UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
x |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014 |
|
|
|
or |
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from __________ to __________ |
Commission File No. 333-184443
COIL TUBING TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
Nevada |
76-0625217 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
22305 Gosling Road, Spring, Texas |
77389 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(Zip code) |
19511 Wied Rd.,
Suite E
Spring, Texas
77388
(Address of former
principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(281) 651-0200
Registrant's telephone number, including area
code
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shortened period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large accelerated filer |
o |
|
Accelerated filer |
o |
|
Non-accelerated filer |
o |
|
Smaller reporting company |
x |
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's $0.001 par
value common stock on November 10, 2014 is 15,651,827 shares.
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
COIL TUBING TECHNOLOGY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of September 30, 2014 and December 31,
2013
($ in thousands except share data)
(Unaudited)
| |
September 30, | | |
December 31, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Assets | |
| | | |
| | |
Current Assets: | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash | |
$ | 1,086 | | |
$ | 902 | |
Accounts receivable, net | |
| 2,333 | | |
| 1,875 | |
Other current assets | |
| 41 | | |
| 112 | |
Total Current Assets | |
| 3,460 | | |
| 2,889 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Rental tools, net | |
| 2,544 | | |
| 3,034 | |
Property and equipment, net | |
| 1,505 | | |
| 1,500 | |
Intangible assets, net | |
| 893 | | |
| 953 | |
Total Assets | |
$ | 8,402 | | |
$ | 8,376 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | |
| | | |
| | |
Current Liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts payable | |
$ | 429 | | |
$ | 332 | |
Accrued liabilities | |
| 287 | | |
| 109 | |
Note payable-related party, current portion | |
| 130 | | |
| 156 | |
Notes payable, current portion | |
| 91 | | |
| 91 | |
Total Current Liabilities | |
| 937 | | |
| 688 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Long-Term Liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Note payable-related party, net of current portion | |
| – | | |
| 91 | |
Notes payable, net of current portion | |
| 839 | | |
| 799 | |
Total Liabilities | |
| 1,776 | | |
| 1,578 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Commitments and contingencies | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Stockholders' Equity: | |
| | | |
| | |
Preferred Stock, $.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized | |
| | | |
| | |
Series A Preferred Stock, $.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares designated; 0 shares issued and outstanding | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, $.001 par value, 0 and 1,000,000 shares designated at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and 0 and 1,000,000 shares issued and outstanding, at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 | |
| – | | |
| 1 | |
Common Stock, $.001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 15,651,827 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 | |
| 16 | | |
| 16 | |
Additional paid-in capital | |
| 9,995 | | |
| 9,841 | |
Accumulated deficit | |
| (3,385 | ) | |
| (3,060 | ) |
Total Stockholders' Equity | |
| 6,626 | | |
| 6,798 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | |
$ | 8,402 | | |
$ | 8,376 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
COIL TUBING TECHNOLOGY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September
30, 2014 and 2013
($ in thousands except
share data)
(Unaudited)
| |
Three Months Ended | | |
Nine Months Ended | |
| |
September 30, | | |
September 30, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Revenue: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Rental revenue | |
$ | 1,407 | | |
$ | 1,566 | | |
$ | 3,981 | | |
$ | 4,758 | |
Product revenue | |
| 753 | | |
| 44 | | |
| 1,092 | | |
| 97 | |
Total revenue | |
| 2,160 | | |
| 1,610 | | |
| 5,073 | | |
| 4,855 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cost of revenue: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Compensation and benefits | |
| 254 | | |
| 221 | | |
| 730 | | |
| 666 | |
Material, supplies and support service | |
| 378 | | |
| 278 | | |
| 877 | | |
| 789 | |
Facilities and support expenses | |
| 48 | | |
| 63 | | |
| 138 | | |
| 197 | |
Depreciation of rental tools | |
| 302 | | |
| 278 | | |
| 874 | | |
| 819 | |
Total cost of revenue | |
| 982 | | |
| 840 | | |
| 2,619 | | |
| 2,471 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Gross profit | |
| 1,178 | | |
| 770 | | |
| 2,454 | | |
| 2,384 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Operating (Income) Expenses: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Compensation and benefits | |
| 206 | | |
| 202 | | |
| 581 | | |
| 682 | |
Selling and marketing | |
| 333 | | |
| 395 | | |
| 1,095 | | |
| 1,246 | |
General and administrative | |
| 311 | | |
| 264 | | |
| 837 | | |
| 644 | |
Depreciation and amortization | |
| 85 | | |
| 71 | | |
| 254 | | |
| 208 | |
(Gain) loss on sale of fixed assets | |
| (26 | ) | |
| 11 | | |
| (27 | ) | |
| 15 | |
Total operating expenses | |
| 909 | | |
| 943 | | |
| 2,740 | | |
| 2,795 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Income (loss) from operations | |
| 269 | | |
| (173 | ) | |
| (286 | ) | |
| (411 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Other income (expense): | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Other income | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| 1 | | |
| 6 | |
Interest expense | |
| (13 | ) | |
| (5 | ) | |
| (39 | ) | |
| (13 | ) |
Total other income (expense ) | |
| (13 | ) | |
| (5 | ) | |
| (38 | ) | |
| (7 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net income (loss) | |
$ | 256 | | |
$ | (178 | ) | |
$ | (324 | ) | |
$ | (418 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net income (loss) per common share : | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Basic and diluted income (loss) | |
$ | 0.02 | | |
$ | (0.01 | ) | |
$ | (0.02 | ) | |
$ | (0.03 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Basic and diluted | |
| 15,651,827 | | |
| 15,651,827 | | |
| 15,651,827 | | |
| 15,651,827 | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
COIL TUBING TECHNOLOGY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
and 2013
($ per thousands)
(Unaudited)
| |
September 30, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
