2C. The proposal to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, provisions in the Proposed Certificate of Incorporation limiting personal liability of NewCo directors and officers for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or as an officer to the extent permissible under the Delaware General Corporate Law (“DGCL”) was adopted by the following vote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
344,906,727 |
|
279,601 |
|
55,356 |
|
— |
2D. The proposal to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, provisions in the Proposed Bylaws that provide, subject to certain exceptions, that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall be the sole and exclusive forum for any NewCo stockholder to bring (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of NewCo, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a duty (including any fiduciary duty) owed by any current or former director, officer, stockholder, employee or agent of NewCo to NewCo or NewCo stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against NewCo or any current or former director, officer, stockholder, employee or agent of NewCo arising out of or relating to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Proposed Certificate of Incorporation or the Proposed Bylaws (each, as in effect from time to time), or (iv) any action asserting a claim against NewCo or any current or former director, officer, stockholder, employee or agent of NewCo governed by the internal affairs doctrine of the State of Delaware. This exclusive forum provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability vested in the exclusive jurisdiction of a court or forum other than the Court of Chancery, such as those created by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. In addition, the Proposed Bylaws provide that the federal district courts of the U.S. will be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, was adopted by the following vote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
344,939,270 |
|
247,345 |
|
55,069 |
|
— |
2E. The proposal to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the adoption of a staggered term for the Board of Directors of NewCo (“NewCo Board”), which NewCo directors will initially be divided into three classes, each class to consist of, as equally as possible, one-third the total number of the directors constituting the entire NewCo Board, with the term of the initial Class I, II and III directors terminating on the date of the 2026, 2024 and 2025 Annual Meeting of NewCo stockholders, respectively, and at each succeeding annual meeting beginning in 2024, successors to the class of directors whose term expires at the annual meeting shall be elected for a three year term was adopted by the following vote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
273,907,995 |
|
71,278,431 |
|
55,258 |
|
— |
2F. The proposal to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the adoption of a threshold of holders of at least 80% of the shares of NewCo who are entitled to vote at an election of directors to amend, alter, change or repeal, or to adopt any provision inconsistent with the purpose and intent of (i) Paragraphs (c), (d), (e), or (f) of Article Fifth or any provision of Articles Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Eleventh and Twelfth of the Proposed Certificate of Incorporation and (ii) Sections 3, 4 or 5 of Article II or Sections 1, 2, 4, or 6 of Article III or any of the provisions of Article VIII, Article IX or Article X of the Proposed Bylaws was adopted by the following vote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
273,892,231 |
|
71,292,228 |
|
57,225 |
|
— |
Proposal 3: Adjournment Proposal
The proposal to approve the adjournment of the Special Meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, either (i) to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there are insufficient votes for, or otherwise in connection with, the approval of one or more proposals at the Special Meeting, to be effective as of the date of the Special Meeting, or (ii) if the Board determines before the Special Meeting that it is not necessary or no longer desirable to proceed with the other proposals was adopted by the following vote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
338,147,086 |
|
7,029,841 |
|
64,757 |
|
— |