Use of Peer Group and Comparative Data
As part of our compensation process, our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee, with input from Compensia, established a peer group that it used in evaluating compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and other named executive officers. The peer group included similar publicly traded medical technology companies operating in a comparable market for executive talent and meeting specified financial criteria. Companies included had revenues and market capitalization of a magnitude that our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee felt were appropriate for comparison. The peer group approved in 2015 consists of the following companies:
|
|
|
|
Accuray Incorporated
|
|
Cardica, Inc.
|
|
|
Cogentix Medical, Inc.
|
|
Corindus Vascular Robotics, Inc.
|
|
|
CryoLife, Inc.
|
|
Cutera, Inc.
|
|
|
GenMark Diagnostics, Inc.
|
|
Harvard Bioscience, Inc.
|
|
|
Iridex Corporation
|
|
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.
|
|
|
Misonix, Inc.
|
|
Staar Surgical Company
|
|
|
Stereotaxis, Inc.
|
|
SurModics, Inc.
|
|
|
Symmetry Surgical Inc.
|
|
Transenterix, Inc.
|
|
|
TriVascular Technologies Inc.
|
|
|
Our Compensation Committee also reviewed compensation data from the 2015 Radford Global Technology Survey (the Radford Survey) in evaluating compensation for select positions where market data was not available through the public filings of our peers.
At our 2011 Annual Meeting, our stockholders indicated their preference that we solicit a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” vote, every three years. Subsequently, our Board of Directors adopted a policy that is consistent with that preference. In accordance with that policy, this year, we are again asking our stockholders to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with SEC rules. We will hold our next “say on pay” vote in 2017.
Stockholder Non-Binding Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
More than 98% of the shares voted at our April 2014 annual meeting of stockholders were in favor of the compensation of our named executive officers. In light of strong stockholder support, our Compensation Committee has made no changes to the structure of our named executive officers’ 2015 compensation programs in response to the April 2014 stockholder vote. In addition, as we evaluated our compensation practices throughout fiscal year 2015, we were mindful of the strong support our shareholders expressed for our compensation practices and policies.
Compensation Elements
Base Salary
. The base salaries paid to our named executive officers are designed to attract and retain a high quality, stable management team by providing a base level of compensation that generally is not subject to performance risk. Our named executive officers’ base salaries reflect the scope of their responsibilities, taking into account competitive market compensation paid by other medical device companies for similar positions, and are adjusted as necessary to recruit or retain specific individuals for certain positions. We generally review the base salaries of our named executive officers in December of each fiscal year in connection with a review of their performance, with any increase effective as of January 1 of the following year.
Base salaries for Messrs. Vance, Lowe, Cathcart, Guido, Sheahan and Sutton were determined at the time of their hire for their current roles. Their initial base salaries were the product of negotiation at the time they were hired, and ultimately determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee competitive market data and the relative base salaries of our other executive officers.
Base salaries for our named executive officers for our fiscal years 2014 and 2015 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
2014 Base Salary
|
|
|
2015 Base Salary Effective
1/1/2015
|
|
Percentage Increase
|
|
Mr. Vance
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Mr. Lowe
|
|
$
|
435,000
|
|
|
$
|
435,000
|
*
|
|
N/A
|
|
Mr. Cathcart
|
|
$
|
254,616
|
|
|
$
|
254,616
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Mr. Guido
|
|
$
|
248,745
|
|
|
$
|
273,620
|
**
|
|
10%
|
|
Mr. Sutton
|
|
$
|
358,000
|
|
|
$
|
368,740
|
***
|
|
3%
|
|
Mr. Sheahan
|
|
$
|
285,000
|
|
|
$
|
285,000
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Mr. Lowe
. On June 10, 2014, our Board of Directors appointed Mr. Lowe as our interim Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Lowe received a monthly salary of $36,250. For the months of January through September, 2015, Mr. Lowe served part-time as our Interim Chief Financial Officer and received a monthly salary of $14,500.
|
|
|
|
**
|
Mr. Guido
. In December 2014, Mr. Guido was promoted to Senior Vice President, Marketing and Business Development. The Compensation Committee approved a 3% annual merit increase and a 7% promotion increase, effective January 1, 2015. Mr. Guido resigned his employment with the Company on February 18, 2016.
|
|
|
|
***
*
|
Mr. Sutton.
In January 2015, Mr. Sutton received a 3% annual merit increase. Mr. Sutton resigned his employment with the Company on November 6, 2015.
|
Annual Incentive Compensation.
Our annual incentive compensation program is designed to reward our management team for achieving, or achieving progress toward, discrete goals with a time horizon of one year or less. For sales employees (including Mr. Cathcart), our commission plan (as further described below) provides cash-based incentives that reward employees in direct proportion to the volume and value of goods, products and services sold.
2015 Bonus Program
Mr. Lowe, as part of his employment agreement to serve as Interim Chief Financial Officer, agreed to forego a bonus opportunity for 2015.
In lieu of a cash bonus program, our Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers received PSUs, as indicated below. The size of the award was intended to approximate the target cash bonus opportunity each officer might have otherwise been eligible to receive, using an assumed stock price of $9.20 per share, the fair market value of our stock on April 23, 2015.
One hundred percent of the PSUs granted to Mr. Vance were subject to vesting based on the achievement of two company-wide performance goals for 2015, which our Board of Directors approved in December 2014 and which are described below. Fifty percent of the PSUs granted to our other named executive officers were subject to the achievement of the same company-wide performance goals, while the remaining fifty percent were subject to the achievement of departmental goals, which our Board of Directors approved in December 2014 and which are described below.
The table below shows each named executive officer’s target bonus as a percentage of base salary (which remained at the same levels as with respect to fiscal year 2014), the number of PSUs granted to that officer and the number of PSUs that ultimately vested (as further described under “Goal Achievement” below).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
Target Bonus
Opportunity as
a Percentage
of Base Salary
|
|
Number of
PSUs Granted
|
|
Number of
PSUs Vested
|
Mr. Vance
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
44,022
|
|
|
0
|
|
Mr. Lowe
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Mr. Cathcart
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
3,805
|
|
|
616
|
|
Mr. Guido
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
14,313
|
|
|
4,293
|
|
Mr. Sutton
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
22,044
|
|
|
0
|
|
Mr. Sheahan
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
14,907
|
|
|
7,454
|
|
Corporate Goals
The company-wide performance goals included two objectives related to revenue and gross margin. These goals applied to all of our named executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Goals
|
|
Weighting
|
|
1. Total Revenue - $27.1M at target
|
|
60
|
%
|
2. Gross Margin reported at 10-K filing- 30% at target
|
|
40
|
%
|
Goal Achievement
Our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee determined that the company did not achieve the company-wide performance goals, resulting in each of our named executive officers earning none of the portion of the PSUs related to the achievement of company-wide goals. In light of Mr. Vance’s role in 2015 while the Company considered strategic alternatives, and the fact Mr. Vance received no bonus under the Company’s 2015 Bonus Plan based on the scoring of the 2015 Bonus Plan, the Board of Directors approved a cash bonus of $75,000 for Mr. Vance on February 9, 2016.
