Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission File Number 001-33077
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware   38-3164336
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
29110 Inkster Road    
Suite 100    
Southfield, Michigan   48034
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 762-6837
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes    þ      No    o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes    o      No    o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer  o Accelerated filer  þ   Non-accelerated filer  o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes    o      No    þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
The number of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01, outstanding on November 5, 2010 was 17,752,360
 
 

 


 

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
             
Item       Page
 
  PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION        
  Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements        
 
      Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets     3  
 
      Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income     4  
 
      Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity     5  
 
      Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows     6  
 
      Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)     7  
  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     24  
  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk     45  
  Controls and Procedures     45  
 
           
 
  PART II — OTHER INFORMATION        
  Legal Proceedings     46  
  Risk Factors     46  
  Exhibits     47  
  EX-31.A
  EX-31.B
  EX-32.A
  EX-32.B

2


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART I. — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (Unaudited)          
    (Dollars in thousands,  
    except share and per share data)  
ASSETS
               
Investments
               
Debt securities
  $ 688,556     $ 648,522  
Equity securities and other
    42,328       38,752  
Short-term
    40,710       12,216  
 
           
Total Investments
    771,594       699,490  
Cash and cash equivalents
    13,771       14,275  
Premiums and reinsurance balances receivable
    48,576       78,544  
Accrued investment income
    6,220       6,248  
Accrued profit sharing commissions
    8,903       14,661  
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses
    216,003       172,711  
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
    63,072       57,374  
Deferred acquisition costs
    24,197       25,654  
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization
    35,590       37,104  
Goodwill
    25,483       25,483  
Other assets
    44,421       26,049  
 
           
Total Assets
  $ 1,257,830     $ 1,157,593  
 
           
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
 
               
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
  $ 566,886     $ 488,444  
Unearned premium reserves
    149,491       146,773  
Long-term debt
    67,013       67,013  
Line of credit
    30,000       4,000  
Funds held under reinsurance treaties
    80,409       71,661  
Premiums payable to insurance companies
    29,767       31,167  
Reinsurance payable on paid losses
    1,221       958  
Deferred federal income taxes
    17,821       13,844  
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
    13,523       17,649  
 
           
Total Liabilities
    956,131       841,509  
 
           
Stockholders’ Equity
               
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 17,752,360 and 17,181,106 shares
    178       172  
Paid-in-capital
    157,535       154,417  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    28,020       16,256  
Retained earnings
    117,814       147,087  
Treasury stock; 134,500 shares
    (1,848 )     (1,848 )
 
           
Total Stockholders’ Equity
    301,699       316,084  
 
           
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
  $ 1,257,830     $ 1,157,593  
 
           
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)  
Operating Revenue
                               
Net earned premiums
  $ 49,236     $ 51,512     $ 152,413     $ 155,539  
Commissions and fees
    40       7,445       15,699       23,916  
Net investment income
    8,349       7,540       25,434       21,105  
Net realized gains on investments
    7,671       13,766       10,354       25,204  
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments:
                               
Total losses
    (214 )     (761 )     (1,339 )     (1,631 )
Portion of losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income
    103       469       684       1,205  
 
                       
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings
    (111 )     (292 )     (655 )     (426 )
 
                       
Total Operating Revenues
    65,185       79,971       203,245       225,338  
 
                       
 
                               
Operating Expenses
                               
Losses and loss adjustment expenses, net
    42,531       30,345       108,114       96,301  
Amortization of deferred acquisition expenses
    13,269       13,960       40,024       40,889  
Underwriting, agency and other expenses
    11,215       10,169       35,071       28,919  
Amortization of intangible assets
    482       559       1,515       1,709  
Restructuring
                5,018        
 
                       
Total Operating Expenses
    67,497       55,033       189,742       167,818  
 
                       
 
                               
Operating Income (Loss)
    (2,312 )     24,938       13,503       57,520  
Interest Expense
    1,554       1,446       4,483       4,278  
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
          (171 )           (401 )
 
                       
 
                               
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
    (3,866 )     23,663       9,020       53,643  
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
    (1,835 )     8,018       1,694       17,707  
 
                       
Net Income (Loss)
  $ (2,031 )   $ 15,645     $ 7,326     $ 35,936  
 
                       
 
                               
Net Income (Loss) Per Share:
                               
Basic
  $ (0.11 )   $ 0.90     $ 0.42     $ 2.03  
 
                       
Diluted
  $ (0.11 )   $ 0.89     $ 0.41     $ 1.99  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
                               
Basic
    17,469,803       17,144,077       17,343,255       17,537,754  
 
                       
Diluted
    17,469,803       17,486,020       17,435,544       17,877,126  
 
                       
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
                                                 
                    Accumulated                    
                    Other                    
    Common     Paid-in     Comprehensive     Retained     Treasury        
    Stock     Capital     Income (Loss)     Earnings     Stock     Total  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
                                               
Balance , January 1, 2009
  $ 178     $ 161,957     $ (3,027 )   $ 103,028     $ (499 )   $ 261,637  
Issuance of restricted stock
    1       (1 )                        
Exercise of stock options
    1       8                         9  
Stock-based compensation expense
          2,288                         2,288  
Stock-based compensation excess tax benefits
          (21 )                       (21 )
Common stock repurchased and held in treasury
                            (1,349 )     (1,349 )
Common stock repurchased and retired
    (8 )     (10,479 )                       (10,487 )
Payment of shareholder dividend
                      (873 )           (873 )
Comprehensive income:
                                               
Net income
                      35,936             35,936  
Cumulative effect of adoption of FASB ASC 320-10 at April 1, 2009
                (999 )     999                
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
                                               
Unrealized holding losses on securities arising during the period having credit losses recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of income, net of tax of $422
                (783 )                 (783 )
Unrealized holding gains on securities arising during the period having no credit losses recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of income, net of tax of ($12,377)
                22,986                   22,986  
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps, net of tax of $268
                (498 )                 (498 )
Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of tax of $739
                (1,373 )                 (1,373 )
 
                                   
Total other comprehensive income
                20,332                   20,332  
 
                                   
Total comprehensive income
                20,332       35,936             56,268  
 
                                   
Balance , September 30, 2009
  $ 172     $ 153,752     $ 16,306     $ 139,090     $ (1,848 )   $ 307,472  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Balance , January 1, 2010
  $ 172     $ 154,417     $ 16,256     $ 147,087     $ (1,848 )   $ 316,084  
Issuance of restricted stock
    2       (2 )                        
Exercise of stock options
    4       1,089                         1,093  
Stock-based compensation expense
          2,053                         2,053  
Stock-based compensation excess tax benefits
          (22 )                       (22 )
Payment of shareholder dividends
                      (36,599 )           (36,599 )
Comprehensive income:
                                             
Net income
                      7,326             7,326  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
                                               
Unrealized holding gains on securities arising during the period having credit losses recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of income, net of tax ($378)
                702                   702  
Unrealized holding gains on securities arising during the period having no credit losses recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of income, net of tax ($8,325)
                15,460                   15,460  
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps, net of tax of $272
                (506 )                 (506 )
Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of tax of $2,095
                (3,892 )                 (3,892 )
 
                                   
Total other comprehensive income
                11,764                   11,764  
 
                                   
Total comprehensive income
                11,764       7,326             19,090  
 
                                   
Balance , September 30, 2010
  $ 178     $ 157,535     $ 28,020     $ 117,814     $ (1,848 )   $ 301,699  
 
                                   
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2010     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
               
Net Income
  $ 7,326     $ 35,936  
Adjustments to reconcile income to net cash provided by operating activities
               
Depreciation and amortization
    3,006       3,051  
Net investment income on alternative investments
    (1,880 )     (1,338 )
Realized gains on investments
    (10,354 )     (25,204 )
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments
    655       426  
Deferrals of acquisition costs, net
    1,457       1,060  
Deferred income taxes
    (2,358 )     5,716  
Stock-based compensation expense
    2,053       2,288  
Increase (decrease) in cash resulting from changes in assets and liabilities
               
Premiums and reinsurance balances receivable
    29,968       3,930  
Accrued investment income
    28       (540 )
Accrued profit sharing commissions
    5,757       (2,526 )
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses
    (43,292 )     (32,185 )
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
    (5,698 )     (10,863 )
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
    78,442       75,544  
Unearned premium reserves
    2,718       2,806  
Funds held under reinsurance treaties
    8,749       17,674  
Reinsurance payable on paid losses
    263       12  
Premiums payable to insurance companies
    (1,401 )     3,532  
Other
    (9,195 )     (14,051 )
 
           
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities
    66,244       65,268  
 
               
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
               
Cost of short-term investments acquired
    (209,916 )     (238,579 )
Proceeds from disposals of short-term investments
    165,849       259,966  
Cost of debt and equity securities acquired
    (179,557 )     (213,818 )
Proceeds from disposals of debt and equity securities
    166,404       121,256  
 
           
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities
    (57,220 )     (71,175 )
 
               
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
               
Stock issued on stock options exercised
    1,093       9  
Purchase of common stock
          (10,487 )
Payment of shareholder dividends
    (36,599 )     (873 )
Cash retained on excess tax benefits
    (22 )     (21 )
Purchase of treasury stock
          (1,349 )
Net borrowings under credit facility
    26,000       3,000  
 
           
Net Cash Used In Financing Activities
    (9,528 )     (9,721 )
 
           
 
               
Net Decrease In Cash and Cash Equivalents
    (504 )     (15,628 )
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period
    14,275       31,833  
 
           
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period
  $ 13,771     $ 16,205  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
               
Cash paid during the period for:
               
Interest
  $ 4,379     $ 4,137  
Income taxes
  $ 10,150     $ 8,100  
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
     Basis of Presentation
     The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes of First Mercury Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (“FMFC” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and do not contain all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. Readers are urged to review the Company’s 2009 audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for a more complete description of the Company’s business and accounting policies. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been included. Such adjustments consist only of normal recurring items. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for the full year. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 was derived from the Company’s audited annual consolidated financial statements.
     Significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
      Use of Estimates
     In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements, and revenues and expenses reported for the periods then ended. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are susceptible to significant change in the near term relate primarily to the determination of the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses and valuation of investments, intangible assets and goodwill.
      Reclassifications
     Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
      Recently Issued Accounting Standards
     In January 2010, the FASB issued an update to the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) related to fair value measurements and disclosures. This ASC update provides for additional disclosure requirements to improve the transparency and comparability of fair value information in financial reporting. Specifically, the new guidance requires separate disclosure of the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, as well as the reasons for the transfers, and separate disclosure for the purchases, sales, issuances and settlement activity in Level 3. In addition, this ASC update requires fair value measurement disclosure for each class of assets and liabilities, and disclosures about the input and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements in Levels 2 and 3. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for annual or interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide Level 3 activity detail which will become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. These amendments do not require disclosures for earlier periods presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption. The adoption of this guidance during 2010 is included in Note 5, “Fair Value Measurements” to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
     In September 2009, the FASB issued updated guidance on the accounting for variable interest entities that eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation of the previous guidance for determining which company, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The guidance requires an analysis of whether a company has: (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb the losses that could potentially be significant to the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the entity. An entity is required to be re-evaluated as a variable interest entity when the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar rights to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. Additional disclosures are required about a company’s involvement in variable interest entities and an ongoing assessment of whether a company is the primary beneficiary. The guidance is effective for all variable interest entities owned on or formed after January 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance during 2010 did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

7


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (Concluded)
      Prospective Accounting Standards
     In October 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-26, Financial Services – Insurance (Topic 944): Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts . The ASU amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 944, Financial Services – Insurance to address diversity in practice regarding the interpretation of which costs relating to the acquisition of new or renewal insurance contracts qualify for deferral. ASU 2010-26 reflects the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 09-G, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts.”
     The guidance provides that the deferral of acquisition costs will be limited to incremental direct costs of contract acquisition that are incurred in transactions with independent third parties. In addition, future cash flows attributable to advertising costs should be accounted for using the direct-response advertising guidance in Subtopic 340-20 for capitalization purposes. The capitalized costs would then be treated as deferred acquisition costs pursuant to Subtopic 944-30 for classification, subsequent measurement and premium deficiency purposes. The guidance in the ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011, and should be applied prospectively upon adoption. Retrospective application to all prior periods presented upon the date of adoption also is permitted, but not required.
     The adoption of this guidance will likely have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial position. In the period of adoption and thereafter, the Company expects to capitalize less acquisition costs than those that would have been capitalized if the previous guidance had been applied, due to the narrowed definition of what constitutes an acquisition cost eligible for capitalization. The result will be a decrease in the Deferred acquisition costs asset balance in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, compared to the balance if the previous guidance had been applied. This lower asset balance will also result in lower amortization expense, presented as Amortization of deferred acquisition expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Income, in the period of adoption and thereafter compared to amortization recorded under the previous guidance. Lastly, by deferring less expense in the period of adoption and future periods, the result is an increase in expenses classified as Underwriting, agency and other in the Consolidated Statement of Income compared to those recorded if the previous guidance had been applied.

