Indicate by check mark whether
the registrant has fi led a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control
over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C.7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that
prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
This Amendment on Form
20-F/A is being filed by XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. (the “Company”) as Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to
its Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 (the “Original Filing”) originally filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 15, 2021 (the “Original Filing Date”). The purpose
of this Amendment is to restate the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 and for the three years ended
December 31, 2020. The restatement is required due to incorrectly classifying the Company’s warrants as equity instead of liabilities
with fair value accounting through profit and loss. This misstatement is a result of inappropriately assuming that a cashless exercise
mechanism of the Company's warrants was removed during 2018.
On May 18, 2021, the
Company concluded, with concurrence from the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) that the previously
issued consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2020, should no longer be relied upon because of misstatement in such financial
statements.
As a result of such misstatement,
the Company concluded that the previously issued consolidated financial statements in the Original Filing were materially misstated and
as such, has restated these financial statements in this Amendment.
Further, as a result of
the restatement, changes have been made to the financial information under Item 3 – Key Information, Item 5 – Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects, Item 15 – Controls and Procedures and Item 18 – Consolidated Financial Statements. Management,
under the supervision and participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, has conducted an evaluation of
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020 using criteria established in Internal
Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO and, based on this evaluation, concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures and internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2020 as a result of the material weakness
in our internal control over financial reporting. For a description of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting
and for an amended management’s annual report on internal controls over financial reporting, see Item 15 – Controls and Procedures
of this Amendment.
Except for the changes
described above and in Note 21 to the financial statements included herein, this Amendment continues to present information as of the
Original Filing and does not purport to amend, update or restate the information in any other item of the Annual Report as originally
filed with the SEC. This Amendment includes currently dated certifications from our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer, as required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the inclusion of a reissued Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm with respect to the restated financial statements of December 31, 2020 as of May 18, 2021.
PART
I
Unless
the context requires otherwise, references in this report to “XTL,” the “Company,” “we,” “us”
and “our” refer to XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd, an Israeli company and our consolidated subsidiary. We have prepared our consolidated
financial statements in United States, or US, dollars and in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS. All
references herein to “dollars” or “$” are to US dollars, and all references to “Shekels” or “NIS”
are to New Israeli Shekels.
ITEM
1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not
applicable
ITEM
2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not
applicable
ITEM
3. KEY INFORMATION
A.
Selected Financial Data
The tables below present
selected financial data for the fiscal years ended and as of December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016. We have derived the selected
financial data for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, and as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, from our restated
audited consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this report and prepared in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) We have derived
the selected financial data for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, and as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, from our
audited consolidated financial statements not included in this report. You should read the selected financial data in conjunction with
“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects,” “Item 8. Financial Information” and “Item 18. Consolidated
Financial Statements.”
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss):
|
|
Year
ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
U.S
Dollars in thousands (except for per share information)
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and development expenses
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
General and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
(910
|
)
|
|
|
(807
|
)
|
|
|
(755
|
)
|
|
|
(1,203
|
)
|
|
|
(1,270
|
)
|
Impairment of intangible
assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
loss
|
|
|
(948
|
)
|
|
|
(842
|
)
|
|
|
(793
|
)
|
|
|
(1,246
|
)
|
|
|
(2,561
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance cost related
to warrants to investors
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Revaluation of
warrants to purchase ADS’s
|
|
|
(2,172
|
)
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
1,618
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Revaluation of
marketable securities – InterCure Ltd
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
2,753
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other finance income
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Other
finance expenses
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
income (expenses), net
|
|
|
(2,006
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
4,423
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,954
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
(781
|
)
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive
income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items that might
be classified to profit or loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes
in the fair value of available-for-sale financial assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,954
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive income (loss) for the year
|
|
|
(2,954
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) for
the year attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders
of the Company
|
|
|
(2,954
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
(781
|
)
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
Non-controlling
interests
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,954
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
(781
|
)
|
|
|
(2,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income (loss) for the year attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders
of the Company
|
|
|
(2,954
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
Non-controlling
interests
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,954
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
earnings (loss) from continuing and discontinued operations (in US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations
|
|
|
(0.006
|
)
|
|
|
(0.001
|
)
|
|
|
0.007
|
|
|
|
(0.002
|
)
|
|
|
(0.009
|
)
|
From discontinued
operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Basic
and diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
(0.006
|
)
|
|
|
(0.001
|
)
|
|
|
0.007
|
|
|
|
(0.002
|
)
|
|
|
(0.009
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
number of issued ordinary shares
|
|
|
514,205,799
|
|
|
|
514,205,799
|
|
|
|
514,205,799
|
|
|
|
470,188,629
|
|
|
|
274,035,533
|
|
*
– less than one thousand.
Consolidated
Statements of Financial Position Data:
|
|
As
of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
U.S
Dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash,
cash equivalents and short-term bank deposits
|
|
|
3,631
|
|
|
|
4,455
|
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
5,796
|
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
Working capital*
|
|
|
5,867
|
|
|
|
6,598
|
|
|
|
7,942
|
|
|
|
5,906
|
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
6,503
|
|
|
|
7,212
|
|
|
|
8,575
|
|
|
|
6,586
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
Long term liabilities
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
|
|
2,667
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
3,612
|
|
|
|
6,515
|
|
|
|
7,273
|
|
|
|
3,619
|
|
|
|
2,687
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
*
Working capital is calculated as current assets less current liabilities.
B. Capitalization
And Indebtedness
Not
applicable.
C. Reasons
For Offer And Use Of Proceeds
Not
applicable.
D. Risk
Factors
Before
you invest in our ordinary shares or American Depositary Shares, you should understand the high degree of risk involved. You should carefully
consider the risks described below and other information in this report, including our consolidated financial statements and related
notes included elsewhere in this report, before you decide to purchase our ordinary shares or American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”).
If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected. As
a result, the trading price of our ordinary shares or ADSs could decline and you could lose part or all of your investment.
Risk factor Summary
|
●
|
We
have incurred substantial operating losses since our inception. We expect to continue to
incur losses in the future in our drug development activity and may never become profitable.
|
|
●
|
Raising
additional capital may cause dilution to our existing stockholders, restrict our operations
or require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or product candidates.
|
|
●
|
We
have not yet commercialized any products or technologies, and we may never become profitable.
|
|
●
|
If
we are unable to successfully complete our clinical trial programs for our drug candidates,
or if such clinical trials take longer to complete than we project, our ability to execute
our current business strategy will be adversely affected.
|
|
●
|
We
have limited experience in conducting and managing clinical trials necessary to obtain regulatory
approvals. If our drug candidates and technologies do not receive the necessary regulatory
approvals, we will be unable to commercialize our products.
|
|
●
|
If
third parties on which we will have to rely for clinical trials do not perform as contractually
required or as we expect, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize
our products.
|
|
●
|
Our
international clinical trials may be delayed or otherwise adversely impacted by social, political
and economic factors affecting the particular foreign country.
|
|
●
|
If
the clinical data related to our drug candidates and technologies do not confirm positive
early clinical data or preclinical data, our corporate strategy and financial results will
be adversely impacted.
|
|
●
|
If
we do not establish or maintain drug development and marketing arrangements with third parties,
we may be unable to commercialize our drug candidates and technologies into products.
|
|
●
|
Even
if we or our collaborative/strategic partners or potential collaborative/strategic partners
receive approval to market our drug candidates, if our products fail to achieve market acceptance,
we will never record meaningful revenues.
|
|
●
|
If
the third parties upon whom we rely to manufacture our products do not successfully manufacture
our products, our business will be harmed.
|
|
●
|
If
our competitors develop and market products that are less expensive, more effective or safer
than our products, our revenues and results may be harmed and our commercial opportunities
may be reduced or eliminated.
|
|
●
|
If
we lose our key personnel or are unable to attract and retain additional personnel, our business
could be harmed.
|
|
●
|
Our
Chief Financial Officer is not required to work exclusively for us, which could materially
and adversely affect us and our business.
|
|
●
|
We
face product liability risks and may not be able to obtain adequate insurance.
|
|
●
|
Because
all of our proprietary drug candidates and technologies are licensed to us by third parties,
termination of these license agreements could prevent us from developing our drug candidates.
|
|
●
|
If
we are unable to adequately protect our intellectual property, third parties may be able
to use our technology, which could adversely affect our ability to compete in the market.
|
|
●
|
Litigation
or third-party claims of intellectual property infringement could require us to spend substantial
time, money and other resources defending such claims and adversely affect our ability to
develop and commercialize our products.
|
|
●
|
The
ADSs are traded in small volumes, limiting ability to sell ADSs that represent ordinary shares
at a desirable price, if at all.
|
|
●
|
Our
stock price can be volatile, which increases the risk of litigation and may result in a significant
decline in the value of your investment.
|
|
●
|
Concentration
of ownership of our ordinary shares among our principal stockholders may prevent new investors
from influencing significant corporate decisions.
|
|
●
|
Our
ordinary shares and ADSs trade on two different markets, and this may result in price variations
and regulatory compliance issues.
|
|
●
|
Holders
of our ordinary shares or ADSs who are U.S. citizens or residents may be required to pay
additional income taxes.
|
|
●
|
As
a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance
practices instead of applicable SEC and Nasdaq requirements, which may result in less protection
than is accorded to investors under rules applicable to domestic issuers.
|
|
●
|
ADS
holders are not shareholders and do not have shareholder rights.
|
|
●
|
There
are circumstances where it may be unlawful or impractical to make distributions to the holders
of the ADSs.
|
|
●
|
We
may fail to remain in compliance with the continued listing standards of the Nasdaq Capital
Market and a delisting of our ADSs could make it more difficult for investors to sell their
shares
|
|
●
|
Conditions
in the Middle East and in Israel may harm our operations.
|
|
●
|
Our
results of operations may be adversely affected by inflation and foreign currency fluctuations.
|
|
●
|
Provisions
of Israeli law may delay, prevent or otherwise impede a merger with, or an acquisition of,
our company, which could prevent a change of control, even when the terms of such a transaction
are favorable to us and our shareholders.
|
|
●
|
It
may be difficult to enforce a U.S. judgment against us, our officers or our directors or
to assert U.S. securities law claims in Israel.
|
|
●
|
Under
applicable U.S. and Israeli law, we may not be able to enforce covenants not to compete and
therefore may be unable to prevent our competitors from benefiting from the expertise of
some of our former employees. In addition, employees may be entitled to seek compensation
for their inventions irrespective of their agreements with us, which in turn could impact
our future profitability.
|
|
●
|
Your
rights and responsibilities as a shareholder will be governed by Israeli law which may differ
in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders of U.S. companies.
|
Risks
Related to Our Financial Position and Capital Requirements
We
have incurred substantial operating losses since our inception. We expect to continue to incur losses in the future in our drug development
activity and may never become profitable.
You
should consider our prospects in light of the risks and difficulties frequently encountered by development stage companies. We have incurred
operating losses since our inception and expect to continue to incur operating losses for the foreseeable future. We have not yet commercialized
any of our drug candidates or technologies and cannot be sure we will ever be able to do so. Even if we commercialize one or more of
our drug candidates or technologies, we may not become profitable. Our ability to achieve profitability depends on a number of factors,
including our ability to complete our development efforts, consummate out-licensing agreements, obtain regulatory approval for our drug
candidates and technologies and successfully commercialize them.
We
expect to continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future, and these losses will likely increase as we:
|
●
|
initiate
and manage pre-clinical development and clinical trials for our current and new product candidates;
|
|
●
|
seek
regulatory approvals for our product candidates;
|
|
●
|
implement
internal systems and infrastructures;
|
|
●
|
seek
to license additional technologies to develop;
|
|
●
|
hire
management and other personnel; and
|
|
●
|
progress
product candidates towards commercialization.
|
If
our product candidates fail in clinical trials or do not gain regulatory clearance or approval, or if our product candidates do not achieve
market acceptance, we may never become profitable. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability
on a quarterly or annual basis. Our inability to achieve and then maintain profitability would negatively affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations, and cash flows. Moreover, our prospects must be considered in light of the risks and uncertainties
encountered by an early-stage company and in highly regulated and competitive markets, such as the biopharmaceutical market, where regulatory
approval and market acceptance of our products are uncertain. There can be no assurance that our efforts will ultimately be successful
or result in revenues or profits.
We
will require substantial additional financing to achieve our goals, and a failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed could
force us to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or commercialization efforts.
As of December 31, 2020,
we had approximately $3,631 thousand in cash, cash equivalents and short-term bank deposits, working capital of approximately $5,867
thousand and an accumulated deficit of approximately $155,605 thousand. We have incurred continuing losses and depend on outside financing
resources to continue our activities. Based on existing business plans, we estimate that our outstanding cash and cash equivalent balances
will allow us to finance our activities for an additional period of at least 12 months from the date of this Report. In order to perform
clinical trials aimed at developing our product until obtaining its marketing approval, we will need to raise additional financing by
issuing securities. Should we fail to raise additional capital under terms acceptable to us, we will be required to reduce our development
activities or sell or grant a sublicense to third parties to use all or part of our technologies.
We
have expended and believe that, subject to receiving adequate financing and/or entering into a collaboration agreement, we will continue
to expend significant operating and capital expenditures for the foreseeable future developing our product candidates. These expenditures
will include, but are not limited to, costs associated with research and development, manufacturing, conducting preclinical experiments
and clinical trials, contracting with contract manufacturing organizations and contract research organizations, hiring additional management
and other personnel and obtaining regulatory approvals, as well as commercializing any products approved for sale. Because the outcome
of our planned and anticipated clinical trials is highly uncertain, we cannot reasonably estimate the actual amounts necessary to successfully
complete the development and commercialization of our product candidates and any other future product. In addition, other unanticipated
costs may arise. As a result of these and other factors currently unknown to us, we will require additional funds, through public or
private equity or debt financings or other sources, such as strategic partnerships and alliances and licensing arrangements. In addition,
we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds
for our current or future operating plans. A failure to fund these activities may harm our growth strategy, competitive position, quality
compliance, and financial condition.
Our
future capital requirements depend on many factors, including:
|
●
|
the
number and characteristics of products we develop;
|
|
●
|
the
scope, progress, results and costs of researching and developing our product candidates and conducting preclinical and clinical trials;
|
|
●
|
the
timing of, and the costs involved in, obtaining regulatory approvals;
|
|
●
|
the
cost of commercialization activities if any are approved for sale, including marketing, sales and distribution costs;
|
|
●
|
the
cost of manufacturing any product candidate we successfully commercialize;
|
|
●
|
our
ability to establish and maintain strategic partnerships, licensing, supply or other arrangements and the financial terms of such
agreements;
|
|
●
|
the
costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining, defending and enforcing patent claims, including litigation costs
and the outcome of such litigation;
|
|
●
|
hCDR1
patent expiration in 2024 and failure to obtain patent term extension, expand patent protection or obtain data exclusivity in the
U.S. and Europe;
|
|
●
|
the
costs of in-licensing further patents and technologies.
|
|
●
|
the
cost of development of in-licensed technologies
|
|
●
|
the
timing, receipt and amount of sales of, or royalties on, any future products;
|
|
●
|
the
expenses needed to attract and retain skilled personnel; and
|
|
●
|
any
product liability or other lawsuits related to existing and/or any future products.
|
Additional
funds may not be available when we need them, on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If adequate funds are not available to us
on a timely basis, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate preclinical studies, clinical trials or other research and
development activities for our product candidates or delay, limit, reduce or terminate our establishment of sales and marketing capabilities
or other activities that may be necessary to commercialize our product candidates or any future products.
Raising
additional capital may cause dilution to our existing stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our
technologies or product candidates.
We
may seek additional capital through a combination of private and public equity offerings, debt financings, strategic partnerships and
alliances, and licensing arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt
securities, the ownership interests of existing shareholders will be diluted, and the terms may include liquidation or other preferences
that adversely affect shareholder rights. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting
our ability to take certain actions, such as incurring debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional
funds through strategic partnerships and alliances and licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable
rights to our technologies or product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. If we are unable to raise
additional funds through equity or debt financing when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development
or commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market
ourselves.
Risks
Related to our Drug Development Business
We
have not yet commercialized any products or technologies, and we may never become profitable.
We
have not yet commercialized any products or technologies, and we may never be able to do so. We do not know when or if we will complete
any of our product development efforts, obtain regulatory approval for any product candidates incorporating our technologies or successfully
commercialize any approved products. Even if we are successful in developing products that are approved for marketing, we will not be
successful unless these products gain market acceptance for appropriate indications at favorable reimbursement rates. The degree of market
acceptance of these products will depend on a number of factors, including:
|
●
|
the
timing of regulatory approvals in the countries, and for the uses, we seek;
|
|
●
|
the
competitive environment;
|
|
●
|
the
establishment and demonstration in the medical community of the safety and clinical efficacy of our products and their potential
advantages over existing therapeutic products;
|
|
●
|
our
ability to enter into strategic agreements with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies with strong marketing and sales capabilities;
|
|
●
|
the
adequacy and success of distribution, sales and marketing efforts; and
|
|
●
|
the
pricing and reimbursement policies of government and third-party payors, such as insurance companies, health maintenance organizations
and other plan administrators.
|
Physicians,
patients, third-party payors or the medical community in general may be unwilling to accept, utilize or recommend, and in the case of
third-party payors, cover any of our products or products incorporating our technologies. As a result, we are unable to predict the extent
of future losses or the time required to achieve profitability, if at all. Even if we successfully develop one or more products that
incorporate our technologies, we may not become profitable.
If
we are unable to successfully complete our clinical trial programs for our drug candidates, or if such clinical trials take longer to
complete than we project, our ability to execute our current business strategy will be adversely affected.
Whether
or not and how quickly we complete clinical trials depends in part upon the rate at which we are able to engage clinical trial sites
and, thereafter, the rate of enrollment of patients, and the rate at which we are able to collect, clean, lock and analyze the clinical
trial database. Patient enrollment is a function of many factors, including the size of the patient population, the proximity of patients
to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the study, the existence of competitive clinical trials, and whether existing or new
drugs are approved for the indication we are studying. We are aware that other companies are planning clinical trials that will seek
to enroll patients with the same diseases and stages as we are studying. If we experience delays in identifying and contracting with
sites and/or in patient enrollment in our clinical trial programs, we may incur additional costs and delays in our development programs,
and may not be able to complete our clinical trials on a cost-effective or timely basis.
We
have limited experience in conducting and managing clinical trials necessary to obtain regulatory approvals. If our drug candidates and
technologies do not receive the necessary regulatory approvals, we will be unable to commercialize our products.
We
have not received, and may never receive, regulatory approval for commercial sale for hCDR1. We currently do not have any drug candidates
pending approval with the Food and Drug Administration, or FDA or with regulatory authorities of other countries. We will need to conduct
significant additional research and human testing before we can apply for product approval with the FDA or with regulatory authorities
of other countries. In order to obtain FDA approval to market a new drug product, we or our potential partners must demonstrate proof
of safety and efficacy in humans. To meet these requirements, we and/or our potential partners will have to conduct “adequate and
well-controlled” clinical trials.
Clinical
development is a long, expensive and uncertain process. Clinical trials are very difficult to design and implement, in part because they
are subject to rigorous regulatory requirements. Satisfaction of regulatory requirements typically depends on the nature, complexity
and novelty of the product and requires the expenditure of substantial resources. The commencement and rate of completion of clinical
trials may be delayed by many factors, including:
|
●
|
obtaining
regulatory approvals to commence a clinical trial;
|
|
●
|
reaching
agreement on acceptable terms with prospective CROs, and trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive negotiation
and may vary significantly among different CROs and trial sites;
|
|
●
|
slower
than expected rates of patient recruitment due to narrow screening requirements and competing clinical studies;
|
|
●
|
the
inability of patients to meet protocol requirements imposed by the FDA or other regulatory authorities;
|
|
●
|
the
need or desire to modify our manufacturing process;
|
|
●
|
delays,
suspension, or termination of the clinical trials due to the institutional review board responsible for overseeing the study at a
particular study site; and
|
|
●
|
governmental
or regulatory delays or “clinical holds” requiring suspension or termination of the trials.
|
Following
the completion of a clinical trial, regulators may not interpret data obtained from pre-clinical and clinical tests of our drug candidates
and technologies the same way that we do, which could delay, limit or prevent our receipt of regulatory approval. In addition, the designs
of any clinical trials may not be reviewed or approved by the FDA prior to their commencement, and consequently the FDA could determine
that the parameters of any studies are insufficient to demonstrate proof of safety and efficacy in humans. Failure to approve a completed
study could also result from several other factors, including unforeseen safety issues, the determination of dosing, low rates of patient
recruitment, the inability to monitor patients adequately during or after treatment, the inability or unwillingness of medical investigators
to follow our clinical protocols, and the lack of effectiveness of the trials.
Additionally,
the regulators could determine that the studies indicate the drugs may have serious side effects. In the U.S., this is called a black
box warning, which is a type of warning that appears on the package insert for prescription drugs indicating that they may cause serious
adverse effects. A black box warning means that medical studies indicate that the drug carries a significant risk of serious or even
life-threatening adverse effects.
If
the clinical trials fail to satisfy the criteria required, the FDA and/or other regulatory agencies/authorities may request additional
information, including additional clinical data, before approval of marketing a product. Negative or inconclusive results or medical
events during a clinical trial could also cause us to delay or terminate our development efforts. If we experience delays in the testing
or approval process, or if we need to perform more or larger clinical trials than originally planned, our financial results and the commercial
prospects for our drug candidates and technologies may be materially impaired.
Clinical
trials have a high risk of failure. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry, including biotechnology companies, have suffered
significant setbacks in clinical trials, even after achieving promising results in earlier trials. It may take us many years to complete
the testing of our drug candidates and technologies, and failure can occur at any stage of this process.
Even
if regulatory approval is obtained, our products and their manufacture will be subject to continual review, and there can be no assurance
that such approval will not be subsequently withdrawn or restricted. Changes in applicable legislation or regulatory policies, or discovery
of problems with the products or their manufacture, may result in the imposition of regulatory restrictions, including withdrawal of
the product from the market, or result in increased costs to us.
If
third parties on which we will have to rely for clinical trials do not perform as contractually required or as we expect, we may not
be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our products.
We
will have to depend on independent clinical investigators, and other third-party service providers to conduct the clinical trials of
our drug candidates and technologies. We also may, from time to time, engage a clinical research organization for the execution of our
clinical trials. We will rely heavily on these parties for successful execution of our clinical trials, but we will not control many
aspects of their activities. Nonetheless, we are responsible for confirming that each of our clinical trials is conducted in accordance
with the general investigational plan and protocol. Our reliance on these third parties that we do not control does not relieve us of
our responsibility to comply with the regulations and standards of the FDA and/or other foreign regulatory agencies/authorities relating
to good clinical practices. Third parties may not complete activities on schedule or may not conduct our clinical trials in accordance
with regulatory requirements or the applicable trial’s plans and protocols. The failure of these third parties to carry out their
obligations could delay or prevent the development, approval and commercialization of our products, or could result in enforcement action
against us.
Our
international clinical trials may be delayed or otherwise adversely impacted by social, political and economic factors affecting the
particular foreign country.
We
may conduct clinical trials in different geographical locations. Our ability to successfully initiate, enroll and complete a clinical
trial in any of these countries, or in any future foreign country in which we may initiate a clinical trial, are subject to numerous
risks unique to conducting business in foreign countries, including:
|
●
|
difficulty
in establishing or managing relationships with clinical research organizations and physicians;
|
|
●
|
different
standards for the conduct of clinical trials and/or health care reimbursement;
|
|
●
|
our
inability to locate qualified local consultants, physicians, and partners;
|
|
●
|
the
potential burden of complying with a variety of foreign laws, medical standards and regulatory requirements, including the regulation
of pharmaceutical products and treatment; and
|
|
●
|
general
geopolitical risks, such as political and economic instability, and changes in diplomatic and trade relations.
|
Any
disruption to our international clinical trial program could significantly delay our product development efforts.
If
the clinical data related to our drug candidates and technologies do not confirm positive early clinical data or preclinical data, our
corporate strategy and financial results will be adversely impacted.
Our
drug candidates and technologies are in clinical stages. Specifically, our product candidate, hCDR1 is planned for and/or ready for advanced
clinical studies. In order for our candidates to proceed to later stage clinical testing or marketing approval, they must show positive
clinical results.
Preliminary
results of pre-clinical, clinical observations or clinical tests do not necessarily predict the final results, and promising results
in pre-clinical, clinical observations or early clinical testing might not be obtained in later clinical trials. Drug candidates in the
later stages of clinical development may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy traits despite having progressed through initial
clinical testing. Any negative results from future tests may prevent us from proceeding to later stage clinical testing or marketing
approval, which would materially impact our corporate strategy, and our financial results may be adversely impacted.
If
we do not establish or maintain drug development and marketing arrangements with third parties, we may be unable to commercialize our
drug candidates and technologies into products.
We
do not possess all of the capabilities to fully commercialize our drug candidates and technologies on our own. From time to time, we
may need to contract with third parties to:
|
●
|
assist
us in developing, testing and obtaining regulatory approval for some of our compounds and technologies;
|
|
●
|
manufacture
our drug candidates; and
|
|
●
|
market
and distribute our products.
|
We
can provide no assurance that we will be able to successfully enter into agreements with such third-parties on terms that are acceptable
to us. If we are unable to successfully contract with third parties for these services when needed, or if existing arrangements for these
services are terminated, whether or not through our actions, or if such third parties do not fully perform under these arrangements,
we may have to delay, scale back or end one or more of our drug development programs or seek to develop or commercialize our drug candidates
and technologies independently, which could result in delays. Further, such failure could result in the termination of license rights
to one or more of our drug candidates and technologies. Moreover, if these development or marketing agreements take the form of a partnership
or strategic alliance, such arrangements may provide our collaborators with significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources
that they will apply to the development and commercialization of our products. Accordingly, to the extent that we rely on third parties
to research, develop or commercialize our products, we may be unable to control whether such products will be scientifically or commercially
successful.
Even
if we or our collaborative/strategic partners or potential collaborative/strategic partners receive approval to market our drug candidates,
if our products fail to achieve market acceptance, we will never record meaningful revenues.