In February 2016, our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee scored the departmental goals for Messrs. Cathcart, Guido and Sheahan. Mr. Cathcart received a payout commensurate with the scoring of his departmental goals of 32.2%, Mr. Guido received a payout commensurate with the scoring of his departmental goals of 60%, and Mr. Sheahan received a payout commensurate with the scoring of his departmental goals of 100%. Mr. Sutton separated from the company in November 2015 and thus was not eligible to receive a payout with respect to his departmental goals.
Departmental Goals
Fifty percent of the bonuses for each of Messrs. Cathcart, Guido, Sutton and Sheahan were subject to vesting based on achievement of departmental milestones related to their functional areas of responsibility. These departmental goals, described below, are intended to set objective milestones which the Company strives to achieve in the given year and were intended to be challenging but achievable with strong management performance.
U.S. Commercial Operations and EMEA (Mr. Cathcart)
. Mr. Cathcart’s commercial operations departmental goals related to worldwide sales objectives, utilization objectives, and completion of training programs. Our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee determined that the goal achievement for the department was 32.5% for 2015.
Marketing and Business Development (Mr. Guido)
. Mr. Guido’s departmental goals related to a specified number of annual sales, product launch planning and implementation of the Magellan 10Fr catheter, completion of a specified number of data publications on the Magellan System, increasing utilization per installed system and increasing awareness for Magellan through hospital-supported marketing campaigns. Our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee determined that the goal achievement for the department was 60% for 2015.
Research and Development, Engineering, Manufacturing and Field Service (Mr. Sutton)
. Mr. Sutton’s research and development and engineering departmental goals related to the commercial release of active drive robotics by year end, development of micro-catheter capability by year end, achieving 6 FR high pressure FDA submissions by June 1, 2015 and developing electromagnetic sensing study by year end. His engineering goals included achieving cost improvement targets for certain products, ensuring timely response to all CAPAs, complaints and investigations. Mr. Sutton’s manufacturing goals included reducing manufacturing inventory by six percent, reducing manufacturing related variances by forty percent,
supplying to forecast, and achieving cost improvement targets for both catheter and system builds. His field service goals included ensuring system up-time of 99%, achieving warranty system renewal revenue targets, and reducing service inventory levels by ten percent. Our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee determined that the goal achievement for each of Mr. Sutton’s departments was 95%, 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively, for 2015. As noted above, in light of Mr. Sutton’s 2015 separation from the company, he forfeited his 2015 PSU grant.
Regulatory, Clinical, Training & Quality Affairs (Mr. Sheahan)
. Mr. Sheahan’s regulatory goals included setting and submitting the pre-market authorization shell and negotiating the various modules of the premarket approval with FDA on or before December 31, 2015, receiving 10Fr FDA and DEKRA approval and initiating the Japanese regulatory process and initial submission for Magellan. His clinical goals included enrollment and expansion of the Rover Registry, completing enrollment of all patients in the initial cohort and additional patients as needed per protocol for the company’s IDE, and completion of certain conference presentations and manuscripts. Mr. Sheahan’s clinical engineering goals included providing support to the research and development team on the 10 Fr project, eKit and other research and development initiatives, supporting commercialization activities and updating procedural workflows. His quality goals included successfully passing the DEKRA recertification audit, revising and implementing improved usability compliance system and reducing complaint closure and CAPAs to 100 days at a maximum. Our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee determined that the goal achievement for Mr. Sheahan’s departments was 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, for 2015.
Commissions
During 2015, our sales employees, including Mr. Cathcart, were eligible to earn cash commissions. Mr. Cathcart’s 2015 commission opportunity was based on sales of our products both within and outside of the U.S. His commission opportunity with respect to robotic systems was 1.0% of orders up to a specified 2015 base revenue target and 2.0% of orders above such target. In addition, Mr. Cathcart was eligible to receive a 0.5% commission on CoHesion™ upgrades. Base revenue is defined as all systems, sales and new service contracts (including CoHesion upgrades), which are booked and shipped in the month.
Mr. Cathcart was also eligible for quarterly bonuses based on the global number of clinical procedures performed using our catheters in our robotic system and global catheter sales targets. No quarterly bonus was earned unless at least 90% of the applicable target was met. With respect to both the procedure and catheter sale bonuses, the quarterly bonus amount was $1,875 if 90-94% of the applicable target was achieved, $2,344 at 95-99% of target, $3,125 at 100-109% of target and $3,594 at 110% or more of target.
The commission opportunities for Mr. Cathcart are included in the 2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. The actual commissions earned by Mr. Cathcart pursuant to these arrangements are included in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.
Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Awards
Our long-term equity compensation has historically consisted of a mix of stock options, restricted stock units (or RSUs) and performance stock units (or PSUs). The Committee views stock options as an important component of executive compensation as they give our executive officers a continuing stake in our long-term success by allowing them to participate in the appreciation of our common stock while accepting personal accountability for our financial results. Because the exercise price of our stock options is equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, the option grant will provide a return only if our common stock appreciates over the option term. Additionally, stock options provide a means of enhancing the retention of those executives, inasmuch as they are subject to vesting over an extended period of time.
The Committee has also awarded RSUs and PSUs as an additional element of compensation. RSUs represent the right to receive a specified number of shares of our common stock at no cost to the employee provided the employee remains employed by us when the RSUs vest. As a result, RSUs retain some value even if our stock price declines or does not appreciate significantly and help reduce dilution as typically the number of shares subject to an RSU award is smaller than the number of shares subject to an option.
In 2014, we hired Compensia to evaluate our long-term equity-based incentive awards. This review was intended to ensure ongoing alignment of the company’s compensation program with the company’s strategic objectives and maintain a strong link between executive compensation and company performance. Following this review, the Committee approved executive equity grants in 2014 that consisted of a mix of stock options, RSUs and PSUs and in 2015 that consisted of RSUs and PSUs.
When establishing the size of the annual equity award grants to our named executive officers, our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee consider the size of awards held by our other officers, the individual’s performance, potential for future retention, responsibility and promotion, competitive compensation data from the Radford Survey and the peer group,
level of contribution, industry experience, and other factors they deem relevant. The relative weight given to these factors varies among individuals at the discretion of the Board of Directors and Compensation Committee.
In March 2015, Mr. Vance received inducement grants in the form of two long-term equity incentive RSUs granted outside the company’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan in accordance with the terms of Mr. Vance’s offer letter. One RSU was for 23,849 shares with 25% of the shares vesting on June 1, 2015 and an additional 2.06% of the shares vesting on each of the company’s quarterly vesting dates on March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 thereafter. Mr. Vance’s other RSU grant was for 23,849 shares. The RSU award vests based on performance goals tied to a minimum 2015 revenue target of $38 million dollars as determined by an approval date that is thirty day after the company files its 10-K for fiscal year 2015 (the “Approval Date”). On April 28, 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that the minimum revenue target was not met for 2015 and all of the RSU Awards were forfeited. In addition, Messrs. Cathcart and Sheahan received similar RSUs in February 2014 and October 2014, respectively. None of the RSU shares pursuant to their respective grants vested based on the Compensation Committee’s determination on April 28, 2016.