$ | (324 | ) | |
$ | (418 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Stock option expense | |
| 153 | | |
| 344 | |
Depreciation and amortization | |
| 1,128 | | |
| 1,027 | |
(Gain) loss on sale of fixed assets | |
| (27 | ) | |
| 15 | |
Bad debt expense | |
| – | | |
| 1 | |
Changes in: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts receivable | |
| (458 | ) | |
| (478 | ) |
Other current assets | |
| 71 | | |
| (6 | ) |
Accounts payable | |
| 96 | | |
| (58 | ) |
Accrued liabilities | |
| 178 | | |
| 43 | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | |
| 817 | | |
| 470 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Purchase of rental tools | |
| (525 | ) | |
| (344 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of lost tools | |
| 156 | | |
| 144 | |
Purchase of machinery and equipment | |
| (246 | ) | |
| (280 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets | |
| 59 | | |
| – | |
Net cash used in investing activities | |
| (556 | ) | |
| (480 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Proceeds from notes payable | |
| 110 | | |
| 57 | |
Payments on notes payable | |
| (70 | ) | |
| – | |
Payments on related party notes payable | |
| (117 | ) | |
| (117 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | |
| (77 | ) | |
| (60 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash | |
| 184 | | |
| (70 | ) |
Cash at beginning of period | |
| 902 | | |
| 1,153 | |
Cash at end of period | |
$ | 1,086 | | |
$ | 1,083 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash paid for: | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest | |
$ | 27 | | |
$ | 13 | |
Income taxes | |
$ | – | | |
$ | – | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
COIL TUBING TECHNOLOGY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2014
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Nature of the Company
Coil Tubing Technology, Inc. (“we”
or the “Company”) provides products and services to the oil and gas industry specializing in the design and
production of proprietary tools for the coil tubing industry. The Company concentrates on three categories of coil tubing applications:
tubing fishing, tubing work over and coil tubing drilling. The Company supplies a full line of tools to oil companies, coiled tubing
operators and well servicing companies. The Company focuses on the development, marketing, sales and rental of advanced tools and
related technical solutions for use with coil tubing and jointed pipe in the bottom hole assembly for the exploration and production
of hydrocarbons. Historically, our revenues have been generated primarily from the rental of coil tubing products.
Basis of Accounting
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Coil Tubing Technology Holdings, Inc., a Nevada
corporation and its Texas corporate subsidiaries, Total Downhole Solutions, Inc. (“TDS”), formerly Precision
Machining Resources, Inc., Coil Tubing Technology, Inc. (“CTT Texas”) and Coil Tubing Technology Canada Inc.,
an Alberta, Canada corporation (“CTT Canada”). The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and
the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company's annual report for the year ended December 31, 2013
filed with the SEC on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary
for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been reflected
herein. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full
year. Notes to the consolidated financial statements which would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the audited
consolidated financial statements for the most recent fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 as reported in Form 10-K have been omitted.
NOTE 2 – RENTAL TOOLS, NET
Rental tools are purchased from contract manufacturers
engaged to produce the Company’s patented or licensed products. These tools are rented or leased to a variety of well-servicing
companies over the life of the tool. Rental tools are depreciated over their estimated useful life of five years and are presented
in the accompanying financial statements, net of accumulated depreciation of $4,031,000 and $3,172,000 as of September 30, 2014
and December 31, 2013, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, depreciation expense of $874,000, and
$819,000, respectively, was included in the cost of revenue.
NOTE 3 – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE,
NET
As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013,
accounts receivable, net consists of the following (in thousands):
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Accounts receivable | |
$ | 2,438 | | |
$ | 1,980 | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts | |
| (105 | ) | |
| (105 | ) |
Accounts receivable, net | |
$ | 2,333 | | |
$ | 1,875 | |
NOTE 4 – NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are
as follows (in thousands):
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Notes payable | |
$ | 930 | | |
$ | 890 | |
Note payable-related party | |
| 130 | | |
| 247 | |
Total debt | |
| 1,060 | | |
| 1,137 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Less current portion: | |
| | | |
| | |
Note payable-related party | |
| (130 | ) | |
| (156 | ) |
Notes payable | |
| (91 | ) | |
| (91 | ) |
Long-term debt | |
$ | 839 | | |
$ | 890 | |
Building Loan
Effective October 25, 2013, the Company purchased
a 6,000 square foot office/warehouse building and associated land located at 22305 Gosling Road, Spring, Texas 77389. The purchase
price was $884,508. The Company obtained $649,000 of the purchase price by way of a loan from Independent Bank (formerly Bank of
Houston), evidenced by a promissory note, which loan bears interest at 5% per annum for three years and the prime rate plus 1%
thereafter (not to be less than 5%), and has a maturity date of October 25, 2018. Upon an event of default, the loan bears interest
at the lesser of the rate of 5% above the then applicable interest rate of the note, and the greatest amount provided by law. Amortization
payments based on a 20-year amortization schedule (initially $4,309 per month) are due on the loan until maturity (recalculated
based on the then interest rate after the first three years of the loan). The amount due under the loan is secured by a Deed of
Trust, Security Agreement and Financing Statement on the property purchased.
Vehicle Loans
The Company has entered into a number of loans
for the purchase of vehicles used in its business. These vehicles are primarily used by sales and delivery personnel. These installment
loans are generally two to six-year loans at interest rates varying from 4.99% to 7.84% and are secured by the vehicles and a personal
guarantee of a corporate officer.