8


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
2. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
     Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if common stock equivalents were issued and exercised.
     The following is a reconciliation of basic number of common shares outstanding to diluted common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)  
 
                               
Net income (loss) as reported
  $ (2,031 )   $ 15,645     $ 7,326     $ 35,936  
Net income (loss) allocated to unvested restricted stock shares
    32       (141 )     (116 )     (316 )
 
                       
Net income (loss) available to common
  $ (1,999 )   $ 15,504     $ 7,210     $ 35,620  
 
                               
Weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
                               
 
                               
Basic number of common shares outstanding
    17,469,803       17,144,077       17,343,255       17,537,754  
Dilutive effect of stock options
          341,943       92,289       339,372  
 
                       
Dilutive number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding
    17,469,803       17,486,020       17,435,544       17,877,126  
 
                       
 
                               
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share:
                               
Basic
  $ (0.11 )   $ 0.90     $ 0.42     $ 2.03  
 
                       
Diluted
  $ (0.11 )   $ 0.89     $ 0.41     $ 1.99  
 
                       
 
                               
Anti-dilutive shares excluded from diluted net income (loss) per common share
    1,072,705       1,112,688       1,053,022       1,112,688  
 
                       
     On January 1, 2009, we adopted new FASB accounting guidance which requires that unvested restricted stock with a nonforfeitable right to receive dividends be included in the two-class method of computing earnings per share. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our reported earnings per share amounts.
3. INVESTMENTS
     The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and market value of marketable investment securities classified as available-for-sale at September 30, 2010 by major security type were as follows:
                                 
            Gross Unrealized        
    Amortized Cost     Gains     Losses     Market Value  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Debt Securities
                               
U.S. government securities
  $ 3,675     $ 170     $     $ 3,845  
Government agency mortgage-backed securities
    106,919       6,223       (9 )     113,133  
Government agency obligations
    1,009       33             1,042  
Collateralized mortgage obligations and other asset-backed securities
    117,441       12,476       (549 )     129,368  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    192,332       13,299       (62 )     205,569  
Corporate bonds
    152,653       15,839       (32 )     168,460  
 
                       
Total Debt Securities
    574,029       48,040       (652 )     621,417  
Preferred stocks
    1,416       162       (129 )     1,449  
Short-term investments
    40,710                   40,710  
 
                       
Total
  $ 616,155     $ 48,202     $ (781 )   $ 663,576  
 
                       

9


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
3. INVESTMENTS — (Continued)
     The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and market value of marketable investment securities classified as available-for-sale at December 31, 2009 by major security type were as follows:
                                 
            Gross Unrealized        
    Amortized Cost     Gains     Losses     Market Value  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Debt Securities
                               
U.S. government securities
  $ 4,014     $ 110     $ (3 )   $ 4,121  
Government agency mortgage-backed securities
    98,278       3,820       (16 )     102,082  
Government agency obligations
    986       30             1,016  
Collateralized mortgage obligations and other asset-backed securities
    120,505       8,142       (3,033 )     125,614  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    198,252       9,310       (293 )     207,269  
Corporate bonds
    135,549       10,596       (505 )     145,640  
 
                       
Total Debt Securities
    557,584       32,008       (3,850 )     585,742  
Preferred stocks
    1,416       121       (131 )     1,406  
Short-term investments
    12,216                   12,216  
 
                       
Total
  $ 571,216     $ 32,129     $ (3,981 )   $ 599,364  
 
                       
     The amortized cost and market value of debt securities classified as available-for-sale, by contractual maturity, as of September 30, 2010 are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Additionally, the expected maturities of the Company’s investments in putable bonds fluctuate inversely with interest rates and therefore may also differ from contractual maturities.
                 
    Amortized Cost     Market Value  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Due in one year or less
  $ 73,841     $ 74,750  
Due after one year through five years
    151,333       163,448  
Due after five years through ten years
    139,243       153,282  
Due after ten years
    27,378       29,595  
 
           
 
    391,795       421,075  
Government agency mortgage-backed securities
    106,919       113,133  
Collateralized mortgage obligations and other asset-backed securities
    117,441       129,368  
 
           
Total
  $ 616,155     $ 663,576  
 
           
     As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the market value of convertible securities accounted for as hybrid instruments was $73.4 million and $69.5 million, respectively. Convertible bonds and bond units had a market value of $66.2 million and $61.4 million and were included in Debt securities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Convertible preferred stocks had a market value of $7.2 million and $8.2 million and were included in Equity securities and other in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The Company recorded an increase in the fair value of the hybrid instruments of $3.0 million and a decrease of $2.9 million in Net realized gains on investments for the three months and nine months, respectively, ended September 30, 2010. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, all convertible securities were accounted for as hybrid instruments in accordance with FASB accounting guidance.
Alternative Investments
     The Company has $17.0 million invested in a limited partnership, which invests in high yield convertible securities. The market value of this investment was $20.5 million at September 30, 2010. In addition, the Company has $10.0 million invested in another limited partnership, which invests in distressed structured finance products. The market value of this investment was $14.2 million at September 30, 2010. The Company elected the fair value option for these investments in accordance with FASB accounting guidance. The change in fair value of these investments is recorded in Net investment income and Net realized gains on investments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

10


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
3. INVESTMENTS — (Concluded)
The Company recorded an increase in the fair value of these alternative investments of $0.6 million and $1.9 million as Net investment income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. Also, the Company recorded an increase in the fair value of these alternative investments of $1.1 million and $2.2 million recognized as Net realized gains on investments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. These investments are recorded in Equity securities and other in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
4. OTHER THAN TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENTS OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Impairment of Investment Securities
     Impairment of investment securities results when a market value decline below amortized cost is other-than-temporary. The other-than-temporary write down is separated into an amount representing the credit loss which is recognized in earnings and the amount related to all other factors which is recorded in other comprehensive income. Management regularly reviews our fixed maturity securities portfolio to evaluate the necessity of recording impairment losses for other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of investments. Factors considered in evaluating potential impairment include, but are not limited to, the current fair value as compared to cost or amortized cost of the security, as appropriate, the length of time the investment has been below cost or amortized cost and by how much, our intent to sell a security and whether it is more-likely-than-not we will be required to sell the security before the recovery of our amortized cost basis, and specific credit issues related to the issuer and current economic conditions. Other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses result in a reduction of the cost basis of the underlying investment. Significant changes in these factors we consider when evaluating investments for impairment losses could result in a change in impairment losses reported in the consolidated financial statements.
     With respect to securities where the decline in value is determined to be temporary and the security’s cost basis is not written down, a subsequent decision may be made to sell that security and realize a loss. Subsequent decisions on security sales are made within the context of overall risk monitoring, changing information and market conditions. Management of the Company’s investment portfolio is outsourced to third party investment managers which is directed and monitored by our investment committee. While these investment managers may, at a given point in time, believe that the preferred course of action is to hold securities with unrealized losses that are considered temporary until such losses are recovered, the dynamic nature of the portfolio management may result in a subsequent decision to sell the security and realize the loss, based upon a change in market and other factors described above. The Company believes that subsequent decisions to sell such securities are consistent with the classification of the Company’s portfolio as available-for-sale.
     Investment managers are required to notify management of rating agency downgrades of securities in their portfolios as well as any potential investment valuation issues no later than the end of each quarter. Investment managers are also required to notify management, and receive prior approval, prior to the execution of a transaction or series of related transactions that may result in a realized loss above a certain threshold. Additionally, investment managers are required to notify management, and receive approval, prior to the execution of a transaction or series of related transactions that may result in any realized loss up until a certain period beyond the close of a quarterly accounting period.
     Under current accounting standards, an OTTI write-down of debt securities, where fair value is below amortized cost, is triggered in circumstances where (1) an entity has the intent to sell a security, (2) it is more-likely-than-not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, or (3) the entity does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. If an entity intends to sell a security or if it is more-likely-than-not the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery, an OTTI write-down is recognized in earnings equal to the difference between the security’s amortized cost and its fair value. If an entity does not intend to sell the security or it is not more-likely-than-not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery, the OTTI write-down is separated into an amount representing the credit loss, which is recognized in earnings, and the amount related to all other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income.

11


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
4. OTHER THAN TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENTS OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES — (Continued)
     The following table presents a roll-forward of the credit component of OTTI on debt securities recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for which a portion of the OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income for the period January 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010:
                                                 
                    Additions for            
    January 1, 2010   Additions for OTTI   OTTI Securities   Reductions Due to   Adjustments to   September 30,
    Cumulative OTTI   Securities Where   Where Credit   Sales or   Book Value of   2010 Cumulative
    Credit Losses   No Credit Losses   Losses Have Been   Intend/Required to   Credit-Impaired   OTTI Credit Losses
    Recognized for   Were Recognized   Recognized Prior   Sell of Credit-   Securities due to   Recognized for
    Securities Still   Prior to   to   Impaired   Changes in Cash   Securities Still
    Held   Janaury 1, 2010   January 1, 2010   Securities   Flows   Held
    (Dollars in thousands)
Debt securities:
                                               
Mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations and passthrough securities
  $ 796     $     $ 545     $         $ 1,341  
All other corporate bonds
    569       110             (110 )           569  
     
Total debt securities
  $ 1,365     $ 110     $ 545     $ (110 )       $ 1,910  
     
     The Company determines the credit loss component of fixed maturity investments by utilizing discounted cash flow modeling to determine the present value of the security and comparing the present value with the amortized cost of the security. If the amortized cost is greater than the present value of the expected cash flows, the difference is considered credit loss and recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
     The fair value and amount of unrealized losses segregated by the time period the investment had been in an unrealized loss position is as follows at September 30, 2010:
                                 
    Less than 12 Months     Greater than 12 Months  
    Fair Value             Fair Value        
    of             of        
    Investments             Investments        
    With     Gross     With     Gross  
    Unrealized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Unrealized  
    Losses     Losses     Losses     Losses  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Debt Securities
                               
U.S. government securities
  $     $     $     $  
Government agency mortgage-backed securities
    3,052       (9 )            
Government agency obligations
                       
Collateralized mortgage obligations and other asset-backed securities
    8,548       (105 )     6,219       (444 )
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
                1,216       (62 )
Corporate bonds
    1,672       (30 )     955       (2 )
 
                       
Total Debt Securities
    13,272       (144 )     8,390       (508 )
Preferred Stocks
                377       (129 )
 
                       
Total
  $ 13,272     $ (144 )   $ 8,767     $ (637 )
 
                       
 
                               
 
                               
 
                               

12


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
4. OTHER THAN TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENTS OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES — (Continued)
     The fair value and amount of unrealized losses segregated by the time period the investment had been in an unrealized loss position is as follows at December 31, 2009:
                                 
    Less than 12 Months     Greater than 12 Months  
    Fair Value             Fair Value        
    of             of        
    Investments             Investments        
    With     Gross     With     Gross  
    Unrealized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Unrealized  
    Losses     Losses     Losses     Losses  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Debt Securities
                               
U.S. government securities
  $ 359     $ (3 )   $     $  
Government agency mortgage-backed securities
    3,854       (16 )            
Government agency obligations
                       
Collateralized mortgage obligations and other asset-backed securities
    8,438       (1,291 )     9,635       (1,742 )
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    14,044       (237 )     1,179       (56 )
Corporate bonds
    4,551       (404 )     5,563       (101 )
 
                       
Total Debt Securities
    31,246       (1,951 )     16,377       (1,899 )
Preferred Stocks
                375       (131 )
 
                       
Total
  $ 31,246     $ (1,951 )   $ 16,752     $ (2,030 )
 
                       
     Below is a table that illustrates the unrecognized impairment loss by sector. The increase in spread relative to U.S. Treasury Bonds was the primary factor leading to impairment for the periods ended September 30, 2010. All asset sectors were affected by the overall increase in spreads as can be seen from the table below. In addition to the level of interest rates, we also look at a variety of other factors such as direction of credit spreads for an individual issue as well as the magnitude of specific securities that have declined below amortized cost.

13


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
4. OTHER THAN TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENTS OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES — (Continued)
         
    Unrealized  
    Loss at  
    September 30,  
Sector   2010  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Debt Securities
       
U.S. Treasuries
  $  
U.S. Agencies
     
 
     
U.S. government securities
     
 
     
Government agency mortgage-backed securities
    (9 )
 
     
Government agency obligations
     
 
     
MBS Passthroughs
    (4 )
CMOs
    (198 )
Asset Backed Securities
    (210 )
Commercial MBS
    (137 )
 
     
Collateralized mortgage obligations and other asset-backed securities
    (549 )
 
     
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    (62 )
 
     
Corporate Bonds
    (3 )
High Yield Bonds
    (29 )
 
     
Corporate Bonds
    (32 )
 
     
Total Debt Securities
    (652 )
Preferred Stocks
    (129 )
Short-term investments
     
 
     
Total
  $ (781 )
 
     
     At September 30, 2010, there were 72 unrealized loss positions with a total unrealized loss of $0.8 million. This represents approximately 1.3% of the quarter end amortized cost of available-for-sale assets of $616.2 million. This unrealized loss position is a function of the purchase of specific securities in a lower interest rate or spread environment than what prevails as of September 30, 2010. Some of these losses are due to the increase in spreads of select corporate bonds or structured securities. We have viewed these market value declines as being temporary in nature. Our portfolio is relatively short as the duration of the core fixed income portfolio excluding cash, convertible securities, and equity is approximately 3.6 years, and 3.3 years on a taxable equivalent basis. There have been certain instances over the past year where due to market based opportunities; we have elected to sell a small portion of the portfolio. These situations were unique and infrequent occurrences and in our opinion, do not reflect an indication that we intend to sell or will be required to sell these securities before they mature or recover in value.
     The most significant risk or uncertainty inherent in our assessment methodology is that the current credit rating of a particular issue changes over time. If the rating agencies should change their rating on a particular security in our portfolio, it could lead to a reclassification of that specific issue. The majority of our unrecognized impairment losses are investment grade and “AAA” or “AA” rated securities. Should the credit quality of individual issues decline for whatever reason then it would lead us to reconsider the classification of that particular security. Within the non-investment grade sector, we continue to monitor the particular status of each issue. Should prospects for any one issue deteriorate, we would potentially alter our classification of that particular issue.
     The table below illustrates the breakdown of impaired securities by investment grade and non-investment grade as well as the duration that these sectors have been trading below amortized cost. The average duration of the impairment has been greater than 12 months. The unrealized loss of impaired securities as a percent of the amortized cost of those securities is 3.4% as of September 30, 2010.

