|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harland
Clarke
|
|
|
Harland
Financial
Solutions
|
|
|
Scantron
|
|
|
Licorice
Products
|
|
|
Corporate
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
Product revenues, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
$
|
331.5
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.3
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
391.3
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
154.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
177.5
|
|
Service revenues, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
62.3
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
65.6
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Intersegment revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
$
|
55.4
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
69.5
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
$
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40.5
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
Capital expenditures (excluding capital leases):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
18
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Selected summarized financial information for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harland
Clarke
|
|
|
Harland
Financial
Solutions
|
|
|
Scantron
|
|
|
Licorice
Products
|
|
|
Corporate
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
Products revenues, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
$
|
771.7
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
77.0
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
908.2
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
473.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
546.0
|
|
Service revenues, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
100.4
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
105.8
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Intersegment revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
$
|
122.8
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(19.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
144.5
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
68.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
91.8
|
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
$
|
68.8
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
88.6
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
40.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.0
|
|
Capital expenditures (excluding capital leases):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
$
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18.3
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
7.
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(15.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
29.6
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Changes in fair value of cash flow hedging instruments, net of taxes of $4.9, $0.9, $4.7 and $0.0
|
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Unrealized loss on investments, net of a negligible tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(19.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
32.1
|
|
19
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
8.
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Share
|
The basic and diluted per share data is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the following periods (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
Common equivalent shares consisting of outstanding stock options and directors stock units are included in the 2006 diluted income per share calculations. Common equivalent shares consisting of directors stock units are included in the three months ended September 30, 2007 diluted income per share calculations. Directors stock units, outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock, were not included in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 diluted loss per share calculations as their effect was anti-dilutive due to the Company’s net loss.
9. Income and Other Taxes
The Company records any tax assessed by a governmental authority that is both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction between a seller and a customer, which may include, but is not limited to, sales, use, value added, and some excise taxes on a net basis in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
On January 1, 2007 the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, ‘‘Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109’’ (‘‘FIN 48’’), which prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2007 and September 30, 2007 which, if recognized in the future, would favorably impact the Company’s effective tax rate were not material. The Company records both accrued interest and penalties related to income tax matters in the provision for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. At January 1, 2007 and September 30, 2007, the Company had accrued immaterial amounts for the potential payment of penalties and interest.
The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s federal tax returns for the 2003 through 2006 tax years remain subject to examination. Recently, the Joint Committee has concluded its review of the 2001 and 2002 tax years which had no impact on the consolidated financial statements, and the Internal Revenue Service commenced its examination for the year 2005. The Company files in numerous state jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. In addition, open tax years related to foreign jurisdictions remain subject to examination but are not considered material.
20
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
10.
|
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
|
Mafco Worldwide
Certain current and former employees of Mafco Worldwide are covered under various defined benefit retirement plans. Plans covering Mafco Worldwide’s salaried employees generally provide pension benefits based on years of service and compensation. Plans covering Mafco Worldwide’s union members generally provide stated benefits for each year of credited service. Mafco Worldwide has an unfunded supplemental benefit plan to provide salaried employees with additional retirement benefits due to limitations established by United States income tax regulations. The Company’s contributions to its pension plans, which are based on current legal requirements, were $0.4 and $0.7 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and $0.3 and $0.5 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006.
Net periodic pension income for the Company’s pension plans is due to the overfunded status of certain plans and consisted of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
Service cost – benefits earned during the period
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligations
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost and net loss
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Net pension income
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
Other
As a result of the Harland Acquisition, the Company currently sponsors unfunded postretirement defined benefit plans that cover certain salaried and nonsalaried employees who were formerly employees of Harland. One plan provides health care benefits and the other provides life insurance benefits. The medical plan is contributory and contributions are adjusted annually based on actual claims experience. For retirees who retired from Harland prior to December 31, 2002 with twenty or more years of service at December 31, 2000, the Company currently contributes approximately 50% of the cost of providing the medical plan. For all other retirees, the Company’s intent is that the retirees provide the majority of the actual cost of providing the medical plan. The life insurance plan is noncontributory for those employees that retired from Harland by December 31, 2002.
The accrued postretirement benefit obligation as of May 1, 2007, the date of the Harland Acquisition, was $17.3. The Company expects to contribute $0.8 to the postretirement benefit plans during the period May 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007. The Company’s contributions to these postretirement plans during the period May 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007 were $0.4.
Net periodic postretirement costs were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
Interest on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Net amortization
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net postretirement benefit cost
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
21
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
11. Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
Harland Clarke Holdings $480.0 Prior Credit Facilities, net of $1.8
unamortized original issue discount at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
423.2
|
|
Harland Clarke Holdings 11.75% Senior Notes due 2013
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
175.0
|
|
Harland Clarke Holdings $1,900.0 Senior Secured Credit Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
1,795.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Harland Clarke Holdings Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2015
|
|
|
|
|
305.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Harland Clarke Holdings 9.50% Senior Fixed Rate Notes due 2015
|
|
|
|
|
310.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mafco Worldwide $125.0 Senior Secured Credit Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
73.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
88.9
|
|
Capital lease obligations and other indebtedness
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,488.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
692.7
|
|
Less: current maturities
|
|
|
|
|
(25.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(47.7
|
)
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,462.9
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
645.0
|
|
Harland Clarke Holdings $1,900.0 Senior Secured Credit Facilities
In connection with the Harland Acquisition, on April 4, 2007, Harland Clarke Holdings and substantially all of its subsidiaries as co-borrowers entered into a credit agreement (the ‘‘Credit Agreement’’).
The Credit Agreement provides for a $1,800.0 senior secured term loan (the ‘‘Term Loan’’), which was fully drawn at closing on May 1, 2007 and matures on June 30, 2014. Harland Clarke Holdings is required to repay the Term Loan in equal quarterly installments in aggregate annual amounts equal to 1% of the original principal amount. In addition, the Credit Agreement requires that a portion of Harland Clarke Holdings’ excess cash flow be applied to prepay amounts borrowed, as further described below. The Credit Agreement also provides for a $100.0 revolving credit facility (the ‘‘Revolver’’) that matures on June 28, 2013. The Revolver includes an up to $60.0 subfacility in the form of letters of credit and an up to $30.0 subfacility in the form of short-term swing line loans. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding under the Term Loan was 7.6% at September 30, 2007. As of September 30, 2007, there were no borrowings under the Revolver and there was $84.2 available for borrowing (giving effect to the issuance of $15.8 of letters of credit).
Under certain circumstances, Harland Clarke Holdings is permitted to incur additional term loan and/or revolving credit facility indebtedness in an aggregate principal amount of up to $250.0. In addition, the terms of the Credit Agreement and the 2015 Senior Notes (as defined below) allow Harland Clarke Holdings to incur substantial additional debt.
Loans under the Credit Agreement bear, at Harland Clarke Holdings’ option, interest at:
|
|
|
|
•
|
a rate per annum equal to the higher of (a) the prime rate of Credit Suisse and (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%, in each case plus an applicable margin of 1.50% per annum for revolving loans and for term loans; or
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
a rate per annum equal to a reserve-adjusted LIBOR rate, plus an applicable margin of 2.50% per annum for revolving loans and for term loans.
|
The Credit Agreement has a commitment fee for the unused portion of the Revolver and for issued letters of credit of 0.50% and 2.88%, respectively. Interest rate margins and commitment fees under the Revolver are subject to reduction in increments based upon Harland Clarke Holdings achieving certain consolidated leverage ratios.
22
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Harland Clarke Holdings and each of its existing and future domestic subsidiaries, other than unrestricted subsidiaries and certain immaterial subsidiaries, are guarantors and may also be co-borrowers under the Credit Agreement. In addition, Harland Clarke Holdings’ direct parent, CA Acquisition Holdings, Inc., is a guarantor under the Credit Agreement. The senior secured credit facilities are secured by a perfected first priority security interest in substantially all of Harland Clarke Holdings’, each of the co-borrowers’ and the guarantors’ tangible and intangible assets and equity interests (other than voting stock in excess of 65.0% of the outstanding voting stock of each direct foreign subsidiary and certain other excluded property).
The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants including, among other things, restrictions on indebtedness, liens, mergers and consolidations, sales of assets, loans, acquisitions, restricted payments, transactions with affiliates, dividends and other payment restrictions affecting subsidiaries and sale-leaseback transactions. The Credit Agreement requires Harland Clarke Holdings to maintain a maximum consolidated secured leverage ratio for the benefit of lenders under the Revolver only. Harland Clarke Holdings has the right to prepay the Term Loan at any time without premium or penalty, subject to certain breakage costs, and Harland Clarke Holdings may also reduce any unutilized portion of the Revolver at any time, in minimum principal amounts set forth in the Credit Agreement. Harland Clarke Holdings is required to prepay the Term Loan with 50% of excess cash flow (as defined in the Credit Agreement, commencing with the fiscal year 2008, with certain reductions set forth in the Credit Agreement, based on achievement and maintenance of leverage ratios) and 100% of the net proceeds of certain issuances, offerings or placements of debt obligations of Harland Clarke Holdings or any of its subsidiaries (other than permitted debt). Each such prepayment will be applied first to the next eight unpaid quarterly amortization installments on the term loans and second to the remaining amortization installments on the term loans on a pro rata basis.
The Credit Agreement also contains certain customary affirmative covenants and events of default. Such events of default include, but are not limited to: non-payment of amounts when due; violation of covenants; material inaccuracy of representations and warranties; cross default and cross acceleration with respect to other material debt; bankruptcy and other insolvency events; certain ERISA events; invalidity of guarantees or security documents; and material judgments. Some of these events of default allow for grace periods.