Related Party Notes Payable
In November 2010, the Company entered into
an Intellectual Property Purchase Agreement (the “IP Agreement”) with Jerry Swinford, the Company’s
then Chief Executive Officer and current Executive Vice President. Pursuant to the IP Agreement, the Company agreed to purchase
the patents and pending patents owned and held by Mr. Swinford for $25,000 cash and $1,175,000 in the form of two promissory notes
payable to Mr. Swinford (the “Swinford Notes”). The first note, in the amount of $475,000 was paid in full in
January 2011. The second note in the amount of $700,000 is due on September 15, 2015, and is payable in equal monthly installments
of $12,963. The notes are non-interest bearing. The balance of the note at September 30, 2014 is $129,628. The Company also
agreed to grant Mr. Swinford a security interest in all of the Company’s assets in connection with and to secure the repayment
of the Swinford Notes and Coil Tubing Technology Holdings, Inc., the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary (“Holdings”)
also agreed, pursuant to a Guaranty Agreement, to guaranty the repayment of the Swinford Notes.
In connection with the IP Agreement, Mr. Swinford
agreed to cancel 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock. As a result of this cancellation, there was
a change of control whereby Herbert C. Pohlmann obtained voting control over the Company. Mr. Swinford has a first priority security
interest over the patents until such time as the promissory notes are satisfied in full.
Future maturities of the notes payable are as follows (in thousands):
2014 | |
$ | 221 | |
2015 | |
| 94 | |
2016 | |
| 92 | |
2017 | |
| 80 | |
2018 and later | |
| 573 | |
| |
$ | 1,060 | |
NOTE 5 – PREFERRED STOCK
Grifco International Inc. (“Grifco”)
was the sole holder of the Company’s 1,000,000 outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred
Stock”). The Preferred Stock provided Grifco the right to convert such Preferred Stock shares into common stock of the Company
(on a 0.066-for-1 basis), after Grifco exercised its option to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred
Stock for $100 (the “Option”). Such Option was exercisable subject to the occurrence of certain events and expired
unexercised pursuant to its terms on November 30, 2012. As a result of the expiration of the Option, the Preferred Stock no longer
had any rights or privileges. The Company filed a Certificate of Withdrawal of Certificate of Designation for the Preferred Stock
with the Secretary of State of Nevada on August 18, 2014. As such, effective August 18, 2014, the Company no longer has any Series
B Preferred Stock designated.
NOTE 6 – STOCK OPTIONS
There were no options granted during the nine months ended September
30, 2014.
The Company recognized total option expense
of $153,000 and $344,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The remaining amount of unamortized
options expense at September 30, 2014 was $171,000. The intrinsic value of outstanding and exercisable options at September 30,
2014 was $-0-.
NOTE 7 – MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The Company had gross sales of $5,073,000 and
$4,855,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company had one customer representing approximately
10% of gross sales and two customers representing approximately 22% and 14% of total accounts receivable for the nine months ended
September 30, 2014. The Company had two customers that represented approximately 19% and 15% of gross sales and 39% and 17% of
total accounts receivable for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
NOTE 8 – INCOME TAXES
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014,
the Company’s net loss was $324,000 and, accordingly, no income tax is due even though the Company had net income for the
three months ended September 30, 2014 which would have resulted in income tax being due if not for such income tax being offset
by the cumulative losses.
NOTE 9 – CONTINGENCIES
From time to time, we may become party to litigation
or other legal proceedings that we consider to be a part of the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved
in legal proceedings that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial
condition or results of operations other than the proceeding described below. We may become involved in other material legal proceedings
in the future.
On July 25, 2013, Eric Cohen (a shareholder
of the Company) filed a lawsuit against the Company, Jerry Swinford (the Executive Vice President and director of the Company),
Jason Swinford (the Chief Executive Officer and director of the Company) and Herbert C. Pohlmann (the Company’s majority
shareholder and former director)(collectively, the “Defendants”) in the 61st Judicial District Court for Harris County,
Texas (Cause No. 2013-43593). The suit seeks monetary damages in excess of $1 million in connection with compensatory damages alleged
suffered by Mr. Cohen or seeks a buyout of Mr. Cohen’s interest in the Company. The suit also seeks legal fees and pre-and-post
judgment interest. The suit alleges “minority shareholder oppression” and “breach of fiduciary duty” in
connection with the actions of Defendants, i.e., that Defendants have engaged in wrongful conduct which has diluted Mr. Cohen’s
shares; granted more power to Defendants (for little or no consideration); and granted rights to insiders for less than reasonably
equivalent value. The Company disputes Mr. Cohen’s claims and the Company has engaged legal counsel in the matter and filed
an answer to the complaint denying Cohen’s allegations. The Company intends to vigorously defend the case against Cohen’s
claims. At this stage of the litigation, the Company believes the likelihood of material loss is remote. On January
27, 2014, the Company filed a counterclaim against Eric Cohen (plaintiff) requesting damages and attorneys’ fees incurred
in this case. As of the date of this report, Mr. Cohen and the Defendants have agreed in principal on the terms of a settlement
and are negotiating a settlement agreement pursuant to which each side will dismiss their claims and the lawsuit will be dismissed
with prejudice. The Company hopes to enter into such settlement shortly after the filing of this report.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Form
10-Q”) is prepared by Coil Tubing Technology, Inc. Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, in this
Form 10-Q all references to “Coil Tubing Technology, Inc.” the “Company,” “we,” “our”
and “us” refer to Coil Tubing Technology, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
The following discussion and analysis of our
results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements
as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and for the years then ended, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2014 (the “Form 10-K”) and with
the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto presented in this Form 10-Q.
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Our disclosure and analysis in this Form 10-Q
may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Act, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations
and projections relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business.
You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements
may include words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,”
“plan,” “believe” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the
timing or nature of future operating or financial performance or other events. All statements other than statements of historical
facts included in this Form 10-Q that address activities, events or developments that we expect, believe or anticipate will or
may occur in the future are forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are largely
based on our expectations and beliefs concerning future events, which reflect estimates and assumptions made by our management.
