UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the
Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
☐
|
Confidential, for use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
☒
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
☐
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
☐
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
|
Duff & Phelps Utility and Corporate Bond Trust Inc.
(Name of Registrant as
Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy
Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box):
☐
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11.
|
|
1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
☐
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
☐
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify
the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
DUFF & PHELPS UTILITY AND CORPORATE BOND TRUST INC.
200 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 500
Chicago, Illinois 60606
(800) 338-8214
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
March 24, 2020
The annual meeting of shareholders of Duff & Phelps Utility and Corporate Bond Trust Inc. (the Fund)
will be held at the offices of Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co., 200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, Illinois 60606, on Tuesday, March 24, 2020 at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, to:
|
1.
|
Elect Geraldine M. McNamara and David J. Vitale as directors of the Fund by the holders of the Funds common stock;
|
|
2.
|
Consider and vote on a shareholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting, asking the board of directors of the Fund to consider a
self-tender offer for all outstanding common stock of the Fund, and, if more than 50% of the Funds outstanding shares are submitted for tender, to cancel the tender offer and either liquidate the Fund or convert it to an open-end fund or exchange-traded fund; and
|
|
3.
|
Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
|
Shareholders of record at the close of business on December 27, 2019 are entitled to vote at the
meeting.
For the Board of Directors of the Fund,
WILLIAM J. RENAHAN Secretary
January 16, 2020
SHAREHOLDERS, WE NEED YOUR PROXY VOTE IMMEDIATELY.
YOUR VOTE IS VITAL. THIS MEETING IS VERY IMPORTANT BECAUSE AN OPPORTUNISTIC INVESTOR THAT HAS BEEN ACCUMULATING SHARES IN THE FUND HAS SUBMITTED A PROPOSAL WHICH ASKS THE
BOARD TO CONSIDER A TENDER OFFER FOR ALL OF THE FUNDS SHARES AND POTENTIALLY TO ELIMINATE THE ABILITY OF THE FUND TO OPERATE AS A CLOSED-END FUND. THE BOARD OF YOUR FUND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE
AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.
THE MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS WILL HAVE TO BE ADJOURNED WITHOUT
CONDUCTING ANY BUSINESS IF FEWER THAN A MAJORITY OF THE SHARES ELIGIBLE TO VOTE ARE REPRESENTED. IN THAT EVENT, THE FUND MAY NEED TO CONTINUE TO SOLICIT VOTES IN AN ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN A QUORUM. TO AVOID THE EXPENSE OF AND THE POSSIBLE DELAY CREATED
BY SUCH A SOLICITATION, PLEASE VOTE YOUR PROXY IMMEDIATELY. YOU AND ALL OTHER SHAREHOLDERS WILL BENEFIT FROM YOUR COOPERATION.
PROXY STATEMENT
The board of directors (the Board) of the Fund is soliciting proxies from the shareholders of the Fund for use at the annual
meeting of shareholders to be held on Tuesday, March 24, 2020 and at any adjournment or postponement of that meeting. A proxy may be revoked at any time before it is voted, either by voting in person at the meeting or by written notice to the
Fund or delivery of a later-dated proxy.
Summary of Proposals to Be Voted Upon
|
1.
|
Election of Geraldine M. McNamara and David J. Vitale as directors of the Fund
|
|
2.
|
If properly presented at the meeting, a shareholder proposal asking the Board to consider a self-tender offer for all outstanding common stock
of the Fund, and, if more than 50% of the Funds outstanding shares are submitted for tender, to cancel the tender offer and either liquidate the Fund or convert it to an open-end fund or exchange-traded
fund
|
This meeting is very important because an opportunistic investor that has accumulated shares in the
Fund has submitted Proposal 2 above, which asks the Board to consider a tender offer for all of the Funds shares and potentially to eliminate the ability of the Fund to operate as a closed-end fund.
This proposal is unanimously OPPOSED by the Board. Your Board is asking you to vote AGAINST the shareholder proposal for the reasons discussed in detail under Opposing Statement of the Board of Directors later in this proxy
statement.
Shareholders of record of the Fund at the close of business on December 27, 2019 are entitled to notice of
and to participate in the meeting. On the record date, DUC had 27,494,683 shares of common stock outstanding. Each share of common stock outstanding on the record date entitles the holder thereof to one vote for each director being elected by the
common stock (with no cumulative voting permitted) and to one vote on each other matter.
This proxy statement is first being
mailed on or about January 16, 2020. The Fund will bear the cost of the annual meeting and this proxy solicitation.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on Tuesday, March 24, 2020:
The proxy statement for the 2020 annual meeting, the form of proxy card and the annual report for the most recently ended fiscal year are available to the Funds shareholders at www.dpimc.com/duc. You can obtain directions to the annual meeting
by contacting the administrator for the Fund at (833) 604-3163 (toll-free) or fa@rwbaird.com.
1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of the Fund is responsible for the
overall management and operations of the Fund. As of the date of this proxy statement, the Board of the Fund is composed of seven directors. Directors of the Fund are divided into three classes and are elected to serve staggered three-year terms.
The persons named in the enclosed proxy intend to vote in favor of the election of the persons named below (unless otherwise
instructed). Each of the nominees has consented to serve as a director of the Fund, if elected. In case any of the nominees should become unavailable for election for any unforeseen reason, the persons designated in the proxy will have the right to
vote for a substitute.
Election of the Funds Directors (Proposal 1)
At the meeting, holders of the Funds common stock are entitled to elect two directors for a term ending in 2023 to serve until the
annual meeting of shareholders in that year and until their respective successors are elected and qualified. A plurality of votes cast at the meeting by the holders of the Funds common stock is necessary to elect those directors. Abstentions
and broker-non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the meeting, but will not affect the determination of whether a director
candidate has received a plurality of votes cast.
Biographical Information about Nominees and Continuing Directors
Set forth in the table below are the names and certain biographical information about the nominees for the position of director and the
continuing directors of the Fund. All of the directors are elected to the Funds Board by the holders of the Funds common stock. All of the Funds directors also serve on the board of directors of three other registered closed-end investment companies that are advised by Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co., the Funds investment adviser (the Adviser): DNP Select Income Fund Inc. (DNP),
Duff & Phelps Utility and Infrastructure Fund Inc. (DPG) and DTF Tax-Free Income Inc. (DTF).
All of the directors of the Fund, with the exception of Mr. Partain, are classified as independent directors because none of them are interested persons of the Fund, as defined in the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). Mr. Partain is an interested person of the Fund by reason of his positions as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Fund and President, Chief Investment Officer and
employee of the Adviser. The term Fund Complex refers to the Fund and all other investment companies advised by affiliates of Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (Virtus), the Advisers parent company. The address for all
directors is c/o Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co., 200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, Illinois 60606.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Address and Age
|
|
Positions
Held
with Fund
|
|
Term of
Office and
Length of
Time Served
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
During
Past
5 Years &
Qualifications
|
|
Number of
Portfolios in
Fund Complex
Overseen by
Director
|
|
Other
Directorships
Held
by the
Director
During Past 5 Years
|
NomineesIndependent Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geraldine M. McNamara
Age: 68
|
|
Director
|
|
Nominee for a term expiring in 2023; Director since 2003
|
|
Private investor since 2006; Managing Director, U.S. Trust Company of New York 1982-2006
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. McNamara was selected to serve on the Board because her experience of advising individuals on their personal financial management has given her an enhanced
understanding of the goals and expectations that individual investors bring to the Fund.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Address and Age
|
|
Positions
Held
with Fund
|
|
Term of
Office and
Length of
Time Served
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
During
Past
5 Years &
Qualifications
|
|
Number of
Portfolios in
Fund Complex
Overseen by
Director
|
|
Other
Directorships
Held
by the
Director
During Past 5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David J. Vitale
Age:
73
|
|
Director and Chairman of the Board
|
|
Nominee for a term expiring in 2023; Director since 2005
|
|
Advisor, Ariel Investments, LLC since October 2019; Chairman, Urban Partnership Bank 2010-2019; President, Chicago Board of Education 2011-2015; Senior Advisor to the CEO, Chicago
Public Schools 2007-2008 (Chief Administrative Officer 2003-2007); President and Chief Executive Officer, Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. 2001-2002; Vice Chairman and Director, Bank One Corporation
1998-1999; Vice Chairman and Director, First Chicago NBD Corporation, and President, The First National Bank of Chicago 1995-1998; Vice Chairman, First Chicago Corporation and The First National Bank of
Chicago 1993-1998 (Director 1992-1998; Executive Vice President 1986-1993)
|
|
4
|
|
Director, United Continental Holdings, Inc. (airline holding company), Ariel Investments, LLC and Wheels, Inc. (automobile fleet management); Chairman, Urban Partnership Bank
2010-2019
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Vitale was selected to serve on the Board because of his extensive experience as an executive in both the private and public sector, his experience serving
as a director of other public companies and his knowledge of financial matters, capital markets, investment management and the utilities industry.
