The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
EL CAPITAN PRECIOUS METALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
Three Months Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
(As Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
6,667
|
|
|
$
|
10,315
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for third party payables
|
|
|
82,000
|
|
|
|
217,431
|
|
Common stock issued for related party payables
|
|
|
145,000
|
|
|
|
102,849
|
|
Common stock issued on settlement of debt and accrued interest
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
307,982
|
|
Common stock issued for inventory
|
|
|
3,784
|
|
|
|
378,430
|
|
Common stock issued for prepayment of services and costs incurred
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
120,337
|
|
Common stock issued for accrued mining cost
|
|
|
79,085
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common stock issued for fixed assets
|
|
|
8,515
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Purchase of insurance through financing contract
|
|
|
25,224
|
|
|
|
32,773
|
|
Debt discount from derivative liabilities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
92,000
|
|
Reclassification of warrants from equity to derivative liabilities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
205,526
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
EL CAPITAN PRECIOUS METALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Business, Operations and Organization
The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. (“El Capitan” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include all information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) for complete annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation. Interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2017, or for any subsequent period. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on January 13, 2017 (the “2016 Form 10-K”). The consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2016, has been derived from the audited financial statements included in the 2016 Form 10-K.
Notes to the financial statements which would substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the audited financial statements for fiscal 2016 as reported in the 2016 Form 10-K have been omitted.
On July 26, 2002, El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. was incorporated as a Delaware corporation to engage in the business of acquiring properties containing precious metals, principally gold, silver, and platinum (“El Capitan Delaware”). On March 18, 2003, El Capitan Delaware entered into a share exchange agreement with DML Services, Inc. (“DML”), a Nevada corporation, and became the wholly owned subsidiary of DML. On April 11, 2003, DML changed its name to El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. The results of El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc., a Nevada corporation (formerly DML Services, Inc.), and its wholly owned Delaware subsidiary of the same name are presented on a consolidated basis.
El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc., a Nevada corporation, is based in Prescott, Arizona. Together with its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company,” “our” or “we”), the Company is an exploration stage company as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Industry Guide 7, as the Company has no established reserves as required under the Industry Guide 7. We are principally engaged in the exploration of precious metals and other minerals. Our primary asset is the 100% equity interest in El Capitan, Ltd., an Arizona corporation (“ECL”), which holds an interest in the El Capitan property located near Capitan, New Mexico (the “El Capitan Property”). Our ultimate objective is to market and sell the El Capitan Property to a major mining company or enter into a joint venture arrangement with a major mining company to conduct mining operations. We have completed research and confirmation procedures on the recovery process for the El Capitan Property mineralized material and our evaluation as to the economic and legal feasibility of the property. We have not yet demonstrated the existence of proven or probable reserves at the El Capitan Property. To date, we have not had any material revenue producing operations. There is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on our property.
We commenced planned mineral exploration activity in the quarter ended December 2015 under our modified mining permit. However, we have not yet demonstrated the existence of proven or probable reserves at our El Capitan Property. As a result, and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for exploration stage companies, all expenditures for exploration and evaluation of our property are expensed as incurred.
The Company owns 100% of the outstanding common stock of El Capitan Delaware. Prior to January 19, 2011, El Capitan Delaware owned a 40% interest in El Capitan, Ltd., an Arizona corporation (“ECL”). On January 19, 2011, we acquired the remaining 60% interest in ECL from Gold and Minerals Company, Inc. (“G&M”) by merging an acquisition subsidiary created by the Company with and into G&M. In connection with the merger, each share of G&M common and preferred stock outstanding was exchanged for approximately 1.414156 shares of the Company’s common stock, resulting in the issuance of an aggregate of 148,127,043 shares of the Company’s common stock to former G&M stockholders. Upon closing of the merger, G&M became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and our consolidated Company acquired 100% of ECL. As a result, we now own 100% of the El Capitan Property site (described below).
Restatement Effect on Financial Statements
The following table illustrates the impact of the restatement of advances to vendor to the restated unaudited consolidated balance sheet, the unaudited statement of operations and unaudited statement of cash flows for the period ended December 31, 2016.
The Company has subsequently determined to expense all costs for the Pilot Plant as incurred and applying the SEC Industry Guide 7 to the Pilot Plant activity.
|
|
As Previously
Reported
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances to vendor
|
|
$
|
335,616
|
|
|
$
|
(335,616
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
$
|
822,497
|
|
|
$
|
(335,616
|
)
|
|
$
|
486,881
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
3,350,454
|
|
|
$
|
(335,616
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,014,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
$
|
(212,474,619
|
)
|
|
$
|
(335,616
|
)
|
|
$
|
(212,810.235
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
$
|
1,757,908
|
|
|
$
|
(335,616
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,422,292
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
$
|
3,350,454
|
|
|
$
|
(335,616
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,014,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for three months
ended December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mine and exploration costs
|
|
$
|
189,650
|
|
|
$
|
335,616
|
|
|
$
|
525,266
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
$
|
311,174
|
|
|
$
|
335,616
|
|
|
$
|
646,790
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
$
|
(448,011
|
)
|
|
$
|
(335,616
|
)
|
|
$
|
(783,627
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for three months
ended December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(448,011
|
)
|
|
$
|
(335,616
|
)
|
|
$
|
(783,627
|
)
|
Stock issued for mining costs
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
235,616
|
|
|
$
|
235,616
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
(31,375
|
)
|
|
$
|
25,224
|
|
|
$
|
(6,151
|
)
|
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
|
|
$
|
(321,539
|
)
|
|
$
|
(74,776
|
)
|
|
$
|
(396,315
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance to vendor for pilot plant equipment purchases
|
|
$
|
(100,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
|
$
|
(100,002
|
)
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
Increase in finance contracts
|
|
$
|
25,224
|
|
|
$
|
(25,224
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
|
$
|
188,982
|
|
|
$
|
(25,224
|
)
|
|
$
|
163,758
|
|
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Gold and Minerals Company, Inc., a Nevada corporation; and El Capitan, Ltd., an Arizona corporation. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Basis of Presentation and Going Concern
The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"), and have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company currently has a minimum source of revenue to cover its costs. The Company has incurred a loss for the year ended September 30, 2016 and for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and the Company has a working capital deficit as of December 31, 2016. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
To continue as a going concern, the Company is dependent on achievement of cash flow and future profits from entering the production stage of operations. The Company does not have adequate liquidity to fund its current operations, meet its obligations and continue as a going concern. The Company has an “equity line” financing arrangement under a Purchase Agreement with River North Equity, LLC, as amended. In the past the Company has secured working capital loans to assist in financing its activities for the near term. The Company may also pursue other financing alternatives from time to time, including short-term operational strategic financing or equity financing, to fund its activities until it can achieve cash flow and profits from its operations. The Company’s consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments, which include cash, investments, accounts payable, accrued expenses and notes payable, approximate their carrying amounts because of the short maturities of these instruments or because of restrictions.
