UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________to __________
Commission file number:
333-131531
PANGLOBAL BRANDS
INC.
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its
charter)
Delaware
|
20-8531711
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
organization)
|
|
2853 E. Pico Blvd. Los Angeles, CA
90023
(Address of principal executive offices)
323.226-6500
(Issuers telephone number,
including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former
fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
|
[ ]
|
Accelerated filer
|
[ ]
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
[ ]
|
Smaller reporting company
|
[X]
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
As of February 20, 2009, the Company had 37,671,710 shares of
common stock issued and outstanding.
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains forward-looking statements. These
statements relate to future events or future financial performance. In some
cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as may,
should, expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates,
predicts, potential or continue or the negative of these terms or other
comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the
section entitled Risk Factors, that may cause our industrys actual results,
levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from
any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or
implied by these forward-looking statements.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the
forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results,
levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by
applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not
intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these
statements to actual results.
Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed
in the forward looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to
such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and
elsewhere in this quarterly report, particularly in the section entitled "Risk
Factors" beginning on page 35 of this quarterly report.
Our financial statements are stated in United States Dollars
(US$) unless otherwise stated and are prepared in accordance with United States
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
In this quarterly report, unless otherwise specified, all
references to "common shares" refer to the common shares in our capital stock.
As used in this annual report, the terms "we", "us", "our",
means Panglobal Brands Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Mynk Corporation
unless otherwise indicated.
2
|
|
PANGLOBAL BRANDS INC.
|
AND SUBSIDIARY
|
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of
$542,584 and $544,176 as of
|
$
|
482,144
|
|
$
|
444,291
|
|
December
31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from factor, net
|
|
1,264,114
|
|
|
1,411,456
|
|
Inventory
|
|
1,185,423
|
|
|
1,304,407
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
110,658
|
|
|
97,354
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
3,042,339
|
|
|
3,257,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
,
net
|
|
503,495
|
|
|
587,992
|
|
Trademarks and intangible assets
|
|
1,177,235
|
|
|
1,177,235
|
|
Deposits
|
|
128,392
|
|
|
134,520
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
4,851,461
|
|
$
|
5,157,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdraft
|
$
|
62,967
|
|
$
|
171,521
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
4,516,772
|
|
|
3,861,562
|
|
Convertible note payable to shareholders
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
5,329,739
|
|
|
4,783,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized - 600,000,000 shares; issued and
outstanding 37,671,710 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and 37,671,710 shares at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and September 30, 2008, respectively
|
|
3,767
|
|
|
3,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
14,937,974
|
|
|
14,741,439
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
(15,420,019
|
)
|
|
(14,371,034
|
)
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
(478,278
|
)
|
|
374,172
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
$
|
4,851,461
|
|
$
|
5,157,255
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
3
|
|
PANGLOBAL BRANDS INC.
|
AND SUBSIDIARY
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
$
|
6,452,464
|
|
$
|
120,633
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
4,936,651
|
|
|
127,027
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
1,515,813
|
|
|
(6,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Design and development
|
|
818,284
|
|
|
862,860
|
|
Selling and shipping
|
|
769,765
|
|
|
404,232
|
|
General and administrative, including
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$196,535 and $547,901 of stock-based
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
compensation for the three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 and 2007,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
respectively;
|
|
871,484
|
|
|
1,016,225
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
30,498
|
|
|
14,467
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
2,490,031
|
|
|
2,297,784
|
|
|
|
(974,218
|
)
|
|
(2,304,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
3
|
|
|
17,843
|
|
Interest (expense)
|
|
(74,770
|
)
|
|
--
|
|
Interest income(expense), net
|
|
(74,767
|
)
|
|
17,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(1,048,985
|
)
|
$
|
(2,286,335
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share - basic and
diluted
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
Weighted average number of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding - basic and diluted
|
|
37,671,710
|
|
|
28,916,805
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
4
|
|
PANGLOBAL BRANDS INC.
|
AND SUBSIDIARY
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2006
|
|
3,749,995
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
$
|
646,635
|
|
$
|
(833,236
|
) $
|
|
(186,226
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued to acquire in connection
with reverse merger transaction
|
|
11,396,500
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
(68,991
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(67,851
|
)
|
Shares issued to related parties for debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in connection with reverse merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
transaction
|
|
975,000
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
389,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,000
|
|
Shares issued in private placement, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of offering costs of $21,900
|
|
10,610,226
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
4,751,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,752,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
644,230
|
|
Net loss for the year ended September 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,924,871
|
)
|
|
(3,924,871
|
)
|
Balance, September 30, 2007
|
|
26,731,771
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
6,363,418
|
|
|
(4,758,107
|
)
|
|
1,607,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued in private placement
|
|
10,871,759
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
6,152,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,153,818
|
|
Shares issued as loan fees
|
|
68,180
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
48,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,863
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,176,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,176,434
|
|
Net loss for the year ended September 30,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,612,927
|
)
|
|
(9,612,927
|
)
|
Balance, September 30, 2008
|
|
37,671,710
|
|
$
|
3,767
|
|
$
|
14,741,439
|
|
$
|
(14,371,034
|
)
|
$
|
374,172
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,535
|
|
Net loss for the quarter ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,048,985
|
)
|
|
(1,048,985
|
)
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
37,671,710
|
|
$
|
3,767
|
|
$
|
14,937,974
|
|
$
|
(15,420,019
|
)
|
$
|
(478,278
|
)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
5
|
|
PANGLOBAL BRANDS INC.
|
AND SUBSIDIARY
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
|
December
|
|
|
|
31,
|
|
|
31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$
|
(1,048,985
|
)
|
$
|
(2,286,335
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
30,498
|
|
|
14,467
|
|
Recovery of bad debts
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
(1,613
|
)
|
Provision for returns
|
|
179,104
|
|
|
(106,204
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
196,535
|
|
|
547,901
|
|
Cancellation of website development contract
|
|
53,999
|
|
|
---
|
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
(36,261
|
)
|
|
420
|
|
Due from factor
|
|
(31,762
|
)
|
|
131,175
|
|
Inventory
|
|
118,984
|
|
|
(221,840
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
(13,304
|
)
|
|
(16,164
|
)
|
Deposits
|
|
6,128
|
|
|
(77,255
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
655,210
|
|
|
403,229
|
|
Net cash provided by(used in) operating activities
|
|
108,554
|
|
|
(1,612,219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of office equipment
|
|
---
|
|
|
(145,151
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
---
|
|
|
(145,151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in bank overdraft
|
|
62,967
|
|
|
-
|
|
Gross proceeds from private placements
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,153,819
|
|
Repayment of related party loans
|
|
-
|
|
|
(10,000
|
)
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
62,967
|
|
|
2,143,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase(decrease) in cash
|
|
171,521
|
|
|
386,449
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
period
|
|
(171,521
|
)
|
|
1,170,214
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
---
|
|
$
|
1,556,663
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
6
|
|
PANGLOBAL BRANDS INC.
|
AND SUBSIDIARY
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and
financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued as loan fees
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
---
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
$
|
74,770
|
|
$
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
$
|
---
|
|
$
|
---
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
7
|
|
PANGLOBAL BRANDS INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
|
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
Organization and Nature of Operations
EZ English Online Corp, a
Delaware corporation (EZ English), was incorporated in the State of Delaware
on March 2, 2005. EZ English sold common stock pursuant to a registration
statement on Form SB-2 declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 28, 2006, and raised gross proceeds of approximately
$85,000. Through September 30, 2006, EZ English was a development stage company
offering a teacher training course to teach English as a second language over
the Internet.
Beginning in December 2006, in
conjunction with a new controlling shareholder acquiring approximately 79% of
the issued and outstanding common shares, EZ English began a program to
discontinue its existing business operations and prepare to enter the fashion
industry. On February 2, 2007, in order to better reflect its future business
operations and prepare for its acquisition of Mynk Corporation, a privately-held
Nevada corporation (Mynk), EZ English completed a merger with its wholly-owned
Delaware subsidiary, in order to effect a name change to Panglobal Brands Inc.
(Panglobal), and effected a six-for-one forward split of its outstanding
common stock. All common share amounts referred to herein are presented on a
post-split basis. All options referred to herein were issued on a post-split
basis.
Mynk was incorporated in Nevada
on February 3, 2006 to engage in the business of design, manufacture and
distribution of clothing and accessories throughout the United States and
Canada.
Unless the context indicates
otherwise, Panglobal and Mynk are hereinafter referred to as the Company. The
Company sells its products through a network of wholesale accounts. The Company
was considered a development stage company as defined in Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 7, Accounting and Reporting by Development
Stage Enterprises until December 31, 2007, as it had not yet commenced any
material revenue-generating operations, did not have any material cash flows
from operations, and was dependent on debt and equity funding to finance its
operations. The Company recorded approximately $13.9 million in revenue in the
year ended September 30, 2008 and no longer considers itself a development
stage company.
Basis of Presentation
On May 11, 2007, Mynk completed a
transaction with Panglobal, whereby Mynk became a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Panglobal (see Note 3). Panglobal was a development stage company and had
terminated its prior operations by that date and was essentially a shell company
seeking a new business opportunity. For financial reporting purposes, Mynk was
considered the accounting acquirer in the merger and the merger was accounted
for as a reverse merger. The determination to account for this transaction as a
reverse merger was based on the fact that the shareholders and officers of Mynk
acquired effective control of Panglobal at the conclusion of the transactions
described herein, through control of the Board of Directors and ownership of
approximately 43% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of
Panglobal. Additional factors that Panglobal considered in arriving at this
determination included that through a series of planned and interdependent
transactions beginning in December 2006, as disclosed in Panglobals prior
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Panglobal and its
controlling shareholder (who owned approximately 79% of the outstanding common
shares in December 2006) terminated Panglobals prior business operations,
changed its name, appointed new officers and directors, entered into a series of
stock-based transactions funded by Panglobals controlling shareholder to
facilitate the acquisition and operations of Mynk, and raised approximately
$4,750,000 of equity capital from investors to fund the business operations of
Mynk as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Panglobal.
8
The controlling shareholder of
Panglobal returned 18,975,000 shares of common stock to the Company for
cancellation immediately prior to the closing of the transaction on May 10,
2007. Of the 11,396,550 shares of common stock retained by the Panglobal
shareholders on May 11, 2007 upon the closing of the transaction, 5,025,000
shares were owned by the controlling shareholder, resulting in the other public
shareholders owning 6,371,550 shares. Of such 5,025,000 shares, 2,025,000 shares
were subject to purchase and escrow agreements transferring such shares to new
management at June 30, 2007, and of the remaining 3,000,000 shares, 1,000,000
were transferred to a consultant to the Company, Lolly Factory and 1,500,000
reserved for Lolly Factory for attainment of performance of certain sales
revenue objectives for 2008-2010 (see Note 8), and 250,000 transferred to the
Chief Financial Officer (see Note 3).
Accordingly, the historical
financial statements presented herein are those of Mynk and do not include the
historical financial results of Panglobal, except for the period subsequent to
May 11, 2007. The stockholders equity section of Panglobal has been
retroactively restated for all periods presented to reflect the accounting
effect of the reverse merger transaction. All costs associated with the reverse
merger transaction were expensed as incurred.
Interim Financial Information
The interim consolidated
financial statements are unaudited, but in the opinion of management of the
Company, contain all adjustments (including normal recurring adjustments),
necessary to present fairly the financial position at December 31, 2008, the
results of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and the cash
flows for the three months ended December 31, 2008.
Operating results for the three
months ended December 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to
be expected for the full fiscal year ending September 30, 2009.
2. Business Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
Going Concern and Plan of Operations
The Companys financial
statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which
contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the
normal course of business. Prior to December 31, 2007 the Company had been in
the development stage. It has generated approximately $13.9 million in revenues
from operations for the year ended September 30, 2008 and $6.5 million for the
three months ended December 31, 2008 but is still dependent upon debt and equity
financing which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern. The Companys ability to continue as a going concern is dependent
upon its ability to achieve profitable operations. As of December 31, 2008, the
Company had an accumulated deficit of ($15,420,019); and negative working
capital of $(2,287,400) and had incurred a net loss of ($1,048,985) and provided
net cash in operating activities of $108,554 for the three months ended December
31, 2008. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
At December 31, 2008, the Company
has had four quarters of revenue-generating operations. Principal activity
through December 31, 2007 related to the Companys formation, capital raising
efforts and initial product design and development activities. Revenue
generating activities generated approximately $13.9 million in revenue for the
period from January 1-September 30, 2008 and the Company has an order backlog of
approximately $9.2 million in prospective sales as of February 16, 2009. The
Company has yet to generate any material cash flows from operations, and is
essentially dependent on debt and equity funding from both related and unrelated
parties to finance its operations.
Prior to February 28, 2007, the
Companys cash requirements were funded by advances from Mynks founders. On
February 27, 2007, the Company completed an initial closing of its private
placement (see Note 3), selling 9,426,894 shares of common stock at a price of
$0.45 per share and receiving net proceeds of $4,220,203. On February 28, 2007,
the Company completed a second closing of its private placement, selling
1,183,332 shares of common stock at a price of $0.45 per share and receiving net
proceeds of $532,499.
