UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[x] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2013

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 000-52641

INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 98-0492752
(State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1135 Terminal Way, Suite 207B
Reno, NV 89502 USA
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

775-322-4448
 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

With a copy to:
Jonathan H. Gardner
Kavinoky Cook LLP
726 Exchange St., Suite 800
Buffalo, NY 14210

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [X]
 (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ X ] No [ ]

The number of shares of registrant’s common stock outstanding as of January 31, 2014 was 138,304,619.


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.

FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED December 31, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS

    PAGE
  PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION  
     
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) 4
     
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 26
     
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 35
     
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 36
     
  PART II – OTHER INFORMATION  
     
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 37
     
Item 1A. Risk Factors 37
     
Item 2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 40
     
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 40
     
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 40
     
Item 5. Other Information 40
     
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 41
     
  SIGNATURES 42

- 2 -


PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2013

(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

CONTENTS

- 3 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets as at
December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

    December 31,     June 30,  
    2013     2013  
  $     $    
    (unaudited)     (audited)  
ASSETS            
Current            
   Cash and cash equivalents   160,243     106,847  
   Marketable securities (Note 10)   46,070     49,917  
   Prepaid expenses and other receivables   49,237     15,988  
             
Total Current Assets   255,550     172,752  
             
Restricted Cash (Note 5)   100,000     100,000  
Reclamation Deposit (Note 6)   240,805     240,805  
             
Plant and Equipment, net (Note 7)   562,375     607,441  
Mineral Property Interests (Note 8)   -     -  
             
Total Assets   1,158,730     1,120,998  
             
LIABILITIES            
Current            
   Accounts payable   2,723     29,251  
   Accrued liabilities   36,963     68,839  
   Notes Payable (Note 9)   -     141,074  
Total Current Liabilities   39,686     239,164  
             
Deferred Revenue (Note 10)   346,836     307,460  
Asset Retirement Obligation (Note 11)   28,529     27,171  
             
Total Liabilities   415,051     573,795  
             
Going Concern (Note 3)            
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14)            
Related Party Transactions (Note 15)            
Subsequent Events (Note 16)            
             
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY            
Capital Stock (Note 12)            
   Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding - -
   Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 138,304,619 issued and outstanding (June 30, 2013 – 98,935,486) 13,830 9,894
Additional Paid - in Capital   24,739,920     23,977,767  
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (Note 10)   (120,766 )   (105,043 )
Deficit Accumulated During the Exploration Stage   (23,889,305 )   (23,335,415 )
             
Total Stockholders' Equity   743,679     547,203  
             
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity   1,158,730     1,120,998  

See Condensed Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

-4-


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
For the six-months and three-months ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012
and the period from Inception (June 3, 1999) to December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

          For the     For the     For the     For the  
          six months     six months     three months     three months  
    Cumulative     ended     ended     ended     ended  
    since     December 31,     December     December     December 31,  
    inception     2013     2012     2013     2012  
  $   $   $   $   $  
Operating Expenses                              
                               
     General and administration   11,103,060     258,521     503,511     130,650     259,607  
     Project expenses   11,706,023     290,027     673,364     47,062     275,383  
     Impairment loss on mineral property interests (Note 8)   514,525     -     514,525           514,525  
     Depreciation   1,313,673     45,066     53,604     22,533     26,825  
                               
Total Operating Expenses   24,637,281     593,614     1,745,004     200,245     1,076,340  
                               
Loss from Operations   (24,637,281 )   (593,614 )   (1,745,004 )   (200,245 )   (1,076,340 )
     Other income-interest   387,539     74     228     34     102  
     Other income-gain on termination of option and         -                 -  
       sale agreements (Note 10)   217,550     42,500     -     42,500     -  
     Other income-gain on bargain purchase (Note 8)   238,645     -     -     -     -  
     Interest Expense   (95,758 )   (2,850 )   -     (222 )   -  
                               
Loss before Income Taxes   (23,889,305 )   (553,890 )   (1,744,776 )   (157,933 )   (1,076,238 )
                               
     Provision for income taxes   -     -     -     -     -  
                               
Net Loss   (23,889,305 )   (553,890 )   (1,744,776 )   (157,933 )   (1,076,238 )
                               
Loss per Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding - Basic and Fully Diluted (0.004 ) (0.018 ) (0.001 ) (0.011 )
                               
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding During the Periods - Basic and Fully Diluted 124,549,850 98,935,486 137,845,373 98,935,486
                               
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
                               
Net Loss         (553,890 )   (1,744,776 )   (157,933 )   (1,076,238 )
     Other comprehensive loss:                              
     Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities (Note 10)         (15,723 )   (9,383 )   4,456     (5,132 )
                               
Comprehensive Loss         (569,613 )   (1,754,159 )   (153,477 )   (1,081,370 )

See Condensed Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

-5-


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
For the six-months ended December 31, 2013
and for the period from Inception (June 3, 1999) to December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

                            Deficit              
                            Accumulated     Accumulated        
    Common Stock     Additional     Deferred     during the     Other     Total  
    Number           Paid-in     Stock     Exploration     Comprehensive     Stockholders'    
    of Shares     Amount     Capital     Compensation     Stage     Loss     Equity  
         $    $    $    $    $    
For the period from inception (June 3, 1999)
 through July 1, 2004
1 - 5,895 (5,895 ) -
 Net (loss)   -     -     910           (910 )         -  
Balance June 30, 2005 (audited)   1     -     6,805     -     (6,805 )         -  
 Contribution to additional paid-in capital   -     -     3,024                       3,024  
 Cancelled shares   (1 )   -     (1 )                     (1 )
 Common shares issued for nil consideration   14,360,000     1,436     (1,436 )         -           -  
 Common shares issued for cash   2,050,000     205     414,795           -           415,000  
 Subscription for stock               300,000           -           300,000  
 Stock issuance cost   -     -     (24,500 )         -           (24,500 )
 Net loss for the year   -     -     -           (87,574 )         (87,574 )
Balance June 30, 2006 (audited)   16,410,000     1,641     698,687     -     (94,379 )         605,949  
                                           
 Common shares issued for cash   3,395,739     340     548,595           -           548,935  
 Common shares issued to agents in lieu
    of commission for placement of common
    shares and convertible debentures
1,064,000 106 265,894 - 266,000
 Common shares issued for acquisition
    of interests in mineral claims
3,540,600 354 884,796 - 885,150
 Common shares issued for acquisition
    of interests in mineral claims
1,850,000 185 462,315 - 462,500
 Common shares issued for acquisition
    interests in a refinery
88,500 9 22,116 - 22,125
 Common shares issued for purchase of
    a mill with capital equipment
6,975,000 697 1,743,053 - 1,743,750
 Stock issuance cost               (59,426 )                     (59,426 )
 Stock based compensation               30,026                       30,026  
 Net loss for the year         -     -     -     (2,845,424 )         (2,845,424 )
Balance June 30, 2007 (audited)   33,323,839     3,332     4,596,056     -     (2,939,803 )         1,659,585  
                                           
 Common stock issued to consultants   3,000,000     300     2,249,700     (1,875,000 )   -           375,000  
 Stock based compensation         -     139,272           -           139,272  
 Warrant modification expense               844,423                       844,423  
 Conversion of convertible debentures with    accrued interest 7,186,730 719 3,590,801 - - 3,591,520
 Common shares issued for acquisition of    interests in mineral claims 175,000 18 104,982 105,000
 Common stock issued to a consultant   100,000     10     57,990                       58,000  
 Amortization of deferred stock
    compensation
562,500 562,500
 Net loss for the year                           (4,635,465 )         (4,635,465 )
Balance June 30, 2008 (audited)   43,785,569     4,379     11,583,224     (1,312,500 )   (7,575,268 )         2,699,835  
                                           
 Common shares issued for cash (net)   7,040,000     704     3,372,296     -     -           3,373,000  
 Common stock issued to a consultant   75,000     7     43,493     -     -           43,500  
 Common stock issued on acquisition of a
   subsidiary
397,024 40 31,722 - - 31,762
 Common shares issued on warrant exercises 8,900,907 890 2,224,337 - - 2,225,227
 Stock based compensation               814,050                       814,050  
 Warrant modification expense               346,673                       346,673  
 Amortization of deferred stock compensation 1,125,000 1,125,000
 Net loss for the year                           (6,045,477 )         (6,045,477 )
Balance June 30, 2009 (audited)   60,198,500     6,020     18,415,795     (187,500 )   (13,620,745 )         4,613,570  
                                           
 Common shares issued for cash   6,973,180     697     1,603,134                       1,603,831  
 Common stock issued on acquisition of a
   subsidiary
1,021,777 102 275,778 275,880
 Stock based compensation               216,751                       216,751  
 Amortization of deferred stock
    compensation
187,500 187,500
 Net loss for the year                           (3,314,953 )         (3,314,953 )
Balance June 30, 2010 (audited)   68,193,457     6,819     20,511,458     -     (16,935,698 )         3,582,579  
                                           
 Common shares issued for cash   2,083,333     209     499,791                       500,000  
 Stock based compensation               101,503                       101,503  
 Common stock options exercised   50,000     5     7,495                       7,500  
 Net loss for the year                           (2,523,079 )         (2,523,079 )
Balance June 30, 2011 (audited)   70,326,790     7,033     21,120,247     -     (19,458,777 )         1,668,503  
                                           
 Common shares issued for cash (net)   26,000,000     2,600     2,212,799     -     -           2,215,399  
 Preferred shares converted to common shares   2,608,696     261     299,739                       300,000  
 Stock based compensation               61,990                       61,990  
 Unrealized loss on marketable securities                                 (88,412 )   (88,412 )
 Net loss for the period                           (1,362,040 )         (1,362,040 )
Balance June 30, 2012 (audited)   98,935,486     9,894     23,694,775     -     (20,820,817 )   (88,412 )   2,795,440  
                                           
 Stock based compensation               282,992                       282,992  
 Unrealized loss on marketable securities                                 (16,631 )   (16,631 )
 Net loss for the period                           (2,514,598 )         (2,514,598 )
Balance June 30, 2013 (audited)   98,935,486     9,894     23,977,767     -     (23,335,415 )   (105,043 )   547,203  
                                           
 Common shares issued for cash (net)   33,333,333     3,333     462,010                       465,343  
 Common shares issued on conversion
    of debt (Note 12)
6,035,800 603 210,650 211,253
 Gain on common shares issued on
    conversion of related party debt (Note 12)
81,747 81,747
 Stock based compensation               7,746                       7,746  
 Unrealized loss on marketable securities                                 (15,723 )   (15,723 )
 Net loss for the period                           (553,890 )         (553,890 )
Balance December 31, 2013 (unaudited)   138,304,619     13,830     24,739,920     -     (23,889,305 )   (120,766 )   743,679  

See Condensed Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

- 6 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the six-months ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012
and for the period from Inception (June 3, 1999) to December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