Management Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting periods. Management makes these estimates using the best information available at the time the estimates are made; however, actual results could differ materially from these estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers those short-term, highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less as cash and cash equivalents. At times, cash in banks may be in excess of the FDIC limits. The Company has no cash equivalents.
Inventory
Inventories include mineralized material stockpile, concentrate, iron ore inventories and road base, as described below. Inventories are carried at the lower of average cost or net realizable value, in the case of mineralized material stockpile and concentrate inventories and minimal cost is attributable to the iron ore inventories. The net realizable value of mineralized material stockpile inventories represents the estimated future sales price of the product based on current and long-term metals prices, less the estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to sale. Concentrate inventories are carried at the lower of full cost of production or net realizable value based on current metals prices. Write-downs of inventory will be reported as a component of production costs applicable to sales.
Mineralized Material
Stockpile Inventories
Mineralized material stockpile inventories represent mineralized materials that have been mined and are available for further processing. Costs are allocated to mineralized material stockpile inventories based on relative values of material stockpiled and processed using current mining costs incurred up to the point of stockpiling the mineralized material.
Concentrates
Concentrates inventory include metal concentrates located either at the Company’s El Capitan Property mine site or in transit to a customer’s port. Inventories consist of mineralized material that contains gold and silver mineralization.
Iron Ore
Iron ore material is inventoried until the market prices are reestablished at a higher market demand and are valued at approximately $20 a ton. Any proceeds from the sale of iron ore will offset the cost of mining the mineralized ore.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Upon retirement or sale, the cost of the assets disposed of and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, with any resultant gain or loss being recognized as a component of operating income or expense. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash consists of two certificates of deposits in favor of the New Mexico Minerals and Mining Division for a total of $74,506. The amount is posted as a financial assurance for required reclamation work to be completed on mined acreage.
Exploration Property Costs
Exploration property costs are expensed as incurred until such time as economic reserves are quantified. To date the Company has not established any proven or probable reserves on the El Capitan Property. The Company has capitalized $1,864,608 of exploration property acquisition costs reflecting its investment in the El Capitan Property.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow or, market risks. The Company reviews the terms of convertible debt, equity instruments and other financing arrangements to determine whether there are embedded derivative instruments, including embedded conversion options that are required to be bifurcated and accounted for separately as a derivative financial instrument. Also, in connection with the issuance of financing instruments, the Company may issue freestanding options or warrants that may, depending on their terms, be accounted for as derivative instrument liabilities, rather than as equity. The Company may also issue options or warrants to non-employees in connection with consulting or other services.
Derivative financial instruments are initially measured at their fair value. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as charges or credits to income. For warrant-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to value the derivative instruments. To the extent that the initial fair values of the freestanding and/or bifurcated derivative instrument liabilities exceed the total proceeds received, an immediate charge to income is recognized, in order to initially record the derivative instrument liabilities at their fair value.
The discount from the face value of the convertible debt or equity instruments resulting from allocating some or all of the proceeds to the derivative instruments, together with the stated interest on the instrument, is amortized over the life of the instrument through periodic charges to income, using the effective interest method.
The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is reassessed at the end of each reporting period. If reclassification is required, the fair value of the derivative instrument, as of the determination date, is reclassified. Any previous charges or credits to income for changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are not reversed. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within twelve months of the balance sheet date.
Stock-Based Compensation
FASB ASC 718 requires companies to measure all stock compensation awards using a fair value method and recognize the related compensation cost in its financial statements. Beginning with the Company’s quarterly period that began on October 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 718 and expenses the fair value of employee stock options and similar awards in the financial statements. The Company accounts for share based payments in accordance with ASC 718,
Compensation - Stock Compensation
, which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on the grant date fair value of the award. In accordance with ASC 718-10-30-9,
Measurement Objective – Fair Value at Grant Date
, the Company estimates the fair value of the award using the Black-Scholes option pricing model for valuation of the share-based payments. The Company believes this model provides the best estimate of fair value due to its ability to incorporate inputs that change over time, such as volatility and interest rates, and to allow for actual exercise behavior of option holders. The simplified method is used to determine compensation expense since historical option exercise experience is limited relative to the number of options issued. The compensation cost is recognized ratably using the straight-line method over the expected vesting period.
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation to other than employees in accordance with FASB ASC 505-50. Equity instruments issued to other than employees are valued at the earlier of a commitment date or upon completion of the services, based on the fair value of the equity instruments and is recognized as expense over the service period.
The Company recognized stock-based administrative compensation aggregating $0 and $22,367 for common stock options and common stock issued to administrative personnel, directors and consultants during the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Also during the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company paid stock-based compensation consisting of common stock issued to non-employees and mining costs aggregating $235,616 and $102,207, respectively.
Revenue Recognition
When revenue is generated from operations, it will be recognized in accordance with FASB ASC 605. In general, the Company will recognize revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue generated and costs incurred under this agreement will be reported on a net basis in accordance with FASB ASC 605-45. There was nominal revenue generated for the Company’s quarter ended December 31, 2015 and none for the quarter ended December 31, 2016.
Pilot Plant Costs
The Company paid to the operator of the Pilot Plant currently being prepared for the equipment in transit operating costs for site improvements and sundry equipment. Based on current information, the equipment is estimated to arrive in the third week of February 2017 and anticipated to be operational in the fourth week of the month.