9
On October 23, 2007, the Company
closed a private placement of 2,871,759 units for gross proceeds of $2,153,819.
Each unit was sold for $0.75 and consists of one common share and one common
share purchase warrant. Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder
to purchase, if exercised, one additional common share of our company at a price
of $1.00 per common share until October 23, 2008 and at $1.50 per common share
if exercised during the period from October 24, 2008 until the warrants expire
on October 23, 2009.
On July 11, 2008, the Company
raised $4,000,000 in a private placement selling 8,000,000 of its common shares
at a price of $0.50 per share which officially closed on July 10, 2008.
The Company issued 560,000 shares
pursuant to the exemption from registration under the United States Securities
Act of 1933 provided by Section 4(2), Section 4(6) and/or Rule 506 of Regulation
D promulgated under the 1933 Act to four (4) investors who are accredited
investors within the respective meanings ascribed to that term in Rule 501(a)
under the 1933 Act.
The Company issued 7,440,000
shares to eighteen (18) non U.S. persons (as that term is defined in Regulation
S of the Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on
Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated
financial statements include the financial statements of Panglobal and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Mynk Corporation. All intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and
cash equivalents, accounts receivable, due from factor, prepaid expenses,
accounts payable, accrued expenses, loan from officer and convertible note
payable to shareholders approximate their respective fair values due to the
short-term nature of these items and/or the current interest rates payable in
relation to current market conditions.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly
liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when
purchased to be cash equivalents. At times, such cash and cash equivalents may
exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced a loss in such
accounts to date. The Company maintains its accounts with financial institutions
with high credit ratings. The cash held by the factor is not included in cash
and cash equivalents (see Note 5).
Accounts Receivable
The Company extends credit to
customers whose sales invoices have not been sold to our factor based upon an
evaluation of the customers financial condition and credit history and
generally require no collateral. Management performs regular evaluations
concerning the ability of our customers to satisfy their obligations and records
a provision for doubtful accounts based on these evaluations. Based on existing
economic conditions and collection practices, the Companys allowance for
doubtful accounts has been estimated to be $542,584 and $13,062 at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The Companys credit losses for the periods
presented have not significantly exceeded managements estimates.
10
Concentration of Credit Risks
During the three months ended
December 31, 2008 sales to three customers accounted for 23%, 13% and 12% of the
Companys net sales. During the year three months ended December 31, 2008,
purchases from one supplier totaled approximately $1,354,000. At December 31
2008, one customer accounted for 58% of the Accounts Receivable, net of
allowance. At December 31, 2008, three customers accounted for 17%, 15%, and
10%, respectively, of the Due From Factor.
Inventory
Inventories are valued at the
lower of cost or market, with cost being determined by the first-in, first-out
method. The Company continually evaluates its inventories by assessing
slow-moving product and records mark-downs as appropriate. At December 31, 2008,
inventories consisted of finished goods, work-in-process and raw materials.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are
recorded at cost. Expenditures for major renewals and improvements that extend
the useful lives of property and equipment are capitalized. Expenditures for
maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are
retired or sold, the property accounts and related accumulated depreciation and
amortization accounts are relieved, and any resulting gain or loss is included
in operations.
Depreciation is computed on the
straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets of five
years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the remaining life of the
related lease, which has been determined to be shorter than the useful life of
the asset.
Trademarks and Intangibles
Effective with the Companys
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, since inception of the Company,
intangibles (including trademarks) with indefinite lives are no longer
amortized, but instead tested for impairment. Intangible assets are reviewed for
impairment annually or whenever events or changes in business circumstances
indicate the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Impairment
losses are recognized if future cash flows of the related assets are less than
their carrying values.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and
Intangibles
Long-lived assets, including
purchased intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not
be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected
to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the
impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying
amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed
of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to
sell. Management has considered the net loss incurred for the three months ended
December 31, 2008 and has concluded that there is no impairment of long lived
assets or intangibles at December 31, 2008.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue
from the sale of merchandise to its wholesale accounts when products are shipped
and the customer takes title and assumes the risk of loss, collection of the
relevant receivable is reasonably assured, pervasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, and the sales price is fixed or otherwise determinable. Sales allowances
are recorded as a reduction to revenue. Management has evaluated the effects of
estimating and accruing for sales returns in the current and prior periods and
provides for an estimated allowance for returns.
Design and Development
Design and development costs
related to the development of new products are expensed as incurred.
11
Advertising
The Company expenses advertising
costs, consisting primarily of placement in publications, along with design and
printing costs of sales materials when incurred. Advertising expense for the
three months ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 amounted to $500 and
$8,476, respectively.
Shipping and Handling Costs
The Company records shipping and
handling costs billed to customers as a component of revenue, and shipping and
handling costs incurred by the Company for inbound and outbound freight are
recorded in selling and shipping expenses. Total shipping and handling costs
amounted to $54,594 and $7,460 for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
Effective February 3, 2006, the
Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised
2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), a revision to SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123R requires that the
Company measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for equity
awards based on the grant date fair value of the awards, with the cost to be
recognized as compensation expense in the Company's financial statements over
the period of benefit, which is generally the vesting period of the awards.
Accordingly, the Company recognizes compensation cost for equity-based
compensation for all new or modified grants issued after February 3, 2006
(Inception).
The Company accounts for stock
option and warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employees in accordance with
EITF No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than
Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services, and
EITF 00-18, Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions involving Equity
Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees, whereas the value of the stock
compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either (a) the
date at which a performance commitment is reached or (b) at the date at which
the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income
taxes under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and
liabilities for the expected impact of differences between the financial
statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.
The Company will provide a
valuation allowance for the full amount of the deferred tax asset since there is
no assurance of future taxable income. Tax deductible losses can be carried
forward for 20 years until utilized.
Effective January 1, 2007, the
Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits
claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the
financial statements. Under FIN 48, the Company may recognize the tax benefit
from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax
position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on
the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the
financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the
largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes,
accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The adoption
of the provisions of FIN 48 did not have a material effect on the Companys
financial statements. The Company currently files or has in the past filed
income tax returns in Canada and the United States. The Company is subject to
tax examinations by tax authorities for tax years ending in 2006 and
subsequently.
The Companys policy is to record
interest and penalties on uncertain tax provisions as income tax expense. As of
December 31, 2008, the Company has no accrued interest or penalties related to
uncertain tax positions.
12
Loss per Common Share
Loss per common share is computed
by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the respective periods. Basic and diluted loss percommon
share are the same for all periods presented because all warrants and stock
options outstanding are anti-dilutive. The related party loan continues to be
convertible to common shares and is not repaid at December 31, 2008, but the
conversion is anti-dilutive. The 2,884,612 shares of common stock issued to the
founders of Mynk in conjunction with the closing of the reverse merger
transaction on May 11, 2007 have been presented as outstanding for all periods
presented.
3. Share Exchange Agreement and Private Placements
As a result of the sale of the
10,610,226 shares of common stock in late February 2007 at a per share price of
$0.45, and the acquisition of Mynk by Panglobal effective May 11, 2007, the
Company has determined that the grant date fair value charge to operations for
all stock options and other similar stock-based compensation that is amortizable
over future periods should begin on May 11, 2007, since that is the date on
which acquisition occurred and the period of benefit therefore began. Since the
Companys common stock traded on a very limited and sporadic basis prior to May
11, 2007, the Company has also determined that the best indicator of fair value
of the Companys common stock on May 11, 2007 was the $0.45 per share cash price
paid by the investors in the recent private placement, who owned approximately
40% of the issued and outstanding shares of common on May 11, 2007.
Share Exchange Agreement
On May 11, 2007, pursuant to a
Share Exchange Agreement dated as of February 15, 2007 (the Share Exchange
Agreement) by and among Panglobal, the shareholders of Mynk Corporation
(Selling Shareholders) and Mynk, Panglobal issued 3,749,995 shares of its
common stock in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Mynk,
issued 975,000 shares of it common stock in payment of $390,000 of outstanding
loans to Mynk, and agreed to reimburse a shareholder of Mynk up to $100,000 for
outstanding amounts due (the Exchange).
Previously, on February 3, 2006,
Mynk had issued 10,000,000 shares of its common stock to its founders for
$497,700 in cash, and 3,000,000 shares of its common stock valued at $149,310,
as loan fees on June 20, 2006, for a total of 13,000,000 shares, which
constituted all of the issued and outstanding shares of Mynk prior to the
Exchange. The share exchange was conducted on the basis of 0.2884615 common
shares of Panglobal for every one common share of Mynk. As a result of the
Exchange, Mynk became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Panglobal.
The Company also agreed to file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, within a reasonable time following
the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement, a registration statement on Form
SB-2 to effect the registration of half of the shares of the common stock that
were issued to Mynk shareholders pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement. There
was no specified filing deadline or financial penalty if the Company failed to
file the registration statement.
Pursuant to the Exchange,
Panglobal issued to the Selling Shareholders 3,749,995 shares of its common
stock. Panglobal had a total of 26,731,771 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding after giving effect to the Exchange and the 10,610,226 shares of
common stock issued in the Companys two private placements.
As a result of the Exchange and
the shares of common stock issued in the two private placements, on May 11,
2007, the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to the Exchange owned
11,396,550 shares of common stock, equivalent to approximately 43% of the issued
and outstanding shares of the Companys common stock, and the Company was
controlled by the former stockholders of Mynk at that time.
Private Placements
On February 27, 2007, in
anticipation of the Exchange, the Company sold an aggregate of 9,426,894 shares
of its common stock to fifty accredited investors in an initial closing of its
private placement at a per share price of $0.45, resulting in aggregate gross
proceeds to the Company of $4,242,103. Net cash proceeds to the Company, after
the deduction of all private placement offering costs and expenses of $21,900,
were $4,220,203.
13
On February 28, 2007, the Company
sold an aggregate of 1,183,332 shares of its common stock to nine accredited
investors in a second closing of the private placement at a per share price of
$0.45, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of $532,499. Net
cash proceeds to the Company were also $532,499.
Stephen Soller, the Companys
Chief Executive Officer, purchased 291,666 shares in the private placement for
$131,250. Craig Soller, the brother of Stephen Soller and a consultant to the
Company, purchased 244,444 shares of common stock in the private placement for
$110,000. Three Mynk shareholders also purchased an aggregate of 299,999 shares
in the private placement for $134,500.
On October 23, 2007, the Company
closed a private placement of 2,871,759 units for gross proceeds of $2,153,818.
Each unit was sold for $0.75 and consists of one common share and one common
share purchase warrant. Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder
to purchase, if exercised, one additional common share of our company at a price
of $1.00 per common share until October 23, 2008 and at $1.50 per common share
if exercised during the period from October 24, 2008 until the warrants expire
on October 23, 2009.
On July 11, 2008, the Company
closed a private placement, selling 8,000,000 shares of common stock at a price
of $0.50 per share for proceeds of $4,000,000. The Company issued 560,000 shares
pursuant to the exemption from registration under the United States Securities
Act of 1933 provided by Section 4(2), Section 4(6) and/or Rule 506 of Regulation
D promulgated under the 1933 Act to four (4) investors who are accredited
investors within the respective meanings ascribed to that term in Rule 501(a)
under the 1933 Act. The Company issued 7,440,000 shares to eighteen (18) non
U.S. persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act of
1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S and/or Section 4(2) of
the Securities Act of 1933.
Stock Options
On January 18, 2007, in
anticipation of the closing of the Exchange and Private Placements, the Company
granted to Felix Wasser, the Companys Chief Financial Officer, a stock option
to purchase an aggregate of 250,000 shares of common stock, exercisable for a
period of five years at $0.30 per share, with one quarter vesting every six
months through January 18, 2009. The fair value of this option, as calculated
pursuant to the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was determined to be $97,500
($0.39 per share), and was being charged to operations ratably from May 11, 2007
through January 18, 2009. Felix Wasser resigned as an officer of the Company on
August 21, 2007 and no further charges to operations were recorded. Vesting has
ceased and the 250,000 options have been cancelled.
On February 12, 2007, in
anticipation of the closing of the Exchange and Private Placements, the Company
granted to Stephen Soller, the Companys Chief Executive Officer, stock options
to purchase an aggregate of 1,800,000 shares of common stock, exercisable for a
period of five years at $0.30 per share, with one-sixth vesting every six months
through February 12, 2010. The fair value of this option, as calculated pursuant
to the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was determined to be $702,000 ($0.39
per share), and is being charged to operations ratably from May 11, 2007 through
February 12, 2010. During the three months ended December 31, 2008 the Company
recorded a charge to operations of $63,818 with respect to this option.
The fair value of these stock
options were calculated using the following Black-Scholes input variables: stock
price on date of grant - $0.45; exercise price - $0.30; expected life 4.67
4.75 years; expected volatility -125%; expected dividend yield - 0%; risk-free
interest rate 5.0% .
