UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
or
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number: 001-33631
Quicksilver Gas Services LP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
56-2639586
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
777 West Rosedale, Fort Worth, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
76104
(Zip Code)
|
817-665-8620
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
o
|
Accelerated filer
þ
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common units, as
of the latest practicable date:
|
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
Outstanding as of July 22, 2009
|
Common Units
|
|
12,313,451
|
QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
For the Period Ended June 30, 2009
2
DEFINITIONS
As used in this report, unless the context otherwise requires:
Bbl
or
Bbls
means barrel or barrels
Btu
means British Thermal units, a measure of heating value
EBITDA
means earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and accretion
LIBOR
means London Interbank Offered Rate
Management
means management of Quicksilver Gas Services LPs General Partner
MMBtu
means million Btu
MMBtud
means million Btu per day
Mcf
means thousand cubic feet
MMcf
means million cubic feet
MMcfd
means million cubic feet per day
MMcfe
means MMcf of natural gas equivalents, calculated as one Bbl of oil or NGLs equaling
six Mcf of gas
MMcfed
means MMcfe per day
NGL
or
NGLs
means natural gas liquids
COMMONLY USED TERMS
Other commonly used terms and abbreviations include:
AICPA
means the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
FASB
means the Financial Accounting Standards Board, which promulgates accounting standards
GAAP
means Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States
Gas Gathering and Processing Agreement
means the Sixth Amended and Restated Gas
Gathering and Processing Agreement, dated September 1, 2008, among Quicksilver Resources
Inc., Cowtown Pipeline Partners L.P. and Cowtown Gas Processing Partners L.P.
General Partner
means Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, which is owned by Quicksilver
IPO
means our initial public offering completed on August 10, 2007
KGS Predecessor
means prior to the IPO, collectively Cowtown Pipeline L.P., Cowtown
Pipeline Partners L.P., Cowtown Gas Processing L.P. and Cowtown Gas Processing Partners
L.P.
Lake Arlington Gas Gathering Agreement
means the Amended and Restated Gas
Gathering Agreement, dated September 1, 2008, among Quicksilver Resources Inc. and
Cowtown Pipeline L.P. and subsequently assigned to Cowtown Pipeline Partners L.P.
Omnibus Agreement
means the Omnibus Agreement, dated August 10, 2007, among Quicksilver Gas
Services LP, Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC and Quicksilver Resources Inc., as amended
Partnership Agreement
means the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership of Quicksilver Gas Services LP, dated February 19, 2008
Quicksilver
means, Quicksilver Resources Inc. and its subsidiaries
Quicksilver Counties
means Hood, Somervell, Johnson, Tarrant, Hill, Parker, Bosque and
Erath Counties in Texas
SEC
means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
SFAS
or
Statement
means Statement of Financial Accounting Standards issued by the FASB
3
Forward-Looking Information
Certain statements contained in this report and other materials we file with the SEC, or in
other written or oral statements made or to be made by us, other than statements of historical
fact, are forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations or forecasts of future
events. Words such as may, assume, forecast, position, predict, strategy, expect,
intend, plan, aim, estimate, anticipate, believe, project, budget, potential, or
continue, and similar expressions are used to identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements can be affected by assumptions used or by known or unknown risks or
uncertainties. Consequently, no forward-looking statements can be guaranteed. Actual results may
vary materially. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements
and should also understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors and
should not consider the following list to be a complete statement of all potential risks and
uncertainties. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results
contemplated by such forward-looking statements include:
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in natural gas prices;
|
|
|
|
|
failure or delays in Quicksilver and third parties achieving expected production from
natural gas projects;
|
|
|
|
|
competitive conditions in our industry;
|
|
|
|
|
actions taken or non-performance by third parties, including suppliers, contractors,
operators, processors, transporters and customers;
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the value of certain of our assets and liabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the availability and cost of capital;
|
|
|
|
|
operating hazards, natural disasters, weather-related delays, casualty losses and other
matters beyond our control;
|
|
|
|
|
construction costs or capital expenditures exceeding estimated or budgeted amounts;
|
|
|
|
|
the effects of existing and future laws and governmental regulations;
|
|
|
|
|
the effects of current and future litigation; and
|
|
|
|
|
certain factors discussed elsewhere in this quarterly report.
|
The list of factors is not exhaustive, and new factors may emerge or changes to these factors
may occur that would impact our business. Additional information regarding these and other factors
may be contained in our filings with the SEC, especially on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K. All such
risk factors are difficult to predict and are subject to material uncertainties that may affect
actual results and may be beyond our control.
All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing
cautionary statements.
4
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
In thousands, except for per unit data Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
Gathering and transportation revenue Quicksilver
|
|
$
|
14,092
|
|
|
$
|
7,199
|
|
|
$
|
28,166
|
|
|
$
|
13,676
|
|
Gathering and transportation revenue
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
1,644
|
|
|
|
2,453
|
|
Gas processing revenue Quicksilver
|
|
|
8,684
|
|
|
|
7,701
|
|
|
|
17,386
|
|
|
|
14,521
|
|
Gas processing revenue
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
|
|
2,290
|
|
Other revenue Quicksilver
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
23,981
|
|
|
|
18,205
|
|
|
|
48,695
|
|
|
|
33,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations and maintenance
|
|
|
6,003
|
|
|
|
5,312
|
|
|
|
11,414
|
|
|
|
10,262
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,738
|
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
3,730
|
|
|
|
3,239
|
|
Depreciation and accretion
|
|
|
5,768
|
|
|
|
3,407
|
|
|
|
10,809
|
|
|
|
6,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
13,509
|
|
|
|
10,141
|
|
|
|
25,953
|
|
|
|
20,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
10,472
|
|
|
|
8,064
|
|
|
|
22,742
|
|
|
|
13,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
5,686
|
|
|
|
4,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
7,660
|
|
|
|
5,644
|
|
|
|
17,057
|
|
|
|
8,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,412
|
|
|
$
|
5,606
|
|
|
$
|
16,846
|
|
|
$
|
8,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partner interest in net income
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
504
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
Common and subordinated unitholders interest in net income
|
|
|
7,179
|
|
|
|
5,480
|
|
|
|
16,342
|
|
|
|
8,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common and subordinated unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common and subordinated units
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
23,827
|
|
|
|
23,783
|
|
|
|
23,827
|
|
|
|
23,783
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
28,395
|
|
|
|
23,924
|
|
|
|
28,489
|
|
|
|
23,924
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In thousands, except for unit data Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
2,082
|
|
Accounts receivable from Quicksilver
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
3,058
|
|
|
|
2,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
507,462
|
|
|
|
488,120
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
|
|
1,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
512,251
|
|
|
$
|
493,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of debt
|
|
$
|
1,925
|
|
|
$
|
1,375
|
|
Accounts payable to Quicksilver
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,502
|
|
Accrued additions to property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
10,105
|
|
|
|
17,433
|
|
Accounts payable and other
|
|
|
3,392
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
15,422
|
|
|
|
31,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
195,900
|
|
|
|
174,900
|
|
Note payable to Quicksilver
|
|
|
52,817
|
|
|
|
52,271
|
|
Repurchase obligations to Quicksilver
|
|
|
133,443
|
|
|
|
123,298
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
8,898
|
|
|
|
5,234
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common unitholders (12,313,451 and
12,269,714 units issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)
|
|
|
108,176
|
|
|
|
108,036
|
|
Subordinated unitholders (11,513,625 units issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
(2,951
|
)
|
|
|
(2,328
|
)
|
General partner
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital
|
|
|
105,191
|
|
|
|
105,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
512,251
|
|
|
$
|
493,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
In thousands Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
16,846
|
|
|
$
|
8,490
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
10,631
|
|
|
|
6,478
|
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
Equity-based compensation
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
3,252
|
|
|
|
4,607
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
(1,435
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(562
|
)
|
Accounts receivable and payable with Quicksilver
|
|
|
(2,284
|
)
|
|
|
5,170
|
|
Accounts payable and other
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
33,286
|
|
|
|
24,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(35,780
|
)
|
|
|
(59,434
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(35,780
|
)
|
|
|
(59,434
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from revolving credit facility borrowings
|
|
|
31,500
|
|
|
|
50,300
|
|
Repayment of credit facility
|
|
|
(10,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of subordinated note payable to Quicksilver
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(550
|
)
|
Distributions to unitholders
|
|
|
(18,165
|
)
|
|
|
(14,914
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
2,772
|
|
|
|
34,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash increase (decrease)
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
Cash at beginning of period
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|
$
|
607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
2,745
|
|
|
$
|
739
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital related to capital expenditures
|
|
|
15,056
|
|
|
|
29,497
|
|
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment under repurchase
obligation
|
|
|
(7,570
|
)
|
|
|
(46,732
|
)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS CAPITAL
In thousands Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Capital
|
|
|
|
Limited Partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
108,036
|
|
|
$
|
(2,328
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
105,703
|
|
Equity-based compensation expense recognized
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
Distributions paid to partners
|
|
|
(9,112
|
)
|
|
|
(8,520
|
)
|
|
|
(533
|
)
|
|
|
(18,165
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
8,445
|
|
|
|
7,897
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
16,846
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
108,176
|
|
|
$
|
(2,951
|
)
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
|
$
|
105,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
8
QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
UNAUDITED
1. ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Organization
Quicksilver Gas Services LP (KGS or the Partnership) is a Delaware limited
partnership formed in January 2007 for the purpose of completing a public offering of common units
and concurrently acquiring midstream assets. KGS general partner is owned by Quicksilver.
