VANCOUVER, BC, Feb. 24,
2025 /CNW/ - FPX Nickel Corp. (TSXV: FPX)
(OTCQB: FPOCF) ("FPX" or the "Company") is pleased to
announce results from an Awaruite Refinery Scoping Study (the
"Study") which demonstrates a compelling business case for
the development of a standalone refinery (the "Refinery") to
refine awaruite concentrate into battery-grade nickel sulphate for
the electric vehicle ("EV") industry, along with producing
valuable cobalt, copper, and ammonium sulphate by-products.
The Study has been prepared by Wood Canada Limited and all
amounts are in US Dollars unless otherwise indicated. The
Study relates to a standalone industrial project and anticipates
the production of awaruite ore from projects that are not limited
to mineral projects of the Company; without limiting the foregoing,
the Study is separate and standalone from the Baptiste Nickel
Project, which demonstrated the technical and commercial advantage
of mining and concentrating awaruite ore to a high-grade awaruite
concentrate.
Highlights
- Strong Economics: After-tax NPV8% of
$445 million and IRR of 20% at
$8.50 /lb Ni
- Large-Scale, Long Life:
40-year operating life producing 32,000 tpa of nickel contained in
battery-grade nickel sulphate
- Valuable Products: Production of battery-grade nickel
sulphate for the EV industry, and by-products including cobalt,
copper, and ammonium sulphate, a valuable fertilizer product for
the agricultural sector
- Low Cost: Total estimated operating costs of
$1,598/t Ni, or $133/t Ni ($0.06
/lb Ni) on a by-product basis for refining awaruite concentrate to
battery-grade nickel sulphate, resulting in total all-in production
costs of $8,290/t Ni ($3.76/lb Ni) for nickel sulphate generated from
awaruite mineralization (inclusive of mining, processing, refining,
on a by-product basis), with both figures ranking in the lowest
decile of the respective global nickel sulphate cost curves
- Low Carbon: A carbon
intensity of 0.2 tCO2/t Ni for refining operations, resulting in a
total all-in carbon intensity of 1.4 t CO2/t Ni for nickel sulphate
generated from awaruite mineralization, which is magnitudes lower
than current nickel sulphate production routes
"This Study confirms the disruptive potential of awaruite
concentrate as an ideal feedstock for the production of
battery-grade nickel sulphate for the automotive sector," commented
Martin Turenne, FPX Nickel's Chief
Executive Officer and President. "The Study reinforces the
opportunity for the development of an integrated,
made-in-Canada solution from
mine-to-battery, utilizing awaruite concentrate as a lynchpin
source of nickel, with conventional refining steps underpinning
low-cost, low-carbon nickel production for use in domestic and
allied country EV battery supply chains."
Background
FPX commenced development of the Study in October 2024 to further demonstrate the economic
and strategic opportunity to refine awaruite concentrates to
battery-grade nickel sulphate and other valuable by-products. This
Study incorporates the flowsheet advancements outlined in the
Company's previously reported pilot-scale hydrometallurgical
testwork results (see FPX news release dated October 15, 2024).
Scoping Study Overview
The mine-to-battery pathway for awaruite mineralization is
presented in Figure 3. At a mine site, awaruite mineralization
could be subjected to a simple mineral processing flowsheet to
produce a high-grade awaruite concentrate, which could then be
marketed either to the stainless steel or EV battery supply chains.
This Study envisions purchasing of such awaruite concentrate and
refining to battery-grade nickel sulphate, which would then be
marketed to precursor cathode active material ("PCAM") and
cathode active material ("CAM") producers to further process
the nickel sulphate into CAM, a direct input in EV battery cell
fabrication.
This Study outlines a mid-stream Refinery located in an
industrial location in central British
Columbia which will be fed with awaruite concentrate
and produce battery-grade nickel sulphate. The Study considers a
Refinery capable of producing 32,000 tonnes per year of contained
nickel in battery-grade nickel sulphate.
