- Quarterly Report (10-Q)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended SEPTEMBER 30, 2010


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 000-51104

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


Maryland		52-2180744

(State or Other Jurisdiction		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
of Incorporation or Organization)

1804 West Street, Suite 200, Annapolis, MD 21401
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

410-280-6695

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

N/A
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of November 5, 2010 the number of outstanding shares of registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share was: 1,820,548

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX


	Page(s)

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 — Financial Statements

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition — September 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009 (Audited)		3

FOR PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 and 2009:

Consolidated Statements of Operations — Nine and Three months (Unaudited)		4

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income — Nine and Three months (Unaudited)		5

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity — Nine months (Unaudited)		6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Nine months (Unaudited)		7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		8-11

Item 2 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis		12-29

Item 3 — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		29

Item4T — Controls and Procedures		29

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 — Legal Proceedings		30

Item 1A Risk Factors		30

Item 2 — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		30

Item 3 — Defaults Upon Senior Securities		30

Item 4 — [Removed and Reserved]		30

Item 5 — Other Information		30

Item 6 — Exhibits		30

SIGNATURES		31

Exhibit 31(a)
Exhibit 31(b)
Exhibit 32(a)
Exhibit 32(b)

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
(dollars in thousands except per share data)


	September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
ASSETS

Cash and due from banks	$	2,757		$	2,106
Interest bearing deposits		14,445			8,228
Federal funds sold		—			154

Cash and cash equivalents		17,202			10,488
Investments in restricted stocks, at cost		527			527

Loans receivable		184,631			185,482
Allowance for loan losses		(2,533	)		(2,380	)

Net loans receivable		182,098			183,102

Premises and equipment, net		596			739
Accrued interest receivable		770			681
Deferred income taxes		890			919
Other real estate owned		2,387			2,462
Other assets		1,517			1,453

Total Assets	$	205,987		$	200,371


LIABILITIES

Non-interest bearing deposits	$	25,332		$	21,024
Interest bearing deposits		157,634			157,621

Total deposits		182,966			178,645

Accrued interest payable		159			184
Other liabilities		648			600

Total Liabilities		183,773			179,429


STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock — $.01 par value; authorized 4,000,000 shares. Issued and outstanding: 1,820,548 shares at September 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009		18			18
Additional paid-in capital		17,853			17,853
Retained earnings		4,343			3,071

Total Stockholders’ Equity		22,214			20,942

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	205,987		$	200,371

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Nine and Three Months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands except per share data)


	Nine Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	9,471	$	8,606	$	3,179	$	3,019
U.S. Treasury securities		—		82		—		17
Investment in stocks		21		19		7		6
Interest bearing deposits		41		17		17		9
Federal funds sold		—		2		—		—

Total interest income		9,533		8,726		3,203		3,051

Interest expense:
Deposits		2,500		3,547		753		1,204

Total interest expense		2,500		3,547		753		1,204


Net interest income		7,033		5,179		2,450		1,847

Less provision for loan losses		1,646		1,149		612		350

		5,387		4,030		1,838		1,497


Non-interest income:
Gain on sale of SBA loans		419		164		49		47
Service charges and other income		361		339		115		130

Total non-interest income		780		503		164		177


Non-interest expenses:
Compensation and benefits		2,220		2,185		756		722
Legal and professional		188		196		56		68
Rent and occupancy		424		420		145		139
Marketing and business development		64		46		16		22
FDIC insurance		239		332		83		120
Data processing		109		104		37		37
Support services		149		142		47		48
Communications		95		89		32		33
Depreciation and amortization		175		219		57		71
Other		385		311		179		94

Total non-interest expenses		4,048		4,044		1,408		1,354

Income before income taxes		2,119		489		594		320
Income tax expense		847		197		238		128

Net income	$	1,272	$	292	$	356	$	192

Basic earnings per share	$	0.70	$	0.16	$	0.20	$	0.11

Diluted earnings per share	$	0.70	$	0.16	$	0.20	$	0.11

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the Nine and Three Months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)


	Nine Months Ended					Three Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2010		2009			2010		2009
Net income	$	1,272	$	292		$	356	$	192

Change in unrealized gains on securities available for sale, net of taxes		—		(47	)		—		(11	)

Total comprehensive income	$	1,272	$	245		$	356	$	181

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)


							Accumulated
			Additional				Other
	Common		Paid-in		Retained		Comprehensive
	Stock		Capital		Earnings		Income			Total

Balance December 31, 2008	$	18	$	17,853	$	2,393	$	47		$	20,311

Net income- September 30, 2009						292					292

Net change in unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale								(47	)		(47	)


Balance September 30, 2009	$	18	$	17,853	$	2,685	$	—		$	20,556


Balance December 31, 2009	$	18	$	17,853	$	3,071	$	—		$	20,942

Net income- September 30, 2010						1,272					1,272


Balance September 30, 2010	$	18	$	17,853		4,343	$	—		$	22,214

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)


	September 30,			September 30,
	2010			2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	1,272		$	292
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation and amortization		175			219
Gain on sales of SBA loans		(419	)		(164	)
Provision for loan losses		1,646			1,149
Provision for losses on unfunded commitments		6			5
Valuation allowance on other real estate owned		75			—
Deferred income taxes		29			(219	)
Change in assets and liabilities:
Increase in accrued interest receivable		(89	)		(21	)
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(64	)		253
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable		(25	)		4
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		42			(21	)
Other amortization and accretion, net		—			9

Net cash provided by operating activities		2,648			1,506


CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of restricted stock		—			(60	)
Proceeds from redemption of investment securities		—			3,000
Proceeds from sale of SBA loans		6,635			2,608
Increase in loans, net		(6,858	)		(30,096	)
Increase in other real estate owned		—			(653	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(32	)		(15	)

Net cash used by investing activities		(255	)		(25,216	)


CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Increase (decrease) in non-interest bearing deposits, net		4,308			(1,972	)
Net increase in other deposits		13			30,437

Net cash provided by financing activities		4,321			28,465


Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		6,714			4,755
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		10,488			8,964

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	17,202		$	13,719


SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest paid	$	2,525		$	3,543

Income taxes paid	$	1,140		$	415

Transfer of loans to real estate owned	$	—		$	653

Total decrease in unrealized gains on available for sale securities	$	—		$	(47	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. The Company and its Significant Accounting Policies

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not contain all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

The financial data at December 31, 2009 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements that are included in the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2009. The financial data at September 30, 2010 and 2009 are derived from unaudited consolidated financial statements. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiary, CommerceFirst Bank (the “Bank”). Inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows include cash on hand, non-interest bearing amounts due from correspondent banks, interest and non-interest bearing deposits due from the Federal Reserve, certificate of deposits with maturities of less than one year and Federal funds sold.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s method of presentation.

Note 2. Fair value

ASC Section 820 — Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. The hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels as follows:

	*Level 1:*		Quoted prices in active exchange markets for identical assets or liabilities; also includes certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government and agency securities actively traded in over-the-counter markets.

	*Level 2:*		Observable inputs other than Level 1 including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in less active markets, or other observable inputs that can be corroborated by observable market data; also includes derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with observable market inputs or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain U.S. government and agency securities, corporate debt securities, derivative instruments, and residential mortgage loans held for sale.

	*Level 3:*		Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity for financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation; also includes observable inputs for single dealer nonbinding quotes not corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain private equity investments, retained interests from securitizations, and certain collateralized debt obligations.

The Company’s bond holdings in the investment securities portfolio, if any, are the only asset or liability subject to fair value measurement on a recurring basis. No assets are valued under Level 1 inputs at September 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009. The Company has assets measured by fair value measurements on a non-recurring basis during 2010. At September 30, 2010, these assets include $1.0 million of non-accrual loans and other real estate owned of $2.4 million which are valued under Level 2 inputs. The remaining $2.0 million ($1.5 million after specific reserves) of non-accrual loans are valued under Level 3 inputs.