These estimates and assumptions reflect our best judgment based on currently known market conditions and other factors relating
to our operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control.
Although we believe our estimates and assumptions
to be reasonable, they are inherently uncertain and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that are beyond our control. In
addition, management’s assumptions about future events may prove to be inaccurate. Management cautions all readers that the
forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q are not guarantees of future performance, and we cannot assure any reader
that those statements will be realized or the forward-looking events and circumstances will occur. Actual results may differ materially
from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements due to the factors listed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors”
in our Form 10-K and this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”
section, or MD&A. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We do not intend to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required
by law. These cautionary statements qualify all forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf.
Our Markets and Business Strategy
Our primary markets for our coil tubing products
are oil and gas companies engaged in horizontal drilling activities located in the United States, Mexico and Canada. We sell or
rent our products to these oil and gas companies either directly or indirectly through oil service companies. Our revenues are
generated by drilling and well services activities which are subject to drilling company budgets and the competitive bundling for
our services by oil service companies. During fiscal 2013 and continuing throughout the first nine months of 2014, oil and gas
service companies, which are our clients, reduced their drilling and work-over operations in Canada, Pennsylvania and Louisiana
which continues to have an overall negative impact on our rental revenues. Our total revenues for the nine months ended September
30, 2014 were approximately $5,073,000 compared to $4,855,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, an increase of $218,000.
We expect our revenues in North America and Canada to continue to be impacted by, and to follow the trends in natural gas drilling
activities for the remainder of 2014. As discussed below, we are in the process of advancing our technology and global participation
in Mexico, South America and Asia to take advantage of the growing coil tubing demands.
Based on the current trends in world-wide drilling
activities, we have implemented the following strategies:
|
· |
We will continue to enter into Master Service agreements with multinational oil and gas service companies to integrate and update their coil tubing service capabilities throughout the world; |
|
· |
We have expanded our product lines with new proprietary tools as well as generic tools; |
|
· |
We have commenced sales of our coil tubing products to large integrated oil companies to support their drilling activities in the Gulf of Mexico, Mexico and South America; and |
|
|
|
|
· |
We have expanded our engineering staff and international sales staff to meet the demand for our tools in Mexico and South America. |
We believe increasing the availability of our
proprietary product lines to our customers is critical to our profitability. Therefore, we will focus on initiatives to drive quarter
over quarter sales growth for our existing and new products emphasizing:
| · | Quality proprietary coil tubing tools
and service both domestically and internationally; |
|
· |
Expedited delivery time, training and backup inventory at the customers’ sites; |
|
· |
Focusing on the higher margin coil tubing products to be integrated into our customers’ current and long-term demands with options to either purchase or rent on a daily basis; |
|
· |
Targeting the specific tool needs for each customer through on-site marketing our new product lines; and |
|
· |
Integrating new generic tools sales to our existing customers. |
Critical Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition. The Company's
revenue is generated primarily from the rental and sales of its tools used for oilfield services primarily in Texas, Louisiana
and Pennsylvania in the U.S. and in Mexico and Canada. Rental income is recognized over the rental periods, which are generally
from one to thirty days. The estimated amounts of sales discounts, returns and allowances are accounted for as reductions of sales
when the sale occurs and the realization of collectability is reasonably assured. These estimates are based on historical amounts
and adjusted periodically based on changes in facts and circumstances when the changes become known to the Company. The Company
also recognizes rental revenue for the full sales price of any tools which are lost and/or damaged in use (and billed to the customer)
and recognizes the net carrying cost of such tool (“manufacturers’ cost” less depreciation) as cost of
product and rental revenue.
Sales of coil tubing related products are primarily
derived from instances where a customer has a specific need for a particular coil tubing related product and desires to have the
Company obtain and/or manufacture the particular product. These sales may include replacement parts, as well as proprietary tools
which are manufactured to the customer’s specification, but which are not part of the Company’s tool line. The Company
generally recognizes product revenue at the time the product is shipped. Concurrent with the recognition of revenue, the Company
provides for the estimated cost of product returns. Sales incentives are generally classified as a reduction of revenue and are
recognized at the later of when revenue is recognized or when the incentive is offered. Shipping and handling costs are included
in cost of goods sold.
Rental Tool Assets. Approximately 79%
of the Company’s revenues are generated from the rental of its coil tubing products. Rental tools are recorded on the Company’s
books as rental equipment at “manufacturers’ cost.” Depreciation is calculated using the straight line
method over the useful lives of the assets of five years. Lost or destroyed tools are not a significant source of rental tools
revenue for the Company. The Company bills customers for the sales price of any tools which are lost and/or damaged in use and
the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting revenue or expense is recognized.
Lost tools are recognized as product rental revenue and cost of products and rental revenue, respectively.
Intangible Assets. The Company’s
intangible assets, which are recorded at cost, consist primarily of the unamortized cost basis of issued and pending patents. These
assets are being amortized on a straight line basis over the estimated useful lives of 15 years. The Company continually evaluates
the amortization period and carrying basis of intangible assets to determine whether subsequent events and circumstances warrant
a revised estimated useful life or impairment in value. To date, no such impairment has occurred. To the extent such events or
circumstances occur that could affect the recoverability of our Intangible assets, we may incur charges for impairment in the future.
Stock-Based Compensation. The Company
accounts for stock-based employee compensation arrangements using the fair value method that requires that the fair value
of employees awards issued, modified, repurchased or cancelled after implementation, under share-based payment arrangements, be
measured as of the date the award is issued, modified, repurchased or cancelled. The resulting cost is then recognized in the statement
of earnings over the service period.
The Company periodically issues common stock
for services rendered and may issue common stock for acquisitions in the future. Common stock issued is valued at fair market value.
