UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number 001-33077
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
38-3164336
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
29110 Inkster Road
|
|
|
Suite 100
|
|
|
Southfield, Michigan
|
|
48034
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (800) 762-6837
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
o
|
Accelerated filer
þ
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
The number of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01, outstanding on November 5, 2010 was 17,752,360
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands,
|
|
|
|
except share and per share data)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
$
|
688,556
|
|
|
$
|
648,522
|
|
Equity securities and other
|
|
|
42,328
|
|
|
|
38,752
|
|
Short-term
|
|
|
40,710
|
|
|
|
12,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
|
771,594
|
|
|
|
699,490
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
13,771
|
|
|
|
14,275
|
|
Premiums and reinsurance balances receivable
|
|
|
48,576
|
|
|
|
78,544
|
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
6,220
|
|
|
|
6,248
|
|
Accrued profit sharing commissions
|
|
|
8,903
|
|
|
|
14,661
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses
|
|
|
216,003
|
|
|
|
172,711
|
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
63,072
|
|
|
|
57,374
|
|
Deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
24,197
|
|
|
|
25,654
|
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization
|
|
|
35,590
|
|
|
|
37,104
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
25,483
|
|
|
|
25,483
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
44,421
|
|
|
|
26,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
1,257,830
|
|
|
$
|
1,157,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
|
|
$
|
566,886
|
|
|
$
|
488,444
|
|
Unearned premium reserves
|
|
|
149,491
|
|
|
|
146,773
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
67,013
|
|
|
|
67,013
|
|
Line of credit
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Funds held under reinsurance treaties
|
|
|
80,409
|
|
|
|
71,661
|
|
Premiums payable to insurance companies
|
|
|
29,767
|
|
|
|
31,167
|
|
Reinsurance payable on paid losses
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
|
958
|
|
Deferred federal income taxes
|
|
|
17,821
|
|
|
|
13,844
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
|
|
|
13,523
|
|
|
|
17,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
956,131
|
|
|
|
841,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued
and outstanding 17,752,360 and 17,181,106 shares
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
Paid-in-capital
|
|
|
157,535
|
|
|
|
154,417
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
28,020
|
|
|
|
16,256
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
117,814
|
|
|
|
147,087
|
|
Treasury stock; 134,500 shares
|
|
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
301,699
|
|
|
|
316,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
1,257,830
|
|
|
$
|
1,157,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
Operating Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
$
|
49,236
|
|
|
$
|
51,512
|
|
|
$
|
152,413
|
|
|
$
|
155,539
|
|
Commissions and fees
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
7,445
|
|
|
|
15,699
|
|
|
|
23,916
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
8,349
|
|
|
|
7,540
|
|
|
|
25,434
|
|
|
|
21,105
|
|
Net realized gains on investments
|
|
|
7,671
|
|
|
|
13,766
|
|
|
|
10,354
|
|
|
|
25,204
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on
investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
|
(1,631
|
)
|
Portion of losses recognized in accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
(655
|
)
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Revenues
|
|
|
65,185
|
|
|
|
79,971
|
|
|
|
203,245
|
|
|
|
225,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses, net
|
|
|
42,531
|
|
|
|
30,345
|
|
|
|
108,114
|
|
|
|
96,301
|
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition expenses
|
|
|
13,269
|
|
|
|
13,960
|
|
|
|
40,024
|
|
|
|
40,889
|
|
Underwriting, agency and other expenses
|
|
|
11,215
|
|
|
|
10,169
|
|
|
|
35,071
|
|
|
|
28,919
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
|
1,709
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
67,497
|
|
|
|
55,033
|
|
|
|
189,742
|
|
|
|
167,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(2,312
|
)
|
|
|
24,938
|
|
|
|
13,503
|
|
|
|
57,520
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
|
|
4,483
|
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
(3,866
|
)
|
|
|
23,663
|
|
|
|
9,020
|
|
|
|
53,643
|
|
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
|
|
|
(1,835
|
)
|
|
|
8,018
|
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
|
|
17,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,031
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,645
|
|
|
$
|
7,326
|
|
|
$
|
35,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
2.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
1.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
17,469,803
|
|
|
|
17,144,077
|
|
|
|
17,343,255
|
|
|
|
17,537,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
17,469,803
|
|
|
|
17,486,020
|
|
|
|
17,435,544
|
|
|
|
17,877,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
, January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
161,957
|
|
|
$
|
(3,027
|
)
|
|
$
|
103,028
|
|
|
$
|
(499
|
)
|
|
$
|
261,637
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
Stock-based compensation excess tax benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Common stock repurchased and held in treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,349
|
)
|
|
|
(1,349
|
)
|
Common stock repurchased and retired
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(10,479
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,487
|
)
|
Payment of shareholder dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,936
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of FASB ASC 320-10 at April 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(999
|
)
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses on securities arising during the
period having credit losses recognized in the condensed
consolidated statements of income, net of tax of $422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(783
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(783
|
)
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities arising during the
period having no credit losses recognized in the condensed
consolidated statements of income, net of tax of ($12,377)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,986
|
|
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps, net of tax of $268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(498
|
)
|
Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net
income, net of tax of $739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,332
|
|
|
|
35,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
, September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
153,752
|
|
|
$
|
16,306
|
|
|
$
|
139,090
|
|
|
$
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|
$
|
307,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
, January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
154,417
|
|
|
$
|
16,256
|
|
|
$
|
147,087
|
|
|
$
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|
$
|
316,084
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
Stock-based compensation excess tax benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Payment of shareholder dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,599
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,599
|
)
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,326
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities arising during
the period having credit losses recognized in the condensed
consolidated statements of income, net of tax ($378)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities arising during the
period having no credit losses recognized in the condensed
consolidated statements of income, net of tax ($8,325)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,460
|
|
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps, net of tax of
$272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
Less reclassification adjustment for
gains included in net income, net of tax of $2,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,764
|
|
|
|
7,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
, September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
157,535
|
|
|
$
|
28,020
|
|
|
$
|
117,814
|
|
|
$
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|
$
|
301,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
7,326
|
|
|
$
|
35,936
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile income to net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,006
|
|
|
|
3,051
|
|
Net investment income on alternative investments
|
|
|
(1,880
|
)
|
|
|
(1,338
|
)
|
Realized gains on investments
|
|
|
(10,354
|
)
|
|
|
(25,204
|
)
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
Deferrals of acquisition costs, net
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(2,358
|
)
|
|
|
5,716
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
2,053
|
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in cash resulting from changes in assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and reinsurance balances receivable
|
|
|
29,968
|
|
|
|
3,930
|
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(540
|
)
|
Accrued profit sharing commissions
|
|
|
5,757
|
|
|
|
(2,526
|
)
|
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses
|
|
|
(43,292
|
)
|
|
|
(32,185
|
)
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
(5,698
|
)
|
|
|
(10,863
|
)
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
|
|
|
78,442
|
|
|
|
75,544
|
|
Unearned premium reserves
|
|
|
2,718
|
|
|
|
2,806
|
|
Funds held under reinsurance treaties
|
|
|
8,749
|
|
|
|
17,674
|
|
Reinsurance payable on paid losses
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Premiums payable to insurance companies
|
|
|
(1,401
|
)
|
|
|
3,532
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(9,195
|
)
|
|
|
(14,051
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities
|
|
|
66,244
|
|
|
|
65,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of short-term investments acquired
|
|
|
(209,916
|
)
|
|
|
(238,579
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposals of short-term investments
|
|
|
165,849
|
|
|
|
259,966
|
|
Cost of debt and equity securities acquired
|
|
|
(179,557
|
)
|
|
|
(213,818
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposals of debt and equity securities
|
|
|
166,404
|
|
|
|
121,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities
|
|
|
(57,220
|
)
|
|
|
(71,175
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued on stock options exercised
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,487
|
)
|
Payment of shareholder dividends
|
|
|
(36,599
|
)
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
Cash retained on excess tax benefits
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,349
|
)
|
Net borrowings under credit facility
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Financing Activities
|
|
|
(9,528
|
)
|
|
|
(9,721
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease In Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
(504
|
)
|
|
|
(15,628
|
)
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
14,275
|
|
|
|
31,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
13,771
|
|
|
$
|
16,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
4,379
|
|
|
$
|
4,137
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
10,150
|
|
|
$
|
8,100
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes of First Mercury
Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (FMFC or the Company) have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial
information and do not contain all of the information and footnotes required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements.
Readers are urged to review the Companys 2009 audited consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
for a more complete description of the Companys business and accounting policies. In the opinion
of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial
statements have been included. Such adjustments consist only of normal recurring items. Interim
results are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for the full year. The
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 was derived from the Companys audited annual
consolidated financial statements.
Significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements, and
revenues and expenses reported for the periods then ended. Actual results may differ from those
estimates. Material estimates that are susceptible to significant change in the near term relate
primarily to the determination of the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses and
valuation of investments, intangible assets and goodwill.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In January 2010, the FASB issued an update to the
Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC)
related to fair value measurements and disclosures. This ASC update provides for additional
disclosure requirements to improve the transparency and comparability of fair value information in
financial reporting. Specifically, the new guidance requires separate disclosure of the amounts of
significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, as well as the reasons for the transfers, and
separate disclosure for the purchases, sales, issuances and settlement activity in Level 3. In
addition, this ASC update requires fair value measurement disclosure for each class of assets and
liabilities, and disclosures about the input and valuation techniques used to measure fair value
for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements in Levels 2 and 3. The new disclosures
and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for annual or interim reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide Level 3 activity detail
which will become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim
periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. These amendments do not require
disclosures for earlier periods presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption. The
adoption of this guidance during 2010 is included in Note 5, Fair Value Measurements to the
condensed consolidated financial statements.
In September 2009, the FASB issued updated guidance on the accounting for variable interest
entities that eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and the
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation of the previous guidance for determining which
company, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The guidance
requires an analysis of whether a company has: (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable
interest entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (2) the
obligation to absorb the losses that could potentially be significant to the entity or the right to
receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the entity. An entity is
required to be re-evaluated as a variable interest entity when the holders of the equity investment
at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar rights to direct the activities
that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. Additional disclosures are
required about a companys involvement in variable interest entities and an ongoing assessment of
whether a company is the primary beneficiary. The guidance is effective for all variable interest
entities owned on or formed after January 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance during 2010 did
not have a material effect on the Companys results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
7
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Concluded)
Prospective Accounting Standards
In October 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-26,
Financial Services
Insurance (Topic 944): Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance
Contracts
. The ASU amends
FASB Accounting Standards Codification
Topic 944,
Financial Services
Insurance
to address diversity in practice regarding the interpretation of which costs relating to
the acquisition of new or renewal insurance contracts qualify for deferral. ASU 2010-26 reflects
the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 09-G, Accounting for Costs
Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts.
The guidance provides that the deferral of acquisition costs will be limited to incremental
direct costs of contract acquisition that are incurred in transactions with independent third
parties. In addition, future cash flows attributable to advertising costs should be accounted for
using the direct-response advertising guidance in Subtopic 340-20 for capitalization purposes. The
capitalized costs would then be treated as deferred acquisition costs pursuant to Subtopic 944-30
for classification, subsequent measurement and premium deficiency purposes. The guidance in the
ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after
December 15, 2011, and should be applied prospectively upon adoption. Retrospective application to
all prior periods presented upon the date of adoption also is permitted, but not required.
The adoption of this guidance will likely have a material effect on the Companys results of
operations and financial position. In the period of adoption and thereafter, the Company expects
to capitalize less acquisition costs than those that would have been capitalized if the previous
guidance had been applied, due to the narrowed definition of what constitutes an acquisition cost
eligible for capitalization. The result will be a decrease in the Deferred acquisition costs asset
balance in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, compared to the balance if the previous guidance had
been applied. This lower asset balance will also result in lower amortization expense, presented
as Amortization of deferred acquisition expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Income, in the
period of adoption and thereafter compared to amortization recorded under the previous guidance.
Lastly, by deferring less expense in the period of adoption and future periods, the result is an
increase in expenses classified as Underwriting, agency and other in the Consolidated Statement of
Income compared to those recorded if the previous guidance had been applied.
8
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
2. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the
weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted net income
(loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if common stock equivalents were
issued and exercised.
The following is a reconciliation of basic number of common shares outstanding to diluted
common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) as reported
|
|
$
|
(2,031
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,645
|
|
|
$
|
7,326
|
|
|
$
|
35,936
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to unvested restricted stock shares
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
(316
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common
|
|
$
|
(1,999
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,504
|
|
|
$
|
7,210
|
|
|
$
|
35,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,469,803
|
|
|
|
17,144,077
|
|
|
|
17,343,255
|
|
|
|
17,537,754
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341,943
|
|
|
|
92,289
|
|
|
|
339,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding
|
|
|
17,469,803
|
|
|
|
17,486,020
|
|
|
|
17,435,544
|
|
|
|
17,877,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
2.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
1.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive shares excluded from diluted net income (loss)
per common share
|
|
|
1,072,705
|
|
|
|
1,112,688
|
|
|
|
1,053,022
|
|
|
|
1,112,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On January 1, 2009, we adopted new FASB accounting guidance which requires that
unvested restricted stock with a nonforfeitable right to receive dividends be included in the
two-class method of computing earnings per share. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
material impact on our reported earnings per share amounts.