The changes in the assets subject to fair value measurements are summarized below by Level:


In thousands	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3
December 31, 2009:
Loans	$	—	$	1,458		$	1,276
Other real estate owned		—		2,462			—

Total December 31, 2009		—		3,920			1,276


Activity:
Loans:
New loans measured at fair value		—		—		$	2,109
Payments and other loan reductions		—		—			(312	)
Loans charged-off		—		(438	)		(1,097	)

Net change in loans		—		(438	)	$	700


Other real estate owned:
Provision for valuation reduction		—		(75	)		—

		—		(75	)		—


September 30, 2010:
Loans		—		1,020			1,976
Other real estate owned		—		2,387			—

Total September 30, 2010	$	—	$	3,407		$	1,976

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are summarized below. The fair values of a significant portion of these financial instruments are estimates derived using present value techniques and may not be indicative of the net realizable or liquidation values. Also, the calculation of estimated fair values is based on market conditions at a specific point in time and may not reflect current or future fair values.


	September 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
In thousands	Amount		Value		Amount		Value
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	2,757	$	2,757	$	2,106	$	2,106
Interest bearing deposits		14,445		14,445		8,228		8,228
Federal funds sold		—		—		154		154
Investments in restricted stock		527		527		527		527
Loans, net		182,098		193,078		183,102		192,687
Accrued interest receivable		770		770		681		681

Financial liabilities:
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	25,332	$	25,332	$	21,024	$	21,024
Interest bearing deposits		157,634		159,918		157,621		160,450
Accrued interest payable		159		159		184		184

Off-balance sheet commitments		—		—		—		—

Fair values are based on quoted market prices for similar instruments or estimated using discounted cash flows. The discounts used are estimated using comparable market rates for similar types of instruments adjusted to be commensurate with the credit risk, overhead costs and optionality of such instruments.

The fair value of cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits, federal funds sold, investments in restricted stocks and accrued interest receivable are equal to the carrying amounts. The fair values of investment securities are determined using market quotations. The fair value of loans receivable is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis.

The fair value of non-interest bearing deposits, interest-bearing checking, savings, and money market deposit accounts, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and accrued interest payable are equal to the carrying amounts. The fair value of fixed maturity time deposits is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis.

Note 3. Net Income per Common Share

Basic earnings per share of common stock are computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are calculated by including the average dilutive common equivalents outstanding during the period. Dilutive common equivalent shares consist of stock options and warrants, calculated using the treasury stock method. All of the previously issued and outstanding warrants and options expired during August 2010.


	Nine Months				Three Months
	Ended September 30,				Ended September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Weighted average shares outstanding		1,820,548		1,820,548		1,820,548		1,820,548
Common stock equivalents		—		—		—		—

Average common shares and equivalents		1,820,548		1,820,548		1,820,548		1,820,548

Net income (in thousands)	$	1,272	$	292	$	356	$	192
Basic earnings per share	$	0.70	$	0.16	$	0.20	$	0.11
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.70	$	0.16	$	0.20	$	0.11

All of the 126,372 outstanding warrants and options were excluded from the calculation of diluted income per share in 2009 because they are anti-dilutive.

Note 4. Related Party Transactions

The Company paid $15 thousand during the first nine months of 2010 for legal services to a firm of which a Director of the Company is a principal. The Company also paid $41 thousand during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 for computer related services to firm of which a Director is a principal. The above transactions have been consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arms length transactions.

Executive officers, directors and their affiliated interests enter into loan transactions with the Company in the ordinary course of business. These loans are made on the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with unrelated borrowers. They do not involve more than normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable terms. At September 30, 2010 the amounts of such loans outstanding were $2.8 million.

Deposit balances of executive officers, directors and their affiliated interests totaled $13 million at September 30, 2010.

Note 5. Commitments and contingencies

The Company is a party to financial instruments in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments typically include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, which involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Outstanding commitments as of September 30, 2010 are as follows:


	Millions
Loan commitments	$	9.1
Unused lines of credit	$	36.5
Letters of Credit	$	1.3

Note 6. Recent Relevant Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 — Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures amending Topic 820. The ASU provides for additional disclosures of transfers between assets and liabilities valued under Level 1 and 2 inputs as well as additional disclosures regarding those assets and liabilities valued under Level 3 inputs. The new disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 except for those provisions addressing Level 3 fair value measurements which provisions are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 amending FASB ASC Topic 855 to exclude SEC reporting entities from the requirement to disclose the date on which subsequent events have been evaluated. It further modifies the requirement to disclose the date on which subsequent events have been evaluated in reissued financial statements to apply only to such statements that have been restated to correct an error or to apply U.S. GAAP retrospectively. The Company has complied with ASU No. 2010-09.

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310), Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The main objective of this ASU is to provide financial statement users with greater transparency about an entity’s allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. The ASU requires that entities provide additional information to assist financial statement users in assessing their credit risk exposures and evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses. For the Company, the disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are required for the annual reporting periods ending on December 31, 2010. Required disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning January 1, 2011. The adoption of this ASU will result in additional disclosures in the Company’s financial statements regarding its loan portfolio and related allowance for loan losses but does not change the accounting for loans or the allowance. The Company will comply with this ASU for the annual reporting period ending December 31, 2010 and the interim and annual reporting periods thereafter.

The FASB has issued several exposure drafts which, if adopted, would significantly alter the Company’s (and all other financial institutions’) method of accounting for, and reporting, its financial assets and some liabilities from a historical cost method to a fair value method of accounting as well as the reported amount of net interest income. Also, the FASB has issued an exposure draft regarding a change in the accounting for leases. Under this exposure draft, the total amount of “lease rights” and total amount of future payments required under all leases would be reflected on the balance sheets of all entities as assets and debt. If the changes under discussion in either of these exposure drafts are adopted, the financial statements of the Company could be materially impacted as to the amounts of recorded assets, liabilities, capital, net interest income, interest expense, depreciation expense, rent expense and net income. The Company has not determined the extent of the possible changes at this time. The exposure drafts are in different stages of review, approval and possible adoption.


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS .

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain information contained in this discussion may include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by phrases such as “the Company expects,” “the Company believes” or words of similar import. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks including, but not limited to, changes in general economic and business conditions, interest rate fluctuations, competition within and from outside the banking industry, new products and services in the banking industry, risk inherent in making loans such as repayment risks and fluctuating collateral values, problems with technology utilized by the Company, changing trends in customer profiles and changes in laws, accounting standards and regulations applicable to the Company. Although the Company believes that its expectations with respect to the forward-looking statements are based upon reliable assumptions within the bounds of its knowledge of its business and operations, there can be no assurance that actual results, performance or achievements of the Company will not differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned against placing undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. The Company’s past results are not necessarily indicative of future performance. Please refer to the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for a discussion of various factors which may affect our performance.

General

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) is the bank holding company for CommerceFirst Bank, a Maryland chartered commercial bank headquartered in Annapolis, Maryland (the “Bank”). The Bank was capitalized, became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and commenced operations on June 29, 2000. The Company’s common stock trades on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “CMFB”. The Company maintains five banking offices in Anne Arundel, Howard and Prince George’s counties in central Maryland. The Company focuses on providing commercial banking services to small and medium sized businesses in its market areas.

The Company assets increased modestly at September 30, 2010 from December 31, 2009 primarily with the increase in cash and cash equivalents as the Company increased its liquidity position. Earnings improved as the result of this asset growth and the reduction of the cost of deposits due to re-pricing of the deposits to lower current market interest rates. The provision for loan losses continues to remain relatively high in recognition of the effect of uncertain economic conditions on the Company’s borrowers and collateral values as well as loan charge-offs. Key measurements and events for the period include the following:

	•		The Company’s net income was $1.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to net income of $292 thousand for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009 largely resulting from increased net interest income during 2010.

