ITEM 3.
KEY INFORMATION
A.
Selected Financial Data
The following selected financial data, as of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. December 31, 2014 and 2015 figures have been provided in the disclosure documents for our initial public offering.
As a result of the discontinuation of our operations in Mexico in September 2018, approved by the board of directors on August 6, 2018, our consolidated statements of profit or loss and cash flow for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 included in the table below were restated for the purposes of applying IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations” for comparability purposes. See “Introduction––Financial Information.”
The following selected financial and other data is qualified by reference to and should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto contained in this annual report, as well as the information set forth under the heading “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”
Consolidated Statements of Profits or Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
except per share data)
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
1,086,784
|
1,453,685
|
1,685,151
|
1,835,212
|
1,808,064
|
466,621
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
(312,074)
|
(383,673)
|
(431,065)
|
(495,190)
|
(480,206)
|
(123,931)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
(137,129)
|
(144,455)
|
(162,338)
|
(143,253)
|
(191,695)
|
(49,472)
|
Other operating expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income
|
32,399
|
61,144
|
28,285
|
28,996
|
15,026
|
3,878
|
Financial expense
|
(72,539)
|
(93,619)
|
(104,795)
|
(129,040)
|
(83,223)
|
(21,478)
|
Monetary position (loss) gain, net
|
―
|
―
|
―
|
―
|
9,595
|
2,476
|
Loss before income tax
|
(127,402)
|
(78,244)
|
(134,244)
|
(154,222)
|
(321,593)
|
(82,996)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss……………………..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners of the Parent from continuing operations
|
(126,993)
|
(77,407)
|
(133,422)
|
(153,623)
|
(321,166)
|
(82,886)
|
Owners of the Parent from discontinuing operations
|
(16,973)
|
(21,269)
|
(17,652)
|
(16,123)
|
(10,579)
|
(2,730)
|
Non-controlling interests
|
(409)
|
(837)
|
(822)
|
(599)
|
(629)
|
(159)
|
Loss per share attributable to owners of the Parent
Basic and Diluted
(4)
|
(7.54)
|
(4.66)
|
(7.05)
|
(5.95)
|
(10.68)
|
(2.76)
|
(1) For comparison purposes, the financial information provided in the table above reflects a restatement of such financial information for the years ended December 31 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 as a result of the discontinuation of our operations in Mexico in September 2018, which has been made in accordance with IFRS 5. Our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere also reflects a restatement as a result of the discontinuation of our operations in Mexico, which has been made in accordance with IFRS 5. See “Introduction––Financial Information.”
(2) Solely for the convenience of the reader,
real
amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018 have been translated into U.S. dollars at the selling rate reported by the Central Bank at December 31, 2018 of R$3.8748 to US$1.00. See “Item 3. Key Information––A. Selected Financial Data––Exchange Rates” for information regarding historical exchange rates of reais to U.S. dollars.
(3) Relates to our operations in Mexico which were discontinued in September 2018.
(4) Basic loss per common share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares for the relevant period. Diluted loss per common share reflects, for each period, the potential dilution of share options that could be exercised or converted into common shares, and is computed by dividing net loss attributable to the owners of the Parent by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the potentially dilutive effect of all of our share options. Earnings per common share data for all periods have been calculated after giving effect to the share split that occurred on April 18, 2017 in connection with the completion of our initial public offering. When we report net loss attributable to the owners of the Parent, the diluted loss per common share is equal to the basic loss per common share due to the anti-dilutive effect of the outstanding share options.
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Statements of Financial Position Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
242,372
|
249,064
|
111,304
|
395,962
|
67,321
|
17,374
|
Total current assets
(2)
|
743,408
|
938,358
|
824,711
|
1,113,558
|
582,070
|
150,220
|
Total assets
|
861,956
|
1,113,568
|
1,113,722
|
1,497,125
|
994,332
|
256,616
|
Total current liabilities
|
378,416
|
523,271
|
616,695
|
796,330
|
605,751
|
156,331
|
Total long-term debt
(3)
|
335,410
|
333,993
|
387,382
|
285,971
|
228,879
|
59,069
|
Share-based payment liability
|
30,113
|
35,978
|
30,139
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Total liabilities
|
616,949
|
824,566
|
989,697
|
1,013,776
|
837,782
|
216,214
|
Total shareholders equity
|
245,007
|
289,002
|
124,025
|
483,349
|
156,550
|
40,402
|
(1) Solely for the convenience of the reader,
real
amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018 have been translated into U.S. dollars at the selling rate reported by the Central Bank at December 31, 2018 of R$3.8748 to US$1.00. See “Item 3. Key Information––A. Selected Financial Data––Exchange Rates” for information regarding historical exchange rates of reais to U.S. dollars.
(2) Includes cash and cash equivalents.
(3) Includes current portion of long-term debt. See note 18 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Selected Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating data from continuing operations
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active customers (in thousands)
(2)
|
3,662
|
4,567
|
5,432
|
6,516
|
6,805
|
Total orders (in thousands)
(3)
|
6,642
|
8,273
|
10,005
|
12,037
|
12,624
|
% of total orders placed from mobile devices
(4)
|
11.6%
|
20.8%
|
32.8%
|
45.9%
|
58.7%
|
Average basket size
(5)
|
R$ 211.0
|
217.4
|
R$ 205.5
|
R$ 202.6
|
R$ 203.9
|
(1) Does not consider operating data from our Mexican operations, which were discontinued in September 2018 but considers operating data from our operations in Argentina, which were discontinued as of April 2019.
(2) Customers who made purchases online with us during the preceding twelve months as of the relevant dates.
(3) Total number of orders invoiced to active customers during the relevant period.
(4) The sum of total orders placed by active customers through our mobile site and applications as a percentage of total orders placed by active customers for the relevant period. This operational metric is especially relevant as sales made on mobile devices have become an important part of our business.
(5) The sum of total order value from online purchases with us divided by the number of total orders for the relevant period.
Non-IFRS Financial Measures
We use non-IFRS financial measures for financial and operational decision-making purposes. To provide investors and others with additional information regarding our financial results and operating performance, we have disclosed in the tables below and within this annual report our EBITDA from continuing operations and EBITDA Margin from continuing operations and GMV which are non-IFRS financial measures.
EBITDA from Continuing Operations and EBITDA Margin from Continuing Operations
We define: (1) “EBITDA from Continuing Operations” as net income (loss) from continuing operations plus interest income/expense, net (which includes interest income, imputed interest on installment sales, interest expenses related to debt, imputed interest on credit purchases and debt issuance costs), income tax, depreciation and amortization expenses and monetary gain (loss), net; and (2) “EBITDA Margin from Continuing Operations” as EBITDA from Continuing Operations divided by net sales for the relevant period, expressed as a percentage. EBITDA from Continuing Operations and EBITDA Margin from Continuing Operations are not measures of financial performance in accordance with IFRS and should not be considered as a substitute for other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with IFRS. These measurements assist our management and may be useful to investors in comparing our operating performance consistently over time as they eliminate the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest charges), asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization) and items outside the control of our management (primarily taxes). These measurements have limitations as analytical tools, including:
·
EBITDA from Continuing Operations does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs or contractual commitments;
·
EBITDA from Continuing Operations does not reflect our tax expense or the cash requirements to pay our taxes;
·
Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated or amortized will often need to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA from Continuing Operations does not reflect any cash requirements for these replacements; and
·
Other companies may calculate EBITDA from Continuing Operations differently than we do, and therefore this presentation of EBITDA from Continuing Operations may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures used by other companies.
Because of these limitations, you should consider EBITDA from Continuing Operations and EBITDA Margin from Continuing Operations alongside other financial performance measures, like net income (loss) and our other IFRS results. The following table reflects the reconciliation of our net loss from continuing operations to EBITDA from Continuing Operations and EBITDA Margin from Continuing Operations for each of the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
(127,402)
|
(78,244)
|
(134,244)
|
(154,222)
|
(321,795)
|
Add (subtract):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income/expense, net
(1)
|
26,941
|
30,524
|
74,175
|
93,047
|
54,097
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
15,965
|
19,892
|
30,738
|
31,487
|
58,022
|
Income tax expense
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
202
|
Monetary gain (loss), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA from continuing
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA Margin from continuing operations
|
(12.7)%
|
(6.1)%
|
(10.5)%
|
(1.6)%
|
(12.1)%
|
(1) Includes interest income, imputed interest on installment sales, interest expenses related to debt, imputed interest on credit purchases and debt issuance costs.
(2) Does not consider net sales from our Mexican operations, which were discontinued in September 2018 but considers net sales from our operations in Argentina, which was sold by us on April 26, 2019. See “Introduction––Financial Information” and Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects––A. Operations Results––Our Business Segments.”
9
GMV
We define “GMV” as the sum of net sales, returns, GMV from marketplace and net sales taxes, less marketplace and NCard activation commission fees. GMV is a metric useful to investors as it provides an indication of the total volume of product sales (in terms of gross merchandise value) transacted in online and offline purchases with us as well as the growth trend of our marketplace, which has become an increasingly important part of our business. GMV is not a measure of financial performance in accordance with IFRS and should not be considered as a substitute for other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with IFRS. Because of these limitations, you should consider GMV alongside other financial performance measures, like net sales and our other IFRS results. The following table reflects the reconciliation of our net sales to GMV for each of the periods indicated:
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2014
(Restated)
|
2015
(Restated)
|
2016
(Restated)
|
2017
(Restated)
|
2018
|
(In thousands)
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
(2)
|
R$1,086,784
|
R$1,453,685
|
R$1,685,151
|
R$1,835,212
|
R$1,808,064
|
Add (subtract):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales taxes
(3)
|
241,378
|
251,714
|
282,944
|
327,723
|
381,818
|
Returns
(4)
|
73,210
|
98,543
|
139,751
|
197,232
|
140,277
|
Marketplace commission fees
(5)
|
—
|
—
|
(9,086)
|
(38,858)
|
(64,307)
|
NCard activation commission fees
(6)
|
—
|
—
|
(375)
|
(1,974)
|
(2,532)
|
Sub-Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMV from marketplace
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMV
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) For comparison purposes, the financial information provided in the table above reflects a restatement of such financial information for the years ended December 31 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 as a result of the discontinuation of our operations in Mexico in September 2018, which has been made in accordance with IFRS 5. Our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere also reflects a restatement as a result of the discontinuation of our operations in Mexico, which has been made in accordance with IFRS 5. See “Introduction––Financial Information.” The financial information provided above still considers our operations in Argentina, which was sold by us on April 26, 2019.
(2) Net sales includes revenue from product sales and other revenues, net of promotional discounts, returns and net sales taxes. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Components of our Results of Operations.”
(3) Value added taxes added in our product sales, net of value added taxes incentives granted to us and recorded in our net sales. For further discussion regarding the tax incentives applicable to us, see notes 6 and 8 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
(4) Represents revenue from product sales that are returned by our customers.
(5) Represents the commission revenue arising from product sales of qualified third-party business-to-consumer, or B2C, vendors through our marketplace, launched in February 2016, that we record as net sales on a net basis. For further information, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Components of our Results of Operations.”
(6) Represents the commission revenue generated by customers’ activation of NCards, an initiative launched in April 2016. For further information, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Components of our Results of Operations.”
(7) Means the gross merchandise value of product sales through our online marketplace, launched in February 2016.
Exchange Rates
The Brazilian foreign exchange system allows the purchase and sale of foreign currency and the international transfer of
reais
by any person or legal entity, regardless of the amount, subject to certain regulatory procedures.
In the past, the Central Bank has intervened occasionally to control unstable movements in foreign exchange rates. We cannot predict whether the Central Bank or the Brazilian government will continue to permit the
real
to float freely or will intervene in the exchange rate market through the return of a currency band system or otherwise. The
real
may depreciate or appreciate against the U.S. dollar and other currencies substantially. Furthermore, Brazilian law provides that, whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments or there are serious reasons to foresee a serious imbalance, temporary restrictions may be imposed on remittances of foreign capital abroad. We cannot assure you that such measures will not be taken by the Brazilian government in the future. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in Brazil—Exchange rate instability may adversely increase our costs and affect our financial condition and results of operations.”
The following table shows the selling rate for U.S. dollars for the periods and dates indicated. The information in the “Average” column represents the average of the daily exchange rates during the periods presented. The numbers in the “Period End” column are the quotes for the exchange rate as of the last business day of the period in question.
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
2.7403
|
2.1974
|
2.3547
|
2.6562
|
2015
|
4.1949
|
2.5754
|
3.3387
|
3.9048
|
2016
|
4.1558
|
3.1193
|
3.4833
|
3.2591
|
2017
|
3.3807
|
3.0510
|
3.1925
|
3.3080
|
2018
|
4.1879
|
3.1391
|
3.6558
|
3.8748
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2018
|
4.0273
|
3.6368
|
November 2018
|
3.8925
|
3.6973
|
December 2018
|
3.9330
|
3.8285
|
January 2019
|
3.8595
|
3.6519
|
February 2019
|
3.7756
|
3.6519
|
March 2019
|
3.9682
|
3.7762
|
April (through April 26, 2019)
|
3.9725
|
3.8345
|
Source: Central Bank.
The exchange rate on December 31, 2018 was R$3.8748 per US$1.00 and on April 26, 2019 was
3.9353
per US$1.00.
Pro Forma Financial Information for the Sale of our Operations in Argentina
On April 26, 2019, we effected the sale of our operations in Argentina to BT8 S.A. Pursuant to terms of this transaction, we have granted to NS3 Internet S.A. a license for the period of eighteen months from the date hereof to use in Argentina our brand and e-commerce platform and contributed AR$106.308.088 (approximately US$2.4 million) into NS3 Internet S.A. at closing.
Pro forma
financial information that gives effect to such divestment as if it had occurred as of January 1, 2018 is below:
Pro Forma
Consolidated Statements of Profit or Loss
|
For the year ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
Pro Forma
Adjustments
(2)
|
|
|
R$
|
R$
|
R$
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
1,808,064
|
(126,101)
|
1,681,963
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
(480,206)
|
39,664
|
(440,542)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
(191,695)
|
10,005
|
(181,690)
|
Other operating expenses, net
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
|
Financial income
|
15,026
|
(427)
|
14,599
|
Financial expenses
|
(83,223)
|
12,684
|
(70,539)
|
Monetary position (loss) gain, net
|
|
|
|
Loss before income tax
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to:
|
|
|
|
Owners of the Parent from continuing operations
|
(321,166)
|
37,700
|
(283,466)
|
Owners of the Parent from discontinued operations
|
(10,579)
|
(47,568)
|
(58,147)
|
Non-controlling interests
|
(629)
|
—
|
(629)
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share attributable to owners of the Parent
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
(1) Financial data derived from our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 included elsewhere in this annual report.
(2)
Pro forma
adjustments to give effect to the discontinuation of our operations in Argentina as if such divestment had occurred as of January 1, 2018. As a result, it represents the elimination of statement of profit or loss line items associated with our operations in Argentina.
Pro Forma
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
|
For the year ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
Pro Forma
Adjustments
(2)
|
|
|
R$
|
R$
|
R$
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
67,321
|
(732)
|
66,589
|
Restricted cash
|
2,996
|
—
|
2,996
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Trade accounts receivables, net
|
163,807
|
(2,375)
|
161,432
|
Inventories, net
|
268,594
|
(13,509)
|
255,085
|
Recoverable taxes
|
59,214
|
(1,238)
|
57,976
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets:
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
18,533
|
—
|
18,533
|
Judicial deposits
|
119,717
|
—
|
119,717
|
Recoverable taxes
|
40,033
|
—
|
40,033
|
Other assets
|
14,166
|
—
|
14,166
|
Due from related parties
|
7
|
—
|
7
|
Property and equipment, net
|
76,489
|
—
|
76,489
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
(1) Financial data derived from our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 included elsewhere in this annual report.
(2)
Pro forma
adjustments to give effect to the discontinuation of our operations in Argentina as if such divestment had occurred as of January 1, 2018. As a result, it represents the elimination of statement of financial position line items associated with our operations in Argentina.
12
|
For the year ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
Pro Forma
Adjustments
(2)
|
|
|
R$
|
R$
|
R$
|
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
337,120
|
(10,753)
|
326,367
|
Reverse factoring
|
45,276
|
—
|
45,276
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
38,473
|
—
|
38,473
|
Taxes and contributions payable
|
18,467
|
(842)
|
17,625
|
Deferred revenue
|
3,983
|
—
|
3,983
|
Accrued expenses
|
136,721
|
(6,881)
|
129,840
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
190,406
|
—
|
190,406
|
Provision for labor, civil and tax risks
|
19,935
|
—
|
19,935
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
244
|
—
|
244
|
Additional-paid in capital
|
1,347,581
|
—
|
1,347,581
|
Treasury shares
|
(1,533)
|
—
|
(1,533)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(11,022)
|
—
|
(11,022)
|
Accumulated losses
|
|
|
|
Equity attributable to owners of the parent
|
156,806
|
(9,274)
|
147,532
|
Equity attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
156,550
|
(9,018)
|
147,532
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
(1) Financial data derived from our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 included elsewhere in this annual report.
(2)
Pro forma
adjustments to give effect to the discontinuation of our operations in Argentina as if such divestment had occurred as of January 1, 2018. As a result, it represents the elimination of statement of financial position line items associated with our operations in Argentina.
These
pro forma c
onsolidated statements of profit or loss and consolidated statement of financial position have been prepared by us for illustrative purposes and are not intended to represent our results of operations or financial position in future periods or what our results of operations or financial position actually would have been had we completed this divestment during the specified period or as of a specified date.
B.
Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
C.
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
D.
Risk Factors
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
We have determined that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern and our independent registered public accounting firm has included an explanatory paragraph relating to our ability to continue as a going concern in its report on our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.
Our audited consolidated financial statements were prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. However, as set out in note 1.4 of our audited consolidated financial statements we have concluded that we will need to explore financing alternatives to meet our obligations within one year from the date of issue of our audited consolidated financial statements and there is no assurance that we will be able to meet our funding requirements and have the ability to gain continued access to short-term financing. We have incurred operating losses, negative cash flow from operating activities and have a working capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. In recognition of this, the report of our independent registered public accounting firm included elsewhere in this annual report contains an explanatory paragraph stating there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Although our management is currently exploring alternatives to obtain access to other sources of capital necessary to meet our ongoing liquidity needs and is taking measures to improve our operating performance and cash, liquidity and financial
position
, our plan to improve our operating performance and financial position may not be successful and we may not be able to obtain additional financing when needed on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. The perception that we may not be able to continue as a going concern may also make it more difficult to raise additional funds or operate our business due to concerns about our ability to meet our contractual obligations. For further information regarding such measures taken by our management, see
“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
We may not be able to maintain adequate liquidity, and our cash flows from operations may not be sufficient to meet our current obligations with financial creditors and suppliers unless we improve our operating performance and cash, liquidity and financial position and obtain access to alternative sources of capital necessary to meet our ongoing liquidity needs.
We experienced net losses and significant cash outflows from cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2018. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, we had accumulated losses of R$1,180.9 million (compared to R$847.1 million as of December 31, 2017), net loss of R$332.4 million (compared to R$170.3 million in 2017) and net cash used in operating activities of R$102.5 million (compared to R$43.5 million of net cash provided in operating activities in 2017). As of December 31, 2018, we recorded R$23.7 million of net current liabilities (compared to R$317.3 million of net current assets as of December 31, 2017). Our business performance and financial condition has faced increasing pressure since December 31, 2018.
We may be able to meet our funding requirements and have the ability to gain continued access to short-term financing. If for any reason we are unable to continue as a going concern, then this could have an impact on our ability to realize assets at their recognized values, and to settle liabilities in the ordinary course of business (including with suppliers and creditors) at the amounts stated in our audited consolidated financial statements, resulting
in defaults in agreements with our creditors and suppliers and may experience additional defaults in the future, including as a result of cross-defaults. Most of our financing agreements are subject to termination in the event of default, and our indebtedness may be accelerated in the event of continuing default.
For further information, see
“
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Failure to maintain sufficient working capital could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We have significant working capital requirements primarily driven by payment terms agreed with our suppliers and extended payment terms that we offer our customers. For the year ended December 31, 2018, 56.5% of our product sales were paid in installments by our customers. Differences between the date when we pay our suppliers and the date when we receive payments from customers may negatively affect our liquidity and our cash flows. In addition, we expect our working capital needs to increase as our total number of products sold increases. In order to finance our working capital needs, we enter into financing arrangements to decrease the amount of time it takes for us to collect our trade accounts receivable, or factoring, and to increase the amount of time we have to pay our trade accounts payable, or reverse factoring. For the year ended December 31, 2018, our volume of factoring of trade accounts receivable with financial institutions reached R$1,509.7 million (compared to R$1,113.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017). There can be no assurance that these types of financing arrangements will continue to be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all, particularly if we are not able to maintain adequate liquidity and continue as a going concern. If we do not have sufficient working capital, we may not be able to respond to competitive pressures or fund key strategic initiatives, such as the development of our sites, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Since our inception, we have never recorded profits in a fiscal year.
Since our inception, we have not recorded profits on a consolidated basis and are most likely not be able to record profits on a consolidated basis in the near future. If our operating activities are not profitable and provide us with sufficient cash flows to meet our operational and investment needs, we may be required to seek additional sources of capital, which could include equity, equity-linked and debt financing. Equity financing would have a dilutive effect on our common shares, and new investors in any subsequent transactions could gain rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our common shareholders. Debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants and could reduce our operational flexibility and profitability. We cannot assure you that any additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to fund our expansion, take advantage of acquisition opportunities, develop or enhance services or products or respond to competitive pressures. These inabilities may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are partially dependent upon a select number of prime brands manufactured by certain retail companies. We do not have long-term agreements with our suppliers, and they can cease or limit our access to their products at any time, which could adversely impact our results depending on the importance of the supplier.
Our business partially depends on a select number of prime brands. For instance, for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, Nike, Adidas, Mizuno and Asics made up approximately 45.3%, 34.8%, 34.8% and 37.8%, respectively, of our net sales. We currently do not have long-term agreements with our suppliers.
If any of these suppliers choose not to sell their products to us or limit our access to their products (for example, by entering into exclusive distribution arrangements with other retailers), whether or not resulting from inability to settle liabilities with them in the ordinary course of our business, our capacity to grow, our market share and our financial results could be adversely impacted. In view of recent issues relating to our ability to continue as a going concern, we have recently delayed payments to certain suppliers. Also, to the extent that the increase in the sales of our private label products on our sites negatively affects the sales of our suppliers’ products, our relationship with certain of them could be adversely impacted.
In addition, our suppliers participate in an extremely competitive market with few global brands having the majority of the market share. In order to gain scale or market share, these brands could merge or acquire competitors. The further concentration of our suppliers could negatively impact our ability to negotiate with them and limit the number of companies that could act as our main suppliers.
The eCommerce market in Brazil is developing, and our business depends on the continued growth of eCommerce, as well as increased availability, quality and usage of the Internet in Brazil.
Our future sales depend substantially on consumers’ widespread acceptance and use of the Internet as a way to conduct commerce. Rapid growth in the use of the Internet (particularly as a way to provide and purchase products and services) is a relatively recent phenomenon in Brazil, and we cannot assure you that this acceptance and use will continue or increase. In order to grow our customer base successfully, consumers who have historically used physical channels of commerce to purchase lifestyle, sporting, fashion and beauty goods must accept and use new ways of conducting business and exchanging information. Furthermore, if the penetration of Internet access in Brazil does not increase quickly, that may limit our potential growth, particularly in regions with low levels of Internet quality and access and/or low levels of income.
The Internet penetration in Brazil may never reach a percentage similar to more developed countries for reasons that are beyond our control, including the lack of necessary network infrastructure or delayed development of enabling technologies, performance improvements and security measures. The infrastructure for the Internet in Brazil may not be able to support continued growth in the number of users, their frequency of use or their bandwidth requirements. In addition, Internet reliability may not improve in Brazil due to delays in telecommunications, infrastructure development or other technology shortfalls, or due to increased government regulation. If telecommunications services are not sufficiently available to support the growth of the Internet in Brazil, response times could be slower, which would adversely affect the use of the Internet and our services in particular.
Furthermore, the price of Internet access and Internet-connected devices, such as personal computers, tablets, mobile phones and other portable devices, may limit our potential growth in parts of Brazil with low levels of income. Given the comparatively low level of income in Brazil, the penetration rate for Internet-connected devices is significantly lower in Brazil than it is in the United States and many other more developed countries, and the cost of Internet access is still relatively high as compared with other more developed countries. In addition, there may be increases in Internet access fees or telecommunication fees in Brazil. If that happens, our potential number of customers may decrease, which in turn may adversely affect our sales.
The online retail industry is intensely competitive, and we may not compete successfully against new and existing competitors, which may materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
The retail market for the products we sell is intensely competitive. Consumers have many choices online and offline, including global, regional and local retailers. Our current and potential competitors include brick-and-mortar retailers specializing in sporting goods, fashion and beauty, general brick-and-mortar retailers and pure-play eCommerce players, such as other B2C eCommerce retailers. In the future, we may also face competition from new entrants, the consolidation of existing competitors or companies spun off from our larger competitors.
We face a variety of competitive challenges, including: sourcing products efficiently, pricing the products we sell competitively, maintaining optimal inventory levels, selling products effectively, maintaining the quality of the products we sell, building our customer base, conducting effective marketing activities, anticipating and responding quickly to changing consumer demands and preferences (which is especially true for the fashion and beauty segments), attracting visitors to our sites and maintaining favorable brand recognition. In addition, as we
further develop our business, we will face increasing challenges to compete for and retain high quality suppliers. If we cannot properly address these challenges, our business and prospects would be materially and adversely affected. Other online retailers may be acquired by, receive investments from or enter into strategic relationships with well-established and well-funded companies or investors, which would help enhance their competitive positions. Certain of our competitors may be able to secure more favorable terms with suppliers, devote greater resources to marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing or inventory policies and devote substantially more resources to infrastructure and logistics development. Increased competition may reduce our sales performance, product margins, market share and brand recognition.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors, and competitive pressures may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If the Internet or the markets for our Internet-based services in Brazil fail to grow as anticipated, such lack of growth may have a material adverse impact on our business prospects, results of operations and financial condition.
We operate in a rapidly evolving market. Accordingly, we may be unable to accurately forecast net sales or earnings and appropriately plan our future expenditures.
Considering the emerging nature of the markets in which we compete, the rapidly evolving nature of our business, the relative newness of eCommerce in Brazil, our business diversification and continuous innovation and the general economic and business conditions in Brazil, it is particularly difficult for us to forecast our net sales or earnings accurately. Our current and future expenditure levels are based largely on our investment plans and are, to a large extent, fixed. We may not be able to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected net sales shortfalls arising from the rapidly evolving nature of our business or other conditions that affect our business. Accordingly, any significant shortfall in net sales relative to our planned expenditures would have an immediate adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We depend on search engines, e-mail, and other messaging services to attract a substantial portion of the customers who visit our sites, and changes in search engine logic, or any restrictions on the sending of emails or messages or an inability to timely deliver such communications could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our site traffic is generated by different advertising channels. A portion is generated by customers clicking on search results displayed by search engines, such as Google, Facebook, Yahoo or Bing. These search engines typically provide two types of results: algorithmic and purchased listings. Algorithmic listings cannot be purchased and instead are determined and displayed solely by a set of formulas designed by the search engine provider. Purchased listings can be purchased by companies and other entities in order to attract users to their sites. We rely on both algorithmic and purchased listings to attract a substantial portion of the customers that we serve. The cost of purchased search listing advertising may increase as demand for such advertising channels grows, and further increases may have a negative impact on our ability to maintain or increase profitability. Further, search engines revise their algorithms from time to time in an attempt to optimize their search result listings and to maximize the advertising revenue generated by those listings. Search engines may also place websites on a “blacklist” or remove them from their indexes. We cannot guarantee that a removal by Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Bing or another search engine will not happen to us in the future or that we will be able to adapt to changes in their algorithms in a timely manner.
If the search engines on which we rely for site traffic remove us from their indices or otherwise modify their algorithms such that we have less favorable placement or do not appear among search results, our business will be adversely affected. Such circumstances may result in fewer customers clicking through to our sites, requiring us to resort to other more costly resources to attempt to replace that traffic, and this may reduce our net sales and harm our business. We may also be unable to purchase listings on alternative search engines and if we are able to purchase listings from such alternative search engines, those companies may charge higher prices for advertising or have fewer users.
Also, our business partially relies on email and other messaging services for promoting our sites and product offerings. We provide promotional emails to consumers in our database and we rely on a third-party service for the delivery of all our emails. Delays or errors in the delivery of such emails or other messaging we send may occur and are beyond our control. From time to time, Internet service providers or other third parties may block bulk email transmissions or otherwise experience technical difficulties that result in our inability to successfully deliver emails or other messages to our customers. Changes in the laws or regulations that limit our ability to send such communications or impose additional requirements upon us in connection with sending such communications could also materially and adversely impact our business. In addition, changes in how webmail applications organize and prioritize email may reduce the number of our emails being opened, including if our email messages are delivered to “spam” or similar folders. Actions by third parties to block, impose restrictions on or charge for the delivery of emails or other messages or delays in the distribution of such messages could materially and adversely impact our business. We also use social media services and other retargeting channels to send communications and product offerings to our customers. Changes in the terms of use of social media services and other retargeting channels that would limit our ability to send promotional communications or our customers’ ability to receive communications, disruptions or downtime experienced by these services or a decline in the use of or engagement with social media by customers and potential customers could harm our business.
Our success depends in part on our ability to increase our net sales per active customer. If our efforts to increase customer loyalty and repeat purchasing and to maintain high levels of customer engagement and the average basket size of our customers are not successful, our prospects and net sales will be materially adversely affected.
Our ability to grow our business depends on our ability to retain our existing customer base, generate increased sales and repeat purchases from this customer base, and maintain high levels of customer engagement. To do this, we must continue to provide our customers and potential customers with an intuitive, convenient, efficient and differentiated shopping experience and to continue to offer products that our customers find compelling. If we fail to increase net sales per active customer, generate repeat purchases or maintain high levels of customer engagement and average basket size, our growth prospects, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
If we are unable to predict or effectively react to changes in consumer demand or shopping patterns, we may face significant inventory risk or lose customers and our sales may decline.
Our success depends in part on our ability to anticipate and respond in a timely manner to changing consumer demands and preferences and shopping patterns and seasonality regarding sporting, lifestyle, fashion and beauty goods. The products we sell must appeal to a broad range of consumers whose preferences cannot be predicted with certainty and are subject to change. Sudden changes in consumer spending patterns, consumer demands and preferences are especially likely in fashion and beauty, markets in which we recently began operating and have limited experience. Also, consumer preferences could shift rapidly and our future success depends in part on our ability to select and offer products in a way that anticipates and responds to those changes. If we misjudge the market for our merchandise and do not forecast consumer demand accurately, our sales may decline significantly.
We may experience excess inventory levels (for example, if we overstock unpopular products) and be forced to take significant inventory markdowns, which could have a negative impact on our profitability. Conversely, shortages of products that prove popular could negatively impact our net sales. In addition, a major shift in consumer demand away from sporting, fashion or beauty goods could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We often agree to purchase products from our suppliers several months in advance of the proposed delivery; however, product demand can change significantly between the time we commit to buy a product and its expected date of sale. Also, we carry a broad selection of products—some at significant inventory levels—and we may be unable to sell products in sufficient quantities or during the selling seasons. Any one of these inventory risks may adversely affect our operating results.
For instance, in the second half 2017, after remodeling our B2B operation, as of December 31, 2017, we had R$117.7 million of nutritional supplement products stored in our inventories and during the course of 2018 the venture with Midway Labs to sell nutritional supplement products continued to generate lower than expected results and a high level of inventory of nutrition supplements. In light of that, and as part of our continuing move to streamline our operations and focus on our core B2C operation, we announced in October 2018 that we have
decided to discontinue our B2B operation dedicated to sales of Midway’s nutrition supplements and vitamins. In order to minimize further negative results, we adjusted the margins of nutrition supplements products, accelerating sales through our B2C channel. This resulted in a write-down of about R$60 million in existing Midway’s nutrition supplement inventory in September 2018. As of December 31, 2018, we had R$24.7 million of Midway’s nutritional supplement products stored in our inventories. There can be no assurance that we will be able to sell them in sufficient quantities prior to their expiration date.
A number of factors, many of which are outside our control, may affect consumer demand, shopping patterns or the predictability of our inventory levels, including: general economic conditions; lockouts or strikes involving professional sports teams; the retirement of sports or other celebrities used in marketing for the various products we sell; sports scandals or scandals involving celebrities we use in campaigns to advertise our sites; litigation; and pricing and other actions taken by our competitors.
Failure to anticipate and respond to changing consumer preferences and shopping patterns in a timely manner could lead to, among other things, lower sales and excess inventory levels.
Our business is subject to substantial fluctuation as a result of the seasonal buying patterns of our customers.
We experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and operating results, both of which may vary from quarter-to-quarter in the future. We have historically generated significantly higher net sales in the fourth quarter, which includes the Black November period and the holiday selling season. Accordingly, a reduction in consumer confidence during the holiday season would have a significant impact on our business. Further, in the fourth quarter we generally have increased expenses for personnel and advertising, due to anticipated higher purchase and sales volumes. Seasonality also influences our buying patterns since we purchase merchandise for seasonal activities in advance of a season, which directly impacts our inventory and accounts payable levels and cash flows. If we miscalculate the demand for the amount of products we will sell or for the product mix during the fourth quarter, our net sales can decline, which can harm our financial performance. If fourth quarter net sales are not high enough to allow us to fully recoup our personnel and advertising expenses or are lower than the targets used to determine our inventory levels, this shortfall can negatively impact our results of operations. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results—Seasonality and Quarterly Results of Operations.”
Our quarterly results of operations may also fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of other factors, including, among other things, the timing of the introduction of and advertising for new products and changes in our product mix. As a result of these seasonal and quarterly fluctuations, we believe that comparisons of our operating results between different quarters within a single year are not necessarily meaningful and that these comparisons cannot be relied upon as indicators of our future performance. Any seasonal or quarterly fluctuations that we report in the future may not match the expectations of market analysts and investors. This could cause the price of our common shares to fluctuate significantly.
We derive our net sales from product categories that represent discretionary spending, and changes in global macroeconomic conditions may decrease the demand for the products we sell and adversely affect our growth strategies and business prospects.
Our operating results are affected by the relative condition of the economy. Our business and financial performance may be adversely affected by current and future economic conditions that cause a decline in business and consumer spending, including a reduction in the availability of credit, increased unemployment levels, higher energy and fuel costs, rising interest rates, financial market volatility and recession. Additionally, we may experience difficulties in operating and growing our operations as a result of economic pressures.
As a business that depends on consumer discretionary spending, we may be adversely affected if our customers reduce their purchases due to continued job losses, foreclosures, bankruptcies, higher consumer debt and interest rates, reduced access to credit, lower consumer confidence, uncertainty or changes in tax policies and tax rates. Decreases in customer traffic or average value per transaction negatively affect our financial performance, and a prolonged period of depressed consumer spending could have a material adverse effect on our business. Promotional activities and decreased demand for consumer products, particularly higher-end products, could affect profitability and margins. The timing and duration of the different economic cycles in Brazil are difficult to forecast
and mitigate. As a consequence, our sales, operating and financial results for a particular period are difficult to predict, and, therefore, it is difficult to forecast future results. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and could adversely affect our share price.
A continued or future slowdown in Brazil or the global economy or a negative economic outlook could materially adversely affect consumer spending habits and potentially our future operating results.
If we are unable to appropriately address new market risks or the inherent risks in the lines of business into which we are expanding, our growth potential, reputation and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
We are engaged in an effort to expand our operations into other products and services in order to monetize our user traffic and distribution capabilities. Our ability to monetize our user traffic is critical to our envisioned plans for growth. As we expand into new business segments or regions, such as fashion and beauty, we will face new risks associated with lines of business in which we have limited or no experience and in which we may be less well-known. We may be unable to attract a sufficient number of customers, fail to anticipate competitive conditions or face difficulties in operating effectively in these new segments. In addition, profitability, if any, in our newer activities may be lower than in our more mature lines of business, and we may not be successful enough to recover our investments in them. For instance, in September 2018 and in April 2019, respectively we divested from our operations in Mexico and Argentina, both as a result of our strategy of focusing on our core Brazilian operations.
Most of our new lines of business are subject to risks similar to those that our sporting goods business is subject, such as changes in consumer demands or shopping patterns, risks related to our suppliers and private label brands, seasonality and distribution risks. However, some of them are subject to their own set of inherent risks. For instance, we launched an online marketplace in February 2016, and maintaining a trusted status for its operations will be critical to its success. Any damage to our reputation related to, or loss of trust in, our online marketplace operations could have a negative impact on our business and result in consumers, merchants and other participants choosing not to carry out transactions or reducing their activity level on our online marketplace, which could limit our potential for growth. The success of our online marketplace will depend on, among other things, our ability to (1) attract both consumers and merchants to our online marketplace, (2) offer a secure and reliable transactional environment (including payment services) for both consumers and merchants, (3) create an effective set of rules governing our online marketplace, that is perceived as fair, (4) restrict access to our online marketplace for merchants who are not reliable or do not offer high-quality products and (5) ensure that third-party couriers used by merchants will be able to provide reliable logistics services in order to deliver products to customers within the agreed-upon timeframe.
Interruption or failure of our information technology and communications systems could impair our operations, which could damage our reputation and harm our results of operations. Specifically, we rely on certain third-party providers to provide us with Internet data centers to host our sites and back-office end systems and keep them fully operational. Disruptions with this provider or in the services it provides to us could materially affect our reputation, operations or financial results.
Our success and ability to sell products online and provide high quality customer service depend on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our computer and information technology systems. Any failure of our computer systems and information technology to operate effectively or to integrate with other systems, performance inadequacy or breach in security may cause interruptions in the availability of our sites, delays in product fulfillment and reduced efficiency of our operations. We experience service disruptions from time to time and on occasion, our site has not properly displayed promotions as marketed. Any failures, problems or security breaches may adversely affect the number of customers willing to purchase the products we offer in the future. Factors that could occur and significantly disrupt our operations include: system failures and outages caused by fire, floods, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunications failures, sabotage, vandalism, terrorist attacks and similar events; software errors; computer viruses, worms, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer systems and data centers; and security breaches related to the storage and transmission of proprietary information or customer information, such as credit card numbers or other personal information. Also, if too many customers access our sites within a short period of time due to increased holiday demand or any other reason, like one we had in the past we may in the future experience system interruptions that make our sites unavailable or
prevent us from efficiently fulfilling orders, which may reduce the volume of goods we sell and the attractiveness of our products and services. We cannot assure you that such events will not occur and while we have backup systems and contingency plans for certain aspects of our operations and business processes, our planning does not account for all possible scenarios.
Specifically, we rely on certain technologies that we license from third parties, such as UoL Diveo, to host our eCommerce sites in cloud and keep them operational and to provide us with two data centers to host our back-office end systems. Failure by Uol Diveo to adequately keep our sites fully operational, including any prolonged or unscheduled service disruption that affects our customers’ ability to utilize our sites and effect purchases therein, could result in the loss of sales and customers and/or increased costs, which could materially affect our reputation, operations or financial results. In addition, we rely on Uol Diveo to advise us of any security breaches, and if they do not provide notice on a timely basis, our reputation and results of operations may be adversely affected. We may have limited access to alternative services and may not be able to timely replace Uol Diveo, or find a replacement on a cost-efficient basis, in the event of termination of these agreements, disruptions, failures to provide services or other issues with them that may adversely affect our business. See “Item 10. Additional Information—C. Material Contracts.”
Any disruptions or service interruptions that affect our sites could damage our reputation, require us to spend significant capital and other resources and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability. We do not carry any business interruption insurance to compensate for losses that may occur as a result of any of these events and our agreements with third-party service providers do not require those providers to indemnify us for any losses resulting from any disruption in service. Accordingly, our results of operations may be adversely affected if any of the above disruptions should occur.
Our business may be harmed if we are unable to secure licenses for third-party technologies on which we rely.
We rely on licenses to utilize certain technology provided by third parties, such as our key database technology, our eCommerce platform, operating systems for our servers and other computers and components for our servers. These third-party technology licenses may cease to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we are unable to obtain licenses for, or otherwise make use of this technology, we would need to obtain substitute technology, which may not be available. If substitute technology is available, it may be of lower quality or have lower performance standards or may only be available at a greater cost, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Also, because we often depend upon the successful operation of third-party products in conjunction with our software, any errors in these third-party products, which may be outside our control, may prevent the implementation or impair the functionality of our software and Internet-based services, delay the introduction of new services and harm our reputation.
If we are not able to continue to innovate and adapt to changes in technology or in our industry, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.
The Internet is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, new mobile apps, protocols and technologies, new service and product introductions, triggering further changes in customer demands and shopping patterns. Our failure to innovate and adapt to these changes would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, total orders placed from mobile devices are growing at a fast pace. In the year ended December 31, 2018, orders placed by our customers from mobile devices represented approximately 58.7% of our total orders (compared to 45.9% in the year ended December 31, 2017, 32.2% in the year ended December 31, 2016 and 20.2% in the year ended December 31, 2015). The variety of technical and other configurations across different mobile devices and platforms increases the challenges associated with this environment. If we are unable to continue to (1) attract new mobile consumers and increase or maintain levels of mobile engagement or (2) to rapidly adapt to future changes in technology, our ability to maintain or grow our business would be materially and adversely affected.
We rely on a small number of third-party couriers to deliver the products we sell to our customers, and their failure to provide high quality delivery services or our failure to effectively manage our relationships with them may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We currently rely on a small number of third-party courier companies to deliver products to our consumers, and any failure by our key third-party service couriers to perform or any adverse change to their financial conditions could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and results of operations. In particular, we rely significantly on Total Express, Transfolha and the Brazilian official post office (
Correios
), which together delivered 55.9% of the purchase orders shipped to our customers for the year ended December 31, 2018. Our third-party couriers may offer us less favorable terms in the future, which may increase our shipping costs and materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operation. For instance, in 2018
Correios
announced a general increase in the prices it charges for the shipment of products, and this increase in cost may be particularly damaging to the qualified third-party B2C vendors selling products through our marketplace (and consequently to the successful development of our marketplace) if they are not capable of either absorbing this increased cost or passing on this additional cost to customers without affecting overall sales volumes. Further, most of our agreements with third-party couriers can be terminated upon delivery of thirty days’ prior written notice by any of the parties. If any of these agreements are terminated, there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully substitute another service provider to provide delivery services on the same terms, in a timely manner or at all.
Additionally, interruptions to or failures in these third parties’ shipping services could prevent the timely or successful delivery of our products and adversely affect our operations. These interruptions may be due to unforeseen events such as inclement weather, natural disasters, pressure from unions, labor unrest or a strike, which are all beyond our control or the control of these third-party couriers. For example, our distribution network is sensitive to fluctuation in oil prices, which may result in increased shipping costs for third-party courier companies (as well as our suppliers’ transportation costs), which may, in turn, increase the prices of the products we sell and make us less competitive.
Additionally, in May 2018, Brazil experienced a national truck drivers’ strike that severely impacted the logistics operations of many companies throughout Brazil, including us, resulting in a temporary reduction in the volume of new orders from customers as a result of uncertainty regarding delivery time and also led us to take longer than usual to deliver the orders that were already in transit. Also, products may not be delivered to certain limited regions impacted by urban violence, which may prevent us from delivering our products to our customers’ homes.
If we do not deliver products in a timely manner or if we deliver damaged products, our customers may refuse to accept them and lose confidence in us. Many of the products we sell may be especially sensitive to delivery delays given that they are often purchased in anticipation of a specific date. Other products have a limited shelf-life and become quickly outdated. Any inability to promptly and successfully deliver the products we sell to customers, may result in the loss of their business and a material and adverse effect on our financial condition and reputation.
If we are unable to successfully manage the logistical challenge of expanding our operations, including the requisite technological capabilities, our results of operations and business could be materially and adversely affected.
We have expanded our operations rapidly since our inception and our net sales have increased from R$252.9 million in 2010 to R$1,808.1 million in 2018 (a compound annual growth rate, or CAGR, of 27.9%). Our substantial growth has placed, and is expected to continue to place, a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources. If our operations continue to grow, we will be required to continue to expand our sales and marketing and distribution functions, upgrade our management information systems and other processes and technology, and obtain more space for our expanding workforce. This expansion could increase the strain on our resources, and we could experience serious operating difficulties, including difficulties in hiring, training and managing an increasing number of employees, difficulties in obtaining sufficient suppliers, and delays in shipments. These difficulties would likely result in the erosion of our brand image and a resulting decrease in net sales and the price of our common shares.
As a result of expansion efforts, we must consistently add new hardware, update software, enhance our billing and transaction systems, and add and train new engineering and other personnel to support the increased use of our sites and the new products and features we regularly introduce. This upgrade process is expensive, and the increasing complexity and enhancement of our sites results in higher costs. Failure to upgrade our technology, transaction processing systems, security infrastructure, or network infrastructure to accommodate increased traffic or transaction volume could harm our business. Adverse consequences could include unanticipated system disruptions, slower response times, degradation in levels of customer support, impaired quality of users’ experiences of our services and delays in reporting accurate financial information. Also, our net sales depend on prompt and accurate billing processes. Our failure to grow our transaction-processing capabilities to accommodate the increasing number of transactions that must be billed on our sites would harm our business and our ability to collect revenue.
Furthermore, we may need to enter into relationships with various strategic partners, sites and other online service providers and other third parties necessary to our business. The increased complexity of managing multiple commercial relationships could lead to execution problems that can affect current and future sales and operating margins. Our current and planned systems, procedures and controls, personnel and third-party relationships may not be adequate to support our future operations. Our failure to manage growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We rely on third-party suppliers for the products we sell and any deterioration in those business relationships, the quality of their products or their reputation, especially in the case of any infringement by them on the intellectual property rights of others, may materially and adversely affect our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.
We source the products we sell (including our private label products) from over 500 suppliers. Our continued growth resulting from increased demand for the products we sell will require us to increase our ability to source commercial-quality products on reasonable terms.
Our suppliers (including those manufacturing our private label products) may:
·
cease selling merchandise on terms acceptable to us or at all in particular in view of recent issues relating to our ability to continue as a going concern;
·
fail to deliver goods that meet consumer demands;
·
encounter financial difficulties;
·
terminate our relationships and enter into agreements with our competitors on more favorable terms;
·
have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with ours and take actions contrary to our instructions, requests or objectives;
·
decide to initiate their own eCommerce operations, thereby directly competing with us;
·
be unable or unwilling to fulfill their obligations, including their obligations to meet our production deadlines, quality standards and product specifications;
·
fail to expand their production capacities to meet our growing demands;
·
encounter raw material or labor shortages or increases in raw material or labor costs, which may impact our costs; or
·
engage in other activities or employment practices that may harm our reputation.
Furthermore, agreements with our suppliers do not typically establish a fixed price for the purchase of products. As a result, we may be subject to price fluctuations based on changes in our suppliers’ businesses, cost
structures or other factors. The occurrence of any of these events, alone or together, may have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, most of our agreements with suppliers do not contain non-compete or exclusivity clauses that would prevent those suppliers from producing similar products for any other third party. Any disruption in our relationships with suppliers or our failure to resolve disputes with or complaints from our suppliers in a timely manner, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Also, our suppliers may sell products that infringe on the intellectual property rights of third parties. As a result, in addition to product delays, we may be subject to claims or proceedings resulting from our suppliers’ infringement. We may also be involved in intellectual property rights claims for sports, fashion or beauty apparel or products sold on our sites that may contain unauthorized logos or brands. In case we have determined that products sold on our sites are infringing on the intellectual property rights of third parties, we will remove them from our sites; however, we could incur significant costs and efforts in defending against or settling such claims. If there is a successful claim against us, we may be required to refrain from further sales of these products, enter into royalty or licensing agreements with other third parties or pay substantial damages, and we may be unable to recoup any losses from our suppliers. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Failure to renew our current leases or locate desirable alternatives for our facilities could materially and adversely affect our business.
All of our offices and distribution centers are currently located on leased premises. At the end of each lease term, we may be unable to negotiate an extension of our leases or renew them on commercially acceptable terms. This could disrupt our operations and adversely affect our operating results. We compete with other businesses for premises at certain locations or of desirable sizes, and some landlords may have entered into long-term leases with other companies for our preferred premises. As a result, we may not be able to obtain new leases at desirable locations or renew our existing leases on acceptable terms or at all, which could materially and adversely affect our business.
We believe the interplay between the location of our distribution centers and our distribution network is an essential part of our business strategy. As we expand our operations, we cannot assure you that we will be able to lease suitable facilities on commercially acceptable terms in accordance with our growth strategy. The expansion of our logistics centers and distribution network, which could come in the form of expanding existing facilities or opening alternative or additional facilities, could put pressure on our managerial, financial, operational and other resources. If we are unable to secure new facilities or effectively manage our expanded logistical operations and control increasing costs, our growth potential, results of operations and business could be materially and adversely affected.
We operate three distribution centers in Brazil, and if we fail to operate them efficiently, or if there is a serious disruption at one of these facilities, we may lose merchandise and be unable to effectively deliver it to our customers.
We currently operate three distribution centers in Brazil with approximately 63,000 square meters in total. One of these distribution centers is in Barueri, in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, one is in Extrema, in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil, and one is in Jaboatão dos Guararapes, in the State of Pernambuco, Brazil. The operation, management and expansion of our distribution centers are key to our business and growth. If we fail to operate our distribution centers successfully and efficiently or there is a serious service disruption in one of these facilities, our deliveries could be delayed, a significant portion of our inventory could be damaged or our ability to adequately stock the products we sell and process returns of products to our suppliers could be impaired.
We have designed and built our own logistics infrastructure, including inbound receipt of items for sale, storage systems, packaging, outbound freight and the receipt, screening and handling of returns. These processes are complex and depend on sophisticated know-how and computerized systems which we have tailored to meet the specific needs of our business. Any failure or interruption, partial or complete, of these systems, for example as a result of software malfunctions or other serious disruptions, could impair our ability to timely deliver our customers’ purchases and harm our reputation. If we continue to add distribution capabilities, add new businesses or categories
with different logistical requirements or change the mix of products that we sell, our logistics infrastructure will become increasingly complex and operating it will become even more challenging. We might encounter operational difficulties which could result in shipping delays and customer dissatisfaction or cause our logistical costs to become high and uncompetitive. Any failure to successfully address these challenges in a cost-effective and timely manner could severely disrupt our business and harm our reputation.
Our product delivery times can vary due to a variety of factors such as the location, our capacity to adequately manage and process multiple orders placed by our customers, the type of product sold, as well as the shipping option chosen by our customer. Our distribution capacity is dependent on the timely performance of services by third parties, including the shipping of products to and from our distribution facilities. Also, customers may expect or demand faster delivery times than we can provide in the future. If we are unable to meet customer expectations or demands in respect of delivery times or convenience, or if our competitors are able to deliver the same or equivalent products faster, more conveniently or for a lower cost, we could lose current or potential customers, our brand and reputation could suffer, and we could experience shortfalls in net sales.
Because many of the products that we sell are manufactured abroad, we may face delays, increased cost or quality control deficiencies in the importation of these products, which could reduce our net sales and profitability.
Although our direct imports of products represent 6.2% of the products we sold in 2018, like many other sporting, fashion and beauty goods retailers, a significant portion of the products that we purchase for resale is manufactured abroad in countries such as the U.S.A, China, Taiwan and South Korea. For the year ended December 31, 2018, 36.9% of the products we sold were imported. Foreign imports subject us to the risks of changes in import duties or quotas, new restrictions on imports, work stoppages, delays in shipment, freight cost increases, product cost increases due to foreign currency fluctuations or revaluations and economic uncertainties (including the imposition of antidumping or countervailing duty orders, safeguards, remedies or compensation and retaliation due to illegal foreign trade practices). If any of these or other factors were to cause a disruption of trade from the countries in which the suppliers of our vendors are located, we may be unable to obtain sufficient quantities of products to satisfy our requirements or our cost of obtaining products may increase.
In addition, we do not control our suppliers or the manufacturers of our private label products. To the extent that any foreign manufacturers that supply products to us directly or indirectly utilize quality control standards, production methods, labor practices or other practices that vary from those legally mandated, expected by our customers or commonly accepted in the world, we could be hurt by any resulting negative publicity or, in some cases, face potential liability. Historically, instability in the political and economic environments of the countries in which our suppliers or we operate has not had a material adverse effect on our operations. However, we cannot predict the effect that future changes in economic or political conditions in the foreign countries where our supplying manufacturers are located may have on our operations. In the event of disruptions or delays in supply due to economic or political conditions in foreign countries, those disruptions or delays could adversely affect our results of operations unless and until alternative supply arrangements are made. In addition, merchandise purchased from alternative sources may be of lesser quality or more expensive than the merchandise we currently purchase abroad.