Even
if our products are approved for sale, they may not be commercially successful in the marketplace. Market acceptance of our product candidates
will depend on a number of factors, including:
|
●
|
perceptions
by members of the health care community, including physicians, of the safety and efficacy of our products;
|
|
●
|
the
rates of adoption of our products by medical practitioners and the target populations for our products;
|
|
●
|
the
potential advantages that our products offer over existing treatment methods or other products that may be developed;
|
|
●
|
the
cost-effectiveness of our products relative to competing products including potential generic competition;
|
|
●
|
the
availability of government or third-party pay or reimbursement for our products;
|
|
●
|
the
side effects of our products which may lead to unfavorable publicity concerning our products or similar products; and
|
|
●
|
the
effectiveness of our and/or our partners’ sales, marketing and distribution efforts.
|
Specifically,
hCDR1, if successfully developed and commercially launched for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, or SLE, and Sjogren’s
syndrome, or SS, on the one hand, will compete with both currently marketed and new products marketed by other companies. Health care
providers may not accept or utilize any of our product candidates. Physicians and other prescribers may not be inclined to prescribe
our products unless our products bring clear and demonstrable advantages over other products currently marketed for the same indications.
Because we expect sales of our products to generate substantially all of our revenues in the long-term, the failure of our products to
find market acceptance would harm our business and could require us to seek additional financing or other sources of revenue.
If
the third parties upon whom we rely to manufacture our products do not successfully manufacture our products, our business will be harmed.
We
do not currently have the ability to manufacture the compounds that we need to conduct our clinical trials and, therefore, rely upon,
and intend to continue to rely upon, certain manufacturers to produce and supply our drug candidates for use in clinical trials and for
future sales. In order to commercialize our products, such products will need to be manufactured in commercial quantities while adhering
to all regulatory and other local requirements, all at an acceptable cost. We may not be able to enter into future third-party contract
manufacturing agreements on acceptable terms, if at all.
If
our contract manufacturers or other third parties fail to deliver our product candidates for clinical use on a timely basis, with sufficient
quality, and at commercially reasonable prices, and we fail to find replacement manufacturers or sources, we may be required to delay
or suspend clinical trials or otherwise discontinue development and production of our drug candidates.
Our
contract manufacturers will be required to produce our clinical drug candidates under strict compliance with current Good Manufacturing
Practices, or cGMP, in order to meet acceptable regulatory standards for our clinical trials. If such standards change, the ability of
contract manufacturers to produce our drug candidates on the schedule we require for our clinical trials may be affected. In addition,
contract manufacturers may not perform their obligations under their agreements with us or may discontinue their business before the
time required by us to successfully produce and market our drug candidates. Any difficulties or delays in our contractors’ manufacturing
and supply of drug candidates could increase our costs, cause us to lose revenue or make us postpone or cancel clinical trials.
In
addition, our contract manufacturers will be subject to ongoing periodic, unannounced inspections by the FDA and corresponding foreign
or local governmental agencies to ensure strict compliance with, among other things, cGMP, in addition to other governmental regulations
and corresponding foreign standards. We will not have control over, other than by contract, third-party manufacturers’ compliance
with these regulations and standards. No assurance can be given that our third-party manufacturers will comply with these regulations
or other regulatory requirements now or in the future.
In
the event that we are unable to obtain or retain third-party manufacturers, we will not be able to commercialize our products as planned.
If third-party manufacturers fail to deliver the required quantities of our products on a timely basis and at commercially reasonable
prices, our ability to develop and deliver products on a timely and competitive basis may be adversely impacted and our business, financial
condition or results of operations will be materially harmed.
If
our competitors develop and market products that are less expensive, more effective or safer than our products, our revenues and results
may be harmed and our commercial opportunities may be reduced or eliminated.
The
pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive. Our commercial opportunities may be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and
market products that are less expensive, more effective or safer than our products. Other companies have drug candidates in various stages
of pre-clinical or clinical development to treat diseases for which we are also seeking to discover and develop drug candidates. Some
of these potential competing drugs are already commercialized or are further advanced in development than our drug candidates and may
be commercialized earlier. Even if we are successful in developing safe, effective drugs, our products may not compete successfully with
products produced by our competitors, who may be able to market their drugs more effectively.
Our
competitors include pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies, as well as universities and public and private research institutions.
In addition, companies that are active in different but related fields present substantial competition for us. Many of our competitors
have significantly greater capital resources, larger research and development staffs and facilities and greater experience in drug development,
regulation, manufacturing and marketing than we do. These organizations also compete with us to recruit qualified personnel, attract
partners for joint ventures or other collaborations, and license technologies that are competitive with ours. As a result, our competitors
may be able to more easily develop products that could render our technologies or our drug candidates obsolete or noncompetitive. Development
of new drugs, medical technologies and competitive medical devices may damage the demand for our products without any certainty that
we will successfully and effectively contend with those competitors.
Effects of the COVID-19 virus (hereafter,
"Coronavirus")
The outbreak of the Coronavirus
in the world in the first half of 2020 and its spread, causes great uncertainty
in the world capital markets and major macroeconomic implications, which are characterized by sharp declines and volatility in many securities’
prices.
As of the date of issuance
of the financial reporting, there was no material effect of the Coronavirus on the operations and financial results of the Company. Although,
due to the ongoing uncertainty around the scope and duration of the Coronavirus, as of the financial statement publication date, there
is uncertainty regarding its impact on the economy and the market state at all, and those impacts on the value of the securities held
by the Company.
The Company is monitoring
and will continue to monitor the developments around the world in connection with the spread of the Coronavirus, and will examine the
implications for its activities.
If we lose our
key personnel or are unable to attract and retain additional personnel, our business could be harmed.
As
of March 15, 2021, we have no employees, only four part-time service providers. To successfully develop our drug candidates and technologies,
we must cooperate with third parties or to be able to attract and retain highly skilled personnel, including consultants and employees.
The retention of their services cannot be guaranteed. Our failure to retain and/or recruit such professionals might impair our performance
and materially affect our technological and product development capabilities and our product marketing ability.
Our
Chief Financial Officer is not required to work exclusively for us, which could materially and adversely affect us and our business.
Itay
Weinstein, our Chief Financial Officer, is not required to work exclusively for us and does not devote all of his time to our operations.
Since serving as our Chief Financial Officer, he has devoted approximately 6 hours a week of his time to the operation of our business.
He also serves as a Partner of the accounting firm Shimony C.P.A. It is possible that his pursuit of other activities may slow
our operations and impact our ability to timely complete our financial statements.
Any
acquisitions or in-licensing transactions we make may dilute your equity or require a significant amount of our available cash and may
not be scientifically or commercially successful.
As
part of our business strategy, we may effect acquisitions or in-licensing transactions to obtain additional businesses, products, technologies,
capabilities and personnel. If we complete one or more such transactions in which the consideration includes our ordinary shares or other
securities, your equity may be significantly diluted. If we complete one or more such transactions in which the consideration includes
cash, we may be required to use a substantial portion of our available cash.
Acquisitions
and in-licensing transactions also involve a number of operational risks, including:
|
●
|
difficulty
and expense of assimilating the operations, technology or personnel of the business;
|
|
●
|
our
inability to attract and retain management, key personnel and other employees necessary to conduct the business;
|
|
●
|
our
inability to maintain relationships with key third parties, such as alliance partners, associated with the business;
|
|
●
|
exposure
to legal claims for activities of the business prior to the acquisition;
|
|
●
|
the
diversion of our management’s attention from our other drug development businesses; and
|
|
●
|
the
potential impairment of goodwill and write-off of in-process research and development costs, adversely affecting our reported results
of operations.
|
In
addition, the basis for completing the acquisition or in-licensing could prove to be unsuccessful as the drugs or processes involved
could fail to be scientifically or commercially viable. We may also be required to pay third parties substantial transaction fees, in
the form of cash or ordinary shares, in connection with such transactions.
If
any of these risks occur, it could have an adverse effect on both the business we acquire or in-license and our existing operations.
We
face product liability risks and may not be able to obtain adequate insurance.
The
use of our drug candidates and technologies in clinical trials, and the sale of any approved products, exposes us to liability claims.
If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability claims, we may incur substantial liabilities or be required to cease
clinical trials of our drug candidates and technologies or limit commercialization of any approved products.
We
believe that we will be able to obtain sufficient product liability insurance coverage for our planned clinical trials. We intend to
expand our insurance coverage to include the commercial sale of any approved products if marketing approval is obtained; however, insurance
coverage is becoming increasingly expensive. We may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost. We may not be able
to obtain additional insurance coverage that will be adequate to cover product liability risks that may arise. Regardless of merit or
eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in:
|
●
|
decreased
demand for a product;
|
|
●
|
damage
to our reputation;
|
|
●
|
inability
to continue to develop a drug candidate or technology;
|
|
●
|
withdrawal
of clinical trial volunteers; and
|
Consequently,
a product liability claim or product recall may result in material losses.
Risks
Related to Our Intellectual Property
Because
all of our proprietary drug candidates and technologies are licensed to us by third parties, termination of these license agreements
could prevent us from developing our drug candidates.
We
do not own any of our drug candidates and technologies. We have licensed the rights, patent or otherwise, to our drug candidates from
third parties. We have licensed hCDR1 from Yeda Research and Development Company Ltd., or Yeda. We licensed a use patent for the use
of rHuEPO from Yeda and Mor Research Applications Ltd., or Mor which we acquired from Bio-Gal Limited, or Bio-Gal.
These
license agreements require us to meet development or financing milestones and impose development and commercialization due diligence
requirements on us. In addition, under these agreements, we must pay royalties on sales of products resulting from licensed drugs and
technologies and pay the patent filing, prosecution and maintenance costs related to the licenses. While we have the right to defend
patent rights related to our licensed drug candidates and technologies, we are not obligated to do so. In the event that we decide to
defend our licensed patent rights, we will be obligated to cover all of the expenses associated with that effort. If we do not meet our
obligations in a timely manner, or if we otherwise breach the terms of our agreements, our licensors could terminate the agreements,
and we would lose the rights to our drug candidates and technologies. From time to time, in the ordinary course of business, we may have
disagreements with our licensors or collaborators regarding the terms of our agreements or ownership of proprietary rights, which could
lead to delays in the research, development, collaboration and commercialization of our drug candidates, or could require or result in
litigation or arbitration, which could be time-consuming and expensive.
If
we are unable to adequately protect our intellectual property, third parties may be able to use our technology, which could adversely
affect our ability to compete in the market.
Our
commercial success will depend in part on our ability and the ability of our licensors to obtain and maintain patent protection on our
drug products and technologies and successfully defend these patents and technologies against third-party challenges. As part of our
business strategy, our policy is to actively file patent applications in the U.S. and internationally to cover methods of use, new chemical
compounds, pharmaceutical compositions and dosing of the compounds and composition and improvements in each of these. Because of the
extensive time required for development, testing and regulatory review of a potential product, it is possible that before we commercialize
any of our products, any related patent may expire or remain in force for only a short period following commercialization, thus reducing
any advantage of the patent.
The
patent positions of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies can be highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions.
No consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology patents has emerged to date. Accordingly, the patents we
use may not be sufficiently broad to prevent others from practicing our technologies or from developing competing products. Furthermore,
others may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or design around our patented technologies. The patents we use may
be challenged or invalidated or may fail to provide us with any competitive advantage.
Generally,
patent applications in the U.S. are maintained in secrecy for a period of at least 18 months. Since publication of discoveries in the
scientific or patent literature often lag behind actual discoveries, we are not certain that we were the first to make the inventions
covered by each of our pending patent applications or that we were the first to file those patent applications. We cannot predict the
breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents, or their enforceability. Third parties or competitors may challenge
or circumvent our patents or patent applications, if issued. If our competitors prepare and file patent applications in the U.S. that
claim compounds or technology also claimed by us, we may be required to challenge competing patent rights, which could result in substantial
cost, even if the eventual outcome is favorable to us. While we have the right to defend patent rights related to the licensed drug candidates
and technologies, we are not obligated to do so. In the event that we decide to defend our licensed patent rights, we will be obligated
to cover all of the expenses associated with that effort.
We
also rely on trade secrets to protect technology where we believe patent protection is not appropriate or obtainable. Trade secrets are
difficult to protect. While we require our employees, collaborators and consultants to enter into confidentiality agreements, this may
not be sufficient to protect our trade secrets or other proprietary information adequately. In addition, we share ownership and publication
rights to data relating to some of our drug candidates and technologies with our research collaborators and scientific advisors. If we
cannot maintain the confidentiality of this information, our ability to protect our proprietary information will be at risk.
Litigation
or third-party claims of intellectual property infringement could require us to spend substantial time, money and other resources defending
such claims and adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize our products.
Third
parties may assert that we are using their proprietary technology without authorization. In addition, third parties may have or obtain
patents in the future and claim that our products infringe their patents. If we are required to defend against patent suits brought by
third parties, or if we sue third parties to protect our patent rights, we may be required to pay substantial litigation costs, and our
management’s attention may be diverted from operating our business. In addition, any legal action against our licensors or us that
seeks damages or an injunction of our commercial activities relating to the affected products could subject us to monetary liability
and require our licensors or us to obtain a license to continue to use the affected technologies. We cannot predict whether our licensors
or we would prevail in any of these types of actions or that any required license would be made available on commercially acceptable
terms, if at all. In addition, any legal action against us that seeks damages or an injunction relating to the affected activities could
subject us to monetary liability and/or require us to discontinue the affected technologies or obtain a license to continue use thereof.
In
addition, there can be no assurance that our patents or patent applications or those licensed to us will not become involved in opposition
or revocation proceedings instituted by third parties. If such proceedings were initiated against one or more of our patents, or those
licensed to us, the defense of such rights could involve substantial costs and the outcome could not be predicted.
Competitors
or potential competitors may have filed applications for, may have been granted patents for, or may obtain additional patents and proprietary
rights that may relate to compounds or technologies competitive with ours. If patents are granted to other parties that contain claims
having a scope that is interpreted to cover any of our products (including the manufacture thereof), there can be no assurance that we
will be able to obtain licenses to such patents at reasonable cost, if at all, or be able to develop or obtain alternative technology.
Risks
Related to our ADSs
We
will need additional capital in the future. If additional capital is not available, we may not be able to continue to operate our business
pursuant to our business plan or we may have to discontinue our operations entirely.
Our net cash used in operating
activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $850 thousand. If we continue to use cash at this rate we will need significant additional
financing, which we may seek to raise through, among other things, public and private equity offerings and debt financing. Any equity
financings will likely be dilutive to existing stockholders, and any debt financings will likely involve covenants restricting our business
activities. Additional financing may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all.
The
ADSs are traded in small volumes, limiting ability to sell ADSs that represent ordinary shares at a desirable price, if at all.
The
trading volume of the ADSs has historically been low. Even if the trading volume of the ADSs increases, we can give no assurance that
it will be maintained or will result in a desirable stock price. As a result of this low trading volume, it may be difficult to identify
buyers to whom shareholders can sell ADSs in desirable volume and shareholders may be unable to sell your ADSs at an established market
price, at a price that is favorable, or at all. A low volume market also limits shareholders’ ability to sell large blocks of the
ADSs at a desirable or stable price at any one time. Shareholders should be prepared to own the ADSs indefinitely.
Our
stock price can be volatile, which increases the risk of litigation and may result in a significant decline in the value of your investment.
The
trading price of the ADSs representing our ordinary shares is likely to be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in price
in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include:
|
●
|
developments
concerning our drug candidates;
|
|
●
|
announcements
of technological innovations by us or our competitors;
|
|
●
|
introductions
or announcements of new products by us or our competitors;
|
|
●
|
developments
in the markets of the field of activities and changes in customer attributes;
|
|
●
|
announcements
by us of significant acquisitions, in/out license transactions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
|
|
●
|
changes
in financial estimates by securities analysts;
|
|
●
|
actual
or anticipated variations in interim operating results and near-term working capital as well as failure to raise required funds for
the continued development and operations of the company;
|
|
●
|
expiration
or termination of licenses, patents, research contracts or other collaboration agreements;
|
|
●
|
conditions
or trends in the regulatory climate and the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries;
|
|
●
|
failure
to obtain orphan drug designation status for the relevant drug candidates in the relevant regions;
|
|
●
|
increase
in costs and lengthy timing of the clinical trials according to regulatory requirements;
|
|
●
|
failure
to increase awareness of our products;
|
|
●
|
changes
in reimbursement policy by governments or insurers in markets we operate or may operate in the future;
|
|
●
|
any
changes in the regulatory environment relating to our drug candidates;
|
|
●
|
changes
in the market valuations of similar companies; and
|
|
●
|
additions
or departures of key personnel.
|
In
addition, equity markets in general, and the market for biotechnology and life sciences companies in particular, have experienced extreme
price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies traded in
those markets. These broad market and industry factors may materially affect the market price of the ADSs, regardless of our development
and operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities
class-action litigation has often been instituted against that company. Such litigation, if instituted against us, could cause us to
incur substantial costs to defend such claims and divert management’s attention and resources even if we prevail in the litigation,
all of which could seriously harm our business.
Future
issuances or sales of the ADSs could depress the market for the ADSs.
Future
issuances of a substantial number of the ADSs, or the perception by the market that those issuances could occur, could cause the market
price of our ordinary shares or ADSs to decline or could make it more difficult for us to raise funds through the sale of equity in the
future. Also, if we make one or more significant acquisitions in which the consideration includes ordinary shares or other securities,
your portion of shareholders’ equity in us may be significantly diluted.
Concentration
of ownership of our ordinary shares among our principal stockholders may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate
decisions.
There are two shareholders
(Mr. Alexander Rabinovitch, a director, and Mr. David Bassa, a former director), who in the aggregate beneficially hold approximately
31.83% of our ordinary shares, as of March 15, 2021). As a result, these persons, either acting alone or together, may have the ability
to significantly influence the outcome of all matters submitted to our shareholders for approval, including the election and removal
of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, such persons, acting alone
or together, may have the ability to effectively control our management and affairs. Accordingly, this concentration of ownership may
depress the market price of our ordinary shares or ADSs.
Our
ordinary shares and ADSs trade on two different markets, and this may result in price variations and regulatory compliance issues.
ADSs
representing our ordinary shares are listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market, or Nasdaq, and our ordinary shares are traded on
the TASE. Trading in our securities on these markets is made in different currencies and at different times, including as a result of
different time zones, different trading days and different public holidays in the U.S. and Israel. Consequently, the effective trading
prices of our securities on these two markets may differ. Any decrease in the trading price of our securities on one of these markets
could cause a decrease in the trading price of our securities on the other market.
Holders
of our ordinary shares or ADSs who are U.S. citizens or residents may be required to pay additional income taxes.
There is a risk that we will
be classified as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for certain tax years. If we are classified as a PFIC, a U.S. holder
of our ordinary shares or ADSs representing our ordinary shares will be subject to special federal income tax rules that determine the
amount of federal income tax imposed on income derived with respect to the PFIC shares. We will be a PFIC if either 75% or more of our
gross income in a tax year is passive income or the average percentage of our assets (by value) that produce or are held for the production
of passive income in a tax year is at least 50%. The risk that we will be classified as a PFIC arises because cash balances, even if
held as working capital, are considered to be assets that produce passive income. Therefore, any determination of PFIC status will depend
upon the sources of our income and the relative values of passive and non-passive assets, including goodwill. A determination as to a
corporation’s status as a PFIC must be made annually. We believe we may be a PFIC during 2020 and although we have not determined
whether we will be a PFIC in 2021, or in any subsequent year, our operating results for any such years may cause us to be a PFIC. Although
we may not be a PFIC in any one year, the PFIC taint remains with respect to those years in which we were or are a PFIC and the special
PFIC taxation regime will continue to apply.
In
view of the complexity of the issues regarding our treatment as a PFIC, U.S. shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors
for guidance as to our status as a PFIC.
As
a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of applicable SEC and
Nasdaq requirements, which may result in less protection than is accorded to investors under rules applicable to domestic issuers.
As
a foreign private issuer, we will be permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of those otherwise
required under Nasdaq for domestic issuers. For instance, we may follow home country practice in Israel with regard to, among other things,
composition and function of the audit committee and other committees of our Board of Directors and certain general corporate governance
matters. In addition, in certain instances we will follow our home country law, instead of the Nasdaq, which requires that we obtain
shareholder approval for certain dilutive events, such as an issuance that will result in a change of control of the company, certain
transactions other than a public offering involving issuances of a 20% or more interest in the company and certain acquisitions of the
stock or assets of another company. We comply with the director independence requirements of the Nasdaq, including the requirement that
a majority of the Board of Directors be independent. Following our home country governance practices as opposed to the requirements that
would otherwise apply to a United States company listed on Nasdaq may provide less protection than is accorded to investors under Nasdaq
applicable to domestic issuers.
In
addition, as a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules and regulations under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, related to the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders
are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we
are not required under the Exchange Act to file annual, quarterly and current reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently
or as promptly as domestic companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act.
ADS
holders are not shareholders and do not have shareholder rights.
The
Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary, executes and delivers the ADSs on our behalf. Each ADS is a certificate evidencing a specific
number of ADSs. The ADS holders will not be treated as shareholders and do not have the rights of shareholders. The depositary will be
the holder of the shares underlying the ADSs. Holders of the ADSs will have ADS holder rights. A deposit agreement among us, the depositary
and the ADS holders, and the beneficial owners of ADSs, sets out ADS holder rights as well as the rights and obligations of the depositary.
New York law governs the deposit agreement and the ADSs. Our shareholders have shareholder rights prescribed by Israeli law. Israeli
law and our Articles of Association, or Articles, govern such shareholder rights. The ADS holders do not have the same voting rights
as our shareholders. Shareholders are entitled to our notices of general meetings and to attend and vote at our general meetings of shareholders.
At a general meeting, every shareholder present (in person or by proxy, attorney or representative) and entitled to vote has one vote
on a show of hands. Every shareholder present (in person or by proxy, attorney or representative) and entitled to vote has one vote per
fully paid ordinary share on a poll. This is subject to any other rights or restrictions which may be attached to any shares. The ADS
holders may instruct the depositary to vote the ordinary shares underlying their ADSs, but only if we ask the depositary to ask for their
instructions. If we do not ask the depositary to ask for their instructions, the ADS holders are not entitled to receive our notices
of general meeting or instruct the depositary how to vote. The ADS holders will not be entitled to attend and vote at a general meeting
unless they withdraw the ordinary shares from the depository. However, the ADS holders may not know about the meeting far enough in advance
to withdraw the ordinary shares. If we ask for the ADS holders’ instructions, the depositary will notify the ADS holders of the
upcoming vote and arrange to deliver our voting materials and form of notice to them. The depositary will try, as far as is practical,
subject to the provisions of the deposit agreement, to vote the shares as the ADS holders instruct. The depositary will not vote or attempt
to exercise the right to vote other than in accordance with the instructions of the ADS holders. We cannot assure the ADS holders that
they will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that they can instruct the depositary to vote their shares. In addition, there
may be other circumstances in which the ADS holders may not be able to exercise voting rights.
The
ADS holders do not have the same rights to receive dividends or other distributions as our shareholders. Subject to any special rights
or restrictions attached to a share, the directors may determine that a dividend will be payable on a share and fix the amount, the time
for payment and the method for payment (although we have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our ordinary stock and we do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future). Dividends and other distributions payable to our shareholders with respect
to our ordinary shares generally will be payable directly to them. Any dividends or distributions payable with respect to ordinary shares
will be paid to the depositary, which has agreed to pay to the ADS holders the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian
receives on shares or other deposited securities, after deducting its fees and expenses. The ADS holders will receive these distributions
in proportion to the number of shares their ADSs represent. In addition, there may be certain circumstances in which the depositary may
not pay to the ADS holders amounts distributed by us as a dividend or distribution.
There
are circumstances where it may be unlawful or impractical to make distributions to the holders of the ADSs.
The
deposit agreement with the depositary allows the depositary to distribute foreign currency only to those ADS holders to whom it is possible
to do so. If a distribution is payable by us in New Israeli Shekels, the depositary will hold the foreign currency it cannot convert
for the account of the ADS holders who have not been paid. It will not invest the foreign currency and it will not be liable for any
interest. If the exchange rates fluctuate during a time when the depositary cannot convert the foreign currency, the ADS holders may
lose some of the value of the distribution.
The
depositary is not responsible if it decides that it is unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to any ADS holders. This
means that the ADS holders may not receive the distributions we make on our shares or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical
for the depository to make such distributions available to them.
Shareholders’
percentage ownership in us may be diluted by future issuances of share capital, which could reduce their influence over matters on which
shareholders vote.
Issuances
of additional shares would reduce shareholders’ influence over matters on which our shareholders vote.
We
may fail to remain in compliance with the continued listing standards of the Nasdaq Capital Market and a delisting of our ADSs
could make it more difficult for investors to sell their shares
Our
ADSs were approved for listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market in July 2013 where they continue to be listed. We are required to meet certain
qualitative and financial tests (including having stockholders’ equity of at least $2.5 million, a market value of listed securities
of $35 million or $500,000 of net income from continuing operations for the most recently completed fiscal year or two of the most recently
completed fiscal years, to maintain the listing of our ADSs on the Nasdaq Capital Market as set forth in Nasdaq listing rule 5550(b)(1)
the (“Stockholders’ Equity Requirement” or “Rule 5550(b)(1)”). If we do not maintain compliance with the
continued listing requirements for Nasdaq within specified periods and subject to permitted extensions, our ADSs may be recommended for
delisting (subject to any appeal we would file). If our ADSs were delisted, it could be more difficult to buy or sell our ADSs and to
obtain accurate quotations, and the price of our stock could suffer a material decline. Delisting would also impair our ability to raise
capital.
If
we fail to maintain compliance with Nasdaq’s continued listing standards, we may be delisted and our ADSs will trade, if at all,
only on the over-the-counter market, such as the OTC Bulletin Board or OTCQX market, and then only if one or more registered broker-dealer
market makers comply with quotation requirements. In addition, delisting of our ADSs could depress the price of our ADSs, substantially
limit liquidity of our ADSs and materially adversely affect our ability to raise capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
Finally,
delisting of our ADSs would likely result in our ADSs becoming a “penny stock” under the Securities Exchange Act. The principal
result or effect of being designated a “penny stock” is that securities broker-dealers cannot recommend the shares but must
trade it on an unsolicited basis. Penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt
from those rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, which specifies information about penny stocks
and the nature and significance of risks of the penny stock market. A broker-dealer must also provide the customer with bid and offer
quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and sales person in the transaction, and monthly account statements
indicating the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. In addition, the penny stock rules require that,
prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination
that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction.