	•		Net interest income, the Company’s main source of income, increased by 35.8% from $5.2 million during the nine month period ended September 30, 2009 to $7.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

	•		Total assets increased by 2.8% from $200 million at December 31, 2009 to $206 million at September 30, 2010.

	•		Net loans outstanding decreased by 0.5% from $183 million at December 31, 2009 to $182 million as of September 30, 2010.

	•		Deposits increased by 2.4% from $179 million at December 31, 2009 to $183 million at September 30, 2010.

	•		Non-interest income increased by 55.1% from $503 thousand for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009 to $780 thousand for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010.

	•		Non-interest expenses increased by 0.1% from $4.04 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $4.05 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010.

A discussion of the factors leading to these changes can be found in the discussion below.

Critical Accounting Policies

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and follow general practices within the industry in which it operates. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in more financial statement volatility. The fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based either on quoted market prices or are provided by other third-party sources, when available.

The most significant accounting policies followed by CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. are presented in Note 1 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the other financial statement notes and in this discussion, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions and estimates underlying those amounts, management has identified the determination of the allowance for loan losses as the accounting area that requires the most subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available.

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. believes it has developed appropriate policies and procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, recognizing that this process requires a number of assumptions and estimates with respect to its loan portfolio. These procedures include identifying and assessing possible impaired loans. CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.’s assessments may be affected in future periods by changes in economic conditions, the impact of regulatory examinations and the discovery of information with respect to borrowers that is not known to management at the time of the issuance of the consolidated financial statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

General . The Company reported net income of $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to net income of $292 thousand for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009. Earnings increased during 2010 as the result of the increase in earning assets, reduction of interest expense and the increase in gains on loan sales. The provision for loan losses was $1.6 million during 2010 as compared to $1.1 million in 2009, an increase of $0.5 million, or 43.3%. The Company continues to experience the detrimental effects of the weakened economy on its loan customers which effects are recognized through the Company’s provision for loan losses and loan charge-offs. The amount of non-accrual loans increased by $263 thousand, or 9.6%, at September 30, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009. Net interest income increased in 2010 as compared to 2009 by $1.9 million, or 35.8%. This increase resulted primarily from increases in earning assets and reduced cost of deposits. During the first half of 2010 and the last quarter of 2009, a significant amount of high interest rate, longer term certificates of deposit matured and were either re-priced at lower rates or replaced with lower rate accounts. Additional higher rate certificates of deposit were re-priced or replaced at lower interest rates during the third quarter of 2010 resulting in increases in net interest income, net interest margin and net interest spread. However, the amount of such certificates available to be re-priced in future quarters is diminishing. There are approximately $2 million of certificates of deposit with interest rates greater than 3% at September 30, 2010. Most of these accounts mature during the fourth quarter of 2010; therefore, subsequent increases in net income, net interest margin and net interest spread as a result of reduction in the cost of deposits may be more difficult to achieve or be less significant.

Return on Average Assets and Average Equity . The following table shows the return on average assets and average equity for the period shown.


	Nine Months Ended						Year ended
	September 30,						December 31,
	2010			2009			2009

Return on Average Equity		7.80	%		1.91	%		4.54	%

Return on Average Earning Assets		0.84	%		0.22	%		0.51	%

Ratio of Average Equity to Average Assets		10.45	%		11.24	%		11.03	%

Nine months ended September 30, 2010

Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin . Net interest income is the amount by which interest earned on assets exceeds the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The Company’s principal interest earning assets are loans to businesses. Interest-bearing liabilities consist primarily of savings accounts, money market accounts and certificates of deposit. Generally, changes in net interest income are measured by net interest rate spread and net interest margin. Net interest rate spread is equal to the difference between the average rate earned on interest earning assets and the average rate incurred on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin represents the difference between interest income (including net loan fees earned) and interest expense calculated as a percentage of average earning assets.

Total interest income increased by $807 thousand or 9.3% to $9.5 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. This increase in interest income was attributable to the $23.8 million increase in average earning assets during the first three quarters of 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. Interest income was adversely affected by the 23 basis point decline in the yield of the average earning assets from 6.5% in 2009 to 6.3% in 2010.

Interest expense decreased by $1.0 million or 29.5% to $2.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $3.5 million during the same nine months of 2009. This decrease was primarily attributable to the 135 basis point decrease in the cost of funds from 3.4% during the first nine months of 2009 to 2.0% during the first nine months of 2010. The decline in the cost of funds was partially offset by the $23.9 million increase in average interest bearing liabilities during 2010 as compared to 2009.

The net interest income for the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 was $7.0 million as compared to $5.2 million for the same period in 2009. Net interest income increased primarily because of the increase in average earning assets and the reduced cost of funds during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

The following table shows the average balances and average rates earned or paid on of the various categories of the Company’s assets and liabilities for the nine month period ended September 30 of each year. Nonperforming loans are included in average balances in the following table:

NINE MONTHS


	2010								2009								2008
	Average					Yields/			Average					Yields/			Average					Yields/
In thousands	Balance			Interest		Rates			Balance			Interest		Rates			Balance			Interest		Rates

Assets
Securities (1)	$	527		$	21		5.33	%	$	3,018		$	101		4.47	%	$	8,480		$	281		4.41	%
Loans, net of unearned income		184,680			9,471		6.86	%		165,615			8,606		6.95	%		135,163			7,588		7.48	%
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		17,330			41		0.32	%		8,984			17		0.25	%		—			—		—
Federal funds sold		43			—		0.19	%		1,211			2		0.22	%		9,269			160		2.30	%

Total interest-earning assets		202,580			9,533		6.29	%		178,828			8,726		6.52	%		152,912			8,029		7.00	%

Less allowance for loan losses		(2,326	)							(2,133	)							(1,729	)
Non interest earning assets		8,454								5,693								5,780

Total assets	$	208,708							$	182,388							$	156,963


Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing deposits
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	714		$	—		0.04	%	$	1,965		$	1		0.07	%	$	1,550		$	3		0.26	%
Money market deposit accounts		7,911			28		0.47	%		12,335			49		0.53	%		18,391			286		2.07	%
Savings accounts		15,563			164		1.41	%		2,183			31		1.90	%		55			—		0.00	%
Certificates of deposit		139,435			2,308		2.21	%		123,267			3,466		3.76	%		93,905			3,501		4.97	%
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase		—			—		—			—			—		—			2,763			28		1.35	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities		163,623			2,500		2.04	%		139,750			3,547		3.39	%		116,664			3,818		4.36	%

Demand deposits and other liabilities		23,275								22,130								19,957

Total liabilities		186,898								161,880								136,621

Stockholders’ equity		21,810								20,508								20,342

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	208,708							$	182,388							$	156,963

Interest rate spread							4.25	%							3.13	%							2.64	%

Net interest income and margin				$	7,033		4.64	%				$	5,179		3.87	%				$	4,211		3.67	%


(1)		Yields on securities are calculated based on amortized cost.

Net interest margin was 4.64% in the first nine months of 2010, as compared to 3.87% in the comparable period in 2009. Interest spread was 4.25% in the first nine months of 2010, as compared to the 3.13% in the first nine months of 2009 reflecting the greater reduction in the cost of interest bearing funds as compared to the reduction of the earnings rates of interest earning assets. The growth in average loans receivable as well as the re-pricing of interest bearing deposits at lower interest rates combined to improve the net interest spread and net interest margin.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding changes in interest income and interest expense of the Company. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to: (i) changes in volume (change in volume of the asset multiplied by the prior year’s rate) and (ii) changes in rates (change in rate multiplied by the current year’s volume).