3. INVESTMENTS
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and market value of marketable
investment securities classified as available-for-sale at September 30, 2010 by major security type
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Debt Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government securities
|
|
$
|
3,675
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,845
|
|
Government agency mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
106,919
|
|
|
|
6,223
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
113,133
|
|
Government agency obligations
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations and other
asset-backed securities
|
|
|
117,441
|
|
|
|
12,476
|
|
|
|
(549
|
)
|
|
|
129,368
|
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions
|
|
|
192,332
|
|
|
|
13,299
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
205,569
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
152,653
|
|
|
|
15,839
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
168,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt Securities
|
|
|
574,029
|
|
|
|
48,040
|
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
|
|
621,417
|
|
Preferred stocks
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
1,449
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
40,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
616,155
|
|
|
$
|
48,202
|
|
|
$
|
(781
|
)
|
|
$
|
663,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
3. INVESTMENTS (Continued)
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and market value of marketable
investment securities classified as available-for-sale at December 31, 2009 by major security type
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Debt Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government securities
|
|
$
|
4,014
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,121
|
|
Government agency mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
98,278
|
|
|
|
3,820
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
102,082
|
|
Government agency obligations
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations and other
asset-backed securities
|
|
|
120,505
|
|
|
|
8,142
|
|
|
|
(3,033
|
)
|
|
|
125,614
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
198,252
|
|
|
|
9,310
|
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
207,269
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
135,549
|
|
|
|
10,596
|
|
|
|
(505
|
)
|
|
|
145,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt Securities
|
|
|
557,584
|
|
|
|
32,008
|
|
|
|
(3,850
|
)
|
|
|
585,742
|
|
Preferred stocks
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
12,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
571,216
|
|
|
$
|
32,129
|
|
|
$
|
(3,981
|
)
|
|
$
|
599,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and market value of debt securities classified as available-for-sale, by
contractual maturity, as of September 30, 2010 are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from
contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or
without call or prepayment penalties. Additionally, the expected maturities of the Companys
investments in putable bonds fluctuate inversely with interest rates and therefore may also differ
from contractual maturities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
73,841
|
|
|
$
|
74,750
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
151,333
|
|
|
|
163,448
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
139,243
|
|
|
|
153,282
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
27,378
|
|
|
|
29,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391,795
|
|
|
|
421,075
|
|
Government agency mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
106,919
|
|
|
|
113,133
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations and
other asset-backed securities
|
|
|
117,441
|
|
|
|
129,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
616,155
|
|
|
$
|
663,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the market value of convertible securities
accounted for as hybrid instruments was $73.4 million and $69.5 million, respectively. Convertible
bonds and bond units had a market value of $66.2 million and $61.4 million and were included in
Debt securities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively. Convertible preferred stocks had a market value of $7.2 million and $8.2
million and were included in Equity securities and other in the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The Company recorded an increase
in the fair value of the hybrid instruments of $3.0 million and a decrease of $2.9 million in Net
realized gains on investments for the three months and nine months, respectively, ended September
30, 2010. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, all convertible securities were
accounted for as hybrid instruments in accordance with FASB accounting guidance.
Alternative Investments
The Company has $17.0 million invested in a limited partnership, which invests in high yield
convertible securities. The market value of this investment was $20.5 million at September 30,
2010. In addition, the Company has $10.0 million invested in another limited partnership, which
invests in distressed structured finance products. The market value of this investment was $14.2
million at September 30, 2010. The Company elected the fair value option for these investments in
accordance with FASB accounting guidance. The change in fair value of these investments is
recorded in Net investment income and Net realized gains on investments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
10
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
3. INVESTMENTS (Concluded)
The Company recorded an increase in the fair value of
these alternative investments of $0.6 million and $1.9 million as Net investment income for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. Also, the Company recorded an
increase in the fair value of these alternative investments of $1.1 million and $2.2 million
recognized as Net realized gains on investments for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010, respectively. These investments are recorded in Equity securities and other in the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
4. OTHER THAN TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENTS OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Impairment of Investment Securities
Impairment of investment securities results when a market value decline below amortized cost
is other-than-temporary. The other-than-temporary write down is separated into an amount
representing the credit loss which is recognized in earnings and the amount related to all other
factors which is recorded in other comprehensive income. Management regularly reviews our fixed
maturity securities portfolio to evaluate the necessity of recording impairment losses for
other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of investments. Factors considered in evaluating
potential impairment include, but are not limited to, the current fair value as compared to cost or
amortized cost of the security, as appropriate, the length of time the investment has been below
cost or amortized cost and by how much, our intent to sell a security and whether it is
more-likely-than-not we will be required to sell the security before the recovery of our amortized
cost basis, and specific credit issues related to the issuer and current economic conditions.
Other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses result in a reduction of the cost basis of the
underlying investment. Significant changes in these factors we consider when evaluating investments
for impairment losses could result in a change in impairment losses reported in the consolidated
financial statements.
With respect to securities where the decline in value is determined to be temporary and the
securitys cost basis is not written down, a subsequent decision may be made to sell that security
and realize a loss. Subsequent decisions on security sales are made within the context of overall
risk monitoring, changing information and market conditions. Management of the Companys
investment portfolio is outsourced to third party investment managers which is directed and
monitored by our investment committee. While these investment managers may, at a given point in
time, believe that the preferred course of action is to hold securities with unrealized losses that
are considered temporary until such losses are recovered, the dynamic nature of the portfolio
management may result in a subsequent decision to sell the security and realize the loss, based
upon a change in market and other factors described above. The Company believes that subsequent
decisions to sell such securities are consistent with the classification of the Companys portfolio
as available-for-sale.
Investment managers are required to notify management of rating agency downgrades of
securities in their portfolios as well as any potential investment valuation issues no later than
the end of each quarter. Investment managers are also required to notify management, and receive
prior approval, prior to the execution of a transaction or series of related transactions that may
result in a realized loss above a certain threshold. Additionally, investment managers are required
to notify management, and receive approval, prior to the execution of a transaction or series of
related transactions that may result in any realized loss up until a certain period beyond the
close of a quarterly accounting period.
Under current accounting standards, an OTTI write-down of debt securities, where fair value is
below amortized cost, is triggered in circumstances where (1) an entity has the intent to sell a
security, (2) it is more-likely-than-not that the entity will be required to sell the security
before recovery of its amortized cost basis, or (3) the entity does not expect to recover the
entire amortized cost basis of the security. If an entity intends to sell a security or if it is
more-likely-than-not the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery, an OTTI
write-down is recognized in earnings equal to the difference between the securitys amortized cost
and its fair value. If an entity does not intend to sell the security or it is not
more-likely-than-not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery, the OTTI
write-down is separated into an amount representing the credit loss, which is recognized in
earnings, and the amount related to all other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive
income.
11
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
4. OTHER THAN TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENTS OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)
The following table presents a roll-forward of the credit component of OTTI on debt securities
recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for which a portion of the OTTI was
recognized in other comprehensive income for the period January 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2010
|
|
Additions for OTTI
|
|
OTTI Securities
|
|
Reductions Due to
|
|
Adjustments to
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Cumulative OTTI
|
|
Securities Where
|
|
Where Credit
|
|
Sales or
|
|
Book Value of
|
|
2010 Cumulative
|
|
|
Credit Losses
|
|
No Credit Losses
|
|
Losses Have Been
|
|
Intend/Required to
|
|
Credit-Impaired
|
|
OTTI Credit Losses
|
|
|
Recognized for
|
|
Were Recognized
|
|
Recognized Prior
|
|
Sell of Credit-
|
|
Securities due to
|
|
Recognized for
|
|
|
Securities Still
|
|
Prior to
|
|
to
|
|
Impaired
|
|
Changes in Cash
|
|
Securities Still
|
|
|
Held
|
|
Janaury 1, 2010
|
|
January 1, 2010
|
|
Securities
|
|
Flows
|
|
Held
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities,
collateralized mortgage
obligations and passthrough
securities
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
545
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,341
|
|
All other corporate bonds
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
$
|
1,365
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
545
|
|
|
$
|
(110
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,910
|
|
|
|
|
The Company determines the credit loss component of fixed maturity investments by
utilizing discounted cash flow modeling to determine the present value of the security and
comparing the present value with the amortized cost of the security. If the amortized cost is
greater than the present value of the expected cash flows, the difference is considered credit loss
and recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
The fair value and amount of unrealized losses segregated by the time period the investment
had been in an unrealized loss position is as follows at September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
Greater than 12 Months
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Debt Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Government agency mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
3,052
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government agency obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations and other
asset-backed securities
|
|
|
8,548
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
6,219
|
|
|
|
(444
|
)
|
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt Securities
|
|
|
13,272
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
8,390
|
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
Preferred Stocks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13,272
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,767
|
|
|
$
|
(637
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
4. OTHER THAN TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENTS OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)
The fair value and amount of unrealized losses segregated by the time period the investment
had been in an unrealized loss position is as follows at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
Greater than 12 Months
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Debt Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government securities
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Government agency
mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
3,854
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government agency obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations and other
asset-backed securities
|
|
|
8,438
|
|
|
|
(1,291
|
)
|
|
|
9,635
|
|
|
|
(1,742
|
)
|
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions
|
|
|
14,044
|
|
|
|
(237
|
)
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
4,551
|
|
|
|
(404
|
)
|
|
|
5,563
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt Securities
|
|
|
31,246
|
|
|
|
(1,951
|
)
|
|
|
16,377
|
|
|
|
(1,899
|
)
|
Preferred Stocks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
31,246
|
|
|
$
|
(1,951
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,752
|
|
|
$
|
(2,030
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below is a table that illustrates the unrecognized impairment loss by sector. The increase in
spread relative to U.S. Treasury Bonds was the primary factor leading to impairment for the periods
ended September 30, 2010. All asset sectors were affected by the overall increase in spreads as
can be seen from the table below. In addition to the level of interest rates, we also look at a
variety of other factors such as direction of credit spreads for an individual issue as well as the
magnitude of specific securities that have declined below amortized cost.
13
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
4. OTHER THAN TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENTS OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Loss at
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Sector
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Debt Securities
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasuries
|
|
$
|
|
|
U.S. Agencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government agency mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Government agency obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBS Passthroughs
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
CMOs
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
Asset Backed Securities
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
Commercial MBS
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations and other
asset-backed securities
|
|
|
(549
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
High Yield Bonds
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt Securities
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
Preferred Stocks
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(781
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2010, there were 72 unrealized loss positions with a total unrealized loss of
$0.8 million. This represents approximately 1.3% of the quarter end amortized cost of
available-for-sale assets of $616.2 million. This unrealized loss position is a function of the
purchase of specific securities in a lower interest rate or spread environment than what prevails
as of September 30, 2010. Some of these losses are due to the increase in spreads of select
corporate bonds or structured securities. We have viewed these market value declines as being
temporary in nature. Our portfolio is relatively short as the duration of the core fixed income
portfolio excluding cash, convertible securities, and equity is approximately 3.6 years, and 3.3
years on a taxable equivalent basis. There have been certain instances over the past year where
due to market based opportunities; we have elected to sell a small portion of the portfolio. These
situations were unique and infrequent occurrences and in our opinion, do not reflect an indication
that we intend to sell or will be required to sell these securities before they mature or recover
in value.
The most significant risk or uncertainty inherent in our assessment methodology is that the
current credit rating of a particular issue changes over time. If the rating agencies should
change their rating on a particular security in our portfolio, it could lead to a reclassification
of that specific issue. The majority of our unrecognized impairment losses are investment grade
and AAA or AA rated securities. Should the credit quality of individual issues decline for
whatever reason then it would lead us to reconsider the classification of that particular security.
Within the non-investment grade sector, we continue to monitor the particular status of each
issue. Should prospects for any one issue deteriorate, we would potentially alter our
classification of that particular issue.
The table below illustrates the breakdown of impaired securities by investment grade and
non-investment grade as well as the duration that these sectors have been trading below amortized
cost. The average duration of the impairment has been greater than 12 months. The unrealized loss
of impaired securities as a percent of the amortized cost of those securities is 3.4% as of
September 30, 2010.
14
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
4. OTHER THAN TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENTS OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Concluded)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Average Unrealized Loss
|
|
|
% of Loss
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses
|
|
|
as % of Amortized Cost
|
|
|
> 12 Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non Investment Grade
|
|
|
34.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,929
|
|
|
$
|
384
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
88.2
|
%
|
Investment Grade
|
|
|
65.3
|
|
|
|
14,891
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
75.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
22,820
|
|
|
$
|
781
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
81.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The majority of these securities are rated investment grade, BBB- or better. Of the $0.4
million of unrealized loss within non-investment grade, Alt-A and sub-prime Asset Backed Securities
accounted for 54.2% of this loss. The next highest percent of the loss within non-investment grade
were non-agency CMOs, which accounted for 37.2% of the loss. The remaining portion of the loss, or
8.6%, was within non-investment grade corporate bonds and one non-agency MBS passthrough. These
issues are continually monitored and may be classified in the future as being other than
temporarily impaired.
The highest concentration of temporarily impaired securities is Asset Backed Securities at
26.9% of the total loss. The next largest concentration of temporarily impaired securities is CMOs
at 25.3% of the loss, followed by Commercial MBS at 17.5%, Preferred Stocks at 16.5%, Municipal
Bonds at 8.0%, Corporates at 4.0% and MBS Passthroughs at 1.8%. These securities have been
affected primarily by the widening of spreads and/or general level of interest rates, and will
continue to be monitored.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we sold approximately $4.3 million of market
value of fixed income securities, excluding convertibles, which were trading below amortized cost
while recording a realized loss of $0.1 million. This loss represented 2.5% of the amortized cost
of the positions. These sales were unique opportunities to sell specific positions due to changing
market conditions.
5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
According to FASB guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures, fair value is the
price that would be received to sell an asset or would be paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the
exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In
determining fair value, we primarily use prices and other relevant information generated by market
transactions involving identical or comparable assets, or market approach as defined by the FASB
guidance.
