ADVFN Logo ADVFN

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts 실시간 알림, 사용자 정의 포트폴리오 및 시장 동향을 받으려면 등록하세요.
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (QB)

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (QB) (FMCKL)

8.5695
0.0695
(0.82%)
마감 08 12월 6:00AM

실시간 스트리밍 인용문, 아이디어 및 실시간 토론을 위한 허브

FMCKL 뉴스

공식 뉴스 전용

FMCKL Discussion

게시물 보기
trunkmonk trunkmonk 7 시간 전
this is what i have to say in the future for anyone who does not buy now, or even before real runup

https://memes.yarn.co/yarn-clip/fe85b906-e76a-4592-88b5-404fc97435ee#Je4R4l64.copy
👍️0
navycmdr navycmdr 7 시간 전
$Fannie $Mae (FNMA) – $Price $Target $90

Fannie Mae (FNMA) – Price Target $90
Posted on December 6, 2024

Fannie Mae

Two BUY recommendations were posted on November 26, 2022[1] and September 13, 2023[2] for Federal National Mortgage Association or Fannie Mae (FNMA) common stock. This post will analyze the conservatorship, Net Worth Sweep, Fannie Mae’s earnings, and provide a potential price target.

Conservatorship and Net Worth Sweep

On September 6, 2008, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) took full control over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Major losses in 2007 and 2008 stemming from defaults in the mortgage market prompted the start of the government conservatorship. The conservatorship directed the FHFA to act as conservator to preserve and conserve the assets of Fannie and Freddie. Once Fannie and Freddie recovered its losses, it would be released from the FHFA’s control.[3]

The conservatorship included an agreement between the U.S. Treasury and Fannie Mae. The Treasury bought senior preferred stock in Fannie and Freddie in exchange for a $100 billion capital commitment to each company. In exchange, Fannie would pay the Treasury a 10% dividend. The capital commitment was increased to $200 billion and then ultimately raised to an unlimited amount through the end of 2012.

However, without notice to shareholders, on August 17, 2012, the Treasury and FHFA changed the agreement. The Treasury knew Fannie would make record profits in the future and directed the companies to pay 100% of its net profits to the Treasury instead of 10%.[4] On the first year of the net worth sweep in 2013, Fannie Mae posted its highest annual profit ever of $83.9 billion. As a result, Fannie and Freddie were forced to pay 100% of its profit or over $130 billion in cash dividends to the Treasury. Fannie and Freddie were forced to pay $111 billion more than what the original 10% dividend would have been. At the end of 2013, Fannie’s share price closed at $3.01.

Shareholders filed a class action lawsuit against the FHFA in 2013. “First filed in 2013, the lawsuit by Fannie and Freddie shareholders bounced between the trial and appellate courts over the next decade, with Hume arguing and winning a successful federal appeal in the D.C. Circuit in 2017. The case was finally heard by a federal jury in the fall of 2022, but that jury could not agree upon a unanimous verdict. The second time around, the jury issued a resounding and historic rebuke against the government’s overreach.”[5] Since the conclusion of the court proceedings the presiding judge has yet to finalize the verdict.

Make Fannie and Freddie Great Again



In his last term, President Donald Trump was trying to release Fannie and Freddie from conservatorship. “My Administration would have sold the government’s common stock in these companies at a huge profit and fully privatized the companies,” Trump wrote in a 2021 letter after he left office to Republican Sen. Rand Paul. “The idea that the government can steal money from its citizens is socialism and is a travesty brought to you by the Obama/Biden administration. My Administration was denied the time it needed to fix this problem because of the unconstitutional restriction on firing Mel Watt,” the FHFA director at the time, Trump said.[6]

Donald Trump won the election in November 2024 and is appointing a cabinet that is focused on the release of Fannie and Freddie from conservatorship.[7] “The government’s stake in the two mortgage giants could be valued at billions of dollars, meaning a spinoff would potentially net a big payday for the government and private investors in the two companies, said Ted Tozer, who led Ginnie Mae, a separate government-sponsored mortgage company, during the Obama administration.”[8]

Hedge fund managers John Paulson and Bill Ackman are participating in the background to help Trump and his cabinet release Fannie and Freddie. Paulson and Ackman have been vocal about their stakes in the two companies.[9] [10] According to FOX Business, Paulson’s investments in government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) such as Fannie Mae “played a role in his dropping out of the Treasury Secretary contention,” suggesting it signals “a huge clue that privatizing the GSEs may be back on the table” for the incoming Trump Treasury.”[11]

Fannie Mae’s Earnings

Below are tables of Fannie Mae’s annual net income from 1985 to 2023 for reference.[12] The tables are separated by time periods ranging from 1985 – 2001, 2002 – 2006, 2007 – 2011, and 2012-2023. The table includes the year, annual net income, percentage change from the prior year, and different periods of growth highlighted.




