piece of a company that looks like a fraud except for a select few who found themselves terribly underwater and decided the only way out was to buy more and then to try to persuade others to bail them out by dumping their shares based on speculations. You even try contacting Shell to ask them to keep their confidental agreement....confidential. Why? Because if it was not what you thought it could end all of this right now. That was too big of risk.

Badog
👍️0
badog badog 10 시간 전
Badog, you ask why I post instead of sitting back quietly. Here’s why: Short sellers have had 7+ years of narrative control, using silence to discourage longs and mask their own exposure. I’m simply matching fire with light.

Well, I don't know about short sellers controlling the narrative. Most of what I have seen is posters countering what we believe is BS being dreamed up and thrown out to try to find buyers for millions of shares that have gone nowhere but down. You admitted that the idea of massive short sellers was based on the fact that we claim that we don't hold any shares short. That's your proof? You have no other proof? Who would make a conclusion based on that? ssc has documented many other assertions by you that have been false like the Christmas Surprise where all shorts would be demolished. And I have seen no one....even in those 70 followers that believe the $8/share BS based on some fictitious short squeeze. You kick PJ out of your little club because he didn't swallow all that you serve. That's why I wonder.....if you are so sure that this is all going to work out for you why are you still begging shorts to cover....and other investors to please buy on Speed Trader? If you are so sure this end well for you why do you work so hard to find buyers for your shares. I mean....it won't matter...right? Once the big reveal occurs billions will be made by all...right?

Badog
👍️0
badog badog 10 시간 전
Let me tell you why you are the ultimate F O S

Sorry PJ....I couldn't GOS what you think.
LOL

Badog
👍️0
ssc ssc 11 시간 전
Watch the guerguerian dickran lying in full bloom. dickran pleads of course he/she is not trying to convince anyone to buy - then spews out a 2 post manifesto explaining how and why people should buy, complete with how great it is to sit for years and years with huge losses in a non-reporting triple stock, and how all the 70 members of his lied about, nonexistent spv aren't buying because they have all the shares they want. Ever hear of anyone who wouldn't buy more of a stock in the triple zeros they believe is going to $8? Or $1? Or even 10 cents? How can dickran continue to have the audacity to present these illogical, asinine claims? Of course the answer is his/her own insatiable greed and hubris.

So we see erhe's largest stuck shareholder and supposed 70 followers owning the controlling interest in erhc, sitting in a dark room for years and years, waiting for a triple zero stock to go to $8, and taking no action. Except for leader dickran, who has tried thousands of lies and even peddling fake insider info at $100/clip while he/she sits on hundreds of thousands of dollars in losses. No wonder his baseless claims, false rumors and outright lies never stop.
👍️0
Krombacher Krombacher 13 시간 전
RubyMartin (continued),

Just to add one more perspective—if you’re trying to avoid SpeedTrader’s per-share fees, the only real alternative is to try buying the shares in Canada.

But that path is a minefield:

1. Canadian Capital Gains Tax – You're now taxed under Canadian law, which often comes with higher rates and stricter rules.


2. Cross-Border Accounting – You’ll need Canadian tax prep and U.S. tax prep. That’s two sets of accountants or software, and a headache at tax time. You might even need a cross-border CPA.


3. Intermediary Costs – Unless you already have a Canadian brokerage account (rare for most Americans), you’ll likely need a middleman—someone willing to buy on your behalf. And they don’t work for free.


4. Logistical Barriers – Opening a Canadian brokerage account as a U.S. citizen is increasingly difficult, often requiring physical presence, residency ties, or documentation most investors don’t have ready.



So yeah, SpeedTrader may not feel like the “easy button,” but when you compare it to the alternative—it’s the only real option for U.S. buyers.

And the irony? That friction is part of what’s keeping this window open. By the time it’s “easy,” it may already be gone.

Of course, there’s a third alternative some people float:
“Why doesn’t ERHC just get off the Caveat Emptor list?”

Simple—because doing that gives away the very advantage it currently holds.