These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for shares that become subject
to those penny stock rules. Under such circumstances, shareholders may find it more difficult to sell, or to obtain accurate quotations,
for our ADSs, and our ADSs would become substantially less attractive to certain purchasers such as financial institutions, hedge funds
and other similar investors.
Risks
Relating to Operations in Israel
Conditions
in the Middle East and in Israel may harm our operations.
Our
head executive office, our research and development facilities, as well as some of our planned clinical sites are or will be located
in Israel. Our officers and most of our directors are residents of Israel. A significant asset of ours is the investment in the shares
of InterCure Ltd., an Israeli company. Accordingly, political, economic, and military conditions in Israel and the surrounding region
may directly affect our business and operations. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts
have taken place between Israel and its neighboring countries, and between Israel and the Hamas and Hezbollah militant groups. Any hostilities
involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its trading partners could adversely affect our operations
and results of operations. In recent years, the hostilities involved missile strikes against civilian targets in various parts of Israel,
including areas in which our employees and some of our consultants are located, and negatively affected business conditions in Israel.
Our offices, located in Ramat Gan, Israel, are within the range of the missiles and rockets that have been fired sporadically at Israeli
cities and towns from Gaza and South Lebanon since 2006, with escalations in violence during which there were a substantially larger
number of rocket and missile attacks aimed at Israel. In addition, Iran has threatened to attack Israel and is widely believed to be
developing nuclear weapons. Iran is also believed to have a strong influence among extremist groups in the region, such as Hamas in Gaza,
Hezbollah in Lebanon, and various rebel militia groups in Syria. Since September 2015, there has been an increase in terrorist attacks
on Israeli civilians including shootings, stabbings and car rammings which has impacted the general feeling of personal safety in the
country. These situations may potentially escalate in the future to more violent events which may affect Israel and us. Any armed conflicts,
terrorist activities or political instability in the region could adversely affect business conditions, could harm our results of operations
and could make it more difficult for us to raise capital. Parties with whom we do business may decline to travel to Israel during periods
of heightened unrest or tension, forcing us to make alternative arrangements when necessary in order to meet our business partners face
to face. In addition, the political and security situation in Israel may result in parties with whom we have agreements involving performance
in Israel claiming that they are not obligated to perform their commitments under those agreements pursuant to force majeure provisions
in such agreements. Further, in the past, the State of Israel and Israeli companies have been subjected to economic boycotts. Several
countries still restrict business with the State of Israel and with Israeli companies. These restrictive laws and policies may have an
adverse impact on our operating results, financial condition or the expansion of our business.
Our
commercial insurance does not cover losses that may occur as a result of events associated with the security situation in the Middle
East. Although the Israeli government currently covers the reinstatement value of direct damages that are caused by terrorist attacks
or acts of war, we cannot assure you that this government coverage will be maintained. Any losses or damages incurred by us could have
a material adverse effect on our business. Any armed conflicts or political instability in the region would likely negatively affect
business conditions and could harm our results of operations.
Further,
the State of Israel and Israeli companies have been subjected to an economic boycott. Several countries still restrict business with
the State of Israel and with Israeli companies. These restrictive laws and policies may have an adverse impact on our operating results,
financial condition or the expansion of our business.
Our
results of operations may be adversely affected by inflation and foreign currency fluctuations.
We
hold most of our cash, cash equivalents and bank deposits in U.S. dollars. As we are located in Israel, a significant portion of our
expenses are in New Israeli Shekels, or NIS, mainly due to payment to Israeli employees and suppliers. Our investment in the shares of
InterCure Ltd. is also in NIS. As a result, we could be exposed to the risk that the U.S. dollar will be devalued against the NIS or
other currencies, and consequentially our financial results could be harmed. To protect against currency fluctuations we may decide to
hold a significant portion of our cash, cash equivalents, bank deposits and marketable securities in NIS, as well as to enter into currency
hedging transactions. These measures, however, may not adequately protect us from the adverse effects of inflation in Israel. In addition,
we are exposed to the risk that the rate of inflation in Israel will exceed the rate of devaluation of the New Israeli Shekel in relation
to the U.S. dollar or that the timing of any devaluation may lag behind inflation in Israel.
Provisions
of Israeli law may delay, prevent or otherwise impede a merger with, or an acquisition of, our company, which could prevent a change
of control, even when the terms of such a transaction are favorable to us and our shareholders.
As
a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel, we are subject to Israeli corporate law regulates mergers, requires tender
offers for acquisitions of shares above specified thresholds, requires special approvals for transactions involving directors, officers
or significant shareholders and regulates other matters that may be relevant to these types of transactions. For example, a merger may
not be consummated unless at least 50 days have passed from the date that a merger proposal was filed by each merging company with the
Israel Registrar of Companies and at least 30 days from the date that the shareholders of both merging companies approved the merger.
In addition, the holder of a majority of each class of securities of the target company must approve a merger. Moreover, a full tender
offer can only be completed if the acquirer receives at least 95% of the issued share capital (provided that a majority of the offerees
that do not have a personal interest in such tender offer shall have approved the tender offer, except that if the total votes to reject
the tender offer represent less than 2% of the company’s issued and outstanding share capital, in the aggregate, approval by a
majority of the offerees that do not have a personal interest in such tender offer is not required to complete the tender offer), and
the shareholders, including those who indicated their acceptance of the tender offer, may, at any time within six months following the
completion of the tender offer, petition the court to alter the consideration for the acquisition (unless the acquirer stipulated in
the tender offer that a shareholder that accepts the offer may not seek appraisal rights).
Furthermore,
Israeli tax considerations may make potential transactions unappealing to us or to those of our shareholders whose country of residence
does not have a tax treaty with Israel exempting such shareholders from Israeli tax. For example, Israeli tax law does not recognize
tax-free share exchanges to the same extent as U.S. tax law. With respect to mergers, Israeli tax law allows for tax deferral in certain
circumstances but makes the deferral contingent on the fulfillment of numerous conditions, including a holding period of two years from
the date of the transaction during which sales and dispositions of shares of the participating companies are restricted. Moreover, with
respect to certain share swap transactions, the tax deferral is limited in time, and when such time expires, the tax becomes payable
even if no actual disposition of the shares has occurred.
These
and other similar provisions could delay, prevent or impede an acquisition of us or our merger with another company, even if such an
acquisition or merger would be beneficial to us or to our shareholders.
It
may be difficult to enforce a U.S. judgment against us, our officers or our directors or to assert U.S. securities law claims in Israel.
Service
of process upon us, since we are incorporated in Israel, and upon our directors and officers, who reside outside the U.S., may be difficult
to obtain within the U.S. In addition, because substantially all of our assets and most of our directors and officers are located outside
the U.S., any judgment obtained in the U.S. against us or any of our directors and officers may not be collectible within the U.S. There
is a doubt as to the enforceability of civil liabilities under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act pursuant to original actions instituted
in Israel. Subject to particular time limitations and provided certain conditions are met, executory judgments of a U.S. court for monetary
damages in civil matters may be enforced by an Israeli court.
Under
applicable U.S. and Israeli law, we may not be able to enforce covenants not to compete and therefore may be unable to prevent our competitors
from benefiting from the expertise of some of our former employees. In addition, employees may be entitled to seek compensation for their
inventions irrespective of their agreements with us, which in turn could impact our future profitability.
We
generally enter into non-competition agreements with our employees and key consultants. These agreements prohibit our employees and key
consultants, if they cease working for us, from competing directly with us or working for our competitors or clients for a limited period
of time. We may be unable to enforce these agreements under the laws of the jurisdictions in which our employees work and it may be difficult
for us to restrict our competitors from benefitting from the expertise our former employees or consultants developed while working for
us. For example, Israeli courts have required employers seeking to enforce non-compete undertakings of a former employee to demonstrate
that the competitive activities of the former employee will harm one of a limited number of material interests of the employer which
have been recognized by the courts, such as the secrecy of a company’s confidential commercial information or the protection of
its intellectual property. If we cannot demonstrate that such interests will be harmed, we may be unable to prevent our competitors from
benefiting from the expertise of our former employees or consultants and our ability to remain competitive may be diminished.
In
addition, Chapter 8 to the Israeli Patents Law, 5727-1967, or the Patents Law, deals with inventions made in the course of an employee’s
service and during his or her term of employment, whether or not the invention is patentable, or service inventions. Section 134 of the
Patents Law, sets forth that if there is no agreement which explicitly determines whether the employee is entitled to compensation for
the service inventions and the extent and terms of such compensation, such determination will be made by the Compensation and Rewards
Committee, a statutory committee of the Israeli Patents Office. As a result, it is unclear if, and to what extent, our research and development
employees may be able to claim compensation with respect to our future revenue. As a result, we may receive less revenue from future
products if such claims are successful, which in turn could impact our future profitability.
Your
rights and responsibilities as a shareholder will be governed by Israeli law which may differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities
of shareholders of U.S. companies.
We
are incorporated under Israeli law. The rights and responsibilities of the holders of our ordinary shares and ADSs are governed by our
Articles of Association and Israeli law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities
of shareholders in typical U.S.-based corporations. In particular, a shareholder of an Israeli company has a duty to act in good faith
toward the company and other shareholders and to refrain from abusing its power in the company, including, among other things, in voting
at the general meeting of shareholders on matters such as amendments to a company’s articles of association, increases in a company’s
authorized share capital, mergers and acquisitions and interested party transactions requiring shareholder approval. In addition, a shareholder
who knows that it possesses the power to determine the outcome of a shareholder vote or to appoint or prevent the appointment of a director
or executive officer in the company has a duty of fairness toward the company. There is limited case law available to assist us in understanding
the implications of these provisions that govern shareholders’ actions. These provisions may be interpreted to impose additional
obligations and liabilities on holders of our ordinary shares and ADSs that are not typically imposed on shareholders of U.S. corporations.
Risks Relating to
Weaknesses in Internal Accounting Controls
Failure to remediate a material weakness
in internal accounting controls could result in material misstatements in our financial statements.
Our management has identified
a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to our improper classification of the Company’s warrants
as equity (and not as a non-current liability) and has concluded that, due to such material weakness, our disclosure controls and procedures
and internal control over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2020. If not remediated, or if we identify further
material weaknesses in our internal controls, our failure to establish and maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and
internal control over financial reporting could result in material misstatements in our financial statements and a failure to meet our
reporting and financial obligations, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and the trading price
of our securities.
If we fail to implement proper and effective
internal controls, our ability to produce accurate financial statements would be impaired, which could adversely affect our operating
results, our ability to operate our business and our stock price.
We must ensure that we
have adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures in place to produce accurate financial statements on a timely
basis. We have tested our internal controls and identified a material weakness and may find additional areas for improvement in the future.
Remediating this material weakness will require us to implement and perform additional control procedures. Implementing any future changes
to our internal controls may require compliance training of our directors, officers and employees, entail substantial costs to modify
our accounting systems and take a significant period of time to complete. Such changes may not, however, be effective in establishing
the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, and our failure to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis,
could increase our operating costs and could materially impair our ability to operate our business. In addition, investors’ perceptions
that our internal control over financial reporting is inadequate or that we are unable to produce accurate financial statements may materially
adversely affect the trading price of our securities.
ITEM
4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
A.
History and Development of XTL
We
are a biopharmaceutical company engaged in the acquisition and development of pharmaceutical drugs for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.
Our current drug development program is focused on the development of hCDR1 for the treatment of SLE and SS.
Company
Information and History
Our
legal and commercial name is XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. We were established as a private company limited by shares under the laws of
the State of Israel on March 9, 1993, under the name Xenograft Technologies Ltd. We re-registered as a public company on June 7, 1993,
in Israel, and changed our name to XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. on July 3, 1995.
We commenced
operations to use and commercialize technology developed at the Weizmann Institute, in Rehovot, Israel. Since 1993, we have pursued therapeutic
and pharmaceutical development programs for the treatment of a variety of indications including hepatitis B, hepatitis C, diabetic neuropathic
pain, schizophrenia, SLE, and multiple myeloma, most of which have terminated. Our current drug development program is currently focused
on the treatment of SLE and multiple myeloma.
We
currently have one subsidiary, Xtepo Ltd., a private company limited by shares under the laws of the State of Israel which holds a license
for the exclusive use of rHuEPO for the treatment of multiple myeloma. As of December 31, 2020, we hold approximately 1.76% of the issued
and outstanding share capital of InterCure Ltd., a related party and former subsidiary of ours (subsidiary between mid-2012 and the beginning
of 2015).
The
ADSs are listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “XTLB.” Our ordinary shares are traded on the TASE
under the symbol “XTLB.” We operate under the laws of the State of Israel under the Israeli Companies Law, and in the U.S.,
the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.
Our
principal offices are located at 5 Badner St., Ramat Gan 5218102, Israel, and our telephone number is (972) 3-6116600. Our primary internet
address is www.xtlbio.com. None of the information on our website is incorporated by reference herein.
B.
Business Overview
Introduction
We
are a biopharmaceutical company engaged in the acquisition and development of pharmaceutical drugs for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.
Our current drug, hCDR1, is a potential treatment for (1) systemic lupus erythematosus, or SLE and (2) Sjogren’s syndrome, or SS.
Our sole drug candidate is
hCDR1, a Phase II-ready asset for the treatment of SLE, the most prominent type of lupus. There is currently no known cure for SLE. Only
one new treatment for SLE, Benlysta, has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, in the last 50 years. Lupus
is a chronic autoimmune disease involving many systems in the human body, including joints, kidneys, the central nervous system, heart,
the hematological system and others. The biologic basis of the disease is a dysfunction of the immune (defense) system, leading to production
of self (auto) antibodies, attacking healthy organs and causing damage that can be irreversible. According to research estimates of the
Lupus Foundation of America, at least 1.5 million Americans have the disease (more than 5 million worldwide) with more than 16,000 new
cases diagnosed each year in the United States.
hCDR1 is a peptide (short
protein) that is administered subcutaneously and acts as a disease-specific treatment to modify the SLE-related autoimmune process. It
postulated to do so by specific upstream immunomodulation through the generation of regulatory T cells, reducing inflammation and resuming
immune balance. More than 40 peer-reviewed papers have been published on hCDR1. Two placebo controlled Phase I trials and a placebo controlled
Phase 2 trial, or the PRELUDE trial, were conducted on patients with SLE by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., or Teva, which had
previously in-licensed hCDR1 from Yeda Research and Development, or Yeda. The studies consisted of over 400 patients and demonstrated
that hCDR1 is well tolerated by patients and has a favorable safety profile. The PRELUDE trial did not achieve its primary efficacy endpoint
based on the SLE Disease Activity Index, or SLEDAI scale, resulting in Teva returning the asset to Yeda. However, the PRELUDE trial showed
encouraging results in its secondary clinical endpoint, the British Isles Lupus Activity Group index, or BILAG index, and, in fact, the
0.5 mg weekly dose showed a substantial effect. Multiple post-hoc analyses also showed impressive results for this dose using the BILAG
index. Such dose will be the focus of the clinical development plan moving forward. Subsequent to Teva’s return of the program
to Yeda, the FDA directed that the primary endpoint in future trials for Lupus therapies, including those for hCDR1, should be based
on either the BILAG index or the SLE Responder Index (“SRI”). The FDA has provided the Company with written guidance confirming
the acceptability of BILAG as the primary endpoint in our planned study. The Company has decided to reduce its research and development
expenditures in connection with the execution of clinical trials relating to hCDR1 until full funding for the trials or cooperation with
a strategic partner is secured.
hCDR1is also Phase II-ready
for the treatment of SS. SS is also a chronic autoimmune disorder affecting lacrimal and salivary gland function (glandular) but may
also affect other organs and systems (extraglandular) such as the kidneys, gastrointestinal system, blood vessels, lungs, liver, pancreas,
and the nervous system. There is currently no known cure for SS. The only specific treatments available, such as Salagen and Evoxac,
are symptomatic, aiming to alleviate dry eyes and dry mouth. A number of immunomodulatory agents including corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine,
cyclosporine, and other immunosuppressive agents are used to treat SS. The biologic basis of the disease is a dysfunction of the immune
system, leading to production of antibodies that attack healthy organs causing damage that may be irreversible. Disease prevalence estimations
vary from 2.5 million patients (Global Data Research 2016) to 4 million patients (Sjogren’s Syndrome Foundation) in the US alone,
with a worldwide estimate of up to an aggregate of 7.7 million in in the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom,
and Japan by the year 2024 (Global Data Research).
In preclinical studies, blood
mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from blood samples of patients with primary SS (pSS) were incubated in vitro in the presence of hCDR1
and a control peptide. Following 48 hours of incubation, cells were collected and mRNA was prepared from all samples. The expression
of various genes was determined using real-time -PCR. The results obtained to date indicate that in vitro incubation of PBMCs of pSS
patients with hCDR1 resulted in a significant reduction of gene expression of four pathogenic cytokines known to be involved in SS and
lupus (including B-lymphocyte stimulator or BLyS), as well as upregulation of two immunosuppressive genes, one of which is a marker for
activity of regulatory T cells. The majority of such effects were previously seen in similar studies involving lupus patients. Because
amelioration of SLE manifestations in murine models as well as in SLE patients was associated with down-regulation of pathogenic cytokines,
we believe it is likely that hCDR1 is capable of beneficially affecting SS patients. In addition, based on hCDR1’s favorable safety
profile in over 400 SLE patients (as noted above), as well as the same route of administration as in SLE and similar doses, we believe
we can begin the clinical development of hCDR1 in SS with a Phase 2 trial.
The
Company is exploring the expansion of its IP portfolio surrounding hCDR1 and at the same time has decided to reduce its research and
development expenditures in connection with execution of its clinical trials. In parallel, the Company searches to identify additional
assets to add to XTL’s portfolio.
Our
Strategy
Our
objective is to be a leading biopharmaceutical company engaged in the acquisition and development of pharmaceutical products for the
treatment of autoimmune diseases. We are currently looking for new opportunities in order to expand our business by acquire new activities.
The Company is expanding
its IP portfolio surrounding hCDR1 and has decided a few years ago to reduce its research and development expenditures in connection
with execution of its clinical trials until full funding for the trials or cooperation with a strategic partner is secured. In parallel,
the Company will look to identify additional assets to add to XTL’s portfolio.
Recent
Developments
On January 29, 2020, Doron
Turgeman replaced Josh Levine as the Chief Executive Officer.
On May 19, 2020, the board
of directors appointed Shlomo Shalev to serve as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Also on May 19, 2020, Mr. Turgeman resigned
as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Turgeman remains on the board of directors of the Company and serves as non-executive Chairman of the
board.
Products
Under Development
hCDR1
for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Market
Opportunity
hCDR1
(edratide) is a Phase 2-ready asset for the treatment of SLE, the most prominent type of lupus. SLE is a heterogenous, chronic, debilitating
inflammatory autoimmune disease characterized by the production of an array of autoantibodies, including antibodies to double-stranded
DNA, to other nuclear antigens, and to ribonucleoproteins. Although SLE can affect any part of the body, most patients experience systemic
symptoms including fever, fatigue and malaise along with symptoms in one or only a few organs. The most common signs and symptoms are
arthralgia, arthritis, fatigue, fever, skin rashes, including a characteristic butterfly-shaped rash across the cheeks and nose, anemia
and pleurisy. The clinical course of SLE may also include periods in which few, if any, symptoms are evident and other times when the
disease becomes more active.
According
to research estimates of the Lupus Foundation of America, at least 1.5 million Americans have the disease (more than 5 million worldwide)
with more than 16,000 new cases diagnosed each year in the United States. The Lupus Foundation of America reports that lupus affects
mostly women of childbearing age (15-44). SLE is one of the most common forms of lupus, affecting over 70% of lupus patients.
SLE
treatment is highly individualized and is based on a patient’s disease severity, organ involvement and previous response. Mild
forms of SLE may be treated with antimalarial medications, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and topical and/or low-dose glucocorticoids,
although treatment with methotrexate may be needed. In addition, low-dose oral steroids or intramuscular injections of depot steroid
preparations can be used for mild disease. More severe cases of SLE may be treated with high-dose glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive
or cytotoxic drugs to suppress the immune system. GlaxoSmithKline’s Benlysta (belimumab), a monoclonal antibody, is a newer medication
that is FDA-approved for patients with mild to moderate SLE currently taking standard therapy who have not yet experienced an adequate
response. Benlysta is the first product to gain marketing approval for patients with SLE in more than 50 years, paving the way for the
introduction of new disease-modifying therapies and reigniting the interest of pharmaceutical developers in this therapy area. GlaxoSmithKline
reported that its 2020 sales of Benlysta were up 17% AER (annual equivalent rate), 19% CER (coupon equivalent rate) to £719 million
(approximately USD 982 million), including sales of the sub-cutaneous formulation of £354 (approximately USD 483 million) million
up 32% AER, 33% CER.
Decision
Resources estimates the drug sales for SLE in 2012 were approximately $900 million across the markets covered in its forecast. By the
end of the forecast period of 2022, sales are estimated to grow to $4.0 billion with a CAGR of 16.1%. This growth is expected to be driven
by improved uptake of Benlysta, the introduction of new biological therapies and the overall increase in prevalent cases of SLE, mainly
due to the increasing population in these markets.
hCDR1:
General & Mechanism of Action
hCDR1
is a synthetic peptide composed of 19 amino-acid residues. It was developed by Teva in collaboration with Prof. Edna Mozes of the Weizmann
Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. The sequence of the peptide is based on the complementarity determining region 1 (CDR1) of a pathogenic
human anti-dsDNA mAb that bears the 16/6 idiotype. The idiotype was found to have clinical relevance in SLE patients.
Accumulating
data from in vivo and in vitro studies demonstrate that hCDR1 functions by inducing regulatory T cell
function through multiple pathways. Administration of hCDR1 to mice has been shown to induce CD4 + CD25 + cells using
regulatory and suppressor characteristics such as CD45RB LOW, TGF-, CTLA-4 and Foxp3. This induction suppresses autoreactive CD4 + cell
activation, indicated by the reduced expression of CD69 and Fas ligand; ultimately, resulting in reduced rates of activation-induced
apoptosis. Inhibition by hCDR1-induced CD4 + CD25 + cells is mediated through the immunosuppressive cytokine TGF-.
TGF- secretion is up regulated and activated autoreactive cells are decreased; both are associated with a decrease of pathogenic cytokines
such as interferon gamma (IFN-), interleukin-10 (IL-10), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-). Effects on
TGF- and Foxp3 have been shown to correlate with a significant decrease in SLEDAI-2K and BILAG scores in patients treated with hCDR1
in comparison with patients treated with placebo. Another subset of T cells (CD8 + CD28 - ) expresses Foxp3 and has
been shown to be essential for the induction and the optimal suppressive function of CD4 + CD25 + cells. The function
of hCDR1-induced subsets of regulatory T cells result in the effective suppression, ultimately leading to the modulation of the underlying
aberrancy of the immune system, which we believe culminates in the diminished activity of the disease.
hCDR1
was extensively investigated for its ability to down-regulate the autoimmune response elicited by the pathogenic antibodies and autoreactive
T cells in SLE and up-regulate the expression of gene markers, such as TGF-β and FoxP3. Therefore hCDR1 may attenuate the general
SLE-associated autoimmune process and provide effective treatment for many clinical manifestations of SLE. The clinical development plan
is thus designed to demonstrate the efficacy of hCDR1 in the systemic disease.
Clinical
Trial History
Prior
to being licensed to us by Yeda, hCDR1 was licensed to Teva which performed two placebo controlled Phase I trials and a placebo controlled
Phase 2 trial, or the PRELUDE trial. The Phase I and Phase 2 studies consisted of over 400 patients, demonstrating that hCDR1 is well
tolerated by patients and has a favorable safety profile.
The
PRELUDE trial was a 26-week study conducted at 48 centers in 12 countries: Canada, France, Germany, Holland, Hungary, Israel, Italy,
Mexico, Russia, Spain, UK and U.S. enrolling 340 patients with mild to moderate SLE. The PRELUDE trial did not achieve its primary efficacy
endpoint based on the SLEDAI scale, resulting in Teva returning the asset to Yeda in 2009. However, the PRELUDE trial showed encouraging
results in its secondary clinical endpoint, the BILAG index, and, in fact, the 0.5 mg weekly dose showed a substantial effect. Multiple
post-hoc analyses also showed impressive results for this dose using the BILAG index. Such dose will be the focus of clinical development
moving forward. Subsequent to Teva’s return of the program to Yeda, in 2010 the FDA directed that the primary endpoint in future
trials for lupus therapies, including those for hCDR1, should be based on either the BILAG index or the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Responder Index. The FDA has provided the Company with written guidance confirming the acceptability of BILAG as the primary endpoint
in our planned study, subject to receipt of adequate financing.
Planned
Clinical Trial
The
Company submitted a pre-Investigational New Drug (“IND”) meeting package, including a draft protocol for our planned clinical
trial, to the FDA in December 2015. In January 2016, the Company received a written response to its pre-IND meeting package in which
the FDA provided guidance on several key aspects of its proposed clinical trial including: acceptance of the primary efficacy endpoint
to be based on the BILAG index, a measure of lupus disease activity which was the secondary efficacy endpoint in the PRELUDE trial and
confirmation of the appropriate patient population and total number of patients required to prove safety for a new drug application (NDA)
for marketing approval. The FDA recommended that the trial be a Phase 2 study and also provided additional guidance on other aspects
of the trial design including doses and study duration. The Company has decided to reduce its research and development expenditures in
connection with the execution of clinical trials relating to hCDR1 until full funding for the trials or cooperation with a strategic
partner is secured. Subject to receipt of such funding or cooperation with a strategic partner, based on the FDA’s response, XTL
could file its IND, and initiate a global clinical trial for hCDR1 in the treatment of SLE.
hCDR1
for the Treatment of Sjogren’s Syndrome
Market
Opportunity
hCDR1
(Edratide) is a Phase 2-ready asset for the treatment of SS. SS is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by lymphocytic
infiltration of exocrine glands. Sjogren’s syndrome may be an isolated disease, termed primary Sjogren syndrome (pSS) or may accompany
another autoimmune disease, thus termed secondary Sjogren’s syndrome. Clinical presentation varies from mild symptoms such as classic
sicca symptoms of dry eyes (xerophthalmia), dry mouth (xerostomia) and parotid gland enlargements to severe systemic symptoms involving
multiple organ systems such as arthritis, arthralgia, myalgia, pulmonary disease, gastrointestinal disease, neuropathy and lymphoma.