Failure to maintain and further develop our brand recognition and maintain a positive public image could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We believe developing our brand recognition is important to our sales and marketing efforts. If we fail to enhance the recognition of our brand, it could have a material adverse effect on our ability to sell products and, in turn, our business and results of operations. If we fail to maintain and develop a positive public image and reputation, our existing business with our customers could decline and we may fail to attract new customers, which could, in turn, adversely affect our prospects and results of operations.
For instance, complaints from customers or negative publicity about the products we sell (especially our private label products), the prices we charge or customer service have, from time to time, had a negative effect on our reputation in the past and could in the future reduce consumer confidence and the use of our services and adversely affect our business. In addition, some of the products we sell may expose us to product liability claims relating to personal injury, death, or property damage, and may require product recalls or other actions. To maintain
good customer relations, we need prompt and accurate customer service to resolve irregularities and disputes. Effective customer service requires significant personnel expense and investment in developing programs and technology infrastructure to help customer service representatives carry out their functions. These expenses, if not managed properly, could significantly impact our profitability. Failure to manage or train our customer service representatives properly could compromise our ability to handle customer complaints effectively. If we do not handle customer complaints effectively, our reputation may suffer and we may lose our customers’ confidence.
In addition, from time to time we execute advertisement contracts with celebrities to promote our sites and brands in marketing campaigns. Harm to those celebrities’ reputations, even if not associated with our sites and brands, could also harm our brand image and result in a material decrease in our net sales, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Changes in tax laws, tax incentives, benefits or differing interpretations of tax laws may adversely affect our results of operations.
Changes in tax laws, regulations, related interpretations and tax accounting standards in, Brazil the Cayman Islands and the United States may result in a higher tax rate on our earnings, which may result in a significant negative impact on our profits and cash flows from operations. Also, our results of operations and financial condition may be affected if certain tax incentives are not retained or renewed. For example, the ICMS (
Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços
) is a Brazilian state value-added tax with nominal rates of 4% to 25% depending on each state’s tax legislation. Sales to purchasers outside of the State of Pernambuco originating from our distribution center located in the city of Recife (State of Pernambuco, Brazil) currently enjoy Pernambuco State ICMS tax rates ranging from 0.5% to 1.0%, depending on the type of product offered. Also, sales to purchasers outside of the State of Minas Gerais originating from our distribution center located in the city of Extrema (State of Minas Gerais, Brazil) currently enjoy a Minas Gerais State ICMS tax rate of 1.0%. These ICMS tax benefits can be suspended or cancelled by the States of Pernambuco and Minas Gerais at any time. Benefits can also be suspended or cancelled by Brazilian judicial courts in the event of lawsuits filed by other States or legitimate parties challenging their
constitutionality, and any loss of these incentives would result in increased taxes for the upcoming fiscal years and adversely affect our results if we are not able to pass this tax increase on to our customers. In 2015, our average ICMS tax burden was 3.6%, mainly as a result of tax reductions and incentives. As a result of an amendment to the Brazilian constitution occurred in 2016, which changed the rules about the allocation of ICMS taxes collected in interstate sales between the state of origin of the products sold and the state where the final customer is located, we expect that our average ICMS tax burden will increase to 10.1% by 2019, as these changes are expected to partially offset the benefits we currently experience from these tax incentives. For further information regarding the changes prompted by this constitutional amendment and its impact on us, see “Item 4. Information on the Company— B. Business Overview—Regulation.” If we are not capable of optimizing our cost structure to offset this tax increase or if we are not capable of passing on this tax increase to our customers, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely impacted.
In addition, governments are increasingly considering tax law changes as a means to cover budgetary shortfalls resulting from the recent downturn of the economic environment in Brazil. If such proposals were enacted, or if modifications were to be made to certain existing tax benefits or treaties, the consequences may have a material adverse impact on us, including increasing our tax burden, increasing costs of our tax compliance or otherwise adversely affecting our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Additionally, tax laws and regulations may be interpreted differently by tax authorities, which may impact our operations if the interpretation of the tax authorities differs from our interpretation. For further information regarding ongoing relevant disputes between us and tax authorities, see “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal and Administrative Proceedings —Legal and Administrative Proceedings—Tax and Social Security Matters.”
We may be or become a passive foreign investment company, which could result in adverse United States tax consequences to United States investors.
Based on the past and projected composition of our income and assets, and the valuation of our assets, and taking into account the value of our goodwill calculated based on the current value of our common shares, we do not
believe we were a passive foreign investment company (a “PFIC”) for our most recent taxable year, and we do not expect to become a PFIC in the current taxable year or the foreseeable future. However, the determination of whether or not we are a PFIC is made on an annual basis and will depend on the composition of our income and assets from time to time. Specifically, for any taxable year we will be classified as a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes if either (i) at least 75% of our gross income in that taxable year is passive income or (ii) at least 50% of the value (determined based on a quarterly average) of our assets is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. The calculation of the value of our assets will be based, in part, on the quarterly market value of our common shares, which is subject to change. See “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences—Passive Foreign Investment Company.”
If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which you hold our common shares, such characterization could result in adverse United States federal income tax consequences to you if you are a United States Holder, as defined under “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.” For example, if we are or become a PFIC, you may become subject to increased tax liabilities under United States federal income tax laws and regulations, and will generally become subject to burdensome reporting requirements. We cannot assure you that we are not a PFIC for our current taxable or that we will not be a PFIC for any future taxable year. For more information, see “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences —Passive Foreign Investment Company.”
The expansion of our business partially depends on increased availability of credit and credit cards to our customers, and we are subject to payments-related risks.
Our business is highly dependent on credit cards as the preferred payment method of our customers. As of December 31, 2018, 76.7% of our net sales were derived from payments effected through credit cards. As a result, the continued growth of our business is also partially dependent on the expansion of credit card penetration in Brazil, which may never reach a percentage similar to more developed countries for reasons that are beyond our control, such as low credit availability for a relevant portion of the population in such countries.
In addition to credit cards, we accept payments using a variety of methods, including bank payment slips, electronic payment platforms (such as PayPal) and consumer invoicing. As we offer new payment options to our customers, we may be subject to additional regulations, compliance requirements, and additional fraud-related risks. For certain payment methods, including credit cards, we pay transaction and other fees, which may increase over time and raise our operating costs, lowering profitability. We rely on third parties to provide payment processing services and it could disrupt our business if these companies become unwilling or unable to provide these services to us or if their data security systems are breached or compromised. If we fail to comply with these third-party servicers’ rules or requirements, or if our data security systems are breached or compromised (similar to the increase in fraud attempts we experienced in 2016 and the cybersecurity incident experienced in December 2017), we may be liable for chargebacks, credit card issuing banks’ costs, fines and higher transaction fees and we may lose our ability to accept credit card payments from our customers, process electronic funds transfers, or facilitate other types of online payments. Additionally, consumers and merchants in Brazil can bring claims against us for credit card and other losses due to third-party fraud on our marketplace platform. If any of these situations were to occur, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.
In addition, as secure methods of payment for eCommerce transactions have not been widely adopted in certain emerging markets, consumers and other merchants may have relatively low confidence in the integrity of eCommerce transactions and remote payment mechanisms, which may have a material and adverse effect on our business prospects or limit our growth.
Our costs may change as a result of currency exchange rate fluctuations or inflation in the cost of merchandise manufactured and purchased abroad.
We source goods from various countries (mainly from the United States of America, Taiwan and China) in currencies other than the Brazilian
real
(mainly the U.S. dollar). As a result, changes in the value of the U.S. dollar or in the functional currencies in which our subsidiaries operate compared to other currencies, or inflation affecting foreign labor and raw material costs, may affect the cost of goods that we purchase. If the cost of goods that we
purchase increases, we may not be able to similarly increase the retail prices that we charge consumers without impacting our sales and our results of operations may suffer. If we do increase our retail prices, our reputation may suffer, which may also negatively impact our results of operations.
We depend on key management personnel, and the loss of our management or the inability to attract and retain other key personnel could harm our business.
Our future success depends largely on the skills and efforts of our senior management team, and in particular, Marcio Kumruian, one of our founders, and currently chairman of our board of directors and chief executive officer. The loss of members of our management could disrupt our operations and have an adverse effect on our business. If members of our senior management team resign, we may not be able to sustain our existing culture or replace them with individuals of the same experience and qualification. In particular, our business model was designed by Marcio Kumruian, and we believe that we will continue to be heavily dependent on his insights and experience for our continuing success.
Our future success also depends on our ability to identify, attract, hire, train, retain, motivate and manage other highly skilled technical, managerial, information technology, marketing and customer service personnel. Competition for these personnel is intense, and we may not be able to successfully attract, hire, train, retain, motivate and manage sufficiently qualified personnel.
We are susceptible to illegal uses of our platform, and we could potentially face liability for any illegal use of our platform.
We, like our platforms, are susceptible to potentially illegal or improper uses, including, fraudulent and illicit sales on the payment methods accepted by us and bank fraud. In addition, our services could be subject to unauthorized credit card use, identity theft, employee fraud or other internal security breaches. We may incur significant costs to protect against the threat of information security breaches or to respond to or alleviate problems caused by any breaches. Laws may require notification to regulators, customers or employees and we may be required to reimburse customers or credit card companies for any funds stolen as a result of any breaches or to provide credit monitoring or identity theft protection in the event of a privacy breach. These requirements, as well as any additional restrictions that may be imposed by credit card companies, could raise our costs significantly and reduce our attractiveness.
In addition to the direct costs of such losses, if they are related to credit card transactions and become excessive they could result in us losing the right to accept credit cards for payment. If we are unable to accept credit cards, our business will be adversely affected given that credit cards are the most widely used method for our customers to pay for the products we sell.
Requirements associated with being a public company in the United States will require significant company resources and management attention.
We are subject to certain reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, and the other rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE. We are also subject to various other regulatory requirements, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These rules and regulations increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, these rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage. New rules and regulations relating to information disclosure (including cybersecurity risk), financial reporting and controls and corporate governance, which could be adopted by the SEC, the NYSE or other regulatory bodies or exchange entities from time to time, could result in a significant increase in legal, accounting and other compliance costs and make certain corporate activities more time-consuming and costly, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These rules and regulations may also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers.
These new obligations may also require substantial attention from our senior management and could divert their attention away from the day-to-day management of our business. Given that most of the individuals who now constitute our management team have limited experience managing a publicly traded company and complying with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies, initially, these new obligations could demand even greater attention. These cost increases and the diversion of management’s attention could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operation results.
Our management has identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective at December 31, 2018, which may have a material adverse result on our results of operation and financial condition.
Our management identified a number of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting in 2018. For further information on the material weaknesses identified by our management, see “Item 15. “Controls and Procedures—B. Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.”
As a result, due to the identified material weaknesses, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2018. Although we have developed and implemented several measures to remedy these material weaknesses, we cannot be certain that there will be no other material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting in the future.
If our efforts to remediate the material weaknesses are not successful, we may be unable to report our results of operations for future periods accurately and in a timely manner and make our required filings with government authorities, including the SEC. There is also a risk that there could be accounting errors in our financial reporting, and we cannot be certain that in the future
additional
material weaknesses will not exist or otherwise be discovered. Any of these occurrences could adversely affect our business and operating results, resulting in fines and enforcement actions against us and could generate negative market reactions, potentially leading to a decline in the price of our common shares.
Our holding company structure makes us dependent on the operations of our subsidiaries.
We are a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability. Our material assets are our direct and indirect equity interests in our subsidiaries, particularly our Brazilian subsidiary. We are, therefore, dependent upon payments, dividends and distributions from our subsidiaries for funds to pay our holding company’s operating and other expenses and to pay future cash dividends or distributions, if any, to holders of our common shares, and we may have tax costs in connection with any dividend or distribution. Furthermore, exchange rate fluctuation will affect the U.S. dollar value of any distributions our subsidiaries make with respect to our equity interests in those subsidiaries. See “—Risks Related to Doing Business in Brazil —The Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy. This involvement, as well as Brazilian political and economic conditions, could have an adverse effect on us and the market price of our common shares,” “—Risks Related to our Common Shares—It is unlikely that we will declare any dividends on our common shares” and “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividends and Dividend policy.”
An occurrence of a natural disaster, widespread health epidemic or other outbreaks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business could be materially and adversely affected by natural disasters, such as fires or floods, the outbreak of a widespread health epidemic, or other events, such as wars, acts of terrorism, environmental accidents, power shortages or communication interruptions. The occurrence of a disaster or similar event could materially disrupt our business and operations. These events could also cause us to close our operating facilities temporarily, which would severely disrupt our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our net sales could be materially reduced to the extent that a natural disaster, health epidemic or other major event harms the economy of Brazil. Our operations could also be severely disrupted if our consumers, merchants or other participants were affected by natural disasters, health epidemics or other major events.
Our business is subject to cyberattacks and security and privacy breaches. Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential customer information or our failure or the perception by our customers that we failed to comply with privacy laws or properly address privacy concerns could harm our business and standing with our customers.
We collect, store, process, and use certain personal information and other user data in our business. A significant risk associated with eCommerce and communications is the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks.
An increasing number of organizations, including large businesses, financial institutions and government institutions, have disclosed breaches of their information technology and information security systems, some of which have involved sophisticated and highly targeted attacks, including on portions of their websites or infrastructure. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized, improper or illegal access to systems, data or our customers’ data, to disable or degrade service, or to sabotage systems are constantly evolving, may be difficult to detect quickly, and often are not recognized until launched against a target. Unauthorized parties may attempt to gain access to our systems or facilities through various means, including, among others, hacking into our systems or those of our customers, partners or vendors, or attempting to fraudulently induce our employees, customers, partners, vendors or other users of our systems into disclosing user names, passwords, payment card information or other sensitive information, which may in turn be used to access our information technology systems. Certain efforts may be supported by significant financial and technological resources, making them even more sophisticated and difficult to detect.
The perception of privacy concerns, whether or not valid, may adversely affect our business and results of operations. We must ensure that any processing, collection, use, storage, dissemination, transfer and disposal of data for which we are responsible complies with relevant data protection and privacy laws. The protection of our customer, employee and company data is critical to us. Currently, a number of our users authorize us to bill their credit card accounts directly. We rely on commercially available systems, software, tools and monitoring to provide secure processing, transmission and storage of confidential customer information, such as credit card and other personal information.
Despite the security measures we have in place, our facilities and systems, and those of our third-party service providers, may be vulnerable to security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming or human errors, or other similar events. Any security breach, or any perceived failure involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, distributed denial of service attacks into our web-sites as well as any failure or perceived failure to comply with laws, policies, legal obligations or industry standards regarding data privacy and protection, whether by us or our vendors, could damage our reputation, expose us to litigation risk and liability, subject us to negative publicity, disrupt our operations and harm our business.
For instance, in December 2017 we experienced a cybersecurity incident in our operations in Brazil, in which specified non-banking personal data (no passwords or credit card data) from certain of our customers were disclosed to unauthorized third-parties. In this context, we reached an agreement (
Termo de Ajustamento de Conduta
) with the Brazilian Federal District State Attorney’s Office (
Ministério Público Estadual do Distrito Federal e Territórios
), ratified by Brazilian courts on February 12, 2019, pursuant to which we agreed to pay a fine in the amount of R$500,000.00. In return, the Brazilian Federal District State Attorney’s Office terminated its administrative legal proceeding related to this incident. Although after the conclusion of an internal investigation carried out by an independent specialized cybersecurity company there is no indication that our IT infrastructure has been compromised, we cannot assure you that our security measures in place are sufficient to prevent future security breaches or that our failure to prevent them will not have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, we do not carry and we do not require our vendors to carry cybersecurity insurance to compensate for any losses that may result from any breach of security. Therefore, our results of operations or financial condition may be materially adversely affected if our existing general liability policies did not cover a security breach.
Our inability or failure to protect our intellectual property and any intellectual property infringement against us could have a negative impact on our operating results.
Our trademarks, service marks, copyrights, trade secrets, domain names and other intellectual property (including those related to our private label products) are valuable assets that are critical to our success. In particular, the protection of our trademarks and service marks is an important factor in product recognition and in our ability to maintain or increase market share. If we do not adequately protect our rights in our various trademarks and service marks, unauthorized reproduction or other misappropriation of our intellectual property may arise. Such infringement of our intellectual property rights could diminish the value of our brands or goodwill and cause a decline in our sales. As a result, any failure to protect our intellectual property could have an adverse effect on our operating results.
Effective trademark and other intellectual property protection may not be available in Brazil and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to adequately protect our intellectual property from misappropriation or unauthorized use. The process of seeking intellectual property protection is expensive and time-consuming. While we aim to acquire adequate protection of our brand through trademark registrations in key markets, occasionally third parties may have already registered or otherwise acquired rights to identical or similar marks for products or solutions that address our market. Policing unauthorized use of intellectual property is also difficult. Additionally, costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and our failure to successfully defend our proprietary rights could adversely affect our business.
Cayman Islands economic substance legislation may adversely impact us or our operations.
The Cayman Islands, together with several other non-European Union jurisdictions, have recently introduced legislation aimed at addressing concerns raised by the Council of the European Union as to offshore structures engaged in certain activities which attract profits without real economic activity. With effect from January 1, 2019, the International Tax Co-operation (Economic Substance) Law, 2018 (the “Economic Substance Law”) came into force in the Cayman Islands, introducing certain economic substance requirements for in-scope Cayman Islands entities which are engaged in “relevant activities,” which in the case of exempted companies incorporated before January 1, 2019, will apply from July 1, 2019. However, it is anticipated that we may remain out of scope of the Economic Substance Law or be subject to limited substance requirements thereunder. Although it is presently anticipated that the Economic Substance Law will have little material impact on us or our operations, as the legislation is new and remains subject to further clarification and interpretation, it is not currently possible to ascertain the precise impact of these legislative changes on us.
Risks Related to Doing Business in Brazil
The Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy. This involvement, as well as Brazilian political and economic conditions, could have an adverse effect on us and the market price of our common shares.
We conduct a substantial amount of our operations in Brazil, and we sell a substantial portion of our products to customers in the domestic market. For the year ended December 31, 2018, 93.0% of our net sales (excluding net sales from our operations in Mexico, which were discontinued in September 2018) were derived from Brazil. Accordingly, our results of operations are substantially dependent on the economic conditions in Brazil. Brazil’s gross domestic product, or GDP, in real terms, grew by 0.1% in 2014, shrank by 3.8% in 2015 and by 3.6% in 2016, grew again by 1.0% in 2017, and 1.1% in 2018. In 2016, the
real
has fluctuated significantly, primarily as a result of Brazil’s political instability, and it has generally appreciated against the U.S. dollar since March 2016. In 2017, the
real
has generally stabilized, and in 2018 it depreciated against the U.S. dollar back to the level seen in the end of 2015 (to approximately R$3.90). In addition, the credit rating of the Brazilian federal government has been downgraded in 2015 and 2016 by all major credit rating agencies and is no longer investment grade. In January 2018, S&P further lowered its long-term rating for Brazil’s sovereign credit from BB to BB-minus, with a stable outlook, citing less timely and effective reform policymaking. In February 2018, Fitch lowered its long-term rating for Brazil’s sovereign credit from BB to BB-minus, with a stable outlook. We cannot assure that Brazil’s GDP will increase or stabilize in the future. Future developments in the Brazilian economy may affect Brazil’s growth rates, employment rates, the availability of credit and average wages in Brazil and, consequently, the consumption level of the products we sell. As a result, these developments could impair our business strategies, results of operations or financial condition.
The Brazilian government frequently intervenes in the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes significant changes in policy and regulations. The Brazilian government’s actions to control inflation and implement other policies and regulations have often involved, among other measures, increases in interest rates, changes in tax policies, wage and price controls, currency devaluations, capital controls and limits on imports. Our business, financial condition, results of operations, trading price of the common shares and prospects may be adversely affected by changes in government policies or regulations, involving or affecting factors such as:
·
interest rates;
·
exchange rates and exchange control policies;
·
restrictions on remittances abroad;
·
currency fluctuation;
·
inflation rates;
·
tariff and export/import control policies;
·
economic and social instability;
·
liquidity of domestic financial and capital markets;
·
electricity rationing and energy shortage;
·
international trade policy;
·
tax policies;
·
regulatory framework governing our industry; and
·
other political, diplomatic, social and economic developments in or affecting Brazil.
Historically, the Brazilian currency has suffered frequent devaluations against the U.S. dollar. Throughout the periods of currency depreciation, the Brazilian government has implemented certain measures and various economic plans for exchange controls. For instance, Brazilian law provides that whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments or reason to foresee a serious imbalance, the Brazilian government may impose temporary restrictions on the remittance to foreign investors of the proceeds of their investments in Brazil. For example, for approximately six months in 1989 and early 1990, the Brazilian government froze all dividend and capital repatriations that were owed to foreign equity investors and held by the Central Bank in order to conserve Brazil’s foreign currency reserves. These amounts were subsequently released in accordance with Brazilian governmental directives. We cannot assure you that the Brazilian government will not take similar measures in the future. As a result, we may not be able to receive dividends or distributions from our Brazilian subsidiary in currencies other than
reais
and consequently be unable to pay dividends to our shareholders. The likelihood that the Brazilian government would impose such restrictions may be affected by the extent of Brazil’s foreign currency reserves, the availability of foreign currency in the foreign exchange markets on the date a payment is due, the size of Brazil’s debt service burden relative to the economy as a whole, and other factors.
Furthermore, the Brazilian economy has experienced a sharp downturn in recent years due, in part, to the interventionist economic and monetary policies of the Brazilian government and the global drop in commodity prices. It is expected from current Brazilian federal government to propose the general terms of a fiscal reform to stimulate the economy and reduce the forecasted budget deficit for 2019, but it is uncertain whether the Brazilian government will be able to gather the required support in the Brazilian Congress to pass additional specific reforms. As of the date of this annual report, many of the proposed public expenses in Brazil’s budget have been maintained
and it is not clear whether other expenses will be reduced or entirely eliminated. If some or all of these public expenses are maintained, Brazil will continue to run a budget deficit for 2019 and the years going forward. We cannot predict the effects of this budget deficit on the Brazilian economy. We cannot predict which policies the Brazilian federal government may adopt or change or the effect that any such policies might have on our business and on the Brazilian economy. Any such new policies or changes to current policies may have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Uncertainty as to whether the Brazilian government will implement changes in policy or regulations affecting these or other factors in the future may contribute to economic uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets and the securities issued by Brazilian companies.
Operation Lava Jato or similar investigations and political instability resulting therefrom may adversely affect our business and results of operations and the price of the securities issued by subsidiaries of companies with substantial operations in Brazil. Additionally, such investigations may result in reputational risks.
Brazil’s political environment has historically influenced, and continues to influence, the performance of the country’s economy. Political crises have affected and continue to affect investor confidence and that of the general public, which resulted in economic deceleration and heightened volatility in the securities issued by Brazilian companies.
Brazilian markets have been experiencing heightened volatility due to uncertainties derived from the ongoing
Lava Jato
investigation, which is being conducted by the Office of the Brazilian Federal Prosecutor, and its impact on the Brazilian economy and political environment. As a result of the ongoing Lava Jato investigation, a number of senior politicians, including current and former congressmen and officers of some of the major state-owned companies in Brazil have resigned or been arrested. Other senior elected officials and other public officials in Brazil are being investigated for allegations of unethical and illegal conduct identified during the Lava Jato investigation. The matters that have come, and may continue to come, to light as a result of, or in connection with the Lava Jato investigation and related anti-corruption inquiries have adversely affected and we expect that they will continue to adversely affect the Brazilian economy, markets and trading prices of securities issued by issuers with Brazilian operating subsidiaries in the near future.
The potential outcome of the investigations related to the
Lava Jato
operation is uncertain, but they have already had an adverse impact on the image and reputation of the implicated companies, and on the general market perception of the Brazilian economy. We cannot predict whether the allegations will lead to further political and economic instability or whether new allegations against government officials will arise in the future. In addition, we cannot predict the outcome of any such allegations nor their effect on the Brazilian economy. The development of the cases could adversely affect us.
Amidst this background of political uncertainty, in August 2016, the Brazilian Senate approved the removal from office of Brazil’s then-President, Dilma Rousseff, following a legal and administrative impeachment process for infringement of budgetary laws. Michel Temer, the former Vice-President, who assumed the presidency of Brazil following Rousseff’s ouster, is also under investigation on corruption allegations. In addition, the former President, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, began serving a 12-year prison sentence on corruption and money laundering charges in April 2018 yet had led for a while the polls as a top contender to win the 2018 presidential election. On October 28, 2018, Jair Bolsonaro, a former member of the military and three-decade congressman, was elected the president of Brazil and took office on January 1, 2019. During his presidential campaign, Bolsonaro was reported to favor the privatization of state-owned companies, economic liberalization, and social security and tax reforms. However, there is no guarantee that Bolsonaro will be successful in executing his campaign promises or passing certain favored reforms fully or at all, particularly when confronting a fractured congress. In February 2019, the Brazilian federal government presented to the Congress a bill proposing a large and comprehensive change of Brazil’s public social security system. If some or all of these public expenses are maintained and the required reforms are not passed, Brazil will continue to run a budget deficit for 2019 and the years going forward. We cannot predict the effects of this budget deficit on the Brazilian economy. We cannot predict which policies the Brazilian federal government may adopt or change or the effect that any such policies might have on our business and on the Brazilian economy. Any such new policies or changes to current policies may have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition, his current minister of the economy,
Paulo Guedes, proposed during the presidential campaign the revocation of income tax exemption over payment of dividends, which, if enacted, would increase the tax expenses associated with any dividend or distribution by Brazilian companies, which could impact our capacity to receive, from our subsidiaries, future cash dividends or distributions net of taxes. Moreover, Bolsonaro was generally a polarizing figure during his campaign for presidency, particularly in relation to certain of his behavioral views, and we cannot predict the ways in which a divided electorate may continue to impact his presidency and ability to implement policies and reforms, all of which could have a negative impact on our business and the price of our common shares.
Inflation and efforts by the Brazilian government to combat inflation may contribute significantly to economic uncertainty in Brazil and could have an adverse effect on us and the market price of our common shares.
Brazil has historically experienced high rates of inflation. Inflation, as well as governmental measures put in place to combat inflation, have had a material adverse effect on the Brazilian economy. Inflationary pressures persist, and actions taken in an effort to curb inflation, coupled with public speculation about possible future governmental actions, have in the past contributed to economic uncertainty in Brazil and heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities market. The inflation rate in Brazil, as reflected by the Broad Consumer Price Index (
Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo
, or IPCA), published by the Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística
, or IBGE), was 10.67% in 2015, 6.29% in 2016, 2.95% in 2017 and 3.75% in 2018.
As a result of inflationary pressures and macroeconomic instability, the Brazilian government historically has adopted monetary policies that have resulted in Brazil’s interest rates being among the highest in the world. The Central Bank sets the base interest rates generally available to the Brazilian banking system, based on the expansion or contraction of the Brazilian economy, inflation rates and other economic indicators. In August 2012, the base interest rate (
Sistema Especial de Liquidação e Custódia
, or SELIC rate) set by the Central Bank was 7.50%. To control inflation during 2013, the Central Bank gradually raised the SELIC rate to 8.50% in July, 9.00% in August, 9.50% in October, and 10.00% in December. In 2014, the Central Bank raised the SELIC rate to 11.00% in April, 11.25% in October and 11.75% in December. In 2015, it was raised again to 12.25% in January, 12.75% in March, 13.25% in May and 14.25% in July. From July 2015 to September 2016 it remained at 14.25% and mostly following lower inflationary pressures it was reduced to 14% in October 2016, 13.75% in November 2016, 13% in January 2017, 12.25% in February 2017, 11.25% in April 2017, 10.25% in May 2017, 9.25% in July 2017, 8.25% in September 2017, 7.50% in October 2017, 7.00% in December 2017 and 6.5% in April 2018. As of April 26, 2019, the SELIC rate was 6.5%. Brazilian interest rates remain relatively high and any increase in interest rates could negatively affect our profitability and results of operations and would increase the costs associated with financing our operations.
Inflation and government measures to combat inflation, along with speculation about possible future governmental measures, have had and are expected to continue to have significant negative effects on the Brazilian economy, including heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities market. In addition, measures to control inflation have often included maintaining a tight monetary policy with high interest rates, thereby restricting the availability of credit and limiting economic growth. On the other hand, these policies may be incapable of preventing increases in the inflation rate. Furthermore, the absence of such policies may trigger increases in the inflation rate and thereby adversely affect economic stability. In the event of an increase in inflation, we may not be able to adjust the prices we charge our customers to offset the effects of inflation on our cost structure, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and the market price of our common shares.
Exchange rate instability may adversely increase our costs and affect our financial condition and results of operations.
The Brazilian currency has historically experienced frequent, sometimes significant, fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies. On December 31, 2012 the
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$2.04 per US$1.00. During 2013, the
real
depreciated against the U.S. dollar, and on December 31, 2013, the exchange rate was R$2.34 per US$1.00. The
real
continued its decline against the U.S. dollar in 2014, reaching R$2.66 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2014. In 2015, the
real
further depreciated against the U.S. dollar, reaching R$3.90 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2015. In 2016, the
real
appreciated against the U.S. dollar, reaching R$3.26 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2016. In 2017, the
real
remained relatively stable against the U.S. dollar, reaching R$3.31 per
US$1.00 on December 31, 2017. On December 31, 2018 the
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$3.87 per US$1.00 and on April 26, 2019, the
real
/U.S. dollar exchange rate was R$3.94 per US$1.00.
A devaluation of the
real
relative to the U.S. dollar could create inflationary pressures in Brazil and cause the Brazilian government to, among other measures, increase interest rates. Any depreciation of the
real
may generally restrict access to the international capital markets. It would also reduce the U.S. dollar value of our results. Restrictive macroeconomic policies could adversely affect the stability of the Brazilian economy, as well as adversely impact our results of operations and profitability. In addition, domestic and international reactions to restrictive economic policies could have a negative impact on the Brazilian economy. These policies and any reactions to them may adversely affect us by curtailing access to foreign financial markets and prompting further government intervention. A devaluation of the
real
relative to the U.S. dollar may also, as in the context of the current economic slowdown, decrease consumer spending, increase deflationary pressures and reduce economic growth.
On the other hand, an appreciation of the
real
relative to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies may deteriorate the Brazilian foreign exchange current accounts. Many of the goods we purchase are manufactured abroad, and the prices charged by foreign manufacturers may be affected by the fluctuation of their local currency against the U.S. dollar. We source goods from various countries, including China, and thus changes in the value of the U.S. dollar compared to other currencies may affect the costs of goods that we purchase. Depending on the circumstances, either devaluation or appreciation of the
real
relative to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies could adversely affect the growth of the Brazilian economy, as well as our business, results of operations and profitability.
Deterioration in general economic and market conditions or the perception of risk in other countries, especially the United States and emerging market countries, may adversely affect Brazil, the market price of our common shares, our access to the international capital markets and, accordingly, our results of operation and financial condition.
The market price of securities issued by Brazilian companies or holding companies with Brazilian subsidiaries is affected to varying degrees by economic and market conditions in other countries, including the United States and other Latin American and emerging market countries. Factors such as higher interest rates, higher fuel and energy costs, weakness in overall market conditions, higher levels of inflation and unemployment, decreases in consumer disposable income, unavailability of consumer credit or credit restrictions imposed by credit card companies, higher consumer debt levels and tax rates, among others, may adversely affect consumer demand for sporting, fashion and beauty goods, and significantly affect our business. Although economic conditions in certain countries may differ significantly from economic conditions in Brazil, investors’ reactions to developments in other countries may have an adverse effect on companies with operations in Brazil. For example, the popular referendum that approved the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union and the election of the current president of the United States, may have an adverse effect on the market value of securities of Brazilian issuers, or companies with significant operations in Brazil. Crises or investors’ perceptions of events in the United States and other emerging market countries or changes in economic policies of other countries may substantially affect capital flows into these countries and the market value of securities from issuers in other countries, and may especially impact the demand for securities of Brazilian issuers or issuers with Brazilian operating subsidiaries, including ours. Any of these factors could adversely affect the market price of our securities and restrict our ability to access international capital markets at all or on acceptable terms and finance our operations.
In the past, adverse economic conditions in other emerging markets resulted in a significant outflow of funds and a decrease in the quantity of foreign capital invested in Brazil. The financial crisis that began in the United States during the third quarter of 2008 contributed to a global recession. This had direct and indirect adverse effects in the Brazilian economy and capital markets. These effects included fluctuations in the trading prices of listed securities, scarcity of credit, cost-cutting measures, general worldwide recession, exchange rate instability and inflationary pressures. Any of these events could adversely affect the market price of our common shares and limit our access to capital markets. As a result, we may be unable to finance our operations in the future on acceptable terms or at all.
To the extent that economic problems in emerging market countries or elsewhere adversely affect Brazil, our business and the market value of our common shares could be adversely affected. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that, in the event of adverse developments in emerging market economies, the international capital markets will remain open to companies with significant Brazilian operations or that the resulting interest rates in such markets will be advantageous to us. Decreased foreign investment in Brazil may negatively affect growth and liquidity in the Brazilian economy, which in turn may have a negative impact on our business.
Internet regulation in Brazil is recent and still limited and several legal issues related to the Internet are uncertain.
In 2014, Brazil enacted a law setting forth principles, guarantees, rights and duties for the use of the internet in Brazil, including provisions about Internet service provider liability, Internet user privacy and internet neutrality, or the Internet Act. In May 2016, further regulations were passed in connection with the Internet Act. However, unlike in the United States, little case law exists around the Internet Act and existing jurisprudence has not been consistent. Legal uncertainty arising from the limited guidance provided by current laws in force allows for different judges or courts to decide very similar claims in different ways and establish contradictory jurisprudence. This legal uncertainty allows for rulings against us and could set adverse precedents, which individually or in the aggregate could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, legal uncertainty may negatively affect our customers’ perception and use of our services.
We are subject to costs and risks associated with increased or changing laws and regulations affecting our business, including those relating to the sale of consumer products. Specifically, developments in data protection and privacy laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results or operations.
We operate in a complex regulatory and legal environment that exposes us to compliance and litigation risks and that could materially affect our operations and financial results. These laws may change, sometimes significantly, as a result of political, economic or social events. Some of the federal, state or local laws and regulations that affect us include: those relating to consumer products, product liability or consumer protection; those relating to the manner in which we advertise, market or sell products; labor and employment laws, including wage and hour laws; tax laws or interpretations thereof; data protection and privacy laws and regulations; customs or import laws and regulations; and securities and exchange laws and regulations.
For instance, on August 14, 2018, the President of Brazil approved Law No. 13,709/2018, a comprehensive data protection law establishing general principles and obligations that apply across multiple economic sectors and contractual relationships (
Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados
), or the LGPD. The LGPD establishes detailed rules for the collection, use, processing and storage of personal data and will affect all economic sectors, including the relationship between customers and suppliers of goods and services, employees and employers and other relationships in which personal data is collected, whether in a digital or physical environment. The obligations established by LGPD will become effective within 24 months from the date of publication of the law (August 2020), by which date we will be required to adapt our data processing activities to these new rules. A comprehensive understanding of personal data flows and, as a consequence, the review of internal documents and procedures, as well as the negotiation of contractual amendments are examples of adaptations required for compliance with the LGPD. There can be no guarantee that we will have sufficient financial resources to comply with this regulation and any new regulations or successfully compete in the context of a shifting regulatory environment. Any additional privacy laws or regulations enacted or approved in Brazil or in other jurisdictions in which we may operate in the future could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We may face restrictions and penalties under the Brazilian Consumer Protection Code in the future.
Brazil has a series of strict consumer protection statutes, or collectively the Consumer Protection Code (
Código de Defesa do Consumidor
), that are intended to safeguard consumer interests and that apply to all companies in Brazil that supply products or services to Brazilian consumers. These consumer protection provisions include protection against misleading and deceptive advertising, protection against coercive or unfair business practices and protection in the formation and interpretation of contracts, usually in the form of civil liabilities and administrative penalties for violations. These penalties are often levied by the Brazilian Consumer Protection
Agencies (
Fundação de Proteção e Defesa do Consumidor
, or PROCONs), which oversee consumer issues on a district-by-district basis. Companies that operate across Brazil may face penalties from multiple PROCONs, as well as the National Secretariat for Consumers (
Secretaria Nacional do Consumidor
, or SENACON). Companies may settle claims made by consumers via PROCONs by paying compensation for violations directly to consumers and through a mechanism that allows them to adjust their conduct,
called a conduct adjustment agreement (
Termo de Ajustamento de Conduta
, or TAC). Brazilian Public Prosecutor Offices may also commence investigations related to consumer rights violations and this TAC mechanism is also available for them. Companies that violate TACs face potential automatic fines. Brazilian Public Prosecutor Offices may also file
public civil actions against companies in violation of consumer rights, seeking strict observation to the consumer protection law provisions and compensation for the damages consumers may have suffered.
As of December 31, 2018, we had approximately 2,000 active proceedings with PROCONs and small claims courts relating to consumer rights. Most of these disputes are related to delays in the delivery of products, chargeback disputes, and product returns. To the extent consumers file such claims against us in the future, we may face reduced revenue due to refunds and fines for non-compliance that could negatively impact our results of operations.
Risks Related to our Common Shares
The price of our common shares may fluctuate substantially, and your investment may decline in value.
The trading price of our common shares is likely to be highly volatile and may be subject to wide fluctuations in response to factors, many of which are beyond our control, including those described above under “—Risks Related to our Business and Industry” and “—Risks Related to Doing Business in Brazil.” The stock markets in general, and the NYSE and the market for Internet-related and technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the companies involved. We cannot assure you that trading prices and valuations will be sustained. These broad market and industry factors may materially adversely affect the market price of our common shares, regardless of our operating performance. Market fluctuations, as well as general political and economic conditions in the markets in which we operate, such as recession or currency exchange rate fluctuations, may also adversely affect the market price of our common shares. Following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, that company may often be subject to securities class-action litigation. For further information about the high and low closing sales prices for our common shares on the NYSE, see “Item 9. —A. Offer and Listing Details—Price History of Our Common Shares.” This kind of litigation may result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For instance, two purported shareholder class actions under the Securities Act were filed in the Supreme Court of New York, claiming that we, among other defendants, made alleged material misstatements or omissions in the registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with our initial public offering. The plaintiffs have not specified an amount of alleged damages in the actions. A court order consolidating these actions was entered on September 14, 2018. Because this lawsuit is in its early stage, the possible loss or range of losses, if any, arising from the litigation cannot be estimated and consequently we have made no provisions with respect to this litigation. In the event that this litigation is decided against us, or we enter into an agreement to settle such matters, we may be required to pay substantial amounts. Depending on the outcome, such litigation could also result in restrictions on our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business. We have engaged a U.S. firm as legal counsel and intend to defend vigorously against the allegations made in the context of these actions. See Item 8. “Financial Information—Legal and Administrative Proceedings—U.S. Class Action” for a description of the U.S. securities class action litigation against us.
Our largest shareholders and their affiliates, in the aggregate, own 71.26% of our outstanding common shares and, to the extent they act together, will control all matters requiring shareholder approval. This concentration of ownership limits your ability to influence corporate matters.
Our largest shareholders and their affiliates own 71.26% of our common shares. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—A. Major Shareholders.” Despite the termination of our shareholders’ agreement upon completion of our initial public offering in April 2017, these entities, to the extent they act together, will control a substantial majority of our voting power and will have the ability to control matters affecting, or
submitted to a vote of, our shareholders. As a result, these shareholders may be able to elect all or a substantial majority of the members of our board of directors and set our management policies and exercise overall control over us. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees” and “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions — A. Major Shareholders” for more information.
The interests of these shareholders may conflict with, or differ from, the interests of other holders of our common shares. For example, these shareholders may cause us to make acquisitions that increase the amount of our indebtedness or outstanding common shares, sell revenue-generating assets or inhibit change of control transactions that benefit other shareholders. They may also pursue acquisition opportunities for themselves that may be complementary to our business, and as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. So long as these shareholders continue to own a substantial number of our common shares, they will significantly influence all our corporate decisions and together with other shareholders they may be able to effect or inhibit changes in the control of our company.
Our Articles of Association contain anti-takeover provisions that may discourage a third party from acquiring us and adversely affect the rights of holders of our common shares.
Our Articles of Association contain certain provisions that could limit the ability of others to acquire our control, including a provision that grants authority to our board of directors to establish and issue from time to time one or more series of preferred shares without action by our shareholders and to determine, with respect to any series of preferred shares, the terms and rights of that series. These provisions could have the effect of depriving our shareholders of the opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over the prevailing market price by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain our control in a tender offer or similar transactions.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or publish unfavorable research or reports, our share price and trading volume may decline.
The trading market for our common shares will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us, our business, our market or our competitors. In the event one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades us or releases negative publicity about our common shares, our share price would likely decline. Further, as we are not required to publish quarterly financial information, if we cease to publish that information, any analysts covering us may not have enough information to compare us to our peers on a regular basis and may choose to cease coverage. If one or more of these analysts ceases to cover us or fails to regularly publish reports on us, interest in our common shares may decrease, which may cause our share price or trading volume to decline.
It is unlikely that we will declare any dividends on our common shares in the foreseeable future and therefore, you must rely on price appreciation of our common shares for a return on your investment.
We do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. Instead, we intend to retain earnings, if any, for future operations and expansion. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our general meeting of shareholders, acting pursuant to a proposal by our board of directors, and will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, cash requirements, financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that our general meeting of shareholders or board of directors may deem relevant. Accordingly, investors will most likely have to rely on sales of their common shares, which may increase or decrease in value, as the only way to realize cash from their investment. There is no guarantee that the price of our common shares will ever exceed the price that you pay.
Common shares eligible for future sale may cause the market price of our common shares to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.
The market price of our common shares may decline as a result of sales of a large number of our common shares in the market or the perception that these sales may occur. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate.
We currently have 31,056,244 common shares outstanding that except as set forth below, are freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act by persons other than our affiliates within the meaning of Rule 144 of the Securities Act.
Our shareholders or entities controlled by them or their permitted transferees will be able to sell their shares in the public market from time to time without registering them, subject to certain limitations on the timing, amount and method of those sales imposed by regulations promulgated by the SEC. If any of our shareholders, the affiliated entities controlled by them or their respective permitted transferees were to sell a large number of their shares, the market price of our common shares may decline significantly. In addition, the perception in the public markets that sales by them might occur may also adversely affect the market price of our common shares.
From time to time we may grant share based compensation to our board members, executives and employees, which may cause their interests to become excessively tied to the trading price of our common shares.
We have created a share option plan, which is in the process of being fully vested and exercised. From time to time, we may grant additional share options to our board members, executives and employees under this plan. For instance, during the course of 2018 we granted 724,500 additional share options and expect to continue granting share options to our management and employees from time to time. We may also introduce new share option plans for our senior management and employees in order to further increase their efficiency, align their interests with the interests of our shareholders and retain executives who commit to long-term earnings and short-term performance.
If our board of directors approve the issuance of new share option plans (or the issuance of additional share options under the existing share option plan), you may be diluted in the event that the exercise price under such share option plan is lower than the trading price of our common shares. In addition, new share option plans may cause the interests of our management to become excessively tied to the trading price of our common shares, which may have an adverse impact on our business and financial condition. For more information about our share based compensation, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—A. Operating Results— Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Share-based Payments” and “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—B. Compensation of Directors and Officers—2012 Share Plan.”
We are a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability. The rights of our shareholders may be different from the rights of shareholders governed by the laws of U.S. jurisdictions.
We are a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability. Our corporate affairs are governed by our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association and by the laws of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders and the responsibilities of members of our board of directors may be different from the rights of shareholders and responsibilities of directors in companies governed by the laws of U.S. jurisdictions. In the performance of its duties, the board of directors of a solvent Cayman Islands exempted company is required to consider the company’s interests, and the interests of its shareholders as a whole, which may differ from the interests of one or more of its individual shareholders. See “Item 16G. Corporate Governance.”
As a foreign private issuer and an “emerging growth company” (as defined in the JOBS Act), we will have different disclosure and other requirements than U.S. domestic registrants and non-emerging growth companies.
As a foreign private issuer and emerging growth company, we may be subject to different disclosure and other requirements than domestic U.S. registrants and non-emerging growth companies. For example, as a foreign private issuer, in the United States, we are not subject to the same disclosure requirements as a domestic U.S. registrant under the Exchange Act, including the requirements to prepare and issue quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or to file current reports on Form 8-K upon the occurrence of specified significant events, the proxy rules applicable to domestic U.S. registrants under Section 14 of the Exchange Act or the insider reporting and short-swing profit rules applicable to domestic U.S. registrants under Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we intend to rely on exemptions from certain U.S. rules which will permit us to follow Cayman Islands legal requirements rather than certain of the requirements that are applicable to U.S. domestic registrants.
We follow Cayman Islands laws and regulations that are applicable to Cayman Islands companies. However, Cayman Islands laws and regulations applicable to Cayman Islands companies do not contain any provisions comparable to the U.S. proxy rules, the U.S. rules relating to the filing of reports on Form 10-Q or 8-K or the U.S. rules relating to liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time, as referred to above.
Furthermore, foreign private issuers are required to file their annual report on Form 20-F within 120 days after the end of each fiscal year, while U.S. domestic issuers that are accelerated filers are required to file their annual report on Form 10-K within 75 days after the end of each fiscal year. Foreign private issuers are also exempt from Regulation Fair Disclosure, aimed at preventing issuers from making selective disclosures of material information, although we are subject to Cayman Islands laws and regulations having substantially the same effect as Regulation Fair Disclosure. As a result of the above, even though we are required to file reports on Form 6-K disclosing the limited information which we have made or are required to make public pursuant to Cayman Islands law, or are required to distribute to shareholders generally, and that is material to us, you may not receive information of the same type or amount that is required to be disclosed to shareholders of a U.S. company.
The JOBS Act contains provisions that, among other things, relax certain reporting requirements for emerging growth companies. Under this act, as an emerging growth company, we will not be subject to the same disclosure and financial reporting requirements as non-emerging growth companies. For example, as an emerging growth company we are permitted to, and intend to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. Also, we will not have to comply with future audit rules promulgated by the PCAOB (unless the SEC determines otherwise) and our auditors will not need to attest to our internal controls under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We may follow these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an emerging growth company. As a result, our shareholders may not have access to certain information that they deem important. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of our first sale of our common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, (b) in which we have total annual revenues of at least US$1.07 billion, or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common shares that is held by non-affiliates exceeds US$700.0 million as of the prior June 30
th
, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than US$1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period. Accordingly, the information about us available to you will not be the same as, and may be more limited than, the information available to shareholders of a non-emerging growth company.
We cannot predict if investors will find our common shares less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common shares and our share price may be more volatile.
We are a foreign private issuer and, as a result, in accordance with the listing requirements of the NYSE we will rely on certain home country governance practices from the Cayman Islands, rather than the corporate governance requirements of the NYSE.
We report under the Exchange Act as a non-U.S. company with foreign private issuer status. The NYSE rules provide that foreign private issuers are permitted to follow home country practice in lieu of certain NYSE corporate governance standards. The standards applicable to us are considerably different than the standards applied to U.S. domestic issuers. For instance, we are not required to:
·
have a majority of the board be independent (other than as may result from the requirements for the audit committee member independence under the Exchange Act);
·
have a compensation committee or a nominating and corporate governance committee; or
·
have regularly scheduled executive sessions with only independent directors;
Although we may have certain corporate governance practices that generally follow NYSE corporate governance standards, as a foreign private issuer, we may follow home country practice from the Cayman Islands in lieu of the above requirements. Therefore, our board of director’s approach to governance may be different from that of a board of directors consisting of a majority of independent directors, and, as a result, our management oversight may be more limited than if we were subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance standards. Accordingly, you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are not foreign private issuers. For further information regarding our corporate governance practices, see “Item 16G. Corporate Governance.”
Our shareholders may face difficulties in protecting their interests because we are a Cayman Islands exempted company.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, by the Companies Law (as amended) of the Cayman Islands and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under the Cayman Islands laws are not as clearly defined as under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in jurisdictions in the United States. Therefore, you may have more difficulty protecting your interests than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States, due to the comparatively less formal nature of Cayman Islands law in this area.
While Cayman Islands law allows a dissenting shareholder to express the shareholder’s view that a court sanctioned reorganization of a Cayman Islands company would not provide fair value for the shareholder’s shares, Cayman Islands statutory law does not specifically provide for shareholder appraisal rights in connection with a merger or consolidation of a company. This may make it more difficult for you to assess the value of any consideration you may receive in a merger or consolidation or to require that the acquirer gives you additional consideration if you believe the consideration offered is insufficient. However, Cayman Islands statutory law provides a mechanism for a dissenting shareholder in a merger or consolidation to apply to the Grand Court for a determination of the fair value of the dissenter’s shares if it is not possible for the company and the dissenter to agree on a fair price within the time limits prescribed.
Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies (such as us) have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records and accounts or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders. Our directors have discretion under our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records may be inspected by our shareholders, but are not obliged to make them available to our shareholders. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest.
Subject to limited exceptions, under Cayman Islands laws, a minority shareholder may not bring a derivative action against the board of directors. Class actions are not recognized in the Cayman Islands, but groups of shareholders with identical interests may bring representative proceedings, which are similar.
United States civil liabilities and certain judgments obtained against us by our shareholders may not be enforceable.
We are a Cayman Islands exempted company and substantially all of our assets are located outside of the United States. In addition, the majority of our directors and officers are nationals and residents of countries other than the United States. A substantial portion of the assets of these persons is located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons. It may also be difficult to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained in U.S. courts based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us and our officers and directors who are not resident in the United States and the substantial majority of whose assets are located outside of the United States.
Further, it is unclear if original actions predicated on civil liabilities based solely upon U.S. federal securities laws are enforceable in courts outside the United States, including in the Cayman Islands and Brazil. Courts of the Cayman Islands may not, in an original action in the Cayman Islands, recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state of the United States on the grounds that such provisions are penal in nature. Although there is no statutory enforcement
in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, courts of the Cayman Islands will recognize and enforce a foreign judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction if such judgment is final, for a liquidated sum, provided it is not in respect of taxes or a fine or penalty, is not inconsistent with a Cayman Islands’ judgment in respect of the same matters, and was not obtained in a manner which is contrary to the public policy of the Cayman Islands. In addition, a Cayman Islands court may stay proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.
Judgments of Brazilian courts to enforce our obligations with respect to our common shares may be payable only in reais.
Most of our assets are located in Brazil. If proceedings are brought in the courts of Brazil seeking to enforce our obligations in respect of our common shares, we may not be required to discharge our obligations in a currency other than the
real
. Under Brazilian exchange control laws, an obligation in Brazil to pay amounts
denominated in a currency other than the
real
may only be satisfied in Brazilian currency at the exchange rate, as determined by the Central Bank, in effect on the date the judgment is obtained, and such amounts are then adjusted to reflect exchange rate variations through the effective payment date. The then-prevailing exchange rate may not afford non-Brazilian investors with full compensation for any claim arising out of or related to our obligations under the common shares.
Risks Related to the Merger
Failure to complete the Merger could negatively impact our share price, business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
The Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain closing conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, including, among others, that:
·
the Merger must have been approved by shareholders of Netshoes representing at least two-thirds (2/3) of votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy at a general meeting;
·
no governmental authority of competent jurisdiction has enacted, entered, promulgated or enforced any law, statute, rule, regulation, executive order, decree, ruling injunction or other order (whether temporary, preliminary or permanent) which prohibits, restrains or enjoins the consummation of the Merger; and
·
clearance from Brazilian anti-trust authorities.
In addition, each party’s obligation to complete the Merger is subject to the truthful and correctness of the other parties’ representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement (subject in most cases to materiality and knowledge qualifications), and the other parties’ compliance with their respective covenants and agreements in the Merger Agreement in all material respects.
No assurance can be given that each of the conditions will be satisfied. In addition, the Merger Agreement may be terminated under the circumstances set forth in the Merger Agreement, including by mutual decision of the parties thereto. If the conditions are not satisfied or waived in a timely manner and the Merger is delayed, payment of the merger consideration will also be delayed. If the Merger is not completed (including in the case the Merger Agreement is terminated), our ongoing business will be materially adversely affected.
We also could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the Merger. If the Merger is not completed, these risks may materialize and may materially adversely affect the price of our common shares, our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
Our CEO and chairman of the board of directors has interests that may differ from the interests of our shareholders.