Management and the board of directors consider market price quotations, recent stock offering prices and other factors in determining
fair market value for purposes of valuing the common stock. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the various weighted average assumptions, including dividend yield, expected
volatility, average risk-free interest rate and expected lives.
Income Taxes. The Company uses the liability
method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon
differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates
and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance
to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
the consolidated statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.
Comparison of Results of Operations
Three and Nine Months Ended September
30, 2014, Compared To Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
The following tables set forth summarized consolidated
financial information for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:
| |
Three Months Ended September 30, | |
(in thousands) | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
$ Change | | |
% Change | |
Total revenues | |
$ | 2,160 | | |
$ | 1,610 | | |
$ | 550 | | |
| 34 | % |
Cost of revenues | |
| (982 | ) | |
| (840 | ) | |
| 142 | | |
| 17 | % |
Gross profit | |
| 1,178 | | |
| 770 | | |
| 408 | | |
| 53 | % |
Gross profit as a percentage of total revenues | |
| 55 | % | |
| 48 | % | |
| | | |
| 7 | % |
Operating expenses | |
| 909 | | |
| 943 | | |
| (34 | ) | |
| (4 | %) |
Income (loss) from operations | |
| 269 | | |
| (173 | ) | |
| 442 | | |
| 255 | % |
Other income (expense) | |
| (13 | ) | |
| (5 | ) | |
| (8 | ) | |
| (160 | %) |
Net income (loss) | |
$ | 256 | | |
$ | (178 | ) | |
$ | 434 | | |
| 244 | % |
For the three months ended September 30, 2014,
the Company's business operations reflected an increase in sales. For the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Company's
consolidated operations generated revenues of approximately $2,160,000 compared to revenues of $1,610,000 for the three months
ended September 30, 2013. The $550,000 increase in total revenues is primarily attributable to an increase in sales of coil tubing
products for Mexico service providers. We plan to continue to tailor our product offerings to address the current trends in the
international drilling industry based on sales information provided by our largest customers with the goal of increasing our revenues
moving forward. For the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Company had a gross profit as a percentage of sales of 55%,
compared to 48% for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The $408,000 increase in gross profit for the three months ended
September 30, 2014, compared to the prior period, is attributed to increased revenue from the sale of coil tubing products.
The following tables set forth summarized consolidated
financial information for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
5,073 |
|
|
$ |
4,855 |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Cost of revenues |
|
|
(2,619 |
) |
|
|
(2,471 |
) |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Gross profit as a percentage of total revenues |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
%) |
Operating expenses |
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Loss from operations |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(443 |
%) |
Net loss |
|
$ |
(324 |
) |
|
$ |
(418 |
) |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014,
the Company's business operations reflected an increase in sales. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company's consolidated
operations generated revenues of approximately $5,073,000 compared to revenues of $4,855,000 for the nine months ended September
30, 2013. The $218,000 increase in total revenues is attributable to increased revenue from the sale of coil tubing products. We
plan to continue to tailor our product offerings to address the current trends in the international drilling industry based on
sales information provided by our largest customers with the goal of increasing our revenues moving forward. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2014, the Company had a gross profit as a percentage of sales of 48%, compared to 49% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2013. The $70,000 increase in gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the prior period,
is attributed to increased revenue from the sale of coil tubing products.
Revenue Information
The following table sets forth summarized consolidated
sales information for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Rentals |
|
$ |
1,407 |
|
|
$ |
1,566 |
|
|
$ |
(159 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
%) |
Products |
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
1,611 |
% |
Total revenue |
|
$ |
2,160 |
|
|
$ |
1,610 |
|
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
We had total revenues of approximately $2,160,000
for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to total revenues of $1,610,000 for the three months ended September 30,
2013, an increase in total revenues of $550,000 or 34% from the prior period. Total revenues included $1,407,000 of rental revenue
for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to $1,566,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, a decrease
in rental revenue of $159,000 or 10% from the prior period. The decrease in rental revenue was mainly due to a decrease in customer
demand and an increase in competitive pricing by other large service companies. Revenues from product sales for the three months
ended September 30, 2014 were $753,000 compared to $44,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, an increase in product
revenue of $709,000 or 1,611% from the prior period. We believe that through joint pricing efforts with our partner service companies
we will be able to expand our product sales and services to new customers in the United States, Mexico and Canada.
The following table sets forth summarized consolidated
sales information for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Rentals |
|
$ |
3,981 |
|
|
$ |
4,758 |
|
|
$ |
(777 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
%) |
Products |
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
% |
Total revenue |
|
$ |
5,073 |
|
|
$ |
4,855 |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
We had total revenues of approximately $5,073,000
for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to total revenues of $4,855,000 for the nine months ended September 30,
2013, an increase in total revenues of $218,000 or 4% from the prior period. Total revenues included $3,981,000 of rental revenue
for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to $4,758,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, a decrease in
rental revenue of $777,000 or 16% from the prior period. The decrease in rental revenue was mainly due to a decrease in customer
demand and an increase in competitive pricing by other large service companies. Revenues from product sales for the nine months
ended September 30, 2014 were $1,092,000 compared to $97,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, an increase in product
revenue of $995,000 or 1,026% from the prior period. We believe that through joint pricing efforts with our partner service companies,
that we will be able to expand our product sales and services to new customers in the United States, Mexico and Canada.
Cost of Revenue
The following table sets forth summarized cost
of revenue information for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Depreciation of rental tools |
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Facilities and support expenses |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
%) |
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Material, supplies and support service |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
Total cost of revenue |
|
$ |
982 |
|
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Cost of revenue includes costs associated with
products and rental sales and depreciation of capitalized rental tool assets that are rented to oil field service companies. We
had cost of products and rental revenue of approximately $982,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to a
cost of approximately $840,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, an increase of $142,000 or 17% from the prior period.
