HUMBL Inc (PK) (HMBL) 뉴스

Polaroids were an obvious scam by Edwin H. Land. A device that takes a picture and develops the film and spits it out of the camera? Really? Unpossible! Clearly wizardry designed to lure marks. Developing film instantly is very scammy and fraudy.

I wanted to beat the usual suspects to the punch on this one 😆. GLTY

I signed up and got early access haven't funded yet but looks really good and super user friendly 

Very well wrote out. There is something bigger forsure happening here behind the scenes we just got to enjoy the ride until it comes 💯🤝

I love when this message board is more exciting that the actual stock. I will say that I never considered HMBL being illegally shorted, but after the discussion here this week, I'd have to say that I believe it could be a real possibility.

I actually decided a while ago to get completely out of the stock and then I saw some very unusual trading. If anyone is interested, go back to the charts and see when the stock went from .0006-7ish to .0031. I saw unusual activities right before it happened. Look at the date of this occurrence and look at my posts the week before. I predicted the move up with great accuracy. The trading pattern showed a setup.

There have been several trading oddities here before the WSCG and Ybyra deal. Having 4 bil on the bid for about a month was definitely odd. Before that it was 2-3billion for a long time. I attributed it to someone - a white knight sitting at the bid to make toxic debt holders ineffective while buying at the ask. Maybe for a later conversion to preferred C shares after things got better. Pacific Lion suggested that they would do something like this, but the Q's said that they didn't actually live up to the agreement. It still might be what happened. If so, it was a genius move to eliminate toxic debt like nothing I have seen in over 30 years. Not a flippant remark. Even if this is not the reason for the crazy trading, the thought of someone effectively neutering a toxic debt holder by sitting at the bid will be discussed in finance schools across the country for decades. I studied toxic debt for years and have never seen anything like it. Caused me to start buying shares beyond what I imagined I would want.

Now, someone (well a few people on this board) have presented an alternative possibility. That the stock was illegally shorted and now that the balance sheet was cleaned up and there is potential of a net profit in either the last q or in this q, the company doesn't look like it will go out of business. If someone was actually illegally shorting this stock thinking they could eliminate the company completely and hiding the short shares by misreporting the shares (ok, maybe many many someones), we might be sitting on a very unusual situation.

I will state that I have been trading stocks since I was 12 years old (Polaroid was my first stock at 12 - 48 years ago). I have never seen trading activity such as this in my life. I would spend every day for well over a year and a half watching every trade in amazement. Wife says, "how boring" but I knew this was something very different. Mind boggling. It was exciting even though I was told by the basher clowns that we would see a no bid situation soon.

So, it might have been a battle between shorts and a white night - or future owner - or Pacific Lion thinking out of the box - or George Sharp lending a hand... or it might have been a few hedge funds thinking that HMBL would be out of business very soon after it hit $7 on a dreaded RS with a ton of preferred C shares being able to dump in a company that had no product yet. If they assumed that the company couldn't possibly survive a bankruptcy, they may have misreported the short shares so that they wouldn't have needed to buy them back, it is conceivable that as the debt was being paid down in record speed, it was possible that those very companies were trying to buy back at the bid to cover their shorts before anyone found out that those shares were fraudulent. It isn't like we had several billion share trading days here - except that is exactly what happened. Volume for a company that had no actual product until after Dec 3 was oddly high.

We blew through $58mil in debt - most of which was toxic in less than a year and a half, but the stock price didn't drop to .0001. We added 12 bil at a time when the stock actually rose. WHAT? Not possible, is it? Most will say big deal... The company was making very little in revenue during that time and never had a net profit, but was able to reduce debt by over $58mil through mostly toxic debt. Talk to anyone who has ever run a business or a finance professor and ask if that is possible. The answer is NO. Something is happening here.

Have yall signed up for humbl etx? If not, well, it looks like the new talking point must stray away from they have no working products because this sucker works.

Got me some more today !!!

lol....what bubble are you in man. No.......jesus.

Are you admitting to being a fraud?

It's basic check kiting. It always has been. You play the lag. Not sure kiting still works like it did....but you could drag a week out until pay/delivery by kiting from bank to bank. Been there...done that. It's not something you can do often...and..... I'm sure it would suck ass getting caught...lol.

This is the thing that the "get shorty" con artist crow hopes is ignored, exactly what you said. There's a buyer on one end of a trade with a broker than expects a share to be delivered into their account. If it isn't within the prescribed time frame, it becomes an FTD. The seller cannot hide an FTD from the buyer in the trade. Thus, if there are no FTD's, then there are no shorts, naked or otherwise.