Our CEO and chairman of the board of directors, Marcio Kumruian, may have interests that differ from, or are in addition to, his interests as shareholder in connection with the approval of the proposals at the shareholders’ extraordinary general meeting. Even though he did not vote as a director in connection with approving the execution of the Merger Agreement and recommending to shareholders to approve the Merger, these interests could cause members of our board of directors to have, or be perceived to have, a conflict of interest in approving the proposals at the shareholders’ extraordinary general meeting.
The fact that there is a Merger pending could harm our business and results of operations.
While the Merger is pending, we are subject to a number of risks that may harm our business and results of operations, including:
·
the diversion of management and employee attention from our business may detract from our ability to operate efficiently, capitalize on new opportunities and commence new initiatives;
·
we may be unable to respond effectively to competitive pressures, industry developments and future opportunities;
·
we could be subject to costly litigation associated with the Merger;
·
our current and prospective employees may be uncertain about their future roles and relationships with Parent during and following completion of the Merger, and this uncertainty may adversely affect our ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel;
·
the Merger Agreement contains certain covenants restricting the conduct of our business between the date of the Merger Agreement and the earlier to occur of (i) the termination of the Merger Agreement pursuant to its terms and (ii) the effective time, the waiver of which is subject to the consent of the other parties. These covenants may limit our freedom to operate our business in potentially adverse ways.
Our obligation to pay a termination fee under certain circumstances and the restrictions on our ability to solicit or engage in negotiations with respect to other acquisition proposals may discourage other transactions that may be favorable to our shareholders.
Until the Merger is completed or the Merger Agreement is terminated, with limited exceptions, the Merger Agreement generally prohibits us from initiating, soliciting, facilitating or knowingly encouraging any inquiries with respect to, any acquisition inquiry or acquisition proposal, or executing or entering into any agreement in connection with any acquisition proposal. We may be required to pay to Magazine Luiza S.A. a termination fee equal to US$1,800,000.00 under certain circumstances. For more details, see “Item 10. Additional Information—C. Material Contracts.”
We may be the target of securities class action and derivative lawsuits which could result in substantial costs and may delay or prevent the Merger from being completed.
Securities class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits are often brought against public companies that have entered into merger agreements. Even if the lawsuits are without merit, defending against these claims can result in substantial costs and divert management time and resources. An adverse judgment could result in monetary damages, which could have a negative impact on our liquidity and financial condition. Additionally, if a plaintiff is successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting completion of the Merger, then that injunction may delay or prevent the Merger from being completed, which may adversely affect our or, if the Merger is completed but delayed, the combined company’s business, financial position and results of operations.
ITEM 4.
INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
A.
History and Development of the Company
Netshoes (Cayman) Limited is a publicly-held company listed on the New York Stock Exchange since April, 2017, and therefore subject to
certain
reporting requirements of the Exchange Act.
We were founded in January 2000 when our founders Marcio Kumruian and Hagop Chabab opened a physical shoe store in São Paulo, Brazil, and
our
business has transformed substantially since then. In 2007, we closed our brick-and-mortar retail stores, shifted our focus to eCommerce retail and launched Netshoes.com, our online store specialized in sports and active lifestyle goods.
Our principal executive office is located at Rua Vergueiro 961, Liberdade, Zip Code 01504-001, in the city of São Paulo, State of São Paulo, Brazil. We were incorporated in the Cayman Islands as an exempted company with limited liability. Our registered office is located at Floor 4, Willow House, Cricket Square, Grand Cayman, KY1-9010, Cayman Islands. The telephone number of our investor relations department is +(55-11) 3028-8298. Our corporate investor relations website can be found at www.netshoes.com/institucional. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report, and you should not consider information contained on our website to be part of this annual report or in deciding whether to invest in our common shares.
On April 29, 2019, we entered into the Merger Agreement. See “Item 10. Additional Information—C. Material Contracts.” See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Merger” and “Item 10. Additional Information—C. Material Contracts.”
Principal Capital Expenditures
Our capital expenditures (consisting of purchase of property and equipment and intangible assets) represented 4.3%, 3.1% and 5.2% of our net sales in 2016, 2017 and 2018,
respectively
. In 2018, expenditures were mainly concentrated in the acquisition and in-house development of software. For 2019, we have budgeted capital expenditures of R$45 million, including the acquisition of property and equipment and intangible assets, which will be funded through our operating activities and debt financing.
B.
Business Overview
Since our launch, we have sold to more than 17.6 million customers across our sites (representing a 16.9% year-over-year growth from 2017), solidifying our position as one of the few scaled online retailers in Brazil and creating a foundation of audience, brand and capabilities on top of which we are building a digital ecosystem capable of delivering increasing and significant value to customers and partners in the future. Through our desktop and mobile websites and applications, which we refer to as our “sites,” we deliver our customers a convenient and intuitive online shopping experience across our two core brands, Netshoes and Zattini. We believe that Zattini, a site we launched in December 2014, is quickly becoming a leading online brand for fashion and beauty in Brazil in terms of consumer recognition.
We were founded in January 2000 by Marcio Kumruian and Hagop Chabab as a single physical shoe store in São Paulo, Brazil. In 2007, we closed our brick-and-mortar stores and shifted to an online business to reach more customers across Brazil. We have also selectively introduced new product categories, maintaining our core strategy of focusing on product verticals with higher margins that have short replacement cycles and are easy to ship.
We have a relentless focus on delivering a superior customer experience across Brazil, including remote locations not typically served by traditional retailers. As one of the first companies in Latin America to provide online retail offerings, we have emphasized the importance of customer service, including introducing short delivery times (with same-day delivery in capital cities of each of the countries in which we operate and certain other densely populated areas in Brazil), free return shipping for the first return or exchange, one-click purchasing, secure payment options and post-sales support. We have also developed technology that personalizes the shopping experience for
our customers, and our sites have advanced features including enhanced search capabilities, easy navigation, product recommendations and customized ordering.
Our sites are also optimized for mobile shopping, and to facilitate our customers’ access to our sites. Despite Latin America’s relatively low smartphone penetration rate, in the year ended December 31, 2018, 58.7% of the total orders placed by our active customers came from mobile devices (in Brazil, mobile commerce accounted for 29% of eCommerce sales in 2018, according to Euromonitor
1
).
We are also a trusted partner and the go-to channel for the most important brands in sports and lifestyle retail in Brazil, and are increasingly establishing similar partnerships with fashion and beauty brands. We offer over 320,000 stock keeping units, or SKUs, from over 500 brands, including Nike, Adidas, Mizuno, Tommy Hilfiger, Ralph Lauren and Lacoste and work closely with our suppliers to promote and protect their brands and help manage product selection. We believe we are one of the largest distribution channels for these brands in Brazil. We have also begun to develop our private label brands to supplement our existing supplier relationships in key categories.
Our success has been dependent on our consistent ability to build a solid infrastructure network to support our operations, as well as our scalable and customized logistics capabilities. We have created a highly automated picking, packing and inventory management system, built to efficiently handle the products in which we specialize — easy-to-ship items with high margins and short replacement cycles. Today, we have three automated distribution centers in Brazil. We have also established innovative partnerships with
over 10 local companies, across all of our operations, including
Correios
, the largest shipping provider in Brazil which has established shipping centers within our distribution centers to facilitate more efficient distribution. Also, since September 2017, we offer customers the option of collecting their purchases directly at
Correios’
branches, with over 7,000 pick-up points in Brazil. We are able to ship over one million orders a month, and on average, process the orders we receive within eight hours after confirmation, achieving an on-time delivery rate of approximately 97.0% of total processed orders. Having built scale in logistics has enabled us to offer the benefits of this scale to our third-party marketplace sellers. Today more than 50% of our marketplace sellers are using
“Netshoes Entregas,”
benefiting from cheaper, more agile and controlled delivery options using our
courriers
.
We have achieved the following significant milestones as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018 (excluding data from our Mexican operations, which were discontinued in September 2018):
·
6.8 million active customers, an increase of 4.4% from the 6.5 million active customers we had as of December 31, 2017;
·
12.6 million total orders on our sites, an increase of 4.9% from the 12.0 million total orders for the year ended December 31, 2017;
·
58.7% of our total orders were placed by customers on a mobile device, an increase of 12.7 percentage points from 45.9% for the year ended December 31, 2017; and
Also, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018, excluding the results of our Mexican operations, which were discontinued in September 2018, we reported:
·
Net sales of R$ 1,835.2 million and R$1,808.1 million, respectively, representing a decrease of 1.5% in 2018;
·
Net loss of R$170.3 million and R$332.4 million, respectively; and
·
R$29.7 million and R$219.1 million in negative EBITDA from Continuing Operations, respectively.
1
Source: Euromonitor International Limited; Retailing 19ed; per Retailing, Internet Retailing, Mobile Internet Retailing; retail value sales, RSP, excl. Sales tax, current prices, local currency; 2018 data.
For information on how we define and calculate active customers, total orders, total orders placed from mobile devices and EBITDA from Continuing Operations, and for a reconciliation of our non-IFRS figures to their IFRS equivalents, see the section of this annual report captioned “Item 3. Key Information—A. Selected Financial Data
—
Selected Operating Data.”
Our Industry
We believe eCommerce is becoming the universal solution for consumers to access products, anytime, anywhere.
In Brazil in particular, eCommerce presents a significant opportunity, with a number of factors supporting its expansion: increasing online penetration and mobile adoption, the emergence of new payment methods, and better network and logistics infrastructure, amongst others.
Additionally, despite recent macroeconomic volatility in Brazil, eCommerce in the country has grown at an attractive CAGR of 18.6% from 2012 to 2018, according to Euromonitor. In the mid- to long-term, we expect strong macro tailwinds due to an expanding middle class, increased disposable income, and reduced unemployment and interest rates, among others.
Overview of our market and the opportunity
Large and growing online audience in Brazil
·
Brazil alone has the fourth largest online audience in the world
. As of December 31, 2018, Brazil had 138 million Internet users (representing a 70.5% penetration in the country). According to Euromonitor
2
, the portion of Brazil’s population that is connected to the Internet in Brazil is expected to grow at a 4.3% CAGR between 2018 and 2022, compared to 3.3% for the United States, which had 239.4 million Internet users as of December 31, 2018.
Our market verticals, in particular, represent a large opportunity, driven by an increased use of technology
·
Sports, fashion and beauty represent a significant opportunity in Brazil.
We operate in the sports, fashion and beauty categories, which represent a significant opportunity in the countries where we are present. For instance, in Brazil, these categories reached, according to our estimates, US$2.4 billion in 2018, representing 12.8% of the country’s total online sales
3
.
·
Online retail penetration is low, but accelerating.
With only 7.2% share of the total retail market in 2018, eCommerce in Brazil has significant potential vis-à-vis developed economies such as the United States, at a 13.7% market share, according to Euromonitor.
·
New technology-enabled business models empowering online consumption.
We believe the continued evolution of both web and mobile technology is enabling the emergence of new business models that better address customer needs. These new business models are creating new and innovative ways to interact more closely with consumers, providing them with access to a larger assortment of goods, and higher levels of service and convenience that were previously not achievable. We believe that consumers now have access to more brands and more retail channels than ever before, and brands are in turn increasingly using online retail channels to gain access to a broader set of consumers.
Mobile becoming more prevalent and rapidly gaining share in eCommerce
2
Source: Euromonitor International Limited; Digital Consumer 19ed.; per Internet Users and Percentage of Population Using the Internet definitions; 2018 data.
3
Source: Company’s estimates based on Euromonitor’s data. Source: Euromonitor International Limited; Retailing 19ed; per Apparel and Footwear through Internet Retailing, Beauty and Personal Care Internet Retailing, Consumer Health Internet Retailing and Personal Accessories and Eyewear through Internet Retailing and Internet Retailing definitions; retail value sales, RSP, excl sales tax, current prices; 2018 data.
·
Smartphone adoption is high and rapidly growing
. The possession of smartphones has achieved rapid adoption in households in Brazil, with rates of 96.5%, compared to 94.2% in the United States for the year ended 2018, according to Euromonitor
4
. In 2022, Smartphone penetration in households are expected to reach 98.6% in Brazil.
·
Mobile commerce is growing and gaining share
. The growth and proliferation of smartphones and tablets has made mobile commerce one of the fastest growing retail channels in Brazil. Based on data from Euromonitor
5
, mobile commerce accounted for 29% of eCommerce sales in Brazil in 2018, increasing from 4.5% in 2013, compared to 27.2% in the United States in 2018.
Greater focus on sports, apparel, accessories, footwear, fashion and beauty, which are the most attractive categories in online retail
·
Increasing focus on active lifestyles and sports, resulting in a very attractive business opportunity.
We believe that there has been an increased focus on education and health in Brazil, which is translating into more active lifestyles and participation in sports. While soccer remains the most popular sport in Brazil, other sports including running, volleyball, mixed martial arts, basketball, tennis and motor sports have become increasingly popular. Overall, we believe that sports are a very attractive category to operate in.
·
Sports, fashion, beauty and footwear are among the retail categories with the highest gross margins in the retail sector.
Sporting goods, clothing, beauty and footwear retailers have some of the highest gross margins among retail businesses in the United States, a trend which we believe also applies to Brazil.
·
Short replacement cycles.
We believe that these retail categories are highly attractive due to their relatively short replacement cycles compared to other product categories. For instance, in the United States, according to Claims Pages, sneakers and clothes have on average 1 and 4 years of useful life, respectively, compared to 15 years for houseware and electronics. As a result, there are opportunities for recurring purchases of these goods. In addition, by having shorter replacement cycles, these product categories have higher inventory turnover, which in turn leads to lower inventory levels and capital requirements.
Dynamics in Brazilian eCommerce
Unique dynamics driving eCommerce adoption
·
Low but growing penetration of credit cards and evolution of online payment methods.
According to the Bank of International Settlements and data from the World Bank, payment with card use remains relatively low in Brazil compared to more developed markets. Debit and credit card payments accounted for 28.4% of the Brazilian household consumption in 2015, compared with 45.0% in the United States. In addition, other payment alternatives have emerged in Brazil, such as PagSeguro, PayPal and MercadoPago, among other alternatives. We believe the emergence of these payment alternatives, along with the increasing penetration of credit cards, is driving the adoption of online payments and enabling more consumers to transact online securely.
·
Installment payments as an important method in Brazil.
According to e-Bit, 50.2% of eCommerce payments in Brazil were made with extended payment terms during 2017 As a result, the ability to manage net working capital dynamics through the asymmetric payment cycle is an important local expertise needed to operate in the Brazilian market.
4
Source: Euromonitor International Limited 19ed.; Digital Consumer; per Possession of Mobile Phone definitions; 2018 data.
5
Source: Euromonitor International Limited; Retailing 19ed; per Retailing, Internet Retailing, Mobile Internet Retailing; retail value sales, RSP, excl. Sales tax, current prices, local currency; 2018 data.
·
Increasing trust and confidence in online retailers.
In the past, online retailing in Brazil suffered from consumer lack of confidence due to a lack of secure payment options and low visibility in the delivery of products, among other factors. However, we believe that the emergence of more secure online payment methods, coupled with the higher reliability of mail networks for delivery, is making consumers more confident in purchasing through online retailers, particularly for small-volume goods.
·
eCommerce as a unique solution to a geographically disperse universe of customers.
We believe eCommerce is particularly well suited to Brazil. With expanding and geographically dispersed population, brick-and-mortar retailers have difficulties in serving a large portion of consumers in Brazil. Brick-and-mortar retailers tend to concentrate in specific cities or regions, leaving large percentages of the population without convenient access to their products. For this reason, we believe that eCommerce provides a unique solution to consumers who are looking to access a variety of goods from various brands, irrespective of their location.
Our Competition
eCommerce in Brazil includes a number of local players and a few global companies focused on a wide variety of categories. Based on management’s experience in, and knowledge of, the industry, we do not believe we have a relevant direct competitor in the eCommerce sports category in Brazil ( we are a leader in this country), and while we face competition in our fashion and beauty categories, in just four years of operation we believe we have become a clear contender for the market leader in Brazil. Our current or potential competitors include the following:
·
Brick-and-mortar stores:
We face competition from brick-and-mortar retailers specialized in sporting goods, fashion and beauty and general brick-and-mortar retailers, some of which currently also sell, or in the future may sell, their products online. Based on management’s experience in, and knowledge of, the industry, we believe that most existing brick and mortar retail players in Brazil have limited eCommerce presence and are often focused on specific categories which, in general, are not core to us; such as electronics and household appliances. We believe that most retailers’ constraint to physical locations results in limited product offerings and restricts their operations to narrower geographies. In summary, we believe, based on management’s experience in, and knowledge of, the industry, that the nature of the eCommerce platforms developed by most brick-and-mortar stores is more of a complementary service rather than a priority for their business. We believe our platform, on the other hand, provides a unique solution to customers and focuses on more attractive product categories with a team of professionals solely dedicated to delivering a best-in-class customer service; and
·
Pure-play eCommerce players:
We face competition from (a) other B2C eCommerce retailers; (b) retailers and other sellers that conduct commerce through online marketplaces; and (c) a number of indirect competitors, including Internet portals and Internet search engines that are involved in online commerce, either directly or in collaboration with other retailers. We believe that, based on management’s experience in, and knowledge of, the industry, pure-play sports eCommerce players are fragmented in Brazil with no company having achieved scale other than us. Moreover, no consolidation strategy has been deployed by any local or global player.
We believe our 6.9% growth in consolidated B2C GMV in Brazil - which includes marketplace sales - for the year ended December 31, 2018 was above the average of retail industries in Brazil. According to Euromonitor
6
, in 2018 the total retail market in Brazil grew by 5.1%.
Our Customers
With 6.8 million active customers as of December 31, 2018, a highly recognized consumer brand and a large selection of verticals and products, we attract a highly diversified customer base as measured across multiple attributes: gender, age and income. In particular, the launch of Zattini in December 2014, with new categories such as fashion and beauty, introduced our sites to a larger number of women. The launch of Zattini has also helped
create a cycle where Netshoes customers are expanding into Zattini and Zattini is bringing a new customer base onto the Netshoes platform. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2018, approximately 53.8% of Zattini customers in Brazil were originally Netshoes customers.
6
Source: Euromonitor International Limited; Retailing 19ed; per Retailing definitions; retail value sales, RSP, excl sales tax, current prices, local currency; 2018 data.
Our customer base is also diversified in terms of age, income and geographic dispersion. As of December 31, 2018, our customer base was comprised of 27.3% customers under 25 years of age, 36.2% between 26 and 35 years, 22.5% between 36 and 45 years and 14.1% over 45 years of age, showing no significant concentration within any specific age group. In addition, our customer base spans across all levels of income, from low (54%), to middle- (33%) and high-end customers (13%). Our customers are distributed nationwide and our solid infrastructure network allows us to reach customers in all zip codes of Brazil.
In order to improve traffic, attract more customers to our sites and increase conversion rates, we actively use data analytics and other technology tools. The insights collected from our customers’ engagement with our sites and marketing are used to improve customer experience, enhance conversion, and increase repeat purchases by further personalizing marketing and communication campaigns. Given our practice to analyze consumer behavior and engagement with our sites (including browsing and purchasing activities), we believe we are in a better position than brick-and-mortar stores to predict and react to any changes in consumer demand and shopping patterns and to recommend to our customers specific products that might be of interest to them based on their behavior.
Our Partner Suppliers
We are a trusted partner for the most important brands in the sports and lifestyle retail industry in Brazil, with a network of partner suppliers spanning over 500 brands, including Nike, Adidas, Mizuno, Tommy Hilfiger, Ralph Lauren and Lacoste. We are the go-to-channel for global sports brands to reach customers in Brazil, and we are increasingly establishing similar partnerships with fashion and beauty brands.
Different from many of our competitors whose operations rely on a smaller number of suppliers, our diversified network of partner suppliers allows us to offer our customers a comprehensive product portfolio while reducing operational risk and dependency on specific suppliers. For the year ended December 31, 2018, our top 10 partner suppliers represented 54.0% of our net sales, the same share recorded for the year ended December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2018, we had expanded our sporting and lifestyle product offerings to more than 320,000 SKUs compared to approximately 111,000 SKUs as of December 31, 2014, reflecting our diversified product offerings achieved through broadening our network of partner suppliers.
In order to continuously improve our relationship with partner suppliers, further developing brand recognition and streamlining processes, we have a fully dedicated team responsible for the constant management and evaluation of our partner suppliers. The results of these measurements are periodically shared with our partner suppliers in an effort to promote higher efficiency and profitability.
Our Private Labels
In November 2014, we began offering private label sports brands on the Netshoes site, and in 2016, we started to offer private label brands on our fashion and beauty site, Zattini. Our private label brands span product categories in which we believe we can compete to provide online shoppers lower cost, high quality options. Our private label products are higher margin items and our seven brands cover the majority of the categories we currently offer. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the sales of private label products accounted for 9% of the net sales of our operations in Brazil and for 8% of our net sales on a consolidated basis.
“Gonew,” our first private label brand was created in September 2014 and today is our sixth largest brand in terms of net sales, currently selling over 2,700 SKUs within the sports apparel, equipment and footwear categories. We also have private labels such as, “Mood,” “Burn” and “Treebo” covering apparel, equipment and footwear for Surfing & Skating activities and other casual shoes and clothes labels, such as “Shoestock” and “Drezzup” covering fashion shoes and clothing, and “Zeep!”, designed to offer shoes and clothes for kids. We outsource the production of 100% of our private label products from qualified national and international third-party suppliers.
Our Sites
We currently operate under three brands: Netshoes, Zattini and Free Lace. Although we connect the brands through cross promotional links and the user interface of our sites, each brand has a unique identity and product set to cater to specific consumer tastes, styles and purchasing goals. Across our brands and sites, we offer the same personalized shopping and rich product selection for which we are known, focusing on delivering an intuitive online experience for all consumers regardless of the brand with which they engage.
Netshoes:
Netshoes was our first to market brand and is the leading sporting goods retailer in Brazil. Our website offers consumers a superior and personalized shopping experience for sporting and active lifestyle products and features a user-friendly and intuitive interface designed to allow users to conveniently search for, find, compare and purchase sporting and active lifestyle goods. We are the one stop shop for consumers across sporting goods and active lifestyle products and we operate this business through our websites www.netshoes.com.br and www.netshoes.com.ar.
Currently we offer our customers a wide selection of athletic shoes, jerseys, apparel, accessories and sporting equipment from leading international and local brands, including Nike, Under Armour, Adidas, Puma, Mizuno, Asics, Umbro, New Balance, Olympikus, Fila, Wilson, Topper, Oakley, Timberland and Reebok. In addition, we have licenses to sell a number of exclusive products from brands such as Kappa, Pretorian, Disney, Camaro and Corvette and private label offerings. We also offer personalized products, such as jerseys, footwear and bicycles, where customers can print or engrave words or images on the item. We were the first large scale Brazilian retailer to offer personalized products from Nike, Puma and Adidas online.
Zattini:
Launched in December 2014, Zattini is one of the fastest growing fashion and beauty site in Brazil. Our website offers consumers a superior and personalized shopping experience for fashion and beauty products such as shoes, clothes, accessories, fragrances and hair care products, and features a user-friendly and intuitive interface similar to our Netshoes sites. We offer over 200 leading international and local brands (including, among others, Calvin Klein, Revlon, Maybelline, L’Oreal, Joico, Dolce & Gabbana and Carolina Herrera). Also, to capitalize on consumer openness to private label in apparel, in February 2016 we acquired Shoestock, a strong fashion brand in Brazil. Currently we operate Zattini through our websites www.zattini.com and www.zattini.com.br. As of December 31, 2018, our Zattini platform had over 215,000 SKUs offered to our customers.
Free Lace
: Launched in September 2018, Free Lace website was developed to connect our clients with the most sophisticated, exclusive and desirable sneakers from the most iconic brands, offering a superior and personalized shopping experience. We operate this business through our website www.freelace.com.br.
The Features of Our Sites
Our sites consist of desktop websites and our mobile websites and applications. We designed our sites to be customer friendly, visually appealing, stable, secure and responsive to customers’ preferences. We manage our desktop sites, mobile websites and mobile applications differently, each optimized for the screens they fit and the way our customers use them.
We are focused on providing consumers the most user-friendly and efficient way to find products that meet their needs and preferences. The central part of our home page is the search tool, where consumers can type in product keywords or brands to search for specific products in our merchandise database. Relevant listings, pictures and custom editorial content are also placed throughout the site.
Mobile access is a key component of our long-term strategy and we have made significant investments in our mobile functionality. Our mobile website and applications were custom built for our unique needs and are powered by the same core platform that powers our eCommerce sites. mCommerce has grown on our sites as a result of the continued success of our applications, increasing mobile penetration and the launch of programs such as our partnership with local telecommunication service providers to offer free access to the Internet from mobile devices when accessing our sites.
Browsing:
Our sites provide users with detailed product information, including a description, rich media images, typically with multiple pictures from different angles, size and color availabilities, sizing charts and customer reviews of products. In addition, for our Netshoes sites, our customers have access to the following features that were designed to optimize their browsing experience: (a) Shop by Sport, (b) Shop by Gender, (c) Shop by Brand, (d) Shop by category, which allows users to browse certain product categories, such as shoes, clothes, accessories, nutritional supplements among others, and (e) Super Discount, which allows users to find products with promotions and discounts.
For Zattini, our customers have access to the following features that were designed to optimize their browsing experience: (a) Shop by Gender, (b) Shop by Brand, (c) Beauty Products, (d) Home and Décor Products, and (e) Super Discount.
Our sites use algorithms across many dimensions, including visits, product margin, revenue and available inventory, to optimize product sorting and search results to rank relevance and test the optimal results for specific customers.
Site Personalization:
We offer a personalized eCommerce experience through product recommendations by enabling our users to build online shopper profiles reflecting their preferences and interests and by tracking users’ browsing and purchase history. Each of our customers has a user name and password, which allows him or her to track order status and previous purchases. Prior to logging into their accounts, our system can typically customize the initial landing page for our customers by reviewing their browsing records. In addition, we analyze each customer’s purchase patterns and send personalized e-mails to our registered members periodically. Our e-mails update our customers on new product arrivals, tailored promotions and other related items that might be of interest based on their preferences.
Product Reviews:
We now have a solid customer review database, which helps customers find the right product for their needs and our merchandising team in its buying decisions. Our customers are generally engaged in writing reviews on our website. As of December 31, 2018, approximately 62.1% of the SKUs available on our sites had been reviewed by our clients.
Our Additional Sources of Revenues
A portion of our net sales is generated from sources other than product sales effected by us directly from our Netshoes and Zattini sites. These sources include our services to customers through our marketplace, as well as products sold through partner-hosted sites, Shoestock site and its omni-channel brick and mortar store, and NCard. These sources allow us to continue to reach a broader consumer base, help us build our brand, improve customer loyalty to the platform and drive incremental net sales.
Online Marketplace:
Our marketplace enables customers to purchase products from a multitude of third-party qualified B2C vendors through a seamless purchase experience on our sites. In February 2016, we launched this marketplace service to supplement our direct sales site. Our marketplace collects product photos and merchandise from approved sellers and showcases them on our platform to supplement products we have in inventory. We have focused the marketplace on helping extend our product offering into merchandise for which it is not economical to hold inventory. For example, when a customer searches for a baseball bat and gloves, we can show products from an approved seller, and we leverage our platform for checkout and reviews.
Partner-Branded Stores:
In addition to offering merchandise through our sites, we offer and deliver merchandise to our customers through a number of partner-branded store sites managed by us. These include the sub-home of the National Basketball Association, or NBA, in Brazil; the Brazilian online stores of multiple global and local brands including Puma and Olympikus; and the online stores of major soccer clubs including Corinthians, São Paulo, Santos, Internacional, Vasco da Gama, Chapecoense and Cruzeiro, among others. As of December 31, 2018, we managed 14 partner-branded stores.
Shoestock Store:
In March 2017, we successfully re-launched Shoestock, a Brazilian fashion brand for shoes and accessories acquired by us in February 2016. With over 30 years of existence, Shoestock is a brand with solid customer awareness in the São Paulo region in Brazil, and augments our private label portfolio in the fashion category. Shoestock products are available to customers nationwide via Zattini site, Shoestock’s own store site and also through its concept brick-and-mortar store – offering a complete omni-channel shopping experience to customers in the city of São Paulo. This store is fully integrated with our online operations and provides significant cross-selling opportunities with other fashion and beauty categories.
NCard:
In partnership with Banco Itaú S.A., a major Brazilian financial institution, we offer consumers an International MasterCard on par with credit cards readily available in Brazil. NCards also provide special loyalty rewards and benefits for our customers, which we believe improve customer loyalty. Customers using their NCards receive additional 5% to 10% off throughout most of our sites, free customization on products throughout our sites, among others. We have found that NCard holders visit our sites more often than our average customer, driving their annual purchase value higher.
We continuously analyze the possibility of developing new adjacent businesses, which we believe could generate long-term growth and value to our consumers.
Our Customer Service
As a result of our efforts to deliver a superior customer experience, we have been widely recognized by our customers and the industry. We have been awarded several prizes, including: the E-award Prize – Best Customer Service (
Braspag
, 2015 and 2016) and Modern Consumer Award in Customer Excellence – Company that Most Respects its Customers (
Grupo Padrão
, 2013 through 2018).
A key element of our sales strategy is our ability to provide our users with a high level of customer service and support. We believe our rapid growth has been driven in part by our excellence in customer service. By helping consumers navigate our sites, answering their questions and completing their orders, our team helps us to continue building trust with consumers, enhance our reputation and drive sales.
We provide our customers with an array of online self-service features including the ability to track orders and shipment status, review estimated delivery dates, cancel unshipped items, change delivery information and process exchanges or returns. We also respond to 99% of emails sent to our customer service desk within 24 hours, and we are continuing to reduce our contact per order as we implement electronic systems that answer the most frequent questions in our region – delivery timing and order completion.
Our customers can contact our customer service representatives through real-time online chat, our customer service e-mail address or our customer service hotline. As of December 31, 2018, our customer service department had more than 510 in-house employees empowered to keep our customers happy and satisfied. Our decision to have all of our customer service professionals in-house was driven by our relentless focus on customer experience.
We maintain service quality by placing emphasis on selecting personnel carefully and regularly monitoring the performance of our employees. Our employees are trained to have in-depth product knowledge, professional service attitudes and communication skills to best address customer needs and inquiries. Each of our new customer service employees is required to complete a rigorous training program for more than 12 days followed by working alongside a senior customer service professional for one month before having their first direct contact with a customer.
In addition, while we offer our customers the ability to return items, we benefit from low return rates as compared to similar retailers in the United States due to cultural norms and more limited credit availability.
Sales & Marketing
Our sales and marketing efforts are focused on driving organic traffic to our sites and increasing the monetization of our existing traffic. Given that Netshoes is one of the most recognizable brands in Brazil, we have focused on performance marketing for this site to drive measurable customer acquisition. For Zattini, we continue to focus on growing brand awareness as well as performance marketing. We aim to maintain the right balance between marketing across brand-building channels and performance-based customer acquisition strategies.
Our Sales & Marketing is integrated with our business strategy and supported by our technology development efforts. We evaluate each of our marketing initiatives for its return on investment and performance versus our business objectives. Although some of the visitors to our sites make purchases when they first register, we have noticed that visitors may register to receive our emails and “push” communications months before they make their first purchase. We consider 6.8 million (or approximately one-third) of our users to be Prospects (i.e., registered users who have not made purchases yet), and we believe an opportunity exists to convert them to customers. A portion of our marketing spend is meant to target these visitors for whom the conversion to purchasing comes after we have built a substantial relationship with them through regular contact and outreach over time. We also benefit from the breadth of our platform as purchasers often first engage on either Netshoes or Zattini and then move over to the other site. This means we can acquire a member once for either site and benefit continuously across both sites.
Due to our market leadership in Brazil, we have pioneered many new regional marketing programs with third parties, such as Facebook, Google and Criteo, which allow us to deepen our knowledge about online consumer
behavior and, consequently, results in a better shopping experience for our customers. We constantly share data analytics about our respective experiences with digital consumers in order to take advantage of new latent opportunities related to our markets.
We acquire new email-registered members through a diverse set of paid and unpaid marketing channels. Our paid advertising efforts include search engine marketing, display advertising, paid social media, affiliate channels and specific offline marketing channels (such as television ads). Our non-paid advertising efforts include search engine optimization, non-paid social media, mobile “Push” notifications, customer referrals and email. Upon acquiring a customer or a potential customer’s email address, we focus on how to increase their engagement with our platform and drive consistent repeat purchases. This effort to increase engagement and repeat purchasing is primarily accomplished by providing consistent customer service and email marketing efforts. We consistently track our member base across their current activity status—Prospect (as defined above), New Purchaser (customers whose first online purchases with us were in the preceding month prior to the relevant dates), Active (customers who made purchases online with us during the preceding twelve months prior to the relevant dates), Inactive (customers who made purchases online with us between thirteen and twenty four months prior to the relevant date the relevant dates) and Churn (customers who have not made purchases online with us for more than twenty four months prior to the relevant dates)—and we focus on engaging or reengaging each member depending on their current status.
Our Technology
We are proud of our technology leadership in Brazil and were awarded the Sales Innovator of the Year Award in 2016 by eCommerce Brasil and “The Most Innovative Retailer” in 2016 through 2018 by
Valor Econômico
, a prestigious business and financial newspaper in Brazil. As one of the first online retailers in country, we have adopted a technology-forward and data-driven approach to all aspects of our business.
We use our technology platform to improve the experience of our customers, increase the purchase frequency and average order size placed by our customers and optimize the efficiency of our business operations. We have successfully built an innovative technology culture that is unique in our geography and enables us to attract and retain some of the best technological minds in Brazil. We employ over 236 dedicated technology professionals and our research and development is centralized in São Paulo.
We have organized our technology team into 15 small, nimble and autonomous squads that tackle problems across each of our sites. Our squads are aligned with business goals, such as improving conversion and revenue per visit. Our technology team adopts a continuous improvement, high-frequency testing approach to our business, aimed at improving both traffic and conversion rates. Our site updates several times a day with changing imagery, product descriptions and inventory, based on updated revenue and margin targets. These constant site refreshes also allow our technology professionals to A/B test multiple site features over the course of each day.
Our platform is engineered to provide a personalized experience to our customers. We collect insights from our customers’ interactions through our algorithms and through traditional information retrieval techniques, such as cookies. We then use these insights to customize our sites in real-time for individual customers, with product suggestions and category highlights. These insights also form the basis of our enhanced conversion strategies as we continue to target a customer between 0 – 15 days after they view an item. We use email, social media marketing and retargeting campaigns to remind customers of their searches, items left in carts and items browsed.
We strive to keep customers engaged wherever they are, by providing the functionality of our website in iOS and Android mobile apps. Our mobile apps include search and discovery, personalization and social shopping features similar to those that customers enjoy on our desktop site. In addition, we are also capable of managing significantly higher volumes of site traffic during peak periods, such as those generally experienced during the Black November period. We routinely test and expand the capacity of our servers so we are prepared to provide our customers with uninterrupted access to our sites during periods with high levels of user traffic. We also have in place two redundant data centers and back-up systems located in two different cities designed to ensure the uninterrupted operation of our information technology systems and sites.
We believe we can continue to scale our technology to accommodate significantly higher volumes of site traffic, customers, orders and the overall growth in our business. We have built a technology stack with a proven record of an ability to scale.
Security and Privacy Policy
We are committed to operating a secure online business. We use various security methods in an effort to protect the integrity of our networks and the confidential data collected and stored on our servers. For example, we use hierarchical levels of firewall technology to protect access to our networks and to our servers and databases on which we store confidential data. We have developed and use internal policies and procedures to protect the personal information of our customers.
We believe that issues relating to privacy and use of personal information relating to Internet users are becoming increasingly important as the Internet and its commercial use continue to grow. We have adopted what we believe is a detailed privacy policy that complies with local legal requirements and outlines the information that we collect concerning our users and how we use it, and the extent to which other registered Netshoes and Zattini users may have access to this information. Users must acknowledge and expressly agree to this policy when registering with our sites. For more information, particularly with respect to a cybersecurity incident experienced by us in December 2017, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Business and Industry—Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential customer information or our failure or the perception by our customers that we failed to comply with privacy laws or properly address privacy concerns could harm our business and standing with our customers” and “Item 8. Financial Information——A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal and Administrative Proceedings—Legal and Administrative Proceedings—Civil Matters.”
Although we send marketing communications to our users periodically, we use our best efforts to ensure that they respect users’ notification preferences. When users register with us, they can opt out of receiving marketing e-mails from us. They can modify their notification preferences at any time in the “My Account” section of our sites.
We do not sell or rent any personally identifiable information about our users to any third party. However, for our marketplace operations, we do disclose information to merchants and purchasers so they can complete the transaction (respective names and addresses of purchasers, among other relevant information). We only use information about our users for internal purposes in order to improve marketing and promotional efforts and to improve our content, product offerings and site layout. We may also disclose information about our users in response to legal requirements. All information is stored on our servers located in Brazil.
Billing and Collection
We provide our online customers in Brazil the flexibility to choose from a number of payment options including online payment through all major credit cards and bank payment slips, known as “
boleto
” in Brazil. We offer our credit card paying customers the option to pay in monthly installments (up to 15 for customers using NCard and up to 10 for customers using other types of credit cards), with a minimum installment payment of R$39.90. Paying by credit card in monthly installments is the most popular option among our customers in Brazil. For the year ended December 31, 2018, 56.5% of our product sales were paid in installments by our customers. In conjunction with third-party service providers, we have a dedicated risk department that conducts a rigorous analysis of each transaction to help reduce the risk of fraudulent payments and decrease payment default.
Seasonality
We experience the effects of seasonality throughout the calendar year. Typically, the fourth quarter of the year is the strongest for our sales due to the Black November period in Brazil and the Christmas season in Brazil. The first quarter of the year is our slowest period, as the months of January, February and March correspond to vacation time in Brazil. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Intellectual Property
We rely on a combination of trademark, trade secret and other intellectual property laws as well as confidentiality agreements with our employees and suppliers for the purpose of protecting the proprietary rights associated with the products branded under our private labels. We have also registered the domain names
www.netshoes.com, www.netshoes.com.br, www.zattini.com, www.zattini.com.br, www.shoestock.com, www.shoestock.com.br, www.freelace.com.br
and their variations. Our “Netshoes” and “Zattini” trademarks and logos have also been registered with the relevant authorities in Brazil and in other countries. Trademark registrations for “Shoestock” have been granted to us in the United States and Brazil. Furthermore, we have applied for the registration of the trademarks and logos of all of our private labels, such as Gonew, Burn, Drezzup and Mood, all of which have been granted in Brazil.
In addition to the protection of our intellectual property, we are focused on ensuring that our product offerings (and especially those products branded under our private labels) do not infringe the intellectual property of others. Generally, our agreements with suppliers of private label products contain provisions to safeguard us against potential intellectual property infringement by our suppliers and impose penalties in the event of any infringement. We reserve the right to refuse to work with or terminate our relationship with suppliers where it comes to our attention that they are violating the intellectual property rights of a third party. For more information, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Business and Industry—Our inability or failure to protect our intellectual property and any intellectual property infringement against us could have a negative impact on our operating results” elsewhere in this annual report.
Insurance We have insurance policies with reputable insurers in amounts considered sufficient by our management to cover potential losses arising from events that may affect our assets, as well as for any indemnities that we may have to pay to third parties as a result of our operations. These policies include insurance covering our distribution centers including equipment, machinery and inventory stored therein (or in transit) and have coverage limits of up to R$288.2 million. We seek coverage against risks that are compatible with our scale and type of operations, considering the nature of our activities, the risks we are exposed to, market practices in our industry, and the advice of our insurance consultants.
The insured amounts are reviewed every year when policies are renewed, to ensure the amounts are consistent with the value of our assets and our liabilities from operations. We do not anticipate having any difficulties in renewing any of our insurance policies.
While we believe our insurance contracts reflect standard market practices, there are certain types of risks that may not be covered by the policies (such as war, terrorism, acts of God and force majeure, liability for certain harm or interruption of certain activities). Therefore, if any of these uncovered events occur, we may be obliged to incur additional costs to remedy the situation, reconstitute our assets and/or indemnify our customers, which may adversely affect us. Furthermore, even in the event that we incur a loss that is covered by our policies, we cannot assure that damages awarded by our insurers will be sufficient to cover the losses arising from the insured event.
Regulation
Our business is subject to a number of laws and regulations that affect companies conducting business on the Internet, many of which are still evolving and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business. While it is difficult to fully ascertain the extent to which new developments in the field of law will affect our business, there has been a trend towards increased consumer and data privacy protection. It is possible that general business regulations and laws, or those specifically governing the Internet, eCommerce or mCommerce, may be interpreted and applied in a manner that may place restrictions on the conduct of our business. Below is a summary of the most relevant laws that apply to the operations of eCommerce companies in Brazil:
Consumer Protection Laws
. Brazil’s consumer Protection Code sets forth the legal principles and requirements applicable to consumer relations in Brazil. This law regulates, among other things, commercial practices, product and service liability, strict liability of the supplier of products or services, reversal of the burden of proof to the benefit of consumers, the joint and several liability of all companies within the supply chain, abuse of rights in contractual clauses, advertising and information on products and services offered to the public. Specifically,
as an Internet-based retailer, we are subject to several laws and regulations designed to protect consumer rights — most importantly Law No. 8,078 of September 11, 1990 — known as the Consumer Protection Code, and Decree No 7,962 of March 15, 2013, that regulates eCommerce in Brazil, or the eCommerce Decree. The Consumer Protection Code establishes the legal framework for the protection of consumers, setting out certain basic rights, among which is the right to clear and accurate information about products and services offered in the consumer market, with correct specification of characteristics, structure, quality and price and the risks they pose, and the consumers’ rights to access and modify personal information collected about them and stored in private databases. The eCommerce Decree complements the Consumer Protection Code and sets forth specific rights and obligations of consumers and eCommerce retailers. Pursuant to the eCommerce Decree, online retailers are required to break-down pricing and disclose fees and shipping charges. Online retailers are also required to provide clear and accurate terms and conditions for the sales, including the consumers’ right to cancel a transaction without charges (
direito de arrependimento
) and to return or exchange products. In addition, the eCommerce Decree sets forth general guidelines that must be followed by online retailers’ consumer services. The growth and demand for eCommerce could result in more stringent consumer protection laws that impose additional compliance burdens on online companies. These consumer protection laws could result in substantial compliance costs.
Data Privacy and Protection
. The Internet Act establishes principles, guarantees, rights and duties for the use of the Internet in Brazil, including regulation about data privacy for Internet users. Under Brazilian laws personal data may only be treated (i.e., collected, used, transferred, etc.) upon users’ prior and express consent. Privacy policies of any company must be clear and detailed and include information regarding all contemplated uses for such users’ data and excessively ample or vague consent for data treatment may be deemed invalid in Brazil. Brazilian courts have applied joint and several liability among all entities that shared and/or used personal data subject to a breach. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Business and Industry—Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential customer information or our failure or the perception by our customers that we failed to comply with privacy laws or properly address privacy concerns could harm our business and standing with our customers.” We are also subject to the LGPD, which establishes detailed rules for the collection, use, processing and storage of personal data and will affect all economic sectors, including the relationship between customers and suppliers of goods and services, employees and employers and other relationships in which personal data is collected, whether in a digital or physical environment. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Business and Industry—We are subject to costs and risks associated with increased or changing laws and regulations affecting our business, including those relating to the sale of consumer products. Specifically, developments in data protection and privacy laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results or operations.”
Recent Changes in Brazilian Laws Relevant for our Business:
Value Added Tax Laws
. On April 2015, an amendment to the Brazilian Constitution became effective to change the then-existing rules as to the allocation of ICMS taxes collected in interstate sales between the state of origin of products sold and the state where the final customer is located, or State of Destination. Under the prior rules, ICMS taxes levied on sales to customers characterized as the final customers of certain goods were entirely collected by the state from where the product was shipped and invoiced, or State of Origin. As a result of this constitutional amendment, since 2016 ICMS taxes in interstate sales have been allocated between the States of Origin and States of Destination on the following basis: (a) States of Origin have the right to collect the value corresponding to the ICMS interstate tax rate applicable for the product while (b) the States of Destination have the right to collect the value corresponding to the difference between the ICMS interstate tax rate applicable for
the product and the internal ICMS tax rate of such State of Destination applicable for the relevant product (assuming that the internal ICMS tax rate of the State of Destination is higher than the ICMS interest tax rate). While these constitutional changes did not affect the benefits we currently extract from tax incentives in the States of Origin from where we generally ship and invoice our products (i.e., Minas Gerais and Pernambuco), we expect that our average ICMS tax burden will increase from 3.6% in 2015 to 10.1% by 2019 as we are now required to also pay ICMS taxes to States of Destination of our products in which we currently have no tax benefits. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Business and Industry— Changes in tax laws, tax incentives, benefits or differing interpretations of tax laws may adversely affect our results of operations.”
C.
Organizational Structure
The following is a chart of our current corporate structure (which already contemplates divestment from our operations in Argentina):
For a complete list of all of our direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, see note 2.3 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
D.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Our Facilities, Logistics and Operations
Fundamental to our success is our custom-built logistics and operations infrastructure. We were recently selected for the Best Logistics award by e-Commerce Brasil, and we believe that we are market leaders in developing a proprietary infrastructure that supports our specific product verticals and regions. We manage all of the key components of our supply chain, including fulfillment and customer service. We monitor each step of our order fulfillment process from the time a product is inspected and stocked, to when the product is delivered to a customer, which we believe enables us to maintain a high level of shipping accuracy and timely delivery.
We currently lease all properties for our operations in Brazil. Our corporate headquarters are located in São Paulo, Brazil. We lease three distribution centers in Brazil, one of which is located in the State of São Paulo (Barueri), one in the State of Minas Gerais (Extrema) and one in the State of Pernambuco (Jaboatão dos Guararapes). We also lease one physical store location for Shoestock in São Paulo, Brazil. We believe that our properties are generally suitable to meet our needs for the foreseeable future, and we will continue to seek additional space as needed to pursue our growth strategy.
The following table sets forth a summary of our distribution centers as of December 31, 2018:
|
|
|
Agreement Expiration Date
|
Barueri (State of São Paulo, Brazil)
(1)
|
19,143
|
45,843
|
April 1, 2028
|
Extrema (State of Minas Gerais, Brazil)
|
28,656
|
42,316
|
October 22, 2020
|
Jaboatão dos Guararapes (State of Pernambuco, Brazil)
|
15,321
|
23,915
|
January 31, 2023
|
(1) The original expiration date of May 31, 2019 was extended by the parties in March 2018.
In Brazil, we have three distribution centers with a total storage capacity of over 110,000 square meters across all floors and a high level of automation. Our distribution centers located in Brazil have the capacity to handle over 9.7 million items at peak capacity and are able to ship products across all 26 Brazilian states and the Federal District of Brazil.
In Brazil, we have a nationwide delivery network consisting of 13 third-party courier companies and were the first retail company to develop an on-site partnership with Brazil’s national post office,
Correios
, which expedites the delivery of our products. We leverage our large scale of operations and reputation to obtain favorable contractual terms with the courier companies. We monitor and review the courier companies’ performance and its compliance with our contractual terms.
Our distribution centers and delivery network are strategically located and designed for reliable and timely product delivery. In general, orders are automatically allocated to one of our distribution centers for fulfillment. We then process our orders within eight hours after the orders are confirmed on average, and we can deliver on the same day in the main Brazilian urban centers and Buenos Aires. We offer a wide range of delivery options to cater to our customers’ individual requirements and preferences. Our delivery options include normal delivery within four to five days, express delivery within two to three days, super express delivery for same-day delivery, scheduled delivery, and the option to pick-up products from one of the almost 7,000
Correios
branches in Brazil. We have an on-time delivery rate of approximately 97.0% of total processed orders. Our infrastructure also includes two data centers that are critical to our operations (see Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Technology”).
We also use our distribution centers and delivery network to manage the logistics and distribution of a number of our suppliers’ and partners’ online stores.
We invested in 2018 in the expansion of the storage capacity and in increased automation for our distribution center located in the municipality of Extrema, State of Minas Gerais, increasing its current storage capacity of 35,431 m
2
to 42,316 m
2
.
Material Financing Agreements
The table below sets forth selected information regarding our material outstanding indebtedness as of December 31, 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-convertible notes - Debentures
|
September 2021
|
R$
|
100% of CDI+3.23% p.a.
|
7,636
|
56,504
|
64,140
|
Secured borrowing - Working Capital (Banco do Brasil)
|
August 2021
|
R$
|
138.5% of CDI p.a.
|
18,377
|
75,504
|
93,881
|
Secured borrowing - Working Capital (Bradesco)
|
September 2021
|
R$
|
100% of CDI+3.65% p.a.
|
10,784
|
34,554
|
45,338
|
Secured borrowing - Working Capital (FINEP)
|
July 2026
|
R$
|
TJLP+ 3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
CDI: Brazilian interbank deposit certificate rate.
TJLP: Brazil’s long-term interest rate.
The weighted average interest rate of our debt was 9.87% and 9.54% for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018, respectively.
Our principal financing agreements are described below:
Debentures
On March 5, 2015, our Brazilian subsidiary NS2, completed a local offering in Brazil of secured non-convertible debentures in the aggregate amount of R$150.0 million, with an interest rate equal to the daily average rates of 100% of the Brazilian Interbank Deposit Rate (
Certificado de Depósito Interbancário
, or CDI) plus 3.231% per year, payable quarterly. Amortization of the principal amount also occurs quarterly. Under the terms of the debentures, the totality of NS2’s Visa and American Express credit and debit card account receivables are automatically deposited into a linked escrow account at Banco Bradesco S.A. managed by the debentures’ fiduciary agent, and upon NS2’s request (provided it is not in breach of any of the terms of the debenture deed) the fiduciary agent is required to release the balance of the linked escrow account that exceeds 50% of the outstanding balance under the debentures at the time of any such request.
This agreement was amended in August 2018 to, among other things, (1) extend the maturity of the outstanding balance to August 2021, (2) create a 12-month grace period for principal amortization and (3) include one of our founders, Marcio Kumruian, as a guarantor. The debenture deed requires NS2 to maintain a ratio of
financial indebtedness (defined as the balance of loans and financings) to credit card accounts receivable not greater than 3.00, to be calculated every six months. As of December 31, 2018, NS2 was in compliance with this covenant with a ratio of 1.5. The debenture deed also provides for certain customary covenants that limit NS2’s ability to, among other things, (1) undertake transactions that deviate from the corporate purpose set forth in its by-laws and (2) distribute dividends and pay interest on equity if NS2 is in breach of any of the terms of the debenture deed. It further includes customary events of default provisions, such as NS2’s failure to perform or observe certain terms, covenants or other agreements referred to in the debenture deed, and certain corporate restructurings that result in a change of its control. As of December 31, 2018, the outstanding amount under these debentures was R$66.0 million.
Working Capital Financing
In August 2014, NS2 entered into a working capital facility agreement with Banco do Brasil S.A. for an aggregate principal amount of R$200.0 million. Principal and interest on the loan are payable on a monthly basis. This loan is secured by the fiduciary assignment (
cessão fiduciária
) of R$20.0 million in financial assets (NS2’s investment in a mutual fund managed by Banco do Brasil S.A.) and a portion of NS2’s existing and future credit card account receivables, limited to a percentage of the outstanding balance of the loan. This agreement was amended in August 2016 to, among other things, (1) extend the maturity of the outstanding balance to August 2020, (2) change the interest rate applicable for the period from August 2016 to August 2020 to 138.5% of the CDI rate, (3) and include one of our founders, Marcio Kumruian, as a guarantor. This agreement also requires NS2 to comply with the following financial covenants: (1) maintain a shareholder’s equity greater than zero, and (2) maintain a ratio of financial indebtedness to credit card receivables not greater than 3.00, as calculated every six months. As of December 31, 2018, NS2 was in compliance with these covenants with a ratio of 1.5. As of December 31, 2018, the outstanding amount under this working capital facility agreement was R$46.3 million. This agreement was amended again in August 2018 to, among other things, (1) extend the maturity of the outstanding balance to August 2021 and (2) create a 12-month grace period for principal amortization.
In September 2016, NS2 entered into a working capital facility agreement with Banco Bradesco S.A. for an aggregate principal amount of R$60.0 million with an interest rate equal to 100% of the CDI rate plus 3.65% per year. Principal and interest on the loan are payable on a monthly basis, with maturity in September 2020. This loan is secured by the fiduciary assignment (
cessão fiduciária
) of NS2’s Visa and American Express credit card account receivables deposited from time to time into an escrow account with the lender, limited to 50% of the outstanding balance of the loan. As of December 31, 2018, the outstanding amount under this working capital facility agreement was R$26.5 million. This agreement was amended in August 2018 to, among other things, (1) extend the maturity of the outstanding balance to August 2021, (2) create a 12-month grace period for principal amortization and (3) include one of our founders, Marcio Kumruian, as a guarantor.