	September 30, 2010 vs.									September 30, 2009 vs.
	2009									2008
	Increase (Decrease)									Increase (Decrease)
In thousands	Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total
Interest-Earning Assets:
Federal funds sold	$	(2	)	$	—		$	(2	)	$	(139	)	$	(19	)	$	(158	)
Interest bearing deposits		16			8			24			17			—			17
Investment portfolio		(84	)		4			(80	)		(181	)		1			(180	)
Loans receivable		991			(126	)		865			1,710			(692	)		1,018

Net Change in Interest Income		921			(114	)		807			1,407			(710	)		697


Interest Bearing Liabilities:
Interest bearing deposits		528			(1,575	)		(1,047	)		949			(1,192	)		(243	)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		—			—			—			(28	)		—			(28	)

Net Change in Interest Expense		528			(1,575	)		(1,047	)		921			(1,192	)		(271	)

Change in Net Interest Income	$	393		$	1,461		$	1,854		$	486		$	482		$	968

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses represents the amount charged against earnings to increase the allowance for loan losses to the level deemed appropriate by management. The provision for loan losses and the allowance for loan losses are based on management’s ongoing assessment of the Company’s credit exposure and consideration of certain other relevant factors. The provision for loan losses was $1.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The Company has increased its provision for loan losses to address identified loan concerns and in recognition of the detrimental effect of the weakened economy. The allowance is comprised of specific and general allowance amounts.

Non-Interest Income . Non-interest income principally consists of gains from the sale of the guaranteed portion of Small Business Administration loans and from deposit account services charges. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, gains on sales of the guaranteed portion of SBA loans was $419 thousand whereas gains on sales of SBA loans amounted to $164 thousand during the first nine months of 2009. Generally, the Company desires to sell the guaranteed portion of most additional SBA loans resulting in a continuing stream of income that may vary significantly from quarter to quarter, depending in part upon the volume of loans actually sold. Deposit account service charges and other income amounted to $361 thousand during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $339 thousand for the same period in 2009, reflecting an increase in the number of accounts subject to service charges on such deposit accounts. This increase was somewhat offset by declines in net rental income from rental of other real estate owned properties caused by additional expenses to maintain the properties.

Non-Interest Expense . Total non-interest expenses increased by $4 thousand during the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009, a 0.1% increase. The 2009 expenses included $86 thousand of a FDIC special insurance assessment whereas no special assessment was charged during 2010. The 2010 expenses reflect $75 thousand of provision for declining value of other real estate owned; no such provision was expensed in 2009.

Income Tax Expense . During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded an income tax expense of $847 thousand as compared to a $197 thousand expense during the same period in 2009. The income tax expense was 40.0% of income before taxes in 2010 and 40.3% of income before taxes in 2009.

Three months ended September 30, 2010

Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin . Total interest income increased by $152 thousand or 5.0% to $3.2 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2010. This increase in interest income was attributable to the increase in average earning assets during 2010 as compared to 2009. The interest income was adversely affected by the decline in the yield of the average earning assets.

Interest expense decreased by $451 thousand or 37.5% to $753 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period of 2009. This decrease was primarily attributable to the decrease in the cost of funds. The decline in the cost of funds was partially offset by the increase in average interest bearing liabilities during 2010 as compared to 2009.

The following table shows the average balances and average rates earned or paid on of the various categories of the Company’s assets and liabilities for the three month period ended September 30 of each year. Nonperforming loans are included in average balances in the following table:

THREE MONTHS


	2010								2009								2008
	Average					Yields/			Average					Yields/			Average					Yields/
In thousands	Balance			Interest		Rates			Balance			Interest		Rates			Balance			Interest		Rates

Assets
Securities (1)	$	527		$	7		5.27	%	$	1,540		$	23		5.99	%	$	6,104		$	72		4.68	%
Loans, net of unearned income		185,858			3,179		6.79	%		176,419			3,019		6.87	%		139,658			2,537		7.21	%
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		16,466			17		0.41	%		14,510			9		0.25	%		—			—		—
Federal funds sold		—			—		—			198			0		0.00	%		11,833			58		1.94	%

Total interest-earning assets		202,851			3,203		6.26	%		192,667			3,051		6.35	%		157,595			2,667		6.71	%

Less allowance for loan losses		(2,197	)							(2,096	)							(1,747	)
Non interest earning assets		8,211								6,317								5,564

Total assets	$	208,865							$	196,888							$	161,412

Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing deposits
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	692		$	—		0.06	%	$	1,522		$	—		0.00	%	$	1,026		$	1		0.39	%
Money market deposit accounts		7,695			8		0.41	%		8,930			13		0.58	%		15,730			70		1.77	%
Savings accounts		19,630			63		1.27	%		5,375			27		2.01	%		38			—		—
Certificates of deposit		133,226			682		2.03	%		137,938			1,164		3.38	%		101,650			1,200		4.68	%
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase		—			—		—			—			—		—			2,180			5		0.91	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities		161,243			753		1.85	%		153,765			1,204		3.14	%		120,624			1,276		4.20	%

Demand deposits and other liabilities		25,407								21,303								20,348

Total liabilities		186,650								175,068								140,972

Stockholders’ equity		22,215								21,820								20,440

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	208,865							$	196,888							$	161,412

Interest rate spread							4.41	%							3.21	%							2.51	%

Net interest income and margin				$	2,450		4.79	%				$	1,847		3.85	%				$	1,391		3.50	%

(1)

Yields on securities are calculated based on amortized cost.

The net interest income for the three month period ended September 30, 2010 was $2.5 million as compared to $1.8 million for the same period in 2009. Net interest income increased primarily because of the increase in average earning assets and the reduced cost of funds during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009.

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses was $612 thousand during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $350 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The Company has increased its provision for loan losses to address identified loan concerns and in recognition of the detrimental effect of the weakened economy. The allowance is comprised of specific and general allowance amounts.

Non-Interest Income . For the three months ended September 30, 2010, gains on sales of the guaranteed portion of SBA loans were $49 thousand whereas gains on sales of SBA loans amounted to $47 thousand during the same period in 2009. Deposit account service charges and other income amounted to $115 thousand during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $130 thousand for the same period in 2009 reflecting the decrease in net rental income from the leases of other real estate owned properties.

Non-Interest Expense . Total non-interest expense increased by $54 thousand during the three-month period ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009, a 4.0% increase. The 2010 expenses reflect $75 thousand of provision for declining value of other real estate owned; no such provision was expensed in 2009.

Income Tax Expense . During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded an income tax expense of $238 thousand as compared to a $128 thousand expense during the same period in 2009. The income tax expense was 40.0% of income before taxes in 2010 and 40.0% of income before taxes in 2009.

FINANCIAL CONDITION.

General . The Company’s assets at September 30, 2010 were $206.0 million, an increase of $5.6 million or 2.8%, from December 31, 2009. The gross loans totaled $184.6 million at September 30, 2010 and are comprised of real estate loans of $131.5 million, an increase of $14.4 million, or 12.3%, from December 31, 2009 and commercial loans of $53.2 million, a decrease of $15.3 million, or 22.3% from December 31, 2009. The changes noted above reflect the effect of reclassifying approximately $9.5 million of commercial loans to real estate loans during the second quarter of 2010. The reclassification resulted from a review by the Company of the risk profile of the loan portfolio. The majority of the reclassified loans are to entities whose cash flow is directly or indirectly significantly dependent upon the sale, refinance, or management of real estate assets or collections of the entities’ financing of real estate. None of these loans were on non-accrual or classified as substandard at the time of reclassification. At September 30, 2010, deposits totaled $183.0 million, an increase of $4.3 million, or 2.4%, from December 31, 2009. Deposits at September 30, 2010 are comprised primarily of certificates of deposit of $127.6 million, NOW and Money Market accounts of $8.8 million, savings accounts of $21.2 million and noninterest bearing deposits of $25.3 million.