14


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
4. OTHER THAN TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENTS OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES — (Concluded)
                                         
    % of Total     Total     Total     Average Unrealized Loss     % of Loss  
    Amortized Cost     Amortized Cost     Unrealized Losses     as % of Amortized Cost     > 12 Months  
            (Dollars in thousands)                  
Non Investment Grade
    34.7 %   $ 7,929     $ 384       4.8 %     88.2 %
Investment Grade
    65.3       14,891       397       2.7       75.1  
 
                             
Total
    100.0 %   $ 22,820     $ 781       3.4 %     81.6 %
 
                             
     The majority of these securities are rated investment grade, BBB- or better. Of the $0.4 million of unrealized loss within non-investment grade, Alt-A and sub-prime Asset Backed Securities accounted for 54.2% of this loss. The next highest percent of the loss within non-investment grade were non-agency CMOs, which accounted for 37.2% of the loss. The remaining portion of the loss, or 8.6%, was within non-investment grade corporate bonds and one non-agency MBS passthrough. These issues are continually monitored and may be classified in the future as being other than temporarily impaired.
     The highest concentration of temporarily impaired securities is Asset Backed Securities at 26.9% of the total loss. The next largest concentration of temporarily impaired securities is CMOs at 25.3% of the loss, followed by Commercial MBS at 17.5%, Preferred Stocks at 16.5%, Municipal Bonds at 8.0%, Corporates at 4.0% and MBS Passthroughs at 1.8%. These securities have been affected primarily by the widening of spreads and/or general level of interest rates, and will continue to be monitored.
     For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we sold approximately $4.3 million of market value of fixed income securities, excluding convertibles, which were trading below amortized cost while recording a realized loss of $0.1 million. This loss represented 2.5% of the amortized cost of the positions. These sales were unique opportunities to sell specific positions due to changing market conditions.
5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
     According to FASB guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or would be paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the “exit price”) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, we primarily use prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets, or “market approach” as defined by the FASB guidance.
     FASB guidance establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements that distinguishes between market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (“observable inputs”) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (“unobservable inputs”). The estimated fair values of the Company’s fixed income securities, convertible bonds, and equity securities are based on prices provided by an independent, nationally recognized pricing service. The prices provided by this service are based on quoted market prices, when available, non-binding broker quotes, or matrix pricing. The independent pricing service provides a single price or quote per security and the Company does not adjust security prices, except as otherwise disclosed. The Company obtains an understanding of the methods, models and inputs used by the independent pricing service, and has controls in place to validate that amounts provided represent fair values, consistent with this standard. The Company’s controls include, but are not limited to, initial and ongoing evaluation of the methodologies used by the independent pricing service, a review of specific securities and an assessment for proper classification within the fair value hierarchy. The hierarchy level assigned to each security in our available-for-sale, hybrid securities, and alternative investments portfolios is based on our assessment of the transparency and reliability of the inputs used in the valuation of such instrument at the measurement date. The three hierarchy levels are defined as follows:
    Level 1 — Valuations based on unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical securities. The fair values of fixed maturity and equity securities and short-term investments included in the Level 1 category were based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market. The Level 1 category includes publicly traded equity securities, highly liquid U.S. Government notes, treasury bills and mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association; highly liquid cash management funds; and short-term certificates of deposit.

15


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS — (Continued)
    Level 2 — Valuations based on observable inputs (other than Level 1 prices), such as quoted prices for similar assets at the measurement date; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. The fair value of fixed maturity and equity securities and short-term investments included in the Level 2 category were based on the market values obtained from an independent pricing service that were evaluated using pricing models that vary by asset class and incorporate available trade, bid and other market information and price quotes from well established independent broker-dealers. The independent pricing service monitors market indicators, industry and economic events, and for broker-quoted only securities, obtains quotes from market makers or broker-dealers that it recognizes to be market participants. The Level 2 category includes corporate bonds, municipal bonds, redeemable preferred stocks and certain publicly traded common stocks with no trades on the measurement date.
 
    Level 3 — Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement, and involve management judgment.
     If the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, a financial security’s hierarchy level is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. A number of our investment grade corporate bonds are frequently traded in active markets and traded market prices for these securities existed at September 30, 2010. These securities were classified as Level 2 at September 30, 2010 because our third party pricing service uses valuation models which use observable market inputs in addition to traded prices.
     The following table presents our investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2010 classified by the fair value measurements standard valuation hierarchy (as discussed above):
                                 
            Fair Value Measurements Using  
    Total     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Available for sale investments:
                               
Fixed maturity securities
  $ 622,866     $ 3,845     $ 619,021     $  
Equity securities
                       
Short-term investments
    40,710       40,710              
Hybrid securities
    73,351             73,351        
Alternative investments
    34,667             14,207       20,460  
 
                       
Total
  $ 771,594     $ 44,555     $ 706,579     $ 20,460  
 
                       
     The following table presents our investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009 classified by the fair value measurements standard valuation hierarchy (as discussed above):
                                 
            Fair Value Measurements Using  
    Total     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
            (Dollars in thousands)          
Available for sale investments:
                               
Fixed maturity securities
  $ 587,148     $ 4,121     $ 583,027     $  
Equity securities
                       
Short-term investments
    12,216       12,216              
Hybrid securities
    69,525             69,525        
Alternative investments
    30,601             12,427       18,174  
 
                       
Total
  $ 699,490     $ 16,337     $ 664,979     $ 18,174  
 
                       
     Recent FASB guidance that we adopted in the first quarter of 2010 requires separate disclosure of the amounts of significant transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the reasons for the transfers. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
     Level 3 assets at September 30, 2010 include a $20.5 million investment in a limited partnership. At times, this limited partnership will invest in highly illiquid high yield convertible securities for which observable inputs are not available. The general partner of this limited partnership values this investment through an internally developed pricing model. If a security is listed on a recognized exchange,

16


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS — (Concluded)
it will be valued at the last sale price or the average of the highest current independent bid and lowest current independent offer for the security if there is not a reported transaction in the security on that day. If a security is traded over the counter, it shall be valued at the average of the highest current independent bid and lowest current independent offer reported upon the closing of trading on that day. If the market for a security exists predominantly through a limited number of market makers, the general partner will attain the bid and offer for the security made by at least two market makers in the security. The security shall then be valued at the mid-point of the quote that represents the fair value of the security, as determined under the circumstances and in the good faith judgment of the general partner. If the general partner determines in good faith, however, that the application of these rules does not properly reflect a security’s fair market value, then such security shall be valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the general partner on the basis of all relevant facts and circumstances. All records with regard to valuation shall be retained by the limited partnership. With respect to securities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the value of such securities shall be converted to U.S. dollars upon the close of each month by utilizing the spot currency exchange rate as set forth by Bloomberg Financial Services (or such other source deemed appropriate by the general partner). As of September 30, 2010, 4.1% of the reported market value of this limited partnership was valued by a good faith judgment of the general partner and the balance by observable market inputs.
                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30, 2010     September 30, 2010  
 
               
Level 3 investments, beginning of period
  $ 19,402     $ 18,174  
Purchases
           
Transfers to Level 2
           
Transfers to Level 3
           
Change in market value
    1,058       2,286  
 
           
Level 3 investments as of September 30, 2010
  $ 20,460     $ 20,460  
 
           
     We use derivatives to hedge our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. For these derivatives, we used quoted market prices to estimate fair value and included the estimate as a Level 2 measurement.
     The Company’s financial instruments include investments, cash and cash equivalents, premiums and reinsurance balances receivable, reinsurance recoverable on paid losses, line of credit and long-term debt. At September 30, 2010, the carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, including its derivative financial instruments, approximated fair value, except for the $67.0 million of the Company’s junior subordinated debentures. The fair value of these junior subordinated debentures is estimated to be $35.4 million at September 30, 2010. The estimate of fair value for the Company’s junior subordinated debentures is a Level 3 measurement. We use a discounted cash flow model based on the contractual terms of the junior subordinated debentures and a discount rate of 8.53%, which is based on yields of comparable securities. The fair values of the Company’s investments, as determined by quoted market prices, are disclosed in Note 3.
6. INCOME TAXES
     At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we have taken no uncertain tax positions which would require additional disclosure per current FASB accounting guidance. Although the IRS is not currently examining any of our income tax returns, tax years 2007, 2008 and 2009 remain open and are subject to examination.
     The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return with its subsidiaries. Taxes are allocated among the Company’s subsidiaries based on the Tax Allocation Agreement employed by these entities, which provides that taxes of the entities are calculated on a separate-return basis at the highest marginal tax rate.
     Income taxes in the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income differ from the statutory tax rate of 35.0% primarily due to state income taxes, non-deductible expenses including acquisition-related expenses, the nontaxable portion of dividends received, tax-exempt interest and a one-time purchase accounting adjustment.

17


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
7. LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSE RESERVES
     The Company establishes a reserve for both reported and unreported covered losses, which includes estimates of both future payments of losses and related loss adjustment expenses. The following represents changes in those aggregate reserves for the Company during the periods presented below:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
            (Dollars in thousands)          
 
                               
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 527,042     $ 426,908     $ 488,444     $ 372,721  
Less reinsurance recoverables
    182,616       146,157       164,488       128,552  
 
                       
Net Balance, beginning of period
    344,426       280,751       323,956       244,169  
 
                       
 
                               
Incurred Related To
                               
Current year
    31,175       31,645       96,758       101,972  
Prior years
    11,356       (1,300 )     11,356       (5,671 )
 
                       
Total Incurred
    42,531       30,345       108,114       96,301  
 
                       
 
                               
Paid Related To
                               
Current year
    797       6,461       5,024       10,900  
Prior years
    24,099       13,266       64,985       38,201  
 
                       
Total Paid
    24,896       19,727       70,009       49,101  
 
                       
 
                               
Net Balance
    362,061       291,369       362,061       291,369  
Plus reinsurance recoverables
    204,825       156,896       204,825       156,896  
 
                       
Balance, end of period
  $ 566,886     $ 448,265     $ 566,886     $ 448,265  
 
                       
8. REINSURANCE
     Net written and earned premiums, including reinsurance activity, were as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
            (Dollars in thousands)          
 
                               
Written Premiums
                               
Direct
  $ 80,936     $ 77,607     $ 236,132     $ 228,619  
Assumed
    2,913       4,201       15,584       13,588  
Ceded
    (40,075 )     (35,483 )     (101,858 )     (92,615 )
 
                       
Net Written Premiums
  $ 43,774     $ 46,325     $ 149,858     $ 149,592  
 
                       
 
                               
Earned Premiums
                               
Direct
  $ 79,092     $ 77,907     $ 231,936     $ 226,125  
Assumed
    4,536       4,529       17,062       13,276  
Ceded
    (33,934 )     (29,907 )     (96,160 )     (81,752 )
Earned but unbilled premiums
    (458 )     (1,017 )     (425 )     (2,110 )
 
                       
Net Earned Premiums
  $ 49,236     $ 51,512     $ 152,413     $ 155,539  
 
                       
     The Company manages its credit risk on reinsurance recoverables by reviewing the financial stability, A.M. Best rating, capitalization, and credit worthiness of prospective and existing risk-sharing partners. The Company customarily collateralizes reinsurance balances due from unauthorized reinsurers through funds withheld, grantor trusts, or stand-by letters of credit issued by highly rated banks.
     The Company’s 2010 and 2009 ceded reinsurance program includes quota share reinsurance agreements with authorized reinsurers that were entered into and are accounted for on a “funds withheld” basis. Under the funds withheld basis, the Company records the ceded premiums payable to the reinsurer, less ceded paid losses and loss adjustment expenses receivable from the reinsurer, less any amounts due to the reinsurer for the reinsurer’s margin, or cost of the reinsurance contract, as a liability, and reported $80.4 million and $71.7 million

18


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
8. REINSURANCE — (Concluded)
as Funds held under reinsurance treaties in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. As specified under the terms of the agreements, the Company credits the funds withheld balance at stated interest crediting rates applied to the funds withheld balance. If the funds withheld liability is exhausted, interest crediting would cease and additional claim payments would be recoverable from the reinsurer.
     Interest cost on reinsurance contracts accounted for on a funds withheld basis is incurred during all periods in which a funds withheld liability exists or as otherwise specified under the terms of the contract and is included in Underwriting, agency and other expenses. The amount subject to interest crediting rates was $19.6 million and $22.8 million at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
9. SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM
     On August 19, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the extension of the Company’s existing share repurchase program through August 19, 2011. The share repurchase program authorizes the repurchase of up to 1.0 million shares of common stock through open market or privately negotiated transactions. Prior to this extension, the share repurchase program was set to expire on August 20, 2010. During the three and nine months ending September 30, 2010, the Company did not repurchase any shares of common stock under the share repurchase program.
10. SPECIAL DIVIDEND
     On February 22, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a one-time, special cash dividend of $2.00 per share which was paid March 31, 2010. The special dividend was funded in part from borrowings under the Company’s credit agreement. The special dividend was $35.3 million in total.
11. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
     The 1998 Stock Compensation Plan (as amended, the “1998 Plan”) was established September 3, 1998. On May 13, 2009, the Company adopted an amendment to the 1998 Plan prohibiting the issuance of any additional awards under the 1998 Plan.
     The First Mercury Financial Corporation Omnibus Incentive Plan of 2006 (the “Omnibus Plan”) was established October 16, 2006. The Company reserved 1,500,000 shares of its common stock for future granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SAR”), restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSU”), deferred stock units (“DSU”), performance shares, performance cash awards, and other stock or cash awards to employees and non-employee directors at any time prior to October 15, 2016. On May 13, 2009, the Company’s stockholders approved the amendment and restatement of the Omnibus Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder by 1,650,000 shares, which brings the total number of shares reserved under the Omnibus Plan to 3,150,000. All of the terms of awards made under the Omnibus Plan, including vesting and other restrictions are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. The exercise price of any stock option will not be less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant.
     The stock options and shares of restricted stock awarded under the Omnibus Plan vest in three equal installments over a period of three years, unless otherwise disclosed. Stock-based compensation will be recognized over the expected vesting period of the stock options and shares of restricted stock. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company granted 18,400 shares of restricted stock to non-employee directors under the Omnibus Plan. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company granted 19,704 shares of restricted stock to non-employee directors under the Omnibus Plan. These shares of restricted stock vested immediately, but are not transferable for one year after the grant date, and stock-based compensation expense was recognized immediately.
     Shares available for future grants under the Omnibus Plan totaled 1,672,264 at September 30, 2010.
     The following table summarizes stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.