In addition to nickel sulphate, the Refinery will produce three
by-products, approximately as follows:
- 570 tonnes per year of contained cobalt in cobalt
carbonate;
- 240 tonnes per year of contained copper in copper cement;
and
- 87,400 tonnes per year of ammonium sulphate, a valuable
fertilizer product.
The Refinery would process commercially available awaruite
concentrate. Published metallurgical testwork on awaruite
(Ni3Fe) nickel ores has shown that a relatively simple
mineral processing flowsheet utilizing magnetic separation followed
by conventional froth flotation can produce a highly desirable
awaruite concentrate that presents flexibility for downstream
consumption. Considering other awaruite nickel projects in
development by FPX and others, a refinery operation lifespan of 40
years is considered.
Study economics are presented in Table 1, demonstrating the
Refinery has robust economics while producing meaningful quantities
of battery-grade nickel sulphate for the EV supply chain.
Table 1 – Awaruite Refinery Scoping Study Economics
Criteria
|
Units
|
Value
|
Initial Capital
Cost
|
$, millions
|
$424
|
Operating
Cost
|
$/t Ni
produced
|
$1,598
|
Operating Cost, net of
by-products
|
$/t Ni
produced
|
$133
|
After- Tax
|
NPV8%
|
$, millions
|
$445
|
IRR
|
%
|
20
|
Payback
Period
|
Years
|
4.0
|
The Refinery's operating costs excluding byproduct credits
($1,598 /t nickel contained) would
fall within the lowest decile of global production as per
Benchmark Mineral Intelligence's ("Benchmark") nickel
sulphate cost model, as presented in Figure 1. When byproduct
credits are included, the Refinery would have a lower production
cost that any current global producer.
The Refinery will be supplied with low-carbon power from the BC
Hydro grid, resulting in a carbon intensity of 0.2 t
CO2/tNi. As presented in Figure 2, this is
magnitudes lower than current nickel sulphate production
routes.
According to Benchmark's database, the 2024 annualized nickel
sulphate production market size was approximately 657,000 tonnes
per year of contained nickel as of the fourth quarter of 2024, with
production heavily dominated by China at 76%, as presented in Figure 4.
Additionally, less than 1% of current nickel sulphate production is
North American (3,300 tonnes per year of contained nickel).
As such, the 32,000 tonnes per year of high-quality nickel sulphate
produced by the Refinery in Canada
would represent an approximate tenfold increase in current North
American nickel sulphate production.
Metallurgy & Process Design
The metallurgical testwork program involved multiple bench- and
a pilot-scale campaigns (see FPX news release dated October 15, 2024). The latest testwork campaign
involved continuous pilot-scale testing of leaching unit operations
and confirmed the leaching flowsheet. Nickel leach extractions
greater than 99% and production of low-impurity leach solution,
suitable for downstream purification and crystallization, were
simultaneously achieved during piloting. In addition, bench-scale
testing of solution purification and crystallization unit
operations demonstrated the ability to produce battery-grade nickel
sulphate crystals using the new ammonia-based flowsheet.
Incorporating testwork results, the refining strategy takes
advantage of awaruite's characteristics in a simple flowsheet
utilizing well proven unit operations, as presented in Figure
5.
Refinery Process Description
In the leaching area, awaruite concentrate is first subjected to
an atmospheric leach, which serves the dual purpose of 1)
commencing awaruite dissolution, and 2) using awaruite as a reagent
to neutralize free acid and precipitate remaining iron, aluminum,
and chromium from the pressure leach solution. Any unleached
awaruite is then further leached in a mild pressure oxidation
circuit, where full awaruite dissolution is achieved in tandem with
initial iron precipitation. Pressure leach solution then reports to
the atmospheric leach circuit and pressure leach residue is
dewatered for disposal. A slipstream of pressure leach solution is
processed in a copper removal circuit, where a copper cement
grading approximately 70 to 80% copper is produced.
