sspalmo
9 시간 전
We all know that most lawsuits are settled with IP, not actual money. Since Enzolytics no longer claims to own any IP, then I-Glow is just trying to save shareholders the hassle of trying to after the leadership they believe defrauded them. It's not like leadership made any money on this unsuccessful venture. We should all leave Chandra alone and let him try to get this going again with Adnexus, 1606 Corp, Chandradrishti, Sutra, Sanctum Therapeutics, WhatEverHeWantsToCallIt.com, etc. (I am being Sarcastic for those that can't tell)
I-Glow
16 시간 전
You don't know what you are talking about - you were pumping ENZC and even defended the SAGA fake deal.
Do not give any money to this guy for a fake lawsuit. As he is a scammer/pumper.
Participating in any way of a P&D scheme can violate a number of federal securities laws including Section 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Section 9(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: This section specifically targets market manipulation, including practices like "painting the tape" or creating false impressions of market activity. It prohibits actions that artificially influence the price or volume of a security, which is central to pump-and-dump schemes.
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: This is the broad antifraud provision that makes it unlawful to use any manipulative or deceptive device in connection with the purchase or sale of any security. The SEC enforces this provision through Rule 10b-5, which prohibits fraud, misrepresentation, and deceit in securities transactions. Pump-and-dump schemes typically violate this rule because they involve spreading false or misleading information to manipulate stock prices.
In more severe cases of pumping, criminal penalties may be imposed by the Department of Justice (DOJ), including imprisonment and significant fines for willful violations.
I saw ComputerBux who was pumping on iHub and he was indicted by the Justice Department.
"Stock Pumping is not illegal. Find me a single law that says so; show any proof IHub pumpers ever went to jail."
IHub pumpers Komando Robot and Hot Stock Ace received 5 and 3 years in Federal Prison. For pumping several stocks.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2014/comp-pr2014-159.pdf
I have shown you the Securities laws about pumping and an example of 2 ihub pumpers who were indicted and found quilty of pumping.
Two Sentenced to Prison for Stock Manipulation Scheme
https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdwa/pr/two-sentenced-prison-stock-manipulation-scheme
This was for Hot Stock Ace.
"The SEC alleged that the defendants sold their shares and reaped more than $2.5 million in profits, and the stocks subsequently collapsed and resulted in losses to investors. Earlier this year, Mr. Hawatmeh and Mr. Mrowca were sentenced to five and three years in prison, respectively, for their participation in the scheme."
Alexander Hawatmeh is Komando Robot.
Those are stone cold facts to prove your nonsense that - "Stock Pumping is not illegal." isn't close to being true.
IG
sspalmo
1 일 전
Yes, you are correct. This was essentially a dead stock when Alex was pumping it. The day that he started dumping shares (September 16, 2020) is the day that the BioClonetics Letter of Intent was announced. He did continue to pump Enzolytics after September 16, 2020 while dumping the shares he owned.
https://www.accesswire.com/606214/enzolytics-inc-announces-execution-of-letter-of-intent-with-bioclonetics-immunotherapeutics-inc-with-additional-update-on-2020-initiatives
archilles, is that the day it became a good stock where pumping is acceptable and legal? Mid-September was essentially the start of the run up to $0.96 per share. The leadership of the company was informing shareholders of progress being made on the work done, and that they had real results. That's also the time this board turned positive, and many enthusiastic users were posting about the company. Some of those posts might have been considered pumping. Most of what Enzolytic's leadership stated in press releases was covered under the forward-looking statement clause. I don't believe the statements made by leadership in the discord, on twitter, the James Hick's interviews, etc. are covered by the forward-looking statement clause.
Valuator2
1 일 전
FWIW, that was "old ENZC", prior to the merger with BioClonetics. I wasn't following it then, but the time frame prior to the merger doesn't seem to be very impressive. JMHO.
Beginning on September 16, 2020, and continuing through September 25, 2020, Gallagher sold approximately 6.5 million of his 7 million shares, but during that time, he continued to issue tweets touting ENZC and encouraging others to buy without disclosing he was not buying himself, but rather selling.
sspalmo
2 일 전
At the time Steven Gallagher (Alex Delarge) was pumping Enzolytics, was it a dead stock? At the time I, and suspect many others, thought it was a good stock that was increasing in value. The leadership of the company was informing shareholders of progress being made on the work done. They were telling us that they had real results. I am still unclear if they ever had real results or if they were just dangling a carrot in front of the investors.