Getting off the CE list would mean filing detailed financials and updates, which may sound great on the surface—but that information wouldn’t just be read by longs. It would also be used by shorts to time and manage any potential squeeze. They want transparency because it helps them control the outcome.

By staying silent, ERHC keeps them in the dark. And in a dark room, the sharks don’t know which way to swim—or when the net drops.

That silence may be frustrating to some, but for others, it’s the best setup we’ve seen in years.

—Krombacher
👍️0
Krombacher Krombacher 15 시간 전
RubyMartin,

Totally fair points. Everyone has a different risk threshold, and no one should bet more than they’re comfortable with. That said, you’ve just outlined the math why this setup is so asymmetric.

You’re concerned about risking $10,000 on 10 million shares… but your upside target is $8 per share. That’s $80 million on a $10K outlay. Even if the outcome is only partially realized, the potential ROI dwarfs the commission.

SpeedTrader’s per-share commission model is a barrier by design—it filters out volume-based speculation. But sometimes, paying a premium to access the trade is the trade. The very reason this opportunity still exists is because most people won't act unless it's easy—and this isn't.

As for me, I already hold a large position and have no plans to add more at this time. Sometimes the best move is patience—not because of doubt, but because you’ve already placed your bet and don’t want to tip the board by leaning too hard on it.

I’m not here to persuade. But if you’re staring at the door and wondering what’s on the other side… just know some of us are already sitting inside, quietly waiting.

—Krombacher
👍️0
Krombacher Krombacher 17 시간 전
Ssc / Badog,

Let’s get a few things straight.

My SEC Form 5 filing wasn’t late—it was filed within the window allowed for late-year transactions. And even then, if the shares I acquired were in fact naked shorted shares, as evidence increasingly suggests, then the filing was done out of an abundance of caution, not obligation. So the narrative that I was “dragged into transparency” is just more projection from someone who’s never had to disclose anything—because they’re on the other side of the trade.

As for moving the goalpost? If you think I’ve pivoted over time, you’re right—because strategies evolve. The world changes. Legal postures shift. Drilling windows open. I follow the data. And if that bothers you, maybe it’s because the data isn’t favoring your position.

Badog, you ask why I post instead of sitting back quietly. Here’s why: Short sellers have had 7+ years of narrative control, using silence to discourage longs and mask their own exposure. I’m simply matching fire with light.

If you truly believed the story was over, you wouldn’t be here every day trying to convince everyone of it. You’d be gone.

But you’re not. And neither am I.

So yes—I’ll continue to outline scenarios that fit the facts. Not because I need to convince anyone… but because I’m already positioned.

Krombacher
👍️0
Peter J Peter J 18 시간 전
Badog,

Let me tell you why you are the ultimate F O S
That's why I limited myself to $12 for 60,000 shares If this ever even hits $1 I'll cash in for $60,000 and all it cost me was $12. I expect to lose my $12 but what the Hell...I'm a big spender.
First of all: you lost north of $50.000,- in working hours. Whether you accept this fact or not. Once this is over (it will at some point, either way), you will realize this, the hard way.
Then: what you don't mention, and what is FAR more likely, is: it will not hit $8,- or $1,- but you always take that extremely unlikely figure because: if it only his 10 cents... you are virtually empty handed here after thousands of posts and all those working hours... you would walk away with $6K, I would walk away with 5 million.... so, FOS again.

But most of all: look at your posting regime of even the last days: it is highly disciplined. Let's imagine (lol) that you are really driven by altruistic reasons solely (while it is virtually impossible to buy stock and there is hardly a market for Skull & Bones stocks, and these types of investors don't need your 'advice' anyway, they are not novice investors): your disclipline (and that of your homie ssc) would be understandably less disciplined... it would not be your number one item on your daily agenda, like it is now for you.

This degree of relentelessness in posting style can only be driven by ONE MOTIVATOR: MONEY. (Money makes the world go round, wars are mostly over money, (some) people even kill for money).

You might say again that I'm 'babbling' but like I adviced you before: just ask in your 'innner circle' of friends and family... you will find out that I'm right.