FASB guidance establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements that
distinguishes between market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from
sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and the reporting entitys own
assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available
in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The estimated fair values of the Companys fixed
income securities, convertible bonds, and equity securities are based on prices provided by an
independent, nationally recognized pricing service. The prices provided by this service are based
on quoted market prices, when available, non-binding broker quotes, or matrix pricing. The
independent pricing service provides a single price or quote per security and the Company does not
adjust security prices, except as otherwise disclosed. The Company obtains an understanding of the
methods, models and inputs used by the independent pricing service, and has controls in place to
validate that amounts provided represent fair values, consistent with this standard. The Companys
controls include, but are not limited to, initial and ongoing evaluation of the methodologies used
by the independent pricing service, a review of specific securities and an assessment for proper
classification within the fair value hierarchy. The hierarchy level assigned to each security in
our available-for-sale, hybrid securities, and alternative investments portfolios is based on our
assessment of the transparency and reliability of the inputs used in the valuation of such
instrument at the measurement date. The three hierarchy levels are defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuations based on unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for
identical securities. The fair values of fixed maturity and equity securities and short-term
investments included in the Level 1 category were based on quoted prices that are readily and
regularly available in an active market. The Level 1 category includes publicly traded equity
securities, highly liquid U.S. Government notes, treasury bills and mortgage-backed securities
issued by the Government National Mortgage Association; highly liquid cash management funds; and
short-term certificates of deposit.
|
15
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuations based on observable inputs (other than Level 1 prices), such as
quoted prices for similar assets at the measurement date; quoted prices in markets that are not
active; or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. The
fair value of fixed maturity and equity securities and short-term investments included in the Level
2 category were based on the market values obtained from an independent pricing service that were
evaluated using pricing models that vary by asset class and incorporate available trade, bid and
other market information and price quotes from well established independent broker-dealers. The
independent pricing service monitors market indicators, industry and economic events, and for
broker-quoted only securities, obtains
quotes from market makers or broker-dealers that it recognizes to be market participants. The
Level 2 category includes corporate bonds, municipal bonds, redeemable preferred stocks and certain
publicly traded common stocks with no trades on the measurement date.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall
fair value measurement, and involve management judgment.
|
If the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy,
a financial securitys hierarchy level is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant
to the fair value measurement. A number of our investment grade corporate bonds are frequently
traded in active markets and traded market prices for these securities existed at September 30,
2010. These securities were classified as Level 2 at September 30, 2010 because our third party
pricing service uses valuation models which use observable market inputs in addition to traded
prices.
The following table presents our investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
September 30, 2010 classified by the fair value measurements standard valuation hierarchy (as
discussed above):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Available for sale
investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities
|
|
$
|
622,866
|
|
|
$
|
3,845
|
|
|
$
|
619,021
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
40,710
|
|
|
|
40,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid securities
|
|
|
73,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative investments
|
|
|
34,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,207
|
|
|
|
20,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
771,594
|
|
|
$
|
44,555
|
|
|
$
|
706,579
|
|
|
$
|
20,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents our investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2009 classified by the fair value measurements standard valuation hierarchy (as
discussed above):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale
investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities
|
|
$
|
587,148
|
|
|
$
|
4,121
|
|
|
$
|
583,027
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
12,216
|
|
|
|
12,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid securities
|
|
|
69,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative investments
|
|
|
30,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,427
|
|
|
|
18,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
699,490
|
|
|
$
|
16,337
|
|
|
$
|
664,979
|
|
|
$
|
18,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent FASB guidance that we adopted in the first quarter of 2010 requires separate disclosure
of the amounts of significant transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy
and the reasons for the transfers. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Level 3 assets at September 30, 2010 include a $20.5 million investment in a limited
partnership. At times, this limited partnership will invest in highly illiquid high yield
convertible securities for which observable inputs are not available. The general partner of this
limited partnership values this investment through an internally developed pricing model. If a
security is listed on a recognized exchange,
16
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Concluded)
it will be valued at the last sale price or the average of the highest current
independent bid and lowest current independent offer for the security if there is not a reported
transaction in the security on that day. If a security is traded over the counter, it shall be
valued at the average of the highest current independent bid and lowest current independent offer
reported upon the closing of trading on that day. If the market for a security exists predominantly
through a limited number of market makers, the general partner will attain the bid and offer for
the security made by at least two market makers in the security. The security shall then be valued
at the mid-point of the quote that represents the fair value of the security, as determined under
the circumstances and in the good faith judgment of the general partner. If the general partner
determines in good faith, however, that the application of these rules does not properly reflect a
securitys fair market value, then such security shall be valued at fair value as determined in
good faith by the general partner on the basis of all relevant facts and circumstances. All
records with regard to valuation shall be retained by the limited partnership. With respect to
securities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the value of such securities shall
be converted to U.S. dollars upon the close of each month by utilizing the spot currency exchange
rate as set forth by Bloomberg Financial Services (or such other source deemed appropriate by the
general partner). As of September 30, 2010, 4.1% of the reported market value of this limited
partnership was valued by a good faith judgment of the general partner and the balance by
observable market inputs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 investments, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
19,402
|
|
|
$
|
18,174
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers to Level 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers to Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in market value
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
2,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 investments as of September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
20,460
|
|
|
$
|
20,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use derivatives to hedge our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. For these
derivatives, we used quoted market prices to estimate fair value and included the estimate as a
Level 2 measurement.
The Companys financial instruments include investments, cash and cash equivalents, premiums
and reinsurance balances receivable, reinsurance recoverable on paid losses, line of credit and
long-term debt. At September 30, 2010, the carrying amounts of
the Companys financial instruments, including its derivative financial instruments,
approximated fair value, except for the $67.0 million of the Companys junior subordinated
debentures. The fair value of these junior subordinated debentures is estimated to be $35.4
million at September 30, 2010. The estimate of fair value for the Companys junior subordinated
debentures is a Level 3 measurement. We use a discounted cash flow model based on the contractual
terms of the junior subordinated debentures and a discount rate of 8.53%, which is based on yields
of comparable securities. The fair values of the Companys investments, as determined by quoted
market prices, are disclosed in Note 3.
6. INCOME TAXES
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we have taken no uncertain tax positions which
would require additional disclosure per current FASB accounting guidance. Although the IRS is not
currently examining any of our income tax returns, tax years 2007, 2008 and 2009 remain open and
are subject to examination.
The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return with its subsidiaries. Taxes are
allocated among the Companys subsidiaries based on the Tax Allocation Agreement employed by these
entities, which provides that taxes of the entities are calculated on a separate-return basis at
the highest marginal tax rate.
Income taxes in the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income differ
from the statutory tax rate of 35.0% primarily due to state income taxes, non-deductible expenses
including acquisition-related expenses, the nontaxable portion of dividends received, tax-exempt
interest and a one-time purchase accounting adjustment.
17
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
7. LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSE RESERVES
The Company establishes a reserve for both reported and unreported covered losses, which
includes estimates of both future payments of losses and related loss adjustment expenses. The
following represents changes in those aggregate reserves for the Company during the periods
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
beginning of period
|
|
$
|
527,042
|
|
|
$
|
426,908
|
|
|
$
|
488,444
|
|
|
$
|
372,721
|
|
Less reinsurance recoverables
|
|
|
182,616
|
|
|
|
146,157
|
|
|
|
164,488
|
|
|
|
128,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Balance,
beginning of period
|
|
|
344,426
|
|
|
|
280,751
|
|
|
|
323,956
|
|
|
|
244,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred Related To
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year
|
|
|
31,175
|
|
|
|
31,645
|
|
|
|
96,758
|
|
|
|
101,972
|
|
Prior years
|
|
|
11,356
|
|
|
|
(1,300
|
)
|
|
|
11,356
|
|
|
|
(5,671
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Incurred
|
|
|
42,531
|
|
|
|
30,345
|
|
|
|
108,114
|
|
|
|
96,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid Related To
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
6,461
|
|
|
|
5,024
|
|
|
|
10,900
|
|
Prior years
|
|
|
24,099
|
|
|
|
13,266
|
|
|
|
64,985
|
|
|
|
38,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Paid
|
|
|
24,896
|
|
|
|
19,727
|
|
|
|
70,009
|
|
|
|
49,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Balance
|
|
|
362,061
|
|
|
|
291,369
|
|
|
|
362,061
|
|
|
|
291,369
|
|
Plus reinsurance recoverables
|
|
|
204,825
|
|
|
|
156,896
|
|
|
|
204,825
|
|
|
|
156,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
end of period
|
|
$
|
566,886
|
|
|
$
|
448,265
|
|
|
$
|
566,886
|
|
|
$
|
448,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. REINSURANCE
Net written and earned premiums, including reinsurance activity, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written Premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
$
|
80,936
|
|
|
$
|
77,607
|
|
|
$
|
236,132
|
|
|
$
|
228,619
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
2,913
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
|
|
15,584
|
|
|
|
13,588
|
|
Ceded
|
|
|
(40,075
|
)
|
|
|
(35,483
|
)
|
|
|
(101,858
|
)
|
|
|
(92,615
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Written Premiums
|
|
$
|
43,774
|
|
|
$
|
46,325
|
|
|
$
|
149,858
|
|
|
$
|
149,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned Premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
$
|
79,092
|
|
|
$
|
77,907
|
|
|
$
|
231,936
|
|
|
$
|
226,125
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
4,536
|
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
17,062
|
|
|
|
13,276
|
|
Ceded
|
|
|
(33,934
|
)
|
|
|
(29,907
|
)
|
|
|
(96,160
|
)
|
|
|
(81,752
|
)
|
Earned but unbilled premiums
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
(1,017
|
)
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
|
|
(2,110
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earned Premiums
|
|
$
|
49,236
|
|
|
$
|
51,512
|
|
|
$
|
152,413
|
|
|
$
|
155,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company manages its credit risk on reinsurance recoverables by reviewing the financial
stability, A.M. Best rating, capitalization, and credit worthiness of prospective and existing
risk-sharing partners. The Company customarily collateralizes reinsurance balances due from
unauthorized reinsurers through funds withheld, grantor trusts, or stand-by letters of credit
issued by highly rated banks.
The Companys 2010 and 2009 ceded reinsurance program includes quota share reinsurance
agreements with authorized reinsurers that were entered into and are accounted for on a funds
withheld basis. Under the funds withheld basis, the Company records the ceded premiums payable to
the reinsurer, less ceded paid losses and loss adjustment expenses receivable from the reinsurer,
less any amounts due to the reinsurer for the reinsurers margin, or cost of the reinsurance
contract, as a liability, and reported $80.4 million and $71.7 million
18
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
8. REINSURANCE (Concluded)
as Funds held under reinsurance treaties in the
accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. As specified under the terms of the agreements, the Company credits the funds
withheld balance at stated interest crediting rates applied to the funds withheld balance. If the
funds withheld liability is exhausted, interest crediting would cease and additional claim payments
would be recoverable from the reinsurer.
Interest cost on reinsurance contracts accounted for on a funds withheld basis is incurred
during all periods in which a funds withheld liability exists or as otherwise specified under the
terms of the contract and is included in Underwriting, agency and other expenses. The amount
subject to interest crediting rates was $19.6 million and $22.8 million at September 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
9. SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On August 19, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the extension of the
Companys existing share repurchase program through August 19, 2011. The share repurchase program
authorizes the repurchase of up to 1.0 million shares of common stock through open market or
privately negotiated transactions. Prior to this extension, the share repurchase program was set
to expire on August 20, 2010. During the three and nine months ending September 30, 2010, the
Company did not repurchase any shares of common stock under the share repurchase program.
10. SPECIAL DIVIDEND
On February 22, 2010, the Companys Board of Directors declared a one-time, special cash
dividend of $2.00 per share which was paid March 31, 2010. The special dividend was funded in part
from borrowings under the Companys credit agreement. The special dividend was $35.3 million in
total.
11. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
The 1998 Stock Compensation Plan (as amended, the 1998 Plan) was established September 3,
1998. On May 13, 2009, the Company adopted an amendment to the 1998 Plan prohibiting the issuance
of any additional awards under the 1998 Plan.
The First Mercury Financial Corporation Omnibus Incentive Plan of 2006 (the Omnibus Plan)
was established October 16, 2006. The Company reserved 1,500,000 shares of its common stock for
future granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights
(SAR), restricted stock, restricted stock units (RSU), deferred stock units (DSU),
performance shares, performance cash awards, and other stock or cash awards to employees and
non-employee directors at any time prior to October 15, 2016. On May 13, 2009, the Companys
stockholders approved the amendment and restatement of the Omnibus Plan to increase the number of
shares authorized for issuance thereunder by 1,650,000 shares, which brings the total number of
shares reserved under the Omnibus Plan to 3,150,000. All of the terms of awards made under the
Omnibus Plan, including vesting and other restrictions are determined by the Compensation Committee
of the Companys Board of Directors. The exercise price of any stock option will not be less than
the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant.
The stock options and shares of restricted stock awarded under the Omnibus Plan vest in three
equal installments over a period of three years, unless otherwise disclosed. Stock-based
compensation will be recognized over the expected vesting period of the stock options and shares of
restricted stock. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company granted 18,400
shares of restricted stock to non-employee directors under the Omnibus Plan. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, the Company granted 19,704 shares of restricted stock to non-employee
directors under the Omnibus Plan. These shares of restricted stock vested immediately, but are not
transferable for one year after the grant date, and stock-based compensation expense was recognized
immediately.
Shares available for future grants under the Omnibus Plan totaled 1,672,264 at September 30,
2010.
The following table summarizes stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009.
19
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
11. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998 Plan
|
|
|
Omnibus Plan
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oustanding at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
431,050
|
|
|
$
|
2.82
|
|
|
|
932,188
|
|
|
$
|
17.93
|
|
Granted during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,500
|
|
|
|
13.04
|
|
Forfeited during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,000
|
)
|
|
|
16.71
|
|
Exercised during the period
|
|
|
(5,088
|
)
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2009
|
|
|
425,962
|
|
|
$
|
2.83
|
|
|
|
1,112,688
|
|
|
$
|
17.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oustanding at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
419,762
|
|
|
$
|
2.83
|
|
|
|
1,112,688
|
|
|
$
|
17.00
|
|
Granted during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,500
|
|
|
|
13.35
|
|
Forfeited during the period
|
|
|
(27,562
|
)
|
|
|
2.04
|
|
|
|
(196,333
|
)
|
|
|
16.89
|
|
Exercised during the period
|
|
|
(371,850
|
)
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
(4,500
|
)
|
|
|
13.01
|
|
Cancelled during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2010
|
|
|
20,350
|
|
|
$
|
4.86
|
|
|
|
1,052,355
|
|
|
$
|
16.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
425,962
|
|
|
$
|
2.83
|
|
|
|
447,793
|
|
|
$
|
18.27
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
20,350
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
|
|
|
708,467
|
|
|
|
17.69
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of fully vested options outstanding and exercisable under the
1998 Plan was $0.1 million at September 30, 2010. There was no aggregate intrinsic value of
options expected to vest under the Omnibus Plan at September 30, 2010.