The final leach solution, grading 100 g/l nickel, is first
processed in a solvent extraction ("SX") circuit to extract
cobalt. Extracted cobalt is then precipitated from the
cobalt-rich solution as a carbonate product grading approximately
50% cobalt. While a cobalt carbonate product was selected for the
Study, FPX testwork has also demonstrated the ability to produce
cobalt-rich mixed hydroxide precipitate ("MHP").
Nickel is then extracted away from the cobalt depleted leach
solution to produce a purified and concentrated stream of nickel
sulphate which is then crystallized into battery-grade nickel
sulphate crystals suitable for use in the EV supply chain.
The nickel depleted leach solution is then treated to
sequentially removal trace levels of nickel and magnesium. This
purified stream is then crystallized into ammonium sulphate
crystals, a widely used industrial fertilizer. Miscellaneous minor
process streams are also processed in the ammonium sulphate
crystallizer which enables the refinery to operate as a zero liquid
discharge facility.
Capital Cost Estimate
Initial capital costs have been estimated in alignment with AACE
(Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering) Class 5
standards, while sustaining and closure capital costs have been
estimated on an order-of-magnitude ("OOM") basis. The total
initial capital cost for the Project is estimated to be
$424 million, with no expansion
considered. Total sustaining capital cost is estimated to be
$40 million and total closure capital
cost is estimated to be $42
million. No salvage value is considered due to the
40-year operation life.
Table 2 – Total Estimated Capital Costs
Capital Cost
Type
|
Category
|
Total
($,
millions)
|
Notes
|
Initial
Capital
Costs
|
Refinery
Process
|
$152
|
|
Reagents
|
$45
|
|
Utilities, Services,
& Infrastructure
|
$40
|
|
Total Direct
Costs
|
$237
|
|
Indirect
Costs
|
$81
|
34% of Direct
Costs
|
Contingency
|
$89
|
28% of Direct and
Indirect Costs
|
Owners Costs
|
$18
|
|
Total Initial
Capital
|
$424
|
|
Total Sustaining
Capital Costs
|
$40
|
Expended years
1-40
|
Total Closure Capital
Costs
|
$42
|
Expended years
41-42
|
Total Capital
Costs
|
$506
|
|
Operating Cost Estimate
Total operating costs are estimated to average $1,598 per tonne of nickel produced before
by-product credits, with a breakdown of these costs by cost centre
presented in Table 3. The net operating cost inclusive of
by-product credits for cobalt, copper, and ammonium sulphate is
$133/t Ni ($0.06 /lb Ni).
Table 3 –Estimated Operating Costs (excludes by-product
credits)
Category
|
Units
|
Value
|
Reagents
|
$/t Ni
produced
|
$757
|
Consumables
|
$/t Ni
produced
|
$264
|
Labour
|
$/t Ni
produced
|
$258
|
Maintenance
|
$/t Ni
produced
|
$136
|
Power
|
$/t Ni
produced
|
$69
|
General &
Administrative
|
$/t Ni
produced
|
$114
|
Total
|
$/t Ni
produced
|
$1,598
|
Economic Analysis
At an assumed nickel price of $8.50/lb ($18,738/t) and a USD:CAD exchange rate of 0.74,
the Refinery generates an after-tax NPV8% of
$445 million, an after-tax IRR of
20%, and an after-tax payback of 4.0 years. Table 4 provides
further details on study economics.
Benchmark maintains a comprehensive database of nickel
production statistics and forecasts long-term pricing premiums
relative to the LME nickel price for battery-grade nickel
sulphate. While the nickel sulphate market is currently small
with inherent pricing volatility, even the most conservative of EV
adoption rates will see a significant increase in nickel sulphate
requirements. As the nickel sulphate market grows in coming years
and preferred feedstocks are established, it is expected that a
more consistent premium basis will be established based on typical
upgrading costs. Benchmark's forecast nickel sulphate premium basis
for the year 2030 is $1,575/t nickel
($0.71/lb nickel), which has been
applied in the economic analysis. This premium is based on
Benchmark's "base case" forecast of EV adoption and battery
chemistry trends.
