Item 2.01 Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets
As described in Item 1.01 above, on 27
February we acquired all the issued and outstanding shares of Bret pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement and Bret became our
wholly owned subsidiary. The acquisition was accounted for as a recapitalization effected by a share exchange, wherein Bret is
considered the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting purposes.
As a result of the acquisition of all the issued
and outstanding shares of Bret, we have now assumed Bret’s business operations as our own.
FORM 10 DISCLOSURE
As mentioned in Item 1.01, on February 27, 2023,
the Company effectively acquired Bret in a Reverse Merger business combination transaction and of which the Company was a shell company
prior to such acquisition is now entering into a business combination, other than a business combination with a shell company, as those
terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, according to Item 2.01(f) of Form 8-K, the registrant is required to disclose
the information that would be required if the registrant were filing a general form for registration of securities under the Exchange
Act on Form 10.
We hereby provide below information that would
be included in a Form 10 registration statement.
Description of Business
Corporate History
Arma Services, Inc. was
incorporated by our director in the State of Nevada on September 2, 2014. Our primary business was to be destination management and event
management services initially in the Russian Federation, but with plans at a later stage to spread our business to America and China.
We attempted to provide a full range of services in the field of Meeting, Incentive, Conference, and Exhibition tourism in Russia for
corporate customers from United States, China and Russia.
Prior management was
comprised of one person, Sergey Gandin. Mr. Sergey Gandin resign from the positions of the Director, CEO and CFO of the Company and be
appointed solely as Secretary of Arma Services Inc. The Company and Mr. Gandin are in agreement that these changes were effective from
March 26, 2022. The Company appointed Clive Hill, 66, from the United Kingdom to the positions of Director, CEO and CFO of the Company.
This appointment was effective from March 26, 2022. On August 17, 2022, Clive Hill resigned as President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, and as a Member of the Board of Directors of the Company. Also on August 17, 2022, B. Maria Teresa Tattersfield consented
to act as a Member of the Board of Directors of the Company, Alberto Ramirez consented to act as a Member of the Board of Directors of
the Company, Eduardo Piquero consented to act as a Member of the Board of Directors of the Company, and Jaime Sanchez Cortina consented
to act as the new President, CEO, CFO, and Member of the Board of Directors of the Company. On January 27, 2023, Jaime Sanchez Cortina
resigned immediately as CEO, CFO, President and a member of the Board of Directors. Also on January 27, 2023, Eric Nixon agreed to be
appointed the President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and as a Member of the Board of Directors of the Company.
On March 2, 2015, the
Company filed a Form S-1 for registration of securities under the Securities Act of 1933. The S-1 was eventually declared effective on
August 12, 2016, and at that time the Company became a fully reporting public company.
On March 28, 2022, the
management of the Company, approved the engagement of BF Borgers CPA PC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm for the Company’s fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, effective immediately, and dismissed Zia Masood Kiani & Co. Chartered
Accountants (“ZMK”), as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm.
The reports of ZMK on the Company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended October 31, 2021 and 2020 did not
contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting
principles. ZMK reports for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2021 and 2022 included an explanatory
paragraph indicating that there was substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
ZMK was dismissed as
the Company’s CPA through a mutual agreement between Arma Services, Inc. and the ZMK.
On June 20, 2022, the
there was a change of control of the company Mr. Corin Bailey purchased Four Million Shares (4,000,000) from Ruslan Mishin the control
shareholders.
On December 14, 2022,
the there was a change of control of the company Mr. Ronny Fabien Suarez Araya purchased Three Million Shares (3,000,000) from Corin Bailey
the control shareholders.
On January 26, 2023, Arma Services, Inc. (the
“Company”) terminated its engagement with BF Borgers CPA PC (“BFB”), the Registrant’s prior independent
registered public accounting firm, and thereafter provided BFB with its disclosures in the Current Report on Form 8-K disclosing the termination
of the engagement of BFB and requested in writing that BFB furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange
Commission stating whether or not they agree with such disclosures. BFB's response is filed as an exhibit to this Current Report on Form
8-K.
BFB had not provided any reports to the financial
statements of the Company but reviewed the reports for the quarters ended January 31, 2022, April 30, 2022 and September 30, 2022. There
had been no disagreements with BFB on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope
or procedure during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, nor in the subsequent periods through January 26, 2023.
On January 26, 2023, the Board of Directors of
the Company engaged OLAYINKA OYEBOLA & CO. (“OOC”) as its independent accountant to provide auditing services for going
forward for the Company. The Company has terminated the engagement of BFB. The decision to hire OOC was approved by the Company’s
Board of Directors.
On February 27, 2023, Arma Services Inc. (“ARMV,”
or the “Company”) entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with Wenflor International
Inc. and Bret International Holding Corp., owner of 100% of Bret Consultores, SAPI de CV: Carbon Capture (“Bret”), a Mexican
corporation, and Ecapfin Sapi de Cv., and Eric Eastwood Nixon (“Appointee”), as the President, & CEO and director of ARMV.
Under the Share Exchange Agreement, One Hundred Percent (100%) of the ownership interest of Bret was exchanged for 6,000,000 shares of
common stock of ARMV issued to Wenflor International Inc. The former stockholders of Bret will acquire a majority of the issued and outstanding
common stock as a result of the share exchange transaction. The transaction has been accounted for as a recapitalization of the
Company, whereby Bret is the accounting acquirer.
Immediately after completion of such share exchange,
the Company has a total of 12,240,000 issued and outstanding shares, with authorized share capital for common share of 75,000,000.
Business Overview
ARMA Services Inc. (“ARMV” or the
“Company”) is a US holding company incorporated in Nevada on September 2, 2014, entered into an agreement on February 27,
2023 to acquire all the outstanding shares of Bret International Holding Corp which operates through the Company’s wholly owned
subsidiary Bret Consultores, SAPI de CV: Carbon Capture (“Bret”), a Mexican corporation incorporated on August 2, 2021 and
Ecapfin Sapi de Cv (Mexico) a company specialized in developing methodologies of carbon capture in agricultural applications.
The company seeks to promote healthy, sustainable,
and resilient rural economies through the carbon market, while strengthening the participation of rural communities in project development
and decision-making. At the same time, companies, organizations and individuals can offset their emissions and meet their climate goals.
The company assists in the re-foresting, forest
management and monetization of the Carbon Captured. It promotes healthy, sustainable, and resilient rural economies through the carbon
market, while strengthening the participation of communities and private landowners in project development and decision-making. At the
same time, companies, organizations and individuals can offset their emissions and meet their climate goals. The company works under international
standards such as CAR and Verra, and social and environmental safeguards with rural communities to issue carbon credits to be sold in
the Global Carbon Market.
Businesses and other organizations buy carbon
credits for three reasons; a) to comply with a regulated market, b) to speculate trading with them c) to offset a carbon footprint voluntarily,
and to contribute to conservate forests, mangroves and other important ecosystems.
Bret’s carbon credits (one carbon credit
equals one metric ton of CO2 removed or avoided) are verified by an independent third party the certifies them, following a robust carbon
standard, such as CAR or Verra. This ensures: i) Additionality - the reductions in emissions must be “above business as usual”
– they would not have happened unless the project was implemented. ii) Permanence - the GHGs must be permanently reduced or sequestered.
Permanence is defined as providing lasting benefits to the environment. iii) Leakage - there can be no shifting of emissions from one
place to another due to a project. Bret provides training on climate change issues, building of inventories, generation of offsets, carbon
market basics and community empowerment, transferring know-how to locales and providing them with additional revenue streams.
The Bret team has over 12 years of experience
in the implementation of community carbon capture projects in Mexico. They are pioneers in developing specialized standards in the Mexican
context of land tenure, communal land, and integration of indigenous minorities.
A.I. Addressing the Compliance Accountability
in the Carbon Market
Arma Services Inc has a clear mission: to develop
Artificial Intelligence Software that streamlines compliance accountability in the carbon forestry, agriculture, and technology industries.
Their work is aimed at tackling a significant issue raised by The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market that pertains to
accountability. To this end, the company is working on setting a global standard for high-integrity carbon credits that relies on rigorous
scientific research and data that is both measurable and verifiable.
Addressing the Deforestation Challenge
The world needs carbon markets in a large, transparent,
verifiable, and environmentally robust way for regenerative, nature-based solutions.
Our ambition is to accelerate climate neutrality
providing expertise to value native vegetation and encourage reforestation, as well as carbon fixation in the soil, rewarding farmers
and communities for their contribution to nature preservation.
Over the last four decades, Mexico has suffered
the loss of 350,000 hectares of forest per annum, resulting in a loss of carbon stock of approximately 336 m metric tons of carbon (T.C)
(Instituto Nacional de Ecologia y Cambio Climatico, Mexico, 2020)
The Company
The Company, or Bret International Holding Corp
is committed to self-sustainable rural development and addressing the issue of climate change through carbon capture, addressing issues
of desertification and reforestation using forests, Succulent , mangrove and methane projects.
Bret contributes towards atmospheric carbon dioxide
(CO2) drawdown by developing and supplying carbon offsets from restoration and conservation of Succulent, forests and natural habitats
at the regional scale through the maintenance of the crops in production or maintenance of forestry hectares.
Bret manages carbon capture projects through all
its phases, from design to planning, execution, and generation of high-quality offsets. Bret ensures transparency, permanence and win-win
for the actors involved, with a 100% success rate of projects developed.
Bret partners up with local organizations, linked
to forest owners and communities in Mexico, and works in the capacity building of these, assisting organizations to become forest carbon
project developers and strengthening the landowner’s capacities to take part in the carbon market. The process involves training
the communities and organizations, monitoring projects, providing the necessary equipment, assisting in the generation of a strategy to
generate additionality by reducing vulnerability and the possibility of deforestation, and following through the process of generating
carbon credits until completion, assisting the organizations in selling high quality offsets at a fair price.
We are following the Climate Action Reserve standards
in forestry Capture (Carbon Dioxide Capture) specifically CAR’s Mexico Forest Protocol, tailored to the Mexican context, by members
of the Bret team. We generate most of our carbon credits from improved forest management (IFM), restoration and reforestation.
We have developed a methodology to measure the
plant growth on a yearly basis to calculate the amount of captured CO2 using Succulent and the sale of Carbon Credits to companies identified
in the Carbon Disclosure Project Report (CDP), Price Waterhouse Cooper report on Carbon obligations of over 5,000 Multi-National Corporations.