As of June 30, 2009 the ownership of KGS is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Common unitholders:
|
|
|
|
|
Public
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
Quicksilver
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
Subordinated unitholders:
|
|
|
|
|
Quicksilver
|
|
|
47.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Total limited partner interest
|
|
|
98.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Partner interest:
|
|
|
|
|
Quicksilver
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Neither KGS nor the general partner has any employees. Employees of Quicksilver have been
seconded to KGS general partner pursuant to a services and secondment agreement. The seconded
employees, including field operations personnel, general and administrative personnel and a vice
president, operate or directly support KGS gathering and processing assets.
Description of Business
We are engaged in gathering and processing natural gas and NGLs
produced from the Barnett Shale formation in the Fort Worth Basin located in Texas. We provide
services under contracts, whereby we receive fees for performing the gathering and processing
services. We do not take title to the natural gas or associated NGLs that we gather and process
and therefore avoid direct commodity price exposure.
KGS owns the following:
|
|
|
The Cowtown System, located in the southern portion of the Fort Worth Basin, which
includes:
|
|
|
|
the Cowtown Pipeline, consisting of a pipeline gathering system and gas
compression facilities. This system gathers natural gas produced by KGS customers and
delivers it for processing;
|
|
|
|
|
the Cowtown Plant, consisting of a 125 MMcfd natural gas processing unit and a 75
MMcfd natural gas processing unit that extract NGLs from the natural gas stream and
deliver customers residue gas to unaffiliated pipelines for transport downstream; and
|
|
|
|
|
the Corvette Plant, placed into service during the first quarter of 2009,
consisting of a 125 MMcfd natural gas processing unit that extracts NGLs from the
natural gas stream and delivers customers residue gas to unaffiliated pipelines for
transport downstream.
|
|
|
|
The Lake Arlington Dry System, located in Tarrant County, Texas, purchased from
Quicksilver in the fourth quarter of 2008, which consists of a pipeline gathering system
and a gas compression facility. This system gathers natural gas produced by KGS customers
and delivers it to unaffiliated pipelines for transport downstream.
|
As more fully described in Note 2, KGS financial statements also include the results of
operations of the Hill County Dry System, located in the southern portion of the Fort Worth Basin.
This system consists of a pipeline gathering system and a gas compression facility that deliver
customers gas to unaffiliated pipelines for transport downstream.
9
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements
and related notes present the financial position, results of operations, cash flows and changes in
partners capital of KGS natural gas gathering and processing assets. These unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership and have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included
in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In managements opinion all adjustments and eliminations
of intercompany balances necessary to fairly present the Partnerships results of operations,
financial position and cash flows for the periods presented have been made. All such adjustments
are of a normal and recurring nature. As permitted by SEC rules, certain disclosures normally
included in financial statements have been condensed or omitted. The results of operations for an
interim period are not necessarily indicative of annual results.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets,
liabilities, revenue and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities that exist as
of the date of the financial statements. Estimates and judgments are based on information
available at the time such estimates and judgments are made. Although management believes the
estimates are appropriate, actual results can differ from those estimates.
Repurchase Obligations to Quicksilver
On June 5, 2007, KGS Predecessor sold pipeline and
gathering assets to Quicksilver with KGS having either the obligation or option to repurchase the
pipelines and gathering assets at a future date.
Assets that are currently subject to repurchase from Quicksilver consist of the following:
Cowtown Pipeline
KGS has the option to purchase certain laterals connected to the
Cowtown Pipeline from Quicksilver at their original construction cost. Quicksilver provided
notice to KGS during April 2009 that assets with an original construction cost of $62.5 million
were available for purchase. These assets are included in the repurchase obligation to
Quicksilver with an aggregate amount of $68.4 million, including accrued interest. KGS has two
years from the date of notice to exercise our repurchase option on these assets. We have not
determined which assets we will exercise our repurchase option for or the exact timing for
completing the repurchase.
Hill County Dry System
KGS is obligated to purchase the Hill County Dry System from
Quicksilver at its fair market value. These assets are included in the repurchase obligation to
Quicksilver with an aggregate amount of $65.0 million, including accrued interest. KGS has two
years from the date it receives notice from Quicksilver that the system is complete and has
commenced commercial service to repurchase the Hill County Dry System.
The following table summarizes the assets subject to repurchase rights and obligations at June
30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase Obligation
(1)
|
|
|
KGS Repurchase
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cowtown Pipeline
|
|
$
|
68.4
|
|
|
Optional at construction cost
|
Hill County Dry System
|
|
|
65.0
|
|
|
Obligatory at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
133.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Quicksilver expects capital expenditures of approximately $4 million for the
remainder of 2009 for assets subject to the repurchase obligations.
|
These assets conveyance to Quicksilver on June 5, 2007 was not treated as a sale for
accounting purposes because KGS operates them and intends to repurchase them. Accordingly, the
original cost and subsequently incurred costs are recognized in both KGS property, plant and
equipment and our repurchase obligations to Quicksilver. KGS results of operations include the
revenue and expenses for these operations and similar treatment was applied to the Lake Arlington
Dry System that was purchased from Quicksilver during 2008. For the six months ended June 30,
2009, KGS recognized $2.6 million of interest expense associated with the repurchase obligations to
Quicksilver based on a weighted-average interest rate of 3.96%.
Net Income per Limited Partner Unit
KGS net income is allocated to the general partner and
the limited partners, including the holders of the common and subordinated units, in accordance
with their respective ownership percentages, after giving effect to incentive distributions paid to
the general partner. Basic earnings per unit is computed by dividing net income attributable to
unitholders by the weighted average number of units outstanding during each period.
10
Diluted
earnings per unit is computed using the treasury stock method, which considers the impact to net
income and common equivalent units from the potential issuance of common units.
The following is a reconciliation of the weighted-average common and subordinated units used
in the calculations of basic and diluted earnings per unit for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008. The impact of the convertible subordinated note to Quicksilver is dilutive for
the three months ended June 30, 2009, but was anti-dilutive for the three months ended June 30,
2008, based principally upon KGS units market price during that time. The impact of the
convertible subordinated note to Quicksilver is dilutive for the six months ended June 30, 2009,
but was anti-dilutive for the six months ended June 30, 2008, based principally upon KGS units
market price during that time. Approximately 2.2 million potentially dilutive securities for the
subordinated note to Quicksilver were excluded from the diluted net income per unit calculations
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit data)
|
|
Common and subordinated unitholders interest in net income
|
|
$
|
7,179
|
|
|
$
|
5,480
|
|
|
$
|
16,342
|
|
|
$
|
8,308
|
|
Impact of interest on subordinated note to Quicksilver
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available assuming conversion of convertible debt
|
|
$
|
7,671
|
|
|
$
|
5,480
|
|
|
$
|
17,417
|
|
|
$
|
8,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and subordinated units basic
|
|
|
23,827
|
|
|
|
23,783
|
|
|
|
23,827
|
|
|
|
23,783
|
|
Effect of restricted phantom units
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
Effect of subordinated note to Quicksilver
(1)
|
|
|
4,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and subordinated units diluted
|
|
|
28,395
|
|
|
|
23,924
|
|
|
|
28,488
|
|
|
|
23,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common and subordinated unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Assumes that convertible debt is converted at a price of $13.41 per unit and
$13.11 per unit, using the average closing price per unit for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009, respectively. Note 6,
Long-Term Debt
, in the consolidated financial statements in our
2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K contains a more complete description of our indebtedness.
|
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is equal to net income for all periods presented
due to the absence of any other comprehensive income.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Affecting KGS
Pronouncements Implemented
SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations
, SFAS No. 141(R) was issued in December
2007. SFAS No. 141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141,
Business Combinations
, while retaining its
fundamental requirements that the acquisition method of accounting be used for all business
combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. SFAS No. 141(R)
defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control in the business combination and it
establishes the criteria to determine the acquisition date. The Statement also requires an
acquirer to recognize the assets acquired and liabilities assumed measured at their fair values as
of the acquisition date. In addition, acquisition costs are required to be recognized separately
from the acquisition. We adopted the Statement on January 1, 2009, and will apply it to
acquisitions completed after that date, none of which have occurred.
SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of
ARB No. 51
was issued in December 2007. The Statement amends prior standards to establish
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (previously
referred to as minority interest) and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160
clarifies that a noncontrolling interest is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that
should be reported as a component of equity in the consolidated financial statements. The
Statement also changes the way the consolidated income statement is
presented by requiring consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the
amounts attributable to both the Parent and noncontrolling interest. Additionally, SFAS No. 160
establishes a single method for accounting for changes in a parents ownership interest in a
subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation. We adopted the Statement on January 1, 2009,
without impact.
11
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP FAS 157-2), which granted a one-year deferral of the effective date of SFAS No. 157 as it
applies to non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis (e.g. those measured at fair value in a business combination and asset
retirement obligations). Beginning January 1, 2009, we applied SFAS No. 157 to non-financial
assets and liabilities.
The FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
(SFAS No. 161) in March 2008. Under SFAS No. 161, companies are required to disclose the fair
value of all derivative and hedging instruments and their gains or losses in tabular format and
information about credit risk-related features in derivative agreements, counterparty credit risk,
and its strategies and objectives for using derivative instruments. We adopted SFAS No. 161
beginning January 1, 2009, without impact based upon the absence of derivative instruments.
The
Emerging Issues Task Force
issued EITF No. 07-4,
Application of the Two-Class Method
under FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings per Share, to Master Limited Partnerships, (EITF 07-4),
in 2008. EITF 07-4 addresses how master limited partnerships should calculate earnings per unit
using the two-class method described in SFAS No. 128,
Earnings per Share
and how current period
earnings of a master limited partnership should be allocated among the general partner, limited
partners, and other participating securities. We adopted EITF 07-4 on January 1, 2009, with prior
periods retroactively presented. The implementation of EITF 07-4 was not material.
In May 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) (FSP
APB 14-1), which clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon
conversion (including partial cash settlement) are not addressed by existing GAAP. In addition,
FSP APB 14-1 indicates that issuers of such instruments should separately account for the liability
and equity components in a manner reflecting the entitys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when
interest cost is recognized in periods after issuance. We adopted FSP APB 14-1 on January 1, 2009,
without impact on KGS in current or prior periods.
The FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payments Transactions Are Participating Securities
(FSP EITF 03-6-1) in June 2008. Under FSP
EITF 03-6-1, unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in
the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. Our adoption of FSP EITF
03-6-1 on January 1, 2009 had no impact.
The FASB issued SFAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events
, (SFAS No. 165) in May 2009 and the
Statement became effective for us and we adopted it for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. SFAS No.
165 established general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued by public entities. It mirrors the
existing guidance for subsequent events that was established by the AICPA.
Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented
The FASB issued SFAS No. 168,
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(SFAS No. 168) in July 2009. The codification provides
a single source of authoritative GAAP in the United States, except for accounting rules promulgated
by the SEC. It retains existing GAAP and will have no effect on our financial statements upon
adoption, which will occur on September 30, 2009.
3. PARTNERS CAPITAL AND DISTRIBUTIONS
The KGS Partnership Agreement requires that within 45 days after the end of each quarter, KGS
distribute all of its available cash (as defined in the KGS Partnership Agreement) to unitholders
of record on the applicable record date selected by the general partner.
12
The following table presents cash distributions for 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to the
|
|
Per Unit
|
|
Total Cash
|
Payment Date
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Distribution
(1)
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
Pending Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 14, 2009
(2)
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.370
|
|
|
$
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2009
(2)
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.370
|
|
|
$
|
9.1
|
|
February 13, 2009
(2)
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
0.370
|
|
|
$
|
9.1
|
|
November 14, 2008
(3)
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
0.350
|
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
August 14, 2008
(3)
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
0.350
|
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
May 15, 2008
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
0.315
|
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents common and subordinated unitholders
|
|
(2)
|
|
Total cash distribution includes an Incentive Distribution Rights amount of
approximately $90,000 to the general partner
|
|
(3)
|
|
Total cash distribution includes an Incentive Distribution Rights amount of
approximately $20,000 to the general partner
|
4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Gathering and transportation systems
|
|
$
|
203,113
|
|
|
$
|
179,594
|
|
Processing plants
|
|
|
280,791
|
|
|
|
157,353
|
|
Construction in progress plant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,563
|
|
Construction in progress pipeline
|
|
|
12,354
|
|
|
|
27,994
|
|
Rights-of-way and easements
|
|
|
44,074
|
|
|
|
39,473
|
|
Land
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
Buildings and other
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
544,025
|
|
|
|
514,052
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(36,563
|
)
|
|
|
(25,932
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
507,462
|
|
|
$
|
488,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
KGS routinely conducts business with Quicksilver and its affiliates. For a more complete
description of our agreements with Quicksilver, see Note 2 and Note 11 to the consolidated
financial statements in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009, Quicksilver accounted for more than 90%
of our total revenue. All cash disbursements for our operations and maintenance expenses and
general and administration expenses for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009 were paid to
Quicksilver, which processes such amounts on our behalf.
In June 2009, KGS entered into an agreement with Quicksilver in which KGS waived its right to
purchase midstream assets located in and around the Alliance Airport area in Tarrant County, Texas
(the Alliance Midstream Assets). The agreement permitted Quicksilver to own and operate the
Alliance Midstream Assets and granted KGS an option at fair market value and a right of first
refusal to purchase the Alliance Midstream Assets and additional midstream assets located in Denton
County, Texas. As of June 30, 2009, assets subject to this agreement have a recognized cost of
approximately $53 million.
13
6. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Credit Agreement
|
|
$
|
195,900
|
|
|
$
|
174,900
|
|
Subordinated Note to Quicksilver
|
|
|
54,742
|
|
|
|
53,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,642
|
|
|
|
228,546
|
|
Current maturities of debt
|
|
|
(1,925
|
)
|
|
|
(1,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
248,717
|
|
|
$
|
227,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009, the lenders commitments under our credit agreement were $235 million and
may be further increased to as much as $350 million with lender approval. Based on our results
through June 30, 2009, our total borrowing capacity is
$235 million. The weighted-average
interest rate as of June 30, 2009 was 1.82%.
Note 6,
Long-Term Debt
, in the consolidated financial statements in our 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K contains a more complete description of our indebtedness.
7. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
As of June 30, 2009, no assets are legally restricted for use in settling asset retirement
obligations. Activity for asset retirement obligations follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Beginning asset retirement obligations
|
|
$
|
5,234
|
|
Additional liability incurred
|
|
|
3,486
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending asset retirement obligations
|
|
$
|
8,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
In February 2009, McGuffy Energy Services, L.P. (McGuffy) filed a lawsuit against us and
subsequently added Quicksilver as a party. McGuffy alleges, among other things, claims for breach
of contract, fraud and negligent misrepresentation arising from a written agreement by which
McGuffy was retained to provide certain engineering and construction services for KGS Corvette
Plant. McGuffy further seeks to foreclose on a $3.2 million lien that it filed on the Corvette
Plant. KGS disputes the amounts claimed by McGuffy and asserts a number of defenses to McGuffys
claims, including that payments to McGuffy must be withheld as demanded by McGuffys unpaid
subcontractors. In March 2009, we filed a lawsuit against McGuffy seeking damages and declaratory
relief for the disputes between KGS and McGuffy. The McGuffy subcontractors that made demands on
KGS were also named as parties. Several of the subcontractor defendants have filed counterclaims
against us seeking to foreclose on their purported liens. Through June 30, 2009 we have recognized
$2.9 million of the disputed amounts as a part of the Corvette Plant construction costs. We intend
to vigorously defend this matter and do not expect its outcome to have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition or results of operation.
9. INCOME TAXES
No provision for federal income taxes related to KGS results of operations is included in the
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements as such income is
taxable directly to our unitholders.
Note 9,
Income Taxes
, in the consolidated financial statements in our 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K contains more information about our income taxes.
14
10. EQUITY PLAN
Awards of phantom units have been granted under KGS 2007 Equity Plan, which permits the
issuance of up to 750,000 units. The following table summarizes information regarding the phantom
unit activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable in cash
|
|
Payable in units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
Units
|
|
Value
|
|
Units
|
|
Value
|
Unvested phantom units January 1, 2009
|
|
|
60,319
|
|
|
$
|
21.63
|
|
|
|
139,918
|
|
|
$
|
25.15
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
|
13.76
|
|
|
|
(49,789
|
)
|
|
|
25.25
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
13.40
|
|
|
|
405,428
|
|
|
|
10.06
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(5,973
|
)
|
|
|
21.36
|
|
|
|
(8,284
|
)
|
|
|
17.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested phantom units June 30, 2009
|
|
|
54,116
|
|
|
$
|
21.68
|
|
|
|
487,273
|
|
|
$
|
12.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2009, KGS had total unvested compensation expense of $2.3 million related to
phantom units. KGS recognized compensation expense of approximately $1.3 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2009, including $0.2 million related to Quicksilver equity grants issued to
employees seconded to KGS . Grants of phantom units during the six months ended June 30, 2009 had
an estimated grant date fair value of $4.1 million. KGS has unearned compensation expense of $3.5
million at June 30, 2009 that will be recognized in expense through June 2011. Phantom units that
vested during the six months ended June 30, 2009 had a fair value of $1.3 million on their vesting
date.