19


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
11. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS — (Continued)
                                 
    1998 Plan     Omnibus Plan  
    Number of     Weighted Average     Number of     Weighted Average  
    Options     Exercise Price     Options     Exercise Price  
 
                               
Oustanding at January 1, 2009
    431,050     $ 2.82       932,188     $ 17.93  
Granted during the period
                222,500       13.04  
Forfeited during the period
                (42,000 )     16.71  
Exercised during the period
    (5,088 )     1.62              
Cancelled during the period
                       
 
                       
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
    425,962     $ 2.83       1,112,688     $ 17.00  
 
                               
Oustanding at January 1, 2010
    419,762     $ 2.83       1,112,688     $ 17.00  
Granted during the period
                140,500       13.35  
Forfeited during the period
    (27,562 )     2.04       (196,333 )     16.89  
Exercised during the period
    (371,850 )     2.78       (4,500 )     13.01  
Cancelled during the period
                       
 
                       
Outstanding at September 30, 2010
    20,350     $ 4.86       1,052,355     $ 16.55  
 
                               
Exercisable at:
                               
September 30, 2009
    425,962     $ 2.83       447,793     $ 18.27  
September 30, 2010
    20,350       4.86       708,467       17.69  
     The aggregate intrinsic value of fully vested options outstanding and exercisable under the 1998 Plan was $0.1 million at September 30, 2010. There was no aggregate intrinsic value of options expected to vest under the Omnibus Plan at September 30, 2010.
     There were no stock options exercised for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $4.6 million.
     The number of stock option awards outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2010 by range of exercise prices was as follows:
                                         
    Options Outstanding   Options Exercisable
            Weighted-Average   Weighted-Average           Weighted-Average
Range of   Outstanding as of   Remaining   Exercise Price Per   Exercisable as of   Exercise Price Per
Exercisable Price   September 30, 2010   Contractual Life   Share   September 30, 2010   Share
 
                                       
1998 Plan  
                                       
$4.86 - $6.49
    20,350     4.14 Years   $ 4.86       20,350     $ 4.86  
 
                                       
 
                                       
Omnibus Plan
                                       
$10.98 - $14.93
    430,000     8.49 Years   $ 13.74       143,166     $ 14.23  
$17.00 - $20.75
    622,355     5.44         18.49       565,301       18.56  
 
                                       
Total
    1,052,355     6.69         16.55       708,467       17.69  
 
                                       

20


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
11. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS — (Concluded)
     A summary of the Company’s restricted stock activity was as follows:
         
    Number of
    Restricted Shares
Outstanding at January 1, 2009
    62,166  
Shares granted
    138,204  
Shares vested
    (41,571 )
Shares forfeited
    (3,300 )
 
       
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
    155,499  
 
       
 
       
Outstanding at January 1, 2010
    155,499  
Shares granted
    237,400  
Shares vested
    (73,068 )
Shares forfeited
    (41,836 )
 
       
Outstanding at September 30, 2010
    277,995  
 
       
     The fair value of stock options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were determined on the dates of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
                 
    Nine Months Ended
    September 30,
    2010   2009
Omnibus Plan
               
Expected term
  6 years   6 years
Expected stock price volatility
    43.20 %     41.64 %
Risk-free interest rate
    3.04 %     2.22 %
Expected dividend yield
    0.75 %     0.08 %
Estimated fair value per option
  $ 5.67     $ 5.57  
     The expected term of options was determined based on the simplified method per FASB accounting guidance for stock compensation. Expected stock price volatility was based on an average of the volatility factors utilized by companies within the Company’s peer group with consideration given to the Company’s historical volatility. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of U.S. Treasury securities with an equivalent remaining term.
     The assumptions used to calculate the fair value of options granted are evaluated and revised, as necessary, to reflect market conditions and the Company’s historical experience and future expectations. The calculated fair value is recognized as compensation cost in the Company’s financial statements over the requisite service period of the entire award. Compensation cost is recognized only for those options expected to vest, with forfeitures estimated at the date of grant and evaluated and adjusted periodically to reflect the Company’s historical experience and future expectations. Any change in the forfeiture assumption is accounted for as a change in estimate, with the cumulative effect of the change on periods previously reported being reflected in the financial statements of the period in which the change is made. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $0.7 million and $2.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $0.7 million and $2.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
     As of September 30, 2010, there was approximately $4.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Omnibus Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.

21


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
12. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
     The Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income included the following:
                 
    September 30,  
    2010     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
               
Unrealized holding losses on securities having credit losses recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of income, net of tax
  $ (438 )   $ (1,782 )
Unrealized holding gains on securities having no credit losses recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of income, net of tax
    30,749       20,163  
Fair value of interest rate swaps, net of tax
    (2,291 )     (2,075 )
 
           
Total accumulated other comprehensive income
  $ 28,020     $ 16,306  
 
           
13. INSURANCE REGULATION
     In September 2009, First Mercury Insurance Company (“FMIC”) and CoverX Corporation (“CoverX”) received from the California Department of Insurance (the “California Department”) an Accusation and an Order to Cease and Desist (collectively the “Pleadings”). The Pleadings (i) allege that FMIC and CoverX transacted business in California without the proper licenses, (ii) order FMIC and CoverX to stop transacting any business in California for which they do not have a license and (iii) seek the revocation of CoverX’s existing California fire and casualty producer license. In October 2009, the Pleadings were expanded to include First Mercury Emerald Insurance Services, Inc. (“Emerald”). Although the Pleadings seek to revoke CoverX’s and Emerald’s existing California fire and casualty producer licenses, the California Department has agreed that CoverX and Emerald may continue to produce California business, and that FMIC may continue to insure California risks as long as those risks are produced by CoverX and Emerald personnel located outside the State of California. The Pleadings also assert a right to seek monetary penalties. FMIC, CoverX and Emerald have denied the allegations in the Pleadings, and CoverX and Emerald have requested a hearing on the action to revoke their respective fire and casualty producer licenses. FMIC, CoverX and Emerald have also been conferring with the California Department to obtain surplus lines broker licenses and resolve these issues. While it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of any legal proceeding, we believe the outcome of these proceedings will not result in a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
14. RESTRUCTURING
     Following a review of the Company’s operating structure with the Board of Directors in early 2010, the Company determined that a restructuring of certain components of the Company’s insurance underwriting operations and corporate support functions was necessary to improve the Company’s cost structure. As a result of this decision, the Company recorded a pretax restructuring charge of $5.0 million related to reductions in staffing levels, lease termination costs and other items in the first quarter of 2010. There was no restructuring charge recorded in the second or third quarters of 2010. The Company does not anticipate any additional restructuring charges as a result of this plan.
15. CREDIT AGREEMENT
     On April 30, 2010, the Company amended its existing credit agreement with its lender since the payment of the special dividend would have resulted in a violation of a covenant in the credit agreement. The amendment extended the maturity date of the credit agreement from September 30, 2011 to September 30, 2013 and revised certain restrictive covenants. Refer to the “Long-term debt” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis for more information.
16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
     On October 28, 2010, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (“Fairfax”) and the Company announced that they have entered into a merger agreement pursuant to which Fairfax will acquire all of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock (except for shares held by Fairfax, by the Company in treasury or shares owned by stockholders who properly exercise appraisal rights under Delaware law).

22


Table of Contents

FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS — (Concluded)
Upon completion of the merger, the Company’s stockholders will receive $16.50 per share in cash, representing an aggregate transaction value of approximately $294 million. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2011. The transaction is subject to customary conditions, including approval by the Company’s stockholders and regulatory approvals.
     In connection with the execution of the merger agreement with Fairfax, the Company has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to liquidate its investment portfolio, which had a market value of $771.6 million at September 30, 2010, provided the Company has no obligation to sell any investment for an amount less than its September 30, 2010 market value. The Company believes this provision does not impact the classification of certain investments as available for sale nor the Company’s conclusions regarding other-than-temporary impairments at September 30, 2010. In addition, the Company will not repurchase any shares of common stock or pay dividends on its common stock without prior consent from Fairfax.
On November 5, 2010, the Company completed the previously announced acquisition of Valiant Insurance Group, Inc. (“Valiant”), a subsidiary of Ariel Holdings, Ltd. The purchase price for Valiant was $52.7 million, subject to certain purchase price adjustments. The purchase price was funded from existing liquidity. The Company has not provided more disclosures due to the recent completion of the transaction.

23


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
     This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that relate to future periods and includes statements regarding our anticipated performance. Generally, the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “plans” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements or industry results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other important factors include, among others: recent and future events and circumstances impacting financial, stock, and capital markets, and the responses to such events by governments and financial communities; the impact of the economic recession and the volatility in the financial markets on our investment portfolio; the impact of catastrophic events and the occurrence of significant severe weather conditions on our operating results; our ability to maintain or the lowering or loss of one of our financial or claims-paying ratings; our actual incurred losses exceeding our loss and loss adjustment expense reserves; the failure of reinsurers to meet their obligations; our estimates for accrued profit sharing commissions are based on loss ratio performance and could be reduced if the underlying loss ratios deteriorate; our inability to obtain reinsurance coverage at reasonable prices; the failure of any loss limitations or exclusions or changes in claims or coverage; our ability to successfully integrate acquisitions that we make; our ability to realize anticipated benefits from acquisitions; our lack of long-term operating history in certain specialty classes of insurance; our ability to acquire and retain additional underwriting expertise and capacity; the concentration of our insurance business in relatively few specialty classes; the increasingly competitive property and casualty marketplace; fluctuations and uncertainty within the excess and surplus lines insurance industry; the extensive regulations to which our business is subject and our failure to comply with those regulations; our ability to maintain our risk-based capital at levels required by regulatory authorities; our inability to realize our investment objectives; the sale of our company to Fairfax may not be completed as anticipated; our business operations may suffer due to actions needed to complete the merger; the liquidation of our non-cash investments in our investment portfolio could harm the long-term performance of our investment portfolio; and the risks identified in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Given these uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update or revise them or provide reasons why actual results may differ.
     The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
      Overview
     We are a provider of insurance products and services to the specialty commercial insurance markets, primarily focusing on niche and underserved segments where we believe that we have underwriting expertise and other competitive advantages. During our 37 years of underwriting security risks, we have established CoverX ® as a recognized brand among insurance agents and brokers and have developed significant underwriting expertise and a cost-efficient infrastructure. Over the last ten years, we have leveraged our brand, expertise and infrastructure to expand into other specialty classes of business, particularly focusing on smaller accounts that receive less attention from competitors.
     First Mercury Financial Corporation (“FMFC”) is a holding company for our operating subsidiaries. Our operations are conducted with the goal of producing overall profits by strategically balancing underwriting profits from our insurance subsidiaries with the commissions and fee income generated by our non-insurance subsidiaries. FMFC’s principal operating subsidiaries are CoverX Corporation (“CoverX”), First Mercury Insurance Company (“FMIC”), First Mercury Casualty Company (“FMCC), First Mercury Emerald Insurance Services, Inc. (“FM Emerald”), and American Management Corporation (“AMC”).
     CoverX markets, produces and binds insurance policies pursuant to guidelines that we establish and for which we retain risk and receive premiums. As a wholesale insurance broker, CoverX markets our insurance policies through a nationwide network of wholesale and retail insurance brokers who then distribute these policies through retail insurance brokers. CoverX also provides services with respect to the insurance policies it markets in that it reviews the applications submitted for insurance coverage, decides whether to accept all or part of the coverage requested and determines applicable premiums based on guidelines that we provide. CoverX receives commissions from affiliated insurance companies, reinsurers, and non-affiliated insurers as well as policy fees from wholesale and retail insurance brokers.
     FM Emerald is a wholesale insurance agency producing commercial lines business on primarily an excess and surplus lines basis for CoverX via a producer agreement. As a wholesale insurance agency, FM Emerald markets insurance products for CoverX through a nationwide network of wholesale and retail insurance brokers who then distribute these products through retail insurance brokers.

24


Table of Contents

     FMIC and FMCC are two of our insurance subsidiaries. FMIC writes substantially all the policies produced by CoverX. FMCC provides reinsurance to FMIC. FMIC and FMCC have entered into an intercompany pooling reinsurance agreement wherein all premiums, losses and expenses of FMIC and FMCC, including all past liabilities, are combined and apportioned between FMIC and FMCC in accordance with fixed percentages. FMIC also provides claims handling and adjustment services for policies produced by CoverX and directly written by third parties.
      Recent Developments
     On October 28, 2010, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (“Fairfax”) and the Company announced that they have entered into a merger agreement pursuant to which Fairfax will acquire all of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock (except for shares held by Fairfax, by the Company in treasury or shares owned by stockholders who properly exercise appraisal rights under Delaware law). Upon completion of the merger, the Company’s stockholders will receive $16.50 per share in cash, representing an aggregate transaction value of approximately $294 million. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2011. The transaction is subject to customary conditions, including approval by the Company’s stockholders and regulatory approvals.
     For additional information on the merger agreement refer to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2010.
      GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Performance Metrics
     Throughout this report, we present our operations in the way we believe will be most meaningful, useful, and transparent to anyone using this financial information to evaluate our performance. In addition to the GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America) presentation of net income and certain statutory reporting information, we show certain non-GAAP financial and other performance measures that we believe are valuable in managing our business and drawing comparisons to our peers. These measures are gross written premiums, net written premiums, and combined ratio.
     Following is a list of performance measures found throughout this report with their definitions, relationships to GAAP measures, and explanations of their importance to our operations:
      Gross written premiums. While net earned premiums is the related GAAP measure used in the statements of earnings, gross written premiums is the component of net earned premiums that measures insurance business produced before the impact of ceding reinsurance premiums, but without respect to when those premiums will be recognized as actual revenue. We use this measure as an overall gauge of gross business volume in our insurance underwriting operations with some indication of profit potential subject to the levels of our retentions, expenses, and loss costs.
      Net written premiums. While net earned premiums is the related GAAP measure used in the statements of earnings, net written premiums is the component of net earned premiums that measures the difference between gross written premiums and the impact of ceding reinsurance premiums, but without respect to when those premiums will be recognized as actual revenue. We use this measure as an indication of retained or net business volume in our insurance underwriting operations. It is an indicator of future earnings potential subject to our expenses and loss costs.
      Combined ratio. This ratio is a common industry measure of profitability for any underwriting operation, and is calculated in two components. First, the loss ratio is losses and loss adjustment expenses divided by net earned premiums. The second component, the expense ratio, reflects the sum of policy acquisition costs and insurance operating expenses, net of insurance underwriting commissions and fees, divided by net earned premiums. The sum of the loss and expense ratios is the combined ratio. The difference between the combined ratio and 100 reflects the per-dollar rate of underwriting income or loss. For example, a combined ratio of 85 implies that for every $100 of premium we earn, we record $15 of pre-tax underwriting income.
      Critical Accounting Policies
     The critical accounting policies discussed below are important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require us to exercise significant judgment. We use significant judgments concerning future results and developments in making these critical accounting estimates and in preparing our consolidated financial statements. These judgments and estimates affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of material contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on a continual basis using information that we believe to be relevant. Actual results may differ materially from the estimates and assumptions used in preparing the consolidated financial statements.