Similar
to SLE, SS is a heterogenous, chronic, inflammatory autoimmune disease. Some of the autoantibodies characteristic of pSS occur in
SLE as well, including antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti-Ro (also termed anti SSA), anti-La (also termed anti SSB) as well as rheumatoid
factor (RF). Hypergammaglobulinemia is common as well. pSS affects the salivary and lacrimal glands with chronic inflammation leading
to the most common symptoms seen in SS including dry eyes and dry mouth. In addition, SS may affect multiple systems with clinical manifestations
similar to those seen in SLE including fever, fatigue and malaise along with symptoms in one or only a few organs including arthralgia,
arthritis, fatigue, vasculitic rashes, interstitial lung disease, kidney disease as well as neurologic manifestations.
Disease
prevalence estimations vary from 2.5 million (Global Data Research 2016) to 4 million patients (Sjogren’s Syndrome Fopundation)
in the US alone, with a worldwide estimate of up to 7.7 million in the 7 Major Markets (US, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK and
Japan) by the year 2024 (Global Data Research). pSS affects mostly middle aged women (40-50 years of age) with a female to male prevalence
ratio of 9:1 (some estimates even go as far as 20:1). pSS patients have an increased risk of developing non-Hodgkin’s B cell lymphoma
(relative risk of 13.76.)
pSS
treatment is highly individualized and is based on a patient’s disease severity, organ involvement and previous response. Mild
forms of pSS may be treated symptomatically with artificial tears and salivary flow stimulation. Fatigue and arthralgia may respond to
antimalarial medications. More severe, systemic manifestations may be treated with high-dose glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive or
cytotoxic drugs to suppress the immune system.
Global
Data estimates the drug sales for SS in 2014 were approximately $990 million in the US and $1.1 billion across the markets covered in
its forecast. By the end of the forecast period of 2024, sales are estimated to grow to $1.9 billion in the US and $2.2 billion across
the markets covered in its forecast with a Compound Annual Growth Rate of 7.2%. The market size estimate in 2014 includes Salagen (pilocarpine)
and Evoxac (cevimeline), the two FDA approved agents for SS, and the common use of off-label agents, such as biologics approved for other
autoimmune diseases, and systemic and topical immunosuppressants and corticosteroids. This growth is expected to be driven by the anticipated
approval of Orencia for use in patients with SS in the US and EU in 2021 and Japan in 2022.
hCDR1:
General & Mechanism of Action
See
above discussion regarding the Mechanism of Action of hCDR1 for SLE.
Since
SS is an autoimmune disease similar to SLE with some autoantibodies and clinical manifestations identical with those detected in SLE,
and since there is no specific treatment for Sjogren’s syndrome, the experiments were undertaken on the Company’s behalf
by Professor Edna Mozes of the Weizmann Institute in Israel to determine the ability of hCDR1 to beneficially affect autoimmune responses
related to this disease. To this end, PBMCs obtained from blood samples of pSS patients were incubated in vitro in the presence of hCDR1
and a control peptide. Following 48 hours of incubation, cells were collected and mRNA was prepared from all samples. The expression
of various genes was determined using real-time PCR. The results obtained to date indicate that in vitro incubation of PBMCs of pSS patients
with hCDR1 resulted in a significant reduction of gene expression of four pathogenic cytokines known to be involved in SS and lupus (including
B-lymphocyte stimulator or BLyS), as well as upregulation of two immunosuppressive genes, one of which is a marker for activity of regulatory
T cells. The vast majority of such effects were previously seen in similar studies involving lupus patients.
Clinical
Trial History
No
clinical trials with hCDR1 in SS have been performed to date.
Planned
Clinical Trial
As
noted above, hCDR1 has been tested in greater than 400 SLE patients to date. Given its clean safety profile, shown in three different
clinical studies, subject to receipt of adequate financing and/or entry into a collaboration agreement, we will consider whether to test
hCDR1 in a small Phase 2 clinical trial in pSS. The objectives of the study will be to test the safety & efficacy of different doses
of hCDR1 in pSS patients in addition to a control arm. Such study is not being actively considered due to financial constraints and,
therefore, we do not have accurate forecasts regarding the size and duration of such study.
rHuEPO
for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
As our
focus has changed, we do not anticipate conducting material research and development activities for rHuEPO.
Intellectual
Property
Patents
General
Patents
and other proprietary rights are very important to the development of our business. We will be able to protect our proprietary technologies
from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that our proprietary rights are covered by valid and enforceable patents or
are effectively maintained as trade secrets. We intend to seek and maintain patent and trade secret protection for our drug candidates
and our proprietary technologies. As part of our business strategy, our policy is to file patent applications in the U.S. and internationally
to cover methods of use, new chemical compounds, pharmaceutical compositions and dosing of the compounds and compositions and improvements
in each of these. We also rely on trade secret information, technical know-how, innovation and agreements with third parties to continuously
expand and protect our competitive position. Because of the extensive time required for development, testing and regulatory review of
a potential product, it is possible that before we commercialize any of our products, any related patent may expire or remain in existence
for only a short period following commercialization, thus reducing any commercial advantage or financial value attributable to the patent.
Generally,
patent applications in the U.S. are maintained in secrecy for a period of at least 18 months. Since publication of discoveries in the
scientific or patent literature often lag behind actual discoveries, we are not certain that we were the first to make the inventions
covered by each of our pending patent applications or that we were the first to file those patent applications. The patent positions
of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies are highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. Therefore, we cannot
predict the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents, or their enforceability. To date, there has been no
consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology patents. Third parties or competitors may challenge or circumvent
our patents or patent applications, if issued. Granted patents can be challenged and ruled invalid at any time, therefore the grant of
a patent is not of itself sufficient to demonstrate our entitlement to a proprietary right. The disallowance of a claim or invalidation
of a patent in any one territory can have adverse commercial consequences in other territories.
If
our competitors prepare and file patent applications in the U.S. that claim technology also claimed by us, we may choose to challenge
competing patent rights, which could result in substantial cost, even if the eventual outcome is favorable to us. While we have the right
to defend patent rights related to our licensed drug candidates and technologies, we are not obligated to do so. In the event that we
decide to defend our licensed patent rights, we will be obligated to cover all of the expenses associated with that effort.
If
a patent is issued to a third party containing one or more preclusive or conflicting claims, and those claims are ultimately determined
to be valid and enforceable, we may be required to obtain a license under such patent or to develop or obtain alternative technology.
In the event of a litigation involving a third party claim, an adverse outcome in the litigation could subject us to significant liabilities
to such third party, require us to seek a license for the disputed rights from such third party, and/or require us to cease use of the
technology. Further, our breach of an existing license or failure to obtain a license to technology required to commercialize our products
may seriously harm our business. We also may need to commence litigation to enforce any patents issued to us or to determine the scope,
validity and/or enforceability of third-party proprietary rights. Litigation would involve substantial costs.
hCDR1
for the Treatment of SLE and SS
We
have exclusively licensed from Yeda, three families of patents relating to hCDR1.
|
●
|
A
basic patent family entitled “Synthetic Human Peptides and Pharmaceutical Compositions Comprising Them” for the Treatment
of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus” that covers the active pharmaceutical agent, the Edratide peptide. The patent has been granted
in a large number of jurisdictions: U.S., Europe (Austria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Spain,
Sweden, Switzerland, The Netherlands and the UK), Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, India, Israel, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Norway, Hungary
and Russia. The patent expires on February 26, 2022 except in the case of the U.S., which expires on September 22, 2022.
|
|
●
|
A patent family for the formulation entitled “Parenteral
Formulations of Peptides for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus” that covers a very specific pharmaceutical composition
comprising Edratide. It has been granted in the U.S., Europe (Switzerland, Germany, Denmark, Spain, Finland, France, Great Britain,
Ireland, Italy, Netherlands and Sweden), China, India, Israel, Japan, Mexico, and Canada. The patent expires on January 14, 2024.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
A patent family for treatment
of Sjögren’s syndrome with Edratide and similar peptides was filed on January 4, 2018. National and regional applications
have been filed and are pending in the U.S. Europe, Australia, Canada, China, Hong Kong, Israel, and Japan.
|
A patent application for a specific
treatment regimen was filed in the U.S. on August 10, 2017.
Other
Intellectual Property Rights
We
depend upon trademarks, trade secrets, know-how and continuing technological advances to develop and maintain our competitive position.
To maintain the confidentiality of trade secrets and proprietary information, we require our employees, scientific advisors, consultants
and collaborators, upon commencement of a relationship with us, to execute confidentiality agreements and, in the case of parties other
than our research and development collaborators, to agree to assign their inventions to us. These agreements are designed to protect
our proprietary information and to grant us ownership of technologies that are developed in connection with their relationship with us.
These agreements may not, however, provide protection for our trade secrets in the event of unauthorized disclosure of such information.
Licensing
Agreements and Collaborations
hCDR1
On
January 7, 2014, we entered into a license agreement with Yeda, as amended on September 6, 2015, which grants us the exclusive worldwide
right to research, develop, and commercialize hCDR1 for all indications. Yeda is the commercial arm of the Weizmann Institute of Science.
In consideration, we are responsible
for a patent expense reimbursement to Yeda in six installments totaling $382,989. On May 14, 2014, we issued 222,605 of our ordinary
shares to Yeda, as the first of six installments, representing a value of approximately $38,000. On January 21, 2015, we issued a further
802,912 of our ordinary shares to Yeda as the second of six installments, representing a value of approximately $84,000. The remaining
installments of approximately $64,000 each, payable in cash, are due every six months commencing on July 1, 2015, with the final payment
due on January 1, 2017. In July 2016, the Company and Yeda signed a second amendment to the license agreement whereby, the final two
payments due under the Agreement were made on April 7, 2017, provided that if we receive funding of at least $5,000,000 then we shall
be required to promptly pay Yeda any unpaid patent expense reimbursement in one lump-sum cash payment. To this date the patent expenses
were incurred but not yet paid and the Company and Yeda have held discussions regarding further amendment to the payment scheme under
the license agreement.
Under the license agreement,
we are required to make milestone payments of up to $2.2 million: $200,000 upon starting a Phase 3 clinical trial, $1 million upon FDA
approval to market in the U.S., and $250,000 for marketing approval in each of China and three of the European Union’s Group of
Five. In addition, we are required to pay 2-3% royalties of annual net sales and sublicense fees of 15-20% of whatever we receive from
any sub-licensee. Under the license agreement, we are also required to meet certain development milestones including the delivery of
a trial protocol to Yeda by January 1, 2016 (which we delivered), receipt of investment of at least $5 million by August 1, 2016 (of
which $4 million was received in April 2015) and commencement of a Phase II clinical trial by January 1, 2017. In subsequent amendments
signed between the Company and Yeda, the parties agreed to postpone the last two installments of the patent expense reimbursement until
April 7, 2017, receipt of the remainder of the required $5 million investment by May 1, 2017 and commencement of a Phase 2 clinical trial
in respect of hCDR1 by October 1, 2017. The company decided not to conduct the phase 2 by itself and to look for a strategic partner.
As a result, the second milestone to pay (commencement of Phase 2) the next payment did not happen yet. To this date the Company and
Yeda have held discussions regarding further amendment to the payment scheme under the license agreement.
The term of the license agreement
is the later of the date of expiry of the last of the licensed patents or the expiry of a continuous period of 11 years after first commercial
sale in any country during which there shall not have been a first commercial sale in the U.S., EU, Japan, China or any OECD member.
The license agreement may be terminated by us without cause upon 60 days prior written notice. The license agreement may also be terminated
by Yeda if either we fail to meet certain development milestones or commercial sale shall have commenced and there shall be a period
of 6 months of no sales, subject to certain exceptions. Yeda shall also be entitled to terminate the license agreement if we were to
commence legal action against Yeda challenging the validity of any of the licensed patents, and we were unsuccessful in such challenge,
in which event we would be required to pay to Yeda liquidated damages of $8 million. Either party may also terminate the license agreement
in the case of a material breach that remains uncured or certain bankruptcy events.
Competition
Competition
in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries is intense. Our competitors include pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies,
as well as universities and public and private research institutions. In addition, companies that are active in different but related
fields represent substantial competition for us. Many of our competitors have significantly greater capital resources, larger research
and development staffs and facilities and greater experience in drug development, regulation, manufacturing and marketing than we do.
These organizations also compete with us to recruit qualified personnel, attract partners for joint ventures or other collaborations,
and license technologies that are competitive with ours. To compete successfully in this industry we must identify novel and unique drugs
or methods of treatment and then complete the development of those drugs as treatments in advance of our competitors.
The
drugs that we are attempting to develop will have to compete with existing therapies. In addition, a large number of companies are pursuing
the development of pharmaceuticals that target the same diseases and conditions that we are targeting. Other companies have products
or drug candidates in various stages of pre-clinical or clinical development to treat diseases for which we are also seeking to discover
and develop drug candidates. Some of these potential competing drugs are further advanced in development than our drug candidates and
may be commercialized earlier.
Competing
Products for Treatment of SLE
Very
few drugs have been approved for Lupus in the last 50 years, including GlaxoSmithKline’s Benlysta (belimumab) and Aurinia Pharmaceuticals
Voclosporin for lupus nephritis. Other commonly used therapies include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, anti-malarials
and immunosuppressants. Corticosteroids and immunosuppressants lead to broad, non-selective immunosuppression often associated with significant
adverse events. In addition these therapies are not effective in all SLE patients.
Despite
initial enthusiasm following approval of Benlysta as the first drug approved for SLE with a selective target, it has been approved to
date only in patients with mild to moderate disease, without active renal or CNS disease, its onset of action is slow and sales have
been lower than expected. Additional drugs are in advanced clinical development to treat SLE.
Competing
Products for Treatment of pSS
No specific
drug has been approved for the cure of pSS. A variety of drugs are used for the symptomatic relief of signs and symptoms including the
use of cholinergic agonists e.g. Salagen (pilocarpine) and Evoxac (cevilemine). Immunomodulatory treatments, usually for extra-glandular
disease, which may be used include cyclosporine (ocular inflammation), hydroxychloroquine (mild inflammatory symptoms of joints, muscles&
skin), corticosteroids (rare but serious symptoms: vasculitic rash, interstitial lung disease, interstitial nephritis, glomerulonephritis),
immunosuppressive agents e.g. methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide (used to treat serious internal organ manifestations) and
biologic agents e.g. rituximab. Corticosteroids lead to broad, non-selective immunosuppression often associated with significant adverse
events.
Seasonality
Our
business and operations are generally not affected by seasonal fluctuations or factors.
Raw
Materials and Suppliers
We
believe that the raw materials that we require to manufacture hCDR1 and rHuEPO are widely available from numerous suppliers and are generally
considered to be generic industrial chemical supplies. We do not rely on a single or unique supplier for the current production of any
therapeutic small molecule in our pipeline.
Manufacturing
We
currently have no manufacturing capabilities and do not intend to establish any such capabilities.
With
respect to our drug candidate, hCDR1, we believe that we will be able to outsource production to a contract manufacturer in order to
obtain sufficient inventory to satisfy the clinical supply needs for our future development for the treatment of SLE and SS. With respect
to our drug candidate rHuEPO, we believe that we will either be able to purchase rHuEPO from existing pharmaceutical companies or to
enter into collaborative agreements with contract manufacturers or other third-parties.
At
the time of commercial sale, to the extent that it is possible and commercially practicable, we plan to engage a back-up supplier for
each of our product candidates. Until such time, we expect that we will rely on a single contract manufacturer to produce each of our
product candidates under cGMP regulations. Our third-party manufacturers have a limited number of facilities in which our product candidates
can be produced and will have limited experience in manufacturing our product candidates in quantities sufficient for conducting clinical
trials or for commercialization. Our third-party manufacturers will have other clients and may have other priorities that could affect
our contractor’s ability to perform the work satisfactorily and/or on a timely basis. Both of these occurrences would be beyond
our control. We anticipate that we will similarly rely on contract manufacturers for our future proprietary product candidates.
We
expect to similarly rely on contract manufacturing relationships for any products that we may in-license or acquire in the future. However,
there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully contract with such manufacturers on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
Contract
manufacturers are subject to ongoing periodic inspections by the FDA, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency and corresponding state and local
agencies to ensure strict compliance with cGMP and other state and federal regulations. We do not have control over third-party manufacturers’
compliance with these regulations and standards, other than through contractual obligations.
If
we need to change manufacturers, the FDA and corresponding foreign regulatory agencies must approve these new manufacturers in advance,
which will involve testing and additional inspections to ensure compliance with FDA regulations and standards and may require significant
lead times and delay. Furthermore, switching manufacturers may be difficult because the number of potential manufacturers is limited.
It may be difficult or impossible for us to find a replacement manufacturer quickly or on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
Environmental
Matters
We
may from time to time be subject to various environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing air emissions,
water and wastewater discharges, noise emissions, the use, management and disposal of hazardous, radioactive and biological materials
and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated sites. We believe that our business, operations and facilities are being operated in compliance
in all material respects with applicable environmental and health and safety laws and regulations. Based on information currently available
to us, we do not expect environmental costs and contingencies to have a material adverse effect on us. The operation of our testing facilities,
however, entails risks in these areas. Significant expenditures could be required in the future if these facilities are required to comply
with new or more stringent environmental or health and safety laws, regulations or requirements.
Government
and Industry Regulation
Numerous
governmental authorities, principally the FDA and corresponding state and foreign regulatory agencies, impose substantial regulations
upon the clinical development, manufacture and marketing of our drug candidates and technologies, as well as our ongoing research and
development activities. None of our drug candidates have been approved for sale in any market in which we have marketing rights. Before
marketing in the U.S., any drug that we develop must undergo rigorous pre-clinical testing and clinical trials and an extensive regulatory
approval process implemented by the FDA, under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, as amended. The FDA regulates, among
other things, the pre-clinical and clinical testing, safety, efficacy, approval, manufacturing, record keeping, adverse event reporting,
packaging, labeling, storage, advertising, promotion, export, sale and distribution of biopharmaceutical products.
The
regulatory review and approval process is lengthy, expensive and uncertain. We are required to submit extensive pre-clinical and clinical
data and supporting information to the FDA for each indication or use to establish a drug candidate’s safety and efficacy before
we can secure FDA approval. The approval process takes many years, requires the expenditure of substantial resources and may involve
ongoing requirements for post-marketing studies or surveillance. According to the FDA, before commencing clinical trials in humans, we
must submit an IND to the FDA containing, among other things, pre-clinical data, chemistry, manufacturing and control information, and
an investigative plan. Our submission of an IND may not result in FDA authorization to commence a clinical trial.
We
were granted an Orphan-drug designation from the FDA in May 2011, for rHuEPO. In the U.S., Orphan-drug designation is granted by the
FDA Office of Orphan Drug Products to novel drugs or biologics that treat a rare disease or condition affecting fewer than 200,000 patients
in the U.S. The designation provides the drug developer with a seven-year period of U.S. marketing exclusivity if the drug is the first
of its type approved for the specified indication or if it demonstrates superior safety, efficacy, or a major contribution to patient
care versus another drug of its type previously granted the designation for the same indication, as well as with tax credits for clinical
research costs, the ability to apply for annual grant funding, clinical research trial design assistance and waiver of Prescription Drug
User Fee Act filing fees.
We
may apply to the European Medicines Agency in order to obtain Orphan-drug designation for its Recombinant Erythropoietin in Europe. Orphan
designation is granted by the European Medicines Agency, following a positive opinion from the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products,
to a medicinal product that is intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening or a chronically debilitating
condition affecting not more than five in 10,000 persons in the European Community when the application for designation is submitted.
Orphan drug designation provides the sponsor with access to the Centralized Procedure for the application for marketing authorization,
protocol assistance, up to a 100% reduction in fees related to a marketing authorization application, pre-authorization inspection and
post-authorization activities, and could provide ten years of market exclusivity in the EU, once approved for the treatment of Multiple
Myeloma.
The
FDA may permit expedited development, evaluation, and marketing of new therapies intended to treat persons with serious or life-threatening
conditions for which there is an unmet medical need under its fast track drug development programs. A sponsor can apply for fast track
designation at the time of submission of an IND, or at any time prior to receiving marketing approval of the NDA. To receive fast track
designation, an applicant must demonstrate that the drug:
|
●
|
is
intended to treat a serious or life-threatening condition;
|
|
●
|
is
intended to treat a serious aspect of the condition; and
|
|
●
|
has
the potential to address unmet medical needs, and this potential is being evaluated in the planned drug development program.
|
Clinical
testing must meet requirements for institutional review board oversight, informed consent and good clinical practices, and must be conducted
pursuant to an IND, unless exempted.
For
purposes of NDA approval, clinical trials are typically conducted in the following sequential phases:
|
●
|
Phase
1: The drug is administered to a small group of humans, either healthy volunteers or patients, to test for safety, dosage tolerance,
absorption, metabolism, excretion, and clinical pharmacology.
|
|
●
|
Phase
2: Studies are conducted on a larger number of patients to assess the efficacy of the product, to ascertain dose tolerance and the
optimal dose range, and to gather additional data relating to safety and potential adverse events.
|
|
●
|
Phase
3: Studies establish safety and efficacy in an expanded patient population.
|
|
●
|
Phase
4: The FDA may require Phase 4 post-marketing studies to find out more about the drug’s long-term risks, benefits, and optimal
use, or to test the drug in different populations, such as children.
|
The
length of time necessary to complete clinical trials varies significantly and may be difficult to predict. Clinical results are frequently
susceptible to varying interpretations that may delay, limit or prevent regulatory approvals. Additional factors that can cause delay
or termination of our clinical trials, or that may increase the costs of these trials, include:
|
●
|
slow
patient enrollment due to the nature of the clinical trial plan, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria
for participation in the study or other factors, and the number of sites participating in the trial;
|
|
●
|
inadequately
trained or insufficient personnel at the study site to assist in overseeing and monitoring clinical trials or delays in approvals
from a study site’s review board;
|
|
●
|
longer
treatment time required to demonstrate efficacy or determine the appropriate product dose;
|
|
●
|
insufficient
supply of the drug candidates;
|
|
●
|
adverse
medical events or side effects in treated patients; and
|
|
●
|
ineffectiveness
of the drug candidates.
|
In
addition, the FDA may place a clinical trial on hold or terminate it if it concludes that subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable
health risk. Any drug is likely to produce some toxicity or undesirable side effects when administered at sufficiently high doses and/or
for a sufficiently long period of time. Unacceptable toxicity or side effects may occur at any dose level at any time in the course of
studies designed to identify unacceptable effects of a drug candidate, known as toxicological studies, or clinical trials of drug candidates.
The appearance of any unacceptable toxicity or side effect could bring us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, limit, delay, or abort
the development of any of our drug candidates and could ultimately prevent approval by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities for
any or all targeted indications.
Before
receiving FDA approval to market a product, we must demonstrate that the product is safe and effective for its intended use by submitting
to the FDA an NDA containing the pre-clinical and clinical data that have been accumulated, together with chemistry and manufacturing
and controls specifications and information, and proposed labeling, among other things. The FDA may refuse to accept an NDA for filing
if certain content criteria are not met and, even after accepting an NDA, the FDA may often require additional information, including
clinical data, before approval of marketing a product.
As
part of the approval process, the FDA must inspect and approve each manufacturing facility. Among the conditions of approval is the requirement
that a manufacturer’s quality control and manufacturing procedures conform to cGMP. Manufacturers must expend time, money and effort
to ensure compliance with cGMP, and the FDA conducts periodic inspections to certify compliance. It may be difficult for our manufacturers
or us to comply with the applicable cGMP and other FDA regulatory requirements. If we or our contract manufacturers fail to comply, then
the FDA will not allow us to market products that have been affected by the failure.
If
the FDA grants approval, the approval will be limited to those disease states, conditions and patient populations for which the product
is safe and effective, as demonstrated through clinical studies. Further, a product may be marketed only in those dosage forms and for
those indications approved in the NDA. Certain changes to an approved NDA, including, with certain exceptions, any changes to labeling,
require approval of a supplemental application before the drug may be marketed as changed. Any products that we manufacture or distribute
pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to continuing regulation by the FDA, including compliance with cGMP and the reporting of adverse
experiences with the drugs. The nature of marketing claims that the FDA will permit us to make in the labeling and advertising of our
products will be limited to those specified in an FDA approval, and the advertising of our products will be subject to comprehensive
regulation by the FDA. Claims exceeding those that are approved will constitute a violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or regulatory requirements at any time during the product development process,
approval process, or after approval may result in agency enforcement actions, including withdrawal of approval, recall, seizure of products,
injunctions, fines and/or civil or criminal penalties. Any agency enforcement action could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Should
we wish to market our products in countries other than the U.S., we must receive marketing authorization from the appropriate regulatory
authorities. The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, marketing authorization, pricing and reimbursement vary widely
from country to country. At present, companies are typically required to apply for foreign marketing authorizations at a national level.
However, within the EU, registration procedures are available to companies wishing to market a product in more than one EU member state.
Typically, if the regulatory authority is satisfied that a company has presented adequate evidence of safety, quality and efficacy, then
the regulatory authority will grant a marketing authorization. This regulatory approval process, however, involves risks similar or identical
to the risks associated with FDA approval discussed above, and therefore we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain the appropriate
marketing authorization for any product in any particular country. Our current development strategy calls for us to seek marketing authorization
for our drug candidates in countries other than the United States.
Failure
to comply with applicable laws and regulations would likely have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, laws and regulations
regarding the manufacture and sale of new drugs are subject to future changes. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature, effect or extent
of adverse governmental regulation that might arise from future legislative or administrative action.
Employees
As of March 15, 2021, we
have no employees, only four part-time service providers. We and our Israeli employees are subject, by an extension order of the Israeli
Ministry of Welfare, to certain provisions of collective bargaining agreements between the Histadrut, the General Federation of Labor
Unions in Israel and the Coordination Bureau of Economic Organizations, including the Industrialists Associations. Our part-time service
providers are not subject to these collective bargaining agreements. These provisions principally address cost of living increases, recreation
pay, travel expenses, vacation pay and other conditions of employment. We provide our employees with benefits and working conditions
equal to or above the required minimum. Other than those provisions, our employees are not represented by a labor union.
Organizational
structure
Our
legal and commercial name is XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. We were established as a private company limited by shares under the laws of
the State of Israel on March 9, 1993, under the name Xenograft Technologies Ltd. We re-registered as a public company on June 7, 1993,
in Israel, and changed our name to XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. on July 3, 1995.