    Cumulative     For the six     For the six  
    Since     months ended     months ended  
    Inception     December 31, 2013     December 31, 2012  
  $   $   $  
Cash Flows from Operating Activities                  
   Net loss   (23,889,305 )   (553,890 )   (1,744,776 )
   Adjustment for:                  
       Depreciation   1,313,673     45,066     53,604  
       Amortization of debt issuance cost   247,490     -     -  
       Loss on disposal of plant and equipment   10,524     -     -  
       Gain on Bargain Purchase (Note 8)   (238,645 )   -     -  
       Gain on termination of option and sale agreements (Note 10)   (217,550 )   (42,500 )   -  
       Stock based compensation   1,654,330     7,746     171,912  
       Impairment loss on mineral property interests (Note 8)   514,525     -     514,525  
       Warrant modification expense   1,191,096     -     -  
       Shares issued for mineral claims, as part of project expenses   1,452,650     -     -  
       Shares issued for consultant services expensed   2,351,500     -     -  
       Shares issued on acquisition of subsidiary   31,762     -     -  
       Shares issued in lieu of interest payment (Note 9)   3,000     1,926        
       Accretion of Asset Retirement Obligation (Note 11)   28,529     1,358     1,236  
       Interest on convertible debentures   90,453     -     -  
   Changes in non-cash working capital                  
       Prepaid expenses and other receivables   (49,237 )   (33,249 )   (70,392 )
       Accounts payable   2,723     (26,528 )   (88,438 )
       Accrued liabilities   37,404     (31,876 )   (18,500 )
                   
   Net cash used in operating activities   (15,465,078 )   (631,947 )   (1,180,829 )
                   
Cash Flows from Investing Activities                  
       Decrease (Increase) in Short-term investments   -     -     (46 )
       Increase in Reclamation Deposit   (240,805 )   -     -  
       Increase in Restricted Cash   (100,000 )   -     -  
       Cash received for option on claims and included in Deferred revenue net (Note 10)*   180,000     27,500     50,000  
       Cash received for termination of option and sales agreements (Note 10)   217,550     42,500     -  
       Acquisition of plant and equipment for cash   (123,031 )   -     (1,216 )
       Proceeds from sale of plant and equipment   2,500     -     -  
                   
   Net cash provided (used) in investing activities   (63,786 )   70,000     48,738  
                   
Cash Flows from Financing Activities                  
       Issuance of common shares for cash (net)   9,575,313     465,343     -  
       Issuance of preferred shares later converted to common shares   300,000     -     -  
       Issuance of common shares for warrant exercises   2,225,227     -     -  
       Issuance of common shares for option exercise   7,500     -     -  
       Issuance of promissory note   100,000     -     -  
       Repayment of promissory note   (100,000 )   -     -  
       Issuance of promissory notes later converted to common shares (Note 9)   290,000     150,000     -  
       Issuance of convertible debentures subsequently converted to cash   3,501,067     -     -  
       Stock and debenture placement commissions paid in cash   (210,000 )   -     -  
                   
   Net cash provided by financing activities   15,689,107     615,343     -  
                   
Net Change in Cash   160,243     53,396     (1,132,091 )
                   
Cash - beginning of period   -     106,847     1,533,139  
                   
Cash - end of period   160,243     160,243     401,048  
                   
Supplemental Cash Flow Information                  
   Interest Paid   2,305     924     -  
   Income taxes paid   -     -     -  

* Excludes receipt of marketable securities for $166,836, being a non-cash item included in Deferred Revenue

See Condensed Notes to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

-7-


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

1.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Infrastructure Materials Corp. (the “Company”), have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”); however, such information reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto together with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013. In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary to fairly state the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013, the results of its operations for the three and six-month periods ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and its cash flows for the six-month periods ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. In addition, some of the Company’s statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may be considered forward-looking and involve risks and uncertainties that could significantly impact expected results. The results of operations for the six-month period ended December 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Infrastructure Materials Corp US (“IMC US”), Silver Reserve Corp. (“SRC”) and Canadian Infrastructure Corp. (“CIC”). All material inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In October 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update, Technical Corrections and Improvements (“ASU 2012-04”). The amendments in this update covered a wide range of topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 did not have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company.

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, " Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities ". This ASU clarifies that the scope of ASU No. 2011-11, " Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. " applies only to derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse purchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with specific criteria contained in FASB Accounting Standards Codification or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company.

-8-


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

1.

Basis of Presentation – Cont’d

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update) in (“ASU 2012-03”). This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2013, the FASB amended its guidance related to the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits. The standard provides that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows. To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The guidance is to be applied prospectively to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date. Retrospective application is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impacts of this guidance.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-04, " Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date ." This ASU addresses the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of certain obligations resulting from joint and several arrangements including debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. This ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this guidance.

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, " Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity ." This ASU addresses the accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. The guidance outlines the events when cumulative translation adjustments should be released into net income and is intended by FASB to eliminate some disparity in current accounting practice. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this guidance.

-9-


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

2.

Nature of Business and Operations

The Company’s focus is on the exploration and development, if feasible, of limestone and precious metals from its claims in the State of Nevada.

The Company is an exploration stage company and has not yet realized any revenue from its operations. It is primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties. Mineral property acquisition costs are initially capitalized in accordance with ASC 805-20-55-37, previously referenced as the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue 04-2. The Company assesses the carrying costs for impairment under ASC 360 and evaluates its carrying value under ASC 930 at each fiscal quarter end. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, the costs incurred to develop such property will be capitalized. In February 2010, the Company capitalized $514,525 as Mineral Property Interests, and has written off all other property payments to project expenses as impaired costs. The previously capitalized Mineral Property Interests were written off as impaired costs in December 2012 as discussed in Note 8, Mineral Property Interests.

To date, mineral property exploration costs have been expensed as incurred. To date the Company has not established any proven or probable reserves on its mineral properties.

The Company’s limestone assets are held by its wholly owned subsidiary, IMC US, a Nevada corporation that was acquired as of November 2008. As of the date of the financial statements, IMC US controls 2 limestone projects in Nevada, made up of 115 mineral claims covering approximately 840 acres on land owned or controlled by the United States Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management (the “BLM”). IMC US has also acquired 50% of the mineral rights on 680 acres and 25% of the mineral rights on 160 acres.

On December 18, 2008, the Company incorporated a second wholly owned subsidiary in the State of Delaware under its former name, “Silver Reserve Corp.” (“SRC”). The Company assigned all fourteen of its silver/base metal projects in Nevada to SRC. SRC has since terminated its interests in four of the projects. As of the date of the financial statements, the remaining ten projects contain 600 mineral claims covering approximately 12,385 acres on BLM land and 14 patented claims and 6 leased patented claims covering approximately 365 acres. SRC also has a milling facility located in Mina, Nevada on six mill site claims covering 30 acres.

The Company has not yet determined that any of its claims, mineral rights, mineral exploration permits or quarry leases can be economically developed and has expensed related costs to project expense. The Company’s assessment of the claims, mineral exploration permits, mineral rights and quarry leases may change after further exploration.

- 10 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

3.

Going Concern

The Company's financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and are presented on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

The Company is in the exploration stage and has not yet realized revenues from its planned operations. The Company has incurred a cumulative loss of $23,889,305 from inception to December 31, 2013. The Company has no source of operating revenue and expects to incur significant expenses before establishing operating revenue. Due to continuing operating losses and cash outflows from continuing operations, the Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain adequate financing and to reach profitable levels of operation. In the event that the Company is unable to raise additional capital, as to which there is no assurance, the Company will not be able to continue doing business. The Company’s future success is dependent upon its continued ability to raise sufficient capital, not only to finance its operating expenses, but to continue its exploration activities and its assessments of the commercial viability of its claims. There is no assurance that such capital will be available on acceptable terms, if at all, or that the Company will attain profitable levels of operation. Historically, the Company has funded operations through the issuance of capital stock, convertible debentures and redeemable preferred stock. Prior to December 2011, the Company received net proceeds of $12,718,365 pursuant to the issuance of such securities. In December 2011, the Company completed a public offering in Canada of shares of its common stock (“Common Shares”) for net proceeds of $2,215,399. On August 28, 2013, the Company completed a private placement of its Common Shares for net proceeds of approximately $465,343. In April 2013 and July 2013, the Company borrowed $140,000 and $150,000, respectively, issuing promissory notes that were converted to Common Shares in October 2013. Management's plan is to continue raising additional funds through future equity or debt financing until it achieves profitable operations from production of minerals or metals on its properties, if feasible.

- 11 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

4.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair values of financial assets measured at the balance sheet date of December 31, 2013 were as follows:

            Quoted prices              
            in active     Significant        
            markets for     observable     Unobservable  
      Carrying     identical assets     inputs     inputs  
    Amount     (Level 1)   (Level 2)   (Level 3)
  Balance sheet classification and nature $     $     $     $    
                           
  Assets                        
  Cash and cash equivalents   160,243     160,243              
  Marketable securities   46,070     46,070              
  Restricted Cash   100,000     100,000              

The fair values of financial assets measured at the balance sheet date of June 30, 2013 were as follows:

            Quoted prices              
            in active     Significant        
            markets for     observable     Unobservable  
      Carrying     identical assets     inputs     inputs  
    Amount     (Level 1)   (Level 2)   (Level 3)  
  Balance sheet classification and nature $   $   $   $  
                           
  Assets                        
  Cash and cash equivalents   106,847     106,847              
  Marketable securities   49,917     49,917              
  Restricted Cash   100,000     100,000              

5.

Restricted Cash

Amounts reflected as Restricted Cash represent either cash held as collateral or certificates of deposits pledged toward reclamation liabilities assessed by the BLM. Periodically, the BLM may require the Company to pledge additional cash as collateral or the Company may be allowed to remove restrictions on this cash by completing its reclamation obligations, as the case may be.

6.

Reclamation Deposit

The Company posted a reclamation bond of $240,805 pursuant to the Plan of Operations for its Blue Nose limestone project, as required by the BLM to secure remediation costs if the project is abandoned or closed. In December 2013, the Company submitted an application to withdraw its Plan of Operations and to seek a refund from the BLM of a portion of the reclamation bond. Also see Note 16, Subsequent Events.

- 12 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

7.

Plant and Equipment, Net

Plant and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided commencing in the month following acquisition using the following annual rate and method:

Computer equipment 30% declining balance method
Office furniture and fixtures 20% declining balance method
Plant and Machinery 15% declining balance method
Tools 25% declining balance method
Vehicles 20% declining balance method
Consumables 50% declining balance method
Molds 30% declining balance method
Mobile Equipment 20% declining balance method
Factory Buildings 5% declining balance method

      December 31, 2013     June 30, 2013  
            Accumulated           Accumulated  
      Cost     Depreciation     Cost     Depreciation  
    $   $   $   $  
                         
  Computer equipment   25,729     15,843     25,729     14,097  
  Office, furniture and fixtures   3,623     2,714     3,623     2,612  
  Plant and Machinery   1,514,511     1,052,100     1,514,511     1,014,606  
  Tools   11,498     8,203     11,498     7,729  
  Vehicles   76,928     57,599     76,928     55,451  
  Consumables   64,197     63,756     64,197     63,612  
  Molds   900     832     900     820  
  Mobile Equipment   73,927     59,299     73,927     57,673  
  Factory Buildings   74,849     23,441     74,849     22,121  
      1,846,162     1,283,787     1,846,162     1,238,721  
                           
  Net carrying amount         562,375           607,441  
                           
  Depreciation Charges         45,006           107,344  

During the six-months ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded depreciation expense of $45,066. During the twelve months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded depreciation expense of $107,344.