Loan Portfolio. The loan portfolio is the largest component of earning assets and accounts for the greatest portion of total interest income. At September 30, 2010, net loans were $182.1 million, a 0.5% decrease from the $183.1 million in loans outstanding at December 31, 2009. Generally, loans are internally generated but the Company does periodically purchase loan participations from other local community banks. Lending activity is generally confined to the Company’s immediate market areas. The small decrease in the loan balances from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010 resulted partially from the sale of SBA guaranteed portions of loans in the amount of $6.6 million during the first nine months of 2010. Without these sales, loan balances would have increased by $5.6 million. The Company is continuing its efforts to attract quality credits with no dilution of credit underwriting standards. The current economic conditions have reduced the number of loan requests as well as the number of applicants that meet the Company’s underwriting standards.

The percentage of total loans comprised of commercial real estate loans has increased as the Company has concentrated on this type of lending. The majority of these loans are secured by real property that is occupied by the borrowers’ businesses. The Company has approximately $0.9 million of acquisition and construction loans secured by residential building lots. The Company does not engage in foreign lending activities. Loans secured by residential real estate are loans to investors for commercial purposes. The Bank does not lend funds to consumers. The following table presents the composition of the loan portfolio by type of loan at the dates indicated.

Loans receivable, net is comprised of the following:


	September 30, 2010						September 30, 2009						December 31, 2009
				Percentage						Percentage						Percentage
In thousands	Balance			of Loans			Balance			of Loans			Balance			of Loans
Commercial and Industrial loans	$	53,211			28.8	%	$	66,727			37.1	%	$	68,476			36.9	%
Real estate loans secured by:
Residential real estate		26,510			14.4	%		22,261			12.4	%		22,140			11.9	%
Commercial real estate		105,024			56.8	%		90,843			50.5	%		94,947			51.2	%

Total real estate loans		131,534			71.2	%		113,104			62.9	%		117,087			63.1	%

		184,745			100.0	%		179,831			100.0	%		185,563			100.0	%

Unearned loan fees, net		(114	)					(77	)					(81	)
Allowance for loan losses		(2,533	)					(2,150	)					(2,380	)

	$	182,098					$	177,604					$	183,102

Note: The loan amounts and percentages for September 30, 2010 above reflect the effect of reclassifying approximately $9.5 million of commercial and industrial loans to real estate loans during the second quarter of 2010. Without the reclassification, the commercial and industrial loans would have comprised approximately 33.9% of the total loans at September 30, 2010.

The following table shows the interest rate sensitivity of the loan portfolio at September 30, 2010. Demand loans, loans without a stated maturity and overdrafts are reported as re-pricing in one year or less. Floating rate loans are reported to reflect the period until re-pricing.


	Loan Re-pricing as of September 30, 2010
	1 year				After
In thousands	or less		1-5 years		5 years		Total
Loans with:
Fixed interest rates	$	14,152	$	31,282	$	—	$	45,434
Floating and adjustable interest rates		69,465		69,846		—		139,311

Total loans receivable	$	83,456	$	100,661	$	—	$	184,745

Allowance for loan losses. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is evaluated based upon loan categories except for loans rated substandard, doubtful or loss, which are evaluated separately and assigned loss amounts based upon the evaluation. Loss ratios are applied to each category of loan to determine estimated loss amounts. Categories of loans are identified as commercial, SBA and mortgage loans. Loss ratios are determined based upon historical losses incurred adjusted for the effect of current economic conditions, any industry concentration or identified weakness in an industry, credit management and underwriting policy changes and secured versus unsecured nature of the loan category. At September 30, 2010, the range of the loss ratios used to determine estimated losses by loan category were: commercial loans — 1.0%; SBA loans (unguaranteed portion) — 6.7% and real estate loans- 0.2% to 2.0%. These loss ratios are about 0.04% higher than the ratios applied at December 31, 2009. The loss ratios have increased because of the amount of loan charge-offs reflecting the effect of the continuing trend of weaknesses in economic conditions. Additional losses are estimated resulting from additional identified risks factors, such as loans with underwriting exceptions, the level and direction of payment delinquencies and the level of large loans. Not all of these additional loss estimates are allocated to the separate loan categories.

The Company monitors its loan portfolio for indications of weaknesses through the review of borrowers’ financial condition, cash flows, loan payment delinquencies, economic factors occurring in borrowers’ business sectors and other information which may come to the Company through its contacts in the market place. The determination of the effect of the weaknesses noted on the repayment of the loans is an ongoing process as to each borrower. The Company may set aside specific loss reserves during this process in amounts determined on subjective bases until such time as the collectability of the loan from the borrowers’ primary repayment source(s) is in doubt. During this time, secondary and tertiary repayment sources, including liquidation of collateral, are evaluated which may result

in additional specific loss reserves being established. Independent or internal appraisals and evaluations are performed to determine potential recovery amounts, or range of amounts, from the loan collateral and other payment sources. Collateral values are subject to change depending on market factors, collateral condition and method and timing of liquidation efforts. Loans, or portions of loans, for which the Company does not expect to obtain repayment are charged-off. In most cases, the Company has established specific reserves for the amount of the loans’ losses prior to the point of charge-off.

The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is also reviewed at least quarterly using risk ratings applied to the loans based upon rating criteria consistent with regulatory definitions. The risk rating is adjusted, as necessary, if loans become delinquent, if significant adverse information is discovered regarding the underlying credit and, in the case of commercial loans and commercial real estate loans, the normal periodic review of the underlying credit indicates that a change in risk rating is appropriate. An estimated “low” and “high” loss percentage is applied to loans in each risk rating. These loss percentages increase as the loan risk rating increases. Loans rated as substandard, doubtful or loss are evaluated separately and assigned loss amounts based upon the separate evaluation. Risks factors identified beyond individual loan risks, such as economic conditions, underwriting exceptions and loan concentrations are quantified based upon management’s estimations of loss exposure. Loss percentages used are generally based upon management’s best estimates considering losses incurred. Estimated “low” and “high” allowance for loan loss amounts are derived by accumulating the estimated losses using the “low” and “high” loss percentages for each risk rating and adding losses based upon separate loan evaluations and identified other risks. The actual allowance for loan losses is compared to this range to ascertain that it is reasonably situated within the range. In addition, on at least a quarterly basis, the recorded allowance for loan losses (as a percent of loans) is compared to peer group levels to ascertain the reasonableness of the estimate. At September 30, 2010, the actual allowance for loan losses of 1.37% was equal to the “high” allowance amount. The low range percent was 1.12%.

The allowance for loan losses represents 1.37% and 1.28% of loans receivable at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The increase in the allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans at September 30, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009 resulted from increased specific reserves as well as general reserves reflecting the effect of the current economic conditions. There was no change in the methodology of determining the allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009 apart from changes to loss factors based on management’s perception of economic environmental factors and trends. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate for each period presented.

The activity in the allowance for loan losses is shown in the following table.


	Nine Months Ended			Year Ended December 31,
In thousands	September 30, 2010			2009			2008			2007			2006
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	2,380		$	1,860		$	1,665		$	1,614		$	1,615
Charge-offs- Commercial and Industrial loans		(1,429	)		(963	)		(497	)		(72	)		(226	)
Recoveries- Commercial and Industrial loans		42			5			45			78			—
Charge-offs- Commercial real estate loans		(106	)		(138	)		—			—			—

Net recoveries (charge-offs)		(1,493	)		(1,096	)		(452	)		6			(226	)

Provision for loan losses		1,646			1,616			647			45			225

Ending balance	$	2,533		$	2,380		$	1,860		$	1,665		$	1,614


Net recoveries (charge-offs) to average loans		(0.81	%)		(0.65	%)		(0.33	%)		0.00	%		(0.26	)%

The activity in the allowance for loan losses by category during 2010 is shown in the following table.