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Address and Age
|
|
Positions
Held
with Fund
|
|
Term of
Office and
Length of
Time Served
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
During
Past
5 Years &
Qualifications
|
|
Number of
Portfolios in
Fund Complex
Overseen by
Director
|
|
Other
Directorships
Held
by the
Director
During Past 5 Years
|
Continuing DirectorsIndependent Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald C. Burke
Age: 59
|
|
Director
|
|
Director the Fund since 2014; term expires 2021
|
|
Retired since 2009; President and Chief Executive Officer, BlackRock U.S. Funds 2007-2009; Managing Director, BlackRock Inc. 2006-2009; Managing Director, Merrill Lynch Investment
Managers 1990-2006
|
|
71
|
|
Director, Avista Corp. (energy company); Trustee, Goldman Sachs Fund Complex 2010-2014; Director, BlackRock Luxembourg and Cayman Funds 2006-2010
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Burke was selected to serve on the Board because of his extensive experience with mutual funds, including as president and chief executive officer of a major
fund complex, and subsequently as an independent trustee of another major fund complex, and because of his knowledge of the utility industry derived from his service on the board of a public company involved in the production, transmission and
distribution of energy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Genetski
Age:
77
|
|
Director
|
|
Director since 2009; term expires 2022
|
|
Co-owner, Good Industries, Inc. (branding company) since 2014; President, Robert Genetski & Associates, Inc. (economic and financial
consulting firm) since 1991; Senior Managing Director, Chicago Capital Inc. (financial services firm) 1995-2001; former Senior Vice President and Chief Economist, Harris Trust & Savings Bank; author of several books
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Genetski was selected to serve on the Board because of his academic and professional qualifications as an economist and a published author and speaker on
economic topics and his experience in overseeing investment research and asset management operations.
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Address and Age
|
|
Positions
Held
with Fund
|
|
Term of
Office and
Length of
Time Served
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
During
Past
5 Years &
Qualifications
|
|
Number of
Portfolios in
Fund Complex
Overseen by
Director
|
|
Other
Directorships
Held
by the
Director
During Past 5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philip R. McLoughlin
Age:
73
|
|
Director
|
|
Director since 1996; term expires 2022
|
|
Private investor since 2010; Partner, CrossPond Partners, LLC (investment management consultant) 2006-2010; Managing Director, SeaCap Partners LLC (strategic advisory firm)
2009-2010
|
|
74
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Lazard World Trust Fund (closed-end fund; f/k/a The World Trust Fund) 2010-2019 (Director since 1991)
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. McLoughlin was selected to serve on the Board because of his understanding of asset management and mutual fund operations and strategy gained from his
experience as chief executive officer of an asset management company and chief investment officer of an insurance company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eileen A. Moran
Age:
65
|
|
Director and Vice Chairperson of the Board
|
|
Director the Fund since 1996; term expires 2021
|
|
Private investor since 2011; President and Chief Executive Officer, PSEG Resources L.L.C. (investment company) 1990-2011
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Moran was selected to serve on the Board because of her experience in managing a large portfolio of assets, a significant portion of which were invested in
the electric and natural gas utility industry.
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Address and Age
|
|
Positions
Held
with Fund
|
|
Term of
Office and
Length of
Time Served
|
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
During
Past
5 Years &
Qualifications
|
|
Number of
Portfolios in
Fund Complex
Overseen by
Director
|
|
Other
Directorships
Held
by the
Director
During Past 5 Years
|
Continuing DirectorInterested Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nathan I. Partain, CFA
Age: 63
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
Director since 2007; term expires 2022
|
|
President and Chief Investment Officer of the Adviser since 2005 (Executive Vice President 1997-2005); Director of Utility Research, Duff & Phelps Investment Research Co.
1989-1996 (Director of Equity Research 1993-1996 and Director of Fixed Income Research 1993); President and Chief Executive Officer of DNP Select Income Fund Inc. since 2001 (Chief Investment Officer 1998-2017; Executive Vice President 1998-2001;
Senior Vice President 1997-1998); President and Chief Executive Officer of DUC and DTF since 2004 and of DPG since 2011
|
|
4
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Director, Otter Tail Corporation (manages diversified operations in the electric, plastics, manufacturing and other business operations
sectors)
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Partain was selected to serve on the Board because of his significant knowledge of the Funds operations as Chief Executive Officer of the Fund and
President of the Adviser, and because of his experience serving as a director of another public utility company and chairman of its board and audit committee.
|
Board Leadership Structure
The Board believes that the most appropriate leadership structure for the Fund is for the Chairman of the Board to be an independent director, in order to provide strong, independent oversight of the
Funds management and affairs, including the Funds risk management function. Accordingly, while the Chief Executive Officer of the Fund will generally be a member of the Board, he or she will not normally be eligible to serve as Chairman
of
6
the Board. The independent Chairman of the Board presides at meetings of the shareholders, meetings of the Board and meetings of independent directors. In addition, the independent Chairman of
the Board takes part in the meetings and deliberations of all committees of the Board, facilitates communication among directors and communication between the Board and the Funds management and is available for consultation with the
Funds management between Board meetings. The Board has four standing committees, which are described below: the executive committee, the audit committee, the contracts committee, and the nominating and governance committee.
The executive committee of the Board is currently comprised of Mr. Vitale (Chairman), Mr. Burke, Ms. McNamara and
Ms. Moran, and has authority, with certain exceptions, to exercise the powers of the Board between Board meetings.
The
audit committee of the Board is currently comprised of all independent directors of the Fund (Mr. Burke, Chairman) and makes recommendations regarding the selection of the Funds independent registered public accounting firm, meets with
representatives of that accounting firm to determine the scope of and review the results of each audit and assists the Board in overseeing the Funds accounting, auditing, financial reporting and internal control functions.
The contracts committee of the Board is currently comprised of all independent directors of the Fund (Ms. Moran, Chairperson) and
makes recommendations regarding the Funds contractual arrangements for investment management and administrative services, including the terms and conditions of such contracts.
The nominating and governance committee of the Board is currently comprised of all independent directors of the Fund (Ms. McNamara,
Chairperson) and selects nominees for election as directors, recommends individuals to be appointed by the Board as officers of the Fund and members of Board committees and makes recommendations regarding other Fund governance and Board
administration matters. The committee also oversees the Boards continuing education program, which includes quarterly presentations for directors covering a variety of topics, including, among other topics, (i) the industries and types of
investments in which the Fund invests, (ii) investment techniques utilized by the Fund, (iii) current developments in securities law and the mutual fund industry (iv) best practices in corporate and mutual fund governance and
(v) enterprise risk management, cybersecurity, and other emerging issues.
During the Funds fiscal year ended
October 31, 2019, the Board met four times; the Boards audit committee met two times; the Boards nominating and governance committee met two times; the Boards contracts committee met two times; and the Boards executive
committee did not meet, but acted once by written consent. Each director attended at least 75% in the aggregate of the meetings of the Board and of the committees on which he or she served.
Risk Oversight. The audit committee charter provides that the audit committee is responsible for discussing with management the
guidelines and policies that govern the process by which management assesses and manages the Funds major financial risk exposures. The contracts committee charter provides that in assessing whether the Funds investment advisory agreement
and administration agreement should be continued, the contracts committee is to give careful consideration to the risk oversight policies of the Adviser and the Funds administrator, respectively. In addition, the audit committee and the full
Board receive periodic reports on enterprise risk management from the chief risk officer of the Adviser.
7
Nomination of Directors. The nominating and governance committee acts under a written
charter that was most recently amended on December 14, 2016. A copy of the charter is available on the Funds website at www.dpimc.com/duc and in print to any shareholder who requests it. None of the members of the nominating and
governance committee are interested persons of the Fund as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. In identifying potential director nominees, the nominating and governance committee considers candidates recommended by one or
more of the following sources: the Funds current directors, the Funds officers, the Funds shareholders and any other source the committee deems appropriate. The committee may, but is not required to, retain a third-party search
firm at the Funds expense to identify potential candidates. Shareholders wishing to recommend candidates to the nominating and governance committee should submit such recommendations to the Secretary of the Fund, who will forward the
recommendations to the committee for consideration. See also Shareholder Proposals and Nominations under Other Information below.
