CTR Investments and Consulting Inc New (PK) (CIVX) 뉴스

Hi_Lo is not in to it 🤮

I’m in for it 🚀

they are trying to make it a better company

Good buy opp
Did you hear that straight from the company...

"It is a mess."

Listen to that pumping scammer at your financial peril.

Directly from the company:

I cannot nor will I attempt to answer any questions about CIVX since 2006. All I can say, it is a mess.

What I've been saying all along.

This company is a disaster with no hope of getting a Form 10 approved by the SEC.

"It is a mess."

here is the answer:Thank you for being a loyal shareholder. I cannot nor will I attempt to answer any questions about CIVX since 2006. All I can say, it is a mess.

We are attempting to clean it up and get current with the necessary and needed filings and then consider moving ahead with possible acquisitions and mergers.

We will do our best to keep everyone up to date and to do so, please follow the filings on OTC Markets, put in the symbol, CIVX., and check the filings.


James E. Shipley
(714) 814-7146

I have sent my question to those 2 emails

jim@ctricinc.com or jshipley33@gmail.com should work. He replied to me

That should tell you something.

Thanks for the info.

I have sent a mail to info@ctricinc.com, before I have got response, now not anymore 😶

Hi_Lo is this correct English?????

He’s trying to get his bid filled
I have never invested nor woill I ever invest in the obvious scam that CIVX is.

He’s trying to get his bid filled before the run up just like he did on the last one or he is just down bad and angry because he doesn’t know how to trade lol

To warn people about this scam.

Dear Mr Hi_Lo Why are you stil posting here? If you are so negative about this stock, please go away then, what is the point of always posting info here!!!!!

CIVX take their time!!

They will have an eternity of time because CIVX will never get SEC/FINRA approval for a merger because of the HUGE 13 year gap of missing audited financials.

Because of all of the missing financials, CIVX is violating FINRA Rule 6490 and has qn SEC restriction on corporate actions such as a merger so it's basically a dead stock.

Stop telling lies and spreading the discredited Lionsgate "deal."

Where is CTRV's Form 10 approval?

Where are the missing audited financials to get SEC registered?

Where is the LIONGATE verification of this so called "deal."

CIVX take their time!!

After that when merger happens
CIVX will never get SEC/FINRA approval for any corporate actions (especially any merger) because of the HUGE gap (13 years!!!) of missing financials.

Because of all of the missing financials, CIVX is violating FINRA Rule 6490 so it's basically a dead stock.

Once Frank's shares are announced they are canceled when he's found guilty, we move up bigly. After that when merger happens we hit multiple pennies. Still holding and adding here and there. Lots of potential here. $CIVX

the question is when is the company coming out with news???

Bye, bye Cavan!!!

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/news/CTR-Investments--Consulting-Inc-Announces-a-Change-of-Control-and-New-Officers-and-Directors?id=452867

You’re an angry elf

Cavan is working hard behind the scenes
Okay. Tell us what he's done?

Cavan is working hard behind the scenes. CIVX is a holding company. The 2025 bull market will bring more liquidity. Good times coming to the OTC again.

I dumb
So are the rest of the people buying this garbage.

is* sorry I dumb

Hi blow I back we are definitely about to run again soon ;) that what happened last time as well!!!!!!🚀🚀🚀

I'm playing on you pumping this junk.

Hi_Lo are we going to play on the person, that's not ok. I'm dutch and not english

From your spelling and grammar in just one sentence, I agree you ARE naive.

Plus investing in this garbage reinforces it.

Sorry Hi_Lo maybe I'm naieve but I stil believe this company

Companies with a shell history like CIVX must register with the SEC

https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/2020/form-10-registration-statement/#:~:text=Both%20public%20and%20private%20companies,subject%20to%20SEC%20reporting%20requirements.

Both public and private companies can register a class of securities on Form 10. Form 10 is also used by shell purveyors to create inventory for reverse merger transactions that take a company from private to public company status. These shells are subject to SEC reporting requirements.

Q. If a non-reporting company was a shell company twenty years ago, is it required to file a Form 10 to cure its shell status for purposes of its shareholders having the ability to rely upon Rule 144’s safe harbor?

A. Yes, if a non-reporting entity was a shell company during any time in its history, it must either file a Form 10 registration statement or a registration statement on Form S-1 in order for its shareholders to rely upon Rule 144.

And CIVX can't file a Form 10 registration because of its missing financials from 2008 - 2020 which makes CIVX delinquent with the SEC.

No merger coming for CIVX per SEC/FINRA regulations...no matter what the CEO of a penny stock company pumps in a press release to promote his company.

CIVX is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 because of its 13 years of missing financials and all publicly traded stocks need to conform with FINRA Rule 6490.

There is a huge gap of missing financials from 2008 - 2020 which means CIVX is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 which will prevent CIVX from getting any corporate actions such as a merger approved by SEC/FINRA. The same thing caused GVSI's catastrophic collapse. Look at that ticker as a good example of what will happen here.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/disclosure



More proof CIVX is a dirty shell and a scam.

HOW FINRA RULE 6490 lMPACTS REVERSE MERGERS

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/how-finra-rule-6490-lmpacts-reverse-mergers-30567

FINRA Rule 6490, has evolved since it was enacted over two years ago. For some time, FINRA has required that issuers provide expansive disclosures and supporting documentation not only for the corporate change subject to the notice but for the company’s entire corporate history from inception.