Beginning on September 16, 2020, and continuing through September 25, 2020, Gallagher sold approximately 6.5 million of his 7 million shares, but during that time, he continued to issue tweets touting ENZC and encouraging others to buy without disclosing he was not buying himself, but rather selling.
https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/2021/steven-gallagher-arrested-and-charged-with-securities-fraud-for-using-his-twitter-account-to-operate-a-pump-and-dump-scheme/
archilles
2 일 전
In my humble opinion,
Stock pumping of a dead stock( with an ill intention for example, knowing that there is no real results, just lies to deceive and steal shareholders monies) is illegal.
Stock pumping of a good stock, for example, with real work having been done and have real results, is acceptable and legal
docsetc
2 일 전
Stock Pumping is not illegal. Find me a single law that says so; show any proof IHub pumpers ever went to jail. Pure BS.
I wish it was illegal, but only if you catch them in truly illegal/False claims, serious ones can you get into any trouble, and its usually NOT jail time.
(And jail time would have to include criminally involved insider information or some other form of stock manipulation.) Don't believe me, go ask a securities lawyer. You're all capable of calling one.
Boiler-room operations are illegal, pumping fraud with full knowledge that you are running a scam operation and the customer has no positive results available in advance of your pumping. That can land you in jail. There's even a decent movie about it with Vince Vaughn and Ed Harris, check it out if you can't look up real law.
Those clowns over on Twitter/X, have been careful to not post anything truly indicative of what they are probably doing, (besides French-kissing Chandra's crack).
While they may be worthless a-holes, you'll never see them in jail. Prove they had inside stuff from Chandra, and that may well be the case, then you could pursue something, but it would be mostly on Chandra.
There were testing results published on Clone3 and Clone7, some of those are on Adnexus' new website. No one said anything about Clinical trials. Efficacy is not only determined in formal trials. Efficacy can be publicly reported in volunteer trials, repeat lab testing, partner vetting, etc. Bonnie repeated some of the PR stuff, she did not falsely push anything else. You guys need a life.
GLTA
docsetc
2 일 전
Stock Pumping is not illegal. Find me a single law that says so; show any proof IHub pumpers ever went to jail. Pure BS.
I wish it was illegal, but only if you catch them in truly illegal/False claims, serious ones can you get into any trouble, and its usually NOT jail time.
(And jail time would have to include criminally involved insider information or some other form of stock manipulation.) Don't believe me, go ask a securities lawyer. You're all capable of calling one.
Boiler-room operations are illegal, pumping fraud with full knowledge that you are running a scam operation and the customer has no positive results available in advance of your pumping. That can land you in jail. There's even a decent movie about it with Vince Vaughn and Ed Harris, check it out if you can't look up real law.
Those clowns over on Twitter/X, have been careful to not post anything truly indicative of what they are probably doing, (besides French-kissing Chandra's crack).
While they may be worthless a-holes, you'll never see them in jail. Prove they had inside stuff from Chandra, and that may well be the case, then you could pursue something, but it would be mostly on Chandra.
There were testing results published on Clone3 and Clone7, some of those are on Adnexus' new website. No one said anything about Clinical trials. Efficacy is not only determined in formal trials. Efficacy can be publicly reported in volunteer trials, repeat lab testing, partner vetting, etc. Bonnie repeated some of the PR stuff, she did not falsely push anything else. You guys need a life.
GLTA
docsetc
3 일 전
Yeah, 1606 Corp looked dubious, at best and at first sight. Now, today, up-close, they look downright laughable. Their parent, SinglePoint actually looked pretty decent just 60 days ago, and now they disavow a lot of their alleged old connections, and are barely breaking even, if that.
Sad what some promote themselves to be.
GLTY
docsetc
3 일 전
Well, for my 2 cents SS, I was referring to the most potential of pumpers having any effect, and the potential for legal action if they had insider info. That time frame seemed like where I saw more pumpers blindly pumping in the face of negative news coming out, than at any other time.