We
commenced operations to use and commercialize technology developed at the Weizmann Institute, in Rehovot, Israel. Since 1993 we pursued
therapeutic and pharmaceutical development programs for the treatment of a variety of indications including hepatitis B, hepatitis C,
diabetic neuropathic pain, schizophrenia, SLE and multiple myeloma, most of which have terminated. Our current drug development program
is currently focused on the treatment of SLE and multiple myeloma.
We
currently have one subsidiary, Xtepo Ltd., a private company limited by shares under the laws of the State of Israel which holds a license
for the exclusive use of rHuEPO for the treatment of multiple myeloma. As of March 2021, we hold approximately 1.76% of the issued and
outstanding share capital of InterCure Ltd., a now former subsidiary of ours.
The
ADSs are listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “XTLB.” Our ordinary shares are traded on the TASE
under the symbol “XTLB.” We operate under the laws of the State of Israel under the Israeli Companies Law, and in the U.S.,
the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.
Our
principal offices are located at 5 Badner St., Ramat Gan 5218102, Israel, and our telephone number is (972) 3-6116600. Our primary internet
address is www.xtlbio.com. None of the information on our website is incorporated by reference herein.
ITEM
4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM
5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
You should read the following
discussion and analysis in conjunction with our restated audited consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, prepared
in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018,
and as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, contained in “Item 18. Consolidated Financial Statements” and with any other selected
financial data included elsewhere in this annual report.
The tables below present
selected financial data for the fiscal years ended as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 and as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. We have
derived this selected financial data from our restated audited consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this report and
prepared in accordance with IFRS issued by the IASB. You should read the selected financial data in conjunction with “Item 3. Key
Information” and “Item 8. Financial Information” and “Item 18. Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss):
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
U.S.
dollars in thousands
(except
per share data)
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
Continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(910
|
)
|
|
|
(807
|
)
|
|
|
(755
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(948
|
)
|
|
|
(842
|
)
|
|
|
(793
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revaluation of warrants to purchase ADS’s
|
|
|
(2,172
|
)
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
1,618
|
|
Revaluation of marketable securities
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
2,753
|
|
Other finance income
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Other finance expenses
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income (expenses), net
|
|
|
(2,006
|
)
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
4,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) for the year
|
|
|
(2,954
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items that might be classified to profit or loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale financial
assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,954
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company
|
|
|
(2,954
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company
|
|
|
(2,954
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per
share (in U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
(0.006
|
)
|
|
|
(0.001
|
)
|
|
|
0.007
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Financial Position Data:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
U.S Dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
(Restated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and bank deposits
|
|
|
3,631
|
|
|
|
4,455
|
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
5,867
|
|
|
|
6,598
|
|
|
|
7,942
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
6,503
|
|
|
|
7,212
|
|
|
|
8,575
|
|
Long term liabilities
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
3,612
|
|
|
|
6,515
|
|
|
|
7,273
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Overview
We
are a biopharmaceutical company engaged in the acquisition and development of pharmaceutical drugs for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.
Our current lead drug compound, hCDR1, is for the treatment of SLE and SS.
We
were established as a corporation under the laws of Israel in 1993, and commenced operations to use and commercialize technology developed
at the Weizmann Institute, in Rehovot, Israel. Since commencing operations, our activities have been primarily devoted to developing
our technologies and drug candidates, acquiring pre-clinical and clinical-stage compounds, raising capital, purchasing assets for our
facilities, and recruiting personnel. We have had no drug product sales to date. Our major sources of working capital have been proceeds
from various private and public offerings of our securities and option and warrant exercises.
We
have incurred negative cash flow from operations each year since our inception and we anticipate incurring negative cash flows from operating
activities for the foreseeable future. We have spent, and expect to continue to spend, substantial amounts in connection with implementing
our business strategy, including our planned product development efforts, our clinical trials, and potential in-licensing and acquisition
opportunities.
Our
research and development expenses primarily consisted of expenses related to the hCDR1 development plan. As part of the preparations
for future clinical trials of hCDR1, we engaged regulatory and clinical consultants and commenced work on Chemistry, Manufacturing and
Control, or CMC, including production and testing of the drug substance. The Company is expanding its IP portfolio surrounding hCDR1
and has decided to reduce its research and development expenditures in connection with execution of its clinical trials until full funding
for the trials or cooperation with a strategic partner is secured. In parallel, the Company will look to identify additional assets to
add to XTL’s portfolio.
Subject
to receiving adequate financing and/or entering into a collaboration agreement, we plan to:
|
●
|
initiate
an international, prospective advanced clinical study intended to assess the safety and efficacy of hCDR1 when given to patients
with SLE;
|
|
●
|
initiate
a prospective Phase 2 study intended to assess the safety and efficacy of hCDR1 when given to patients with pSS; and
|
|
●
|
continually
build our pipeline of therapeutic candidates.
|
Our
general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, consultant fees, and related expenses for executive, finance and other
administrative personnel, professional fees, director fees and other corporate expenses, including investor relations, business development
costs and facilities related expenses. We expense our general and administrative costs as incurred.
Our
results of operations include non-cash compensation expense as a result of the grants of XTL stock options. Compensation expense for
awards of options granted to employees and directors represents the fair value of the award (measured using the Black-Scholes valuation
model) recorded over the respective vesting periods of the individual stock options (see details below.)
For
awards of options and warrants to consultants and other third-parties, according to IFRS 2, the treatment of such options and warrants
is the same as employee options compensation expense (see note 14 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December
31, 2020). We record compensation expense based on the fair value of the award at the grant date according to the Black-Scholes valuation
model. According to IFRS 2, in non-performance-based options, we recognize options expenses using the graded vesting method (accelerated
amortization). Graded vesting means that portions of a single option grant will vest on several dates, equal to the number of tranches.
We treat each tranche as a separate share option grant; because each tranche has a different vesting period, and hence the fair value
of each tranche is different. Therefore, under this method the compensation cost amortization is accelerated to earlier periods in the
overall vesting period.
Our
planned clinical trials will be lengthy and expensive. Even if these trials show that our drug candidates are effective in treating certain
indications, there is no guarantee that we will be able to record commercial sales of any of our product candidates in the near future
or generate licensing revenues from upfront payments associated with out-licensing transactions. In addition, we expect losses in our
drug development activity to continue as we continue to fund development of our drug candidates. As we continue our development efforts,
we may enter into additional third-party collaborative agreements and may incur additional expenses, such as licensing fees and milestone
payments. As a result, our periodical results may fluctuate and a period-by-period comparison of our operating results may not be a meaningful
indication of our future performance.
A.
Results of Operations
Year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December
31, 2019
Research and Development Expenses.
Research and development expenses in the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 totaled approximately $38 thousand and $35 thousand,
respectively. Research and development expenses are comprised mainly of expenses related to maintenance of our intangible assets.
General and Administrative
Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 totaled approximately $910 thousand
and $807 thousand, respectively. The increase in 2020 compared to 2019 is mainly due to the replacement of the Company’s CEO and
from the increase in D&O insurance fee.
Impairment of intangible assets.
The Company is required to determine, at least on an annual basis and as of year-end, whether the fair value of its unamortized intangible
assets exceeds their book value. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company recognized no impairments. For further information, see
also Note 8 of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Finance income (expenses),
net. Finance income (expenses), net for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 totaled approximately $(2,006) thousand and $79
thousand, respectively. The increase in finance expenses, net in 2020 compared to 2019 derives mainly from the revaluation of warrants
to purchase ADS’s.
Year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December
31, 2018
Research and Development Expenses.
Research and development expenses in the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 totaled approximately $35 thousand and $38 thousand,
respectively. Research and development expenses are comprised mainly of expenses related to maintenance of our intangible assets.
General and Administrative
Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 totaled approximately $807 thousand
and 755 thousand, respectively. The increase in 2019 compared to 2018 is mainly due to the increase in D&O
insurance fee.
Impairment of intangible assets.
The Company is required to determine, at least on an annual basis and as of year-end, whether the fair value of its unamortized intangible
assets exceeds their book value. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recognized no impairments. For further information, see
also Note 9 of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Finance income, net.
Finance income, net for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 totaled approximately $79 thousand and $4,423 thousand, respectively.
The decrease in finance income in 2019 compared to 2018 derives mainly from the revaluation of marketable securities and warrants to purchase ADSs.
Significant Accounting Policies
We describe our significant accounting
policies more fully in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Basis of presentation of the
consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiary (the “Group”)
as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020 have been prepared in accordance
with International Financial Reporting Standards which are standards and interpretations issued by the IASB (“IFRS”).
The
significant accounting policies described below are consistent with those of all periods presented, unless indicated otherwise.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires
the Company’s management to exercise its judgment in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas that
involve judgment which has significant effect or complexity or where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial
statements are disclosed in Note 3 to the annual consolidated financial statements. Actual results could significantly differ from the
estimates and assumptions used by the Group’s management.
Financial
liabilities at fair value through profit or loss:
In accordance with International
Accounting Standard 32: “Financial Instruments: Presentation”, warrants allotted to investors with a cashless exercise mechanism
are a “financial liability”. As the aforementioned liability was a non-equity derivative financial instrument, it was classified
in accordance with International Accounting Standard 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement” (“IAS
39”) as a financial liability at fair value through profit or loss, which was measured at its fair value at each date of the balance
sheet, with changes in the fair value carried to “revaluation of warrants to purchase ADS’s” in the statement of comprehensive
loss.
The
Company analyzes the expenses recognized in the statement of comprehensive loss by classification based on the function of expense.
Subsidiaries
consolidation and business combinations
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and entities controlled by the Company. Control exists when the
Company has the power over the investee, has exposure, or rights, to variable returns from involvement in the investee, and has the ability
to use its power over the investee to affect its returns.
The
Company examines whether it controls another entity even when it does not hold more than 50% of the voting rights, but can control the
entity’s financial and operating policies by de-facto control. De-facto control can be created under circumstances in which the
ratio of the Company’s voting rights in the entity to the percentage and dispersion of the holdings of the other shareholders grants
the Company the power to control the entity’s financial and operating policies.
Subsidiaries
are fully consolidated starting from the date on which control therein is attained by the Company. Their consolidation ceases when such
control is discontinued.
Intra-group
balances and transactions, including revenues, expenses and dividends in respect of transactions between the Group companies, are eliminated.
Gains and losses arising from intra-group transactions that have been recognized as assets (such as inventories and property, plant and
equipment) are also eliminated. Such intra-group losses may point to the impairment of assets which is tested and accounted for as specified
below.
Transactions
with non-controlling interests in subsidiaries which do not result in loss of control in the subsidiaries are accounted for as transactions
with owners. In these transactions, the difference between the fair value of any consideration paid or received and the amount of adjustment
of the non-controlling interests to reflect the changes in their relative rights in the subsidiaries is directly recognized in equity
and attributed to the equity holders of the parent.
Associate
An
associate is an entity over which the Group exercises significant influence, but not control, which is usually expressed in holding 20%-50%
of the voting rights. The investment in an associate is presented using the equity method of accounting. According to the equity method
of accounting, the investment is initially recognized at cost and its carrying amount varies to the extent that the Group recognizes
its share of the associate’s earnings or losses from the acquisition date.
The
Group’s share in the earnings or losses of associates after the acquisition date is carried to profit or loss and its share in
the other comprehensive income movements after the acquisition date is carried to other comprehensive income against the carrying amount
of the investment.
Intangible
assets
|
1.
|
Unamortized
intangible assets (licenses and patent rights)
|
The
amortization of an asset on a straight-line basis over its useful life begins when the development procedure is completed and the asset
is available for use. These assets are reviewed for impairment once a year or whenever there are indicators of a possible impairment,
in accordance with the provisions of IAS 36, “Impairment of Assets”.
|
2.
|
Research
and development
|
Research
expenditures are recognized as expenses when incurred. Costs arising from development projects are recognized as intangible assets when
the following criteria are met:
|
●
|
it
is technically feasible to complete the intangible asset so that it will be available for use;
|
|
●
|
management
intends to complete the intangible asset and use or sell it;
|
|
●
|
there
is an ability to use or sell the intangible asset;
|
|
●
|
it
can be demonstrated how the intangible asset will generate probable future economic benefits;
|
|
●
|
adequate
technical, financial and other resources to complete the development and to use or sell the intangible asset are available; and
|
|
●
|
the
expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development can be reliably measured.
|
Other
development expenditures that do not meet these criteria are recognized as an expense when incurred. Development costs that were previously
recognized as an expense are not recognized as an asset in a later period. During the three years ended December 31, 2020, the Group
did not capitalize development costs to intangible assets.
Impairment
of intangible assets
Intangible
assets which are not yet available for use are not depreciated and impairment in their respect is tested every year. Depreciable assets
are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable
amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets
are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units). Non-financial assets
that sustained impairment are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each date of the statement of financial position.
Share
capital
The
Company’s ordinary shares are classified as share capital. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issuance of new shares
or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the issuance proceeds.
When
Group companies purchase Company shares (treasury shares), the consideration paid, including incremental costs directly attributable
to the purchase (less the effect of taxes on income), is deducted from the equity attributable to equity holders of the parent until
the shares are eliminated or reissued. When these shares are reissued in subsequent periods, the consideration received, less incremental
costs directly attributable to the transaction and less the effect of taxes on income, is included in equity attributable to equity holders
of the parent.
Share-based
payment
The
Group operates a number of share-based payment plans to employees and to other service providers who render services that are similar
to employees’ services that are settled with the Group’s equity instruments. In this framework, the Group grants employees,
from time to time, and at its sole discretion, options to purchase shares of the Group companies. The fair value of services received
from employees in consideration of the grant of options is recognized as an expense in the statement of comprehensive income (loss) and
correspondingly carried to equity. The total amount recognized as an expense over the vesting term of the options (the term over which
all pre-established vesting conditions are expected to be satisfied) is determined by reference to the fair value of the options granted
at grant date, except the effect of any non-market vesting conditions.
Non-market
vesting conditions are included in the assumptions used in estimating the number of options that are expected to vest. The total expense
is recognized over the vesting period, which is the period over which all of the specified vesting conditions of the share-based payment
arrangement are to be satisfied.
In
each reporting date, the Company revises its estimates of the number of options that are expected to vest based on the non-market vesting
conditions and recognizes the impact of the revision to original estimates, if any, in the statement of comprehensive income (loss) with
a corresponding adjustment in equity.
When
the options are exercised, the Company issues new shares. The proceeds net of any directly attributable transaction costs are credited
to share capital (nominal value) and share premium.
Share-based
payment transactions in which the Company acquired assets as consideration for the Company’s equity instruments are measured at
the value of the assets acquired.
Provisions
A
provision in accordance to IAS 37 is recognized when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of an event
that occurred in the past, it is probable that the Group will be required to use economic resources to settle the obligation and it can
be reliably estimated. The group recognizes a provision for warranty when the product is sold to the customer or when the service is
provided to the customer. Initial recognition is based on past experience. The estimated provision is re-tested every year.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Estimates
and judgments are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events
that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
|
1.
|
Critical
accounting estimates and assumptions
|
Accounting
estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of
causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are addressed below.
|
(i)
|
In
testing impairment of research and development assets, the Company’s management is required to estimate, among other things,
the probable endpoints of trials conducted by the Company, the commercial technical feasibility of the development and the resulting
economic benefits. Actual results and estimates to be made in the future may significantly differ from current estimates.
|
|
(ii)
|
The
Group is required to determine at the end of each reporting period whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired.
If indicators for impairment are identified, the Group estimates the assets’ recoverable amount, which is the higher of an
asset’s fair value less costs to sell and its value-in-use.
|
|
●
|
Warrants
- In accordance with International Accounting Standard 32: "Financial Instruments: Presentation", warrants allotted to
investors with a cashless exercise mechanism are a "financial liability". As the aforementioned liability is a non-equity
derivative financial instrument, it is classified in accordance with International Accounting Standard 32 "Financial Instruments:
Presentation " as a financial liability at fair value through profit or loss, which is measured at its fair value using Black-Scholes
model at each date of the balance sheet, with changes in the fair value carried to "revaluation of warrants to purchase ADS's" in
the statements of comprehensive loss.
|
Impact
of Inflation and Currency Fluctuations
We
hold most of our cash, cash equivalents and bank deposits in US dollars. While a substantial amount of our operating expenses are in
US dollars, we incur a portion of our expenses in New Israeli Shekels. In addition, we also pay for some of our services and supplies
in the local currencies of our suppliers. As a result, we are exposed to the risk that the US dollar will be devalued against the New
Israeli Shekel or other currencies, and as result our financial results could be harmed if we are unable to protect against currency
fluctuations in Israel or other countries in which services and supplies are obtained in the future. Accordingly, we may enter into currency
hedging transactions to decrease the risk of financial exposure from fluctuations in the exchange rates of currencies. The Company’s
treasury’s risk management policy is to hold NIS-denominated cash and cash equivalents and short-term deposits in the amount of
the anticipated NIS-denominated liabilities for six consecutive months from time to time in line with the directives of the Company’s
Board. These measures, however, may not adequately protect us from the adverse effects of inflation in Israel. In addition, we are exposed
to the risk that the rate of inflation in Israel will exceed the rate of devaluation of the New Israeli Shekel in relation to the US
Dollar or that the timing of any devaluation may lag behind inflation in Israel. Future activities may lead us to perform a clinical
trial in Israel, which may lead us to reassess our use of the US dollar as our functional currency.
As of
December 31, 2020, had the Group’s functional currency strengthened by 10% against the NIS with all other variables remaining constant,
loss for the year would have been $242 thousand lower (2019 loss approximately $233 thousand lower; 2018 - profit approximately $289
thousand higher), mainly as a result of exchange rate changes on translation of other accounts receivable, net and exchange rate changes
on NIS-denominated cash and cash equivalents and short-term deposits.
Governmental
Economic, Fiscal, Monetary or Political Policies that Materially Affected or Could Materially Affect Our Operations
Tax
rates applicable to the Company:
|
●
|
Taxable
income of the Company is subject to a corporate tax rate as follow: 2020 and 2019 - 23%.
|
As of
December 31, 2020, XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. did not have any taxable income. As of December 31, 2020, our net operating loss carry
forwards for Israeli tax purposes registered on behalf of XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. amounted to approximately $41 million. Under Israeli
law, these net-operating losses may be carried forward indefinitely and offset within XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd only, against future
taxable income, including capital gains from the sale of assets used in the business, with no expiration date.
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have financed our operations
from inception primarily through various proceeds from various private and public offerings of our securities and option and warrant
exercises. As of December 31, 2020, we received net proceeds of approximately $85.5 million from various private placement transactions,
public offerings and exercises of warrants, including most recently $2.8 million from our private placement in March 2017.
As of December 31, 2020, we had
approximately $3.7 million in cash and cash equivalents (including short-term bank deposits), compared to $4.4 million on December 31,
2019. The decrease is mainly from the General and administrative expenses of 2020.
Net cash used in operating activities
for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $0.9 million, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $0.9 million for year ended
December 31, 2019.
Net cash provided by investing
activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $32 thousand compared to $2,111 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019. The
decrease in net cash provided by investing activities is primarily due to repayment of short term bank deposits during 2019 offset investment
in short term bank deposit in 2018.
Net cash provided by financing
activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $0 million, compared to $0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.
We
have incurred continuing losses and depend on outside financing resources to continue our activities. We have decided to reduce our research
and development expenditures in connection with execution of our clinical trials until full funding for the trials or cooperation with
a strategic partner is secured. In parallel, we will look to identify additional assets to add to our portfolio.
Subject
to receiving adequate financing and/or entering into a collaboration agreement, we plan to:
|
●
|
initiate
an international, prospective advanced clinical study intended to assess the safety and efficacy of hCDR1 when given to patients
with SLE;
|
|
●
|
initiate
a prospective Phase 2 study intended to assess the safety and efficacy of hCDR1 when given to patients with pSS; and
|
|
●
|
continually
build our pipeline of therapeutic candidates.
|
Based
on existing business plans, our management estimates that our outstanding cash and cash equivalent balances will allow us to finance
our activities for an additional period of at least 12 months from the date of this report. However, the amount of cash which we will
need in practice to finance our activities depends on numerous factors which include, but are not limited to, the timing, planning and
execution of clinical trials of existing drugs and future projects which we might acquire or other business development activities such
as acquiring new technologies and/or changes in circumstances which are liable to cause significant expenses to us in excess of management’s
current and known expectations as of the date of these financial statements and which will require us to reallocate funds against plans,
also due to circumstances beyond our control.
We
expect to incur additional losses through the end of 2021 and beyond arising from research and development activities, testing additional
technologies and operating activities, which will be reflected in negative cash flows from operating activities. In order to perform
the clinical trials aimed at developing a product until obtaining its marketing approval, we may be required to raise additional funds
in the future by issuing securities. Should we fail to raise additional capital in the future under standard terms, we will be required
to minimize our activities or sell or grant a sublicense to third parties to use all or part of its technologies.
C.
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses
Research
and development costs in 2020, 2019, 2018 substantially derived from costs related to the hCDR1 and, to a lesser degree, development
plans. As part of the preparations for a planned clinical study of hCDR1, the Company engaged regulatory and clinical consultants and
completed work on CMC, including production and testing of the drug substance and drug product.
hCDR1
for the Treatment of SLE
The
Company is expanding its IP portfolio surrounding hCDR1 and has decided to reduce its R&D expenditure in connection with execution
of its clinical trials until full funding for the trials or cooperation with a strategic partner is secured.
rHuEPO
for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
We
have decided to concentrate our efforts and resources on the development of hCDR1 and therefore do not expect to initiate any activities
related to rHuEPO.
The
following table sets forth the research and development costs for the years 2020, 2019 and 2018 including all costs related to the clinical-stage
projects, our pre-clinical activities, and all other research and development. We in-licensed hCDR1 in January 2014 and started preparations
for clinical development of this asset during the year. We started preparations for rHuEPO clinical development in the last quarter of
2010 (after the completion of the Bio-Gal transaction on August 2010). We in-licensed SAM-101 in November 2011 and in June 2015, the
Company terminated the license agreement and all rights in and to the licensed technology reverted to MinoGuard. Whether or not and how
quickly we commence and complete development of our clinical stage projects is dependent on a variety of factors, including the rate
at which we are able to engage clinical trial sites and the rate of enrollment of patients. As such, the costs associated with the development
of our drug candidates will probably increase significantly.
|
|
Research
and development
Expenses in thousand US$
|
|
|
|
Year
ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hCDR1
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Total Research and Development
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
D.
Trend Information
We
are a development stage company and it is not possible for us to predict with any degree of accuracy the outcome of our research, development
or commercialization efforts. As such, it is not possible for us to predict with any degree of accuracy any significant trends, uncertainties,
demands, commitments or events that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our net sales or revenues, income from continuing
operations, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that would cause financial information to not necessarily be indicative
of future operating results or financial condition. However, to the extent possible, certain trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments
and events are identified in the preceding subsections.
E.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We
have not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated entities whereby we have financial guarantees, subordinated retained interests,
derivative instruments or other contingent arrangements that expose us to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities, or any other
obligations under a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides us with financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk
support.
F.
Tabular disclosure of contractual Obligations
As of
December 31, 2020 and 2019, we do not carry any contractual obligations, commitments or contingencies relates to research and development
operations.
Pursuant
to our asset purchase agreement to acquire the rights to develop rHuEPO for the treatment of Multiple Myeloma from Bio-Gal Ltd., we are
obligated to pay 1% royalties on net sales of the product, as well as a fixed royalty payment in the total amount of $350 thousand upon
the successful completion of Phase 2. The payment of $350 thousand is to be made to Yeda upon the earlier of (i) six months from the
successful completion of Phase 2 or (ii) the completion of a successful fundraising by XTL at any time after the completion of the Phase
2 in an amount of at least $2 million. No Phase 2 study has been initiated on this compound.
According
to the licensing agreement signed with Yeda to develop hCDR1, a Phase II-ready asset for the treatment of SLE. The terms of the licensing
agreement include, among other things, expense reimbursement for patent expenses payable in six installments (as of December 31, 2017
four out of the six installments have been paid in cash or through issuance of shares), certain milestone payments to Yeda, low single-digit
royalties based on net sales, and additional customary royalties to the Office of the Chief Scientist.
ITEM
6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
|
A.
|
Directors
and Senior Management
|
|
B.
|
The
following sets forth information with respect to our directors and executive officers as of the date hereof.
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
Shlomo
Shalev
|
|
59
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
Itay
Weinstein
|
|
49
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
Osnat
Hillel Fain
|
|
55
|
|
Non-Executive
and External Director
|
Iris
Shapira Yalon
|
|
53
|
|
Non-Executive
and External Director
|
Alexander
Rabinovich
|
|
50
|
|
Non-Executive
Director
|
Doron
Turgeman
|
|
52
|
|
Non-Executive
Director and Chairman of the Board
|
Dr.
Jonathan Schapiro
|
|
60
|
|
Non-Executive
Director
|
Dr.
Dobroslav Melamed
|
|
43
|
|
Non-Executive
Director
|
Shlomo Shalev joined
our Board of Directors in December 2014. On May 19, 2020, Mr. Shalev was appointed to serve as Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
In August 2015, Mr. Shalev was appointed to serve as Chairman, and served in such capacity through June 2018. He most recently served
as Chairman of the Board of Intercure, a TASE listed company. In addition to serving as a board member on a number of NASDAQ and TASE
listed companies, such as OphirOptronics, Arel Communications and PowerDsine, Mr. Shalev was the Senior Vice President of Investments
for Ampal. He has also worked on a number of transactions in mergers and acquisitions and initial public offerings. With an educational
background in economics, Mr. Shalev was Israel’s Consul for Economic Affairs and the Economic Advisor to the Director General,
Ministry of Industry and Trade. Mr. Shalev holds an MBA from the University of San Francisco and a B.A. degree in Economics from the
University of Ben Gurion, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Itay Weinstein was
appointed our Chief Financial Officer in July, 2017. Mr. Itay Weinstein is a Partner at Shimony C.P.A. and has been employed there since
1999. Mr. Weinstein served as the Controller of Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd. since 2003 and as the Chief Financial Officer of Ophthalix Inc.
from November 2011 through November 2017. Prior to joining Shimony C.P.A, Mr. Weinstein served as an auditor at Oren Horowitz. Mr. Weinstein
holds a B.A. in economics and accounting from the Tel Aviv University, Israel, and has been a licensed CPA since 1999. Mr. Weinstein
is also a board member of Uno Management and Consulting Ltd.