On January 2, 2009, KGS awarded annual equity grants totaling 405,428 phantom units to the
non-management directors, executive officers of KGS general partner and employees seconded to KGS.
Each phantom unit will settle in KGS units and had a grant date fair value of $10.06, which will
be recognized over the vesting period of three years. At June 30, 2009, 212,901 units were
available for issuance under the 2007 Equity Plan.
Note 10,
Equity Plan,
in the consolidated financial statements in our 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K contains a more complete description of KGS Equity Plan.
15
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
We are a growth-oriented Delaware limited partnership engaged in gathering and processing
natural gas produced from the Barnett Shale geologic formation of the Fort Worth Basin located in
Texas. We began operations in 2004 to provide these services primarily to Quicksilver, the owner
of our general partner, and to other natural gas producers in this area. During both the quarter
and six months ended June 30, 2009, more than 90% of our total gathering volumes were comprised of
natural gas owned or controlled by Quicksilver.
Our Operations
The results of our operations are significantly influenced by the volumes of natural gas
gathered and processed through our systems. We gather and process natural gas pursuant to
contracts under which we receive fees. We do not take title to the natural gas or associated NGLs
that we gather and process, and therefore, we avoid direct commodity price exposure. However, a
sustained decline in natural gas prices could result in reduced production volumes by our customers
and a resulting decrease in our revenue. Our contracts provide relatively stable cash flows, but
little upside in higher commodity price environments.
Operational Measurement
Our management uses a variety of financial and operational measures to analyze our
performance. We view these measures as important factors affecting our profitability and
unitholder value and we review them regularly to identify trends in our operations. These
performance measures are outlined below:
Volume
We must continually obtain new supplies of natural gas to maintain or increase throughput
volumes on our gathering and processing systems. We routinely monitor producer activity in the
areas we serve to identify new supply opportunities. Our ability to achieve these objectives is
impacted by:
|
|
|
the level of successful drilling and production activity in areas where our systems are
located;
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to compete with other midstream companies for production volumes; and
|
|
|
|
|
our pursuit of new opportunities where a limited number of midstream companies conduct
business.
|
Adjusted Gross Margin
Adjusted gross margin information is presented as a supplemental
disclosure because it is a key measure used by management to evaluate the relationship between our
gathering and processing revenue and our cost of operating our facilities, including our general
and administrative overhead. Adjusted gross margin is not a measure calculated in accordance with
GAAP as it does not include deductions for expenses such as interest and income tax which are
necessary to maintain our business. In measuring our operating performance, adjusted gross margin
should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income or operating cash
flow determined in accordance with GAAP. Our adjusted gross margin may not be comparable to a
similarly titled measure of another company because other entities may not calculate adjusted gross
margin in the same manner. A reconciliation of adjusted gross margin to amounts reported under
GAAP is presented in Results of Operations below.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses are a separate measure that we use to evaluate the
performance of our operations. These expenses are comprised primarily of direct labor, insurance,
property taxes, repair and maintenance expense, utilities and contract services, and are largely
independent of the volumes through our systems, but may fluctuate depending on the scale of our
operations during a specific period. Our ability to manage operating expenses has a significant
impact on our profitability and cash available for distribution.
EBITDA
We believe that EBITDA is a widely accepted financial indicator of a companys
operational performance and its ability to incur and service debt, fund capital expenditures and
make distributions. EBITDA is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, as it does not
include deductions for items such as depreciation, interest and income taxes, which are necessary
to maintain our business. EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to net income, operating
cash flow or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA
calculations may vary among entities, so our computation may not be comparable to EBITDA measures
of other entities. In evaluating EBITDA, we believe that investors should also consider, among
other things, the amount by which EBITDA exceeds interest costs, how EBITDA compares to principal
payments on debt and how EBITDA compares to capital expenditures for each period. A reconciliation
of EBITDA to amounts reported under GAAP is presented in Results of Operations.
16
EBITDA is also used as a supplemental performance measure by our management and by external
users of our financial statements such as investors, commercial banks, research analysts and
others, to assess:
|
|
|
financial performance of our assets without regard to financing methods, capital
structure or historical cost basis;
|
|
|
|
|
our operating performance as compared to those of other companies in the midstream
industry without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;
and
|
|
|
|
|
the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects and the rates of return on
investment opportunities.
|
17
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
The following discussion compares the results of operations for the three months ended June
30, 2009 to the three months ended June 30, 2008, which we refer to as the 2009 quarter and the
2008 quarter, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except volume data)
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
23,981
|
|
|
$
|
18,205
|
|
Operations and maintenance expense
|
|
|
6,003
|
|
|
|
5,312
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
1,738
|
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted gross margin
|
|
|
16,240
|
|
|
|
11,471
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
16,241
|
|
|
|
11,472
|
|
Depreciation and accretion expense
|
|
|
5,768
|
|
|
|
3,407
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,412
|
|
|
$
|
5,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes gathered (MMcf)
|
|
|
20,263
|
|
|
|
17,127
|
|
Volumes processed (MMcf)
|
|
|
14,108
|
|
|
|
14,593
|
|
The following table summarizes our volumes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gathering
|
|
Processing
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(MMcf)
|
Cowtown System
|
|
|
14,425
|
|
|
|
14,764
|
|
|
|
14,108
|
|
|
|
14,593
|
|
Lake Arlington Dry System
|
|
|
4,657
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hill County Dry System
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
20,263
|
|
|
|
17,127
|
|
|
|
14,108
|
|
|
|
14,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the changes in our revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gathering
|
|
|
Processing
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
8,832
|
|
|
$
|
9,148
|
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
18,205
|
|
Volume changes
|
|
|
1,617
|
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
Price changes
|
|
|
4,312
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
14,761
|
|
|
$
|
8,995
|
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
23,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Total Revenue
and
Volumes
Approximately $3.5 million of the increase in revenue is related
to additional compression fees as a result of lower pressures on the Cowtown System and the Hill
County Dry System where additional compression assets were placed into service during the current
year. Additionally, $1.6 million of the increase in revenue was due to the increases in volumes
that we gathered in the Fort Worth Basin. This increase was partially offset by lower processed
volumes on the Cowtown System. The increase in gathered volumes is due to increased well
connections related to the continued development of the Fort Worth Basin, particularly in the Lake
Arlington area. For all of 2009, we expect daily volumes to remain relatively flat or slightly
higher than we had in the 2009 quarter.
Operations and Maintenance Expense
The increase in operations and maintenance expense was
mainly due to the continued expansion of our natural gas gathering systems. However, the increases
in our 2009 quarter operations and maintenance expenses have been less significant than the
increases in our throughput volumes and revenue. We expect operations and maintenance expenses to
be relatively flat with the 2009 quarter for the remainder of 2009.
General and Administrative Expense
The increase in general and administrative expense
results from our expanded operations and the increase in the allocable portion of Quicksilvers
overhead costs, primarily related to safety and purchasing. General and administrative expense
includes $0.4 million and $0.3 million of equity-based compensation for each of the quarters ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Adjusted Gross Margin
and
EBITDA
Adjusted gross margin and EBITDA increased primarily as a
result of the increase in revenue described above. As a percentage of revenue, adjusted gross
margin and EBITDA increased from 63% in the 2008 quarter to approximately 68% in the 2009 quarter,
primarily due to the increase in revenue, which was partially offset by an increase in operations
and maintenance expense associated with our current scale of operations and higher general and
administrative expense.
Depreciation and Accretion Expense
Depreciation and accretion expense increased primarily
as a result of the property, plant and equipment placed into service since June 30, 2008 expanding
our gathering network and increasing our processing capability. The Corvette Plant being placed
into service during the first quarter of 2009 contributed approximately $1.0 million to the
increase in depreciation and accretion expense for the 2009 quarter.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased primarily due to greater amounts outstanding
under the revolving credit agreement, partially offset by lower effective interest rates.