14
On February 12, 2007, in
anticipation of the closing of the Exchange and Private Placements, the Company
granted to two consultants stock options to purchase an aggregate of 375,000
shares of common stock exercisable for a period of five years at $0.45 per
share, with one-third of the options vesting annually on each of February 11,
2008, February 11, 2009 and February 11, 2010. The fair value of these options,
as calculated pursuant to the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was initially
determined to be $142,500 ($0.38 per share). The fair value of such options is
being charged to operations ratably from May 11, 2007 through February 11, 2010.
In accordance with EITF 96-18, options granted to consultants are valued each
reporting period to determine the amount to be recorded as an expense in the
respective period. On December 31, 2008 the fair value of these options, as
calculated pursuant to the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was determined to
be $0.04 per share, which resulted in a charge to operations of $454 during the
three months ended December 31, 2008. As the options vest, they will be valued
on each vesting date and an adjustment will be recorded for the difference
between the value already recorded and the then current value on the date of
vesting. On October 31, 2007 the relationship of one of the consultants with the
Company ended and options to exercise 250,000 shares of common stock have been
cancelled at that time and previously calculated compensation in the amount of
$34,205 had been reversed during the three months ended December 31, 2007.
Accordingly, there will be no further non-cash compensation expenses charged
relating to those 250,000 options.
On February 12, 2007, the fair
value of the aforementioned stock options was calculated using the following
Black-Scholes input variables: stock price on date of grant - $0.45; exercise
price - $0.45; expected life 4.75 years; expected volatility - 125%; expected
dividend yield - 0%; risk-free interest rate 5.0% . On September 30, 2007, the
fair value of the aforementioned stock options was calculated using the
following Black-Scholes input variables: stock price of grant - $1.02; exercise
price - $0.45; expected life 4.625 years; expected volatility - 125%; expected
dividend yield - 0%; risk-free interest rate 5.0%
On August 7, 2007, the Company
granted a consultant a stock option to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock
exercisable for a period of one year at $0.45 per share, all of which were fully
vested upon issuance, for past services through June 2007. The fair value of
this option, as calculated pursuant to the Black-Scholes option-pricing model,
was determined to be $69,000 ($0.69 per share), and was charged to operations at
June 30, 2007. At June 30, 2008, the Company agreed to extend the exercise
period by one year. The fair value of the one year extension, as calculated
pursuant to the Black-Scholes option pricing model, was determined to be $35,000
($0.35 per share), and was fully charged to operations at June 30, 2008.
On October 23, 2007, the Company
granted to Charles Lesser, the Companys Chief Financial Officer, stock options
to purchase an aggregate of 480,000 shares of common stock, exercisable for a
period of five years at $0.75 per share, with 10,000 shares vesting monthly
commencing January 1, 2008 through December 1, 2011. The fair value of this
option, as calculated pursuant to the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was
determined to be $355,200 ($0.74 per share), and is being charged to operations
ratably from November 1, 2007 through December 1, 2011. During the three months
ended December 31, 2008 the Company recorded a charge to operations of
$21,312.
The fair value of these stock
options were calculated using the following Black-Scholes input variables: stock
price on date of grant - $0.88; exercise price - $0.75; expected life 4.25
4.50 years; expected volatility -125%; expected dividend yield - 0%; risk-free
interest rate 5.0% .
On October 23, 2007, the Company
granted to Charles Lesser, the Companys Chief Financial Officer, Incentive
stock options to purchase an aggregate of 660,000 shares of common stock,
exercisable for a period of five years at $0.75 per share, with 132,000 shares
vesting on December 1, 2007 and 11,000 shares vesting monthly commencing January
1, 2008 through December 1, 2011. The fair value of this option, as calculated
pursuant to the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was determined to be
$488,400 ($0.74 per share), and is being charged to operations ratably from
November 1, 2007 through December 1, 2011. During the three months ended
December 31, 2008 the Company recorded a charge to operations of $29,304.
The fair value of these stock
options were calculated using the following Black-Scholes input variables: stock
price on date of grant - $0.88; exercise price - $0.75; expected life 4.25
4.50 years; expected volatility -125%; expected dividend yield - 0%; risk-free
interest rate 5.0% .
15
On April 18, 2008, the Company
granted to 15 employees, stock options to purchase an aggregate of 1,535,000
shares of common stock, exercisable for a period of five years at $1.10 per
share, with twenty five percent of the shares vesting each year through April
18, 2012. The fair value of this option, as calculated pursuant to the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was determined to be $1,427,550 ($0.93 per
share). On June 17, 2008 the Company decided to lower the exercise price to
reflect market conditions to $0.75 per share. The fair value of the option at
that date, as calculated by the Black-Scholes option pricing model, was
determined to be $1,473,600 ($0.96 per share) and is being charged to operations
ratably from April 18, 2008 through April 17, 2013. A number of employees have
since left the employee of the Company and the company cancelled 725,000 options
at September 30, 2008. During the three months ended December 31, 2008 the
Company recorded a charge to operations of $40,800 with respect to this
option.
The fair value of these stock
options were calculated using the following Black-Scholes input variables: stock
price on date of grant - $1.10; exercise price - $0.75; expected life 4.75
5.00 years; expected volatility -125%; expected dividend yield - 0%; risk-free
interest rate 3.0% .
On June 17, 2008, the Company
granted to 3 employees, stock options to purchase an aggregate of 185,000 shares
of common stock, exercisable for a period of five years at $0.75 per share, with
twenty five percent of the shares vesting each year through June 17, 2012. The
fair value of this option, as calculated pursuant to the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model, was determined to be $111,000 ($0.60 per share and is
being charged to operations ratably from June 17, 2008 through June 17, 2012.
During the three months ended December 31, 2008 the Company recorded a charge to
operations of $6,938 with respect to this option.
The fair value of these stock
options were calculated using the following Black-Scholes input variables: stock
price on date of grant - $.71; exercise price - $0.75; expected life 4.75
5.00 years; expected volatility -125%; expected dividend yield - 0%; risk-free
interest rate 3.0% .
During the period from February
3, 2006 (Inception) through December 31, 2006, the Company did not issue any
stock options.
A summary of stock option activity for the three months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life
(Years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at September 30, 2007
|
|
2,337,500
|
|
$
|
0.333
|
|
|
4.48
|
|
Granted
|
|
1,140,000
|
|
|
0.750
|
|
|
4.80
|
|
Exercised
|
|
---
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
---
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
(312,500
|
)
|
|
0.420
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
3,165,000
|
|
$
|
0.473
|
|
|
4.23
|
|
Options exercisable at December 31, 2007
|
|
532,000
|
|
$
|
0.440
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life
(Years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at September 30, 2008
|
|
4,160,0000
|
|
$
|
0.540
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
Granted
|
|
---
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
---
|
|
Exercised
|
|
---
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
---
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
---
|
|
|
0.652
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
4,160,000
|
|
$
|
0.540
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
Options exercisable at December 31, 2008
|
|
1,425,667
|
|
$
|
0.436
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
16
The weighted-average grant-date
fair value of options granted during the three months ended December 31, 2008
and 2007 was $0.00 and $0.75, respectively.
The aggregate intrinsic value of
stock options outstanding at December 31, 2008 was $0.
Share Purchase Agreements
In anticipation of the closing of
the Exchange and Private Placements, additional compensatory transactions were
entered into pursuant to various Share Purchase Agreements between Jacques
Ninio, the controlling shareholder of Panglobal at that time, and the Chief
Executive Officer and certain other consultants. Since these transactions were
intended to benefit the Company and were entered into by an affiliate of the
Company, the Company has recorded these transactions on its financial statements
as follows:
On February 12, 2007, Stephen
Soller, the Companys Chief Executive Officer, purchased 519,250 shares of
common stock from two former founding shareholders of Mynk at a price of $0.325
per share. The fair value of this transaction was determined to be in excess of
the purchase price by $64,904 ($0.125 per share), reflecting the difference
between the $0.325 purchase price and the $0.45 private placement price, and was
charged to operations on May 11, 2007.
On February 12, 2007, Stephen
Soller, the Companys Chief Executive Officer, acquired the beneficial rights to
1,800,000 shares of common stock from Jacques Ninio, the controlling shareholder
of Panglobal at that time, at a price of $0.0001 per share. Pursuant to a
related Escrow Agreement, the shares are to vest and be released to Mr. Soller
at the rate of 600,000 shares every six months beginning on August 12, 2007,
provided that Mr. Sollers underlying employment agreement has not been
terminated. The fair value of this transaction, as calculated pursuant to the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was determined to be $810,000 ($0.45 per
share), reflecting the difference between the $0.0001 purchase price and the
$0.45 private placement price, and is being charged to operations ratably from
May 11, 2007 through August 11, 2008. During the three months ended December 31,
2008, the Company recorded a charge to operations of $0.
On February 12, 2007, the fair
value of the aforementioned share purchases was calculated using the following
Black-Scholes input variables: stock price on date of grant - $0.45; exercise
price - $0.0001; expected life 1.25 years; expected volatility - 125%;
expected dividend yield - 0%; risk-free interest rate 5.0% . On May 11, 2007,
the fair value of the aforementioned share purchases was calculated using the
following Black-Scholes input variables: stock price of grant - $0.45; exercise
price - $0.0001; expected life 3 years; expected volatility - 125%; expected
dividend yield - 0%; risk-free interest rate 5.0% . At June 30, 2007, the fair
value of the aforementioned share purchase was calculated using the following
Black-Scholes input variables: stock price of grant - $1.02; exercise price -
$0.0001; expected life 2.875 years; expected volatility - 125%; expected
dividend yield - 0%; risk-free interest rate 5.0% .
On May 11, 2007, Craig Soller and
David Long, two consultants to the Company, acquired the beneficial rights to
125,000 shares and 100,000 shares of common stock, respectively, from Jacques
Ninio, the controlling shareholder of Panglobal at that time, at a price of
$0.0001 per share. Pursuant to related Escrow Agreements, the 225,000 shares are
to vest and be released to the consultants at the rate of 75,000 shares annually
beginning on May 11, 2008, provided that the underlying consulting agreements
have not been terminated. The fair value of these transactions, as calculated
pursuant to the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was initially determined to
be $101,250 ($0.45 per share), reflecting the difference between the $0.0001
purchase price and the $0.45 private placement price. In accordance with EITF
96-18, such compensation arrangements granted to consultants are valued each
reporting period to determine the amount to be recorded as an expense in the
respective period. On December 31, 2008, the fair value of the transaction, as
calculated pursuant to the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was determined to
be $0.08 per share, which resulted in a charge to operations of $909 during the
three months ended December 31, 2008. As the restricted shares vest, they will
be valued on each vesting date and an adjustment will be recorded for the
difference between the value already recorded and the then current value on the
date of vesting. On October 31, 2007 the relationship of one of the consultants
with the Company ended and the right to acquire 100,000 shares of common stock
has ceased and previously calculated compensation related to this right to
acquire 100,000 shares of common stock in the amount of $14,116 had been
reversed during the three months ended December 31, 2007. Accordingly, there
will be no further non-cash compensation expenses charged relating to those
100,000 shares.
17
On October 31, 2007, David Long,
as part of a settlement agreement, acquired the beneficial rights to acquire
20,000 shares of common stock from Jacques Ninio, a shareholder of Panglobal, at
a price of $0.0001 per share. The 20,000 shares are to vest immediately. The
fair value of this transaction, as calculated pursuant to the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model, was determined to be $20,000 ($1.00 per share), reflecting
the difference between the $0.0001 purchase price and the $1.00 fair market
value on October 31, 2007 and the amount of $20,000 was charged to operations
during the three months ended December 31, 2007.
On October 23, 2007, Charles
Lesser, the Companys Chief Financial Officer, acquired the beneficial rights to
250,000 shares of common stock from Jacques Ninio, the controlling shareholder
of Panglobal at that time, at a price of $0.0001 per share. Pursuant to a
related Escrow Agreement, the shares are to vest and be released to Mr. Lesser
according to the following schedule: 100,000 shares on June 30, 2008 and 75,000
shares on December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, provided that Mr. Lessers
underlying employment status has not been terminated. The fair value of this
transaction, as calculated pursuant to the Black-Scholes option-pricing model,
was determined to be $220,000 ($0.88 per share), reflecting the difference
between the $0.0001 purchase price and the fair market value of $0.88 on October
23, 2007, and is being charged to operations ratably from November 1, 2007
through June 30, 2009. During the three months ended December 31, 2008, the
Company recorded a charge to operations of $33,000.
4. Accounts Receivable
The Company also sells goods to
some of its customers and assumes the credit risk. The Company has a receivable
in dispute for which the Company has provided an estimated allowance for
doubtful accounts, however, future events may change that estimate. Accounts
receivable, as presented in the balance sheet at December 31, 2008 and September
30, 2008 is presented below:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30
,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Outstanding accounts receivable
|
$
|
1,024,728
|
|
$
|
988,467
|
|
Less: allowance for doubtful debts
|
|
(542,584
|
)
|
|
(544,176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
482,144
|
|
$
|
444,291
|
|
Changes to the allowance for doubtful debts were ($1,592) and
($1,613) for the three months ended December 31, 2008, and 2007,
respectively.
