Netlist Inc (QB) (NLST) 뉴스

lol!!! that would be to easy a solution to the problem, but you never know. just imagine the chaos that would cause big tec, because they couldnt tell their children what to do!!!

Those PTAB Judges would be good candidates for a D.O.G.E. audit. I'm sure they can be easily replaced with impartial A.I. "judges"

BolliverShagnasty $NLST I really need to research this post I just saw on X. The PTAB judges are "Administrative Law Judges" if they don't know how they can all learn to code!

thread.... https://stocktwits.com/BolliverShagnasty/message/605311205

SilviaJ $NLST Samsung pleads that declaratory judgment jurisdiction exists because on July 6, 2021, Google made an indemnification request to Samsung and on July 19, 2021, Lenovo made an indemnification request to Samsung.

Lenovo apparently supplies Google with equipment that contains Samsung products. The Federal Circuit is clear that the mere presence of an indemnification demand from a customer is insufficient to create declaratory judgement jurisdiction.

Samsung is required to plead as a threshold matter that it has an actual indemnification obligation to these customers as to the specific products accused of infringement in the Google Action, such that Samsung would be actually liable for the judgment.

thread........... https://stocktwits.com/SilviaJ/message/605309561

Netlist Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (8:20-cv-00993)
District Court, C.D. California
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.676.0.pdf

Netlist is pushing back the BOC pretrial date.

I’m away from my computer (hospital stay) so I can’t post the filing. But it’s free to post up if someone wants to do it.

The 523 CAFC oral argument on March 4, 2025 is scheduled for 10:00 in courtroom 201. Netlist vs. Samsung is second on the list. Here is the link @Stokd shared
https://www.youtube.com/@USCourtsCAFC/streams

NLST March 4, 2025: Oral argument for the '523 patent.

May/July 2025: Oral arguments for the '314 patent.

Fall 2025: Oral arguments for the '506 patent.

Winter 2025: Oral arguments for the '339 patent.

And the end of another great week in NLSTville, sarcastically said.
Another week down and oh.....about 20 years or so until the court cases are finally decided hopefully in our favor and we get paid.

i usually go to popeyes, but for the price of it i could make you aprx. 10lbs of boneless chicken breast in spag sauce from the oven and cut out all that grease!!! but do enjoy it!!!

lol stop eating ...... wife just called she's stopping at kfc best bang for the buck lol

no argument from me!!! but i'm not dreaming of the past. in fact i dont even want to think of how long i've been in this pos anymore......the problem is how much longer are we going to be tortured!!!

whats up?????? we're gonna be rich!!! 1 rack gone 2 left.....i'm just hope'n i'll have some left so i dont have to cook tomorrow!

I think he left to put his app in at NLST he'll be back later in the mean time " ONE OF THESE DAYS"

As a Netlist shareholder it's best not to dream. Because the dream thus far has been a nightmare.

I'll be there emmm emmm
lots of large buys going off whats up??????

lol!!! my whole house smells like garlic and sweet baby rays bbq sauce smothered over 3 racks of ribs.......should be done in an hour..........

i always heard if your gonna dream, dream big.......... https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/2104048/default.png

2nd paragraph......imagine the procrastination on the length of this due process once it gets started, again..........maybe they just say screw it and pay.........but that money is out there waitin for us.........the ultimate carrot.........
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/2103159/default.png

i just did!!!

you putting your app in???

DuffelBagChad $NLST READ THE HEADING.
And congratulations, this is the first of who knows how many Billion Dorror Pahtents that "we" own. The context of the Pahtent is so simple that even I'm able to comprehend the gross construction the new panel created to suit a narrative.
But it looks like yous have a B one here, and HONG knows it!
Can someone say DDR5, too?
https://charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_604975598.jpg

NLST Senior Administrative Assistant, Legal - job post
Netlist Inc
111 Academy Way, Irvine, CA 92617
$90,000 - $105,000 a year - Full-time

Handle confidential and sensitive information with discretion.
Communicate effectively with internal and external stakeholders.

Minimum of 5 years of administrative experience as a legal / administrative assistant in support of attorneys who practice before the U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, and/or the Patent Trial & Appeal Board...
https://www.indeed.com/q-senior-scheduler-l-fountain-valley,-ca-jobs.html?vjk=581de7e11a974411

New USPTO Leadership on the Horizon: Lutnick Confirmed as Commerce Secretary, Squires Expected as Director https://patentlyo.com/patent/2025/02/leadership-confirmed-secretary.html

Stokd $NLST Excellent!!! 🔥 Samsung's motion to stay the 463 case CAFC appeal and de-designate it as a companion case to the patent PTAB appeals was DENIED by the CAFC. Pic 1

And Sheasby filed a Notice Of Supplemental Authority in the 463 case, notifying Gilstrap of the CAFC order. Pic 2

The CAFC is not going to entertain Samsung's games...it's a completely different playing field and atmosphere. Feels good for a change after they were being handing whatever they asked from Scarsi and PTAB.
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/2088704/default.png 1
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/2088732/default.png 2

gotta luv it........... https://stocktwits.com/Scarleon/message/604893592

SilviaJ $NLST Working in lock-step:

As Micron recognized, the term rank was created by JEDEC to describe an arrangement of memory chips. The term “rank”—referring to a “line of soldiers ranged side by side (Webster’s Dictionary) aptly describes DRAM chips arranged side-by-side.