8.

Mineral Property Interests

The Company entered into an agreement to acquire, as a wholly owned subsidiary, Canadian Infrastructure Corp. (“CIC”), a Canadian corporation, pursuant to a share exchange agreement (the “CIC Agreement”) dated as of December 15, 2009, between the Company, CIC and Todd D. Montgomery. Under the terms of the CIC Agreement, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of CIC in exchange for 1,021,777 Common Shares of the Company. The CIC Agreement closed on February 9, 2010.

- 13 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

8.

Mineral Property Interests – Cont’d

The Company accounted for the acquisition of CIC as a business combination under the acquisition method as discussed in FASB ASC Topic 805. ASC 805 requires acquisition-date fair value measurement of identifiable assets, liabilities assumed and non-controlling interests in the acquiree. The only assets acquired were CIC’S quarry leases having a fair value of $514,525 (CDN$550,000) that were recorded as an asset, “Mineral Property Interests,” on the date of acquisition. The Company obtained an independent appraisal and market study to determine the fair value of the quarry leases acquired. The stock of the Company traded at $0.27 per share on February 9, 2010, and the Company recorded a $275,880 increase in shareholders’ equity reflecting the issuance of 1,021,777 Common Shares of the Company in exchange for all issued and outstanding shares of CIC. There were no liabilities recorded in the financial records of CIC as of the date of acquisition. Further, the Company acquired all the issued and outstanding shares of CIC, resulting in the absence of non-controlling interests in the acquiree yielding a bargain purchase price of $238,645 that was recorded as Other Income in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. Costs incurred in connection with the acquisition were expensed.

Amounts recognized as assets as of the acquisition date:

Mineral Property Interests, being quarry leases in the province of Manitoba, Canada at fair value (CDN$550,000) $514,525
         
  Total consideration transferred included the following:      
         
Fair value as of the acquisition date of 1,021,777 common shares of the Company issued in exchange for all issued and outstanding shares of CIC $275,880
         
Gain on bargain purchase, being the excess of the fair value of net assets acquired over the purchase price, and recognized as Other Income in the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss $238,645

During the quarter ended December 31, 2012, the Company performed a full review of CIC’s quarry leases. This review considered the exploration potential of the area, the current probable mineral reserves and resources, if any, regional competition, the cost to maintain control of the quarry leases, the projected operating costs to undertake exploration activities in light of the Company’s available cash and the condition of capital markets to fund those operating costs, and the effect of the regional and national economies on limestone prices. These served as inputs to determine which properties the Company considers economical to continue its exploration activities. As a result of these factors, the Company updated its mineral exploration plan and decided not to renew CIC’s quarry leases, which resulted in an impairment charge of $514,525.

- 14 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

9.

Notes Payable

On April 22, 2013, the Company borrowed $140,000 from Mont Strategies Inc., a corporation that is owned and controlled by a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. This demand loan was made pursuant to a promissory note that called for all principal and interest to be paid upon demand. The principal amount of the promissory note bore interest at four percent (4%) per annum and could be prepaid by the Company at any time without penalty. For the six-month period ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded interest expense of $1,519 for the promissory note.

On July 19, 2013, the Company borrowed an additional $150,000 from Mont Strategies Inc., a corporation that is owned and controlled by a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. This demand loan was made pursuant to a promissory note that called for all principal and interest to be paid upon demand. The principal amount of the promissory note bore interest at 4 percent (4%) per annum and could be prepaid by the Company at any time without penalty. For the six-month period ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded interest expense of $1,331 for the promissory note.

On October 8, 2013 the Company completed a debt conversion transaction (the “Conversion”) with Mont Strategies Inc. Under the terms of the Conversion, the Company converted $293,000, representing the combined principal amount of the two promissory notes discussed above and $3,000 of accrued interest thereon, into 6,035,800 Common Shares at a conversion price of CDN$0.05 per share. The remaining $924 of interest accrued on the promissory notes was paid in cash to Mont Strategies Inc. Also see Note 12, Issuance of Common Shares and Warrants.

10.

Deferred Revenue, Marketable Securities, Other Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

On February 25, 2011, SRC entered into an option and joint venture agreement (the “Option Agreement”) with International Millennium Mining Inc. (“IMMI”), a wholly owned subsidiary of International Millennium Mining Corp. (“IMMC”), to sell an 85% interest in SRC’s NL Extension Project (the “NL Project”) for total consideration of $350,000 cash and 1,925,000 shares of IMMC’s common stock (together, the “Consideration”). The NL Project consists of 18 mineral claims located in Esmeralda County, Nevada, approximately 6 miles southwest of Silver Peak, Nevada on Highway 47. Under the terms of the Option Agreement, the Consideration is payable over a five-year period that ends on September 15, 2015, with IMMI’s interest in the NL Project vesting at the end of such period. Also see Note 14, Commitments and Contingencies.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company had received Consideration of $264,960, consisting of 875,000 shares of IMMC with a fair market value of $154,960 that is recorded as Marketable Securities in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and $110,000 in cash. In September 2013, the Company received additional Consideration of $81,876 consisting of 350,000 shares of IMMC’s common stock with a fair market value of $11,876 and $70,000 in cash. Because IMMI’s interest in the NL Project vests at the end of the five-year period, this Consideration is accounted for in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Deferred Revenue, a non-current liability. The unrealized loss of $120,766 arising from the reduction in the market value of the Company’s shares of IMMC’s common stock as of December 31, 2013, is accounted for in the Stockholders’ Equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.

- 15 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

10.

Deferred Revenue, Marketable Securities, Other Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss – Cont’d

On March 5, 2013, SRC executed a Sale and Purchase Agreement (the “Sale Agreement”) with IMMI to sell to IMMI (1) all of SRC’s interest in the NL Project and (2) all of its interest in the Option Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Sale Agreement, upon closing IMMI would pay SRC a purchase price of $425,000 and the Option Agreement would terminate. Also, upon closing of the Sale Agreement, SRC would transfer 100% of its interest in the NL Project to IMMI. The closing date was scheduled to occur on or about April 30, 2013, and was extended several times. In connection with the closing date extensions, IMMI paid a ten percent (10%) non-refundable deposit of $42,500 towards the purchase price, which was also accounted for as Deferred Revenue until such time as the Sale Agreement closed or was cancelled. The terms of the Sale Agreement provided that all Consideration paid by IMMI under the Option Agreement prior to closing would be retained by the Company.

On October 4, 2013, SRC, elected to terminate the Sale Agreement after IMMI failed to close the transaction as contemplated. Accordingly, the non-refundable deposit of $42,500 was forfeited by IMMI and recognized as Other Income in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Option Agreement governing the NL Project, between SRC and IMMI remains in effect.

                  Accumulated  
                  Other  
      Deferred     Marketable     Comprehensive  
      Revenue     Securities     Loss  
  Balance as of June 30, 2013 $  307,460   $  49,917   $  (105,043 )
Consideration received during the period ending December 31, 2013 81,876 11,876
Other income recognized on termination of Sale Agreement (42,500 )
Change in market value of securities for the period ending December 31, 2013 (15,723 ) (15,723 )
  Balance as of December 31, 2013 $  346,836   $  46,070   $  (120,766 )

11.

Asset Retirement Obligation

The Company is required to recognize a liability for its legal obligation to perform reclamation and disturbance monitoring activities once any of its projects are abandoned or closed. Although these activities are conditional upon future events, the Company is required to make a reasonable estimate of the fair value of the liability. Based on the existing level of ground disturbance and monitoring requirements, the discounted asset retirement obligations ("ARO's") were estimated to be $22,455 as of June 30, 2011, assuming payments made over a three-year period. Determination of the undiscounted ARO and the timing of these obligations were based on internal estimates using information currently available and existing regulations.

- 16 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

11.

Asset Retirement Obligation – Cont’d

At the end of each reporting period, ARO’s are equal to the present value of all estimated future costs required to remediate any ground disturbances that exist as of the end of the period, using discount rates applicable at the time of initial recognition of each component of the liability. A liability for an asset retirement obligation may be incurred over more than one reporting period if the events that create the obligation occur over more than one reporting period. Any incremental liability incurred in a subsequent reporting period shall be considered to be an additional layer of the original liability. Each layer shall be initially measured at fair value. Included in this liability are the costs of reclamation and monitoring and maintenance costs. A discount rate of 10% was determined to be applicable. The Company recorded accretion expense of $2,244 for the year ended June 30, 2012, $2,472 for the year ended June 30, 2013, and $1,358 for the six-month period ended December 31, 2013. The Company’s entire ARO relates to the Company’s Blue Nose project.

Balance as of June 30, 2013 $  27,171  
Increase in Asset Retirement Obligation -
Accretion for the period ending December 31, 2013 1,358
       
Balance as of December 31, 2013 $  28,529  

12.

Issuance of Common Shares and Warrants

Common Shares:

Six-month period ended December 31, 2013

On August 28, 2013, the Company completed a private placement (the “Private Placement”) of 33,333,333 Common Shares at a price of $0.014 (CDN$0.015) per share for gross proceeds of $474,203 (CDN$500,000). The Private Placement was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to an exemption afforded by Regulation S promulgated thereunder.

On October 8, 2013 the Company issued 6,035,800 Common Shares as full settlement of a debt conversion transaction (the “Conversion”) with Mont Strategies Inc. (“Mont Strategies”), a company that is owned and controlled by a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. Under the terms of the Conversion, the Company converted $293,000 of indebtedness owed by the Company to Mont Strategies (a related party) into 6,035,800 Common Shares at a conversion price of CDN$0.05 per share. The amount allocated to Stockholders’ Equity based on a fair value of US$0.035 per share was $211,253. The balance of $81,747 represents a gain on the debt settlement with a related party that was also allocated to the equity section of the Balance Sheet because the member of the Company’s Board of Directors is also a significant shareholder in the Company. The Conversion was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to an exemption afforded by Regulation S promulgated thereunder. Also see Note 9, Notes Payable.

- 17 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

12.

Issuance of Common Shares and Warrants – Cont’d

Year ended June 30, 2013

There were no securities issued during this period.