Exponential Potential?

There are two ways to plot data; linearly and logarithmically.

A linear scale has equal distance between each data point.[13] If exponential growth occurs between each data point, a linear scale will not display it accurately. Therefore, plotting data that grows exponentially on a linear scale will be meaningless.[14] Linear scales are used for precise measurement, not measurements that variate. A linear scale is used to display a map, nautical chart, engineering drawing, or architectural drawing.[15] Reading an improperly scaled map might lead one to the wrong destination.

A logarithmic scale does not have an equal distance between each data point. The spacing between each data point is not proportional, hence more suitable for unequal changes in data. Negative numbers are not plotted on a logarithmic scale, so all numbers are positive. The distance between data points is a multiple of a base number raised to a power. In other words, if exponential growth occurs, a logarithmic scale will display that growth. Logarithmic scales are better suited to plot large numbers that cover a large range.[16] This may include a company’s earnings, sound levels, or earthquake magnitudes.

Fannie Mae’s annual net income from 1984 to 2023 is graphed below. The first graph is scaled linearly.


Graph created using https://draxlr.com/

From 1985 to 2001, Fannie Mae’s net income grew from $37 million to $5.89 billion or approximately a 16,000% increase. The large percentage increase of 16,000% is barely noticeable on a linear scale. Smaller variations are difficult to view, such as between 2002 to 2006, when earnings only grew 4%. Also, the linear chart inaccurately displays the 488% gain as a larger line than the 648% gain.

In contrast, the second graph below is scaled logarithmically.


Graph created using https://draxlr.com/

As a result, the exponential rise from 1985 to 2001 is more prominently displayed. The variation in earnings from 2002 to 2006 is more visible. Logarithmic scales display only real numbers therefore the losses from 2007 to 2011 are not plotted. The change between 2012 and 2013 is not as pronounced versus the linear chart. This suggests the current earnings do not appear distant from the record profit-making year of 2013. Since the distance between each data point is based upon a percentage change, a logarithmic scale accurately displays the magnitude of a change in values. An example is from 2017 to 2018 when earnings went from $2B to $15.9B or a 648% increase. 648% is a larger line than 488% whereas on the linear chart it was incorrectly scaled by a large distance. In conclusion, the logarithmic chart scales Fannie’s earnings more accurately than the linear chart.


Graph created using https://draxlr.com/

Using a logarithmic scale instead of a linear scale proposes the following conclusions about Fannie’s earnings. Fannie’s 5-year earnings dispersion lies at a higher level approximately 3 to 3.5x higher than in 2006 and prior. Fannie Mae traded at its all-time high of $89.38 in 2000. In 2000, Fannie Mae earned $4.4B. The average of Fannie Mae’s most recent 5-year earnings from 2019-2023 equates to $15.6B. In other words, Fannie Mae has earned 3.5x more than it did in 2000.

Which Price May Be Right?

Subnani Investment Research, LLC believes the price of Fannie Mae’s common shares should be higher than its all-time high of $89.38 considering the current earnings are 3.5x higher than when Fannie’s shares were trading at its peak. This represents an undervaluation of approximately 33x of the current market price. The firm believes the significant mispricing is a result of a market inefficiency. In economic theory, an inefficient market is one in which an asset’s prices do not accurately reflect its true value. “Market inefficiencies exist due to information asymmetries, transaction costs, market psychology, and human emotion, among other reasons. As a result of market inefficiencies, assets may be over- or undervalued in the market, creating opportunities for excess profits.”

Technical analysis is a method used in financial charting to determine trends of a stock. If market inefficiencies exist, technical analysis holds merit. The 200-day simple moving average is a key indicator that may provide potential entry and exit points or identify the direction of an overall trend. Fannie Mae’s price closed below the simple moving average in November 2007 at $38.42 during the real estate meltdown. This indicated a major bearish signal. However, in November, Fannie Mae closed at $3.13, significantly above the 200-day simple moving average of $1.86. The firm believes the close above the 200-day simple moving average is a bullish signal and an indication of a major reversal of the overall trend.