In addition, in April of 2015, Mr. Vance was granted an option for 30,000 shares as part of our long-term equity-based incentive awards. Twenty-five percent of the shares subject to such option vest on the first anniversary of the effective date of grant and 1/48
th
thereafter on a monthly basis over the next three years of service.
2015 Retention Equity Awards
Messrs. Vance, Guido, Cathcart, Sutton and Sheahan received retention RSUs in the first quarter of 2015. One hundred percent of the RSUs shall vest, if at all, on February 3, 2019 so long as the named executive officers have not ended their continuous service with the company. If a named executive officer is terminated without cause or good reason, as those terms are defined in the named executive officer’s award agreement, after February 3, 2017 but before February 3, 2018, 50% of each respective award shall vest. If a named executive officer is terminated without cause or good reason, as those terms are defined in the named executive officer’s award agreement, after February 3, 2018 but before February 3, 2019, 75% of each respective award shall vest.
On June 12, 2015, Mr. Lowe received a retention option for 7,500 shares for his continued role as the company’s Interim CFO. The shares vest monthly over twelve months.
Severance Benefits
Our named executive officers are eligible for severance payments and vesting acceleration benefits pursuant to written retention agreements. We believe that severance protection is necessary to attract officers to us and important for the retention of these officers. In particular, these arrangements are intended to mitigate some of the risks that exist for executives working at a smaller public company and therefore help attract and retain qualified executives who could have job alternatives at companies that appear less risky to them.
In March 2013, our Compensation Committee adopted a new form of retention agreement, effective for use with executive officers hired on or after January 1, 2013 (including Messrs. Cathcart and Sheahan but excluding our Chief Executive Officer). Pursuant to the revised form of retention agreement, severance benefits are reduced for executive officers who have not completed at least 12 months of continuous service with us, unless the termination of employment occurs within 12 months after a change in control of our company.
In May 2014, our Compensation Committee approved an amendment to the retention agreement with Mr. Cathcart. If Mr. Cathcart’s employment is terminated without cause or if he resigns for good reason, he will be eligible to receive salary continuation payments for 12 months, the payment by us of COBRA premiums for himself and his eligible dependents for up to 12 months and, under certain circumstances, a prorated target bonus payable ratably during the severance period.
Pursuant to his May 2014 offer letter, we entered into a retention agreement with Mr. Vance. Pursuant to the retention agreement, in the event that Mr. Vance’s employment is terminated without cause or he resigns for good reason, he will be eligible for the following severance benefits: (1) a lump sum severance payment equal to twelve months’ worth of his then-current base salary, (2) to the extent not already paid, he will remain eligible to receive a bonus payment for the prior fiscal year (if applicable), (3) payment of his and his dependents’ COBRA premiums for up to twelve months and (4) if the termination occurs within three months prior to or within 12 months after a change in control, full acceleration of any unvested equity awards subject to time-based vesting then held by him. All of the foregoing severance benefits would be contingent on Mr. Vance’s execution of a release of claims and his resignation as a member of our Board of Directors.
On November 14, 2015, we entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Sutton in connection with the end of his employment with us on November 6, 2015. Pursuant to the separation agreement, Mr. Sutton received a lump sum payment of $92,185, which is equal to three months of his most recent base salary.
On March 9, 2016, we entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Guido in connection with the end of his employment with us on February 19, 2016. Pursuant to the separation agreement, Mr. Guido received a lump sum payment of $68,405, which is equal to three months of his most recent base salary.
In April 2016, our Compensation Committee approved the entry into a retention agreement with Mr. Lowe. Pursuant to the retention agreement, in the event that Mr. Lowe’s employment is terminated without cause or he resigns for good reason, he will be eligible for the following severance benefits: (1) to the extent not already paid, he will remain eligible to receive a bonus payment for the prior fiscal year (if applicable), and (2) if the termination occurs within three months prior to or within 12 months after a change in control, full acceleration of any unvested equity awards subject to time-based vesting then held by him. All of the foregoing severance benefits would be contingent on Mr. Lowe’s execution of a release of claims and his resignation as a member of our Board.
A summary of the material terms of the severance arrangements with our named executive officers, together with a quantification of the payments and benefits under these arrangements, may be found in the section of this Amended Report entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
In addition, pursuant to our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, all of our employees’ equity awards will fully vest if they are not continued or replaced by an acquirer in connection with a change in control. We believe this protection is appropriate to keep our executives and employees focused on our business rather than on the potential risks they may perceive if we are acquired. At the same time, this provision allows an acquirer to maintain the incentive and retention value inherent in our equity awards by continuing them after a change in control.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
Pursuant to his May 2014 offer letter, Mr. Vance is provided a housing and relocation allowance of $15,000 per month during the first twelve months of Mr. Vance’s employment in order to assist him in relocating to the San Francisco Bay Area and we paid $750 in outside legal fees incurred by Mr. Vance in negotiating his employment offer. Additionally, we paid Mr. Vance $100,000 for the actual loss Mr. Vance incurred on the sale of his primary residence in 2015.
In February 2014, we entered into an employment letter agreement with Mr. Lowe, to serve as our Interim Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Lowe was reimbursed for his reasonable travel expenses as well as for temporary living expenses. In June 2014, we appointed Mr. Lowe as our interim Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Lowe will continue to be reimbursed for his reasonable business travel expenses.
Pursuant to his October 2014 offer letter, Mr. Sheahan is reimbursed for his reasonable travel expenses up to $4,000 per calendar month for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with housing and travel to and from our Mountain View facility and for any amounts in excess of $4,000 which are authorized by the company in writing in advance of incurring such expenses.
Because Mr. Cathcart’s position as Senior Vice President of Global Sales involves significant travel, we offer him a monthly car allowance of $600.
Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines
Our Board of Directors believes that our executive officers should have a significant financial stake in our company to help align their interests with those of our stockholders and to promote sound corporate governance. In December 2013, our Board of Directors (upon recommendation of our Compensation Committee) adopted stock ownership guidelines providing that each executive officer should own shares or certain share equivalents with a value equal to at least (i) the officer’s base salary, in the case of our chief executive officer and (ii) one-half of the officer’s base salary, in the case of all other executive officers. Executive officers have five years from the later of (i) December 11, 2013, or (ii) the date such individual commenced service as an executive officer to achieve this ownership level. Thereafter, compliance will be measured annually. At its discretion, our Board of Directors may waive this requirement if an executive officer would otherwise incur a hardship.
Tax and Accounting Effects
We consider the impact of federal tax laws in developing and implementing our compensation programs, including Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. However, to maintain flexibility in compensating officers in a manner designed
to promote varying corporate and governance goals, our Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy requiring all compensation to be deductible. In particular, the deductibility of certain equity awards granted to our named executive officers may be limited. Our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee have and may continue to approve compensation or changes to plans, programs or awards that may cause the compensation or awards to exceed the limitation under Section 162(m) if it determines that such action is appropriate. In addition, although we have not typically tailored our executive compensation program to achieve particular accounting results, our Compensation Committee considers the impact of the accounting treatment of stock-based awards when making compensation decisions.