The following table summarizes the details of interest expense for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Interest cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
Repurchase obligation
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
1,494
|
|
Subordinated note to Quicksilver
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
|
|
2,713
|
|
Less interest capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
2,813
|
|
|
$
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
The following discussion compares the results of operations for the six months ended June 30,
2009 to the six months ended June 30, 2008, which we refer to as the 2009 period and the 2008
period, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except volume data)
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
48,695
|
|
|
$
|
33,390
|
|
Operations and maintenance expense
|
|
|
11,414
|
|
|
|
10,262
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
3,730
|
|
|
|
3,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted gross margin
|
|
|
33,551
|
|
|
|
19,889
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
33,552
|
|
|
|
19,895
|
|
Depreciation and accretion expense
|
|
|
10,809
|
|
|
|
6,563
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,686
|
|
|
|
4,839
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
16,846
|
|
|
$
|
8,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes gathered (MMcf)
|
|
|
44,049
|
|
|
|
31,678
|
|
Volumes processed (MMcf)
|
|
|
28,760
|
|
|
|
26,749
|
|
The following table summarizes our volumes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gathering
|
|
Processing
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(MMcf)
|
Cowtown System
|
|
|
29,532
|
|
|
|
27,329
|
|
|
|
28,760
|
|
|
|
26,749
|
|
Lake Arlington Dry System
|
|
|
10,935
|
|
|
|
3,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hill County Dry System
|
|
|
3,582
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
44,049
|
|
|
|
31,678
|
|
|
|
28,760
|
|
|
|
26,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the changes in our revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gathering
|
|
|
Processing
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
16,129
|
|
|
$
|
16,811
|
|
|
$
|
450
|
|
|
$
|
33,390
|
|
Volume changes
|
|
|
6,299
|
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,563
|
|
Price changes
|
|
|
7,382
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
29,810
|
|
|
$
|
18,435
|
|
|
$
|
450
|
|
|
$
|
48,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Total Revenue
and
Volumes
Approximately $7.6 million of the increase in revenue was due to
the increases in volumes that we gathered and processed in the Fort Worth Basin. The increase in
gathered volumes is due to increased well connections related to the continued development of the
Fort Worth Basin, particularly in the Lake Arlington area. Additionally $6.2 million of the
increase in revenue is related to additional compression fees as a result of lower field pressures
on the Cowtown System and the Hill County Dry System where additional compression assets were
placed into service during 2009. For all of 2009, we expect daily volumes to remain relatively
flat or slightly lower than we had in the 2009 period.
Operations and Maintenance Expense
The increase in operations and maintenance expense was
mainly due to the continued expansion of our natural gas gathering systems. However, the increases
in our operations and maintenance expenses have been less significant than the increases in our
throughput volumes and revenue. We expect operations and maintenance expenses to be relatively
flat for the remainder of 2009.
General and Administrative Expense
The increase in general and administrative expense was
primarily the result of our expanded operations and the increase in the allocable portion of
Quicksilvers overhead costs, primarily related to safety and purchasing. General and
administrative expense includes $0.9 million and $0.7 million of equity-based compensation for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Adjusted Gross Margin
and
EBITDA
Adjusted gross margin and EBITDA increased primarily as a
result of the increase in revenue described above. As a percentage of revenue, adjusted gross
margin and EBITDA increased from 60% in the 2008 period to approximately 69% in the 2009 period,
primarily due to the increase in revenue, which was partially offset by an increase in operations
and maintenance expense associated with our current scale of operations and higher general and
administrative expense.
Depreciation and Accretion Expense
Depreciation and accretion expense increased primarily
as a result of the property, plant and equipment placed into service since June 30, 2008 in
expanding our gathering network and increasing our processing capability. The Corvette Plant being
placed into service during the first quarter of 2009 contributed approximately $1.6 million to the
increase in depreciation and accretion expense for the 2009 period.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased primarily due to greater amounts outstanding
under the revolving credit agreement, partially offset by lower effective interest rates.
The following table summarizes the details of interest expense for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Interest cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
$
|
2,325
|
|
|
$
|
844
|
|
Repurchase obligation
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
|
2,927
|
|
Subordinated note to Quicksilver
|
|
|
1,096
|
|
|
|
1,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost
|
|
|
5,996
|
|
|
|
5,260
|
|
Less interest capitalized
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
(421
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
5,686
|
|
|
$
|
4,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The volumes of natural gas gathered and processed through our systems are dependent upon the
natural gas volumes produced by our customers, which may be affected by prevailing natural gas
prices, the availability and cost of capital, the level of successful drilling activity and other
factors beyond their control. Although Quicksilver has mitigated its near-term exposure to low
prices through the use of derivative financial instruments covering portions of its expected 2009
and 2010 production, we cannot predict whether or when natural gas prices will increase or
decrease. In addition, there continues to be uneasiness in the credit and financial markets. In
response, Quicksilver and other customers have announced year-over-year reductions in their planned
levels of capital expenditures and drilling activity for 2009. Quicksilver has continued to
optimize its drilling program throughout the year which has resulted in reduced capital
expenditures in the southern part of the Fort Worth Basin impacting gathering and processing
volumes in the Cowtown System. If these conditions were to persist or worsen over a prolonged
period of time, we could experience significant reductions in volumes through our systems and
therefore reductions of revenue and cash flows. Our sources of liquidity include:
|
|
|
cash generated from operations;
|
|
|
|
|
borrowings under our revolving credit agreement; and
|
|
|
|
|
future capital market transactions.
|
We believe that the cash generated from these sources will be sufficient to meet our expected
$0.37 per unit quarterly cash distributions during 2009 and satisfy our short-term working capital
and capital expenditure requirements.
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
33,287
|
|
|
$
|
24,080
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(35,780
|
)
|
|
|
(59,434
|
)
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
2,772
|
|
|
|
34,836
|
|
Our cash flows are significantly influenced by Quicksilvers production in the Fort Worth
Basin. As Quicksilver and others have developed the Fort Worth Basin, we have expanded our
gathering and processing facilities to serve the additional volumes produced by such development.
Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
The increase in cash flows provided by
operating activities resulted primarily from increased revenue and higher profitability associated
with the natural gas gathered and processed through our systems, partially offset by the timing of
cash due to or due from Quicksilver.
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities
The decrease in cash flows used in investing
activities resulted from the lower capital expenditures used to expand our gathering system and
processing capabilities. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we spent $12.5 million on
gathering assets and $23.3 million on processing facilities, which included $22.1 million related
to the Corvette Plant. The cash flows used in investing activities during the first six months of
2009 include the payment of $16.9 million that was incurred and accrued at December 31, 2008.
Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities
Cash flows provided by financing activities in
the first six months of 2009 consisted primarily of the net proceeds from borrowings under our
credit agreement of $21.0 million used to expand our gathering system and processing facilities,
partially offset by distributions of $18.2 million to our unitholders.
Information regarding historical and pending cash distributions is included in Note 3 to our
condensed consolidated interim financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this quarterly
report.
Capital Expenditures
The midstream energy business is capital intensive, requiring significant investment for the
acquisition or development of new facilities, particularly in emerging production areas such as the
Fort Worth Basin. We categorize our capital expenditures as either:
|
|
|
expansion capital expenditures, which are made to construct additional assets, expand
and upgrade existing systems, or acquire additional assets; or
|
22
|
|
|
maintenance capital expenditures, which are made to replace partially or fully
depreciated assets, to maintain the existing operating capacity of our assets and extend
their useful lives, or to maintain existing system volumes and related cash flows.
|
We anticipate that we will continue to make capital expenditures to develop our gathering and
processing network as Quicksilver continues to expand its development efforts in the Fort Worth
Basin. Consequently, our ability to develop and maintain sources of funds to meet our capital
requirements is critical to our ability to meet our growth objectives and to maintain our
distribution levels.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we increased gross property, plant and equipment by
$30.0 million, including expansion capital expenditures of approximately $13.9 million, $5.0
million in maintenance capital expenditures, $3.5 million in asset retirement cost and $7.6 million
in capital expenditures related to assets subject to repurchase obligations. We expect remaining
capital expenditures for 2009 to be approximately $19.0 million, excluding any expenditures to
reacquire or develop assets subject to repurchase obligations.
Additionally, Quicksilver has the right to complete construction of the Hill County Dry
System, which we are obligated to purchase from Quicksilver at fair market value. These assets are
included in the repurchase obligation to Quicksilver with an aggregate amount of $65.0 million,
including accrued interest. We have two years to repurchase the Hill County Dry System from the
date we receive notice from Quicksilver that the system is complete and has commenced commercial
service. Quicksilver expects to incur capital expenditures of approximately $4 million for the
Hill County Dry System during the remainder of 2009.
We have the option to purchase certain laterals connected to the Cowtown Pipeline from
Quicksilver at their original construction cost. Quicksilver provided us notice during April 2009
that assets with an original construction cost of $62.5 million were available for purchase. These
assets are included in the repurchase obligation to Quicksilver with an aggregate amount of $68.4
million, including accrued interest. We have two years from the date of notice to exercise our
repurchase option on these assets. We have not determined which assets we will exercise our
repurchase option for or the exact timing for completing the repurchase.
We operate Quicksilvers midstream assets subject to repurchase for which we receive a fee of
$75,000 per month.
We regularly review opportunities for both organic growth projects and acquisitions that will
enhance our financial performance. Since we strive to distribute most of our available cash to our
unitholders, we will depend on a combination of borrowings under our revolving credit agreement,
operating cash flows and debt or equity offerings to finance any future growth capital expenditures
or acquisitions.
Debt
Credit Agreement
At June 30, 2009, the lenders commitments under our credit agreement were
$235 million and may be further increased to as much as $350 million with lender approval. Based
on our results through June 30, 2009, our total borrowing capacity is $235 million and our
borrowings were $195.9 million. The weighted average interest rate as of June 30, 2009 was 1.82%.