Our ambition is to accelerate climate neutrality
providing expertise to value native vegetation and encourage reforestation, as well as carbon fixation in the soil, rewarding farmers
and communities for their contribution to nature preservation and replanting process.
We support over 40 forestry projects, encompassing
156,000 hectares in the states of Chihuahua, Durango, Jalisco, Quintana Roo and Oaxaca. We work with ejidos,(Indigenous People), on communal
lands and on private properties, generating carbon credits through internationally recognized protocols, such as CAR and Verra.
We advise companies, organizations and individuals
who want to offset their emissions through projects that provide not only carbon mitigation, but also other environmental co-benefits,
such as water infiltration, biodiversity conservation, landscape values, among other key environmental services.
Bret purchased Ecapfin, which developed the following
methodology for agriculture applications using Succulents and Farming Carbon Capture applications company, on July 12, 2022, for the total
sum of Fifty Thousand USD (US$50,000).
Our Mission
To promote healthy, sustainable development, and
resilient rural agriculture development through the carbon market, while strengthening the participation of communities and private landowners
in project development and decision-making. At the same time, companies, organizations and individuals can offset their emissions and
meet their climate goals.
| · | We focus on solving challenges at the intersection of sustainability and human wellbeing, generating quality offsets in cooperation with
forest communities and landowners |
| · | We develop and support projects that provide
multiple environmental, social, and economic benefits |
| · | We work with companies, governments and individuals
who want to have a positive impact on the planet |
Our projects and activities:
| · | Improve the quality of life of natural resource owners through Nature-based Solutions (NbS). |
| · | Preserve and increase forest biomass and, therefore, carbon reserves. |
| · | Promote activities for the preservation of ecosystem services such as water supply, soil conservation,
and biodiversity. |
| · | Develop project development and monitoring capacities among local communities, partners and allies. |
| · | Develop quality forest carbon capture projects under Verra and CAR standards. |
| · | Contribute to the construction of a carbon market that reflects social and environmental safeguards. |
| · | Recognize that most of the profits belong to land and forest owners and promote their use for the maintenance
and preservation of ecosystems. |
Our Model
We combine traditional and scientific knowledge,
and engagement with land owners and inhabitants, with advanced satellite monitoring and data analytics to achieve carbon drawdown at the
ecosystem level.
We mitigate the risk of carbon project development
and make simple to aggregate landowners under our payment for carbon removal programs.
We manage four types of carbon capture programs;
Forestry, Succulents, Sustainable Agriculture development, Mangroves and Methane Capture to produce alternative energy financed through
the sale of Carbon Offsets in the Carbon Markets. Each has its unique aspects, but in general the model can be apply to all, engagement
with the communities and local organizations.
Forest Carbon projects are not without their challenges.
The rural areas of Mexico experience a plethora of social, environmental, and political shortcomings. Drug-related violence and land tenure
are some of the key issues facing offset generation. Many productive and conservation projects have failed because of this.
We must also ensure communities are autonomous
on their decision making, while being consistent with agreements and contracts.
Bret does not develop projects in territories
affected by narcotraffic or violence. In the territories we do work, our project design generates an effective shield, ensuring forest
owners are the ones who defend the projects, as our model generates ownership, builds capacities and provides revenue streams, generating
employment options.
The process involves training the communities
and organizations, providing the necessary equipment, assisting in the generation of a strategy to generate additionality by reducing
vulnerability and the possibility of deforestation, and following through the process of generating carbon credits until completion, assisting
the organizations in selling high quality offsets at a fair price.
Depending on the extension of the area of activity,
we hire between 8 to 12 people per project with the best daily payment conditions, including accident and life insurance.
We provide each community with equipment looking
to build local monitoring capacity, so they will continue to be involved in the project, generating ownership and involvement.
All programs started in Mexico, with the objective
of expanding our Carbon projects internationally. We are currently in discussions with indigenous communities in Panama, Colombia, Brazil,
Peru, and Paraguay.
Our Succulent Carbon Program
Bret, though Ecapfin, is committed to self-sustainable
rural development, addressing the issue of climate change through Carbon Capture, the production of renewable energy addressing issues
of desertification and food security, producing organic fertilizer and animal feed for sustainable development using our Succulent Breed.
The advantage of using Succulent is 600% more
efficient per Hectare than harvesting CO2 using forests management programs.
The Company’s goals are to:
| 1. | Position Bret as a leading forest carbon offset developer and
supplier from restoration and conservation of forests and natural habitats in Mexico in terms of tCO2e transacted. |
| 2. | Reach 800,000 tCO2e transacted by 1Q of 2023 from our forest carbon
programs. |
| 3. | Become a reference of technology driven innovation for forest
carbon monitoring and community engagement and capacity building. |
| 4. | Identify additional income revenue stream from ecosystem services
to implement from 2023 onward, including sourcing REDD+ credits at subnational level with State Governments and with Indigenous Communities. |
Our Approach for Achieving Business Goals
Our approach is focused on:
| 1. | Understanding and assessing the ample carbon absorption potential
at a regional scale with a top-down perspective. |
| 2. | Realizing forest carbon offset transactions through a network
of alliances with universities, NGOs, local carbon developers, and local communities and forest owners the realize the offset potential
from bottom up. |
| 3. | Providing an economic improvement of livelihoods for forest communities
and owners through our forest carbon programs. |
| 4. | Devising Emission Reductions Payment Agreement (ERPA) contracts hand in hand with solid mechanisms
to build long term relations with counterparts and allies to facilitate forest carbon permanence and environmental and social
integrity. |
| 5. | Drive innovation in ecosystems services monitoring and forest
carbon accounting through technology. |
Value Proposition
The successful development, sourcing and supply
of carbon offsets from restoration and conservation of forest requires a value proposition that:
| 1. | Reduces transactional costs related to project documentation and
monitoring through state-of-the-art data acquisition and analysis; and streamlined aggregation of landowners under our forest carbon
programs. |
| 2. | Focus on a continuous engagement with forest owners and inhabitants
through strong long-term partnerships and alliances with technical partners including NGOs, academia and local project developers that
enables carbon permanence and improves communities livelihoods. |
| 3. | Legal document in which the Seller (such as a REDD+ country) and
the Buyer agree on the commercial terms (e.g. volume, price, options, etc.) of the sale and payment for Emission Reductions to be generated
and verified under an Emission Reductions Program” (Forest Carbon Partnership, 2022) |
| 4. | Mitigate delivery risks of forest carbon projects with the support
of emission tracking per hectare of Forestry or Agriculture Production undermanagement accumulated on a balance sheet with delivery dates
and third-party verification to facilitate upfront payments to finance project activities. |
Key Functions and Resources
Functions
| · | Source forest carbon offsets from local partners and allies |
| · | Build carbon project development and monitoring capacities amongst local communities, partners and allies. |
| · | Develop carbon projects whenever is required. |
| · | Monitor projects performance through drone and satellite data acquisition and big data analysis techniques. |
| · | Lead new methodologies development under specific registries as Climate Forward, Carbon Action Reserve,
Verra and the Mexican Carbon Protocol. |
Resources
| · | Multiple geospatial data layers |
| · | Big data analysis capabilities |
| · | Personal Software and Hardware |
| · | Office in México City |
Key Partnerships
ONGs
| · | MexiCo2 |
| · | Cool Effect |
| · | Climate Impact Partners |
| · | Mirova |
| · | Climate Partners |
Governments
| · | CONANP |
| · | State Governments |
| · | Durango, Chihuahua, Jalisco, Oaxaca, Hidalgo, CDMX, Yucatán |
Private Sector
| · | Boomitra – Succulent |
| · | NCX – Forestry |
| · | CAR |
| · | Verra |
| · | Freepoint |
Technical Private Sector
| · | Bioforestal |
| · | Unidad Topia |
| · | Sendas |
Our Organization
Employees
We currently have three employee’s working
for the Arma Services Inc, Eric Eastwood Nixon our President & Chief Financial Officer, Teresa Tattersfield, Program Originator, Alberto
Ramirez, we have for four employees working for Bret Consultores SAPI de CV, Forest Carbon Developer, Rene Ibarra, Finance and Business,
Valeria Lopez Porttillo, Institutional Alliance Manager, Yazmin Pimentel, Carbon Development Specialist, and one Employee working for
Ecapfin SAPI de CV. Eric Gordillo, Succulent Carbon Coordinator.
ARMA Services Inc has also engaged Ten Independent
International Consultants evaluating global carbon development opportunities in the green energy sector working on several continents.
We anticipate hiring additional employees in the next twelve months and the necessary personnel based on an as needed basis only on a
per contract basis to be compensated directly from revenues.
Intellectual Property
The Company’s methodology has been registered
as a new methodology by Verified Carbon Standard. The methodology is explained in more detail in Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto
CARBON AGRICULTURAL METHODOLGY
Article 1. Summary Description of
the Proposed Methodology
Additionality and Crediting Method |
Additionality |
Project |
Crediting Baseline |
Project |
This methodology describes steps for estimating
and monitoring carbon dioxide capture and biomass in Succulent crops. The protocol is based on guidance provided in the IPCC 2003 Good
Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. The methodology has been designed to be applicable to estimate CO2
s sequestration by Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM) plant Succulent under field growing conditions. It is important to mention that
CAM metabolism can be very variable depending on the taxonomic scale to which we are limiting (e. g, families, subfamilies, genera and
species) (see Nobel and Harstock 1986); in particular, among Succulent species, the CAM metabolism can present important changes
that affect the CO2 capture rates, therefore not conforming to the models and equations described here. This is very important, since
around the world not only O. ficus indica species is cultivated, in a much smaller proportion other congenerics are also used.
Because of these reasons, it is recommended to use this method, only for Succulent crops. If the methodology is used for other
species, genera or some other taxonomic category of CAM plants, the results should be interpreted with caution considering the above.
The intention of the developers has been to create
an easy methodology which includes sufficient detail on methods to allow to evaluate a wide range of environmental and crop conditions
in which this member of Opuntiodeae is cultivated. However, accurately estimating and projecting the values of the various Succulent
carbon pools does require a level of technical ability on the part of the project proponent team. It is therefore expected that in
many cases landowners and farmers may need to work with people with specific technical skills to complete the development of an O.
ficus-indica carbon project using this methodology.