Compensation Committee Report
(1)
Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) contained in this Amended Report with management. Based on our Compensation Committee’s review of, and the discussions with management with respect to, the CD&A, our Compensation Committee on April 28, 2016 recommended to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, and in the Company’s proxy statement for its 2016 annual meeting of stockholders.
From the members of our Compensation Committee:
William Rohn, Chairman
Kevin Hykes
Nadim Yared
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Hansen Medical under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
2015 Summary Compensation Table
The following summary compensation table shows, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and, if required by applicable SEC executive compensation disclosure rules, December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, information regarding the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, three other executive officers who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2015 and one former executive officer. We refer to these officers as our “named executive officers.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
Option
Awards
($)(1)
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)(2)
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
Total
($)
|
Cary G. Vance(3)
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
461,250
|
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
(4)
|
$
|
153,426
|
|
|
$
|
1,320,268
|
|
(5)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
67,500
|
|
(6)
|
$
|
2,077,444
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
272,727
|
|
|
$
|
190,000
|
|
(7)
|
$
|
1,462,560
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
212,500
|
|
(6)
|
$
|
2,137,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher P. Lowe(8)
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
244,193
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
38,449
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
282,642
|
|
Interim Chief Financial Officer and Former Interim Chief Executive Officer
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
467,904
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
303,600
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
771,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Cathcart
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
254,616
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
168,005
|
|
(5)
|
$
|
93,504
|
|
(9)
|
$
|
7,200
|
|
(10)
|
$
|
523,325
|
|
Senior Vice President of Global Sales
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
247,200
|
|
|
$
|
49,440
|
|
|
$
|
534,246
|
|
|
$
|
101,149
|
|
|
$
|
118,936
|
|
|
$
|
7,200
|
|
|
$
|
1,058,171
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
230,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
417,587
|
|
|
$
|
16,575
|
|
|
$
|
59,564
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
723,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph Guido
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
273,670
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
256,778
|
|
(5)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
530,448
|
|
Senior Vice President,
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
248,745
|
|
|
$
|
49,749
|
|
|
$
|
337,524
|
|
|
$
|
60,876
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
(11)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
746,894
|
|
Marketing & Business Development
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
241,500
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
107,144
|
|
|
$
|
53,885
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
402,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William Sutton
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
330,330
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
(12)
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
400,982
|
|
(5)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
92,185
|
|
(13)
|
$
|
923,497
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
333,083
|
|
|
$
|
86,962
|
|
|
$
|
549,546
|
|
|
$
|
109,578
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
(14)
|
$
|
1,129,169
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
275,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
53,551
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
438,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Sheahan(15)
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
285,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
263,628
|
|
(5)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
48,000
|
|
|
$
|
596,628
|
|
Vice President Clinical, Regulatory and Quality Affairs
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
62,614
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
194,781
|
|
|
$
|
141,422
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
410,817
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of option awards or stock awards granted to the officer in the applicable fiscal year computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 11 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 22, 2016 for a discussion of all assumptions made by us in determining the grant date fair values of our equity awards. In accordance with SEC rules, the grant date fair value of an award subject to performance conditions is based on the probable outcome of the conditions, which, as of the grant date, was the maximum achievement level.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
The amounts in this column reflect the dollar amount of restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance stock units (PSUs) awarded to the officer in the applicable fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Mr. Vance’s employment with us began on May 23, 2014.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
In light of Mr. Vance’s role in 2015 while the Company considered strategic alternatives, and the fact Mr. Vance received no bonus under the Company’s 2015 Bonus Plan based on the scoring of the 2015 Bonus Plan, the Board of Directors approved a 2015 cash bonus of $75,000 for Mr. Vance on February 9, 2016.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
As noted in footnote 1, amount reflects the probable achievement of performance conditions applicable to the PSUs granted to the officers. The maximum grant date fair value of these awards, assuming all of the milestones had been achieved, was $1,320,269 for Mr. Vance, $168,005 for Mr. Cathcart, $256,778 for Mr. Guido, $400,982 for Mr. Sutton, and $263,628 for Mr. Sheahan.
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
Represents a housing and relocation allowance of $67,500 in 2015. Pursuant to his letter agreement with us, Mr. Vance must repay all of the allowance that he receives if he voluntarily resigns his employment within 12 months of his employment commencement date and 50% of the amount he receives if he voluntarily resigns his employment within 24 months of his employment commencement date. The amount reported for 2014 also includes $100,000 of actual loss protection paid to Mr. Vance from the sale of Mr. Vance’s primary residence.
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
2014 bonus amount represents minimum guarantee of $190,000 pursuant to Mr. Vance’s employment letter agreement.
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
Mr. Lowe’s employment as our interim Chief Executive Officer began on February 9, 2014 and ended on May 23, 2014. Mr. Lowe became our interim Chief Financial Officer on June 10, 2014. 2014 compensation includes compensation that Mr. Lowe received as non-executive director in 2014 prior to February 9, 2014.
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
Amount represents $93,504 from commissions pursuant to our sales commission plan, as described in greater detail in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
|
|
|
|
(10)
|
Amount reflects automobile allowance.
|
|
|
|
(11)
|
Amount represents a spot bonus paid in the form of a 3.5% sales commission approved by the Compensation Committee in August, 2014 related to the sale of systems in Japan.
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
Mr. Sutton entered into a retention agreement on May 12, 2014 pursuant to which Mr. Sutton received a 26.4% salary increase and the right to earn a lump-sum cash bonus of $50,000 on each of September 30, 2014, March 31, 2015, September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2016 subject to Mr. Sutton remaining continuously employed by us through each such date. Mr. Sutton’s employment terminated with us on November 6, 2015.
|
|
|
|
(13)
|
Amount includes severance pay of $92,185 pursuant to a separation agreement between the company and Mr. Sutton, which is equal to three months of his most recent base salary. Mr. Sutton’s employment terminated with us on November 6, 2015.
|
|
|
|
(14)
|
Mr. Sheahan’s employment with us began on October 13, 2014.
|
|
|
|
(15)
|
Amount reflects housing allowance of $4,000 per month.