Below is a monthly chart of Fannie Mae dating from 1985 to present scaled linearly and scaled logarithmically. Stock prices do not move proportionately day-to-day. Scaling the price data similarly to how the earnings were above yields a strikingly different appearance. While $90 may seem unattainably distant when scaled linearly, the logarithmic chart appears to shorten that distance.


Fannie Mae common stock price (1985-2024) / ThinkorSwim Charting / Linear Scale


Fannie Mae common stock price (1985-2024) / ThinkorSwim Charting / Logarithmic scale

Stock prices experience exponential changes therefore the firm expects the stock to recover faster than anticipated. The firm maintains its STRONG BUY rating and has a $90 price target. To become a client, contact Sanju via email at ssubnani@sinvestsllc.com.
👍 1
ron_66271 ron_66271 18 시간 전
Today’s Final LIBOR Document Count is 33 Filings.

FDIC as Receiver, and both FNMA and FMCC are listed.



Ron
👍️ 1
ron_66271 ron_66271 23 시간 전
.
👍️0
ron_66271 ron_66271 23 시간 전
23 New LIBOR Documents Filed Today.

https://www.docketbird.com/court-cases/In-re-Libor-Based-Financial-Instruments-Antitrust-Litigation/nysd-1:2011-md-02262



Ron
👍️ 1
krab krab 23 시간 전
Yep, GM went public Nov 2010 @ $33 - $34 with 1.1B float shares
👍️0
Golfbum22 Golfbum22 1 일 전
posted by juicy juice fnma board-look at this price target

https://sinvestsllc.com/fannie-mae-fnma-price-target-90/

wow we Ricky bobby

go FnF

are these guys credible? will anyone notice?

TIA
👍️ 2 🚀 1
QueenVic QueenVic 1 일 전
GM.
I PM'd to ya...😎
👍️0
Louie_Louie Louie_Louie 1 일 전
All the talk about goverrnment needing to earn a fortune off this is moot and bull-pucky. The government knows the average person does not know or care about this CONservatorship, so all the nonsense talk by idiots like Whalen talking about political fall out is nonsensical hype. I said it before, you can fit in a baseball stadium the amount of folks who are fully aware of the GSE's, their purpose, their business and their illegal take over saga. Those who keep fear mongering and gaslighting lies about if the GSE's are releassed have an agenda that is detrimental to GSE survival.

NO ONE predicted DOGE or that Trump would win, or the people he is/will/and has picked that will affect the outcome of our release. What will the JPS crowd start spewing when the Capital requirement is lowered? It's coming, and they can kiss any conversion bye bye, won't be needed, not even a capital raise will be needed. Once they annouced the lowered capital requirement, and soon to follow would be the releasse plan, at that point the stock will honestly rise and be hard for the manipulators to take down, especially if the government tells them to stop the manipulation. Re-list to the NYSE and POW, way more capital than the lowered rule requires. Easy peasy release and zero political fall out. YES, most Democrats and a few Republicans will be angry because their golden goose will be pulled out of their hands, but those will be the folks DOGE should especially watch and weed out of government when midterms arrive.

I expect the government to void the warrants and claim them paid in full, because it was nothing more than collateral put in place to assure payment, a payment which was over paid back already! The senior prefs, I assume will be written off- BUT I look to the government to keep their hands in the GSE kitty. If there is a commitment fee or congress provides a type of implicit or explicit guarntee, that may be tied to the senior prefs, where by the government might deem a part of the seniors a special class of pref that will act solely as the explicit gurantee of a government backstop, and will pay a dividend - maybe forever, or maybe until a capital level is assumed that is deemed to be adequate. But most of the seniors will be gone. The government can allow conversion of these special prefs shares to become a regular pref share or convert to commons at a later date once the GSE's are deemed fully safe. They can do all this under a consent decree, or not. THEY HAVE THE POWER TO, and the courts, but they need to do what is right and fair.
👍️ 3
Golfbum22 Golfbum22 2 일 전
it's great up until the last line where the conservator still elects the board.

but hopefully the is the start of getting closer to where shareholders can elect the board

thx again for the info
👍️ 1
Lite Lite 2 일 전
Would be interesting to know how this judgment delay will be handled by the new administration. A speed bump, or just a pebble picked up and thrown out as the real wheel of justice rolls thru.

‘… plus a Jury 8-0 decision.’
👍️ 1
ron_66271 ron_66271 2 일 전
Me, I’m Tracking LIBOR and Gruenberg‘s Retirement.