Diversity Policy. The goal of the Fund is to have a board of directors comprising individuals with a diversity of business, educational and life experiences (including, without limitation, with
respect to accounting and finance, business and strategic judgment, investment management and financial markets, and knowledge of the industries in which the Fund invest) that will enable them to constructively review, advise and guide management of
the Fund. The annual Board self-evaluation process includes consideration of whether the Boards composition represents an appropriate balance of skills and diversity for the Funds needs. In evaluating potential director nominees,
including nominees recommended by shareholders, the nominating and governance committee considers such qualifications and skills as it deems relevant but does not have any specific minimum qualifications that must be met by a nominee. The committee
considers, among other things:
|
|
|
the extent to which the candidates business, educational and life experiences will add to the diversity of the Board;
|
|
|
|
whether the candidate will qualify as a director who is not an interested person of the Fund;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any real or apparent conflict of interest that would interfere with the candidates ability to act in the best interests of the
Fund and its shareholders;
|
|
|
|
the contribution that the candidate can make to the Board by virtue of his or her education, business experience and financial expertise;
|
|
|
|
the interplay of the candidates skills and experience with the skills and experience of other Board members;
|
|
|
|
whether the candidate is willing to commit the time necessary to attend meetings and fulfill the responsibilities of a director; and
|
|
|
|
the candidates personality traits, including integrity, independence, leadership, sound business judgment and the ability to work effectively
with the other members of the Board.
|
With respect to the renomination of incumbent directors, past service
to the Board is also considered.
Retirement Policy. The bylaws of the Fund establish a mandatory retirement age of 78
for directors of the Fund. Specifically, no person who has attained the age of 78 years is eligible for election or reelection as a director, and no incumbent director who attains the age of 78 years is qualified to continue serving as a director
following the adjournment of the next succeeding annual meeting of shareholders, and therefore his or her service on the Board will automatically terminate at such time. None of the director nominees or incumbent directors are 78 years or older as
of the date of this proxy statement or will be 78 years or older as of the scheduled date of the annual meeting.
8
Officers of the Fund
The officers of the Fund are elected at the annual meeting of the Board held in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders. The officers receive no compensation from the Fund, but are also
officers of the Adviser or the Fund administrator and receive compensation in such capacities. Information about Nathan I. Partain, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Fund, is provided above under the caption Continuing
DirectorInterested Director. The address for all officers listed below is c/o Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co., 200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, Illinois 60606, except as noted.
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Address
and Age
|
|
Position(s) Held with Fund and
Length
of Time Served
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5
Years
|
Alan M. Meder, CFA, CPA
Age:
60
|
|
Treasurer of the Fund since 2000 and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Assistant Secretary since 2002
|
|
Treasurer of DTF since 2000 and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Assistant Secretary since 2002; Treasurer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Assistant
Secretary of DNP since 2011 (Assistant Treasurer 2010-2011); Treasurer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Assistant Secretary of DPG since 2011; Chief Risk Officer of the Adviser since 2001 and Senior Managing Director since 2014
(Senior Vice President 1994-2014); Member, Board of Governors of CFA Institute 2008-2014 (Chair 2012-2013; Vice Chair 2011-2012); Member, Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council 2011-2014
|
|
|
|
Daniel J. Petrisko, CFA
Age:
59
|
|
Chief Investment Officer of the Fund since 2004, Senior Vice President since 2017 and Assistant Secretary since 2015 (Vice President 2000-2016; Portfolio Manager
2002-2004)
|
|
Senior Vice President of DNP since 2017 and Assistant Secretary since 2015 (Vice President 2015-2016); Senior Vice President of DPG and DTF since 2017 and Assistant Secretary since
2015; Executive Managing Director of the Adviser since 2017 (Senior Managing Director 2014-2017; Senior Vice President 1997-2014; Vice President 1995-1997)
|
|
|
|
William J. Renahan
Age:
50
|
|
Vice President and Secretary of the Fund since 2015
|
|
Vice President and Secretary of DNP and DTF since 2015; Vice President of DPG since 2012 and Secretary since 2015 (Assistant Secretary 2012-2015); Secretary of the Adviser since
2014, Senior Counsel since 2015 and Chief Compliance Officer since March 2019; Senior Legal Counsel and Vice President, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. since 2012; Managing Director, Legg Mason, Inc. (and predecessor firms)
1999-2012
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Address
and Age
|
|
Position(s) Held with Fund and
Length
of Time Served
|
|
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past 5
Years
|
Joyce B. Riegel
Age:
65
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer of the Fund since 2003
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer of DTF since 2003; Chief Compliance Officer of DNP since 2004; Chief Compliance Officer of DPG since 2011; Senior Managing Director of the Adviser since
2014 (Chief Compliance Officer 2002-March 2019; Senior Vice President 2004-2014; Vice President 2002-2004)
|
|
|
|
Dianna P. Wengler
Robert W.
Baird & Co. Incorporated
500 West Jefferson Street
Louisville, KY 40202
Age: 59
|
|
Vice President and Assistant Secretary of the Fund since 2014.
|
|
Vice President of DNP since 2006 and Assistant Secretary since 1988 (Assistant Vice President 2004-2006); Vice President and Assistant Secretary of DTF since 2014; Senior Vice
President and DirectorFund Administration, Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated since 2019; Senior Vice President, J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L. Lyons, LLC (Hilliard Lyons) 2016-2019 (Vice President 1990-2015); Senior Vice
President, Hilliard-Lyons Government Fund, Inc. 2006-2010 (Vice President 1998-2006; Treasurer 1988-2010)
|
The following table provides certain information relating to the equity securities beneficially owned by
each director or director nominee as of October 31, 2019, (i) in the Fund and (ii) on an aggregate basis, in any registered investment companies overseen or to be overseen by the director or nominee within the same family of investment
companies as the Fund, in each case based on information provided to the Fund, including information furnished by the Funds service providers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Director
|
|
Dollar Range of
Equity Securities
Owned in DUC
|
|
|
Aggregate Dollar
Range
of Equity
Securities in
All Funds
Overseen or to
be Overseen
by Director or
Nominee in
Family of
Investment
Companies
|
|
Independent Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald C. Burke
|
|
|
$10,001$50,000
|
|
|
|
Over $100,000
|
|
Robert J. Genetski
|
|
|
$1$10,000
|
|
|
|
Over $100,000
|
|
Philip R. McLoughlin
|
|
|
$1$10,000
|
|
|
|
Over $100,000
|
|
Geraldine M. McNamara
|
|
|
$10,001$50,000
|
|
|
|
Over $100,000
|
|
Eileen A. Moran
|
|
|
$50,001$100,000
|
|
|
|
Over $100,000
|
|
David J. Vitale
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
$50,001$100,000
|
|
|
|
|
Interested Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nathan I. Partain
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
Over $100,000
|
|
10
Based on information provided to the Fund, including information furnished by the
Funds service providers, as of October 31, 2019, none of the independent directors, or their immediate family members, owned any securities of the Adviser or any person (other than a registered investment company) directly or indirectly
controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser.
The following table sets forth the aggregate
compensation paid to each director by the Fund with respect to its most recently completed fiscal year and by the Fund Complex with respect to the fiscal year ended October 31, 2019.
COMPENSATION TABLE(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Director
|
|
Aggregate
Compensation
from the Fund
|
|
|
Aggregate
Compensation
from DNP,
DPG and DTF(2)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Compensation
from Other Funds
in Fund Complex(2)
|
|
|
Total Compensation
from Fund Complex
Paid to Directors(2)
|
|
Independent Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald C. Burke
|
|
$
|
15,554.96
|
|
|
$
|
76,445.04
|
|
|
$
|
280,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
372,000.00
|
|
Robert J. Genetski
|
|
|
14,202.32
|
|
|
|
69,797.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,000.00
|
|
Philip R. McLoughlin
|
|
|
14,202.32
|
|
|
|
69,797.68
|
|
|
|
647,744.56
|
|
|
|
731,744.56
|
|
Geraldine M. McNamara
|
|
|
15,554.96
|
|
|
|
76,445.04
|
|
|
|
316,195.65
|
|
|
|
408,195.65
|
|
Eileen A. Moran
|
|
|
15,554.96
|
|
|
|
76,445.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,000.00
|
|
David J. Vitale
|
|
|
22,656.12
|
|
|
|
111,343.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,000.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interested Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nathan I. Partain
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
(1)
|
Because each director serves as a director of each of DNP, DPG, DUC and DTF, directors receive a single set of fees as remuneration for their service
to all four funds: (i) each director not affiliated with the Adviser receives a retainer fee of $84,000 per year; (ii) the chairpersons of the audit committee, contracts committee and nominating and governance committee each receive an
additional retainer fee of $8,000 per year; and (iii) the Chairman of the Board receives an additional retainer fee of $50,000 per year. Directors and officers affiliated with the Adviser receive no compensation from the Fund Complex for their
services as such. In addition to the amounts shown in the table above, all directors and officers who are not interested persons of the Fund or the Adviser or affiliated with the Fund administrator are reimbursed for the expenses incurred by them in
connection with their attendance at a meeting of the Board or a committee of the Board. The Fund does not have a pension or retirement plan applicable to its directors or officers.
|
(2)
|
Please refer to the table on pages 2 to 6 for the number of investment companies in the Fund Complex overseen by each director. In addition to DNP,
DPG, DUC and DTF, Mr. Burke, Mr. McLoughlin and Ms. McNamara respectively oversee 71, 75 and 71 additional funds that are advised by affiliates of Virtus.
|
The Board of the Fund, including all of the independent directors, unanimously recommends a vote FOR the election of the
two nominees for director named above.