Warrants:

On December 16, 2011, the Company completed the sale of 26,000,000 Common Shares to the public in Canada at a price of $0.096 (CDN$0.10) per share to raise gross proceeds of $2,507,180 (CDN$2,600,000). PI Financial Corp. (“PI Financial”) acted as lead agent and received, among other compensation, non-transferable Agent's Warrants valued at $14,644 entitling PI Financial to acquire 209,850 Common Shares at a price of $0.096 (CDN$0.10) per share exercisable for 24 months. The fair value of the Agent’s Warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: risk-free rate of 1.63%, expected dividend yield of 0%, annualized volatility of 142.45% and expected life of two years. These Agent’s Warrants were not granted pursuant to the Company’s stock option plan then in effect. On December 15, 2013, the Agent’s Warrants expired with none being exercised.

13.

Stock Based Compensation

In July of 2011, the shareholders of the Company approved an amendment and restatement of the Company’s 2006 Stock Option Plan. This amended and restated stock option plan is referred to herein as the “2011 Amended Plan.” The purpose of the 2011 Amended Plan was to enhance the Company's stockholder value and financial performance by attracting, retaining and motivating the Company's officers, directors, key employees and consultants and to encourage stock ownership by such individuals by providing them with a means to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company's success through stock ownership.

The material terms of the 2011 Amended Plan include (a) officers, directors, employees and consultants who provide services to the Company may be granted options to acquire Common Shares of the Company at the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant, (b) options may have a term of up to 10 years, (c) the Company may issue options in a number up to a maximum of 10% of the outstanding Common Shares, and (d) outstanding stock options previously granted pursuant to the 2006 Stock Option Plan will remain in effect and be exercisable in accordance with, and be deemed to be issued under, the terms of the 2011 Amended Plan. It was expected that options issued pursuant to the 2011 Amended Plan would not be “qualified” options under the provisions of section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

In July of 2013, the shareholders of the Company approved the Company’s 2013 Amended Stock Option Plan (the “Current Stock Option Plan”), which amends and restates in its entirety the 2011 Amended Plan. The Current Stock Option Plan effected minor technical clarifications to the 2011 Amended Plan and did not materially change its terms.

- 18 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

13.

Stock Based Compensation – Cont’d

Six-month period ended December 31, 2013

No options were granted pursuant to the Current Stock Option Plan during the six-month period ended December 31, 2013. On December 10, 2013, 25,000 options issued in accordance with the Company’s 2006 Stock Option Plan expired.

For the six-month period ended December 31, 2013, the Company recognized in the financial statements, stock-based compensation costs as per the following details. The fair value of each option used for the purpose of estimating the stock compensation is based on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

The expected term calculation is based upon the expected term the option is to be held, which is the full term of the option. The risk-free interest rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant for an instrument with a maturity that is commensurate with the expected term of the stock options. The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that the Company has never paid cash dividends on our common stock and has no present intention to pay cash dividends. The expected forfeiture rate of 0% is based on the vesting of stock options in a short period of time.

                                                      Stock-based        
                                                      compensation     Unexpensed  
                                                      cost expensed     Stock-based  
                                                      during the six-     compensation  
                                                      month period     cost deferred  
      Risk free     Volatility     Expected     Forfeiture     Expected     Exercise     Total number of     Grant date     ended December     over the vesting  
  Date of grant   rate     factor     Dividends     rate     life     price     options granted     fair value     31, 2013     period  
                                                               
  Oct-8-12   3.63%     168.86%     0%     0%     10 years   $  0.10     125,000   $  0.10   $  3,368   $  -  
  Jun-6-13   3.63%     169.03%     0%     0%     10 years   $  0.10     125,000   $  0.07   $  4,378   $  3,711  
                                                               
  Total                                                 $  7,746   $  3,711  

As of December 31, 2013, there was $3,711 of unrecognized expenses related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted. The stock-based compensation expense for the six-month period ended December 31, 2013 was $7,746.

The following table summarizes the options outstanding at December 31, 2013:

Outstanding at June 30, 2013 (audited)   8,775,000  
Granted   -  
Expired   (25,000 )
Exercised   -  
Forfeited   -  
Cancelled   -  
Outstanding at December 31, 2013   8,750,000  
Exercisable at December 31, 2013   8,687,500  

- 19 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

14.

Commitments and Contingencies

On August 1, 2006, the Company acquired the Pansy Lee Project from Anglo Gold Mining Inc. in exchange for 1,850,000 Common Shares pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated August 1, 2006 (the “Pansy Lee Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to the Pansy Lee Purchase Agreement, a 2% net smelter royalty pertains to 8 of the 30 claims in this project. In the event that any one or more of the 8 claims becomes a producing claim, our revenue is subject to a 2% net smelter return royalty where net smelter returns are based upon gross revenue less deductions as provided in the Pansy Lee Purchase Agreement.

The Company obtained 25 mineral claims (the “Option Claims”), located in Elko County, Nevada pursuant to an option agreement (the “Option Agreement”) dated as of May 1, 2008 (the “Date of Closing”) with Nevada Eagle Resources, LLC and Steve Sutherland (together, the “Optionees”). The provisions of the Option Agreement included, among others, payments of specified annual amounts ranging from $10,000 to $80,000 by the Company to the Optionees over a period of ten years. Effective June 1, 2010, the Company and the Optionees agreed to terminate the Company’s interests in the Option Claims pursuant to (1) payment by the Company of $8,750 to each of the Optionees, (2) performance by the Company of such reclamation and remediation as required to discharge the surface management bond posted by the Company pursuant to a Notice of Intent filed with the BLM prior to undertaking exploration activity on the Option Claims, and (3) conveyance by the Company to Nevada Eagle Resources, LLC of the 124 mineral claims staked by the Company after the Date of Closing that are within the Area of Interest described in the Option Agreement. As of December 31, 2013, the undertakings described in (1) and (3) above have been completed and the reclamation and remediation described in (2) above are in progress. The 25 Option Claims together with 124 mineral claims staked by the Company have been referred to by the Company as the “Medicine Claim Group.”

On December 8, 2008 IMC US entered into a Mineral Rights Lease Agreement (the “Edgar Lease Agreement”) with the Earl Edgar Mineral Trust (“Edgar”) to lease certain mineral rights in Elko County, Nevada described below (the “Edgar Property”). The term of the Edgar Lease Agreement was ten years. The rent was paid each year on January 1st. $1.00 per net acre was paid upon execution of the Edgar Lease Agreement. On January 1 of each year commencing in 2010 and extending for so long as the Edgar Lease Agreement is in effect, IMC US was obligated to make the following payments:

  2010 $1.00 per net acre
  2011 $2.00 per net acre
  2012 $2.00 per net acre
  2013 $3.00 per net acre
  2014 $3.00 per net acre
  2015 $4.00 per net acre
  2016 $4.00 per net acre
  2017 $5.00 per net acre in each year for the duration of the Edgar Lease Agreement.

- 20 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

14.

Commitments and Contingencies – Cont’d

The Edgar Lease Agreement covered 100% of the mineral rights on 1,120 acres of the Edgar Property (“Property A”) and 50% of the mineral rights on 6,720 acres of the Edgar Property (“Property B”). Edgar was entitled to receive a royalty of $0.50 per ton for material mined and removed from Property A and $0.25 per ton for material mined and removed from Property B during the term of the Edgar Lease Agreement and any renewal thereof.

On April 9, 2009, the Company and Edgar entered into an Amendment to the Edgar Lease Agreement (the “Amendment”), effective as of December 8, 2008. The Amendment provided for Standard Steam LLC to carry out exploration for geothermal energy sources on the Edgar Property after obtaining the written consent of the Company. The Amendment also provided for other cooperation with Standard Steam LLC regarding mineral rights on Property B of the Edgar Property.

On November 6, 2013 the Edgar Lease Agreement was terminated by the Company.

On November 30, 2009, IMC US entered into a Mineral Rights Agreement with Perdriau Investment Corp. (“Perdriau”) to purchase 50% of the mineral rights, including all easements, rights of way and appurtenant rights of any type that run with the mineral rights in certain sections of Elko County, Nevada (the “Perdriau Property”). The purchase price was $10 per net acre. IMC US purchased 340 net acres for a total purchase price of $3,400. Perdriau will be entitled to receive a royalty of $0.25 per ton for material mined and removed from the Perdriau Property. Material mined and stored on the Perdriau Property or adjacent property for reclamation purposes will not be subject to any royalty. Material removed from the Perdriau Property for the purposes of testing or bulk sampling, provided it does not exceed 50,000 tons, will also not be subject to any royalty. The royalty will be calculated and paid within 45 days after the end of each calendar quarter.

On January 15, 2010, the Company entered into a Property Lease Agreement with Eugene M. Hammond (the “Hammond Lease”) for surface rights on 80 acres in Elko County, Nevada (the “Hammond Surface Rights”). The term of the Hammond Lease was five years and the annual rent was $500. The Company was responsible for the payment of all real estate taxes on the Hammond Surface Rights. During the term of the Hammond Lease, the Company had the exclusive right to conduct exploration and development work on the Hammond Surface Rights. The results of all drilling and exploration are the property of the Company. The Company was responsible for any environmental damage caused by the Company and any reclamation costs required as a result of drilling and testing. The Company had an option to purchase the property covered by the Hammond Lease for $15,000, less the amount paid in rent during the term of the Hammond Lease.

On December 18, 2013 the Hammond Lease was terminated by the Company.

On January 15, 2010, IMC US entered into a Mineral Rights Agreement with Eugene M. Hammond (the “Hammond Mineral Rights Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company purchased a 25% interest in any and all minerals extracted from 160 acres (the “Hammond Mineral Rights Property”) covered by the Hammond Mineral Rights Agreement. The purchase price was $400. In addition, Eugene M. Hammond is entitled to receive a royalty of $0.125 per ton on material mined and removed from the Hammond Mineral Rights Property. The Hammond Mineral Rights Agreement does not cover petroleum.

- 21 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

14.

Commitments and Contingencies – Cont’d

Effective July 1, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with an individual to provide business and administrative services. The employment agreement has a term of one year and is automatically renewable thereafter. Either party may terminate the employment agreement upon 60 days notice. According to the terms of the employment agreement as amended effective March 1, 2012, the Company will pay the individual no less than $8,333 per month and reimburse related business expenses.

Effective July 1, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with an individual to provide receptionist and administrative services at its Reno, Nevada corporate headquarters. The employment agreement has a term of one year and is automatically renewable thereafter. Either party may terminate the employment agreement upon 30 days notice. Pursuant to this employment agreement, the Company will pay no less than $51,000 per year for such services.