The Company has subsequently determined to expense all costs for the Pilot Plant as incurred and applying the SEC Industry Guide 7 to the Pilot Plant activity. Any proceeds from the sale of precious metals derived from concentrates generated by the Pilot Plant will be divided on a future determined percentage split between the Company and the Pilot Plant operator. The Pilot Plant operator owns the equipment per the terms in the Agreement.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Other than as set forth below, management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.
In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-01,
“Financial Instruments - Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Subtopic 825-10).”
The amendments require all equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized through net income (other than those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee). The amendments also require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities and the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet for public business entities. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect to early adopt this guidance and does not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09,
"Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting."
ASU 2016-09 amends several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted any interim or annual period. If early adopted, an entity must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In August, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
(a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force). Effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period.
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the AICPA, and the SEC during the current reporting period did not, or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Consulting Agreements
Effective May 1, 2009, the Company has informal arrangements with an individual, currently whom is an officer, pursuant to which such individual serves as support staff for the functioning of the home office and all related corporate activities and projects. The aggregate monthly payments under the informal arrangements are $6,667. There is no written agreement with this individual. At December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016, this individual had accrued and unpaid compensation of $40,000 respectively, recorded in accrued compensation – related parties.
During the three months ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 1,768,293 of restricted common shares and 1,768,293 shares of S-8 to a former officer and currently a director of the Company as payment of accrued compensation of $145,000. The fair value of the stock was $199,110 and the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $54,110.
In January 2012, the Company retained the consulting services of Management Resource Initiatives, Inc. (“MRI”), a company controlled by John F. Stapleton who served as the Chief Financial Officer and a director of the Company at that time and who currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company. The current monthly consulting fee for such services is $15,000. Total consulting fees expensed to MRI for both the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $45,000, respectively. At December 31, 2016, MRI had accrued and unpaid compensation of $315,000 recorded in accrued compensation – related parties.
Total administrative consulting fees expensed under these informal arrangements for both the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $65,000, respectively.
On February 4, 2015, the Company signed a $30,000 promissory note payable to MRI, at 18% interest per annum, due and payable on February 4, 2016. As an inducement for the loan represented by the note, the Company issued 200,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company to MRI. The Company approved amending the note to extend the maturity date from February 4, 2016 to February 4, 2017 under the original terms of the Agreement. See
Note 5.
NOTE 3 – INVENTORY
The following table provides the components of inventory as of December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineralized material stockpile
|
|
$
|
84,153
|
|
|
$
|
87,840
|
|
Concentrate
|
|
|
154,411
|
|
|
|
146,738
|
|
Iron ore
|
|
|
17,686
|
|
|
|
17,888
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
256,250
|
|
|
$
|
252,466
|
|
NOTE 4 – ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining costs
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
60,613
|
|
Accounting and legal
|
|
|
223,865
|
|
|
|
285,025
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
68,639
|
|
|
|
61,694
|
|
|
|
$
|
292,504
|
|
|
$
|
407,332
|
|
NOTE 5 – NOTES PAYABLE
Agreements with Logistica U.S. Terminals, LLC
Under an agreement with Logistica U.S. Terminals, LLC (“Logistica”) dated February 28, 2014, Logistica agreed to remit a $400,000 payment on the Company’s behalf that represented the remaining balance of the Company’s purchase price for a heavy ore trailing separation line to be used for processing of mineralized material at the El Capitan Property mine site. The Company previously remitted $100,000 toward the purchase of such equipment. In consideration for Logistica remitting such payment, the Company agreed to deliver a $400,000 promissory note to Logistica and issued 2,500,000 shares of common stock to a designee of Logistica under the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. The promissory note accrues interest at 4.5%, with principal and accrued interest payments to be made out of the Company’s proceeds from sale of iron extracted from mineralized material as part of the Company’s exploration activities. As of December 31, 2016, the outstanding balance under this note payable was $400,000 and accrued interest on the note was $51,140.
On January 5, 2016, we entered into our current agreement with Logistica U.S. Terminals, LLC (“Logistica”). Under the agreement we will provide to Logistica concentrated ore to their specifications at the mine site. Logistica will transport, process, and refine the precious metals concentrates to sell to precious metals buyers. The terms of the new agreement provide for the recovery of hard costs related to the concentrates by both parties prior to the distribution of profits. The agreement also provided for the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock and the elimination of a $100,000 accrued liability to Logistica for prior services rendered. When certain terms and conditions are met, the Agreement calls for Logistica to arrange for a letter of credit for working capital for the mining, processing and sale activities under the Agreement. The shares were issued in August 2016. The new agreement supersedes the previous agreements with Logistica.
October 17, 2014 Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement
On October 17, 2014, we entered into a private Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor pursuant to which we borrowed $500,000 against delivery of a promissory note (the “2014 Note”) in such amount and issued warrants to purchase 882,352 shares of our common stock pursuant to the Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement. The promissory note carries an interest rate of 8% per annum, was initially due on July 17, 2015 and is secured by a first priority security interest in all right, title and interest of the Company in and to the net proceeds received by the Company from its sale of tailings separated from iron recovered by the Company at the El Capitan Property. On August 24, 2015, the 2014 Note was mutually extended from July 17, 2015 to January 17, 2016. In consideration of the extension, the Company amended the common stock purchase warrant to purchase 4,714,286 shares (subject to adjustment) of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.07 per share. The warrant dated October 17, 2014 was cancelled. On January 19, 2016, the amended 2014 Note was extended from January 17, 2016 to September 19, 2016. The note is currently in default. In consideration of the extension, we issued to the investor a fully vested three year common stock purchase warrant to purchase 471,429 shares (subject to adjustment) of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.051 per share, the closing price on the date of the agreed extension agreement. The fair value of the warrants was determined to be $16,775 using Black-Scholes option price model and was expensed during the three months ended March 31, 2016. The Note is currently due and principal payments are being made on the Note. During the quarter ended December 31, 2016, the outstanding principal balance of the amended 2014 Note was reduced by an additional $150,000 and related accrued interest payments have been made. As of December 31, 2016, the outstanding balance under this note payable was $250,000 and accrued interest on the note was $1,205.