If a change of control (as defined in the Credit Agreement) occurs, Harland Clarke Holdings will be required to make an offer to prepay all outstanding term loans under the Credit Agreement at 101% of the outstanding principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, and lenders holding a majority of the revolving credit commitments may elect to terminate the revolving credit commitments in full. Harland Clarke Holdings is also required to offer to prepay outstanding term loans at 100% of the principal amount to be prepaid, plus accrued and unpaid interest, with the proceeds of certain asset sales under certain circumstances.
Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, Harland Clarke Holdings is required to ensure that, until no earlier than May 1, 2009, at least 40% of the aggregate principal amount of its long-term indebtedness bears interest at a fixed rate, either by its terms or through entering into hedging agreements within 180 days of the effectiveness of the Credit Agreement. In order to comply with this requirement, Harland Clarke Holdings has entered into interest rate derivative arrangements described in ‘‘Interest Rate Hedges’’ below.
Harland Clarke Holdings Senior Notes due 2015
Additionally, in connection with the Harland Acquisition, on May 1, 2007, Harland Clarke Holdings issued $305.0 aggregate principal amount of Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2015 (the
23
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
‘‘Floating Rate Notes’’) and $310.0 aggregate principal amount of 9.50% Senior Fixed Rate Notes due 2015 (the ‘‘Fixed Rate Notes’’ and, together with the Floating Rate Notes, the ‘‘2015 Senior Notes’’). The 2015 Senior Notes mature on May 15, 2015. The Fixed Rate Notes bear interest at a rate per annum of 9.50%, payable on May 15 and November 15 of each year. The Floating Rate Notes bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the Applicable LIBOR Rate (as defined in the indenture governing the 2015 Senior Notes (the ‘‘Indenture’’)) plus 4.75%, payable on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15 of each year. The interest rate on the floating rate notes was 10.3% at September 30, 2007. The Senior Notes are unsecured and are therefore effectively subordinated to all of Harland Clarke Holdings’ senior secured indebtedness, including outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement. The Indenture contains customary restrictive covenants, including, among other things, restrictions on Harland Clarke Holdings’ ability to incur additional debt, pay dividends and make distributions, make certain investments, repurchase stock, incur liens, enter into transactions with affiliates, enter into sale and lease back transactions, merge or consolidate and transfer or sell assets. Harland Clarke Holdings must offer to repurchase all of the 2015 Senior Notes upon the occurrence of a ‘‘change of control,’’ as defined in the Indenture, at a purchase price equal to 101% of their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Harland Clarke Holdings must also offer to repurchase the 2015 Senior Notes with the proceeds from certain sales of assets, if it does not apply those proceeds within a specified time period after the sale, at a purchase price equal to 100% of their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
In accordance with the deadlines and other provisions of a registration rights agreement that Harland Clarke Holdings executed in connection with the issuance of the 2015 Senior Notes, Harland Clarke Holdings filed a registration statement on June 13, 2007 registering an offer to exchange for publicly registered 2015 Senior Notes with substantially equivalent terms as those of the 2015 Senior Notes originally issued, which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 20, 2007. Harland Clarke Holdings commenced an exchange offer on June 21, 2007 and closed the offer on August 3, 2007, with $614.5 of the total $615.0 principal amount of the 2015 Senior Notes having been exchanged.
Harland Clarke Holdings Prior Credit Facilities
Concurrent with the completion of the Company’s acquisition of Clarke American Corp. (since renamed Harland Clarke Holdings) in December 2005, Harland Clarke Holdings, as Borrower, entered into senior secured credit facilities (the ‘‘Prior Credit Facilities’’), which provided for a revolving credit facility (the ‘‘Prior Revolver’’) in the amount of $40.0 maturing on December 15, 2010 and a $440.0 term loan maturing on December 15, 2011 (the ‘‘Prior Term Loan’’). The outstanding principal balance under the Prior Credit Facilities of $393.7 was repaid on May 1, 2007 in connection with the Harland Acquisition and related financing transactions, along with accrued interest through the date of repayment of $2.9 and prepayment penalties of $3.9. Portions of the Prior Revolver were available for the issuance of letters of credit and swing line loans. The Prior Credit Facilities had a commitment fee for the unused portion of the revolving credit facility and for issued letters of credit of 0.50% and 3.25%, respectively.
The Prior Term Loan had an aggregate principal amount at maturity of $440.0. Harland Clarke Holdings assumed $437.8 of net obligations from its issuance, net of original issue discount of 0.5%. The original issue discount was being amortized as non-cash interest expense over the life of the term loan facility using the effective interest method, and the unamortized amount of $1.5 was written off in the second quarter of 2007 upon repayment of the debt. The Prior Term Loan was required to be repaid in quarterly installments in annual amounts of $19.0 in 2007, $28.0 in 2008, $33.0 in 2009, $38.0 in 2010 and $280.5 in 2011. The Prior Term Loan also required that a portion of Harland Clarke Holdings’ excess cash flow be applied to prepay amounts borrowed thereunder. The amount of the
24
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
excess cash flow payment, with respect to 2006, included in current maturities was $26.5 at December 31, 2006 and such amount was paid in February 2007. At the time of the excess cash flow payment, the Company wrote-off deferred financing fees of $0.6.
Loans under Harland Clarke Holdings’ Prior Credit Facilities bore, at Harland Clarke Holdings’ option, interest at:
|
|
|
|
•
|
a rate per annum equal to the higher of (a) the prime rate announced from time to time by The Bank of New York and (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%, in each case plus an applicable margin of 2.00% per annum for revolving loans, or 2.25% per annum for term loans; or
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
a rate per annum equal to a reserve-adjusted Eurodollar rate, plus an applicable margin of 3.00% per annum for revolving loans, or 3.25% per annum for term loans.
|
Harland Clarke Holdings Senior Notes due 2013
Concurrent with the completion of the Company’s acquisition of Clarke American Corp. (since renamed Harland Clarke Holdings) in December 2005, Harland Clarke Holdings issued $175.0 principal amount of 11.75% Senior Notes due December 15, 2013 (the ‘‘2013 Senior Notes’’). All of these notes were either repurchased in a tender offer that closed on May 3, 2007 or redeemed on June 4, 2007 for total consideration of $220.1, including prepayment premiums and consent payments totaling $37.3 and accrued interest of $7.8. The 2013 Senior Notes were to mature on December 15, 2013 and paid interest at a rate per annum of 11.75% on June 15 and December 15 of each year. The 2013 Senior Notes were unsecured and were subordinated to all of Harland Clarke Holdings’ secured indebtedness.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt
In connection with the extinguishment of Harland Clarke Holdings’ Prior Credit Facilities and the 2013 Senior Notes, the Company recorded a total loss on early extinguishment of debt of $54.6, consisting of the following: the $37.3 prepayment premiums and consent payments on the 2013 Senior Notes, the $3.9 prepayment penalty on the Prior Credit Facilities, a non-cash expense of $1.5 for the write-off of unamortized original discount on the Prior Credit Facilities, and a non-cash expense of $11.9 for the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees related to the 2013 Senior Notes and the Prior Credit Facilities.
Mafco Worldwide $125.0 Senior Secured Credit Facilities
On December 8, 2005, Mafco Worldwide entered into a credit agreement governing its $125.0 senior secured credit facilities. The Mafco Worldwide credit facilities consist of a $110.0 term loan which was drawn on December 8, 2005 and matures in December 2011 and a $15.0 revolving credit facility that matures in December 2010. The indebtedness under the Mafco Worldwide credit facilities is guaranteed by Mafco Worldwide’s domestic subsidiaries and its parent corporation, Flavors Holdings Inc. (collectively, the ‘‘Mafco Worldwide Guarantors’’). Mafco Worldwide’s obligations under the Mafco Worldwide credit facilities and the guarantees of the Mafco Worldwide Guarantors are secured by a first-priority security interest in substantially all of Mafco Worldwide’s and the Mafco Worldwide Guarantors’ assets. Borrowings under the Mafco Worldwide credit facilities bear interest, at Mafco Worldwide’s option, at either an adjusted Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin of 2.25% in the case of revolving loans or 2.00% in the case of term loans, or an alternative base rate, plus an applicable margin of 1.25% in the case of revolving loans or 1.00% in the case of term loans. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding under the Mafco Worldwide credit facilities was 7.6% at September 30, 2007.
25
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
The Mafco Worldwide credit facilities contain affirmative and negative covenants customary for such financings. The Mafco Worldwide credit facilities also require Mafco Worldwide to maintain a maximum total debt ratio and a minimum consolidated interest expense ratio as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. The Mafco Worldwide credit facilities contain events of default customary for such financings, including but not limited to nonpayment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts when due; violation of covenants; failure of any representation or warranty to be true in all material respects when made or deemed made; cross default and cross acceleration to certain indebtedness; certain ERISA events; change of control; dissolution, insolvency and bankruptcy events; material judgments; actual or asserted invalidity of the guarantees or security documents; and violation of limitations on the activities of Flavors Holdings Inc. and Mafco Shanghai Corporation, a subsidiary of Mafco Worldwide. Some of these events of default allow for grace periods and materiality concepts.