The main reasons for the increase were an increase in material, supplies and support service which was directly related to the
increase in product sales revenue and an increase in compensation of machine shop staff for the three months ended September 30,
2014 compared to the prior year’s period.
The following table sets forth summarized cost
of revenue information for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:
| |
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
(in thousands) | |
2014 | | |
2013 | | |
$ Change | | |
% Change | |
Depreciation of rental tools | |
$ | 874 | | |
$ | 819 | | |
$ | 55 | | |
| 7 | % |
Facilities and support expenses | |
| 138 | | |
| 197 | | |
| (59 | ) | |
| (30 | %) |
Compensation and benefits | |
| 730 | | |
| 666 | | |
| 64 | | |
| 10 | % |
Material, supplies and support service | |
| 877 | | |
| 789 | | |
| 88 | | |
| 11 | % |
Total cost of revenue | |
$ | 2,619 | | |
$ | 2,471 | | |
$ | 148 | | |
| 6 | % |
Cost of revenue includes costs associated with
products and rental sales and depreciation of capitalized rental tool assets that are rented to oil field service companies. We
had cost of products and rental revenue of approximately $2,619,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to a
cost of approximately $2,471,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, an increase of $148,000 or 6% from the prior period.
The main reasons for the increase were an increase in material, supplies and support service which was directly related to the
increase in product sales revenue, an increase in compensation of machine shop staff and an increase in the depreciation of rental
tools offset by a decrease in facilities and support expenses.
Depreciation of Rental Tools
Depreciation expense (as a portion of cost
of revenues) increased by $24,000 or 9%, to $302,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to $278,000 for the
three months ended September 30, 2013, which increase was mainly due to an increase in the depreciable asset base in 2014 versus
2013.
Depreciation expense (as a portion of cost
of revenues) increased by $55,000 or 7%, to $874,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to $819,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2013, which increase was mainly due to an increase in the depreciable asset base in 2014 versus
2013.
Gross Profit
We had gross profit of $1,178,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2014, compared to gross profit of $770,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, an increase
in gross profit of $408,000 or 53% from the prior period. Our gross profit was 55% of revenue for the three months ended September
30, 2014, compared to 48% for the three months ended September 30, 2013.
We had gross profit of $2,454,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2014, compared to gross profit of $2,384,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, an increase
in gross profit of $70,000 or 3% from the prior period. Our gross profit was 48% of revenue for the nine months ended September
30, 2014, compared to 49% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
General Operating Expenses
The following table sets forth summarized general
operating expense information for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
General and administrative - Professional services |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
General and administrative expenses - Other |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
%) |
Total general operating expenses |
|
$ |
602 |
|
|
$ |
537 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
We had total general operating expenses of
$602,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to total general operating expenses of $537,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2013, an increase in operating expenses of $65,000 or 12% from the prior period. The increase in general
operating expenses was primarily related to an increase in professional service fees related to accounting, consulting and legal
fees related to our lawsuit (see also Part II - Item 1).
The following table sets forth summarized operating
expense information for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
%) |
General and administrative - Professional services |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
General and administrative expenses - Other |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Total general operating expenses |
|
$ |
1,672 |
|
|
$ |
1,534 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
We had total general operating expenses of
$1,672,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to total general operating expenses of $1,534,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2013, an increase in operating expenses of $138,000 or 9% from the prior period. The increase in general
operating expenses was primarily related to an increase in professional service fees related to accounting, consulting and legal
fees related to our lawsuit (see also Part II - Item 1).
Selling and Marketing
The following table sets forth summarized selling
and marketing expense information for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Auto |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
Commissions |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
%) |
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
%) |
Other selling and marketing |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
%) |
Total selling and marketing expenses |
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
$ |
(62 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
%) |
We had total selling and marketing expenses
of $333,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to $395,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013,
a decrease of $62,000 or 16% from the prior period, which decrease was primarily due to decreased commissions and a decrease in
selling and marketing expenses.
The following table sets forth summarized selling
and marketing expense information for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Auto |
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Commissions |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
%) |
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Other selling and marketing |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
%) |
Total selling and marketing expenses |
|
$ |
1,095 |
|
|
$ |
1,246 |
|
|
$ |
(151 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
%) |
We had total selling and marketing expenses
of $1,095,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to $1,246,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013,
a decrease of $151,000 or 12% from the prior period, which decrease was primarily due to decreased commissions and a decrease in
selling and marketing expenses offset by an increase in auto repair and maintenance expense and compensation benefits.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased
by $14,000 or 20%, to $85,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to $71,000 for the three months ended September
30, 2013. The increase was primarily due to the addition of shop equipment and automobiles.
Total depreciation and amortization expense
increased by $46,000 or 22%, to $254,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to $208,000 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2013. The increase was primarily due to the addition of shop equipment and automobiles.
Income (Loss) from Operations
We had income from operations of $269,000 for
the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to a loss from operations of $173,000 for the three months ended September
30, 2013, an increase of $442,000 or 255% from the prior period.
We had a loss from operations of $286,000 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to a loss from operations of $411,000 for the nine months ended September 30,
2013, a decrease of $125,000 or 30% from the prior period.
Other Income (expense)
We had other expense of $13,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2014, which represented interest expense of $13,000 versus other expense of $5,000 for the three months
ended September 30, 2013, which represented $5,000 of interest expense. The increase in interest expense was directly attributable
to the new building debt.
We had other expense of $38,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2014, which included interest expense of $39,000 offset by $1,000 of other income, versus other expense
of $7,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, which represented $6,000 of other income offset by $13,000 of interest
expense. The increase in interest expense was directly attributable to the new building debt.