February 4, 2015 Unsecured Promissory Notes
On February 4, 2015, we issued unsecured promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $63,000, of which $30,000 is issued to MRI, a company controlled by John F. Stapleton, who served as the Chief Financial Officer and a director of the Company at that time and who currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company. Outstanding amounts under these notes accrue interest at 18% per year, with all principal and accrued interest being due and payable on February 4, 2016. As additional consideration for the loan, we issued 200,000 shares of our restricted common stock for each note for a total of 400,000 shares. The relative fair value of the common stock was determined to be $21,211 and was recorded as discounts to the promissory notes was amortized to interest expense over the life of the notes. On February 4, 2016, one of the promissory notes was amended to extend the maturity date from February 4, 2016 to February 4, 2017 and reduced the interest rate to 10% per year. The Company also agreed to add the accrued interest on the note at February 4, 2016 of $5,940 to the principle of the note. In consideration of the amendment, the Company agreed to issue an aggregate 150,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company to the lenders and the Board of Directors approved the issuance on April 22, 2016. One of the lenders is affiliated with the Company and provided $30,000 of the original $63,000 loaned funds and has agreed to extend the note to February 4, 2017 at the same rate of interest and the issuance of 200,000 shares of our restricted common stock. Our obligations under both notes are personally guaranteed by the Company’s director and Chief Executive Officer at the time of the original notes.
As of December 31, 2016, the aggregate outstanding balance under these notes was $68,940, accrued interest was $13,828 and the unamortized discount on the notes payable was $507. During the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, amortization expense of $1,262 and $6,253, respectively was recognized.
Financing of Insurance Premiums
On August 15, 2016, we entered into an agreement to finance a portion of our liability insurance premiums in the amount of $28,384 at an interest rate of 7.25% with equal payments of $2,934, including interest, due monthly beginning July 14, 2016 and continuing through April 14, 2017. As of December 31, 2016, the outstanding balance under this note payable was $11,559.
On November 14, 2016, we entered into an agreement to finance director and officer insurance premiums in the amount of $25,224 at an interest rate of 5.00% with equal payments of $2,581, including interest, due monthly beginning December 21, 2016 and continuing through September 21, 2017. As of December 31, 2016, the outstanding balance under this note payable was $22,748.
The components of the notes payable, including the note payable to related party, at December 31, 2016 are as follows:
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Discount
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
$
|
723,247
|
|
|
$
|
(507
|
)
|
|
$
|
722,740
|
|
Notes payable – related party
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
753,247
|
|
|
$
|
(507
|
)
|
|
$
|
752,740
|
|
The components of the notes payable at September 30, 2016 are as follows:
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Discount
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
$
|
858,988
|
|
|
$
|
(1,769
|
)
|
|
$
|
857,219
|
|
Notes payable – related party
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
888,988
|
|
|
$
|
(1,769
|
)
|
|
$
|
887,219
|
|
NOTE 6 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
U.S. accounting standards require disclosure of a fair-value hierarchy of inputs the Company uses to value an asset or a liability. In September 2006, the FASB issued new accounting guidance, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company previously partially adopted this guidance for all instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. In the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company adopted the remaining provisions of the guidance for all non-financial assets and liabilities that are not re-measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The adoption of these provisions did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Fair value standards define fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, the standards establish a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires that the Company maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of the fair-value hierarchy are described as follows:
Level 1 – Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments such as exchange-traded derivatives, marketable securities and listed equities.
Level 2 – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date.
Level 3 – Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.
The following table sets forth by level with the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on September 30, 2016 and 2015:
December 31, 2016:
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration property
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,864,608
|
|
|
$
|
1,864,608
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
September 30, 2016:
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration property
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,864,608
|
|
|
$
|
1,864,608
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The exploration property associated with the El Capitan Property, which the Company is intending to continue to market for sale to a major mining company, is classified as Level 3. The fair value of the exploration property is determined based upon the cost basis the of the Company’s investment in the exploration property under U.S. GAAP. There was no change in the carrying valuation of the exploration property during the three months ended December 31, 2016.
NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Related Party
In January 2012, the Company retained the consulting services of Management Resource Initiatives, Inc. (“MRI”), a company controlled by John F. Stapleton who served as the Chief Financial Officer and a director of the Company at that time and who currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company. The current monthly consulting fee for such services is $15,000. Total consulting fees expensed to MRI for both the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $45,000, respectively. At December 31, 2016, MRI had accrued and unpaid compensation of $315,000 recorded in accrued compensation – related parties.
On January 18, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Stephan J. Antol as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, replacing Mr. Stapleton in such capacity. Mr. Stapleton continued to serve as a director of the Company and as Chairman of the Board. Effective August 4, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Mr. Stapleton to replace Charles C. Mottley as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The change in senior management was proposed by Mr. Mottley, who continues to serve as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors and as President Emeritus. At December 31, 2016, Mr. Antol had accrued and unpaid compensation of $40,000 recorded in accrued compensation – related parties.
On February 4, 2015, the Company signed a $30,000 promissory note payable to MRI, at 18% interest per annum, due and payable on February 4, 2016. As an inducement for the loan represented by the note, the Company issued 200,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company to MRI. The Company approved amending the note to extend the maturity date from February 4, 2016 to February 4, 2017 under the original terms of the Agreement. See
Note 5, February 4, 2015 Unsecured Promissory Notes.
Purchase Contract with Glencore AG
On March 10, 2014, the Company entered into a life-of-mine off take agreement with Glencore AG (“Glencore”) for the sale of iron extracted from mineralized material at the El Capitan Property (such agreement is referred to herein as the “Glencore Purchase Contract”). Under the terms of the Glencore Purchase Contract, the Company agreed to sell to Glencore, and Glencore agreed to purchase from the Company, iron that meets the applicable specifications from the El Capitan Property mine. Payment for the iron is to be made pursuant an irrevocable letter of credit in favor of the Company. The purchase price is based on an index price less an applicable discount. Either party may terminate the Glencore Purchase Contract following a breach by the other party that remains uncured for a specified period after receipt of written notice. Because of current market iron ore prices, the contract has not been implemented or terminated.