5. Due from Factor
The Company uses a factor for
credit administration and cash flow purposes. Under the factoring agreement, the
factor purchases a portion of the Companys domestic wholesale sales invoices
and assumes most of the credit risks with respect to such accounts for a charge
of 0.75% of the gross invoice amount. The Company can draw cash advances from
the factor based on a pre-determined percentage, which is 75% of eligible
outstanding accounts receivable. The factor holds as security substantially all
assets of the Company and charges interest at a rate of prime plus 1.0% on the
outstanding advances. Effective October 27, 2008, the interest charge was
increased to prime plus 2%. At March 31, 2008, the Company had cash account in
the amount of $400,000 with the factor to be used as collateral for the loans
advanced. On May 5, 2008 the cash collateral was reduced to $300,000. The
Company is liable to the factor for merchandise disputes and customer claims on
receivables sold to the factor. The factoring agreement expires on March 4,
2009, but automatically renews unless cancelled by either side.
At times, our customers place
orders that exceed the credit that they have available from the factor. We
evaluate those orders to consider if the customer is worthy of additional credit
based on our past experience with the customer. If we decide to sell merchandise
to the customer on credit, we take the credit risk for the amounts that are
above their approved credit limit with the factor. As of December 31, 2008, the
amount of Due from Factor for which we bear the credit risk is $355,249.
For the three months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company paid a total of approximately $58,376
and $0, respectively, of interest to the factor which is reported as a component
of interest expense in the consolidated statements of income.
18
Due from factor, net of reserve
for chargebacks and estimated sales returns as presented in the balance sheet at
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 is summarized below:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Outstanding factored receivables
|
$
|
3,898,654
|
|
$
|
3,126,405
|
|
Cash collateral reserve
|
|
302,243
|
|
|
303,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,200,897
|
|
|
3,429,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: advances
|
|
(2,428,691
|
)
|
|
(1,689,387
|
)
|
Reserves for chargeback and sales returns
|
|
(508,092
|
)
|
|
(328,988
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,264,114
|
|
$
|
1,411,456
|
|
6. Inventory
Inventory consists of the
following at December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Finished goods
|
$
|
843,444
|
|
$
|
1,006,116
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
248,289
|
|
|
156,697
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
93,690
|
|
|
141,594
|
|
|
$
|
1,185,423
|
|
$
|
1,304,407
|
|
7. Property and Equipment
A summary of property and
equipment at December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
$
|
167,486
|
|
$
|
167,486
|
|
Computer hardware and software
|
|
247,950
|
|
|
301,949
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
76,699
|
|
|
76,699
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
149,583
|
|
|
149,583
|
|
|
|
641,718
|
|
|
695,717
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
(138,223
|
)
|
|
(107,725
|
)
|
|
$
|
503,495
|
|
$
|
587,992
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
expense for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $30,498 and
$14,467, respectively.
8. Asset Purchase
On June 18, 2008, the Company
purchased certain assets, including trademarks and office equipment, originally
belonging to a company in foreclosure directly from the financial institution
holding a security interest in the foreclosed assets. The Company obtained a
release of all claims which the financial institution had in any intellectual
property and customer information which it purchased.
The Company purchased the
following assets:
|
(a)
|
certain computers, office equipment and
furniture;
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
all intangible property, trademarks (or rights or claims
therein), copyrights, artwork, designs, graphics, patterns, markers,
blocks and designs which were formerly used in marketing apparel products
under the Scrapbook and Crafty Couture
labels;
|
19
|
(c)
|
all open and unshipped orders relating to Scrapbook and
Crafty Couture apparel products, all customer lists, and information
regarding customer requirements and
specifications.
|
The Company paid $1,200,000 as
consideration for both the purchase of the purchased assets and the release of
all claims or rights to the two trademarks, Scrapbook and Crafty Couture.
The purchase price was allocated as follows:
Office equipment and furniture
|
$
|
22,765
|
|
Trademarks and intangible assets
|
|
1,177,235
|
|
Total Purchase price
|
$
|
1,200,000
|
|
The Company engaged an
independent firm of appraisers to perform a valuation of the purchased assets
and determined that the price paid represented a fair price and that no
adjustment needs to be made.
Employment of Kelly Kaneda
The Company subsequently hired
Kelly Kaneda, the originator of the Scrapbook label at a salary of $150,000 per
year for the first 12 months, increasing by $25,000 per year for each of three
additional years. In addition, Mr. Kaneda shall receive a commission of one and
one-half percent (1.5%) on the net sales of the Scrapbook Division. Net sales
shall be defined as gross sales less discounts, markdowns, returns, losses for
uncollected accounts, and other allowances actually taken by customers. Mr.
Kaneda has received a signing bonus of 200,000 shares of restricted common
stock. The fair value of this transaction, as calculated pursuant to the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was determined to be $128,000 ($0.64 per
share), and, as these shares are fully vested, was charged to operations at June
30, 2008.
In each of the first four (4)
years of Mr. Kanedas employment commencing June, 2008, upon attainment of
specified sales targets, he shall receive restricted common stock in the amounts
set forth below, which stock shall be transferred and shall vest on the last day
of the applicable contract year. In the event that Mr. Kaneda is terminated
other than for cause or Mr. Kaneda resigns for cause, he shall be entitled to a
prorated portion of the annual stock bonus, calculated through the effective
date of termination or resignation.
|
|
Shares of
|
Year
|
Sales Goals
|
Stock
|
Year 1
|
$20,000,000
|
200,000
|
Year 2
|
$25,000,000
|
250,000
|
Year 3
|
$30,000,000
|
250,000
|
Year 4
|
$40,000,000
|
250,000
|
Total:
|
|
950,000
|
9. Related Party Transactions
Craig Soller, the brother of the
Companys Chief Executive Officer, Stephen Soller, is a consultant to the
Company. See Note 3 for transactions involving Craig Soller.
Convertible Note Payable to Shareholders
On March 3, 2008 the Company
entered into a Revolving Loan Agreement with two of the shareholders of the
Company. The loan allows the Company to borrow and repay, on a revolving basis,
up to an outstanding amount of $750,000. The outstanding principal balance of
the Loan bears interest, payable monthly, at a rate of 8% per annum. The loan is
secured by a lien on the assets of the Company, except for factored receivables.
20
The Loan was due to be repaid in
full by November 30, 2008. As consideration for the loan, the Company agreed to
pay 68,180 of its Common shares as loan fees. At March 31, 2008, $500,000 was
advanced and the Company recorded an expense of $25,000 included in operating
expenses equivalent to the issuance of 45,454 shares of the Companys common
stock at the fair market value of $0.55 per share, the closing price of the
Companys common shares on the first advance date of February 26, 2008. The
Company drew a further advance on April 10, 2008 and recorded an expense in
general and administrative expenses of $23,863 equivalent to the issuance of
22,726 shares of its common stock at the fair market value of $1.05, the closing
price of the Companys common stock on April 10, 2008.
At any time after August 31,
2008, if there is an outstanding amount on the Loan, the lenders may convert, by
written notice, either a portion or the total amount of the outstanding loan to
common shares of the Company at a price per share equal to the lesser of:
|
a)
|
the average closing bid for the five (5) trading days
immediately preceding the first advance date of February 26, 2008;
or,
|
|
|
|
|
b)
|
the average closing bid price for the five (5) trading
days immediately preceding the notice of intent to
convert.
|
At December 31, 2008 the Company
had an outstanding balance of $750,000 on the loan. During the three months
ended December 31, 2008, the Company paid $16,393 in interest expense on the
Loan. The loan has not been repaid at December 31, 2008 and may be called or
converted into shares at any time.
10. Consulting Agreement for Sosik
On August 20, 2007 the Company
signed a consulting agreement with Lolly Factory, Inc. and its sole shareholder
(Consultant) to provide sales and merchandising consulting services for the
Sosik and Juniors apparel divisions through December 31, 2010. Consulting fees
totaling $452,125 were payable between September 2007 and June 2008 and have
been fully paid. In addition, under the consulting agreement the Consultant
shall earn a 3.5% (reduced to 3.15% on October 1, 2008) commission on the
Sosik/Junior divisions net sales. The Company recorded sales commission expense
of $62,500 for the three months ended December 31, 2008. The Consultant also
earned 100,000 of our common shares payable each month from September, 2007 to
June, 2008, up to an aggregate of 1,000,000 common shares which shares are
deemed to be earned and vested each month.
The Consultant and the Company
have established sales targets totaling $30.0 million for calendar year 2008,
$45.0 million for calendar year 2009 and $60.0 million for calendar year 2010.
The Consultant can earn up to 1,500,000 additional common shares of Panglobal
Brands Inc. according to the following schedule:
|
(i)
|
500,000 shares upon meeting the sales target for calendar
year 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
500,000 shares upon meeting the sales target for calendar
year 2009; and,
|
|
|
|
|
(iii)
|
500,000 shares upon meeting the sales target for calendar
year 2010.
|
The sales target for calendar
2008 was not met and the Company has not accrued an expense for issuing shares
for meeting the sales target for 2008.
11. Common Stock
Prior to December 15, 2006, the
Companys Articles of Incorporation authorized the issuance of 100,000,000
shares of the Companys common stock with a par value of $0.0001 per share. On
February 2, 2007 the Company increased the number of its authorized shares of
common stock to 600,000,000 shares. The Company does not have any preferred
stock authorized.
21
On February 2, 2007, the Company
effected a six-for-one forward split of its outstanding common stock. All common
share amounts referred to herein are presented on a post-split basis. All
options referred to herein were issued on a post-split basis.
Mynks initial capitalization
consisted of cash of $497,700 in exchange for the issuance of 10,000,000 shares
of Mynk common stock (equivalent to 2,884,612 shares of Panglobal common stock).
On May 11, 2007, pursuant to a
Share Exchange Agreement dated as of February 15, 2007 (the Share Exchange
Agreement) by and among Panglobal, the shareholders of Mynk Corporation
(Selling Shareholders) and Mynk, Panglobal issued 3,749,995 shares of its
common stock in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Mynk,
issued 975,000 shares of it common stock in payment of $390,000 of outstanding
loans to Mynk, and agreed to reimburse a shareholder of Mynk up to $100,000 for
outstanding amounts due (the Exchange). Previously, on February 3, 2006, Mynk
had issued 10,000,000 shares of its common stock to its founders for $497,700 in
cash, and 3,000,000 shares of its common stock valued at $149,310, as loan fees
on June 20, 2006, for a total of 13,000,000 shares, which constituted all of the
issued and outstanding shares of Mynk prior to the Exchange. The share exchange
was conducted on the basis of 0.2884615 common shares of Panglobal for every one
common share of Mynk.
The Company raised $4,000,000 in
a private placement selling 8,000,000 of its common shares at a price of $0.50
per share which officially closed on July 10, 2008; but was reflected at June
30, 2008 as cash had been received by the Company at quarter-end.
We issued 560,000 shares pursuant
to the exemption from registration under the United States Securities Act of
1933 provided by Section 4(2), Section 4(6) and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D
promulgated under the 1933 Act to four (4) investors who are accredited
investors within the respective meanings ascribed to that term in Rule 501(a)
under the 1933 Act.
We issued 7,440,000 shares to
eighteen (18) non U.S. persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the
Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S
and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
The Companys executive and head
office moved on February 15, 2008 to 2853 E. Pico Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90023.
The Company has signed a three year lease for the new head office measuring
18,200 square feet at a monthly rental of $11,500. The lease began on January 1,
2008 and the Company moved into the new premises on February 15, 2008. Total
rent expense including sales showrooms for the three months ended December 31,
2008 and 2007 was $98,749 and $50,353, respectively.
The table below sets forth the
Companys lease obligations through 2013.
Year ending September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
$
|
257,860
|
|
2010
|
|
353,528
|
|
2011
|
|
222,609
|
|
2012
|
|
123,027
|
|
2013
|
|
10,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
967,302
|
|
The Company is periodically
subject to various pending and threatened legal actions that arise in the normal
course of business. The Companys management believes that the impact of any
such litigation will not have a material adverse impact on the Companys
financial position or results of operations. On September 19, 2008 Mynk
Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary, sued Delias Inc., a customer, in the
Superior Court of the State of California, for goods shipped, but unpaid, in the
amount of $604,081.
22
13. Income Taxes
Potential benefits of income tax
losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than
not. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes as of
its inception. Pursuant to SFAS No. 109 the Company is required to compute tax
asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits
of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements
because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize
the net operating losses carried forward in future years.
The deferred tax benefit is
composed of the following:
|
|
December 31 ,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Deferred tax benefit: Federal
|
$
|
4,913,000
|
|
$
|
4,913,000
|
|
Deferred tax benefit: State
|
|
1,276,000
|
|
|
1,276,000
|
|
Total benefit of NOL carry forward
|
|
6,189,000
|
|
|
6,189,000
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
(6,189,000
|
)
|
|
(6,189,000
|
)
|
Total
|
$
|
0
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 unused
net operating losses equal to $13,379,000 are available for 17 years to offset
future years federal and state taxable income. SFAS 109 requires that the tax
benefit of such NOLs be recorded using current tax rates as an asset to the
extent management assesses the utilization of such NOLs to be more likely than
not. Based upon the Company's short term historical operating performance, the
Company provided a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset.