At June 30, 2009, our revolving credit agreement required us to maintain a ratio of our
consolidated trailing 12-month EBITDA (as defined in our credit agreement) to our net interest
expense of not less than 2.5 to 1.0; and a ratio of total indebtedness to consolidated trailing
12-month EBITDA of not more than 4.5 to 1.0. Furthermore, this credit agreement contains various
covenants that limit, among other things, our ability to:
|
|
|
incur further indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
|
grant liens;
|
|
|
|
|
pay distributions; and
|
|
|
|
|
engage in transactions with affiliates.
|
Our repurchase obligations to Quicksilver, our obligations to Quicksilver under the
subordinated note described below, and the capitalized or non-cash interest thereon, are excluded
for purposes of determining our covenant compliance.
23
Subordinated Note
The principal payment for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was not
permitted by the debt ratio requirements of the subordinated note. Interest expense of $1.1
million recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2009 was added to the outstanding principal
amount. The interest rate at June 30, 2009 was 3.42%.
Note 6,
Long-Term Debt
, in the consolidated financial statements in our 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K contains a more complete description of our indebtedness.
Repurchase Obligations to Quicksilver
The information regarding repurchase obligations to
Quicksilver is included in Note 2 to our condensed consolidated interim financial statements
included in Item 1 of Part I of this quarterly report.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
There have been no significant changes to our contractual obligations and commercial
commitments as disclosed in Item 7 in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
The information regarding recent accounting pronouncements is included in Note 2 to our
condensed consolidated interim financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this quarterly
report.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are
based on our condensed consolidated interim financial statements and related footnotes contained
within Item 1 of Part I of this quarterly report. Our critical accounting estimates used in the
preparation of the consolidated financial statements were discussed in our 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. These critical estimates, for which no significant changes have occurred in the six
months ended June 30, 2009, include estimates and assumptions pertaining to:
|
|
|
Depreciation expense and capitalization limits for property, plant and equipment;
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase obligations to Quicksilver;
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations; and
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-based compensation.
|
The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and
expenses. These estimates and assumptions are based upon what we believe is the best information
available at the time of the estimates or assumptions. The estimates and assumptions could change
materially as conditions within and beyond our control change. Accordingly, actual results could
differ materially from those estimates.
24
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We have established policies and procedures for managing risk within our organization,
including internal controls. The level of risk assumed by us is based on our objectives and
capacity to manage risk.
Credit Risk
Our primary credit risk is that we are dependent on Quicksilver for the majority of our
natural gas volumes and are consequently subject to the risk of nonpayment or late payment by
Quicksilver for gathering and processing fees. Quicksilvers credit ratings are below investment
grade, where we expect them to remain for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, this risk is higher
than it might be with a more creditworthy contract counterparty or with a more diversified group of
customers. Unless and until we significantly increase our customer base, we expect to continue to
be subject to significant and non-diversified risk of nonpayment or late payment of our fees.
Additionally, broad market factors such as lower credit availability, prompt us to perform frequent
credit analyses of our customers. We have not had any customers fail to perform on their financial
obligations to us.
Interest Rate Risk
As base interest rates remain low, the credit markets have caused the spreads charged by
lenders to increase. As base rates or spreads increase, our financing costs will increase
accordingly. Although this could limit our ability to raise funds in the capital markets, we
expect that our competitors would face similar challenges with respect to funding acquisitions and
capital projects.
We are exposed to variable interest rate risk as a result of borrowings under our revolving
credit agreement and our subordinated note and repurchase obligations to Quicksilver.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered
by this report pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2009, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that material
information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
25
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The information regarding Legal Proceedings which were filed on February 19, 2009 in the
335
th
Judicial District Court of Hood County, Texas and on March 3, 2009 in the
67
th
Judicial District Court of Tarrant County, Texas is included in Note 8 to our
condensed consolidated interim financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this quarterly
report. On May 19, 2009, the claims of all parties pertaining to the Corvette Plant were severed
from the Tarrant County suit and transferred to the 335
th
Judicial District Court of
Hood County, Texas.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following risk factors update the risk factors set forth in part I, Item IA, Risk
Factors of our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. You should carefully consider the following risk
factors together with all of the other information included in this quarterly report and the other
information that we file with the SEC, including the financial statements and related notes, when
deciding to invest in us. Limited partner interests are inherently different from capital stock of
a corporation, although many of the business risks to which we are subject are similar to those
that would be faced by a corporation engaged in a similar business. You should be aware that the
occurrence of any of the events described herein and elsewhere in this quarterly report could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash
flows. In that case, we may be unable to make distributions to our unitholders and the trading
price of our common units could decline.
We are dependent on a single natural gas producer, Quicksilver, for a majority of our volumes. The
loss of this customer would result in a material decline in our volumes, revenue and cash available
for distribution.
We rely on Quicksilver for the majority of our natural gas throughput. During 2009,
Quicksilver has accounted for more than 90% of our natural gas throughput. Accordingly, we are
indirectly subject, to a significant degree, to the various risks to which Quicksilver is subject.
We may be unable to negotiate on favorable terms, if at all, any extension or replacement of
our contract with Quicksilver to gather and process Quicksilvers production from the Quicksilver
Counties after the initial 10-year term of the contract. Furthermore, during the term of the
contract and thereafter, even if we are able to renew this contract, Quicksilver may have decreased
production volumes in the Quicksilver Counties. The loss of a significant portion of the natural
gas volumes supplied by Quicksilver would result in a material decline in our revenue and cash
available for distribution.
Quicksilver has no contractual obligation to develop its properties in the Quicksilver
Counties and may determine in the future that drilling activity in other areas is strategically
more attractive than in the Quicksilver Counties. A shift in Quicksilvers focus away from the
Quicksilver Counties could result in reduced volumes gathered and processed by us and a material
decline in our revenue and cash available for distribution.
We may not have sufficient available cash to enable us to make cash distributions to holders of our
common units and subordinated units at the current distribution rate under our cash distribution
policy.
In order to maintain our current cash distributions of $0.37 per unit per quarter, or $1.48
per unit per year, we will require available cash of approximately $9.1 million per quarter, or
$36.3 million per year. The amount of cash we can distribute depends principally upon the amount
of cash we generate from our operations, which will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on,
among other things:
|
|
|
the fees we charge and the margins we realize for our services;
|
|
|
|
|
the level of production of, and the price of natural gas, NGLs, and condensate;
|
|
|
|
|
the volume of natural gas and NGLs we gather and process;
|
|
|
|
|
the level of competition from other midstream energy companies;
|
|
|
|
|
the level of our operating cost structure; and
|
|
|
|
|
prevailing economic conditions.
|
In addition, the actual amount of cash we have available for distribution will depend on other
factors, some of which may be beyond our control, including:
26
|
|
|
the level of capital expenditures we make;
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to make borrowings under our revolving credit agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
the cost of acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
|
our debt service requirements;
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our working capital needs;
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to access capital markets;
|
|
|
|
|
compliance with our debt agreements; and
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of cash reserves established by our general partner.
|
The amount of cash we have available for distribution to holders of our common units and
subordinated units depends primarily on our cash flow and not solely on profitability.
The amount of cash we have available for distribution depends primarily upon our cash flow and
not solely on profitability, which may be affected by non-cash items. As a result, we may make
cash distributions during periods when we report net losses, and conversely, we might fail to make
cash distributions during periods when we report net profits.
At the present level of outstanding units, we require $36.3 million of distributable cash flow
annually to maintain the current level of distributions. We may not have sufficient available cash
from operating surplus each quarter to enable us to make cash distributions at the current
distribution rate under our cash distribution policy.
Estimates of oil and gas reserves depend on many assumptions that may be inaccurate and any
material inaccuracies could materially reduce the production that we gather and process and
consequently could adversely affect our financial performance and our ability to make cash
distributions.
The reserve information for Quicksilver or any company represents only estimates based on
reports prepared by petroleum engineers. Such estimates are calculated using oil and gas prices in
effect on the dates indicated in the reports. Any significant price changes may have a material
effect on the quantity and recoverability of reserves. Petroleum engineering is a complex and
subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and gas that cannot be measured
in an exact manner. Estimates of economically recoverable oil and gas reserves and of future net
cash flows depend upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, including:
|
|
|
historical production from the area compared with production from other comparable
producing areas;
|
|
|
|
|
the assumed effects of regulations by governmental agencies;
|
|
|
|
|
assumptions concerning future oil and gas prices; and
|
|
|
|
|
assumptions concerning future operating costs, severance and excise taxes, development
costs and workover and remedial costs.
|
Because all reserve estimates can be subjective, the number of wells that can be economically
drilled, the quantities of oil and gas that are ultimately recovered and the timing of the recovery
of oil and gas reserves may differ materially from those assumed in estimating reserves.