In July 03, 2017, we entered into a financing agreement with Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos – FINEP (a public institution linked to the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology), in the amount of R$79.7 million. The funds from this financing will be part of a financing package aimed at supporting our strategic plan in innovation. This financing agreement has a grace period of 24 months, starting from its execution date. This agreement is payable in 85 installments, with the first one falling due on July 15, 2019 and the last due on July 15, 2026. The first tranche of R$25.8 million was disbursed to us in October 2017. Under the terms of this agreement, we agreed to provide FINEP with a bank guarantee as collateral. As of December 31, 2018, the outstanding amount under this finacing agreement was R$25.5 million. See note 18 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for additional information.
Capital Expenditures
See “B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Consolidated Cash Flows—Investing Activities.”
C.
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses
Our research and development activities are primarily focused on the development of software, which we view as an important element of the investments we make in our technology and our business. Our primary software development activities have been focused on technology to personalize the shopping experience of our customers,
and to set up our marketplace. In the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, we spent R$36.6 million, R$49.3 million and R$71.7 million, respectively, on software development.
D.
Trend Information
Other than as disclosed elsewhere in this annual report, we are not aware of any trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events for the year ended December 31, 2018 that are reasonably likely to have a material and adverse effect on our net revenues, income, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that would cause the disclosed financial information to be not necessarily indicative of future results of operations or financial conditions.
E.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2018, except for operating lease obligations as described below, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
F.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes significant contractual obligations and commitments at December 31, 2018.
|
Payments due by period
|
(in thousands of R$)
|
Total
|
|
Less than 1 year
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
More than 5 years
|
Long-term debt obligations
(1)
|
R$ 228,879
|
|
R$ 59,264
|
|
R$ 191,630
|
|
R$ 7,120
|
|
R$ 6,166
|
Operating lease obligations
(1)
|
132,419
|
|
28,163
|
|
60,861
|
|
30,633
|
|
12,762
|
Total
|
R$
361,298
|
|
R$
87,427
|
|
R$
252,491
|
|
R$
37,753
|
|
R$ 18,928
|
(1) Includes current portion of long-term debt. Also includes estimated interest payments of R$35.3 million, of which R$20.8 million and R$14.5 million are due in less than one year and one to five years, respectively. Estimated interest payments were calculated based on the interest rate indexes of our floating interest rate indebtedness in effect as of December 31, 2018.
(2) Operating lease obligations primarily include non-cancellable lease commitments for our offices and distribution centers.
G.
Safe Harbor
See “Part I—Introduction—Forward-Looking Statements.”
ITEM 6.
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
A.
Directors and Senior Management
Board of Directors
The following table provides information regarding our directors:
|
|
|
|
|
Marcio Kumruian
|
45
|
Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
Class I
|
Shareholders meeting to be held in 2021
|
Pedro Reiss
|
40
|
Director
|
Class I
|
Shareholders meeting to be held in 2021
|
Frederico Brito e Abreu
|
39
|
Director
|
Class II
|
Shareholders meeting to be held in 2019
|
Ricardo Knoepfelmacher
|
52
|
Director
|
Class II
|
Shareholders meeting to be held in 2019
|
Nilesh Lakhani
|
58
|
Director
|
Class III
|
Shareholders meeting to be held in 2020
|
André Béla Jánszky
|
67
|
Director
|
Class III
|
Shareholders meeting to be held in 2020
|
Below is a summary of the professional experience and areas of activity of our current board members.
Marcio Kumruian
. Mr. Kumruian is our co-founder. He has been the chairman of our board of directors and chief executive officer since 2000, Since 2017 he is a member of our nominating and corporate governance committee and of our compensation committee. Mr. Kumruian is responsible for leading Netshoes into becoming a leading sports and lifestyle online consumer platform in Brazil. Mr. Kumruian also served on the boards of directors of Modnet until August 2016, and Netfarma until January 2016. Mr. Kumruian holds a degree in Economics from Mackenzie University. In 2013, Mr. Kumruian was awarded Entrepreneur of the year in the category of Technology by IstoÉ Dinheiro, a leading Brazilian business and economic magazine. In March 2017, Mr. Kumruian was named a finalist in the master category for the Entrepreneur of the Year award by Ernst & Young Terco.
Frederico Brito e Abreu.
Mr. Brito e Abreu has been a member of our board of directors and a member of our audit committee since April 2017. From 2010 to 2017, Mr. Brito e Abreu served as chief financial officer of Kroton Educacional S.A. (BM&FBovespa: KROT3), where he was responsible for planning and control, treasury, tax, accounting, credit, collections, IT, compliance, procurement and legal, and also headed its M&A department.Prior to joining Kroton Educacional S.A., Mr. Brito e Abreu served as a director of the private equity firm Advent International (from 2007 to 2010) and as a manager of McKinsey & Company in São Paulo, New York and Lisbon (from 2001 to 2007). Mr. Brito e Abreu was the recipient of the Best CFO award in the education sector in Latin America every year from 2013 to 2017, awarded by Institutional Investor Magazine, and received the 2016 CFO Award in Latin America by Finance Monthly. Mr. Brito e Abreu holds a degree in business administration from the Catholic University of Portugal in Lisbon and an MBA from INSEAD.
Ricardo Knoepfelmacher
. Mr. Knoepfelmacher has been a member of our board of directors since April 2017 and is also currently a member our audit committee. Mr. Knoepfelmacher is the founder of RK Partners, an advisory firm focused on financial and operational restructuring and corporate turnarounds, and is currently the Managing Partner of the firm. Mr. Knoepfelmacher has also been on the board of directors of NII Holdings, Inc. (Nextel) since 2013, Vicunha Têxtil S.A. since 2013 and Iguá Saneamento S.A. since 2017. Prior to founding RK Partners, Mr. Knoepfelmacher led several corporate restructurings, which included Brasil Ferrovias S.A. (railway operator in Brazil), EBX Group (OGX, OSX and MMX), PDG, UTC, Rossi Residencial, Bombril, Galvão Engenharia, Paranapanema, Usina Caeté and Property Brasil, among others. Previously, Mr. Knoepfelmacher was the Chief Executive Officer of Brasil Telecom S.A. from 2005 to 2009, Chief Executive Officer of Pegasus Telecom S.A. from 2000 to 2002, and Chief Executive Officer of Bicicletas Caloi from 1997 to 1999. Mr. Knoepfelmacher also worked at Citibank and McKinsey & Company before launching his own company, MGDK & Associados, a restructuring and consulting firm later sold to the Monitor Group, currently owned by Deloitte. Mr. Knoepfelmacher holds a master’s degree in international management from the Thunderbird School of Global Management and a bachelor degree in economics from Universidade de Brasília.
Nilesh Lakhani
. Mr. Lakhani has been a member of our board of directors since April 2013 and is also currently the chairman of our audit committee. Mr. Lakhani has over 25 years of experience working with international companies. He has been an independent director on the board of Despegar.com, Inc. (NYSE: DESP) since 2012 and was elected as chairman of its board in March 2019. He has held key executive positions with growth companies in the technology, media and financial services industries. From 2015 to 2018, he served as an operating partner at Lumia Capital LLC. From 2013 to 2014, Mr. Lakhani was a member of the board and of the audit committee of QIWI, which is a Nasdaq-listed company. From 2010 to 2012, he was the chief financial officer of oDesk Corporation. Prior to that, from 2007 to 2010, he was the chief financial officer of Yandex N.V. (Nasdaq: YNDX). He also served as chief financial officer of CTC Media, Inc. from 2004 to 2007, which he led to a successful IPO in 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Lakhani was the chief financial officer of Pogo.com, and was vice president of Global Operations at Electronic Arts Inc. after it acquired Pogo.com. Mr. Lakhani also served as senior vice president with Transamerica Corporation from 1991 to 1997, and worked with GE Capital from 1984 to 1991. Mr. Lakhani received a degree in economics from the University of Manchester and an MBA in finance from the University of San Francisco. Mr. Lakhani is an independent director.
Pedro Reiss
. Mr. Reiss has been a member of our board of directors since June, 2018. Mr. Reiss works with digital marketing since 1999 and is currently the chief executive officer of the Brazilian operations of Wunderman, one the largest digital advertising agencies in the world. He was also one of the founders of the digital advertising agency F.biz, which was sold in 2011 to the WPP group, and is currently a board member and investor in several technology companies, including Geru (fintech) and Lotan Agrosciences (biotech). Mr. Reiss holds a degree in
business administration from Fundação Getúlio Vargas – São Paulo and attended courses at the Singularity University.
André Béla Jánszky
. Mr. Jánszky has been a member of our board of directors since October 2018. Since then, he has also been a member of each of our audit, nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees. Mr. Jánszky has decades of experience as a corporate finance, capital markets and mergers and acquisitions lawyer. Until November 2016, he was the partner responsible for the Latin America practice of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP and managing partner of the firm’s São Paulo office. He currently splits his time between Brazil and New York as a corporate finance, governance and anti-corruption consultant. Mr. Jánszky has served as a member of the independent committees of CCR, HYPERA and M. Dias Branco, all listed on the Brazilian stock exchange (B3). He is currently an independent member on the board of directors of Gol Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes.
Executive Officers
The following presents summary biographical information of our executive officers:
|
|
|
Marcio Kumruian..........................................................
|
45
|
Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
Alexandre Augusto Olivieri..........................................
|
47
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Graciela Kumruian Tanaka............................................
|
41
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
The following is a summary of the professional experience and areas of activity of our current executive officers.
Marcio Kumruian.
Mr. Kumruian is our co-founder and he has been the chairman of our board of directors and chief executive officer since 2000. For biographical information regarding Mr. Kumruian, see “—Board of Directors.”
Alexandre Augusto Olivieri.
Mr.
Olivieri has been our chief financial officer since February 2018. Prior to joining us, Mr. Olivieri served as chief financial officer at Grupo São Francisco (from 2017 to 2018), a healthcare Brazilian company with over R$1.3 billion in revenues. Previously, he served as chief financial officer at Fastshop (2015), as chief financial officer for GP Investment’s invested companies Hypermarcas and ELOG Logística (from 2009 to 2013), as marketing, controlling and supply chain director at Braskem (from 2006 to 2009), as strategic planning director at Coca-Cola FEMSA (from 2003 to 2006), and as senior associate at McKinsey & Co (from 1996 to 2003). Currently Mr. Olivieri also serves as a board member at DalBen Homecare & Seniorcare. Mr. Olivieri holds an industrial engineering degree from the University of São Paulo (
Universidade de São Paulo
), a post-graduate degree in finance from Fundação Getúlio Vargas and an MBA from Bocconi School of Management.
Graciela Kumruian Tanaka
. Ms. Tanaka joined us in 2008 and has been our acting chief operating officer since 2012. In 2008, she set up our entire technology department and became responsible for the management and internal development of all of our core systems. In 2012, Ms. Tanaka assumed her current position as our chief operating officer and, with her technology background and expertise, we were able to implement pioneering projects in our logistics and customer relationship departments. Ms. Tanaka also managed important and innovative projects throughout her career. For instance, from 2005 to 2008, she worked as IT director at the Federal Regional Court of the 3
rd
Region (
Tribunal Regional Federal da 3
a
Região
), where she was responsible for the implementation of systems designed to streamline processes in the judicial system, and while at Diebold from 1999 to 2005, she participated in the set-up of electronic voting systems in two general elections in Brazil. Ms. Tanaka holds a degree in computer science from Saint Judas Tadeu University (Universidade São Judas Tadeu).
Our executive officers are elected and serve at the discretion of our board of directors.
Family Relationships
Marcio Kumruian, the chairman of our board of directors and chief executive officer and Graciela Kumruian Tanaka, our
chief
operating officer, are siblings.
B.
Compensation of Directors and Officers
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, the aggregate compensation to the members of our board of directors and officers amounted to R$10.2 million, R$24.4 million and R$16.6 million (US$4.3 million). We made compensation payments to our officers through our subsidiaries. Under Cayman Islands law, we are not required to disclose compensation paid to our senior management on an individual basis and we have not otherwise publicly disclosed this information elsewhere. We did not pay any other cash compensation or benefits in kind to our directors in 2016, 2017 and 2018. The compensation to our officers includes comparable benefits generally provided to our employees, such as pension, retirement and health insurance coverage. Some variations may exist with regard to company car benefits and levels of health insurance coverage. For information regarding purchase rights or share options granted to our current officers and directors, see “—2012 Share Plan.” The agreements we have with our directors do not provide for any benefits to them in the event of termination of their relationship with us.
2012 Share Plan
On April 16, 2012, we established our 2012 Share Plan, or Share Plan, which provides for (1) the direct grant or sale of common shares and (2) the grant of options to purchase common shares to persons we select. We have not directly granted common shares under the Share Plan. Options granted under the Share Plan may be an incentive stock option, or ISO, as described in Section 422 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, or an option that does not qualify as an incentive stock option as described in Section 422(b) or 423(b) of the Code, or Nonstatutory Options, and, together with the ISO, Options. Each share option agreement must specify whether the Option is an ISO or a Nonstatutory Option. The Share Plan was set up for the following purposes: (1) attracting, retaining and motivating its beneficiaries; (2) adding value to shareholders; and (3) encouraging an entrepreneurial mindset among our employees.
Eligibility
. Pursuant to our Share Plan, only our employees, members of our board of directors who are not employees, persons who qualify as consultants under Rule 701(c)(1) of the Securities Act, or such equivalent persons of our controlling shareholders or subsidiaries are eligible to be (1) awarded with the sale of our common shares or (2) granted Nonstatutory Options. Furthermore, only our employees, or the employees of our controlling shareholders or subsidiaries are eligible to be granted ISOs. However, a person who owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes (if there is more than one) of our outstanding shares, our controlling shareholders, or any of our subsidiaries is ineligible to be granted ISOs unless (1) the exercise price is at least 110% of the fair market value of our common shares on the date of grant and (2) such ISO by its terms is not exercisable after the expiration of five years from the date of grant.
Shares Subject to the Share Plan
. Our Share Plan is currently limited to the issuance of 1,296,470 of our common shares. Common shares that have been previously issued under the Share Plan and reacquired by us, outstanding options or other rights that for any reason expired or have been canceled are added back to the number of shares available under the Share Plan. As of the date of this annual report, 1,165,041 shares were available for issuance under the Share Plan, all of which have been registered with the SEC under a Form S-8.
Vesting Schedule for Purchase Rights and Options.
In general, our board of directors determines the vesting schedule for each share purchase award or Option under a notice of share option grant. Awards granted under our Share Plan are generally subject to the following vesting schedule: over a four-year period, at each anniversary of the vesting commencement date, 25% of the total common shares subject to the award will vest as the Optionee completes each year of continuous service.
Terms and Conditions for the Award of Purchase Rights or Options
. Any right to purchase shares under the Share Plan (other than an Option) expires automatically if not exercised by the purchaser within 30 days (or such other period as may be specified in the agreement) from the grant of such right. The right to purchase shares under the Share Plan is not transferable and may be exercised only by the purchaser to whom such right was granted. An Option to purchase shares under the Share Plan is not transferable and may be exercised only by the optionee to whom such right was granted, except by means of:
·
a beneficiary designation;
·
a will;
·
the laws applicable of descent and distribution; or
·
if the applicable award agreement so provides in the case of Nonstatutory Options, which will then be transferable only as gifts or domestic relations orders to the optionee’s family members.
In addition, an ISO may be exercised during the lifetime of the optionee only by the optionee or by the optionee’s guardian or legal representative. An Option must comply with the conditions set forth under certain applicable regulations under the Exchange Act, which provides for certain transferability restrictions that shall apply to an Option and, prior to exercise, to the Shares to be issued upon exercise of such Option, including restrictions as to any pledge, mortgage or other transfer by the optionee during certain periods.
Pursuant to our Share Plan, our board of directors is required to determine the purchase price of our common shares to be offered under the Share Plan at its sole discretion. Our board of directors shall also determine the exercise price of each Option to be issued under the Share Plan, provided that the exercise price of an Option shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share on the date of grant unless the optionee is not a U.S. taxpayer, in which case the exercise price may be less than 100% of the fair market value of a common share on the date of grant.
In addition, our board of directors is responsible for determining, at its sole discretion, the exercisability provisions of each share Option agreement, as well as Option expiration dates, provided that each term shall not exceed 10 years from the date of grant. If an optionee’s service terminates for any reason other than the optionee’s death, then the optionee’s Options shall expire pursuant to the terms provided in the Share Plan, in which case he will be entitled to exercise all or part of his Options prior to such expiration, provided that such Options had become exercisable before the termination event (or as a result thereto). In the event of an optionee’s death, Options will generally expire on the earlier of (a) the Option’s expiration date and (b) 12 months after the optionee’s death (or such later date as our board of directors may determine, but in no event earlier than six months after the optionee’s death).
An optionee does not have rights as a shareholder with respect to any shares covered by the optionee’s Option until such person (1) becomes entitled to receive such shares by filing a notice of exercise and paying the exercise price and (2) is entered in the Register of our shareholders.
Payment of the Purchase Price or the Exercise Price
. The purchase price of our common shares or the exercise price to acquire our common shares upon the exercise of an Option issued under the Share Plan may be paid in cash or (to the extent that the applicable award agreement so provides) any other form permitted by our board of directors and according to the Cayman Islands law.
Adjustment of Shares
. The common shares available for direct granting or sale under the Share Plan, as well as the number of shares covered by each outstanding Option and any unexercised right to purchase shares that has not yet expired and the respective exercise price under each outstanding Option and purchase prices applicable to any unexercised share purchase right, are subject to proportional adjustments in the event of certain corporate changes such as subdivision of our outstanding common shares, a bonus issue of our common shares, combination or consolidation of our common shares into a lesser number of common shares, spin-off, among other changes.
Our Right of Repurchase, of First Refusal and Transfer Restrictions
. Shares issued under the Share Plan are subject to such rights of repurchase, rights of first refusal, other transfer restrictions and other terms and conditions set forth by our board of directors under the applicable award agreements. We only have a right of first refusal until we become a public company and after that date, the holders of the shares can trade them in the market. We also hold a right to repurchase our common shares exercised according to the Share Plan by certain holders of our common shares.
Miscellaneous
. In relation to tax matters, unless otherwise expressly set forth in the applicable award agreement, awards granted under the Share Plan are intended to be exempt from Code Section 409A. Our Share Plan
will terminate automatically 10 years from the later of (1) the date when the board of directors adopted the Share Plan (which was on April 16, 2012) or (2) the date when the board of directors approved the most recent increase in the number of common shares reserved under the Share Plan (which was on August 7, 2018). The Share Plan may also be terminated on any earlier date at any time for any reason by our board of directors. Our board of directors may also amend the plan, provided that any material amendment requires the approval of our shareholders. Our Share Plan is governed by the Cayman Islands law.
The following table summarizes the options we granted to our current directors and executive officers under the Share Plan.
|
Number of Common Shares Underlying Options
|
Exercise Price (US$/ Share)
|
|
Commencement Vesting Date
|
|
Marcio Kumruian
|
60,000*
|
8.10
|
March 29, 2017
|
March 29, 2017
|
March 28, 2027
|
Nilesh Lakhani
|
100,000*
|
3.79
|
July 2, 2018
|
July 2, 2018
|
December 31, 2025
|
Frederico Brito e Abreu
|
100,000*
|
3.79
|
July 2, 2018
|
July 2, 2018
|
December 31, 2025
|
Pedro Reiss
|
30,000*
|
3.79
|
July 2, 2018
|
July 2, 2018
|
December 31, 2025
|
Ricardo Knoepfelmacher
|
100,000*
|
3.79
|
July 2, 2018
|
July 2, 2018
|
December 31, 2025
|
Alexandre Augusto Olivieri
|
60,000*
|
8.10
|
March 22, 2018
|
March 1, 2018
|
March 21, 2028
|
André Béla Jánszky
|
80,000*
|
1.91
|
December 12, 2018
|
December 12, 2018
|
December 31, 2025
|
Graciela Kumruian Tanaka
(1)
|
77,460*
|
8.10
|
May 30, 2012/ April 24, 2014/ March 29, 2017
|
February 10, 2010/ February 1, 2014
|
May 29, 2022/
April 23, 2024/ March 28, 2027
|
|
60,000*
|
3.79
|
July 2, 2018
|
July 2, 2018
|
December 31, 2025
|
(1) Ms. Graciela Kumruain Tanaka has exercised 17,679 share options to date.
* The common shares that the person has the right to acquire represent less than 1% of our outstanding common shares.
C.
Board Practices
Duties of Directors
As a matter of Cayman Islands law, a director of a Cayman Islands company is considered a fiduciary of the company. Accordingly, directors owe fiduciary duties to their companies to act in accordance with the best interests of the company, to exercise their powers for the purposes for which they are conferred and not to place themselves in a position where there is a conflict between their personal interests and their duty to the company. Accordingly, a director owes a company a duty not to make a profit based on his or her position as director (unless the company permits him or her to do so) and a duty not to put himself or herself in a position where the interests of the company conflict with his or her personal interests or his or her duties to a third party. However, a company’s articles of association may permit a director to vote on a matter in which he or she has a personal interest if he or she has disclosed the nature of his or her interest to the board of directors. Our Articles of Association provide that a director must disclose the
nature
and extent of any material interests in any contract or arrangement, and that he or she may not vote at any meeting on any resolution concerning an interested matter.
A director of a Cayman Islands company also owes to the company duties to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his functions and to exercise reasonable skill, care and diligence, which has both objective and subjective elements. Recent Cayman Islands case law confirmed that directors must exercise the care, skill and diligence that would be exercised by a reasonably diligent person having the general knowledge, skill and experience reasonably to be expected of a person acting as a director. Additionally, a director must exercise the knowledge, skill and experience that he or she actually possesses.
Election and Terms of Directors
Our Articles of Association provide that persons standing for election as directors at a duly constituted general meeting with requisite quorum shall be elected by an ordinary shareholders’ resolution, which requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast on the resolution by the shareholders entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy at a meeting. Upon being elected, each director is appointed to a term of three years to succeed the directors of the class whose terms expire at such annual general meeting. See “Item 10. Additional Information.—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association—Description of Share Capital—Appointment, Disqualification and Removal of Directors.”
Board Committees
Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a nominating and corporate governance committee, a compensation committee. In the future, our board of directors may establish other committees, as it deems appropriate, to assist with its responsibilities.
Audit Committee
Our Audit Committee currently consists of Nilesh Lakhani (chairperson), Frederico Brito e Abreu, Ricardo Knoepfelmacher and André Béla Jánszky. Nilesh Lakhani satisfies the criteria of an audit committee financial expert as set forth under the applicable rules of the SEC. Nilesh Lakhani, Frederico Brito e Abreu, Ricardo Knoepfelmacher and André Béla Jánszky meet the criteria for independence set forth in Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. The audit committee will oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our financial statements. Our audit committee is responsible for, among other things:
·
selecting our independent auditor, approving related fees and terminating our relationship with our independent auditor in the committee’s discretion;
·
pre-approving audit and non-audit services permitted to be performed by the independent auditor;
·
annually reviewing the independent auditor’s report describing the auditing firm’s internal quality control procedures, any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality control review, or peer review, of the independent auditors and all relationships between the independent auditor and our company;
·
reviewing with the independent auditor any audit problems or difficulties and management’s response, as well as resolving any disagreements between management and the independent auditor regarding financial reporting;
·
reviewing and discussing the annual audited financial statements with management, internal audit team (or third-service provider performing this function) and the independent auditor, as well as quarterly unaudited financial statements;
·
reviewing and discussing with management and the independent auditors major issues regarding accounting principles and financial statement presentations;
·
discussing earnings press releases with management, as well as financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies;
·
reviewing the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives, as well as off-balance sheet structures, on our financial statements;
·
overseeing our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting;
·
assessing and monitoring our risk exposures, as well as the policies and guidelines with respect to risk management;
·
timely reviewing reports from the independent auditor regarding all critical accounting policies and practices to be used by our company, all alternative treatments of financial information within IFRS that have been discussed with management and all other material written communications between the independent auditor and management;
·
establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by our company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;
·
analyzing our related-party transactions based on our policy for these transactions;
·
periodically reviewing and reassessing the adequacy of our audit committee charter;
·
any other matters that are specifically delegated to our audit committee by our board of directors from time to time;
·
periodically meeting with management, internal audit team (or third-service provider performing this function) and the independent auditors, separately; and
·
reporting regularly to the full board of directors.
The written charter for our audit committee is available on our website. Information contained on our website shall not constitute, or be deemed incorporated as, a part of this annual report.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Our nominating and corporate governance committee currently consists of Marcio Kumruian (chairperson) and André Béla Jánszky. The nominating and corporate governance committee assists our board of directors in selecting individuals qualified to become our directors and in determining the composition of our board of directors and its committees. Our nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for, among other things:
·
selecting and recommending to our board of directors nominees for election by the shareholders or appointment by the board;
·
reviewing annually with our board of directors the current composition of the board with regard to characteristics such as independence, knowledge, skills, experience and diversity;
·
making recommendations on the frequency and structure of board meetings and monitoring the functioning of the committees of the board; and
·
advising our board of directors periodically with regard to significant developments in the law and practice of corporate governance as well as our compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and making recommendations to our board of directors on all matters of corporate governance and on any remedial action to be taken.
The written charter for our nominating and corporate governance committee is available on our website. Information contained on our website shall not constitute, or be deemed incorporated as, a part of this annual report.
Compensation Committee
Our compensation committee currently consists of Marcio Kumruian and André Béla Jánszky. Our compensation committee assists our board of directors in reviewing and approving the compensation structure, including all forms of compensation, relating to our directors and executive officers.
Our compensation committee will be responsible for, among other things:
·
reviewing, evaluating and, if necessary, revising our overall compensation policies;
·
making recommendations to the board of directors as to the policies and procedures pertaining to attraction, retention, training and development of key personnel for us;
·
reviewing and recommending to the board of directors corporate goals and objectives relevant our and our subsidiaries senior management and other executive officer’s compensation, including annual performance objectives;
·
reviewing and recommending senior management employment agreements with us and our subsidiaries;
·
reviewing and monitoring our incentive-compensation plans and equity-based plans; and
·
any other matters that are specifically delegated to the compensation committee by our board of directors from time to time.
The written charter for our compensation committee is available on our website. Information contained on our website shall not constitute, or be deemed incorporated as, a part of this annual report.
D.
Employees
We have built our culture to be relentlessly focused on delivering a best-in-class customer experience and to make data-driven decisions. We pride ourselves on our ability to attract engaged employees who in turn deliver outstanding customer service. We have instated programs such as “Birthdays Off,” flexible working hours and “Bermuda Everyday” in order to foster a “tech” culture in our workforce. Furthermore, we have redesigned our offices to deliver to our employees a modern and comfortable environment with a sports court, game room, food trucks, a TV room and other common areas to continue to integrate our team.
We are proud of our employees and believe our team is one of our most important assets. As of December 31, 2018, we had 2,429 employees, being 2,281 of them in Brazil. We had a total of 845 employees in our distribution centers, 510 customer service representatives, 236 employees in information technology, 78 employees in risk management and 97 employees in marketing. We believe that having most of our employees in-house enables us to foster a better customer experience-focused culture. We had a total of 2,687, 2,728 and 2,429 employees as of December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively.
We hire temporary employees to handle fluctuations in activity experienced throughout the year. In particular, we hire additional temporary workers during the fourth quarter of each year due to the significant increase in sales volume typically experienced in this period. During the fourth quarter of 2017 and 2018, we contracted 815 and 847 temporary workers, respectively, to handle the increased Black November and the subsequent holiday selling season demand. Temporary employees primarily work at our distribution centers and in our customer service. In the first three quarters of the year, we generally do not use temporary workers.
We are a leading equal opportunity employer, with women representing approximately 50% of our employee base. We believe that we offer our employees competitive compensation packages and a differentiated culture, and as a result, we have generally been able to attract and retain qualified personnel and maintain a stable management team. We generally enter into standard employment contracts with our employees. Our employees in
are represented by five labor unions in Brazil. We believe that we have a good working relationship with our employees and their labor unions, and we have not experienced any significant labor disputes.
Our management team’s clear sense of mission, long-term focus and commitment to the values that define our culture, combined with our practice of fostering responsible autonomy and maintaining a startup mindset among our employees, have been fundamental to our successful track record. In addition, our leadership team has been remarkably stable and has created and developed leading new businesses organically, including Zattini.
These factors combined have given us the honor of being named amongst the best companies to work for in Brazil for six consecutive years since 2011 and placing first in the eCommerce category in 2015 according to “
Revista Você S/A
,” a leading business-focused magazine in Brazil. We were also ranked by
Great Place to Work
as one of the best Companies to work for in Brazil in 2017.
E.
Share Ownership
For information regarding the share ownership of our directors and senior management, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
—
A. Major Shareholders.” For information as to stock options granted to our directors, executive officers and other employees, see "Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees — B. Compensation—2012 Share Plan."
ITEM 7.
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
A.
Major Shareholders
The following table sets forth information with respect to beneficial ownership of our common shares as of April 29, 2019 by:
·
each person known to us who owns beneficially more than 5% of our common shares;
·
each person who is a member of our board of directors and each of our executive officers; and
·
all of the persons who are members of our board of directors and all of our executive officers, as a single group.
Beneficial ownership is determined under SEC rules and generally includes voting or investment power over securities. Except in cases where community property laws apply or as indicated in the footnotes to this table, we believe that each shareholder identified in the table below possesses sole voting and investment power over all common shares shown as beneficially owned by the shareholder in the table.
Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 31,056,244 common shares outstanding as of the date of this annual report. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we have included shares that the person has the right to acquire within 60 days of this annual report, including through the exercise of any option or other right and the vesting of restricted shares but we do not treat them as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person
.
All of our shareholders hold common shares with identical voting rights, preferences and privileges.
|
Common Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
|
Founders:
|
|
|
Marcio Kumruian
(1)
|
3,895,609
|
12.5%
|
HCFT Holdings, LLC
(2)
|
2,120,129
|
6.8%
|
Other Investors:
|
|
|
Tiger Global Investors
(3)
|
8,865,903
|
28.5%
|
Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb L.P
(4)
|
2,813,166
|
9.1%
|
GIC Private Limited
(5)
|
2,506,526
|
8.1%
|
Riverwood Capital Partners
(6)
|
1,928,900
|
6.2%
|
Other Directors and Executive Officers:
|
|
|
Graciela Kumruian Tanaka
(7)
|
95,742
|
0.3%
|
Nilesh Lakhani
(8)
|
69,300
|
0.2%
|
Frederico Brito e Abreu
(9)
|
12,640
|
0.0%
|
Alexandre Olivieri
(10)
|
18,750
|
0.1%
|
|
|
|
(1) Based on an statement on Schedule 13G filed on January 24, 2019 jointly by CDK Net Fund IC and Marcio Kumruian, Mr. Marcio Kumruian, the chairman of our board of directors and our chief executive officer, is the sole beneficial owner and indirectly holds common shares in us through his ownership of all participation interests in CDK Net Fund IC, an investment condominium incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas for his benefit and Camelback Overseas Corp., a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands owned by Mr. Kumruian and his wife. The business address for Mr. Marcio Kumruian is Rua Vergueiro 961, Liberdade, CEP 01504-001, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. It also includes the 33,750 shares Mr. Kumruian has the right to acquire within 60 days of this annual report through the exercise of options granted to him under our Share Plan.
(2) Based on an statement on Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2018 by HCFT Holdings, LLC, the date of the last available Schedule 13G filed by HCFT Holdings, LLC with the SEC. Mr. Hagop Chabab indirectly holds common shares in us through HCFT Holdings, LLC, a trust created for his benefit. Mr. Hagop Chabab’s/ HCFT Holdings, LLC business address is 500 Stanton Christiana Road, Newark, DE 19713.
(3) Based on an statement on Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2018 jointly by Tiger Global Management, LLC, Tiger Global Private Investment Partners V, L.P, Tiger Global Private Investment Partners VI, L.P, Charles P. Coleman III, Lee Fixel, Scoot Shleifer, and other entities deemed as beneficially owned by Charles P. Coleman III, Lee Fixel, Scoot Shleifer, the date of the last available Schedule 13G filed by such persons with the SEC. Charles P. Coleman III, Lee Fixel and Scott Shleifer have business address at 9 West 57th Street, 35th Floor, New York, NY 10019.
(4) Based on an statement on Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2019 by Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb. The address of Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb is 9 West 57th Street, Suite 5000, New York, New York 10019-2701. Based on an statement on Schedule 13G filed on February 1, 2019 jointly by GIC Private Limited, GIC Special Investments Pte. Ltd. and Archy LLC. The address of GIC Private Limited and GIC Special Investments Pte. Ltd. is 168 Robinson Road, #37-01 Capital Tower, Singapore, 068912. The business address for Archy LLC is One Bush Street, Suite 1100, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA.
(5) Based on an statement on Schedule 13G filed on February 1, 2019 jointly by GIC Private Limited, GIC Special Investments Pte. Ltd. and Archy LLC. The address of GIC Private Limited and GIC Special Investments Pte. Ltd. is 168 Robinson Road, #37-01 Capital Tower, Singapore, 068912. The business address for Archy LLC is One Bush Street, Suite 1100, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA.
(6) Based on an statement on Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2018 jointly by Riverwood Capital GP II, L.P., or Riverwood GP, Riverwood Capital II L.P., or Riverwood LP, Riverwood Capital Partners II L.P., or RCP, and Riverwood Capital Partners II (Parallel – B) L.P, or RCP Parallel – B, the date of the last available Schedule 13G filed by such persons with the SEC. The entities referred to above have business address at 70 Willow Road, Suite 100, Menlo Park, California, USA 94025. Riverwood LP is the sole general partner of each of RCP and RCP Parallel-B. Riverwood GP is the sole general partner of Riverwood LP. The shareholders of Riverwood GP, acting by majority vote, have the power to vote or to direct the vote of, and the members of the investment committee of Riverwood GP, acting by majority vote, have the power to dispose or to direct the disposition of, the Shares that are beneficially owned by Riverwood GP, Riverwood LP, RCP and RCP Parallel-B. The shareholders and investment committee members of Riverwood GP disclaim beneficial ownership of all Shares beneficially owned by Riverwood GP, Riverwood LP, RCP and RCP Parallel-B for the purposes of Sections 13(d) and 13(g).
(7) Ms. Graciela Kumruian Tanaka’s business address is Rua Vergueiro 961, Liberdade, CEP 01504-001, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
It also includes the 59,781 shares Ms. Tanaka has the right to acquire within 60 days of this annual report through the exercise of options granted to her under our Share Plan.
(8) The address for Mr. Nilesh Lakhani is 1020 91st Ave NE, Bellevue, WA 98004.
(9) The business address for Mr. Frederico Brito e Abreu is Rua Miranhas 16, house 4, Vila Madalena, CEP 05434-040, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
(10) Refers to 18,750 shares Mr. Alexandre Olivieri has the right to acquire within 60 days of this annual report through the exercise of options granted to her under our Share Plan.The business address for Mr. Alexandre Olivieri is Rua Vergueiro 961, Liberdade, CEP 01504-001, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in Brazil—Our largest shareholders and their affiliates, in the aggregate, own 71.26% of our outstanding common shares and, to the extent they act together, will control all matters requiring shareholder approval. This concentration of ownership limits your ability to influence corporate matters.”
Shareholders’ Agreement
On March 20, 2015, (1) we; (2) Marcio Kumruian, HCFT Holdings, LLC and Hagop Chabab, or the Founders; (3) Tiger Global Private Investment Partners V, L.P. and Tiger Global Private Investment Partners VI, L.P., together Tiger Global; (3)
Metal Monkey Trust; (4) Scott Shleifer 2011 Descendants’ Trust; (5) The Feroz Dewan 2010 GRAT IX;
(6) Clemenceau Investments Pte Ltd., or Clemenceau; (7) Archy LLC, (8) Riverwood Capital Partners (and, jointly with Tiger Global, Clemenceau, and Archy LLC, the Major Investors); (9) Kaszek Ventures I, L.P., Kaszek Ventures I-A, L.P., Kaszek Ventures I-B L.P. and Kaszek Ventures I-C, L.P., together, Kaszek Investors, (10)
Dialvest Ltd.,
(11) ICQ Investments V LP and ICQ Investments 16, LP, together, ICQ, and (12) International Finance Corporation, or IFC, and, jointly with the Major Investors, collectively referred to as the Investors; entered into the Fourth Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Agreement, or the Shareholders’ Agreement. On February 15, 2017, Marcio Kumruian transferred all of our common shares held by him to CDK Net Limited (an entity converted into an investment condominium incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas with the name CDK Net Fund IC on February 20, 2017), which then became a party and bound by the provisions of the Shareholders’ Agreement. On February 15, 2017, Dialvest Ltd. transferred all of our common shares held by it to Nicolas Szekasy, who then became a party and bound by the provisions of the Shareholders Agreement. On March 29, 2017, our shareholders agreed to amend and restate our Shareholders’ Agreement upon the completion of our initial public offering.
Our Shareholders’ Agreement terminated upon completion of our initial public offering, except for provisions relating to registration rights, non-compete and non-hire/non-solicitation of the Founders (including the related liquidated damages) and other miscellaneous provisions, which we understand will be terminated upon completion of the Merger.
Registration Rights
The Shareholders’ Agreement provides certain registration rights to certain shareholders, including the right of the Investors and the Founders to request that we, at any time after six months from the effective date of a qualified public offering in the United States, file a registration statement under the Securities Act covering the registration of certain securities with an anticipated aggregate offering price of at least US$5.0 million. The Shareholders’ Agreement also grants registration rights in the event we propose to register any of our equity securities under the Securities Act. Additionally, Investors and the Founders may require us to register their common shares on Form F-3 and comply with any other requirements in order to permit or facilitate the sale and distribution of their common shares.
These registration rights described above are subject to certain other terms, limitations and exceptions further detailed in the Shareholders’ Agreement.
Non-Compete; Non-Hire and Non-Solicitation
For the benefit of Investors, the Founders are precluded from participating, directly or indirectly in any type of eCommerce business or sporting goods retail business in Latin America, or the Company Business, provided, however, that any such Founder will be allowed to own, directly or indirectly, shares, quotas, rights or financial interest in a company, venture, association or other entity engaged in the Company Business to the extent the Founder is not deemed an affiliate, as defined under the shareholders agreement, by reason of such ownership or otherwise. This prohibition remains valid as long as the Founders continue to render services to us related to the management of its day-to-day business and affairs, and for a two-year period following the rendering of those services. To this effect, each of the Founders will not do any of the following, directly or indirectly, including through any affiliates or immediate family members (i.e., parents, children and spouses), during such time: (1) operate, develop, exploit, invest, engage or pursue any business engaged in the eCommerce Business, sporting goods retail business in Latin America or any portion thereof, or operate, offer or sell products or services for any business engaged in the eCommerce Business, sporting goods retail business in Latin America or any portion thereof; (2) promote or assist, financially or otherwise, any person, firm, association, corporation or other entity directly or indirectly involved, in whole or in part, in the eCommerce Business, sporting goods retail business in Latin America or any portion thereof; and (3) perform consulting or related services directed to or related to the eCommerce Business, sporting goods retail business in Latin America or any portion thereof.
The Founders have agreed not to (1) hire, induce or try to induce any employee or person connected with us or any of our subsidiaries to leave his or her employment or fail to render services to us or our subsidiaries; and (2) not to induce or try to induce any of our and our subsidiaries’ suppliers and/or clients to cease or reduce their business with us and our subsidiaries. This prohibition remains valid as long as the Founders continue to render services to us related to the management of its day-to-day business and affairs, and for a two-year period following the rendering of those services.
In the event the Founders violate their non-compete, non-hire or non-solicitation obligations they will be subject to liquidated damages in the amount of R$124.0 million plus any damages effectively incurred as a result of such violation of the Investors.
IFC Policy Agreement
On March 20, 2015, we entered into a policy agreement with the IFC, or IFC Policy Agreement. This agreement governs certain additional rights granted to IFC in its capacity as our shareholder, including with respect to the right to inspect and to receive information from us, and certain other specific covenants imposed on us, as further detailed below. The IFC Policy Agreement terminated upon the completion of our initial public offering, except for the reporting and policy covenants imposed on us.
We have agreed to comply with certain affirmative and negative covenants under the IFC Policy Agreement including, among others, reporting covenants as to (1) certain financial and corporate matters and (2) our compliance with social and environmental guidelines set forth in the IFC Policy Agreement. As of the date of this annual report, we were in compliance with all these covenants. In addition, pursuant to this agreement, IFC is entitled to (1) visit and inspect our sites and premises, (2) have access to our books and records, and (3) have access to our employees and officers.
B.
Related Party Transactions
In addition to the compensation arrangements with directors and executive officers described under “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—B. Compensation of Directors and Officers” and the registration and other rights of certain of the holders of our common shares as described under “— A. Major Shareholders —Shareholders’ Agreement—Registration Rights,” the following is a description of each transaction since January 1, 2016 and each currently proposed transaction in which the amount involved in the transactions is material to us and any related party.
February 2017 Investment Round
In February 2017, we raised capital from financial investors by issuing notes convertible into our common shares with total proceeds amounting to US$30.0 million (or R$92.3 million, using the exchange rate on the date of the execution of the convertible note purchase agreement). The following table summarizes the participation in our February 2017 investment round by beneficial owners of our outstanding common shares:
|
|
Tiger Global
|
US$ 16,054,023.00
|
Archy LLC
|
4,522,290.00
|
Clemenceau
|
3,736,739.00
|
Riverwood Capital Partners
|
3,582,496.00
|
IFC
|
904,452.00
|
CDK Net Fund IC
|
900,000.00
|
HCFT Holdings, LLC
|
|
Total
|
|
These convertible notes were converted into our equity upon the completion of our initial public offering in April 2017.
Agreements relating to our Common Shares
Shareholders’ Agreement
On March 20, 2015, (1) we; (2) the Founders; (3) Tiger Global; (4) Clemenceau; (5) Archy LLC; (6) Riverwood Capital Partners, (7) Kaszek Investors; (8) ICQ and (9) IFC entered into a Shareholders Agreement.
The Shareholders’ Agreement governs the rights of the Founders and the Investors as our shareholders, including with respect to registration rights of our common shares, the right to inspect and to receive information from us, the right to participate in our future equity offerings, as well as other matters such as restrictions in connection with the transfer of our common shares, voting rights and certain other specific covenants imposed on the Founders. The Shareholders’ Agreement terminated upon completion of our initial public offering, except for provisions relating to registration rights, non-compete and non-hire/non-solicitation (including the related liquidated damages) and other miscellaneous provisions. See “—Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—A. Major Shareholders—Shareholders’ Agreement.”
IFC Policy Agreement
On March 20, 2015, we entered into the IFC Policy Agreement. This agreement governs certain additional rights granted to IFC in its capacity as our shareholder, including with respect to the right to inspect and to receive information from us, and certain other specific covenants imposed on us. The IFC Policy Agreement terminated upon the completion of our initial public offering, except for the reporting and policy covenants imposed on us See “—Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—A. Major Shareholders—IFC Policy Agreement.”
Guarantees provided by Related Parties
One of our Founders, Marcio Kumruian, has personally guaranteed the obligations of our Brazilian subsidiary, NS2, in three financing agreements executed with Banco do Brasil S.A. and Banco Bradesco S.A. for an aggregate principal amount of R$235.5 million. For further information, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness—Material Financing Agreements.”
Relationships with our Directors
Marcio Kumruian, the chairman of our board of directors and chief executive officer indirectly holds 12.5% of our common shares through CDK Net Fund IC and Camelback Overseas Corp. See “—Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—A. Major Shareholders.”
Indemnification Agreements
We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers. Pursuant to these agreements, we have agreed to indemnify and hold harmless each beneficiary to the full extent permitted by applicable law if a beneficiary becomes or is threatened with becoming a party to or a participant in any proceeding due to the beneficiary’s relationship with us.
In addition, under the terms of these agreements, we have agreed to cover all expenses actually and reasonably incurred by each beneficiary in connection with any proceeding to the extent that such beneficiary has acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not to opposed our best interests. However, if applicable law so provides, the beneficiaries of these agreements will not be entitled to be indemnified for all expenses actually and reasonably incurred in connection with a proceeding as to which such beneficiary is held liable to us, unless and only to the extent authorized by the court.
Each of these agreements will remain in force while a beneficiary is our officer, a member of our board of directors, or is or was serving at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise and thereafter if such beneficiary becomes or is threatened to become a party to or a participant in any proceeding due to such beneficiary’s relationship with us.
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Parties
The audit committee of our board of directors is currently responsible for analyzing all related party transactions, and will submit them for approval by the disinterested members of our board of directors in accordance with our related party transaction policy. All related party transactions will be made or entered into on terms that are no less favorable than those that can be obtained from unaffiliated third parties. Our Articles of Association and our code of ethics requires that all of our management and employees inform us of any transaction or relationship that comes to their attention that creates or could reasonably be expected to create a conflict of interest.
Share Option Plan
See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—B. Compensation of Directors and Officers—2012 Share Plan.”
C.
Interests of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable.
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
A.
Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
See Exhibits.
Legal and Administrative Proceedings
From time to time, we are involved in disputes that arise in the ordinary course of our business. Any claims against us, whether meritorious or not, can be time consuming, result in costly litigation, require significant management time and result in the diversion of significant operational resources.
We are engaged in several legal proceedings, including civil, labor, tax and social security and other proceedings, for which we have established provisions in an aggregate amount of R$19.9 million and have made judicial deposits in an aggregate amount of R$119.7 million, as of December 31, 2018.
We record a provision in our balance sheet for losses arising from litigation based on an evaluation of the likelihood of loss by our external and internal legal counsel, the progress of related proceedings, the history of losses in similar cases and the individual analysis of each contingency. We record provisions for contingencies based on probable loss or when so required under accounting rules.
We are currently not a party to, and we are not aware of any threat of, any legal, arbitration or administrative proceedings that, in the opinion of our management, are likely to have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We may from time to time become party to various legal, arbitration or administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business.
Civil Matters
As of December 31, 2018, we were party to approximately 1,500 judicial and administrative proceedings of a civil nature for which we recorded a provision of approximately R$2.1 million. The civil claims to which we are a party generally relate to consumer claims, including those related to delays in delivery and product returns, among others. We believe these proceedings are unlikely to have a material adverse impact, individually, or in the aggregate, on our results of operations or financial condition.
Additionally, we terminated the Agreement of Supply, Distribution and Other Covenants dated January 1, 2016, as amended, with Midway
Labs
USA, LLC and Midway Tecnologia de Alimentos Ltda. and on September 7, 2018 we filed a lawsuit against them in
addition to certain of their executives.
Netshoes has sued defendants in
seeking monetary damages, with certain claims applicable to certain defendants, for the following: (i) violation of Florida’s Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act, (ii) breach of contract, (iii) account stated, (iv) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, (v) unjust enrichment, (vi) fraud, (vii) negligent misrepresentation, (viii) tortious interference with contractual relationships, and (ix) civil conspiracy. This proceeding is currently in the discovery stage.
Also, in the context of the cybersecurity incident in our operations in Brazil occurred in December 2017, in which specified non-banking personal data (no passwords or credit card data) from certain of our customers were disclosed to unauthorized third-parties, we reached an agreement (
Termo de Ajustamento de Conduta
) with the Brazilian Federal District State Attorney’s Office (
Ministério Público Estadual do Distrito Federal e Territórios
), ratified by Brazilian courts on February 12, 2019, pursuant to which we agreed to pay a fine in the amount of R$500,000.00. In return, the Brazilian Federal District State Attorney’s Office terminated its administrative legal proceeding related to this incident.
Labor Matters
As of December 31, 2018, we were party to 88 labor-related judicial and administrative proceedings for which we recorded a provision of R$0.5 million. In general, the labor claims to which we are a party were filed by former employees or third parties employees seeking our joint and/or subsidiary liability for the acts of our suppliers and service providers. The principal claims involved in these labor suits relate to overtime, salary equalization termination fees, and indemnities based on Brazilian labor laws. We believe these proceedings are unlikely to have a material adverse impact, individually or in the aggregate, on our results of operations or financial condition.
Tax and Social Security Matters
As of December 31, 2018, we were involved in 61 judicial and administrative tax and social security proceedings for which we recorded a provision of R$16.8 million, each as a plaintiff. In our most significant tax proceeding, we are party to a judicial proceeding in which we have challenged the Brazilian federal tax authority’s interpretation that the calculation basis for PIS and COFINS taxes over the products we sell should also consider the ICMS tax rate levied upon such products. On March 15, 2017, the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court decided for the unconstitutionality of considering the inclusion of the VAT tax (ICMS) from PIS and COFINS calculations basis. Based on this decision, our lawyers assessed the likelihood of losing this legal dispute as remote as of December 31, 2017 and 2018, and we have not recorded any such provision for this litigation accordingly. Since August of 2017, the Brazilian tax authority has ceased to require us to make judicial deposit of the PIS/COFINS arguably due while we disputed the tax authorities interpretation. As of December 31, 2018, we had judicial deposits in an aggregate amount of R$119.7 million, of which R$101.9 million is relates to such proceeding and we are currently waiting for the court to define which procedures are necessary to refund us with such judicial deposit.
Also, in September 2017, we received a tax assessment amounting to R$89.0 million from the Brazilian federal tax authorities, asserting that we had unduly used PIS and COFINS tax credits related to marketing and information technology services, effectively reducing our PIS and COFINS calculation basis. Based on the assessment of our counsel, we have classified the risk of loss as possible and therefore, no provision has been recognized in relation to this claim. If Brazilian courts ultimately decide against us on these judicial proceedings, we may have to take unanticipated provisions and charges, which could have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations. See “Item 3. Key Information— D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Business and Industry— Changes in tax laws, tax incentives, benefits or differing interpretations of tax laws may adversely affect our results of operations.
U.S. Class Action
On August 9, 2018, two purported shareholder class actions under U.S. Securities Act of 1933 were filed before the Supreme Court of the State of New York, claiming that we, among other defendants, made alleged material misstatements or omissions in the registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with Netshoes’s April 2017 initial public offering. An order consolidating these actions was entered on September 14, 2018. Because the lawsuit is in its early stage, the possible loss or range of losses, if any, arising from them cannot be estimated. While we believe that the claims against us are without merit and will continue to defend against the
litigation vigorously, in the event that the litigation is decided against us, or we enter into an agreement to settle, we may be required to pay substantial amounts. See “Item 3. Key Information— D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Common Shares— The price of our common shares may fluctuate substantially, and your investment may decline in value.”
Dividends and Dividend Policy
Since our inception, we have not declared or paid any dividends on our common shares, and we have no present plan to pay any dividends on our common shares in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to operate and expand our business. See “Item 3. Key Information— D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Common Shares—It is unlikely that we will declare any dividends on our common shares.”
We may make any future determination to pay dividends based on an ordinary shareholder resolution, but no dividend may exceed the amount recommended by our board of directors. Even if our board of directors recommends a dividend payment, the form, frequency and amount will depend on a number of factors, including our future operations and earnings, our capital requirements and surplus, our general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant. Cash dividends on our common shares, if any, will be paid in U.S. dollars.
We are a holding company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. We rely on dividends and distributions from our subsidiaries in Brazil and elsewhere for our cash requirements, including funds to pay our operating expenses, service any debt we may incur and pay dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders. Our holding company structure makes us dependent on the operations of our subsidiaries and therefore, any determination to pay dividends in the future will depend on our ability to receive distributions from them, particularly our main Brazilian subsidiary, NS2. See “Item 3. Key Information— D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Common Shares—Our holding company structure makes us dependent on the operations of our subsidiaries.”
Certain Cayman Islands Legal Requirements Related to Dividends
Under the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands and our Articles of Association, a Cayman Islands company may pay a dividend out of either its profit or share premium account, but a dividend may not be paid if this would result in the company being unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. According to our Articles of Association, dividends can be declared and paid out of funds lawfully available to us, which include the share premium account. Dividends, if any, would be paid in proportion to the number of common shares a shareholder holds. For further information, see “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—Cayman Islands Tax Considerations.”
B.
Significant Changes
Except as disclosed elsewhere in this annual report, we have not experienced any significant changes since the date of our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.
ITEM 9.
THE OFFER AND LISTING
A.
Offer and Listing Details
Our common shares have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange since April 18, 2017 under the symbol "NETS." Prior to that date, there was no public trading market for our common shares. The table below shows, for the periods indicated, the high and low market prices on the New York Stock Exchange for our common shares through April 26, 2019.