|
2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth certain information regarding each plan-based award granted to our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, all of the equity awards described below were made under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. For a description of the vesting acceleration applicable to the stock options and stock units granted to our named executive officers, see the section of this Amended Report entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards Target ($)
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units
|
|
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options
(#)
|
|
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards
($/Sh)
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
($)(1)
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
Date of Board or Compensation Committee Approval
|
|
Threshold
($)
|
|
Target
($)
|
|
Maximum
($)
|
|
Threshold
(#)
|
|
Target
(#)
|
|
Maximum
(#)
|
|
|
|
Mr. Vance
|
|
2/3/15
|
|
2/3/15
|
(2)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
349,600
|
|
|
Mr. Vance
|
|
3/17/15
|
|
4/29/14
|
(3)(4)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,975
|
|
|
15,899
|
|
|
23,849
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
181,252
|
|
(9)
|
Mr. Vance
|
|
3/17/15
|
|
4/29/14
|
(4)(5)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
23,849
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
181,252
|
|
|
Mr. Vance
|
|
4/23/15
|
|
4/23/15
|
(6)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
(7)
|
$
|
9.21
|
|
|
$
|
153,426
|
|
|
Mr. Vance
|
|
4/23/15
|
|
4/23/15
|
(8)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
17,609
|
|
|
44,022
|
|
|
66,033
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
608,614
|
|
(9)
|
Mr. Lowe
|
|
6/12/15
|
|
6/12/15
|
(10)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
$
|
9.20
|
|
|
$
|
38,449
|
|
|
Mr. Cathcart
|
|
2/3/15
|
|
2/3/15
|
(2)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
13,500
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
124,200
|
|
|
Mr. Cathcart
|
|
4/23/15
|
|
4/23/15
|
(8)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
3,805
|
|
|
4,756
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
43,805
|
|
(9)
|
Mr. Cathcart
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
145,000
|
|
(11)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Mr. Cathcart
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,875
|
|
(12)
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
28,752
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Mr. Cathcart
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,875
|
|
(13)
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
28,752
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Mr. Guido
|
|
2/3/15
|
|
2/3/15
|
(2)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
92,000
|
|
|
Mr. Guido
|
|
4/23/15
|
|
4/23/15
|
(8)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
14,313
|
|
|
17,891
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
164,778
|
|
(9)
|
Mr. Sutton
|
|
2/3/15
|
|
2/3/15
|
(2)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
147,200
|
|
|
Mr. Sutton
|
|
4/23/15
|
|
4/23/15
|
(8)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
22,044
|
|
|
27,555
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
253,782
|
|
(9)
|
Mr. Sheahan
|
|
2/3/15
|
|
2/3/15
|
(2)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
92,000
|
|
|
Mr. Sheahan
|
|
4/23/15
|
|
4/23/15
|
(8)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
14,908
|
|
|
18,635
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
171,628
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards or option awards granted to the officer, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 11 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 22, 2016, for a discussion of all assumptions made by us in determining the grant date fair values of our equity awards.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
The RSUs were granted to our named executive officers on February 3, 2015 as part of long-term equity based retention awards as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The RSU awards vest as to 100% on February 3, 2019 provided the named executive officer remains in continuous service with the company and 50% of the RSUs will vest if the event of a termination of employment on or after February 3, 2017 but before February 3, 2018 due to the named executive officer’s termination without cause or good reason, as those terms are defined in the named executive officer’s award agreement. If a named executive officer is terminated without cause or good reason as those terms are defined in the named executive officer’s award agreement after February 3, 2018 but before February 3, 2019, 75% of each respective award shall vest.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
RSU inducement award granted to Mr. Vance outside our 2006 Equity Plan. The RSU award vests based on the achievement of performance goals as follows: the amount shown in the “threshold” column reflect the shares vested if the minimum revenue target of $38 million was achieved in 2015 as approved within thirty day after the company filed its 10-K for fiscal year 2015 (the “Approval Date”). ”). On April 28, 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that the minimum revenue target was not met for 2015 and all of the RSU Awards were forfeited.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
The stock awards were granted effective on the date of our Registration Statement on Form S-8 as filed with the SEC on March 17, 2015.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
RSU inducement award granted to Mr. Vance outside our 2006 Equity Plan. 25% of the award vested on June 1, 2015 and 6.25% of the award vests on each company vesting date thereafter (“Company Vesting Dates”), provided Mr. Vance remains in continuous service with the company. The Company Vesting Dates are March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1.
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
Pursuant to our general policy of not granting stock options when our officers and directors are precluded from trading under our insider trading policy, the option was granted effective as of the first trading day when our officers and directors were permitted to sell shares under our insider trading policy.
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
Option vests over four years of service from April 23, 2015, with 25% vesting on April 23, 2016 and in equal monthly installments thereafter and is fully vested as of April 23, 2019.
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
As described in greater detail in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” our named executive officers were granted PSU awards in lieu of a 2015 cash bonus opportunity. The PSUs vested based on achievement of 2015 company-wide and departmental goals described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The amounts shown in the “threshold” column reflect the minimum amount payable if a single goal with the lowest weighting was achieved. The amounts show in the “target” column reflect the amounts payable if all of the goals were achieved. On February 2, 2016, our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee determined that 0 units vested with respect to Mr. Vance due to Mr. Vance’s 2015 bonus being tied 100% to the company-wide goals as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”, 616 units vested with respect to Mr. Cathcart, 4,293 units vested with respect to Mr. Guido, 0 units vested with respect to Mr. Sutton due to his departure from the company, and 7,454 units vested with respect to Mr. Sheahan.
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
In accordance with SEC rules, the grant date fair value of an award subject to a performance condition is based on the probable outcome of the condition.
|
|
|
|
(10)
|
Option vests in equal monthly installments over twelve months and is fully vested as of June 12, 2016.
|
|
|
|
(11)
|
Reflects Mr. Cathcart’s commission opportunity based on sales of our robotic systems, as described in greater detail in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The amount shown in the target column is based on achievement of target sales. No “threshold” or “maximum” applies to this award
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
Reflects Mr. Cathcart’s bonus opportunity based on sales of our catheters, as described in greater detail in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The amount shown in the “threshold” column reflects the minimum bonus payable for a single quarter if 90% of the target number of catheters were sold for that quarter in a single region during the third or fourth quarter of our 2015 fiscal year. The amount shown in the “target” column reflects the amount payable if the target number of catheters were sold in all four quarters. The amount shown in the “maximum” column reflects the amount payable if 110% or more of the target number of catheters were sold in all four quarters.
|
|
|
|
(13)
|
Reflects Mr. Cathcart’s bonus opportunity based on the number of clinical procedures performed, as described in greater detail in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The amount shown in the “threshold” column reflects the minimum bonus payable for a single quarter if 90% of the target number of procedures were performed for that quarter in a single region during the third or fourth quarter of our 2015 fiscal year. The amount shown in the “target” column reflects the amount payable if the target number of procedures were performed in all four quarters. The amount shown in the “maximum” column reflects the amount payable if 110% or more of the target number of procedures were performed in all four quarters.