Agreements with Logistica U.S. Terminals, LLC
Under an agreement with Logistica U.S. Terminals, LLC (“Logistica”) dated February 28, 2014, Logistica agreed to remit a $400,000 payment on the Company’s behalf that represented the remaining balance of the Company’s purchase price for a heavy ore trailing separation line to be used for processing of mineralized material at the El Capitan Property mine site. The Company previously remitted $100,000 toward the purchase of such equipment. In consideration for Logistica remitting such payment, the Company agreed to deliver a $400,000 promissory note to Logistica and issued 2,500,000 shares of common stock to a designee of Logistica under the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan. The promissory note accrues interest at 4.5%, with principal and accrued interest payments to be made out of the Company’s proceeds from sale of iron extracted from mineralized material as part of the Company’s exploration activities. As of December 31, 2016, the outstanding balance under this note payable was $400,000 and accrued interest on the note was $51,140.
On January 5, 2016, we entered into our current agreement with Logistica U.S. Terminals, LLC (“Logistica”). Under the agreement we will provide to Logistica concentrated ore to their specifications at the mine site. Logistica will transport, process, and refine the precious metals concentrates to sell to precious metals buyers. The terms of the new agreement provide for the recovery of hard costs related to the concentrates by both parties prior to the distribution of profits. The agreement also provides for the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock and the elimination of a $100,000 accrued liability to Logistica for prior services rendered. When certain terms and conditions are met, the Agreement calls for Logistica to arrange for a letter of credit for working capital for the mining, processing and sale activities under the Agreement. The shares were issued in August 2016. The new agreement supersedes the previous agreements with Logistica.
NOTE 8 – 2015 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
On October 8, 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the El Capitan Precious Metals, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”). The 2015 Plan enables the Board of Directors to grant to employees, directors, and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries a variety of forms of equity-based compensation, including grants of options to purchase shares of common stock, shares of restricted common stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, other stock-based awards and performance-based awards. At the time it was adopted, the maximum number of shares of common stock of the Company that could be issued or awarded under the 2015 Plan was 15,000,000 shares. On October 14, 2015, the Company filed Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-207399 with the SEC registering the 15,000,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance pursuant to the 2015 Plan. On December 15, 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted Amendment No. 1 to the 2015 Plan, pursuant to which the number of shares of common stock issuable under the 2015 Plan was increased from 15,000,000 to 23,000,000. On January 14, 2016, the Company filed Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-208991 with the SEC registering the additional 8,000,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance pursuant to the 2015 Plan. Effective April 22, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted Amendment No. 2 to the 2015 Plan pursuant to which the number of shares of the common stock issuable under the 2015 Plan was increased from 23,000,000 to 28,000,000. On April 27, 2016, the Company filed Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-210942 with the SEC registering the additional 5,000,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance pursuant to the 2015 Plan. Effective August 4, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted Amendment No. 3 to the 2015 Plan pursuant to which the number of shares of the common stock issuable under the 2015 Plan was increased from 28,000,000 to 50,000,000. On August 8, 2016, the Company filed Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333- 212972 with the SEC registering the additional 22,000,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance pursuant to the 2015 Plan. Effective October 31, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s 2015 Plan pursuant to which the number of shares of the common stock issuable under the 2015 Plan was increased from 50,000,000 to 75,000,000. On November 4, 2016, the Company filed Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333- 214442 with the SEC registering the additional 25,000,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance pursuant to the 2015 Plan.
NOTE 9 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Restatement Effect on Net Loss for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2016
The restatement of advances to a vendor to operating costs in the three months ended December 31, 2016, resulted in a decrease in net equity of $335,616.
Authorized Common Shares
At the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders held September 28, 2016, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock from 400,000,000 to 500,000,000 shares. The change in the authorized number of shares of common stock was effected pursuant to an Certificate of Amendment (the “Certificate of Amendment”) filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada on October 4, 2016 and was effective as of such date.
Preferred Stock Issuances
During the three months ended December 31, 2016, the Company did not issue any shares of preferred stock.
Common Stock Issuances
During the three months ended December 31, 2016, the Company:
|
(i)
|
Issued 1,768,293 shares of restricted common stock and 1,768,293 shares of S-8 common stock for accrued compensation payable to an officer valued at $199,110 on the date of issuances and recorded a loss on debt extinguishment of $54,110;
|
|
(ii)
|
Issued 2,000,000 shares of S-8 common stock for accrued legal services at a market value of $150,000 and recorded a loss on debt extinguishment of $68,000;
|
|
(iii)
|
Issued 5,000,000 shares of S-8 common stock to our contract miners at a market value of $327,000, including payment of $79,085 for accrued mining cost and services, payment of $3,784 for inventory, payment of $8,515 for lab equipment and payment of $235,616 for pilot plant operating costs;
|
|
(iv)
|
Issued 7,182,868 shares of common stock under the 2016 Purchase Agreement with River North for aggregate cash proceeds of $324,723.
|
Options
During the three months ended December 31 2016 the Company did not grant any options.
Warrants
During three months ended December 31, 2016, the Company did not issue any warrants.
The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of its warrant and option awards. No estimates were required during the current quarter.
Stock option activity, both within and outside the 2015 Plan, and warrant activity for the three months ended December 31, 2016, are as follows:
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
Stock Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2016
|
|
|
11,137,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.265
|
|
|
|
5,332,773
|
|
|
$
|
0.071
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
11,137,500
|
|
|
|
0.265
|
|
|
|
5,332,773
|
|
|
|
0.071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
11,137,500
|
|
|
|
0.265
|
|
|
|
5,332,773
|
|
|
|
0.071
|
|
The range of exercise prices and remaining weighted average life of the options outstanding at December 31, 2016 were $0.042 to $1.02 and 4.62 years, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of the outstanding options at December 31, 2016 was $4,550.
The range of exercise prices and remaining weighted average life of the warrants outstanding at December 31, 2016 were $0.051 to $0.17 and 1.65 years, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of the outstanding warrants at December 31, 2016 was $1,933.
The Company maintains its 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2015 Plan”), pursuant to which the Company has reserved and registered 75,000,000 shares for stock and option grants. As of December 31, 2016, there were 22,768,268 shares available for grant under the 2015 Plan, excluding the 11,137,500 options outstanding.
NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent Issuances of Common Stock
Subsequent to December 31, 2016, the Company issued 501,803 shares of common stock under the 2016 Purchase Agreement with River North for aggregate cash proceeds of $19,351.
Board Approval of Stock Issuances Subsequent to December 31, 2016
On January 16, 2017, the Board authorized the issuance of up to 3,000,000 S-8 common shares to our contract miner to meet current obligations for services currently being provided to the Company. As of the date of filing this 10-Q, no shares have been advanced under this authorization.
The Board on this date also authorized a grant of 500,000, two year, fully vested warrants at the closing market price of the Board meeting, for consideration of a note extension.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
The following management discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes which are included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and with our audited financial statements and the “Risk Factors” section included in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on January 13, 2017.
Overview of Business
The Company is an exploration stage company as defined by the SEC’s Industry Guide 7 as the Company has no established reserves as required under Industry Guide 7. We are principally engaged in the exploration of precious metals and other minerals on the El Capitan property located near Capitan, New Mexico (the “El Capitan Property”). We recorded nominal revenues in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 consisting of revenue for test loads of iron ore to a construction contractor.
We commenced planned mineral exploration activity in the quarter ended December 2015 under our modified mining permit. However, we have not yet demonstrated the existence of proven or probable reserves at our El Capitan Property. As a result, and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for exploration stage companies, all expenditures for exploration and evaluation of our property and the Pilot Plant are expensed as incurred.
Basis of Presentation and Going Concern
The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"), and have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company currently has a minimum source of revenue to cover its costs. The Company has incurred a loss for the three months ended December, 2016 and has a working capital deficit as of December 31, 2016. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
To continue as a going concern, the Company is dependent on achievement of cash flow and future profits from entering the production stage of operations. The Company does not have adequate liquidity to fund its current operations, meet its obligations and continue as a going concern. The Company currently has an equity line of credit in place that it expects to utilize to finance its activities in the near term and, in the past, has secured working capital loans for such purpose. The Company may also pursue other financing alternatives from time to time, including short-term operational strategic financing or equity financing, to fund its activities until it can achieve cash flow and profits from its operations. The Company’s consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.
Results of Operations - Three Months Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
We are an exploration stage company and have not yet realized any material revenue from operations through our fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2016. We realized a net increase in operating expenses of $276,232, from $370,558 for the three months ended December 31, 2015 to $646,790 for the three months ended December 31, 2016. The increase is comprised mainly of increases in mine and exploration costs of $422,753 and offset by decreases in professional fees of $46,513, legal and accounting fees of $54,225 and other general and administrative of $45,783.
The increase in mine and exploration costs is primarily due to increased activity associated with the concentration of mineralized ore to specifications required by various refiners and initial Pilot Plant related costs, an increase in legal fees of $33,188 associated with the mine and a credit against mine costs of $71,567 in the comparable measurement period. The decrease in legal and accounting fees resulted from decreased legal fees related to the negotiation and preparation of financial contracts and agreements during the comparable prior year period. The decrease in other general and administrative is attributable to the retirement of the former CEO and president.
Our net loss increased by $228,829 from $554,798 for the three months ended December 31, 2015 to $783,627 for the three months ended December 31, 2016. The increase in net loss is mainly attributable to the net increase in operating expenses as detailed above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2016, we had cash on hand of $64,060 and a working capital deficit of $1,105,665. Based upon our budgeted burn rate, we currently have operating capital for approximately one month. The Company has historically relied on equity or debt financings to finance its ongoing operations. Our current financing arrangements are summarized below under the caption
“Recent Financing Activities.”
Our only current committed source of future financing is pursuant to the Purchase Agreement with River North, which is described below (the “Purchase Agreement”). Under the Purchase Agreement, we may from time to time, in our discretion, sell shares of our common stock to River North for aggregate gross proceeds of up to $5,000,000. This arrangement is also sometimes referred to herein as the “Equity Line.” Unless terminated earlier, River North’s purchase commitment will automatically expire on March 16, 2018. As of December 31, 2016, approximately $3.8 million remained available to us under the Equity Line.
Currently, we intend to rely on the sale of stock under the Equity Line to fund our ongoing operations. However, our ability to obtain proceeds from the Equity Line is subject to the various conditions and restrictions set forth in the Purchase Agreement, which are described below. Due to these restrictions and conditions, we may not be able to obtain proceeds from the Equity Line at such times and in such amounts as needed to fund our ongoing operations. If we are required to raise additional capital, we do not know whether it will be available on terms favorable or acceptable to us when needed, if at all. To the extent that we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience dilution. In addition, we may grant future investors rights superior to those of our existing stockholders. If we raise additional funds by incurring debt, we could incur additional interest expense and become subject to covenants in the related transaction documentation that could affect the manner in which we conduct our business. Currently the Company is negotiating short term financing facilities to bridge operations until such time as the Company can generate revenue from its mineral exploration and mining activities.
If adequate additional capital is not available when required, we may be forced to reduce or eliminate our exploration activities and our marketing efforts for the sale of the El Capitan Property, or suspend our operations entirely.
Recent Financing Activities
Agreements with Logistica U.S. Terminals, LLC
On January 5, 2016, we entered into our current agreement with Logistica U.S. Terminals, LLC (“Logistica”). Under the agreement we will provide to Logistica concentrated ore to their specifications at the mine site. Logistica will transport, process, and refine the precious metals concentrates to sell to precious metals buyers. The terms of the new agreement provide for the recovery of hard costs related to the concentrates by both parties prior to the distribution of profits. The agreement also provides for the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock and the elimination of a $100,000 accrued liability to Logistica for prior services rendered. When certain terms and conditions are met, the Agreement calls for Logistica to arrange for a letter of credit for working capital for the mining, processing and sale activities under the Agreement. The shares were issued in August 2016. The new agreement supersedes previous agreements with Logistica entered into in March 2014.