Price History of Our Common Shares
The tables below set forth the high and low closing sales prices for our common shares on the NYSE for the periods indicated.
|
New York Stock Exchange
US$ per Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
2017
|
26.73
|
5.82
|
2018
|
9.94
|
0.95
|
2019 (through April 26, 2019)
|
2.77
|
1.45
|
________________
Source: Bloomberg
|
New York Stock Exchange
US$ per Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2017
|
13.70
|
5.82
|
First Quarter 2018
|
5.92
|
9.57
|
Second Quarter 2018
|
5.97
|
2.14
|
Third Quarter 2018
|
3.21
|
1.91
|
Fourth Quarter 2018
|
2.62
|
1.16
|
First Quarter 2019
|
2.77
|
1.45
|
Source: Bloomberg
|
New York Stock Exchange
US$ per Common Share
|
|
Month
|
|
|
October 2018
|
2.62
|
2.05
|
November 2018
|
2.03
|
1.16
|
December 2018
|
1.50
|
1.22
|
January 2019
|
2.70
|
1.50
|
February 2019
|
2.77
|
2.00
|
March 2019
|
2.40
|
1.45
|
April 2019 (through April 26, 2019)
|
2.55
|
1.54
|
Source: Bloomberg
B.
Plan of Distribution
Not applicable.
C.
Markets
See “— Offer and Listing Details” above.
D.
Selling Shareholders
Not applicable.
E.
Dilution
Not applicable.
F.
Expenses of the Issue
Not applicable.
ITEM 10.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A.
Share Capital
Not applicable.
B.
Memorandum and Articles of Association
Description of Share Capital
We are a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability duly registered with the Cayman Islands Registrar of Companies. Our corporate purposes are unrestricted and we have the authority to carry out any object not prohibited by any law as provided by Section 7(4) of the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands.
Our affairs are governed by (1) our Fourth Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, or Articles of Association, which is effective since April 12, 2017, (2) the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands, and (3) the common law of the Cayman Islands.
The following discussion summarizes the material terms of our common shares. This discussion does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to our Articles of Association. Our Articles of Association is filed as an exhibit to this annual report.
Issued and Authorized Share Capital
As of the date of this annual report, have 31,056,244 common shares with par value US$0.0033 (rounded to 4 decimal places) per share issued and outstanding, all of which will be fully paid-up. We may not make capital calls upon our common shares that are fully paid-up. Each of our common share confers on its holder the right to cast one vote per common share and our shareholders who are non-residents of the Cayman Islands may freely hold and vote their common shares.
We have an authorized share capital, including the issued share capital, of US$305,250 and will be authorized to issue up to 92,500,000 common shares (subject to share splits, consolidation of shares or similar transactions) with a nominal or par value of US$0.0033 (rounded to 4 decimal places) each.
Issuance of Shares
Our board of directors has general and unconditional authority to grant options over, offer or otherwise deal with or dispose of any unissued shares in our capital without further action by our shareholders (whether forming part of the original or any increased share capital), either at a premium or at par, with or without preferred, deferred or other special rights or restrictions, whether in regard to dividend, voting, return of capital or otherwise and to such persons, on such terms and conditions, and at such times as the directors may decide, but so that no share shall be issued at a discount, except in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands. We will not issue bearer shares.
Our board of directors, without shareholder approval, may issue preferred shares with voting, conversion or other rights that could adversely affect the voting power and other rights of holders of our common shares. Subject to the directors’ duty of acting in our best interest, preferred shares can be issued quickly with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control of us or make removal of management more difficult. Additionally, the issuance of preferred shares may have the effect of decreasing the market price of the common shares, and may adversely affect the voting and other rights of the holders of common shares. Issuance of these preferred shares may dilute the voting power of holders of our common shares.
On April 16, 2012, we adopted our Share Plan, which provides both for the direct award or sale of common shares and for the grant of options to purchase common shares. Our Share Plan is governed by the laws of the Cayman Islands and is limited to the issuance of 1,296,470 of our common shares.
Fiscal Year
Our fiscal year begins on January 1 of each year and ends on December 31 of the same year.
Record Dates
For the purpose of determining shareholders entitled to notice of, or to vote at any general meeting of shareholders or any adjournment thereof, or shareholders entitled to receive dividend or other distribution payments, or in order to make a determination of shareholders for any other purpose, our board of directors may determine a record date which shall not exceed forty (40) clear days prior to the date where the determination will be made.
General Meetings of Shareholders
As a condition of admission to a shareholders’ meeting, a shareholder must be duly registered as our shareholder at the applicable record date for that meeting and all calls or installments then payable by such shareholder to us in respect of our common shares must have been paid.
Subject to any special rights or restrictions as to voting then attached to any shares, at any general meeting every shareholder who is present in person or by proxy (or, in the case of a shareholder being a corporation, by its duly authorized representative not being himself or herself a shareholder entitled to vote) shall have one vote per common share.
As a Cayman Islands exempted company, we are not obliged by the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands to call annual general meetings; however, our Articles of Association provide that in each year we will hold an annual general meeting of shareholders at a time determined by our board of directors. For the annual general meeting of shareholders the agenda will include, among other things, the adoption of our annual accounts and the appropriation of our profits. In addition, the agenda for a general meeting of shareholders will only include such items as have been included therein by the board of directors.
Also, we may, but are not required to (unless required by the Law), in each year hold any other extraordinary general meeting. Our general meetings of shareholders shall take place in São Paulo, Brazil or in the United States.
The Companies Law of the Cayman Islands provides shareholders with only limited rights to requisition a general meeting, and does not provide shareholders with any right to put any proposal before a general meeting. However, these rights may be provided in a company’s articles of association. Our Articles of Association provide that upon the requisition of shareholders representing not less than one-third of the voting rights entitled to vote at general meetings, our board will convene an extraordinary general meeting and put the resolutions so requisitioned to a vote at such meeting. However, shareholders may propose only ordinary resolutions to be put to a vote at such meeting and shall have no right to propose resolutions with respect to the election, appointment or removal of directors or with respect to the size of the board. Our Articles of Association provide no other right to put any proposals before annual general meetings or extraordinary general meetings.
Subject to regulatory requirements, our annual general meeting and any extraordinary general meetings must be called by not less than ten (10) clear days’ notice prior to the relevant shareholders meeting and convened by a notice discussed below. Alternatively, upon the prior consent of all holders entitled to receive notice, with regards to the annual general meeting, and the holders of 95% in par value of the shares entitled to receive notice of some particular meeting, that meeting may be convened by a shorter notice and in a manner deemed appropriate by those holders.
We will give notice of each general meeting of shareholders by publication on our website, in a Cayman Islands daily newspaper with national distribution and in any other manner that we may be required to follow in order to comply with Cayman Islands law, NYSE and SEC requirements. The holders of registered shares may be convened for a shareholders’ meeting by means of letters sent to the addresses of those shareholders as registered in our shareholders’ register, or, subject to certain statutory requirements, by electronic means. We will observe the statutory minimum convening notice period for a general meeting of shareholders, which is currently seven (7) clear days.
A quorum for a general meeting consists of any one or more persons holding or representing by proxy not less than one-third of our issued voting shares entitled to vote upon the business to be transacted.
A resolution put to the vote of the meeting shall be decided on a poll. An ordinary resolution to be passed by the shareholders requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast by, or on behalf of, the shareholders entitled to vote present in person or by proxy and voting at the meeting. A special resolution requires the affirmative vote of no less than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy at a general meeting (except for certain matters described below which require an affirmative vote of 95%). Both ordinary resolutions and special resolutions may also be passed by a unanimous written resolution signed by all the shareholders of our company, as permitted by the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands and our Articles of Association.
Our Articles of Association provide that the affirmative vote of no less than 95% of votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy at a general meeting shall be required to approve any amendments to any provisions of our Articles of Association that relate to or have an impact upon the procedures regarding the election, appointment, removal of directors and size of the board.
Pursuant to our Articles of Association, the general meeting of shareholders is chaired by the chairman of our board of directors. If the chairman of our board of directors is absent, the directors present at the meeting shall appoint one of them to be chairman of the general meeting. If neither the chairman nor another director is present at
the general meeting of shareholders within fifteen minutes after the time appointed for holding the meeting, the directors present may elect any one of them to be chairman. The order of business at each meeting shall be determined by the chairman of the meeting, and he or she shall have the right and authority to prescribe such rules, regulations and procedures and to do all such acts and things as are necessary or desirable for the proper conduct of the meeting, including, without limitation, the establishment of procedures for the maintenance of order and safety, limitations on the time allotted to questions or comments on the our affairs, restrictions on entry to such meeting after the time prescribed for the commencement thereof, and the opening and closing of the polls.
Liquidation Rights
Subject to any special rights, privileges or restrictions as to the distribution of available surplus assets on liquidation applicable to any class or classes of shares (1) if we are wound up and the assets available for distribution among our shareholders are more than sufficient to repay the whole of the capital paid up at the commencement of the winding up, the excess shall be distributed
pari passu
among our shareholders in proportion to the amount paid up at the commencement of the winding up on the shares held by them, respectively, and (2) if we are wound up and the assets available for distribution among our shareholders as such are insufficient to repay the whole of the paid-up capital, those assets shall be distributed so that, as nearly as may be, the losses shall be borne by our shareholders in proportion to the capital paid up at the commencement of the winding up on the shares held by them, respectively.
If we are wound up, the liquidator may with the sanction of a special resolution and any other sanction required by the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands, divide among our shareholders in specie the whole or any part of our assets and may, for such purpose, value any assets and may determine how such division shall be carried out as between the shareholders or different classes of shareholders. The liquidator may also, with the sanction of a special resolution, vest any part of these assets in trustees upon such trusts for the benefit of our shareholders as the liquidator shall think fit, but so that no shareholder will be compelled to accept any assets, shares or other securities upon which there is a liability.
Changes to Capital
Pursuant to our Articles of Association, we may from time to time by shareholders resolution passed by a simple majority of the voting rights entitled to vote at a general meeting:
·
increase our capital by such sum, to be divided into shares of such amounts, as the relevant resolution shall prescribe;
·
consolidate and divide all or any of our share capital into shares of larger amount than our existing shares;
·
convert all or any of its paid up shares into stock and reconvert that stock into paid up shares of any denomination;
·
sub-divide our existing shares, or any of them, into shares of smaller amounts than is fixed pursuant to our Articles of Association; and
·
cancel any shares which at the date of the passing of the resolution have not been taken or agreed to be taken by any person, and diminish the amount of our share capital by the amount of the shares so cancelled, subject to the provisions of the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands.
In addition, subject to the provisions of the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands and our Articles of Association, we may:
·
issue shares on terms that they are to be redeemed or are liable to be redeemed;
·
purchase our own shares (including any redeemable shares); and
·
make a payment in respect of the redemption or purchase of our own shares in any manner authorized by the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands, including out of our capital.
Transfer of Shares
Subject to any applicable restrictions set forth in our Articles of Association, any of our shareholders may transfer all or a portion of their common shares by an instrument of transfer in the usual or common form or in the form prescribed by the NYSE or in any other form which our board of directors may approve.
Our common shares are traded on the NYSE in book-entry form and may be transferred in accordance with Articles of Association and the rules and regulations of such exchange.
Our board of directors may, in its absolute discretion, refuse to register a transfer of any common share that is not a fully paid up share to a person of whom it does not approve, or any common share issued under any share incentive scheme for employees upon which a restriction on transfer imposed thereby still subsists, and it may also, without prejudice to the foregoing generality, refuse to register a transfer of any common share to more than four joint holders or a transfer of any share that is not a fully paid up share on which we have a lien. Our board of directors may also decline to register any transfer of any registered common share unless:
·
a fee of such maximum sum as the NYSE may determine to be payable or such lesser sum as the board of directors may from time to time require is paid to us in respect thereof;
·
the instrument of transfer is in respect of only one class of shares;
·
the common shares transferred are fully paid and free of any lien;
·
the instrument of transfer is lodged at the registered office or such other place (i.e., our transfer agent) at which the register of shareholders is kept in accordance with the accompanied by any relevant share certificate(s) and/or such other evidence as the board of directors may reasonably require to show the right of the transferor to make the transfer; and
·
if applicable, the instrument of transfer is duly and properly stamped.
If our board of directors refuse to register a transfer, they are required, within one month after the date on which the instrument of transfer was lodged, to send to each of the transferor and the transferee notice of such refusal.
Share Repurchase
We are empowered by the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands and our Articles of Association to purchase our own shares, subject to certain restrictions. Our board of directors may only exercise this power on our behalf, subject to the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands, our Articles of Association and to any applicable requirements imposed from time to time by the SEC, the NYSE, or by any recognized stock exchange on which our securities are listed.
Dividends and Capitalization of Profits
Subject to the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands, our shareholders may, by resolution passed by a simple majority of the voting rights entitled to vote at the general meeting, declare dividends (including interim dividends) to be paid to our shareholders but no dividend shall be declared in excess of the amount recommended by our board of directors. Dividends may be declared and paid out of funds lawfully available to us. Except as otherwise provided by the rights attached to shares, all dividends shall be declared and paid according to the amounts paid up on the shares on which the dividend is paid. All dividends shall be paid in proportion to the number of common shares a shareholder holds during any portion or portions of the period in respect of which the dividend is paid; but, if any share is issued on terms providing that it shall rank for dividend as from a particular date, that
share shall rank for dividend accordingly. Our board of directors may also declare and pay dividends out of the share premium account or any other fund or account which can be authorized for this purpose in accordance with the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands.
In addition, our board of directors may:
·
resolve to capitalize any undivided profits not required for paying any preferential dividend (whether or not they are available for distribution) or any sum standing to the credit of the our share premium account or capital redemption reserve;
·
appropriate the sum resolved to be capitalized to the shareholders who would have been entitled to it if it were distributed by way of dividend and in the same proportions and apply such sum on their behalf either in or towards paying up the amounts, if any, for the time being unpaid on any shares held by them respectively, or in paying up in full unissued shares or debentures of a nominal amount equal to such sum, and allot the shares or debentures credited as fully paid to those shareholders, or as they may direct, in those proportions, or partly in one way and partly in the other;
·
resolve that any shares so allotted to any shareholder in respect of a holding by him/her of any partly-paid shares rank for dividend, so long as such shares remain partly paid, only to the extent that such partly paid shares rank for dividend;
·
make such provision by the issue of fractional certificates or by payment in cash or otherwise as they determine in the case of shares or debentures becoming distributable under our Articles of Association in fractions; and
·
authorize any person to enter on behalf of all our shareholders concerned in an agreement with us providing for the allotment of them respectively, credited as fully paid, of any shares or debentures to which they may be entitled upon such capitalization, any agreement made under such authority being binding on all such shareholders.
Appointment, Disqualification and Removal of Directors
We are managed by our board of directors, which will consist of a specified number of directors determined, from time to time, by a majority of the directors then in office. Our Articles of Association provide that, unless otherwise determined by a special resolution of shareholders in a general meeting, the minimum number of directors will be four. There are no provisions relating to retirement of directors upon reaching any age limit. Our Articles of Association also provide that our board of directors must always comply with the residency and citizenship requirements of the U.S. securities laws applicable to foreign private issuers.
Our Articles of Association provide that persons standing for election as directors at a duly constituted annual general meeting with requisite quorum shall be elected by an ordinary resolution of our shareholders, which requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast on the resolution by the shareholders entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy at the meeting. Each director shall be appointed and elected to a term expiring at the applicable annual shareholders meeting as set forth below or at such time as such director’ successor is appointed and elected.
Our board of directors is divided into three classes designated as Class I, Class II and Class III, respectively, with as nearly equal a number of directors in each group as possible. At the annual general meeting of our shareholders to be held in 2021, the term of office of the Class I directors will expire and Class I directors will be elected for a full term of three years. At the annual general meeting of our shareholders to be held in 2019, the term of office of the Class II directors will expire and Class II directors will be elected for a full term of three years. At the annual general meeting of our shareholders to be held in 2020, the term of office of the Class III directors will expire and Class III directors will be elected for a full term of three years. At each succeeding annual general meeting of our shareholders, directors will be elected for a full term of three years to succeed the directors of the
class whose terms expire at such annual general meeting. The persons to stand for election at each annual general meeting will be nominated by our board of directors. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees.”
Any vacancies on our board of directors arising other than upon the expiry of a Director’s term at an annual general meeting or additions to the existing board of directors can be filled only by the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the remaining directors holding office, although these directors constitute less than a quorum. Shareholders do not have the right to nominate, elect or remove directors, or to fill vacancies on our board of directors, other than upon the expiry of a director’s term at the relevant annual general meeting.
Grounds for Removing a Director
A director will be removed from office if the director:
·
becomes prohibited by law from being a director;
·
becomes bankrupt or makes any arrangement or composition with his creditors generally;
·
dies, or is, in the opinion of all his co-directors, incapable by reason of mental disorder of discharging his duties as director;
·
resigns his office by notice to us; and
·
he has for more than six months been absent without permission of the directors from meetings of the board of directors held during that period, and the directors resolve that his/her office be vacated.
Replacement directors must be nominated by our board of directors. Shareholders do not have the right to remove directors.
Proceedings of the Board of Directors
Our Articles of Association provide that our business is to be managed and conducted by our board of directors. The quorum necessary for the board meeting may be fixed by the board and, unless so fixed at another number, will be a majority of the board of directors then holding office and business at any meeting shall be decided by a majority of votes. In the case of an equality of votes, the chairman shall have a casting vote.
Subject to the provisions of the Articles of Association, our board of directors may regulate their proceedings as they determine is appropriate, provided that a meeting shall be held at least once every calendar quarter and shall take place either in São Paulo, Brazil or in the United States or elsewhere previously agreed among the members of our board of directors.
Subject to the provisions of the Articles of Association, to any directions given by the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast on the resolution by the shareholders entitled to vote who are present in the meeting and the listing rules of the NYSE, our board of directors may from time to time at its discretion exercise all powers of our company, including to raise capital or borrow money, to mortgage or charge all or any part of the undertaking, property and assets (present and future) and uncalled capital of our company and, subject to the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands, issue debentures, bonds and other securities of our company, whether outright or as collateral security for any debt, liability or obligation of our company or of any third party.
Inspection of Books and Records
Holders of common shares will have no general right under Cayman Islands law to inspect or obtain copies of our list of shareholders or our corporate records. However, our board of directors may determine from time to time whether our accounting records and books shall be open to the inspection of our shareholders not members of our board of directors. Notwithstanding the above, our Articles of Association provide our shareholders with the
right to receive annual audited financial statements. Such right to receive annual audited financial statements may be satisfied by filing such annual reports as we are required to file with the SEC.
Register of Shareholders
Our common shares are held through DTC, and DTC or Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC, will be recorded in our shareholders register as the holder of our common shares.
Under Cayman Islands law, we must keep a register of shareholders that includes:
·
the names and addresses of the shareholders, a statement of the shares held by each member, and of the amount paid or agreed to be considered as paid, on the shares of each member;
·
the date on which the name of any person was entered on the register as a member; and
·
the date on which any person ceased to be a member.
Exempted Company
We are an exempted company with limited liability under the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands. The Companies Law in the Cayman Islands distinguishes between ordinary resident companies and exempted companies. Any company that is registered in the Cayman Islands but conducts business mainly outside of the Cayman Islands may apply to be registered as an exempted company. The requirements for an exempted company are essentially the same as for an ordinary company except for the exemptions and privileges listed below:
·
an exempted company does not have to file an annual return of its shareholders with the Registrar of Companies;
·
an exempted company’s register of shareholders is not open to inspection;
·
an exempted company does not have to hold an annual general meeting;
·
an exempted company need not issue par value, negotiable or bearer shares;
·
an exempted company may obtain an undertaking against the imposition of any future taxation (such undertakings are usually given for 20 years in the first instance);
·
an exempted company may register by way of continuation in another jurisdiction and be deregistered in the Cayman Islands;
·
an exempted company may register as a limited duration company; and
·
an exempted company may register as a segregated portfolio company.
“Limited liability” means that the liability of each shareholder is limited to the amount unpaid by the shareholder on the shares of the company (except in exceptional circumstances, such as involving fraud, the establishment of an agency relationship or an illegal or improper purpose or other circumstances in which a court may be prepared to pierce or lift the corporate veil).
Anti-Takeover Provisions in our Articles of Association
Some provisions of our Articles of Association may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company or management that shareholders may consider favorable, including provisions that:
·
authorize our board of directors to issue preference shares in one or more series and to designate the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of such preference shares without any further vote or action by our shareholders;
·
limit the ability of shareholders to request and convene general meetings of shareholders;
·
limit the ability of our shareholders to elect and remove our directors, and to fill any vacancy on our board of directors; and
·
limit the ability of our shareholders to amend our Articles of Association.
However, under Cayman Islands law, our board of directors may only exercise the rights and powers granted to them under our Articles of Association, for what they believe in good faith to be in the best interests of our company.
Protection of Minority Shareholders
The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands may, on the application of shareholders holding not less than one fifth of our shares in issue, appoint an inspector to examine our affairs and report thereon in a manner as the Grand Court shall direct.
Subject to the provisions of the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands, any shareholder may petition the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands which may make a winding up order, if the court is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that we should be wound up.
Notwithstanding U.S. securities laws and regulations applicable to us, general corporate claims against us by our shareholders must, as a general rule, be based on the general laws of contract or tort applicable in the Cayman Islands or their individual rights as shareholders as established by our Articles of Association.
The Cayman Islands courts ordinarily would be expected to follow English case law precedents, which permit a minority shareholder to commence a representative action against us, or derivative actions in our name, to challenge (1) an act which is
ultra vires
or illegal, (2) an act which constitutes a fraud against the minority and the wrongdoers themselves control us, and (3) an irregularity in the passing of a resolution that requires a qualified (or special) majority.
Differences in Corporate Law
The Companies Law of the Cayman Islands is modelled after similar laws in England and Wales but does not follow recent statutory enactments in England and Wales. In addition, the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands differs from laws applicable to U.S. corporations and their shareholders. Set forth below is a summary of the significant differences between the provisions of the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands applicable to us and the laws applicable to companies incorporated in the United States and their shareholders.
Mergers and Similar Arrangements
The Companies Law of the Cayman Islands permits mergers and consolidations between Cayman Islands companies and between Cayman Islands companies and non-Cayman Islands companies.
For these purposes, (a) “merger” means the merging of two or more constituent companies and the vesting of their undertaking, property and liabilities in one of such companies as the surviving company and (b) a “consolidation” means the combination of two or more constituent companies into a consolidated company and the vesting of the undertaking, property and liabilities of such companies in the consolidated company. In order to effect such a merger or consolidation, the directors of each constituent company must approve a written plan of merger or consolidation, which must then be authorized by either (a) a special resolution of the shareholders of each constituent company; and (b) such other authorization, if any, as may be specified in such constituent company’s
articles of association. The plan must be filed with the Registrar of Companies together with a declaration as to: (1) the solvency of the consolidated or surviving company, (2) the merger or consolidation is bona fide and not intended to defraud unsecured creditors of the constituent companies; (3) no petition or other similar proceeding has been filed and remains outstanding and no order or resolution to wind up the company in any jurisdiction, (4) no receiver, trustee, administrator or similar person has been appointed in any jurisdiction and is acting in respect of the constituent company, its affairs or property, (5) no scheme, order, compromise or similar arrangement has been entered into or made in any jurisdiction with creditors; (6) a list of the assets and liabilities of each constituent company; (7) the non-surviving constituent company has retired from any fiduciary office held or will do so; (8) that the constituent company has complied with any requirements under the regulatory laws, where relevant; and (9) an undertaking that a copy of the certificate of merger or consolidation will be given to the members and creditors of each constituent company and published in the Cayman Islands Gazette.
Dissenting shareholders have the right to be paid the fair value of their shares (which, if not agreed between the parties, may be determined by the Cayman Islands’ court) if they follow the required procedures, subject to certain exceptions. Court approval is not required for a merger or consolidation which is effected in compliance with these statutory procedures.
In addition, there are statutory provisions that facilitate the reconstruction and amalgamation of companies, provided that the arrangement in question is approved by a majority in number of each class of shareholders and creditors with whom the arrangement is to be made, and who must in addition represent three-fourths in value of each such class of shareholders or creditors, as the case may be, that are present and voting either in person or by proxy at a meeting, or meetings convened for that purpose. The convening of the meetings and subsequently the arrangement must be sanctioned by the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands. While a dissenting shareholder would have the right to express to the court the view that the transaction should not be approved, the court can be expected to approve the arrangement if it satisfies itself that:
·
we are not proposing to act illegally or
ultra vires
and the statutory provisions as to majority vote have been complied with;
·
the shareholders have been fairly represented at the meeting in question;
·
the arrangement is such that may be reasonably approved by an intelligent and honest man of that class acting in respect of his interest; and
·
the arrangement is not one that would more properly be sanctioned under some other provision of the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands or that would amount to a “fraud on the minority.”
When a takeover offer is made and accepted by holders of 90.0% of the shares within four months, the offeror may, within a two-month period, require the holders of the remaining shares to transfer such shares on the terms of the offer. An objection may be made to the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands but is unlikely to succeed unless there is evidence of fraud, bad faith or collusion.
If the arrangement and reconstruction are thus approved, any dissenting shareholders would have no rights comparable to appraisal rights, which might otherwise ordinarily be available to dissenting shareholders of U.S. corporations and allow such dissenting shareholders to receive payment in cash for the judicially determined value of their shares.
Shareholders’ Suits
Class actions are not recognized in the Cayman Islands, but groups of shareholders with identical interests may bring representative proceedings, which are similar. However, a class action suit could nonetheless be brought in a U.S. court pursuant to an alleged violation of U.S. securities laws and regulations.
In principle, we will normally be the proper plaintiff and as a general rule, whilst a derivative action may be initiated by a minority shareholder on our behalf in a Cayman Islands court, such shareholder will not be able to
continue those proceedings without the permission of a Grand Court judge, who will only allow the action to continue if the shareholder can demonstrate that we have a good case against the Defendant, and that it is proper for the shareholder to continue the action rather than our board of directors. Examples of circumstances in which derivative actions would be permitted to continue are where:
·
a company is acting or proposing to act illegally or beyond the scope of its authority;
·
the act complained of, although not beyond the scope of its authority, could be effected duly if authorized by more than a simple majority vote that has not been obtained; and
·
those who control the company are perpetrating a “fraud on the minority.”
Corporate Governance
Cayman Islands law restricts transactions with directors unless there are provisions in the Articles of Association which provide a mechanism to alleviate possible conflicts of interest. Additionally, Cayman Islands law imposes on directors duties of care and skill and fiduciary duties to the companies which they serve. Under our Articles of Association, a director must disclose the nature and extent of his material interest in any contract or arrangement, and the interested director may not vote at any meeting on any resolution concerning the interested matter. The interested director shall be counted in the quorum at such meeting and the resolution may be passed by a majority of the disinterested directors present at the meeting, even if the disinterested directors constitute less than a quorum.
Indemnification of Directors and Executive Officers and Limitation of Liability
The Companies Law of the Cayman Islands does not limit the extent to which a company’s articles of association may provide for indemnification of directors and officers, except to the extent that it may be held by the Cayman Islands courts to be contrary to public policy, such as to provide indemnification against civil fraud or the consequences of committing a crime. Our Articles of Association provides that we shall indemnify and hold harmless our directors and officers against all actions, proceedings, costs, charges, expenses, losses, damages, liabilities, judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts incurred or sustained by such directors or officers, other than by reason of such person’s dishonesty, willful default or fraud, in or about the conduct of our company’s business or affairs (including as a result of any mistake of judgment) or in the execution or discharge of his duties, powers, authorities or discretions, including without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, any costs, expenses, losses or liabilities incurred by such director or officer in defending (whether successfully or otherwise) any civil proceedings concerning our company or its affairs in any court whether in the Cayman Islands or elsewhere. This standard of conduct is generally the same as permitted under the Delaware General Corporation Law for a Delaware corporation. In addition, we entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers that will provide such persons with additional indemnification beyond that provided in our Articles of Association.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers or persons controlling us under the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the SEC, this indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Directors’ Fiduciary Duties
As a matter of Cayman Islands law, a director of a Cayman Islands company is in the position of a fiduciary with respect to the company. Accordingly, directors owe fiduciary duties to their companies to act
bona fide
in what they consider to be the best interests of the company, to exercise their powers for the purposes for which they are conferred and not to place themselves in a position where there is a conflict between their personal interests and their duty to the company. Accordingly, a director owes a company a duty not to make a profit based on his or her position as director (unless the company permits him or her to do so) and a duty not to put himself or herself in a position where the interests of the company conflict with his or her personal interest or his or her duty to a third party. In addition, directors of a Cayman Islands company must not therefore place themselves in a position in
which there is a conflict between their duty to the company and their personal interests. However, this obligation may be varied by the company’s articles of association, which may permit a director to vote on a matter in which he has a personal interest provided that he has disclosed that nature of his interest to the board of directors. Our Articles of Association provides that a director must disclose the nature and extent of his material interest in any contract or arrangement, and such director may not vote at any meeting on any resolution concerning such interested matter.
A director of a Cayman Islands company also owes to the company duties to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his functions and to exercise reasonable skill, care and diligence, which has both objective and subjective elements. Recent Cayman Islands case law confirmed that directors must exercise the care, skill and diligence that would be exercised by a reasonably diligent person having the general knowledge, skill and experience reasonably to be expected of a person acting as a director. Additionally, a director must exercise the knowledge, skill and experience which he actually possesses.
A general notice may be given at a meeting of the board of directors to the effect that (1) the director is a member or officer of a specified company or firm and is to be regarded as interested in any contract or arrangement which may after the date of the notice in writing be made with that company or firm; or (2) he is to be regarded as interested in any contract or arrangement which may after the date of the notice in writing to the board of directors be made with a specified person who is connected with him or her, will be deemed sufficient declaration of interest. This notice shall specify the nature of the interest in question. Following the disclosure being made pursuant to our Articles of Association and subject to any separate requirement under applicable law or the listing rules of NYSE, a director may not vote in respect of any contract or arrangement in which he or she is interested but may be counted in the quorum at the meeting. However, even if a director discloses his interest and is therefore permitted to vote, he must still comply with his duty to act
bona fide
in the best interest of our company.
In comparison, under Delaware corporate law, a director of a Delaware corporation has a fiduciary duty to the corporation and its shareholders. This duty has two components: the duty of care and the duty of loyalty. The duty of care requires that a director act in good faith, with the care that an ordinarily prudent person would exercise under similar circumstances. Under this duty, a director must inform himself or herself of, and disclose to shareholders, all material information reasonably available regarding a significant transaction. The duty of loyalty requires that a director act in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the corporation. He or she must not use his or her corporate position for personal gain or advantage. This duty prohibits self-dealing by a director and mandates that the best interest of the corporation and its shareholders take precedence over any interest possessed by a director, officer or controlling shareholder and not shared by the shareholders generally. In general, actions of a director are presumed to have been made on an informed basis, in good faith and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interests of the corporation. However, this presumption may be rebutted by evidence of a breach of one of the fiduciary duties. Should such evidence be presented concerning a transaction by a director, a director must prove the procedural fairness of the transaction, and that the transaction was of fair value to the corporation.
Shareholder Proposals
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a shareholder has the right to put any proposal before the annual meeting of shareholders, provided it complies with the notice provisions in the governing documents. The Delaware General Corporation Law does not provide shareholders an express right to put any proposal before the annual meeting of shareholders, but Delaware corporations generally afford shareholders an opportunity to make proposals and nominations provided that they comply with the notice provisions in the certificate of incorporation or bylaws. A special meeting may be called by the board of directors or any other person authorized to do so in the governing documents, but shareholders may be precluded from calling special meetings.
The Companies Law of the Cayman Islands provides shareholders with only limited rights to requisition a general meeting, and does not provide shareholders with any right to put any proposal before a general meeting. However, these rights may be provided in a company’s articles of association. Our Articles of Association provide that upon the requisition of shareholders representing not less than one-third of the voting rights entitled to vote at general meetings, our board will convene an extraordinary general meeting and put the resolutions so requisitioned to a vote at such meeting. However, shareholders may propose only ordinary resolutions to be put to a vote at such meeting and shall have no right to propose resolutions with respect to the election, appointment or removal of
directors or with respect to the size of the board. Our Articles of Association provide no other right to put any proposals before annual general meetings or extraordinary general meetings.
Cumulative Voting
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, cumulative voting for elections of directors is not permitted unless the corporation’s certificate of incorporation specifically provides for it. Cumulative voting potentially facilitates the representation of minority shareholders on a board of directors since it permits the minority shareholder to cast all the votes to which the shareholder is entitled on a single director, which increases the shareholder’s voting power with respect to electing such director. As permitted under Cayman Islands law, our Articles of Association do not provide for cumulative voting. As a result, our shareholders are not afforded any less protections or rights on this issue than shareholders of a Delaware corporation.
Removal of Directors
Under our Articles of Association, our shareholders generally do not have the right to remove directors. A director will be removed from office automatically if, among other things, he or she (1) becomes prohibited by law from being a director, (2) becomes bankrupt or makes an arrangement or composition with his creditors, (3) dies or is in the opinion of all his co-directors, incapable by reason of mental disorder of discharging his duties as director (4) resigns his office by notice to us or (5) has for more than six months been absent without permission of the directors from meetings of the board of directors held during that period, and the directors resolve that his/her office be vacated.
Transactions with Interested Shareholders
The Delaware General Corporation Law provides that; unless the corporation has specifically elected not to be governed by this statute, it is prohibited from engaging in certain business combinations with an “interested shareholder” for three years following the date that this person becomes an interested shareholder. An interested shareholder generally is a person or a group who or which owns or owned 15% or more of the target’s outstanding voting shares or who or which is an affiliate or associate of the corporation and owned 15% or more of the corporation’s outstanding voting shares within the past three years. This has the effect of limiting the ability of a potential acquirer to make a two-tiered bid for the target in which all shareholders would not be treated equally. The statute does not apply if, among other things, prior to the date on which the shareholder becomes an interested shareholder, the board of directors approves either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the person becoming an interested shareholder. This encourages any potential acquirer of a Delaware corporation to negotiate the terms of any acquisition transaction with the target’s board of directors.
Cayman Islands law has no comparable statute. As a result, we cannot avail ourselves of the types of protections afforded by the Delaware business combination statute. However, although Cayman Islands law does not regulate transactions between a company and its significant shareholders, it does provide that these transactions must be entered into
bona fide
in the best interests of the company and for a proper corporate purpose and not with the effect of constituting a fraud on the minority shareholders.
Dissolution; Winding Up
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, unless the board of directors approves the proposal to dissolve, dissolution must be approved by shareholders holding 100% of the total voting power of the corporation. If the dissolution is initiated by the board of directors it may be approved by a simple majority of the corporation’s outstanding shares. Delaware law allows a Delaware corporation to include in its certificate of incorporation a supermajority voting requirement in connection with dissolutions initiated by the board. Under Cayman Islands law, a company may be wound up by either an order of the courts of the Cayman Islands or by a special resolution of its members or, if the company is unable to pay its debts as they fall due, by an ordinary resolution of its members. The court has authority to order winding up in a number of specified circumstances including where it is, in the opinion of the court, just and equitable to do so.
Under the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands and our Articles of Association, our company may be dissolved, liquidated or wound up by a shareholder resolution passed by a majority of at least two-thirds of the voting rights entitled to vote at a general meeting of our shareholders.
Variation of Rights of Shares
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a corporation may vary the rights of a class of shares with the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares of that class, unless the certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. Under Cayman Islands law and our Articles of Association, if our share capital is divided into more than one class of shares, we may vary the rights attached to any class only with the sanction of a special resolution passed at a separate meeting of the holders of the shares of that class.
Also, except with respect to share capital (as described above), alterations to our Articles of Association may only be made by special resolution of no less than two-thirds of voting rights entitled to vote at a meeting of our shareholders.
Amendment of Governing Documents
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a corporation’s certificate of incorporation may be amended only if adopted and declared advisable by the board of directors and approved by a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, and the bylaws may be amended with the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote and may, if so provided in the certificate of incorporation, also be amended by the board of directors. Under Cayman Islands law, our Articles of Association generally may only be amended by special resolution of no less than two-thirds of voting rights entitled to vote at a meeting of our shareholders and provisions related to the election, appointment and removal or the size of the board may only be amended by a special resolution of at least 95% of voting rights entitled to vote at a meeting of our shareholders.
Rights of Non-Resident or Foreign Shareholders
There are no limitations imposed by our Articles of Association on the rights of non-resident or foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting rights on our shares. In addition, there are no provisions in our Articles of Association governing the ownership threshold above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed.
C.
Material Contracts
Merger Agreement
On April 29, 2019, we entered into the Merger Agreement with Magazine Luiza S.A. and Magazine Luiza Cayman Ltd,
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Magazine Luiza S.A.
We have entered into the Merger Agreement after an extensive process in which we evaluated our prospects as an independent company and reviewed, with the assistance of Goldman Sachs & Co., as financial advisor, opportunities to protect shareholder value through a sale transaction. While we have believed in and worked to meet our market opportunity as an independent company, our recent financial results and increasing pressure on our working capital position, caused us to reevaluate our prospects and resulted in our decision to enter into the Merger Agreement.
Our board of directors has (i) approved the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; and (ii) determined to recommend that our shareholders approve the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, each of our common shares issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time will be canceled and converted into the right to receive US$2.00 in cash (the “merger consideration”) and our stock options (vested or not) will be cancelled at the effective time and those with an exercise price higher than the merger consideration will be converted into the right to receive the merger consideration (less the applicable exercise price) at the effective time.
We have made customary representations and warranties and agreed to customary covenants in the Merger Agreement, including, among others, covenants by us to conduct our and our subsidiaries business in the ordinary course during the period between the execution of the Merger Agreement and the effective time and not to engage in certain types of transactions during this period unless approved in writing by Magazine Luiza S.A., in each case subject to certain exceptions.
Until the Merger is completed or the Merger Agreement is terminated, the Merger Agreement generally prohibits us from initiating, soliciting, facilitating or knowingly encouraging any inquiries with respect to, any acquisition inquiry or acquisition proposal, or executing or entering into any agreement in connection with any acquisition proposal. An exception shall be made if, prior to obtaining the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds (2/3) of all of votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy at a general meeting, we receive an unsolicited bona fide acquisition proposal that constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to constitute, result in or lead to, a superior proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement), and if the failure to engage in discussions or negotiations relating to such proposals would be inconsistent with the fiduciary duties of Netshoes’ board of directors under applicable law.
Consummation of the Merger is subject to several conditions, including requisite regulatory approval by Brazilian antitrust authorities and the approval by our shareholders representing at least two-thirds (2/3) of votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy at a general meeting.
The Merger Agreement may be terminated under certain circumstances. Upon the termination of the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances specified therein, we may be required to pay Magazine Luiza S.A. a termination fee amounting to US$1,800,000.00. For more information, see Exhibit 4.07 to this annual report for a complete copy of the Merger Agreement.
In connection with the Merger Agreement, the Magazine Luiza S.A. has entered into a Voting and Support Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2019, with certain of our shareholders, including Marcio Kumruian, chairman of our board of directors and our chief executive officer, HCFT Holdings, LLC, Hagop Chabab and Tiger Global, pursuant to which, among other things, each such shareholder has agreed to vote all common shares beneficially owned by such Shareholder in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and the approval of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and against any Acquisition Proposal (as defined in the Merger Agreement) or any transaction that is the subject of an Acquisition Proposal. The obligations of the such shareholders terminate under certain circumstances, including if the Merger Agreement is terminated.
UoL Diveo
On October 21, 2016, we entered into two hosting services agreements with Uol Diveo Tecnologia Ltda., or Uol Diveo, or the Hosting Services Agreements, in which Uol Diveo agreed to provide us with two data centers to, among others, host our eCommerce sites and to host our back-office and other systems. Pursuant to the terms of the Hosting Services Agreements, we are obligated to pay Uol Diveo a total monthly fee of approximately R$38,000.00, including taxes, and Uol Diveo is required to provide us with the necessary hardware, equipment and some of the software licenses required to keep our sites operational, among other requirements, as well as technical monitoring, ensuring the security of our sites and allowing us to have access to the data centers that, among other systems, hosted our eCommerce sites. Uol Diveo has the contractual right to immediately suspend the services in case we don’t comply with our payment obligations under the agreement. This agreement expires on April 2, 2019, one year following their execution and may be automatically renewable.
Uol Diveo also provides us with Microsoft Azure cloud data centers to host our eCommerce sites, migrated from Processor Informática S.A. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we are obligated to pay Uol Diveo a total monthly fee of approximately R$600,000.00, including taxes, and Uol Diveo is required to provide us with Microsoft Cloud Azure services. This agreement will expire on August 7, 2021, three years following their execution and is not automatically renewable.
Among other services providers, we depend on Uol Diveo to keep our sites fully operational and accessible to our customers. See “Item 3. Key Information— D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Business and Industry—
Interruption or failure of our information technology and communications systems could impair our operations, which could damage our reputation and harm our results of operations. Specifically, we rely on certain third-party providers to provide us with Internet data centers to host our sites and back-office end systems and maintain them fully operational, and disruptions with this provider or in the services it provides to us could materially affect our reputation, operations or financial results.”
Furthermore, a significant part of our revenue comes from site traffic generated by advertising channels with Google and Facebook. The agreement with Google provides for advertising services in different formats to promote materials into any content or property provided by Google (text, shopping, display, video and retargeting), and provides for various payment models (cost per click, cost per impression, cost per purchase, among others). The program offered by Google is an advertising platform in which we authorize Google to use automated tools to format ads. The agreement with Facebook provides for the purchase of advertising in different formats offered by the partner (retargeting, ads etc.) and various payment models (cost per click, cost per impression, among others). Both agreements are subject to applicable general policies issued by Google, Facebook and other partners, which may be modified at anytime at their sole discretion. See “Item 3. Key Information— D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Business and Industry—We depend on search engines, e-mail, and other messaging services to attract a substantial portion of the customers who visit our sites, and changes in search engine logic, or any restrictions on the sending of emails or messages or an inability to timely deliver such communications could adversely affect our business and results of operations.”
For additional information concerning other contracts important to our business, see “
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Except as otherwise described in this annual report, we have not entered into any material contracts other than in the ordinary course
of business.
D.
Exchange Controls
See “Item 3. Key Information––A. Selected Financial Data––Exchange Rates”
E.
Taxation
Cayman Islands Tax Considerations
The Cayman Islands laws currently levies no taxes on individuals or corporations based upon profits, income, gains or appreciation and there is no taxation in the nature of inheritance tax or estate duty or withholding tax applicable to us or to any holder of common shares. There are no other taxes likely to be material to us levied by the government of the Cayman Islands except for stamp duties which may be applicable on instruments executed in, or after execution brought within the jurisdiction of the Cayman Islands. No stamp duty is payable in the Cayman Islands on transfers of shares of Cayman Islands companies except those which hold interests in land in the Cayman Islands. The Cayman Islands is not party to any double tax treaties which are applicable to any payments made by or to our company. There are no exchange control regulations or currency restrictions in the Cayman Islands.
Payments of dividends and capital in respect of our common shares will not be subject to taxation in the Cayman Islands and no withholding will be required on the payment of a dividend or capital to any holder of our common shares, nor will gains derived from the disposal of our common shares be subject to Cayman Islands income or corporation tax.
There is no income tax treaty or convention currently in effect between the United States and the Cayman Islands.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following discussion describes certain United States federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the common shares of Netshoes (Cayman) Ltd. Netshoes (Cayman) Ltd. filed a valid
election to be treated as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes before its initial public offering. Netshoes (Cayman) Ltd. has therefore been treated as a foreign corporation for United States federal income tax purposes at all times that its common shares have been held by a United States Holder (as defined below). This discussion deals only with common shares that are held as capital assets by a United States Holder.
As used herein, the term “United States Holder” means a beneficial owner of our common shares that is, for United States federal income tax purposes, any of the following:
·
an individual citizen or resident of the United States;
·
a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
·
an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
·
a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable United States Treasury regulations to be treated as a United States person.
This discussion is based upon provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, and regulations, rulings and judicial decisions thereunder as of the date hereof. Those authorities may be changed, perhaps retroactively, so as to result in United States federal income tax consequences different from those summarized below.
This discussion does not represent a detailed description of the United States federal income tax consequences applicable to you if you are subject to special treatment under the United States federal income tax laws, including if you are:
·
a dealer in securities or currencies;
·
a financial institution;
·
a regulated investment company;
·
a real estate investment trust;
·
an insurance company;
·
a tax-exempt organization;
·
a person holding our common shares as part of a hedging, integrated or conversion transaction, a constructive sale or a straddle;
·
a trader in securities that has elected the mark-to-market method of accounting for your securities;
·
a person liable for alternative minimum tax;
·
a person who owns or is deemed to own 5% or more of our stock (by vote or value);
·
a partnership or other pass-through entity for United States federal income tax purposes;
·
a person required to accelerate the recognition of any item of gross income with respect to our common shares as a result of such income being recognized on an applicable financial statement; or
·
a person whose “functional currency” is not the United States dollar.
If a partnership (or other entity treated as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes) holds our common shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner of a partnership holding our common shares, you should consult your tax advisors.
This discussion does not contain a detailed description of all the United States federal income tax consequences to you in light of your particular circumstances and does not address the Medicare tax on net investment income or the effects of any state, local or non-United States tax laws.
If you are considering the purchase of our common shares, you should consult your own tax advisors concerning the particular United States federal income tax consequences to you of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common shares, as well as the consequences to you arising under other United States federal tax laws and the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.
Taxation of Dividends
Subject to the discussion under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company” below, the gross amount of distributions on the common shares will be taxable as dividends to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under United States federal income tax principles. To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits for a taxable year, the distribution will first be treated as a tax-free return of capital, causing a reduction in the tax basis of the common shares, and to the extent the amount of the distribution exceeds your tax basis, the excess will be taxed as capital gain recognized on a sale or exchange. We do not, however, expect to determine earnings and profits in accordance with United States federal income tax principles. Therefore, you should expect that a distribution will generally be reported as a dividend.
With respect to non-corporate United States investors, certain dividends received from a qualified foreign corporation may be subject to reduced rates of taxation. A foreign corporation is treated as a qualified foreign corporation with respect to dividends paid by that corporation on shares that are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. United States Treasury Department guidance indicates that our common shares, which are listed on the NYSE, are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States. Thus, we believe that dividends we pay on our common shares will meet the conditions required for the reduced tax rate. There can be no assurance that our common shares will be considered readily tradable on an established securities market in later years. Non-corporate holders that do not meet a minimum holding period requirement during which they are not protected from the risk of loss or that elect to treat the dividend income as “investment income” pursuant to Section 163(d)(4) of the Code will not be eligible for the reduced rates of taxation regardless of our status as a qualified foreign corporation. In addition, the rate reduction will not apply to dividends if the recipient of a dividend is obligated to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. This disallowance applies even if the minimum holding period has been met. You should consult your own tax advisors regarding the application of these rules to your particular circumstances.
Any dividends that you receive will be includable in your gross income as ordinary income on the day actually or constructively received by you. Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations under the Code.
Passive Foreign Investment Company
Based on the past and projected composition of our income and assets, and the valuation of our assets, and taking into account the value of our goodwill calculated based on the current value of our common shares, we do not believe we would have been a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for our most recent taxable year, and
we do not expect to become a PFIC in the current taxable year or the foreseeable future, although there can be no assurance in this regard.
In general, we will be a PFIC for any taxable year in which:
·
at least 75% of our gross income is passive income, or
·
at least 50% of the value (determined based on a quarterly average) of our assets is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income.
For this purpose, passive income generally includes dividends, interest, royalties and rents (other than royalties and rents derived in the active conduct of a trade or business and not derived from a related person). If we own at least 25% (by value) of the stock of another corporation, for purposes of determining whether we are a PFIC, we will be treated as owning our proportionate share of the other corporation’s assets and receiving our proportionate share of the other corporation’s income.
The determination of whether we are a PFIC is made annually. Accordingly, it is possible that we may become a PFIC in the current or any future taxable year due to changes in our asset or income composition. Because we have valued our goodwill based on the current market value of our common shares, a decrease in the price of our common shares may also result in us becoming a PFIC. If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which you hold our common shares, you will be subject to special tax rules discussed below.
If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which you hold our common shares and you do not make a timely mark-to-market election, as described below, you will be subject to special tax rules with respect to any “excess distribution” received and any gain realized from a sale or other disposition, including a pledge, of common shares. Distributions received in a taxable year will be treated as excess distributions to the extent that they are greater than 125% of the average annual distributions received during the shorter of the three preceding taxable years or your holding period for the common shares. Under these special tax rules:
·
the excess distribution or gain will be allocated ratably over your holding period for the common shares,
·
the amount allocated to the current taxable year, and any taxable year prior to the first taxable year in which we were a PFIC, will be treated as ordinary income, and
·
the amount allocated to each other year will be subject to tax at the highest tax rate in effect for that year and the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax will be imposed on the resulting tax attributable to each such year.
Although the determination of whether we are a PFIC is made annually, if we are a PFIC for any taxable year in which you hold our common shares, you will generally be subject to the special tax rules described above for that year and for each subsequent year in which you hold the common shares (even if we do not qualify as a PFIC in such subsequent years). However, if we cease to be a PFIC, you can avoid the continuing impact of the PFIC rules by making a special election to recognize gain as if your common shares had been sold on the last day of the last taxable year during which we were a PFIC. You are urged to consult your own tax advisor about this election.
In lieu of being subject to the special tax rules discussed above, you may make a mark-to-market election with respect to your common shares provided such common shares are treated as “marketable stock.” The common shares generally will be treated as marketable stock if they are regularly traded on a “qualified exchange or other market” (within the meaning of the applicable Treasury regulations).
If you make an effective mark-to-market election, for each taxable year that we are a PFIC you will include as ordinary income the excess of the fair market value of your common shares at the end of the year over your adjusted tax basis in the common shares. You will be entitled to deduct as an ordinary loss in each such year the excess of your adjusted tax basis in the common shares over their fair market value at the end of the year, but only to
the extent of the net amount previously included in income as a result of the mark-to-market election. Your adjusted tax basis in the common shares will be increased by the amount of any income inclusion and decreased by the amount of any deductions under the mark-to-market rules. In addition, upon the sale or other disposition of your common shares in a year that we are a PFIC, any gain will be treated as ordinary income and any loss will be treated as ordinary loss, but only to the extent of the net amount of previously included income as a result of the mark-to-market election.
If you make a mark-to-market election, it will be effective for the taxable year for which the election is made and all subsequent taxable years unless the common shares are no longer regularly traded on a qualified exchange or other market, or the Internal Revenue Service consents to the revocation of the election. You are urged to consult your tax advisor about the availability of the mark-to-market election, and whether making the election would be advisable in your particular circumstances.
Alternatively, you can sometimes avoid the special tax rules described above by electing to treat a PFIC as a “qualified electing fund” under Section 1295 of the Code. However, this option is not available to you because we do not intend to comply with the requirements necessary to permit you to make this election.
If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which you hold our common shares and any of our non-United States subsidiaries is also a PFIC, you will be treated as owning a proportionate amount (by value) of the shares of the lower-tier PFIC for purposes of the application of the PFIC rules. You are urged to consult your tax advisors about the application of the PFIC rules to any of our subsidiaries.
You will generally be required to file Internal Revenue Service Form 8621 if you hold our common shares in any year in which we are classified as a PFIC. You are urged to consult your tax advisors concerning the United States federal income tax consequences of holding common shares if we are considered a PFIC in any taxable year.
Taxation of Capital Gains
For United States federal income tax purposes, you will recognize taxable gain or loss on any sale or exchange of the common shares in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized for the common shares and your tax basis in the common shares. Subject to the discussion under “—Passive Foreign Investment Company” above, such gain or loss will generally be capital gain or loss and will generally be long-term capital gain or loss if you have held the common shares for more than one year. Long-term capital gains of non-corporate United States Holders (including individuals) are eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. Any gain or loss recognized by you will generally be treated as United States source gain or loss.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
A United States Holder that purchases our common shares will be required to file an IRS Form 926 with the IRS if, among other reasons, the amount of cash transferred by such person (or any related person) to us during the 12-month period ending on the date of such purchase exceeds US$100,000.
In general, information reporting will apply to dividends in respect of our common shares and the proceeds from the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common shares that are paid to you within the United States (and in certain cases, outside the United States), unless you are an exempt recipient. A backup withholding tax may apply to such payments if you fail to provide a taxpayer identification number or certification of exempt status or fail to report in full dividend and interest income.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax and any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against your United States federal income tax liability provided the required information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
F.
Dividends and Paying Agents
Not applicable.
G.
Statement by Experts
Not applicable.
H.
Documents on Display
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act applicable to foreign private issuers. Accordingly, we are required to file reports and other information with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 20-F within four months from the end of each of our fiscal years, and reports on Form 6-K. You can read our SEC filings over the Internet at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any document we file with the SEC at its public reference room at 100 F. Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain copies of these documents upon the payment of the fees prescribed by the SEC. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information about the public reference room.
I.