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2015 Fiscal Year-End
The following table shows certain information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
Name
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
Number
of
Shares
or Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
|
|
Market
Value
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)(1)
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(2)
|
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)(2)
|
Mr. Vance
|
|
33,723
|
|
(3)
|
51,469
|
|
|
$
|
14.00
|
|
|
5/23/24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Vance
|
|
10,965
|
|
(4)
|
32,895
|
|
|
$
|
6.50
|
|
|
12/8/24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Vance
|
|
—
|
|
(5)
|
57,500
|
|
|
$
|
6.45
|
|
|
12/9/24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Vance
|
|
—
|
|
(6)
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
9.21
|
|
|
4/23/25
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Vance
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
(7)
|
$
|
88,540
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Vance
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
13,414
|
|
(8)
|
$
|
31,255
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Cathcart
|
|
21,251
|
|
(9)
|
8,749
|
|
|
$
|
21.60
|
|
|
2/27/20
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Cathcart
|
|
10,965
|
|
(4)
|
32,894
|
|
|
$
|
6.50
|
|
|
12/8/24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Cathcart
|
|
—
|
|
(5)
|
20,500
|
|
|
$
|
6.45
|
|
|
12/9/24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Cathcart
|
|
5,159
|
|
(10)
|
6,091
|
|
|
$
|
23.00
|
|
|
2/25/24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Cathcart
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
13,500
|
|
(7)
|
$
|
31,455
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Cathcart
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
616
|
|
(11)
|
$
|
1,435
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Guido
|
|
22,920
|
|
(12)
|
2,080
|
|
|
$
|
31.60
|
|
|
4/29/19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Guido
|
|
12,500
|
|
(13)
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
21.80
|
|
|
11/11/19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Guido
|
|
5,156
|
|
(14)
|
2,344
|
|
|
$
|
22.22
|
|
|
3/13/20
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Guido
|
|
7,312
|
|
(4)
|
21,928
|
|
|
$
|
6.50
|
|
|
12/8/24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Guido
|
|
—
|
|
(5)
|
14,500
|
|
|
$
|
6.45
|
|
|
12/9/24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Guido
|
|
2,867
|
|
(10)
|
3,383
|
|
|
$
|
23.00
|
|
|
2/25/24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Guido
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
(7)
|
$
|
23,300
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Guido
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,294
|
|
(11)
|
$
|
10,005
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Lowe
|
|
3,125
|
|
(15)
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
77.60
|
|
|
9/20/16
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Lowe
|
|
1,000
|
|
(16)
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
171.50
|
|
|
6/18/15
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Lowe
|
|
1,000
|
|
(17)
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
48.80
|
|
|
6/16/16
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Lowe
|
|
1,000
|
|
(18)
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
21.30
|
|
|
6/14/17
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Lowe
|
|
1,000
|
|
(19)
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
26.70
|
|
|
6/14/18
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Lowe
|
|
1,000
|
|
(20)
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
24.90
|
|
|
5/24/19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Lowe
|
|
3,000
|
|
(21)
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
17.20
|
|
|
5/29/20
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Lowe
|
|
12,000
|
|
(22)
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
23.00
|
|
|
2/25/24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Lowe
|
|
7,500
|
|
(23)
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
14.10
|
|
|
6/10/24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Lowe
|
|
3,750
|
|
(24)
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
9.20
|
|
|
6/11/25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Sutton
|
|
24,794
|
|
(25)
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
20.80
|
|
|
12/9/19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Sutton
|
|
4691
|
|
(10)
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
23.00
|
|
|
2/25/24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Sheahan
|
|
—
|
|
(5)
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6.45
|
|
|
12/9/24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Sheahan
|
|
8114
|
|
(26)
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
9.10
|
|
|
10/30/24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Sheahan
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
(7)
|
$
|
23,300
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Sheahan
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,454
|
|
(11)
|
$
|
17,368
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Sheahan
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,927
|
|
(27)
|
$
|
9,150
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Table excludes an inducement RSU award to Mr. Vance for 23,849 shares granted in March 2015, an RSU award to Mr. Sheahan for 8,571 shares granted in October 2014, and an RSU award to Mr. Cathcart for 6,716 shares granted in February 2014 (the “RSU Awards”). The RSU Awards all contained similar vesting provisions based on achievement of revenue targets for fiscal year 2015. Based on the company’s revenue performance as of December 31, 2015, the company attributed no value to the RSU Awards based on the likelihood of all of the RSU Awards being subject to forfeiture. On April 28, 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that the minimum revenue target was not met for 2015 and all of the RSU Awards were forfeited.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Computed in accordance with SEC rules as the number of unvested units multiplied by the closing price of our common stock on the last trading day of the 2015 fiscal year, which was $2.33 on December 31, 2015. The actual value realized by the officer depends on whether the units vest and the future performance of our common stock.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Option vests over four years of service from May 23, 2014, with 25% vesting upon completion of one year of service and in 36 equal monthly installments thereafter.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Option vests over four years of service from December 8, 2014, with 25% vesting upon completion of one year of service and in 36 equal monthly installments thereafter.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
Option vests over four years of service from December 9, 2014, with 20% vesting upon completion of two years of service, 30% additional vesting upon completion of three years of service, and the remaining 50% vesting upon completion of four years of service.
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
Option vests over four years of service from April 23, 2015, with 25% vesting upon completion of one year of service and in 36 equal monthly installments thereafter.
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
The RSUs were granted to our named executive officers on February 3, 2015 as part of retention awards as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” 100% of the RSUs shall vest, if at all, on February 3, 2019 so long as the named executive officers have not ended their continuous service with the company. If a named executive officer is terminated without cause or good reason as those terms are defined in the named executive officer’s award agreement after February 3, 2017 but before February 3, 2018, 50% of each respective award shall vest. If a named executive officer is terminated without cause or good reason as those terms are defined in the named executive officer’s award agreement after February 3, 2018 but before February 3, 2019, 75% of each respective award shall vest.
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
RSU award granted to Mr. Vance outside our 2006 Equity Plan. 25% of the award vested on June 1, 2015 and 6.25% of the award vests on each company vesting date thereafter (“Company Vesting Dates”), provided Mr. Vance remains in continuous service with the company. The Company Vesting Dates are March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1.
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
Option vests over four years of service from January 16, 2013, with 25% vesting upon completion of one year of service and in equal monthly installments thereafter.
|
|
|
|
(10)
|
Option vests over four years of service from February 25, 2014, with 25% vesting upon completion of one year of service and in equal monthly installments thereafter.
|
|
|
|
(11)
|
The PSUs were granted to our named executive officers in lieu of a 2015 cash bonus opportunity and vested based on achievement of 2015 company-wide and departmental goals as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The amount shown reflects the units that vested based on actual performance through December 31, 2015. On February 2, 2016, our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee determined that 616 units vested with respect to Mr. Cathcart, 4,294 units vested with respect to Mr. Guido, and 7,454 units vested with respect to Mr. Sheahan. In order to receive award, NEO had to be there through the approval date.
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
Option vests over four years of service from April 2, 2012, with 25% vesting upon completion of one year of service and in 36 equal monthly installments thereafter.
|
|
|
|
(13)
|
Represents the vested portion of a retention-based option granted to Mr. Guido on November 12, 2012.
|
|
|
|
(14)
|
Option vests in equal monthly installments over 48 months of service following March 4, 2013.
|
|
|
|
(15)
|
Represents the vested portion of an option granted to Mr. Lowe on September 21, 2006 in connection with his service on the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
(16)
|
Represents the vested portion of an option granted to Mr. Lowe on June 19, 2008 in connection with his service on the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
(17)
|
Represents the vested portion of an option granted to Mr. Lowe on June 17, 2009 in connection with his service on the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
(18)
|
Represents the vested portion of an option granted to Mr. Lowe on June 15, 2010 in connection with his service on the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
(19)
|
Represents the vested portion of an option granted to Mr. Lowe on June 15, 2011 in connection with his service on the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
(20)
|
Represents the vested portion of an option granted to Mr. Lowe on May 25, 2012 in connection with his service on the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
(21)
|
Represents the vested portion of an option granted to Mr. Lowe on May 30, 2015 in connection with his service on the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
(22)
|
Represents the vested portion of an option granted to Mr. Lowe on February 25, 2014 in connection with his service as Interim Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
|
|
(23)
|
Represents the vested portion of an option granted to Mr. Lowe on June 10, 2014 in connection with his service as Interim Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
|
|
(24)
|
Option vests in equal monthly installments over twelve months and is fully vested as of June 12, 2016.