Gruenberg is retiring the day before Trumps Inauguration.
Why?? 😁

Gruenberg Started with the FDIC in 2005, the same time as the Tick-off meeting for Project West in 2005.
Gruenberg, the JPM inside asset from 2005 Is out of the FDIC ASAP.
And we all thought it was SB as the inside agent. Yes SB is stupid.


The incoming administration is also created the pathway for the cancellation of the F&F Conservership created by a group of Marxist.
Totally unconstitutional and ruled against twice, plus a Jury 8-0 decision.


LIBOR is coming to a Climax in February or sooner.

Keep watching the Docket;
“MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: [4352] Letter requesting the Court's approval of letter by DAPs, filed by The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver, The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. So ordered. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 12/4/24)”.

https://www.docketbird.com/court-cases/In-re-Libor-Based-Financial-Instruments-Antitrust-Litigation/nysd-1:2011-md-02262

Two new documents filed yesterday.


There is a new Sheriff coming to Town.


The Political process is telling us, because the Geopolitical, Legal System is coming back to be Constitutionally based.



Ron
👍️ 1
navycmdr navycmdr 2 일 전
Fannie Mae shifts to annual election of directors

Dec. 05, 2024 4:44 PM ET

Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) StockBy: Liz Kiesche

Fannie Mae (OTCQB:FNMA) recently implemented an annual election schedule for its board, and its conservator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, executed written stockholder consent, electing all the company's current board members, it said Thursday.

Since 2021, board members appointed for the first time to the board served three-year terms.

Directors elected to the board are: Priscilla Almodovar, Amy E. Alving, Christopher J. Brummer, Renée Lewis Glover, Michael J. Heid, Simon Johnson, Karin J. Kimbrough, Diane N. Lye, Diane C. Nordin, Chetlur S. Ragavan, Manuel Sánchez Rodríguez, Michael A. Seelig, and Michael A. Seelig.

Each director will serve for a term that ends on the date of our next annual meeting of shareholders, or when the conservator next elects our directors by written consent, Fannie Mae (OTCQB:FNMA) said.
👍️ 2
Sammy boy Sammy boy 2 일 전
Amazing how a lying article can bring the stock down over a buck but after being debunked it only trickles upward! The SWAMP is real folks!

Lamberth someone posted on Twitter is worse than Fauci, how true is that ? That Govt paid fat falk is disgrace to the American judiciary system!
👍️0
Sammy boy Sammy boy 2 일 전
Amazing how a lying article can bring the stock down over a buck buy once debunked it only trickles upward! The SWAMP is real folks!

Lamberth someone posted on Twitter is worse than Fauci, how true is that. That paid fat falk is disgrace to the American judiciary system!
👍️0
Viking61 Viking61 3 일 전
Sammy has played both sides of the fence for as long as I can remember. No pun intended Mr. Fence😀
👍️0
Viking61 Viking61 3 일 전
Sammy has played both sides of the fence for as long as I can remember. No pun intended Mr. Fence😀
👍️0
EternalPatience EternalPatience 3 일 전
Pot calling the kettle back

This guy used be the crapping the board with 5 by Friday. Now he is mocking the 4 guy
👍️ 1
Golfbum22 Golfbum22 3 일 전
“Doom and gloom”

From the 2 stooges

Zandi and cat man

Wonder how much these unemployed not going to be a part of the new administration are getting paid to help take down the gse stock prices so tbtf can cover and “whack a mole” us again

It’s not going to matter what they say

They are not going to making any decisions or a part of DJT plans.

It’s criminal that the media does these bogus interviews

The media couldn’t change the election

They won’t be able to change what is coming

Wait until real news comes out from new administration and not these 2
Has been nobody’s next year