Subsidiary Information
See note 2.3 to our consolidated financial statements for a description of our subsidiaries.
ITEM 11.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to the market risks described in “Risk Factors,” “Forward-Looking Statements” and elsewhere in this annual report. We are also exposed to a variety of risks in the ordinary course of our business, including foreign currency exchange risk, interest rate risk, customer and credit risk and liquidity risk. We regularly assess each of these risks to minimize any adverse effects on our business as a result of those factors. For sensitivity analysis of our exposure to these risks, see note 19 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Our net sales are denominated in the functional currencies of the countries in which our operational subsidiaries are located. Accordingly, our receivables are generally not subject to foreign currency exchange risks.
In the ordinary course of business, our subsidiaries purchase goods from vendors in both local functional currency and foreign currencies (mainly U.S. dollars). Generally, when we purchase goods in foreign currencies, except as noted below, we enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts in order to hedge our exposure to purchase commitments denominated in those currencies.
However, when our subsidiary in Argentina purchases certain goods from vendors in currencies other than its local functional currency, it does not enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts given the current immateriality of our operations in this country and the financing costs involved in these types of transactions in Argentina. Consequently these purchase commitments are not hedged. As a result, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange risk to the extent there is fluctuation between the currencies in which these purchase commitments are made and the local functional currency of our subsidiary in Argentina.
Fluctuations in currency exchange rates may also generally impact our net sales and results of operations. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Business and Industry—Our costs may change as a result of currency exchange rate fluctuations or inflation in the cost of merchandise manufactured and purchased abroad.”
Also, see note 19 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for a sensitivity analysis of the impact of a hypothetical 10% appreciation or depreciation of foreign exchange rates to which we have exposure (mostly US$) in our income or (loss) before tax.
Inflation and Interest Rate Risk
Brazil and countries in Latin America in general, have historically experienced high rates of inflation. Inflationary pressures persist, and actions taken in an effort to curb inflation, coupled with public speculation about possible future governmental actions, have in the past contributed to economic uncertainty in Brazil and other Latin America countries and heightened volatility in the Latin America securities market. The inflation rate in Brazil, as reflected by the IPCA index was 6.29% in 2016, 2.95% in 2017 and 3.75 in 2018. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including fiscal and monetary policies to combat inflation and Brazilian and international economic and political considerations, as well as other factors beyond our control. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in Brazil—Inflation and efforts by the Brazilian government to combat inflation may contribute significantly to economic uncertainty in Brazil and could have an adverse effect on us and the market price of our common shares.”
We have floating interest rate indebtedness, so we are exposed to interest rate risk as a result of changes in the level of interest rates and any increase in interest rates could negatively affect our results of operations and would increase the costs associated with financing our operations.
As of December 31, 2018, substantially all of our total indebtedness consisted of floating rate debt and was principally indexed to interest rate indexes such as the CDI and the Brazil Long Term Interest Rate – TJLP.
Furthermore, our exposure to interest rate risk is also applicable to our cash and cash equivalents deposited in interest-bearing accounts which are indexed to the CDI, which can affect our results of operations and cash flows.
See note 19 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for a sensitivity analysis of the impact of a hypothetical 50 basis point increase or decrease on the variable interest rate indexes of our floating rate indebtedness and cash and cash equivalents for the relevant twelve month period.
Customer and Credit Risk
Our trade accounts receivables are represented by credit sales (installments) funded by credit card operators and receivables from B2B customers. We regularly monitor our trade accounts receivable from credit sales and consider the risk of not collecting receivables from our customers as limited given the intrinsic nature of the methods we have adopted to receive payments from most of our customers (credit card and bank direct deposits).
Substantially all of our past due receivables are related to (i) disputes we have with our third-party couriers in connection with loss of or damage to products to be delivered to our customers, and (ii) receivables from B2B customers. During 2018, we experienced delays in payment from certain B2B customers and entered into negotiations aiming at recovering overdue receivables. As a result of increased credit risk from certain of our B2B customers derived from such increase of overdue receivables in our B2B operations we recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of R$6.4 million in 2018. As of December 31, 2018, we had past due receivables amounting to R$20.4 million with respect to our B2B operations.
Liquidity Risk
We manage liquidity risk through the daily monitoring of our cash flows, control of financial assets and maturity of our liabilities, as well as maintaining a close relationship with financial institutions. Any additional cash in our activities not spent in operating and capital expenditure activities is invested into interest-bearing accounts and we choose investments with appropriate maturity and liquidity terms based on our cash flow estimates. Our liquidity is also dependent on factoring a portion of our trade accounts receivable and extending the payment terms of our trade accounts payable in connection with our reverse factoring arrangements. See
“
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects —B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
ITEM 12.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
A.
Debt Securities
Not applicable.
B.
Warrants and Rights
Not applicable.
C.
Other Securities
Not applicable.
D.
American Depositary Shares
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 13.
DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
None.
ITEM 14.
MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 15.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
A.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2018. “Disclosure controls and procedures” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act means controls and procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2018 were ineffective in view of the material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting as described below.
B.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our
management
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act.
Our system of internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As required by Rule 13a-15(c) of the Exchange Act, our management conducted an evaluation of our company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated
Framework
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment and criteria, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2018 due to the material weaknesses described below.
Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the
normal
course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis.
We identified material weaknesses in internal control related to some ineffective information technology general controls (ITGCs) over certain information technology systems that support our financial reporting processes. These control deficiencies were identified in the operation of controls related to procedures for (i) granting access, (ii) segregation of duties analysis, (iii) definition of a contingency plan; (iv) evidence of approvals and testing supporting documentation to
manage
changes to certain systems and (v) evidence of approvals and restore and batch testing procedures. Our business process controls (automated and manual) that are dependent on the affected ITGCs could also have been adversely impacted by these control deficiencies.
Also, control deficiencies were identified in the operation of controls related to the accounting for capitalized software. Specifically, our process level control over internal use software may not have effectively tracked and categorized costs associated with software in use, write-off needs and completeness of balance to be amortized. These control deficiencies create a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement in the consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
In addition, during our
assessment
of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, we also identified the weaknesses described below, that when evaluated together, may constitute a material weakness:
·
Manual Journal entries:
control deficiencies were identified in the operation of controls related to establishing and maintaining effective procedures to ensure adequate review and approval according to the defined policy, and existence of sufficient supporting documentation over manual journal entries. This weakness, combined with inadequate approval and lack of revision, could result in a failure to timely detect errors in manual journal entries.
·
Management review controls:
we identified that certain review and approval controls are not always executed in accordance with our policies. These deficiencies were noted in certain controls that affect commission calculation, royalty’s approval, discounts and price changes and post-closing adjustments not identified during financial reporting closing process. Also, control deficiencies were identified in validating the completeness of the data extracted of certain systems (IPE - Information Provided by Entity).
·
Anti-corruption and code of ethics compliance oversight
: we do not have a defined process to report potentially irregular activities to the audit committee and the board of directors. Also there is no defined committee in charge to analyze complaints and evaluate current controls to maintain an effective anti-corruption compliance program to prevent and detect violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (FCPA) and other applicable anti-corruption laws.
Remediation Efforts
Our management has been actively engaged in the design and implementation of remediation efforts to address the identified material weaknesses, as well as other identified areas of risk. The remediation efforts outlined below, which have been implemented or are in the process of implementation, are intended to address both the identified weaknesses and
related
areas. During 2018, we have undertaken the following remedial steps to address the weaknesses identified:
·
A segregation of duties assessment was performed on seven of our systems where conflicts were identified. Management is working to remediate the conflicts and to implement compensatory controls. We expect the remediation to be completed by the end of 2019.
·
We are committed to continue to improve our internal control processes and will continue to diligently review our financial reporting controls and procedures in order to ensure our compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the related rules promulgated by the SEC. Management is working to improve our internal controls environment considering (i) review of the policies and procedures in place; (ii) update of documents and control activities according to our policies; and (iii) reinforcement with our employees the internal control requirements on execution, review, including evidences and approvals according to our policies. Also, during 2018 we performed trainings (SOX training, IPE training and Management Review Controls training) to process owners throughout the company. In addition, we are working with external advisors to support us on the internal controls assessment and implementation requirements.
·
Management has reviewed and published the Code of Ethics in our internal communication tools, obtaining the formal acceptance of our employees. We have a hotline, in which employees and third parties can anonymously communicate concerns, suggestions and ethics complaints. These complaints are analyzed by an independent company, which is responsible for the identification, tracking, investigation and classification of the complaint according to the materiality of the report, and directs us the necessary information to complete the analysis and disclosure of the return to whistleblower. We also included in the process of integration of new employees the presentation of the Ethics Code and the hotline with formal agreement by the employees.
We believe that these actions will remediate the identified material weaknesses. These material weaknesses will not be considered remediated, however, until the applicable controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively. We expect that the remediation of these material weaknesses will be completed by the end of 2019.
C.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
Not Applicable.
D.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during fiscal year 2018, which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting are described above under “Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.”
ITEM 16.
RESERVED
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Nilesh Lakhani, an independent director within the meaning of Section 303A of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual and a member of our audit committee, qualifies as “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 16A of Form 20-F.
ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS
We have adopted a code of ethics, which is applicable to all of our directors, officers and employees. The Code of Ethics is attached it as an exhibit to this annual report. We have also posted a copy of our code of business conduct and ethics on our website at http://investor.netshoes.com/corporate-governance.
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees by categories specified below in connection with certain professional services rendered by KPMG Auditores Independentes, our principal external auditors, for the periods indicated. We did not pay any other fees to our auditors during the periods indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of R$)
|
Audit fees:
|
1,466
|
1,751
|
Audit-related fees
|
15
|
—
|
Tax fees
|
67
|
10
|
Total fees
|
|
|
The policy of our audit committee is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by KPMG Auditores Independentes, including audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services as described above, other than those for
de minimus
services which are approved by the audit committee prior to the completion of the audit.
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
None.
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
None.
ITEM 16F. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
None.
ITEM 16G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
We are a “foreign private issuer” (as such term is defined in Rule 3b-4 under the Exchange Act), and our common shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Under Section 303A of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual, New York Stock Exchange listed companies that are foreign private issuers are permitted to follow home country practice in lieu of the corporate governance provisions specified by the New York Stock Exchange with limited exceptions. The following summarizes some significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.
Under the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual, or the NYSE Manual, U.S. domestic listed companies are required to have a majority independent board (with the independence requirements set forth in the
NYSE), which is not required under the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands, our home country. In addition, the NYSE Manual requires U.S. domestic listed companies to have a compensation committee and a nominating/corporate governance committee, each composed entirely of independent directors, which are not required under the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands.
ITEM 16H. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 17.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 18.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
See our consolidated financial statements beginning at page F-1.
ITEM 19.
EXHIBITS
See exhibit index attached hereto.
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on Form 20-F on its behalf.
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
Name: Marcio Kumruian
|
|
Title: Chief Executive Officer
|
By:
|
/s/ Alexandre Augusto Olivieri
|
|
Name: Alexandre Augusto Olivieri
|
|
Title: Chief Financial Officer
|
Date: April 30, 2019
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
1.01
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association of Netshoes (Cayman) Limited as currently in effect (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.02 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed with the SEC on April 6, 2017, File No. 333-216727).
|
2.01
|
Fifth Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Agreement executed by and between Netshoes (Cayman) Limited, CDK Net Fund IC, HCFT Holdings, LLC, Hagop Chabab, Tiger Global Private Investment Partners V, L.P., Tiger Global Private Investment Partners VI, L.P., Metal Monkey Trust, Scott Shleifer 2011 Descendants’ Trust, The Feroz Dewan 2010 GRAT IX, Nicolas Szekasy, Clemenceau Investments Pte. Ltd., Kaszek Ventures I, L.P., Kaszek Ventures I-A, L.P., Kaszek Ventures I-B, L.P., Kaszek Ventures I-C, L.P., ICQ Investments V L.P, ICQ Investments 16, L.P, Archy LLC, Riverwood Capital Partners II, L.P., Riverwood Capital Partners II (Parallel-B) L.P., Macro Continental, Inc., Boscolo Intervest Limited and International Finance Corporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.01.02 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed with the SEC on April 6, 2017, File No. 333-216727)
.
|
2.02
|
Policy Agreement dated March 20, 2015 between Netshoes (Cayman) Limited and International Finance Corporation, and the amendment thereto dated February 22, 2017(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.02 to the Registration Statement on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on April 6, 2017, File No. 333-216727).
|
2.03
|
The registrant hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, copies of instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries and for any of its unconsolidated subsidiaries for which financial statements are required to be filed.
|
4.01
|
English translation of the Lease Assignment and Affirmation of Debt Agreement dated June 1, 2009 between PMG Administradora de Bens Ltda., Montecchio do Brasil Empreendimentos Imobiliários Ltda., Argos Armazéns Gerais Ltda., Argos Transportes Ltda., NS2.com Internet Ltda., Zareh Chabab and Ovsanna Chabab, and of the First Amendment thereto dated April 10, 2013 between PMG Administradora de Bens Ltda. and NS2.com Internet S.A., and of the Second Amendment thereto dated April 2, 2014 between Uittorenen do Brasil Participações Ltda. and NS2.com Internet S.A. (Instrumento Particular de Cessão de Locação e de Confissão de Dívida) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed with the SEC on March 16, 2017, File No. 333-216727).
|
4.02
|
English translation of the Lease Agreement of a Custom-Built Property dated November 5, 2014 between FW2 Logística e Empreendimentos Imobiliários S.A., NS2.com Internet S.A. and RCA Gerenciamento e Fiscalização Ltda., and the First Amendment thereto dated November 4, 2015 (Instrumento Particular de Contrato de Locação de Imóvel Sob Medida e Outras Avenças) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.02 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed with the SEC on March 16, 2017, File No. 333-216727).
|
4.03
|
English translation of the Non-Residential Lease Agreement dated September 18, 2012 between CCG Empreendimentos Ltda. and NS2.com Internet S.A. (Instrumento Particular de Contrato de Locação de Imóvel para Fins Não Residenciais), of the First Amendment thereto dated October 18, 2012, of the Second Amendment thereto dated May 31, 2015, of the Third Amendment thereto dated October 23, 2015, of the Fourth Amendment thereto dated June 1, 2016, of the Fifth Amendment thereto dated August 1, 2016, of the Sixth Amendment thereto dated August 1, 2016, of the Seventh Amendment thereto dated January 3, 2018, and of the Eighth Amendment thereto dated January 18, 2018(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.03 to the annual report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 28, 2018, File No. 001-38055).
|
4.04
|
English translation of the Hosting Services Agreements dated October 21, 2016 between NS2.com Internet S.A. and UOL Diveo Tecnologia Ltda (Pedido de Compra/Contrato Nº 16-03868; Pedido de Compra/Contrato Nº 16-03869) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.06 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed with the SEC on March 16, 2017, File No. 333-216727).
|
4.05
|
Netshoes (Cayman) Limited 2012 Share Plan, adopted on April 16, 2012. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.07 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed with the SEC on March 16, 2017, File No. 333-216727).
|
4.06
|
English translation of the Non-Compete Agreement dated December 23, 2009 between NS2.com Internet S.A. and Marcio Kumruian (Acordo de Não-Competição) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.08 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed with the SEC on March 16, 2017, File No. 333-216727).
|
4.07
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 29, 2019, by and among the Company, Magazine Luiza S.A., a Brazilian sociedade anônima incorporated under the laws of the Federal Republic of Brazil, and Magazine Luiza Cayman Ltd, an exempted company with limited liability incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands.
|
8.01
|
List of Subsidiaries.
|
11.01
|
English Translation of the Code of Ethics (Código de Ética) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 14.01 to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed with the SEC on March 30, 2017, File No. 333-216727).
|
12.1
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
|
12.2
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
|
13.1
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
|
13.2
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED
Consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2017 and 2018
and for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Netshoes (Cayman) Limited
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Netshoes (Cayman) Limited and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of profit or loss, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and changes in shareholders’ equity for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes, collectively, the consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
Translation of consolidated financial statements into United States Dollars
The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018 have been translated into United States dollars solely for the convenience of the reader. We have audited the translation and, in our opinion, the consolidated financial statements expressed in Brazilian reais have been translated into United States dollars on the basis set forth in note 2.2 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements
Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1.4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred operating losses, negative cash flow from operating activities and has a working capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1.4. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/S/ KPMG Auditores Independentes
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2010
São Paulo, Brazil
April 29, 2019
F-2
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
|
December 31, 2017 and 2018
|
(Reais and Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
Assets
|
Note
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD Note 2.2
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
9
|
R$
|
395,962
|
R$
|
67,321
|
US$
|
17,374
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
19,397
|
|
2,996
|
|
773
|
Trade accounts receivables, net
|
10
|
|
113,168
|
|
163,807
|
|
42,275
|
Inventories, net
|
11
|
|
456,632
|
|
268,594
|
|
69,318
|
Recoverable taxes
|
12
|
|
80,047
|
|
59,214
|
|
15,282
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
48,352
|
|
20,138
|
|
5,198
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,113,558
|
|
582,070
|
|
150,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
15,048
|
|
18,533
|
|
4,783
|
Judicial deposits
|
24
|
|
106,914
|
|
119,717
|
|
30,896
|
Recoverable taxes
|
12
|
|
70,765
|
|
40,033
|
|
10,332
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
14,166
|
|
3,656
|
Due from related parties
|
23
|
|
12
|
|
7
|
|
2
|
Property and equipment, net
|
13
|
|
73,039
|
|
76,489
|
|
19,740
|
Intangible assets, net
|
14
|
|
115,839
|
|
143,317
|
|
36,987
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
383,567
|
|
412,262
|
|
106,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
R$
|
1,497,125
|
R$
|
994,332
|
US$
|
256,616
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
|
December 31, 2017 and 2018
|
(Reais and Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
|
Note
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD Note 2.2
|
Trade accounts payable
|
15
|
R$
|
365,835
|
R$
|
337,120
|
US$
|
87,003
|
Reverse factoring
|
16
|
|
148,928
|
|
45,276
|
|
11,685
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
18
|
|
106,577
|
|
38,473
|
|
9,929
|
Taxes and contributions payable
|
|
|
19,875
|
|
18,467
|
|
4,766
|
Deferred revenue
|
7
|
|
3,732
|
|
3,983
|
|
1,028
|
Accrued expenses
|
17
|
|
120,366
|
|
136,721
|
|
35,285
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
31,017
|
|
25,711
|
|
6,635
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
796,330
|
|
605,751
|
|
156,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
18
|
|
179,394
|
|
190,406
|
|
49,140
|
Provision for labor, civil and tax risks
|
24
|
|
12,523
|
|
19,935
|
|
5,145
|
Deferred revenue
|
7
|
|
25,502
|
|
21,690
|
|
5,598
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
27
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
217,446
|
|
232,031
|
|
59,883
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,013,776
|
|
837,782
|
|
216,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
21
|
|
244
|
|
244
|
|
63
|
Additional-paid in capital
|
21
|
|
1,345,507
|
|
1,347,581
|
|
347,781
|
Treasury shares
|
21
|
|
(1,533)
|
|
(1,533)
|
|
(396)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(13,664)
|
|
(11,022)
|
|
(2,845)
|
Accumulated losses
|
|
|
(847,125)
|
|
(1,178,464)
|
|
(304,135)
|
Equity attributable to owners of the parent
|
|
|
483,429
|
|
156,806
|
|
40,468
|
Equity attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(80)
|
|
(256)
|
|
(66)
|
Total shareholders' equity
|
|
|
483,349
|
|
156,550
|
|
40,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
|
R$
|
1,497,125
|
R$
|
994,332
|
US$
|
256,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Consolidated Statements of Profit or Loss
|
Years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
|
(Reais and Dollars in thousands, except loss per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
Note
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD Note 2.2
|
Revenue
|
6
|
R$
|
1,685,151
|
R$
|
1,835,212
|
R$
|
1,808,064
|
US$
|
466,621
|
Cost of sales
|
8
|
|
(1,144,231)
|
|
(1,247,014)
|
|
(1,389,842)
|
|
(358,687)
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
540,920
|
|
588,198
|
|
418,222
|
|
107,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
8
|
|
(431,065)
|
|
(495,190)
|
|
(480,206)
|
|
(123,931)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
8
|
|
(162,338)
|
|
(143,253)
|
|
(191,695)
|
|
(49,472)
|
Other operating expenses, net
|
|
|
(5,251)
|
|
(3,933)
|
|
(9,312)
|
|
(2,403)
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
(598,654)
|
|
(642,376)
|
|
(681,213)
|
|
(175,806)
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(57,734)
|
|
(54,178)
|
|
(262,991)
|
|
(67,872)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income
|
8
|
|
28,285
|
|
28,996
|
|
15,026
|
|
3,878
|
Financial expenses
|
8
|
|
(104,795)
|
|
(129,040)
|
|
(83,223)
|
|
(21,478)
|
Monetary position (loss) gain, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
9,595
|
|
2,476
|
Loss before income tax
|
|
|
(134,244)
|
|
(154,222)
|
|
(321,593)
|
|
(82,996)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
20
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(202)
|
|
(52)
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
|
R$
|
(134,244)
|
R$
|
(154,222)
|
R$
|
(321,795)
|
US$
|
(83,048)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
3
|
R$
|
(17,652)
|
|
(16,123)
|
|
(10,579)
|
US$
|
(2,730)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
R$
|
(151,896)
|
|
(170,345)
|
|
(332,374)
|
US$
|
(85,778)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners of the Parent from continuing operations
|
R$
|
(133,422)
|
R$
|
(153,623)
|
R$
|
(321,166)
|
US$
|
(82,886)
|
Owners of the Parent from discontinued operations
|
|
(17,652)
|
|
(16,123)
|
|
(10,579)
|
|
(2,730)
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(822)
|
|
(599)
|
|
(629)
|
|
(159)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share attributable to owners of the Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
5
|
R$
|
(7.05)
|
R$
|
(5.95)
|
R$
|
(10.68)
|
US$
|
(2.76)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations per share attributable to owners of the Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
5
|
R$
|
(6.22)
|
R$
|
(5.39)
|
R$
|
(10.34)
|
US$
|
(2.67)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
F-5
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
Years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
|
(Reais and Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD Note 2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
R$
|
(151,896)
|
R$
|
(170,345)
|
R$
|
(332,374)
|
US$
|
(85,778)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items that will subsequently be recorded to profit or loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(11,015)
|
|
5,502
|
|
2,989
|
|
771
|
Foreign currency translation - sale of subsidiary
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
64
|
|
17
|
Cash flow hedges – effective portion of changes in fair value
|
|
|
(3,907)
|
|
348
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Cash flow hedges – reclassified to initial cost of inventories
|
|
|
3,119
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Cash flow hedges – reclassified to profit or loss
|
|
|
(670)
|
|
197
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(12,473)
|
|
6,047
|
|
3,053
|
|
788
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(164,369)
|
|
(164,298)
|
|
(329,321)
|
|
(84,990)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners of the Parent
|
|
R$
|
(163,829)
|
R$
|
(163,833)
|
R$
|
(329,103)
|
US$
|
(84,934)
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(540)
|
|
(465)
|
|
(218)
|
|
(56)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
Years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
|
(Reais and Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
Cash flows from continuing operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 2.2
|
Net loss from continuing operations
|
R$
|
(134,244)
|
|
R$
|
(154,222)
|
|
R$
|
(321,795)
|
US$
|
(83,048)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
25,443
|
|
|
13,014
|
|
3,359
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
30,776
|
|
|
31,487
|
|
|
58,022
|
|
14,974
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment, and intangible assets
|
|
901
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
3,770
|
|
973
|
Impairment of property and equipment, and intangible assets
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
851
|
|
220
|
Impairment of recoverable taxes (note 3)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
4,828
|
|
1,246
|
Share-based payment
|
|
930
|
|
|
(13,860)
|
|
|
7,923
|
|
2,045
|
Provision for labor, civil and tax risks
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
10,111
|
|
|
10,795
|
|
2,786
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
90,605
|
|
|
110,568
|
|
|
62,066
|
|
16,018
|
Monetary position (loss) gain, net
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5,428
|
|
1,401
|
Provision for inventory losses
|
|
949
|
|
|
4,904
|
|
|
72,526
|
|
18,717
|
Provision for expected losses, Other non-current assets (note 19)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
13,225
|
|
3,413
|
Other
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
205
|
|
52
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
2,549
|
|
|
16,401
|
|
4,233
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
148
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
67,767
|
|
|
75,095
|
|
|
(67,290)
|
|
(17,366)
|
Inventories
|
|
(79,904)
|
|
|
(108,386)
|
|
|
84,034
|
|
21,687
|
Recoverable taxes
|
|
(57,610)
|
|
|
(53,172)
|
|
|
34,236
|
|
8,836
|
Judicial deposits
|
|
(39,940)
|
|
|
(35,097)
|
|
|
(12,803)
|
|
(3,304)
|
Other assets
|
|
(20,901)
|
|
|
9,525
|
|
|
6,196
|
|
1,599
|
Increase (decrease) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
(209)
|
|
|
(186)
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
98,545
|
|
|
29,880
|
|
|
(1,497)
|
|
(386)
|
Reverse factoring
|
|
8,104
|
|
|
121,061
|
|
|
(103,652)
|
|
(26,750)
|
Taxes and contributions payable
|
|
9,334
|
|
|
5,112
|
|
|
537
|
|
139
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
(1,875)
|
|
|
(3,641)
|
|
|
(3,562)
|
|
(919)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
30,118
|
|
|
(2,978)
|
|
|
24,719
|
|
6,378
|
Share-based payment
|
|
(715)
|
|
|
(2,366)
|
|
|
(611)
|
|
(158)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
(12,954)
|
|
|
(8,683)
|
|
|
(8,273)
|
|
(2,135)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operating activities
|
|
(7,778)
|
|
|
43,502
|
|
|
(100,707)
|
|
(25,990)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from continuing investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operation (note 3a)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
241
|
|
62
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
(25,069)
|
|
|
(7,728)
|
|
|
(22,185)
|
|
(5,725)
|
Loan to third parties (note 3a)
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(8,801)
|
|
(2,271)
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
|
(47,043)
|
|
|
(49,378)
|
|
|
(71,743)
|
|
(18,515)
|
Interest received on installment sales
|
|
6,987
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
373
|
Restricted cash
|
|
760
|
|
|
6,206
|
|
|
(3,485)
|
|
(900)
|
Net cash used in continuing investing activities
|
|
(64,365)
|
|
|
(48,829)
|
|
|
(104,528)
|
|
(26,976)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from continuing financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from debt
|
|
137,325
|
|
|
134,152
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Payments of debt
|
|
(79,004)
|
|
|
(141,788)
|
|
|
(57,040)
|
|
(14,721)
|
Payments of interest
|
|
(105,234)
|
|
|
(108,429)
|
|
|
(62,889)
|
|
(16,230)
|
Share-based payment
|
|
-
|
|
|
(5,824)
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Proceeds from issuance of common shares
|
|
-
|
|
|
423,166
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing financing activities
|
|
(46,913)
|
|
|
301,277
|
|
|
(119,929)
|
|
(30,951)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations (note 03)
|
|
(13,620)
|
|
|
(18,162)
|
|
|
(8,121)
|
|
(2,096)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
(5,083)
|
|
|
6,869
|
|
|
4,644
|
|
1,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
(137,759)
|
|
|
284,657
|
|
|
(328,641)
|
|
(84,815)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
249,064
|
|
|
111,305
|
|
|
395,962
|
|
102,189
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
111,305
|
|
|
395,962
|
|
|
67,321
|
|
17,374
|
|
R$
|
(137,759)
|
|
R$
|
284,657
|
|
|
(328,641)
|
US$
|
(84,815)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property and equipment and intagible assets
|
R$
|
4,677
|
|
R$
|
1,710
|
|
R$
|
2,182
|
US$
|
563
|
Deferred offering costs reclassified to equity
|
R$
|
-
|
|
R$
|
6,808
|
|
R$
|
-
|
US$
|
-
|
Convertible notes converted to common shares
|
R$
|
-
|
|
R$
|
94,151
|
|
R$
|
-
|
US$
|
-
|
Reclassification of share-based payment from Cash-settled arrangement to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-settled arrangement
|
R$
|
-
|
|
R$
|
13,706
|
|
R$
|
-
|
US$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
|
F-7
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
|
Years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
|
(Reais in thousand)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Attributtable to owners of the Parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share
Capital
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
Tresuary
Shares
|
|
Accumulated
Losses
|
|
Foreign
Currency
Translation
|
|
Gain (Loss) on Hedge
Accounting
|
|
Total
|
|
Non-controlling
Interest
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2016
|
R$
|
141
|
R$
|
821,988
|
R$
|
(925)
|
R$
|
(526,305)
|
R$
|
(7,735)
|
R$
|
913
|
R$
|
288,077
|
R$
|
925
|
R$
|
289,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(151,074)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(151,074)
|
|
(822)
|
|
(151,896)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(11,297)
|
|
(1,458)
|
|
(12,755)
|
|
282
|
|
(12,473)
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(151,074)
|
|
(11,297)
|
|
(1,458)
|
|
(163,829)
|
|
(540)
|
|
(164,369)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions with Owners and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(608)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(608)
|
|
-
|
|
(608)
|
Total transactions with owners and other
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(608)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(608)
|
|
-
|
|
(608)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2016
|
R$
|
141
|
R$
|
821,988
|
R$
|
(1,533)
|
R$
|
(677,379)
|
R$
|
(19,032)
|
R$
|
(545)
|
R$
|
123,640
|
R$
|
385
|
R$
|
124,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(169,746)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(169,746)
|
|
(599)
|
|
(170,345)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
5,368
|
|
545
|
|
5,913
|
|
134
|
|
6,047
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(169,746)
|
|
5,368
|
|
545
|
|
(163,833)
|
|
(465)
|
|
(164,298)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions with Owners and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares in initial public offering, net of offering costs
|
|
84
|
|
415,466
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
415,550
|
|
-
|
|
415,550
|
Conversion of convertible notes to common shares
|
|
19
|
|
94,132
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
94,151
|
|
-
|
|
94,151
|
Share-based payments
|
|
-
|
|
13,921
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
13,921
|
|
-
|
|
13,921
|
Total transactions with owners and other
|
|
103
|
|
523,519
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
523,622
|
|
-
|
|
523,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2017
|
R$
|
244
|
R$
|
1,345,507
|
R$
|
(1,533)
|
R$
|
(847,125)
|
R$
|
(13,664)
|
R$
|
-
|
R$
|
483,429
|
R$
|
(80)
|
R$
|
483,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment on initial adoption of IFRS 15 (see note 2.6)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(1,153)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(1,153)
|
|
-
|
|
(1,153)
|
Adjustment on initial adoption of IFRS 9 (see note 2.6)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(701)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(701)
|
|
-
|
|
(701)
|
Hyperinflation adjustment - IAS 29 (see note 3)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
2,260
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
2,260
|
|
42
|
|
2,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(331,745)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(331,745)
|
|
(629)
|
|
(332,374)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
2,642
|
|
|
|
2,642
|
|
411
|
|
3,053
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(331,745)
|
|
2,642
|
|
-
|
|
(329,103)
|
|
(218)
|
|
(329,321)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payments
|
|
-
|
|
2,074
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
2,074
|
|
-
|
|
2,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2018
|
R$
|
244
|
R$
|
1,347,581
|
R$
|
(1,533)
|
R$
|
(1,178,464)
|
R$
|
(11,022)
|
R$
|
-
|
R$
|
156,806
|
R$
|
(256)
|
R$
|
156,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
|
F-8
1.
Organization and background
1.1
Nature of Operations
Netshoes (Cayman) Limited (“NSC” or the “Parent") was incorporated in the Cayman Islands on April 12, 2011. NSC is a holding company and conducts its business primarily through its subsidiaries (together with NSC, the “Company”, “we” or “us”). The Company’s registered office is at Willow House, Cricket Square, George Town, KY 1-1104, Cayman Islands. Major shareholders of the Company include Tiger Global Private Investment Partners V, L.P. (“Tiger Global V”), Tiger Global Private Investment Partners V, L.P. (“Tiger Global V”), Tiger Global Private Investment Partners VI, L.P. (“Tiger Global VI”), Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb LP, CDK Net Fund IC and HCFT Holdings.
The Company is a sports and lifestyle ecommerce destination in Latin America with operations in Brazil and Argentina. The Company’s core business is to offer to its customers a reliable and convenient online shopping experience with a wide selection of products including athletic shoes, jerseys, apparel, accessories and sporting equipment from leading international, local and private brands as well as fashion and beauty. The Company conducts its business mainly through its ecommerce websites (
Netshoes,
Zattini,
Shoestock and Freelace).
In August 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with the Grupo Sierra Capital (“Sierra”) to sell the entirety of its Mexico operations. On October 11, 2018 the Company and Sierra concluded the transaction, which was preceded by final adjustments agreed by the parties under the original terms and conditions of the negotiation (see note 3).
In January 2019, the Company decided to divest Argentina operations (see note 3).
1.2
Split of Shares
The Board of Directors approved a 1.0 for 3.0 share split of the Company's outstanding common shares. The share split became effective on April 18, 2017. The Company has retrospectively adjusted loss per share data considering the split of shares (see note 5).
1.3
Convertible Notes and Initial Public Offering
On February 22, 2017, the Company entered into a note purchase agreement pursuant to which it issued and sold unsecured promissory notes convertible into its common shares, in the aggregate principal amount of US$30.0 million, to certain of its shareholders.
The Company determined that the convertible notes constituted a hybrid instrument with characteristics of a debt containing embedded derivative features requiring separate accounting as a derivative instrument. The liability related to the convertible notes was initially recorded at fair value and, subsequently, at amortized cost. The embedded derivative associated with the convertible notes was recorded at fair value with its changes being recorded in the statement of profit or loss.
Immediately prior to the completion of the IPO, the convertible notes (principal amount and any unpaid accrued interest) and its embedded derivative was converted into our common shares with a 10% price discount relative to the initial public offering price of the Company’s outstanding common shares. The value of the Company’s outstanding convertible notes (principal amount and unpaid accrued interest) and its embedded derivative was US$ 30,4 million (or R$94,2 million, using the exchange rate on the date of completion of the IPO) that was converted in 1,870,709 common shares.
F-9
On April 18, 2017, the Company completed its Initial Public Offering (IPO). The Company sold 8,250,000 of its common shares at a public offering price of $18.00 per common share, for gross proceeds of $148.5 million (or R$459.7 million, using the exchange rate on the date of completion of the IPO). The Company received net proceeds of $134.2 million (or R$415.6 million, using the exchange rate on the date of completion of the IPO), after deducting $9.7 million (or R$29.9 million, using the exchange rate on the date of completion of the IPO) in underwriting discounts and commissions and $4.6 million (or R$14.2 million, using the exchange rate on the date of completion of the IPO) of other offering expenses.
The shares offered and sold in the initial public offering were registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration No.333-216727), which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 12, 2017. The common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on April 12, 2017 under the symbol "NETS."
1.4
Going concern considerations
The Company recorded a net loss and a significant negative operating cash flow in the year ended December 31, 2018. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company had accumulated losses of R$ 1,178,464 (compared to R$ 847,125 as of December 31, 2017), net loss of R$ 332,374 (compared to R$170,345 for the year ended December 31, 2017) and net cash used in operating activities of R$ 100,707 (compared to R$43,502 of net cash provided in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2017). In addition, the Company has a working capital deficiency as of December 31, 2018, with R$ 23,681 of net current liabilities (compared to a working capital surplus of R$ 317,228 of net current assets as of December 31, 2017).
The Company expects to continue to incur net losses for at least the next twelve-months following the issue of these consolidated financial statements. Although the Company continues to take action to improve its operating performance and expects to generate positive net operating cash flow over the next twelve-months, this positive cash flow from operating activities by itself may not be sufficient to meet the Company’s cash requirements in the same period arising from its financing activities. As such, Management has concluded that financing alternatives will be necessary to meet its obligations within one year from the date of issue of these consolidated financial statements. However, there can be no assurance that the Company’s plan to improve its operating performance and financial position will be successful or that the Company will be able to obtain additional financing on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
The Company is currently exploring alternatives to obtain access to other sources of capital necessary to meet its ongoing liquidity needs, such as obtaining new lines of credit, and is taking measures to improve its operating performance and cash, liquidity and financial position. Such measures include, among others, the following:
·
pursuing the sale of its operations in Argentina by the second quarter of 2019, which have not performed as expected and have had a negative effect on the Company’s operating cash flows;
·
continuing to implement cost-saving initiatives across the Company;
·
negotiating alternative payment terms with suppliers;
·
seeking with current creditors the partial release of collateral provided under certain of the Company’s financing arrangements (basically restricted cash and cash equivalents, which as of December 31, 2018 amounted to R$ 88,760); and
·
assessing ways of monetizing the Company’s PIS/COFINS judicial deposits, following a favorable decision in its judicial disputes challenging the tax authorities’ interpretation of the calculation basis for PIS/COFINS taxes over products sold by the Company (such tax credits amounted to R$ 101,971 as of December 31, 2018). Following the favorable decision, the Company expects these deposits to be released, however authorization for release is subject to government approval, the timing of which is currently unknown.
F-10
The Company has also engaged financial and other advisors to assist it in those efforts.
Given the above, management acknowledges there is a material uncertainty which may cast substantial doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The financial statements of the Company have been prepared assuming the Company’s ability to continue as an going concern as management has a reasonable expectation that the Company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future based on the projections and measures being taken. If for any reason the Company is unable to continue as a going concern, then this could have an impact on the Company’s ability to realize assets at their recognized values, and to settle liabilities in the ordinary course of business at the amounts stated in the consolidated financial statements. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from this uncertainty.
1.5
Merger agreement – subsequent event
The Company announced, on April 29, 2019, that it has entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger Agreement”) with Magazine Luiza S.A. and its wholly-owned subsidiary located in the Cayman Islands (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Magazine Luiza S.A. will acquire the Company, such that, at the effective time of the transaction, Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company continuing after the Merger as the surviving company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Magazine Luiza S.A. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, each of Company´s shareholders will receive US$2.00 per share in cash for each common share.
The Merger is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent established in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, including, among others, its approval by two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy at a Company’s general meeting, and by the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica – CADE), the Brazilian anti-trust agency.
In addition, on April 29, 2019, Magazine Luiza S.A. announced that it has entered into a voting and support agreement, with shareholders representing 47.9% of our capital stock, pursuant to which, among other things, each such shareholder has agreed to vote all common shares beneficially owned by such shareholder in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and the approval of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
2.1.
Statement of Compliance
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. The consolidated financial statements were authorized for issuance by the Board of Directors on April 29, 2019.
2.2.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical-cost basis, unless otherwise indicated. The presentation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain accounting estimates, and also requires the Company´s Management to exercise its judgment in the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies. Note 2.5 to these consolidated financial statements shows the areas in which a greater level of judgment and estimates have been applied.
Intercompany balances and transactions, including income and expenses and any unrealized income and expenses and the balance of receivables and payables arising from intercompany transactions, are eliminated. Unrealized losses are eliminated in the same way as unrealized gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.
The functional currency of the Company is US$ and the reporting currency is Brazilian Real (“R$”) as this currency better reflects the underlying operations of the consolidated entities. The Company’s subsidiaries with operations in Brazil and Argentina use their respective currencies as their functional currencies.
Due to the significant inflation in Argentina over the past few years, the three-year cumulative inflation rate in Argentina has exceeded 100% based on data from the national wholesale price index and various available inflation indices in May 2018. As such, Argentina was considered as hyperinflationary economy effective July 1, 2018 and, in these annual financial statements, beginning January 1, 2018 the Company is required to apply inflation accounting. Thus, its statement of financial position and statement of profit or loss are adjusted for the changes in the general purchasing power of the local currency, using official indices at the reporting date, before translation into Brazilian Real (“R$”) and, as a result, are stated in terms of the measuring unit current at the reporting date. The details of recognition of the effects of inflation in Argentina operations are disclosed in note 3.
F-11
The comparative information for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017 were restated for the purposes of applying IFRS 5 "Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations" after approval by the Board of Directors of the sale of its operation in Mexico on August 6, 2018 as presented in note 3.
Translations of balances in the consolidated statement of financial positions, consolidated statement of profit or loss, consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss) and consolidated statement of cash flows from R$ into US$ are solely for the convenience of the readers and have been calculated at the rate of US$1.00 = R$ 3.8748, representing the exchange rate set forth by the Banco Central do Brasil (Central Bank of Brazil) on December 31, 2018. No representation is made that the R$ amounts could have been, or could be, converted, realized or settled into US$ at that rate on December 31, 2018, or at any other rate. All values have been rounded to the nearest thousands of R$ and US$, except where noted.
2.3.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all entities in which NSC has a controlling financial interest.
i.
Consolidated subsidiaries
Consolidated subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Parent. The Parent controls an entity when it is exposed, or has the right to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. The financial statements of consolidated subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date on which control commences until the date on which control ceases.
The consolidated subsidiaries are listed as follows:
|
|
|
|
Percentage Ownership and Voting Interest
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
Country of
Incorporation
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netshoes Holding, LLC
|
|
United States of America
|
|
100.00%
|
|
100.00%
|
NS2 Com Internet S.A.
|
|
Brazil
|
|
100.00%
|
|
100.00%
|
NS3 Internet S.A.
|
|
Argentina
|
|
98.17%
|
|
98.22%
|
NS4 Com Internet S.A.
|
|
Mexico
|
|
100.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
NS4 Servicios de México S.A. C.V.
|
|
Mexico
|
|
100.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
NS5 Participações Ltda.
|
|
Brazil
|
|
99.99%
|
|
99.99%
|
NS6 Serviços Esportivos Ltda.
|
|
Brazil
|
|
100.00%
|
|
100.00%
|
ii.
Non-controlling interests
Non-controlling interests in the net assets of consolidated subsidiaries are identified separately from the Company’s equity. The interest of non-controlling shareholders may be initially measured either at fair value or at the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the fair value of the identifiable net assets of the relevant entity. The choice of measurement basis is made on an individual basis. Subsequent to the acquisition of a non-controlling interest, the carrying amount of non-controlling interest is the amount of relevant interests at initial recognition plus the non-controlling interest share of subsequent changes in equity. Total comprehensive income (loss) is attributed to non-controlling interests even if it results in the non-controlling interest having a deficit balance.
F-12
Changes in the Parent’s interest in subsidiaries that do not result in a loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions.
2.4.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions
i.
Foreign Currency Translation
The financial statements of foreign entities that use a functional currency different from the reporting currency are translated into Brazilian Real as described below:
·
Assets and liabilities are translated into Brazilian Real at the closing rate, corresponding to the spot exchange rate at the reporting date; and
·
Income statement and cash flow items are translated into Brazilian Real using the average rate of the period unless significant variances occur.
The resulting exchange differences are recognized directly in other comprehensive income (loss). When a foreign operation is disposed of, the cumulative amount of the exchange differences in consolidated equity relating to that operation is recorded to the consolidated statements of profit or loss.
ii.
Foreign Currency Operations
Foreign currency transactions are converted into the functional currency using the exchange rate at the transaction date. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are re-measured into functional currency using the exchange rate at the reporting date and the resulting exchange differences are recognized as financial income (expenses) in the consolidated statements of profit or loss. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are not re-measured at the reporting date.
2.5.
Use of Judgments, Estimates and Assumptions
In preparing these consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS, management has made judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of the Company’s accounting policies and the reported amount of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to estimates are recognized prospectively.
Information about judgments, assumptions and estimates made in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effects on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements are included in the following notes:
-
Note 3 – Hyperinflation: Determining inflation rate;
-
Note 6 – Revenue: Estimating the sales returns;
-
Note 10 – Trade Accounts Receivable: Estimated losses on doubtful accounts;
-
Note 11 – Inventories: Provision for inventory losses;
-
Note 13, 14 and 25 – Property and Equipment and Intangible Assets: Useful lives of property and equipment and intangible, software development costs related to intangible assets and impairment of long-lived assets;
-
Note 19 – Credit risk of Other non-current assets: Uncertainty of possible outcomes
F-13
-
Note 20 – Income Taxes: Recognition of deferred income tax assets and availability of future taxable profit against which tax losses carried forward can be used. The determination of tax positions that are probable of being sustained also involves significant judgment;
-
Note 22 – Share-based payments: Valuation and classification of awards; and
-
Note 24 – Contingencies: Key assumptions about the likelihood and magnitude of an outflow of resources.
2.6.
Changes in accounting policies
The Company applied as of January 1, 2018, IFRS 15 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers) and IFRS 9 (Financial Instruments). The nature and effect of these changes are described below.
i.
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
IFRS 15 establishes a comprehensive framework for determining whether, how much and when revenue is recognized. It replaces existing revenue recognition guidance, including IAS 11 Construction Contracts, IAS 18 Revenue, IFRIC 13 Customer Loyalty Programmes, IFRIC 15 Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate, IFRIC 18 Transfers of Assets from Customers, and SIC-31 Revenue-Barter Transactions Involving Advertising Services and it applies to all revenue arising from contracts with customers, unless those contracts are in the scope of other standards. The new standard establishes a five-step model to account for revenue arising from contracts with customers. Under IFRS 15, revenue is recognized at an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring goods or services to a customer.
The standard requires entities to exercise judgment, taking into consideration all the relevant facts and circumstances when applying each step of the model to contracts with their customers.
The standard also specifies the accounting for the incremental costs of obtaining a contract and the costs directly related to fulfilling a contract.
The Company adopted IFRS 15 using the cumulative effect method of adoption. Accordingly, the effect of adoption has been recorded as an adjustment to equity.
The details of new significant accounting policies and the nature and effect of the changes to previous accounting policies are set out below.
a.
Revenue from product sales
The Company’s contracts with customers for products sales generally includes a performance obligation. The Company has concluded that revenue from products sales should be recognized at the point in time when control of the asset is transferred to the customer, generally on delivery of the goods. Therefore, the adoption of IFRS 15 did not have any impact on the timing of revenue recognition, as sales were already recognized upon delivery of the goods to customers. However, the amount of revenue to be recognized was affected by the variable consideration, as stated below.
Variable consideration
Some contracts for product sales provide customers with a right of return. Prior to the adoption of IFRS 15, the Company recognized revenue from the sale of goods measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, net of returns. If revenue could not be reliably measured, the Company deferred revenue recognition until the uncertainty was resolved.
F-14
Under IFRS 15, rights of return give rise to variable consideration. The variable consideration is estimated at contract inception and constrained until the associated uncertainty is subsequently resolved. The application of the constraint on variable consideration increases the amount of revenue that will be deferred.
Rights of return
For contracts that permit the customer to return an item, under IFRS 15 revenue is recognized to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. Therefore, the amount of revenue recognized is adjusted for expected returns, which are estimated based on historical data.
The effect of adoption in January 1, 2018 resulted in the recognition of right of return assets (increase in inventories) of R$1,592 and refund liabilities (increase in other liabilities) of R$2,745. The net effect of R$1,153 was recorded in Accumulated losses. The effect of adoption on Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018 is a decrease of R$1,058 (USD 273).
b.
Freight-related services
The Company’s contracts with customers for freight-related services is recognized once the service is rendered. The shipping fees are linked to the revenue from products sales. Therefore, the adoption of IFRS 15 did not have any impact on the timing of revenue recognition, as services were already recognized upon delivery of the goods to customers. However, the amount of revenue to be recognized was affected by the variable consideration, as stated in topic (a).
c.
Marketplace platform
The Company’s contracts with customers for Marketplace platform generates revenue in the form of a commission, when the third-party vendors sell the products on the Company’s platform. The Company recognizes revenue from the marketplace platform on a net basis because the Company acts as an agent and does not have primary responsibility for fulfilling the orders, bear inventory risk or have discretion in establishing prices. Therefore, the adoption of IFRS 15 did not have any impact in the Company’s accounting policies, once the Company already recognized these revenues as an agent.
d.
NCard
The Company generates commission revenue from the customers’ activation of NCards (a co-branded credit card). The revenue is recognized when the NCards are activated by the customers. Therefore, the adoption of IFRS 15 did not have any impact in the Company’s accounting policies, once the Company already recognized these revenues when the customers activate the NCards.
e.
Presentation and disclosure requirements
As required for the consolidated financial statements, the Company disaggregated revenue recognized from contracts with customers into categories that depict how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors. The Company also disclosed information about the relationship between the disclosure of disaggregated revenue and revenue information disclosed for each reportable segment. Refer to notes 4 and 6 for the disclosure on disaggregated revenue.
ii.
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
IFRS 9 sets out requirements for recognizing and measuring financial assets, financial liabilities and some contracts to buy or sell non-financial items. This standard replaces IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.
F-15
The Company has applied IFRS 9 with the initial adoption date of January 1, 2018 and has taken an exemption not to restate comparative information for prior periods with respect to classification and measurement (including impairment) requirements. Differences in the carrying amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities resulting from the adoption of IFRS 9 were recognized in Accumulated losses as at January 1, 2018. Accordingly, the information presented for 2017 does not generally reflect the requirements of IFRS 9 but rather those of IAS 39.
The details of new significant accounting policies and the nature and effect of the changes to previous accounting policies are set out below.
a.
Classification and measurement of financial assets and liabilities
IFRS 9 contains a new classification and measurement approach for financial assets that reflects the business model in which assets are managed and their cash flow characteristics.
IFRS 9 contains three principal classification categories for financial assets: measured at amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI) and fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL). The standard eliminates the existing IAS 39 categories of held to maturity, loans and receivables and available for sale.
IFRS 9 largely retains the existing requirements in IAS 39 for the classification of financial liabilities. Therefore, the adoption of IFRS 9 has not had a significant effect on the Company’s accounting policies related to classification and measurement of financial liabilities.
The following table compares the measurement and classification under IAS 39 and IFRS 9 for each class of financial assets.
Financial instrument
|
|
Classification under IAS 39
|
|
Classification under IFRS 9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
Loans and receivables
|
|
Amortized cost
|
Restricted cash, current and non-current portion
|
|
Loans and receivables
|
|
Amortized cost
|
Trade accounts receivables
|
|
Loans and receivables
|
|
Amortized cost
|
Due from related parties
|
|
Loans and receivables
|
|
Amortized cost
|
Judicial deposits
|
|
Loans and receivables
|
|
Amortized cost
|
Other assets, current and non-current portion
|
|
Loans and receivables
|
|
Amortized cost
|
The effect of adopting IFRS 9 on the carrying amounts of financial assets at January 1, 2018 relates solely to the new impairment requirements.
b.
Impairment
IFRS 9 replaces the “incurred loss” model in IAS 39 with a forward-looking “expected credit loss” (ECL) model. This new model requires the Company to record expected credit losses on trade accounts receivables on lifetime basis.
The Company has assessed the application of IFRS 9 impairment model requirements and its assessment did not have a material impact on its opening balance at January 1, 2018 (except for trade receivables, described below).
F-16
Trade accounts receivables
The estimated ECLs were calculated based on actual credit loss experience over the past two years, with ECL rates calculated separately for B2C (business to consumer) and B2B (business to business) trade accounts receivable. The Company already considered the exposure to credit risk over the impairment recognized under IAS 39.
Factors considered were:
·
Significant financial difficulty of the customer;
·
Payment default;
·
Exposure to expected losses;
·
High probability of customer bankruptcy;
·
Breach of contract, such as default or delinquency in interest or principal; and
·
Adverse change in a factor (for example, unemployment rates, external credit ratings).
Exposures within each group are based on credit risk characteristics and aging status.
The application of IFRS 9’s impairment requirements at January 1, 2018 resulted in an additional allowance for doubtful accounts as follows.
|
|
As at January 1, 2018
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts (as previously disclosed)
|
|
Restated allowance for expected losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not past due
|
R$
|
(8,199)
|
R$
|
(11,222)
|
Past due 1-30 days
|
|
(2,134)
|
|
(2,134)
|
Past due 31-90 days
|
|
(3,686)
|
|
(3,686)
|
Past due 91-120 days
|
|
(1,845)
|
|
(1,845)
|
Past due 120-180 days
|
|
(3,108)
|
|
(3,108)
|
Past due over 180 days
|
|
(1,899)
|
|
(1,899)
|
Total
|
R$
|
(20,871)
|
R$
|
(23,894)
|
Note 10 includes a table to summarize the effect of adoption of IFRS 9 on new allowance for doubtful accounts.
c.
Hedge accounting
The Company´s assessment did not indicate any impact of the application of IFRS 9 for hedge accounting, because no hedge transactions existed as of December 31, 2017 and no hedge transactions were entered into in the year ended December 31, 2018.
2.7.
New Accounting Pronouncements not yet effective
i.