There were no stock options exercised for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The
total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was
$4.6 million.
The number of stock option awards outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2010 by range
of exercise prices was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
Range of
|
|
Outstanding as of
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Exercise Price Per
|
|
Exercisable as of
|
|
Exercise Price Per
|
Exercisable Price
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
Share
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998 Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$4.86 - $6.49
|
|
|
20,350
|
|
|
4.14 Years
|
|
$
|
4.86
|
|
|
|
20,350
|
|
|
$
|
4.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omnibus Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$10.98 - $14.93
|
|
|
430,000
|
|
|
8.49 Years
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
|
|
143,166
|
|
|
$
|
14.23
|
|
$17.00 - $20.75
|
|
|
622,355
|
|
|
5.44
|
|
|
|
|
18.49
|
|
|
|
565,301
|
|
|
|
18.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,052,355
|
|
|
6.69
|
|
|
|
|
16.55
|
|
|
|
708,467
|
|
|
|
17.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
11. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS (Concluded)
A summary of the Companys restricted stock activity was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Restricted Shares
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
62,166
|
|
Shares granted
|
|
|
138,204
|
|
Shares vested
|
|
|
(41,571
|
)
|
Shares forfeited
|
|
|
(3,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
155,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
155,499
|
|
Shares granted
|
|
|
237,400
|
|
Shares vested
|
|
|
(73,068
|
)
|
Shares forfeited
|
|
|
(41,836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
277,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of stock options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 were determined on the dates of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
Omnibus Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected term
|
|
6 years
|
|
6 years
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
43.20
|
%
|
|
|
41.64
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.04
|
%
|
|
|
2.22
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
Estimated fair value per option
|
|
$
|
5.67
|
|
|
$
|
5.57
|
|
The expected term of options was determined based on the simplified method per FASB accounting
guidance for stock compensation. Expected stock price volatility was based on an average of the
volatility factors utilized by companies within the Companys peer group with consideration given
to the Companys historical volatility. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of U.S.
Treasury securities with an equivalent remaining term.
The assumptions used to calculate the fair value of options granted are evaluated and revised,
as necessary, to reflect market conditions and the Companys historical experience and future
expectations. The calculated fair value is recognized as compensation
cost in the Companys financial statements over the requisite service period of the entire
award. Compensation cost is recognized only for those options expected to vest, with forfeitures
estimated at the date of grant and evaluated and adjusted periodically to reflect the Companys
historical experience and future expectations. Any change in the forfeiture assumption is
accounted for as a change in estimate, with the cumulative effect of the change on periods
previously reported being reflected in the financial statements of the period in which the change
is made. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $0.7 million and $2.1 million
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. The Company recognized
stock-based compensation expense of $0.7 million and $2.3 million for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
As of September 30, 2010, there was approximately $4.5 million of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the
Omnibus Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.
21
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
12. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The Companys accumulated other comprehensive income included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses on securities having
credit losses recognized in the condensed consolidated
statements of income, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(438
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,782
|
)
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities having no
credit losses recognized in the condensed consolidated
statements of income, net of tax
|
|
|
30,749
|
|
|
|
20,163
|
|
Fair value of interest rate swaps, net of tax
|
|
|
(2,291
|
)
|
|
|
(2,075
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
28,020
|
|
|
$
|
16,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. INSURANCE REGULATION
In September 2009, First Mercury Insurance Company (FMIC) and CoverX Corporation (CoverX)
received from the California Department of Insurance (the California Department) an Accusation
and an Order to Cease and Desist (collectively the Pleadings). The Pleadings (i) allege that
FMIC and CoverX transacted business in California without the proper licenses, (ii) order FMIC and
CoverX to stop transacting any business in California for which they do not have a license and
(iii) seek the revocation of CoverXs existing California fire and casualty producer license. In
October 2009, the Pleadings were expanded to include First Mercury Emerald Insurance Services, Inc.
(Emerald). Although the Pleadings seek to revoke CoverXs and Emeralds existing California fire
and casualty producer licenses, the California Department has agreed that CoverX and Emerald may
continue to produce California business, and that FMIC may continue to insure California risks as
long as those risks are produced by CoverX and Emerald personnel located outside the State of
California. The Pleadings also assert a right to seek monetary penalties. FMIC, CoverX and
Emerald have denied the allegations in the Pleadings, and CoverX and Emerald have requested a
hearing on the action to revoke their respective fire and casualty producer licenses. FMIC, CoverX
and Emerald have also been conferring with the California Department to obtain surplus lines broker
licenses and resolve these issues. While it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome
of any legal proceeding, we believe the outcome of these proceedings will not result in a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
14. RESTRUCTURING
Following a review of the Companys operating structure with the Board of Directors in early
2010, the Company determined that a restructuring of certain components of the Companys insurance
underwriting operations and corporate support functions was necessary to improve the Companys cost
structure. As a result of this decision, the Company recorded a pretax restructuring charge of
$5.0 million related to reductions in staffing levels, lease termination costs and other items in
the first quarter of 2010. There was no restructuring charge recorded in the second or third
quarters of 2010. The Company does not anticipate any additional restructuring charges as a result
of this plan.
15. CREDIT AGREEMENT
On April 30, 2010, the Company amended its existing credit agreement with its lender since the
payment of the special dividend would have resulted in a violation of a covenant in the credit
agreement. The amendment extended the maturity date of the credit agreement from September 30,
2011 to September 30, 2013 and revised certain restrictive covenants. Refer to the Long-term
debt section of Managements Discussion and Analysis for more information.
16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On October 28, 2010, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (Fairfax) and the Company announced
that they have entered into a merger agreement pursuant to which Fairfax will acquire all of the
outstanding shares of the Companys common stock (except for shares held by Fairfax, by the Company
in treasury or shares owned by stockholders who properly exercise appraisal rights under Delaware law).
22
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Concluded)
Upon completion of the merger, the Companys stockholders will receive $16.50 per
share in cash, representing an aggregate transaction value of approximately $294 million. The
transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2011. The transaction is subject to
customary conditions, including approval by the Companys stockholders and regulatory approvals.
In connection with the execution of the merger agreement with Fairfax, the Company has agreed
to use commercially reasonable efforts to liquidate its investment portfolio, which had a market
value of $771.6 million at September 30, 2010, provided the Company has no obligation to sell any
investment for an amount less than its September 30, 2010 market value. The Company believes this
provision does not impact the classification of certain investments as available for sale nor the
Companys conclusions regarding other-than-temporary impairments at September 30, 2010. In
addition, the Company will not repurchase any shares of common stock or pay dividends on its common
stock without prior consent from Fairfax.
On November 5, 2010, the Company completed the previously announced acquisition of Valiant
Insurance Group, Inc. (Valiant), a subsidiary of Ariel Holdings, Ltd. The purchase price for
Valiant was $52.7 million, subject to certain purchase price adjustments. The purchase price was
funded from existing liquidity. The Company has not provided more disclosures due to the recent
completion of the transaction.
23
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that relate to future
periods and includes statements regarding our anticipated performance. Generally, the words
anticipates, believes, expects, intends, estimates, projects, plans and similar
expressions identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause our actual results,
performance or achievements or industry results to differ materially from any future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks,
uncertainties and other important factors include, among others: recent and future events and
circumstances impacting financial, stock, and capital markets, and the responses to such events by
governments and financial communities; the impact of the economic recession and the volatility in
the financial markets on our investment portfolio; the impact of catastrophic events and the
occurrence of significant severe weather conditions on our operating results; our ability to
maintain or the lowering or loss of one of our financial or claims-paying ratings; our actual
incurred losses exceeding our loss and loss adjustment expense reserves; the failure of reinsurers
to meet their obligations; our estimates for accrued profit sharing commissions are based on loss
ratio performance and could be reduced if the underlying loss ratios deteriorate; our inability to
obtain reinsurance coverage at reasonable prices; the failure of any loss limitations or exclusions
or changes in claims or coverage; our ability to successfully integrate acquisitions that we make;
our ability to realize anticipated benefits from acquisitions; our lack of long-term operating
history in certain specialty classes of insurance; our ability to acquire and retain additional
underwriting expertise and capacity; the concentration of our insurance business in relatively few
specialty classes; the increasingly competitive property and casualty marketplace; fluctuations and
uncertainty within the excess and surplus lines insurance industry; the extensive regulations to
which our business is subject and our failure to comply with those regulations; our ability to
maintain our risk-based capital at levels required by regulatory authorities; our inability to
realize our investment objectives; the sale of our company to Fairfax may not be completed as
anticipated; our business operations may suffer due to actions needed to complete the merger; the
liquidation of our non-cash investments in our investment portfolio could harm the long-term
performance of our investment portfolio; and the risks identified in our filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our Annual
Report on Form 10-K. Given these uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update or revise them or provide
reasons why actual results may differ.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related
notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
Overview
We are a provider of insurance products and services to the specialty commercial insurance
markets, primarily focusing on niche and underserved segments where we believe that we have
underwriting expertise and other competitive advantages. During our 37 years of underwriting
security risks, we have established CoverX
®
as a recognized brand among insurance
agents and brokers and have developed significant underwriting expertise and a cost-efficient
infrastructure. Over the last ten years, we have leveraged our brand, expertise and infrastructure
to expand into other specialty classes of business, particularly focusing on smaller accounts that
receive less attention from competitors.
First Mercury Financial Corporation (FMFC) is a holding company for our operating
subsidiaries. Our operations are conducted with the goal of producing overall profits by
strategically balancing underwriting profits from our insurance subsidiaries with the commissions
and fee income generated by our non-insurance subsidiaries. FMFCs principal operating
subsidiaries are CoverX Corporation (CoverX), First Mercury Insurance Company (FMIC), First
Mercury Casualty Company (FMCC), First Mercury Emerald Insurance Services, Inc. (FM Emerald),
and American Management Corporation (AMC).
CoverX markets, produces and binds insurance policies pursuant to guidelines that we establish
and for which we retain risk and receive premiums. As a wholesale insurance broker, CoverX markets
our insurance policies through a nationwide network of wholesale and retail insurance brokers who
then distribute these policies through retail insurance brokers. CoverX also provides services
with respect to the insurance policies it markets in that it reviews the applications submitted for
insurance coverage, decides whether to accept all or part of the coverage requested and determines
applicable premiums based on guidelines that we provide. CoverX receives commissions from
affiliated insurance companies, reinsurers, and non-affiliated insurers as well as policy fees from
wholesale and retail insurance brokers.
FM Emerald is a wholesale insurance agency producing commercial lines business on primarily an
excess and surplus lines basis for CoverX via a producer agreement. As a wholesale insurance
agency, FM Emerald markets insurance products for CoverX through a nationwide network of wholesale
and retail insurance brokers who then distribute these products through retail insurance brokers.
24
FMIC and FMCC are two of our insurance subsidiaries. FMIC writes substantially all the
policies produced by CoverX. FMCC provides reinsurance to FMIC. FMIC and FMCC have entered into
an intercompany pooling reinsurance agreement wherein all premiums, losses and expenses of FMIC and
FMCC, including all past liabilities, are combined and apportioned between FMIC and FMCC in
accordance with fixed percentages. FMIC also provides claims handling and adjustment services for
policies produced by CoverX and directly written by third parties.
Recent Developments
On October 28, 2010, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (Fairfax) and the Company announced
that they have entered into a merger agreement pursuant to which Fairfax will acquire all of the
outstanding shares of the Companys common stock (except for shares held by Fairfax, by the Company
in treasury or shares owned by stockholders who properly exercise appraisal rights under Delaware
law). Upon completion of the merger, the Companys stockholders will receive $16.50 per share in
cash, representing an aggregate transaction value of approximately $294 million. The transaction
is expected to close in the first quarter of 2011. The transaction is subject to customary
conditions, including approval by the Companys stockholders and regulatory approvals.
For additional information on the merger agreement refer to the Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2010.
GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Performance Metrics
Throughout this report, we present our operations in the way we believe will be most
meaningful, useful, and transparent to anyone using this financial information to evaluate our
performance. In addition to the GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States of America) presentation of net income and certain statutory reporting information, we show
certain non-GAAP financial and other performance measures that we believe are valuable in managing
our business and drawing comparisons to our peers. These measures are gross written premiums, net
written premiums, and combined ratio.
Following is a list of performance measures found throughout this report with their
definitions, relationships to GAAP measures, and explanations of their importance to our
operations:
Gross written premiums.
While net earned premiums is the related GAAP measure used in the
statements of earnings, gross written premiums is the component of net earned premiums that
measures insurance business produced before the impact of ceding reinsurance premiums, but without
respect to when those premiums will be recognized as actual revenue. We use this measure as an
overall gauge of gross business volume in our insurance underwriting operations with some
indication of profit potential subject to the levels of our retentions, expenses, and loss costs.
Net written premiums.
While net earned premiums is the related GAAP measure used in the
statements of earnings, net written premiums is the component of net earned premiums that measures
the difference between gross written premiums and the impact of ceding reinsurance premiums, but
without respect to when those premiums will be recognized as actual revenue. We use this measure
as an indication of retained or net business volume in our insurance underwriting operations. It
is an indicator of future earnings potential subject to our expenses and loss costs.
Combined ratio.