All the operations involved in the estimation
method described here are based on data consulted from the scientific articles cited in this report (Acevedo et al 1983; Ligouri et al
2013; Nobel and Harstock 1983, 1986; Nobel and Valenzuela 1987; Nobel 1988; Nobel et al.1992, 1993, 2002; Nobel and Israel 1994; Nobel
and Bobich 2002; Pimienta-Barrios et al., 2000, 2001, 2005). The CO2 capture values in O. ficus-indica correspond to theoretical
data that were obtained under “controlled” or more stable conditions than those that can be found directly in the field. Although
in these studies the effect of different factors that can affect the capture of CO2 in Succulent is already part of the evaluation,
-environmental (temperature, humidity, photosynthetic active radiation, CO2 concentration), growth (development stage) and of the life
cycle (in vegetative or sexual reproduction) – these factors, particularly the environmental ones, represent a small range of variation
compared to the spectrum to which crops can be confronted at bigger spatial scales (throughout the geography) and much more extensive
temporary (from one to ten years).
The output values of method VM000XX, Version 1.
0. must be interpreted as a conservative estimate based on the average CO2 capture under controlled conditions, with adjustments that
involve some factors that potentially affect the capture efficiency of this plant, since closely related to their physiology. To have
a much more accurate data and in accordance with the conditions of the problem plantation, different studies were carried out in the field
considering the spatial and temporal environmental variation, making capture measurements on the cladodes and trees.
The estimates of captured CO2 and biomass are
derived from the morphological variables of the cladodes. With the width, length and thickness of the cladodes, the respective calculation
of the area of the two faces of each cladode, of the surface corresponding to the edge and its volume is performed.
This methodology is focused on addressing the
following key variables:
| · | Estimating the amount of carbon in the Succulent crops at the start of the project. |
| · | Estimating the amount of CO2 captured by total photosynthetic surface in the crop. |
| · | Estimating the value of CO2 and biomass per crop of Succulent (base line) for year during for ten years. |
| · | Monitoring and documenting changes in Succulent carbon for ten years under the project scenario |
The methodology has been designed using a modular
approach. This methodology document lays out the steps required to fulfil estimation, projection and quantification requirements for projects
wishing to register credits under the VCS program.
The methodology requires the completion of 7 main
tasks, each of which is comprised of a number of sub-tasks:
| – | Task 1: Identification of limits and extension of project area. |
| – | Task 2: Determining the baseline scenario |
| – | Task 3: Measuring morphological variables of cladodes and trees of project area. |
| – | Task 4: Estimating biomass (tons at T0) corresponding to all plants in the project area |
| – | Task 5: Estimating CO2 capture. |
| – | Task 6: Projecting Carbon accumulation per year in project area for 10 years. The overall process used by the methodology is shown
in the following methodology map. |
| – | Task 7. Monitoring and estimation. |
An Opuntia's methodology for accrediting carbon sequestration in crops (OMC) project involves management activities that maintain and
increase the carbon stocks in the Succulent -in crops, in relation to the levels of carbon stored at the zero time of the project.
Thus, initial conditions at cero time of the project are estimated: the amount of carbon in the Succulent crops at the start of
the project, the amount of CO2 captured by total photosynthetic surface in the crop, the value of CO2 and cacti biomass per crop of O.
ficus-indica (base line) for year during the project and monitoring and documenting changes in Succulent carbon during the
project scenario.
Furthermore, actions are carried out that focus
on maintaining the structure of the crops, i.e. dimensions of the project area, number of plants per unit area, baseline of plants within
the project area; the latter corresponds to the number of cladodes that have to be maintained per plant so that it ensures with an appropriate
volume and baseline area that it maintains the growth, capture and storage of carbon, as well as allows the harvest of the plant for human
consumption (without affecting the estimates during the project's accreditation period).
Article 2. Pending Methodologies
Approved and pending methodologies under the VCS
and approved GHG programs, that fall under the same combination of sectoral scopes or AFOLU project categories, were reviewed to determine
whether an existing methodology could be reasonably revised to meet the objective of the proposed methodology.
Article 3. Project Activities and Applicability
Conditions
This methodology is global in scope and applies
to estimate CO2 capture correspond to the CAM metabolism of the Succulent species under growing conditions. CAM metabolism can
be very variable depending on the taxonomic scale to which we are limiting (e. g, families, subfamilies, genera and species).
All projects using this methodology must meet
the following conditions:
| 1. | Projects must meet the most recent VCS requirements for one of
the following two Agricultural Land Management activities: |
| · | Improved Cropland Management (ICM) |
| · | Cropland and Grassland Land-use Conversions (CGLC) |
| 2. | Project activities must be implemented on land that is cropland
at the project start date and remains cropland throughout the project crediting period (i.e., land use change is not eligible, including
conversion from cropland to grassland and grassland to cropland). |
| 3. | As of the project start date entire project area consists in croplands
of Succulent . Crops may include Succulent grown for food products (Succulent , fruits, vegetable, prickly pear) or other
derivate products of this cacti. |
| 4. | The conditions of project (number of trees per area unity, levels
of growing in all trees, trees of the same age, equidistant crop lines) must be homogenously maintained by the next ten years to ensure
the CO2 assimilation calculated by mean the methodology. |
| 5. | Project activities must not include changes in project area, and
the conditions of the crop at the moment of the accreditation: e. g. number of trees in the project, number of growth levels per tree
(no more tree levels), soil water regimes or other significant anthropogenic changes in the crop as changes in fertilization. |
| 6. | The project must meet with an annual evaluation to verify the
biomass and CO2 accredited and to ensure that the project area maintain homogeneous conditions respect to those at moment of accreditation. |
| 7. | The biomass
accredited in the project area excludes that which is harvested per season to human use (Succulent , fruits, vegetable, or prickly pear). |
Article 4. Demonstration of Additionality
Succulent methodology offers a cost-effective
option for projects to yield surplus GHG reductions that and demonstrate additionality to what would have occurred in the absence of the
project.
The approach to additionality for Succulent methodology
for accrediting carbon sequestration in crops projects recognizes increases in the amount of CO2 removed from the atmosphere relative
to “business as usual” management. It also considers the long-term risks to carbon sequestered in the project area presented
by “business as usual” management and the potential emissions of carbon into the atmosphere. Under this approach, additionality
takes into account the following:
| · | Onsite carbon stocks are at risk on a 20-year
time scale. |
| · | Land ownership and management direction are not
permanent, except in cases where binding commitments limit management options, such as conservation easements (CA). |
| · | Management goals and objectives are likely to
change over time, especially as: ownership of a crop changes hands, as often happens between generations of family crop owners or between
entities owning crops as a financial investment. |
| · | Over the length of a project lifetime and in
the absence of a long-term commitment to a project and associated conservation easement, emissions may have resulted from the clearing
of Succulent trees to convert a crop to another crop type or from harvest. |
| · | Activities that reduce average onsite carbon
stocking. |
| · | Committing a site to crop cover in perpetuity |
Furthermore, this methodology acknowledges that
the project’s baseline, as the way “business as usual” management is represented for quantification purposes, is a counterfactual
scenario, i.e., a representation of what may have actually occurred if the project had never happened. Additionality is assured over the
20-year crediting period, during which the terms of the CA ensure carbon stocks increase compared to the baseline.
The methodology has been designed using a modular
approach and lays out the steps required to fulfill estimation, projection and quantification requirements for projects wishing to register
credits under the VCS program.
The methodology requires the completion of 11
main tasks, each of which is comprised of a number of sub-tasks:
| · | Task 1: Identification of limits and extension
of project area. |
| · | Task 2: Determining the baseline scenario |
| · | Task 3: Measuring morphological variables of
cladodes and trees of project area. (Quantification) |
| · | Task 4. Social and Environmental Safeguards |
| · | Task 5: Estimating biomass (tons at T0) corresponding
to all plants in the project area |
| · | Task 6: Estimating CO2 capture. |
| · | Task 7: Projecting Carbon accumulation per year
in project area for 10 years. The overall process used by the methodology is shown in the following methodology map. |
| · | Task 8. Monitoring and estimation |
| · | Task 9. Permanence |
| · | Task 10. Verification process |
| · | Task 11. Credits emission |
Article 5 Quantification of Emission Reductions
This section provides requirements and guidance
for quantifying an OMC project’s net GHG reductions. The Verified Carbon Units (VCUs) will be issued to an OMC project upon confirmation
for ISO- accredited and Verra-approved verification body that the OMC project’s GHG reductions and removals have been quantified
following the applicable requirements of this methodology.
The estimates of captured CO2 and biomass are
derived from the morphological variables of the cladodes. With the width, length and thickness of the cladodes, the respective calculation
of the area of the two faces of each cladode, of the surface corresponding to the edge and its volume is performed. It has to be mentioned
that for these calculations, + the formula of the area of a regular ellipse was considered, because in general the cladodes are oval (like
an ellipse); however, its shape is much more complex, especially in the proximal region, so the calculated values of area and volume do
not represent the actual area of a racket. In this sense, the VM000XX, Version 1. 0 include a size adjustment based in a geometric morphometric
study in thousands of cladodes of this species (in process).
This methodology is focused on addressing the
following key variables:
| · | Estimating the amount of carbon in the Succulent
crops at the start of the project. |
| · | Estimating the amount of CO2 captured by total
photosynthetic surface in the crop. |
| · | Estimating the value of CO2 and biomass per crop
of Succulent (base line) for year during for ten years. |
| · | Monitoring and documenting changes in Succulent
carbon for ten years under the project scenario |
Article 6 Monitoring
The monitoring plan must be prepared using module
VMD0034 Methods for Developing a Monitoring Plan. This module includes specifications on quality assurance and quality control that must
be followed during development of the project description and other project documents.
Reports to Security Holders
You may read and
copy any materials the Company files with the Commission in the Commission’s Public Reference Section, Room 1580, 100 F Street N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Section by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
Additionally, the SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding
issuers that file electronically with the SEC, which can be found at http://www.sec.gov.
Risk Factors
An investment in our common stock involves
a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information contained in this report before
deciding to invest in our common stock.
Risks Related to our Business
Bret a limited operating history
Bret has limited operating history. We will, in
all likelihood, sustain operating expenses without corresponding revenues, at least for the foreseeable future. We can make no assurances
that we will be able to effectuate our strategies or otherwise to generate sufficient revenue to continue operations.
During the year ended October 31, 2021, Bret’s
total revenue was $6,812, and had a net loss of $94,548. During the twelve months ended October 31, 2022, Bret’s total revenue was
$59,745, and had a net loss of $619,899.