25


Table of Contents

     Readers are also urged to review “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies” and Note 1 to the audited consolidated financial statements thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission for a more complete description of our critical accounting policies and estimates.
      Use of Estimates
     In preparing our consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements, and revenues and expenses reported for the periods then ended. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are susceptible to significant change in the near term relate primarily to the determination of the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses and valuation of investments, intangible assets and goodwill.
      Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves
     The reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses represent our estimated ultimate costs of all reported and unreported losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred and unpaid at the balance sheet date. Our reserves reflect our estimates at a given time of amounts that we expect to pay for losses that have been reported, which are referred to as Case reserves, and losses that have been incurred but not reported and the expected development of losses and allocated loss adjustment expenses on reported cases, which are referred to as IBNR reserves. We do not discount the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses for the time value of money.
     We allocate the applicable portion of our estimated loss and loss adjustment expense reserves to amounts recoverable from reinsurers under ceded reinsurance contracts and report those amounts separately from our loss and loss adjustment expense reserves as an asset on our balance sheet.
     The estimation of ultimate liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses is an inherently uncertain process, requiring the use of informed estimates and judgments. Our loss and loss adjustment expense reserves do not represent an exact measurement of liability, but are our estimates based upon various factors, including:
    actuarial projections of what we, at a given time, expect to be the cost of the ultimate settlement and administration of claims reflecting facts and circumstances then known;
 
    estimates of future trends in claims severity and frequency;
 
    assessment of asserted theories of liability; and
 
    analysis of other factors, such as variables in claims handling procedures, economic factors, and judicial and legislative trends and actions.
     Most or all of these factors are not directly or precisely quantifiable, particularly on a prospective basis, and are subject to a significant degree of variability over time. In addition, the establishment of loss and loss adjustment expense reserves makes no provision for the broadening of coverage by legislative action or judicial interpretation or for the extraordinary future emergence of new types of losses not sufficiently represented in our historical experience or which cannot yet be quantified. Accordingly, the ultimate liability may be more or less than the current estimate. The effects of changes in the estimated reserves are included in the results of operations in the period in which the estimate is revised.
     Our reserves consist of reserves for property and liability losses, consistent with the coverages provided for in the insurance policies directly written or assumed by the Company under reinsurance contracts. In many cases, several years may elapse between the occurrence of an insured loss, the reporting of the loss to us and our payment of the loss. Although we believe that our reserve estimates are reasonable, it is possible that our actual loss experience may not conform to our assumptions and may, in fact, vary significantly from our assumptions. Accordingly, the ultimate settlement of losses and the related loss adjustment expenses may vary significantly from the estimates included in our financial statements. We continually review our estimates and adjust them as we believe appropriate as our experience develops or new information becomes known to us.

26


Table of Contents

     Our reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, gross and net of ceded reinsurance were as follows:
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
               
Gross
               
Case reserves
  $ 168,776     $ 125,561  
IBNR and ULAE reserves
    398,110       362,883  
 
           
Total reserves
  $ 566,886     $ 488,444  
 
           
 
               
Net of reinsurance
               
Case reserves
  $ 112,783     $ 83,911  
IBNR and ULAE reserves
    249,278       240,045  
 
           
Total
  $ 362,061     $ 323,956  
 
           
      Revenue Recognition
      Premiums . Premiums are recognized as earned using the daily pro rata method over the terms of the policies. When premium rates change, the effect of those changes will not immediately affect earned premium. Rather, those changes will be recognized ratably over the period of coverage. Unearned premiums represent the portion of premiums written that relate to the unexpired terms of policies-in-force. As policies expire, we audit those policies comparing the estimated premium rating units that were used to set the initial premium to the actual premiums rating units for the period and adjust the premiums accordingly. Premium adjustments identified as a result of these audits are recognized as earned when identified.
     The Company underwrote retroactive loss portfolio transfer (“LPT”) contracts during 2009 and the first quarter of 2010 in which the insured loss events occurred prior to the inception of the contract. These contracts were evaluated to determine whether they met the established criteria for reinsurance accounting. When reinsurance accounting is appropriate, written premiums are fully earned and corresponding losses and loss expenses recognized at the inception of the contract. These contracts can cause significant variances in gross written premiums, net written premiums, net earned premiums, and net incurred losses in the periods in which they are written. Reinsurance contracts sold not meeting the established criteria for reinsurance accounting are recorded using the deposit method. The Company has no LPT contracts that are accounted for using the deposit method.
      Commissions and Fees . Wholesale agency commissions and fee income from unaffiliated companies are earned at the effective date of the related insurance policies produced or as services are provided under the terms of the administrative and service provider contracts. Related commissions to retail agencies are concurrently expensed at the effective date of the related insurance policies produced. Profit sharing commissions due from certain insurance and reinsurance companies, based on losses and loss adjustment expense experience, are earned when determined and communicated by the applicable contract.
      Investments
     Our marketable investment securities, including fixed maturity and equity securities, and short-term investments, are classified as available-for-sale and, as a result, are reported at market value. The changes in the fair value of these investments are recorded as a component of Other comprehensive income (loss). Convertible securities are accounted for under the accounting guidance for hybrid securities whereby changes in fair value are reflected in Net realized gains (losses) on investments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Alternative investments consist of our investments in limited partnerships, which invest in high yield convertible securities and distressed structured finance products. At the date of inception, we elected the fair value accounting option for these alternative investments in accordance with FASB guidance, whereby changes in fair value are reflected in Net investment income and Net realized gains (losses) on investments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
     FASB guidance establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements that distinguishes between market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (“observable inputs”) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (“unobservable inputs”). The estimated fair values of the Company’s fixed income securities, convertible bonds, and equity securities are based on prices provided by an independent, nationally recognized pricing service. The prices provided by this service are based on quoted market prices, when available, non-binding broker quotes, or matrix pricing. The independent pricing service provides a single price or quote per security and the Company does not adjust security prices, except as otherwise disclosed.

27


Table of Contents

     The Company obtains an understanding of the methods, models and inputs used by the independent pricing service, and has controls in place to validate that amounts provided represent fair values, consistent with this standard. The Company’s controls include, but are not limited to, initial and ongoing evaluation of the methodologies used by the independent pricing service, a review of specific securities and an assessment for proper classification within the fair value hierarchy. The hierarchy level assigned to each security in our available-for-sale, hybrid securities, and alternative investments portfolios is based on our assessment of the transparency and reliability of the inputs used in the valuation of such instrument at the measurement date. The three hierarchy levels are defined as follows:
    Level 1 — Valuations based on unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical securities. The fair values of fixed maturity and equity securities and short-term investments included in the Level 1 category were based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market. The Level 1 category includes publicly traded equity securities, highly liquid U.S. Government notes, treasury bills and mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association; highly liquid cash management funds; and short-term certificates of deposit.
 
    Level 2 — Valuations based on observable inputs (other than Level 1 prices), such as quoted prices for similar assets at the measurement date; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. The fair value of fixed maturity and equity securities and short-term investments included in the Level 2 category were based on the market values obtained from an independent pricing service that were evaluated using pricing models that vary by asset class and incorporate available trade, bid and other market information and price quotes from well established independent broker-dealers. The independent pricing service monitors market indicators, industry and economic events, and for broker-quoted only securities, obtains quotes from market makers or broker-dealers that it recognizes to be market participants. The Level 2 category includes corporate bonds, municipal bonds, redeemable preferred stocks and certain publicly traded common stocks with no trades on the measurement date.
 
    Level 3 — Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement, and involve management judgment.
     If the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, a financial security’s hierarchy level is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. A number of our investment grade corporate bonds are frequently traded in active markets and traded market prices for these securities existed at September 30, 2010. These securities were classified as Level 2 at September 30, 2010 because our third party pricing service uses valuation models which use observable market inputs in addition to traded prices.
     Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related debt security as an adjustment to yield using the effective-interest method. Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned. Realized gains and losses are included in earnings and are derived using the specific identification method for determining the cost of securities sold.
     In connection with the execution of the merger agreement with Fairfax on October 28, 2010, the Company has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to liquidate its investment portfolio, which had a market value of $771.6 million at September 30, 2010, provided the Company has no obligation to sell any investment for an amount less than its September 30, 2010 market value. The Company believes this provision does not impact the classification of certain investments as available for sale nor the Company’s conclusions regarding other-than-temporary impairments at September 30, 2010.
      Impairment of Investment Securities
     Impairment of investment securities results when a market decline below cost is other-than-temporary. The other-than-temporary write down is separated into an amount representing the credit loss which is recognized in earnings and the amount related to all other factors which is recorded in Other comprehensive income. Management regularly reviews our fixed maturity securities portfolio to evaluate the necessity of recording impairment losses for other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of investments. Factors considered in evaluating potential impairment include, but are not limited to, the current fair value as compared to cost or amortized cost of the security, as appropriate, the length of time the investment has been below cost or amortized cost and by how much, our intent to sell a security and whether it is more-likely-than-not we will be required to sell the security before the recovery of our amortized cost basis, and specific credit issues related to the issuer and current economic conditions. Other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses result in a reduction of the cost basis of the underlying investment. Significant changes in these factors we consider when evaluating investments for impairment losses could result in additional impairment losses reported in the consolidated financial statements.

28


Table of Contents

     With respect to securities where the decline in value is determined to be temporary and the security’s value is not written down, a subsequent decision may be made to sell that security and realize a loss. Subsequent decisions on security sales are made within the context of overall risk monitoring, changing information and market conditions. Management of the Company’s investment portfolio is outsourced to third party investment managers which is directed and monitored by our investment committee. While these investment managers may, at a given point in time, believe that the preferred course of action is to hold securities with unrealized losses that are considered temporary until such losses are recovered, the dynamic nature of the portfolio management may result in a subsequent decision to sell the security and realize the loss, based upon a change in market and other factors described above. The Company believes that subsequent decisions to sell such securities are consistent with the classification of the Company’s portfolio as available-for-sale.
     Investment managers are required to notify management of rating agency downgrades of securities in their portfolios as well as any potential investment valuation issues no later than the end of each quarter. Investment managers are also required to notify management, and receive prior approval, prior to the execution of a transaction or series of related transactions that may result in a realized loss above a certain threshold. Additionally, investment managers are required to notify management, and receive approval, prior to the execution of a transaction or series of related transactions that may result in any realized loss up until a certain period beyond the close of a quarterly accounting period.
     Under current accounting standards, an OTTI write-down of debt securities, where fair value is below amortized cost, is triggered in circumstances where (1) an entity has the intent to sell a security, (2) it is more-likely-than-not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, or (3) the entity does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. If an entity intends to sell a security or if it is more-likely-than-not the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery, an OTTI write-down is recognized in earnings equal to the difference between the security’s amortized cost and its fair value. If an entity does not intend to sell the security or it is not more-likely-than-not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery, the OTTI write-down is separated into an amount representing the credit loss, which is recognized in earnings, and the amount related to all other factors, which is recognized in Other comprehensive income.
      Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
     Policy acquisition costs related to direct and assumed premiums consist of commissions, underwriting, policy issuance, and other costs that vary with and are primarily related to the production of new and renewal business, and are deferred, subject to ultimate recoverability, and expensed over the period in which the related premiums are earned. Investment income is included in the calculation of ultimate recoverability.
      Goodwill and Intangible Assets
     In accordance with the accounting guidance for goodwill and intangible assets that are not subject to amortization, these intangible assets shall be tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The impairment test for goodwill shall consist of a comparison of the fair value of the goodwill with the carrying amount of the reporting unit to which it is assigned. The impairment test for intangible assets shall consist of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible assets with their carrying amounts. If the carrying amount of the goodwill or intangible assets exceeds their fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
     In accordance with the accounting guidance for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, the carrying value of long-lived assets, including amortizable intangibles and property and equipment, are evaluated whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that a potential impairment has occurred relative to a given asset or assets. Impairment is deemed to have occurred if projected undiscounted cash flows associated with an asset are less than the carrying value of the asset. The estimated cash flows include management’s assumptions of cash inflows and outflows directly resulting from the use of that asset in operations. The amount of the impairment loss recognized is equal to the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its then estimated fair value.
     All of the Company’s goodwill is allocated to the reporting unit of AMC since AMC has its own distinct business platform with discrete financial information. The Company acquired AMC to gain access to an established and experienced specialty admitted underwriting franchise with a definable niche market. The expertise of AMC’s specialty admitted underwriting franchise is not significantly correlated to our existing underwriting operations and we did not allocate any goodwill to our existing insurance underwriting operations based on this fact.

