Whalatane
1 주 전
Well Jess you can review all my posts on Ihub ....boards posted on etc ...and review my positions on APP, RZLT , SWAV , SLNO etc .
APP and RZLT I still hold .
SWAV was bt out and selling SLNO ( up about 7X at time of sale ) was a huge mistake ( as I've noted )
Re AUPH , KZR , UNCY and ARDX
I'm not negative on AUPH . I think I responded to a post from Cosa some time that if I owned it I probably wouldn't be selling it .
However I'm not super positive on it and think theres limited upside .
Re KZR vs AUPH ...the early data on KZR IMHO looked better . But Co ran into mgt / BOD issues and eventually adverse events torpedoed the stock .
I posted long ago why I was exiting KZR
UNCY and ARDX
CMS appears determined to sink any opportunity for dialysis patients to be prescribed these new serum pho lowering drugs .
Yes they may have access to them , but the way the dialysis bundle works ( providers get to keep any $ left over between what CMS pays per dialysis ...about $273 .. and what they spend ) essentially means that dialysis providers won't prescribe the new Brand pho lowering drugs because of the expense of these new drugs .... and will push the low cost generics instead .
This will change if the Kidney Patient Act pass's
I expected UNCY to rally on FDA approval of its NDA ...Instead the mkt sold the news .
So I was very wrong on that
Kiwi
rosemountbomber
2 주 전
A Fierce Pharma article dated today about the restructuring, (As a side note, I didn't know that sales were flat from 2Q to 3Q so I will have to go back and look at that again):
https://www.amazon.com/YOGINGO-Pack-Christmas-Stockings-Personalized/dp/B0D86JV9ZQ/ref=sr_1_41?crid=1M8FRWGP1DKNR&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.P8XAFzm46Eai6mU0rxi3J657M6xzme7YFrtWeGO8Ahf5iEyxaa59x5UEfo2Pv8ou-RabXdTMjVcejZZbdETKHNdygdyXHKxl3FfdVnbe37_D9DIhEzbXxH_Y_3X2D3yhJ8hB3G35XqSNC8s-KwqGY0-YtcJAX61IcWZ3f5CCGjV6NMH9Q2hRVb2_YkHUwdBtFjDswLBWzLX37K9qkZGoRXr1XFshtSY2Jebev6a2fHYA77wocgoYlpiDeLzCMls71OzOwlD96yOHCo95Z26K0puFLkBiC_h6ptHEKLvSwUQ.AF18_HCbKa0FQd125MB3rir03ZFnegC_Hx0_-2CkKvI&dib_tag=se&keywords=christmas%2Bstockings&qid=1731015416&sprefix=christmas%2Bstocking%2Caps%2C191&sr=8-41&th=1
"After an activist investor revolted against the leadership team at Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, the CEO in question is resorting to restructuring.
Aurinia on Thursday unveiled a strategic overhaul that will slash 45% of the Canadian biotech’s entire workforce.
Aurinia expects the trimming will save it more than $40 million in annual operating expenses. The move will allow the company to focus on the commercialization of its lupus nephritis drug Lupkynis and the development of AUR200, an autoimmune disease candidate that Aurinia recently salvaged from its garbage can.
The cost savings will strengthen Aurinia’s financial position and “provide more flexibility to engage in future business building activities,” CEO Peter Greenleaf said on an investor call Thursday.
This marks the second round of layoffs at Aurinia in less than a year. Back in February, following a fruitless search for a potential buyer, Aurinia decided to reduce its headcount by about 25%.
At that time, Aurinia had decided to discontinue AUR200 but later revived the APRIL/BAFF inhibitor. Now, CEO Greenleaf in a Thursday statement said the organizational overhaul will help Aurinia accelerate the development of AUR200, an “important pipeline product.”
Greenleaf’s leadership at Aurinia was put into serious question when he and three other Aurinia board directors lost majority stockholder support during the company’s annual meeting. The company’s proposed executive pay packages also failed to garner majority investor backing.
As required by Aurinia’s company policy, the four directors submitted their resignations. But the board, while accepting the resignations of the other three members, argued that “there are exceptional circumstances that warrant the rejection of Mr. Greenleaf’s conditional resignation,” it said in a September securities filing. As a result, Greenleaf stayed on.