IFRS 16 Leases
F-17
IFRS 16, Leases replaces IAS 17, Leases and related interpretations. The core principle is that a lessee recognizes assets and liabilities for all leases with a lease term of more than 12 months. A lessee is required to recognize a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying leased asset and a lease liability representing its obligation to make lease payments. Assets and liabilities arising from a lease are initially measured on a present value basis. The measurement includes non-cancellable lease payments (including inflation-linked payments), and also includes payments to be made in optional periods if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise an option to extend the lease, or not to exercise an option to terminate the lease. The new standard is intended to provide a faithful representation of leasing transactions, in particular those that do not currently require the lessees to recognize an asset and liability arising from an operating lease. IFRS 16 is effective for annual periods beginning on January 1, 2019.
The actual impacts of adopting the standard on January 1, 2019 may change because:
-
the Company has not finalized the testing and assessment over its controls; and
-
the new accounting policies are subject to change until the Company presents its first consolidated financial statements that include the date of initial application.
The Company will recognize new assets and liabilities for its operating leases of distribution centers and administrative headquarters. The nature of expenses related to those leases will change because the Company will recognize a depreciation charge for right-of-use assets and interest expense on lease liabilities.
Previously, the Company recognized operating lease expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, and recognized assets and liabilities only to the extent that there was a timing difference between actual lease payments and the expense recognized. In addition, the Company will no longer recognize provisions for operating leases that it assesses to be onerous. Instead, the Company will include the payments due under the lease in its lease liability. No significant impact is expected for the Company’s finance leases.
The Company decides to adopt the modified retrospective application as of January 01, 2019, with the following expedients:
-
apply the new definition of a lease to all of their contracts;
-
exemptions for short term leases and/or with low values;
-
no restatement of its prior-period financial information;
-
calculate lease assets and lease liabilities as at the beginning of the current period using:
o
the lease liability at the date of initial application as the present value of the remaining lease payments;
o
the right of use assets at an amount equal to the lease liability; and
-
apply a single discount rate to the portfolio of leases with similar characteristics using market rates which reasonable approximates the Company risks.
Based on the information currently available, the Company estimates that it will recognize amounts between:
F-18
|
|
January 1st, 2019
|
|
|
BRL
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
Right of use - non-current assets
|
R$
|
80,000 - 90,000
|
Recoverable taxes - current and non-current assets
|
10,000 - 12,000
|
Lease liability - current liabilities
|
|
15,000 - 20,000
|
Lease liability - non-current liabilities
|
|
75,000 - 82,000
|
The Company has operating leases on a number of buildings where its distribution centers and administrative headquarters are located with third parties in arm’s length conditions. The agreements mature on different date and are usually indexed to the General Market Price Index (IGP-M). The future minimum payments of non-cancellable operating leases are presented below:
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
Up to one year
|
|
R$
|
28,163
|
US$
|
7,268
|
One to five years
|
|
|
72,225
|
|
18,640
|
More than five years
|
|
|
32,031
|
|
8,267
|
Total
|
|
R$
|
132,419
|
US$
|
34,175
|
During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, the Company recorded total operating lease expenses of R$26,813, R$27,463 and R$28,105 (US$7,253), respectively.
ii.
IFRIC 23 - Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments
IFRIC 23 clarifies how to apply the recognition and measurement requirements in IAS 12 when there is uncertainty over income tax treatments. In such a circumstance, the Company shall recognize and measure its current or deferred tax asset or liability applying the requirements in IAS 12 based on taxable profit (tax loss), tax bases, unused tax losses, unused tax credits and tax rates determined applying this interpretation. The interpretation is effective from January 1, 2019.
The Company is evaluating the possible effects from the adoption of the interpretation, and until the present moment no relevant impact has been identified.
iii.
Other Clarifications, amendments and interpretations
Several other amendments and interpretations apply for the first time in 2018 and 2019, but do not have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
3.
Events occurred during the year
i.
Hyperinflation
F-19
Argentina was considered a hyperinflationary economy in 2018. As a result, the Company has applied the IAS 29 accounting requirements to its Argentinean subsidiary with effect from January 1, 2018. The main implications of this are as follows:
-
2017 figures were not restated (accounting policy);
-
Adjustment of the historical costs of non-monetary assets and liabilities and the various items of equity of the Argentinean subsidiary from their date of acquisition or inclusion in the consolidated statement of financial position to the end of the period to reflect the changes in purchase power of the currency caused by inflation;
-
The cumulative impact of the accounting restatement to adjust for the effects of hyperinflationary for years prior to 2018 is reflected in the translation differences (equity) in the beginning of 2018;
-
Adjustment of the consolidated statements of profit or loss to reflect the financial gain caused by the impact of inflation in the year on net monetary assets (loss of purchasing power);
-
The various components of consolidated statements of profit or loss and statement of cash flows have been adjusted for the inflation index since their recognition; and
-
All components of the financial statements of the Argentinean subsidiary have been translated at the closing exchange rate to the Company functional currency.
The main effects on the consolidated financial statement for 2018 are as follows:
|
|
Until December 31, 2017
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
R$
|
-
|
R$
|
5,232
|
US$
|
1,350
|
Operating loss
|
|
-
|
|
(13,866)
|
|
(3,579)
|
Net loss
|
|
-
|
|
6,870
|
|
1,773
|
Non-monetary assets
|
|
3,165
|
|
3,019
|
|
779
|
Accumulated losses
|
|
2,302
|
|
9,172
|
|
2,367
|
The index used to reflect current values is derived from a combination of the wholesale price index (IPIM) and the consumer price index (IPC) published by
Instituto Nacional de Estatisticas y Censos
(INDEC – Argentinean government agency). The movement in the price index for year ended as of December 31, 2018 is 47.60% (24.80% as of December 31, 2017).
ii.
Foreign operations
Accounting policy, and Critical accounting estimates and judgments
The classification as a discontinued operation occurs through disposal or when the operation meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale, if this occurs earlier. A discontinued operation is a component of a Company business comprising cash flows and operations that may be clearly distinct from the rest of the Company and that represents an important separate line of business or geographical operational area.
The result of discontinued operations is presented in a single line in the statement of profit or loss, including the results after income tax of these operations less any impairment loss.
F-20
When an operation is classified as a discontinued operation, the statement of profit or loss and the cash flow of the prior periods are restated as if the operation had been discontinued since the beginning of the comparative period.
a.
Mexico operation
In August 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with the Grupo Sierra Capital (“Sierra”) to sell the entirety of its Mexico operations. In October 11, 2018 (the “Closing date”) the Company and Sierra concluded the transaction, which was preceded by final adjustments agreed by the parties under the original terms and conditions of the negotiation. As consequence of these adjustments, the final consideration has changed, and the Company received an amount of R$ 6,271 (USD 1,693 as of October 11, 2018).
As part of the final agreement, the Company granted to the former Mexican subsidiaries a loan in the amount of R$8,801 (USD 2,462 as of October 11, 2018), recognized within Other current assets, with maturity on the first anniversary of the closing date.
The Company signed a Transitional Services Agreement (“TSA”) with Sierra to outsource certain services relating to IT and marketing. The IT services are being provided to the former subsidiary for a term of eighteen months and Marketing services are being provided for a term of twelve months, both as from the Closing Date. The Company has a cost estimate R$2,865 (USD 739) to provide these services to the former subsidiary, such amount was deferred and will be recognized as expense reduction when the service is rendered. The Company recognized a gain of BRL 241 (USD 62) in the consolidated statements of profit and loss from discontinued operations, as summarized below.
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale
|
R$
|
6,271
|
Deferred revenue - TSA
|
|
(2,865)
|
Other related costs
|
|
(1,793)
|
Investments disposal
|
|
(1,308)
|
Foreign currency translation - OCI
|
|
(64)
|
|
R$
|
241
|
The Company may receive additional earn-out of the transaction up to USD 1,500 in circumstances where revenue exceed certain levels during each of the twelve months fiscal periods after the completion of the transaction, during three years.
The statements of profit or loss and cash flow from discontinued operations of the Mexico operation for the year ended December 31, 2018 are presented below, as well as the restatement of the corresponding years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017, as mentioned in Note 2.2.
F-21
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD Note 2.2
|
Revenue
|
R$
|
54,389
|
R$
|
53,794
|
R$
|
45,147
|
US$
|
11,651
|
Cost of sales
|
|
(44,422)
|
|
(44,413)
|
|
(35,984)
|
|
(9,287)
|
Gross Profit
|
|
9,967
|
|
9,381
|
|
9,163
|
|
2,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
(12,708)
|
|
(14,017)
|
|
(9,550)
|
|
(2,465)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
(12,238)
|
|
(9,884)
|
|
(8,514)
|
|
(2,197)
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
(24,946)
|
|
(23,901)
|
|
(18,064)
|
|
(4,662)
|
Operating loss
|
|
(14,979)
|
|
(14,520)
|
|
(8,901)
|
|
(2,298)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
82
|
|
1,136
|
|
905
|
|
234
|
Financial expenses
|
|
(2,755)
|
|
(2,737)
|
|
(2,824)
|
|
(729)
|
Loss before income tax
|
|
(17,652)
|
|
(16,121)
|
|
(10,820)
|
|
(2,793)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
-
|
|
(2)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Net loss
|
R$
|
(17,652)
|
R$
|
(16,123)
|
R$
|
(10,820)
|
US$
|
(2,793)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operation
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
241
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
R$
|
(17,652)
|
R$
|
(16,123)
|
R$
|
(10,579)
|
US$
|
(2,730)
|
F-22
|
|
Years ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 2.2
|
Net loss
|
R$
|
(17,652)
|
R$
|
(16,123)
|
R$
|
(10,820)
|
US$
|
(2,793)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
155
|
|
40
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
462
|
|
333
|
|
294
|
|
76
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment, and intangible assets
|
|
-
|
|
19
|
|
13
|
|
3
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
1,831
|
|
2,190
|
|
2,155
|
|
556
|
Provision for inventory losses
|
|
(100)
|
|
479
|
|
644
|
|
166
|
Other
|
|
(125)
|
|
2
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
120
|
|
(645)
|
|
(85)
|
|
(22)
|
Inventories
|
|
2,709
|
|
(5,696)
|
|
3,916
|
|
1,011
|
Recoverable taxes
|
|
1,108
|
|
458
|
|
1,347
|
|
348
|
Other assets
|
|
(296)
|
|
414
|
|
1,374
|
|
355
|
Increase (decrease) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
(3,982)
|
|
4,410
|
|
(6,192)
|
|
(1,598)
|
Taxes and contributions payable
|
|
(157)
|
|
5
|
|
169
|
|
44
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
(625)
|
|
1,118
|
|
11
|
|
3
|
Other liabilities
|
|
(709)
|
|
(82)
|
|
(4,968)
|
|
(1,282)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
(17,416)
|
|
(13,118)
|
|
(11,987)
|
|
(3,093)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
(165)
|
|
(133)
|
|
(59)
|
|
(15)
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
|
(23)
|
|
(17)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
(188)
|
|
(150)
|
|
(59)
|
|
(15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from debt
|
|
25,306
|
|
25,832
|
|
26,169
|
|
6,754
|
Payments of debt
|
|
(23,548)
|
|
(28,671)
|
|
(20,240)
|
|
(5,224)
|
Payments of interest
|
|
(2,052)
|
|
(2,203)
|
|
(2,038)
|
|
(526)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
(294)
|
|
(5,042)
|
|
3,891
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
4,278
|
|
148
|
|
34
|
|
8
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations
|
|
(13,620)
|
|
(18,162)
|
|
(8,121)
|
|
(2,096)
|
b.
Argentina operation impairment
During the first quarter of 2019 the Company decided to divest the Argentina operations, and recorded the impairment impact as follows:
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
(note 2.2)
|
Recoverable taxes
|
R$
|
4,828
|
US$
|
1,246
|
Property and equipment
|
|
839
|
|
217
|
Intangible assets
|
|
12
|
|
3
|
|
R$
|
5,679
|
US$
|
1,466
|
See impairment analysis and conclusions in note 25.
F-23
Subsequent event
The subsidiaries (NS2.Com Internet S.A. and NS5 Participações Ltda.) have signed an agreement, on April 26, 2019 (“closing date”), to sell the entirety of its Argentina operations (NS3 Internet S.A.), which belongs to the reportable International segment, through the sale of all shares which they hold.
Pursuant to terms of this transaction, the Company:
- will receive ARS 1 (one Argentinean peso) for the shares that are transferred;
- has granted to the former subsidiary a license for the period of eighteen months from the closing date, in Argentina, for the Company brand and e-commerce platform;
- has agreed to provide certain services relating to IT for the period of eighteen months from the closing date; and
- has agreed to contribute approximately ARS106,000 (approximately USD2,500) into NS3.
4.
Segment Information
Accounting policy
An operating segment is a component of the Company that : a) engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenditures, including revenues and expenses that relate to transactions with any of the Company’s other components, and b) whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) to make decisions as to allocation of resources to the relevant segment and assess its performance and for which individual financial information is available.
The Company uses the “management approach” to determine its reportable segments. The management approach identifies operating segments based on how the entity is organized and based on how financial information is presented to the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). The Company concluded that the CODM is the Chief Executive Officer.
The Company is organized around geographical divisions and discloses the following reportable segments:
·
Brazil: consists of retail sales of consumer products from all of our verticals (which includes sales of sporting goods and related garments as well as fashion and more recently, beauty goods) carried out through our sites Netshoes.com.br, Zattini.com.br, Shoestock.com.br, Freelace.com.br and third-party sites that we manage as well as our business to business offline operation.
·
Argentina: consists of retail sales of consumer products from sporting goods and related garments carried out through our site Netshoes.com.ar and third-party sites that we manage.
Corporate functions and activities (primarily operating expenses, financial income and financial expenses recorded in Netshoes (Cayman) Limited and Netshoes Holding, LLC) are not allocated directly to the reportable segments and are disclosed below to reconcile the segments to the consolidated financial information.
As explained in note 3, the Mexico operations were sold in October of 2018 and consequently they are presented as discontinued operations.
The CODM receives individual financial information based on the nature of revenues and expenses incurred. There is no regular reporting of individual financial information for products, services, or major customers, and therefore the Company concluded that Brazil and Argentina were each independent reportable segment.
F-24
No information on segment assets or liabilities is relevant for decision-making. There are no inter segment transactions in the internal reporting structure.
The Company evaluates the performance of its reportable segments using “segment net income (loss)”. A reconciliation of reportable segments is as follows:
F-25
|
|
|
Brazil
|
|
Argentina
|
|
Reconciling items (corporate and others)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
Continuing operations
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
Net Sales
|
|
R$
|
1,554,405
|
R$
|
1,693,467
|
R$
|
1,681,963
|
US$
|
434,077
|
R$
|
130,746
|
R$
|
141,745
|
R$
|
126,101
|
US$
|
32,544
|
R$
|
-
|
R$
|
-
|
R$
|
-
|
US$
|
-
|
R$
|
1,685,151
|
R$
|
1,835,212
|
R$
|
1,808,064
|
US$
|
466,621
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(1,043,700)
|
|
(1,132,900)
|
|
(1,280,376)
|
|
(330,437)
|
|
(100,531)
|
|
(114,114)
|
|
(109,466)
|
|
(28,251)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(1,144,231)
|
|
(1,247,014)
|
|
(1,389,842)
|
|
(358,687)
|
Segment gross profit
|
|
|
510,705
|
|
560,567
|
|
401,587
|
|
103,640
|
|
30,215
|
|
27,631
|
|
16,635
|
|
4,293
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
540,920
|
|
588,198
|
|
418,222
|
|
107,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employees' benefits
|
|
|
(191,140)
|
|
(167,655)
|
|
(193,466)
|
|
(49,929)
|
|
(18,152)
|
|
(20,125)
|
|
(18,845)
|
|
(4,863)
|
|
(1,320)
|
.
|
(1,449)
|
|
(1,810)
|
|
(467)
|
|
(210,612)
|
|
(189,229)
|
|
(214,121)
|
|
(55,260)
|
Marketing expenses
|
|
|
(152,759)
|
|
(184,836)
|
|
(188,416)
|
|
(48,626)
|
|
(19,108)
|
|
(18,392)
|
|
(16,306)
|
|
(4,208)
|
|
(233)
|
|
(781)
|
|
(886)
|
|
(229)
|
|
(172,100)
|
|
(204,009)
|
|
(205,608)
|
|
(53,063)
|
Operating lease
|
|
|
(24,683)
|
|
(25,369)
|
|
(25,928)
|
|
(6,692)
|
|
(2,214)
|
|
(2,094)
|
|
(2,195)
|
|
(566)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(26,897)
|
|
(27,463)
|
|
(28,123)
|
|
(7,258)
|
Credit card fees
|
|
|
(25,572)
|
|
(30,213)
|
|
(31,621)
|
|
(8,161)
|
|
(5,255)
|
|
(5,032)
|
|
(4,192)
|
|
(1,082)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(30,827)
|
|
(35,245)
|
|
(35,813)
|
|
(9,243)
|
Information technology services
|
|
|
(29,473)
|
|
(30,064)
|
|
(25,082)
|
|
(6,474)
|
|
(883)
|
|
(712)
|
|
(665)
|
|
(172)
|
|
(6,244)
|
|
(6,054)
|
|
(3,274)
|
|
(845)
|
|
(36,600)
|
|
(36,830)
|
|
(29,021)
|
|
(7,491)
|
Amortization and depreciation
|
|
|
(27,777)
|
|
(27,503)
|
|
(41,104)
|
|
(10,607)
|
|
(798)
|
|
(634)
|
|
(1,094)
|
|
(282)
|
|
(2,163)
|
|
(3,350)
|
|
(15,824)
|
|
(4,084)
|
|
(30,738)
|
|
(31,487)
|
|
(58,022)
|
|
(14,974)
|
Consulting
|
|
|
(7,785)
|
|
(10,081)
|
|
(18,861)
|
|
(4,868)
|
|
(680)
|
|
(684)
|
|
(620)
|
|
(160)
|
|
(1,215)
|
|
(2,215)
|
|
(8,831)
|
|
(2,279)
|
|
(9,680)
|
|
(12,980)
|
|
(28,312)
|
|
(7,307)
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(6,227)
|
|
(25,443)
|
|
(13,014)
|
|
(3,359)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(6,227)
|
|
(25,443)
|
|
(13,014)
|
|
(3,359)
|
Sales commissions and royalties
|
|
|
(12,021)
|
|
(16,069)
|
|
(17,459)
|
|
(4,505)
|
|
(959)
|
|
(910)
|
|
(940)
|
|
(243)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(12,980)
|
|
(16,979)
|
|
(18,399)
|
|
(4,748)
|
Facilities expenses
|
|
|
(14,020)
|
|
(14,185)
|
|
(13,480)
|
|
(3,479)
|
|
(1,390)
|
|
(1,280)
|
|
(1,084)
|
|
(280)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(15,410)
|
|
(15,465)
|
|
(14,564)
|
|
(3,759)
|
Other selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
(35,803)
|
|
(38,445)
|
|
(21,587)
|
|
(5,571)
|
|
(5,465)
|
|
(3,948)
|
|
(3,728)
|
|
(962)
|
|
(64)
|
|
(920)
|
|
(1,589)
|
|
(410)
|
|
(41,332)
|
|
(43,313)
|
|
(26,904)
|
|
(6,941)
|
Other operating (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(5,146)
|
|
(3,849)
|
|
(7,502)
|
|
(1,935)
|
|
(103)
|
|
(28)
|
|
(1,803)
|
|
(465)
|
|
(2)
|
|
(56)
|
|
(7)
|
|
(2)
|
|
(5,251)
|
|
(3,933)
|
|
(9,312)
|
|
(2,403)
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
(532,406)
|
|
(573,712)
|
|
(597,520)
|
|
(154,206)
|
|
(55,007)
|
|
(53,839)
|
|
(51,472)
|
|
(13,283)
|
|
(11,241)
|
|
(14,825)
|
|
(32,221)
|
|
(8,316)
|
|
(598,654)
|
|
(642,376)
|
|
(681,213)
|
|
(175,806)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income
|
|
|
26,642
|
|
27,672
|
|
14,539
|
|
3,752
|
|
731
|
|
500
|
|
427
|
|
110
|
|
912
|
|
824
|
|
60
|
|
15
|
|
28,285
|
|
28,996
|
|
15,026
|
|
3,878
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
(93,178)
|
|
(116,947)
|
|
(70,329)
|
|
(18,150)
|
|
(11,616)
|
|
(10,002)
|
|
(12,684)
|
|
(3,273)
|
|
(1)
|
|
(2,091)
|
|
(210)
|
|
(54)
|
|
(104,795)
|
|
(129,040)
|
|
(83,223)
|
|
(21,478)
|
Monetary correction gain (loss), net
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
9,595
|
|
2,476
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
9,595
|
|
2,476
|
Loss before income tax
|
|
|
(88,237)
|
|
(102,420)
|
|
(251,723)
|
|
(64,964)
|
|
(35,677)
|
|
(35,710)
|
|
(37,499)
|
|
(9,677)
|
|
(10,330)
|
|
(16,092)
|
|
(32,371)
|
|
(8,355)
|
|
(134,244)
|
|
(154,222)
|
|
(321,593)
|
|
(82,996)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(202)
|
|
(52)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(202)
|
|
(52)
|
Net loss
|
|
R$
|
(88,237)
|
R$
|
(102,420)
|
R$
|
(251,723)
|
US$
|
(64,964)
|
R$
|
(35,677)
|
R$
|
(35,710)
|
R$
|
(37,701)
|
US$
|
(9,729)
|
R$
|
(10,330)
|
R$
|
(16,092)
|
R$
|
(32,371)
|
US$
|
(8,355)
|
R$
|
(134,244)
|
R$
|
(154,222)
|
R$
|
(321,795)
|
US$
|
(83,048)
|
F-26
The Company has aggregated its products and services into groups of similar products and provided the supplemental disclosure of Revenue below. The Company evaluates whether additional disclosure is appropriate when a product or service category begins to approach a significant level of Revenue.
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
Sports
(1)
|
R$
|
1,504,800
|
R$
|
1,528,295
|
R$
|
1,435,652
|
US$
|
370,510
|
Fashion
(1)
|
|
172,077
|
|
272,423
|
|
309,538
|
|
79,885
|
Market Place
|
|
8,274
|
|
34,494
|
|
62,874
|
|
16,226
|
Total net sales
|
R$
|
1,685,151
|
R$
|
1,835,212
|
R$
|
1,808,064
|
US$
|
466,621
|
(1)
Freight services were allocated to the product revenues that they are related to.
Property and equipment and intangible assets by geography are as follows:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil
|
R$
|
69,350
|
R$
|
76,489
|
US$
|
19,740
|
Argentina
|
|
2,574
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Mexico
|
|
1,115
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Total property and equipment, net
|
R$
|
73,039
|
R$
|
76,489
|
US$
|
19,740
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil
|
R$
|
95,684
|
R$
|
133,117
|
US$
|
34,356
|
Argentina
|
|
11
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Mexico
|
|
41
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Cayman
|
|
20,103
|
|
10,200
|
|
2,631
|
Total intangible assets, net
|
R$
|
115,839
|
R$
|
143,317
|
US$
|
36,987
|
Total
|
|
188,878
|
|
219,806
|
|
56,727
|
5.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share (“EPS”)
Accounting policy
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to the owners of the Parent by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution of share options that could be exercised or converted into common shares and is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to the owners of the Parent by the weighted average number of common share outstanding plus the potentially dilutive effect of share options.
When the Company reports net loss
attributable to the owners of the Parent
, the diluted losses per common share are equal to the basic losses per common share due to the anti-dilutive effect of the outstanding share options.
F-27
Earnings per share data for the periods presented have been calculated giving effect to the stock split of 1.0 for 3.0 which occurred immediately prior to the completion of the Initial Public Offering on April 18, 2017 (see note 1.2).
The following table sets forth the computation of the Company’s basic and diluted loss per share attributable to the owners of the Parent for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
Numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the period attributable to the owners of the Parent from continuing operations
|
R$
|
(133,422)
|
R$
|
(153,623)
|
R$
|
(321,166)
|
US$
|
(82,886)
|
Net loss for the period attributable to the owners of the Parent from discontinued operations
|
|
(17,652)
|
|
(16,123)
|
|
(10,579)
|
|
(2,730)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of outstanding shares of common stock
|
|
21,435,576
|
|
28,510,918
|
|
31,056,244
|
|
31,056,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share attributable to the owners of the Parent
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
R$
|
(7.05)
|
R$
|
(5.95)
|
R$
|
(10.68)
|
US$
|
(2.76)
|
Basic and diluted from continuing operations
|
|
(6.22)
|
|
(5.39)
|
|
(10.34)
|
|
(2.67)
|
Basic and diluted from discontinued operations
|
|
(0.83)
|
|
(0.56)
|
|
(0.34)
|
|
(0.09)
|
(1)
When the Company reports net loss attributable to the owners of the Parent, the diluted loss per common share is equal to the basic losses per common share due to the anti-dilutive effect of the outstanding share options and convertible notes.
6.
Revenue
Accounting policy
Revenue is measured based on the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in a contract with a customer and excludes amounts collected on behalf of third parties. The Company recognizes revenue when it transfers control of a product or service to a customer.
i.
Revenue from Product Sales
Revenue from product sales arises from (i) online purchases on the Company’s sites (i.e. Netshoes, Zattini, Shoestock and Freelace) and third-party sites that the Company manages and (ii) offline purchases with the Company.
Revenue is recognized when the goods are delivered and have been accepted by customers at their premises. For contracts that permit the customer to return an item, revenue is recognized to the extent that it is highly probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur.
Therefore, the amount of revenue recognized is adjusted for expected returns, which are estimated based on the historical data. In these circumstances, a refund liability and a right to recover returned goods asset are recognized.
The Company recognizes revenue from product sales on a gross basis since the Company acts as principal and as such, it has primary responsibility for fulfilling the orders, it bears inventory risk, and it has discretion in establishing prices and bears the customer’s credit risk.
ii.
Other Revenues
F-28
Other revenues mainly consist of the following:
• Freight-related services: Revenue from the freight-related services is recognized once the service is rendered;
• Marketplace platform: The Company generates revenue from the marketplace platform in the form of a commission, when the third-party vendors sell the products on Company’s platform. The Company recognizes revenue from the marketplace platform on a net basis because the Company acts as an agent and does not have primary responsibility for fulfilling the orders, bear inventory risk or have discretion in establishing prices; and
• NCard: The Company generates commission revenue from the customers’ activation of NCards. The revenue is recognized when the NCards are activated by the customers.
Critical accounting estimates and judgments
For certain contracts that permit the customer to return an item, revenue is currently recognized when a reasonable estimate of return can be made, provided that all other criteria for revenue recognition are met.
Because the contract allows the customer to return the products, the consideration received from the customer is variable. The Company has decided to use the expected value method to estimate the goods that will be returned because this method better predicts the amount of variable consideration to which the Company will be entitled.
Details of Revenue for years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018 were as follows:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales - B2C
|
R$
|
1,579,857
|
R$
|
1,734,204
|
R$
|
1,672,380
|
US$
|
431,604
|
Product sales - B2B
|
|
65,884
|
|
9,388
|
|
10,364
|
|
2,675
|
Other revenues - Freight related services
|
|
31,136
|
|
56,479
|
|
59,883
|
|
15,455
|
Other revenues - Marketplace
|
|
8,274
|
|
34,494
|
|
62,874
|
|
16,226
|
Other revenues - Ncard
|
|
-
|
|
647
|
|
2,563
|
|
661
|
Total net sales
|
R$
|
1,685,151
|
R$
|
1,835,212
|
R$
|
1,808,064
|
US$
|
466,621
|
The Company has established distribution centers in the Brazilian States of Pernambuco and Minas Gerais, where it has been granted tax incentives by local government which reduce the amount of sales taxes paid, effectively increasing the amount of revenue recognized.
As a result of such tax incentives, sales to purchasers outside of the State of Pernambuco originated from our distribution center located in the city of Recife (State of Pernambuco, Brazil), enjoyed Pernambuco State ICMS tax rate range from 0.5% to 1.0% during 2017 and 2018, depending on the type of product offered. Also, sales to purchasers outside of the State of Minas Gerais originated from our distribution center located in the city of Extrema (State of Minas Gerais, Brazil) enjoyed a Minas Gerais State ICMS tax rate of 1.0% during 2017 and 2018.
The incentive also determines that the Company is not allowed to take any credit for taxes paid on the purchase of products subsequently sold outside of those states such that these amounts become non-
recoverable taxes and increase the Cost of Sales. Note 8 (i) of these financial statements presents the impact on cost of sales.
F-29
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, the total amounts of tax incentives recorded in Revenue are as follows:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of Pernambuco
|
R$
|
95,151
|
R$
|
66,587
|
R$
|
46,514
|
US$
|
12,004
|
State of Minas Gerais
|
|
121,520
|
|
152,588
|
|
123,706
|
|
31,926
|
Total tax incentives - Net sales
|
R$
|
216,671
|
R$
|
219,175
|
R$
|
170,220
|
US$
|
43,930
|
7.
Deferred Revenue
On October 30, 2015, the Company entered into a partnership agreement with a financial institution to create a co-branded credit card (“NCard”). Deferred revenue recorded represents the amount paid in advance by the financial institution for the exclusive use of the Company's customer database and credit card activation.
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue from exclusive use of customer database
|
R$
|
11,750
|
R$
|
10,986
|
US$
|
2,835
|
Deferred revenue from credit card activation
|
|
17,484
|
|
14,687
|
|
3,791
|
Total
|
R$
|
29,234
|
R$
|
25,673
|
US$
|
6,626
|
Current
|
|
3,732
|
|
3,983
|
|
1,028
|
Non-current
|
|
25,502
|
|
21,690
|
|
5,598
|
Deferred revenue from exclusive use of the Company’s customer database is recognized as other operating (expense) income, net in the consolidated statements of profit or loss using the straight-line method, over the period of the contract (10 years). In the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, the amount of R$1,500, R$ 1,500 and 1,500 (US$387), respectively, was recorded in other operating income related to customer database.
Deferred revenue from credit card activation is recognized as other revenues within revenue, in the consolidated statements of profit or loss, when the credit cards are activated with the bank by the Company’s customers. In the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018 the amount of R$0, R$647 and R$2,563 (US$661), respectively.
In the event the bank decides to terminate the contract early, the Company will be entitled to the remaining amount of deferred revenue related to the customer database proportionally to the remaining period of the contract while credit cards activation deferred revenue balances will be reimbursed to the bank proportionally to credit cards not activated, with interest.
In the event the Company decides to terminate the contract early, the amounts related to the customer database will be reimbursed to the bank proportionally to the remaining period of the contract and the amounts related to credit card activation will be reimbursed to the bank proportionally to credit cards not activated, both including interest. In addition, a penalty will be paid to the bank as follows:
F-30
|
Penalty
|
Termination year
|
BRL
|
2019
|
6,300
|
2020
|
5,400
|
2021
|
4,500
|
2022
|
3,600
|
2023
|
2,700
|
2024
|
1,800
|
2025
|
900
|
Additionally, the bank and the Company will share the profit and loss of this partnership, equally. In case of losses in the partnership, the amount attributable to the Company will be compensated with future profits. Losses in the partnership will only be absorbed by the Company in case of early termination of the contract by the Company, therefore the revenue will be recorded when the right to receive payment is established by the amount net of losses.
8.
Expenses and Financial Income and Expenses
Accounting policy
Cost of sales consist of costs related to direct sales, including purchase price of consumer products sold to customers from direct sales, inbound freight charges to fulfillment center and outbound freight cost, packaging supplies, gains related to discounts obtained from suppliers and costs for lost, stolen or damaged goods received. Freight charges to receive products from suppliers are included in inventory and recognized as cost of sales upon sale of products to customers.
Financial income comprises interest income on cash and cash equivalents, imputed interest income on installment sales arising from extended payment terms offered to our customers, foreign exchange gains and gains on derivative financial instruments. Interest income is recognized as it accrues in profit or loss, using the effective interest rate method. The rate used to determine imputed interest income on installment sales is 100% of the Brazilian Interbank Deposit Rate (
Certificado de Depósito Interbancário
, or CDI), plus a percentage that represents the credit risk of the Company’s counterparties.
Financial expenses comprise interest expenses on debt and imputed interest expense on credit purchases with extended payment terms offered by our suppliers. Financial expenses also include bank fees, foreign exchange losses and losses on derivative instruments. Borrowing costs are recognized in the consolidated statements of profit or loss using the effective interest method. The rate to determine imputed interest expense on credit purchase is 100% of the CDI, plus a percentage that represents the Company’s credit risk.
i.
Costs of Sales
The following is the breakdown of cost of sales for years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively:
F-31
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product sales
|
R$
|
1,004,917
|
R$
|
1,085,362
|
R$
|
1,206,757
|
US$
|
311,437
|
Shipping costs
|
|
137,144
|
|
149,576
|
|
160,517
|
|
41,426
|
Others
|
|
2,170
|
|
12,076
|
|
22,568
|
|
5,824
|
Total cost of sales
|
R$
|
1,144,231
|
R$
|
1,247,014
|
R$
|
1,389,842
|
US$
|
358,687
|
Cost of product sales include the non-recoverable ICMS taxes resulting from the tax incentives disclosed in note 6 granted by the States of Minas Gerais and Pernambuco. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, the total amounts of non-recoverable ICMS are as follows:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State of Pernambuco
|
R$
|
30,507
|
R$
|
25,218
|
R$
|
26,220
|
US$
|
6,767
|
State of Minas Gerais
|
|
52,463
|
|
81,113
|
|
74,409
|
|
19,203
|
Non-recoverable ICMS
|
R$
|
82,970
|
R$
|
106,331
|
R$
|
100,629
|
US$
|
25,970
|
The impact of tax incentives net of non-recoverable ICMS for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018 is R$133,701, R$112,844 and R$69,591 (US$17,960), respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, the Company reviewed and changed ICMS tax positions taken on past transactions and recorded ICMS tax credits amounting to R$ 5,500, R$10,118, and R$0 (US$0), respectively, as a reduction of the cost of product sales.
ii.
Selling and Marketing Expenses
The following is the breakdown of selling and marketing expenses for years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employees' benefits
|
R$
|
132,463
|
R$
|
141,896
|
R$
|
143,806
|
US$
|
37,113
|
Marketing expenses
|
|
172,100
|
|
204,009
|
|
205,608
|
|
53,063
|
Operating lease
|
|
20,300
|
|
19,170
|
|
19,530
|
|
5,040
|
Credit card fees
|
|
30,827
|
|
35,245
|
|
35,813
|
|
9,243
|
Information technology services
|
|
1,896
|
|
1,414
|
|
1,040
|
|
269
|
Amortization and depreciation
|
|
7,624
|
|
4,312
|
|
7,155
|
|
1,846
|
Consulting
|
|
-
|
|
870
|
|
5,651
|
|
1,458
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
6,227
|
|
25,443
|
|
13,014
|
|
3,359
|
Sales commissions and royalties
|
|
12,980
|
|
16,979
|
|
18,399
|
|
4,748
|
Facilities expenses
|
|
12,117
|
|
12,556
|
|
11,271
|
|
2,909
|
Others
|
|
34,531
|
|
33,296
|
|
18,919
|
|
4,883
|
Total selling and marketing expenses
|
R$
|
431,065
|
R$
|
495,190
|
R$
|
480,206
|
US$
|
123,931
|
iii.
General and Administrative Expenses
The following is the breakdown of general and administrative expenses for years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively:
F-32
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employees' benefits
|
R$
|
78,149
|
R$
|
47,333
|
R$
|
70,315
|
US$
|
18,147
|
Operating lease
|
|
6,597
|
|
8,293
|
|
8,593
|
|
2,218
|
Information technology services
|
|
34,704
|
|
35,416
|
|
27,981
|
|
7,221
|
Amortization and depreciation
|
|
23,114
|
|
27,175
|
|
50,867
|
|
13,128
|
Consulting
|
|
9,680
|
|
12,110
|
|
22,661
|
|
5,848
|
Facilities expenses
|
|
3,293
|
|
2,909
|
|
3,293
|
|
850
|
Others
|
|
6,801
|
|
10,017
|
|
7,985
|
|
2,060
|
Total general and administrative expenses
|
R$
|
162,338
|
R$
|
143,253
|
R$
|
191,695
|
US$
|
49,472
|
iv.
Financial Income and Expenses
The following is the breakdown of financial income and expenses of the Company for years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
R$
|
19,675
|
R$
|
24,631
|
R$
|
9,833
|
US$
|
2,538
|
Foreign exchange gain
|
|
2,090
|
|
1,336
|
|
2,871
|
|
741
|
Imputed interest on installment sales
(1)
|
|
5,706
|
|
2,255
|
|
2,259
|
|
583
|
Derivative financial instruments gain
|
|
-
|
|
764
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Other
|
|
814
|
|
10
|
|
63
|
|
16
|
Total financial income
|
R$
|
28,285
|
R$
|
28,996
|
R$
|
15,026
|
US$
|
3,878
|
(1)
This includes discounts charged by credit card acquirers for the advanced payment of receivables due from them (arising from sales to Company´s customers paid for using credit cards) of R$24,900, R$23,114 and R$16,826 (USD 4,320) for years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively.
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
R$
|
65,081
|
R$
|
61,287
|
R$
|
33,302
|
US$
|
8,595
|
Imputed interest on credit purchases
|
|
32,653
|
|
53,981
|
|
30,439
|
|
7,856
|
Bank charges
|
|
3,005
|
|
6,451
|
|
5,287
|
|
1,364
|
Derivative financial instruments loss
|
|
492
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Foreign exchange loss
|
|
-
|
|
1,810
|
|
6,179
|
|
1,595
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
2,532
|
|
4,665
|
|
2,447
|
|
632
|
Other
|
|
1,032
|
|
846
|
|
5,569
|
|
1,436
|
Total financial expense
|
R$
|
104,795
|
R$
|
129,040
|
R$
|
83,223
|
US$
|
21,478
|
9.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
F-33
Accounting policy
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, bank deposits and highly liquid investments in fixed-income funds with an initial maturity of less than three months and subject to an insignificant risk of change in value.
Cash and cash equivalents are held with banks and financial institutions counterparties, which are rated BB-, based on Standards & Poor’s credit rating for local currency credit issuers as at December 31, 2018.
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and bank balances
|
R$
|
17,801
|
R$
|
6,108
|
US$
|
1,576
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
378,161
|
|
61,213
|
|
15,798
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
R$
|
395,962
|
R$
|
67,321
|
US$
|
17,374
|
Cash equivalents are investments in Bank Deposit Certificates (“CDB”) with original maturities of 90 days or less and investments funds with an insignificant risk of change in value and with daily liquidity, issued by Brazilian financial institutions, that accrue at an average interest rate of 89.93% of CDI (Interbank Deposit Certificate rate).
10.
Trade Accounts Receivable, Net
Accounting policy
The Company’s trade accounts receivables are represented by credit sales (installments) funded by credit card operators and receivables from B2B (business-to-business) customers. They are included within current assets, with the exception of those maturing in over twelve months from the closing date of the financial statements, in which case they are classified as non-current assets.
Trade accounts receivable are recognized at fair value which primarily represents the present value of the amount receivable and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses.
When a trade accounts receivable is uncollectible, it is written-off against the allowance for trade accounts receivable. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written-off are recognized as income in profit or loss.
Policy applicable before January 01, 2018
An impairment loss of trade accounts receivable is recognized when there is objective evidence that the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of the relevant receivables. Significant financial difficulties of the debtor, probability that the debtor will enter bankruptcy or financial reorganization, and default or delinquency in payment are considered indicators that the trade accounts receivable may be impaired.
Policy applicable from January 01, 2018
F-34
The Company always measures loss allowance for trade receivables at an amount equal to lifetime ECLs. Lifetime ECLs are the ECLs that result from all possible default events over the expected life of the instrument. The Company uses provision matrixes to determine its ECLs for trade account receivables.
Critical accounting estimates and judgments
The estimated ECLs (Expected Credit Loss) were calculated based on actual credit loss experience over the past two years, with ECL rates calculated separately for B2C (business-to-consumer) and B2B (business-to-business) trades accounts receivable.
Factors considered were:
• Significant financial difficulty of the customer;
• Payment default;
• Exposure to expected losses;
• High probability of customer bankruptcy;
• Breach of contract, such as default or delinquency in interest or principal; and
• Adverse change in a factor (for example, unemployment rates, external credit ratings).
Exposures within each group are based on credit risk characteristics and aging status. As disclosed in note 19
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivables
|
R$
|
134,039
|
R$
|
184,954
|
US$
|
47,733
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
(20,871)
|
|
(21,147)
|
|
(5,458)
|
Total trade accounts receivables,net
|
R$
|
113,168
|
R$
|
163,807
|
US$
|
42,275
|
The changes in the allowance for doubtful trade accounts receivable for years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018 are as follows:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
Balance at January 1
|
R$
|
(555)
|
R$
|
(1,722)
|
R$
|
(20,871)
|
US$
|
(5,387)
|
Additions
|
|
(6,227)
|
|
(25,443)
|
|
(13,014)
|
|
(3,359)
|
Adjustment from adoption of IFRS 9 (a)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(2,322)
|
|
(599)
|
Adjustment from adoption of IFRS 9 (b)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(701)
|
|
(181)
|
Sale of Mexico operation
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
155
|
|
40
|
Write-offs
|
|
5,060
|
|
6,294
|
|
15,606
|
|
4,028
|
Balance at December 31
|
R$
|
(1,722)
|
R$
|
(20,871)
|
R$
|
(21,147)
|
US$
|
(5,458)
|
a)
Impact of adopting IFRS9 on opening balance, related to reclassification from accounts receivables (“gross”) to allowance for doubtful accounts at January 1, 2018 as disclosed in Note 2.6.
b)
Impact of adopting IFRS9 on opening balance, recognized in Accumulated losses as at January 1, 2018 as disclosed in Note 2.6.
Information about the Company’s exposure to credit and other market risks is included in note 19.
F-35
11.
Inventories, Net
Accounting policy
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The cost of inventories is based on the weighted-average method, and includes expenditures incurred in acquiring relevant inventories and other costs incurred in bringing them to their existing location and condition. Cost of purchase of inventories comprises their purchase price including non-recoverable taxes, transport and handling costs and any other directly attributable costs, less trade discounts. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated selling expenses.
When inventories are sold, the carrying amount of those inventories is recognized as cost of sales in the consolidated statements of profit or loss in the period in which the related revenue is recognized. The amount of any write-down of inventories to net realizable value and all losses of inventories are recognized as an expense in the period the write-down or loss occurs. The amount of any reversal of any write-down of inventories is recognized as a reduction in the amount of inventories recognized as an expense in the period in which the reversal occurs.
Critical accounting estimates and judgments
The Company writes down the carrying value of its inventories for estimated amounts related to the lower of cost or net realizable value, obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated net realizable value. The estimated net realizable value of inventory is based on historical usage and assumptions about future demand, future product purchase commitments and market conditions on a product-by-product basis. When the circumstances that previously caused inventories to be written down below cost no longer exist or when there is clear evidence of an increase in net realizable value because of changed economic circumstances, the amount of the write-down is reversed (i.e. the reversal is limited to the amount of the original write-down) so that the new carrying amount is the lower of the cost and the revised net realizable value.
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods for resale
|
R$
|
466,486
|
R$
|
308,666
|
US$
|
79,660
|
Right to recover returned goods
|
|
-
|
|
2,282
|
|
589
|
Allowance for slow moving and others
|
|
(9,854)
|
|
(42,354)
|
|
(10,931)
|
Total inventories, net
|
R$
|
456,632
|
R$
|
268,594
|
US$
|
69,318
|
During the years December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, inventories of R$1,040,803, R$1,126,781 and R$1,014,856 (US$261,669) were sold and recognized as cost of sales in the consolidated statements of profit or loss, respectively.
Due to obsolescence, damaged and slow-moving items, the Company recognizes an allowance on the related inventories to their net realizable value. For years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, the Company recognized a loss of R$949, R$4,904 and R$64,187 (US$16,565), respectively, which was included in cost of sales in the consolidated statements of profit or loss.
F-36
During the third quarter of 2018, the Company terminated a commercial relationship with the supplier of B2B operation (Midway Labs). As consequence the Company adjusted margins of nutrition supplements products, in order to accelerate sales through its B2C channel. The Company recognized additional allowances for net realizable value of R$44,367 and a write-off of R$14,914, which reduced its inventories acquired from that former supplier to a net realizable value of R$24,713 (US$ 6,378).
12.
Recoverable Taxes
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VAT Taxes Brazil (ICMS)
|
R$
|
107,965
|
R$
|
90,069
|
US$
|
23,245
|
VAT Taxes International
|
|
16,261
|
|
1,168
|
|
301
|
Taxes other than income tax (PIS and COFINS)
|
14,829
|
|
176
|
|
45
|
Withholding income taxes
|
|
4,467
|
|
5,869
|
|
1,515
|
Others
|
|
7,290
|
|
1,965
|
|
508
|
Total recoverable taxes
|
R$
|
150,812
|
R$
|
99,247
|
US$
|
25,614
|
Current
|
|
80,047
|
|
59,214
|
|
15,282
|
Non-Current
|
|
70,765
|
|
40,033
|
|
10,332
|
The Company recognized an impairment loss of R$ 4,828 on VAT Taxes International, due to decision to close Argentina operations (see Note 3).
13.
Property and Equipment, Net
Accounting policy
Property and equipment are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. Cost includes the purchase price and any other costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating. The cost of a self-constructed asset is determined using the same principles as for an acquired asset.
Depreciation is recognized on a straight-line basis method, reflecting the pattern in which the asset’s future economic benefits are expected to be consumed by the Company. The estimated useful lives are as follows:
Asset Class
|
Useful Life (years)
|
Leasehold improvements
|
10
|
Machinery and equipment
|
10
|
Hardware
|
6
|
Facilities
|
15
|
Furniture and fixture
|
12
|
Vehicles
|
5
|
F-37
G
ain or loss arising from the disposal of property and equipment is determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds, if any, and the carrying amount of the item and recognized in other operating income (expenses) in the consolidated statements of profit or loss.
Critical accounting estimates and judgments
See impairment analysis and conclusions in note 25.
Breakdown of and changes in property and equipment are as follows:
|
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
Hardware
|
|
Facilities
|
|
Furniture and fixture
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
Total
|
|
Total
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
As of January 1, 2016
|
|
33,463
|
|
13,596
|
R$
|
10,259
|
R$
|
5,932
|
R$
|
2,995
|
R$
|
150
|
R$
|
1,287
|
R$
|
67,682
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
10,903
|
|
2,569
|
|
7,403
|
|
758
|
|
1,218
|
|
157
|
|
3,384
|
|
26,392
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
(180)
|
|
(76)
|
|
(220)
|
|
(39)
|
|
(194)
|
|
(1)
|
|
-
|
|
(710)
|
|
|
Depreciation for the year
|
|
(9,833)
|
|
(2,012)
|
|
(4,054)
|
|
(725)
|
|
(629)
|
|
(36)
|
|
-
|
|
(17,289)
|
|
|
Tranfers
|
|
602
|
|
-
|
|
673
|
|
-
|
|
11
|
|
-
|
|
(1,286)
|
|
-
|
|
|
Net exchange differences arising from translation adjustments
|
|
(202)
|
|
(278)
|
|
(115)
|
|
(1,152)
|
|
(119)
|
|
(7)
|
|
-
|
|
(1,873)
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
R$
|
34,753
|
R$
|
13,799
|
R$
|
13,946
|
R$
|
4,774
|
R$
|
3,282
|
R$
|
263
|
R$
|
3,385
|
R$
|
74,202
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
358
|
|
207
|
|
2,018
|
|
543
|
|
701
|
|
-
|
|
4,084
|
|
7,911
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(23)
|
|
(7)
|
|
(17)
|
|
(152)
|
|
-
|
|
(199)
|
|
|
Depreciation for the year
|
|
(1,944)
|
|
(1,444)
|
|
(3,925)
|
|
(657)
|
|
(524)
|
|
(34)
|
|
-
|
|
(8,528)
|
|
|
Tranfers
|
|
3,340
|
|
131
|
|
206
|
|
205
|
|
755
|
|
-
|
|
(4,637)
|
|
-
|
|
|
Net exchange differences arising from translation adjustments
|
|
(43)
|
|
(81)
|
|
(2)
|
|
(190)
|
|
(32)
|
|
1
|
|
-
|
|
(347)
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2017
|
|
36,464
|
|
12,612
|
|
12,220
|
|
4,668
|
|
4,165
|
|
78
|
|
2,832
|
|
73,039
|
|
18,850
|
Additions
|
|
185
|
|
243
|
|
1,308
|
|
772
|
|
632
|
|
-
|
|
17,742
|
|
20,882
|
|
5,389
|
Disposals
|
|
(726)
|
|
(75)
|
|
(499)
|
|
(39)
|
|
(202)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(1,541)
|
|
(398)
|
Depreciation for the year
|
|
(5,742)
|
|
(2,354)
|
|
(3,160)
|
|
(422)
|
|
(491)
|
|
(27)
|
|
-
|
|
(12,196)
|
|
(3,147)
|
Tranfers
|
|
215
|
|
18,733
|
|
|
|
1,602
|
|
14
|
|
-
|
|
(20,564)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Net exchange differences arising from translation adjustments
|
|
(157)
|
|
(322)
|
|
(70)
|
|
(961)
|
|
(115)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(1,625)
|
|
(419)
|
Monetary correction gain, net
|
|
366
|
|
493
|
|
52
|
|
1,663
|
|
61
|
|
(1)
|
|
-
|
|
2,634
|
|
680
|
Impairment
|
|
(366)
|
|
(681)
|
|
(166)
|
|
(2,146)
|
|
(176)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(3,535)
|
|
(912)
|
Sale from Mexico operation
|
|
-
|
|
(125)
|
|
(180)
|
|
(769)
|
|
(95)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(1,169)
|
|
(303)
|
As of December 31, 2018
|
R$
|
30,239
|
R$
|
28,524
|
R$
|
9,505
|
R$
|
4,368
|
R$
|
3,793
|
R$
|
50
|
R$
|
10
|
R$
|
76,489
|
|
19,740
|
At December 31, 2017 and 2018, properties with a carrying amount of R$4,547 and R$0 (US$0), respectively were granted as collateral under certain loan and financing arrangements.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the main additions relate to the Extrema warehouse expansion.
14.
Intangible assets, Net
Accounting policy
Intangible items are recognized as intangible assets when they meet the following criteria:
·
the item is identifiable and separable;
·
the Company has the capacity to control future economic benefits from the item; and
·
the item will generate future economic benefits.
Intangible assets consist mainly of trademark, software purchased, and software internally developed.
Intangible assets acquired separately by the Company are measured at cost, which includes capitalized borrowing costs.
F-38
Subsequent to initial recognition, the intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortization and any accumulated impairment losses. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Amortization of the asset begins when development is complete, and the asset is available for use. Indefinite life intangibles are not amortized but are tested for impairment at each year-end or whenever there is an indication that the carrying amount may not be recovered. The estimated useful lives of assets are as follows:
Asset Class
|
Useful Life (years)
|
Purchased software
|
5
|
Internally developed software
|
5
|
Trademark
|
Indefinite
|
Amortization methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each financial year-end and adjusted if appropriate and any changes are accounted for as changes in accounting estimates. There were no such changes for any of the periods presented.
An intangible asset is derecognized on disposal when no future economic benefits are expected from its use or disposal. Gain or loss arising from derecognition of an intangible asset is determined as the difference between the net sale proceeds, if any, and the carrying amount of the intangible asset. When an intangible asset is derecognized, it is recorded as other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of profit or loss.
Expenditure on research activities, undertaken with the prospects of gaining new scientific or technical knowledge and understanding, is recognized as an expense in the statements of profit or loss when incurred.
Critical accounting estimates and judgments
Development activities involve a plan or project aimed at putting in use new or significantly improved technologies. Development costs are capitalized only if the Company can demonstrate all of the following:
·
the technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset so that it will be available for use or sale;
·
its intention to complete the intangible asset and use or sell it;
·
its ability to use or sell the intangible asset;
·
how the intangible asset will generate probable future economic benefits. Among other things, the Company can demonstrate the existence of a market for the output of the intangible asset or the intangible asset itself or, if it is to be used internally, the usefulness of the intangible asset;
·
the availability of adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the development and to use or sell the intangible asset; and
·
its ability to measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development.
The expenditures capitalized include the cost of materials, labor and other costs that are directly attributable to preparing the asset for its intended use. Other development expenditures are recognized as expenses in the statements of profit or loss when incurred.
See impairment analysis and conclusions in note 25.