Interesting comment... I have had and still have friends in the mafia. They are never on the wrong side of a transaction for some reason.When someone claims a win ratio of 95%, it typically signals that the discussion might venture into areas that could make some participants uncomfortable...

! Please review:

Translation needed

https://www.gov.br/pgfn/pt-br/servicos/editais-de-notificacao/editais-2024/EDITALDEABERTURADEPROCEDIMENTOADMINISTRATIVODERECONHECIMENTODERESPONSABILIDADEN188320.11.2024.pdf

The PGFN identified that the taxpayers listed were administrators of legal entities that have debts with the Union registered in Active Debt. It was also verified that, due to the absence of economic and financial indicators, these legal entities were extinguished irregularly, that is, they ended their activities without following the legal rules for terminating a legal entity.

When a legal entity is terminated irregularly, the administrator at the time of the irregular termination may be held responsible for the debts
of the legal entity registered in Active Debt. At the end of this notice, you can see the table with the list of taxpayers, debtor legal entities and their respective Procedure number Administrative Recognition of Responsibility. The taxpayers listed in the table may be considered debtors at the end of the Administrative Procedure of Recognition of Responsibility.

I am quite familiar with a lot of Securities law. It has been an interest for many years.

I find it is more entertaining and helpful to debate this stuff when I actually understand how it works.

My interest in that rule was driven a number of years back by iHub’s now defunct IRP program…and the disclosure requirements.

One would wonder why you are quite familiar with Finra Rule 2111🧐

LMAO

So your my financial advisor AND my therapist now.

>>>Deep inside you do but I get it, conflict of interest>>>

I'm quite sure I'm okay but listen the minute I'm not I'll reach out to you for help.

If I was being honest you sound quite upset and annoyed I hope you're okay!!!

It's the weekend relax buddy Monday will be here soon enough.


$HMBL


#DYING LOL

Posts and reads don’t get us money on table. Foote’s times were proof of such. PPS now is proof of such. People also like to be entertained by a ponzi drama sometimes. HMBL smells, looks and taste like it.

Facts speak for itself $0.0006… Countdown continues… You must agree with such…

Deep inside you do but I get it, conflict of interest… Everyone underwater in here. I only hope newbies don’t get trap in here

Thanks for your cooperation. Have a great weekend

Lol, you too. 😏🥂

LOL…have a good night.

Welcome to the $HMBL board.

Thank You For Fighting the good fight.

#1 MOST POSTED ON IHUB

#3 MOST READ ON IHUB

$HMBL

Lots of 👀 on us for a good reason

It's there for all to see. There would be no point in spoon-feeding you anymore, as you are clearly too confused to have a conversation with. I'd seek professional help. Clearly, something is very wrong.

I answered the question:

Individuals are not payed to type messages in forums to effectuate a market maker's recourse

Grow the f' up or learn how it works. Preferably both.

“ Actually, I have, all throughout this now mundane conversation. At this point, I'd refer you to the previous posts where that has already been answered…”

Keep telling yourself that…or is there a specific post of yours you are referring to?

But I have to give you credit for realizing you were about to step in it…and have backed away. .

Actually, I have, all throughout this now mundane conversation. At this point, I'd refer you to the previous posts where that has already been answered. Instead of being all ears, you should use your eyes and brain as well.

You are asking a very ignorant and immature question that no matter how many times it is explained...it goes through one ear and out the other. Individuals are not payed to type messages in forums to effectuate a market maker's recourse. That in itself is vulgar when you direct it to an individual in a message forum. I don't appreciate the mentality or discourse so please just fuck off.

“I’ve already defended and explained exactly what I said multiple times.“

Actually you haven’t…

But one more chance…

How can a foreign regulation, regulator, or rule affect the trading activity on HMBL in the US or even a HMBL investor?

I am all ears….

And I picked that picture out quite awhile ago…for obvious reasons . LOL.

“Can you assure investors that there is absolutely no naked short selling activity associated with HMBL shares in any manner?“

Since whether a short is “naked” or not is only determined at settlement at T+1 (use to be T+2)…at that point if the shares are not delivered then settlement does not occur and an FTD is generated.

Since there are no FTD’s then there are no naked short positions in HMBL.

Now there are other reasons FTD’s can be generated including long transactions…but again HMBL has ZERO, 0, none, nada FTD’s.

Not sure how much clearer I can be.

@TenKay Your profile picture is fitting. I’ve already defended and explained exactly what I said multiple times. You disregarded most of your wrong statements along the way and continue to try and steer the conversation to have any standing. You seem too confused to have a conversation with and appear to lack even the most basic knowledge of investing. Shame...