No telling how long Chandra has been working social media and pumpers. Looking over his old posts, early 2019 was his entry point, best I can tell. But the greatest potential I saw was the 2020-2021 jump in PPS, and the next two years of timelines Harry was putting out, that allegedly, CCC knew nothing of (?)
GLTA
docsetc
3 일 전
Yeah, great thoughts all, SS, but the SEC has the collars of Harry Z and ENZC right now, and will push back any and all other cases brought against them until they're fully adjudicated too. So, our focus, while we have to name Harry Z, is on CCC. Every lawyer we've spoken to about this, 4 now, have told us as far as Harry and ENZC go, the SEC will control all balls in that arena until they're done with them. So, the other direction, that has a solution or two available to them, is how we're proceeding over here.
I would love to get a picture of Chandra's face when he's served though. I know the Cotropia's will just show silenced anger and annoyance, but prima-donna Gaurav, will be like a zit getting popped.
GLTA
sspalmo
3 일 전
I am confused by this:
With ENZC, only the last two years (2022-4/2024) or the run up to .96c pps, could be involved
The run up to $0.96 per share occurred in late 2020 - early 2021. In my opinion this would be the time period to focus on to see if any pumpers had inside information. The 2023 spike as result of the SPAC deal could also be investigated, but in my opinion the run to $0.96 would be a better use of resources. I believe whether this inside information is true or false, it would be illegal to trade shares based on it. I would also think it would be illegal to post this information on a message board knowing it will drive up enthusiasm and share price. I'm not accusing anyone of doing this, but I do remember early on that quite a bit of information was being shared on here before showing up on otcmarkets.com. I have no evidence of anyone doing this, but if the SEC is already doing an investigation, it is something they may be looking into. I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. If anyone knows better about trading based on insider information I would love to hear about it.
docsetc
3 일 전
Unfortunately, stock pumping is not illegal. Neither are cheerleaders on the sidelines of the Cleveland Browns, who are also pumping a known loser.
If the SEC can prove any pumpers had inside information from say, Chandra, (the prime candidate), and it was knowingly false, then they could go after a pumper as an accessory, with Chandra & Harry being the primary culprits and defendants. With ENZC, only the last two years (2022-4/2024) or the run up to .96c pps, could be involved, and no one I know has any evidence to that fact. It would be interesting if any came up.
Only 1 item comes up as a possible potential for your thinking. That's if both Clone3 and Clone7 never showed any efficacy. If they hid that, and Chandra and his pimps knew it, then you could nail the bunch of them. I'm just not sure that's the case at hand.
GLTA
docsetc
3 일 전
Don't get too mentally tied up with the new administration. Things will get better of course, but this SEC case is filed, well-structured and it's going to vaporize Harry's ENZC, and hopefully to some extent, him too.
I can only hope he gets a criminal referral to the DOJ over this. Everyone here should offer to testify to the SEC on this case, as they are not even hitting his false promises and public lies. But, it does sound like they have plenty to do him in.
Just looking at some other similar SEC cases recently, Harry will lose any ability to be an officer or owner in any public traded company. He'll be barred from Exchanges forever, and he should be destitute by the time they finish with him. Then, if we're lucky, he gets that referral to the DOJ.
MythicProphet100
3 일 전
Best of luck to them trying to move forward without addressing the past ENZC corruption—it’s not going to happen. Too many shareholders are already furious, and if this isn’t resolved, even more lawsuits are inevitable. Investing a few million dollars to settle this issue would go a lot further than trying to sweep it under the rug, especially if they have the cures. Which I suspect they do at this point, but I respect everyone's viewpoint until we have proof.
If they had no intention of resolving this, I strongly suspect they’d already be named in the SEC lawsuit. With Trump and his team running the show now, the timeline for fraudulent players like Harry and his crew is running out.
Good luck to all!
docsetc
3 일 전
IF CCC turned state's evidence against ENZC and Harry & Co, then they may have gained limited immunity in this action, and, have a shot at reacquiring ENZC.