Osnat Hillel Fain
joined our Board of Directors in March 2015. She most recently served as Founder, Director and Managing Partner of Newton Propulsion
Technologies LTD. In addition to serving as a board member on a number of TASE listed companies, including First ET View LTD, Priortech
LTD, Aran R&D (1982) LTD, LeumiStart Fund and SDS LTD, Ms. Fain was the Business Development Manager at Giora Eiland Ltd., a representative
of The Cheyne Capital Group in Israel, CEO of InterVision, Co-manager of the Aran Medical Ventures hedge fund, Marketing Manager at Datasphere
Ltd. and an independent marketing consultant for TCB. She earned an Executive MBA and a BA in Humanities at Tel Aviv University and completed
a one year course in Management at the Tel Aviv campus of the College of Management.
Iris Shapira Yalon
was appointed a director on January 29, 2020. Ms. Yalon serves as External Director of Electra Real Estate Ltd., as well as Director
of Rotem Industries Ltd. (Israeli government-owned company), Mei Avivim, (a water corporation of Tel Aviv) and in several associations
for the benefit of the public and as a Lecturer of Director's course (at the Israeli institute of CPA). Prior to that, served as Board
member on a number of TASE listed companies, including Computer Direct Group Ltd. and on a dual listed company such as TAT Technologies
Ltd., Ms. Yalon served as the Chief Financial Officer of multiple companies such as Kryon Systems Ltd., Haldor Advanced Technologies
Ltd., Mofet Technology Fund Ltd., and Cloverleaf Media Ltd.,which was acquired in 2010 by Dot Hill. Moreover, Ms. Yalon has served as
Audit Team Manager at Ernest & Young. She earned a BA in Economics and Accounting (cum laude) at Tel Aviv University and she is licensed
accountant.
Alexander Rabinovich
joined our Board of Directors in April 2017. He has significant public company experience with both NASDAQ and TASE listed companies.
Mr. Rabinovich is currently the Chief Executive Officer and director of Green Forest Holdings Ltd., a fully owned company engaged in
capital investments. He served as director in Pilat Media Global PLC, public company listed on TASE and on the Alternative Investment
Market of the London Stock Exchange and several other private companies such as Visualety Systems Ltd. Mr. Rabinovich holds a B.A. degree
in Economics and Accounting from the University of Haifa.
Doron Turgeman joined
our Board of Directors in December 2014 and was appointed Chief Executive Officer on January 29, 2020. On May 19, 2020, Mr. Turgeman
resigned as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Turgeman remains on the board following his resignation as Chief Executive Officer. He has served
as Chairman of our Board of Directors since July 2018 through present. Mr. Turgeman has significant public company experience with both
NASDAQ and TASE listed companies. He has gained considerable experience in mergers and acquisitions involving both debt and equity. Mr.
Turgeman holds a B.A. degree in Economics and Accounting from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and is a certified public accountant
in Israel.
Dr. Jonathan Schapiro
joined our Board of Directors in December 2014. He is Director of HIV/AIDS at the National Hemophilia Center at Sheba Medical
Center in Tel-Aviv, Israel, and the Head of the Advisory Committee for the Stanford University HIVDB Drug Resistance Interpretation System,
as well as Co-Chair, Research and Innovation Working Group Subcommittee, World Health Organization HIV Drug Resistance Network, Geneva,
Switzerland. He served as a committee member on the United States Food and Drug Administration Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee and
is a member of the Liverpool University HIV Drug Interactions Editorial Board. Dr. Schapiro is on the organizing and scientific committee
of international conferences on antiviral drug development, clinical pharmacology, and resistance, as well as contributing to guidelines
publications. His research has appeared in major journals such as Lancet and Annals of Internal Medicine. He has served on the scientific
advisory boards of major pharmaceutical and molecular diagnostic companies and has been involved in the development of multiple antiviral
drugs over the last 20 years. Dr. Schapiro has devoted his career to HIV clinical care, research, and education since completing his
Fellowship in Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford CA. He graduated from the
Ben Gurion University School of Medicine and completed his Medical Residency at the Rabin Medical Center in Israel.
Dr.
Dobroslav Melamed joined our Board of Directors in December 2014. He is a biotech entrepreneur with over 10 years of experience
in the life science industry. He has demonstrated success in taking drugs from the lab to the shelf by identifying target markets, planning
regulatory strategy, raising capital, executing successful clinical trials and scaling up to commercial production. He is currently establishing
two companies involved in the development of a treatment for Ebola and novel drug delivery. Until September 2014, he was the President
of SciVac (formerly SciGen IL), a high growth biopharmaceutical company that develops, manufactures and markets recombinant human health
care biotechnology derived products, including vaccines. Dr. Melamed was responsible for SciVac’s operations, clinical trials and
new business. Dr. Melamed is the co-founder of Periness LTD, a developer of new drugs for male infertility and Oshadi LTD, a developer
of oral carriers for proteins like insulin. He has also been a researcher at Bar-Ilan University’s Male Fertility clinic, where
he assisted in the development of new drugs for male infertility; and QBI, where he worked in the Pre-clinical and Research Pharmacology
Department establishing In-Vivo models for drug discovery and delivery. Dr. Melamed earned a PhD in Biotechnology and a Bachelor of Arts
degree in Biotechnology from the Bar-Ilan University, Israel.
B.
Compensation
The
aggregate compensation paid by us to all persons who served as directors or officers for the year 2020 (9 persons) was approximately
$329,000. This amount includes payments of approximately $3,000 made for social security, pension, disability insurance and health insurance
premiums, severance accruals, payments made in lieu of statutory severance, payments for continuing education plans and payments made
for the redemption of accrued vacation.
All members of our Board of
Directors who are not our employees are reimbursed for their expenses for each meeting attended, save for Alexander Rabinovich, who is
a significant shareholder of our Company. Our directors are eligible to receive stock options under our stock option plans. With the
exception of the Chairman of the Board of Directors who receives monthly compensation, non-executive directors do not receive any remuneration
from us other than fees for their services as members of the board or committees of the board and expense reimbursement, save for one
director who is eligible for fees for consulting services provided to the Company.
In
2017, we fixed the monetary compensation for non-executive directors as follows: annual consideration of NIS 29 thousand (to be paid
in 4 equal quarterly payments), payments of NIS 1,460 for attendance at each board or committee meeting in person, NIS 876 for meetings
held by teleconference, NIS 730 for unanimous written board resolutions and reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.
For further details regarding
share options granted to our employees, directors and service providers, see Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2020.
Employment Agreements
Shlomo Shalev
Our Chief Executive Officer,
Shlomo Shalev, was appointed on May 19, 2020. Mr. Shalev will receive compensation as follows:
|
1.
|
Monthly
Salary – Mr. Shalev shall be entitled to a fixed gross monthly fee of NIS 30,000 (approximately USD 9,331), excluding value
added tax.
|
|
2.
|
Working
Hours – Mr,. Shalev shall be employed at a 50% capacity.
|
|
3.
|
Social
Benefits – Mr. Shalev shall be entitled to receive monthly car expense payments of NIS 3,000 (approximately USD 933).
|
|
4.
|
Options
– Mr. Shalev shall be issued 10,000,000 options (the “Options”) to purchase, under the approved ESOP plan of the
Company, 10,000,000 ordinary shares of the Company consisting of about two per cent (2%) of the total issued and outstanding capital
share of the Company, at an exercise price of NIS 0.09 (approximately USD 0.03) per Option. The Options shall vest on a quarterly
basis over 36 months, so that 1/12 of the Options shall vest on the last day of each three month period, provided that on such date
Mr. Shalev is still employed by the Company.
|
Doron Turgeman
Doron Turgeman resigned as
our Chief Executive Officer on May 19, 2020. Mr. Turgemman received compensation as follows:
|
1.
|
Monthly
Salary – Mr. Turgeman was entitled to a fixed gross monthly fee of NIS 30,000 (approximately USD 9,331), excluding value added
tax.
|
|
2.
|
Working
Hours – Mr. Turgeman was employed at a 50% capacity.
|
|
3.
|
Social
Benefits – Mr. Turgeman was entitled to receive monthly car expanses payments of NIS 3,000 (approximately USD 933).
|
|
4.
|
Options
– Mr. Turgeman was entitled to be issued with 10,000,000 options to purchase, under the approved ESOP plan of the Company 10,000,000
ordinary shares of the Company consisting about two per cent (2%) of the total issued and outstanding capital share of the Company,
at an exercise price of NIS 0.09 (approximately USD 0.03) per Option. The Options shall vest on a quarterly basis over 36 months,
so that 1/12 of the Options shall vest on the last day of each three-month period, provided that on such date Mr. Turgeman is still
employed by the Company. Due to Mr. Turgeman’s resignation in the same year he was appointed, no options were issued.
|
On the same day, Mr, Turgeman
was appointed Chairman of the Board.
Josh Levine
We entered into a consulting
agreement with Mr. Levine, our former Chief Executive Officer, on April 5, 2020. Mr. Levine receives compensation as follows:
|
1.
|
Monthly
Salary – Mr. Levine is entitled to a fixed monthly consulting fee of NIS 6,000 (approximately USD 1,866), excluding value added
tax.
|
|
2.
|
Success
Bonus – subject to execution of a transaction during the Term under which the Company will sell, license or otherwise partner
the Lupus Asset due to the Services of Mr. Levine, he shall be entitled to a success bonus equal to 25% of the net proceeds actually
received by the Company as a result of the transaction.
|
Itay
Weinstein
In July 2017, we entered into
a service agreement with Mr. Itay Weinstein pursuant to which he serves as our Chief Financial Officer on a part time basis. Mr. Weinstein
is entitled to a monthly gross payment of NIS 15,000 (NIS 180,000 annually).
In addition, we pay Shimony
C.P.A, the accounting firm of which Mr. Weinstein is a Partner, monthly fees of NIS 15,000 for controller and bookkeeping services.
Jonathan
Schapiro
We entered into a consulting
agreement dated January 1, 2015 with Dr. Jonathan Schapiro, a director. Commencing on such date, Dr. Schapiro shall serve as a consultant
to us for a monthly fee of $1,500 increasing to $3,000 upon the successful completion of a cash fund raising of at least $3 million in
a public offering or private placement of equity securities, including securities convertible or exercisable into equity by us or any
entity in our control. In addition, under the consulting agreement, on December 30, 2014, Dr. Schapiro was granted options to purchase
150,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of NIS 0.4915 per share (in addition to the options granted to him as a director on the
same day as described above). One third of the options vest on the twelve month anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining two
thirds vest on a quarterly basis over the following two years provided Dr. Schapiro provides services to us. The options have a term
of ten years. The consulting agreement continues in force unless terminated without cause upon 30 days’ advance written notice.
Jonathan receives a fixed
fee of $2,000 per month (in addition to his board membership fee).
In
accordance with the requirements of Israeli Law, we determine our directors’ compensation in the following manner:
|
●
|
first,
our compensation committee reviews the proposal for compensation.
|
|
●
|
second,
provided that the compensation committee approves the proposed compensation, the proposal is then submitted to our Board of Directors
for review, except that a director who is the beneficiary of the proposed compensation does not participate in any discussion or
voting with respect to such proposal; and
|
|
●
|
finally,
if our Board of Directors approves the proposal, it must then submit its recommendation to our shareholders, which is usually done
in connection with our shareholders’ general meeting.
|
The
approval of a majority of the shareholders voting at a duly convened shareholders meeting is required to implement any such compensation
proposal.
C.
Board Practices
Election
of Directors and Terms of Office
Our Board of Directors currently
consists of seven members. Other than our two external directors, our directors are elected by an ordinary resolution at the annual general
meeting of our shareholders. The nomination of our directors is proposed by our Board of Directors or a designated nomination committee
composed of three members of our Board of Directors, whose proposal is then approved by the board. Our board, following receipt of a
proposal of the nomination committee, has the authority to add additional directors up to the maximum number of 12 directors allowed
under our Articles. Such directors appointed by the board serve until the next annual general meeting of the shareholders. Unless they
resign before the end of their term or are removed in accordance with our Articles, all of our directors, other than our external directors,
will serve as directors until our next annual general meeting of shareholders.
None
of our directors or officers has any family relationship with any other director or officer.
Our
Articles permit us to maintain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and to indemnify our directors and officers for
actions performed on behalf of us, subject to specified limitations. We maintain a directors and officers insurance policy which covers
the liability of our directors and officers as allowed under Israeli Companies Law.
There
are no service contracts or similar arrangements with any director that provide for benefits upon termination of a directorship.
External
and Independent Directors
The
Israeli Companies Law requires Israeli companies with shares that have been offered to the public either in or outside of Israel to appoint
two external directors. No person may be appointed as an external director if that person or that person’s relative, partner, employer
or any entity under the person’s control, has or had, on or within the two years preceding the date of that person’s appointment
to serve as an external director, any affiliation with the company or any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with
the company. The term affiliation includes:
|
●
|
an
employment relationship;
|
|
●
|
a
business or professional relationship maintained on a regular basis;
|
|
●
|
service
as an office holder, other than service as an officer for a period of not more than three months, during which the company first
offered shares to the public.
|
No
person may serve as an external director if that person’s position or business activities create, or may create, a conflict of
interest with that person’s responsibilities as an external director or may otherwise interfere with his/her ability to serve as
an external director. If, at the time external directors are to be appointed, all current members of the Board of Directors are of the
same gender, then at least one external director must be of the other gender. A director in one company shall not be appointed as an
external director in another company if at that time a director of the other company serves as an external director in the first company.
In addition, no person may be appointed as an external director if he/she is a member or employee of the Israeli Security Authority,
and also not if he/she is a member of the Board of Directors or an employee of a stock exchange in Israel.
External
directors are to be elected by a majority vote at a shareholders’ meeting, provided that either:
|
●
|
the
majority of shares voted at the meeting, including at least one-half of the shares held by non-controlling shareholders or other
shareholders who have a personal interest in such election voted at the meeting, vote in favor of election of the director, with
abstaining votes not being counted in this vote; or
|
|
●
|
the
total number of shares held by non-controlling shareholders voted against the election of the director does not exceed two percent
of the aggregate voting rights in the company.
|
The
initial term of an external director is three years and may be extended for two additional three-year terms. An external director may
be removed only by the same percentage of shareholders as is required for their election, or by a court, and then only if such external
director ceases to meet the statutory qualifications for their appointment or violates his or her duty of loyalty to the company. Both
external directors must serve on every committee that is empowered to exercise one of the functions of the Board of Directors.
An
external director is entitled to compensation as provided in regulations adopted under the Israeli Companies Law and is otherwise prohibited
from receiving any other compensation, directly or indirectly, in connection with service provided as an external director.
Osnat Hillel Fain and Iris
Shapira Yalon serve as external directors pursuant to the provisions of the Israeli Companies Law. They both serve on our audit committee,
our committee for the approval of financial statements, our nomination committee and our compensation committee.
Audit
Committee
The
Israeli Companies Law requires public companies to appoint an audit committee. The responsibilities of the audit committee include identifying
irregularities in the management of the company’s business and approving related party transactions as required by law. An audit
committee must consist of at least three directors, including all of its external directors. The chairman of the Board of Directors,
any director employed by or otherwise providing services to the company, and a controlling shareholder or any relative of a controlling
shareholder, may not serve as members of the audit committee. An audit committee may not approve an action or a transaction with a controlling
shareholder, or with an office holder, unless at the time of approval two external directors are serving as members of the audit committee
and at least one of the external directors was present at the meeting in which an approval was granted.
Our audit committee is currently
comprised of three independent non-executive directors. The audit committee is chaired by Osnat Hillel Fain, who serves as the audit
committee financial expert, Iris Shapira Yalon and Dobroslav Melamed as members. The audit committee meets at least four times a year
and monitors the adequacy of our internal controls, accounting policies and financial reporting. It regularly reviews the results of
the ongoing risk self-assessment process, which we undertake, and our interim and annual reports prior to their submission for approval
by the full Board of Directors. The audit committee oversees the activities of the internal auditor, sets its annual tasks and goals
and reviews its reports. The audit committee reviews the objectivity and independence of the external auditors and also considers the
scope of their work and fees.
We
have adopted a written charter for our audit committee, setting forth its responsibilities as outlined by the regulations of the SEC.
In addition, our audit committee has adopted procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints we may receive regarding
accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters and the submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable
accounting or auditing matters. In addition, SEC rules mandate that the audit committee of a listed issuer consist of at least three
members, all of whom must be independent, as such term is defined by rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. We are in compliance
with the independence requirements of the SEC rules.
Financial
Statement Examination Committee
According
to regulations promulgated under the Companies law and since we are considered as a “Small Corporation” under the Israeli
Securities law Regulation, we are not required to appoint a financial statement examination committee, therefore our financial statements
are examined and approved by our board of directors.
Compensation
Committee
Under
the Companies Law, the board of directors of any public company must establish a compensation committee and to adopt a compensation policy
with respect to its officers, or the Compensation Policy. In addition, the Companies Law sets forth the approval process required for
a public company’s engagement with its officers (with specific reference to a director, a non-director officer, a chief executive
officer and controlling shareholders and their relatives who are employed by the company).
The compensation committee
shall be nominated by the board of directors and be comprised of its members. The compensation committee must consist of at least three
members. All of the external directors must serve on the compensation committee and constitute a majority of its members. The remaining
members of the compensation committee must be directors who qualify to serve as members of the audit committee (including the fact that
they are independent) and their compensation should be identical to the compensation paid to the external directors of the company. The
approval of the compensation committee is required in order to approve terms of office and/or employment of office holders. The Company’s
Compensation Policy was duly approved on January 7, 2021.
Similar
to the rules that apply to the audit committee, the compensation committee may not include the chairman of the board, or any director
employed by the company, by a controlling shareholder or by any entity controlled by a controlling shareholder, or any director providing
services to the company, to a controlling shareholder or to any entity controlled by a controlling shareholder on a regular basis, or
any director whose primary income is dependent on a controlling shareholder, and may not include a controlling shareholder or any of
its relatives. Individuals who are not permitted to be compensation committee members may not participate in the committee’s meetings
other than to present a particular issue; provided, however, that an employee that is not a controlling shareholder or relative may participate
in the committee’s discussions, but not in any vote, and the company’s legal counsel and corporate secretary may participate
in the committee’s discussions and votes if requested by the committee.
The
roles of the compensation committee are, among other things, to: (i) recommend to the board of directors the Compensation Policy for
office holders and recommend to the board once every three years the extension of a Compensation Policy that had been approved for a
period of more than three years; (ii) recommend to the directors any update of the Compensation Policy, from time to time, and examine
its implementation; (iii) decide whether to approve the terms of office and of employment of office holders that require approval of
the compensation committee; and (iv) decide, in certain circumstances, whether to exempt the approval of terms of office of a chief executive
officer from the requirement of shareholder approval.
The
Compensation Policy requires the approval of the general meeting of shareholders with a “Special Majority”, which requires
a majority of the shareholders of the company who are not either a controlling shareholder or an “interested party” in the
proposed resolution, or the shareholders holding less than 2% of the voting power in the company voted against the proposed resolution
at such meeting. However, under special circumstances, the board of directors may approve the Compensation Policy without shareholder
approval, if the compensation committee and thereafter the board of directors decided, based on substantiated reasons after they have
reviewed the compensation policy again, that the Compensation Policy is in the best interest of the company.
The
compensation policy must serve as the basis for decisions concerning the financial terms of employment or engagement of executive officers
and directors, including exculpation, insurance, indemnification or any monetary payment or obligation of payment in respect of employment
or engagement. The Compensation Policy must relate to certain factors, including advancement of the company’s objectives, the company’s
business and its long-term strategy, and creation of appropriate incentives for executives. It must also consider, among other things,
the company’s risk management, size and the nature of its operations. The Compensation Policy must furthermore consider the following
additional factors:
|
●
|
the
knowledge, skills, expertise and accomplishments of the relevant director or executive;
|
|
●
|
the
director’s or executive’s roles and responsibilities and prior compensation agreements with him or her;
|
|
●
|
the
relationship between the terms offered and the average and median compensation of the other employees of the company;
|
|
●
|
the
impact of disparities in salary upon work relationships in the company;
|
|
●
|
the
possibility of reducing variable compensation at the discretion of the board of directors; and the possibility of setting a limit
on the exercise value of non-cash variable compensation; and
|
|
●
|
as
to severance compensation, the period of service of the director or executive, the terms of his or her compensation during such service
period, the company’s performance during that period of service, the person’s contribution towards the company’s
achievement of its goals and the maximization of its profits, and the circumstances under which the person is leaving the company.
|
The
compensation policy must also include the following principles:
|
●
|
the
link between variable compensation and long-term performance and measurable criteria;
|
|
●
|
the
relationship between variable and fixed compensation, and the ceiling for the value of variable compensation;
|
|
●
|
the
conditions under which a director or executive would be required to repay compensation paid to him or her if it was later shown that
the data upon which such compensation was based was inaccurate and was required to be restated in the company’s financial statements;
|
|
●
|
the
minimum holding or vesting period for variable, equity-based compensation; and
|
|
●
|
maximum
limits for severance compensation.
|
The
compensation policy must also consider appropriate incentives from a long-term perspective and maximum limits for severance compensation.
Osnat Hillel Fain is the chairman
of our compensation committee. Dobroslav Melamed and Iris Shapira Yalonserve as the other members of our compensation committee.
Approval
of Compensation to Our Officers
The
Israeli Companies Law prescribes that compensation to officers must be approved by a company’s board of directors.
As detailed above, our compensation
committee consists of three independent directors: Dobroslav Melamed, Osnat Hillel Fain and Iris Shapira Yalon. The responsibilities
of the compensation committee are to set our overall policy on executive remuneration and to decide the specific remuneration, benefits
and terms of employment for directors, officers and the Chief Executive Officer.
The
objectives of the compensation committee’s policies are that such individuals should receive compensation which is appropriate
given their performance, level of responsibility and experience. Compensation packages should also allow us to attract and retain executives
of the necessary caliber while, at the same time, motivating them to achieve the highest level of corporate performance in line with
the best interests of shareholders. In order to determine the elements and level of remuneration appropriate to each executive director,
the compensation committee reviews surveys on executive pay, obtains external professional advice and considers individual performance.
Internal
Auditor
Under
the Israeli Companies Law, the board of directors must appoint an internal auditor, nominated by the audit committee. Our internal auditor
is Daniel Spira. The role of the internal auditor is to examine, among other matters, whether the company’s actions comply with
the law and orderly business procedure. Under the Israeli Companies Law, an internal auditor may not be:
|
●
|
a
person (or a relative of a person) who holds more than 5% of the company’s shares;
|
|
●
|
a
person (or a relative of a person) who has the power to appoint a director or the general manager of the company;
|
|
●
|
an
executive officer or director of the company; or
|
|
●
|
a
member of the company’s independent accounting firm.
|
We
comply with the requirement of the Israeli Companies Law relating to internal auditors. Our internal auditors examine whether our various
activities comply with the law and orderly business procedure. Our internal auditor is not our employee, but the managing partner of
a firm which specializes in internal auditing.
D.
Employees
As of March 15, 2021, we
have no employees, only four part-time service providers. We and our Israeli employees are subject, by an extension order of the Israeli
Ministry of Welfare, to certain provisions of collective bargaining agreements between the Histadrut, the General Federation of Labor
Unions in Israel and the Coordination Bureau of Economic Organizations, including the Industrialists Associations. Our part-time service
providers are not subject to these collective bargaining agreements. These provisions principally address cost of living increases, recreation
pay, travel expenses, vacation pay and other conditions of employment. We provide our employees with benefits and working conditions
equal to or above the required minimum. Other than those provisions, our employees are not represented by a labor union.
E. Share Ownership
The following table sets
forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our outstanding ordinary shares as of March 15, 2021 by the members of our senior
management, board of directors, individually and as a group, and each person who we know beneficially owns 5% or more of our outstanding
ordinary shares. The beneficial ownership of ordinary shares is based on 514,205,799 ordinary shares outstanding as of March 15, 2021
and is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes any ordinary shares over which a person exercises sole
or shared voting or investment power. For purposes of the table below, we deem shares subject to options or warrants that are currently
exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2021, to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding the
options or warrants for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of that person but we do not treat them as outstanding for
the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number of
Ordinary
Shares
|
|
|
Percentage of
Class*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Management and Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shlomo
Shalev
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
7,169,309
|
(1)
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
Osnat
Hillel Fain
Director
|
|
|
150,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Iris Shapira
Yalon
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Alexander
Rabinovich
Director
|
|
|
153,288,887
|
(3)
|
|
|
28.43
|
%
|
Jonathan
Schapiro
Director
|
|
|
300,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dobroslav
Melamed
Director
|
|
|
150,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Doron
Turgeman
Director
|
|
|
490,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Itay Weinstein
Chief Finance Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Senior Management as a group (8 persons)
|
|
|
161,548,196
|
|
|
|
30.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial owners of 5% or more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander Rabinovitch
|
|
|
153,288,887
|
|
|
|
28.43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Bassa
|
|
|
47,628,227
|
(7)
|
|
|
9.05
|
%
|
(1)
|
Includes
(i) 3,019,309 ordinary shares, (ii) 150,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of NIS 0.4325
per share exercisable until December 29, 2024, (iii) 1,500,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise
price of NIS 0.6 per share exercisable until March 30, 2026, and (iv) 2,500,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options
at an exercise price of NIS 0.09 per share exercisable until July 6, 2030.
|
(2)
|
Includes
150,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of NIS
0.4 per share exercisable until March 24, 2025.
|
(3)
|
Includes
(i) 62,149,487 ordinary shares, (ii) 661,394 ADSs representing 66,139,400 ordinary shares, and (iii) warrants to purchase 250,000
ADSs representing 25,000,000 ordinary shares at $2.30 per ADS until September 21, 2022. Pursuant to the terms of the foregoing warrants
the holder cannot exercise such warrants if it would beneficially own, after any such exercise, more than 4.99% of the outstanding
ordinary shares. The percentage in the table above does not give effect to the blocker.
|
(4)
|
Includes
(i) 150,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of NIS 0.4325 per share exercisable until
December 29, 2024, and (ii) 150,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of NIS 0.4915 per
share exercisable until December 29, 2024.
|
(5)
|
Includes
150,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options at an exercise price of NIS 0.4325 per share exercisable until December
29, 2024.
|
(6)
|
Includes
(i) 340,000 ordinary shares represented by 3,400 ADSs, and (ii) 150,000 ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of options at
an exercise price of NIS 0.4325 per share exercisable until December 29, 2024.
|
(7)
|
Includes
(i) 35,378,227 ordinary shares represented by 353,782 ADSs, and (ii) 12,250,000 ordinary shares represented by 1,250,000 ADSs issuable
upon the exercise of warrant at a price of $2.30 per share.
|
Share Option Plans
We
maintain the following share option plans for our and our subsidiary’s employees, directors and consultants. In addition to the
discussion below, see note 14 of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Our
Board of Directors administers our share option plans and has the authority to designate all terms of the options granted under our plans
including the grantees, exercise prices, grant dates, vesting schedules and expiration dates, which may be no more than ten years after
the grant date. Options may not be granted with an exercise price of less than the fair market value of our ordinary shares on the date
of grant, unless otherwise determined by our Board of Directors.