11
2. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL ASKING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE FUND TO CONSIDER A
SELF-TENDER OFFER FOR ALL OUTSTANDING COMMON STOCK OF THE FUND, AND, IF MORE THAN 50% OF THE FUNDS OUTSTANDING SHARES ARE SUBMITTED FOR TENDER, TO CANCEL THE TENDER OFFER AND EITHER LIQUIDATE THE FUND OR CONVERT IT TO AN OPEN-END FUND OR
EXCHANGE-TRADED FUND
A shareholder of the Fund, Karpus Management, Inc. (Karpus), has informed the Fund that
it intends to submit a shareholder proposal at the meeting and has requested that the Fund include the shareholder proposal in this years proxy materials. This proposal is non-binding and requests that
the Board take certain actions if Karpus proposal is approved by shareholders. The Fund will provide the address of Karpus and the number of shares it owns promptly to any shareholder upon receiving an oral or written request for such
information.
A majority of votes cast at the meeting by the holders of the Funds common stock is necessary to approve
Karpus proposal. Abstentions and broker-non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the meeting, but will not affect the
determination of whether Karpus proposal has received a majority of votes cast.
The
non-binding shareholder proposal and Karpus supporting statement for it, exactly as received by the Fund, are set forth below and are followed by the Boards explanation of the reasons for opposing
the proposal. The Fund is not responsible for the shareholder proposal or Karpus supporting statement. The Board unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST the shareholder proposal.
Shareholder Proposal
BE IT RESOLVED, the shareholders of the Duff & Phelps Utility and Corporate Bond Trust Inc. (DUC or the Fund) request that the Board of Directors (the
Board) promptly consider authorizing a self-tender offer for all outstanding common shares of the Fund at or close to net asset value (NAV). If more than 50% of the Funds outstanding common shares are tendered, the
tender offer should be cancelled and the Board should take the steps necessary to liquidate, merge, or convert the Fund to an open-end mutual fund or exchange traded fund.
Shareholders Supporting Statement
Through the end of August, our fund traded at an average discount of -8.4% over the last year, -7.5% over the last 3 years,
and -7.8% over the last 5 years (Source: Bloomberg Finance, L.P.).
DUCs
persistently wide discount appears attributable to poor relative price and net asset value (NAV) performance as compared to its Lipper closed-end fund peer group. In fact, following are the
price and net asset value performance over various periods, as well as the Funds performance ranking within its Lipper General Bond Fund category (the higher the percentage, the worse it performed compared to its peers):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 Yrs.
|
|
|
5 Yrs.
|
|
|
1 Yr.
|
|
|
YTD
|
|
Market Return
|
|
|
3.76
|
%
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
11.89
|
%
|
|
|
13.49
|
%
|
Lipper Pct. Rank
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
NAV Return
|
|
|
4.26
|
%
|
|
|
2.94
|
%
|
|
|
8.29
|
%
|
|
|
7.92
|
%
|
Lipper Pct. Rank
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Source: Closed-end Fund Association, www.cefa.com, data as of 9/12/2019,
Lipper General Bond Fund category.
12
When closed-end funds underperform, investors
require: (1) a thoughtful and detailed explanation of managements recent decisions, and (2) the Boards plan going forward. Neither of these proactive steps have been offered, which is why we believe the Funds
underperformance has also led to perpetually wide discounts. The Funds discount also indicates that the market has lost faith in the Advisers ability to significantly add to shareholder value.
To address this, the Funds own prospectus says: The board of directors of the Fund has established a
policy to consider, on at least an annual basis, whether to make open market repurchases of and/or tender offers for shares of the Funds common stock to seek to reduce any market discount from
net asset value that may exist [emphasis added]. Additionally, the prospectus identifies a discount of 3% or more for 12 week period as the level where the Board could consider such actions.
Even though the Fund is likely to argue against our proposal in a manner that well exceeds the word limit restriction we are allowed to
include in this proposal, the premise of our proposal is simple: we believe that the Board must be more responsive to enhancing shareholder value.
Please vote FOR our proposal and tell DUCs Board that you want it to take more effective action to narrow the Fund s discount.
BOARD RECOMMENDATION: AS DETAILED IN THE FOLLOWING OPPOSING STATEMENT, THE BOARD OF THE FUND, INCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, HAS CONCLUDED THAT THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL IS NOT
IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE FUND AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL (PROPOSAL 2)
13
Opposing Statement of the Board of Directors
FOR THE REASONS DISCUSSED BELOW, THE FUNDS BOARD STRONGLY BELIEVES THAT PROPOSAL 2 IS AN OPPORTUNISTS PROPOSAL THAT IS NOT IN
THE BEST INTERESTS OF ALL SHAREHOLDERS AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST PROPOSAL 2.
Reasons for the Boards
Unanimous Recommendation
The Funds Board has carefully and thoughtfully reviewed and considered the Opportunists Proposal
and for the following reasons believes that it is not in the best interest of the Fund and its shareholders:
|
1.
|
This proposal is primarily intended to create short-term gains to benefit opportunistic shareholdersnot shareholders who plan to
hold Fund shares for the long-term;
|
|
2.
|
The proposal likely would significantly reduce Fund assets, which would reduce the potential for economies of scale and cause the Fund
to bear certain fixed costs with a smaller asset base, likely increasing the overall expense ratio of the Fund;
|
|
3.
|
The proposal would potentially force the Fund to sell securities at an inopportune time, cause the Fund to bear additional transaction
expenses to rebalance its portfolio and significantly diminish the Funds ability to operate efficiently, all without providing any meaningful benefits to the Funds long-term shareholders;
|
|
4.
|
The Fund remains committed to taking a long term view and focusing only on higher quality investments consistent with its investment
restrictions that require it to invest in investment grade securities;
|
|
5.
|
The Fund has performed in a manner consistent with its investment mandate, notwithstanding the flawed performance comparisons suggested
by Karpus;
|
|
6.
|
The Funds discount is far less significant than suggested by Karpus;
|
|
7.
|
The Board periodically considers and takes actions to reduce the Funds discount relative to its peer fundsactions that are
more protective of shareholders than the drastic actions contemplated by the Opportunists Proposal; and
|
|
8.
|
Approval of the proposal would increase uncertainty and require subsequent costly actions, and potentially eliminate the Fund as an
investment option for shareholders.
|
For these reasons, as described in more detail below, the Board strongly
believes that shareholders are best served by voting AGAINST the Opportunists Proposal.
1.
|
Karpus, as an Opportunist, has offered a proposal that could provide itself with short-term gains at the expense of long-term
shareholders
|
In our view, the Opportunist, like many activists, primarily cares about its short-term gains and does not
care about the long-term impact on your investment. The Opportunist has a history of targeting closed-end funds and starting proxy fights, presumably in the hope of making a short-term profit through a tender
offer that would line its own pockets at the expense of other shareholders with longer investing horizons, who often plan to hold their shares into their retirement years. The Fund, if forced to initiate a self-tender or liquidate, runs the risk of
selling
14
its investments at a disadvantageous time and curtailing its investment flexibility as it manages a smaller pool of assets. These and other consequences, discussed further below, could impair the
value of your investment, reduce future earnings available for distributions and increase the Funds expense ratio. Likewise, if the Fund is forced to convert to an open-end fund or exchange-traded
fund (ETF), the Fund would likely have to operate in a materially different manner, effectively eliminating the Fund, as it exists today, as an investment option for you and other long-term shareholders.