Net Income (Loss)
We had net income of $256,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2014, compared to a net loss of $178,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, an increase
in net income of $434,000 or 244% from the prior period. The increase in net income was attributable to the increase in total revenue
and decrease in operating expenses, offset by an increase in cost of revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared
to the three months ended September 30, 2013.
We had a net loss of $324,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2014, compared to a net loss of $418,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, a decrease in
net loss of $94,000 or 22% from the prior period. The decrease in net loss was attributable to an increase in total revenue and
a decrease in operating expenses, offset by an increase in cost of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared
to the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We had $2,523,000 of working capital as of
September 30, 2014. We believe we are sufficiently capitalized to continue our growth and are in a position to develop financing
alternatives that will enable us to take advantage of growth opportunities in the future.
As of September 30, 2014, we had total assets
of $8,402,000, which included total current assets of $3,460,000, consisting of $1,086,000 of cash, $2,333,000 of accounts receivable,
net, and $41,000 of other current assets; and long term assets including $2,544,000 of rental tools, net; $1,505,000 of property
and equipment, net; and $893,000 of intangible assets, net.
We had total liabilities of $1,776,000 as of
September 30, 2014, which included total current liabilities of $937,000, consisting of accounts payable of $429,000; accrued liabilities
of $287,000; current portion of related party notes payable of $130,000, relating to amounts owed to Jerry Swinford in connection
with the IP Agreement, described in Note 4 to the financials included herein, and current portion of notes payable of $91,000,
relating to the amount due on loans associated with equipment financing and building loan; and long term liabilities consisting
of $839,000 of notes payable, net of current portion relating to equipment financing and our building loan.
We had net cash provided by operating activities
of $817,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, which consisted of non-cash items including $1,128,000 of depreciation
and amortization, $153,000 of stock-option expense, $71,000 of increase in other current assets, $178,000 of increase in accrued
liabilities, and $96,000 of increase in accounts payable, offset by $458,000 of decrease in accounts receivable, and $324,000
of net loss.
We had $556,000 of net cash used in investing
activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, which included the purchase of $525,000 of rental tools and $246,000 of
machinery and equipment; offset by $156,000 from proceeds from the sale of lost tools and $59,000 from proceeds from the sale of
fixed assets. Our principal recurring investing activity was the funding of capital expenditures to ensure that we have the
appropriate levels and types of equipment in place to generate revenue from operations.
We had $77,000 of net cash used in financing
activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, which included $110,000 of proceeds from notes payable related to vehicles,
offset by $117,000 of payments on related party notes payable, relating to amounts paid to Jerry Swinford in connection with the
IP Agreement, described in Note 4 to the financials included herein and $70,000 of payments on notes payable.
Effective October 25, 2013, we purchased a
6,000 square foot office/warehouse building and associated land located at 22305 Gosling Road, Spring, Texas 77389. The purchase
price was $884,508. The Company obtained $649,000 of the purchase price by way of a loan from Bank of Houston, evidenced by a promissory
note, which loan bears interest at 5% per annum for three years and the prime rate plus 1% thereafter (not to be less than 5%),
and has a maturity date of October 25, 2018. Upon an event of default, the loan bears interest at the lesser of the rate of 5%
above the then applicable interest rate of the note, and the greatest amount provided by law. Amortization payments based on a
20 year amortization schedule (initially $4,309 per month) are due on the loan until maturity (recalculated based on the then interest
rate after the first three years of the loan). The amount due under the loan is secured by a Deed of Trust, Security Agreement
and Financing Statement on the property purchased.
The Company’s outstanding notes payable
and the material terms thereof are described in Note 4 to the financials included herein.
The Company has historically been funded through
loans provided by, and through the sale of common stock and warrants to, the Company’s largest shareholder and former director,
Herbert C. Pohlmann, provided that Mr. Pohlmann is not required to provide us any additional funding and/or to purchase any securities
from us in the future.
Our immediate plans are to continue our growth
by meeting expected demand for our coil tubing tool products in our current geographic markets and further expanding into international
markets (including Mexico) similar to what we accomplished in Canada during 2012 and 2013. We plan to supplement our cash flow
with typical bank debt or similar financing which will enable us to meet larger demand on bigger projects, enter new markets and
improve our network for servicing our customers.
Moving forward, we plan to increase spending
on research and development activities, which we believe will be required to provide technological advancement to our coiled tubing
technologies and workover product lines. We are currently working on a new generation of generic and proprietary coil tubing tools
to aid in and facilitate horizontal drilling. We expect the market for new applications of coiled tubing to continue to expand
throughout the remainder of fiscal 2014, especially in the horizontal drilling and workover applications.
In addition to debt financing and our organic
growth as discussed above, we may raise funds for further expansion of our tool fleet, development of new tools or to make strategic
acquisitions through the sale or exchange of equity securities. Our common stock is now quoted on the OTCQB market, provided that
we may choose to list our common stock on the NYSE MKT or NASDAQ Capital Market in the future. As a result of becoming a fully-reporting
public company, we believe investors may be more willing to purchase our common stock in private offerings allowing us to raise
funding to use for the items described above. The sale of additional equity or debt securities, if accomplished, may result in
dilution to our shareholders.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements:
None.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk.
As a smaller reporting company, as defined
in rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we are not required to provide
the information mandated by this item.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of
the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management
recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of
achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that
there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls
and procedures relative to their costs.
Based on our evaluation, our Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were designed at a reasonable assurance
level and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We regularly review our system of internal
control over financial reporting to ensure we maintain an effective internal control environment. There were no changes in our
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
From time to time, we may become party to litigation
or other legal proceedings that we consider to be a part of the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved
in legal proceedings that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial
condition or results of operations other than the proceeding described below. We may become involved in other material legal proceedings
in the future.