On February 25, 2011, SRC entered into an option and joint venture agreement (the “IMMI Option Agreement”) with International Millennium Mining Inc. (“IMMI”), a wholly owned subsidiary of International Millennium Mining Corp. (“IMMC”), to sell an 85% interest in SRC’s NL Extension Project (the “NL Project”) for total consideration of $350,000 and 1,925,000 shares of IMMC’s common stock (the “Consideration”). The NL Project consists of 18 mineral claims located in Esmeralda County, Nevada, approximately 6 miles southwest of Silver Peak, Nevada on Highway 47. Under the terms of the IMMI Option Agreement, the Consideration is payable over a five-year period that ends on September 15, 2015, with IMMI’s interest in the NL Project vesting at the end of such period. In the event of early termination, IMMI is not entitled to the return of Consideration previously paid to SRC. If the NL Project is determined to be economically feasible, based upon criteria contained in the IMMI Option Agreement, SRC will be required to fund its portion of an operating budget proposed by IMMI in order to retain its 15% interest in the NL Project and to acquire a 15% interest in IMMI’s Nivloc Mine Project (the NL Project and the Nivloc Mine Project, collectively, the “IMMI Project”). In the event that SRC decides not to fund its portion of the budget, its 15% interest would be forfeited, but SRC would be entitled to a 2% net smelter return royalty if and when the IMMI Project enters the production phase. Upon funding of the operating budget and SRC’s acquisition of a 15% interest in the IMMI Project, SRC and IMMI would enter into a joint venture agreement.

Effective February 29, 2012, SRC entered into a mineral lease agreement (the “Gumaskas Agreement”) with Joseph W Gumaskas (“Gumaskas”) to lease a patented claim covering approximately 10 acres (the “Claim”) in Mineral County, Nevada. Unless terminated earlier by SRC, the term of the Gumaskas Agreement is ten years and will automatically renew on the same terms and conditions for additional five-year periods. The Gumaskas Agreement requires SRC to pay Gumaskas advance minimum royalty payments of $500 annually. In the event that the Claim becomes a producing claim, SRC will pay Gumaskas a 3% royalty based upon gross revenue less deductions as permitted by the Gumaskas Agreement. SRC may terminate the Gumaskas Agreement at any time by giving 60 days advance written notice to Gumaskas.

- 22 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

14.

Commitments and Contingencies – Cont’d

On May 15, 2012, SRC entered into an Exploration License with Option to Purchase (the “Buhrman Agreement”) with Ralph L. Buhrman and Jacqueline Buhrman (together, the “Owner”) for three patented claims, covering approximately 59 acres (the “Property”) situated in Mineral County, Nevada. Under the terms of the Buhrman Agreement, SRC was granted the exclusive right and option to enter and examine the Property (the “Exploration License”) in consideration of a $30,000 payment to the Owner (the License Payment”). During the term of the Exploration License, SRC has the exclusive right to undertake geological, geophysical, and geochemical examinations of the Property; to sample the Property by means of pits, trenches, and drilling; and to take bulk samples from the Property for the purpose of conducting metallurgical and leaching tests. However, SRC may not commence development or mining activities on the Property unless it exercises the Purchase Option as defined below. SRC will be responsible for reclamation of its pits, trenches, drill sites, and other such disturbances arising out of its activities on the Property. The Exploration License had an initial one-year term beginning on May 1, 2012 (the “Effective Date”) and ending on April 30, 2013. On April 30, 2013, SRC exercised its right to extend the Exploration License for an additional period of one year by making an additional License Payment of $30,000 to the Owner. SRC was also granted exclusive right and option to purchase the Owner’s ownership interest in the Property (the “Purchase Option”) for the sum of $90,000 less all License Payments previously made. SRC may exercise the Purchase Option at any time during the term of the Exploration License by giving written notice to the Owner. If SRC exercises the Purchase Option, SRC will also pay the Owner a two percent (2%) royalty based upon gross revenues less deductions as defined by the Buhrman Agreement, and SRC will also have the exclusive right and option to purchase such royalty at any time for the sum of $1,000,000 less any payments previously made by SRC to the Owner pursuant to such royalty. SRC may terminate the Buhrman Agreement at any time by giving 30 days’ notice in writing to the Owner.

Effective as of June 23, 2008, the Company appointed Mason Douglas as the President of the Company. Mr. Douglas is also a director of the Company. In connection with the appointment, the Company entered into a consulting services agreement with a Canadian corporation that is controlled by Mr. Douglas (the “Consulting Agreement”). The Consulting Agreement has a term of one year and is then automatically renewable. Either party may terminate the Consulting Agreement upon 90 days notice to the other party. According to the terms of the Consulting Agreement as amended effective March 1, 2012, the Company will pay a fee of $10,417 per month and reimburse related business expenses. The Consulting Agreement permits Mr. Douglas to fulfill his duties for the Company from his office in Canada. Mr. Douglas does not receive a salary from the Company. Effective October 1, 2012, the Company appointed Mr. Douglas to also serve as its Chief Executive Officer. In connection with this appointment, the Consulting Agreement was amended to increase the consulting fee to $155,000 annually, payable in 12 equal monthly installments. By mutual agreement between the Company and Mr. Douglas, effective as of March 1, 2013, the consulting fee was changed to an annual rate of $93,000, payable in 12 equal monthly installments.

- 23 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

14.

Commitments and Contingencies – Cont’d

On April 23, 2013, the Company received a summons from the United States District Court, District of Nevada, naming the Company as a co-defendant in a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Attorney on behalf of the BLM seeking reimbursement for the cost of putting out a fire that occurred on May 8, 2008, and other non-quantified damages. The fire damaged approximately 451 acres of land administered by the BLM near Dayton, Nevada. The lawsuit alleges that the cost of putting out the fire was approximately $510,000. The Company has denied any responsibility for the fire and notified its liability insurance carrier. The Company has not accrued any costs for this claim in its financial statements.

The Company has entered into operating leases for its office space and certain office furniture and equipment. Rent payments associated with those leases for the six-month periods ended December 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012, were $12,547 and $12,165, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, the Company’s estimated future minimum cash payments under non-cancelable operating leases for the years ending June 30, 2014, June 30, 2015, and June 30, 2016, are $10,647, $382, and $0, respectively.

Maintaining Claims in Good Standing

The Company is required to pay to the BLM on or before September 1 st of each year, a fee in the amount of $140 per mineral claim held by the Company. The total amount paid in August 2013, was $98,420 for 703 claims held by the Company at that date. The BLM fee for the 18 NL Project claims held by the Company was paid by IMMI pursuant to the IMMI Option Agreement described above.

The Company is also required to pay on or before November 1 st of each year, annual fees to counties in Nevada in which the claims are held. In October 2013, the Company paid $7,406 to six counties in Nevada for annual claims-related fees.

The Company also holds certain patented claims and leases other patented claims in Nevada. A patented claim is fee simple title to the property. Patented claims are subject to taxes assessed by the local community based on assessment rates set annually.

15.

Related Party Transactions

There are no amounts owed to or from related parties as of December 31, 2013, or June 30, 2013, except as discussed in Note 9, Notes Payable.

The following transactions were undertaken in the normal course of operations and are measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the Company and the related parties.

Six-months ended December 31, 2013

A corporation owned and operated by Mason Douglas, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and also a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, received $49,000 for his services.

- 24 -


INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
(Unaudited-Prepared by Management)

15.

Related Party Transactions – Cont’d

A law firm, a partner of which is also a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, Brent Walter, received $12,971 for legal services rendered and expenses incurred on behalf of the Company.

The Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Rakesh Malhotra, received $3,472 for consulting services provided to the Company.

Anne Macko served as t he Company’s Corporate Secretary and received $18,667 until her resignation on November 5, 2013. There were no disagreements between the Company and Ms. Macko with respect to the management, policies, operations or financial reporting of the Company.

Jeanette Durbin was appointed Corporate Secretary on November 5, 2013, and received $9,333 from her appointment to December 31, 2013.

The Company recorded interest expense of $2,850 pursuant to promissory notes issued to a corporation that is owned and controlled by a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, Todd Montgomery. Also see Note 9, Notes Payable.

Six-months ended December 31, 2012

A corporation owned and operated by Mason Douglas, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and also a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, received $70,002 for his services.

A law firm, a partner of which is also a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, Brent Walter, received $3,925 for legal services rendered and expenses incurred on behalf of the Company.

The Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Rakesh Malhotra, received $5,407 for consulting services provided to the Company.

The Company’s Corporate Secretary, Anne Macko, received $29,500 for administrative services provided to the Company.

16.

Subsequent Events

On January 16, 2014, the Company received $219,205 from the BLM as a partial refund of the reclamation bond for the Company’s Blue Nose limestone project. Also see Note 6, Reclamation Deposit.

On February 2, 2014, 50,000 options issued in accordance with the Company’s 2006 Stock Option Plan expired.

- 25 -


Item 2.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

Our name is Infrastructure Materials Corp. and we sometimes refer to ourselves in this report as “Infrastructure Materials” or “Infrastructure”, or “the Company” or as “we,” “our,” or “us.”

Forward-Looking Statements

Except for historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including, among other things, statements regarding our business strategy, exploration strategy, future revenues and anticipated costs and expenses. Such forward-looking statements include, among others, those statements including the words “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes” and similar language. Our actual results may differ significantly from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed herein as well as in the “RISK FACTORS” section herein. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to the forward-looking statements or reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements.

FOR THE SIX-MONTH AND THREE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013

PLAN OF OPERATIONS

We will require additional capital to maintain our operations and implement the further exploration and possible development of our projects. We expect to raise this capital through the sale of additional securities, through short-term debt financing or some combination of the foregoing. We have limited cash to fund operations and have taken steps to reduce our operating costs. Management is actively pursuing working capital.

Discussion of Operations and Financial Condition

Six-Month and Three-Months Periods ended December 31, 2013

The Company is in the exploration stage and has not yet realized revenues from its planned operations. The Company has incurred a cumulative loss of $23,889,305 from inception to December 31, 2013. We expect our operating losses to continue for so long as we remain in an exploration stage and perhaps thereafter. Our ability to emerge from the exploration stage and conduct mining operations is dependent, in large part, upon our raising additional capital. The Company’s major financial endeavor over the years has been its effort to raise capital to pursue its exploration activities. These efforts continue to be our priority.

- 26 -


Corporate Structure

The following diagram illustrates the Company’s present structure and ownership of its mineral properties and Milling Facility:

The Company’s exploration efforts on its portfolio of limestone and precious metal projects have been reduced primarily due to challenges in raising capital. Exploration of the Company’s precious metals properties held by our wholly owned subsidiary, Silver Reserve Corp. (“SRC”), is focused on the Clay Peters Project. Though the Fall 2013 7,000 ft reverse circulation drill program was cut short due to unfavorable results, the Company has tentative plans to resume drilling on a number of other high priority targets on the Project, depending on the availability of funds. Management believes that the Clay Peters Project, as well as the Silver Queen and Klondyke Projects, currently provide the best opportunity for development of resources that could go to production. The Company is also considering joint venture opportunities with third parties to further explore and develop, if warranted, those properties.