Ok I’m nuts yay I will answer, but good sir you have conveyed your opinion to this board on this matter with self knowledge and a counter argument as established facts I asked you a few times. IMO a very serious question, looking strictly for a yes or no answer from you. You won’t answer but call me names and use vulgarity. So are you telling this board that no illegal naked short positions exist with HMBL shares and are you not representing any MM entity on this HMBL thread/board?

Your reply hinges solely on Failures to Deliver.

I'll provide another chance for clarity...

Can you assure investors that there is absolutely no naked short selling activity associated with HMBL shares in any manner?

There are no naked short positions in HMBL.

As there are no FTD’s…

As for stating facts being “investment advice”?? LOLOL.

I am quite familiar with FINRA Rule 2111.

So in other words words you can’t defend or explain what you said…

It just appears you want to avoid an actual debate about the issue of “foreign” activity or “foreign” rules that you think impact Hmbl activity.

And you are smart to do so…

TenKay, You convey your perspective on this matter with assurance and authority, presenting your counter argument as established fact. Given that your statement may be interpreted as financial advice due to its factual presentation, are you prepared to publicly affirm that no illegal naked short positions exist with HMBL shares?

Thought I hit reply to you, and I'd think that understanding macroeconomic effects is basic investing knowledge. I'm surprised that someone who spends so much time on an investment forum doesn't grasp that, or you're just fud having fun playing dumb.

“Clearly, I'm talking to you.“

And yet responding to yourself…lol. What are you afraid of?

“That does not mean foreign countries' rules don't matter one bit. Perhaps you can figure out why, or if history repeats, you'll need someone to spoon-feed you that as well.”

There is nothing to figure out because they don’t apply to a US stock that only trades in the US.

If there is some explanation I am all ears…go ahead…edumacate me…

…unless, of course, you can’t

Are you severely confused, as shown previously, or just fud having fun? Clearly, I'm talking to you. Onto the nuances and semantics—far from the original post—after all the other facts you can't deny. That does not mean foreign countries' rules don't matter one bit. Perhaps you can figure out why, or if history repeats, you'll need someone to spoon-feed you that as well.

lol.... there are 28,526,549,733 free trading common shares. The share price you are quoting is under 1/100 of a penny. This ticker is solicited(form 211).....there is still some interest...so?

Why the fuck would you think that number is a big deal and a broker dealer would need my help in protecting "it's interest"..let alone pay me for that service ????????????????????????????????????

Learn how this works man and stay off reddit and shit like it for your education- cause' you certainly are not getting one.

Where’s the PR from HMBL?

Working thru the weekend. 💪

Ask for a review by admin…and no I am not a mod.

You talking to yourself? Hoping I don’t reply?

If a US stock does not trade on a foreign exchange…it’s not subject to any foreign regulations.

If any stock trades on a US exchange or OTCLink it is subject to US Securities Law.

This is not a hard concept.

I know right‼️🗽 it makes you think of the French slums. They will pay it for it one day and we shall laugh in the face of scoffers

33,898,842,520 OS omfg. This ting is jank.

Speaking of "shorting", I sold back my shorted shares of SMX @ $4 today 
Easy $$$ after there RS.
Now wait on Monday to maybe "buy" some shares........waiting patiently on merger news.....

Either way Yryba is not legitimate and all three stocks, well scams.

Obviously those carnies at Yryba knew they were getting booted from their home Brazilian exchange so plan B, get to scamming in America before the event actually occurs then hope no one like Omo finds out their reality.

Glad I was able to provide some clarification for you and your wrong statements. As for foreign countries' rules not mattering one bit, that is simply your opinion. Nothing you have said changes the clearly stated facts.

HMBL does not trade on ANY foreign exchange. So what rules there are in other countries matters not one bit.

“ As for options besides borrowing the shares, they can seek an extension, negotiate with the counterparty, and use substitute securities.”

Find me anything that supports this statement? Reg? Ruling? etc.? Smh

And I never said every FTD was a naked short. But EVERY naked short is an FTD.

But it matters not because HMBL has ZERO FTD’s

There is no naked short.

My boss? Is my wife doing the site maintenance??

😂

A foreign country's rules determine their own regulatory framework, which can lead to variations in how short selling and FTDs are managed. Refer to the link to learn more about Canada's mandatory close-out process.

As for options besides borrowing the shares, they can seek an extension, negotiate with the counterparty, and use substitute securities.

Additionally, an FTD can occur without naked shorting if there is a legitimate delay or issue in the settlement process.

Again words matter, and understanding these nuances is important.

Held at DTC
27,623,999,867
01/30/2025
sure looks like it will run yet again as the Boyz are loading 0006/0007