The Mafco Worldwide term loan is repayable in quarterly installments of approximately $0.3. In addition, the Mafco Worldwide term loan facility requires that a portion of Mafco Worldwide’s excess cash flow be applied to prepay amounts borrowed under that facility (there were no such amounts to be paid in the first quarter of 2007 with respect to 2006 due to optional prepayments made by Mafco Worldwide in 2006). Mafco Worldwide made repayments totaling $15.8 during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. As of September 30, 2007, there were no borrowings under the Mafco Worldwide $15.0 revolving credit facility, and there was $14.7 available for borrowing (giving effect to the issuance of $0.3 of letters of credit).
In connection with the purchase of the remaining 50% of a joint venture (see Note 3), Mafco Worldwide entered into the first amendment to the Mafco Worldwide credit facilities on June 27, 2007. The amendment provides for, among other things, Mafco Worldwide’s ability to make certain earnout payments, if any, and the incorporation of such earnout payments into the excess cash flow calculation.
Capital Lease Obligations and Other Indebtedness
Subsidiaries of the Company have outstanding capital lease obligations with principal balances totaling $4.3 and $4.6 at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. These obligations have imputed interest rates ranging from 3.6% to 21.9% and have required payments, including interest, of $0.5 in the fourth quarter of 2007, $1.9 in 2008, $1.7 in 2009, and $0.3 in 2010. A subsidiary of the Company also had $0.5 and $1.0 outstanding under an information technology financing obligation at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
Mafco Worldwide’s French subsidiary has credit agreements renewable annually with two banks whereby it may borrow up to 2.0 million Euros (approximately $2.8 at September 30, 2007) for working capital purposes. The subsidiary had no borrowings at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
Interest Rate Hedges
During February 2006, Harland Clarke Holdings (formerly Clarke American Corp.) entered into interest rate hedge transactions in the form of three-year interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $150.0, which became effective on July 1, 2006 and are accounted for as cash flow hedges. The hedges were designed to swap the underlying variable rate for a fixed rate of 4.992%. The purpose of the hedge transactions was to limit the Company’s risk on a portion of Harland Clarke Holdings’ variable interest rate Prior Credit Facilities. On May 1, 2007, Harland Clarke Holdings’ Prior Credit Facilities were repaid in full. The Company redesignated the swaps as a hedge against the variable interest rate on a portion of Harland Clarke Holdings’ Term Loan. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, as amended and interpreted, the Company is amortizing the fair value of the derivative
26
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
liability of $0.4 as of May 1, 2007 over the remaining life of the derivative contract using the straight-line method in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
During June 2007, Harland Clarke Holdings entered into interest rate derivative transactions in the form of a two-year interest rate swap with a notional amount of $255.0 and a three-year interest rate swap with a notional amount of $255.0, which became effective on June 29, 2007 and are accounted for as cash flow hedges. The two-year hedge swaps the underlying variable rate for a fixed rate of 5.323% and the three-year hedge swaps the underlying variable rate for a fixed rate of 5.362%. The purpose of these hedge transactions is to limit the Company’s risk on a portion of Harland Clarke Holdings’ variable rate Term Loan and comply with the terms of the Credit Agreement.
During August 2007, Harland Clarke Holdings entered into an interest rate derivative transaction in the form of a two-year interest rate swap with a notional amount of $250.0, which became effective on September 28, 2007 and is accounted for as a cash flow hedge. The hedge swaps the underlying variable rate for a fixed rate of 4.997%. The purpose of this hedge transaction is to limit the Company’s risk on a portion of Harland Clarke Holdings’ variable rate Term Loan and comply with the terms of the Credit Agreement.
During February 2006, Mafco Worldwide entered into an interest rate derivative transaction in the form of a two-year non-cancelable interest rate zero-cost collar with a notional amount of $50.0 that caps the underlying variable rate at 5.25% and sets a floor at 4.79%. This derivative is being accounted for as a cash flow hedge. The purpose of this hedge transaction is to limit the Company’s risk on a portion of Mafco Worldwide’s variable rate senior secured credit facility.
As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company recorded a liability of $11.7 and an asset of $0.1, respectively, related to these derivative instruments in other liabilities and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Non-Operating Contingent Claims, Indemnification and Insurance Matters
The Company’s non-operating contingent claims are generally associated with its indirect, wholly owned, non-operating subsidiary, Pneumo Abex LLC (together with its predecessors in interest, ‘‘Pneumo Abex’’). Substantially all of these contingent claims are the financial responsibility of third parties and include various environmental and asbestos-related claims. As a result, the Company has not since 1995 paid and does not expect to pay on its own behalf material amounts related to these matters.
In 1988, a predecessor of PepsiAmericas, Inc. (the ‘‘Original Indemnitor’’) sold to Pneumo Abex various operating businesses, all of which Pneumo Abex re-sold by 1996. Prior to the 1988 sale, those businesses had manufactured certain asbestos-containing friction products. Pneumo Abex has been named, typically along with 10 to as many as 100 or more other companies, as a defendant in various personal injury lawsuits claiming damages relating to exposure to asbestos. Pursuant to indemnification agreements, the Original Indemnitor has ultimate responsibility for all the remaining asbestos-related claims asserted against Pneumo Abex through August 1998 and for certain asbestos-related claims asserted thereafter. In connection with the sale by Pneumo Abex in December 1994 of its Friction Products Division, a subsidiary (the ‘‘Friction Buyer’’) of Cooper Industries, Inc. (now Cooper Industries, LLC, the ‘‘Friction Guarantor’’) assumed all liability for substantially all asbestos-related claims asserted against Pneumo Abex after August 1998 and not indemnified by the Original Indemnitor. Following the Friction Products sale, Pneumo Abex treated the Division as a discontinued operation and stopped including the Division’s assets and liabilities in its financial statements.
27
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
In 1995, MCG Intermediate Holdings Inc. (‘‘MCGI’’), M & F Worldwide and two subsidiaries of M & F Worldwide entered into a transfer agreement (the ‘‘Transfer Agreement’’). Under the Transfer Agreement, Pneumo Abex transferred to MCGI substantially all of its assets and liabilities other than the assets and liabilities relating to its former Abex NWL Aerospace Division (‘‘Aerospace’’) and certain contingent liabilities and the related assets, including its historical insurance and indemnification arrangements. The Transfer Agreement provides for appropriate transfer, indemnification and tax sharing arrangements, in a manner consistent with applicable law and previously existing contractual arrangements, as further explained below.
The Transfer Agreement also requires MCGI, which currently is an indirect subsidiary of Holdings, to undertake certain administrative and funding obligations with respect to certain categories of asbestos-related claims and other liabilities, including environmental claims, that Pneumo Abex did not transfer. Pneumo Abex will be obligated to reimburse the amounts so funded only when it receives amounts under related indemnification and insurance agreements. Such administrative and funding obligations would be terminated as to these categories of asbestos-related claims in the case of a bankruptcy of Pneumo Abex or M & F Worldwide or of certain other events affecting the availability of coverage for such claims from third-party indemnitors and insurers. In the event of certain kinds of disputes with Pneumo Abex’s indemnitors regarding their indemnities, the Transfer Agreement permits Pneumo Abex to require MCGI to fund 50% of the costs of resolving the disputes.
Pneumo Abex’s former subsidiary maintained product liability insurance covering substantially all of the period during which it manufactured or distributed asbestos-containing products. The subsidiary commenced litigation in 1982 against a portion of these insurers in order to confirm the availability of this coverage. As a result of settlements in that litigation, other coverage agreements with other carriers, payments by the Original Indemnitor and funding payments pursuant to the Transfer Agreement, all of Pneumo Abex’s monthly expenditures for asbestos-related claims other than as described below are managed and paid by others. As of September 30, 2007, the Company incurred or expected to incur approximately $1.0 of costs related to asbestos-related claims not subject to the arrangements described above (the ‘‘Remaining Claims’’), as to which it either has received or expects to receive approximately $0.8 in insurance reimbursements. Management does not expect the Remaining Claims to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations, but the Company is unable to forecast either the number of future asbestos-related claimants or the amount of future defense and settlement costs associated with present or future asbestos-related claims.
The Transfer Agreement further provides that MCGI will assume from Pneumo Abex all liability for environmental matters associated with Pneumo Abex’s and its predecessor’s operations to the extent not paid by third-party indemnitors or insurers, other than matters relating to Pneumo Abex’s former Aerospace business. Accordingly, environmental liabilities arising after the 1988 transaction with the Original Indemnitor that relate to the former Aerospace business are the Company’s responsibility. The Original Indemnitor is obligated to indemnify Pneumo Abex for costs, expenses and liabilities relating to environmental and natural resource matters to the extent attributable to the pre-1988 operation of the businesses acquired from the Original Indemnitor, subject to certain conditions and limitations principally relating to compliance with notice, cooperation and other procedural requirements. The Original Indemnitor is generally discharging its environmental indemnification liabilities in the ordinary course, and MCGI manages and advances all costs associated with such matters pending reimbursement by the Original Indemnitor.
It is generally not possible to predict the ultimate total costs relating to any remediation that may be demanded at any of the sites subject to the indemnity from the Original Indemnitor due to, among other factors, uncertainty regarding the extent of prior pollution, the complexity of applicable
28
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
environmental laws and regulations and their interpretations, uncertainty regarding future changes to such laws and regulations or their enforcement, the varying costs and effectiveness of alternative cleanup technologies and methods, and the questionable and varying degrees of responsibility and/or involvement by Pneumo Abex. However, the Company does not itself expect to pay any of these costs due to the Transfer Agreement and the Original Indemnitor’s indemnity.