F-39
Breakdown of and changes in intangible assets are as follows:
|
|
Software purchased
|
|
Software
developed
|
|
Software
in development
|
|
Trademark
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
|
Total
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
As of January 1, 2016
|
|
18,219
|
R$
|
26,794
|
R$
|
7,087
|
R$
|
-
|
R$
|
559
|
R$
|
52,659
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
1,738
|
|
15,722
|
|
18,760
|
|
14,001
|
|
-
|
|
50,221
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
-
|
|
(187)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(187)
|
|
|
Amortization for the year
|
|
(5,777)
|
|
(8,134)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(13,911)
|
|
|
Tranfers
|
|
316
|
|
5,529
|
|
(5,845)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Net exchange differences arising from translation adjustments
|
|
(25)
|
|
(1,164)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(1,189)
|
|
|
As of January 1, 2017
|
R$
|
14,471
|
R$
|
38,560
|
R$
|
20,002
|
R$
|
14,001
|
R$
|
559
|
R$
|
87,593
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
4,850
|
|
10,641
|
|
35,562
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
51,053
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Amortization for the year
|
|
(6,320)
|
|
(16,972)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(23,292)
|
|
|
Tranfers
|
|
1,475
|
|
27,852
|
|
(29,327)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Net exchange differences arising from translation adjustments
|
|
(2)
|
|
474
|
|
13
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
485
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2017
|
|
14,474
|
|
60,555
|
|
26,250
|
|
14,001
|
|
559
|
|
115,839
|
|
29,897
|
Additions
|
|
11,546
|
|
2,231
|
|
59,119
|
|
-
|
|
1
|
|
72,897
|
|
18,813
|
Disposals
|
|
(1,142)
|
|
-
|
|
(1,085)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(2,227)
|
|
(575)
|
Amortization for the year
|
|
(8,694)
|
|
(36,438)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(45,132)
|
|
(11,648)
|
Tranfers
|
|
-
|
|
72,970
|
|
(72,970)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Net exchange differences arising from translation adjustments
|
|
(16)
|
|
1,951
|
|
85
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
2,020
|
|
521
|
Monetary correction gain, net
|
|
10
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
10
|
|
3
|
Impairment
|
|
(48)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(48)
|
|
(12)
|
Sale from Mexico operation
|
|
(42)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(42)
|
|
(11)
|
As of December 31, 2018
|
R$
|
16,088
|
R$
|
101,269
|
R$
|
11,399
|
|
14,001
|
R$
|
560
|
R$
|
143,317
|
U$
|
36,988
|
The amortization cost of intangible assets is recognized in the consolidated statements of profit or loss and allocated into selling expenses and general and administrative expenses based on the nature and use of intangible assets.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the main additions to software developed relates to the new website platform. Included in this amount are capitalized borrowing costs of R$1,060 (US$274), calculated using a capitalization rate of TJLP (Long-Term Interest Rate) plus 3% p.a..
15.
Trade accounts payable
Accounting policy
Trade accounts payable are obligations to pay for goods or services that have been acquired in the ordinary course of business. Trade accounts payable are classified as current liabilities if payment is due within one year or less. If not, they are presented as non-current liabilities.
Trade accounts payable are initially discounted to the present value of consideration due if payment is deferred and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
F-40
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable - domestic
|
R$
|
339,634
|
R$
|
331,656
|
US$
|
85,593
|
Trade accounts payable - foreign
|
|
26,201
|
|
5,464
|
|
1,410
|
Total trade accounts payable
|
R$
|
365,835
|
R$
|
337,120
|
US$
|
87,003
|
Information about the Company’s exposure to currency and liquidity risks is included in note 19.
16.
Reverse factoring
Accounting policy
Under reverse factoring, financial institutions commit to pay the Company’s suppliers at an accelerated rate in exchange for a trade discount. The Company derecognizes trade accounts payable to suppliers and recognizes financial liabilities with respect to the relevant financial institutions under “Reverse Factoring” in its consolidated statements of financial position. Cash payments made by financial institutions for reverse factoring to relevant suppliers are classified as operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Reverse factoring are initially discounted to the present value of consideration due if payment is deferred and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
R$
|
126,755
|
R$
|
31,731
|
US$
|
8,189
|
Other liabilities
|
|
22,173
|
|
13,545
|
|
3,496
|
Total reverse factoring
|
R$
|
148,928
|
R$
|
45,276
|
US$
|
11,685
|
The Company has entered into reverse factoring with financial institutions in order to allow suppliers to advance receivables related to the Company’s purchases of inventories.
17.
Accrued Expenses
F-41
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing services
|
R$
|
76,228
|
R$
|
73,932
|
US$
|
19,080
|
Provision for sales with a right of return
|
|
-
|
|
3,803
|
|
981
|
Freight
|
|
11,087
|
|
17,340
|
|
4,475
|
Gift card
|
|
7,191
|
|
7,722
|
|
1,993
|
Information technology
|
|
3,460
|
|
6,099
|
|
1,574
|
Acquisition of fixed assets and intangible
|
|
1,710
|
|
2,182
|
|
563
|
Rentals
|
|
2,987
|
|
4,226
|
|
1,091
|
Services
|
|
4,047
|
|
11,188
|
|
2,887
|
Employees benefits
|
|
3,566
|
|
2,099
|
|
542
|
Other
|
|
10,090
|
|
8,130
|
|
2,099
|
Total accrued expenses
|
R$
|
120,366
|
R$
|
136,721
|
US$
|
35,285
|
18.
Debt
Accounting policy
Debts are initially measured at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred and are subsequently carried at amortized cost and updated using the effective interest rate method. Any difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognized in the consolidated statements of profit or loss over the period of the loan, using the effective interest rate method. The fees paid in obtaining the loan are recognized as transaction costs.
The carrying value of the Company’s outstanding debt consists of the following:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured borrowings
|
R$
|
201,769
|
R$
|
164,539
|
US$
|
42,464
|
Nonconvertible notes - Debentures
|
|
84,202
|
|
64,340
|
|
16,605
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
285,971
|
|
228,879
|
|
59,069
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
106,577
|
|
38,473
|
|
9,929
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
R$
|
179,394
|
R$
|
190,406
|
US$
|
49,140
|
The terms and conditions for loans and borrowings as of December 31, 2017 and 2018 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2017
|
|
At December 31, 2018
|
|
At December 31, 2018
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
Nominal interest rate p.a.
|
|
Years of maturity
|
|
Carrying amount
|
|
Carrying amount
|
|
Carrying amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
Secured borrowing - FINAME/BNDES
|
|
R$
|
|
5.5%
|
|
2018
|
|
200
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Secured borrowing - FINAME/BNDES
|
|
R$
|
|
3.0%
|
|
2018
|
|
338
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Secured borrowing - Working capital
|
(i)
|
R$
|
|
138.5% of CDI
|
|
2021
|
|
115,783
|
|
93,881
|
|
24,229
|
Secured borrowing - Working capital
|
(ii)
|
R$
|
|
100% of CDI + 3.6%
|
|
2021
|
|
56,811
|
|
45,338
|
|
11,701
|
Secured borrowing - Working capital
|
(iii)
|
R$
|
|
TJLP +3%
|
|
2026
|
|
26,188
|
|
25,520
|
|
6,586
|
Nonconvertible notes - Debentures
|
(iv)
|
R$
|
|
100% of CDI + 3.2%
|
|
2021
|
|
84,202
|
|
64,140
|
|
16,553
|
Bank Loan
|
|
MXN
|
|
TIIE + 1.6%
|
|
|
|
2,449
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,971
|
|
228,879
|
|
59,069
|
F-42
CDI:
Interbank Deposit Certificate rate.
TJLP
: Long-Term Interest Rate
FINAME/BNDES:
Special
A
gency for Industrial Financing
/
National Bank of Economic and Social Development
The Company’s subsidiary NS2 entered into secured borrowing and bank loan arrangements for working capital and acquisition of property and equipment. Additionally, the subsidiary NS2 issued nonconvertible debentures to settle previous debt and for working capital purposes. The secured borrowings and debentures are secured by the fiduciary assignment of the trade accounts receivable originated by credit card sales with a carrying amount of R$87,418 and R$80,220 (US$20,703) on December 31, 2017 and 2018, respectively.
As a consequence of obtaining secured borrowings for working capital purposes, NS2 assumed the covenant of maintaining the ratio between financial debt and accounts receivable from credit card operators lower or equal to 3 (three).
For the nonconvertible debentures issuance, NS2 assumed contractual commitments that may accelerate the maturity of obligations in their entirety if the following situations occur, mainly related to: i) non-payment by the issuer, on maturity date, of the contracted obligations to debenture holders; ii) non-compliance by the Company, while there are outstanding debentures, with the ratio of financial indebtedness and accounts receivable from credit cards lower or equal to 3 (three) to be calculated semi-annually based on the financial statements.
The Company was in compliance as of December 31, 2017 and 2018, with all financial covenants described above, as demonstrated below:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card operations - Gross (1)
|
|
114,218
|
|
159,023
|
|
41,040
|
Long-term debt
|
|
285,971
|
|
228,879
|
|
59,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coefficient ratio (lower or equal to 3)
|
|
2.50
|
|
1.44
|
|
1.44
|
(2)
For covenants calculation purposes, the numerator used to calculate the ratio (credit card gross) represents the balance receivable from credit card operators as of December 31, 2017 and 2018 considering the face value of the corresponding sales invoices (i.e. including interest over installment sales).
(i) In July 2018, the subsidiary NS2.Com Internet S.A. renegotiated a secured borrowing facility agreement with Banco do Brasil S.A. for an aggregate principal amount of R$96.2 million. Principal and interest on the loan are payable on a monthly basis, and the maturity, after renegotiation, changed from August 2020 to July 2021, with a 12-month grace-period (only principal), and the Company paid a debt renegotiation fee over the renegotiated value.
(ii) In July 2018, the subsidiary NS2.Com Internet S.A. renegotiated a secured borrowing facility agreement with Banco Bradesco S.A. for an aggregate principal amount of R$46.1 million. Principal and interest on the loan are payable on a monthly basis, and the maturity, after renegotiation, changed from September 2020 to July 2021, with a 12-month grace-period (only principal), and the Company paid a debt renegotiation fee over the renegotiated value.
F-43
(iii) On July 03, 2017, the Company entered into a financing agreement with Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos – FINEP (public institution linked to the Ministry of Science and Technology), in the amount of R$79,667. The funds from this financing will be part of a financing package aimed at supporting the strategic plan of innovation. The financing has a grace period of 24 months, which covers the period from the agreement signature date and to the date of maturity of the amortization installment, payable in 85 installments, with the first one falling due on July 15, 2019 and the last on July 15, 2026. The first tranche of R$25.8 million was received in October 2017. As at December 31, 2018, no further tranches have been drawdown.
(iv) In August 2018, the subsidiary NS2.Com Internet S.A. renegotiated nonconvertible notes (Debentures) agreement for an aggregate principal amount of R$66.1 million. Principal and interest on the loan are payable on a quarterly basis, and the maturity, after renegotiation, changed from March 2020 to September 2021, with a 12-month grace-period (only principal), and the Company paid a debt renegotiation fee over the renegotiated value.
For the three renegotiations explained above (i, ii and iv), the Company determined that the terms have not been substantially modified. The fees paid amount to R$1,682 and is being deferred for the remaining term of these contracts.
The weighted average interest rate for debt was 9.87% and 9.55% for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018, respectively.
F-44
Reconciliation of movements of assets, liabilities and equity to cash flows arising from financing activities
|
|
|
|
Assets or liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
Reverse factoring
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
As of January 1, 2018
|
|
|
R$
|
285,971
|
US$
|
73,803
|
|
R$
|
148,928
|
US$
|
38,435
|
|
R$
|
365,835
|
US$
|
94,414
|
|
R$
|
113,168
|
US$
|
29,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes from financing cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of debt
|
|
|
|
(57,040)
|
|
(14,721)
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Payments of interest
|
|
|
|
(23,056)
|
|
(5,950)
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
461
|
|
|
(34,690)
|
|
(8,953)
|
|
|
(6,931)
|
|
(1,789)
|
Total from financing cash flows
|
|
|
|
(80,095)
|
|
(20,671)
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
461
|
|
|
(34,690)
|
|
(8,953)
|
|
|
(6,931)
|
|
(1,789)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
|
25,453
|
|
6,569
|
|
|
(1,789)
|
|
(462)
|
|
|
32,227
|
|
8,317
|
|
|
(8,350)
|
|
(2,155)
|
Changes in discontinued operations
|
|
|
(2,450)
|
|
(632)
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
(24,755)
|
|
(6,389)
|
|
|
(1,369)
|
|
(353)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
(103,652)
|
|
(26,750)
|
|
|
(1,497)
|
|
(386)
|
|
|
67,290
|
|
17,366
|
Total from other changes
|
|
|
|
23,003
|
|
5,936
|
|
|
(105,440)
|
|
(27,212)
|
|
|
5,975
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
57,570
|
|
14,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2018
|
|
|
R$
|
228,879
|
US$
|
59,069
|
|
R$
|
45,276
|
US$
|
11,685
|
|
R$
|
337,120
|
US$
|
87,003
|
|
R$
|
163,807
|
US$
|
42,275
|
F-45
|
Assets or liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term debt
|
|
Reverse factoring
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
|
BRL
|
As of January 1, 2017
|
R$
|
387,382
|
|
R$
|
27,867
|
|
R$
|
335,430
|
|
R$
|
213,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes from financing cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from debt
|
|
159,984
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Payments of debt
|
|
(170,459)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Payments of interest
|
|
(46,613)
|
|
|
(916)
|
|
|
(55,936)
|
|
|
(7,166)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common shares
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Total from financing cash flows
|
|
(57,088)
|
|
|
(916)
|
|
|
(55,936)
|
|
|
(7,166)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
|
|
50,277
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
53,981
|
|
|
(18,277)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
-
|
|
|
121,061
|
|
|
34,290
|
|
|
(74,450)
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(2,071)
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities
|
|
(94,151)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates
|
|
(449)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1,930)
|
|
|
1,138
|
Total from other changes
|
|
(44,323)
|
|
|
121,977
|
|
|
86,341
|
|
|
(93,660)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2017
|
R$
|
285,971
|
|
R$
|
148,928
|
|
R$
|
365,835
|
|
R$
|
113,168
|
F-46
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
19.
Financial Instruments - Fair Value and Risk Management
Accounting policy, and Critical accounting estimates and judgments
The Company classifies non-derivative financial assets into the following categories: measured at amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI) or fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL). Additionally, non-derivative financial liabilities are classified into the following categories: financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss and other financial liabilities.
i.
Classification
Policy applicable before January 01, 2018
The Company classifies non-derivative financial assets into the following categories: financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, held-to-maturity financial assets, loans and receivables and available-for-sale financial assets. Additionally, non-derivative financial liabilities are classified into the following categories: financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss and other financial liabilities.
Policy applicable from January 01, 2018
The Company classifies non-derivative financial assets into the following categories: measured at amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI) or fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL). Additionally, non-derivative financial liabilities are classified into the following categories: financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss and other financial liabilities.
ii.
Non-derivative financial assets and financial liabilities – Recognition and derecognition
The Company initially recognizes financial assets and financial liabilities when it becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
The Company derecognizes a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or it transfers the rights to receive the contractual cash flows in a transaction in which substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset are transferred, or it neither transfers nor retains substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership and does not retain control over the transferred asset. Any interest in such derecognized financial assets that is created or retained by the Company is recognized as a separate asset or liability.
The Company derecognizes a financial liability when its contractual obligations are extinguished – i.e. when they are discharged, cancelled or expire or are substantially modified or exchanged for an obligation with substantially different terms.
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset, and the net amount presented in the statement of financial position when, and only when, the Company currently has a legally enforceable right to offset the amounts and intends either to settle them on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
iii.
Non-derivative financial assets – Measurement
Policy applicable before January 01, 2018
a.
Financial assets classified as loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market other than those that the entity intends to sell immediately or in the near term. These assets are initially measured at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
F-47
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
All the Company’s financial assets are classified as loans and receivables.
Policy applicable from January 01, 2018
b.
Financial assets at amortized cost
A financial asset is classified as at amortized cost when its contractual cash flows consist only of payment of principal and interest and it is held in a business model whose objective is to hold assets to collect contractual cash flows. These assets are initially measured at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. The amortized cost is reduced by impairment losses. Interest income and impairment are recognized in profit or loss. Any gain or loss on derecognition is recognized in profit or loss.
All the Company’s financial assets qualify to be measured at amortized cost.
iv.
Non-derivative financial liabilities – Measurement
Financial liabilities are classified as other financial liabilities and are initially measured at fair value less any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, these liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
v.
Fair Value Measurements
Several accounting policies and disclosures require fair value measurement, for both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities.
|
When measuring the fair value of an asset or a liability, the Company uses observable market data as far as possible. Fair values are categorized into different levels in a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used in the valuation techniques as follows:
|
·
Level 1 — unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
·
Level 2 — inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the assets or liability, either directly or indirectly
·
Level 3 — inputs for the assets or liability that are not based on observable market data.
If the inputs used to measure the fair value of an asset or a liability fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, then the fair value measurement is categorized in its entirety in the same level of the fair value hierarchy as the lowest level input that is significant to the entire measurement.
The Company recognizes transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy in the reporting period during which the change has occurred.
i.
Accounting classifications and fair values
The following table shows the carrying amounts and fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities, including their levels in the fair value hierarchy. It does not include fair value information for financial assets and financial liabilities if the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value.
F-48
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
Carrying amount
|
|
|
|
Finacial
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets
|
Finacial
|
|
|
|
|
measured at
|
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
amortized
|
measured at
|
|
Financial assets or liabilities, not measured at fair value
|
|
Fair value
|
cost
|
amortized cost
|
Total
|
|
|
BRL
|
BRL
|
BRL
|
BRL
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
-
|
395,962
|
-
|
395,962
|
Restricted cash, current and non-current portion
|
|
-
|
34,445
|
-
|
34,445
|
Trade accounts receivables
|
|
-
|
113,168
|
-
|
113,168
|
Due from related parties
|
|
-
|
12
|
-
|
12
|
Judicial deposits
|
|
-
|
106,914
|
-
|
106,914
|
Other assets, current and non-current portion
|
|
-
|
22,246
|
-
|
22,246
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
-
|
-
|
(365,835)
|
(365,835)
|
Reverse factoring
|
|
-
|
-
|
(148,928)
|
(148,928)
|
Long-term debt
|
|
-
|
-
|
(285,971)
|
(285,971)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
-
|
-
|
(120,366)
|
(120,366)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
-
|
-
|
(31,017)
|
(31,017)
|
Total
|
R$
|
-
|
672,747
|
(952,117)
|
(279,370)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2018
|
|
|
Carrying amount
|
|
|
|
Finacial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets
|
Finacial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
measured at
|
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amortized
|
measured at
|
|
|
|
Financial assets or liabilities, not measured at fair value
|
|
Fair value
|
cost
|
amortized cost
|
Total
|
|
Total
|
|
|
BRL
|
BRL
|
BRL
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
R$
|
-
|
67,321
|
-
|
67,321
|
US$
|
17,374
|
Restricted cash, current and non-current portion
|
|
-
|
21,529
|
-
|
21,529
|
|
5,556
|
Trade accounts receivables
|
|
-
|
163,807
|
-
|
163,807
|
|
42,275
|
Due from related parties
|
|
-
|
7
|
-
|
7
|
|
2
|
Judicial deposits
|
|
-
|
119,717
|
-
|
119,717
|
|
30,896
|
Other assets, current and non-current portion
|
|
-
|
14,166
|
-
|
14,166
|
|
3,656
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
-
|
-
|
(337,120)
|
(337,120)
|
|
(87,003)
|
Reverse factoring
|
|
-
|
-
|
(45,276)
|
(45,276)
|
|
(11,685)
|
Long-term debt
|
|
-
|
-
|
(228,879)
|
(228,879)
|
|
(59,069)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
-
|
-
|
(136,721)
|
(136,721)
|
|
(35,285)
|
Other liabilities, current and non-current portion
|
|
-
|
-
|
(25,711)
|
(25,711)
|
|
(6,636)
|
Total
|
R$
|
-
|
386,547
|
(773,707)
|
(387,160)
|
US$
|
(99,917)
|
ii.
Measurement of fair values
The Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade accounts receivable, trade accounts payable and other payables, are carried at cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The estimated fair value of Long-term debts is based on the current rates offered to the Company for the same remaining maturities, which is categorized as a Level 2 measurement in the fair value hierarchy. As a substantial portion of these financial instruments has been contracted at floating rates of interest, which are reset at short intervals, the carrying value of these financial instruments at December 31, 2017 and 2018 closely approximated the fair value at December 31, 2017 and 2018, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements or transfer to or from Level 3.
F-49
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
iii.
Financial risk management
In the regular course of its business, the Company is exposed to market risks mainly related to the fluctuation of interest rates, exchange rate variation, credit risk on credit sales and liquidity risk.
The Company adopts certain instruments to minimize its exposure to such risks, based on monitoring, under the supervision of the Company´s executive officers, which in turn is under the oversight of the Company´s board of directors.
The Company has exposure to the following risks arising from financial instruments:
·
credit risk (see (a));
·
liquidity risk (see (b)); and
·
market risk (see (c)).
a.
Credit risk
Credit risk is the Company´s risk of financial loss if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations. This risk principally comes from the outstanding receivables due by customers, derivatives and cash and cash equivalents.
Trade accounts receivable
The Company’s exposure to credit risk is influenced mainly by the individual characteristics of each customer.
The Company regularly monitors trade accounts receivable and, for business to customer (B2C) sales, it considers the risk of not collecting from customers as limited because of the intrinsic nature of the payments of credit card operations methods.
For Business-to-business customers, the credit risk exposure and the carrying values reflect management's assessment of the associated maximum exposure to such credit risk. The maximum exposure to credit risk is equal to the carrying value of the financial assets. The objective of managing counterparty credit risk is to prevent losses in financial assets. The Company assesses the credit quality of the counterparties, taking into account their financial position, past experience and other factors (e.g. credit rating).
No customer had balances representing more than 10% of the Company´s consolidated trade accounts receivable as of December 31, 2017 and 2018.
At December 31, 2017 and 2018, the maximum exposure to credit risk for trade accounts receivable by type of counterparty was as follows:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card operations
|
R$
|
87,983
|
R$
|
140,719
|
US$
|
36,316
|
B2B customers and others
|
|
46,056
|
|
44,235
|
|
11,417
|
Total trade accounts receivable
|
R$
|
134,039
|
R$
|
184,954
|
US$
|
47,733
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
(20,871)
|
|
(21,147)
|
|
(5,458)
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
R$
|
113,168
|
R$
|
163,807
|
US$
|
42,275
|
F-50
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
At December 31, 2017 and 2018, respectively, the aging of trade accounts receivable was as follows:
|
|
As at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
Gross amount
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
Not past due
|
R$
|
109,135
|
R$
|
(8,199)
|
R$
|
100,936
|
Past due 1-30 days
|
|
5,449
|
|
(2,134)
|
|
3,315
|
Past due 31-90 days
|
|
5,304
|
|
(3,686)
|
|
1,618
|
Past due 91-120 days
|
|
3,551
|
|
(1,845)
|
|
1,706
|
Past due 120-180 days
|
|
4,278
|
|
(3,108)
|
|
1,170
|
Past due over 180 days
|
|
6,322
|
|
(1,899)
|
|
4,423
|
Total
|
R$
|
134,039
|
R$
|
(20,871)
|
R$
|
113,168
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2018
|
|
|
Gross amount
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
Not past due
|
R$
|
163,924
|
R$
|
(4,525)
|
R$
|
159,399
|
US$
|
41,137
|
Past due 1-30 days
|
|
1,034
|
|
(159)
|
|
875
|
|
226
|
Past due 31-90 days
|
|
2,461
|
|
(731)
|
|
1,730
|
|
446
|
Past due 91-120 days
|
|
1,784
|
|
(247)
|
|
1,537
|
|
397
|
Past due 120-180 days
|
|
2,183
|
|
(1,928)
|
|
255
|
|
66
|
Past due over 180 days
|
|
13,568
|
|
(13,557)
|
|
11
|
|
3
|
Total
|
R$
|
184,954
|
R$
|
(21,147)
|
R$
|
163,807
|
US$
|
42,275
|
Other assets, non-current
During the third quarter of 2018, the Company terminated a commercial relationship with Midway Labs USA LLC supplier of supplements and vitamins, against which the Company filed a lawsuit The Company has at December 31, 2018 receivables of R$ 27,390 (USD 7,069), R$24,381 as at December 31, 2017, with that former partner. The Company performed an analysis of the recoverability of such amounts. The Company reclassified such amount from Other assets to Other assets, non-current, and recognized an expected loss (against Cost of sales and Selling and marketing expenses) of R$ 13,225 (USD 3,413).
The Company measured expected credit losses of that financial instrument in a way that reflects:
(a) an unbiased and probability-weighted amount that is determined by evaluating a range of possible outcomes;
(b) the time value of money; and
(c) reasonable and supportable information that is available.
b.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting the obligations associated with its financial liabilities that are settled by delivering cash or another financial asset. The Company’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when they are due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Company’s reputation.
The following are the remaining contractual maturities of financial liabilities as of December 31, 2018. The amounts are gross and undiscounted and include contractual interest payments. Estimated interest payments
were calculated based on the interest rate indexes of the Company’s floating interest rate indebtedness, in effect as of December 31, 2017 and 2018.
F-51
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
|
|
As at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
Carrying
amount
|
|
Contractual cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
1 - 3
years
|
|
3 - 5
years
|
|
More than 5 years
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
R$
|
285,971
|
R$
|
114,356
|
R$
|
175,141
|
R$
|
9,634
|
R$
|
10,558
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
365,835
|
|
369,493
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Reverse factoring
|
|
148,928
|
|
150,625
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Taxes and contributions payable
|
|
19,875
|
|
19,875
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
120,366
|
|
120,366
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
31,017
|
|
31,017
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Provision for labor, civil and tax risks
|
|
12,523
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
12,523
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
27
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
27
|
|
R$
|
984,542
|
R$
|
805,732
|
R$
|
175,141
|
R$
|
9,634
|
R$
|
23,108
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2018
|
|
|
Carrying
amount
|
|
Carrying
amount
|
|
Contractual cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
1 - 3
years
|
|
3 - 5
years
|
|
More than 5 years
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
R$
|
228,879
|
US$
|
59,069
|
R$
|
59,264
|
R$
|
191,630
|
R$
|
7,120
|
R$
|
6,166
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
337,120
|
|
87,003
|
|
339,660
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Reverse factoring
|
|
45,276
|
|
11,685
|
|
45,629
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
136,721
|
|
35,285
|
|
136,721
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
25,709
|
|
6,635
|
|
25,709
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Provision for labor, civil and tax risks
|
|
19,935
|
|
5,145
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
19,935
|
|
R$
|
793,640
|
US$
|
204,822
|
R$
|
606,983
|
R$
|
191,630
|
R$
|
7,120
|
R$
|
26,101
|
The following are the Company’s unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and unused portion of the credit facility at December 31, 2017 and 2018:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents
|
R$
|
395,962
|
R$
|
67,321
|
US$
|
17,374
|
Undrawn credit facility
|
|
347
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Available liquidity
|
R$
|
396,309
|
R$
|
67,321
|
US$
|
17,374
|
F-52
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
c.
Market risk
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
The Company’s revenue are denominated in the functional currencies of the countries in which its operational subsidiaries are located. Accordingly, its receivables are generally not subject to foreign currency exchange risks.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company’s subsidiaries purchase goods from vendors in both local functional currency and foreign currencies (mainly U.S. dollars).
The summary of quantitative data about the Company’s exposure to currency risk as reported to management of the Company is as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
USD
|
|
BRL
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
7,920
|
|
26,199
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
879
|
|
2,908
|
Net statement of financial position exposure
|
8,799
|
|
29,107
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
USD
|
|
BRL
|
Other current assets
|
|
(2,462)
|
|
(9,540)
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
1,410
|
|
5,463
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
65
|
|
252
|
Net statement of financial position exposure
|
(987)
|
|
(3,824)
|
The following table indicates the changes in the Company’s income or (loss) before tax that would arise if foreign exchange rates to which the Company has exposure at the reporting date had changed by 10% at that date, assuming all other risk variables remained constant.
|
|
Profit or loss
|
At December 31, 2017
|
|
Strenghthening
|
|
Weakening
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
Net Exposure in USD
|
R$
|
2,911
|
|
(2,911)
|
|
|
Profit or loss
|
At December 31, 2018
|
|
Strenghthening
|
|
Weakening
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
Exposure in USD
|
R$
|
(382)
|
|
382
|
F-53
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
This sensitivity analysis assumes that the change in foreign exchange rates had been applied to re-measure those financial instruments held by the Company which expose it to foreign currency exchange risk at the reporting date. This analysis excludes differences that would result from the translation of the consolidated financial statements of foreign operations into the Company’s reporting currency, which is Brazilian Real. The sensitivity analysis above is conducted for monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies other than functional currency as of December 31, 2018.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including fiscal and monetary policies and domestic and international economic and political considerations, as well as other factors beyond the Company’s control. Interest rate risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in the level of interest rates and the spread between different interest rates. The Company’s debt has floating interest rates. As a result, the Company is exposed to changes in the level of interest rates and to changes in the relationship or spread between interest rates for its floating rate debt. The Company’s floating rate debt requires payments based on variable interest rate indexes such as CDI. Therefore, increases in interest rates may increase the Company’s loss before taxes by increasing its financial expense. If interest rates were to increase or decrease by 50 basis points, the Company´s financial expense on borrowings subject to variable interest rates would increase or decrease by R$1,222 (US$369) for the year ended December 31, 2018. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency exchange rate, remain constant.
To reduce the exposure of variable interest rate (CDI), the Company invests its excess cash and cash equivalents in short-term investments. If interest rates were to increase or decrease by 50 basis points, the Company’s financial income on short-term investments subject to variable interest rates would increase or decrease by R$393 (US$119) for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Inflation Risk
Brazil and countries in Latin America, in general, have historically experienced high rates of inflation. Inflationary pressures persist, and actions taken in an effort to curb inflation, coupled with public speculation about possible future governmental actions, have in the past contributed to economic uncertainty in Brazil and other Latin American countries and heightened volatility in the Latin American securities market.
The inflation rate in Argentina has exceeded projections over the past quarters. As a result, the consumer price index (CPI) currently being used to monitor inflation in Argentina indicate three-year cumulative inflation rates that have increased significantly, also related to the depreciation of the Argentinian Peso. The details of recognition of the effects of inflations in Argentina operations are disclosed in note 3.
The Company does not believe that inflation has had a material effect in its business, financial condition or results of operations. The Company continues to monitor the impact of inflation in order to minimize its effects through pricing strategies and productivity improvements.
20.
Income Taxes
Accounting policy
Income tax comprises current and deferred tax. Current and deferred income tax are recognized in the consolidated statements of profit or loss except for items directly recognized in equity or in OCI.
i.
Current Income Tax
Current income tax comprises the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable income or loss for the year and any adjustment to the tax payable or receivable in respect of previous years. The amount of current
tax payable or receivable is the best estimate of the tax amount expected to be paid or received that reflects uncertainty related to income taxes, if any. It is measured using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.
F-54
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
ii.
Deferred Income Tax
Deferred income tax is recognized in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred income tax is not recognized for:
• temporary differences on the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss;
• temporary differences related to investments in subsidiaries to the extent that the Company is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future; and
• taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill.
Deferred income tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to temporary differences when they reverse, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are offset only if:
·
the entity has a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities, and
·
the deferred tax assets and the deferred tax liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on either:
o
the same taxable entity, or
o
different taxable entities which intend either to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis, or to realize the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously, in each future period in which significant amounts of deferred tax liabilities or assets are expected to be settled or recovered.
Critical accounting estimates and judgments
Deferred income tax assets are recognized for unused tax losses, unused tax credits and deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be used. Deferred income tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized; such reductions are reversed when the probability of future taxable profits improves.
i.
Income tax expenses reconciliation
A reconciliation of income tax expense at the weighted average tax rate to the Company´s and its subsidiaries actual income tax expense in 2016, 2017 and 2018, is shown below:
F-55
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
Restated
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income tax
|
|
R$
|
(134,244)
|
R$
|
(154,222)
|
R$
|
(321,593)
|
US$
|
(82,996)
|
Tax rate
(1)
|
|
|
45.01%
|
|
39.66%
|
|
34.08%
|
|
34.08%
|
|
|
|
60,418
|
|
61,169
|
|
109,594
|
|
28,284
|
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible expenses
|
|
|
(20,001)
|
|
(24,789)
|
|
(21,294)
|
|
(5,496)
|
Unrecognized deferred tax benefits
|
|
|
(32,820)
|
|
(26,384)
|
|
(74,275)
|
|
(19,169)
|
Other
|
|
|
(7,597)
|
|
(9,996)
|
|
(14,227)
|
|
(3,671)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(202)
|
|
(52)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.06%
|
|
0.06%
|
Income tax expense
|
|
R$
|
-
|
R$
|
-
|
R$
|
(202)
|
US$
|
(52)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Weighted average tax rate of the Company and its subsidiaries.
|
ii.
Unrecognized deferred income tax assets
The Company and its subsidiaries have experienced tax losses since inception and therefore they have not recognized deferred income tax assets in respect of the following items to the extent there is no taxable temporary difference that will reverse in the same period that deductible temporary differences reverse.
Deferred income tax assets may be recognized when the Company starts to experience future sustainable taxable income and it is probable that these tax benefits will be realized.
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductible temporary differences
|
|
R$
|
52,139
|
R$
|
73,407
|
US$
|
18,945
|
Income tax loss carry foward
|
|
|
195,538
|
|
211,171
|
|
54,498
|
Total unrecognized deferred income tax assets
|
|
R$
|
247,677
|
R$
|
284,578
|
US$
|
73,443
|
Tax losses carried forward for Argentina expire as follows:
|
December, 31
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
Expiry date
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
2019
|
R$
|
2,037
|
US$
|
526
|
2020
|
|
2,498
|
|
645
|
2021
|
|
2,982
|
|
770
|
2022
|
|
4,283
|
|
1,105
|
2023
|
|
5,964
|
|
1,539
|
|
R$
|
17,763
|
US$
|
4,584
|
F-56
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
Brazilian unrecognized income tax carryforward losses amounting to R$ 142,218 and R$193,408 (US$49,914) at December 31, 2017 and 2018 does not expire, however they can only offset up to 30 percent of a taxpayer’s taxable income in any given year.
21.
Shareholders’ Equity
i.
Common Shares
At December 31, 2017 and 2018, the Company had 31,557,785 of common shares, respectively, with a par value of US$0.0033 issued and outstanding, respectively. All common shares rank equally with regard to the Company’s residual assets. Holders of these shares are entitled to dividends and to one vote per share at general meetings of the Company. The Company has not declared a dividend for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017, and 2018.
ii.
Treasury Shares
All rights attached to the Company’s common shares held by the Company (i.e. treasury shares) are suspended until those shares are reissued. During 2016, the Company’s board of directors approved the repurchase of 7,320 of its own common shares.
A summary of treasury shares activities during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018 is set forth in the following table:
|
|
N
o
. Shares
|
|
Share Capital
|
|
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
Balance at January 1, 2016
|
|
15,331
|
R$
|
925
|
|
|
Repurchased
|
|
7,320
|
|
608
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
|
22,651
|
R$
|
1,533
|
|
|
Repurchased
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
|
22,651
|
|
1,533
|
US$
|
396
|
Repurchased
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
|
22,651
|
R$
|
1,533
|
US$
|
396
|
22.
Share-based Payments
Accounting policy
The Company may grant share-based payments to employees, directors, other service providers or independent contractors. These awards are accounted for as follows:
Equity-settled arrangement
The grant-date fair value of equity-settled share-based payment arrangements granted to employees is recognized as an expense, with a corresponding increase in equity, over the vesting period of the awards. The amount recognized as an expense is adjusted to reflect the number of awards for which the related service and non-market performance conditions are expected to be met, such that the amount ultimately recognized is based on the number of awards that meet the related service and non-market performance conditions at the vesting date. The cost of equity-settled transactions is determined by the fair value at the grant date.
The Company did not modify any awards during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018.
F-57
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
Critical accounting estimates and judgments
The fair value of shares options is determined based on the number of shares granted and the quoted price of our common stock, and the fair value of stock options is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model. The Company considers many factors when estimating expected forfeitures, including employee level, economic conditions, time remaining to vest, and historical forfeiture experience.
The number of share options has been disclosed giving effect to the stock split of 1.0 for 3.0 occurred immediately prior to the completion of Initial Public Offering on April 18, 2017 (see note 1.2).
Under the Share Plan (the “Plan”) established by the Company, its Board of Directors (the “Board”) may grant up to 1,296,470 share options to key employees, directors and independent contractors. On August 7, 2018, the Board approved the increase of the size of the Company’s share option pool from 956,470 to 1,296,470 of its common shares. The options under the Plan were granted at the discretion of the Board; as such, the Board has full authority to establish terms and conditions of any award consistent with the provisions of the Plan and to waive any such terms and conditions at any time. The Plan was set up for the following purposes: (i) attracting, retaining and motivating its beneficiaries; (ii) adding value to quote-holders; and (iii) encouraging the view of entrepreneurs of the business.
i.
Arrangements previously classified as cash-settled
Each share option granted under the Plan contains a vesting period, during which the participant cannot exercise the option, and are generally subject to the following vesting schedule: over a four-year period, 25% of the total common shares subject to the award will vest at the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and the remaining common shares subject to the award will vest in equal monthly installments over the 36 months of continuous service thereafter.
The Company held a right of first refusal to repurchase the shares exercised according to the Plan. The Company only had this right of first refusal until it has become public and, after that date, holders of the common shares can trade them in the market.
In addition, the Company had a non-contractual practice of (i) providing its employees whose employment relationship was terminated (whether voluntarily or involuntarily) with a repurchase proposal to buy back its common shares held by such persons at a discount of their fair value and (ii) to provide holders of vested awards that terminate their relationship with the Company (whether voluntarily or involuntarily) with a bonus equivalent to the exercise price of their exercisable option. For the 2018 granted options the Company extinguished these non-contractual practices.
Due to the characteristics of the transaction, these awards had been regarded as a cash-settled plan and the liability was re-measured at each reporting date. The liability previously recognized in these consolidated financial statements took into account the fair value of the Company´s shares, expected forfeitures and the discount the Company has obtained when repurchasing such shares.
Following the completion of Initial Public Offering, the condition of the right of first refusal by the Company of repurchasing the shares exercised is no longer applicable, as prescribed in the Plan.
Therefore, upon completion of Initial Public Offering, the Company reclassified the share-based plan from cash-settled to equity-settled, and the impact was a reduction in non-current liabilities and an increase in Equity (Capital Reserves) of R$13,706.
As the Company will provide holders of vested awards with a bonus equivalent to the exercise price of the options if they decide to exercise the options, the fair value of the awards was estimated based on the fair
value of the Company´s shares. As mentioned above, for the 2018 granted options the Company extinguished this practice.
F-58
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
A summary of option activities under the Plan and changes during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018 is set forth in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Number of
|
|
Average
|
|
Remaining
|
Cash-settled arrangements
|
Units
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
|
Per Unit
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
Oustanding at January 1, 2016
|
273,147
|
|
19.28
|
|
1.1 year
|
Granted
|
110,250
|
|
8.10
|
|
|
Exercised
|
(20,022)
|
|
8.10
|
|
|
Forfeited, cancelled and expired
|
(16,608)
|
|
8.10
|
|
|
Oustanding at December 31, 2016
|
346,767
|
US$
|
16.91
|
|
1.3 year
|
Granted
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Exercised
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Forfeited, cancelled and expired
|
(73,710)
|
|
43.31
|
|
|
Transfer from cash-settled
|
(273,057)
|
|
(9.59)
|
|
|
arragements on April 12nd
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oustanding at December 31, 2017
|
-
|
US$
|
-
|
|
0 year
|
ii.
Equity-settled arrangements
During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018, the Company granted 127,500 and 828,000 share options, respectively, under the Plan with a non-market performance condition.
The Company only had a right of first refusal under the Plan until April 18, 2017 (IPO date), after that date, holders of the common shares can trade them in the market. Therefore, this arrangement has been reclassified to equity-settled.
As the Company provided holders of vested awards with a bonus equivalent to the exercise price of the options, the fair value of the awards was estimated based on the fair value of the Company´s shares.
A summary of option activities under the Plan and changes during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018 is set forth in the following table:
F-59
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Weighted Average
|
Equity-settled arrangements
|
Number of
|
|
Average
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Units
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
|
Per Unit
|
|
(in years)
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
Oustanding at January 1, 2016
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Granted
|
23,250
|
|
8.10
|
|
|
Exercised
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Forfeited, cancelled and expired
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Oustanding at December 31, 2016
|
23,250
|
US$
|
8.10
|
|
0.8 year
|
Granted
|
127,500
|
|
8.10
|
|
|
Exercised
|
(30,308)
|
|
8.10
|
|
|
Forfeited, cancelled and expired
|
(23,879)
|
|
8.10
|
|
|
Transfer from cash-settled
|
|
|
|
|
|
arragements on April 12nd
|
273,057
|
|
9.59
|
|
|
Oustanding at December 31, 2017
|
369,620
|
US$
|
9.20
|
|
0.7 year
|
Granted
|
828,000
|
|
4.37
|
|
|
Exercised
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Forfeited, cancelled and expired
|
(239,436)
|
|
9.91
|
|
|
Oustanding at December 31, 2018
|
958,184
|
US$
|
4.85
|
|
2.26 years
|
|
Vested at December 31, 2017
|
381,282
|
|
|
|
|
Vested at December 31, 2018
|
296,351
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018, the Company had remaining unrecognized compensation cost of R$6,707 and R$2,083 (US$537), respectively, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.26 year.
The Company recognized compensation expense (income) for both cash and equity-settled arrangements of R$ 930, R$(13,860) and R$7,923 (US$2,045) for years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively.
Upon completion of the initial public offering in April 2017, when the Company reclassified the share-based plan from cash-settled to equity-settled, the fair value per common share underlying the Company share options was re-measured to US$18.00 per common share, which was the price of the common shares on the date of its initial public offering. Subsequent to the initial public offering, the cost of equity-settled transactions is determined by the fair value at the grant date (and the Company uses the market price of the publicly traded common shares as an indicator of fair value).
The weighted average fair value of granted options were estimated at US$18.00 and US$5.91 per share at December 31, 2017 and 2018, respectively.
23.
Related party transactions
The consolidated subsidiaries of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2018 are listed in note 2.3.
The Company has the following related party transactions:
F-60
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
Balances from non-controlling owners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
R$
|
|
|
12
|
R$
|
7
|
US$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
USD Total
|
Income statement amounts
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
Key management personnel compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and short-term benefits
|
|
9,535
|
|
19,699
|
|
12,882
|
|
3,325
|
Share-based payments
|
|
677
|
|
4,652
|
|
1,510
|
|
390
|
Total
|
R$
|
10,212
|
R$
|
24,351
|
R$
|
14,392
|
US$
|
3,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes interest
|
R$
|
-
|
R$
|
2,069
|
R$
|
-
|
US$
|
-
|
24.
Contingencies
Accounting policy
Provisions for tax, civil and labor risks are recorded when the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated, and it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation.
The Company is part of various lawsuits and administrative proceedings. The assessment of the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in these lawsuits and proceedings includes the analysis of the evidence available, the hierarchy of the laws, available jurisprudence, as well as, the most recent court decisions and their importance to the relevant legal system and the opinion of external legal counsel. Provisions are reviewed and adjusted to reflect changes in circumstances, such as applicable statute of limitations, conclusions of tax audits or additional exposures identified based on new matters or court decisions.
Where it is not probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required, or the amount cannot be estimated reliably, the obligation is disclosed as a contingent liability, unless the probability of outflow of economic benefits is remote. Possible obligations, whose existence will only be confirmed by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more future events, are also disclosed as contingent liabilities unless the probability of outflow of economic benefits is remote.
Judicial deposits are court-ordered deposits that serve as collateral until the final settlement of the disputes to which they are related. These deposits accrue interest based on the applicable country’s risk-free interest rate and are reported in non-current assets until a final judicial decision. Changes in judicial deposits are presented as operating activities in the statement of cash flow.
Critical accounting estimates and judgments
By nature, litigations will be resolved when one or more future event occurs or fails to occur. Typically, the occurrence or not of such events is outside of the Company’s control. Legal uncertainties involve the application of significant estimates and judgments by management regarding the potential out comes of future events.
F-61
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
i.
Provision for litigation
The Company is a party to legal proceedings and claims which arise during the ordinary course of business. It reviews its legal proceedings and claims, conducts regulatory reviews and inspections, and reviews other legal matters on an ongoing basis and follows appropriate accounting guidance when making accrual and disclosure decisions. The Company establishes provisions for those contingencies when the incurrence of a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated, and the Company discloses the amount provided for and the amount of a reasonably possible loss in excess of the amount provided for, if such disclosure is necessary for its financial statements not to be misleading. The Company does not record a provision when the likelihood of loss being incurred is probable, but the amount cannot be reasonably estimated, or when the loss is believed to be only reasonably possible or remote. The Company´s assessment of whether a loss is reasonably possible, or probable is based on its assessment and consultation with legal counsel regarding the ultimate outcome of the matter following all appeals.
Breakdown of and changes in provisions whose unfavorable outcome is probable are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labor
|
|
Civil
|
|
Tax
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
R$
|
492
|
R$
|
1,230
|
R$
|
3,455
|
R$
|
5,177
|
|
|
Additions, net of reversals
|
|
383
|
|
3,039
|
|
7,222
|
|
10,644
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
(52)
|
|
(3,246)
|
|
-
|
|
(3,298)
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2017
|
R$
|
823
|
R$
|
1,023
|
R$
|
10,677
|
R$
|
12,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labor
|
|
Civil
|
|
Tax
|
|
Total
|
|
Total
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
As of December 31, 2017
|
R$
|
823
|
R$
|
1,023
|
R$
|
10,677
|
R$
|
12,523
|
U$
|
3,232
|
Additions, net of reversals
|
|
(135)
|
|
5,550
|
|
6,114
|
|
11,529
|
|
2,975
|
Payments
|
|
(190)
|
|
(3,927)
|
|
-
|
|
(4,117)
|
|
(1,062)
|
As of December 31, 2018
|
R$
|
498
|
R$
|
2,646
|
R$
|
16,791
|
R$
|
19,935
|
U$
|
5,145
|
Labor claims presented above are related to different matters, such as overtime and salary equalization. Labor lawsuits are not individually significant.
Civil claims are related to the Company´s ordinary course of operations, and generally relate to consumer claims. None of these lawsuits have significant amounts under dispute.
The Company has a tax claim related to challenging Brazilian tax authorities’ interpretation that retailers of imported goods are subject to paying additional sales taxes on manufactured products (“IPI”) and PIS and COFINS on financial income.
ii.
Contingent liabilities
In September 2017, the Company received a tax assessment amounting to R$89,013 from the Brazilian tax
authorities, asserting that the Company had unduly considered PIS and COFINS tax credits related to
marketing and information technology services, effectively reducing the PIS and COFINS payable calculation
basis. The Company´s assessment, supported by external lawyers, is that the risk of loss of this case is possible
and therefore no provision has been recognized in relation to this claim.
F-62
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
In December 2018, the Company received a tax assessment amounting to R$51,853 from the Brazilian tax
authorities, asserting that the Company had unduly considered ICMS tax credits related to sales returns, effectively reducing the ICMS payable calculation basis. The Company´s assessment, supported by external lawyers, is that the risk of loss of this case is possible and therefore no provision has been recognized in relation to this claim.
iii.
Judicial deposits
In some situations, in connection with a legal requirement or presentation of guarantees, judicial deposits are made to secure the continuance of the claims under discussion. These judicial deposits may be required for claims whose likelihood of loss was analyzed by the Company, grounded on the opinion of its legal advisors as a probable, possible or remote loss.
Until the case is settled, the judicial deposits amounts accrue interest at Brazil
´
s official short-term interest rate (SELIC).
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2018
|
|
|
BRL
|
|
BRL
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VAT taxes Brazil (PIS and COFINS)
1
|
R$
|
94,909
|
R$
|
101,971
|
US$
|
26,316
|
PIS and COFINS on financial income
1
|
|
2,558
|
|
3,319
|
|
857
|
Tax on manufactured products (IPI)
2
|
|
7,489
|
|
12,576
|
|
3,246
|
Other
|
|
1,958
|
|
1,851
|
|
477
|
Total judicial deposits
|
|
106,914
|
|
119,717
|
|
30,896
|
(1)
Contribution tax on gross revenue for social integration program (PIS) and social security financing (COFINS):
in disputes related to:
i)
Exclusion of VAT tax (ICMS) from PIS and COFINS calculation basis, which started in November 2014. On March 15, 2017, the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court decided for the unconstitutionality of considering the inclusion of the VAT tax (ICMS) from PIS and COFINS calculations basis. Based on this decision, the Company´s lawyers assessed the likelihood of losing this legal dispute as remote as of December 31, 2017 and 2018. Since August 2017, the Brazilian tax authority has ceased the obligation to make the judicial deposit. The Company is currently waiting the court to define which procedures are necessary to refund the judicial deposit.
ii)
A constitutional challenge on the imposition of PIS and COFINS on financial income.
(2)
Tax on manufactured products (IPI)
The Company is involved in disputes related to the levy of taxes on manufactured products (IPI) over products it sells and obtained a preliminary injunction allowing it not to pay IPI on imports and sales of goods since it is a trading company.
iv.
Class action
F-63
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
As disclosed by the Company on August 9, 2018 two purported shareholder class actions under U.S. Securities Act of 1933 were filed before the Supreme Court of the State of New York, claiming that the Company, among other defendants, made alleged material misstatements or omissions in the registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with Company’s April 2017 initial public offering. The Company is reviewing the complaints and intend to vigorously defend against these and any other related lawsuits.
As the dispute is still in its findings and class certification stages and considering that the outcome of the dispute is subject to considerable uncertainty, it is not possible, at this stage, for the Company to reasonably estimate the potential loss or range of loss, if any, that may result from the final resolution of these legal proceedings. Therefore, no provision is recognized in the financial statements. An unfavorable outcome of the class action may have a material impact on the Company.
25.
Impairment of long-lived assets
Accounting policy and Critical accounting estimates and judgments
At each reporting date, the Company reviews the carrying amounts of its non-financial assets (other than inventories and deferred tax assets) to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated. The Company considers the relationship between its market capitalization and its book value, among other factors, when reviewing for indicators of impairment.
For impairment testing, assets are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or CGUs.
The recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. The value in use calculation is based on a DCF model. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. The cash flows are derived from the budget for the next years and do not include restructuring activities that the Company is not yet committed to or significant future investments that will enhance the asset’s performance of the CGU being tested. The recoverable amount is sensitive to the discount rate used for the DCF model as well as the expected future cash-inflows and the growth rate used. The key assumptions used to determine the recoverable amount for the different CGUs, including a sensitivity analysis, are further below in this note.
An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of an asset or the CGU exceeds its recoverable amount. An impairment loss recognized in a prior period is reversed if, and only if, there is an indication that there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortization, if no impairment loss had been recognized.
As at December 31, 2018, the market capitalization of the Company was below the book value of its own equity, indicating a potential impairment of the assets.
The Company has defined as a cash-generating unit each country where it operates. For impairment test purpose, the intangible assets located in Cayman, where it has no operations and its assets are used by its subsidiaries, were allocated to Brazil CGU.
Key assumptions used in value in use calculations and sensitivity to changes in assumptions
F-64
NETSHOES (CAYMAN) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to consolidated financial statements
As of December 31, 2017 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018
(In thousands of reais and dollars, unless otherwise stated)
The calculation of value in use CGU’s is most sensitive to the following assumptions:
-
Compound annual growth rate (CAGR)
-
Working capital over Net Revenue
-
Discount rate
-
Royalty
CGU
|
Project period
|
CAGR
|
Working capital
|
Discount rate
|
Brazil
|
5 years
|
12.20%
|
13.20%
|
14.5%
|
CGU
|
Project period
|
CAGR
|
Royalty
|
Discount rate
|
Shoestock
|
Perpetual
|
11.30%
|
6.8%
|
14.5%
|
Given the degree of uncertainty of these assumptions, the Company performs a sensitivity analysis thereof using reasonable changes in the key assumptions on which the recoverable amount of the cash-generating units is based in order to confirm whether their recoverable amount still exceeds their carrying amount. The sensitivity analysis involved adjusting the discount rate by +/- 50 basis points.
There were no impairment losses for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 or 2018.
***********
F-65
Netshoes (Cayman) Limited (NYSE:NETS)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 11월(11) 2024 으로 12월(12) 2024
Netshoes (Cayman) Limited (NYSE:NETS)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 12월(12) 2023 으로 12월(12) 2024