14. Subsequent Events
Elk Brands Manufacturing Company,
Inc. was suing Mynk Corporation for an alleged payment owing of approximately
$70,800, which amount was previously recorded and is included in Accounts
Payable and Accrued Expenses. The claim was settled on February 2, 2009 and Mynk
agreed to pay $40,000 to Elk Brands in four monthly payments of $10,000 each
commencing February 28, 2009 and ending May 31, 2009.
On January 16, 2009 we entered
into a revolving loan agreement with Providence Wealth Management Ltd, a British
Virgin Islands company, whereby Providence agreed to loan the Company the
aggregate principal amount of US$1,000,000 for general corporate purposes. The
loan is issued as follows:
|
(i)
|
by advance of US$700,000 on the date of execution of the
loan agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions
precedent, by advance of up to an additional US$300,000;
and
|
bearing interest at 9% per annum on the outstanding principal,
and repayable on or before July 31, 2009.
The amount of $700,000 was advanced on January 16, 2009 and a
second advance of $300,000 occurred on January 27, 2009.
23
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF
OPERATION.
The following discussion should
be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and
the related notes for quarter ended December 31, 2008 and the factors that could
affect our future financial condition and results of operations. Historical
results may not be indicative of future performance.
Corporate Overview and History
We were incorporated on March 2,
2005, under the laws of the State of Delaware, under the name EZ English Online
Inc. Since incorporation, we were engaged in the development of an online
teacher training course to teach English as a second language.
On July 3, 2006, our common stock
was approved for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board.
On February 2, 2007, we affected
a forward stock split of our authorized and issued and outstanding shares on a
six-for-one basis. The forward split resulted in the increase of our authorized
capital from 100,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.0001 to
600,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.0001.
On February 2, 2007, we completed
a merger with our wholly owned subsidiary Panglobal Brands Inc. As a result, we
changed our name from EZ English Online Inc. to Panglobal Brands Inc. Our
subsidiary was incorporated on January 22, 2007, specifically for the purpose of
the merger. The six-for-one forward stock split, merger and name change became
effective with our listing on NASDAQs OTC Bulletin Board on February 6, 2007
and our trading symbol was changed to PNGB.
On May 11, 2007, we acquired all
of the issued and outstanding shares of Mynk Corporation. Mynk is now our
wholly-owned, operating subsidiary. With the acquisition of Mynk, we changed our
business focus to that of our newly acquired subsidiary and are now engaged in
the business of the design, production and sale of clothing and accessories. We
intend to acquire and create brands for the contemporary apparel market in the
U.S. and international markets.
Our Current Business
Business Strategy
Our strategy is to build a series
of apparel brands, consisting of mainly womens apparel, and to build brand
recognition by marketing our products to fashion conscious, affluent consumers
who shop in high-end boutiques and department stores and who want to wear and be
seen in the latest and most fashionable clothing and accessories. We plan to
update our product offerings continually to be seen as a trend setter in
fashionable clothing and accessories. We also are targeting the junior market
and design, have manufactured and sell junior denim, t-shirts, dresses and other
apparel. Lastly, based upon our branded products, we expect to be offered the
opportunity to manufacture private label womens apparel including dresses,
skirts and knit and woven tops.
We operate all of our apparel
businesses through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Mynk Corporation.
Our divisions are aggregated into
three major consumer market product groupings: -Sosik, Scrapbook and
Contemporary. The major consumer divisions are as follows:
SOSIK-Sosik designs, merchandises
and sells junior t-shirts, dresses, skirts and knit and woven tops and other
apparel manufactured in Asia. Junior apparel includes clothing for girls ages
14-22 as well as products for children ages 6-14. Sales of Sosik, including
products that will be sold under private labels for junior products commenced in
October, 2007 and shipments commenced in January 2008. Approximately 70% of our
revenue for our fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 and 50% for the three
months ended December 31, 2008 related to Sosik and junior products. Customers
include Charlotte Russe, Forever 21, Wet Seal, Ross and Burlington Coat Factory.
24
SCRAPBOOK-Scrapbook and Crafty
Couture trademarks were acquired June 18, 2008. The Scrapbook label is aimed at
junior (teen and early 20s) higher-end contemporary markets and is known for
its mix and match prints and comfortable knit fabrics. Scrapbook products can be
found at better department stores and boutiques. Major customers include
Nordstroms, Dillards, Macys, Anthropologie, Top Shop (in London, UK), Forever
21 and Hot Topic. We have employed Kelly Kaneda, founder of the brand, to be the
new president of the Scrapbook division of Panglobal Brands, Inc. Crafty Couture
is less fashionable and aimed at a younger market, early through late teens.
The following four divisions have
been consolidated into the Contemporary Group.
TEA AND HONEY-Tea and Honey designs,
merchandises and sells womens mid-priced contemporary dresses. Tea and Honey is
a more casual look for women ages 22-35 with a vintage feel easily convertible
for wear by the working woman by day and for evening wear, as well. Tea and
Honey products commenced sales in June 2008 and will be manufactured in Asia.
Retail customers include Federated department store chains, Anthropologie and
boutiques. Competition includes Velvet, Ella Moss and A Common Thread.
HAVEN and PRIVATE LABEL - Based upon
our branded products, we started offering Haven lower priced dresses with
success and are beginning to be offered the opportunity by major department
stores to design, merchandise and manufacture private label womens apparel
including dresses, skirts and knit and woven tops. Our Haven shipments commenced
July, 2008 and include customers such as Nordsrom, Macys and Dillards.
HAUTEUR MYNK-Hauteur Mynk is a
trademarked brand name selling premium denim jeans, skirts, dresses and shorts.
Mynk had sales during the fiscal year, but is currently dormant and only accepts
orders on current inventory. The Company decided that the premium denim market
was saturated with brands and decided to place Hauteur Mynk on hold.
We anticipate no significant
change in our products lines or new apparel industry divisions during the fiscal
year to end on September 30, 2009. In all of our divisions, we purchase finished
goods from numerous contract manufacturers and to a lesser extent raw materials
directly from numerous textile mills and yarn producers and converters. We have
not experienced difficulty in obtaining finished goods or raw materials
essential to our business in any of our apparel business divisions.
We outsource our warehousing and
shipping functions to a third party warehousing company designed to ship apparel
products for multiple companies.
We maintain a company website at
www.panglobalbrand.com where examples of our products can be seen.
Consulting Agreement for Sosik Division
On August 20, 2007 we signed a
consulting agreement with Lolly Factory, Inc. and its sole shareholder
(Consultant) to provide sales and merchandising consulting services for the
Sosik and Juniors apparel divisions through December 31, 2010. Consulting fees
totaling $452,125 were payable between September 2007 and June 2008 and have
been fully paid at September 30, 2008. In addition, under the consulting
agreement, as amended, the Consultant shall earn a 3.15% commission on the
Sosik/Junior divisions net sales. We recorded sales commission expense of
$62,500 for the three months ended December 31, 2008. The Consultant also earned
100,000 of our common shares payable each month from September, 2007 to June,
2008, up to an aggregate of 1,000,000 common shares.
We and the Consultant established
sales targets totaling $30.0 million for calendar year 2008, $45.0 million for
calendar year 2009 and $60.0 million for calendar year 2010. The Consultant can
earn up to 1,500,000 additional common shares of Panglobal Brands Inc. according
to the following schedule:
|
(i)
|
500,000 shares upon meeting the sales target for calendar
year 2008;
|
25
|
(ii)
|
500,000 shares upon meeting the sales target for calendar
year 2009; and,
|
|
|
|
|
(iii)
|
500,000 shares upon meeting the sales target for calendar
year 2010.
|
The sales target for calendar
year 2008 was not met, and, we have not accrued an expense for shares payable to
the Consultant for 2008.
Manufacturing
We outsource all of our
manufacturing to third parties on an order-by-order basis. These contract
manufacturers are found in Asia, Mexico and the United States and they will
manufacture our garments on an order-by-order basis. We believe that we will be
able to meet our production needs in this way. Although the various fabrics that
we intend to use in the manufacture of our products will be of the high quality,
they are available from many suppliers in the United States and abroad.
Employees
As of February 17, 2009, we have
53 full-time employees: three (3) are executive, ten (10) are design staff,
seventeen (17) are production staff, nine (9) are sewing staff, six (6) are
sales staff, six (4) are customer service and shipping staff and four (4) are
accounting/administration staff. None of our employees are subject to a
collective bargaining agreement, and we believe that our relations with our
employees are good.
Quality Control
We will establish a quality
control program to ensure that our products meet our high quality standards. We
intend to monitor the quality of our fabrics prior to the production of garments
and inspect prototypes of each product before production runs commence. We also
plan to perform random on-site quality control checks during and after
production before the garments leave the contractor. We also plan to conduct
final random inspections when the garments are received in our distribution
centers. We believe that our policy of inspecting our products at our
distribution centers and at the vendors facilities will be important to
maintain the quality, consistency and reputation of our products.
Competition
The apparel industry is intensely
competitive and fragmented. We compete against other small companies like ours,
as well as large companies that have a similar business and large marketing
companies, importers and distributors that sell products similar to or
competitive with ours.
We believe that our competitive
strengths consist of the detailing of the design, the quality of the fabric and
the superiority of the fit.
Government Regulation and Supervision
Our operations are subject to the
effects of international treaties and regulations such as the North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). We are also subject to the effects of
international trade agreements and embargoes by entities such as the World Trade
Organization. Generally, these international trade agreements benefit our
business rather than burden it because they tend to reduce trade quotas, duties,
taxes and similar impositions. However, these trade agreements may also impose
restrictions that could have an adverse impact on our business, by limiting the
countries from whom we can purchase our fabric or other component materials, or
limiting the countries where we might market and sell our products.
Labelling and advertising of our
products is subject to regulation by the Federal Trade Commission. We believe
that we are in compliance with these regulations.
26
Information Systems
We believe that high levels of
automation and technology are essential to maintain our competitive position and
support our strategic objectives and we plan to invest in computer hardware,
system applications and networks to provide increased efficiencies and enhanced
controls.
Trademarks
We own numerous trademarks for
all of our brands including Sosik, Scrapbook, Crafty Couture, Tea and Honey,
Haven, Nela and Hauteur Mynk and have applications pending for the balance of
our branded apparel products.
Marketing
We market our products directly
through our sales staff as well as through showrooms which carry multiple lines
of apparel products. In addition we attend industry trade shows.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
The following is a summary of our
uses of cash for the periods set forth below:
|
|
Quarter ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
Cash Flows provided/(used) in Operating
Activities
|
$
|
108,554
|
|
$
|
(1,612,219
|
)
|
|
106.73%
|
|
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities
|
|
-
|
|
|
(145,151
|
)
|
|
100.00%
|
|
Cash Flows provided by Financing Activities
|
|
62,967
|
|
|
2,143,819
|
|
|
(97.06%
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash During Period
|
$
|
171,521
|
|
$
|
386,449
|
|
|
(55.60%
|
)
|
Assets
At December 31, 2008, our total
assets were $4,851,461 compared to our assets of $5,157,255 as at September 30,
2008. The decrease of $299,666 results mainly from the decrease in our due from
factor.
Our current assets totaled
$3,042,339 at December 31, 2008 and $3,257,508 at September 30, 2008
respectively. The decrease in current assets is primarily due to decrease in our
due from factor. Our net sales increased to $6,452,464 for the three months
ended December 31, 2008 compared to sales of $120,633 for the three months ended
December 31, 2007.
Liabilities and Working Capital
The following is a summary of our
working capital at December 31, 2008:
|
|
December
|
|
|
September
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
31,
2008
|
|
|
30,
2008
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
Current Assets
|
$
|
3,042,339
|
|
$
|
3,257,508
|
|
|
(6.61%
|
)
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
5,329,739
|
|
|
4,783,083
|
|
|
11.43%
|
|
Working Capital
|
$
|
(2,287,400
|
)
|
$
|
(1,525,575
|
)
|
|
(50.00%
|
)
|
The decrease in our working
capital of $761,825 is primarily due to increases in our accounts payable and
accrued expenses.
27
Cash Requirements and Additional Funding
Our estimated cash requirements
for the next 12 months are as follows:
EXPENSE
|
|
COST
|
|
Design and development
|
$
|
3,100,000
|
|
Selling and Shipping
|
$
|
3,000,000
|
|
General and administrative(excludes
$750,000 non-cash compensation
|
$
|
2,600,000
|
|
TOTAL
|
$
|
8,700,000
|
|
On February 27 and 28, 2007, we
raised approximately $4,774,602 through the sale of our equity securities in
private placement transactions. We have also earned revenues from the sale of
our fall product line. With the money we raised through the private placements
and the revenue we earned through the sale of our products, we were able to pay
our operating expenses for approximately the next nine months. After the next
nine months, we anticipated requiring further corporate financing to carry out
our business plan.