These disclosures are required of both SEC reporting and non-reporting issuers if they undertake corporate actions including reverse mergers. Compliance with Rule 6490's requirements is a minor task for companies going public by filing a registration statement with the SEC. Companies filing registration statements rarely have difficulties obtaining DTC eligibility unlike reverse merger issuers.

The public filings of companies who register with the SEC contain most of the supporting documentation required by Rule 6490.

It is no surprise that compliance with the requirements of Rule 6490 is less burdensome for companies going public using a registration statement because these companies have fewer corporate changes in their company history than companies engaging in reverse mergers. This is especially true for reverse merger issuers who undergo multiple changes of control and periods of inactivity.

The Problem with Reverse Mergers & Disclosure under Rule 6490

For companies that engage in reverse mergers as part of their going public transaction, compliance with Rule 6490's requirements can be impossible particularly when custodianship or receivership actions have been used by shell brokers to create public shells after years of inactivity. These companies may have multiple corporate actions related to prior changes of control and often have sketchy corporate histories. Some have even been hijacked through custodianship or receivership actions. In these circumstances, documents may be unavailable or if provided to FINRA, it could potentially result in FINRA referring the matter to the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.

These companies are almost always plagued with incomplete or fraudulent corporate records which make it extremely difficult for the post-reverse merger company to comply with FINRA Rule 6490. As a result, these companies may never get FINRA approval of the contemplated corporate action.

Rule 6490 Disclosures

Issuers must provide a cover letter disclosing the full corporate history for the issuer itemizing all material facts including every corporate change that has occurred from inception to present day.

Triggers for Review under FINRA RULE 6490

A FINRA review will be triggered if any of the five factors set forth in Rule 6490 are thought to be present:

• FINRA believes the forms are incomplete, inaccurate or filed without the appropriate corporate authority;

• The issuer is not current in its reporting obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission;

• Persons involved in or related to the corporate action are the subject of pending or settled regulatory action or are under investigation by a regulatory body or are the subject of a pending criminal action related to fraud or securities law violations;

• Persons related to the corporate action are likely involved in fraudulent activities involving securities or may pose a threat to investors;

• There is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the issuer’s securities.

Any company contemplating going public using a reverse merger must consider the potential impact Rule 6490 could have on its future corporate actions. Rule 6490 provides one more compelling reason why private companies seeking to go public should do so using a registration statement instead of a reverse merger.

https://bradshawlawgroup.com/reverse-mergers-a-basic-primer/

Conducting effective due diligence on the shell company is essential, as merging with a “dirty” shell (i.e., a shell whose management failed to follow proper SEC reporting procedures) could prove fatal for the private company.[13] In searching for “clean” shells, private companies should consider the shell’s number of stockholders, reporting record, and how and where it is listed.[14]

Pumpers here are desperate to spread false information so as not to let the truth out.

Cavan has not verfiably denied that the company consultant Christopher Martinez - the indicted and FINRA banned ex-broker and financial advisor and consultant is not the consultant for the company.

This scammer has the same name, was a broker before getting banned by FINRA and was/is also a financial advisor and consultant.

Christopher Martinez who is CIVX's "consultant," unless verifiably proven that he's not the same individual is a shyster.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/profile





https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/individual/individual_4072355.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjA-9CQot6GAxVj4MkDHW3DDx0QFnoECB8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0PGAqtt2DEJXJ5Q_H6hCAm







Why is there no direct link to an actual verifiable post from Cavan about Christopher Martinez, the company consultant not being that indicted, FINRA banned consultant?

Especially with all the lies being spread by pumpers on this board.

Just a denial from a screenshot from a personal email that can be easily altered doesn't cut it.

He's been the CEO/Owner of multiple companies that he took to the OTCQB and has advised others that have gone as far as the NASDAQ.

Then why doesn't Cavan list these companies so that people can do proper DD?

Penny stock CEOs often lie so that the cat doesn't get out of the bag. I've seen it many, many times...especially with all the regulatory problems this stock has.

Unless documented verifiable proof with a direct link to information about the company consultant can be verified, it should not be believed.

Yup looks like he has a plan just needs to capitalize on it for his shareholders ;)

$CIVX, Taking it one step at a time!!😝
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175435356

Someone beat me to the 0004s. I was going to start hitting again next week

seeming too cheap down here maybe

Looks like they are working. Just need to be in it for long haul hopefully they can clean this up even more looks like he has experience with OTC.

you have to use info@ctricinc.com for mailing to the company

The latest Q has Frank and his companies owning 700,000,000 shares. I wonder what happens to those shares now.

Oh okay I got you. My average is 0009. Just wish I didn't go all in awhile ago when things were happening. Could've had more than double I do now with these prices

mean i took my orders of at .0002, still got .0003s

https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26171

What do you mean they took your orders off?

that explains it took my orders off, got link thanks

Frank Igwealor was just charged by the SEC. That might be the cause of the selling. Let's see how this plays out for us.

happens when there is no clear communication here, which is big in pennyland. If retail don't see movement from company or hear from them they move on. Grabbed some.0003's today and got orders in at .0002, it's oversold now.

Some guy awhile back predicted it would fall back down to these levels. Props to him. The company is silent and won't answer emails. Not surprised it has fallen.

looks like .0002 coming unfortunately..
rather be going up