Our estimates of capital, personnel, equipment,
and facilities required for our proposed operations are based on certain other existing businesses operating under projected business
conditions and plans. We believe that our estimates are reasonable, but it is not possible to determine the accuracy of such estimates
at this point. In formulating our business plan, we have relied on the judgment of our officers and directors and their experience in
developing businesses. We can make no assurances that we will be able to obtain sufficient financing or implement successfully the business
plan we have devised. Further, even with sufficient financing, there can be no assurance that we will be able to operate our business
on a profitable basis. We can make no assurances that our projected business plan will be realized or that any of our assumptions will
prove to be correct.
We are subject to a variety
of possible risks that could adversely impact our revenues, results of operations or financial condition. Some of these risks relate to
general economic and financial conditions, while others are more specific to us and the industry in which we operate. The following factors
set out potential risks we have identified that could adversely affect us. The risks described below may not be the only risks we face.
Additional risks that we do not yet know of, or that we currently think are immaterial, could also have a negative impact on our business
operations or financial condition. See also Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Disclosure.
We operate in a
highly competitive industry.
The climate and carbon
treatment business is highly competitive and constantly changing. Our competitors include not only other large multinational companies,
but also smaller entities that operate in local or regional markets as well as new forms of market participants.
Competitive challenges
also arise from rapidly-evolving and new technologies in the carbon capture space, creating opportunities for new and existing competitors
and a need for continued significant investment in research and development.
A number of our existing or potential competitors
may have substantially greater financial, technical, and marketing resources, larger investor bases, greater name recognition, and more
established relationships with their investors, and more established sources of deal flow and investment opportunities than we do. This
may enable our competitors to: develop and expand their services and develop infrastructure more quickly and achieve greater scale and
cost efficiencies; adapt more quickly to new or emerging markets and opportunities, strategies, techniques, technologies, and changing
investor needs; take advantage of acquisitions and other market opportunities more readily; establish operations in new markets more rapidly;
devote greater resources to the marketing and sale of their products and services; adopt more aggressive pricing policies; and provide
clients with additional benefits at lower overall costs in order to gain market share. If our competitive advantages are not compelling
or sustainable and we are not able to effectively compete with larger competitors, then we may not be able to increase or sustain cash
flow.
Cross Border Sales Transactions
Cross border sales transactions carry a risk of
changes in import tax and/or duties related to the import and export of our product, which can result in pricing changes, which will affect
revenues and earnings. Cross border sales transactions carry other risks including, but not limited to, changing regulations, wait times,
customs inspection and lost or damaged product
Our independent public accountants have
provided their report with a going concern opinion.
The Company’s financial statements were
prepared on a going concern basis which assumes that the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the
normal course of business for the foreseeable future. During the twelve-month period ended October 31, 2022, the Company incurred a net
loss of $619,899 and as of that date, the Company’s accumulated deficit was $831,785 There are no assurances that it will be able
to achieve level of revenues adequate to generate sufficient cash flow from operations or obtain additional financing through private
placements, public offerings and/or bank financing necessary to support our working capital requirements. To the extent that funds generated
from any private placements, public offerings and/or bank financing are insufficient, we will have to raise additional working capital.
No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available, or if available, will be on acceptable terms. These conditions
raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. If adequate working capital is not available, we may be forced
to discontinue operations, which would cause investors to lose their entire investment. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result relating to the recoverability and classification of the asset carrying amounts
or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result from the outcome of this risk and uncertainty.
We will need to raise funding, which may
not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed may force us to delay, limit or
terminate our product development efforts or other operations.
We will need to seek funds soon, through public
or private equity or debt financings, government or other third-party funding, marketing and distribution arrangements and other collaborations,
strategic alliances or a combination of these approaches. Raising funds in the current economic environment may present additional challenges.
It is not certain that we have accounted for all costs and expenses of future development and regulatory compliance. Even if we believe
we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans, we may seek additional capital if market conditions are favorable
or if we have specific strategic considerations.
Our future growth may be limited.
The Company’s ability to achieve its expansion
objectives and to manage its growth effectively depends upon a variety of factors, including the Company’s ability to further develop
use of methodology, to attract and retain skilled employees, to successfully position and market the Company, to protect its existing
intellectual property, to capitalize on the potential opportunities it is pursuing with third parties, and sufficient funding. To accommodate
growth and compete effectively, the Company will need working capital to maintain adequate operating levels, develop additional procedures
and controls and increase, train, motivate and manage its work force. There is no assurance that the Company’s personnel, systems,
procedures and controls will be adequate to support its potential future operations.
We are reliant on a small number of customers
for the majority of our revenue.
We have developed key partnerships with Non-Government
Organizations (NGOs) , governments, and companies in the private sector. The loss of any of these partnerships would materially effect
or revenue. The loss of any of these could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business.
We rely on key personnel.
The Company’s success also will depend in
large part on the continued service of its key operational and management personnel, including executive staff, research and development,
engineering, marketing and sales staff. Most specifically, this includes its Director Teresa Tattersfield who oversees new partnerships,
as well as implementation of our methodology, partnership retention, overall management and future growth. The Company faces intense competition
from its competitors, customers and other companies throughout the industry. Any failure on the Company’s part to hire, train and
retain a sufficient number of qualified professionals could impair the business of the Company.
We depend on intellectual property rights
that may be infringed upon or infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others.
The Company’s success depends to a significant
degree upon its ability to develop, maintain and protect proprietary products and methodology. The Company has registered its carbon capture
methodology with Verified Carbon Standard. The assertion of intellectual property protection involves complex legal and factual determinations
and is therefore uncertain and potentially expensive. The Company cannot provide assurance that intellectual property will be granted
with respect to its methodology application, that the scope of any intellectual property it might obtain will be sufficiently broad to
offer meaningful protection, or that it will develop additional proprietary products that are patentable. Losing significant intellectual
property protection could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.
We may need to
defend ourselves against intellectual property infringement claims, which may be time-consuming and cause us to incur substantial costs.
Companies, organizations
or individuals, including our competitors, may own or obtain intellectual property or other proprietary rights that would prevent or limit
our ability to make, use, develop or sell our concept, which could make it more difficult for us to operate our business. We may receive
inquiries from intellectual property owners inquiring whether we infringe their proprietary rights.
Our business may
be adversely affected if we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights from unauthorized use by third parties.
Failure to adequately protect our intellectual
property rights could result in our competitors offering similar products, potentially resulting in the loss of some of our competitive
advantage, and a decrease in our revenue which would adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.
Our success depends, at least in part, on our ability to protect our core methodology and intellectual property. To accomplish this, we
will rely on a combination of intellectual property, trade secrets (including know-how), employee and third-party nondisclosure agreements,
copyright, trademarks, intellectual property licenses and other contractual rights to establish and protect our rights in our technology.
Patent, trademark, and trade secret laws vary significantly throughout the world.
Confidentiality agreements with employees
and others may not adequately prevent disclosure of trade secrets and other proprietary information.
In order to protect our proprietary technology
and processes, we also rely in part on confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, outsource manufacturers and other advisors.
These agreements may not effectively prevent disclosure of confidential information and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event
of unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. In addition, others may independently discover trade secrets and proprietary information.
Costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and failure to obtain
or maintain trade secret protection could adversely affect our competitive business position.
We may not be successful in our potential
business combinations.
The Company may, in the future, pursue acquisitions
of other complementary businesses and technology licensing arrangements. The Company may also pursue strategic alliances and joint ventures
that leverage its core products and industry experience to expand its product offerings and geographic presence. The Company has limited
experience with respect to acquiring other companies and limited experience with respect to forming collaborations, strategic alliances
and joint ventures.
If the Company were to make any acquisitions,
it may not be able to integrate these acquisitions successfully into its existing business and could assume unknown or contingent liabilities.
Any future acquisitions the Company makes, could also result in large and immediate write-offs or the incurrence of debt and contingent
liabilities, any of which could harm the Company’s operating results. Integrating an acquired company also may require management
resources that otherwise would be available for ongoing development of the Company’s existing business.
We may experience intellectual property
enforcement and infringement which could force us to spend on legal fees.
The environmental protection industry has been
characterized by significant litigation and other proceedings regarding intellectual property rights. The situations in which we may become
parties to such litigation or proceedings may include:
1. litigation or other proceedings we may initiate
against third parties to enforce our intellectual property rights;
2. litigation or other proceedings we or our licensee(s)
may initiate against third parties seeking to invalidate the patents held by such third parties or to obtain a judgment that our products
do not infringe such third parties’ intellectual property; and
3. litigation or other proceedings, third parties
may initiate against us to seek to invalidate our intellectual property.
If third parties initiate litigation claiming
that our products infringe their intellectual property rights, we will need to defend against such proceedings.
The costs of resolving any patent litigation or
other intellectual property proceeding, even if resolved in our favor, could be substantial. Many of our potential competitors will be
able to sustain the cost of such litigation and proceedings more effectively than we can because of their substantially greater resources.
In some instances competitors may proceed with litigation or other proceedings pertaining to infringement of their intellectual property
as a means to hinder or devaluate the target defendant company, with no intention of the matter being resolved in their favor. Uncertainties
resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other intellectual property proceedings could have a material adverse
effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace. Intellectual property proceedings may also consume significant management time and
costs.
Global economic conditions, such as COVID-19,
may adversely affect our industry, business and results of operations.
Our overall performance depends, in part, on worldwide
economic conditions which historically is cyclical in character. Key international economies continue to be impacted by a recession, characterized
by falling demand for a variety of goods and services, restricted credit, going concern threats to financial institutions, major multinational
companies and medium and small businesses, poor liquidity, declining asset values, reduced corporate profitability, extreme volatility
in credit, equity and foreign exchange markets and bankruptcies. In markets where our revenue occurs go into recession, these conditions
affect the rate of spending and could adversely affect our customers’ ability or willingness to purchase our concept which could
adversely affect our operating results.
Any further disruptions from an uptick in
new infections related to COVID-19 may materially harm out business prospects.
Further upticks in infection, and the related
enforcement of governmental restrictions would materially hinder our ability to grow, as it would make it could interrupt our supply chain,
as well as the financial condition of our intended customer base.
Any future indebtedness
reduces cash available for distribution and may expose us to the risk of default under debt obligations that we may incur in the future.
Payments of principal
and interest on borrowings that we may incur in the future may leave us with insufficient cash resources to operate the business. Our
level of debt and the limitations imposed on us by debt agreements could have significant material and adverse consequences, including
the following:
| · | our cash flow may be insufficient to meet our required principal and interest payments; |
| · | we may be unable to borrow additional funds as needed or on favorable terms, or at all; |
| · | we may be unable to refinance our indebtedness at maturity or the refinancing terms may be less favorable than the terms of our original
indebtedness; |
| · | to the extent we borrow debt that bears interest at variable rates, increases in interest rates could materially increase our interest
expense; |
| · | we may default on our obligations or violate restrictive covenants, in which case the lenders may accelerate these debt obligations;
and |
| · | our default under any loan with cross default provisions could result in a default on other indebtedness. |
If any one of these events
were to occur, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders could
be materially and adversely affected.