29


Table of Contents

Results of Operations
      Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
     The following table summarizes our results for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
                         
    Three Months Ended        
    September 30,        
    2010     2009     Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)          
 
                       
Operating Revenue
                       
Net earned premiums
  $ 49,236     $ 51,512       (4 )%
Commissions and fees
    40       7,445       (99 )
Net investment income
    8,349       7,540       11  
Net realized gains on investments
    7,671       13,766       (44 )
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments
    (111 )     (292 )     (62 )
 
                 
Total Operating Revenues
    65,185       79,971       (18 )
 
                 
Operating Expenses
                       
Losses and loss adjustment expenses, net
    42,531       30,345       40  
Amortization of intangible assets
    482       559       (14 )
Other operating expenses
    24,484       24,129       1  
 
                 
Total Operating Expenses
    67,497       55,033       23  
 
                 
Operating Income (Loss)
    (2,312 )     24,938       (109 )
Interest Expense
    1,554       1,275       22  
 
                 
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
    (3,866 )     23,663       (116 )
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
    (1,835 )     8,018       (123 )
 
                 
Net Income (Loss)
  $ (2,031 )   $ 15,645       (113 )%
 
                 
 
                       
Loss Ratio
    86.4 %     58.9 %   27.5 points  
Underwriting Expense Ratio
    50.8 %     33.6 %   17.2 points  
 
                 
Combined Ratio
    137.2 %     92.5 %   44.7 points  
 
                 

30


Table of Contents

      Operating Revenue
      Net Earned Premiums
                         
    Three Months Ended        
    September 30,        
    2010     2009     Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)          
 
                       
Written premiums
                       
Direct
  $ 80,936     $ 77,607       4 %
Assumed
    2,913       4,201       (31 )
Ceded
    (40,075 )     (35,483 )     13  
 
                 
Net written premiums
  $ 43,774     $ 46,325       (6 )%
 
                 
 
                       
Earned premiums
                       
Direct
  $ 79,092     $ 77,907       2 %
Assumed
    4,536       4,529        
Ceded
    (33,934 )     (29,907 )     13  
Earned but unbilled premiums
    (458 )     (1,017 )     (55 )
 
                 
Net earned premiums
  $ 49,236     $ 51,512       (4 )%
 
                 
     Direct written premiums increased $3.3 million, or 4%, primarily due to increases in premium production from the Company’s Excess/Umbrella Casualty and Professional Liability lines of business partially offset by a decrease in production from the Company’s Primary General Liability line of business during the three months ended September 30, 2010. Direct earned premiums increased $1.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010, or 2%, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009.
     Assumed written premiums decreased $1.3 million, or 31%, and assumed earned premiums remained flat for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in assumed written premiums is primarily due to a decrease in premium production from the Company’s Professional Liability line of business.
     Ceded written premiums increased $4.6 million, or 13%, and ceded earned premiums increased $4.0 million, or 13%, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009. Ceded written premiums increased to 48% of direct and assumed written premiums during the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to 43% of direct and assumed written premiums during the three months ended September 30, 2009 principally due to purchasing more quota share and excess of loss reinsurance during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 for the Company’s primary casualty business compared to the same period of 2009.
     Earned but unbilled premiums decreased $0.6 million, or 55%, primarily due to the net earned premiums subject to audit during the three months ended September 30, 2010 decreasing compared to the net premiums earned subject to audit during the three months ended September 30, 2009.

31


Table of Contents

      Commissions and Fees
                         
    Three Months Ended        
    September 30,        
    2010     2009     Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)          
 
                       
Insurance underwriting commissions and fees
  $ (5,861 )   $ 1,272       (561 )%
Insurance services commissions and fees
    5,901       6,173       (4 )
 
                 
Total commissions and fees
  $ 40     $ 7,445       (99 )%
 
                 
     Insurance underwriting commissions and fees decreased 561% from the three months ended September 30, 2009 to the three months ended September 30, 2010. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded a net reduction in accrued profit sharing commissions of $5.9 million, of which $6.9 million was a decrease to Insurance underwriting commissions and fees revenue with an offsetting $1.0 million decrease in Other underwriting and operating expenses due to the unfavorable development in prior years’ net loss and loss adjustment expense reserves as discussed in the Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses section below. Insurance services commissions and fees, which were principally AMC commission and fee income and not related to premiums, decreased $0.3 million as the result of decreased AMC commission and fee income of $0.2 million and a decrease of $0.1 million related to our workers’ compensation service program due to lower premium production during the third quarter of 2010 compared to the third quarter of 2009.
      Net Investment Income and Realized Gains on Investments . During the three months ended September 30, 2010, net investment income was $8.3 million, a $0.8 million, or 11% increase from $7.5 million reported for the three months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to the increase in invested assets over the period, partially offset by a decrease in the book yield of the portfolio. At September 30, 2010, invested assets were $771.6 million, a $97.6 million, or 15% increase over $674.0 million of invested assets at September 30, 2009. This increase was primarily due to cash flows from net written premiums and from the cash retained on our quota share reinsurance contracts on a “funds withheld” basis. The annualized investment yield on total investments (net of investment expenses) was 4.7% and 5.0% at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The annualized taxable equivalent yield on total investments (net of investment expenses) was 5.1% and 5.5% at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
     During the three months ended September 30, 2010, net realized gains were $7.7 million compared to net realized gains of $13.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2009. Net realized gains for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were due to the mark to market increase in securities carried at market of approximately $4.1 million and net gains on the sale of certain securities of $3.6 million. Those securities that are marked to market through the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income include convertible securities held both as individually-owned securities and an investment in limited partnerships, and an investment in a structured finance limited partnership. Convertible bond prices are a function of the underlying equity and the fixed income component whose values changed with the stock market and changes in spread of corporate bonds, respectively. The structured finance limited partnership is valued based on a portfolio of non-agency mortgage securities, and the hedges that may accompany positions. The value of these components in the limited partnership changed in value for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, changes in spread for mortgage product, changes in prepayment rates, default rates, severity rates, changes in the overall level of rates and the corresponding value of the underlying loans, and changes in the value of the properties by which these loans are collateralized.
      Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Losses on Investments. During the three months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments were $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
      Operating Expenses
      Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses . Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred increased $12.2 million, or 40%, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009. This increase was primarily due to $11.4 million of net unfavorable development of December 31, 2009 prior years’ loss and loss adjustment expense reserves principally in the Company’s Primary General Liability and Professional Liability lines of business. The net unfavorable development was due to adverse claims development and was primarily related to accident years 2003 through 2006 for Primary General Liability, and primarily in accident year 2009 for Professional Liability. Losses and loss adjustment expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 included approximately $1.3 million of favorable development of December 31, 2008 prior years’ loss and loss adjustment expense reserves.

32


Table of Contents

      Other Operating Expenses
                         
    Three Months Ended        
    September 30,        
    2010     2009     Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)          
 
                       
Amortization of deferred acquisition expenses
  $ 13,269     $ 13,960       (5 )%
Other underwriting and operating expenses
    11,215       10,169       10  
 
                 
Other operating expenses
  $ 24,484     $ 24,129       1 %
 
                 
     During the three months ended September 30, 2010, other operating expenses increased $0.4 million from the three months ended September 30, 2009. Amortization of deferred acquisition expenses decreased $0.7 million, or 5%, during the three months ended September 30, 2010 from the three months ended September 30, 2009. Other underwriting and operating expenses, which consist of commissions, other acquisition costs, and general and underwriting expenses, net of acquisition cost deferrals, increased by $1.0 million, or 10%. The increase was principally due to higher corporate expenses of $1.4 million and lower acquisition cost deferrals of $0.7 million due to lower underwriting operating expenses, partially offset by lower net commissions of $1.0 million due primarily to the aforementioned net reduction in accrued profit sharing commissions during the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009.
      Interest Expense . Interest expense increased 22% from the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. This increase was primarily due to interest expense on the balance outstanding for the Company’s credit agreement and a $0.2 million change in fair value of the interest rate swaps on junior subordinated debentures as discussed in “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.
      Income Taxes . Our effective tax rates were -47.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 33.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and differed from the federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes, non-deductible expenses including acquisition-related expenses, the nontaxable portion of dividends received and tax-exempt interest, and a one-time purchase accounting adjustment. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the nontaxable portion of dividends received and tax-exempt interest constituting a higher portion of overall pretax income (loss).

33


Table of Contents

Results of Operations
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
The following table summarizes our results for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
                         
    Nine Months Ended        
    September 30,        
    2010     2009     Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)          
 
                       
Operating Revenue
                       
Net earned premiums
  $ 152,413     $ 155,539       (2 )%
Commissions and fees
    15,699       23,916       (34 )
Net investment income
    25,434       21,105       21  
Net realized gains on investments
    10,354       25,204       (59 )
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments
    (655 )     (426 )     54  
 
                 
Total Operating Revenues
    203,245       225,338       (10 )
 
                 
Operating Expenses
                       
Losses and loss adjustment expenses, net
    108,114       96,301       12  
Amortization of intangible assets
    1,515       1,709       (11 )
Other operating expenses
    75,095       69,808       8  
Restructuring
    5,018             100  
 
                 
Total Operating Expenses
    189,742       167,818       13  
 
                 
Operating Income
    13,503       57,520       (77 )
Interest Expense
    4,483       3,877       16  
 
                 
Income Before Income Taxes
    9,020       53,643       (83 )
Income Taxes
    1,694       17,707       (90 )
 
                 
Net Income
  $ 7,326     $ 35,936       (80 )%
 
                 
 
                       
Loss Ratio
    70.9 %     61.9 %   9.0 points  
Underwriting Expense Ratio
    43.0 %     31.6 %   11.4 points  
 
                 
Combined Ratio
    113.9 %     93.5 %   20.4 points  
 
                 

34


Table of Contents

      Operating Revenue
      Net Earned Premiums
                         
    Nine Months Ended        
    September 30,        
    2010     2009     Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)          
 
                       
Written premiums
                       
Direct
  $ 236,132     $ 228,619       3 %
Assumed
    15,584       13,588       15  
Ceded
    (101,858 )     (92,615 )     10  
 
                 
Net written premiums
  $ 149,858     $ 149,592       %
 
                 
 
                       
Earned premiums
                       
Direct
  $ 231,936     $ 226,125       3 %
Assumed
    17,062       13,276       29  
Ceded
    (96,160 )     (81,752 )     18  
Earned but unbilled premiums
    (425 )     (2,110 )     (80 )
 
                 
Net earned premiums
  $ 152,413     $ 155,539       (2 )%
 
                 
     Direct written premiums increased $7.5 million, or 3%, primarily due to increases in premium production from the Company’s Excess/Umbrella Casualty and Professional Liability lines of business partially offset by a decrease in production from the Company’s Primary General Liability line of business during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Direct earned premiums increased $5.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, or 3%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
     Assumed written premiums increased $2.0 million, or 15%, and assumed earned premiums increased $3.8 million, or 29%. The increase in assumed written and earned premiums is primarily due to $3.3 million of premiums from assumed retroactive reinsurance transactions recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
     Ceded written premiums increased $9.2 million, or 10%, and ceded earned premiums increased $14.4 million, or 18%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Ceded written premiums increased to 40% of direct and assumed written premiums during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to 38% of direct and assumed written premiums during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 principally due to purchasing more quota share and excess of loss reinsurance during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 for the Company’s primary casualty business compared to the same period of 2009. The increase in quota share and excess of loss cessions was partially offset by assumed reinsurance transactions that were fully retained by the Company.
     Earned but unbilled premiums decreased $1.7 million, or 80%, primarily due to the net earned premiums subject to audit during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 decreasing compared to the net premiums earned subject to audit during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

35


Table of Contents

      Commissions and Fees
                         
    Nine Months Ended        
    September 30,        
    2010     2009     Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)          
 
                       
Insurance underwriting commissions and fees
  $ (3,072 )   $ 3,989       (177 )%
Insurance services commissions and fees
    18,771       19,927       (6 )
 
                 
Total commissions and fees
  $ 15,699     $ 23,916       (34 )%
 
                 
     Insurance underwriting commissions and fees decreased 177% from the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded a net reduction in accrued profit sharing commissions of $5.9 million, of which $6.9 million was a decrease to Insurance underwriting commissions and fees revenue with an offsetting $1.0 million decrease in Other underwriting and operating expenses due to the unfavorable development in prior years’ net loss and loss adjustment expense reserves as discussed in the Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses section below. Insurance services commissions and fees, which were principally AMC commission and fee income and not related to premiums, decreased $1.2 million as the result of decreased AMC commission and fee income of $1.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009 primarily due to a contingent commission adjustment of $1.3 million recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
      Net Investment Income and Realized Gains on Investments . During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net investment income was $25.4 million, a $4.3 million, or 21%, increase from $21.1 million reported for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to the increase in invested assets over the period and offset somewhat by a decrease in the book yield of the portfolio. At September 30, 2010, invested assets were $771.6 million, a $97.6 million, or 15% increase over $674.0 million of invested assets at September 30, 2009. This increase was primarily due to cash flows from net written premiums and from the cash retained on our quota share reinsurance contracts on a “funds withheld” basis. The annualized investment yield on total investments (net of investment expenses) was 4.7% and 5.0% at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The annualized taxable equivalent yield on total investments (net of investment expenses) was 5.1% and 5.5% at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
     During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net realized gains were $10.4 million compared to net realized gains of $25.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Net realized gains for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were principally due to net gains on the sale of certain securities of $11.1 million offset by the mark to market decrease in securities carried at market of approximately $0.7 million. Those securities that are marked to market through the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income include convertible securities held both as individually-owned securities and an investment in a limited partnership, and an investment in a structured finance limited partnership. Convertible bond prices are a function of the underlying equity and the fixed income component whose values changed with the stock market and changes in spread of corporate bonds, respectively. The structured finance limited partnership is valued based on a portfolio of non-agency mortgage securities, and the hedges that may accompany positions. The value of these components in the limited partnership changed in value for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, changes in spread for mortgage product, changes in prepayment rates, default rates, severity rates, changes in the overall level of rates and the corresponding value of the underlying loans, and changes in the value of the properties by which these loans are collateralized.
      Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Losses on Investments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments were $0.7 million compared to other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments of $0.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
      Operating Expenses
      Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses . Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred increased $11.8 million, or 12%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine months ended September, 2009. This increase was primarily due to $11.4 million of net unfavorable development of December 31, 2009 prior years’ loss and loss adjustment expense reserves principally in the Company’s Primary General Liability and Professional Liability lines of business. The net unfavorable development was due to adverse claims development and was primarily related to accident years 2003 through 2006 for Primary General Liability, and primarily in accident year 2009 for Professional Liability. Losses and loss adjustment expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 included $7.6 million of storm-related and commercial property fire and other losses and loss adjustment expenses which did not recur during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Losses and loss adjustment expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 also increased due to an increase in the accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio from decreased premium rates, a higher loss ratio on assumed retroactive reinsurance transactions, and an