This ratio is a common industry measure of profitability for any underwriting
operation, and is calculated in two components. First, the loss ratio is losses and loss adjustment
expenses divided by net earned premiums. The second component, the expense ratio, reflects the sum
of policy acquisition costs and insurance operating expenses, net of insurance underwriting
commissions and fees, divided by net earned premiums. The sum of the loss and expense ratios is the
combined ratio. The difference between the combined ratio and 100 reflects the per-dollar rate of
underwriting income or loss. For example, a combined ratio of 85 implies that for every $100 of
premium we earn, we record $15 of pre-tax underwriting income.
Critical Accounting Policies
The critical accounting policies discussed below are important to the portrayal of our
financial condition and results of operations and require us to exercise significant judgment. We
use significant judgments concerning future results and developments in making these critical
accounting estimates and in preparing our consolidated financial statements. These judgments and
estimates affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the
disclosure of material contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on a continual
basis using information that we believe to be relevant. Actual results may differ materially from
the estimates and assumptions used in preparing the consolidated financial statements.
25
Readers are also urged to review Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Policies and Note 1 to the audited consolidated
financial statements thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009 on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission for a more complete description of our
critical accounting policies and estimates.
Use of Estimates
In preparing our consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements, and
revenues and expenses reported for the periods then ended. Actual results may differ from those
estimates. Material estimates that are susceptible to significant change in the near term relate
primarily to the determination of the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses and
valuation of investments, intangible assets and goodwill.
Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves
The reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses represent our estimated ultimate costs of
all reported and unreported losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred and unpaid at the balance
sheet date. Our reserves reflect our estimates at a given time of amounts that we expect to pay
for losses that have been reported, which are referred to as Case reserves, and losses that have
been incurred but not reported and the expected development of losses and allocated loss adjustment
expenses on reported cases, which are referred to as IBNR reserves. We do not discount the
reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses for the time value of money.
We allocate the applicable portion of our estimated loss and loss adjustment expense reserves
to amounts recoverable from reinsurers under ceded reinsurance contracts and report those amounts
separately from our loss and loss adjustment expense reserves as an asset on our balance sheet.
The estimation of ultimate liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses is an inherently
uncertain process, requiring the use of informed estimates and judgments. Our loss and loss
adjustment expense reserves do not represent an exact measurement of liability, but are our
estimates based upon various factors, including:
|
|
|
actuarial projections of what we, at a given time, expect to be the cost of the
ultimate settlement and administration of claims reflecting facts and circumstances then
known;
|
|
|
|
|
estimates of future trends in claims severity and frequency;
|
|
|
|
|
assessment of asserted theories of liability; and
|
|
|
|
|
analysis of other factors, such as variables in claims handling procedures,
economic factors, and judicial and legislative trends and actions.
|
Most or all of these factors are not directly or precisely quantifiable, particularly on a
prospective basis, and are subject to a significant degree of variability over time. In addition,
the establishment of loss and loss adjustment expense reserves makes no provision for the
broadening of coverage by legislative action or judicial interpretation or for the extraordinary
future emergence of new types of losses not sufficiently represented in our historical experience
or which cannot yet be quantified. Accordingly, the ultimate liability may be more or less than
the current estimate. The effects of changes in the estimated reserves are included in the results
of operations in the period in which the estimate is revised.
Our reserves consist of reserves for property and liability losses, consistent with the
coverages provided for in the insurance policies directly written or assumed by the Company under
reinsurance contracts. In many cases, several years may elapse between the occurrence of an
insured loss, the reporting of the loss to us and our payment of the loss. Although we believe
that our reserve estimates are reasonable, it is possible that our actual loss experience may not
conform to our assumptions and may, in fact, vary significantly from our assumptions. Accordingly,
the ultimate settlement of losses and the related loss adjustment expenses may vary significantly
from the estimates included in our financial statements. We continually review our estimates and
adjust them as we believe appropriate as our experience develops or new information becomes known
to us.
26
Our reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses at September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, gross and net of ceded reinsurance were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case reserves
|
|
$
|
168,776
|
|
|
$
|
125,561
|
|
IBNR and ULAE reserves
|
|
|
398,110
|
|
|
|
362,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reserves
|
|
$
|
566,886
|
|
|
$
|
488,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of reinsurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case reserves
|
|
$
|
112,783
|
|
|
$
|
83,911
|
|
IBNR and ULAE reserves
|
|
|
249,278
|
|
|
|
240,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
362,061
|
|
|
$
|
323,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition
Premiums
. Premiums are recognized as earned using the daily pro rata method over the terms of
the policies. When premium rates change, the effect of those changes will not immediately affect
earned premium. Rather, those changes will be recognized ratably over the period of coverage.
Unearned premiums represent the portion of premiums written that relate to the unexpired terms of
policies-in-force. As policies expire, we audit those policies comparing the estimated premium
rating units that were used to set the initial premium to the actual premiums rating units for the
period and adjust the premiums accordingly. Premium adjustments identified as a result of these
audits are recognized as earned when identified.
The Company underwrote retroactive loss portfolio transfer (LPT) contracts during 2009 and
the first quarter of 2010 in which the insured loss events occurred prior to the inception of the
contract. These contracts were evaluated to determine whether they met the established criteria
for reinsurance accounting. When reinsurance accounting is appropriate, written premiums are fully
earned and corresponding losses and loss expenses recognized at the inception of the contract.
These contracts can cause significant variances in gross written premiums, net written premiums,
net earned premiums, and net incurred losses in the periods in which they are written. Reinsurance
contracts sold not meeting the established criteria for reinsurance accounting are recorded using
the deposit method. The Company has no LPT contracts that are accounted for using the deposit
method.
Commissions and Fees
. Wholesale agency commissions and fee income from unaffiliated companies
are earned at the effective date of the related insurance policies produced or as services are
provided under the terms of the administrative and service provider contracts. Related commissions
to retail agencies are concurrently expensed at the effective date of the related insurance
policies produced. Profit sharing commissions due from certain insurance and reinsurance
companies, based on losses and loss adjustment expense experience, are earned when determined and
communicated by the applicable contract.
Investments
Our marketable investment securities, including fixed maturity and equity securities, and
short-term investments, are classified as available-for-sale and, as a result, are reported at
market value. The changes in the fair value of these investments are recorded as a component of
Other comprehensive income (loss). Convertible securities are accounted for under the accounting
guidance for hybrid securities whereby changes in fair value are reflected in Net realized gains
(losses) on investments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Alternative
investments consist of our investments in limited partnerships, which invest in high yield
convertible securities and distressed structured finance products. At the date of inception, we
elected the fair value accounting option for these alternative investments in accordance with FASB
guidance, whereby changes in fair value are reflected in Net investment income and Net realized
gains (losses) on investments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
FASB guidance establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements that
distinguishes between market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from
sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and the reporting entitys own
assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available
in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The estimated fair values of the Companys fixed
income securities, convertible bonds, and equity securities are based on prices provided by an
independent, nationally recognized pricing service. The prices provided by this service are based
on quoted market prices, when available, non-binding broker quotes, or matrix pricing. The
independent pricing service provides a single price or quote per security and the Company does not
adjust security prices, except as otherwise disclosed.
27
The Company obtains an understanding of the methods, models and inputs used by the independent
pricing service, and has controls in place to validate that amounts provided represent fair values,
consistent with this standard. The Companys controls include, but are not limited to, initial and
ongoing evaluation of the methodologies used by the independent pricing service, a review of
specific securities and an assessment for proper classification within the fair value hierarchy.
The hierarchy level assigned to each security in our available-for-sale, hybrid securities, and
alternative investments portfolios is based on our assessment of the transparency and reliability
of the inputs used in the valuation of such instrument at the measurement date. The three
hierarchy levels are defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuations based on unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for
identical securities. The fair values of fixed maturity and equity securities and short-term
investments included in the Level 1 category were based on quoted prices that are readily and
regularly available in an active market. The Level 1 category includes publicly traded equity
securities, highly liquid U.S. Government notes, treasury bills and mortgage-backed securities
issued by the Government National Mortgage Association; highly liquid cash management funds; and
short-term certificates of deposit.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuations based on observable inputs (other than Level 1 prices), such as
quoted prices for similar assets at the measurement date; quoted prices in markets that are not
active; or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. The fair value of
fixed maturity and equity securities and short-term investments included in the Level 2 category
were based on the market values obtained from an independent pricing service that were evaluated
using pricing models that vary by asset class and incorporate available trade, bid and other market
information and price quotes from well established independent broker-dealers. The independent
pricing service monitors market indicators, industry and economic events, and for broker-quoted
only securities, obtains quotes from market makers or broker-dealers that it recognizes to be
market participants. The Level 2 category includes corporate bonds, municipal bonds, redeemable
preferred stocks and certain publicly traded common stocks with no trades on the measurement date.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall
fair value measurement, and involve management judgment.
|
If the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy,
a financial securitys hierarchy level is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant
to the fair value measurement. A number of our investment grade corporate bonds are frequently
traded in active markets and traded market prices for these securities existed at September 30,
2010. These securities were classified as Level 2 at September 30, 2010 because our third party
pricing service uses valuation models which use observable market inputs in addition to traded
prices.
Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related debt security as
an adjustment to yield using the effective-interest method. Dividend and interest income are
recognized when earned. Realized gains and losses are included in earnings and are derived using
the specific identification method for determining the cost of securities sold.
In connection with the execution of the merger agreement with Fairfax on October 28, 2010, the
Company has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to liquidate its investment portfolio,
which had a market value of $771.6 million at September 30, 2010, provided the Company has no
obligation to sell any investment for an amount less than its September 30, 2010 market value. The
Company believes this provision does not impact the classification of certain investments as
available for sale nor the Companys conclusions regarding other-than-temporary impairments at
September 30, 2010.
Impairment of Investment Securities
Impairment of investment securities results when a market decline below cost is
other-than-temporary. The other-than-temporary write down is separated into an amount representing
the credit loss which is recognized in earnings and the amount related to all other factors which
is recorded in Other comprehensive income. Management regularly reviews our fixed maturity
securities portfolio to evaluate the necessity of recording impairment losses for
other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of investments. Factors considered in evaluating
potential impairment include, but are not limited to, the current fair value as compared to cost or
amortized cost of the security, as appropriate, the length of time the investment has been below
cost or amortized cost and by how much, our intent to sell a security and whether it is
more-likely-than-not we will be required to sell the security before the recovery of our amortized
cost basis, and specific credit issues related to the issuer and current economic conditions.
Other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses result in a reduction of the cost basis of the
underlying investment. Significant changes in these factors we consider when evaluating
investments for impairment losses could result in additional impairment losses reported in the
consolidated financial statements.
28
With respect to securities where the decline in value is determined to be temporary and the
securitys value is not written down, a subsequent decision may be made to sell that security and
realize a loss. Subsequent decisions on security sales are made within the context of overall risk
monitoring, changing information and market conditions. Management of the Companys investment
portfolio is outsourced to third party investment managers which is directed and monitored by our
investment committee. While these investment managers may, at a given point in time, believe that
the preferred course of action is to hold securities with unrealized losses that are considered
temporary until such losses are recovered, the dynamic nature of the portfolio management may
result in a subsequent decision to sell the security and realize the loss, based upon a change in
market and other factors described above. The Company believes that subsequent decisions to sell
such securities are consistent with the classification of the Companys portfolio as
available-for-sale.
Investment managers are required to notify management of rating agency downgrades of
securities in their portfolios as well as any potential investment valuation issues no later than
the end of each quarter. Investment managers are also required to notify management, and receive
prior approval, prior to the execution of a transaction or series of related transactions that may
result in a realized loss above a certain threshold. Additionally, investment managers are
required to notify management, and receive approval, prior to the execution of a transaction or
series of related transactions that may result in any realized loss up until a certain period
beyond the close of a quarterly accounting period.
Under current accounting standards, an OTTI write-down of debt securities, where fair value is
below amortized cost, is triggered in circumstances where (1) an entity has the intent to sell a
security, (2) it is more-likely-than-not that the entity will be required to sell the security
before recovery of its amortized cost basis, or (3) the entity does not expect to recover the
entire amortized cost basis of the security. If an entity intends to sell a security or if it is
more-likely-than-not the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery, an OTTI
write-down is recognized in earnings equal to the difference between the securitys amortized cost
and its fair value. If an entity does not intend to sell the security or it is not
more-likely-than-not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery, the OTTI
write-down is separated into an amount representing the credit loss, which is recognized in
earnings, and the amount related to all other factors, which is recognized in Other comprehensive
income.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Policy acquisition costs related to direct and assumed premiums consist of commissions,
underwriting, policy issuance, and other costs that vary with and are primarily related to the
production of new and renewal business, and are deferred, subject to ultimate recoverability, and
expensed over the period in which the related premiums are earned. Investment income is included
in the calculation of ultimate recoverability.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
In accordance with the accounting guidance for goodwill and intangible assets that are not
subject to amortization, these intangible assets shall be tested for impairment annually, or more
frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The
impairment test for goodwill shall consist of a comparison of the fair value of the goodwill with
the carrying amount of the reporting unit to which it is assigned. The impairment test for
intangible assets shall consist of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible assets with
their carrying amounts. If the carrying amount of the goodwill or intangible assets exceeds their
fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
In accordance with the accounting guidance for the impairment or disposal of long-lived
assets, the carrying value of long-lived assets, including amortizable intangibles and property and
equipment, are evaluated whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that a potential
impairment has occurred relative to a given asset or assets. Impairment is deemed to have occurred
if projected undiscounted cash flows associated with an asset are less than the carrying value of
the asset. The estimated cash flows include managements assumptions of cash inflows and outflows
directly resulting from the use of that asset in operations. The amount of the impairment loss
recognized is equal to the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its then estimated fair
value.
All of the Companys goodwill is allocated to the reporting unit of AMC since AMC has its
own distinct business platform with discrete financial information. The Company acquired AMC to
gain access to an established and experienced specialty admitted underwriting franchise with a
definable niche market. The expertise of AMCs specialty admitted underwriting franchise is not
significantly correlated to our existing underwriting operations and we did not allocate any
goodwill to our existing insurance underwriting operations based on this fact.