Gotta be patient

Go FnF
👍 1
exostatic exostatic 3 일 전
Sammy thanks for showing that you are a hater... I'm cool with that, just putting you in the correct group. That 600k purchase will be laugh all the way to the bank when they get released... But you already know that... I'm keeping mine, I didn't sell 1 share, but that is just me, you do you... Have a great day everyone!!!
EXO
👍️ 1
jacklanvo99 jacklanvo99 3 일 전
Sell more please …he he
👍️0
Sammy boy Sammy boy 3 일 전
That 600K purchase last week is hating life right now.
👍️0
Sammy boy Sammy boy 3 일 전
These cheapies have your names on them gentlemen. Get some more!
👍️0
Sammy boy Sammy boy 3 일 전
Lmao all saying buying more cheapies you had your chance at .49 and you will get another.
👍️0
exostatic exostatic 3 일 전
Man they are pushing it down to get our weak hands to sell their shares... I think I am going to buy more cheapies...So kids what happens when they get released....Yep Lots of haters that want to get your shares on here today!!!
Have a great day
EXO
👍️0
Sammy boy Sammy boy 3 일 전
Where’s the $4 by Friday guy?
👍️ 1 🙉 1
Sammy boy Sammy boy 3 일 전
Come on, I called for $1.92 you corrupt MF’s make me look good !
👍️ 1
Sammy boy Sammy boy 3 일 전
Arnold right, Cramer wrong, Arnold called 2.00
👍️0
Sammy boy Sammy boy 3 일 전
You guys been buying dips for 12 years, how many more can you buy?
👍️ 1
Sammy boy Sammy boy 3 일 전
Viking can I get a witness ? Lmao !
👍️0
Louie_Louie Louie_Louie 3 일 전
It's criminal that Lamberth is procrastinating this out further and further, but the winds change come January and that may be what he is waiting for, possibly. Many of us think this ruling should have been finalized a year ago, but what recourse do shareholders have when the class action lawyers are more than willing to watch the amount gain interest so they can tap a bigger payoff. They'll not open their mouths until those who filed the class action crack the whip on them. Pretty sure though that the lawyers are advising them to stay quiet also so their payout gets bigger. So those of us stuck under this case are left hanging and hung out to dry. It would be Karma if Lamberth kicks the whol thing to the curb and creates a retrial situation under the new administration. That would basically kick the class group plantiffs and their lawyers in the nads since then the plantiff woud start being billed for hours again. Ssitting and waiting for a greedy payout sould end up being their downfall.
👍 3
jacklanvo99 jacklanvo99 3 일 전
Sell sell sell…i am buy buy buy ha ha
👍️0
Sammy boy Sammy boy 3 일 전
Trump stock alright !
👍️ 1
QueenVic QueenVic 3 일 전
Da hastenfeffer. Maybe it would make some sense to give him a call at:
1-800-FAT-FUDD

He's supposed to be a Honorable person of the court. And what about "deadlines"? I don't have an account to research the court hearings (pacer) although you would think there was 'something' written or even said. Or the BIG "if"...

We wait until #47 writes his firing list of FHFA personnel-
...Then I wonder if the case can be dismissed after all?
👍️ 1
Sammy boy Sammy boy 3 일 전
RU ready for 2.19?
👍️ 1
Louie_Louie Louie_Louie 4 일 전
That is great KARMA. Does anyone know on here if shareholders of common and prefs are locked in for the court award? It's been said yes and no. Some have said Lamberth has locked it, otherrs say he has to make final judgement. Is there anyone who can state definitively that Yes shareholders as of (???) will be paid as part of the class?
👍 2
Viking61 Viking61 4 일 전
Wasn’t it you who said .43 before .80 or something to that effect? You’ve been doing this all the way up to over $3. Now you’re saying the same BS with hire numbers. Get real!
👍 1
KenKong KenKong 4 일 전
This didn't age well. ... Hahahahasnork 
🤣 2
tuzedaze tuzedaze 4 일 전
Interesting quote by Trump…..

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113573130299319701

https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/30/politics/trump-brics-currency-tariff/index.html

“The idea that the BRICS Countries are trying to move away from the Dollar while we stand by and watch is OVER. We require a commitment from these Countries that they will neither create a new BRICS Currency, nor back any other Currency to replace the mighty U.S. Dollar or, they will face 100% Tariffs, and should expect to say goodbye to selling into the wonderful U.S. Economy,” Trump posted on Truth Social on Saturday afternoon”
👍️ 3
Sammy boy Sammy boy 4 일 전
Eventually 1.92 is back in play.
👍️0
Lite Lite 5 일 전
Yeah, why didn’t the monies (fines) get credited back to the GSEs? It’s my understanding that monies (collected fines) went to Treasury [general spending fund] for President projects.