|
|
|
|
(25)
|
Option vests over four years of service from December 12, 2012 with 25% vesting upon completion of one year of service and in 36 equal monthly installments thereafter.
|
|
|
|
(26)
|
Option vests over four years of service from October 13, 2014, with 25% vesting upon completion of one year of service and in equal monthly installments thereafter.
|
|
|
|
(27)
|
25% of the RSU award vested on September 1, 2015 and 6.25% of the award vested on December 1, 2015. The remaining shares shall vest as to 6.25% of the award on each company vesting date thereafter (“Company Vesting Dates”), provided Mr. Sheahan remains in continuous service with the company. The Company Vesting Dates are March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1.
|
2015 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table shows the stock options exercised and the vesting of RSUs held by our named executive officers during the 2015 fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
Name
|
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
|
|
Value Realized
on Exercise
($)(1)
|
|
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
|
|
Value Realized
on Vesting
($)(1)
|
Mr. Vance
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10,435
|
|
|
83,000
|
|
Mr. Lowe
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Cathcart
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Guido
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Sutton
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Sheahan
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,787
|
|
|
$
|
9,069
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Computed in accordance with SEC rules based on the fair market value of our common stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of units vested and does not necessarily reflect proceeds received by the officer
|
Separation Agreements
On November 14, 2015, we entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Sutton in connection with the end of his employment with us on November 6, 2015. Pursuant to the separation agreement, Mr. Sutton received a lump sum payment of $92,185, which is equal to three months of his most recent base salary.
On March 9, 2016, we entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Guido in connection with the end of his employment with us on February 19, 2016. Pursuant to the separation agreement, Mr. Guido received a lump sum payment of $68,405, which is equal to three months of his most recent base salary.
Mr. Sutton’s employment with the Company terminated prior to December 31, 2015. As a result, Mr. Sutton is excluded from the discussion in the section entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control” below.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control
Our named executive officers are party to retention agreements which entitle them to the severance payments and benefits described below.
Pursuant to his retention agreement, if we terminate Mr. Vance’s employment without cause or he resigns for good reason, he will be entitled to a lump-sum cash severance payment equal to 12 months of his base salary, payment of his COBRA premiums for up to 12 months and any earned but unpaid portion of his incentive bonus for the prior year. In the event that we terminate Mr. Vance’s employment without cause or he resigns for good reason, in either case within 3 months prior to, or 12 months after, our change in control, Mr. Vance will be entitled to full acceleration of his equity awards.
Pursuant to a retention agreement that we entered into in 2016 with Mr. Lowe, if we terminate Mr. Lowe’s employment without cause or he resigns for good reason, he will be eligible to receive any earned but unpaid portion of his incentive bonus for the prior year. In the event that we terminate Mr. Lowe’s employment without cause or he resigns for good reason, in either case within 3 months prior to, or 12 months after, our change of control, Mr. Lowe will be entitled to full acceleration of his equity awards.
Pursuant to his retention agreement, Mr. Cathcart is entitled to cash severance equal to 12 months of base salary, all bonuses earned through the date of termination and payment of COBRA premiums for up to 12 months if we terminate his employment without cause or he resigns for good reason.
Pursuant to his retention agreement, Mr. Sheahan is entitled to cash severance equal to 6 months of base salary, all bonuses earned through the date of termination and payment of COBRA premiums for up to 6 months if we terminate his employment without cause or he resigns for good reason.
In the event that we terminate the Messrs. Cathcart or Sheahan’s employment without cause or the officer resigns for good reason, in either case within 12 months after our change in control, the officer will also be entitled to a prorated annual target bonus and full acceleration of outstanding equity awards.
All of the severance payments and benefits described above are contingent on the officer’s executing a general release of claims against us and, in the case of Messrs. Lowe and Vance, their resignation from our Board of Directors.
All of our employees, including our named executive officers, also receive payment for accrued but unused vacation in the event of any termination of employment.
The following definitions are used in the retention agreements with our named executive officers:
“Cause” means an intentional unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information or trade secrets which causes material harm to us, a material breach by the officer of any agreement with us, a material failure to comply with our written policies or rules, the officer’s conviction of or plea to a felony, the officer’s gross negligence or willful misconduct, or the officer’s continued failure to perform assigned duties after receiving written notification of such failure from our Board of Directors.
“Change in Control” means a transaction or series of transactions in which any person acquires more than 50% of our voting stock, a change in a majority of our directors over a two-year period (excluding any new director whose nomination for election is approved by two-thirds of the existing directors), or a merger or asset sale unless our stockholders continue to own a majority of the voting stock of the resulting corporation and no one person or group owns 50% or more of the voting stock of the resulting corporation.
“Good Reason” means a material diminution in the officer’s authority, duties or responsibilities; a material change in the geographic location at which the officer must perform services for us and the following changes in the officer’s compensation: a material diminution in base salary other than in connection with certain across-the-board reductions in the compensation of the Company’s senior management (Mr. Vance) and a material diminution in the officer’s base salary and target bonus other than in connection with certain across-the-board reductions in the compensation of the Company’s senior management (Messrs. Cathcart, Guido and Sutton). With respect to Mr. Vance, “Good Reason” also includes a requirement that he report to anyone other than the Board of Directors or the Chief Executive Officer of a successor company or our breach of Mr. Vance’s employment agreement or retention agreement. The officer must provide us with written notice of the good reason condition within 90 days after it comes into existence, after which we will have 30 days to cure the good reason condition. If we do not cure the good reason condition, the officer may resign within 180 days following the initial existence of the good reason condition.