October 17, 2014 Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement
On October 17, 2014, we entered into a private Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor pursuant to which we borrowed $500,000 against delivery of a promissory note (the “2014 Note”) in such amount and issued warrants to purchase 882,352 shares of our common stock pursuant to the Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement. The promissory note carries an interest rate of 8% per annum, was initially due on July 17, 2015 and is secured by a first priority security interest in all right, title and interest of the Company in and to the net proceeds received by the Company from its sale of tailings separated from iron recovered by the Company at the El Capitan Property. On August 24, 2015, the 2014 Note was mutually extended from July 17, 2015 to January 17, 2016. In consideration of the extension, the Company amended the common stock purchase warrant to purchase 4,714,286 shares (subject to adjustment) of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.07 per share. The warrant dated October 17, 2014 was cancelled. On January 19, 2016, the amended 2014 Note was extended from January 17, 2016 to September 19, 2016. The note is currently in default. In consideration of the extension, we issued to the investor a fully vested three year common stock purchase warrant to purchase 471,429 shares (subject to adjustment) of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.051 per share, the closing price on the date of the agreed extension agreement. The fair value of the warrants was determined to be $16,775 using Black-Scholes option price model and was expensed during the three months ended March 31, 2016. The issuance of the new warrant was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) thereof because such issuance did not involve a public offering. As of September 30, 2016, the outstanding balance under the amended 2014 Note was $400,000 and accrued interest was $1,140. During the quarter ended December 31, 2016, the outstanding principal balance of the amended 2014 Note was reduced by an additional $150,000 and related accrued interest payments have been made. As of December 31, 2016, the outstanding balance under this note payable was $250,000 and accrued interest on the note was $1,205.
February 4, 2015 Unsecured Promissory Notes
On February 4, 2015, we issued unsecured promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $63,000, of which $30,000 is issued to MRI, a company controlled by John F. Stapleton, who served as the Chief Financial Officer and a director of the Company at that time and who currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company. Outstanding amounts under these notes accrue interest at 18% per year, with all principal and accrued interest being due and payable on February 4, 2016. As additional consideration for the loan, we issued 200,000 shares of our restricted common stock for each note for a total of 400,000 shares. The relative fair value of the common stock was determined to be $21,211 and was recorded as discounts to the promissory notes was amortized to interest expense over the life of the notes. On February 4, 2016, one of the promissory notes was amended to extend the maturity date from February 4, 2016 to February 4, 2017 and reduced the interest rate to 10% per year. The Company also agreed to add the accrued interest on the note at February 4, 2016 of $5,940 to the principal of the note. In consideration of the amendment, the Company agreed to issue an aggregate 150,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company to the lenders and the Board of Directors approved the issuance on April 22, 2016. One of the lenders is affiliated with the Company and provided $30,000 of the original $63,000 loaned funds and has agreed to extend the note to February 4, 2017 at the same rate of interest and the issuance of 200,000 shares of our restricted common stock. Our obligations under both notes are personally guaranteed by the Company’s director and Chief Executive Officer at the time of the original notes.
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, aggregate amortization expense of $12,065 was recognized. As of December 31, 2016, the aggregate outstanding balance under these notes was $68,940, accrued interest was $13,828 and the unamortized discount on the notes payable was $507.
March 16, 2016 Purchase Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement; December 9, 2016 Amendment
On March 16, 2016, we entered into a Purchase Agreement with River North, which was subsequently amended on December 9, 2016 by Amendment No. 1 thereto (the “Amendment”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement we may from time to time, in our discretion, sell shares of our common stock to River North for aggregate gross proceeds of up to $5,000,000. Unless terminated earlier, River North’s purchase commitment will automatically terminate on the earlier of the date on which River North shall have purchased Company shares pursuant to the Purchase Agreement for an aggregate purchase price of $5,000,000 or March 16, 2018. We have no obligation to sell any shares under the Purchase Agreement. This arrangement is also sometimes referred to herein as the “Equity Line.”
As provided in the Purchase Agreement, the Company may require River North to purchase shares of common stock from time to time by delivering a put notice to River North specifying the total purchase price for the shares to be purchased (the “Investment Amount”); provided there must be a minimum of 10 trading days between deliveries of each put notice. The minimum trading days between deliveries of put notices may be adjusted downward at the discretion of River North from time to time. Currently the minimum time between the put notices is five (5) days. We may determine the Investment Amount, provided that such amount may not be more than the average daily trading volume in dollar amount for the Company’s common stock during the 10 trading days preceding the date on which the Company delivers the applicable put notice. Additionally, such amount may not be lower than $5,000 or higher than $150,000 without prior approval of River North. The number of shares issuable in connection with each put notice will be computed by dividing the applicable Investment Amount by the purchase price for such common stock. River north will have no obligation to purchase shares under the Purchase Agreement to the extent that such purchase would cause River North to own more than 9.99% of the Company’s common stock.
Prior to the Amendment, for each share of our common stock purchased under the Purchase Agreement, River North paid a purchase price equal to 85% of the Market Price, which was defined as the average of the two lowest closing bid prices on the OTCQB Marketplace, as reported by Bloomberg Finance L.P., during the five consecutive Trading Days including and immediately prior to the date on which the applicable put notice is delivered to River North (the “Pricing Period”). If, at the time of a sale, we were not deposit/withdrawal at custodian (“DWAC”) eligible, or if we were under Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) “chill” status, an additional 5.0% and 10% discount to the Market Price, respectively, applied.
On December 9, 2016, the Company and River North entered into the Amendment in order to amend the formula pursuant to which the purchase price for the Company’s shares is calculated and to make certain other amendments to the terms of the Purchase Agreement. As amended, the Pricing Period now includes the five consecutive trading days including and immediately prior to the settlement date of the sale, which in most circumstances will be the trading day immediately following the date that a put notice is delivered to River North (a “Put Date”). In addition, the Amendment provides that if either (i) the closing bid price the common stock is less than $0.10 per share on the Put Date, or (ii) the average daily trading volume in dollar amount for the common stock during the ten trading days including and immediately preceding a Put Date is less than $50,000, then an additional 10% discount to the Market Price will be taken when calculating the purchase price for the shares. The prior discounts for DWAC ineligibility and DTC chill status remain.