Does the Opportunist care about this impact on your long-term investment? We do not believe so, because we expect that, once the Opportunist initiates
these actions and pockets its short-term gains, it will move on to its next target.
Although the Opportunist has been a shareholder of the
Fund since 2014 and has built up its position over time, the Opportunist substantially increased its position much more recently. Shareholders need to know that, during a period of approximately one month prior to submitting its proposal, the
Opportunist bought approximately one third of the shares it currently owns. If the Fund is an underperforming investmentas the Opportunist now claimsthen why did the Opportunist greatly increase its Fund holdings during that period, if
not to profit from the expected short-term gains that might result from its actions? We believe the Opportunist is not being forthright with other shareholders in describing the motivations for its proposal.
2.
|
The Opportunists Proposal is NOT in the best interests of the Fund and long-term shareholders
|
None of the actions included in the Opportunists Proposal are likely to benefit the Fund and long-term shareholders.
The Opportunist has neither provided any data or rationale demonstrating how a tender offer, liquidation, or conversion to an open-end fund or ETF would improve the Funds long-term performance nor shown why such actions might be considered preferable to other features of the Fund that are valuable to shareholders, such as its regular
monthly distributions. Both the Adviser and the Board believe that the long-term prospects for the Funds investments are strong, that a large tender offer or changing the Fund to an open-end fund or ETF
could negatively impact the Funds long-term operations, and that a liquidation would not be in the shareholders best interests.
Tender offer
The Opportunist implies
that the proposed tender offer would benefit all shareholders of the Fund, but the Board believes the tender offer would benefit only short term investors seeking to exploit the Funds current modest discount. In fact, a large tender
offer could have an adverse impact on the Fund and its long term shareholders. Notably, the Opportunist does not mention that, in order to satisfy a tender offer, the Fund would have to liquidate portfolio holdings in order to have cash on
hand to pay for the tendered shares. This could result in a number of negative consequences to the Fund and its long-term shareholders, including:
|
|
|
Asset liquidations could negatively impact long-term performance, which we believe the Opportunist has either failed to consider or, as an
opportunistic, presumably short-term profit-seeker, has simply chosen to ignore. A tender offer would pressure the Fund to sell portfolio holdings relatively quickly and may require the portfolio managers to sell holdings at a time when it is
inadvisable to do so, either because the securitys market price is below its perceived value or because the investment might not yet have achieved its expected potential.
|
15
|
|
|
Transaction costs related to liquidation trades may be substantial and would not be borne solely by those shareholders participating in the tender
offer. The Fund would also likely incur further expenses in rebalancing its portfolio following the liquidation of assets. To the extent that costs and expenses are not incurred prior to the expiration of the tender offer, only long term
shareholders would bear such costs and expenses, while short-term holders would profit at the expense of the Fund and its continuing shareholders.
|
|
|
|
Ultimately, the tender offer could lead to a significant decrease in assets-spreading fixed costs over a smaller asset base-causing the Funds
expense ratio to increase. Moreover, increased expenses could reduce returns, put the Fund at a disadvantage relative to its larger peers and potentially cause the Fund to trade at substantial discounts in the future. The Board and Fund management
believe that it would be much more difficult for the Fund to meet its investment objectives and maintain its current distribution rate after being so severely diminished in size as a result of a large tender offer.
|
|
|
|
A tender offer would have to comply with federal securities laws and would require the Fund to prepare and file a tender offer statement with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The costs associated with this process could be significant and would be borne by all Fund shareholders.
|
A review of previous tender offers by other closed-end funds reveals that, even if there is a resulting narrowing of a funds discount, the effect is
short-lived at best. The beneficiaries of such a temporary narrowing generally are opportunistic investors, who would likely seek to dispose of as much of their holdings as possible in order to line their pockets with short-term profits. In
our view, long-term shareholders would ultimately suffer, for the reasons discussed above.
Liquidation
In our view, the Opportunist utterly disregards the finality of liquidation and its consequences for long-term investors. Shareholders of the Fund
chose to invest in the Fund, in its current structure and format. A liquidation would thwart that choice and simply eliminate this product as a component of shareholders broader investment portfolios, without providing them with an
alternative option for investment. Liquidation is also a lengthy process with many of the same logistical problems and costs described above relating to a tender offer.
Converting to an Open-End Fund or ETF
A conversion
from a closed-end fund to an open-end fund or ETF would be expected to result in, among other things: (i) reduced asset levels, including through the required de-levering of the Fund in order to comply with regulatory requirements imposed on open-end funds and ETFs; (ii) higher operating costs; and (iii) a modified
investment strategy to provide sufficient liquidity to accommodate daily redemptions. Unlike a closed-end fund, open-end funds and ETFs must accommodate cash inflows and
outflows, which means that the amount of investable assets changes continually and unpredictably. This can sometimes act as a constraint on certain longer-term investment strategies. Quite simply, after the conversion, the resulting open-end fund or ETF would likely not resemble the original closed-end fund.
The Funds long-term shareholders have chosen to invest in the Fund because of the particular advantages of the closed-end fund structure. Unique
features of closed-end funds, such as dividend reinvestment programs that allow shareholders to use dividends to purchase additional shares at the discounted open market price, and the current ability to
utilize leverage to help increase the Funds returns, would be lost in a conversion to an open-end fund or ETF.
16
Conversion to an open-end fund or ETF would impair the Funds
ability to use leverage, both because of the structural issues that arise with a fund that must confront possible redemptions and because of the regulatory limitations on permissible types of leverage that are imposed on open-end funds and ETFs, but not closed-end funds. The Funds use of leverage is currently accretive to the Funds earnings and supportive of the Funds
distributions to shareholders. The Funds management, under the Boards oversight, currently has the flexibility under the terms of the Funds credit facility to increase and decrease the Funds leverage based on its assessment
of the market. However, following a conversion to an open-end fund or an ETF, the Fund would effectively lose this ability to nimbly adjust its leverage to meet the Funds needs or changing market
conditions.
A closed-end fund also can maintain a cash level that is appropriate for its investment
strategy. By comparison, an open-end fund must reserve cash and highly liquid assets to meet daily redemption requests, an obligation that may constrain long-term strategies and cause portfolio managers to
make investment decisions they might otherwise not make. This difference is particularly significant in times of market stress, as a closed-end fund, unconstrained by temporary cash management concerns, is
able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities, whereas an open-end fund must often forgo such opportunities in order to meet the anticipated flood of redemption requests that often occur at
such times.
Converting to an open-end fund would invariably lead to a decrease in the size of the
Fund. Short-term profit-seekers, which in our view includes the Opportunist, typically purchase shares of a closed-end fund in advance of a forced conversion, only to then redeem all or most of those shares
after the conversion to the open-end fund structure. This would very likely lead to a sudden and significant reduction of assets, compounded by the de-levering of the
Fund, resulting in significant divestitures of the Funds assets under fire sale conditions, and leaving the Fund with fixed costs being spread over a much smaller asset base and the potential for increased expenses.
There are other ongoing expenses in the open-end fund structure that cannot be ignored, resulting from the need
for continuous registration of shares with the SEC and certain states; registration statement updates, which would also entail additional legal and compliance expenses; and the active servicing of shareholders through a transfer agent. Transfer
agent expenses are often significantly higher in the case of open-end funds.
In the event of a
conversion to an unlisted open-end mutual fund, shareholders would lose the benefits of owning an exchange-listed fund, including the ability to purchase and sell Fund shares
intra-day. Any proposed conversion to an ETF would require the Fund to satisfy the conditions of the SECs new rule governing the operation of ETFs, which may result in substantive changes to the manner
in which the Fund has conducted its business to date, as well as potential increased costs to the Fund and shareholders.
These are all
potential significant consequences of the Opportunists Proposal that would either (i) eliminate the Fund as a component in the broader investment portfolios of long-term investors or (ii) fundamentally change the Fund.
3.
|
The Boards and the Advisers long-term focus has been on providing a high level of current income consistent with investing in
securities of investment grade quality
|
Unlike the Opportunist, whose focus is, in our view, on its own short-term gains,
your Board and the Adviser have historically taken a long-term perspective when determining how best to serve all shareholders and meet the objectives of the Fund. As you are aware, the Fund has achieved a solid long-term record for its
shareholders, providing shareholders with significant current income in the form of the monthly dividend. By steadfastly
17
adhering to its stated investment mandate, the Board and the Adviser believe that the Fund has been able to avoid much of the increased volatility that often accompanies higher risk strategies
and the variability in dividend payments that may result. Adhering to this strategy, the Fund has demonstrated the ability to offer current income over a variety of market cycles, providing a more consistent income stream than many other closed-end funds. As a result, the Funds shareholders have enjoyed a higher level of income predictability.