	Commercial				Real Estate Loans
	and						Non-
	Industrial		SBA		Owner		Owner
In thousands	Loans		Loans		Occupied		Occupied		Unallocated		Total
Loan Category

Balance at December 31, 2009	$	1,290	$	576	$	168	$	242	$	104	$	2,380
Loan charge offs		1,005		424		—		106		—		1,535
Loss recoveries		23		19		—		—		—		42
Provision for loan losses		401		247		306		629		63		1,646

Balance at September 30, 2010	$	709	$	418	$	474	$	765	$	167	$	2,533


Allowance for loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	264	$	35	$	262	$	433	$	—	$	994


Amount of loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,127	$	317	$	8,714	$	2,317	$	—	$	13,475

Additionally, the Company has established a reserve for unfunded commitments that is recorded by a provision charged to other expenses. At September 30, 2010 the balance of this reserve was $58 thousand. The reserve, based on evaluations of the collectability of loans, is an amount that management believes will be adequate over time to absorb possible losses on unfunded commitments (off-balance sheet financial instruments) that may become uncollectible in the future.

Asset Quality . In its lending activities, the Company seeks to develop sound loans with customers who will grow with the Company. There has not been an effort to rapidly build the portfolio and earnings at the sacrifice of asset quality. At the same time, the extension of credit inevitably carries some risk of non-payment.

Below is a summary of the Company’s impaired loans.


	Unpaid				Related		Interest
September 30, 2010	Principal		Recorded		Allowance		Income
In thousands	Balance		Investment		for losses		Recognized
Non-accrual loans:
Commercial and Industrial loans:
With specific reserves	$	2,192	$	1,342	$	264	$	—
Without specific reserves		—		—		—		—

		2,192		1,342		264		—

SBA loans:
With specific reserves		189		107		25		—
Without specific reserves		115		115		—		—

		304		222		25		—

Real Estate — Non Owner Occupied:
With specific reserves		1,538		1,432		229		—
Without specific reserves		—		—		—		—

		1,538		1,432		229		—


	Unpaid				Related		Interest
September 30, 2010	Principal		Recorded		Allowance		Income
In thousands	Balance		Investment		for losses		Recognized

Total Loans:
With specific reserves	$	3,919	$	2,881	$	518	$	—
Without specific reserves		115		115		—		—

Total Non-accrual loans	$	4,034	$	2,996	$	518	$	—


Troubled Debt Restructured loans:
Commercial and Industrial loans:
With specific reserves	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Without specific reserves		253		253		—		3

	$	253	$	253		—		3

Number of loans				1

Real Estate — Owner Occupied:
With specific reserves		1,141		1,141		272		60
Without specific reserves		1,264		1,264		—		67

		2,405		2,405		272		127

Number of loans				3

Real Estate — Non Owner Occupied:
With specific reserves		885		885		215		25
Without specific reserves		1,603		1,603		—		71

		2,488		2,488		215		96

Number of loans				8

Total Loans:
With specific reserves	$	2,026	$	2,026	$	487		85
Without specific reserves		3,120		3,120		—		141

Total Troubled Debt Restructured loans	$	5,146	$	5,146	$	487		226

Number of loans				12


Other Impaired loans:
Commercial and Industrial loans:
With specific reserves	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Without specific reserves		550		550		—		27

Total Other Impaired loans	$	550	$	550	$	—	$	27


Total Impaired Loans:
With specific reserves	$	5,945	$	4,907	$	1,005	$	85
Without specific reserves		3,785		3,785		—		168

Total Impaired loans	$	9,730	$	8,692	$	1,005	$	253

Note: Differences between the unpaid principal balances and the recorded investments above result from the Company charging-off portions of loans. The charge-offs do not affect the total amount due from the borrowers .

Non-accrual loan activity is summarized as follows:


	Nine Months
	Ended
	September 30,		Year Ended December 31,
In thousands	2010		2009		2008		2007		2006
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	2,734	$	5,819	$	1,125	$	628	$	592
New loans placed on non-accrual		2,109		2,427		5,046		569		262
Less:
Loan restored to interest earning status		53		1,266		—		—		—
Paid-off: sold in foreclosure		—		576		—		—		—
Other real estate owned additions		—		2,462		—		—		—
Charge offs		1,535		1,101		236		72		226
Other including payments received		259		107		116

Balance at the end of the period	$	2,996	$	2,734	$	5,819	$	1,125	$	628

Non-accrual loan activity by category during the nine month period ended September 30, 2010 is summarized as follows:


			Commercial				Real Estate		Real Estate
			and				Owner		Non Owner
In thousands	Total		Industrial		SBA		Occupied		Occupied
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	2,734	$	2,280	$	454	$	—	$	—
New loans placed on non-accrual		2,109		346		505		—		1,258
Less:
Loan restored to interest earning status		53		53		—		—		—
Paid-off: sold in foreclosure		—
Other real estate owned additions		—
Charge offs		1,535		855		574		—		106
Other including payments received		259		95		164		—		—

Balance at the end of the period	$	2,996	$	1,623	$	221	$	—	$	1,152

Comparative information regarding the non-accrual loans at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 follows:


In thousands	September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Loans classified non-accrual with specific reserves	$	2,881	$	2,519
Loans classified non-accrual with no specific reserves		115		215

Total non-accrual loans	$	2,996	$	2,734


Allowance for loan losses on non-accrual loans	$	518	$	922
Average balance non-accrual loans during period	$	2,769	$	4,559

Non-accrual loans with specific reserves at September 30, 2010 are comprised of:

Commercial loans — two loans outstanding to a borrower and entity controlled by the same borrower totaling $1.0 million, after partial loan charge off of $437 thousand, secured by residential real estate and corporate assets with a specific reserve of $20 thousand and five loans to various entities totaling $322 thousand with $244 thousand of specific reserves established.

SBA loans — four loans to various entities totaling $107 thousand with $25 thousand of specific reserves established.

Non-owner Occupied Real Estate loans- two loans to the same entity, secured by the same residential property in the amount of $778 thousand, after a partial charge-off of $106 thousand with specific reserves of $47 thousand, one loan secured by undeveloped land in the amount of $374 thousand with an established reserve of $56 thousand, and a loan secured by a loan guarantor’s home in the amount of $280 thousand with reserves of $126 thousand established.

All of these loans are in various stages of collection.

Non-accrual loans without specific reserves at September 30, 2010 are comprised of two SBA loans totaling $115 thousand.

At September 30, 2010, the Company has modified twelve loans in amounts totaling $5.1 million which modifications qualify the loans as Troubled Debt Restructuring. Changes made to the loans included the reduction of loan payments from principal and interest payments to interest only payments for specific time periods, the decrease in interest rates charged on a loan and the extension of the maturity of a loan. Specific reserves were established on the loans as appropriate. The majority of these loans were modified in the third quarter of 2010 as the adverse economic conditions hampered borrowers’ current cash flows.

At September 30, 2010, there were $4.4 million of performing loans considered potential problem loans, defined as loans which are not included in the 90 day past due, not reported as troubled debt restructures or as nonaccrual loans, but for which known information about possible credit problems causes the Company to be uncertain as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms which may in the future result in disclosure in the past due, nonaccrual or restructured loans. The Company closely monitors the financial status of these borrowers.

Generally, the accrual of interest is discontinued when a loan is specifically determined to be impaired or when principal or interest is delinquent for ninety days or more. During 2010, there were no amounts included in gross interest income attributable to loans in non-accrual status.