Our results of operations are highly
susceptible to unfavorable economic conditions.
We are exposed to risks
associated with weak or uncertain regional or global economic conditions and disruption in the financial markets. The global economy continues
to be challenging in some markets. Uncertainty about the strength of the global economy generally, or economic conditions in certain regions
or market sectors, and a degree of caution on the part of some marketers, can have an effect on the demand for advertising and marketing
communication services. In addition, market conditions can be adversely affected by natural and human disruptions, such as natural disasters,
severe weather events, military conflict or public health crises. Our industry can be affected more severely than other sectors by an
economic downturn and can recover more slowly than the economy in general. In the past, some clients have responded to weak economic and
financial conditions by reducing their marketing budgets, which include discretionary components that are easier to reduce in the short
term than other operating expenses. This pattern may recur in the future. Furthermore, unexpected revenue shortfalls can result in misalignments
of costs and revenues, resulting in a negative impact to our operating margins. If our business is significantly adversely affected by
unfavorable economic conditions or other market disruptions that adversely affect client spending, the negative impact on our revenue
could pose a challenge to our operating income and cash generation from operations.
International business risks could adversely affect our operations.
We intend to be a global
business. Operations outside Mexico and the United States could represent a significant portion of our net revenues. These operations
are exposed to risks that include local legislation, currency variation, exchange control restrictions, local labour and employment laws
that hinder workforce flexibility, large-scale local or regional public health crises, and other difficult social, political or economic
conditions. We also must comply with applicable U.S., local and other international anti-corruption laws. These restrictions can place
us at a competitive disadvantage with respect to those competitors who may not be subject to comparable restrictions. Failure to comply
or to implement business practices that sufficiently prevent corruption or violation of sanctions laws could result in significant remediation
expense and expose us to significant civil and criminal penalties and reputational harm.
We may not be able to meet our performance targets and milestones.
From time to time, we
communicate to the public certain targets and milestones for our financial and operating performance that are intended to provide metrics
against which to evaluate our performance. They should not be understood as predictions or guidance about our expected performance. Our
ability to meet any target or milestone is subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, and we caution investors against placing undue
reliance on them. See Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Disclosure.
We have limited personal liability.
Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws generally
provide that the liability of our officers and directors will be eliminated to the fullest extent allowed under law for their acts on
behalf of our Company.
There are implications of being an emerging
growth company.
As a company with less than $2.0 billion in revenue
during its last fiscal year, we qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as a company
is deemed to be an emerging growth company, it may take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other regulatory requirements that
are generally unavailable to other public companies. These provisions include:
| · | a requirement to have only two years of audited financial statements and only two years of related Management’s Discussion and
Analysis included in an initial public offering registration statement; |
| · | an exemption to provide less than five years of selected financial data in an initial public offering registration statement; |
| · | an exemption from the auditor attestation requirement in the assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting; |
| · | an exemption from the adoption of new or revised financial accounting standards until they would apply to private companies; |
| · | an exemption from compliance with any new requirements adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board requiring mandatory
audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report in which the auditor would be required to provide additional information
about the audit and the financial statements of the issuer; and |
| · | reduced disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements. |
An emerging growth company is also exempt from
Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, which requires that the registered accounting firm shall, in the same report, attest to and
report on the assessment on the effectiveness of the internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting. Similarly, as
a Smaller Reporting Company we are exempt from Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and our independent registered public accounting
firm will not be required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting until such time as
we cease being a Smaller Reporting Company.
As an emerging growth company, we are exempt from
Section 14A (a) and (b) of the Exchange Act which require stockholder approval of executive compensation and golden parachutes.
Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging
growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying
with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards
until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition
period. Our financial statements may therefore not be comparable to those of companies that comply with such new or revised accounting
standards.
We would cease to be an emerging growth company
upon the earliest of:
| · | the first fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the filing of this Form 10; |
| · | the first fiscal year after our annual gross revenues are $2 billion or more; |
| · | the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $2 billion in non-convertible debt securities;
or |
| · | as of the end of any fiscal year in which the market value of our Common Stock held by non-affiliates exceeded $700 million as of
the end of the second quarter of that fiscal year. |
Risks Related
to Regulation
Applicable state
and international laws may prevent us from maximizing our potential income.
Depending on the laws
of each particular State and country, we may not be able to fully realize our potential to generate profit. Furthermore, cities and counties
are being given broad discretion to use other carbon capture methodologies. Depending on the laws of international countries and the States,
we might not be able to fully realize our potential to generate profit.
Compliance with
environmental laws could materially increase our operating expenses.
There may be environmental conditions associated
with businesses we acquire of which we are unaware. Such environmental liability exposure associated with properties we acquire could
harm our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Risks Related to the Market for our Stock
The OTC and share value
Our Common Stock trades over the counter, which
may deprive stockholders of the full value of their shares. Our stock is quoted via the Over-The-Counter (“OTC”) Pink Sheets
under the ticker symbol “ARMV”. Therefore, our Common Stock is expected to have fewer market makers, lower trading volumes,
and larger spreads between bid and asked prices than securities listed on an exchange such as the New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ
Stock Market. These factors may result in higher price volatility and less market liquidity for our Common Stock.
Low market price
A low market price would severely limit the potential
market for our Common Stock. Our Common Stock is expected to trade at a price substantially below $5.00 per share, subjecting trading
in the stock to certain Commission rules requiring additional disclosures by broker-dealers. These rules generally apply to any non-NASDAQ
equity security that has a market price share of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions (a “penny stock”).
Such rules require the delivery, prior to any penny stock transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and
the risks associated therewith and impose various sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell penny stocks to persons other
than established customers and institutional or wealthy investors. For these types of transactions, the broker-dealer must make a special
suitability determination for the purchaser and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to the sale.
The broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to the broker-dealer, current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock
and, if the broker-dealer is the sole market maker, the broker-dealer must disclose this fact and the broker-dealer’s presumed control
over the market. Such information must be provided to the customer orally or in writing before or with the written confirmation of trade
sent to the customer. Monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and
information on the limited market in penny stocks. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by such requirements could discourage
broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our Common Stock.
Lack of market and state blue sky laws
Investors may have difficulty in reselling their
shares due to the lack of market or state Blue Sky laws. The holders of our shares of Common Stock and persons who desire to purchase
them in any trading market that might develop in the future should be aware that there may be significant state law restrictions upon
the ability of investors to resell our shares. Accordingly, even if we are successful in having the shares available for trading on the
OTC, investors should consider any secondary market for our securities to be a limited one. We intend to seek coverage and publication
of information regarding our Company in an accepted publication which permits a “manual exemption.” This manual exemption
permits a security to be distributed in a particular state without being registered if the company issuing the security has a listing
for that security in a securities manual recognized by the state. However, it is not enough for the security to be listed in a recognized
manual. The listing entry must contain (1) the names of issuers, officers, and directors, (2) an issuer’s balance sheet, and (3)
a profit and loss statement for either the fiscal year preceding the balance sheet or for the most recent fiscal year of operations. We
may not be able to secure a listing containing all of this information. Furthermore, the manual exemption is a non-issuer exemption restricted
to secondary trading transactions, making it unavailable for issuers selling newly issued securities. Most of the accepted manuals are
those published in Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s Investor Service, Fitch’s Investment Service, and Best’s Insurance
Reports, and many states expressly recognize these manuals. A smaller number of states declare that they “recognize securities manuals”
but do not specify the recognized manuals. The following states do not have any provisions and therefore do not expressly recognize the
manual exemption: Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Montana, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, and Wisconsin.
Accordingly, our shares of Common Stock should
be considered totally illiquid, which inhibits investors’ ability to resell their shares.
Penny stock regulations
We will be subject to penny stock regulations
and restrictions and you may have difficulty selling shares of our Common Stock. The Commission has adopted regulations which generally
define so-called “penny stocks” to be an equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share or an exercise
price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exemptions. We anticipate that our Common Stock will become a “penny stock”,
and we will become subject to Rule 15g-9 under the Exchange Act, or the “Penny Stock Rule”. This rule imposes additional sales
practice requirements on broker-dealers that sell such securities to persons other than established customers. For transactions covered
by Rule 15g-9, a broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and have received the purchaser’s
written consent to the transaction prior to sale. As a result, this rule may affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities
and may affect the ability of purchasers to sell any of our securities in the secondary market.
For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless
exempt, the rules require delivery, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule prepared by the Commission relating
to the penny stock market. Disclosure is also required to be made about sales commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered
representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, monthly statements are required to be sent disclosing recent price
information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stock.
We do not anticipate that our Common Stock will
qualify for exemption from the Penny Stock Rule. In any event, even if our Common Stock were exempt from the Penny Stock Rule, we would
remain subject to Section 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act, which gives the Commission the authority to restrict any person from participating
in a distribution of penny stock, if the Commission finds that such a restriction would be in the public interest.
Rule 144 Risks
Sales of our Common Stock under Rule 144 could
reduce the price of our stock. There are 10,000,000 issued and outstanding shares of our Common Stock held by affiliates that Rule 144
of the Securities Act defines as restricted securities.
These shares will be subject to the resale restrictions
of Rule 144, since we have ceased being deemed a “shell company”. In general, persons holding restricted securities, including
affiliates, must hold their shares for a period of at least nine months, may not sell more than 1.0% of the total issued and outstanding
shares in any 90-day period, and must resell the shares in an unsolicited brokerage transaction at the market price. The availability
for sale of substantial amounts of Common Stock under Rule 144 could reduce prevailing market prices for our securities.
No audit or compensation committee
Because we do not have an audit or compensation
committee, stockholders will have to rely on our entire Board of Directors, none of which are independent, to perform these functions.
We do not have an audit or compensation committee comprised of independent directors. Indeed, we do not have any audit or compensation
committee. These functions are performed by our Board of Directors as a whole. No members of our Board of Directors are independent directors.
Thus, there is a potential conflict in that Board members who are also part of management will participate in discussions concerning management
compensation and audit issues that may affect management decisions.