4.
|
The Fund has performed in a manner consistent with its investment mandate, notwithstanding the flawed performance comparisons suggested by
the Opportunist
|
The Opportunists focus on the Funds annualized performance relative to a peer group composed
of funds that may have significantly higher risk profiles is flawed, self-serving and likely to be misleading. Unlike the mandate of the Fund, which is to invest only in investment grade securities at time of purchase, many funds in the
Lipper General Bond Funds category (the Funds Lipper category referenced by the Opportunist) appear to have no such restriction and traditionally have had significant exposure to non-investment grade
securities (also known as junk bonds). For example, a recent sampling of funds in the General Bond Funds category for which information is readily available reveals that non-investment grade
exposure ranges from 2% to in excess of 90% of the total assets of those so-called peer funds. Comparing your Fund to funds with significantly different risk profiles is, in our view, misguided and illustrates
the Opportunists lack of understanding of the Fund and its stated investment objective.
The Board believes, as is consistently shown in
the Funds shareholder reports, that the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Indexwhich includes only investment grade bonds as index componentsis the most appropriate index to which the Funds performance should be
compared.
A comparison of the Funds performance and the index returns of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is shown
below. It is important to note that the index returns stated below include no fees or expenses, whereas the Funds net asset value (NAV) returns are net of fees and expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return
For the periods indicated
through December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Three Years
(annualized)
|
|
|
Five Years
(annualized)
|
|
|
Ten Years
(annualized)
|
|
Duff & Phelps Utility and Corporate Bond Trust Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
Net Asset Value
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
1
|
The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (formerly known as the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index) is a broad-based benchmark that
measures the investment grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including Treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, residential mortgage-backed securities (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage
passthroughs), asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. The index is calculated on a total return basis and rebalanced monthly. Income generated during the month is held in the index without a reinvestment return until month-end when it is removed from the index. The index is unmanaged; its returns do not reflect any fees, expenses, or sales charges and it is not available for direct investment. Source: Bloomberg L.P.
|
18
Consistent with the Boards and the Advisers long-term focus, as of December 31, 2019,
the Funds ten year annualized total return at net asset value was 4.3%, which was 0.5% above the 3.8% return on the Bloomberg Barclays Aggregate Bond index for the same time period.
5.
|
The Funds discount is far less significant than suggested by the Opportunist
|
The Opportunist asserts that the Fund has experienced a persistently wide discount related to its performance, but a fairer and more accurate
assessment indicates otherwise. As of December 31, 2019, the Funds discount was a modest 4.0%. Closed-end funds traditionally trade at a discount or premium to net asset value due to a variety of
factors. Over the past few years, closed-end funds as a group have mostly continued to exhibit discounts and, during this period, the Funds discount has been only modestly larger than the median discount
of the Funds Lipper category. As of December 31, 2019, the median discount of the Funds Lipper category was 1.9%.
6.
|
The Board periodically considers and takes actions to reduce the Funds discountactions that are more protective of shareholders
than the drastic actions contemplated by the Opportunists Proposal
|
The Board regularly reviews the Funds
discount and ways to enhance shareholder value. As part of its evaluation of options to reduce the Funds discount and potentially enhance shareholder value, the Board seeks to proactively take action and will do so when deemed to be in the
best interest of long-term shareholders.
7.
|
The Opportunists Proposal is not binding and would require subsequent action
|
The Opportunists Proposal is not binding as to the actions that the Board or the Fund ultimately must take; if it were to be approved, it would only
require the Board to consider certain actions. Moreover, under Maryland law and the 1940 Act, a separate shareholder vote, in addition to Board approval, would be required to dissolve the Fund in a complete liquidation or convert the Fund to an open-end fund or ETF. The Fund, and, ultimately, its shareholders, would bear the substantial and duplicative costs of holding such a shareholder vote, including, but not limited to, the costs and expenses incurred
in connection with the preparation, printing and mailing of proxy materials, and the fees and expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation of proxies from the Funds shareholders, which in the aggregate are expected to be substantial.
Moreover, an affirmative vote on the Opportunists Proposal does not allow shareholders to choose or indicate a preference between liquidating the Fund or converting it to an open-end fund or ETF. In
fact, in the exercise of prudence, prior to even commencing a tender offer, the Board would first have to consider each alternative and select one that would be offered to shareholders for an additional vote. This action would be costly, time
consuming and uncertain in its outcome. The Opportunist does not address these additional costs or approvals in its supporting statement and, in doing so, has not provided shareholders with a full and accurate picture of the additional and
potentially burdensome actions that would be required on the part of the Fund and the shareholders in connection with a tender offer and a subsequent liquidation or conversion. The supporting statement of the Opportunist also does not address the
uncertainty that shareholders will face at the time of voting on the Opportunists Proposal as to the future state of the Fund and their investment therein. Consequently, the Opportunist has not presented a complete plan and, in our view, its
supporting statement does not reflect the true cost and impact of an affirmative vote on the Opportunists proposal.
THE BOARD, INCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS,
UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE
AGAINST THE
OPPORTUNISTS PROPOSAL.
19
OTHER BUSINESS
Management is not aware of any other matters that will come before the meeting. If any other business should come before the meeting,
however, your proxy, if signed and returned, will give discretionary authority to the persons designated in it to vote according to their best judgment.
OTHER INFORMATION
The Adviser. Duff & Phelps Investment
Management Co. acts as investment adviser for the Fund. The address of the Adviser is 200 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, Illinois 60606. The Adviser (together with its predecessor) has been in the investment management business for more than
75 years and, as of November 30, 2019, had approximately $11.0 billion in client accounts under discretionary management. The Adviser is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Virtus, a public company whose common stock is traded on the
NASDAQ Global Market under the trading symbol VRTS.
The Administrator. Robert W. Baird & Co.
Incorporated (Baird) serves as administrator of DUC. The address of Baird is 500 West Jefferson Street, Louisville, KY 40202. Founded in 1919, Baird is an employee-owned, international financial services firm with more than
$285 billion in client assets. Baird provides private wealth management, asset management, investment banking, capital markets and private equity services to clients through its offices in the United States, Europe and Asia. In October 2019,
Baird became the successor by merger to Hilliard Lyons, which it acquired in April 2019.
Shareholders. The following
table shows shares of common stock of the Fund as to which each director and director nominee, and all directors and executive officers of the Fund as a group, had or shared power over voting or disposition at October 31, 2019. Shares are held
with sole power over voting and disposition except as noted. The shares of common stock held by each of the persons listed below and by all directors and executive officers as a group represented less than 1% of the outstanding common stock of the
Fund.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
common stock
|
|
Donald C. Burke(1)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Robert J. Genetski
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Philip R. McLoughlin
|
|
|
483
|
|
Geraldine M. McNamara(1)
|
|
|
3,803
|
|
Eileen A. Moran
|
|
|
10,838
|
|
Nathan I. Partain(1)(2)
|
|
|
6,216
|
|
David J. Vitale(2)
|
|
|
None
|
|
Directors and executive officers as a group(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
25,240
|
|
(1)
|
Mr. Burke had shared power to vote and/or dispose of 1,500 of the shares listed as owned by him. Ms. McNamara had shared power to vote and/or
dispose of 3,803 of the shares listed as owned by her. Mr. Partain had shared power to vote and/or dispose of 6,216 of the shares listed as owned by him. The directors and executive officers, in the aggregate, had shared power to vote and/or
dispose of 12,919 of the shares listed as owned by the directors and executive officers as a group.
|
(2)
|
Mr. Partain disclaims beneficial ownership of 6,216 of the shares listed as owned by him. The directors and executive officers, in the aggregate,
disclaim beneficial ownership of 6,216 of the shares listed as owned by the directors and executive officers as a group.
|
(3)
|
The group of directors and executive officers consists of 12 individuals.
|
20
To the Funds knowledge, the only persons (including any group as that term
is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 1934 Act)) who beneficially own more than 5% of any class of the Funds voting securities (as determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the 1934 Act) are the persons identified in the following table. Except as otherwise indicated, the information in this table is based on information provided in Schedule 13D and 13G filings made with
the Securities and Exchange Commission by each of the persons listed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Class of Shares
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
Percentage
of Class
|
|
1607 Capital Partners, LLC (1607 Capital)(1)
13 S. 13th Street, Suite 400, Richmond, Virginia 23219
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
1,394,329
|
|
|
|
5.07
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Sit Investment Associates, Inc. (SIA)(2)
3300 IDS Center, 80
South Eighth Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
3,821,246
|
|
|
|
13.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Karpus Management, Inc. (Karpus Investment Management)(3)
183 Sullys Trail, Pittsford, New York 14534
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
7,306,730
|
|
|
|
26.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)(4)
420 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California 94163
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
1,530,769
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Wells Capital Management Incorporated (Wells Capital)
525 Market St, 10th Floor, San Francisco, California 94105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed by 1607 Capital on February 14, 2019. In that filing, 1607 Capital stated that it has sole voting and dispositive
power over all securities owned by it.