As of
December 31, 2020, we have granted to employees, directors and consultants options that are outstanding to purchase up to 16,200,000
ordinary shares under two share option plans.
2011
Share Option Plan
On
August 29, 2011, our Board of Directors approved the adoption of an employee stock option scheme for the grant of options exercisable
into shares of the Company according to section 102 to the Israeli Tax Ordinance, or the 2011 Plan, and to reserve up to 10 million ordinary
shares in the framework of the 2011 Plan, for options allocation to employees, directors and consultants.
During
2020 it was decided to enlarge the reserve to 30 million options.
The
2011 Plan shall be subject to section 102 of the Israeli Tax Ordinance. According to the Capital Gain Track, which was adopted by us
and the abovementioned section 102, we are not entitled to receive a tax deduction that relates to remuneration paid to our employees,
including amounts recorded as salary benefit in our accounts for options granted to employees in the framework of the 2011 Plan, except
the yield benefit component, if available, that was determined on the grant date. The terms of the options which will be granted according
to the 2011 Plan, including option period, exercise price, vesting period and exercise period, shall be determined by our Board of Directors
on the date of the actual allocation.
As
of December 31, 2020, we have granted options to purchase 16,200,000 ordinary shares under the 2011 Plan at exercise prices between $0.03
and $0.25 per ordinary share.
For further details regarding
share options granted to our employees, directors and service providers, see note 14 to the consolidated financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2020.
ITEM
7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
A.
Major shareholders
As of the date hereof, there
were 2,506,867 ADSs outstanding, held by approximately 50 DTC participants and two registered shareholders, whose holdings represented
approximately 25% of the total outstanding ordinary shares.
The following table sets
forth the number of our ordinary shares owned by any person known to us to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our ordinary shares
as of the date hereof. The information in this table is based on 789,205,799 outstanding ordinary shares as of such date. The number
of Ordinary Shares beneficially owned by a person includes Ordinary Shares subject to options held by that person that were currently
exercisable. None of the holders of the Ordinary Shares listed in this table have voting rights different from other holders of the Ordinary
Shares.
Name
|
|
Number of shares
owned
|
|
|
Percent of ordinary shares
|
|
Alexander Rabinovitch
|
|
|
153,288,887
|
|
|
|
19.42
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Bassa
|
|
|
47,628,227
|
|
|
|
6.03
|
%
|
B.
Related Party Transactions
The
following is a description of some of the transactions with related parties to which we, or our subsidiaries, are party, and which were
in effect within the past three fiscal years. The descriptions provided below are summaries of the terms of such agreements, do not purport
to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by the complete agreements.
We
believe that we have executed all of our transactions with related parties on terms no less favorable to us than those we could have
obtained from unaffiliated third parties. We are required by Israeli law to ensure that all future transactions between us and our officers,
directors and principal shareholders and their affiliates are approved by a majority of our board of directors, including a majority
of the independent and disinterested members of our board of directors, and that they are on terms no less favorable to us than those
that we could obtain from unaffiliated third parties.
Employment
and Consulting Agreements
We have or have had employment,
consulting or related agreements with our senior management. See Item 6 - Compensation-Employment Agreements”.
Indemnification
Agreements
Israeli
law permits a company to insure an office holder in respect of liabilities incurred by him or her as a result of an act or omission in
the capacity of an office holder for:
|
●
|
a
breach of the office holder’s duty of care towards the company or towards another person;
|
|
●
|
a
breach of the office holder’s fiduciary duty to the company, provided that he or she acted in good faith and had reasonable
cause to believe that the act would not prejudice the company; and
|
|
●
|
a
financial liability imposed upon the office holder in favor of another person.
|
|
●
|
A
financial liability imposed on the office holder’s for all victims of the violation in an Administrative Proceeding.
|
|
●
|
Expenses
incurred by the office holder’s in connection with an Administrative Proceeding conducted in his or her case, including litigation
expenses and reasonable legal fees.
|
Moreover,
a company can indemnify an office holder for any of the following obligations or expenses incurred in connection with the acts or omissions
of such person in his or her capacity as an office holder:
|
●
|
monetary
liability imposed upon him or her in favor of a third party by a judgment, including a settlement or an arbitral award confirmed
by the court; and
|
|
●
|
reasonable
litigation expenses, including legal fees, actually incurred by the office holder or imposed upon him or her by a court, in a proceeding
brought against him or her by or on behalf of the company or by a third party, or in a criminal action in which he or she was acquitted,
or in a criminal action which does not require criminal intent in which he or she was convicted; furthermore, a company can, with
a limited exception, exculpate an office holder in advance, in whole or in part, from liability for damages sustained by a breach
of duty of care to the company.
|
|
●
|
financial
liability imposed on the office holder for all victims of the violation in an Administrative Proceeding.
|
|
●
|
expenses
incurred by the office holder in connection with an Administrative Proceeding conducted in his or her case, including litigation
expenses and reasonable legal fees.
|
Our
Articles of Association allow for insurance, exculpation and indemnification of office holders to the fullest extent permitted by law.
We have entered into indemnification, insurance and exculpation agreements with our directors and executive officers, following shareholder
approval of these agreements. We have directors’ and officers’ liability insurance covering our officers and directors for
a claim imposed upon them as a result of an action carried out while serving as an officer or director, for (a) the breach of duty of
care towards us or towards another person, (b) the breach of fiduciary duty towards us, provided that the officer or director acted in
good faith and had reasonable grounds to assume that the action would not harm our interests, and (c) a monetary liability imposed upon
him in favor of a third party.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
A.
Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
Our
audited consolidated financial statements appear in this annual report on Form 20-F. See “Item 18. Financial Statements.”
Significant
Changes
None.
ITEM
9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
Markets
and Share Price History
Our
ordinary shares have been trading on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, or TASE, since July 2005. Our ordinary shares currently trade on the
TASE under the symbol “XTLB”.
On
June 1, 2012, the Company filed an application for relisting its ADSs on the Nasdaq Capital Market, or Nasdaq. On July 10, 2013,
the Company received a notice from Nasdaq stating that the admission committee had approved the Company’s application to relist
its ADSs for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market. Accordingly, on July 15, 2013, the Company’s ADSs began trading on Nasdaq under
the ticker symbol “XTLB”.
ITEM
10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Memorandum
and Articles of Association
Objects
and Purposes of the Company
Pursuant
to Part B, Section 3 of our Articles of Association, we may undertake any lawful activity.
Powers
and Obligations of the Directors
Pursuant
to the Israeli Companies Law and our Articles of Association, a director is not permitted to vote on a proposal, arrangement or contract
in which he or she has a personal interest. Also, the directors may not vote on compensation to themselves or any members of their body,
as that term is defined under Israeli law, without the approval of our audit committee and our shareholders at a general meeting. The
power of our directors to enter into borrowing arrangements on our behalf is limited to the same extent as any other transaction by us.
The
Israeli Companies Law codifies the fiduciary duties that office holders, including directors and executive officers, owe to a company.
An office holder’s fiduciary duties consist of a duty of care and a duty of loyalty. The duty of care generally requires an office
holder to act with the same level of care as a reasonable office holder in the same position would employ under the same circumstances.
The duty of loyalty includes avoiding any conflict of interest between the office holder’s position in the company and such person’s
personal affairs, avoiding any competition with the company, avoiding exploiting any corporate opportunity of the company in order to
receive personal advantage for such person or others, and revealing to the company any information or documents relating to the company’s
affairs which the office holder has received due to his or her position as an office holder.
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers; Limitations on Liability
Israeli
law permits a company to insure an office holder in respect of liabilities incurred by him or her as a result of an act or omission in
the capacity of an office holder for:
|
●
|
a
breach of the office holder’s duty of care towards the company or towards another person;
|
|
●
|
a
breach of the office holder’s fiduciary duty to the company, provided that he or she acted in good faith and had reasonable
cause to believe that the act would not prejudice the company; and
|
|
●
|
a
financial liability imposed upon the office holder in favor of another person.
|
|
●
|
A
financial liability imposed on the office holder’s for all victims of the violation in an Administrative Proceeding.
|
|
●
|
Expenses
incurred by the office holder’s in connection with an Administrative Proceeding conducted in his or her case, including litigation
expenses and reasonable legal fees.
|
Moreover,
a company can indemnify an office holder for any of the following obligations or expenses incurred in connection with the acts or omissions
of such person in his or her capacity as an office holder:
|
●
|
monetary
liability imposed upon him or her in favor of a third party by a judgment, including a settlement or an arbitral award confirmed
by the court; and
|
|
●
|
reasonable
litigation expenses, including legal fees, actually incurred by the office holder or imposed upon him or her by a court, in a proceeding
brought against him or her by or on behalf of the company or by a third party, or in a criminal action in which he or she was acquitted,
or in a criminal action which does not require criminal intent in which he or she was convicted; furthermore, a company can, with
a limited exception, exculpate an office holder in advance, in whole or in part, from liability for damages sustained by a breach
of duty of care to the company.
|
|
●
|
financial
liability imposed on the office holder for all victims of the violation in an Administrative Proceeding.
|
|
●
|
expenses
incurred by the office holder in connection with an Administrative Proceeding conducted in his or her case, including litigation
expenses and reasonable legal fees.
|
Our
Articles of Association allow for insurance, exculpation and indemnification of office holders to the fullest extent permitted by law.
We have entered into indemnification, insurance and exculpation agreements with our directors and executive officers, following shareholder
approval of these agreements. We have directors’ and officers’ liability insurance covering our officers and directors for
a claim imposed upon them as a result of an action carried out while serving as an officer or director, for (a) the breach of duty of
care towards us or towards another person, (b) the breach of fiduciary duty towards us, provided that the officer or director acted in
good faith and had reasonable grounds to assume that the action would not harm our interests, and (c) a monetary liability imposed upon
him in favor of a third party.
Approval
of Related Party Transactions under the Israeli Companies Law
Fiduciary
duties of the office holders
The
Israeli Companies Law imposes a duty of care and a duty of loyalty on all office holders of a company. The duty of care of an office
holder is based on the duty of care set forth in connection with the tort of negligence under the Israeli Torts Ordinance (New Version)
5728-1968. This duty of care requires an office holder to act with the degree of proficiency with which a reasonable office holder in
the same position would have acted under the same circumstances. The duty of care includes a duty to use reasonable means, in light of
the circumstances, to obtain:
|
●
|
information
on the advisability of a given action brought for his or her approval or performed by virtue of his or her position; and
|
|
●
|
All
other important information pertaining to these actions.
|
The
duty of loyalty requires an office holder to act in good faith and for the benefit of the company, and includes the duty to:
|
●
|
refrain
from any act involving a conflict of interest between the performance of his or her duties in the company and his or her other duties
or personal affairs;
|
|
●
|
refrain
from any activity that is competitive with the business of the company;
|
|
●
|
refrain
from exploiting any business opportunity of the company for the purpose of gaining a personal advantage for himself or herself or
others; and
|
|
●
|
disclose
to the company any information or documents relating to the company’s affairs which the office holder received as a result
of his or her position as an office holder.
|
We
may approve an act performed in breach of the duty of loyalty of an office holder provided that the office holder acted in good faith,
the act or its approval does not harm the company, and the office holder discloses his or her personal interest, as described below.
Disclosure
of personal interests of an office holder and approval of acts and transactions
The
Israeli Companies Law requires that an office holder promptly disclose to the company any personal interest that he or she may have and
all related material information or documents relating to any existing or proposed transaction by the company. An interested office holder’s
disclosure must be made promptly and in any event no later than the first meeting of the board of directors at which the transaction
is considered. An office holder is not obligated to disclose such information if the personal interest of the office holder derives solely
from the personal interest of his or her relative in a transaction that is not considered as an extraordinary transaction.
The
term personal interest is defined under the Israeli Companies Law to include the personal interest of a person in an action or in the
business of a company, including the personal interest of such person’s relative or the interest of any corporation in which the
person is an interested party, but excluding a personal interest stemming solely from the fact of holding shares in the company. A personal
interest furthermore includes the personal interest of a person for whom the office holder holds a voting proxy or the interest of the
office holder with respect to his or her vote on behalf of the shareholder for whom he or she holds a proxy even if such shareholder
itself has no personal interest in the approval of the matter. An office holder is not, however, obligated to disclose a personal interest
if it derives solely from the personal interest of his or her relative in a transaction that is not considered an extraordinary transaction.
Under
the Israeli Companies Law, an extraordinary transaction which requires approval is defined any of the following:
|
●
|
a
transaction other than in the ordinary course of business;
|
|
●
|
a
transaction that is not on market terms; or
|
|
●
|
a
transaction that may have a material impact on the company’s profitability, assets or liabilities.
|
Under
the Israeli Companies Law, once an office holder has complied with the disclosure requirement described above, a company may approve
a transaction between the company and the office holder or a third party in which the office holder has a personal interest, or approve
an action by the office holder that would otherwise be deemed a breach of duty of loyalty. However, a company may not approve a transaction
or action that is adverse to the company’s interest or that is not performed by the office holder in good faith.
Under
the Companies Law, unless the articles of association of a company provide otherwise, a transaction with an office holder, a transaction
with a third party in which the office holder has a personal interest, and an action of an office holder that would otherwise be deemed
a breach of duty of loyalty requires approval by the board of directors. Our Articles of Association do not provide otherwise. If the
transaction or action considered is (i) an extraordinary transaction, (ii) an action of an office holder that would otherwise be deemed
a breach of duty of loyalty and may have a material impact on a company’s profitability, assets or liabilities, (iii) an undertaking
to indemnify or insure an office holder who is not a director, or (iv) for matters considered an undertaking concerning the terms of
compensation of an office holder who is not a director, including, an undertaking to indemnify or insure such office holder, then approval
by the audit committee is required prior to approval by the board of directors. Arrangements regarding the compensation, indemnification
or insurance of a director require the approval of the audit committee, board of directors and shareholders, in that order.
A
director who has a personal interest in a matter that is considered at a meeting of the board of directors or the audit committee may
generally not be present at the meeting or vote on the matter, unless a majority of the directors or members of the audit committee have
a personal interest in the matter or the chairman of the audit committee or board of directors, as applicable, determines that he or
she should be present to present the transaction that is subject to approval. If a majority of the directors have a personal interest
in the matter, such matter would also require approval of the shareholders of the company.
Disclosure
of personal interests of a controlling shareholder and approval of transactions
Under
the Israeli Companies Law, the disclosure requirements that apply to an office holder also apply to a controlling shareholder of a public
company. Extraordinary transactions with a controlling shareholder or in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest, including
a private placement in which a controlling shareholder has a personal interest, as well as transactions for the provision of services
whether directly or indirectly by a controlling shareholder or his or her relative, or a company such controlling shareholder controls,
and transactions concerning the terms of engagement of a controlling shareholder or a controlling shareholder’s relative, whether
as an office holder or an employee, require the approval of the audit committee, the board of directors and a majority of the shares
voted by the shareholders of the company participating and voting on the matter in a shareholders’ meeting. In addition, such shareholder
approval must fulfill one of the following requirements:
|
●
|
at
least a majority of the shares held by shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction and are voting at the meeting
must be voted in favor of approving the transaction, excluding abstentions; or
|
|
●
|
the
shares voted by shareholders who have no personal interest in the transaction who vote against the transaction represent no more
than 2% of the voting rights in the company.
|
To
the extent that any such transaction with a controlling shareholder is for a period extending beyond three years, approval is required
once every three years, unless the audit committee determines that the duration of the transaction is reasonable given the circumstances
related thereto.
Duties
of shareholders
Under
the Israeli Companies Law, a shareholder has a duty to refrain from abusing its power in the company and to act in good faith and in
an acceptable manner in exercising its rights and performing its obligations to the company and other shareholders, including, among
other things, voting at general meetings of shareholders on the following matters:
|
●
|
an
amendment to the articles of association;
|
|
●
|
an
increase in the company’s authorized share capital;
|
|
●
|
an
increase in the company’s authorized share capital; and
|
|
●
|
the
approval of related party transactions and acts of office holders that require shareholder approval.
|
A
shareholder also has a general duty to refrain from discriminating against other shareholders.
The
remedies generally available upon a breach of contract will also apply to a breach of the above mentioned duties, and in the event of
discrimination against other shareholders, additional remedies are available to the injured shareholder.
In
addition, any controlling shareholder, any shareholder that knows that its vote can determine the outcome of a shareholder vote and any
shareholder that, under a company’s articles of association, has the power to appoint or prevent the appointment of an office holder,
or has another power with respect to a company, is under a duty to act with fairness towards the company. The Israeli Companies Law does
not describe the substance of this duty except to state that the remedies generally available upon a breach of contract will also apply
in the event of a breach of the duty to act with fairness, taking the shareholder’s position in the company into account.
ORDINARY
SHARES
Rights
Attached to Ordinary Shares
Through
March 18, 2009, our authorized share capital was NIS 10,000,000 consisting of 500,000,000 ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.02 per share.
On March 18, 2009, pursuant to a shareholder’s meeting, the share capital of our company was consolidated and re-divided so that
each five (5) shares of NIS 0.02 nominal value was consolidated into one (1) share of NIS 0.1 nominal value so that following such consolidation
and re-division, our authorized share capital consisted of 100,000,000 ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.10 per share. In addition, the
authorized share capital of our company was increased from NIS 10,000,000 to NIS 70,000,000 divided into 700,000,000 ordinary shares,
NIS 0.10 nominal value. The share consolidation was effected in June 22, 2009. Effective August 3, 2017, the authorized share capital
of the company increased from NIS 70,000,000 divided into 700,000,000 ordinary shares to NIS 145,000,000 divided into 1,450,000,000 ordinary
shares.
Holders
of ordinary shares have one vote per share, and are entitled to participate equally in the payment of dividends and share distributions
and, in the event of our liquidation, in the distribution of assets after satisfaction of liabilities to creditors. No preferred shares
are currently authorized. All outstanding ordinary shares are validly issued and fully paid.
Transfer
of Shares
Fully
paid ordinary shares are issued in registered form and may be freely transferred under our Articles of Association unless the transfer
is restricted or prohibited by another instrument or applicable securities laws.
Dividend
and Liquidation Rights
We
may declare a dividend to be paid to the holders of ordinary shares according to their rights and interests in our profits. In the event
of our liquidation, after satisfaction of liabilities to creditors, our assets will be distributed to the holders of ordinary shares
in proportion to the nominal value of their holdings.
This
right may be affected by the grant of preferential dividend or distribution rights, to the holders of a class of shares with preferential
rights that may be authorized in the future. Under the Israeli Companies Law, the declaration of a dividend does not require the approval
of the shareholders of the company, unless the company’s articles of association require otherwise. Our Articles provide that the
Board of Directors may declare and distribute dividends without the approval of the shareholders.
Annual
and Extraordinary General Meetings
We
must hold our annual general meeting of shareholders each year and no later than 15 months from the last annual meeting, at a time and
place determined by the Board of Directors, upon at least 21 days’ prior notice to our shareholders, to which we need to add an
additional three days for notices sent outside of Israel. A special meeting may be convened by request of two directors, 25% of the directors
then in office, one or more shareholders holding at least 5% of our issued share capital and at least 1% of our issued voting rights,
or one or more shareholders holding at least 5% of our issued voting rights. Notice of a general meeting must set forth the date, time
and place of the meeting. Such notice must be given at least 21 days but not more than 45 days prior to the general meeting. The quorum
required for a meeting of shareholders consists of at least two shareholders present in person or by proxy who hold or represent between
them at least one-third of the voting rights in the company. A meeting adjourned for lack of a quorum generally is adjourned to the same
day in the following week at the same time and place (with no need for any notice to the shareholders) or until such other later time
if such time is specified in the original notice convening the general meeting, or if we serve notice to the shareholders no less than
seven days before the date fixed for the adjourned meeting. If at an adjourned meeting there is no quorum present half an hour after
the time set for the meeting, any number participating in the meeting shall represent a quorum and shall be entitled to discuss the matters
set down on the agenda for the original meeting. All shareholders who are registered in our registrar on the record date, or who will
provide us with proof of ownership on that date as applicable to the relevant registered shareholder, are entitled to participate in
a general meeting and may vote as described in “Voting Rights” and “Voting by Proxy and in Other Manners,” below.
Voting
Rights
Our
ordinary shares do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. As a result, the holders of ordinary shares that represent
more than 50% of the voting power represented at a shareholders meeting in which a quorum is present have the power to elect all of our
directors, except the external directors whose election requires a special majority.
Holders
of ordinary shares have one vote for each ordinary share held on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. Shareholders may vote
in person or by proxy. These voting rights may be affected by the grant of any special voting rights to the holders of a class of shares
with preferential rights that may be authorized in the future.
Under the Israeli Companies
Law, unless otherwise provided in the Articles of Association or by applicable law, all resolutions of the shareholders require a simple
majority. Our Articles of Association provide that all decisions may be made by a simple majority. See “Approval of Related Party
Transactions” above for certain duties of shareholders towards the company.
Voting
by Proxy and in Other Manners
Our
Articles of Association enable a shareholder to appoint a proxy, who need not be a shareholder, to vote at any shareholders meeting.
We require that the appointment of a proxy be in writing signed by the person making the appointment or by an attorney authorized for
this purpose, and if the person making the appointment is a corporation, by a person or persons authorized to bind the corporation. In
the document appointing a proxy, each shareholder may specify how the proxy should vote on any matter presented at a shareholders meeting.
The document appointing the proxy shall be deposited in our offices or at such other address as shall be specified in the notice of the
meeting not less than 48 hours before the time of the meeting at which the person specified in the appointment is due to vote.
The
Israeli Companies Law and our Articles of Association do not permit resolutions of the shareholders to be adopted by way of written consent,
for as long as our ordinary shares are publicly traded.
Limitations
on the Rights to Own Securities
The
ownership or voting of ordinary shares by non-residents of Israel is not restricted in any way by our Articles of Association or the
laws of the State of Israel, except that nationals of countries which are, or have been, in a state of war with Israel may not be recognized
as owners of ordinary shares.
Anti-Takeover
Provisions under Israeli Law
The
Israeli Companies Law permits merger transactions with the approval of each party’s board of directors and shareholders. In accordance
with the Israeli Companies Law, a merger may be approved at a shareholders meeting by a majority of the voting power represented at the
meeting, in person or by proxy, and voting on that resolution. In determining whether the required majority has approved the merger,
shares held by the other party to the merger, any person holding at least 25% of the outstanding voting shares or means of appointing
the board of directors of the other party to the merger, or the relatives or companies controlled by these persons, are excluded from
the vote.
Under
the Israeli Companies Law, a merging company must inform its creditors of the proposed merger. Any creditor of a party to the merger
may seek a court order blocking the merger, if there is a reasonable concern that the surviving company will not be able to satisfy all
of the obligations of the parties to the merger. Moreover, a merger may not be completed until at least 30 days have passed from the
time the merger was approved in a general meeting of each of the merging companies, and at least 50 days have passed from the time that
a merger proposal was filed with the Israeli Registrar of Companies.
Israeli
corporate law provides that an acquisition of shares in a public company must be made by means of a tender offer if, as a result of such
acquisition, the purchaser would become a 25% or greater shareholder of the company. This rule does not apply if there is already another
shareholder with 25% or greater shares in the company. Similarly, Israeli corporate law provides that an acquisition of shares in a public
company must be made by means of a tender offer if, as a result of the acquisition, the purchaser’s shareholdings would entitle
the purchaser to over 45% of the shares in the company, unless there is a shareholder with 45% or more of the shares in the company.
These requirements do not apply if, in general, the acquisition (1) was made in a private placement that received the approval of the
company’s shareholders; (2) was from a 25% or greater shareholder of the company which resulted in the purchaser becoming a 25%
or greater shareholder of the company, or (3) was from a 45% or greater shareholder of the company which resulted in the acquirer becoming
a 45% or greater shareholder of the company. These rules do not apply if the acquisition is made by way of a merger. Regulations promulgated
under the Israeli Companies Law provide that these tender offer requirements do not apply to companies whose shares are listed for trading
external of Israel if, according to the law in the country in which the shares are traded, including the rules and regulations of the
stock exchange or which the shares are traded, either:
|
●
|
there
is a limitation on acquisition of any level of control of the company; or
|
|
●
|
the
acquisition of any level of control requires the purchaser to do so by means of a tender offer to the public.
|
The
Israeli Companies Law provides specific rules and procedures for the acquisition of shares held by minority shareholders, if the majority
shareholder holds more than 90% of the outstanding shares. If, as a result of an acquisition of shares, the purchaser will hold more
than 90% of a company’s outstanding shares, the acquisition must be made by means of a tender offer for all of the outstanding
shares. If less than 5% of the outstanding shares are not tendered in the tender offer, all the shares that the purchaser offered to
purchase will be transferred to it. The Israeli Companies Law provides for appraisal rights if any shareholder files a request in court
within three months following the consummation of a full tender offer. If more than 5% of the outstanding shares are not tendered in
the tender offer, then the purchaser may not acquire shares in the tender offer that will cause his shareholding to exceed 90% of the
outstanding shares of the company. Israeli tax law treats specified acquisitions, including a stock-for-stock swap between an Israeli
company and a foreign company, less favorably than does U.S. tax law. These laws may have the effect of delaying or deterring a change
in control of us, thereby limiting the opportunity for shareholders to receive a premium for their shares and possibly affecting the
price that some investors are willing to pay for our securities.
Rights
of Shareholders
Under the Israeli Companies
Law, our shareholders have the right to inspect certain documents and registers including the minutes of general meetings, the register
of shareholders and the register of substantial shareholders, any document held by us that relates to an act or transaction requiring
the consent of the general meeting as stated above under “Approval of Related Party Transactions” our Articles of Association
and our financial statements, and any other document which we are required to file under the Israeli Companies Law or under any law with
the Registrar of Companies or the Israeli Securities Authority, and is available for public inspection at the Registrar of Companies
or the Securities Authority, as the case may be.