So when I look up the phrase FOS ... AI would tell me: badog & scc....
👍️0
badog badog 21 시간 전
I understand RubyMartin. That may be why no one else is buying either. Like you say, buying in the millions sets one up for a large loss if this doesn't work out. That's why I limited myself to $12 for 60,000 shares If this ever even hits $1 I'll cash in for $60,000 and all it cost me was $12. I expect to lose my $12 but what the Hell...I'm a big spender. LOL

Badog
👍️0
badog badog 21 시간 전
I question things that don't seem logical and appear to be pure speculation with little or no merit. If that is your definition of bashing then so be it. It's not mine. I would cheer for the sp to go to $8....but that won't help. The $8 share price is like respect....you don't just get it because you want it....you have to earn it. We will see.

Badog
👍️0
nwtf nwtf 23 시간 전
You are wrong. Hes not framing anything as a moving goal post. Hes stating a fact that you are a known liar and continue to lie in almost everyone of your posts. Your moving goal post is nothing more than deflection on your part.
👍️0
RubyMartin RubyMartin 1 일 전
Again...why not? $10 plus commission and $35 gets you 100,000 shares....x $8 = $800,000...

I would want to buy in the millions. $.0009 commission per share. So each million would cost $1000. 10 million shares would be $10,000 and not $1000 (which I'd be happy to pay). We both know $8 is not promised, and when this will pop also isn't promised. So where I'd be happy to risk $1,000. I don't want to bet $10,000.
👍️0
RKT989 RKT989 1 일 전
You and your cronies Heavily BASH the stock everyday and day after day...Some that may speculate don't bother because it is not worth it to have to listen to you and them all day everyday...Unique circumstance also .
😫 1 🤢 1 🥴 1
badog badog 1 일 전
I would (buy on Speed Trader) but I don't like the commissions cost, and then $35 per month fees.

If this is going to $8 after the supposed agreement with Shell and the massive short squeeze it would seem that the commissions and a one month fee of $35 would be miniscule...right? So why else is no one buying thru Speed Trader....or thru Canadian brokers for that matter. Haven't we been told that Canadians can buy this thru their brokers? Yet no buying. Again...why not? $10 plus commission and $35 gets you 100,000 shares....x $8 = $800,000....right? Who wouldn't do that. I did. Except I paid $12 for 60,000 shares. If I hadn't followed this for 15 years or more I doubt I would. Management that won't communicate....delisted....no filings....etc.

Badog
👍️0
RubyMartin RubyMartin 1 일 전
I have to agree with this simple question. "why aren't American's buying ERHC if it is available on Speed Trader"

I would but I don't like the commissions cost, and then $35 per month fees.
👍️0
badog badog 1 일 전
Not everything unfolds on your timeline. Some of us are willing to wait longer than others can hold their breath.

Then why not just sit back and wait to see what happens. You constantly push new scenarios as the old ones evaporate. Your scenarios are not going to change the outcome, they are just a way to promote...an attempt to try to attract new buyers and a way to try to get fictional shorts to cover. Maybe it's just your means of entertainment. Who knows. But as your scenarios have never moved the sp I don't see the purpose. They won't change the story's ending.

Badog
👍️ 1
ssc ssc 1 일 전
You have been moving the goal post for more than a decade. You have come up with one fantasy-based bullish scenario after another. It used to be a "done deal buyout by Total" based on pages of redacted wording, all of which resulted in nothing. Now the buyout is abandoned and it's all about a "backstop" and squeezing of shorts that you cannot prove exist. It's all about erhc paying some type of dividend while there is nothing to indicate that is based in reality.

And don't brag about disclosing your position. Your disclosure came a year late, following months of your asinine claims about "a new erhc paradigm" where SEC regulations didn't apply and saying I was wrong when I pointed out the reporting requirements. You were dragged kicking and screaming into transparency because of your ignorance of disclosure rules. Surprising considering all the credentials you flaunt, but not unexpected for a blowhard that can't deal with reality.
👍️0
Krombacher Krombacher 1 일 전
Ssc,

I see the angle you’re working. You’re trying to frame everything as a moving goalpost—“July, or maybe August, or maybe the year after that”—as if anticipating different outcomes somehow invalidates the core thesis.