Though funds remain limited, the Company also continues to look for opportunities to develop mineral deposits of other commodities in high demand or which we anticipate will be in high demand in the future. We continue to believe that the United States federal government will embark on major infrastructure expenditures in the next 10 years, though we have been disappointed that these investments have not come sooner. When significant infrastructure investment does occur, we believe it will create a demand for cement that will exceed the current sources of supply in certain areas of the United States. Because cement is made from limestone, we believe our acquisitions in this area could have significant potential.

Despite the challenges to raise capital, we are moving forward with exploration on our Projects. The Company intends to continue to study and accumulate information about cement grade limestone properties in strategic locations with a view to filling an anticipated increased demand for cement in the United States, with a focus on the States of Nevada, California, Utah, Idaho and Arizona. We believe that our Blue Nose and Morgan Hill Projects currently provide an excellent opportunity for development of resources that could go to production.

The Company is also looking for opportunities to monetize its Red Rock milling facility located in Mina, Nevada on six mill site claims covering 30 acres as well as non-essential mineral projects. With the Red Rock mill at its current advanced permitting stage and given its components and processing capacities, we believe that we have the opportunity to either sell the mill or enter into leasing arrangements. The Company intends to use any funds realized from these efforts towards further exploration of its mineral claims.

- 27 -


On August 28, 2013, the Company completed a private placement (the “Private Placement”) of 33,333,333 Common Shares at a price of $0.014 (CDN$0.015) per share for gross proceeds of $474,203 (CDN$500,000). The Private Placement was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to an exemption afforded by Regulation S promulgated thereunder.

On October 4, 2013, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, SRC, elected to terminate a Sale and Purchase Agreement dated March 5, 2013 (the “Sale Agreement”) between SRC and International Millennium Mining Inc (“IMMI”) with respect to the mineral claims group located in Esmeralda County, Nevada known as the “NL Project.” Among other terms, the Sale Agreement provided that, upon a closing to occur on or about April 30, 2013, IMMI would pay SRC a purchase price of $425,000. The closing date was extended several times. In connection with the closing date extensions, IMMI paid a ten percent (10%) non-refundable deposit of $42,500 towards the purchase price. SRC exercised its termination option after IMMI failed to close the transaction as contemplated in the Sale Agreement. Accordingly, the non-refundable deposit of $42,500 was forfeited by IMMI and recognized as Other Income in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations. An option and joint venture agreement governing the NL Project between SRC and IMMI dated February 25, 2011, and described in Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments, below, remains in effect.

On October 8, 2013 the Company issued 6,035,800 shares of its common stock (“Common Shares”) as full settlement of a debt conversion transaction (the “Conversion”) with Mont Strategies Inc., a company that is owned and controlled by a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. Under the terms of the Conversion, the Company converted $293,000 of indebtedness owed by the Company to Mont Strategies Inc. into 6,035,800 Common Shares at a conversion price of CDN$0.05 per share. The Conversion was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to an exemption afforded by Regulation S promulgated thereunder.

Stock Based Compensation

In July of 2011, the shareholders of the Company approved an amendment and restatement of the Company’s 2006 Stock Option Plan. This amended and restated stock option plan is referred to herein as the “2011 Amended Plan.” The purpose of the 2011 Amended Plan was to enhance the Company's stockholder value and financial performance by attracting, retaining and motivating the Company's officers, directors, key employees and consultants and to encourage stock ownership by such individuals by providing them with a means to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company's success through stock ownership.

The material terms of the 2011 Amended Plan include (a) officers, directors, employees and consultants who provide services to the Company may be granted options to acquire Common Shares of the Company at the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant, (b) options may have a term of up to 10 years, (c) the Company may issue options in a number up to a maximum of 10% of the outstanding Common Shares, and (d) outstanding stock options previously granted pursuant to the 2006 Stock Option Plan will remain in effect and be exercisable in accordance with, and be deemed to be issued under, the terms of the 2011 Amended Plan. It was expected that options issued pursuant to the 2011 Amended Plan would not be “qualified” options under the provisions of section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

In July of 2013, the shareholders of the Company approved the Company’s 2013 Amended Stock Option Plan (the “Current Stock Option Plan”), which amends and restates in its entirety the 2011 Amended Plan. The Current Stock Option Plan effected minor technical clarifications to the 2011 Amended Plan and did not materially change its terms.

- 28 -


SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

    Three months     Three months  
    ended     ended  
    December 31, 2013     December 31, 2012  
             
Revenues   Nil     Nil  
Net (Loss)   ($157,933 )   ($1,076,238 )
(Loss) per share-basic and diluted   (0.001 )   (0.011 )

    Six months     Six months  
    ended     ended  
    December 31, 2013     December 31, 2012  
             
Revenues   Nil     Nil  
Net (Loss)   ($553,890 )   ($1,744,776 )
(Loss) per share-basic and diluted   (0.004 )   (0.018 )

    As of     As of  
    December 31, 2013     June 30, 2013  
             
Total Assets $1,158,730   $1,120,998  
Total Liabilities $415,051   $573,795  
Cash dividends declared per share   Nil     Nil  

Total assets as of December 31, 2013, include cash and cash equivalents of $160,243, marketable securities of $46,070, prepaid expenses and other receivables of $49,237, restricted cash of $100,000, reclamation deposits of $240,805, and plant and equipment of $562,375, net of depreciation. As of June 30, 2013, total assets include cash and cash equivalents of $106,847, marketable securities of $49,917, prepaid expenses and other receivables of $15,988, restricted cash of $100,000, reclamation deposits of $240,805, plant and equipment of $607,441, net of depreciation.

The revenues and net loss (unaudited) of the Corporation for the quarter ended December 31, 2013 as well as the seven quarterly periods completed immediately prior thereto are set out below:

    For the     For the     For the     For the     For the     For the     For the     For the  
    three months     three months     three months     three months     three months     three months     nine months     three months  
    ended     ended     ended     ended     ended     ended     ended     ended  
    December     September     June     March     December     September     June 30     March 31,  
    2013     2013     2013     2013     2012     2012     2012     2012  
     $    $   $   $   $    $    
                                                 
Revenues   Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil     Nil  
                                                 
Net Loss   (157,933 )   (395,957 )   (333,935 )   (435,887 )   (1,076,238 )   (668,538 )   (438,177 )   (360,361 )
                                                 
Loss per Weighted
   Average Number of

    Shares Outstanding
  
-Basic and Fully Diluted
(0.001 ) (0.004 ) (0.003 ) (0.004 ) (0.011 ) (0.007 ) (0.004 ) (0.004 )

- 29 -


Revenues

No revenue was generated by the Company’s operations during the three-month and six-month periods ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Company is an exploration stage company and has not yet realized any revenue from its operations.

Net Loss

The Company’s expenses are reflected in the Statements of Operation under the category of Operating Expenses. To meet the criteria of United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), all mineral property acquisition and exploration costs are expensed as incurred. Mineral property acquisition costs are initially capitalized in accordance with ASC 805-20-55-37, previously referenced as the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue 04-2. The Company assesses the carrying costs for impairment under ASC 930 at each fiscal quarter end. The Company has determined that all property payments are impaired and accordingly the Company has written off the acquisition costs. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, the costs incurred to develop such property are capitalized. For the purpose of preparing financial information, all costs associated with a property that has the potential to add to the Company's proven and probable reserves are expensed until a final feasibility study demonstrating the existence of proven and probable reserve is completed. No costs have been capitalized in the periods covered by these financial statements. Once capitalized, such costs will be amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable reserve.

The significant components of expense that have contributed to the total operating expense are discussed as follows:

(a) General and Administration Expense

Included in operating expenses for the three-month period ended December 31, 2013, is general and administration expense of $130,650 as compared with $259,607 for the three-month period ended December 31, 2012. During the six-month period ended December 31, 2013, general and administration expense was $258,521 as compared to $503,511 for the six-month period ended December 31, 2012. General and administration expense consists of professional, consulting, office and general and other miscellaneous costs. General and administration expense represents approximately 44% of the total operating expense for the six-month period ended December 31, 2013 and approximately 29% of the total operating expense for the six-month period ended December 31, 2012. General and administration expense decreased by $244,990 in the current six-month period, as compared to the similar six-month period for the prior year. The decrease in general and administration expense during the three and six-month periods ended December 31, 2013, is mainly due to decreases in expenses for stock based compensation and investor relations.

- 30 -


(b) Project Expense

During the three-month period ended December 31, 2013, project expense was $47,062 as compared to $275,383 for the three-month period ended December 31, 2012. During the six-month period ended December 31, 2013, project expense was $290,027 as compared to $673,364 for the six-month period ended December 31, 2012. Project expense represents approximately 49% of the total operating expenses for the six-month period ended December 31, 2013 and approximately 39% of the total operating expenses for the six-month period ended December 31, 2012. Project expense decreased significantly during the three and six-month periods ended December 31, 2013, primarily due to the Company conducting a smaller drill program at its Clay Peters Project during the current six-month period and the purchase by the Company of several patented claims during the six-month period ended December 31, 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table summarizes the Company’s cash flow and cash in hand for the six-month periods:

    December 31, 2013     December 31, 2012  
             
Cash and cash equivalents $  160,243   $  401,048  
Working capital $  215,864   $  519,602  
Cash (used) in operating activities $  (631,947 ) $  (1,180,829 )
Cash provided in investing activities $  70,000   $  48,738  
Cash provided by financing activities $  615,343   $  -  

As of December 31, 2013, the Company had working capital of $215,864 as compared to $519,602 as of December 31, 2012.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

On August 1, 2006, the Company acquired the Pansy Lee Project from Anglo Gold Mining Inc. in exchange for 1,850,000 Common Shares pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated August 1, 2006 (the “Pansy Lee Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to the Pansy Lee Purchase Agreement, a 2% net smelter royalty pertains to 8 of the 30 claims in this project. In the event that any one or more of the 8 claims becomes a producing claim, our revenue is subject to a 2% net smelter return royalty where net smelter returns are based upon gross revenue less deductions as provided in the Pansy Lee Purchase Agreement.

The Company obtained 25 mineral claims (the “Option Claims”), located in Elko County, Nevada pursuant to an option agreement (the “Option Agreement”) dated as of May 1, 2008 (the “Date of Closing”) with Nevada Eagle Resources, LLC and Steve Sutherland (together, the “Optionees”). The provisions of the Option Agreement included, among others, payments of specified annual amounts ranging from $10,000 to $80,000 by the Company to the Optionees over a period of ten years. Effective June 1, 2010, the Company and the Optionees agreed to terminate the Company’s interests in the Option Claims pursuant to (1) payment by the Company of $8,750 to each of the Optionees, (2) performance by the Company of such reclamation and remediation as required to discharge the surface management bond posted by the Company pursuant to a Notice of Intent filed with the BLM prior to undertaking exploration activity on the Option Claims, and (3) conveyance by the Company to Nevada Eagle Resources, LLC of the 124 mineral claims staked by the Company after the Date of Closing that are within the Area of Interest described in the Option Agreement. As of December 31, 2013, the undertakings described in (1) and (3) above have been completed and the reclamation and remediation described in (2) above are in progress. The 25 Option Claims together with 124 mineral claims staked by the Company have been referred to by the Company as the “Medicine Claim Group.”