Personally, I think this is a very distant longshot, and would not place any faith in it. I think Harry's done so much damage to the stock and company itself, the SEC will flatten them completely, just to recoup some legal penalties and fees. They'd have to get every penny back that Harry swindled and hid, and I don't think that's realistic either.
It is a fair bet that CCC turned in Harry & Co., or leaked what needed leaking, but even then, having ENZC shares resuscitated is a very, very, low-odds bet. Hope I'm wrong, but....well, I don't think I am.
That Charles and Joe disappear incommunicado, while Chandra pumps and evades, is just about the most pathetic lack of manhood I can see on the PINKS these days. They win the OTC: Most Worthless Trophy. Whatever happens legally to them, might not be enough.
GLTA
docsetc
3 일 전
Chandra's had every chance to come clean with all of us. Instead, he's gotten connected with another super-shady funding source. His patterns continue. CBDW is a walking dead-man joke of a stock, and their parent company is in dire straits. Either Chandra has another huge source of funding, or their entire new show is about to run off over a cliff.
In any case, Chandra isn't telling, just pumping again. So, the legal action has been placed in the hands of the lawyers, who won't complete assessing the case until about the final holiday season. The realities of working with a class-action firm. They have fully-reviewed the initial issues with ENZC, and the escape activity of Adnexus Biotech. I've been informed of the 3 ways they'll be going after Adnexus if they formally sign off on the class action and prepare it for a Judge. I can't reveal too much yet, as the case targets participate on this board.
I wish I could accelerate the process, but I don't control the legal matter at hand.
GLTA
MythicProphet100
4 일 전
After this week we need to take a step back and look at a bigger picture with all the recent news from the Trump administration and the potential SEC admin turnover coming soon.
Like everyone here, I’m frustrated, but it’s clear the CCCs can’t move forward until the ENZC issue is resolved. We are not going away!
Sounds like the SEC currently has a strong case against the six defendants, but it’s also worth noting that the CCC gang has not been charged—that’s a fact. Meanwhile, someone is consistently buying, which has kept the price relatively stable when it should have dropped significantly. Why would anyone be buying at this point?
Doc is thankfully, pushing for resolution through the legal system which I am sure is having some impact on on urgency to this resolved. Thank you again Doc and we all need to rally behind him and support this effort.
Chandra may have gone quiet with us, but he is still posting on X. ENZC news is a joke. Could the CCC gang be working behind the scenes to resolve this quickly so they can move forward? The silence from the CCC gang, while frustrating, might be tied to a legal strategy.
A couple of noteworthy points:
Gary Gensler is hinting at retirement as early as Thanksgiving. Praise God!!!
The Trump administration is focusing on naked shorting, partly due to the stock DJT. This will a big issue with the new Admin.
While immediate action in our favor might not be guaranteed, there are positive developments happening behind the scenes that we shouldn’t overlook. Let’s keep the faith. 🙏 Good luck to all!
docsetc
6 일 전
Achilles, they did all of what you just said, but still, the best you can do is argue that in court as inferred ownership of the IP's to ENZC, in a very limited extent.
The IP's, on documentation in any event, kept the IP's in personal ownership by CCC, AND, even the old/current ENZC website made no statement claiming it owned those properties outright. CCC will successfully argue their properties were assigned and/or licensed to ENZC, only for refinement and development purposes under their merger agreement as Bioclinetics.
We'd have to discover new evidence of anything different.
Harry/ENZC signed off on CCC leaving the company and ENZC having no remaining ownership or control of those IP's in any way whatsoever.
Your points will be helpful in court, to proving shared liability and intent, but it won't zing them in any way without the other main charges leveled first. Taking those properties off and setting up the same shop elsewhere, leaving the initial investors holding their debt bag, is what ties them to fraud, that and taking part in all of Harry's fraudulent operations.
Guess why, probably, Adnexus has not gone public yet? They know legal lines may catch up to them at the throat, and their benefactor, CBDW, is not in good shape right now.
GLTA
Hot Features
프리미엄
같은 생각을 가진 투자자들과 토론할 수 있는 활발한 포럼에서 상호 작용하려면 등록하세요.
okwife
13 시간 전
Timing101
18 시간 전