The Company considers Pneumo Abex’s unassumed contingent claims, except for certain immaterial matters where no third-party indemnification or assumption arrangement exists, to be the financial responsibility of those third parties and monitors their financial positions to determine the level of uncertainty associated with their abilities to satisfy their obligations. Based upon these third parties’ repeated acknowledgements of their obligations, active management of these contingent claims, discharging of the related liabilities when required, and financial positions based upon publicly filed financial statements, as well as the history of insurance recovery set forth above, the Company believes that the likelihood of these third parties failing to satisfy these claims against Pneumo Abex is remote. For these reasons, the Company does not record these amounts in its financial statements.
Federal-Mogul Corporation purchased the Friction Buyer in October 1998. In October 2001, the Friction Buyer filed a petition under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and stopped performing its obligations to Pneumo Abex. The Friction Guarantor guaranteed performance of the Friction Buyer’s obligations, however, and, since the Friction Buyer’s bankruptcy filing, has been fulfilling the Friction Buyer’s obligations. In November 2006, the Company entered into a series of agreements with the Friction Buyer, the Friction Guarantor and others that proposed a settlement of the Company’s claims against the Friction Buyer relating to the 1994 sale transaction as part of the bankruptcy reorganization of the Friction Buyer. If the transactions outlined in the agreements are approved by the courts overseeing the Friction Buyer’s bankruptcy and then consummated, then either (a) (i) the Company would transfer its interest in Pneumo Abex to a trust to be created in connection with the Friction Buyer’s bankruptcy reorganization plan, (ii) the Company would pay $10.0 to the trust, and the Friction Guarantor would pay $246.0 to the trust and issue a 25-year note to the trust for the payment of $500.0, (iii) the trust would assume all financial responsibility for the payment of asbestos-related claims subject to the Friction Buyer’s assumption, and (iv) one or more court-ordered injunctions would bar the assertion of any claim arising out of the asbestos-related claims subject to the Friction Buyer’s assumption from being asserted against the Company, the Friction Buyer or the Friction Guarantor (items (a)(i) through (a)(iv) collectively, the ‘‘Plan A Settlement’’) or (b) under certain conditions set forth in the agreements relating to possible difficulties in implementing the Plan A Settlement, (i) Pneumo Abex would continue to be owned by the Company but would receive $2.0 from the Friction Buyer’s bankruptcy estate, (ii) the Friction Buyer would be relieved of its obligations, and (iii) the Friction Guarantor would continue to honor its guaranty obligation and receive $138.0 from the Friction Buyer’s bankruptcy estate (items (b)(i) through (b)(iii) collectively, the ‘‘Plan B Settlement’’). Both the Plan A Settlement and the Plan B Settlement are subject to various contingencies, including bankruptcy court approval and the effectiveness of the Friction Buyer’s plan of reorganization. No assurance can be given regarding whether the agreements can or will be consummated.
Pneumo Abex’s former Aerospace business sold certain of its aerospace products to the U.S. Government or to private contractors for the U.S. Government. Pneumo Abex retained in the Aerospace sale certain claims for allegedly defective pricing that the Government made with respect to certain of these products. In the sole remaining matter managed by Pneumo Abex, Pneumo Abex contests the Government’s allegations and has been attempting to resolve this matter without litigation.
29
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Honeywell Indemnification
Certain of the intermediate holding companies of the predecessor of Harland Clarke Holdings (formerly Clarke American Corp.) had issued guarantees on behalf of operating companies formerly owned by these intermediate holding companies, which operating companies are not part of Harland Clarke Holdings’ businesses. In the stock purchase agreement executed in connection with the acquisition of Clarke American Corp. by M & F Worldwide, Honeywell has undertaken to use its commercially reasonable efforts to assume, replace or terminate such guarantees and indemnify M & F Worldwide and its affiliates, including Harland Clarke Holdings and its subsidiaries, with respect to all liabilities arising under such guarantees. To the extent such guarantees were not so assumed, replaced or terminated at the closing of the acquisition of Clarke American Corp., at December 15, 2005, Honeywell had posted a letter of credit for the benefit of M & F Worldwide in an amount of $60.0 expiring on December 15, 2007 to secure its indemnification obligations covering the guarantees. The face amount of the letter of credit is subject to adjustment, based on the agreement of the parties, and was $27.0 at September 30, 2007. Since the Company believes the likelihood is remote that it will have to pay any amounts under such guarantees it has not recorded any liability in the accompanying financial statements.
Other
Various other legal proceedings, claims and investigations are pending against the Company, including those relating to commercial transactions, product liability, environmental, safety and health matters and other matters. Most of these matters are covered by insurance, subject to deductibles and maximum limits, and by third-party indemnities. In the opinion of management, based upon the information available at this time, the outcome of the matters referred to above will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
13. Restructuring
Prior to the Harland Acquisition
Prior to the Harland Acquisition, the Company developed a restructuring plan for its checks and related products business, which is now contained in the Harland Clarke segment, to streamline and redesign the manufacturing plant and contact center network in order to take advantage of high-capacity technology and economies of scale, to redefine sales territories and consolidate sales divisions, and to restructure the segment’s corporate staff.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company established $3.3 in reserves with respect to the checks and related products business related to the closure of two production facilities and a reduction in force of the segment’s corporate staff. In connection with the facilities closures, the Company sold $0.5 of assets in January 2007 and recognized an insignificant gain.
During the period January 1, 2007 through April 30, 2007, the Company established $1.5 in reserves with respect to the checks and related products business related to the closure of one contact center and one printing plant. These closures will be completed in 2007 with a total expected expenditure of approximately $2.0, net of an estimated gain from the planned sale of a facility.
Subsequent to the Harland Acquisition
During the second quarter of 2007, as a result of the Harland Acquisition, the Company adopted a plan to restructure its business, focusing on improving operating margins through consolidating
30
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
facilities and reducing duplicative selling, general and administrative expenses, executive and shared services costs. The Company’s planned initiatives primarily include the following:
|
|
|
|
•
|
consolidation of various facilities in the Harland Clarke segment;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
workforce rationalization in sales and marketing, information technology, production support, executive, finance, human resources, legal and other support functions; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
consolidation of certain redundant outsourcing and other professional services, such as consulting.
|
As discussed in Note 3, the Company recorded $12.5 of severance and severance-related costs for the termination of certain Harland employees and $5.4 of costs for the closure of certain Harland facilities in purchase accounting in accordance with EITF 95-3. In addition to these restructuring liabilities recorded in purchase accounting, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 the Company expensed $1.6 and $2.4, respectively, net of adjustments, for severance and severance-related costs for the termination of certain of Harland Clarke Holdings’ historical employees and $0.3 and $1.2, respectively, of costs for the closure of certain of Harland Clarke Holdings’ historical facilities.
Of the liabilities recorded in purchase accounting, $9.3 relates to the Harland Clarke segment, $7.7 relates to the Harland Financial Solutions segment and $0.9 relates to the Corporate segment. All of the restructuring costs expensed during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 relate to the Harland Clarke segment.
With respect to the restructuring costs totaling $3.6 that were expensed subsequent to the Harland Acquisition, the Company expects to complete the planned facilities closures and employee terminations by April 2008. The Company expects to spend in total approximately $1.5 for the closure of certain pre-Harland Acquisition facilities, and approximately $2.6 for the termination of certain pre-Harland Acquisition employees.
The following details the components of the Company’s restructuring accruals for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
Balance
|
|
|
Established
in Harland
Acquisition
Purchase
Accounting
|
|
|
Expensed
|
|
|
Paid in
Cash
|
|
|
Ending
Balance
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and severance-related
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(12.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.9
|
|
Facilities closures
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.7
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and severance-related
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
Facilities closures
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
Restructuring accruals are reflected in other current liabilities and other liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company expects to pay the remaining severance through December 2007 and the remaining facilities closure costs and other costs through February 2010.
31
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
In addition to the amounts disclosed in the table above, the Company also incurred other costs related to the facility closures, including inventory write-offs, training, hiring, relocation and travel of $0.2 and $0.4 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively and $0.1 and $0.4 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.
14. Transactions with Affiliates
Management Services Agreement
MacAndrews & Forbes Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings, provides the services of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel, as well as other management, advisory, transactional, corporate finance, legal, risk management, tax and accounting services pursuant to the terms of a management services agreement (the ‘‘Management Services Agreement’’). Under the terms of the Management Services Agreement, the Company pays MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. an annual fee for these services. The annual rate is $10.0 effective May 1, 2007. Prior to May 1, 2007, the fee was set at an annual rate of $5.0 for the period July 1, 2006 to April 30, 2007 and at an annual rate of $1.5 for periods prior to July 1, 2006.
The Management Services Agreement will terminate on December 31, 2008, subject to automatic one-year renewal periods unless either party gives the other party written notice at least 90 days prior to the end of the initial term or a subsequent renewal period. The Management Services Agreement will also terminate in the event that MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. or its affiliates no longer in the aggregate retain beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the outstanding common stock of the Company. The Management Services Agreement also contains customary indemnities covering MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. and its affiliates and personnel.
Restricted Stock
On May 30, 2007, the Company issued 200,000 shares of restricted common stock to Mr. Ronald O. Perelman under the Company’s 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (the ‘‘Restricted Stock’’). Mr. Perelman is the Chairman of the Company’s board of directors and is the sole shareholder of Holdings. The Restricted Stock vests in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the issuance date, provided that from the issuance date to each such vesting date, Mr. Perelman continues to provide services to the Company as a director, officer or consultant. The Restricted Stock will vest 100% upon the occurrence of a change in control of the Company, as defined in the Indenture (as defined above). The Company’s Compensation Committee has the right to accelerate the vesting of the Restricted Stock in its discretion. The shares of Restricted Stock have all the rights of a stockholder, including the right to vote and the right to receive dividends thereon, however, no transfer of the right is permitted prior to the vesting of the Restricted Stock. In accordance with EITF 96-18, ‘‘Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services,’’ the Company is recognizing non-cash compensation expense related to the Restricted Stock using the straight-line method over the vesting period. The unvested Restricted Stock is revalued at the end of each reporting period based on the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock. The Company expensed $0.7 and $1.1 related to the Restricted Stock during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
Other
As discussed in Note 3, the Company paid $10.0 to Holdings in the second quarter of 2007 for services in sourcing, analyzing, negotiating and executing the Harland Acquisition.