The following table shows the amounts of non-performing assets on the dates indicated:


	September 30,			December 31:
In thousands	2010			2009			2008			2007			2006
Nonaccrual loans:
Commercial and Industrial and SBA	$	1,564		$	2,734		$	2,218		$	1,125		$	628
Real estate		1,432			—			3,601			—			—
Accrual loans —past due 90 days and over		—			—			—			—			—

Total non-performing loans		2,996			2,734			5,819			1,125			628

Other real estate owned		2,387			2,462			—			—			—

Total non-performing assets	$	5,383		$	5,196		$	5,819		$	1,125		$	628


Allowance for loan losses to total non-performing loans		84.5	%		87.1	%		32.0	%		148.0	%		257.0	%
Non-performing loans to total loans		1.62	%		1.47	%		3.80	%		0.89	%		0.65	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		2.61	%		2.59	%		3.49	%		0.76	%		0.44	%

The payment status of loans receivable at September 30, 2010 is as follows:


			Commercial				Real Estate		Real Estate
			and				Owner		Non Owner
In thousands	Total		Industrial		SBA		Occupied		Occupied
Current accruing loans	$	179,436	$	45,533	$	5,463	$	82,154	$	46,286
Current non-accruing loans		1,338		187		—		—		1,151

Past due loans:
30 to 89 days past due		2,313		455		195		—		1,663
90 days plus past due and accruing		—		—		—		—		—
Non-accrual loans, non current		1,658		1,156		222		—		280

Total past due loans		3,971		1,611		417		—		1,943

Total loans at the end of the period	$	184,745	$	47,331	$	5,880	$	82,154	$	49,380

The Company applies risk ratings to the loans based upon rating criteria consistent with regulatory definitions. The risk ratings are adjusted, as necessary, if loans become delinquent, if significant adverse information is discovered regarding the underlying credit and the normal periodic reviews of the underlying credits indicate that a change in risk rating is appropriate. A summary of the risk rating of loans receivable at September 30, 2010 follows:


			Commercial				Real Estate		Real Estate
			and				Owner		Non Owner
In thousands	Total		Industrial		SBA		Occupied		Occupied
Risk rated — pass	$	171,270	$	45,204	$	5,563	$	73,440	$	47,063
Risk rated — special mention (loan weaknesses noted which could lead to loan loss)		7,324		482		179		6,663		—
Risk rated — substandard or doubtful (loans with significant weaknesses that could, or has, result in loan losses)		6,151		1,645		138		2,051		2,317

Total loans at the end of the period	$	184,745	$	47,331	$	5,880	$	82,154	$	49,380

Real estate acquired through or in the process of foreclosure is recorded at fair value less estimated disposal costs. The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of the carrying value of the real estate acquired through foreclosure using current estimates of fair value when it has reason to believe that real estate values have declined for the particular type and location of the real estate owned. In the event of a subsequent decline, an allowance would be provided to reduce real estate acquired through foreclosure to fair value less estimated disposal cost. The Company acquired through foreclosure a commercial building with a fair value of approximately $653 thousand in March 2009. Because of the decline in real estate values in this building’s area, the Company has reduced the carrying value of this owned building by $75 thousand during the third quarter of 2010 with an offsetting increase in non-interest expenses. The Company acquired another commercial building by foreclosure in November 2009 with a fair value of approximately $1.8 million. The Company is leasing these properties to others under short term leases as it offers them for sale.

Investment Portfolio . At September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, the Company had no investments in securities other than investments in Federal Reserve Bank stock as required by regulation and stock in two banker’s banks. The Company is maintaining its liquid assets in its account at the Federal Reserve and fully FDIC insured certificates of deposits in other financial institutions for safety and liquidity purposes. The Company will make additional investments when interest rates have increased and the Company has sufficient excess liquidity. The following table provides information regarding the composition of the Company’s investment securities portfolio at the dates indicated.


	Investment in Stocks
	September 30, 2010					December 31, 2009
In thousands	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
Investments in stocks, at cost;
Federal Reserve Stock	$	465		88.24	%	$	465		88.24	%
Corporate equities		62		11.76	%		62		11.76	%

Total stocks	$	527		100.00	%	$	527		100.00	%

The stocks in the two “bankers’ banks” are not readily marketable.

Deposits and Liquidity. The Company currently has no business other than that of the Bank and does not currently have any material funding commitments unrelated to that business. The Bank’s principal sources of funds for loans, investments and general operations are deposits from its primary market area, principal and interest payments on loans, and proceeds from maturing investment securities. Its principal funding commitments are for the origination or purchase of loans and the payment of maturing deposits, and the payment for checks drawn upon it. The Bank’s most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents, which are cash on hand, amounts due from other financial institutions including the Federal Reserve and Federal funds sold. The levels of such assets are dependent on the Bank’s lending, investment and operating activities at any given time. The variations in levels of liquid assets are influenced by deposit flows and loan demand, both current and anticipated.

The Company’s deposits consist of demand deposits, NOW accounts, money market accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit. These accounts provide the Company with a relatively stable source of funds. The Company generally targets larger deposit relationships by offering competitive interest rates on certificates of deposit of $75 thousand or more in our local markets. Deposits from the local market areas are supplemented with out-of-area deposits comprised of funds obtained through the use of deposit listing services (national market certificates of deposit), deposits obtained through the use of brokers and through the Certificates of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) program. As a result, a substantial portion of our deposits, 28.4% at September 30, 2010 and 37.8% at December 31, 2009 and 43.8% at September 30, 2009, are comprised of certificate of deposit accounts of $100 thousand or more. Total certificates of deposit represent 79.7% of deposits at September 30, 2010 and 77.9% of deposits at December 31, 2009 and 78.2% at September 30, 2009.

The Company’s reliance on certificates of deposit, including the use of larger denomination certificates of deposit and brokered deposits, facilitates funding the growth in the loan portfolio. The Company has relied on certificates of deposit as a primary funding source and has used larger certificates of deposits as a funding source since its inception. While sometimes requiring higher interest rates, such funds carry lower acquisition costs (marketing, overhead costs) and can be obtained when required at the maturity dates desired. Substantially all of the deposit accounts over $100 thousand are fully insured by the FDIC through differing ownership and trustee arrangements and the insured deposit limit of $250 thousand. All of the brokered deposits and national market deposits are fully insured by the FDIC. This insurance and the strong capital position of the Company reduce the likelihood of large deposit withdrawals for reasons other than interest rate competition. Interest rates on these deposits can be, but are not always, higher than other deposits products. There is, however, a risk that some deposits would be lost if rates were to increase and the Company elected not to remain competitive with its own deposit rates. Under those conditions, the Company believes that it is positioned to use other sources of funds, such as borrowing on its unsecured credit facilities with other banks or the sale of loans.

At September 30, 2010, deposits totaled $183.0 million as compared to $178.6 million at December 31, 2009. The $4.3 million increase in deposits resulted from the $4.3 million increase in noninterest bearing deposits, the $10.9 million increase in savings accounts balance, the decline of $11.5 million in the amount of certificates of deposit and the increase of $0.6 million in other deposit accounts. There were $34.6 million and $41.1 million of brokered certificates of deposit at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Included in these brokered deposits at September 30, 2010 are $9.4 million of certificates of deposits received in exchange for the placement of the Company’s customers’ deposit funds with other financial institutions under the CDARS program. Included in deposits are deposits of officers and directors (and their affiliated entities) of $13 million at September 30, 2010. As a result of the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, banks are no longer prohibited from paying interest on demand deposit accounts, including those from businesses, effective in July 2011. If the Company starts to pay interest on these accounts, its net interest margin would decline. It is not clear what affect the elimination of this prohibition will have on the Bank’s interest expense, allocation of deposits, deposit pricing, loan pricing, net interest margin, ability to compete, ability to establish and maintain customer relationships, or profitability.