Furthermore, different reserve engineers may interpret different results from the same available
data. Actual production could vary materially from estimates of reserves, which could result in
material reductions in the volumes we gather and process and consequently could adversely affect
our revenue and cash available for distribution.
Because of the natural decline in production from existing wells in our area of operations, our
success depends on our ability to obtain new sources of supplies of natural gas. Any decrease in
supplies of natural gas could result in a material decline in the volumes we gather and process.
Our gathering systems are connected to wells whose production will naturally decline over
time, which means that our cash flows associated with these wells will also decline over time. To
maintain or increase throughput levels on our system, we must continually obtain new natural gas
supplies. Our ability to obtain additional sources of natural gas depends in part on the level of
successful drilling activity near our pipeline systems by Quicksilver and our ability to compete
for volumes from third parties from their successful new wells.
We have no control over the level of drilling activity in our area of operations, the amount
of reserves associated with the wells drilled or the rate at which production from a well will
decline. In addition, we have no control over producers drilling or production decisions, which
are affected by, among other things, prevailing and projected energy prices, demand for
hydrocarbons, the level of reserves, geological considerations, governmental regulations,
availability of drilling rigs and other production and development services and the availability
and cost of capital. Fluctuations in energy prices can greatly affect investments to
27
develop new natural gas reserves. Recently announced decreases in drilling and capital
investments in the Fort Worth Basin will decrease expected 2009 production activity. Drilling
activity generally decreases as natural gas prices decrease. Declines in natural gas prices have
caused a negative impact on exploration, development and production activity. Reductions in
exploration or production activity in our area of operations could lead to reduced utilization of
our system. Because of these factors, even if new natural gas reserves are known to exist in areas
served by our assets, producers may choose not to develop those reserves. Moreover, Quicksilver is
not contractually obligated to develop the reserves it has dedicated to us in the Quicksilver
Counties. If reductions in drilling activity or competition result in our inability to obtain new
sources of supply to replace the natural decline of volumes from existing wells, throughput on our
system would decline, which could reduce our revenue and cash available for distribution.
Our construction of new assets may not result in revenue increases and is subject to regulatory,
environmental, political, legal and economic risks, which could adversely affect our cash flows,
results of operations and financial condition.
One of the ways we intend to grow our business is through the construction of new midstream
assets. Additions or modifications to our asset base involve numerous regulatory, environmental,
political and legal uncertainties beyond our control and may require the expenditure of significant
amounts of capital. If we undertake these projects, they may not be completed on schedule, at the
budgeted cost, or at all. Moreover, our revenue may not increase as anticipated for a particular
project. For instance, we may construct facilities to capture anticipated future growth in
production in a region in which such growth does not materialize. We do not have access to
estimates of potential non-Quicksilver reserves in an area prior to constructing or acquiring
facilities in such area. To the extent we rely on estimates of future production by parties other
than Quicksilver in our decision to expand our systems, such estimates may prove to be inaccurate
due to numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of future production. As a result,
new facilities may not be able to attract enough throughput to achieve our expected investment
return, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In
addition, expansion of our asset base generally requires us to obtain new rights-of-way. We may be
unable to obtain such rights-of-way or it may become more expensive for us to obtain or renew
rights-of-way. If the cost of rights-of-way increases, our cash flows could be adversely affected.
If we do not make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms, our future growth will be limited.
In addition to expanding our existing systems, we may pursue acquisitions that would increase
the cash generated by operations. If we are unable to make these acquisitions because we are: (1)
unable to identify attractive acquisition candidates, to analyze acquisition opportunities
successfully from an operational and financial point of view or to negotiate acceptable purchase
contracts with them; (2) unable to obtain financing for these acquisitions on economically
acceptable terms; or (3) outbid by competitors, then our future growth and ability to increase
distributions could be limited. Furthermore, even if we do make acquisitions that we believe will
be accretive, these acquisitions may nevertheless result in a decrease in the cash generated by
operations.
Any acquisition involves potential risks, including, among other things:
|
|
|
mistaken assumptions about volumes, revenue and costs, including synergies;
|
|
|
|
|
an inability to integrate successfully the businesses we acquire;
|
|
|
|
|
the assumption of unknown liabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
limitations on rights to indemnity from the seller;
|
|
|
|
|
mistaken assumptions about the overall costs of equity or debt;
|
|
|
|
|
the diversion of managements and employees attention from other business matters;
|
|
|
|
|
unforeseen difficulties operating in new product areas, with new customers, or new
geographic areas; and
|
|
|
|
|
customer or key employee losses at the acquired businesses.
|
We depend on our midstream assets to generate our revenue, and if the utilization of these assets
were reduced significantly, there could be a material adverse effect on our revenue, earnings, and
ability to make distributions to our unitholders.
Operations at our midstream assets could be partially curtailed or completely shut down,
temporarily or permanently, as a result of:
|
|
|
operational problems, labor difficulties or environmental proceedings or other
litigation that compel curtailing of all or a portion of the operations;
|
|
|
|
|
catastrophic events at our facilities or at downstream facilities owned by others;
|
|
|
|
|
an inability to obtain sufficient quantities of natural gas; or
|
28
|
|
|
prolonged reductions in exploration or production activity by producers in the areas in
which we operate.
|
The magnitude of the effect on us of any curtailment of operations will depend on the length
of the curtailment and the extent of the operations affected by such curtailment. We have no
control over many of the factors that may lead to a curtailment of operations.
In the event that we are unable to provide either gathering or processing services,
Quicksilver may use others to gather or process its production as it so determines. In the event
that we are unable to provide either gathering or processing services for 60 consecutive days, for
reasons other than force majeure, causing Quicksilvers wells to be shut-in (in the case of
gathering) or resulting in Quicksilvers inability to by-pass our gathering or processing
facilities and deliver its natural gas production to an alternative pipeline (in the case of
processing), Quicksilver has the right to terminate our gathering and processing agreement as it
relates to the affected gas. In light of our asset concentration, if such a termination were to
occur, it could cause our revenue, earnings and cash distributions to our unitholders, to decrease
significantly.
Pipelines and facilities interconnected to our natural gas and NGL pipelines and facilities could
become unavailable to transport natural gas and NGLs, and our revenue and cash available for
distribution could be adversely affected.
We depend upon pipelines and other facilities owned by others to provide delivery options from
our pipelines and facilities for our customers benefit. Since we do not own or operate these
assets, their continuing operation is not within our control. If any of these pipelines and other
facilities become unavailable to transport natural gas and NGLs, our revenue and cash available for
distribution could be adversely affected.
A change in the jurisdictional characterization of some of our assets by federal, state or local
regulatory agencies or a change in policy by those agencies may result in increased regulation of
our assets, which may cause our revenue to decline and operating expenses to increase.
Our natural gas gathering and intrastate transportation operations are generally exempt from
FERC regulation, but FERC regulation still affects these businesses and the markets for products
derived from these businesses. FERCs policies and practices across the range of its oil and
natural gas regulatory activities, including, for example, its policies on open access
transportation, ratemaking, capacity release and market center promotion, indirectly affect
intrastate markets. In recent years, FERC has pursued pro-competitive policies in its regulation
of interstate oil and natural gas pipelines. However, we have no assurance that FERC will continue
this approach as it considers matters such as pipeline rates and rules and policies that may affect
rights of access to oil and natural gas transportation capacity. In addition, the distinction
between FERC-regulated transmission services and federally unregulated gathering services has
regularly been the subject of litigation, so, the classification and regulation of some of our
gathering facilities and intrastate transportation pipelines could change based on future
determinations by FERC and the courts. If our gas gathering and processing agreement with
Quicksilver, or our performance under that agreement, becomes subject to FERC jurisdiction, the
agreement may be terminated.
State and local regulations also affect our business. Common purchaser statutes generally
require gatherers to purchase without undue discrimination as to source of supply or producer.
These statutes restrict our right to decide whose production we gather or transport. Federal law
leaves any economic regulation of natural gas gathering to the states. Texas, the only state in
which we currently operate, has adopted complaint-based regulation of gathering activities, which
allows oil and natural gas producers and shippers to file complaints with state regulators in an
effort to resolve access and rate grievances. Other state and local regulations may not directly
regulate our business, but may nonetheless affect the availability of natural gas for purchase,
processing and sale, including state regulation of production rates and maximum daily production
allowable from gas wells. While our gathering lines currently are subject to limited state
regulation, there is a risk that state laws will be changed, which may give producers a stronger
basis to challenge the rates, terms and conditions of our gathering lines.
We are subject to environmental laws and regulations that may expose us to significant costs and
liabilities.
Our operations are subject to stringent and complex federal, state and local environmental
laws and regulations. We may incur substantial costs to conduct our operations in compliance with
these laws and regulations. Moreover, new or stricter environmental laws, regulations or
enforcement policies could be implemented that significantly increase our compliance or remediation
costs. For example, uncertainty exists with respect to the regulation of hydraulic fracturing.