On October 23, 2007, we closed a
private placement of 2,871,759 units for gross proceeds of $2,153,819. Each unit
was sold for $0.75 and consists of one common share and one common share
purchase warrant. Each common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to
purchase, if exercised, one additional common share of our company at a price of
$1.00 per common share until October 23, 2008 and at $1.50 per common share if
exercised during the period from October 24, 2008 until the warrants expire on
October 23, 2009.
On March 3, 2008, we entered into
a Revolving Loan Agreement with two of our shareholders. The loan allows us to
borrow and repay, on a revolving basis, up to an outstanding amount of $750,000.
The outstanding principal balance of the Loan bears interest, payable monthly,
at a rate of 8% per annum.
The Loan was due to be repaid in
full by November 30, 2008. At December 31, 2008, we had an outstanding balance
of $750,000 on the loan which may be called or converted into shares at any
time.
As consideration for the loan, we agreed to pay 68,180 of our
common shares as loan fees. At March 31, 2008, $500,000 was advanced and we
recorded an expense of $25,000 included in operating expenses equivalent to the
issuance of 45,454 of our shares of the Companys common stock at the fair
market value of $0.55 per share, the closing price of our common shares on the
first advance date of February 26, 2008. We drew a further advance on April 10,
2008 and recorded an expense in general and administrative expenses of $23,863
equivalent to the issuance of 22,726 shares of its common stock at the fair
market value of $1.05, the closing price of our common stock on April 10, 2008.
At any time after August 31,
2008, if there is an outstanding amount on the Loan, the lenders may convert, by
written notice, either a portion or the total amount of the outstanding loan to
common shares at a price per share equal to the lesser of:
|
a)
|
the average closing bid for the five (5) trading days
immediately preceding the first advance date of February 26, 2008;
or,
|
|
|
|
|
b)
|
the average closing bid price for the five (5) trading
days immediately preceding the notice of intent to
convert.
|
We raised $4,000,000 in a private
placement selling 8,000,000 of its common shares at a price of $0.50 per share
which officially closed on July 10, 2008; but is reflected at June 30, 2008 as
cash had been received by the Company at quarter-end.
We issued 560,000 shares pursuant
to the exemption from registration under the United States Securities Act of
1933 provided by Section 4(2), Section 4(6) and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D
promulgated under
28
the 1933 Act to four (4) investors who are accredited
investors within the respective meanings ascribed to that term in Rule 501(a)
under the 1933 Act.
We issued 7,440,000 shares to
eighteen (18) non U.S. persons (as that term is defined in Regulation S of the
Securities Act of 1933) in an offshore transaction relying on Regulation S
and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On January 16, 2009, we entered
into a revolving loan agreement with Providence Wealth Management Ltd, a British
Virgin Islands company, whereby Providence agreed to loan us the aggregate
principal amount of US$1,000,000 for general corporate purposes. The amount of
$700,000 was advanced on January 16, 2009 and a second advance of $300,000
occurred on January 27, 2009.
The loan is issued as follows:
|
(i)
|
by advance of US$700,000 on the date of execution of the
loan agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions
precedent, by advance of up to an additional US$300,000; and bearing
interest at 9% per annum on the outstanding principal, and repayable on or
before July 31, 2009.
|
There are no assurances that we
will earn the funds required for our continued operation. If we do not earn the
required revenues, then we will have to seek another source of financing, likely
through the sale of more shares of our common stock or borrowing money. There
can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when
needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable
terms. If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis,
we will not be able to meet our other obligations as they become due and we will
be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease the operation of our business.
There is substantial doubt about
our ability to continue as a going concern as the continuation of our business
is dependent upon a combination of our ability to obtain further long-term
financing, the successful and sufficient market acceptance of any product
offerings that we may introduce, the continuing successful development of our
product offerings, and, finally, our ability to achieve a profitable level of
operations. At this time, we have a backlog for shipments of our products
extending through June 2009. The issuance of additional equity securities by us
could result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of our current
stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be
available, would increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.
The Three Months Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to the
Three Months Ended December 31, 2007
Revenue
Net sales for the three months
ended December 31, 2008 totaled $6,452,464 versus $120,633 for 2007. Sales of
Sosik/junior apparel totaled $3,180,000, sales of Scrapbook apparel totaled
$2,664, 000 and the remainder of the sales were Tea and Honey, and Haven
dresses. During the year ended September 30, 2007, the only product sold was
Hauteur Mynk Jeans, all of our other brands only commenced shipping in January
of 2008. Gross profit/(loss) was $1,605,138 and ($6,394) for the three months
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,respectively. At this time, we have a backlog
of sales orders in excess $9.2 million for shipments through June 2009. With the
addition of Scrapbook, our sales mix is changing. Approximately 51% of these
orders are for Sosik and junior apparel products including skirts and knit and
woven tops, 35% are for Scrapbook apparel, and the balance is for contemporary
brands. Our Sosik products are sold through in-house sales staff and we have
corporate sales showrooms in Los Angeles and New York. Our Scrapbook apparel is
sold through in-house sales staff and independent sales showrooms in Chicago,
Dallas and Miami. Our Haven/Nela/Tea and Honey products are sold through
in-house sales staff and a corporate sales showroom in New York, and through
contract outside sales showrooms in Los Angeles earning sales commissions of
10-12%.
29
Expenses
The major components of our
operating expenses are outlined in the table below:
|
|
1st Quarter Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
Design & Development
|
|
818,284
|
|
|
862,860
|
|
|
(9.48%
|
)
|
Selling & Shipping
|
|
769,765
|
|
|
404,232
|
|
|
90.43%
|
|
General and Administrative
|
|
871,484
|
|
|
1,016,225
|
|
|
(14.24%
|
)
|
Depreciation & Amortization
|
|
30,498
|
|
|
14,467
|
|
|
110.81%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EXPENSES
|
|
2,490,031
|
|
|
2,297,784
|
|
|
8.36%
|
|
. The increase for the three months ended December 31, 2008 was
due to the increase in and expansion of our operations, particularly selling and
shipping.
For the three months ended
December 31, 2008 design and development expenses totaled $818,284, of which
$411,000 was for design expenses and $407,000 was for production and development
expenses. Salaries totaled $567,000. Purchases of sample fabric and trims
totaled $118,000. Contract labor and consulting totaled $8,000 and manufacturing
and design supplies totaled $65,000. For the three months ended December 31,
2007 salaries totaled $571,000. Purchases of sample fabric and trims totaled
$132,000. Contract labor and consulting totaled $19,000 and manufacturing and
design supplies totaled $14,000.
For the three months ended
December 31, 2008 selling and shipping expense totaled $769,765 compared to
$404,232 for the three months ended December 31, 2007 due to the increase in
sales volume. During the three months ended December 31, 2008, travel and trade
show expenses totaled $93,000, sales showroom expense totaled $71,000, sales
salaries totaled $177,000 and sales commissions totaled $202,000. Included in
sales commission expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2008 was
$62,5000 paid to Lolly Factory, Inc. Selling expenses for the three months ended
December 31, 2007 consisted of travel and trade show expenses totaling $63,000,
sales showroom expense totaled $37,000, sales salaries totaled $91,000 and sales
cunsulting totaled $188,350. Included in sales consulting expenses for the three
months ended December 31, 2008 was $180,850 paid to Lolly Factory, Inc. None of
the other divisions were in operation during the three months ended December 31,
2007, only the Hauteur Mynk denim brand, and the start-up of the Sosik/junior
division.
Our general and administrative
expenses consist of accounting, information technology, website development,
marketing and promotion, travel, meals and entertainment, rent, insurances,
office maintenance, communication expenses (cellular, internet, fax, telephone),
office supplies, and courier and postage costs.
For the three months ended
December 31, 2008 general and administrative expenses (including non-cash
compensation costs of $196,535) totaled $871,484. Key components included
salaries for executive, accounting and customer service totaling $160,000,
payroll taxes of $67,000, professional (accounting and legal) fees of $123,100,
postage and delivery of $35,500, insurance, including health, liability and
directors & officers liability of $59,000 and rent of $34,500. Not included
in general and administrative expenses is $30,498 in depreciation expense. For
the three months ended December 31, 2007 general and administrative expenses
totaled $1,016,225, of which $547,901 was non-cash compensation expenses. Key
components included salaries of $130,000, payroll taxes of $61,000, postage and
delivery of $39,000 insurance $65,000, rent of $21,000 and professional fees of
$41,000.
Off Balance-Sheet Arrangements
We use what is known as a
factor for credit administration and cash flow purposes. Under the factoring
agreement, the factor purchases a portion of our domestic wholesale sales
invoices and assumes most of the credit risks with respect to such accounts for
a charge of 0.75% of the gross invoice amount. We can draw cash advances from
the factor based on a pre-determined percentage, 75% of eligible outstanding
accounts receivable. The factor holds as security substantially all of our
assets and charges interest at a rate of prime plus 1.0% on the outstanding
advances. At March 31, 2008, we had a cash account in the amount of $400,000
with the factor to be used as collateral for the loans advanced. On May 5, 2008
the cash collateral was reduced to $300,000. We are liable
30
to the factor for merchandise disputes and customer claims on
receivables sold to the factor. The factoring agreement expires on March 4, 2009
and automatically renews unless cancelled by either party.
At times, our customers place
orders that exceed the credit that they have available from the factor. We
evaluate those orders to consider if the customer is worthy of additional credit
based on our past experience with the customer. If we decide to sell merchandise
to the customer on credit, we take the credit risk for the amounts that are
above their approved credit limit with the factor. As of December 31, 2008, the
amount of Due from Factor for which we bear the credit risk is $355,247.
For the three months ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, we paid a total of approximately $58,376 and $0,
respectively, of interest to the factor which is reported as a component of
interest expense in the consolidated statements of income.
Due from factor, net of
chargebacks and estimated sales returns as presented in the balance sheet at
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 is summarized below:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Outstanding factored receivables
|
$
|
3,898,654
|
|
$
|
3,126,405
|
|
Cash collateral reserve
|
|
302,243
|
|
|
303,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,200,897
|
|
|
3,429,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: advances
|
|
(2,428,691
|
)
|
|
(1,689,387
|
)
|
Reserves for chargeback and sales returns
|
|
(508,092
|
)
|
|
(328,988
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,264,114
|
|
$
|
1,411,456
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles used in the United States. Preparing financial
statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. These estimates
and assumptions are affected by managements application of accounting policies.
We believe that understanding the basis and nature of the estimates and
assumptions involved with the following aspects of our consolidated financial
statements is critical to an understanding of our financials.
Inventory is valued at the lower
of cost or market, cost being determined by the first-in, first-out method. We
continually evaluate our inventories by assessing slow moving current product as
well as prior seasons inventory. Market value of non-current inventory is
estimated based on historical sales trends for each category of inventory of our
companys individual product lines, the impact of market trends, an evaluation
of economic conditions and the value of current orders relating to the future
sales of this type of inventory.
Revenue from product sales is
recognized as title passes to the customer upon shipment. Sales returns and
allowances for the three months ended December 31, 2008 totaled $566,126,
approximately 8.0% of sales. We have accrued $508,000 as of December 31, 2008
for estimated chargebacks and sales returns. Sales for the year ended September
30, 2007 were $592,046, net of sales returns of $10,831.
Accounts Receivable
The Company extends credit to
customers whose sales invoices have not been sold to our factor based upon an
evaluation of the customers financial condition and credit history and
generally require no collateral. Management performs regular evaluations
concerning the ability of our customers to satisfy their obligations and records
a provision for doubtful accounts based on these evaluations. Based on
historical losses, existing economic conditions and collection practices, the
Companys allowance for doubtful accounts has been estimated to be $542,584 at
December 31, 2008. The Companys credit losses for the periods presented have
not significantly exceeded managements estimates.
31
Concentration of Credit Risks
During the three months ended
December 31, 2008 sales to three customers accounted for 23%, 13% and 12% of the
Companys net sales. During the year three months ended December 31, 2008,
purchases from one supplier totaled approximately $1,354,000. At December 31
2008, one customer accounted for 58% of the Accounts Receivable, net of
allowance. At December 31, 2008, three customers accounted for 17%, 15%, and
10%, respectively, of the Due From Factor.
Inventory
Inventories are valued at the
lower of cost or market, with cost being determined by the first-in, first-out
method. The Company continually evaluates its inventories by assessing
slow-moving product and records mark-downs as appropriate. At December 31, 2008,
inventories consisted of finished goods, work-in-process and raw materials.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are
recorded at cost. Expenditures for major renewals and improvements that extend
the useful lives of property and equipment are capitalized. Expenditures for
maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are
retired or sold, the property accounts and related accumulated depreciation and
amortization accounts are relieved, and any resulting gain or loss is included
in operations.
Depreciation is computed on the
straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets of five
years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the remaining life of the
related lease, which has been determined to be shorter than the useful life of
the asset.
Stock-Based Compensation
Effective February 3, 2006, the
Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised
2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), a revision to SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123R requires that the
Company measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for equity
awards based on the grant date fair value of the awards, with the cost to be
recognized as compensation expense in the Companys financial statements over
the period of benefit, which is generally the vesting period of the awards.
Accordingly, the Company recognizes compensation cost for equity-based
compensation for all new or modified grants issued after February 3, 2006
(Inception).