But here’s the reality: the only people obsessed with timelines are the ones trapped on the wrong side of them.

You mock dates because you’re desperate to paint this as delusion. But speculation with logic is not lying—it’s investing with incomplete information, which is what the entire market does every day. The difference is that you want everyone to stop speculating, except you.

Let’s talk facts:

I disclosed my position transparently. You twist it into conspiracy.

The company is quiet. You call it collapse.

Volume is low. You call it abandonment.


But low volume isn’t always disinterest—it can be lockdown.

You say I "refuse to tell the truth." No—I refuse to tell your version of it.

You claim there are no shorts, no upside, no structure worth anything. And yet, you’re here—day after day—trying to bury something you say is already dead. That’s not confidence. That’s anxiety disguised as sarcasm.

And about “July”? You mock it not because it’s fiction—but because you’re worried it’s not.

Not everything unfolds on your timeline. Some of us are willing to wait longer than others can hold their breath.

—Krombacher
👍️0
ssc ssc 1 일 전
When I remind everyone of the many lies you have told, it is proof that you are a liar. Observable facts about share structure show authorized shares are about maxed out, that insiders haven't bought shares since being wiped out by the reverse split, that you are the only 10% or greater shareholder, and by your own admission your group owns the majority of erhe shares. The observable facts also show no erhe short positions. The observable facts show erhe price near zero and volume near zero for more than 7 years. Those are the facts and they are documented in history as are all your thousands of lies you pathetically try and pass off as speculation.

The list is not the same, as it gets updated on a regular basis as you come out with one new asinine bullish claim after another. The latest is this ludicrous preferred stock dividend prediction and your big pay day coming in July (or in typical dickran squirming style the month after, or the year after, or the year after that). You say events haven't concluded yet, but the events are products of your delusional, demented, greed and hubris driven psyche. Where are the documented facts to prove any of your claims?
👍️0
farml1234 farml1234 1 일 전
and another big trade of ERHE shares 328 share traded

hay shorts quit spending my money on commissions i want to make all the pain upon you when you have to cover.

ROTFLMAO

jmho
👍️0
Krombacher Krombacher 1 일 전
Ssc,

You repeat the same list of talking points every time. But repetition isn’t proof, and sarcasm isn’t a substitute for insight.

No one here is asking anyone to believe in fairy tales. What I’ve done—and will continue to do—is follow logic, documented history, and the observable facts about share structure, legal history, and regional developments. The rest is speculation—on both sides.

What you dismiss as “silence” is what some of us recognize as leverage—especially in a situation where quiet maneuvering may offer more long-term advantage than premature publicity.

You say it’s “not working”—and yet you’re still here, arguing. That says more than anything else.

As for July, August, or beyond? You mock timelines while ignoring the real question: Why haven’t events concluded yet, if this was over years ago?

Because it’s not over. And that, I think, bothers you more than you’d ever admit.

—Krombacher
👍️0
ssc ssc 2 일 전
Another desperate, deceitful claim from known liar and largest erhe shareholder guerguerian dickran: "the silence is working". If erhe share holders like a stock price of $.0001 and being kept completely in the dark for more than 7 years, then yeah, it's working lmao. What's not working are the thousands of baseless claims, false rumors and outright dickran lies about everything from buyouts to short squeezes to dividends to deep sea divers searching for oil at the bottom of the ocean, all in a greed and hubris driven campaign to try and recoup hundreds of thousands of dollars in erhe losses. It's not working.

Sorry if those things sound like sarcasm or hyperbole. They are neither. They are actual, asinine dickran hype, none of which ever became reality. Now we wait for July or, according to dickran, maybe August or September or the month after that or the year after that. Pathetic, despicable bullshit.
👍️0
Krombacher Krombacher 2 일 전
StrategyOne,

ssc’s mockery aside, your question is exactly the right one to be asking. It’s not rhetorical—it’s directional. And you’re right: a functioning market depends on transparency, accessibility, and participation.