- 31 -


On December 8, 2008 IMC US entered into a Mineral Rights Lease Agreement (the “Edgar Lease Agreement”) with the Earl Edgar Mineral Trust (“Edgar”) to lease certain mineral rights in Elko County, Nevada described below (the “Edgar Property”). The term of the Edgar Lease Agreement was ten years. The rent was paid each year on January 1st. $1.00 per net acre was paid upon execution of the Edgar Lease Agreement. On January 1 of each year commencing in 2010 and extending for so long as the Edgar Lease Agreement is in effect, IMC US was obligated to make the following payments:

  2010 $1.00 per net acre
  2011 $2.00 per net acre
  2012 $2.00 per net acre
  2013 $3.00 per net acre
  2014 $3.00 per net acre
  2015 $4.00 per net acre
  2016 $4.00 per net acre
  2017 $5.00 per net acre in each year for the duration of the Edgar Lease Agreement.

The Edgar Lease Agreement covered 100% of the mineral rights on 1,120 acres of the Edgar Property (“Property A”) and 50% of the mineral rights on 6,720 acres of the Edgar Property (“Property B”). Edgar was entitled to receive a royalty of $0.50 per ton for material mined and removed from Property A and $0.25 per ton for material mined and removed from Property B during the term of the Edgar Lease Agreement and any renewal thereof.

On April 9, 2009, the Company and Edgar entered into an Amendment to the Edgar Lease Agreement (the “Amendment”), effective as of December 8, 2008. The Amendment provided for Standard Steam LLC to carry out exploration for geothermal energy sources on the Edgar Property after obtaining the written consent of the Company. The Amendment also provided for other cooperation with Standard Steam LLC regarding mineral rights on Property B of the Edgar Property.

On November 6, 2013 the Edgar Lease Agreement was terminated by the Company.

On November 30, 2009, IMC US entered into a Mineral Rights Agreement with Perdriau Investment Corp. (“Perdriau”) to purchase 50% of the mineral rights, including all easements, rights of way and appurtenant rights of any type that run with the mineral rights in certain sections of Elko County, Nevada (the “Perdriau Property”). The purchase price was $10 per net acre. IMC US purchased 340 net acres for a total purchase price of $3,400. Perdriau will be entitled to receive a royalty of $0.25 per ton for material mined and removed from the Perdriau Property. Material mined and stored on the Perdriau Property or adjacent property for reclamation purposes will not be subject to any royalty. Material removed from the Perdriau Property for the purposes of testing or bulk sampling, provided it does not exceed 50,000 tons, will also not be subject to any royalty. The royalty will be calculated and paid within 45 days after the end of each calendar quarter.

On January 15, 2010, the Company entered into a Property Lease Agreement with Eugene M. Hammond (the “Hammond Lease”) for surface rights on 80 acres in Elko County, Nevada (the “Hammond Surface Rights”). The term of the Hammond Lease was five years and the annual rent was $500. The Company was responsible for the payment of all real estate taxes on the Hammond Surface Rights. During the term of the Hammond Lease, the Company had the exclusive right to conduct exploration and development work on the Hammond Surface Rights. The results of all drilling and exploration are the property of the Company. The Company was responsible for any environmental damage caused by the Company and any reclamation costs required as a result of drilling and testing. The Company had an option to purchase the property covered by the Hammond Lease for $15,000, less the amount paid in rent during the term of the Hammond Lease.

- 32 -


On December 18, 2013 the Hammond Lease was terminated by the Company.

On January 15, 2010, IMC US entered into a Mineral Rights Agreement with Eugene M. Hammond (the “Hammond Mineral Rights Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company purchased a 25% interest in any and all minerals extracted from 160 acres (the “Hammond Mineral Rights Property”) covered by the Hammond Mineral Rights Agreement. The purchase price was $400. In addition, Eugene M. Hammond is entitled to receive a royalty of $0.125 per ton on material mined and removed from the Hammond Mineral Rights Property. The Hammond Mineral Rights Agreement does not cover petroleum.

Effective July 1, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with an individual to provide business and administrative services. The employment agreement has a term of one year and is automatically renewable thereafter. Either party may terminate the employment agreement upon 60 days notice. According to the terms of the employment agreement as amended effective March 1, 2012, the Company will pay the individual no less than $8,333 per month and reimburse related business expenses.

Effective July 1, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with an individual to provide receptionist and administrative services at its Reno, Nevada corporate headquarters. The employment agreement has a term of one year and is automatically renewable thereafter. Either party may terminate the employment agreement upon 30 days notice. Pursuant to this employment agreement, the Company will pay no less than $51,000 per year for such services.

On February 25, 2011, SRC entered into an option and joint venture agreement (the “IMMI Option Agreement”) with International Millennium Mining Inc. (“IMMI”), a wholly owned subsidiary of International Millennium Mining Corp. (“IMMC”), to sell an 85% interest in SRC’s NL Extension Project (the “NL Project”) for total consideration of $350,000 and 1,925,000 shares of IMMC’s common stock (the “Consideration”). The NL Project consists of 18 mineral claims located in Esmeralda County, Nevada, approximately 6 miles southwest of Silver Peak, Nevada on Highway 47. Under the terms of the IMMI Option Agreement, the Consideration is payable over a five-year period that ends on September 15, 2015, with IMMI’s interest in the NL Project vesting at the end of such period. In the event of early termination, IMMI is not entitled to the return of Consideration previously paid to SRC. If the NL Project is determined to be economically feasible, based upon criteria contained in the IMMI Option Agreement, SRC will be required to fund its portion of an operating budget proposed by IMMI in order to retain its 15% interest in the NL Project and to acquire a 15% interest in IMMI’s Nivloc Mine Project (the NL Project and the Nivloc Mine Project, collectively, the “IMMI Project”). In the event that SRC decides not to fund its portion of the budget, its 15% interest would be forfeited, but SRC would be entitled to a 2% net smelter return royalty if and when the IMMI Project enters the production phase. Upon funding of the operating budget and SRC’s acquisition of a 15% interest in the IMMI Project, SRC and IMMI would enter into a joint venture agreement.

Effective February 29, 2012, SRC entered into a mineral lease agreement (the “Gumaskas Agreement”) with Joseph W Gumaskas (“Gumaskas”) to lease a patented claim covering approximately 10 acres (the “Claim”) in Mineral County, Nevada. Unless terminated earlier by SRC, the term of the Gumaskas Agreement is ten years and will automatically renew on the same terms and conditions for additional five-year periods. The Gumaskas Agreement requires SRC to pay Gumaskas advance minimum royalty payments of $500 annually. In the event that the Claim becomes a producing claim, SRC will pay Gumaskas a 3% royalty based upon gross revenue less deductions as permitted by the Gumaskas Agreement. SRC may terminate the Gumaskas Agreement at any time by giving 60 days advance written notice to Gumaskas.

- 33 -


On May 15, 2012, SRC entered into an Exploration License with Option to Purchase (the “Buhrman Agreement”) with Ralph L. Buhrman and Jacqueline Buhrman (together, the “Owner”) for three patented claims, covering approximately 59 acres (the “Property”) situated in Mineral County, Nevada. Under the terms of the Buhrman Agreement, SRC was granted the exclusive right and option to enter and examine the Property (the “Exploration License”) in consideration of a $30,000 payment to the Owner (the License Payment”). During the term of the Exploration License, SRC has the exclusive right to undertake geological, geophysical, and geochemical examinations of the Property; to sample the Property by means of pits, trenches, and drilling; and to take bulk samples from the Property for the purpose of conducting metallurgical and leaching tests. However, SRC may not commence development or mining activities on the Property unless it exercises the Purchase Option as defined below. SRC will be responsible for reclamation of its pits, trenches, drill sites, and other such disturbances arising out of its activities on the Property. The Exploration License had an initial one-year term beginning on May 1, 2012 (the “Effective Date”) and ending on April 30, 2013. On April 30, 2013, SRC exercised its right to extend the Exploration License for an additional period of one year by making an additional License Payment of $30,000 to the Owner. SRC was also granted exclusive right and option to purchase the Owner’s ownership interest in the Property (the “Purchase Option”) for the sum of $90,000 less all License Payments previously made. SRC may exercise the Purchase Option at any time during the term of the Exploration License by giving written notice to the Owner. If SRC exercises the Purchase Option, SRC will also pay the Owner a two percent (2%) royalty based upon gross revenues less deductions as defined by the Buhrman Agreement, and SRC will also have the exclusive right and option to purchase such royalty at any time for the sum of $1,000,000 less any payments previously made by SRC to the Owner pursuant to such royalty. SRC may terminate the Buhrman Agreement at any time by giving 30 days’ notice in writing to the Owner.

Effective as of June 23, 2008, the Company appointed Mason Douglas as the President of the Company. Mr. Douglas is also a director of the Company. In connection with the appointment, the Company entered into a consulting services agreement with a Canadian corporation that is controlled by Mr. Douglas (the “Consulting Agreement”). The Consulting Agreement has a term of one year and is then automatically renewable. Either party may terminate the Consulting Agreement upon 90 days notice to the other party. According to the terms of the Consulting Agreement as amended effective March 1, 2012, the Company will pay a fee of $10,417 per month and reimburse related business expenses. The Consulting Agreement permits Mr. Douglas to fulfill his duties for the Company from his office in Canada. Mr. Douglas does not receive a salary from the Company. Effective October 1, 2012, the Company appointed Mr. Douglas to also serve as its Chief Executive Officer. In connection with this appointment, the Consulting Agreement was amended to increase the consulting fee to $155,000 annually, payable in 12 equal monthly installments. By mutual agreement between the Company and Mr. Douglas, effective as of March 1, 2013, the consulting fee was changed to an annual rate of $93,000, payable in 12 equal monthly installments.

On April 23, 2013, the Company received a summons from the United States District Court, District of Nevada, naming the Company as a co-defendant in a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Attorney on behalf of the BLM seeking reimbursement for the cost of putting out a fire that occurred on May 8, 2008, and other non-quantified damages. The fire damaged approximately 451 acres of land administered by the BLM near Dayton, Nevada. The lawsuit alleges that the cost of putting out the fire was approximately $510,000. The Company has denied any responsibility for the fire and notified its liability insurance carrier. The Company has not accrued any costs for this claim in its financial statements.

- 34 -


The Company has entered into operating leases for its office space and certain office furniture and equipment. Rent payments associated with those leases for the six-month periods ended December 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012, were $12,547 and $12,165, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, the Company’s estimated future minimum cash payments under non-cancelable operating leases for the years ending June 30, 2014, June 30, 2015, and June 30, 2016, are $10,647, $382, and $0, respectively.