River North’s obligation to purchase shares under the Purchase Agreement is subject to customary closing conditions, including without limitation a requirement that a registration statement remain effective registering the resale by River North of the shares to be issued pursuant to the Purchase Agreement as contemplated by the Registration Rights Agreement described below. The Purchase Agreement contains covenants, representations and warranties of the Company and River North that are typical for transactions of this type. In addition, the Company and River North have granted each other customary indemnification rights in connection with the Purchase Agreement. The Purchase Agreement may be terminated by the Company at any time. The Purchase Agreement is not transferable and any benefits attached thereto may not be assigned.
During the three months ended December 31, 2016, we issued a total of 7,182,868 shares of common stock to River North under the Purchase Agreement for aggregate proceeds of $324,723.
Also on March 16, 2016, in connection with the Purchase Agreement, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with River North requiring the Company to prepare and file, within 45 days of the effective date of the Registration Rights Agreement, a registration statement registering the resale by River North of the shares to be issued under the Purchase Agreement, and to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause such registration statement to become effective, and to keep such registration statement effective until (i) three months after the last closing of a sale of shares under the Purchase Agreement, (ii) the date when River North may sell all the shares under Rule 144 without volume limitations, or (iii) the date on which River North no longer owns any of the shares. On April 11, 2016, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-210686) with the SEC registering the resale of up to 25,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued and sold to River North pursuant to the Purchase Agreement (the “First Registration Statement”), which was declared effective by the SEC on April 20, 2016.
The foregoing description of the Purchase Agreement (including the Amendment) and the Registration Rights Agreement does not purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the Purchase Agreement itself (including the Amendment) and the Registration Rights Agreement.
To date we have issued a total of 20,757,307 shares to River North under the Equity Purchase Agreement for aggregate proceeds of $1,216,265. These shares have been resold by River North under the First Registration Statement. The remaining shares were removed from registration by means of a post-effective amendment filed on February 7, 2017. We will be unable to issue and sell additional shares to River North under the Equity Purchase Agreement until we file subsequent registration statement registering the resale by River North of additional shares that may be issued and sold under the Equity Line and the SEC declares it effective.
As partial consideration for the above-mentioned agreements, on March 16, 2016, we issued to River North a “commitment” convertible promissory note (the “Commitment Note”) in the principal amount of $35,000. The Commitment Note accrued interest at a rate of 10% per annum and was scheduled to mature on March 16, 2017. Upon the registration statement contemplated by the Registration Rights Agreement being declared effective, $10,000 of the principle balance of the Commitment Note and accrued interest thereon was extinguished and deemed to have been repaid.
After 180 days following the date of the Commitment Note, or earlier upon the occurrence of an event of default that remains uncured, the Commitment Note may be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at the election of River North at a conversion price per share equal 60% of the Current Market Price, which is defined as the lowest closing bid price for the common stock as reported by Bloomberg, LP for the 10 trading days ending on the trading day immediately before the conversion. The loan principal and accrued interest were paid in full prior to the note conversion date.
On March 16, 2016, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with River North pursuant to which the Company issued a convertible promissory note (the “Bridge Note”) to River North, in the original principal amount of $90,000, in consideration of the payment by River North of a purchase price equal to $73,800, with $9,000 retained by River North as original issue discount and $7,200 for related legal and due diligence costs and these costs were recorded as discount to the note. The Company issued the Bridge Note on March 16, 2016. The Bridge Note accrues interest at a rate of 10% per annum and matures on March 16, 2017.The Bridge Note provides for conversion rights and events of default on substantially the same terms and conditions as the Commitment Note; provided however that an event of default under the Bridge Note will also be triggered if the Company fails to use at least 15% of the proceeds from each sale of shares under the Purchase Agreement to prepay a portion of the Bridge Note after it becomes convertible. The loan principal and accrued interest were paid in full prior to the note conversion date and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 we recorded a discount expense of $16,200.
Financing of Insurance Premiums
On August 15, 2016, we entered into an agreement to finance a portion of our liability insurance premiums in the amount of $28,384 at an interest rate of 7.25% with equal payments of $2,934, including interest, due monthly beginning July 14, 2016 and continuing through April 14, 2017. As of December 31, 2016, the outstanding balance under this note payable was $11,559.
On November 14, 2016, we entered into an agreement to finance director and officer insurance premiums in the amount of $25,224 at an interest rate of 5.00% with equal payments of $2,581, including interest, due monthly beginning December 21, 2016 and continuing through September 21, 2017. As of December 31, the outstanding balance under this note payable was $22,748.
Factors Affecting Future Mineral Exploration Results
We have generated no revenues, other than interest income and miscellaneous revenue from the sale of two dore’ bars, and loads of iron ore to a contractor since inception. As a result, we have only a limited history upon which to evaluate our future potential performance. Our potential must be considered by evaluation of all risks and difficulties encountered by exploration companies which have not yet established business operations and anticipated results and situations of entering active exploration activities.
The price of gold and silver has experienced an increases and decreases in value over the past five years. A historical chart of their respective prices is contained in
Item 1
, the “
Business
” portion of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on January 13, 2017. Beginning in April 2013, the price of gold and silver has experienced a downward swing. A significant permanent drop in the price of gold, silver or other precious metals may have a materially adverse effect on the future results of potential exploration activities and the opportunity to market the sale of the El Capitan Property and the potential future revenue derived from the sale of concentrates. The El Capitan Property is an open pit mine with lower production costs and a material increase in costs associated with the recovery of precious metals may also cause a material adverse effect on the financial success of the Company and our ability to market the sale of the El Capitan Property.
Time delays in obtaining any necessary future approvals from the various governmental agencies, both federal and state, may also cause delays, all of which are not under our control, in achieving our strategic business plan and current plan of operation.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
During the three months ended December 31, 2016, we did not engage in any off-balance sheet arrangements set forth in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.
Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2016, we had no contractual obligations (including long-term debt obligations, capital lease obligations, operating lease obligations, purchase obligations and other long-term liabilities reflected on our balance sheet under GAAP) that are expected to have an adverse effect on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require us to make estimates and judgments that significantly affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements. Note 1,
“Business, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies”
in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on January 13, 2017, describes our significant accounting policies which are reviewed by management on a regular basis.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.