But markets are also shaped by perception. And when perception is shaped by missing context, strategic silence, or simply a misunderstanding of what’s still in play, it creates a vacuum. That vacuum looks like low volume, lack of interest, or irrelevance.

But sometimes that vacuum is the last breath of calm before something resurfaces.

The shares are available. The structure is extremely tight. And contrary to popular belief, not every significant action must be telegraphed—especially if the company is still non-reporting and the stock is under caveat emptor status.

I can’t speak for the company. But I can say this:

Those who don’t understand why there’s silence may be the very reason the silence is working.

—Krombacher
👍️0
nwtf nwtf 2 일 전
You keep quoting munger but you dont follow his advice. Typical troll-phoney.
👍️0
ssc ssc 2 일 전
Don't you believe erhe's largest shareholder after he has repeated hundreds of times that the silence is all part of a billion dollar conspiracy between Shell, Total, STP, drill rig operators, deep sea divers, an African Queen, Offor, erhc management and sketched heads to punish the nonexistent short sellers? Forget about SEC compliance, fiduciary responsibilities to shareholders, annual meetings, financials, share structure, material event disclosures; forget about everything it means to be a publicly traded company; and forget about anything even closely related to facts and truth. Just trust in desperate delusions about billions of triple zero naked short shares, preferred share dividends, dollars/share done deals, $8/share short squeezes, and backstops created and promoted by someone stuck with 400 million erhe shares facing hundreds of thousands of dollars in losses. But don't hold your breath waiting for any of those asinine claims to actually materialize
👍️0
Strategyone Strategyone 2 일 전
As much as I don't want to get in the middle of this back and forth banter......

I have to agree with this simple question. "why aren't American's buying ERHC if it is available on Speed Trader"

Whether one loves or hates ERHC, I believe the company itself must come out and provide a reason for any future transactions. No speculation, no reading between the lines, no guessing from other potential future partner companies Press Releases....... ERHC needs to do something for themselves and shareholders to create a market for their shares. It is really that simple.

GLTA
👍️0
badog badog 2 일 전
Americans can buy erhc at SpeedTrader, FYI

Then why aren't they?

Badog
👍️0
Krombacher Krombacher 2 일 전
Americans can buy erhc at SpeedTrader, FYI
👍️0
ssc ssc 2 일 전
Consider the source. peterj was exposed as a liar just like dickran with his very first posts. No surprise he has nothing to say about erhc, just dedicates his time here to attacking those who post the truth about dickran and the facts about erhc. How demented and desperate are these guys? Remember when it was pointed out that kingpin on this board has never offered support for any of peterj's claims, dickran jumped in and claimed he was referring to some fictional super hero character?

What else can they do with erhc management silence and share price near zero for more than 7 years but lie, lie, lie, or as dickran puts it "speculate" lmao.
👍️0
badog badog 3 일 전
Kingpin... think about it... what is going on here.
Let it sink in, Kingpin.
Think about it, Kingpin...

What's your obsession with convincing kingpindg to agree with you. You seem to do it often.

The fact is that anyone can post whatever they want. You never seem to dispute ssc's facts...you simply flail your arms and kick your legs at the idea that he does post. I've seen kids at the grocery store who do the same thing when they don't get what they want. I understand that you do not like his posts but maybe you should try to dispute his facts...and prove him wrong instead of your normal babble and complaining. Maybe you would prefer to speculate about the future. I don't care. If you can present a better case for impending riches so be it. But history shows that every speculation has turned out false. Does the latest email from Shell IR prove that ERHC has procured some consideration regarding block 4? Who knows. But when the narrative went swifty to not disclosing any future email responses that was a red flag indicating that someone wanted to use the first email as positive speculation and didn't want to take the chance of a second email blowing it up. I tend to believe Shell would not say anything more anyway because they said it was confidential so I'm sure it's a mute point. Again....I see no change in volume or sp so apparently no one cares about the Shell email.
Yawn.......