Security laws exposure
We are subject to compliance with securities laws,
which exposes us to potential liabilities, including potential rescission rights. We may offer to sell our shares of our Common Stock
to investors pursuant to certain exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, as well as those of various state
securities laws. The basis for relying on such exemptions is factual; that is, the applicability of such exemptions depends upon our conduct
and that of those persons contacting prospective investors and making the offering. We may not seek any legal opinion to the effect that
any such offering would be exempt from registration under any federal or state law. Instead, we may elect to relay upon the operative
facts as the basis for such exemption, including information provided by investor themselves.
If any such offering did not qualify for such
exemption, an investor would have the right to rescind its purchase of the securities if it so desired. It is possible that if an investor
should seek rescission, such investor would succeed. A similar situation prevails under state law in those states where the securities
may be offered without registration in reliance on the partial pre-emption from the registration or qualification provisions of such state
statutes under the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996. If investors were successful in seeking rescission, we would face
severe financial demands that could adversely affect our business and operations. Additionally, if we did not in fact qualify for the
exemptions upon which we have relied, we may become subject to significant fines and penalties imposed by the Commission and state securities
agencies.
No cash dividends
Because we do not intend to pay any cash dividends
on our Common Stock, our stockholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell them. We intend to retain
any future earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on shares
of our Common Stock in the foreseeable future. Unless we pay dividends, our stockholders will not be able to receive a return on their
shares unless they sell them. There is no assurance that stockholders will be able to sell shares of our Common Stock when desired.
Delayed adoption of accounting standards
We have delayed the adoption of certain accounting
standards through an opt-in right for emerging growth companies. We have elected to use the extended transition period for complying with
new or revised accounting standards under Section 102(b)(2) of the Jobs Act, which allows us to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting
standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. As a
result of this election, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates.
Management’s discussion and analysis of
financial condition and results of operation
The following discussion and analysis should be
read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes thereto.
Forward Looking Statements
The following information specifies certain forward-looking
statements of the management of our Company. Forward-looking statements are statements that estimate the happening of future events and
are not based on historical fact. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as may,
shall, could, expect, estimate, anticipate, predict, probable, possible, should, continue, or similar terms, variations of those terms
or the negative of those terms. The forward-looking statements specified in the following information statement have been compiled by
our management on the basis of assumptions made by management and considered by management to be reasonable. Our future operating results,
however, are impossible to predict and no representation, guaranty, or warranty is to be inferred from those forward-looking statements.
The assumptions used for purposes of the forward-looking
statements specified in the following information represent estimates of future events and are subject to uncertainty as to possible changes
in economic, legislative, industry, and other circumstances. As a result, the identification and interpretation of data and other information
and their use in developing and selecting assumptions from and among reasonable alternatives require the exercise of judgment. To the
extent that the assumed events do not occur, the outcome may vary substantially from anticipated or projected results, and, accordingly,
no opinion is expressed on the achievability of those forward-looking statements. We cannot guaranty that any of the assumptions relating
to the forward-looking statements specified in the following information are accurate, and we assume no obligation to update any such
forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include statements regarding our anticipated financial and operating results,
our liquidity, goals, and plans.
All forward-looking statements in this Form 10
are based on information available to us as of the date of this report, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
Overview
Arma Services, Inc. was
incorporated by our director in the State of Nevada on September 2, 2014. Our primary business was to be destination management and event
management services initially in the Russian Federation, but with plans at a later stage to spread our business to America and China.
We attempted to provide a full range of services in the field of Meeting, Incentive, Conference, and Exhibition tourism in Russia for
corporate customers from United States, China and Russia.
Prior management was comprised of one person,
Sergey Gandin. Mr. Sergey Gandin resign from the positions of the Director, CEO and CFO of the Company and be appointed solely as Secretary
of Arma Services Inc. The Company and Mr. Gandin are in agreement that these changes were effective from March 26, 2022. The Company has
appointed Clive Hill, 66, from the United Kingdom to the positions of Director, CEO and CFO of the Company. On August 17, 2022, Clive
Hill resigned as a director and an officer, ceased to be the President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and as a Member
of the Board of Directors of the Company. Also on August 17, 2022, Maria Teresa Tattersfield consented to act as a Member of the Board
of Directors of the Company, Alberto Ramirez consented to act as a Member of the Board of Directors of the Company, Eduardo Piquero consented
to act as a Member of the Board of Directors of the Company, and Jaime Sanchez Cortina consented to act as the new President, CEO, CFO,
and Member of the Board of Directors of the Company.
On March 2, 2015, the
Company filed a Form S-1 for registration of securities under the Securities Act of 1933. The S-1 was eventually declared effective on
August 12, 2016, and at that time the Company became a fully reporting public company.
On March 28, 2022, the
management of the Company, approved the engagement of BF Borgers CPA PC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm for the Company’s fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, effective immediately, and dismissed Zia Masood Kiani & Co. Chartered
Accountants (“ZMK”), as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm.
The reports of ZMK on the Company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended October 31, 2021 and 2020 did not
contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting
principles. ZMK reports for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2021 and 2022 included an explanatory
paragraph indicating that there was substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
ZMK was dismissed as
the Company’s CPA through a mutual agreement between Arma Services, Inc. and the ZMK.
On June 20, 2022 the
there was a change of control of the company Mr. Corin Bailey purchased Four Million Shares (4,000,000) from Ruslan Mishin the control
shareholders.
On December 14th, 2022,
the there was a change of control of the company Mr. Ronny Fabien Suarez Araya purchased Three Million Shares (3,000,000) from Corin
Bailey the control shareholders.
On January 26, 2023, Arma Services, Inc. (the
“Company”) terminated its engagement with BF Borgers CPA PC (“BFB”), the Registrant’s prior independent
registered public accounting firm, and thereafter provided BFB with its disclosures in the Current Report on Form 8-K disclosing the termination
of the engagement of BFB and requested in writing that BFB furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange
Commission stating whether or not they agree with such disclosures. BFB's response is filed as an exhibit to this Current Report on Form
8-K.
The auditor has not provided any reports to the
financial statements of the Company but reviewed the reports for the quarters ended January 31, 2022, April 30, 2022 and September 30,
2022. There had been no disagreements with BFB on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or
auditing scope or procedure during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, nor in the subsequent periods through January 26, 2023.
On January 26, 2023, the Board of Directors of
the Company engaged OLAYINKA OYEBOLA & CO. (“OOC”) as its independent accountant to provide auditing services for going
forward for the Company. The Company has terminated the engagement of BFB. The decision to hire OOC was approved by the Company’s
Board of Directors.
On January 27, 2023, Jaime Sanchez Cortina resigned
immediately as CEO, CFO, President and a member of the Board of Directors. Also on January 27, 2023, Eric Eastwood Nixon, age 35 agreed
to be appointed the President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and as a Member of the Board of Directors of the Company.
For over two decades, Eric has worked in the electrical & technology sector, bringing multiple renewable energy projects to life and
striving for a carbon neutral society. He has worked alongside Conestoga College to educate the public on reducing energy consumption
and researching new technologies to help reduce the carbon footprint. He has the skills and experience to take on projects in the residential,
commercial, industrial, technology sectors and emergency response services when needed.
On February 27, 2023, Arma Services Inc. (“ARMV,”
or the “Company”) entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with Wenflor International
Inc. and Bret International Holding Corp., owner of 100% of Bret Consultores, SAPI de CV: Carbon Capture (“Bret”), a Mexican
corporation, and Ecapfin Sapi de Cv., and Eric Eastwood Nixon (“Appointee”), as the President, & CEO and director of ARMV.
Under the Share Exchange Agreement, One Hundred Percent (100%) of the ownership interest of Bret was exchanged for 6,000,000 shares of
common stock of ARMV issued to Wenflor International Inc. The former stockholders of Bret will acquire a majority of the issued and outstanding
common stock as a result of the share exchange transaction. The transaction has been accounted for as a recapitalization of the
Company, whereby Bret is the accounting acquirer.
Immediately after completion of such share exchange,
the Company has a total of 12,240,000 issued and outstanding shares, with authorized share capital for common share of 75,000,000.
Business Overview
Arma Services Inc. (“ARMV” or
the “Company”) is a US holding company incorporated in Nevada on September 2, 2014, which operates through the
Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Bret International Holding Corp owner of 100% of Bret Consultores, SAPI de CV incorporated
on August 2, 2021 and its newly owned Bret International Holding Corp: Carbon Capture (“Bret”), a Panama corporation
incorporated on May 27, 2022 to promote its international expansion into the global market.
The Company seeks to promote healthy, sustainable,
and resilient rural economies through the carbon market, while strengthening the participation of rural communities in project development
and decision-making. At the same time, companies, organizations and individuals can offset their emissions and meet their climate goals.
The Company assists in the re-foresting, forest
management and monetization of the Carbon Captured. It promotes healthy, sustainable, and resilient rural economies through the carbon
market, while strengthening the participation of communities and private landowners in project development and decision-making. At the
same time, companies, organizations and individuals can offset their emissions and meet their climate goals. The company works under international
standards such as CAR and Verra, and social and environmental safeguards with rural communities to issue carbon credits to be sold in
the Global Carbon Market.
Businesses and other organizations buy carbon
credits for three reasons; a) to comply with a regulated market, b) to speculate trading with them c) to offset a carbon footprint voluntarily,
and to contribute to conservate forests, mangroves and other important ecosystems.
Bret’s carbon credits (one carbon credit
equals one metric tons of CO2 removed or avoided) are verified by an independent third party the certifies them, following a robust carbon
standard, such as Climate Action Reserve (CAR) or Verra, Verified Carbon Standards.
This ensures:
| i) | Additionality - the reductions in emissions must be “above
business as usual” – they would not have happened unless the project was implemented. |
| ii) | Permanence - the GHGs must be permanently reduced or sequestered.
Permanence is defined as providing lasting benefits to the environment. |
| iii) | Leakage - there can be no shifting of emissions from one place
to another due to a project. |
Bret provides training on climate change issues,
building of inventories, generation of offsets, carbon market basics and community empowerment, transferring know-how to locales and providing
them with additional revenue streams.
The Bret team has over 12 years of experience
in the implementation of community carbon capture projects in Mexico. They are pioneers in developing specialized standards in the Mexican
context of land tenure, communal land, and integration of indigenous minorities.
COVID-19
On March 11, 2020, the
World Health Organization (“WHO”) declared the Covid-19 outbreak to be a global pandemic. In addition to the devastating effects
on human life, the pandemic is having a negative ripple effect on the global economy, leading to disruptions and volatility in the global
financial markets. Most US states and many countries have issued policies intended to stop or slow the further spread of the disease.