32
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion regarding the Company’s financial condition and results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006 should be read in connection with the more detailed financial information contained in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and their notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report.
Overview of the Business
M & F Worldwide Corp. ( ‘‘M & F Worldwide’’ and, together with its subsidiaries, the ‘‘Company’’) is a holding company that conducts its operations through its indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. (‘‘Harland Clarke Holdings’’), formerly known as Clarke American Corp., and Mafco Worldwide Corporation (‘‘Mafco Worldwide’’). As a result of the acquisition of John H. Harland Company (‘‘Harland’’), which was completed on May 1, 2007, our business and corporate structure was reorganized along the following four business segments: Harland Clarke (which consists of the combined check business and related products and services of Clarke American Corp. and Harland), Harland Financial Solutions, Scantron and Licorice Products.
The Harland Clarke segment offers checks and related products, forms and treasury supplies, and related delivery and fraud prevention services. It also provides specialized direct marketing and contact center services to its financial and commercial institution clients. Harland Clarke’s direct marketing offerings include turnkey direct marketing solutions, checkbook messaging and e-mail marketing. Through its contact centers, Harland Clarke provides financial institutions with both inbound and outbound support for its clients, including sales and ordering services for checks and related products and services, customer care and banking support, and marketing services.
The Harland Financial Solutions segment provides products and services including lending and mortgage origination and servicing applications, business intelligence solutions, customer relationship management software, branch automation solutions, core processing systems and services and field maintenance services, principally targeted to community banks and credit unions.
The Scantron segment provides testing and assessment solutions to schools in North America, offers specialized data collection solutions to educational and commercial institutions and collects and manages survey information for a wide variety of Fortune 1000 organizations. Scantron’s products and services include scannable forms, scanning equipment, survey services and testing software and related services.
The Licorice Products segment, which is operated by Mafco Worldwide, produces a variety of licorice products from licorice root, intermediary licorice extracts produced by others and certain other ingredients at its facilities in Camden, New Jersey; Richmond, Virginia; Gardanne, France; Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China and at the facilities of its joint venture in Weihai, Shandong, People’s Republic of China. Approximately 71% of Mafco Worldwide’s licorice product sales are to the worldwide tobacco industry for use as tobacco flavor enhancing and moistening agents in the manufacture of American blend cigarettes, moist snuff, chewing tobacco and pipe tobacco. While licorice represents a small percentage of the total cost of manufacturing American blend cigarettes and the other tobacco products, the particular formulation and quantity used by each brand is an important element in the brand’s quality. Mafco Worldwide also sells licorice to confectioners, food processors, cosmetic companies and pharmaceutical manufacturers for use as flavoring or masking agents, including its
Magnasweet
brand flavor enhancer, which is used in various brands of chewing gum, energy bars, non-carbonated beverages, lip balm, chewable vitamins, aspirin and other products. In addition, Mafco Worldwide sells licorice root residue as garden mulch under the name
Right Dress
.
The Harland Acquisition
On December 19, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the ‘‘Merger Agreement’’) with Harland, under which a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company would
33
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
merge with and into Harland, with Harland continuing after the merger as the surviving corporation and as a wholly owned subsidiary of Clarke American Corp. (the ‘‘Harland Acquisition’’). The closing of the Harland Acquisition and the related financing transactions described below occurred on May 1, 2007. The cash consideration paid was $52.75 per share, or a total of approximately $1,423.0 million, for the outstanding equity of Harland in accordance with the Merger Agreement. Subsequent to the completion of the Harland Acquisition, Clarke American Corp. was renamed Harland Clarke Holdings Corp. on May 2, 2007.
To fund the purchase price in the Harland Acquisition, to refinance Harland Clarke Holdings’ and Harland’s prior existing indebtedness, and to pay the fees and expenses for the Harland Acquisition and the related financings:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Harland Clarke Holdings entered into a $1,800.0 million senior secured term loan facility and a $100.0 million revolving credit facility; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Harland Clarke Holdings issued $305.0 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2015 and $310.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9.50% Senior Fixed Rate Notes due 2015.
|
The Harland Acquisition has greatly increased the Company’s revenues, the related cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative expenses. As a result of the application of purchase accounting under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, ‘‘Business Combinations,’’ the Company’s depreciation and amortization expense has also increased significantly.
Having completed the Harland Acquisition, the Company is focused on improving operating margins by reducing selling general and administrative expenses, shared services costs and cost of sales.
This section should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There was no material change to the Company’s Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates included in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed on August 9, 2007 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’) and is available on their website at www.sec.gov.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (‘‘FASB’’) issued SFAS No. 157, ‘‘Fair Value Measurement.’’ SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, but does not expand the use of fair value to any new circumstance. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the anticipated impact of SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated results of operations and financial position.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, ‘‘The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.’’ SFAS No. 159 provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value and requires entities to display the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which the company has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance sheet. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 159 on its consolidated results of operations and financial position.
34
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Operating Results
Subsequent to the completion of the Harland Acquisition on May 1, 2007, the Company reorganized its business along four reportable segments together with a corporate group for certain support services. The reorganization aligns the Company’s operations on the basis of products, services and industry. The Company’s previously existing Financial Institution and Direct to Consumer segments were combined with Harland’s similar operations; this business segment now operates under the name of Harland Clarke and is referred to as the Harland Clarke segment. The Company also added two new reportable segments for business lines acquired in the Harland Acquisition: the Harland Financial Solutions segment and the Scantron segment. Management measures and evaluates the reportable segments based on operating income. Prior period results in the tables below have been restated to conform to the business segment changes.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2006
The operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2007, as reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and described below, include the acquired Harland operations from May 1, 2007, the date of the Harland Acquisition.
Net Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in millions
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2006
|
Consolidated Net Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harland Clarke Segment
|
|
|
|
$
|
332.4
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
155.3
|
|
Harland Financial Solutions Segment
|
|
|
|
|
79.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Scantron Segment
|
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Licorice Products Segment
|
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
456.9
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
178.0
|
|
Net revenues increased by $278.9 million in the 2007 period as compared to the 2006 period, primarily as a result of the Harland Acquisition which accounted for $263.4 million of the increase.
Net revenues from the Harland Clarke segment increased by $177.1 million to $332.4 million in the 2007 period from $155.3 million in the 2006 period, primarily as a result of the Harland Acquisition which accounted for $163.1 million of the increase. The remaining $14.0 million of the increase was primarily due to an increase in revenues from a large client and higher revenues per unit, partially offset by a decline in units.
Net revenues from the Harland Clarke, Harland Financial Solutions and Scantron segments include reductions of $0.2 million, $3.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for a fair value adjustment to deferred revenues recorded in the purchase accounting for the Harland Acquisition. The fair value adjustment is a one-time reduction in deferred revenues for these segments attributable to the purchase accounting for the Harland Acquisition. Net revenues will continue to be affected by this adjustment until all acquired deferred revenue is recognized in the consolidated statement of operations. The Company expects that the substantial majority of the reduction in net revenues resulting from the deferred revenue fair value adjustment will be recognized during the twelve month period following the Harland Acquisition.
Net revenues from the Licorice Products segment increased by $1.4 million, or 6.2%, to $24.1 million in the 2007 period from $22.7 million in the 2006 period.
Magnasweet
and licorice derivatives sales increased $0.9 million due to increased shipment volumes and the consolidation of
35
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Wei Feng Enterprises Limited (‘‘Wei Feng’’) third party sales since July 2, 2007. Sales to the worldwide tobacco industry increased by $0.8 million as the result of an increase in licorice extract sales, which were partially offset by a decline in sales of non-licorice products. Sales of licorice extracts to non-tobacco customers increased $0.8 million as a result of increased sales to customers in Asia, as well as, the favorable impact of the U.S. dollar translation of Mafco Worldwide’s Euro denominated sales due to the weaker dollar in the 2007 period versus the 2006 period. Sales of raw materials from Mafco Worldwide to Wei Feng were $1.1 million in the 2006 period and were eliminated in the consolidation of the Company’s accounts in the 2007 period as the result of the purchase of the remaining 50% of the outstanding shares of Wei Feng.
Cost of Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in millions
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2006
|
Consolidated Cost of Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harland Clarke Segment
|
|
|
|
$
|
215.3
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
96.0
|
|
Harland Financial Solutions Segment
|
|
|
|
|
34.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Scantron Segment
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Licorice Products Segment
|
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
273.6
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
108.7
|
|
Cost of revenues increased by $164.9 million in the 2007 period as compared to the 2006 period, primarily as a result of the Harland Acquisition which accounted for $158.1 million of the increase.
Cost of revenues from the Harland Clarke segment increased by $119.3 million to $215.3 million in the 2007 period from $96.0 million in the 2006 period, primarily as a result of the Harland Acquisition which accounted for $113.7 million of the increase. The remaining $5.6 million of the increase was primarily due to increased delivery expenses, partially offset by cost reductions and lower operating expenses resulting from a facility closure during the second quarter of 2007. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues for the Harland Clarke segment increased to 64.8% in the 2007 period as compared to 61.8% in the 2006 period, primarily related to the depreciation and amortization of fair value adjustments recorded in the purchase accounting for the Harland Acquisition.
Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues for the Harland Financial Solutions and Scantron segments were 43.9% and 47.0%, respectively, in the 2007 period. Cost of revenues in the 2007 period for the Scantron segment includes $0.1 million for a fair value adjustment to inventory recorded in the purchase accounting for the Harland Acquisition, which will not recur.
Cost of revenues for the Licorice Products segment was $13.8 million in the 2007 period and $12.7 million in the 2006 period, an increase of $1.1 million, or 8.7%. This increase was due to the increase in sales, the consolidation of Wei Feng’s results since July 2, 2007, as well as increased manufacturing costs, especially for raw materials. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues for the Licorice Products segment was 57.3% in the 2007 period as compared to 55.9% in the 2006 period.
36
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in millions
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2006
|
Consolidated Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harland Clarke Segment
|
|
|
|
$
|
59.6
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35.8
|
|
Harland Financial Solutions Segment
|
|
|
|
|
34.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Scantron Segment
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Licorice Products Segment
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.8
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
39.9
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $71.9 million in the 2007 period as compared to the 2006 period, primarily as a result of the Harland Acquisition which accounted for $66.8 million of the increase.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the Harland Clarke segment increased by $23.8 million to $59.6 million in the 2007 period from $35.8 million in the 2006 period, primarily as a result of the Harland Acquisition, which accounted for $20.1 million of the increase. The remaining $3.7 million of the increase resulted primarily from $3.1 million of impairment adjustments to intangible assets (see Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements) and various other expenses related to integration activities, partially offset by cost reductions. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues for the Harland Clarke segment were 17.9% in the 2007 period as compared to 23.1% in the 2006 period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $34.7 million and $7.0 million for the 2007 period for the Harland Financial Solutions and Scantron segments, respectively, and relate to operations acquired in the Harland Acquisition.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the Licorice Products segment were $2.6 million in the 2007 period and $2.7 million in the 2006 period.
Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses were $7.9 million in the 2007 period and $1.4 million in the 2006 period, an increase of $6.5 million. This increase primarily relates to additional corporate infrastructure costs and management services fees resulting from the increased size of the business subsequent to the Harland Acquisition, as well as amortization of restricted stock issued on May 30, 2007.
Restructuring Costs
During the second quarter of 2007, as a result of the Harland Acquisition, the Company adopted a plan to restructure its business, focusing on improving operating margins through consolidating facilities and reducing duplicative selling, general and administrative expenses, executive and shared services costs.
The Company recorded $2.0 million of restructuring costs, net of adjustments, for the Harland Clarke segment in the 2007 period related primarily to the closure of a printing plant and a contact center. The Company recorded $1.0 million of restructuring costs for the Harland Clarke segment in the 2006 period related to changes in the senior leadership structure and other costs related to reductions in workforce.
Interest Income
Interest income was $2.9 million in the 2007 period as compared to $0.7 million in the 2006 period. The increase in interest income was mainly due to higher cash balances available for
37
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
investments in cash equivalents and marketable securities in the 2007 period as compared to the 2006 period, as well as higher interest rates in the 2007 period as compared to the 2006 period. The higher cash balances were primarily due to increased cash and cash equivalents on hand subsequent to the closing of the Harland Acquisition resulting from acquisition related financing transactions and cash provided by operating activities.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $54.4 million in the 2007 period as compared to $17.2 million in the 2006 period. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to higher amounts of long-term debt outstanding at Harland Clarke Holdings and its subsidiaries subsequent to May 1, 2007 as a result of the financing transactions completed in connection with the Harland Acquisition.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net was $0.1 million in the 2007 period as compared to a nominal amount in the 2006 period. These amounts primarily relate to non-recurring miscellaneous income.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
The Company’s effective tax rate was a provision of 44.2% in the 2007 period and a provision of 5.9% in the 2006 period. The change is primarily due to the effects of changes in state tax rates on deferred tax balances recorded in the 2006 period and incremental state and local taxes recorded in the 2007 period.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
The operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and described below, include the acquired Harland operations from May 1, 2007, the date of the Harland Acquisition.
Net Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in millions
|
|
|
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2006
|
Consolidated Net Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harland Clarke Segment
|
|
|
|
$
|
773.3
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
474.4
|
|
Harland Financial Solutions Segment
|
|
|
|
|
131.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Scantron Segment
|
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Licorice Products Segment
|
|
|
|
|
77.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.0
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,014.0
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
547.4
|
|
Net revenues increased by $466.6 million in the 2007 period as compared to the 2006 period, primarily as a result of the Harland Acquisition which occurred on May 1, 2007 and accounted for $438.1 million of the increase.
Net revenues from the Harland Clarke segment increased by $298.9 million to $773.3 million in the 2007 period from $474.4 million in the 2006 period, primarily as a result of the Harland Acquisition which accounted for $274.4 million of the increase. The remaining $24.5 million of the increase was primarily due to higher revenues per unit and an increase in revenues from a large client, partially offset by a decline in units.
Net revenues from the Harland Clarke, Harland Financial Solutions and Scantron segments include reductions of $0.5 million, $6.4 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for a fair value
38
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
adjustment to deferred revenues recorded in the purchase accounting for the Harland Acquisition. The fair value adjustment is a one-time reduction in deferred revenues for these segments attributable to the purchase accounting for the Harland Acquisition. Net revenues will continue to be affected by this adjustment until all acquired deferred revenue is recognized in the consolidated statement of operations. The Company expects that the substantial majority of the reduction in net revenues resulting from the deferred revenue fair value adjustment will be recognized during the twelve month period following the Harland Acquisition.
Net revenues from the Licorice Products segment increased by $4.0 million, or 5.5%, to $77.0 million in the 2007 period from $73.0 million in the 2006 period.
Magnasweet
and licorice derivatives sales increased $1.5 million due to increased shipment volumes and the consolidation of Wei Feng’s third party sales since July 2, 2007. Sales to the worldwide tobacco industry decreased by $0.6 million as the result of a decline in sales of non-licorice products offset by an increase in licorice extract sales. Sales of licorice extracts to non-tobacco customers increased $2.6 million as a result of increased sales to customers in Asia, the favorable impact of the U.S. dollar translation of Mafco Worldwide’s Euro denominated sales due to the weaker dollar in the 2007 period versus the 2006 period and an increase in shipment volumes to confectionary customers. Sales of raw materials to Wei Feng prior to it becoming a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of the Company on July 2, 2007 were $2.3 million in the 2007 period and $1.8 million in the 2006 period. Sales from Mafco Worldwide to Wei Feng since July 2, 2007 have been eliminated in consolidation.
Cost of Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in millions
|
|
|
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2006
|
Consolidated Cost of Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harland Clarke Segment
|
|
|
|
$
|
494.0
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
293.4
|
|
Harland Financial Solutions Segment
|
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Scantron Segment
|
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Licorice Products Segment
|
|
|
|
|
41.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
613.5
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
330.9
|
|
Cost of revenues increased by $282.6 million in the 2007 period as compared to the 2006 period, primarily as a result of the Harland Acquisition which occurred on May 1, 2007 and accounted for $269.6 million of the increase.
Cost of revenues for the Harland Clarke segment increased by $200.6 million to $494.0 million in the 2007 period from $293.4 million in the 2006 period, primarily as a result of the Harland Acquisition which accounted for $191.2 million of the increase. The remaining $9.4 million of the increase was primarily due to increased delivery expenses, partially offset by cost reductions and a decrease in non-cash amortization expenses related to fair value adjustments to assets recorded as part of the acquisition of Clarke American Corp. by M & F Worldwide on December 15, 2005. Cost of revenues in the 2006 period includes $1.3 million for a fair value adjustment to inventory recorded in the purchase accounting for the acquisition of Clarke American Corp. which did not recur in the 2007 period. Cost of revenues in the 2007 period includes $1.4 million for a fair value adjustment to inventory recorded in the purchase accounting for the Harland Acquisition, which will not recur. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues for the Harland Clarke segment increased to 63.9% in the 2007 period as compared to 61.8% in the 2006 period, primarily related to the depreciation and amortization of fair value adjustments recorded in the purchase accounting for the Harland Acquisition.
39
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues for the Harland Financial Solutions and Scantron segments were 45.0% and 60.4%, respectively, in the 2007 period. Cost of revenues in the 2007 period for the Scantron segment includes $3.0 million for a fair value adjustment to inventory recorded in the purchase accounting for the Harland Acquisition, which will not recur.