Netlist devised a way to cost-effectively increase memory-module capacity—by increasing the number of ranks—while maintaining compatibility with JEDEC. Netlist’s improved memory modules increased server memory capacity using more, cheaper, lower-capacity DRAM chips. That increased performance without requiring changes to existing memory controllers or motherboards.

Netlist also invented a way for memory controllers to
send commands to individual DRAM devices in a rank—in contrast to the prior art that sent commands to all devices in the rank. That enabled sending individually tailored power-management and calibration commands to each DRAM chip to optimize that chip’s performance and power usage.

Stokd $NLST Netlist filed their Opening Brief in the 912 CAFC appeal. It's on Pacer only and there is no way to make it publicly accessible like from Courtlistener.

I have to be somewhere this morning and wont have time to read or post interesting/significant parts till much later when I get back. I'll post pics of the Table Of Contents and Introduction below for a glimpse into the substance of the appeal.

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/2070731/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/2070738/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/2070760/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/2070779/default.png

$NLST The 523 CAFC oral argument on March 4, 2025 is scheduled for 10:00 in courtroom 201. Netlist vs. Samsung is second on the list. Here is the link @Stokd shared https://www.youtube.com/@USCourtsCAFC/streams

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/2060476/default.png

Ohio State theme song should now be NLST song. "Hang on Sloopy"
I'm from MI.. so absolutely not lol nothing from Ohio...... ;+) em how bout

" hale to the victors" lol

Here is something to review, to waste your time, as we wait for something to happen soon, one of these days!

https://fintel.io/s/us/nlst

and a hang'n and waiting we are, and have been!!!

Ohio State theme song should now be NLST song. "Hang on Sloopy"

“The USPTO Executive Team is filling up with familiar leaders who are expected to be supportive of a pro-patent agenda, which is consistent with the ideological and philosophical preferences of incoming Secretary Lutnick.”

USPTO Executive TeamHoward Lutnick, who is President Trump’s pick to become the next Secretary of Commerce, cleared a key hurdle in the Senate on Thursday, February 13, with the Senate voting 52-45 to invoke cloture. This means Lutnick will indeed soon be confirmed by the Senate to be the next Secretary of Commerce.

IPWatchdog has also reported that Coke Stewart was appointed Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for IP and Deputy Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), which then immediately put her into the role of Acting Director. And we have similarly reported that Valencia Martin Wallace has been tapped to become Acting Commissioner for Patents after now former Commissioner for Patents Vaishali Udupa resigned, electing to take advantage of the deferred resignation program offered federal employees by President Trump. But more quietly, the USPTO Executive Team is filling up with familiar leaders who are expected to be supportive of a pro-patent agenda, which is consistent with the ideological and philosophical preferences of incoming Secretary Lutnick, who himself is a prolific inventor who has made millions of dollars with his inventions, but also has felt the sting of patent eligibility chaos.

We have learned that Janet Gongola has become the Acting Chief Communications Officer (CCO) at the USPTO. Whether she will eventually become the CCO remains to be seen, but Gongola has repeatedly through her career with the agency been placed in important communications and engagement-related roles.

Gongola, who previously served as Vice Chief Judge for Strategy at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board from 2016 to 2025, will now manage a team responsible for development and implementation of the USPTO’s strategic communications in coordination with the U.S. Department of Commerce and the White House. In addition, she will support and advise the Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director of the USPTO. Prior to joining the PTAB, Gongola served as a Senior Advisor for Law and Policy in the Office of the Director from 2014 to 2016, Associate Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy from 2012 to 2014, the Patent Reform Coordinator for implementation of the America Invents Act from 2011 to 2012. Gongola started her USPTO career in 2006 as an Associate Solicitor in the Office of the Solicitor.

While some in the inventor and patent owner communities may try to dismiss Gongola or view her negatively given her service on the PTAB and with the America Invents Act (AIA), that would be a mistake. Yes, Gongola has served in a variety of roles at the USPTO, and it is true that inventors and patent owners often have a dim view of the PTAB and of the AIA, but Gongola is an effective communicator who through her experience is well positioned to promote what is widely believed will be a pro-patent agenda pursued by the Commerce Department during President Trump’s second term.