Badog
👍️0
Peter J Peter J 3 일 전
What needs to be considered is this:

dickran's 10%, 400 million share ownership is just a punchline. The joke is that erhc insiders own very few shares and have no interest in adding any value for a group of triple zero minions following a long time loser that owns most of the erhe shares, no matter what Shell might be doing. There are more than 7 years of actual, factual proof of this. When a public company goes rogue and refuses to make filings or share material events with shareholders for more than 7 years, the likelihood of them sharing any riches, past, present or future, is about as low as the erhe share price.

Charlie Munger would say: then you pick your stocks well, to do DD on.

When, at what point, does your own conclusion sink in?

Kingpin... think about it... what is going on here. These guys are more relentless followers than... a level of altruistic behaviour that nas never been seen or matched witin the investment world...

Think about it, Kingpin...

ssc didn't want the share price to go up... by his own admission!!!

badog refused to say something intelligent about the reason for someone to post more than 8000 posts... without any financial motive...

Let it sink in, Kingpin.

This has nothing to do with Krombacher... but everything with ERHC.

Just common sense.
👍️0
Doc Holiday1 Doc Holiday1 3 일 전
Speculating on that I would say if there IS some kind of confidentiality agreement between Shell and Erhe concerning blk4 EEZ then we could also speculate that the confidentiality deal is some type of cash compensation or buy out.
👍️0
ssc ssc 3 일 전
What needs to be considered is this:

dickran's 10%, 400 million share ownership is just a punchline. The joke is that erhc insiders own very few shares and have no interest in adding any value for a group of triple zero minions following a long time loser that owns most of the erhe shares, no matter what Shell might be doing. There are more than 7 years of actual, factual proof of this. When a public company goes rogue and refuses to make filings or share material events with shareholders for more than 7 years, the likelihood of them sharing any riches, past, present or future, is about as low as the erhe share price.
👍️0
badog badog 3 일 전
If there were anything that would make us all winners,.. then great. I can't wait. But we've been waiting a long long time during many similar speculations that were going to make us rich. Unlike many here I don't just buy into every new speculation. Like I said....if it works out then great. If you can get Shell to elaborate you might have something. They won't. So who knows what they meant. I'm anxiously awaiting my $480,000 same as I have been doing for years.

Even if ERHC was granted some sort of compensation related to an oil find....there would have to be an oil find. No one seems to consider the possibility that there might be no oil found...same as in the JDZ.

Badog
👍️0
Doc Holiday1 Doc Holiday1 3 일 전
Back to speculating again, what if the IR at Shell was actually talking about a specific confidential agreement they have with Erhe energy on blk4 eez.If there is such a deal then we possibly could all win including Peter J .
👍️0
badog badog 3 일 전
you must be as smart as a rock, spending your valuable time here

I'm not the one hugely underwater. Do you know who is? Clue....there are 70 of you....eh?

I have noticed on more than ONE occasion that you have problems with comprehensive reading...

Just can't help yourself. You're babbling again.

Ask Kingpin what he thinks of your motivations for posting like crazy here.

Unlike you, I don't worry about what others think. What I think is what matters. You reference kingpindg because you think he has credibility...unlike yourself. You don't gain any credibility this way. You seem to know that no one cares what you think.

I bought 60,000 shares for $12....so I win either way. There is only one way you win genius. And you have been waiting for years with no luck.

Badog
👍️0
Peter J Peter J 3 일 전
Peter....you are babbling without any knowledge of my situation
I know that you are a Berkshire Hathaway owner... lol. You must be as smart as a rock, spending your valuable time here... we all can figure out why.

You and others pretend you know what truth is yet you have no validation.
I have noticed on more than ONE occasion that you have problems with comprehensive reading...
Maybe stick to facts.
The fact is what Shell IR wrote me, And that you started spinning...

I you were smart back then, you would have bought a few tens of millions of shares when it was possible, for a few $K. Because there still is a chance that something might happen...

Now you lost several $10K in working hours, no matter what happens, all for 'the good of the world' ...

Ask Kingpin what he thinks of your motivations for posting like crazy here... ! Ask him, private. Ask.
👍️0