Covid-19 and the U.S’s
response to the pandemic are significantly affecting the economy. There are no comparable events that provide guidance as to the effect
the Covid-19 pandemic may have, and, as a result, the ultimate effect of the pandemic is highly uncertain and subject to change. We do
not yet know the full extent of the effects on the economy, the markets we serve, our business, or our operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At October 31, 2021 we had $97,840 in current
assets compared to $60,289 at October 31, 2020. Current liabilities at October 31, 2021 totaled $276,362 compared to $115,488 at October
31, 2020. The change is due to the suppliers financing. The company managed to have a better working capital structure,
At October 31, 2022, we had $304,516 in current
assets compared to $97,840 at October 31, 2021. Current liabilities at October 31, 2022 totaled $1,057,140 compared to $276,362 at October
31, 2021.
We will have to meet all the financial disclosure
and reporting requirements associated with being a publicly reporting company. Our management will have to spend additional time on policies
and procedures to make sure our Company is compliant with various regulatory requirements, especially that of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act. This additional corporate governance time required of management could limit the amount of time management has to implement our business
plan and may impede the speed of our operations.
Results of Operations
We generated revenue of $40,667 from inception
through the year ended October 31, 2021. October 2020 revenue of 33,855 and for October 2021 revenue of 6,812
We generated revenue of $59,745 and $6,812 for
the twelve months ended October 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. For the twelve months ended October 31, 2022 our operating expenses were
$679,643 compared to $101,360 for the period ended October 31 2021. As a result, we have reported net loss of $619,899 for the twelve
months ended October 31, 2022 and net loss of $94,548 for the period ended October 31, 2021. The change is due to increase expenses of
the CO2 project in Bret.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements
that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues
or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that are material to investors.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The SEC has defined a company’s critical
accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations
and which require the Company to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of
matters that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, we have identified the critical accounting policies and judgments addressed
below. We also have other key accounting policies that are significant to understanding our results.
Basis of Presentation
The financial statements of the Company have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and are
expressed in Canadian dollars.
Management’s Representation of Interim
Financial Statements
The accompanying consolidated financial statements
have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
The Company uses the same accounting policies in preparing quarterly and annual financial statements. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted as allowed by such rules and regulations, and management believes that the
disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These financial statements include all of the adjustments,
which in the opinion of management are necessary to a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations. All such adjustments
are of a normal and recurring nature. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. These financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto on October 31, 2022.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. The most significant estimates relate to revenue recognition, valuation of accounts receivable and inventories, income
taxes, and contingencies. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience, known or expected trends, and various other assumptions
that are believed to be reasonable given the quality of information available as of the date of these financial statements. The results
of these assumptions provide the basis for making estimates about the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Revenue Recognition
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) outlines a single
comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. The guidance provided in Accounting
Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606 (“ASC 606”) requires entities to use a five-step model to recognize revenue
by allocating the consideration from contracts to performance obligations on a relative standalone selling price basis. Revenue is recognized
when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration that the entity expects to
receive in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also requires new disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and
uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. ASC 606 also includes Subtopic 340-40, Other Assets
and Deferred Costs – Contracts with Customers, which requires the deferral of incremental costs of obtaining a contract with
a customer.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments
with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on deposit
with banks and money market funds, the fair value of which approximates cost. The Company maintains its cash balances with a high-credit-quality
financial institution. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts, and management believes the Company is not exposed
to any significant credit risk on its cash and cash equivalents. As of October 31, 2022, and October 31, 2021, the balances of cash were
$174,181 and $48,027 respectively.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are customer obligations due
under normal trade terms which are recorded at net realizable value. The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based
on management’s assessment of the collectability of trade receivables. A considerable amount of judgment is required in assessing
the amount of the allowance. The Company makes judgments about the creditworthiness of each customer based on ongoing credit evaluations
and monitors current economic trends that might impact the level of credit losses in the future. If the financial condition of the customers
were to deteriorate, resulting in their inability to make payments, a specific allowance will be required.
Recovery of bad debt amounts previously written
off is recorded as a reduction of bad debt expense in the period the payment is collected. If the Company’s actual collection experience
changes, revisions to its allowance may be required. After all, attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written
off against the allowance.
As of October 31, 2022, and October 31, 2021,
the balances of accounts receivable were $15,141 and $14,270, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB
ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized
for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740, the effect on deferred
tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. ASC 740-10-05, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must
be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities.
The amount recognized is measured as the largest
amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company assesses the validity
of its conclusions regarding uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis to determine if facts or circumstances have arisen that might
cause it to change its judgment regarding the likelihood of a tax position’s sustainability under audit.
Foreign Currency Translation
The functional and reporting currency of the Company
is the USD.
Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per
Share
The Company computes net income (loss) per share
in accordance with FASB ASC 260, Earnings per Share which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”)
on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders (numerator)
by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive Diluted
EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
There are no recent accounting pronouncements
that impact the Company’s operations.
Employees
We currently have total of seven employee’s,
three employee’s working for the Arma Services Inc, Eric Eastwood Nixon our President & Chief Financial Officer, Teresa Tattersfield,
Program Originator, Alberto Ramirez. We have for three employees working for Bret Consultores SAPI de CV, Forest Carbon Developer, Rene
Ibarra, Finance and Business, Valeria Lopez Porttillo, Institutional Alliance Manager, Yazmin Pimentel, Carbon Development Specialist,
and one employee working for Ecapfin SAPI de CV. Eric Gordillo, Agriculture Carbon Coordinator. We anticipate hiring necessary personnel
based on an as needed basis only on a per contract basis to be compensated directly from revenues.
Properties
Our mailing address and global operations are situated at
3845 Boulevard International Business Park Panama Pacifico, Suite,14, Rousseau, Panamá, Republic of Panama. WCG4+QX4, International
tax free zone. The company has leased office space for a period of 12 months at a cost of $750.00 USD.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management
The following table sets forth certain information
with respect to the beneficial ownership of our voting securities following the completion of the Reverse Merger described in Items 1.01
of this report by (i) any person or group owning more than 5% of any class of voting securities, (ii) each director, (iii) our chief executive
officer and (iv) all executive officers and directors as a group as of February 27, 2023.
Name | |
Number of Shares of Common Stock | | |
Percentage | |
Maria Teresa Tattersfield Yarza Address: Condor 331-6 Colonia Las Aguilas, Mexico City, Mexico | |
| 990,000 | | |
| 8% | |
Alberto Jesus Ramirez Reyes. Address: 1297, int, 33 Col, Campestre, Mexico City, Mexico | |
| 1,020,000 | | |
| 8.3% | |
Rene Alberto Ibarra Jimen Address: 20-Edif 16 B-003 Acueducto de Guadalupe, Mexico City, Mexico | |
| 990,000 | | |
| 8% | |
Eric Eastwood Nixon Address 69 Harbon Rd, Mississauga, Ontario, L5B 1AB. | |
| 0 | | |
| 0% | |
Wenflor International Inc Address:3845 Blvd , International Business Park, Panama Pacifico, Panama | |
| 6,000,000 | | |
| 49% | |
Colin Bailey Address: 18-26 Sunrise at Rowans , Rowan St George, Barbados. | |
| 1,000,000 | | |
| 8.1% | |
Ronny Fabian Suarez Araya Address: The Regent Apartments, PH 10E, Costa Del Este, Panama | |
| 3,000,000 | | |
| 24.3% | |
(All officers and directors as a group (4 people) | |
| 3,000,000 | | |
| 24.3% | |
There are no other officer or director 5 % shareholders.
Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to
this table and subject to community property laws where applicable, each of the stockholders named in this table has sole or shared voting
and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Except as set forth above, applicable percentages are
based upon 12,240,000 shares of common stock to be outstanding.
Directors and Executive Officers, Promoters
and Control Persons
On August 17, 2022, Maria Teresa Tattersfield
consented to act as a Member of the Board of Directors of the Company, Alberto Ramirez consented to act as a Member of the Board of Directors
of the Company, Eduardo Piquero consented to act as a Member of the Board of Directors of the Company. On January 27, 2023, Eric Nixon
was appointed Chairman of the Board and the President & CEO and director of ARMA Services Inc.
Name |
Age |
Position(s) |
Eric Nixon |
35 |
President CEO, CFO, Secretary, Treasurer, Director of ARMV |
Teresa Tattersfield |
46 |
Co-founder, President and Director of Bret and Director of ARMA |
Eduardo Piquero |
41 |
Director of ARMA |
Alberto
Ramirez |
38 |
Director of ARMA |
ERIC NIXON President
& CEO, Director
Eric Nixon, the President, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer, and as a Member of the Board of Directors of the Company. For over two decades, Eric has worked in the electrical
& technology sector, bringing multiple renewable energy projects to life and striving for a carbon neutral society. He has worked
alongside Conestoga College to educate the public on reducing energy consumption and researching new technologies to help reduce the
carbon footprint. He has the skills and experience to take on projects in the residential, commercial, industrial, technology sectors
and emergency response services when needed.
Teresa Tattersfield,
Director
Teresa is the Co-Founder
of Bret Consultores. She holds a degree in International Relations with a Master's Degree in Environmental Policy and Management, an Specialization
in Sustainable Development (LEAD program from the Colegio de México) and Energy Efficiency and Environment at FLACSO. She is currently
the forest carbon Manager of WRI Mexico, responsible for coordinating the execution of CO2munitario. She is a specialist in the design
and development of methodologies and protocols that have been implemented in Mexico for the sale of offsets in the international market.
During the previous
six years, she oversaw the Program of Natural Solutions at Tec de Monterrey University and was an advisor to the Neutralízate
Program of Pronatura México. She has been part of the special team of advisers in sustainable development and climate change for
the Foreign Ministry of the British Commonwealth Government. She has been responsible for the elaboration of strategies that combine
the efforts of local and federal governments in the development of international initiatives such as Methane to Markets. In her work
at the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources, she coordinated initiatives such as the restoration of the Lerma Chapala Basin.
Alberto Ramírez, Director
Alberto has collaborated as a consultant for entities
such as CONAFOR, PROBOSQUE; SEDEMA; WWF Mexico; Climate Action Reserve (CAR); PRONATURE; ClimateSeed, among others, for the development
and feasibility assessment of forestry carbon capture projects. He has experience as a verifier in compliance with forest regulations
on sustainability with an emphasis on biodiversity and social aspects. He was the first Mexican verifier accredited by CAR and has participated
in the review and proposal of GHG removal quantification protocols; such as CAR’s Forest Protocol for Mexico v.2.0. His main activities
focus on the sustainable management of natural resources through the participation of rural communities. Alberto is a Biologist, graduated
from the Faculty of Higher Studies Iztacala of the UNAM.