Cost of revenues for the Licorice Products segment was $41.1 million in the 2007 period and $37.5 million in the 2006 period, an increase of $3.6 million, or 9.6%. The increase in cost of revenues for the Licorice Products segment was due to the increase in sales and the consolidation of Wei Feng’s results since July 2, 2007, as well as increased manufacturing costs, especially raw materials. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues for the Licorice Products segment was 53.4% in the 2007 period as compared to 51.4% in the 2006 period.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in millions
|
|
|
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2006
|
Consolidated Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harland Clarke Segment
|
|
|
|
$
|
151.6
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
110.5
|
|
Harland Financial Solutions Segment
|
|
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Scantron Segment
|
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Licorice Products Segment
|
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
251.1
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
122.8
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $128.3 million in the 2007 period as compared to the 2006 period, primarily as a result of the Harland Acquisition which occurred on May 1, 2007 and accounted for $116.2 million of the increase.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the Harland Clarke segment increased by $41.1 million to $151.6 million in the 2007 period from $110.5 million in the 2006 period, primarily as a result of the Harland Acquisition, which accounted for $35.0 million of the increase. The remaining $6.1 million of the increase was primarily due to $5.1 million of incremental bonus expense associated with various incentive plans resulting from improved performance of the business and $3.1 million of impairment adjustments to intangible assets (see Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements), partially offset by cost reductions. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues for the Harland Clarke segment was 19.6% in the 2007 period as compared to 23.3% in the 2006 period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $58.6 million and $11.6 million for the 2007 period for the Harland Financial Solutions and Scantron segments, respectively, and relate to operations acquired in the Harland Acquisition which occurred on May 1, 2007.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the Licorice Products segment were $9.7 million in the 2007 period and $8.8 million in the 2006 period. The increase of $0.9 million was primarily due to higher professional fees associated with its indemnification liabilities.
Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses were $19.6 million in the 2007 period and $3.5 million in the 2006 period, an increase of $16.1 million. This increase primarily relates to additional corporate infrastructure costs and management services fees resulting from the increased size of the business subsequent to the Harland Acquisition, increased directors fees, amortization of restricted stock issued on May 30, 2007 and $2.4 million of non-recurring retention bonus expenses.
40
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Restructuring Costs
During the second quarter of 2007, as a result of the Harland Acquisition, the Company adopted a plan to restructure its business, focusing on improving operating margins through consolidating facilities and reducing duplicative selling, general and administrative expenses, executive and shared services costs.
The Company recorded $4.9 million of restructuring costs, net of adjustments, for the Harland Clarke segment in the 2007 period related primarily to this initiative, as well as a restructuring plan implemented prior to the Harland Acquisition, which combined will result in the closure of two printing plants and a contact center, as well as costs to redefine sales territories and consolidate sales divisions. The Company recorded $1.9 million of restructuring costs for the Harland Clarke segment in the 2006 period related to changes in the senior leadership structure and other costs related to reductions in workforce.
Interest Income
Interest income was $5.8 million in the 2007 period as compared to $1.8 million in the 2006 period. The increase in interest income was mainly due to higher cash balances available for investments in cash equivalents and marketable securities in the 2007 period as compared to the 2006 period, as well as higher interest rates in the 2007 period as compared to the 2006 period. The higher cash balances were primarily due to increased cash and cash equivalents on hand subsequent to the closing of the Harland Acquisition resulting from acquisition related financing transactions and cash provided by operating activities.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $118.3 million in the 2007 period as compared to $50.6 million in the 2006 period. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to higher amounts of long-term debt outstanding at Harland Clarke Holdings and its subsidiaries subsequent to May 1, 2007 as a result of the financing transactions completed in connection with the Harland Acquisition.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt
The loss on early extinguishment of debt of $54.6 million in the 2007 period relates to the refinancing transactions completed in connection with the Harland Acquisition. This loss consists of the following related to the repayment of Harland Clarke Holdings debt: $37.3 million for prepayment premiums and consent payments on the 2013 Senior Notes, a $3.9 million prepayment penalty on the Harland Clarke Holdings prior credit facilities, a non-cash expense of $1.5 million for the write-off of unamortized original discount on the prior credit facilities, and a non-cash expense of $11.9 million for the write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees related to the 2013 Senior Notes and the prior credit facilities (see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements).
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net was $0.6 million in the 2007 period as compared to a nominal amount in the 2006 period. These amounts primarily relate to non-recurring miscellaneous income.
(Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes
The Company’s effective tax rate was a benefit of 28.6% in the 2007 period and a provision of 31.2% in the 2006 period. The change is primarily due to the effects of changes in state tax rates on deferred tax balances recorded in the 2006 period and incremental state and local taxes recorded in the 2007 period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow Analysis
The Company’s net cash provided by operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $133.3 million as compared to $85.1 million during the nine months ended
41
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
September 30, 2006. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities of $48.2 million was primarily due to an increase in cash flow from operations, partially offset by a smaller net cash inflow from changes in working capital in the 2007 period as compared to the 2006 period.
The Company’s net cash used in investing activities was $1,464.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $11.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in cash used in investing activities was primarily due to the Harland Acquisition and Peldec assets purchase.
The Company’s net cash provided by financing activities was $1,486.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $40.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 included borrowings to fund the Harland Acquisition, refinance the outstanding 2013 Senior Notes and Harland and Clarke American Corp. credit agreements and pay related fees and expenses. The financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 were primarily scheduled repayments of credit agreements and other borrowings and the funding of the net change in cash overdrafts.
M & F Worldwide is a holding company whose only material assets are its ownership interests in its subsidiaries, approximately $18.4 million in cash and cash equivalents and $40.0 million in marketable securities as of September 30, 2007. M & F Worldwide is considering various alternatives for the application of its cash and cash equivalents and investments on hand. M & F Worldwide’s principal business operations are conducted by its subsidiaries, and M & F Worldwide has no operations of its own. Accordingly, M & F Worldwide’s only source of cash to pay its obligations, other than cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities on hand, is expected to be distributions and tax sharing payments with respect to its ownership interests in its subsidiaries. M & F Worldwide’s subsidiaries may not generate sufficient cash flow to pay dividends, tax sharing payments or distribute funds to M & F Worldwide and applicable state law and contractual restrictions, including negative covenants contained in the debt instruments of such subsidiaries, may not permit such dividends or distributions. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, M & F Worldwide received a cash dividend payment in the amount of $1.8 million from Harland Clarke Holdings to cover certain public company related expenses. M & F Worldwide did not receive any dividends from Mafco Worldwide during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
The Company’s Consolidated Contractual Obligations and Commitments
Estimated interest requirements for the Company’s outstanding long-term debt decreased from $1,502.3 million as of June 30, 2007 to $1,401.1 million as of September 30, 2007 primarily due to the impact of a decline in interest rates on the Company’s floating rate debt. Other contractual obligations and commitments have not changed materially since June 30, 2007. See the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 with respect to the Company’s other contractual obligations and commitments.
Liquidity Assessment
The Company believes that its cash and cash equivalents, borrowings available under the Harland Clarke Holdings and Mafco Worldwide credit agreements (as further discussed in Note 11 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements) and anticipated cash flow from operating activities will be sufficient to meet the Company’s expected operating needs, investment and capital spending requirements and debt service requirements for the foreseeable future.
42
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Harland Clarke Holdings
In addition to Harland Clarke Holdings’ normal operating cash and working capital requirements and service of its indebtedness, it also requires cash to fund capital expenditures, enable cost reductions through restructuring projects and make upfront contract payments to financial institution clients as follows:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Capital Expenditures
. Harland Clarke Holdings’ capital expenditures are primarily related to infrastructure investments, internally developed software, cost reduction programs, marketing initiatives and other projects that support future revenue growth. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, Harland Clarke Holdings incurred $17.2 million and $10.5 million of capital expenditures and $0.3 million and $0.7 million of capitalized interest, respectively. Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 include those relating to the acquired Harland operations since May 1, 2007, the date of the Harland Acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Upfront Contract Payments
. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, Harland Clarke Holdings made $11.1 million and $10.6 million of upfront contract payments to its clients, respectively. Payments for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 include those relating to the acquired Harland operations since May 1, 2007, the date of the Harland Acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Restructuring/Cost Reductions
. Restructuring accruals and purchase accounting reserves have been established for anticipated severance payments, costs related to facilities closures and other expenses related to the planned restructuring or consolidation of some of Harland Clarke Holdings’ historical operations, as well as related to the Harland Acquisition. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, Harland Clarke Holdings made $14.8 million and $2.1 million of payments for restructuring, respectively. Payments for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 include those relating to the acquired Harland operations since May 1, 2007, the date of the Harland Acquisition.
|
Harland Clarke Holdings anticipates that its future capital expenditures and upfront contract acquisition payments will be largely consistent with the combined historical levels of such payments for Clarke American Corp. and Harland. Harland Clarke Holdings expects that payments related to restructuring programs will increase in the next twelve months to support the achievement of planned cost savings.
Mafco Worldwide
In addition to Mafco Worldwide’s normal operating cash and working capital requirements and service of its indebtedness, it also requires cash to fund capital expenditures, periodically build raw materials inventories and fund administrative and other expenses regarding indemnified liabilities.
|
|
|
|
•
|
Capital Expenditures
. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, Mafco Worldwide incurred $1.1 million and $0.7 million of capital expenditures, respectively. While expenditures for future years are expected to be within this general range, future changes in governmental regulations could require the Company to substantially increase capital expenditures in order to comply with these regulations.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Inventories
. Mafco Worldwide’s licorice raw materials are subject to a variety of agricultural risks. Additionally, most of the licorice root Mafco Worldwide purchases originates in countries and regions that have, from time to time, been subject to political instability. Accordingly, Mafco Worldwide must periodically build its raw materials supply in order to avoid material shortages or significant raw material price increases. Shortages of licorice raw materials could have a material adverse effect on Mafco Worldwide’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
|
43
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Cash Flow Risks
Each of Harland Clarke Holdings’ and Mafco Worldwide’s ability to meet their respective debt service obligations and reduce their total debt will depend upon their respective ability to generate cash in the future which, in turn, will be subject to general economic, financial, business, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other conditions, many of which are beyond each’s respective control. Each of Harland Clarke Holdings and Mafco Worldwide may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations and future borrowings may not be available to them under their credit facilities in an amount sufficient to enable them to repay their debt or to fund their other liquidity needs. As of September 30, 2007, Harland Clarke Holdings had $84.2 million of additional availability under its revolving credit facility (after giving effect to the issuance of $15.8 million of letters of credit) and Mafco Worldwide had $14.7 million of additional availability under its revolving credit facility (after giving effect to the issuance of $0.3 million of letters of credit). The Company may also use the revolving credit facilities to fund potential future acquisitions. If future cash flow from operations and other capital resources is insufficient to pay each’s respective obligations as they mature or to fund their liquidity needs, Harland Clarke Holdings or Mafco Worldwide, as the case may be, may be forced to reduce or delay business activities and capital expenditures, sell assets, obtain additional debt or equity capital or restructure or refinance all or a portion of their debt on or before maturity. Harland Clarke Holdings or Mafco Worldwide, as the case may be, may not be able to accomplish any of these alternatives on a timely basis or on satisfactory terms, if at all. In addition, the terms of their existing and future indebtedness may limit their ability to pursue any of these alternatives.