Deposits are summarized below as of dates indicated:


	September 30,		%			December 31:
In thousands	2010		*Change*			2009		2008		2007
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	25,332		20.5	%	$	21,024	$	23,599	$	19,246
Interest bearing deposits:
NOW accounts		1,192		285.8	%	$	309	$	1,247	$	2,440
Money Market accounts		7,629		(2.7	)		7,841		13,049		16,268
Savings accounts		21,232		104.6	%		10,379		148		36
Certificates of deposit accounts:
Less than $100,000		75,636		5.6	%		71,593		37,539		11,383
$100,000 or more		51,945		(23.0	%)		67,499		69,659		74,035

Total interest bearing deposits		157,634		0.0	%		157,621		121,642		104,162

Total deposits	$	182,966		2.4	%	$	178,645	$	145,241	$	123,408

The table below shows the maturities of certificates of deposit:


					December 31, 2009
	September 30, 2010				CDs of
	CDs of $100,000				$100,000 or
In thousand	or more		All CDs		more		All CDs
Twelve months or less	$	40,882	$	84,448	$	53,786	$	94,725
Over twelve months through three years		6,588		33,872		11,139		37,587
Over three years		4,475		9,261		2,574		6,780

Total	$	51,945	$	127,581	$	67,499	$	139,092

The table below shows the source of the Company’s certificate of deposits as well as the amount equal to or greater than $100,000 at September 30, 2010:


	CDs with		CDs with balances
	balances of less		of $100,000 or
In thousands	than $100,000		greater		Total
Source
Local markets	$	10,773	$	37,151	$	47,924
National market		44,590		448		45,038
CDARS program:
Customers’ funds		537		8,826		9,363
Proprietary funding		5,136		4,318		9,454
Other brokered funds		14,600		1,202		15,802

Total	$	75,636	$	51,945	$	127,581

CDARS program funding is reflected in the above schedule as “Customers’ funds” and “Proprietary funding”. The Company, acting as agent for its customers, places customer funds in other financial institutions under the program up to the FDIC insurance limit of $250,000. Under the CDARS program, other financial institutions place deposits in the Company for the same amount of the customers’ funds. “Customers’ funds” are comprised of deposits from these customer transactions. The Company can obtain funding under the CDARS program by bidding for deposit funds without customers’ involvement. This “Proprietary funding” results in traditional brokered deposits.

The Company’s short term liquid assets of cash and cash equivalents were $17.2 million, or 8.4% of assets, and $10.5 million, or 5.2%, of assets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Continued growth in deposits will be required to fund any loan growth. Accordingly, the Company intends to maintain a competitive posture in its deposit interest rate offerings. While adequate liquidity is imperative, excess liquidity has the effect of a lower interest margin, as funds not invested in loans are placed in short-term investments that earn significantly lower yields.

The Company has available unsecured credit facilities for short-term liquidity needs from financial institutions of $8.5 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. There were no borrowings outstanding under these credit arrangements at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

The Company believes its levels of liquidity are adequate to conduct the business of the Company and Bank.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Company holds collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary. The Company has not been required to perform on any financial guarantees and has not recorded or incurred any losses on its commitments. The issuance of letters of credit is not a significant activity of the Company. Outstanding letters of credit at September 30, 2010 totaled $1.3 million and $774 thousand at December 31, 2009.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend funds to customers as long as there are no violations of any condition established in the loan contracts. These commitments include commitments to lend funds as well as un-advanced loan funds. These commitments at September 30, 2010 totaled $45.6 million and $46.0 million at December 31, 2009. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

With the exception of these off-balance sheet arrangements, the Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources, that is material to investors.

CAPITAL ADEQUACY

The Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have established guidelines with respect to the maintenance of appropriate levels of capital by bank holding companies and state non-member banks, respectively. The regulations impose two sets of capital adequacy requirements: minimum leverage rules, which require bank holding companies and banks to maintain a specified minimum ratio of capital to total assets, and risk-based capital rules, which require the maintenance of specified minimum ratios of capital to “risk-weighted” assets. At September 30, 2010, the Company and the Bank were in full compliance with these guidelines, as follows:


							Minimum Ratios
	September 30,			December 31,			To be“ Adequately			To be “Well
	2010			2009			Capitalized”			Capitalized”
Total capital:
Company		13.0	%		12.3	%		8.0	%		N/A
Bank		12.2	%		11.5	%		8.0	%		10.0	%
Tier I:
Company		11.7	%		11.0	%		4.0	%		N/A
Bank		11.0	%		10.2	%		4.0	%		6.0	%
Leverage Total:
Company		10.6	%		10.4	%		4.0	%		N/A
Bank		10.0	%		9.7	%		4.0	%		5.0	%

The assessment of capital adequacy depends on a number of factors such as asset quality, liquidity, earnings performance, and changing competitive conditions and economic forces. The adequacy of the Company’s capital is reviewed by management on an ongoing basis. Management seeks to maintain a capital structure that will assure an adequate level of capital to support anticipated asset growth and to absorb potential losses. The ability of the Company to grow is dependent on the availability of capital with which to meet regulatory capital requirements, discussed below. To the extent the Company is successful it may need to acquire additional capital through the sale of additional common stock, other qualifying equity instruments, such as preferred stock (which the Company is not currently authorized to issue), or subordinated debt. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to the Company on a timely basis or on attractive terms.

Under recent guidance by the federal banking regulators, banks which have concentrations in construction, land development or commercial real estate loans (other than loans for majority owner occupied properties) would be expected to maintain higher levels of risk management and, potentially, higher levels of capital. It is possible that the Company may be required to maintain higher levels of capital than it would otherwise be expected to maintain as a result of its levels of construction, development and commercial real estate loans, which may require us to obtain additional capital.

Significant further growth of the Company may be limited because the current level of capital will not support rapid short term growth while maintaining regulatory capital expectations. Loan portfolio growth will need to be funded by increases in deposits as the Company has limited amounts of on-balance sheet assets deployable into loans. Growth will depend upon Company earnings and/or the raising of additional capital.

ITEM 3 — QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable

ITEM 4T— CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated, as of the last day of the period covered by this report, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Act of 1934) during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 — Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of its business, the Company may become involved in routine legal proceedings. At September 30, 2010, there are no such proceedings.

Item 1A — Risk Factors

Not applicable

Item 2 — Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

	(a)		Sales of Unregistered Securities. None

	(b)		Use of Proceeds. Not applicable.

	(c)		Issuer Purchases of Securities. None

Item 3. — Defaults Upon Senior Securities. None

Item 4 — [Removed and Reserved]

Item 5 — Other Information

	(a)		Information Required to be Reported on Form 8-K . None

	(b)		Changes in Security Holder Nomination Procedures. None

Item 6 — Exhibits


Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibits

3(a)		Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (1)
3(b)		Bylaws of the Company (2)
10(a)		Employment Agreement between Richard J. Morgan and the Company (3)
10(b)		Employment Agreement between Lamont Thomas and the Company (4)
10(c)		2004 Non Incentive Option Plan (5)
10(d)		First Amendment to Employment Agreement between Lamont Thomas and the Company (6)
10(e)		Employment Agreement between Michael T. Storm and CommerceFirst Bank attached hereto (7)
10(f)		Extension of Employment Agreement between Richard J. Morgan and the Company (8)
11		Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Income- See Notes to Financial Statements
21		Subsidiaries of the Registrant — The sole subsidiary of the Registrant is CommerceFirst Bank, a Maryland chartered commercial bank.
31(a)		Certification of Richard J. Morgan, President and CEO
31(b)		Certification of Michael T Storm, Executive Vice President and CFO
32(a)		Certification of Richard J. Morgan, President and Chief Executive Officer
32(b)		Certification of Michael T. Storm, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
99(a)		Amended and Restated Organizers Agreement (9)


(1)		Incorporated by reference to exhibit of the same number filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2, as amended, (File No. 333-91817)

(2)		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2007

(3)		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Company’s to Registration Statement on Form SB-2, as amended) (File No. 333-91817)

(4)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits 10(c) to the Company’s to Registration Statement on Form SB-2, as amended) (File No. 333-91817)

(5)		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-119988).

(6)		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007.

(7)		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(e) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007.

(8)		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2009.

(9)		Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 99(b) and 99(d) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2, as amended (File No. 333-91817)

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	COMMERCEFIRST BANCORP, INC.
Date: November 5, 2010	By:	/s/ Richard J. Morgan
	Richard J. Morgan, President and Chief Executive Officer



Date: November 5, 2010	By:	/s/ Michael T. Storm
	Michael T. Storm, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer