Not All Stun Guns Are Designed the Same; Not All Training for Stun Guns Is the Same
26 10월 2009 - 10:41PM
PR Newswire (US)
TAMPA, Fla., Oct. 26 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Stinger Systems,
Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: STYS), a leader in electro-stun
technology confirmed its training policy to allow officers to aim
at center mass with its S-200 AT EID. A recent training directive
from Taser® International Inc has generated interest and questions
from users of electronic immobilization devices (EID) and more
specifically whether Stinger Systems' products will change its
training policies. In brief, the Taser training bulletin 15.0
concerns ONLY Taser International's products as described therein.
Said training bulletin stated to lower the recommended point of aim
from center of mass to lower-center of mass for dart applications:
http://taser.com/training/Documents/Training%20Memo%20with%20Training%20Bu
lletin%20and%20Warnings.pdf The purpose of an EID is to
effectively, efficiently and as safely as possible, immobilize
hostile or resisting individuals during a lawful arrest process or
confrontation. EIDs are built to only temporarily immobilize an
individual by emitting energy comprised of a blend of voltage,
amperage, resistance. EIDs, of course, can't possibly interpret the
physical condition, impairments or circumstances of a suspect. This
includes factors such as knowing the existence of any medical
problems or use of drugs. Therefore, new advanced and unique
engineering of EIDs could possibly create a different energy
delivery system that could possibly help reduce risk to such
individuals. Stinger Systems certifies its instructors in what
Stinger Systems believes to be proper training protocol and to
conduct its training pursuant to the technology created for its
products. While this technology is not without limitations, it is
intended to be less-than-lethal but Stinger Systems has always
recognized the possibility that an individual can be injured or
even a more serious outcome can occur from a resulting use. As of
this writing and after thousands and thousands of product uses and
applications of Stinger Systems electro-stun products, there has
not been a serious injury or death in either actual field or
training applications. Stinger's training protocol has not
significantly changed over the years. While an EID dart firing
situation to the back of a person is reliable and less likely to
hit sensitive area(s) (eyes, groin, etc.), a front application
(thus the term CONFRONTATION) is permissible. Stinger's training
methodology outlines the risks of frontal shots and clearly
outlines areas of avoidance like the eye, throat, groin or any
combination thereof, that may possibly cause an undetermined
injury. While stun devices accomplish the same end
result....immobilization, how that is achieved is considerably
different with the Stinger EID compared to other EIDs that are
presently being sold. Other EID technology essentially fills
capacitors and "dumps" that energy into a suspect. Stinger's
technology employs an on-board micro computer that can manage the
flow of energy to the suspect in real time. The majority of
confrontations take place from a frontal position. Therefore,
Stinger Systems believes that putting limitations of not being able
to fire at the entire front torso can impede overall use of the EID
thereby defeating its purpose and design. Additionally, Stinger
Systems is of the opinion that if chest shots were deemed "not
preferable," officer injuries could possibly escalate due to missed
shots. Stinger's training protocol has not changed in relation to
its variable pulse output and load/resistance sensing technology.
Stinger is of the belief that EID technology may not work on
everyone and may have not have the desired effect in some
situations. Stinger Systems desires to calibrate its EIDs so that
they are highly effective in the field but does not desire to cross
any barriers that it considers dangerous to the community to
achieve increased success rates. Stinger Systems has developed a
unique process to immobilize suspects that is proprietary to
Stinger. Stinger set out to design an EID product that was designed
with safety in mind while still accomplishing the goal of
immobilization. Among some of the energy dissipation features that
the Stinger S-200 EIDs utilizes that make the Stinger EID
technology different from others are: 1.) Stinger products have
been used since 2000 with a combined thousands of uses of all its
products and the Company has never had an after use death 2.) The
S-200 AT uses cardiac T-Wave Avoidance Technology This means, by
varying the pulse groups per second the ability to continually
"land" on the vital cardiac T-Wave is greatly reduced 3.) The S-200
AT Actually communicates with the wires in the body and regulates
energy flow from the gun based on resistance in the body! 4.) The
S-200 AT is the only EID that changes energy output in real-time!
5.) The S-200 AT uses pulse groups not pulses per second, meaning
there is less total current (current is what is dangerous to
humans) in each micro pulse than a competitor's single pulse. 6.)
The S-200 AT emits variable pulses. Meaning the S-200 AT's energy
is not emitted on a steady pulses per second rate, rather the S-200
AT varies the pulse groups per second output. ABOUT STINGER SYSTEMS
Stinger Systems, Inc., a leading provider of electro stun
technologies, develops and sells a broad array of products
utilizing advanced electro sparc-pulsed technology to police,
corrections, and security sectors worldwide.
http://www.stingersystems.com/. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This
announcement contains forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The
forward-looking statements are based on Stinger Systems' current
intent, belief and expectations. These statements are not
guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks
and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Actual results may
differ materially from these forward-looking statements because of
the risks described in Stinger Systems' filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. Existing and prospective investors are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of today's date. Stinger Systems
undertakes no obligation to update or revise the information
contained in this announcement whether as a result of new
information, future events or circumstances, or otherwise.
DATASOURCE: Stinger Systems, Inc. CONTACT: Robert Gruder, Chairman
and President of Stinger Systems, Inc., +1-866-788-6746, or Web
Site: http://www.stingersystems.com/
Copyright