36


Table of Contents

increase in the loss ratio for a Professional Liability line of business. Losses and loss adjustment expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 included approximately $5.7 million of favorable development of December 31, 2008 prior years’ loss and loss adjustment expense reserves.
      Other Operating Expenses
                         
    Nine Months Ended        
    September 30,        
    2010     2009     Change  
    (Dollars in thousands)          
 
                       
Amortization of deferred acquisition expenses
  $ 40,024     $ 40,889       (2 )%
Other underwriting and operating expenses
    35,071       28,919       21  
 
                 
Other operating expenses
  $ 75,095     $ 69,808       8 %
 
                 
     During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, other operating expenses increased $5.3 million, or 8%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Amortization of deferred acquisition expenses decreased $0.9 million, or 2%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Other underwriting and operating expenses, which consist of commissions, other acquisition costs, and general and underwriting expenses, net of acquisition cost deferrals, increased by $6.2 million, or 21%. The increase was principally due to acquisition-related costs of $1.1 million, higher net commission expenses of $2.2 million and corporate expenses of $2.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
      Restructuring . During the nine months ending September 30, 2010, the Company recorded pretax restructuring charges of $5.0 million related to restructuring activities initiated in the first quarter 2010. As of September 30, 2010, all restructuring activities have been completed and no future restructuring charges are expected relating to these actions initiated in the first quarter of 2010.
      Interest Expense . Interest expense increased 16% from the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This increase was primarily due to interest expense on the balance outstanding for the Company’s credit agreement and a $0.4 million change in fair value of the interest rate swaps on junior subordinated debentures as discussed in “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.
      Income Taxes . Our effective tax rates were 18.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 33.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and differed from the federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes, non-deductible expenses including acquisition-related expenses, the nontaxable portion of dividends received and tax-exempt interest, and a one-time purchase accounting adjustment. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the nontaxable portion of dividends received and tax-exempt interest constituting a higher portion of overall pretax income partially offset by non-deductible acquisition-related expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period of 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
      Sources and Uses of Funds
      FMFC . FMFC is a holding company with all of its operations being conducted by its subsidiaries. Accordingly, FMFC has continuing cash needs primarily for administrative expenses, debt service, shareholder dividends and taxes. Funds to meet these obligations come primarily from management and administrative fees from all of our subsidiaries, and dividends from our non-insurance subsidiaries.
      Insurance Subsidiaries . The primary sources of our insurance subsidiaries’ cash are net written premiums, claims handling fees, amounts earned from investments and the sale or maturity of invested assets. Additionally, FMFC has in the past and may in the future contribute capital to its insurance subsidiaries.
     The primary uses of our insurance subsidiaries’ cash include the payment of claims and related adjustment expenses, underwriting fees and commissions, taxes, making investments and paying dividends. Because the payment of individual claims cannot be predicted with certainty, our insurance subsidiaries rely on our paid claims history and industry data in determining the expected payout of claims and estimated loss reserves. To the extent that FMIC, FMCC, and AUIC have an unanticipated shortfall in cash, they may either liquidate securities held in their investment portfolios or obtain capital from FMFC. However, given the cash generated by our insurance subsidiaries’ operations and the

37


Table of Contents

relatively short duration of their investment portfolios, we do not currently foresee any such shortfall.
     In connection with the execution of the merger agreement with Fairfax on October 28, 2010, the Company has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to liquidate its investment portfolio provided the Company has no obligation to sell any investment for an amount less than its September 30, 2010 market value.
      Non-insurance Subsidiaries . The primary sources of our non-insurance subsidiaries’ cash are commissions and fees, policy fees, administrative fees and claims handling and loss control fees. The primary uses of our non-insurance subsidiaries’ cash are commissions paid to brokers, operating expenses, taxes and dividends paid to FMFC. There are generally no restrictions on the payment of dividends by our non-insurance subsidiaries, except as may be set forth in our borrowing arrangements.
      Cash Flows
     Our sources of funds have consisted primarily of net written premiums, commissions and fees, investment income and proceeds from the issuance of equity securities and debt. We use operating cash primarily to pay operating expenses and losses and loss adjustment expenses, for purchasing investments and for paying shareholder dividends. A summary of our cash flows is as follows:
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2010     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in):
               
Operating activities
  $ 66,244     $ 65,268  
Investing activities
    (57,220 )     (71,175 )
Financing activities
    (9,528 )     (9,721 )
 
           
Change in cash and cash equivalents
  $ (504 )   $ (15,628 )
 
           
     Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was primarily from cash received on net written premiums and less cash disbursed for operating expenses and losses and loss adjustment expenses. A majority of the cash received from net written premiums for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was retained on a “funds withheld” basis in accordance with the quota share reinsurance contracts.
     Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 primarily resulted from our net investment in short-term, debt and equity securities.
     Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was primarily for the payment of shareholders’ dividends, partially offset by net borrowings of $26.0 million on the Company’s revolving credit facility and funds received from the exercise of stock options.
     Based on historical trends, market conditions, and our business plans, we believe that our existing resources and sources of funds will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs in the next twelve months. Because economic, market and regulatory conditions may change, however, there can be no assurances that our funds will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs. In addition, competition, pricing, the frequency and severity of losses and interest rates could significantly affect our short-term and long-term liquidity needs.
      Stockholders’ Equity
     Our total stockholders’ equity was $301.7 million, or $16.99 per outstanding share, as of September 30, 2010 compared to $316.1 million, or $18.40 per outstanding share, as of December 31, 2009. Our tangible stockholders’ equity attributable to common shareholders was $252.7 million, or $14.24 per outstanding share, as of September 30, 2010 compared to $266.1 million, or $15.49 per outstanding share as of December 31, 2009. Below is a reconciliation of our total stockholders’ equity to our tangible stockholders’ equity attributable to common shareholders:

38


Table of Contents

                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share  
    data)  
 
               
Total stockholders’ equity
  $ 301,699     $ 316,084  
Intangible assets, net
    (35,590 )     (37,104 )
Deferred tax liability — intangible assets, net
    12,083       12,613  
Goodwill
    (25,483 )     (25,483 )
 
           
Tangible stockholders’ equity attributable to common shareholders
  $ 252,709     $ 266,110  
 
           
 
               
Common shares outstanding
    17,752,360       17,181,106  
 
           
 
               
Book value per share
  $ 16.99     $ 18.40  
 
           
Tangible book value per share
  $ 14.24     $ 15.49  
 
           
     Book value per share is total common stockholders’ equity divided by the number of common shares outstanding. Tangible book value per share is book value per share excluding the value of intangible assets, goodwill, and the deferred tax liability related to intangible assets divided by the number of common shares outstanding.
      Long-term debt
      Junior Subordinated Debentures . We have $67.0 million cumulative principal amount of floating rate junior subordinated debentures outstanding. The debentures were issued in connection with the issuance of trust preferred stock by our wholly-owned, non-consolidated trusts. Cumulative interest on $46.4 million cumulative principal amount of the debentures is payable quarterly in arrears at a variable annual rate, reset quarterly, equal to the three month LIBOR plus 3.75% for $8.2 million, the three month LIBOR plus 4.00% for $12.4 million, and the three month LIBOR plus 3.0% for $25.8 million principal amount of the debentures. Cumulative interest on $20.6 million of the cumulative principal amount of the debentures is payable quarterly in arrears at a fixed annual rate of 8.25% through December 15, 2012, and a variable annual rate, reset quarterly, equal to the three month LIBOR plus 3.30% thereafter. For our floating rate junior subordinated debentures, we have entered into interest rate swap agreements to pay a fixed rate of interest. See “Derivative Financial Instruments” for further discussion. At September 30, 2010, the three month LIBOR rate was 0.29%. We may defer the payment of interest for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods; however, no such deferral has been made.
      Credit Agreement . Our credit agreement, as amended, provides for borrowings of up to $30.0 million. At September 30, 2010 borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest equal to the greater of: (i) the prime rate, subject to a minimum of 2.50%; or (ii) a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin which is currently 2.0%, or with respect to certain other borrowings, a rate negotiated between the Company and the lender. The obligations under the credit agreement are guaranteed by our material non-insurance subsidiaries. At September 30, 2010, there were $30.0 million of borrowings under the agreement, which represents the full amount of the lender’s commitment to the Company. At September 30, 2010, the interest rate on the $30.0 million of borrowings was 2.3%. The credit agreement also contains various restrictive covenants that relate to the Company’s shareholders’ equity, leverage ratio, fixed charge coverage ratio, surplus and risk based capital, and A.M. Best Ratings of its insurance subsidiaries. On April 30, 2010, the Company renegotiated the terms of its existing credit agreement with its lender. The revised terms allowed for the payment of the special dividend without violation of the covenants of the credit agreement. In addition, the credit agreement’s maturity date was extended from September 30, 2011 to September 30, 2013 and the credit agreement’s financial covenants were revised. The Company was in compliance with the restrictive covenants at September 30, 2010.
      Derivative Financial Instruments . Financial derivatives are used as part of the overall asset and liability risk management process. We use interest rate swap agreements with a combined notional amount of $45.0 million in order to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations with respect to our junior subordinated debentures. In September 2009, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements which expire in August 2014. Under one of the swap agreements we pay interest at a fixed rate of 3.695% and under the other swap agreement we pay interest at a fixed rate of 3.710%. Under our third swap agreement, which expires in December 2011, we pay interest at a fixed rate of 5.013%. Under all three swap agreements, we receive interest at the three month LIBOR, which is equal to the contractual rate under the junior subordinated debentures. At September 30, 2010, we had no exposure to credit loss on the interest rate swap agreements.

39


Table of Contents

      Cash and Invested Assets
     Our cash and invested assets consist of fixed maturity securities, convertible securities, equity securities, and cash and cash equivalents. At September 30, 2010, our investments had a market value of $771.6 million and consisted of the following investments:
                 
    Market Value     % of Portfolio  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
               
Short Term Investments
  $ 40,710       5.3 %
U.S. Treasuries
    3,845       0.5 %
U.S. Agencies
    1,042       0.1 %
Municipal Bonds
    195,590       25.3 %
Taxable Municipal Bonds
    9,979       1.3 %
Corporate Bonds
    135,988       17.6 %
High Yield Bonds
    32,472       4.2 %
MBS Passthroughs
    52,235       6.8 %
CMOs
    100,232       13.0 %
Asset Backed Securities
    28,168       3.7 %
Commercial MBS
    61,865       8.0 %
Convertible Securities
    73,352       9.5 %
High Yield Convertible Fund
    20,460       2.7 %
Structured Finance Fund
    14,207       1.8 %
Preferred Stocks
    1,449       0.2 %
 
           
Total
  $ 771,594       100.0 %
 
           
     The following table shows the composition of the investment portfolio by remaining time to maturity at September 30, 2010. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Additionally, the expected maturities of our investments in putable bonds fluctuate inversely with interest rates and therefore may also differ from contractual maturities.
         
    % of Total
Average Life   Investment
 
       
Less than one year
    20.6 %
One to two years
    16.1 %
Two to three years
    10.9 %
Three to four years
    16.5 %
Four to five years
    8.3 %
Five to seven years
    10.9 %
More than seven years
    16.7 %
 
       
Total
    100.0 %
 
       
     The effective duration of the portfolio as of September 30, 2010 is approximately 3.2 years and the taxable equivalent duration is 2.9 years. Excluding cash and cash equivalents, equity and convertible securities, the portfolio duration and taxable equivalent duration are 3.6 years and 3.3 years, respectively. The shorter taxable equivalent duration reflects the significant portion of the portfolio in municipal securities. The annualized investment yield on total investments (net of investment expenses) was 4.7% at September 30, 2010 and 5.0% at September 30, 2009. The annualized taxable equivalent yield on total investments (net of investment expenses) was 5.1% and 5.5% at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
     The majority of our portfolio consists of AAA or AA rated securities with a Standard and Poor’s weighted average credit quality of A+ at September 30, 2010. The fixed income portfolio had a weighted average credit quality of AA- at September 30, 2010. The majority of the investments rated BBB and below are convertible securities and opportunistic investments in high yield credit and non-agency mortgage-backed securities. Consistent with our investment policy, we review any security if it falls below BBB- and assess whether it should be held or sold. The following table shows the ratings distribution of our investment portfolio as of September 30, 2010 as a percentage of total market value.