29
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
The following table summarizes our results for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
$
|
49,236
|
|
|
$
|
51,512
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
Commissions and fees
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
7,445
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
8,349
|
|
|
|
7,540
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Net realized gains on investments
|
|
|
7,671
|
|
|
|
13,766
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
on investments
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Revenues
|
|
|
65,185
|
|
|
|
79,971
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses, net
|
|
|
42,531
|
|
|
|
30,345
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
24,484
|
|
|
|
24,129
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
67,497
|
|
|
|
55,033
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(2,312
|
)
|
|
|
24,938
|
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
(3,866
|
)
|
|
|
23,663
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
|
|
|
(1,835
|
)
|
|
|
8,018
|
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,031
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,645
|
|
|
|
(113
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Ratio
|
|
|
86.4
|
%
|
|
|
58.9
|
%
|
|
27.5 points
|
|
Underwriting Expense Ratio
|
|
|
50.8
|
%
|
|
|
33.6
|
%
|
|
17.2 points
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Ratio
|
|
|
137.2
|
%
|
|
|
92.5
|
%
|
|
44.7 points
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
Operating Revenue
Net Earned Premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
$
|
80,936
|
|
|
$
|
77,607
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Assumed
|
|
|
2,913
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Ceded
|
|
|
(40,075
|
)
|
|
|
(35,483
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net written premiums
|
|
$
|
43,774
|
|
|
$
|
46,325
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
$
|
79,092
|
|
|
$
|
77,907
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Assumed
|
|
|
4,536
|
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceded
|
|
|
(33,934
|
)
|
|
|
(29,907
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
Earned but unbilled
premiums
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
(1,017
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
$
|
49,236
|
|
|
$
|
51,512
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct written premiums increased $3.3 million, or 4%, primarily due to increases in premium
production from the Companys Excess/Umbrella Casualty and Professional Liability lines of business
partially offset by a decrease in production from the Companys Primary General Liability line of
business during the three months ended September 30, 2010. Direct earned premiums increased $1.2
million in the three months ended September 30, 2010, or 2%, compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2009.
Assumed written premiums decreased $1.3 million, or 31%, and assumed earned premiums remained
flat for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended September 30,
2009. The decrease in assumed written premiums is primarily due to a decrease in premium
production from the Companys Professional Liability line of business.
Ceded written premiums increased $4.6 million, or 13%, and ceded earned premiums increased
$4.0 million, or 13%, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2009. Ceded written premiums increased to 48% of direct and assumed written
premiums during the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to 43% of direct and assumed
written premiums during the three months ended September 30, 2009 principally due to purchasing
more quota share and excess of loss reinsurance during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 for the
Companys primary casualty business compared to the same period of 2009.
Earned but unbilled premiums decreased $0.6 million, or 55%, primarily due to the net earned
premiums subject to audit during the three months ended September 30, 2010 decreasing compared to
the net premiums earned subject to audit during the three months ended September 30, 2009.
31
Commissions and Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance underwriting commissions and
fees
|
|
$
|
(5,861
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,272
|
|
|
|
(561
|
)%
|
Insurance services commissions and fees
|
|
|
5,901
|
|
|
|
6,173
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commissions and fees
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
7,445
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance underwriting commissions and fees decreased 561% from the three months ended
September 30, 2009 to the three months ended September 30, 2010. During the three months ended
September 30, 2010, the Company recorded a net reduction in accrued profit sharing commissions of
$5.9 million, of which $6.9 million was a decrease to Insurance underwriting commissions and fees
revenue with an offsetting $1.0 million decrease in Other underwriting and operating expenses due
to the unfavorable development in prior years net loss and loss adjustment expense reserves as
discussed in the Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses section below. Insurance services commissions
and fees, which were principally AMC commission and fee income and not related to premiums,
decreased $0.3 million as the result of decreased AMC commission and fee income of $0.2 million and
a decrease of $0.1 million related to our workers compensation service program due to lower
premium production during the third quarter of 2010 compared to the third quarter of 2009.
Net Investment Income and Realized Gains on Investments
. During the three months ended
September 30, 2010, net investment income was $8.3 million, a $0.8 million, or 11% increase from
$7.5 million reported for the three months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to the increase
in invested assets over the period, partially offset by a decrease in the book yield of the
portfolio. At September 30, 2010, invested assets were $771.6 million, a $97.6 million, or 15%
increase over $674.0 million of invested assets at September 30, 2009. This increase was primarily
due to cash flows from net written premiums and from the cash retained on our quota share
reinsurance contracts on a funds withheld basis. The annualized investment yield on total
investments (net of investment expenses) was 4.7% and 5.0% at September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The annualized taxable equivalent yield on total investments (net of investment
expenses) was 5.1% and 5.5% at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, net realized gains were $7.7 million
compared to net realized gains of $13.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2009.
Net realized gains for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were due to the mark to market
increase in securities carried at market of approximately $4.1 million and net gains on the sale of
certain securities of $3.6 million. Those securities that are marked to market through the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income include convertible securities held both as
individually-owned securities and an investment in limited partnerships, and an investment in a
structured finance limited partnership. Convertible bond prices are a function of the underlying
equity and the fixed income component whose values changed with the stock market and changes in
spread of corporate bonds, respectively. The structured finance limited partnership is valued
based on a portfolio of non-agency mortgage securities, and the hedges that may accompany
positions. The value of these components in the limited partnership changed in value for a variety
of reasons including, but not limited to, changes in spread for mortgage product, changes in
prepayment rates, default rates, severity rates, changes in the overall level of rates and the
corresponding value of the underlying loans, and changes in the value of the properties by which
these loans are collateralized.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Losses on Investments.
During the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments
were $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
Operating Expenses
Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
. Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred increased
$12.2 million, or 40%, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2009. This increase was primarily due to $11.4 million of net unfavorable
development of December 31, 2009 prior years loss and loss adjustment expense reserves principally
in the Companys Primary General Liability and Professional Liability lines of business. The net
unfavorable development was due to adverse claims development and was primarily related to accident
years 2003 through 2006 for Primary General Liability, and
primarily in accident year 2009 for Professional Liability. Losses and loss adjustment
expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 included approximately $1.3 million of favorable
development of December 31, 2008 prior years loss and loss adjustment expense reserves.
32
Other Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition
expenses
|
|
$
|
13,269
|
|
|
$
|
13,960
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
Other underwriting and operating expenses
|
|
|
11,215
|
|
|
|
10,169
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
$
|
24,484
|
|
|
$
|
24,129
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, other operating expenses increased $0.4
million from the three months ended September 30, 2009. Amortization of deferred acquisition
expenses decreased $0.7 million, or 5%, during the three months ended September 30, 2010 from the
three months ended September 30, 2009. Other underwriting and operating expenses, which consist of
commissions, other acquisition costs, and general and underwriting expenses, net of acquisition
cost deferrals, increased by $1.0 million, or 10%. The increase was principally due to higher
corporate expenses of $1.4 million and lower acquisition cost deferrals of $0.7 million due to
lower underwriting operating expenses, partially offset by lower net commissions of $1.0 million
due primarily to the aforementioned net reduction in accrued profit sharing commissions during the
three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009.
Interest Expense
. Interest expense increased 22% from the three months ended September 30,
2009 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. This increase was primarily due to
interest expense on the balance outstanding for the Companys credit agreement and a $0.2 million
change in fair value of the interest rate swaps on junior subordinated debentures as discussed in
Liquidity and Capital Resources below.
Income Taxes
. Our effective tax rates were -47.5% for the three months ended September 30,
2010 and 33.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and differed from the federal
statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes, non-deductible expenses including
acquisition-related expenses, the nontaxable portion of dividends received and tax-exempt interest,
and a one-time purchase accounting adjustment. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily
due to the nontaxable portion of dividends received and tax-exempt interest constituting a higher
portion of overall pretax income (loss).
33
Results of Operations
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
The following table summarizes our results for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
$
|
152,413
|
|
|
$
|
155,539
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Commissions and fees
|
|
|
15,699
|
|
|
|
23,916
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
25,434
|
|
|
|
21,105
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Net realized gains on investments
|
|
|
10,354
|
|
|
|
25,204
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
on investments
|
|
|
(655
|
)
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Revenues
|
|
|
203,245
|
|
|
|
225,338
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses, net
|
|
|
108,114
|
|
|
|
96,301
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
|
1,709
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
75,095
|
|
|
|
69,808
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
5,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
189,742
|
|
|
|
167,818
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
13,503
|
|
|
|
57,520
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
4,483
|
|
|
|
3,877
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
9,020
|
|
|
|
53,643
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
Income Taxes
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
|
|
17,707
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
7,326
|
|
|
$
|
35,936
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Ratio
|
|
|
70.9
|
%
|
|
|
61.9
|
%
|
|
9.0 points
|
|
Underwriting Expense Ratio
|
|
|
43.0
|
%
|
|
|
31.6
|
%
|
|
11.4 points
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Ratio
|
|
|
113.9
|
%
|
|
|
93.5
|
%
|
|
20.4 points
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Operating Revenue
Net Earned Premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
$
|
236,132
|
|
|
$
|
228,619
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Assumed
|
|
|
15,584
|
|
|
|
13,588
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Ceded
|
|
|
(101,858
|
)
|
|
|
(92,615
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net written premiums
|
|
$
|
149,858
|
|
|
$
|
149,592
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
$
|
231,936
|
|
|
$
|
226,125
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Assumed
|
|
|
17,062
|
|
|
|
13,276
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Ceded
|
|
|
(96,160
|
)
|
|
|
(81,752
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
Earned but unbilled premiums
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
|
|
(2,110
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
$
|
152,413
|
|
|
$
|
155,539
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct written premiums increased $7.5 million, or 3%, primarily due to increases in premium
production from the Companys Excess/Umbrella Casualty and Professional Liability lines of business
partially offset by a decrease in production from the Companys Primary General Liability line of
business during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Direct earned premiums increased $5.8
million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010, or 3%, compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
Assumed written premiums increased $2.0 million, or 15%, and assumed earned premiums increased
$3.8 million, or 29%. The increase in assumed written and earned premiums is primarily due to $3.3
million of premiums from assumed retroactive reinsurance transactions recorded during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010.
Ceded written premiums increased $9.2 million, or 10%, and ceded earned premiums increased
$14.4 million, or 18%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. Ceded written premiums increased to 40% of direct and assumed written
premiums during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to 38% of direct and assumed
written premiums during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 principally due to purchasing more
quota share and excess of loss reinsurance during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 for the
Companys primary casualty business compared to the same period of 2009. The increase in quota
share and excess of loss cessions was partially offset by assumed reinsurance transactions that
were fully retained by the Company.
Earned but unbilled premiums decreased $1.7 million, or 80%, primarily due to the net earned
premiums subject to audit during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 decreasing compared to
the net premiums earned subject to audit during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
35
Commissions and Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance underwriting commissions and fees
|
|
$
|
(3,072
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,989
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)%
|
Insurance services commissions and fees
|
|
|
18,771
|
|
|
|
19,927
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commissions and fees
|
|
$
|
15,699
|
|
|
$
|
23,916
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance underwriting commissions and fees decreased 177% from the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, the Company recorded a net reduction in accrued profit sharing commissions of
$5.9 million, of which $6.9 million was a decrease to Insurance underwriting commissions and fees
revenue with an offsetting $1.0 million decrease in Other underwriting and operating expenses due
to the unfavorable development in prior years net loss and loss adjustment expense reserves as
discussed in the Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses section below. Insurance services commissions
and fees, which were principally AMC commission and fee income and not related to premiums,
decreased $1.2 million as the result of decreased AMC commission and fee income of $1.1 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2009 primarily due to a contingent commission adjustment of $1.3 million recorded during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009.
Net Investment Income and Realized Gains on Investments
. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, net investment income was $25.4 million, a $4.3 million, or 21%, increase from
$21.1 million reported for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to the increase
in invested assets over the period and offset somewhat by a decrease in the book yield of the
portfolio. At September 30, 2010, invested assets were $771.6 million, a $97.6 million, or 15%
increase over $674.0 million of invested assets at September 30, 2009. This increase was primarily
due to cash flows from net written premiums and from the cash retained on our quota share
reinsurance contracts on a funds withheld basis. The annualized investment yield on total
investments (net of investment expenses) was 4.7% and 5.0% at September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The annualized taxable equivalent yield on total investments (net of investment
expenses) was 5.1% and 5.5% at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net realized gains were $10.4 million
compared to net realized gains of $25.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Net realized gains for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were principally due to net gains
on the sale of certain securities of $11.1 million offset by the mark to market decrease in
securities carried at market of approximately $0.7 million. Those securities that are marked to
market through the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income include convertible securities held
both as individually-owned securities and an investment in a limited partnership, and an investment
in a structured finance limited partnership. Convertible bond prices are a function of the
underlying equity and the fixed income component whose values changed with the stock market and
changes in spread of corporate bonds, respectively. The structured finance limited partnership is
valued based on a portfolio of non-agency mortgage securities, and the hedges that may accompany
positions. The value of these components in the limited partnership changed in value for a variety
of reasons including, but not limited to, changes in spread for mortgage product, changes in
prepayment rates, default rates, severity rates, changes in the overall level of rates and the
corresponding value of the underlying loans, and changes in the value of the properties by which
these loans are collateralized.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Losses on Investments.
During the nine months ended September
30, 2010 other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments were $0.7 million compared to
other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments of $0.4 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
Operating Expenses
Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
. Losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred increased
$11.8 million, or 12%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine months
ended September, 2009. This increase was primarily due to $11.4 million of net unfavorable
development of December 31, 2009 prior years loss and loss adjustment expense reserves principally
in the Companys Primary General Liability and Professional Liability lines of business. The net
unfavorable development was due to adverse claims development and was primarily related to accident
years 2003 through 2006 for Primary General Liability, and primarily in accident year 2009 for
Professional Liability. Losses and loss adjustment expenses for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 included $7.6 million of storm-related and commercial property fire and other losses and
loss adjustment expenses which did
not recur during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Losses and loss adjustment
expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 also increased due to an increase in the
accident year loss and loss adjustment expense ratio from decreased
premium rates, a higher loss
ratio on assumed retroactive reinsurance transactions, and an
36
increase in the loss ratio for a
Professional Liability line of business. Losses and loss adjustment expenses for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 included approximately $5.7 million of favorable development of December
31, 2008 prior years loss and loss adjustment expense reserves.