Maintaining Claims in Good Standing

The Company is required to pay to the BLM on or before September 1 st of each year, a fee in the amount of $140 per mineral claim held by the Company. The total amount paid in August 2013, was $98,420 for 703 claims held by the Company at that date. The BLM fee for the 18 NL Project claims held by the Company was paid by IMMI pursuant to the IMMI Option Agreement described above.

The Company is also required to pay on or before November 1 st of each year, annual fees to counties in Nevada in which the claims are held. In October 2013, the Company paid $7,406 to six counties in Nevada for annual claims-related fees.

The Company also holds certain patented claims and leases other patented claims in Nevada. A patented claim is fee simple title to the property. Patented claims are subject to taxes assessed by the local community based on assessment rates set annually.

Cash Requirements

At December 31, 2013, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $160,243, marketable securities of $46,070 and prepaid expenses and other receivables of $49,237 for total current assets of $255,550.

Given the present unfavorable climate for raising venture capital, the Company currently plans to spend very little on exploration efforts. During the twelve month period ending December 31, 2014 the Company expects to incur approximately $20,000 of Project expenses in connection with its Clay Peters precious metals project and plans to incur minor additional expenses related to other precious metals projects. The Company also expects to incur approximately $20,000 of expenses in connection with its Blue Nose limestone project. Our ability to incur Project expenses is subject to permitting programs with the Bureau of Land Management and results of drilling as it progresses. The Company has no firm commitment for additional financing and may not be able to incur all of the Project and General and administration expenses planned in the current fiscal year unless further capital is raised.

Subsequent Events

On January 16, 2014, the Company received $219,205 from the BLM as a partial refund of the reclamation bond for the Company’s Blue Nose limestone project. Also see Note 6, Reclamation Deposit.

On February 2, 2014, 50,000 options issued in accordance with the Company’s 2006 Stock Option Plan expired.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not Applicable.

- 35 -


Item 4. Controls and Procedures

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Based on an evaluation, conducted by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), they concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2013, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act are:

1.

recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC's rules and forms, and

   
2.

accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management believes that potential weaknesses in the Company’s internal controls may arise as a result of a lack of segregation of duties and the existence of related party transactions. Management has added compensating controls to address the lack of segregation of duties and plans to add further controls in the future. In connection with related party transactions, management and the Board have required independent valuations prior to engaging in related party transactions that are not in the ordinary course of business. Management has no evidence of any breakdown in its internal controls and continues to explore methods of reducing and minimizing the risk of a material misstatement in the Company’s financial statements.

Changes in Internal Controls

During the quarter ended December 31, 2013, there have been no changes to the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

- 36 -


PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

On April 23, 2013, the Company received a summons from the United State District Court, District of Nevada, naming the Company as a co-defendant in a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Attorney on behalf of the Bureau of Land Management (the “BLM”) seeking reimbursement for the cost of putting out a fire that occurred on May 8, 2008, and other non-quantified damages. The fire damaged approximately 451 acres of land administered by the BLM near Dayton, Nevada. The lawsuit alleges that the cost of putting out the fire was approximately $510,000. The Company has denied any responsibility for the fire and notified its liability insurance carrier. The Company has not accrued any costs for this claim in its financial statements.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following are certain risk factors that could affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. These risk factors should be considered in connection with evaluating the forward-looking statements because they could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. The risk factors highlighted below are not the only ones we face. If any of these events actually occur, our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows could be negatively affected.

1.

THE COMPANY HAS NO SOURCE OF OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPECTS TO INCUR SIGNIFICANT EXPENSES BEFORE ESTABLISHING AN OPERATING COMPANY, IF IT IS ABLE TO ESTABLISH AN OPERATING COMPANY AT ALL.

Currently, the Company has no source of revenue, limited working capital and no commitments to obtain additional financing. The Company will require additional working capital to carry out its exploration programs. The Company has no operating history upon which an evaluation of its future success or failure can be made. The ability to achieve and maintain profitability and positive cash flow is dependent upon:

 

  further exploration of our properties and the results of that exploration.

   

 

  raising the capital necessary to conduct this exploration and preserve the Company’s Properties.

   

 

  raising capital to develop our properties, establish a mining operation, and operate this mine in a profitable manner if any of these activities are warranted by the results of our exploration programs and a feasibility study.

Because the Company has no operating revenue, it expects to incur operating losses in future periods as it continues to spend funds to explore its properties. Failure to raise the necessary capital to continue exploration could cause the Company to go out of business.

- 37 -



2.

WE WILL NEED TO RAISE ADDITIONAL FINANCING TO COMPLETE FURTHER EXPLORATION.

We will require significant additional financing in order to continue our exploration activities and our assessment of the commercial viability of our properties. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts to raise these require funds, or on terms satisfactory to us. The continued exploration of current and future mineral properties and the development of our business will depend upon our ability to establish the commercial viability of our properties and to ultimately develop cash flow from operations and reach profitable operations. We currently are in an exploration stage and we have no revenue from operations and we are experiencing significant cash outflow from operating activities. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we will not be able to continue our exploration activities and our assessment of the commercial viability of our precious metal and mineral properties.

3.

WE HAVE RECEIVED A “GOING CONCERN” COMMENT FROM OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM, WHICH MAY NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR BUSINESS.

Due to the fact that we are an exploration stage company and have no established source of revenues, the report from Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp, our independent registered public accounting firm, regarding our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, includes an explanatory paragraph stating that the financial statements were prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern. The existence of the “going concern” comment in our auditor’s report may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional financing. In the event that we are unable to raise additional capital, as to which there can be no assurance, we may not be able to continue our operations.

4.

WE HAVE NO RESERVES AND WE MAY FIND THAT OUR PROPERTIES ARE NOT COMMERCIALLY VIABLE.

Our properties do not contain reserves in accordance with the definitions adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and there is no assurance that any exploration programs that we undertake will establish reserves. All of our mineral properties are in the exploration stage as opposed to the development stage and have no known body of economic mineralization. The known mineralization at these projects has not yet been determined, and may never be determined to be economic. We plan to conduct further exploration activities on our properties, which future exploration may include the completion of feasibility studies necessary to evaluate whether a commercial mineable mineral exists on any of our properties. There is a substantial risk that these exploration activities will not result in discoveries of commercially recoverable quantities of minerals. Any determination that our properties contain commercially recoverable quantities of minerals may not be reached until such time that final comprehensive feasibility studies have been concluded that establish that a potential mine is likely to be economic. There is a substantial risk that any preliminary or final feasibility studies carried out by us will not result in a positive determination that our mineral properties can be commercially developed.

- 38 -



5.

WE HAVE A HISTORY OF OPERATING LOSSES AND THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCES WE WILL BE PROFITABLE IN THE FUTURE.

We have a history of operating losses, expect to continue to incur losses, and may never be profitable. Further, we have been dependent on sales of our equity securities and debt financing to meet our cash requirements. We have incurred losses totaling $23,889,305 from inception to December 31, 2013, and incurred losses of $553,890 during the six-month period ended December 31, 2013. Further, we do not expect positive cash flow from operations in the near term. There is no assurance that actual cash requirements will not exceed our estimates. In particular, additional capital may be required in the event that: (i) the costs to acquire additional mineral exploration claims are more than we currently anticipate; or (ii) exploration and or future potential mining costs for additional claims increase beyond our expectations.

6.

THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH EXPLORATION COULD CAUSE PERSONAL INJURY OR DEATH, ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE AND POSSIBLE LEGAL LIABILITY.

We are not currently engaged in mining operations because we are in the exploration phase. However, our exploration operations could expose the Company to liability for personal injury or death, property damage or environmental damage. Although we carry property and liability insurance, cost effective insurance contains exclusions and limitations on coverage and may be unavailable in some circumstances.

7.

BECAUSE OF THE UNIQUE DIFFICULTIES AND UNCERTAINTIES INHERENT IN MINERAL EXPLORATION VENTURES AND CURRENT DETERIORATION IN EQUITY MARKETS, WE FACE A HIGH RISK OF BUSINESS FAILURE.

Investors should be aware of the difficulties normally encountered by new mineral exploration companies and the high rate of failure of such enterprises. Our prospects are further complicated by a pronounced deterioration in equity markets and constriction in equity capital available to finance and maintain our exploration activities. Our likelihood of success must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications and delays encountered in connection with the exploration of the mineral properties that we plan to undertake and the difficult economy and market volatility that we are experiencing. Moreover, most exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercial mineable deposits.

8.

OUR BUSINESS IS AFFECTED BY CHANGES IN COMMODITY PRICES.

Our ability to raise capital and explore our properties and the future profitability of those operations is directly related to the market price of certain minerals such as silver and limestone as well as the price and availability of cement. The Company is negatively affected by the current decline in commodity prices

9.

THE COMPANY COULD ENCOUNTER REGULATORY AND PERMITTING DELAYS.

The Company could face delays in obtaining permits to operate on the property covered by the claims. Such delays could jeopardize financing, if any is available, which could result in having to delay or abandon work on some or all of the properties.

- 39 -



10.

THERE ARE PENNY STOCK SECURITIES LAW CONSIDERATIONS THAT COULD LIMIT YOUR ABILITY TO SELL YOUR SHARES.

Our common stock is considered a "penny stock" and the sale of our stock by you will be subject to the "penny stock rules" of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The penny stock rules require broker-dealers to take steps before making any penny stock trades in customer accounts. As a result, the market for our shares could be illiquid and there could be delays in the trading of our stock which would negatively affect your ability to sell your shares and could negatively affect the trading price of your shares.

11.

CURRENT LEVELS OF MARKET VOLATILITY COULD HAVE ADVERSE IMPACTS.

The capital and credit markets have been experiencing volatility and disruption. If the current levels of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, there can be no assurance that the Company will not experience adverse effects, which may be material. These effects may include, but are not limited to, difficulties in raising additional capital or debt and a smaller pool of investors and funding sources. There is thus no assurance the Company will have access to the equity capital markets to obtain financing when necessary or desirable.

12.

WE DO NOT INTEND TO PAY DIVIDENDS IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.

We have never declared or paid a dividend on our common stock. We intend to retain earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business and, therefore, do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

- 40 -


Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)

None


(b) 31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
     
  31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
     
32.1 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(c)

In addition, the following are incorporated by reference:

   

Current Report on Form 8-K/A “Item 5.07: Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders”, originally dated July 16, 2013 filed January 10, 2014

- 41 -


SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

  INFRASTRUCTURE MATERIALS CORP.
   
   
Dated: February 12, 2014                        By : /s/Jeanette Durbin
                         Jeanette Durbin, Secretary

- 42 -


Infrastructure Materials (CE) (USOTC:IFAM)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 5월(5) 2024 으로 6월(6) 2024 Infrastructure Materials (CE) 차트를 더 보려면 여기를 클릭.
Infrastructure Materials (CE) (USOTC:IFAM)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 6월(6) 2023 으로 6월(6) 2024 Infrastructure Materials (CE) 차트를 더 보려면 여기를 클릭.