The Company accounts for stock
option and warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employees in accordance with
EITF No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than
Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services, and
EITF 00-18, Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions involving Equity
Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees, whereas the value of the stock
compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either (a) the
date at which a performance commitment is reached or (b) at the date at which
the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS No. 157), which establishes a formal framework for
measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles. SFAS No.
157 defines and codifies the many definitions of fair value included among
various other authoritative literature, clarifies and, in some instances,
expands on the guidance for implementing fair value measurements, and increases
the level of disclosure required for fair value measurements. Although SFAS No.
157 applies to and amends the provisions of existing FASB and AICPA
pronouncements, it does not, of itself, require any new fair value measurements,
nor does it establish valuation standards. SFAS No. 157
32
applies to all other accounting pronouncements requiring or
permitting fair value measurements, except for: SFAS No. 123R, share-based
payment and related pronouncements, the practicability exceptions to fair value
determinations allowed by various other authoritative pronouncements, and AICPA
Statements of Position 97-2 and 98-9 that deal with software revenue
recognition. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. The Company is currently assessing the potential effect of SFAS
No. 157 on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159), which provides
companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at
fair value. The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to reduce both complexity in
accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by
measuring related assets and liabilities differently. Generally accepted
accounting principles have required different measurement attributes for
different assets and liabilities that can create artificial volatility in
earnings. SFAS No. 159 helps to mitigate this type of accounting-induced
volatility by enabling companies to report related assets and liabilities at
fair value, which would likely reduce the need for companies to comply with
detailed rules for hedge accounting. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation
and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies
that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and
liabilities. SFAS No. 159 requires companies to provide additional information
that will help investors and other users of financial statements to more easily
understand the effect of the companys choice to use fair value on its earnings.
SFAS No. 159 also requires companies to display the fair value of those assets
and liabilities for which the company has chosen to use fair value on the face
of the balance sheet. SFAS No. 159 does not eliminate disclosure requirements
included in other accounting standards, including requirements for disclosures
about fair value measurements included in SFAS No. 157 and SFAS No. 107. SFAS
No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of a companys first fiscal year
beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the
beginning of the previous fiscal year provided that the company makes that
choice in the first 120 days of that fiscal year and also elects to apply the
provisions of SFAS No. 157. The Company is currently assessing the potential
effect of SFAS No. 159 on its consolidated financial statements and has not
elected to adopt SFAS 159 at this time..
In December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 141(revised 2007),
Business Combinations
, and SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
. SFAS No.
141R improves reporting by creating greater consistency in the accounting and
financial reporting of business combinations, resulting in more complete,
comparable, and relevant information for investors and other users of financial
statements. SFAS No. 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business
combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the
measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and
requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the
information they need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect
of the business combination. SFAS No. 160 improves the relevance, comparability,
and transparency of financial information provided to investors by requiring all
entities to report non-controlling (minority) interests in subsidiaries in the
same wayas equity in the consolidated financial statements. Moreover, SFAS No.
160 eliminates the diversity that currently exists in accounting for
transactions between an entity and non-controlling interests by requiring they
be treated as equity transactions. The two statements are effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008 and management is currently evaluating
the impact that the adoption of these statements may have on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB No. 133, (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 is
intended to improve transparency in financial reporting by requiring enhanced
disclosures of an entitys derivative instruments and hedging activities and
their effects on the entitys financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows. SFAS 161 applies to all derivative instruments within the scope of
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
(SFAS 133). SFAS 161 also applies to non-derivative hedging instruments and
all hedged items designated and qualifying under SFAS 133. SFAS 161 is effective
prospectively for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged.
SFAS 161 encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for periods
prior to its initial adoption. We will adopt SFAS 161 on November 15, 2008 and
are currently evaluating the potential impact on our financial statements when
implemented.
33
In April 2008, the FASB issued
FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets. FSP 142-3 amends the factors an entity should consider in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used in determining the useful life
of recognized intangible assets under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. This new guidance applies prospectively to intangible
assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets in
business combinations and asset acquisitions. FSP 142-3 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the
impact, if any, that FSP 142-3 will have on our consolidated financial
statements.
Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but
not yet effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a
material effect on the Company's financial statements.
Adoption of New Accounting Policies
Effective January 1, 2007, the
Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits
claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the
financial statements. Under FIN 48, the Company may recognize the tax benefit
from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax
position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on
the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the
financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the
largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes,
accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The adoption
of the provisions of FIN 48 did not have a material effect on the Companys
financial statements. As of September 30, 2008, no liability for unrecognized
tax benefits was required to be recorded.
The Company currently files or
has in the past filed income tax returns in Canada and the United States. The
Company is subject to tax examinations by tax authorities for tax years ending
in 2006 and subsequently.
The Companys policy is to record
interest and penalties on uncertain tax provisions as income tax expense. As of
September 30, 2008, the Company has no accrued interest or penalties related to
uncertain tax positions.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK
Not applicable
ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls
and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and
procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter
how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of
achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply
its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls
and procedures. Our disclosure controls and procedures were designed to provide
reasonable assurance that the controls and procedures would meet their
objectives.
As required by SEC Rule
13a-15(b), our management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of
our Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our
34
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable
assurance level.
Management found the following
weakness in our disclosure controls and procedures:
There is not adequate division or
segregation of duties in our accounting department that has three staff members,
which includes the Chief Financial Officer.
We intend to determine how to
address these issues by reviewing and revising our internal accounting policies
and procedures
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our
internal controls over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal controls over financial reporting.
Certificates.
Certificates with respect to
disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting
under Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act are attached to this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Other than as described below, we
know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against our company,
nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending
litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or
affiliates, or any registered or beneficial stockholder, is an adverse party or
has a material interest adverse to our interest. The outcome of open unresolved
legal proceedings is presently indeterminable. Any settlement resulting from
resolution of these contingencies will be accounted for in the period of
settlement. We do not believe the potential outcome from these legal proceedings
will significantly impact our financial position, operations or cash flows.
On September 19, 2008 Mynk
Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary, sued Delias Inc., a customer in the
Superior Court of the State of California, for goods shipped, but unpaid, in the
amount of $604,081. Elk Brands Manufacturing Company, Inc. was suing Mynk
Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary, for an alleged payment owing of
approximately $70,800, which amount was previously accrued and is included in
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses. The claim has now been settled on
February 2, 2009, with Mynk agreeing to pay $40,000 to Elk Brands in four
monthly payments of $10,000 each commencing February 28, 2009 and ending May 31,
2009.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Risks Related to our Business
Our continued operations depend on current fashion trends.
If our products and designs are not considered fashionable or desirable by
enough consumers, then our business could be adversely affected.
The acceptance by consumers of
our products and design is important to our success and competitive position,
and the inability to continue to develop and offer fashionable and desirable
products to consumers could harm our business. We cannot be certain that our
high-fashion clothing and accessories will be considered fashionable and
desirable by enough consumers to make our operations profitable. There are no
assurances that our future designs will be successful, and any unsuccessful
designs could adversely affect our business. If we are unable to respond to
changing consumer demands in a timely and appropriate manner, we may fail to
establish or maintain our brand name and brand image. Even if we react
appropriately to changes in consumer preferences, consumers
35
may consider our brand image to be outdated or associate our
brand with styles that are no longer popular. Should trends veer away from our
style of products and designs, our business could be adversely affected.
We may be unable to achieve or sustain growth or manage our
future growth, which may have a material adverse effect on our future operating
results.
We cannot provide any assurances
that our business plan will be successful and that we will achieve profitable
operations. Our future success will depend upon various factors, including the
strength of our brand image, the market success of our current and future
products, competitive conditions and our ability to manage increased revenues,
if any, or implement our growth strategy. In addition, we anticipate
significantly expanding our infrastructure and adding personnel in connection
with our anticipated growth, which we expect will cause our selling, general and
administrative expenses to increase in absolute dollars and which may cause our
selling, general and administrative expenses to increase as a percentage of
revenue. Because these expenses are generally fixed, particularly in the
short-term, operating results may be adversely impacted if we do not achieve our
anticipated growth.
Future growth may place a
significant strain on our management and operations. If we experience growth in
our operations, our operational, administrative, financial and legal procedures
and controls may need to be expanded. As a result, we may need to train and
manage an increasing number of employees, which could distract our management
team from our business. Our future success will depend substantially on the
ability of our management team to manage our anticipated growth. If we are
unable to anticipate or manage our growth effectively, our operating results
could be adversely affected.
We face intense competition, including competition from
companies with significantly greater resources than ours, and if we are unable
to compete effectively with these companies, our business could be harmed.
We face intense competition in
the apparel industry from other, more established companies. A number of our
competitors have significantly greater financial, technological, engineering,
manufacturing, marketing and distribution resources than we do. Their greater
capabilities in these areas may enable them to better withstand periodic
downturns in the apparel industry, compete more effectively on the basis of
price and production and to develop new products in less time. In addition, new
companies may enter the markets in which we compete, further increasing
competition in the apparel industry.
We believe that our ability to
compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including the style and
quality of our products and the strength of our brand name, as well as many
factors beyond our control. We may not be able to compete successfully in the
future, and increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced profit
margins, loss of market share and an inability to generate cash flows that are
sufficient to maintain or expand our development and marketing of new products,
which would adversely impact the trading price of our common stock.
Our business could suffer if our manufacturers do not meet
our demand or delivery schedules.
Although we design and market our
products, we outsource manufacturing to third party manufacturers. Outsourcing
the manufacturing component of our business is common in the apparel industry
and we compete with other companies for the production capacity of our
manufacturers. Because we are a small enterprise and many of the companies with
which we compete have greater financial and other resources than we have, they
may have an advantage in the competition for production capacity. There is no
assurance that the manufacturing capacity we require will be available to us, or
that if available it will be available on terms that are acceptable to us. If we
cannot produce a sufficient quantity of our products to meet demand or delivery
schedules, our customers might reduce demand, reduce the purchase price they are
willing to pay for our products or replace our product with the product of a
competitor, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and operations.
Government regulation and supervision could restrict our
business and decrease our profitability.
Any negative changes to
international trade agreements and regulations such as the North American Free
Trade Agreement or any agreements affecting international trade such as those
made by the World Trade
36
Organization which result in a rise in trade quotas, duties,
taxes and similar impositions or which has the result of limiting the countries
from whom we can purchase our fabric or other component materials, or limiting
the countries where we might market and sell our products, could decrease our
profitability.
Increases in the price of raw materials or their reduced
availability could increase our cost of sales and decrease our profitability.
The principal fabrics used in our
business are cotton, synthetics, wools and blends. The prices we pay for these
fabrics are dependent on the market price for raw materials used to produce
them, primarily cotton. The price and availability of cotton may fluctuate
significantly, depending on a variety of factors, including crop yields,
weather, supply conditions, government regulation, economic climate and other
unpredictable factors. Any raw material price increases could increase our cost
of sales and decrease our profitability unless we are able to pass higher prices
on to our customers. Moreover, any decrease in the availability of cotton could
impair our ability to meet our production requirements in a timely manner.
If we are unable to enforce our intellectual property rights
or otherwise protect our intellectual property, then our business would likely
suffer.
Our success depends to a
significant degree upon our ability to protect and preserve any intellectual
property we develop or acquire, including copyrights, trademarks, patents,
service marks, trade dress, trade secrets and similar intellectual property. We
rely on the intellectual property, patent, trademark and copyright laws of the
United States and other countries to protect our proprietary rights. However, we
may be unable to prevent third parties from using our intellectual property
without our authorization, particularly in those countries where the laws do not
protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. The use of our
intellectual property or similar intellectual property by others could reduce or
eliminate any competitive advantage we may develop, causing us to lose sales or
otherwise harm our business. We may need to bring legal claims to enforce or
protect such intellectual property rights. Any litigation, whether successful or
unsuccessful, could result in substantial costs and diversions of resources. In
addition, notwithstanding the rights we have secured in our intellectual
property, other persons may bring claims against us that we have infringed on
their intellectual property rights or claims that our intellectual property
right interests are not valid. Any claims against us, with or without merit,
could be time consuming and costly to defend or litigate and therefore could
have an adverse affect on our business. If any of these risks arise, our
business would likely suffer.
The recent weakening of economic conditions in the U.S. and
around the world could have harmful effects on our business. If these harmful
effects cause us to scale down our operations, then our share price will likely
decrease. If these harmful effects cause us to cease our operations, then our
shareholders will likely lose their entire investment in our company.
The recent weakening of economic
conditions in the U.S. and around the world, including in the financial services
and real estate industries, could have harmful effects on our business.
Weakening economic conditions generally lead to less money being spent on
clothing across the industry as a whole. Competition for these limited resources
will likely become more intense. If consumers spend less and do not choose to
spend their limited funds on our clothes, we will earn less revenue and we will
not be able to fund our future operations through revenues from sales.