|
(2)
|
Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by SIA on February 5, 2019. In that filing, SIA stated that it is the investment adviser for fourteen mutual funds
and that it has sole voting and dispositive power over all securities owned by it and the mutual funds it advises.
|
(3)
|
Based on a Schedule 13D/A filed by Karpus Investment Management and George W. Karpus, the President and CEO of Karpus Investment Management, on
September 16, 2019, (i) Karpus Investment Management has sole voting and dispositive power over 7,287,855 of the shares listed, and (ii) Mr. Karpus may be deemed the beneficial owner of 18,875 shares held by the Karpus Investment
Management Profit Sharing Plan Fund BConservative Bond Fund and the Karpus Investment Management Defined Benefit Plan and has shared voting and dispositive power over such shares. Each of Karpus Investment Management and Mr. Karpus
disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of its or his pecuniary interest therein.
|
(4)
|
Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by or on behalf of WFC and Wells Capital on September 10, 2019, (i) WFC has sole voting and dispositive power
over 1 of the shares listed and shared voting and dispositive power over 1,530,768 of the shares listed, (ii) Wells Capital has shared power to vote 684,289 of the shares listed and shared dispositive power over 1,525,933 of the shares listed,
and (iii) Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC has voting and dispositive power over an indeterminate number of shares.
|
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance. Section 30(h) of the 1940 Act imposes the filing requirements of Section 16 of the 1934 Act upon (i) the
Funds directors and officers, (ii) the Funds investment adviser and certain of their affiliated persons and (iii) every person who is directly or indirectly the beneficial owner of more than 10% of any class of the Funds
outstanding securities (other than short-term paper). Based solely on a review of the copies of Section 16(a) forms furnished to the Fund, or written representations that no Forms 5 were required, the Fund believes that during the Funds
most recently completed fiscal year all such filing requirements were complied with.
21
Report of the Audit Committee. The Funds independent directors comprise the
audit committee of the Fund and act under a written charter which sets forth the audit committees responsibilities. A copy of the audit committee charter is available on the Funds website at www.dpimc.com/duc and in print to any
shareholder who requests it. Each of the members of the audit committee is independent as defined in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. In connection with the audit of the Funds 2019 audited financial statements, the audit
committee: (1) reviewed and discussed the Funds 2019 audited financial statements with management, (2) discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as
amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T, (3) received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountant
required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountants communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and (4) discussed with the independent accountant
its independence from the Fund and its management. Based on the foregoing reviews and discussions, the audit committee recommended to the board of directors that the Funds audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report to
Shareholders for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Audit Committee
Donald C. Burke (Chairman)
Robert J. Genetski
Philip R. McLoughlin
Geraldine M. McNamara
Eileen A. Moran
David J. Vitale
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The 1940 Act requires that the Funds independent registered public accounting
firm be selected by the vote, cast in person, of a majority of the members of the Board who are not interested persons of the Fund. In addition, the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange vest the audit committee, in its capacity as a
committee of the Board, with responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the Funds independent registered public accounting firm. In accordance with the foregoing provisions, the firm of
Ernst & Young LLP (Ernst & Young) has been selected as independent registered public accounting firm of the Fund to perform the audit of the financial books and records of the Fund for the fiscal year ending
October 31, 2020. A representative of Ernst & Young is expected to be present at the annual meeting of shareholders and will be available to respond to appropriate questions and will have an opportunity to make a statement if the
representative so desires.
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services. The Fund is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the independent registered public accounting firm. As part of this responsibility, the Funds audit
committee is required to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by the independent accountant in order to assure that they do not impair the independent
accountants independence from the Fund. Accordingly, the Funds audit committee has adopted a joint audit and non-audit services pre-approval policy (the
Joint Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy), which sets forth the procedures and the conditions pursuant to which services proposed to be performed by the independent accountant may be pre-approved. Each engagement of an independent accountant to render audit or non-audit services to the Fund must be either (i) a specific service pre-approved by the Funds audit committee or the chairman of the audit committee, to whom the committee has delegated the authority to grant such pre-approvals between
scheduled meetings of the committee, or (ii) come within the scope of a general pre-approval granted under the Joint Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy. As
provided in the Joint Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy, unless a type of service has received general
22
pre-approval (i.e., the proposed services are pre-approved without consideration of specific case-by-case services by the audit committee), then the service will require specific pre-approval by the audit committee if the
proposed service is to be provided by the independent accountant. As provided in the Joint Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy, any proposed services exceeding
pre-approved cost levels or budgeted amounts require specific pre-approval by the audit committee. In deciding whether to grant
pre-approval for such services, the audit committee, or the chairman of the audit committee acting under delegated authority, as the case may be, will consider whether such services are consistent with the
SECs rules on auditor independence. Additionally, the audit committee, or the chairman of the audit committee acting under delegated authority, as the case may be, will also consider whether the independent accountant is best positioned to
provide the most effective and efficient service, after considering a number of factors as a whole, with no one factor being necessarily determinative.
The Funds audit committee is also required to pre-approve its accountants engagements for non-audit services
rendered to the Adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund, if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund. In
deciding whether to grant pre-approval for such non-audit services, the audit committee or the chairman of the audit committee, as the case may be, considers whether the
provision of such non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the independence of the Funds accountants.
Audit and Non-Audit Fees. The following table sets forth the aggregate audit and non-audit fees billed to the Fund
for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young. For purposes of this table, to the extent the amount of a fee for a pre-approved service is known as of the
date of this report, such fee amount has been allocated to the fiscal year to which the applicable service relates, even in cases where the Fund has not yet been billed for such service.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year
ended
October 31,
2019
|
|
|
Fiscal year
ended
October 31,
2018
|
|
Audit Fees(1)
|
|
$
|
56,000
|
|
|
$
|
56,000
|
|
Audit-Related Fees(2)(6)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Tax Fees(3)(6)
|
|
|
8,350
|
|
|
|
8,350
|
|
All Other Fees(4)(6)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Aggregate Non-Audit Fees(5)(6)
|
|
|
8,350
|
|
|
|
8,350
|
|
(1)
|
Audit Fees are fees billed for professional services rendered by the Funds principal accountant for the audit of the Funds annual financial
statements and for services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
|
(2)
|
Audit-Related Fees are fees billed for assurance and related services by the Funds principal accountant that are reasonably related to the
performance of the audit of the Funds financial statements and are not reported under the caption Audit Fees.
|
(3)
|
Tax Fees are fees billed for professional services rendered by the Funds principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. In
both years shown in the table, such services consisted of preparation of the annual federal and state income tax returns and excise tax returns for the Fund.
|
(4)
|
All Other Fees are fees billed for products and services provided by the Funds principal accountant, other than the services reported under the
captions Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees and Tax Fees.
|
(5)
|
Aggregate Non-Audit Fees are non-audit fees billed by the Funds
accountant for services rendered to the Fund, the Adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund. During both years shown in the table, no portion of such fees
related
|
23
|
to services rendered by the Funds accountant to the Adviser or to any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund.
|
(6)
|
No portion of these fees was approved by the audit committee after the beginning of the engagement pursuant to the waiver of the pre-approval requirement for certain de minimis non-audit services described in Section 10A of the 1934 Act and applicable regulations.
|
Communications with the Board by Shareholders and Other Interested Persons. The Board has adopted
the following procedures for shareholders and other interested persons to send communications to the Board. Shareholders and other interested persons may mail written communications to the full Board, to committees of the Board or to specified
individual directors in care of the Secretary of the Fund, 200 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, Illinois 60606. All such communications received by the Secretary will be forwarded promptly to the full Board, the relevant Board committee or the
specified individual directors, as applicable, except that the Secretary may, in good faith, determine that a communication should not be so forwarded if it does not reasonably relate to the Fund or its operations, management, activities, policies,
service providers, Board, officers, shareholders, or other matters relating to an investment in the Fund or is purely ministerial in nature. The Funds directors are encouraged to attend the annual meeting of shareholders. All of the
individuals who were directors of the Fund at the time of the March 11, 2019 annual meeting of the Funds shareholders were in attendance at that meeting.