The following table estimates, with respect to our named executive officers (other than Mr. Sutton, whose employment with the Company terminated as described above in the section entitled “Separation Agreements”), the amount of compensation and benefits payable to each of our named executive officers under the agreements described above, assuming a termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits and Payments upon Termination
|
|
Termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason prior to, or more than 12 months after, a Change in Control
|
|
Termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason within 12 months after a Change in Control(1)
|
Mr. Vance
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
$
|
468,000
|
|
|
$
|
468,000
|
|
Bonus
|
|
$
|
281,000
|
|
|
$
|
281,000
|
|
Accelerated vesting(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
277,936
|
|
Benefits and perquisites:
|
|
|
|
|
Health care(3)
|
|
$
|
30,008
|
|
|
$
|
30,008
|
|
Total:
|
|
$
|
779,008
|
|
|
$
|
1,056,944
|
|
Mr. Lowe
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Bonus
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Accelerated vesting(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Benefits and perquisites:
|
|
|
|
|
Health care(3)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Total:
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Mr. Cathcart
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
$
|
254,616
|
|
|
$
|
254,616
|
|
Bonus
|
|
$
|
25,461
|
|
|
$
|
25,461
|
|
Accelerated vesting(1)(2)
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
55,968
|
|
Benefits and perquisites:
|
|
|
|
|
Health care(3)
|
|
$
|
22,643
|
|
|
$
|
22,643
|
|
Total:
|
|
$
|
302,720
|
|
|
$
|
358,688
|
|
Mr. Sheahan
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
$
|
142,500
|
|
|
$
|
142,500
|
|
Bonus
|
|
$
|
49,875
|
|
|
$
|
49,875
|
|
Accelerated vesting(1)(2)
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
87,156
|
|
Benefits and perquisites:
|
|
|
|
|
Health care(3)
|
|
$
|
22,643
|
|
|
$
|
22,643
|
|
Total:
|
|
$
|
215,068
|
|
|
$
|
302,174
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
As of December 31, 2015, the acceleration of vesting for the named executive officers includes the full acceleration of their equity awards within 3 months prior to, or within 12 months following a change in control. On April 18, 2016, Mr. Lowe entered into a retention agreement with the company providing for the full acceleration of his equity awards within 3 months prior to, or within 12 months following a change in control.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Because all of the options held by these named executive officers have exercise prices greater than $2.33 per share, the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2015 (the last trading day in 2015), no value was assigned to the acceleration of our named executive officers’ options. In the case of stock units, the value of vesting acceleration was calculated by multiplying the number of unvested stock units (including all performance stock units that were outstanding but unvested as of December 31, 2015) by $2.33, the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2015.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Represents the cost of the executive’s monthly health care premiums (consisting of dental, medical and vision coverage) under COBRA for the severance period based on the rates in effect on December 31, 2015. For our fiscal year 2015, Messrs. Guido and Lowe opted out of all health care plans offered by Hansen.
|
Director Compensation
During 2015 our non-employee directors were eligible to receive the cash and equity compensation described below.
|
|
•
|
$45,000 per year for service as a Board of Directors member;
|
|
|
•
|
$30,000 per year for service as chairman of the Board of Directors (in addition to the cash compensation payable for service as a board member);
|
|
|
•
|
$20,000 per year for service as chairman of the Audit Committee;
|
|
|
•
|
$13,000 per year for service as chairman of the Compensation Committee;
|
|
|
•
|
$9,000 per year for service as chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee;
|
|
|
•
|
$10,000 per year for service as a non-chairman member of the Audit Committee;
|
|
|
•
|
$6,000 per year for service as a non-chairman member of the Compensation Committee; and
|
|
|
•
|
$5,000 per year for service as a non-chairman member of the nominating and corporate governance committee.
|
We also reimburse our non-employee directors for their reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of our Board of Directors and of committees of our Board of Directors.
Non-employee directors receive automatic grants of non-statutory stock options under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. For purposes of our automatic director grant program, a non-employee director is a director who is not employed by us and who does not receive compensation from us or have a business relationship with us that would require disclosure under certain SEC rules. Each non-employee director joining our Board of Directors is automatically granted a non-statutory stock option to purchase 7,500 shares of our common stock with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. This initial option will vest ratably over 36 months of service.
In addition, on the date of each Annual Meeting of our stockholders, each non-employee director is automatically granted a non-statutory stock option to purchase 6,000 shares of our common stock (except for the chairman of the Board of Directors, if any, who automatically receives a grant for 7,000 shares) with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. However, the number of shares subject to an annual grant will be reduced on a
pro rata
basis for each quarter that the director did not serve as a non-employee director during the 12-month period beginning on the date of the previous Annual Meeting. Automatic annual grants vest ratably over 12 months of service. If a non-employee director’s service is terminated within 12 months after we are subject to a change in control other than as a result of a director’s voluntary resignation, then all of the director’s automatic grants will become fully vested. In general, options held by our non-employee directors remain exercisable for up to 12 months from the date of such director’s termination of service. All automatic director options have a maximum term of up to ten years.
2015 Director Compensation Table
The following table shows certain information with respect to the compensation of all of our non-employee directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Fees Earned or Paid
in Cash ($)
|
|
Option Awards
($)(1)(2)(3)
|
|
Total
($)
|
Mr. Eagle
|
|
$
|
85,000
|
|
|
$
|
35,694
|
|
|
$
|
120,694
|
|
Ms. Bowen
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
$
|
30,595
|
|
|
$
|
95,595
|
|
Mr. Hykes
|
|
$
|
52,250
|
|
|
$
|
30,595
|
|
|
$
|
82,845
|
|
Dr. Newman
|
|
$
|
64,000
|
|
|
$
|
30,595
|
|
|
$
|
94,595
|
|
Mr. Rohn
|
|
$
|
58,250
|
|
|
$
|
30,595
|
|
|
$
|
88,845
|
|
Mr. Schuler
|
|
$
|
51,000
|
|
|
$
|
30,595
|
|
|
$
|
81,595
|
|
Mr. Yared
|
|
$
|
50,250
|
|
|
$
|
30,595
|
|
|
$
|
80,845
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of option awards granted to the director in our fiscal year 2015 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 11 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 22, 2016, for a discussion of all assumptions made by us in determining the grant date fair values of our equity awards. Amount consists of: (a) $35,694 with respect to the options granted to Mr. Eagle on June 15, 2015; and (b) $30,595 with respect to the option granted to Ms. Bowen and Messrs. Hykes, Rohn, Schuler, Yared and Dr. Newman on June 15, 2015.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
As of December 31, 2015, our non-employee directors held outstanding stock options as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Shares of Common
Stock Subject to
Stock Options
|
Mr. Eagle
|
|
18,250
|
|
Ms. Bowen
|
|
14,000
|
|
Mr. Hykes
|
|
18,000
|
|
Dr. Newman
|
|
15,000
|
|
Mr. Rohn
|
|
15,250
|
|
Mr. Schuler
|
|
14,000
|
|
Mr. Yared
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
On June 15, 2015, Mr. Eagle received an option to purchase 7,000 shares of our common stock, and each of Ms. Bowen and Messrs. Hykes, Rohn, Schuler, Yared and Dr. Newman received an option to purchase 6,000 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $9.15 per share.
|
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
Our Board of Directors believes that directors should have a significant financial stake in our company to help align their interests with those of our stockholders and to promote sound corporate governance. In December 2013, our Board of Directors (upon recommendation of our Compensation Committee) adopted stock ownership guidelines providing that each non-employee director should own shares or certain share equivalents with a value equal to at least twice their annual base cash retainer. Non-employee directors have five years from the later of (i) December 11, 2013, or (ii) the date such non-employee director joined our Board of Directors to achieve this ownership level. Thereafter, compliance will be measured annually. At its discretion, our Board of Directors may waive this requirement if a non-employee director would otherwise incur a hardship. We anticipate that all non-employee directors with at least one year of service will satisfy the stock ownership guidelines when they become effective at the end of the compliance period.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
As of December 31, 2015, the Compensation Committee consisted of three directors: Mr. Rohn (Chairman), Mr. Hykes, and Mr. Schuler. During 2015, none of Mr. Rohn, Mr. Hykes or Mr. Schuler was a then present or former officer or employee of the Company. None of our executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last completed fiscal year, on the
Compensation Committee or Board of Directors of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.