If we cannot fund all of our
future operations through revenue, we may choose to raise money through sales of
our equity securities. However, many investors have recently seen large
decreases in the value of various investments due to declining share prices
across many economic sectors. Because of this and other market factors, if we
choose to raise funds through the sale of our equity securities, potential
investors may be less likely to buy our equity securities or we may be need to
sell our equity securities at low prices, resulting in fewer proceeds. This
would make it difficult for us to raise adequate amounts to fund our operations
through the sale of our equity securities.
If we are unable to fund all of
our operations through revenues or the sale of our equity securities, then we
may choose to borrow money to pay for some of our operations. A tightening of
credit conditions has also been experienced in the economy recently. Because of
the recent credit crisis, it is possible that we would not be
37
able to borrow adequate amounts to fund our operations on terms
and at rates of interest we find acceptable and in the best interests of our
company.
If we cannot fund our planned
operations from revenue, the sale of our equity securities or through incurring
debt on acceptable terms, then we will likely have to scale down or cease our
operations. If we scale down our operations, our share price would likely
decrease and if we cease our operations, shareholders will likely lose their
entire investment in our company.
The recent weakening of economic conditions in the U.S. and
around the world could have harmful effects on the operations of our customers
and suppliers and the confidence of end consumers, all of which could cause our
operations to suffer and our revenues to decrease.
Some of our customers or
suppliers could experience serious cash flow problems due to the current
economic situation. If our customers or suppliers attempt increase their prices,
pass through increased costs, alter payment terms or seek other relief, our
business may suffer from decreased sales to final consumers or increased costs
to us. If any of our vendors or suppliers go out of business, we may not be able
to replace them with other companies of the same quality and level of service.
If the quality of our products and promptness of delivery deteriorates as a
result, our revenue will likely decrease as retailers and consumers would be
less likely to choose our products out of those available to them.
We do not expect that the
difficult economic conditions are likely to improve significantly in the near
future, and further deterioration of the economy, and even consumer fear that
the economy will deteriorate further, could intensify the adverse effects of
these difficult market conditions.
Risks Related to Our Company
We lack an operating history and have losses which we expect
to continue into the future. We have incurred a loss from operations and
negative cash flows from operations that raise substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern. There is no assurance our future
operations will result in profitable revenues. If we cannot generate sufficient
revenues to operate profitably, we may suspend or cease operations.
Our inception date was February
3, 2006. We have a very short operating history upon which an evaluation of our
future success or failure cannot be made. As of December 31, 2008, our
accumulated losses since inception amount to $15,420,19. In its audit report
dated January 8, 2009, our auditors stated that we have incurred a loss from
operations and negative cash flows from operations which raise substantial doubt
about our ability to continue as a going concern.
We will continue to incur
expenses and may incur operating losses in the future. We cannot guarantee that
we will be successful in becoming or remaining profitable in the future. Failure
to become and remain profitable would cause us to go out of business.
Our management may be able to control substantially all
matters requiring a vote of our stockholders and their interests may differ from
the interests of our other stockholders and cause investors to lose some or all
potential benefit from their investment.
As of December 31, 2008, our
directors and officers as a group beneficially owned approximately 25% of our
outstanding common stock. Therefore, our directors and officers may be able to
control matters requiring approval by our stockholders. Matters that require the
approval of our stockholders include the election of directors and the approval
of mergers or other business combination transactions. Our directors and
officers also have control over our management and affairs. As a result of such
control, certain transactions are effectively not possible without the approval
of our directors and officers, including, proxy contests, tender offers, open
market purchase programs or other transactions that could give our stockholders
the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market prices for
their shares of our common stock. If the interests of our directors and officers
conflict with those of our investors, investors could lose some or all of the
potential benefit of their investment.
38
Risks Related to Our Securities
Our stock price is highly volatile and stockholders may be
unable to sell their shares, or may be forced to sell them at a loss.
The trading price of our common
stock has fluctuated significantly since our incorporation (March 2, 2005), and
is likely to remain volatile in the future. The trading price of our common
stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to many events or
factors, including the following:
-
quarterly variations in our operating results;
-
changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;
-
changes in market valuations or financial results of apparel companies;
-
announcements by us or our competitors of new products, or significant
acquisitions, strategic partnerships or joint ventures;
-
any deviation from projected growth rates in revenues;
-
any loss of a major customer or a major customer order;
-
additions or departures of key management or design personnel;
-
any deviations in our net revenue or in losses from levels expected by
securities analysts;
-
activities of short sellers and risk arbitrageurs; and,
-
future sales of our common stock.
The equity markets have, on
occasion, experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have
affected the market prices for many companies' securities and that have often
been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. Any such
fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock,
regardless of our actual operating performance. As a result, stockholders may be
unable to sell their shares, or may be forced to sell them at a loss.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission imposes
additional sales practice requirements on brokers who deal in our shares which
are penny stocks, some brokers may be unwilling to trade them. This means that
you may have difficulty reselling your shares and this may cause the price of
the shares to decline.
Our shares are classified as
penny stocks and are covered by Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and the Rules which impose additional sales practice requirements on
brokers/dealers who sell our securities in this offering or in the aftermarket.
For sales of our securities, the broker/dealer must make a special suitability
determination and receive from you a written agreement prior to making a sale
for you. Because of the imposition of the foregoing additional sales practices,
it is possible that brokers will not want to make a market in our shares. This
could prevent you from reselling your shares and may cause the price of the
shares to decline.
We do not intend to pay dividends and there will be less
ways in which you can make a gain on any investment in our company.
We have never paid any cash
dividends and currently do not intend to pay any dividends for the foreseeable
future. To the extent that we require additional funding currently not provided
for in our financing plan, our funding sources may likely prohibit the payment
of a dividend. Because we do not intend to declare dividends, any gain on an
investment in our company will need to come through appreciation of the stocks
price.
39
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
None
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
ITEM 4. SUBMISSIONS OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
1.
|
On January 16, 2009 we entered into a revolving loan
agreement with Providence Wealth Management Ltd, a British Virgin Islands
company, whereby Providence agreed to loan our company the aggregate
principal amount of US$1,000,000 for general corporate purposes. The loan
is issued as follows:
|
|
(i)
|
by advance of US$700,000 on the date of execution of the
loan agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions
precedent, by advance of up to an additional US$300,000; and bearing
interest at 9% per annum on the outstanding principal, and repayable on or
before July 31, 2009.
|
In connection with the loan agreement,
we entered into a security agreement dated effective March 4, 2008, with
Providence, whereby we agree to create a security interest by way of priority
security interest in our present and after-acquired personal property and such
other collateral described in the security agreement in favour of
Providence.
On June 12, 2008 we entered into a
revolving loan agreement dated effective March 4, 2008, with Sinecure Holdings
Limited, a British Virgin Islands company, and Capella Investments Inc., a
Nevada company, whereby Sinecure and Capella agreed to loan us the aggregate
principal amount of US$750,000 for general corporate purposes,
Also on June 12, 2008, we entered into
a security agreement dated effective March 4, 2008, with Sinecure and Capella,
whereby we agreed to create a security interest by way of priority security
interest in our present and after-acquired personal property and such other
collateral described in the Security Agreement in favour of Sinecure and
Capella.
On January 16, 2009 we entered into a
pari passu agreement with Providence, Sinecure and Capella, whereby Panglobal,
Providence, Sinecure and Capella agree that all security interests issued will
have equal priority and that the creation, registration, filing and existence of
the security interests will not constitute an event of default under either of
the two security agreements.
2.
|
On January 8, 2009, Panglobal Brands Inc. was notified
that effective December 8, 2008, the personnel of Grobstein Horwath &
Company LLP have joined with Crowe Horwath LLP (Crowe) resulting in the
resignation of Grobstein Horwath as independent registered public
accounting firm for our company. Crowe was appointed as our new
independent registered public accounting firm.
|
|
|
|
The audit reports of Grobstein Horwath on the financial
statements of our company as of and for the years ended to September 30,
2007 and 2006 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of
opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope
or accounting principles. Grobstein Horwaths 2007 and 2006 audit report
relating to Grobstein Horwaths audit of our financial statements for the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 included an emphasis
paragraph relating to an uncertainty as to our ability to continue as a
going concern.
|
|
|
|
The decision to engage Crowe was approved by our board of
directors on January 8, 2009.
|
40
During our companys most two recent fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006 and through January 8, 2009, we did not consult with
Crowe on (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified
transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that may
be rendered on our financial statements, and Crowe did not provide either a
written report or oral advice to us that was an important factor considered by
us in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting
issue; or (ii) the subject of any disagreement, as defined in Item 304
(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions, or a reportable event
within the meaning set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
In connection with the audits of our financial statements for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 and through the date of this
current report, there were: (i) no disagreements between our company and
Grobstein Horwath on any matters of accounting principles or practices,
financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which
disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Grobstein Horwath, would
have caused Grobstein Horwath to make reference to the subject matter of the
disagreement in their reports on our financial statements for such years, and
(ii) no reportable events within the meaning set forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
Regulation S-K.
We have provided Grobstein Horwath a copy of the disclosures in
our Form 8-K and have requested that Grobstein Horwath furnish us with a letter
addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or not
Grobstein Horwath agrees with our statements in this Item 4.01(a) . A copy of
the letter dated January 30, 2009, furnished by Grobstein Horwath in response to
that request is filed as Exhibit 16.2 to our Form 8-K filed on February 4,
2009.
41
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-B
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
(3)
|
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
|
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation of Panglobal Brands Inc.
(formerly EZ English Online) (attached as an exhibit to our Form SB-2
filed January 3, 2006).
|
3.2
|
Bylaws of Panglobal Brands Inc. (formerly EZ English
Online) (attached as an exhibit to our Form SB-2 filed January 3, 2006).
|
3.3
|
Articles of Incorporation of Mynk Corp. (attached as an
exhibit to our Form SB- 2 filed February 3, 2006).
|
3.4
|
Bylaws of Mynk Corp. (attached as an exhibit to our Form
SB-2 filed February 3, 2006).
|
3.5
|
Certificate of Amendment (attached as an exhibit to our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2007).
|
3.6
|
Certificate of Ownership (attached as an exhibit to our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2007).
|
(10)
|
Material Contracts
|
10.1
|
PayPal User Agreement (attached as an exhibit to our Form
SB-2 filed February 3, 2006).
|
10.2
|
Affiliated Stock Purchase Agreement dated December 12,
2006 (attached as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
December 13, 2006).
|
10.3
|
Share Exchange Agreement between Panglobal Brands Inc.
and Mynk Corporation, dated February 15, 2007 (attached as an exhibit to
our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 20, 2007).
|
10.4
|
Consulting Agreement between our company, Lolly Factory,
LLC and Mark Cywinski dated September 16, 2007 (attached as an exhibit to
our Form 8-K filed September 27, 2006).
|
10.5
|
Lease Agreement with RFS Investments LLC, dated January
11, 2007 (attached as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on February 20, 2007).
|
10.6
|
Lease Agreement with YMI Jeanswear (attached as an
exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed on January 15, 2008)
|
10.7
|
Lease Agreement with Jamison California Market Center,
L.P. (attached as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed on
January 15, 2008)
|
10.8
|
Lease Agreement with Steven Goldstein (attached as an
exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed on January 15, 2008)
|
10.9
|
Lease Agreement with TR 39th St. Land Corp. (attached as
an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10- KSB filed on January 15, 2008)
|
10.10
|
Loan Agreement dated January 16, 2009 with Providence
Wealth Management Ltd (attached as an exhibit to our current report on
Form 8-K filed on January 22, 2009)
|
10.11
|
Security Agreement dated January 16, 2009 with Providence
Wealth Management Ltd (attached as an exhibit to our current report on
Form 8-K filed on January 22, 2009)
|
10.12
|
Pari Passu Agreement dated January 16, 2009 with
Providence Wealth Management, Sinecure Holdings Limited and Capella
Investments Inc Ltd (attached as an exhibit to our current report on Form
8-K filed on January 22, 2009)
|
10.13
|
Loan Agreement dated March 4, 2008 with Sinecure Holdings
Limited and Capella Investments Inc Ltd (attached as an exhibit to our
current report on Form 8-K filed on January 22, 2009)
|
10.14
|
Security Agreement dated March 4, 2008 with Sinecure
Holdings Limited and Capella Investments Inc Ltd. (attached as an exhibit
to our current report on Form 8-K filed on January 22, 2009)
|
16
|
Letter re change in certifying accountant
|
16.1
|
Grobstein Horwath & Company LLP resignation dated
January 8, 2009.(attached as an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2009)
|
16.2
|
Letter of Grobstein Horwath & Company LLP, dated
January 30, 2009 (attached as an exhibit to our current report on Form 8-K
filed on February 3, 2009)
|
42
* filed hereto
43
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PANGLOBAL BRANDS INC.
By:/s/ Stephen Soller
Stephen Soller
Chief
Executive Officer, and Director
(Principal Executive Officer )
Dated:
February 20, 2009
By:/s/ Charles Lesser
Charles Lesser
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)
Dated: February 20, 2009
Panglobal Brands (CE) (USOTC:PNGB)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 5월(5) 2024 으로 6월(6) 2024
Panglobal Brands (CE) (USOTC:PNGB)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 6월(6) 2023 으로 6월(6) 2024