Shareholder Proposals and Nominations. In order for any shareholder proposal or director nomination to be considered for inclusion in the Funds proxy statement and form of proxy for the 2021
annual meeting of shareholders, such proposal or nomination must be received by the Secretary of the Fund no later than September 18, 2020. Under the circumstances described in, and upon compliance with,
Rule 14a-4(c) under the 1934 Act, the Fund may solicit proxies in connection with the 2021 annual meeting which confer discretionary authority to vote on any shareholder proposals of which the Secretary
of the Fund does not receive notice by December 2, 2020. Any notice of a shareholder proposal or director nomination must conform to the requirements in the Funds bylaws. Copies of the bylaws of the Fund may be requested from the
Secretary of the Fund, 200 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, Illinois 60606.
Solicitation of Proxies. Proxies will
be solicited by mail. Proxies may be solicited by Fund personnel personally or by telephone, postal mail or electronic mail, but such persons will not be specially compensated for such services. The Fund will inquire of any record holder known to be
a broker, dealer, bank or other nominee as to whether other persons are the beneficial owners of shares held of record by such persons. If so, the Fund will supply additional copies of solicitation materials for forwarding to beneficial owners, and
will make reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket costs. In addition, the Fund has retained Di Costa Partners LLC (DCP) to assist with solicitation of
proxies. The Fund anticipates that the cost of retaining DCP will be up to approximately $117,500, including reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. DCP
anticipates that approximately 15 of its employees or other persons will be involved in soliciting shareholders of the Fund. In addition to solicitation services to be provided by DCP, the Funds officers and employees of the Adviser (none of
whom will receive additional compensation therefor) may solicit proxies by telephone, mail, e-mail and personal interviews. Brokerage houses, banks and other fiduciaries may be requested to forward proxy
solicitation material to their principals to obtain authorization for the execution of proxies, and will be reimbursed by the Fund for such out-of-pocket expenses. If
you have questions about the proposals described in the proxy statement or about voting procedures, please call the Funds proxy solicitor, Di Costa Partners LLC, toll free at (833)892-6624.
Further Information About Voting and the Annual Meeting. A majority of the outstanding shares of the Fund entitled to vote at the
annual shareholder meeting shall constitute a quorum for purposes of conducting business.
24
The Board has fixed the close of business on December 27, 2019 as the record date for
the determination of shareholders of the Fund entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting. Shareholders of the Fund on that date will be entitled to one vote on each matter to be voted on for each share held.
Instructions regarding how to vote via telephone or the Internet are included on the enclosed proxy card. The required control number for
Internet and telephone voting is printed on the enclosed proxy card. The control number is used to match proxy cards with shareholders respective accounts and to ensure that, if multiple proxy cards are executed, shares are voted in accordance
with the proxy card bearing the latest date.
If you wish to attend the annual meeting and vote in person, you will be able to
do so. If you intend to attend the annual meeting in person and you are a record holder of the Funds shares, in order to gain admission you will be required to show photographic identification, such as your drivers license. If you intend
to attend the annual meeting in person and you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other custodian, in order to gain admission you will be required to show photographic identification, such as your drivers license, and satisfactory
proof of ownership of shares of the Fund, such as your voting instruction form (or a copy thereof) or brokers statement indicating ownership as of a recent date. If you hold your shares in a brokerage account or through a bank or other
nominee, you will not be able to vote in person at the annual meeting unless you have previously requested and obtained a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee and present it at the annual meeting.
All shares represented by properly executed proxies received prior to the annual meeting will be voted at the annual meeting in
accordance with the instructions marked thereon or otherwise as provided therein. If any other business is brought before the annual meeting, your shares will be voted at the proxies discretion. If you sign the proxy card, but do not fill in a
vote, your shares will be voted FOR ALL of the nominees for director and AGAINST the shareholder proposal, in accordance with the recommendation of the Board.
Shareholders who execute proxy cards or record their voting instructions via telephone or the Internet may revoke their proxies at any
time prior to the time they are voted by giving written notice to the Secretary of the Fund, by delivering a subsequently dated proxy (including via telephone or the Internet) prior to the date of the annual meeting or by attending and voting at the
annual meeting. Merely attending the annual meeting, however, will not revoke a previously submitted proxy.
Annual
Report. The Fund will provide without charge to any shareholder who so requests, a copy of the Funds annual report for the Funds most recently completed fiscal year. The annual reports for the Fund are available by calling Baird
toll-free at (833) 604-3163 and are also available on the Funds web site at www.dpimc.com/duc.
General. A list of shareholders of the Fund entitled to be present and vote at the annual meeting will be available at the offices of the Fund, 200 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, Illinois
60606, for inspection by any shareholder during regular business hours for ten days prior to the date of the meeting.
Failure
of a quorum of shareholders of the Fund to be present at the annual meeting will necessitate adjournment of the meeting and will give rise to additional expense.
EVERY SHAREHOLDER VOTE IS IMPORTANT. WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERNET OR TELEPHONE VOTING. BOTH ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK.
January 16, 2020
25
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE(S) This section must be completed for
your vote to be counted. Please complete, sign and return this card as soon as possible. Date Signature(s) and Title(s), if applicable (Sign in the box) Note: Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) on this proxy card, and date it. If shares
are held jointly, one or more owners should sign personally. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, officer of corporation or other entity or in another representative capacity, please give the full title under the signature.
DUC_100020_032420 1. Read the proxy statement and have the proxy card at hand. 2. Call toll-free 866-855-9702 3. Follow the simple instructions. 1. Read the proxy statement. 2. Check the appropriate box(es) on the reverse side. 3. Sign, date and
return the proxy card in the envelope provided. 1. Read the proxy statement and have the proxy card at hand. 2. Go to www.proxyvotenow.com/DUC 3. Follow the simple instructions. Vote by Telephone Vote Online CONTROL NUMBER DUFF & PHELPS UTILITY
AND CORPORATE BOND TRUST INC. PROXY IN CONNECTION WITH THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MARCH 24, 2020 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. The undersigned shareholder of Duff & Phelps Utility and
Corporate Bond Trust Inc. (the Fund) hereby appoints Daniel J. Petrisko, Alan M. Meder and William J. Renahan, and each of them, the attorneys and proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote, as indicated herein,
all shares of the Fund standing in the name of the undersigned at the close of business on December 27, 2019, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Fund to be held at the offices of Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co., 200 South
Wacker Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, Illinois 60606, on Tuesday, March 24, 2020 at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, and at any and all adjournments thereof (the Meeting), with all of the powers the undersigned would possess if then and there
personally present and especially (but without limiting the general authorization and power hereby given) to vote as indicated on the proposals, as more fully described in the Proxy Statement for the Meeting. The undersigned hereby acknowledges
receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Fund and of the accompanying Proxy Statement, the terms of each of which are incorporated by reference, and revokes any proxy heretofore given with respect to such meeting. THIS PROXY,
WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IF THIS PROXY IS PROPERLY EXECUTED BUT NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH NOMINEE PRINTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS CARD,
AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL (PROPOSAL 2) AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDERS ON ANY OTHER MATTER PROPERLY BROUGHT BEFORE THE MEETING. Vote by Mail
DUC_100020_032420 EVERY SHAREHOLDERS VOTE IS IMPORTANT
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH NOMINEE IN PROPOSAL 1. INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, mark the FOR ALL EXCEPT box and write the
name of the nominee for which you would like to withhold authority on the following line. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST PROPOSAL 2. PLEASE SIGN AND DATE ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND
RETURN THIS PROXY CARD USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote on any other business as may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof. TO VOTE Mark boxes below in blue or black
ink as shown in this example: 1. Election of Directors of the Fund (01) Geraldine M. McNamara (02) David J. Vitale 2. Shareholder Proposal: BE IT RESOLVED, the shareholders of the Duff & Phelps Utility and Corporate Bond Trust Inc.
(DUC or the Fund) request that the Board of Directors (the Board) promptly consider authorizing a self-tender offer for all outstanding common shares of the Fund at or close to net asset value (NAV).
If more than 50% of the Funds outstanding common shares are tendered, the tender offer should be cancelled and the Board should take the steps necessary to liquidate, merge, or convert the Fund to an open-end mutual fund or exchange traded
fund. 3. Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof. FOR ALL WITHHOLD ALL FOR ALL EXCEPT FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
Duff and Phelps Utilitie... (NYSE:DUC)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 6월(6) 2024 으로 7월(7) 2024
Duff and Phelps Utilitie... (NYSE:DUC)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 7월(7) 2023 으로 7월(7) 2024