Alberto is currently the Forest Carbon Coordinator
at WRI Mexico. Alberto is responsible for coordinating carbon capture forestry projects; through capacity building in communities; linking
of forest communities at the national level; and for providing advice on inventories, monitoring, reporting and verification.
Eduardo Piquero, Director
CEO – MÉXICO2; Eduardo has more than
15 years of experience in international and national carbon pricing instruments and policies. He is currently the CEO of MÉXICO2,
where he oversees the development of environmental markets, including carbon markets, clean energy certificates and green bonds.
He also led the development of the simulation
exercise of a Mexican Emissions Trading System (SCE) in collaboration with the Ministry of Environment of Mexico (SEMARNAT) as a preparation
for the country’s regulated emissions scheme, with the participation of more than 90 companies. Furthermore, he participated in
the creation of a secondary market for Clean Energy Certificates (CEL), which supports the Mexican Wholesale Electricity Market (MEM).
In addition to his work in Mexico, Eduardo has focused on developing projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and has designed climate
change projects in several countries in Latin America, Asia, and Africa.
Term of Office
Our director holds his position until the next
annual meeting of shareholders and until his successor is elected and qualified by our shareholders, or until earlier death, retirement,
resignation or removal.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships between the
Company and any of our current and proposed directors or executive officers.
Legal Proceedings Involving Directors and
Executive Officers
During the past ten years no current or incoming
director, executive officer, promoter or control person of the Company has been involved in the following:
(1) A petition under the
Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law which was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was
appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two
years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two
years before the time of such filing;
(2) Such person was convicted
in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses)
;
(3) Such person was the subject
of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently
or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:
i. Acting as a futures commission
merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other
person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser,
underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings
and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;
ii. Engaging in any type
of business practice; or
iii. Engaging in any activity
in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities
laws or Federal commodities laws;
(4) Such person was the subject
of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending
or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this
section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;
(5) Such person was found
by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and
the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;
(6) Such person was found
by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities
law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed,
suspended or vacated;
(7) Such person was the subject
of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended
or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:
i. Any Federal or State securities
or commodities law or regulation; Or
ii. Any law or regulation
respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of
disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease and desist order, or removal or prohibition order;
Or
iii. Any law or regulation
prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; Or
(8) Such person was the subject
of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined
in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity
Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over
its members or persons associated with a member.
Executive Compensation
The table below sets forth the positions and compensations
for the sole officer and director of ARMV, for the years ended October 31, 2022 and 2021.
Position |
|
Name of Directors |
|
Year |
|
|
Salary before tax |
|
|
Bonus |
|
|
All other compensation |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARMV Former CEO & CFO |
|
Jamie Sanchez |
|
2022 |
|
|
68,640.00 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
and Chairman, Director |
|
Cortina |
|
2021 |
|
|
26,400.00 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Teresa Tattersfield |
|
2022 |
|
|
50,578.10 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
37,278.80 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Alberto Ramirez |
|
2022 |
|
|
60,578.10 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
37,278,.80 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Eduardo Piquero |
|
2022 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current CEO, CFO |
|
Eric Eastwood |
|
2022 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
and Director |
|
Nixon |
|
2021 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
We do not have an audit or compensation committee
comprised of independent directors as our Company qualifies for an exemption from these requirements. Indeed, we do not have any audit
or compensation committee. These functions are performed by our Board of Directors as a whole.
All directors serve 1 yr. terms.
Transactions with related persons, promoters
and certain control persons
Related Party Transactions
On December 14, 2022, Arma Services Inc. (“ARMV,”
or the “Company”) acknowledged the sale of Three Million restricted Shares by the controlling shareholder Corin Bailey to
Ronny Fabian Suarez Araya, this was a private sale between the parties.
Corporate Governance
Director Independence
None of our directors qualified as an “independent
director” under the rules of NASDAQ, Marketplace Rule 4200(a).
Nominating Committee
We do not presently have a nominating committee.
Our Board of Directors currently acts as our nominating committee.
Audit Committee
We do not presently have an audit committee. Our
Board of Directors currently acts as our nominating committee.
Legal Proceeding
None.
Market Price of and dividends on the registrant’s
common equity and related shareholder matters
Market Information
Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC
market "Pink Sheets" under the symbol ARMV. There has been no market price or market established for the shares.
As mentioned in Item 1.01, an additional 6,000,000
restricted common shares were issued to Wenflor International Inc. upon reverse acquisition activity. All additional issued common shares
of ARMV are restricted from disposal for the lesser of 2 years from issuance, or one-year from the date of filing hereof. No options or
warrants to purchase, or securities convertible into, common equity of the registrant. None of above mentioned additional issuance of
restricted common share are issued to qualified institutional buyer as defined under § 230.144A
V Stock Transfer, LLC is the transfer and registrar
agent for ARMV.
Holders
As of October 31, 2022, we had approximately 29
shareholders of our common shares, including the shares held in street name by brokerage firm. The holders of common share are entitle
to one vote for each share held for record on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. Holders of the common share have no pre-emptive
rights and no right to convert their common share into any other securities. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable
to the common share.
Dividends
We have not issued any dividends, and have no
plans of paying cash dividends in the future.
Securities authorized for issuance under
equity compensation plan
As of February 27, 2023, the Company has no securities
authorized either previously approved or disapproved for issuance under equity compensation plan.
Penny Stock Regulations
Our shares of common stock are subject to the
“penny stock” rules of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and various rules under this Act. In general terms, “penny
stock” is defined as any equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. The rules
provide that any equity security is considered to be a penny stock unless that security is registered and traded on a national securities
exchange meeting specified criteria set by the SEC, issued by a registered investment company, and excluded from the definition on the
basis of price (at least $5.00 per share), or based on the issuer’s net tangible assets or revenues. In the last case, the issuer’s
net tangible assets must exceed $3,000,000 if in continuous operation for at least three years or $5,000,000 if in operation for less
than three years, or the issuer’s average revenues for each of the past three years must exceed $6,000,000.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
On February 27, 2023, Arma Services Inc.
(“ARMV,” or the “Company”) entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Share Exchange
Agreement”) with Wenflor International Inc. and Bret International Holding Corp., owner of 100% of Bret Consultores, SAPI de
CV: Carbon Capture (“Bret”), a Mexican corporation, and Ecapfin Sapi de Cv., and Eric Eastwood Nixon
(“Appointee”), as the President, & CEO and director of ARMV. Under the Share Exchange Agreement, One Hundred Percent
(100%) of the ownership interest of Bret was exchanged for 6,000,000 shares of common stock of ARMV issued to Wenflor International
Inc. The former stockholders of Bret will acquire a majority of the issued and outstanding common stock as a result of the share
exchange transaction. The transaction has been accounted for as a recapitalization of the Company, whereby Bret is the
accounting acquirer.
Immediately after completion of such share exchange,
the Company has a total of 12,240,000 issued and outstanding shares, with authorized share capital for common share of 75,000,000.
Description of securities
The following is a summary description of our
capital stock and certain provisions under the laws of the State of Nevada where the Company was incorporated. The following discussion
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such exhibits.
General
We have authorized 75,000,000 shares of common
stock with par value $0.001 per share. As of February 27, 2023, the Company has issued and outstanding 12,240,000 shares of common stock.
Common Stock
The holders of our common stock are entitled
to one vote for each share held of record on all matters to be voted on by stockholders. There is no cumulative voting with respect to
the election of directors, with the result that the holders of more than 50% of the shares voting for the election of directors can elect
all of the directors then up for election. The holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends when, as and if declared
by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our company,
the holders of common stock are entitled to share rateably in all assets remaining which are available for distribution to them after
payment of liabilities and after provision has been made for each class of stock, if any, having preference over the common stock. Holders
of shares of our common stock, as such, have no conversion, pre-emptive or other subscription rights, and there are no redemption provisions
applicable to the common stock.
Indemnification of Directors and Officers
Section 78.138 of the NRS provides that a director
or officer will not be individually liable unless it is proven that (i) the director’s or officer’s acts or omissions constituted
a breach of his or her fiduciary duties, and (ii) such breach involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of the law.
Section 78.7502 of NRS permits a company to indemnify
its directors and officers against expenses, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred in connection
with a threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding if the officer or director (i) is not liable pursuant to NRS 78.138
or (ii) acted in good faith and in a manner the officer or director reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests
of the corporation and, if a criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the conduct of the officer or director
was unlawful.
Section 78.751 of NRS permits a Nevada company
to indemnify its officers and directors against expenses incurred by them in defending a civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding
as they are incurred and in advance of final disposition thereof, upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the officer or director
to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that such officer or director is not entitled
to be indemnified by the company. Section 78.751 of NRS further permits the company to grant its directors and officers additional rights
of indemnification under its articles of incorporation or bylaws or otherwise.
Section 78.752 of NRS provides that a Nevada company
may purchase and maintain insurance or make other financial arrangements on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee
or agent of the company, or is or was serving at the request of the company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another company,
partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, for any liability asserted against him and liability and expenses incurred by him
in his capacity as a director, officer, employee or agent, or arising out of his status as such, whether or not the company has the authority
to indemnify him against such liability and expenses. Our Bylaws provide that we may indemnify and advance litigation expenses to our
directors, officers, employees and agents to the extent permitted by law, our Articles of Incorporation or our Bylaws, and shall indemnify
and advance litigation expenses to our directors, officers, employees and agents to the extent required by law, our Articles of Incorporation
or Bylaws. Our obligations of indemnification, if any, shall be conditioned on receiving prompt notice of the claim and the opportunity
to settle and defend the claim. We may, to the extent permitted by law, purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of an individual who
is or was our director, officer, employee or agent.
Indemnification against Public Policy
Insofar as indemnification by us for liabilities
arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers or persons controlling the company pursuant to provisions
of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable. In the event that a claim
for indemnification by such director, officer or controlling person of us in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding
is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being offered, we will, unless in the opinion
of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether
such indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication
of such issue.
The effect of indemnification may be to limit
the rights of the Company and the shareholders (through shareholders’ derivative suits on behalf of the Company) to recover monetary
damages and expenses against a director for breach of fiduciary duty.