40


Table of Contents

         
    % of Total
S&P Rating   Investments
 
       
AAA
    45.5 %
AA
    13.5 %
A
    13.7 %
BBB
    10.9 %
BB
    7.9 %
B
    2.3 %
CCC
    5.8 %
CC
    0.3 %
D
    0.1 %
 
       
Total
    100.0 %
 
       
     Within Mortgages, the Company invests in residential collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMO”) that typically have high credit quality and are expected to provide an advantage in yield compared to U.S. Treasury securities. The Company’s investment strategy is to purchase CMO tranches which offer the most favorable return given the risks involved. One significant risk evaluated is prepayment sensitivity. While prepayment risk (either shortening or lengthening of duration) and its effect on total return cannot be fully controlled, particularly when interest rates move dramatically, the investment process generally favors securities that control this risk within expected interest rate ranges. The Company does not purchase residual interests in CMO’s.
     At September 30, 2010, the Company held CMO’s classified as available-for-sale with a fair value of $100.2 million. Approximately 55.4% of those CMO holdings were guaranteed by or fully collateralized by securities issued by a full faith and credit agency such as GNMA, or government sponsored enterprises (“GSE”) such as FNMA or FHLMC. In addition, at September 30, 2010, the Company held $51.6 million of mortgage-backed pass-through securities issued by one of the GSE’s and classified as available-for-sale.
     The Company held commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) of $61.9 million, of which 82.6% are pre-2006 vintage, at September 30, 2010. The weighted average credit support (adjusted for defeasance) of our CMBS portfolio was 46.0% and comprised mainly of super senior structures. The weighted average loan to value at origination was 66.8%. The average credit rating of these securities was AAA. The CMBS portfolio was supported by loans that were diversified across economic sectors and geographical areas. It is not believed that this portfolio exposes the Company to a material adverse impact on its results of operations, financial position or liquidity, due to the underlying credit strength of these securities.
     The Company’s fixed maturity investment portfolio included asset-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations collateralized by sub-prime mortgages and alternative documentation mortgages (“Alt-A”) with market values of $14.9 million and $20.8 million at September 30, 2010, respectively. Included in these securities is a recent allocation to a manager who specializes in opportunities in the non-agency mortgage sector. The Company defines sub-prime mortgage-backed securities as investments with weighted average FICO scores below 650. Alt-A securities are defined by above-prime interest rates, high loan-to-value ratios, high debt-to-income ratios, low loan documentation (e.g., limited or no verification of income and assets), or other characteristics that are inconsistent with conventional underwriting standards employed by government-sponsored mortgage entities. The average credit rating on these securities and obligations held by the Company at September 30, 2010 was B+.
     The Company’s fixed maturity investment portfolio at September 30, 2010 included securities issued by numerous municipalities with a total carrying value of $205.6 million. Approximately $9.0 million, or 4.4%, were pre-refunded (escrowed with Treasuries). Approximately $87.6 million, or 42.6%, of the securities were enhanced by third-party insurance for the payment of principal and interest in the event of an issuer default. Such insurance, prior to the downgrades of many of the third party insurers, resulted in a rating of AAA being assigned by independent rating agencies to those securities. The downgrade of credit ratings of insurers of these securities could result in a corresponding downgrade in the ratings of the securities from AA+ to the underlying rating of the respective security without giving effect to the benefit of insurance. Of the total $87.6 million of insured municipal securities in the Company’s investment portfolio at September 30, 2010, 98.7% were rated at A- or above, and approximately 83.7% were rated AA- or above, without the benefit of insurance. The average underlying credit rating of the entire municipal bond portfolio was AA+ at September 30, 2010. The Company believes that a loss of the benefit of insurance would not result in a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity, due to the underlying credit strength of the issuers of the securities, as well as the Company’s ability and intent to hold the securities.

41


Table of Contents

     The Company’s investment portfolio does not contain any exposure to Collateralized Debt Obligations (“CDO”) or investments collateralized by CDOs. In addition, the Company’s investment portfolio does not contain any exposure to auction-rate securities.
     Cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash on hand of $13.8 million at September 30, 2010.
     In connection with the execution of the merger agreement with Fairfax, the Company has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to liquidate its investment portfolio, which was $771.6 million at September 30, 2010, provided the Company has no obligation to sell any investment for an amount less than its September 30, 2010 market value.
     Refer to Note 4 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion and analysis of other than temporary impairments of investment securities.
     Refer to Note 16 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion and analysis of events that occurred after September 30, 2010 that could impact our liquidity and financial position.
      Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
     We defer a portion of the costs of acquiring insurance business, primarily commissions and certain policy underwriting and issuance costs, which vary with and are primarily related to the production of insurance business. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, $40.2 million of the costs were deferred. Deferred policy acquisition costs totaled $24.2 million, or 28.0% of unearned premiums (net of reinsurance), at September 30, 2010.
      Reinsurance
     The following table illustrates our direct written premiums and premiums ceded for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2010     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
               
Direct written premiums
  $ 236,132     $ 228,619  
Ceded written premiums
    101,858       92,615  
 
           
Net written premiums
  $ 134,274     $ 136,004  
 
           
Ceded written premiums as percentage of direct written premiums
    43.1 %     40.5 %
 
           
     The following table illustrates the effect of our reinsurance ceded strategies on our results of operations:
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2010     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
               
Ceded written premiums
  $ 101,858     $ 92,615  
Ceded premiums earned
    96,160       81,752  
Losses and loss adjustment expenses ceded
    68,288       59,604  
Ceding commissions
    23,594       21,897  
     Our net cash flows relating to ceded reinsurance activities (premiums paid less losses recovered and ceding commissions received) were approximately $41.6 million net cash paid for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to net cash paid of $24.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
     The assuming reinsurer is obligated to indemnify the ceding company to the extent of the coverage ceded. The inability to recover amounts due from reinsurers could result in significant losses to us. To protect us from reinsurance recoverable losses, FMIC seeks to enter into

42


Table of Contents

reinsurance agreements with financially strong reinsurers. Our senior executives evaluate the credit risk of each reinsurer before entering into a contract and monitor the financial strength of the reinsurer. On September 30, 2010, substantially all reinsurance contracts to which we were a party were with companies with A.M. Best ratings of “A” or better. One reinsurance contract to which we were a party was with a reinsurer that does not carry an A.M. Best rating. For this contract, we required full collateralization of our recoverable via a grantor trust. In addition, ceded reinsurance contracts contain trigger clauses through which FMIC can initiate cancellation including immediate return of all ceded unearned premiums at its option, or which result in immediate collateralization of ceded reserves by the assuming company in the event of a financial strength rating downgrade, thus limiting credit exposure. On September 30, 2010, there was no allowance for uncollectible reinsurance, as all reinsurance balances were current and there were no disputes with reinsurers.
     On September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, FMFC had a net amount of recoverables from reinsurers of $272.9 million and $228.7 million, respectively, on a consolidated basis.
      Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     In January 2010, the FASB issued an update to the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) related to fair value measurements and disclosures. This ASC update provides for additional disclosure requirements to improve the transparency and comparability of fair value information in financial reporting. Specifically, the new guidance requires separate disclosure of the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, as well as the reasons for the transfers, and separate disclosure for the purchases, sales, issuances and settlement activity in Level 3. In addition, this ASC update requires fair value measurement disclosure for each class of assets and liabilities, and disclosures about the input and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements in Levels 2 and 3. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for annual or interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide Level 3 activity detail which will become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. These amendments do not require disclosures for earlier periods presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption. The adoption of this guidance during the first quarter of 2010 is included in Note 5, “Fair Value Measurements” to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
     In September 2009, the FASB issued updated guidance on the accounting for variable interest entities that eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation of the previous guidance for determining which company, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The guidance requires an analysis of whether a company has: (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb the losses that could potentially be significant to the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the entity. An entity is required to be re-evaluated as a variable interest entity when the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar rights to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. Additional disclosures are required about a company’s involvement in variable interest entities and an ongoing assessment of whether a company is the primary beneficiary. The guidance is effective for all variable interest entities owned on or formed after January 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance during the first quarter of 2010 did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
      Prospective Accounting Standards
     In October 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-26, Financial Services — Insurance (Topic 944): Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts . The ASU amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 944, Financial Services — Insurance to address diversity in practice regarding the interpretation of which costs relating to the acquisition of new or renewal insurance contracts qualify for deferral. ASU 2010-26 reflects the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 09-G, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts.” The guidance in the ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011, and should be applied prospectively upon adoption. Retrospective application to all prior periods presented upon the date of adoption also is permitted, but not required.
     The guidance provides that the deferral of acquisition costs will be limited to incremental direct costs of contract acquisition that are incurred in transactions with independent third parties. In addition, future cash flows attributable to advertising costs should be accounted for using the direct-response advertising guidance in Subtopic 340-20 for capitalization purposes. The capitalized costs would then be treated as deferred acquisition costs pursuant to Subtopic 944-30 for classification, subsequent measurement and premium deficiency purposes. Prospective application is required, with retrospective application permitted.

43


Table of Contents

     The adoption of this guidance will likely have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial position. In the period of adoption and thereafter, the Company expects to capitalize less acquisition costs than those that would have been capitalized if the previous guidance had been applied, due to the narrowed definition of what constitutes an acquisition cost eligible for capitalization. The result will be a decrease in the Deferred acquisition costs asset balance in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, compared to the balance if the previous guidance had been applied. This lower asset balance will also result in lower amortization expense, presented as Amortization of deferred acquisition expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Income, in the period of adoption and thereafter compared to amortization recorded under the previous guidance. Lastly, by deferring less expense in the period of adoption and future periods, the result is an increase in expenses classified as Underwriting, agency and other in the Consolidated Statement of Income compared to those recorded if the previous guidance had been applied.

44


Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
     Refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for a complete discussion of the Company’s market risk. There have been no material changes to the market risk information included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
     The Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded, based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding financial disclosures. There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

45


Table of Contents

PART II. — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
     In September 2009, FMIC and CoverX received from the California Department of Insurance (the “California Department”) an Accusation and an Order to Cease and Desist (collectively the “Pleadings”). The Pleadings (i) allege that FMIC and CoverX transacted business in California without the proper licenses, (ii) order FMIC and CoverX to stop transacting any business in California for which they do not have a license and (iii) seek the revocation of CoverX’s existing California fire and casualty producer license. In October 2009, the Pleadings were expanded to include FM Emerald. Although the Pleadings seek to revoke CoverX’s and FM Emerald’s existing California fire and casualty producer licenses, the California Department has agreed that CoverX and FM Emerald may continue to produce California business, and that FMIC may continue to insure California risks as long as these risks are produced by CoverX and FM Emerald personnel located outside the State of California, which is how the Company is currently conducting business. The Pleadings also assert a right to seek monetary penalties. FMIC, CoverX and FM Emerald have denied the allegations in the Pleadings, and CoverX and FM Emerald have requested a hearing on the action to revoke their respective fire and casualty producer licenses. FMIC, CoverX and FM Emerald have also been conferring with the California Department to obtain surplus lines broker licenses and resolve these issues. While it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of any legal proceeding, we believe the outcome of these proceedings will not result in a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
     We are, from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including litigation involving claims with respect to policies that we write. We do not believe that the resolution of any currently pending legal proceedings, either individually or taken as a whole, will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
     The following are material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
      Failure to complete the pending merger with Fairfax could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and our stock price.
     On October 28, 2010, we entered into a Merger Agreement with Fairfax, pursuant to which Fairfax will acquire all of our outstanding shares for $16.50 per share in cash pursuant to a merger of our company with and into an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Fairfax (the “Merger”). Following the consummation of the Merger, we will continue as the surviving corporation and will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fairfax. The Merger is subject to certain closing conditions, including, but not limited to, approval by our stockholders of the adoption of the Merger Agreement, antitrust clearance and other insurance regulatory approvals. We cannot assure you that these conditions will be satisfied or waived, that the necessary approvals will be obtained, or the Merger will be successfully completed as contemplated under the Merger Agreement or at all. If for any reason the Merger is not consummated, our stockholders will not receive the cash consideration in the Merger and our stock price would likely decline unless some other party were to offer an equivalent or higher price for our shares (and we have no expectation that there is any other party willing to offer an equivalent or higher price); and under some circumstances, we may have to pay a termination fee to Fairfax of 3% of the aggregate consideration to be paid in the Merger and/or reimburse Fairfax for its out-of-pocket transaction-related expenses up to $1.5 million.
     In addition, the pendency of the Merger could adversely affect our operations because:
    the attention of our management and our employees may be diverted from day-to-day operations as they focus on the Merger;
 
    our insureds, distribution partners and other business partners may cease or delay conducting business with us as a result of the announcement of the Merger, which could cause our revenues to materially decline or any anticipated increases in revenues to be lower than expected;
 
    our ability to attract new employees and retain our existing employees may be harmed by uncertainties associated with the Merger, and we may be required to incur substantial costs to recruit replacements for lost personnel or consultants; and
 
    stockholder lawsuits could be filed against us challenging the Merger. If this occurs, even if the lawsuits are groundless and we ultimately prevail, we may incur substantial legal fees and expenses defending these lawsuits, and the Merger could be prevented or delayed.

46


Table of Contents

     The occurrence of any of these events individually or in combination could have a material adverse affect on our results of operations and our stock price. As a result of the occurrence of any of these events, if the Merger is not completed, our business and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
      Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, we are required to use commercially reasonable efforts to sell our non-cash investments which could in the long-term adversely affect our investment portfolio and business.
     Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, we are required to use commercially reasonable efforts to sell all of our non-cash investments held by the Company for cash or treasury bills. As of September 30, 2010, the market value of our investment portfolio was $771.6 million. This requirement could cause us to liquidate our non-cash investments on terms that are not as advantageous to our Company in the long-term as the current non-cash investments that we have. Currently, our results of operations will be adversely affected due to earning less investment income by liquidating our investment portfolio for lower yielding assets. In the event that the Merger is not completed, we may not be able to reinvest these amounts on terms that are as advantageous to us, and as a result, our business, results of operations or financial position in the long-term could be materially adversely affected.
Item 6. Exhibits
     See Index of Exhibits following the signature page, which is incorporated herein by reference.

47


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 
 
  By:   /s/ RICHARD H. SMITH    
    Richard H. Smith   
    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer    
 
     
  By:   /s/ JOHN A. MARAZZA    
    John A. Marazza   
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    
 
  Date:  November 9, 2010  

48


Table of Contents

         
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
             
2.1
    (1 )   Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 28, 2010, by and among Fairfax Holdings Limited, Fairfax Investments III USA Corp. and the Company
 
           
31 (a)
    (2 )   Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
           
31 (b)
    (2 )   Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
           
32 (a)
    (2 )   Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
           
32 (b)
    (2 )   Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
(1)   — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on November 1, 2010
 
(2)   — Filed herewith

49

First Mercury Financial Corp (NYSE:FMR)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 10월(10) 2024 으로 11월(11) 2024 First Mercury Financial Corp 차트를 더 보려면 여기를 클릭.
First Mercury Financial Corp (NYSE:FMR)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 11월(11) 2023 으로 11월(11) 2024 First Mercury Financial Corp 차트를 더 보려면 여기를 클릭.