On July 25, 2013, Eric Cohen (a shareholder
of the Company) filed a lawsuit against the Company, Jerry Swinford (the Executive Vice President and director of the Company),
Jason Swinford (the Chief Executive Officer and director of the Company) and Herbert C. Pohlmann (the Company’s majority
shareholder and former director)(collectively, the “Defendants”) in the 61st Judicial District Court for Harris County,
Texas (Cause No. 2013-43593). The suit seeks monetary damages in excess of $1 million in connection with compensatory damages alleged
suffered by Mr. Cohen or seeks a buyout of Mr. Cohen’s interest in the Company. The suit also seeks legal fees and pre-and-post
judgment interest. The suit alleges “minority shareholder oppression” and “breach of fiduciary duty” in
connection with the actions of Defendants, i.e., that Defendants have engaged in wrongful conduct which has diluted Mr. Cohen’s
shares; granted more power to Defendants (for little or no consideration); and granted rights to insiders for less than reasonably
equivalent value. The Company disputes Mr. Cohen’s claims and the Company has engaged legal counsel in the matter and filed
an answer to the complaint denying Cohen’s allegations. The Company intends to vigorously defend the case against Cohen’s
claims. At this stage of the litigation, the Company believes the likelihood of material loss is remote. On January
27, 2014, the Company filed a counterclaim against Eric Cohen (plaintiff) requesting damages and attorneys’ fees incurred
in this case. As of the date of this report, Mr. Cohen and the Defendants have agreed in principal on the terms of a settlement
and are negotiating a settlement agreement pursuant to which each side will dismiss their claims and the lawsuit will be dismissed
with prejudice. The Company hopes to enter into such settlement shortly after the filing of this report.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes from the
risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed
with the Commission on March 31, 2014, and investors are encouraged to review such risk factors, prior to making an investment
in the Company.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
Effective August 18, 2014, the Company file
filed a Certificate of Withdrawal of Certificate of Designation for the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock (the “Series
B Preferred Stock”) with the Secretary of State of Nevada, which became effective on the same date. Grifco International
Inc. (“Grifco”) was the sole holder of the Company’s 1,000,000 outstanding shares of Series B Preferred
Stock prior to such filing. The Series B Preferred Stock originally provided Grifco the right to convert such Series B Preferred
Stock shares into common stock of the Company (on a 0.066-for-1 basis), after Grifco exercised its option to purchase 1,000,000
shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock for $100 (the “Option”). Such Option was exercisable
subject to the occurrence of certain events and expired unexercised pursuant to its terms on November 30, 2012. As a result of
the expiration of the Option, the Series B Preferred Stock no longer had any rights or privileges. As a result of the filing, effective
August 18, 2014, the Company no longer has any Series B Preferred Stock designated.
Item 6. Exhibits.
See the Exhibit Index following the signature
page to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a list of exhibits filed or furnished with this report, which Exhibit Index is incorporated
herein by reference.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
By: /s/ Jason Swinford
Jason Swinford
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
and Director
Dated: November
10, 2014
By: /s/ Richard R. Royall
Richard R. Royall
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial/Accounting
Officer)
Dated: November
10, 2014
EXHIBIT INDEX
3.1* |
|
Certificate of Withdrawal of Certificate of Designation of Series B Preferred Stock (August 18, 2014) |
31.1* |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
31.2* |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.1** |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.2** |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
101.INS# |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH# |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL# |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF# |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB# |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE# |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
*
Filed herewith.
**
Furnished herewith.
# XBRL (Extensible
Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes
of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
Exhibit 3.1
1. Name of corporation:
Coil Tubing Technology, Inc. [E0806802005-9]
2. Following is the resolution by the board
of directors authorizing the withdrawal of the Certificate of Designation establishing the classes or series of stock:
The Board of Directors of the Corporation
hereby approve, confirm and ratify the withdrawal and termination of the Certificate of Designation For Nevada For Profit Corporation
(Pursuant to NRS 78.1955), establishing the designations, preferences, limitations and relative rights of the Corporation’s
Series B Preferred Stock, as filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on June 5, 2007.
3. The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
have no rights or preferences whatsoever.
4. Signature: (required)
X
/s/ Jason Swinford
Signature of Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
I, Jason Swinford, certify that:
1. I have reviewed
this report on Form 10-Q of Coil Tubing Technology, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;
3. Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's
other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed
such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
d) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Quarterly report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.
Date: | |
November 10, 2014 | |
/s/ Jason Swinford |
| |
| |
Jason Swinford |
| |
| |
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
EXHIBIT 31.2
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
I, Richard R. Royall, certify that:
1. I have reviewed
this report on Form 10-Q of Coil Tubing Technology, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;
3. Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's
other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed
such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
d) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Quarterly report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.
Date: | |
November 10, 2014 | |
/s/ Richard R. Royall |
| |
| |
Richard R. Royall |
| |
| |
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer) |
EXHIBIT 32.1
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Pursuant to 18 U. S. C.
Section 1350, I, Jason Swinford, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of Coil Tubing Technology, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Coil Tubing
Technology, Inc.
Date: | |
November 10, 2014 | |
/s/ Jason Swinford |
| |
| |
Jason Swinford |
| |
| |
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
This certification accompanies
this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
it by reference.
EXHIBIT 32.2
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Pursuant to 18 U. S. C.
Section 1350, I, Richard R. Royall, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of Coil Tubing Technology, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Coil Tubing
Technology, Inc.
Date: | |
November 10, 2014 | |
/s/ Richard R. Royall |
| |
| |
Richard R. Royall |
| |
| |
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer) |
This certification accompanies
this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
it by reference.
Coil Tubing Technology (CE) (USOTC:CTBG)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 10월(10) 2024 으로 11월(11) 2024
Coil Tubing Technology (CE) (USOTC:CTBG)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 11월(11) 2023 으로 11월(11) 2024