Who has been paying Govt lawyers this whole time?
👍️ 1
archilles archilles 5 일 전
Ackman bought millions and millions of FnF shares and he is friend with Trump who will release FnF
👍️0
Sammy boy Sammy boy 5 일 전
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/03/banks-have-paid-321-billion-in-fines-since-the-crisis.html
👍️0
Sammy boy Sammy boy 5 일 전
What ever happened to our good buddy Dick Bove ?
👍️0
EternalPatience EternalPatience 5 일 전
Are you drunk?  Which post of yours we shd read?  The CNN or 2.29.
👍️0
EternalPatience EternalPatience 5 일 전
Just ignore the noise and wait for Scott Bessent to speak at some point of time. Until then close ihub and relax
👍️ 2
archilles archilles 5 일 전
Trump will bring justice to FnF going up tomorrow
👍️ 1
tuzedaze tuzedaze 5 일 전
Sammy…. This article kills me as it quotes mark Zandi and Moody’s…. The same Moody’s that said 73% of the mortgage-backed securities had rated triple-A in 2006 and were downgraded to junk by 2010….. JPM paying $40BN in fines to do business and now Zandi and Moody’s are to be trusted f’n experts… Our entire financial system is a house of cards…..

Peeps… FnF is going to be turbulent as hell for the next few months… Massive open gap down below…. Don’t wait around for Sammy to tell you it’s going lower…. $29M volume day…. Playing here is playing with fire….

Here is an old one from the past to help highlight to the newbies in this stock that the corruption is everywhere and even to those who are supposedly the experts who provide ratings on what makes our economy go…. Moody’s and S&P… F’n crooks…. We still have 11,000 documents under executive privilege and there are many powerful people who do not want you to know where the bodies are buried…. We are in conservatorship so the message can be controlled….. JFK, Gulf Of Tonkin, 9/11, FnF… list goes on…. Lots of turbulence here…..

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/jan/14/moodys-864m-penalty-for-ratings-in-run-up-to-2008-financial-crisis

The credit rating agency Moody’s has agreed to pay nearly $864m to settle with US federal and state authorities over its ratings of risky mortgage securities in the run-up to the 2008 financial crisis, the department of justice said on Friday.

“Moody’s reached the deal with the justice department, 21 states and the District of Columbia, resolving allegations that the firm contributed to the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, the department said in a statement.

“Moody’s failed to adhere to its own credit-rating standards and fell short on its pledge of transparency in the run-up to the ‘great recession’,” principal deputy associate attorney general Bill Baer said in the statement.

S&P Global’s Standard & Poor’s entered into a similar accord in 2015 paying out $1.375bn. Standard and Poor’s is the world’s largest ratings firm, followed by Moody’s.”
👍️0
tuzedaze tuzedaze 5 일 전
Sammy…. This article kills me as it quotes mark Zandi and Moody’s…. The same Moody’s that said 73% of the mortgage-backed securities had rated triple-A in 2006 and were downgraded to junk by 2010….. JPM paying $40BN in fines to do business and now Zandi and Moody’s are to be trusted f’n experts… Our entire financial system is a house of cards…..

Peeps… FnF is going to be turbulent as hell for the next few months… Massive open gap down below…. Don’t wait around for Sammy to tell you it’s going lower…. $29M volume day…. Playing here is playing with fire….

Here is an old one from the past to help highlight to the newbies in this stock that the corruption is everywhere and even to those who are supposedly the experts who provide ratings on what makes our economy go…. Moody’s and S&P… F’n crooks…. We still have 11,000 documents under executive privilege and there are many powerful people who do not want you to know where the bodies are buried…. We are in conservatorship so the message can be controlled….. JFK, Gulf Of Tonkin, 9/11, FnF… list goes on…. Lots of turbulence here…..

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/jan/14/moodys-864m-penalty-for-ratings-in-run-up-to-2008-financial-crisis

The credit rating agency Moody’s has agreed to pay nearly $864m to settle with US federal and state authorities over its ratings of risky mortgage securities in the run-up to the 2008 financial crisis, the department of justice said on Friday.

“Moody’s reached the deal with the justice department, 21 states and the District of Columbia, resolving allegations that the firm contributed to the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, the department said in a statement.

“Moody’s failed to adhere to its own credit-rating standards and fell short on its pledge of transparency in the run-up to the ‘great recession’,” principal deputy associate attorney general Bill Baer said in the statement.

S&P Global’s Standard & Poor’s entered into a similar accord in 2015 paying out $1.375bn. Standard and Poor’s is the world’s largest ratings firm, followed by Moody’s.”
👍️0
Sammy boy Sammy boy 5 일 전
My Mahn Arnold was 100% right last week. When you call it at 10am, yeah pretty impressive !
👍️0

최근 히스토리

Delayed Upgrade Clock