Another new face at the USPTO is Christopher Shipp, who is returning to the USPTO after serving in various senior executive capacities during the first Trump Administration under then-Director Andrei Iancu. Shipp is now the Chief of Staff for the USPTO, which means he is the Director’s principal advisor. He will advise the Director on budget, policies, priorities, and global communications of President Trump’s intellectual property agenda. He will also serve on the USPTO’s Executive Committee, and he will manage the day-to-day policy coordination process with the White House, the Department of Commerce, and other federal agencies.

Shipp, a 2024 Republican National Committee Platform Member, and a Platform Committee Whip, has also held multiple positions with the Montana Republican Party, serving as Executive Director and Communications Director over the course of three election cycles.

https://ipwatchdog.com/2025/02/16/trump-administrations-uspto-executive-team-taking-shape/id=186071/

yes, i agree. it just goes to show how incompetent, and, or malicious they can be without being held liable for their actions. i posted that just for all to see, or should i say, remember what and who we are dealing with.

That’s BS!

However, at the end of 2020, when the contract ended, Netlist demanded a higher royalty than before, and Samsung Electronics refused to renew the contract, amplifying the conflict.

That’s not accurate at all.

Samsung Electronics, Final Battle for US Netlist Patent Invalidation… Going to Appeals Court
https://www.seoulwire.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=635941

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/2034967/default.jpg

SilviaJ In addition, this patent does not just read on a subset of the memory market (like the LRDIMM)......though it does appear to extend to those models.

From the Delaware Case: In "its affirmative acts of making, selling, distributing, or making available the accused DDR4 LRDIMM that infringe the '523 patent"

But it extends to perhaps all memory modules......which suggests that it is one of Netlist's more important patents.

This overview indicates how the 523 is a technological advancement to the very large RDIMM market, as well.
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/2021708/default.jpeg

"squeeze" as in make these #@$%#^&#*&%$@$$%7***^%%$$@#@'S pay us!!!

New OTC Short interest report for NLST.

As of 01/31/25 - NLST short interest increased 3.21% (up 273,237 shares) to 9,043,414 shares, from 8,770,177 shares.

More "squeeze" fuel, for when good news hits from the CAFC!

Stokd $NLST With the 523 CAFC oral argument around the corner on March 4th, linked below is the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Youtube page that streams oral arguments live.

An opportunity to check out our new CAFC specialist Milliken from Sterne Kessler. And keep in mind the 523 patent, which is part of the Samsung/Google DE case and is stayed pending BOC case resolution, was deemed valid/patentable by the PTAB, so we’re in a different and stronger position than we will be with most other patent CAFC oral arguments.

And having the 523 affirmed valid by CAFC will clean/simplify the DE case when BOC does finally resolve, after trial concludes followed by Scarsi final judgment.

If Delaware case resumes once CAFC rules on the 523, there will be nothing left for the Delaware judge to do regarding validity of the patent, the case/trial will continue with infringement as the sole focus on what will then be a CAFC affirmed valid patent. Trial should be fun!
https://www.youtube.com/@USCourtsCAFC/streams

wow.....look at that gtsm, bid vs the ask.......99,500 at .68 with 1000 at 69 on the ask....... strange days indeed......

Well, it could very well be that SK is using the HBM memory patents that Netlist has out there. If they want to continue to use them, they will have to renegotiate the contract to do so. Or I'm sure there will be an additional lawsuit added to the fray, if they decide to just let the contract expire and continue to use them.

There is only the contract for current use. SK already paid the royalties for past use of NLST patents (yes, the $40M was a pittance, but that's what it was for). I believe the contract now in place is for any CURRENT patents that NLST has, plus any patents that are being contested at the CAFC level.

Does that make sense? Is no one else concerned about this? yes it makes total sense, and yes i am concerned. we just need the boc trial under our belt next month and we should be good to go after that. i hope anyway!!!

you just gave me something else to worry about over the wkend thxs alot.. rotflol

but to answer your question no I'm not worried about it HONG has been building up the company the last two yrs.. Will he sell more shares to finance? probably but the cases he has brought against sam goog mu all will be won CAFC will assure that in the next month or so. I can't remember the date of the cafc ruling help me out someone....

gdog, I get the history. And I understand the rationale. But from a savvy business sense, SK must know they're pretty much the only reason NLST is still afloat. If their contract with NLST weren't in place, NLST would have no resources to pay for all the ongoing litigation. They would go bankrupt. So logically, if SK doesn't renegotiate, and just uses NLST patents (like the other infringers), NLST will go bankrupt and all the litigation goes away, and no one owes a bankrupt company anything. Is it unethical? Yes. Would it make business sense for SK and also all the other infringers? Probably.

Does that make sense? Is no one else concerned about this?

Papa SK settled with nlst because they had like everyone else already stolden the tec from NLST and were in line to be sued also... SK uses NLST's technology already, thats why I wished they would have mentioned NLST in the artical as 100 said, thats why they will renew IMHO.

lol!!! won=money!!!

my thinking as well.

i'm gonna go with my gut fwiw and say they renew. afterall, they did settle and pay us.