RELATED
Investor activism resurfaces at Aurinia after CEO’s board role, exec pay lost majority support
Amid broader investor disapproval of Aurinia’s leadership team, an activist shareholder who owned 2.2% of the company’s stock in August called for board and management changes, blasting them for “unchecked spending, ineffective leadership, and a clear lack of strategic direction.”
Lupkynis is currently Aurinia’s single commercial product, with third-quarter sales of $55.5 million. The number represents 36% year-over-year growth but is flat compared with $55 million in the second quarter. The number of patients on the therapy has grown about 25% to 2,422 as of the end of September, Greenleaf told investors on a call Thursday.
“This significant year-over-year growth was driven by patients restarting Lupkynis after being off therapy for an extended period of time, as well as hospital fills and maintaining high persistency rates year over year,” he said.
With total product revenue of $158.6 million in the first nine months of this year, Aurinia has kept its full-year guidance range of $210 million to $220 million.
As to AUR200, the company in September dosed the first participant in a phase 1 single-ascending dose study, with data expected in the first half of 2025. Aurinia has not disclosed the indications that it plans to develop AUR200 in. "
Pablo Bio
3 주 전
Since inception in 2011, venBio has raised roughly $2 billion in capital commitments and led investment rounds in 40+ companies, including
Labrys Biologics (acquired by Teva),
Aragon Pharmaceuticals (acquired by Johnson & Johnson),
Seragon Pharmaceuticals (acquired by Roche),
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: AUPH),
Apellis Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: APLS),
Checkmate Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: CMPI, acquired by Regeneron),
Turning Point Therapeutics (NASDAQ: TPTX, acquired by BMS),
Akero Therapeutics (NASDAQ: AKRO),
Harmony Biosciences (NASDAQ: HRMY),
Pharvaris (NASDAQ: PHVS ),
CinCor Pharma (NASDAQ: CINC, acquired by Astra Zeneca),
RayzeBio (NASDAQ: RYZB, acquired by BMS),
and many others. For more information, visit the venBio website at www.venbio.com and follow on LinkedIn.
Whalatane
2 월 전
RMB Because of the expense of Lupkynis ...around $90k a yr ..insurers have major prior authorization hurdles often requiring Benlysta to be tried first . Benny is around $50k a yr and due to go generic in 2025
The patent for Benlysta is set to expire in the United States in 2025 and in Europe in 2026
Tangs a major AUPH player now and will definitely want a deal done before a generic Benny is available.
On September 6, 2024, TANG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC (Trades, Portfolio) made a notable addition to its investment portfolio by acquiring 4,450,000 shares of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc (NASDAQ:AUPH), a biopharmaceutical company based in Canada.Sep 12, 2024
JMO
Kiwi
moosedogger
2 월 전
Don't they need a sale soon, hopefully before the end of the year?
Lupkynis is a drug owned by Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. It is protected by 3 US drug patents filed from 2021 to 2023 out of which none have expired yet. Lupkynis's patents will be open to challenges from 22 January, 2025. Based on its patents and exclusivities, its generic launch date is estimated to be Dec 07, 2037. Details of Lupkynis's patents and their expiration are given in the table below.
Patent # US7332472 Cyclosporine analogue mixtures and their use as immunomodulating agents
Expires: Oct, 2024 (11 days from now)
Status: Active
Patent # US11622991 Protocol for treatment of lupus nephritis
Expires: Dec, 2037 (13 years from now)
Status: Active
Patent # US10286036 Protocol for treatment of lupus nephritis
Expires: Dec, 2037 (13 years from now)
Status: Active
https://pharsight.greyb.com/drug/lupkynis-patent-expiration
moosedogger
2 월 전
Why isn't the medical world listening?
They seem to be ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ..........................
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of voclosporin for the treatment of lupus nephritis in the United States
CONCLUSIONS:
Following the inclusion of updated data in the cost-effectiveness analysis, voclosporin remains a cost-effective therapy for the treatment of active LN including in a Black, Hispanic, and Latino subpopulation, substantially below the ICER willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY.
https://www.jmcp.org/doi/full/10.18553/jmcp.2024.23324