Legislation has been introduced in the United States Congress that would subject hydraulic
fracturing to regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act, and certain states are also evaluating
whether additional regulation of hydraulic fracturing is appropriate. To the extent further
regulation of hydraulic fracturing affects the volume of natural gas or associated NGLs that we
gather and process, such regulation could have an adverse effect on our business. Greenhouse gas
regulation is also the subject of significant uncertainty. In addition to various
29
other federal, regional, state and local greenhouse gas legislation and regulations that are
currently in effect or under development, the United States Congress is currently considering
legislation that would significantly curtail national greenhouse gas emissions. The United States
Environmental Protection Agency has also taken steps to declare that certain greenhouse gas
emissions are contributing to air pollution which is an endangerment to human health, and may
regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the federal Clean Air Act.
Failure to comply with environmental laws and regulations or the permits issued under them may
result in the assessment of administrative, civil, and criminal penalties, the imposition of
remedial obligations and the issuance of injunctions limiting our operations. In addition, strict
joint and several liabilities may be imposed under environmental laws, which could cause us to
become liable for the conduct of others or for consequences of our own actions that did comply at
the time those actions were taken. Private parties may also have the right to pursue legal actions
against us to enforce compliance, as well as to seek damages for non-compliance, with environmental
laws and regulations or for personal injury or property damage that may result from environmental
and other impacts of our operations. We may not be able to recover some or any of these costs
through insurance or increased revenue, which may materially reduce our earnings and have a
material adverse effect on our ability to make cash distributions.
We may incur significant costs and liabilities as a result of pipeline integrity management program
testing and any related pipeline repair or preventative or remedial measures.
The DOT requires pipeline operators to develop integrity management programs for
transportation pipelines located where a leak or rupture could harm high consequence areas. The
regulations require operators to:
|
|
|
perform ongoing assessments of pipeline integrity;
|
|
|
|
|
identify and characterize applicable threats to pipeline segments that could impact a
high consequence area;
|
|
|
|
|
maintain processes for data collection, integration and analysis;
|
|
|
|
|
repair and remediate pipelines as necessary; and
|
|
|
|
|
implement preventive and mitigating actions.
|
We currently estimate that we will incur costs of approximately $1.7 million through 2011 to
perform the testing required by existing DOT regulations. This estimate does not include the
costs, if any, for repair, remediation, preventative or mitigating actions that may be determined
to be necessary as a result of the testing program, which could be substantial.
We will be required to make substantial capital expenditures to increase our asset base. If we are
unable to obtain needed capital or financing on satisfactory terms, our ability to make cash
distributions may be diminished or our financial leverage could increase.
In order to increase our asset base, we will need to make expansion capital expenditures. If
we do not make sufficient or effective expansion capital expenditures, we may be unable to expand
our business operations or increase our future cash distributions. To fund our expansion capital
expenditures, we will be required to use cash from our operations, incur borrowings or sell
additional common units or other securities. Such uses of cash from operations will reduce cash
otherwise available for distribution to our unitholders. Our ability to obtain bank financing or
to access the capital markets for future equity or debt offerings may be limited by our financial
condition or general economic conditions at the time of any such financing or offering. Even if we
are successful in obtaining the necessary funds, the terms of such financings could adversely
impact our ability to pay distributions to our unitholders. Further, incurring additional debt may
significantly increase our interest expense and financial leverage and issuing additional limited
partner interests may result in significant unitholder dilution and would increase the aggregate
amount of cash required to maintain the cash distribution rate, which could materially decrease our
ability to pay distributions.
We do not own all of the land on which our pipelines and facilities are located, which could
disrupt our operations.
We do not own all of the land on which our pipelines and facilities have been constructed,
which subjects us to the possibility of more onerous terms or increased costs to maintain valid
rights-of-way. We obtain standard easement rights to construct and operate our pipelines on land
owned by third parties. Our rights generally revert back to the landowner after we stop using the
easement for its specified purpose. Therefore, these easements exist for varying periods of time.
Our loss of easement rights could have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our
business, thereby resulting in a material reduction in our revenue, earnings and ability to make
cash distributions.
30
Our business involves many hazards and operational risks, some of which may not be fully covered by
insurance. The occurrence of a significant accident or other event that is not fully insured could
curtail our operations and have a material adverse effect on our cash flows and, accordingly, the
market price for our common units.
Our operations are subject to many risks inherent in the midstream business including:
|
|
|
damage to pipelines and plants, related equipment and surrounding properties caused by
natural disasters and acts of terrorism;
|
|
|
|
|
inadvertent damage from construction, farm and utility equipment;
|
|
|
|
|
leaks or losses of natural gas or NGLs as a result of the malfunction of equipment or
facilities;
|
|
|
|
|
fires and explosions; and
|
|
|
|
|
other hazards that could also result in personal injury, loss of life, pollution or
suspension of operations.
|
These risks could result in curtailment or suspension of our related operations.
We are not fully insured against all risks inherent to our business. For example, we do not
have any property insurance on any of our underground pipeline systems that would cover damage to
the pipelines. We are not insured against all environmental incidents that might occur which may
include certain types of toxic tort claims. Any significant accident or event that is not fully
insured could adversely affect our earnings and cash distributions. In addition, we may not be
able to economically obtain or maintain insurance of the type and amount we desire. As a result of
market conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain of our insurance policies could escalate
further. In some instances, certain insurance could become unavailable or available only for
reduced amounts of coverage. Any type of catastrophic event could have a material adverse effect
on our ability to distribute cash to our unitholders.
The provisions of our revolving credit agreement and the risks associated with our debt could
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, ability to make
distributions to unitholders and value of our units.
Our revolving credit agreement restricts our ability to, among other things:
|
|
|
incur additional debt;
|
|
|
|
|
make distributions on or redeem or repurchase units;
|
|
|
|
|
make certain investments and acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
|
incur or permit certain liens to exist;
|
|
|
|
|
enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
|
merge, consolidate or amalgamate with another company; and
|
|
|
|
|
transfer or otherwise dispose of assets.
|
The provisions of our revolving credit agreement may affect our ability to obtain future
financing and pursue attractive business opportunities and our flexibility in planning for, and
reacting to, changes in business conditions. In addition, a failure to comply with the provisions
of our revolving credit agreement could result in an event of default which could enable our
lenders, subject to the terms and conditions of the revolving credit agreement, to declare the
outstanding principal of that debt, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and
payable. If we were unable to repay the accelerated amounts, our lenders could proceed against the
collateral granted to them to secure such debt. If the payment of our debt is accelerated, our
assets may be insufficient to repay such debt in full, and the holders of our units could
experience a partial or total loss of their investment.
We are exposed to the credit risks of Quicksilver, and any material nonpayment by Quicksilver could
reduce our ability to make distributions to our unitholders.
We are dependent on Quicksilver for the preponderance of the volumes that we gather and
process, and are consequently subject to the risk of nonpayment or late payment by Quicksilver.
Quicksilvers credit ratings are below investment grade, where we expect them to remain for the
foreseeable future. Accordingly, this risk is higher than it would be with a more creditworthy
counterparty or with a more diversified group of customers, and unless and until we significantly
increase our customer base, we expect to remain subject to significant and non-diversified risk of
nonpayment or late payment of our fees. Any material nonpayment or nonperformance by Quicksilver
could reduce our ability to make distributions to our unitholders. Furthermore, Quicksilver is
highly leveraged and subject to its own operating and regulatory risks, which could increase the
risk that it may default on its obligations to us.
31
The loss of key personnel could adversely affect our ability to operate.
We depend on the leadership, involvement and services of a relatively small group of
Quicksilvers key management personnel. The loss of the services of any of these individuals could
adversely affect our ability to operate our business.
32
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
33
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Option, Right of First Refusal, and Waiver in Amendment to Omnibus Agreement and Gas
Gathering and Processing Agreement, dated as of June 9, 2009, among Quicksilver Resources
Inc., Quicksilver Gas Services LP, Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC, Cowtown Pipeline
Partners L.P. and Cowtown Gas Processing Partners L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Form 8-K filed June 11, 2009 and included herein by reference).
|
*31.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
*31.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
*32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: August 10, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
|
|
|
By:
|
QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES GP LLC,
its General Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Thomas F. Darden
|
|
|
|
Thomas F. Darden
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Philip Cook
|
|
|
|
Philip Cook
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer
|
|
35
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Option, Right of First Refusal, and Waiver in Amendment to Omnibus Agreement and Gas
Gathering and Processing Agreement, dated as of June 9, 2009, among Quicksilver Resources
Inc., Quicksilver Gas Services LP, Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC, Cowtown Pipeline
Partners L.P. and Cowtown Gas Processing Partners L.P. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Form 8-K filed June 11, 2009 and included herein by reference).
|
*31.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
*31.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
*32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
Kodiak Gas Services (NYSE:KGS)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 6월(6) 2024 으로 7월(7) 2024
Kodiak Gas Services (NYSE:KGS)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 7월(7) 2023 으로 7월(7) 2024