Other Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred acquisition expenses
|
|
$
|
40,024
|
|
|
$
|
40,889
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Other underwriting and operating expenses
|
|
|
35,071
|
|
|
|
28,919
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
$
|
75,095
|
|
|
$
|
69,808
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, other operating expenses increased $5.3
million, or 8%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Amortization of deferred
acquisition expenses decreased $0.9 million, or 2%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Other underwriting and operating expenses,
which consist of commissions, other acquisition costs, and general and underwriting expenses, net
of acquisition cost deferrals, increased by $6.2 million, or 21%. The increase was principally due
to acquisition-related costs of $1.1 million, higher net commission expenses of $2.2 million and
corporate expenses of $2.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Restructuring
.
During the nine months ending September 30, 2010, the Company recorded pretax
restructuring charges of $5.0 million related to restructuring activities initiated in the first
quarter 2010. As of September 30, 2010, all restructuring activities have been completed and no
future restructuring charges are expected relating to these actions initiated in the first quarter
of 2010.
Interest Expense
. Interest expense increased 16% from the nine months ended September 30,
2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This increase was primarily due to
interest expense on the balance outstanding for the Companys credit agreement and a $0.4 million
change in fair value of the interest rate swaps on junior subordinated debentures as discussed in
Liquidity and Capital Resources below.
Income Taxes
. Our effective tax rates were 18.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 33.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and differed from the federal statutory rate
primarily due to state income taxes, non-deductible expenses including acquisition-related
expenses, the nontaxable portion of dividends received and tax-exempt interest, and a one-time
purchase accounting adjustment. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the
nontaxable portion of dividends received and tax-exempt interest constituting a higher portion of
overall pretax income partially offset by non-deductible acquisition-related expenses for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period of 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources and Uses of Funds
FMFC
. FMFC is a holding company with all of its operations being conducted by its
subsidiaries. Accordingly, FMFC has continuing cash needs primarily for administrative expenses,
debt service, shareholder dividends and taxes. Funds to meet these obligations come primarily from
management and administrative fees from all of our subsidiaries, and dividends from our
non-insurance subsidiaries.
Insurance Subsidiaries
. The primary sources of our insurance subsidiaries cash are net
written premiums, claims handling fees, amounts earned from investments and the sale or maturity of
invested assets. Additionally, FMFC has in the past and may in the future contribute capital to
its insurance subsidiaries.
The primary uses of our insurance subsidiaries cash include the payment of claims and related
adjustment expenses, underwriting fees and commissions, taxes, making investments and paying
dividends. Because the payment of individual claims cannot be predicted with certainty, our
insurance subsidiaries rely on our paid claims history and industry data in determining the
expected
payout of claims and estimated loss reserves. To the extent that FMIC, FMCC, and AUIC have an
unanticipated shortfall in cash, they may either liquidate securities held in their investment
portfolios or obtain capital from FMFC. However, given the cash generated by
our insurance subsidiaries operations and the
37
relatively short duration of their investment portfolios, we do
not currently foresee any such shortfall.
In connection with the execution of the merger agreement with Fairfax on October 28, 2010, the
Company has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to liquidate its investment portfolio
provided the Company has no obligation to sell any investment for an amount less than its September
30, 2010 market value.
Non-insurance Subsidiaries
. The primary sources of our non-insurance subsidiaries cash are
commissions and fees, policy fees, administrative fees and claims handling and loss control fees.
The primary uses of our non-insurance subsidiaries cash are commissions paid to brokers, operating
expenses, taxes and dividends paid to FMFC. There are generally no restrictions on the payment of
dividends by our non-insurance subsidiaries, except as may be set forth in our borrowing
arrangements.
Cash Flows
Our sources of funds have consisted primarily of net written premiums, commissions and fees,
investment income and proceeds from the issuance of equity securities and debt. We use operating
cash primarily to pay operating expenses and losses and loss adjustment expenses, for purchasing
investments and for paying shareholder dividends. A summary of our cash flows is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
66,244
|
|
|
$
|
65,268
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(57,220
|
)
|
|
|
(71,175
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(9,528
|
)
|
|
|
(9,721
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(504
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 was primarily from cash received on net written premiums and less cash disbursed for operating
expenses and losses and loss adjustment expenses. A majority of the cash received from net written
premiums for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was retained on a funds withheld
basis in accordance with the quota share reinsurance contracts.
Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
primarily resulted from our net investment in short-term, debt and equity securities.
Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was
primarily for the payment of shareholders dividends, partially offset by net borrowings of $26.0
million on the Companys revolving credit facility and funds received from the exercise of stock
options.
Based on historical trends, market conditions, and our business plans, we believe that our
existing resources and sources of funds will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs in the next
twelve months. Because economic, market and regulatory conditions may change, however, there can
be no assurances that our funds will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs. In addition,
competition, pricing, the frequency and severity of losses and interest rates could significantly
affect our short-term and long-term liquidity needs.
Stockholders Equity
Our total stockholders equity was $301.7 million, or $16.99 per outstanding share, as of
September 30, 2010 compared to $316.1 million, or $18.40 per outstanding share, as of December 31,
2009. Our tangible stockholders equity attributable to common shareholders was $252.7 million, or
$14.24 per outstanding share, as of September 30, 2010 compared to $266.1 million, or $15.49 per
outstanding share as of December 31, 2009. Below is a reconciliation of our total stockholders
equity to our tangible stockholders equity attributable to common shareholders:
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share
|
|
|
|
data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
301,699
|
|
|
$
|
316,084
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
(35,590
|
)
|
|
|
(37,104
|
)
|
Deferred tax liability intangible assets, net
|
|
|
12,083
|
|
|
|
12,613
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(25,483
|
)
|
|
|
(25,483
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible stockholders equity attributable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
252,709
|
|
|
$
|
266,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,752,360
|
|
|
|
17,181,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
16.99
|
|
|
$
|
18.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible book value per share
|
|
$
|
14.24
|
|
|
$
|
15.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per share is total common stockholders equity divided by the number of common
shares outstanding. Tangible book value per share is book value per share excluding the value of
intangible assets, goodwill, and the deferred tax liability related to intangible assets divided by
the number of common shares outstanding.
Long-term debt
Junior Subordinated Debentures
. We have $67.0 million cumulative principal amount of floating
rate junior subordinated debentures outstanding. The debentures were issued in connection with the
issuance of trust preferred stock by our wholly-owned, non-consolidated trusts. Cumulative
interest on $46.4 million cumulative principal amount of the debentures is payable quarterly in
arrears at a variable annual rate, reset quarterly, equal to the three month LIBOR plus 3.75% for
$8.2 million, the three month LIBOR plus 4.00% for $12.4 million, and the three month LIBOR plus
3.0% for $25.8 million principal amount of the debentures. Cumulative interest on $20.6 million of
the cumulative principal amount of the debentures is payable quarterly in arrears at a fixed annual
rate of 8.25% through December 15, 2012, and a variable annual rate, reset quarterly, equal to the
three month LIBOR plus 3.30% thereafter. For our floating rate junior subordinated debentures, we
have entered into interest rate swap agreements to pay a fixed rate of interest. See Derivative
Financial Instruments for further discussion. At September 30, 2010, the three month LIBOR rate
was 0.29%. We may defer the payment of interest for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods;
however, no such deferral has been made.
Credit Agreement
. Our credit agreement, as amended, provides for borrowings of up to $30.0
million. At September 30, 2010 borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest equal to the
greater of: (i) the prime rate, subject to a minimum of 2.50%; or (ii) a rate per annum equal to
LIBOR plus an applicable margin which is currently 2.0%, or with respect to certain other
borrowings, a rate negotiated between the Company and the lender. The obligations under the credit
agreement are guaranteed by our material non-insurance subsidiaries. At September 30, 2010, there
were $30.0 million of borrowings under the agreement, which represents the full amount of the
lenders commitment to the Company. At September 30, 2010, the interest rate on the $30.0 million
of borrowings was 2.3%. The credit agreement also contains various restrictive covenants that
relate to the Companys shareholders equity, leverage ratio, fixed charge coverage ratio, surplus
and risk based capital, and A.M. Best Ratings of its insurance subsidiaries. On April 30, 2010,
the Company renegotiated the terms of its existing credit agreement with its lender. The revised
terms allowed for the payment of the special dividend without violation of the covenants of the
credit agreement. In addition, the credit agreements maturity date was extended from September
30, 2011 to September 30, 2013 and the credit agreements financial covenants were revised. The
Company was in compliance with the restrictive covenants at September 30, 2010.
Derivative Financial Instruments
. Financial derivatives are used as part of the overall asset
and liability risk management process. We use interest rate swap agreements with a combined
notional amount of $45.0 million in order to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations with
respect to our junior subordinated debentures. In September 2009, the Company entered into two
interest rate swap agreements which expire in August 2014. Under one of the swap agreements we pay
interest at a fixed rate of 3.695% and under the other swap agreement we pay interest at a fixed
rate of 3.710%. Under our third swap agreement, which expires in December 2011, we pay interest at
a fixed rate of 5.013%. Under all three swap agreements, we receive interest at the three
month LIBOR, which is equal to the contractual rate under the junior subordinated debentures.
At September 30, 2010, we had no exposure to credit loss on the interest rate swap agreements.
39
Cash and Invested Assets
Our cash and invested assets consist of fixed maturity securities, convertible securities,
equity securities, and cash and cash equivalents. At September 30, 2010, our investments had a
market value of $771.6 million and consisted of the following investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
% of Portfolio
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short Term Investments
|
|
$
|
40,710
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
U.S. Treasuries
|
|
|
3,845
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
U.S. Agencies
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Municipal Bonds
|
|
|
195,590
|
|
|
|
25.3
|
%
|
Taxable Municipal Bonds
|
|
|
9,979
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
|
135,988
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
High Yield Bonds
|
|
|
32,472
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
MBS Passthroughs
|
|
|
52,235
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
CMOs
|
|
|
100,232
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
Asset Backed Securities
|
|
|
28,168
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
Commercial MBS
|
|
|
61,865
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
Convertible Securities
|
|
|
73,352
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
High Yield Convertible Fund
|
|
|
20,460
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
Structured Finance Fund
|
|
|
14,207
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
Preferred Stocks
|
|
|
1,449
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
771,594
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the composition of the investment portfolio by remaining time to
maturity at September 30, 2010. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because
borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties. Additionally, the expected maturities of our investments in putable bonds fluctuate
inversely with interest rates and therefore may also differ from contractual maturities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
|
Average Life
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one year
|
|
|
20.6
|
%
|
One to two years
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
Two to three years
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
Three to four years
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
Four to five years
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
Five to seven years
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
More than seven years
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective duration of the portfolio as of September 30, 2010 is approximately 3.2 years
and the taxable equivalent duration is 2.9 years. Excluding cash and cash equivalents, equity and
convertible securities, the portfolio duration and taxable equivalent duration are 3.6 years and
3.3 years, respectively. The shorter taxable equivalent duration reflects the significant portion
of the portfolio in municipal securities. The annualized investment yield on total investments
(net of investment expenses) was 4.7% at September 30, 2010 and 5.0% at September 30, 2009. The
annualized taxable equivalent yield on total investments (net of investment expenses) was 5.1% and
5.5% at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The majority of our portfolio consists of AAA or AA rated securities with a Standard and
Poors weighted average credit quality of A+ at September 30, 2010. The fixed income portfolio had
a weighted average credit quality of AA- at September 30, 2010. The majority of the investments
rated BBB and below are convertible securities and opportunistic investments in high yield credit
and non-agency mortgage-backed securities. Consistent with our investment policy, we review any
security if it falls below BBB- and assess whether it should be held or sold. The following table
shows the ratings distribution of our investment portfolio as of September 30, 2010 as a percentage
of total market value.
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
|
S&P Rating
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
|
45.5
|
%
|
AA
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
A
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
BBB
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
BB
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
B
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
CCC
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
CC
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
D
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within Mortgages, the Company invests in residential collateralized mortgage obligations
(CMO) that typically have high credit quality and are expected to provide an advantage in yield
compared to U.S. Treasury securities. The Companys investment strategy is to purchase CMO
tranches which offer the most favorable return given the risks involved. One significant risk
evaluated is prepayment sensitivity. While prepayment risk (either shortening or lengthening of
duration) and its effect on total return cannot be fully controlled, particularly when interest
rates move dramatically, the investment process generally favors securities that control this risk
within expected interest rate ranges. The Company does not purchase residual interests in CMOs.
At September 30, 2010, the Company held CMOs classified as available-for-sale with a fair
value of $100.2 million. Approximately 55.4% of those CMO holdings were guaranteed by or fully
collateralized by securities issued by a full faith and credit agency such as GNMA, or government
sponsored enterprises (GSE) such as FNMA or FHLMC. In addition, at September 30, 2010, the
Company held $51.6 million of mortgage-backed pass-through securities issued by one of the GSEs
and classified as available-for-sale.
The Company held commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) of $61.9 million, of which
82.6% are pre-2006 vintage, at September 30, 2010. The weighted average credit support (adjusted
for defeasance) of our CMBS portfolio was 46.0% and comprised mainly of super senior structures.
The weighted average loan to value at origination was 66.8%. The average credit rating of these
securities was AAA. The CMBS portfolio was supported by loans that were diversified across
economic sectors and geographical areas. It is not believed that this portfolio exposes the
Company to a material adverse impact on its results of operations, financial position or liquidity,
due to the underlying credit strength of these securities.
The Companys fixed maturity investment portfolio included asset-backed securities and
collateralized mortgage obligations collateralized by sub-prime mortgages and alternative
documentation mortgages (Alt-A) with market values of $14.9 million and $20.8 million at
September 30, 2010, respectively. Included in these securities is a recent allocation to a manager
who specializes in opportunities in the non-agency mortgage sector. The Company defines sub-prime
mortgage-backed securities as investments with weighted average FICO scores below 650. Alt-A
securities are defined by above-prime interest rates, high loan-to-value ratios, high
debt-to-income ratios, low loan documentation (e.g., limited or no verification of income and
assets), or other characteristics that are inconsistent with conventional underwriting standards
employed by government-sponsored mortgage entities. The average credit rating on these securities
and obligations held by the Company at September 30, 2010 was B+.
The Companys fixed maturity investment portfolio at September 30, 2010 included securities
issued by numerous municipalities with a total carrying value of $205.6 million. Approximately
$9.0 million, or 4.4%, were pre-refunded (escrowed with Treasuries). Approximately $87.6 million,
or 42.6%, of the securities were enhanced by third-party insurance for the payment of principal and
interest in the event of an issuer default. Such insurance, prior to the downgrades of many of the
third party insurers, resulted in a rating of AAA being assigned by independent rating agencies to
those securities. The downgrade of credit ratings of insurers of these securities could result in
a corresponding downgrade in the ratings of the securities from AA+ to the underlying rating of the
respective security without giving effect to the benefit of insurance. Of the total $87.6 million
of insured municipal securities in the Companys investment portfolio at September 30, 2010, 98.7%
were rated at A- or above, and approximately 83.7% were rated AA- or above, without the benefit of
insurance. The average underlying credit rating of the entire municipal bond portfolio was AA+ at
September 30, 2010. The Company believes that a loss of the benefit of insurance would not result
in a material adverse impact on the Companys results of operations, financial position or
liquidity, due to the underlying credit strength of the issuers of the securities, as well as the
Companys ability and intent to hold the securities.
41
The Companys investment portfolio does not contain any exposure to Collateralized Debt
Obligations (CDO) or investments collateralized by CDOs. In addition, the Companys investment
portfolio does not contain any exposure to auction-rate securities.
Cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash on hand of $13.8 million at September 30, 2010.
In connection with the execution of the merger agreement with Fairfax, the Company has agreed
to use commercially reasonable efforts to liquidate its investment portfolio, which was $771.6
million at September 30, 2010, provided the Company has no obligation to sell any investment for an
amount less than its September 30, 2010 market value.
Refer to Note 4 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion and analysis
of other than temporary impairments of investment securities.
Refer to Note 16 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion and
analysis of events that occurred after September 30, 2010 that could impact our liquidity and
financial position.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
We defer a portion of the costs of acquiring insurance business, primarily commissions and
certain policy underwriting and issuance costs, which vary with and are primarily related to the
production of insurance business. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, $40.2 million of
the costs were deferred. Deferred policy acquisition costs totaled $24.2 million, or 28.0% of
unearned premiums (net of reinsurance), at September 30, 2010.
Reinsurance
The following table illustrates our direct written premiums and premiums ceded for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct written premiums
|
|
$
|
236,132
|
|
|
$
|
228,619
|
|
Ceded written premiums
|
|
|
101,858
|
|
|
|
92,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net written premiums
|
|
$
|
134,274
|
|
|
$
|
136,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceded written premiums as percentage of
direct written premiums
|
|
|
43.1
|
%
|
|
|
40.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table illustrates the effect of our reinsurance ceded strategies on our results
of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceded written premiums
|
|
$
|
101,858
|
|
|
$
|
92,615
|
|
Ceded premiums earned
|
|
|
96,160
|
|
|
|
81,752
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses ceded
|
|
|
68,288
|
|
|
|
59,604
|
|
Ceding commissions
|
|
|
23,594
|
|
|
|
21,897
|
|
Our net cash flows relating to ceded reinsurance activities (premiums paid less losses
recovered and ceding commissions received) were approximately $41.6 million net cash paid for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to net cash paid of $24.9 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009.
The assuming reinsurer is obligated to indemnify the ceding company to the extent of the
coverage ceded. The inability to recover amounts due from reinsurers could result in significant
losses to us. To protect us from reinsurance recoverable losses, FMIC seeks to enter into
42
reinsurance agreements with financially strong reinsurers. Our senior executives evaluate the
credit risk of each reinsurer before entering into a contract and monitor the financial strength of
the reinsurer. On September 30, 2010, substantially all reinsurance contracts to which we were a
party were with companies with A.M. Best ratings of A or better. One reinsurance contract to
which we were a party was with a reinsurer that does not carry an A.M. Best rating. For this
contract, we required full collateralization of our recoverable via a grantor trust. In addition,
ceded reinsurance contracts contain trigger clauses through which FMIC can initiate cancellation
including immediate return of all ceded unearned premiums at its option, or which result in
immediate collateralization of ceded reserves by the assuming company in the event of a financial
strength rating downgrade, thus limiting credit exposure. On September 30, 2010, there was no
allowance for uncollectible reinsurance, as all reinsurance balances were current and there were no
disputes with reinsurers.
On September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, FMFC had a net amount of recoverables from
reinsurers of $272.9 million and $228.7 million, respectively, on a consolidated basis.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued an update to the
Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC)
related to fair value measurements and disclosures. This ASC update provides for additional
disclosure requirements to improve the transparency and comparability of fair value information in
financial reporting. Specifically, the new guidance requires separate disclosure of the amounts of
significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, as well as the reasons for the transfers, and
separate disclosure for the purchases, sales, issuances and settlement activity in Level 3. In
addition, this ASC update requires fair value measurement disclosure for each class of assets and
liabilities, and disclosures about the input and valuation techniques used to measure fair value
for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements in Levels 2 and 3. The new disclosures
and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for annual or interim reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide Level 3 activity detail
which will become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim
periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. These amendments do not require
disclosures for earlier periods presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption. The
adoption of this guidance during the first quarter of 2010 is included in Note 5, Fair Value
Measurements to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
In September 2009, the FASB issued updated guidance on the accounting for variable interest
entities that eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and the
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation of the previous guidance for determining which
company, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The guidance
requires an analysis of whether a company has: (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable
interest entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (2) the
obligation to absorb the losses that could potentially be significant to the entity or the right to
receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the entity. An
entity is required to be re-evaluated as a variable interest entity when the holders of the equity
investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar rights to direct the
activities that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. Additional
disclosures are required about a companys involvement in variable interest entities and an ongoing
assessment of whether a company is the primary beneficiary. The guidance is effective for all
variable interest entities owned on or formed after January 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance
during the first quarter of 2010 did not have a material effect on the Companys results of
operations, financial position or liquidity.
Prospective Accounting Standards
In October 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-26,
Financial
Services Insurance (Topic 944): Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing
Insurance Contracts
. The ASU amends
FASB Accounting Standards Codification
Topic 944,
Financial
Services Insurance
to address diversity in practice regarding the interpretation of which costs
relating to the acquisition of new or renewal insurance contracts qualify for deferral. ASU
2010-26 reflects the consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 09-G,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts. The guidance in
the ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning
after December 15, 2011, and should be applied prospectively upon adoption. Retrospective
application to all prior periods presented upon the date of adoption also is permitted, but not
required.
The guidance provides that the deferral of acquisition costs will be limited to incremental
direct costs of contract acquisition that are incurred in transactions with independent third
parties. In addition, future cash flows attributable to advertising costs should be accounted for
using the direct-response advertising guidance in Subtopic 340-20 for capitalization purposes. The
capitalized costs would then be treated as deferred acquisition costs pursuant to Subtopic 944-30
for classification, subsequent measurement and premium deficiency purposes. Prospective
application is required, with retrospective application permitted.
43
The adoption of this guidance will likely have a material effect on the Companys results of
operations and financial position. In the period of adoption and thereafter, the Company expects
to capitalize less acquisition costs than those that would have been capitalized if the previous
guidance had been applied, due to the narrowed definition of what constitutes an acquisition cost
eligible for capitalization. The result will be a decrease in the Deferred acquisition costs asset
balance in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, compared to the balance if the previous guidance had
been applied. This lower asset balance will also result in lower amortization expense, presented
as Amortization of deferred acquisition expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Income, in the
period of adoption and thereafter compared to amortization recorded under the previous guidance.
Lastly, by deferring less expense in the period of adoption and future periods, the result is an
increase in expenses classified as Underwriting, agency and other in the Consolidated Statement of
Income compared to those recorded if the previous guidance had been applied.
44
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Refer to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for a
complete discussion of the Companys market risk. There have been no material changes to the
market risk information included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded, based on
their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that
the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to
allow timely decisions regarding financial disclosures. There was no change in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2010
that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
45
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In September 2009, FMIC and CoverX received from the California Department of Insurance (the
California Department) an Accusation and an Order to Cease and Desist (collectively the
Pleadings). The Pleadings (i) allege that FMIC and CoverX transacted business in California
without the proper licenses, (ii) order FMIC and CoverX to stop transacting any business in
California for which they do not have a license and (iii) seek the revocation of CoverXs existing
California fire and casualty producer license. In October 2009, the Pleadings were expanded to
include FM Emerald. Although the Pleadings seek to revoke CoverXs and FM Emeralds existing
California fire and casualty producer licenses, the California Department has agreed that CoverX
and FM Emerald may continue to produce California business, and that FMIC may continue to insure
California risks as long as these risks are produced by CoverX and FM Emerald personnel located
outside the State of California, which is how the Company is currently conducting business. The
Pleadings also assert a right to seek monetary penalties. FMIC, CoverX and FM Emerald have denied
the allegations in the Pleadings, and CoverX and FM Emerald have requested a hearing on the action
to revoke their respective fire and casualty producer licenses. FMIC, CoverX and FM Emerald have
also been conferring with the California Department to obtain surplus lines broker licenses and
resolve these issues. While it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of any legal
proceeding, we believe the outcome of these proceedings will not result in a material adverse
effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
We are, from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of
business, including litigation involving claims with respect to policies that we write. We do not
believe that the resolution of any currently pending legal proceedings, either individually or
taken as a whole, will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or
financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following are material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Failure to complete the pending merger with Fairfax could materially and adversely affect our
results of operations and our stock price.
On October 28, 2010, we entered into a Merger Agreement with Fairfax, pursuant to which
Fairfax will acquire all of our outstanding shares for $16.50 per share in cash pursuant to a
merger of our company with and into an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Fairfax (the Merger).
Following the consummation of the Merger, we will continue as the surviving corporation and will
be a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fairfax. The Merger is subject to certain closing conditions,
including, but not limited to, approval by our stockholders of the adoption of the Merger
Agreement, antitrust clearance and other insurance regulatory approvals. We cannot assure you that
these conditions will be satisfied or waived, that the necessary approvals will be obtained, or the
Merger will be successfully completed as contemplated under the Merger Agreement or at all. If for
any reason the Merger is not consummated, our stockholders will not receive the cash consideration
in the Merger and our stock price would likely decline unless some other party were to offer an
equivalent or higher price for our shares (and we have no expectation that there is any other party
willing to offer an equivalent or higher price); and under some circumstances, we may have to pay a
termination fee to Fairfax of 3% of the aggregate consideration to be paid in the Merger and/or
reimburse Fairfax for its out-of-pocket transaction-related expenses up to $1.5 million.
In addition, the pendency of the Merger could adversely affect our operations because:
|
|
|
the attention of our management and our employees may be diverted from
day-to-day operations as they focus on the Merger;
|
|
|
|
|
our insureds, distribution partners and other business partners may cease or
delay conducting business with us as a result of the announcement of the Merger, which
could cause our revenues to materially decline or any anticipated increases in revenues to
be lower than expected;
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract new employees and retain our existing employees may be
harmed by uncertainties associated with the Merger, and we may be required to incur
substantial costs to recruit replacements for lost personnel or consultants; and
|
|
|
|
|
stockholder lawsuits could be filed against us challenging the Merger. If this
occurs, even if the lawsuits are groundless and we ultimately prevail, we may incur
substantial legal fees and expenses defending these lawsuits, and the Merger could be
prevented or delayed.
|
46
The occurrence of any of these events individually or in combination could have a material
adverse affect on our results of operations and our stock price. As a result of the occurrence of
any of these events, if the Merger is not completed, our business and operating results could be
materially adversely affected.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, we are required to use commercially reasonable
efforts to sell our non-cash investments which could in the long-term adversely affect our
investment portfolio and business.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, we are required to use commercially reasonable
efforts to sell all of our non-cash investments held by the Company for cash or treasury bills. As
of September 30, 2010, the market value of our investment portfolio was $771.6 million. This
requirement could cause us to liquidate our non-cash investments on terms that are not as
advantageous to our Company in the long-term as the current non-cash investments that we have.
Currently, our results of operations will be adversely affected due to earning less investment
income by liquidating our investment portfolio for lower yielding assets. In the event that the
Merger is not completed, we may not be able to reinvest these amounts on terms that are as
advantageous to us, and as a result, our business, results of operations or financial position in
the long-term could be materially adversely affected.
Item 6. Exhibits
See Index of Exhibits following the signature page, which is incorporated herein by reference.
47
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIRST MERCURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ RICHARD H. SMITH
|
|
|
|
Richard H. Smith
|
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ JOHN A. MARAZZA
|
|
|
|
John A. Marazza
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
November 9, 2010
|
|
48
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 28, 2010, by and among Fairfax Holdings Limited, Fairfax
Investments III USA Corp. and the Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 (a)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 (b)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 (a)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 (b)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on November 1, 2010
|
|
(2)
|
|
Filed herewith
|
49
First Mercury Financial Corp (NYSE:FMR)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 10월(10) 2024 으로 11월(11) 2024
First Mercury Financial Corp (NYSE:FMR)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 11월(11) 2023 으로 11월(11) 2024