The Study models taxes in accordance with provincial and federal
legislation. The Study reflects the impact of the federal
government's refundable critical minerals investment tax credit,
announced in the 2023 Federal Budget, which is proposed to be equal
to 30% of the capital cost of eligible property for the extraction
and processing of certain critical minerals, including
nickel. The Study estimates total LOM taxes paid of
C$1,000 million including
C$520 million to the Province of
British Columbia and C$480 million to the Government of Canada.
Table 4 – Study Economics
Economic
Basis/Result
|
Units
|
Value
|
Payability, Awaruite
Concentrate
|
% of LME Ni
|
92
|
Price
|
Nickel
|
$/lb
|
8.50
|
Cobalt
|
$/lb
|
15.00
|
Copper
|
$/lb
|
4.00
|
Ammonium
Sulphate
|
$/t
|
330
|
Payability
|
Cobalt
|
%
|
85
|
Copper
|
%
|
95
|
After-Tax
|
NPV8%
|
$, millions
|
$445
|
IRR
|
%
|
20
|
Payback
|
years
|
4.0
|
Environmental Assessment and Permitting
The Refinery has been assumed in the Study to be located in
central B.C., with the selected location ultimately subject to
community consultation, environmental characterization and baseline
studies. The BC Environmental Assessment Act Reviewable Projects
Regulation specifies that a new non-ferrous metal refinery
would require assessment under the established provincial EA
process.
Study Report
FPX intends to file the Study Report on the FPX website before
the end of the first quarter of 2025. As this Study presents a
separate midstream industrial project which does not impact in any
way the Baptiste Nickel Project, or any of FPX's other projects,
there is no mineral resource attributed to the Study. For
readers to fully understand the information in this news release,
they should read the Study Report in its entirety, including all
qualifications, assumptions, exclusions, and risks that relate to
the Study. The Study Report is intended to be read as a
whole, and sections should not be read or relied upon out of
context.
Study Lead
The Study has been prepared by Wood Canada Limited, who has
reviewed and approved the technical and cost estimating content of
this news release.
Qualified Person
Andrew Osterloh, P.Eng., FPX's
Senior Vice President, Projects and Operations, has reviewed and
approved the content of this news release.
About FPX Nickel Corp.
FPX Nickel Corp. is focused on the exploration and
development of the Baptiste Nickel Project, located in central
British Columbia, and other
occurrences of the same unique style of naturally occurring
nickel-iron mineralization known as awaruite. For more
information, please view the Company's website at
https://fpxnickel.com/
On behalf of FPX Nickel Corp.
"Martin Turenne"
Martin Turenne, President, CEO and
Director
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain of the statements made and information contained
herein is considered "forward-looking information" within the
meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws, including those
which relate to the proposed development of the Refinery, the
intended processing of commercially available awaruite concentrate
at the Refinery and the ability to obtain same; the projected
economics of the Refinery, including capital cost; operating costs;
NPV; IRR; carbon intensity; processing life; growth of the EV
market; marketability of the concentrate; growth of demand for
nickel sulphate and pricing therefor; and all other statements,
other than statements of historical facts. These statements address
future events and conditions and actual results could differ from
those currently projected. The Company does not assume the
obligation to update any forward-looking statement.
Generally, forward-looking statements can be identified by
the use of terminology such as "plans", "expects', "estimates",
"intends", "anticipates", "believes" or variations of such words,
or statements that certain actions, events or results "may",
"could", "would", "might", "occur" or "be achieved".
Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other
factors that could cause actual results, performance and
opportunities to differ materially from those implied by such
forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results
to differ materially from these forward-looking statements are set
forth in the public reports and filings for FPX, filed on SEDAR+ at
www.sedarplus.com. Although FPX believes that the information and
assumptions used in preparing the forward-looking statements are
reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on these
statements, which only apply as of the date of this news release,
and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the
disclosed times frames or at all. Except where required by
applicable law, FPX disclaims any intention or obligation to update
or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of
this release.
SOURCE FPX Nickel Corp.