Mafco Worldwide may encounter liquidity risks arising from its supply of licorice root raw material. Mafco Worldwide tries to maintain a sufficient licorice root raw material inventory and open purchase contracts to meet normal production needs for two to three years. At September 30, 2007, Mafco Worldwide had on hand a supply of licorice root raw material between two and three years. Licorice root has an indefinite retention period as long as it is kept dry, and therefore has experienced little, if any, material spoilage. Although Mafco Worldwide has been able to obtain licorice root raw materials without interruption since World War II, since there has been periodic instability in the areas of the world where licorice root raw materials are obtained, Mafco Worldwide may in the future experience a short supply of licorice root raw materials due to these or other instabilities. If Mafco Worldwide is unable to obtain licorice root raw materials, or is unable to obtain them in a cost-effective manner, Mafco Worldwide’s business will be severely hampered and Mafco Worldwide will experience severe liquidity difficulties.
Unresolved Staff Comments
On April 10, 2007, the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘SEC’’) sent the Company a letter informing it that the SEC had reviewed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the ‘‘2006 Form 10-K’’). In the letter, the SEC raised a question, as described below, with respect to the Company’s accounting and related disclosures for the contingent liabilities associated with the Company’s indirect, wholly owned subsidiary, Pneumo Abex LLC (together with its predecessors in interest, ‘‘Pneumo Abex’’), and requested that the Company either provide it with information explaining why such accounting and disclosures were correct or amend the 2006 Form 10-K. Representatives of the Company have exchanged correspondence and had a teleconference with members of the SEC staff and provided them with additional information in response to the SEC’s letter. The Company’s dialogue with members of the SEC staff is continuing.
As indicated in Note 12 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, substantially all of the contingent liabilities of Pneumo Abex, which relate primarily to various environmental and asbestos-related claims, are the financial responsibility of third parties, which are obliged to manage and incur all expenses associated with such claims. As such, the Company has not accrued any amount in respect of such claims on its consolidated balance sheet. The SEC staff has indicated, however, that it believes that a more
44
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
appropriate presentation would require the Company to record on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet an estimate of the value of the contingent claims against Pneumo Abex gross of probable claims by Pneumo Abex for recoveries from third parties.
If, following the Company’s discussions with the SEC, the Company concurs with the views of the SEC staff, the Company may amend the 2006 Form 10-K to restate its consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2006, as well as subsequent filings on Form 10-Q. In such event, the Company would record an estimate of the value of each contingent claim (including expected claims not yet asserted) to the extent that it can reasonably estimate such value and would record an asset in a substantially identical amount, reflecting the fact that any payment in respect of substantially all such claims would be made by a third party on Pneumo Abex’s behalf. The Company would relieve these assets and liabilities as the third parties make payments on Pneumo Abex’s behalf. Any such restatement would have no impact upon any of the Company’s previously reported consolidated statements of income or consolidated statements of cash flows, because the Company does not actually expend any amount in respect of substantially all of Pneumo Abex’s contingent claims and does not expect to do so in the future.
Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as well as certain of the Company’s other public documents and statements and oral statements, contains forward-looking statements that reflect management’s current assumptions and estimates of future performance and economic conditions. When used in this quarterly report, the words ‘‘believes,’’ ‘‘anticipates,’’ ‘‘plans,’’ ‘‘expects,’’ ‘‘intends,’’ ‘‘estimates’’ or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this quarterly report. Although the Company believes that its plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by the forward-looking statements are reasonable, such plans, intentions or expectations may not be achieved. Such forward-looking statements are made in reliance upon the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company cautions investors that any forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results and future trends to differ materially from those projected, stated or implied by the forward-looking statements. In addition, the Company encourages investors to read the summary of the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates included in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 under the heading ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.’’
In addition to factors described in the Company’s SEC filings and others, the following factors could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by the Company:
|
|
|
|
•
|
the substantial indebtedness of Harland Clarke Holdings and its subsidiaries and Mafco Worldwide;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to generate sufficient cash in the future that affects our ability to make payments on our indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to incur substantially more debt that could exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial leverage;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
covenant restrictions under Harland Clarke Holdings’ and Mafco Worldwide’s indebtedness that may limit our ability to operate our businesses and react to market changes;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
lack of access to cash flow or other assets of the Company’s subsidiaries, including Harland Clarke Holdings and Mafco Worldwide;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
increases in interest rates;
|
45
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
•
|
the maturity of the paper check industry, including a faster than anticipated decline in check usage due to increasing use of alternative payment methods and other factors;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
consolidation among financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
adverse changes among the large financial institution clients on which we depend, resulting in decreased revenues;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
intense competition in all areas of our businesses;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to successfully integrate Harland into our business and manage future acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to retain our and Harland’s historical clients after the Harland Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to implement any or all components of our business strategy or realize all of the expected cost savings or synergies;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
interruptions or adverse changes in our vendor or supplier relationships;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
increased production and delivery costs;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in the costs of our raw materials and other supplies;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
technological improvements that may reduce out competitive advantage over some of its competitors;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to protect customer data from account data security breaches;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
changes in legislation relating to consumer privacy protection which could harm our business;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
contracts with our clients relating to consumer privacy protection which could restrict our business;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to protect our intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
our reliance on third-party providers for certain significant information technology needs;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
software defects that could harm our businesses and reputation;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
sales and other taxes which could have adverse effects on our businesses;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
downturns in general economic and market conditions and reductions in information technology budgets;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the ability of our Harland Financial Solutions business to achieve organic growth;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
regulations governing the Harland Financial Solutions business;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to develop new products for our Scantron business;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
future warranty or product liability claims which could be costly to resolve and result in negative publicity;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
government and school clients’ budget deficits, which could have an adverse impact on Scantron;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
softness in direct mail response rates;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
economic, climatic or political conditions in countries in which Mafco Worldwide sources licorice root;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
economic, climatic or political conditions that have an impact on the worldwide tobacco industry or on the consumption of tobacco products in which licorice products are used;
|
46
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
•
|
additional government regulation of tobacco products, tobacco industry litigation or enactment of new or increased taxes on cigarettes or other tobacco products, to the extent any of the foregoing curtail growth in or actually reduce consumption of tobacco products in which licorice products are used;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
additional government regulation relating to non-tobacco uses of Mafco Worldwide’s products;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the failure of third parties to make full and timely payment in our favor for environmental, asbestos, tax, acquisition-related and other matters for which we are entitled to indemnification;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
any material failure of the indemnification, assumption, guaranty or management arrangements that protect Pneumo Abex against contingent claims;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
lower than expected cash flow from operations;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the loss of one of our significant customers;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
work stoppages and other labor disturbances; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
unanticipated internal control deficiencies or weaknesses.
|
The Company encourages investors to read carefully the risk factors described in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 in the section entitled ‘‘Risk Factors’’ for a description of certain risks that could, among other things, cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company has exposure to market risk from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, which could affect its business, results of operations and financial condition. The Company manages its exposure to these market risks through its regular operating and financing activities.
At September 30, 2007, Harland Clarke Holdings had $1,795.5 million of term loans outstanding under its credit agreement, $15.8 million of letters of credit outstanding under its revolving credit facility, $305.0 million of floating rate senior notes and $310.0 million of 9.50% fixed rate senior notes. At September 30, 2007, Mafco Worldwide had $73.2 million of term loans outstanding under its credit agreement and $0.3 million of letters of credit outstanding under its revolving credit facility. All of these outstanding loans bear interest at variable rates, with the exception of the $310.0 million of fixed rate senior notes. Accordingly, the Company is subject to risk due to changes in interest rates. The Company believes that a hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in interest rates applicable to its floating rate debt outstanding at September 30, 2007 would have resulted in an increase or decrease in its interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2007 of approximately $2.9 million.
In order to manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on a portion of the outstanding variable rate debt, the Company entered into interest rate derivative transactions in 2006 and 2007 in the form of swaps for Harland Clarke Holdings with notional amounts totaling $910.0 million and a collar for Mafco Worldwide with a notional amount of $50.0 million, as further described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this quarterly report. The Harland Clarke Holdings’ derivatives swap the underlying variable rate for a fixed rate ranging from 4.992% to 5.362%. The Mafco Worldwide collar caps the underlying variable rate at 5.25% and sets a floor at 4.79%.
47
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries
Item 7A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 presents additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures about exposure to risk in foreign currency exchange rates. There have been no material changes to the disclosures regarding foreign currency exchange rates as of September 30, 2007.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
48
Table of Contents
M & F Worldwide Corp. and Subsidiaries