If
the document required for inspection by one of our shareholders relates to an act or transaction requiring the consent of the general
meeting as stated above, we may refuse the request of the shareholder if in our opinion the request was not made in good faith, the documents
requested contain a commercial secret or a patent, or disclosure of the documents could prejudice our good in some other way.
The
Israeli Companies Law provides that with the approval of the court any of our shareholders or directors may file a derivative action
on our behalf if the court finds the action is a priori, to our benefit, and the person demanding the action is acting in good faith.
The demand to take action can be filed with the court only after it is serviced to us, and we decline or omit to act in accordance to
this demand.
Enforceability
of Civil Liabilities
We
are incorporated in Israel and most of our directors and officers named in this report reside outside the U.S. Service of process upon
them may be difficult to effect within the U.S. Furthermore, because substantially all of our assets, and those of our non-U.S. directors
and officers and the Israeli experts named herein, are located outside the U.S., any judgment obtained in the U.S. against us or any
of these persons may not be collectible within the U.S.
We
have been informed by our legal counsel in Israel, Doron Tikotsky Kantor Gutman & Amit Gross, that there is doubt as to the enforceability
of civil liabilities under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, pursuant to original actions instituted in Israel. However, subject
to particular time limitations, executory judgments of a U.S. court for monetary damages in civil matters may be enforced by an Israeli
court, provided that:
|
●
|
the
judgment was obtained after due process before a court of competent jurisdiction, that recognizes and enforces similar judgments
of Israeli courts, and the court had authority according to the rules of private international law currently prevailing in Israel;
|
|
●
|
adequate
service of process was effected and the defendant had a reasonable opportunity to be heard;
|
|
●
|
the
judgment is not contrary to the law, public policy, security or sovereignty of the State of Israel and its enforcement is not contrary
to the laws governing enforcement of judgments;
|
|
●
|
the
judgment was not obtained by fraud and does not conflict with any other valid judgment in the same matter between the same parties;
|
|
●
|
the
judgment is no longer appealable; and
|
|
●
|
an
action between the same parties in the same matter is not pending in any Israeli court at the time the lawsuit is instituted in the
foreign court.
|
Foreign
judgments enforced by Israeli courts generally will be payable in Israeli currency. The usual practice in an action before an Israeli
court to recover an amount in a non-Israeli currency is for the Israeli court to render judgment for the equivalent amount in Israeli
currency at the rate of exchange in force on the date of the judgment. Under existing Israeli law, a foreign judgment payable in foreign
currency may be paid in Israeli currency at the rate of exchange for the foreign currency published on the day before date of payment.
Current Israeli exchange control regulations also permit a judgment debtor to make payment in foreign currency. Pending collection, the
amount of the judgment of an Israeli court stated in Israeli currency ordinarily may be linked to Israel’s consumer price index
plus interest at the annual statutory rate set by Israeli regulations prevailing at that time. Judgment creditors must bear the risk
of unfavorable exchange rates.
AMERICAN
DEPOSITORY SHARES
We
have issued and deposited ordinary shares with Bank Hapoalim B.M., The Bank of New York’s custodian in Tel Aviv, Israel. The Bank
of New York in turn issued American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, representing American Depositary Shares, or ADSs. One ADS represents
an ownership interest in one hundred of our ordinary shares. Each ADS also represents securities, cash or other property deposited with
The Bank of New York but not distributed to ADS holders. The Bank of New York’s Corporate Trust Office is located at 101 Barclay
Street, New York, NY 10286, U.S.A. Their principal executive office is located at One Wall Street, New York, NY 10286, U.S.A.
You
may hold ADSs either directly or indirectly through your broker or other financial institution. If you hold ADSs directly, you are an
ADS holder. This description assumes you hold your ADSs directly. If you hold the ADSs indirectly, you must rely on the procedures of
your broker or other financial institution to assert the rights of ADS holders described in this section. You should consult with your
broker or financial institution to find out what those procedures are.
Because
The Bank of New York will actually hold the ordinary shares, you must rely on it to exercise the rights of a shareholder. The obligations
of The Bank of New York are set out in a deposit agreement among us, The Bank of New York and you, as an ADS holder. The agreement and
the ADSs are generally governed by New York law.
The
following is a summary of the agreement. Because it is a summary, it does not contain all the information that may be important to you.
For more complete information, you should read the entire agreement and the ADS. Directions on how to obtain copies of these are provided
in the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information.”
Share
Dividends and Other Distributions
The
Bank of New York has agreed to pay to you the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian receives on shares or other deposited
securities after deducting its fees and expenses. You will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of shares your ADSs
represent.
Cash. The
Bank of New York will convert any cash dividend or other cash distribution we pay on the shares into U.S. dollars, if it can do so on
a reasonable basis and can transfer the U.S. dollars to the U.S. If that is not possible or if any approval from any government or agency
thereof is needed and cannot be obtained, the agreement allows The Bank of New York to distribute the foreign currency only to those
ADS holders to whom it is possible to do so. It will hold the foreign currency it cannot convert for the account of the ADS holders who
have not been paid. It will not invest the foreign currency and it will not be liable for the interest.
Before
making a distribution, any withholding taxes that must be paid under U.S. law will be deducted. The Bank of New York will distribute
only whole U.S. dollars and cents and will round fractional cents to the nearest whole cent. If the exchange rates fluctuate during a
time when The Bank of New York cannot convert the foreign currency, you may lose some or all of the value of the distribution.
Shares. The
Bank of New York may distribute new ADSs representing any shares we may distribute as a dividend or free distribution, if we furnish
it promptly with satisfactory evidence that it is legal to do so. The Bank of New York will only distribute whole ADSs. It will sell
shares which would require it to use a fractional ADS and distribute the net proceeds in the same way as it does with cash. If The Bank
of New York does not distribute additional ADSs, each ADS will also represent the new shares.
Rights
to receive additional shares. If we offer holders of our ordinary shares any rights to subscribe for additional shares or any other
rights, The Bank of New York may make these rights available to you. We must first instruct The Bank of New York to do so and furnish
it with satisfactory evidence that it is legal to do so. If we do not furnish this evidence and/or give these instructions, and The Bank
of New York decides it is practical to sell the rights, The Bank of New York will sell the rights and distribute the proceeds, in the
same way as it does with cash. The Bank of New York may allow rights that are not distributed or sold to lapse. In that case, you will
receive no value for them. If The Bank of New York makes rights available to you, upon instruction from you, it will exercise the rights
and purchase the shares on your behalf. The Bank of New York will then deposit the shares and issue ADSs to you. It will only exercise
rights if you pay it the exercise price and any other charges the rights require you to pay.
U.S.
securities laws may restrict the sale, deposit, cancellation and transfer of the ADSs issued after exercise of rights. For example, you
may not be able to trade the ADSs freely in the U.S. In this case, The Bank of New York may issue the ADSs under a separate restricted
deposit agreement, which will contain the same provisions as the agreement, except for the changes needed to put the restrictions in
place.
Other
Distributions. The Bank of New York will send to you anything else we distribute on deposited securities by any means it thinks is
legal, fair and practical. If it cannot make the distribution in that way, The Bank of New York has a choice. It may decide to sell what
we distributed and distribute the net proceeds in the same way as it does with cash or it may decide to hold what we distributed, in
which case the ADSs will also represent the newly distributed property.
The
Bank of New York is not responsible if it decides that it is unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to any ADS holders.
We have no obligation to register ADSs, shares, rights or other securities under the Securities Act. We also have no obligation to take
any other action to permit the distribution of ADSs, shares, rights or anything else to ADS holders. This means that you may not receive
the distribution we make on our shares or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical for us to make them available to you.
Deposit,
Withdrawal and Cancellation
The
Bank of New York will issue ADSs if you or your broker deposits shares or evidence of rights to receive shares with the custodian upon
payment of its fees and expenses and of any taxes or charges, such as stamp taxes or stock transfer taxes or fees. The Bank of New York
will register the appropriate number of ADSs in the names you request and will deliver the ADSs at its office to the persons you request.
You
may turn in your ADSs at The Bank of New York’s office. Upon payment of its fees and expenses and of any taxes or charges, such
as stamp taxes or stock transfer taxes or fees, The Bank of New York will deliver (1) the underlying shares to an account designated
by you and (2) any other deposited securities underlying the ADS at the office of the custodian; or, at your request, risk and expense,
The Bank of New York will deliver the deposited securities at its office.
Voting
Rights
You
may instruct The Bank of New York to vote the shares underlying your ADSs but only if we ask The Bank of New York to ask for your instructions.
Otherwise, you will not be able to exercise your right to vote unless you withdraw the shares. However, you may not know about the meeting
enough in advance to withdraw the shares.
If
we ask for your instructions, The Bank of New York will notify you of the upcoming vote and arrange to deliver our voting materials to
you. The materials will (1) describe the matters to be voted on and (2) explain how you, on a certain date, may instruct The Bank of
New York to vote the shares or other deposited securities underlying your ADSs as you direct. For instructions to be valid, The Bank
of New York must receive them on or before the date specified. The Bank of New York will try, as far as practical, subject to Israeli
law and the provisions of our Articles of Association, to vote or to have its agents vote the shares or other deposited securities as
you instruct. The Bank of New York will only vote or attempt to vote as you instruct. However, if The Bank of New York does not receive
your voting instructions, it will deem you to have instructed it to give a discretionary proxy to vote the shares underlying your ADSs
to a person designated by us provided that no such instruction shall be deemed given and no such discretionary proxy shall be given with
respect to any matter as to which we inform The Bank of New York that (x) we do not wish such proxy given, (y) substantial opposition
exists, (z) such matter materially affects the rights of the holders of the shares underlying the ADSs.
We
cannot assure you that you will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that you can instruct The Bank of New York to vote your
shares. In addition, The Bank of New York and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions or for the
manner of carrying out voting instructions. This means that you may not be able to exercise your right to vote and there may be nothing
you can do if your shares are not voted as you requested.
Rights
of Non-Israeli Shareholders to Vote
The
ADSs may be freely held and traded pursuant to the General Permit and the Currency Control Law. The ownership or voting of ADSs by non-residents
of Israel is not restricted in any way by our Articles of Association or by the laws of the State of Israel.
Fees
and Expenses
ADS
holders must pay:
|
|
For:
|
|
|
|
$5.00
(or less) per 100 ADSs
(or
portion thereof)
|
|
Each
issuance of an ADS, including as a result of a distribution of shares or rights or other
property.
Each
cancellation of an ADS, including if the agreement terminates.
|
|
|
|
$0.05
(or less) per ADS
|
|
Any
cash payment.
|
|
|
|
Registration
or Transfer Fees
|
|
Transfer
and registration of shares on the share register of the Foreign Registrar from your name to the name of The Bank of New York or its
agent when you deposit or withdraw shares.
|
|
|
|
Expenses
of The Bank of New York
|
|
Conversion
of foreign currency to U.S. dollars.
Cable,
telex and facsimile transmission expenses.
Servicing
of shares or deposited securities.
|
|
|
|
$0.02
(or less) per ADS per calendar year (if the depositary has not collected any cash distribution fee during that year)
|
|
Depositary
services.
|
|
|
|
Taxes
and other governmental charges
|
|
As
necessary The Bank of New York or the Custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes,
stamp duty or withholding taxes.
|
|
|
|
A
fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to you had been ordinary shares and the ordinary shares
had been deposited for issuance of ADSs
|
|
Distribution
of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities which are distributed by the depositary to ADS holders.
|
Payment
of Taxes
You
will be responsible for any taxes or other governmental charges payable on your ADSs or on the deposited securities underlying your ADSs.
The Bank of New York may refuse to transfer your ADSs or allow you to withdraw the deposited securities underlying your ADSs until such
taxes or other charges are paid. It may apply payments owed to you or sell deposited securities underlying your ADSs to pay any taxes
owed and you will remain liable for any deficiency. If it sells deposited securities, it will, if appropriate, reduce the number of ADSs
to reflect the sale and pay to you any proceeds, or send to you any property, remaining after it has paid the taxes.
Reclassifications,
Recapitalizations and Mergers
If
we:
|
|
Then:
|
Change
the nominal or par value of our shares;
|
|
The
cash, shares or other securities received by The Bank of New York will become deposited securities. Each ADS will automatically represent
its equal share of the new deposited securities. The Bank of New York may, and will if we ask it to, distribute some or all of the
cash, shares or other securities it received. It may also issue new ADSs or ask you to surrender your outstanding ADSs in exchange
for new ADSs, identifying the new deposited securities.
|
|
|
|
Reclassify,
split up or consolidate any of the deposited securities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribute
securities on the shares that are not distributed to you; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recapitalize,
reorganize, merge, liquidate, sell all or substantially all of our assets, or takes any similar action.
|
|
|
Amendment
and Termination
We
may agree with The Bank of New York to amend the agreement and the ADSs without your consent for any reason. If the amendment adds or
increases fees or charges, except for taxes and other governmental charges or registration fees, cable, telex or facsimile transmission
costs, delivery costs or other such expenses, or prejudices an important right of ADS holders, it will only become effective thirty days
after The Bank of New York notifies you of the amendment. At the time an amendment becomes effective, you are considered, by continuing
to hold your ADS, to agree to the amendment and to be bound by the ADSs and the agreement is amended.
The
Bank of New York will terminate the agreement if we ask it to do so. The Bank of New York may also terminate the agreement if The Bank
of New York has told us that it would like to resign and we have not appointed a new depositary bank within ninety days. In both cases,
The Bank of New York must notify you at least ninety days before termination.
After
termination, The Bank of New York and its agents will be required to do only the following under the agreement: (1) advise you that the
agreement is terminated, and (2) collect distributions on the deposited securities and deliver shares and other deposited securities
upon cancellation of ADSs. After termination, The Bank of New York will, if practical, sell any remaining deposited securities by public
or private sale. After that, The Bank of New York will hold the proceeds of the sale, as well as any other cash it is holding under the
agreement for the pro rata benefit of the ADS holders that have not surrendered their ADSs. It will not invest the money and will have
no liability for interest. The Bank of New York’s only obligations will be to account for the proceeds of the sale and other cash.
After termination our only obligations will be with respect to indemnification and to pay certain amounts to The Bank of New York.
Limitations
on Obligations and Liability to ADS Holders
The
agreement expressly limits our obligations and the obligations of The Bank of New York, and it limits our liability and the liability
of The Bank of New York. We and The Bank of New York:
|
●
|
are
only obligated to take the actions specifically set forth in the agreement without negligence or bad faith;
|
|
●
|
are
not liable if either is prevented or delayed by law or circumstances beyond their control from performing their obligations under
the agreement;
|
|
●
|
are
not liable if either exercises discretion permitted under the agreement;
|
|
●
|
have
no obligation to become involved in a lawsuit or other proceeding related to the ADSs or the agreement on your behalf or on behalf
of any other party; and
|
|
●
|
may
rely upon any documents they believe in good faith to be genuine and to have been signed or presented by the proper party.
|
In
the agreement, we and The Bank of New York agree to indemnify each other under certain circumstances.
Requirements
for Depositary Actions
Before
The Bank of New York will issue or register transfer of an ADS, make a distribution on an ADS, or make a withdrawal of shares, The Bank
of New York may require payment of stock transfer or other taxes or other governmental charges and transfer or registration fees charged
by third parties for the:
|
●
|
transfer
of any shares or other deposited securities;
|
|
●
|
production
of satisfactory proof of the identity and genuineness of any signature or other information it deems necessary, and
|
|
●
|
compliance
with regulations it may establish, from time to time, consistent with the agreement, including presentation of transfer documents.
|
The
Bank of New York may refuse to deliver, transfer, or register transfers of ADSs generally when the books of The Bank of New York or our
books are closed, or at any time if The Bank of New York or we think it advisable to do so. You have the right to cancel your ADSs and
withdraw the underlying shares at any time except:
|
●
|
when
temporary delays arise because: (1) The Bank of New York or we have closed its transfer books; (2) the transfer of shares is blocked
to permit voting at a shareholders’ meeting; or (3) we are paying a dividend on the shares; or
|
|
●
|
when
it is necessary to prohibit withdrawals in order to comply with any laws or governmental regulations that apply to ADSs or to the
withdrawal of shares or other deposited securities.
|
This
right of withdrawal may not be limited by any other provision of the agreement.
Pre-Release
of ADSs
In
certain circumstances, subject to the provisions of the agreement, The Bank of New York may issue ADSs before deposit of the underlying
shares. This is called a pre-release of the ADS. The Bank of New York may also deliver shares upon cancellation of pre-released ADSs
(even if the ADSs are cancelled before the pre-release transaction has been closed out). A pre-release is closed out as soon as the underlying
shares are delivered to The Bank of New York. The Bank of New York may receive ADSs instead of shares to close out a pre-release. The
Bank of New York may pre-release ADSs only under the following conditions: (1) before or at the time of the pre-release, the person to
whom the pre-release is being made must represent to The Bank of New York in writing that it or its customer owns the shares or ADSs
to be deposited; (2) the pre-release must be fully collateralized with cash or other collateral that The Bank of New York considers appropriate;
and (3) The Bank of New York must be able to close out the pre-release on not more than five business days’ notice. In addition,
The Bank of New York will limit the number of ADSs that may be outstanding at any time as a result of prerelease, although The Bank of
New York may disregard the limit from time to time, if it thinks it is appropriate to do so.
Inspection
of Books of the Depositary
Under
the terms of the agreement, holders of ADSs may inspect the transfer books of the depositary at any reasonable time, provided that such
inspection shall not be for the purpose of communicating with holders of ADSs in the interest of a business or object other than either
our business or a matter related to the deposit agreement or ADSs.
Book-Entry
Only Issuance - The Depository Trust Company
The
Depository Trust Company, or DTC, New York, New York, will act as securities depository for the ADSs. The ADSs will be represented by
one global security that will be deposited with and registered in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC’s partnership nominee), or such
other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. This means that we will not issue certificates to you for the
ADSs. One global security will be issued to DTC, which will keep a computerized record of its participants (for example, your broker)
whose clients have purchased the ADSs. Each participant will then keep a record of its clients. Unless it is exchanged in whole or in
part for a certificated security, a global security may not be transferred. However, DTC, its nominees, and their successors may transfer
a global security as a whole to one another. Beneficial interests in the global security will be shown on, and transfers of the global
security will be made only through, records maintained by DTC and its participants.
DTC
is a limited-purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law, a “banking organization” within the meaning
of the New York Banking Law, a member of the United States Federal Reserve System, a “clearing corporation” within the meaning
of the New York Uniform Commercial Code and a “clearing agency” registered under the provisions of Section 17A of the Exchange
Act. DTC holds securities that its participants (direct participants) deposit with DTC. DTC also records the settlement among direct
participants of securities transactions, such as transfers and pledges, in deposited securities through computerized records for direct
participant’s accounts. This eliminates the need to exchange certificates. Direct participants include securities brokers and dealers,
banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other organizations.
DTC’s
book-entry system is also used by other organizations such as securities brokers and dealers, banks and trust companies that work through
a direct participant. The rules that apply to DTC and its participants are on file with the SEC.
DTC
is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, or DTCC. DTCC is, in turn, owned by a number of DTC’s
direct participants and by the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., the American Stock Exchange, Inc. and the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.
When
you purchase ADSs through the DTC system, the purchases must be made by or through a direct participant, who will receive credit for
the ADSs on DTC’s records. Since you actually own the ADSs, you are the beneficial owner and your ownership interest will only
be recorded on the direct (or indirect) participants’ records. DTC has no knowledge of your individual ownership of the ADSs. DTC’s
records only show the identity of the direct participants and the amount of ADSs held by or through them. You will not receive a written
confirmation of your purchase or sale or any periodic account statement directly from DTC. You will receive these from your direct (or
indirect) participant. Thus the direct (or indirect) participants are responsible for keeping accurate account of the holdings of their
customers like you.
We
will wire dividend payments to DTC’s nominee, and we will treat DTC’s nominee as the owner of the global security for all
purposes. Accordingly, we will have no direct responsibility or liability to pay amounts due on the global security to you or any other
beneficial owners in the global security.
Any
redemption notices will be sent by us directly to DTC, who will in turn inform the direct participants, who will then contact you as
a beneficial holder.
It
is DTC’s current practice, upon receipt of any payment of dividends or liquidation amount, to credit direct participants’
accounts on the payment date based on their holdings of beneficial interests in the global securities as shown on DTC’s records.
In addition, it is DTC’s current practice to assign any consenting or voting rights to direct participants whose accounts are credited
with preferred securities on a record date, by using an omnibus proxy. Payments by participants to owners of beneficial interests in
the global securities, and voting by participants, will be based on the customary practices between the participants and owners of beneficial
interests, as is the case with the ADSs held for the account of customers registered in “street name.” However, payments
will be the responsibility of the participants and not of DTC or us.
ADSs
represented by a global security will be exchangeable for certificated securities with the same terms in authorized denominations only
if:
|
●
|
DTC
is unwilling or unable to continue as depositary or if DTC ceases to be a clearing agency registered under applicable law and a successor
depositary is not appointed by us within 90 days; or
|
|
●
|
we
determine not to require all of the ADSs to be represented by a global security.
|
If
the book-entry only system is discontinued, the transfer agent will keep the registration books for the ADSs at its corporate office.
The
information in this section concerning DTC and DTC’s book-entry system has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable,
but we take no responsibility for the accuracy thereof.
Exchange
Controls
There
are no Israeli government laws, decrees or regulations that restrict or that affect our export or import of capital or the remittance
of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of our securities, including the availability of cash and cash equivalents
for use by us and our wholly-owned subsidiaries, except or otherwise as set forth under Taxation.
Taxation
The
following discussion summarizes certain Israeli and U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be material to our shareholders, but
is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal or professional tax advice and does not exhaust all possible tax considerations
that may be relevant to holders of our ordinary shares. This discussion is based on existing law, judicial authorities and administrative
interpretations, all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations, possibly with retroactive effect. This summary does
not purport to be a complete analysis of all potential tax consequences of owning our ordinary shares. In particular, this discussion
does not take into account the specific circumstances of any particular holder or holders who may be subject to special rules, such as
tax-exempt entities, broker-dealers, shareholders subject to Alternative Minimum Tax, shareholders that actually or constructively own
10% or more of our voting securities, shareholders that hold ordinary shares or ADSs as part of straddle or hedging or conversion transaction,
traders in securities that elect mark to market, banks and other financial institutions or partnerships or other pass-through entities.
The following tax considerations are not relevant to employees of the company or any controlling shareholders. The tax aspects do not
include reference to the Encouragement of Capital Investments Law and the Encouragement of Industry Taxes Law.
We
urge shareholders to consult their own tax advisors as to the potential U.S., Israeli, or other tax consequences of the purchase, ownership
and disposition of ordinary shares and ADSs, including, in particular, the effect of any foreign, state or local taxes. For purposes
of the entire Taxation discussion, we refer to ordinary shares and ADSs collectively as ordinary shares.
Israeli
Tax Considerations
The
following discussion refers to the current tax law applicable to companies in Israel, with special reference to its effect on us. This
discussion also includes specified Israeli tax consequences to holders of our ordinary shares and Israeli Government programs benefiting
us. This summary does not discuss all the aspects of Israeli income tax law that may be relevant to a particular investor in light of
his or her personal investment circumstances or to some types of investors subject to special treatment under Israeli law. Examples of
this kind of investor include residents of Israel or traders in securities who are subject to special tax regimes not covered in this
discussion. To the extent that the discussion is based on new tax legislation that has not yet been subject to judicial or administrative
interpretation, we cannot assure you that the appropriate tax authorities or the courts will accept the views expressed in this discussion.
This summary is based on laws and regulations in effect as of the date of this report and does not take into account possible future
amendments which may be under consideration.”
Corporate
Tax Rate
The corporate tax rate in
Israel was 23%, 23% and 23% for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Capital
gains derived by an Israeli resident company are generally subject to tax at the same rate as the corporate tax rate. Under Israeli tax
legislation, a corporation will be considered as an “Israeli Resident” if it meets one of the following: (a) it was incorporated
in Israel; or (b) the control and management of its business are exercised in Israel.
Tax
Benefits for Research and Development
Israeli
tax law allows, under specific conditions, a tax deduction in the year incurred for expenditures, including capital expenditures, relating
to scientific research and development projects, if the expenditures are approved by the relevant Israeli government ministry, determined
by the field of research, and the research and development is for the promotion of the company and is carried out by or on behalf of
the company seeking the deduction. Expenditures not so approved are deductible over a three-year period. In the past, expenditures that
were made out of proceeds made available to us through government grants were automatically deducted during a one year period.
Israeli
Estate and Gift Taxes
Israel
law presently does not impose estate or gift taxes.
Capital
Gains Tax on Sales of our Ordinary Shares by Both Residents and Non-Residents of Israel
The
Israeli Income Tax Ordinance of 1961 (New Version), or the Ordinance, generally imposes a capital gains tax on the sale of capital assets
either (i) located in Israel; (ii) are shares or a right to a share in an Israeli resident corporation, or (iii) the sold asset is abroad
and it essentially represent, directly or indirectly, rights to assets located in Israel, by both residents and non-residents of Israel,
unless a specific exemption is available or unless a treaty between Israel and the country of the non-resident provides otherwise. The
law distinguishes between the inflationary surplus and the real capital gain. The inflationary surplus is the portion of the total capital
gain, which is equivalent to the increase of the relevant asset’s purchase price attributable to the increase in the Israeli consumer
price index from the date of purchase to the date of sale. The real capital gain is the excess of the total capital gain over the inflationary
surplus. A non-resident that invests in taxable assets with foreign currency may elect to calculate the inflationary amount by using
such foreign currency.
Non-Israeli
residents are generally exempt from Israeli capital gains tax on any gains derived from the sale of shares publicly traded on a stock
exchange recognized by the Israeli Ministry of Finance (including the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange and Nasdaq), provided such shareholders
did not acquire their shares prior to an initial public offering and that such capital gains are not derived by a permanent establishment
of the foreign resident in Israel. Notwithstanding the foregoing, dealers in securities in Israel are taxed at the regular tax rates
applicable to business income. However, Non-Israeli corporations will not be entitled to such exemption if an Israeli resident (1) has,
directly, or indirectly, along or together with another, a controlling interest of 25% or more of the means of control in such non-Israeli
corporation, or (2) is the beneficiary of, or is entitled to, 25% or more of the revenue or profits of such non-Israeli corporation,
whether directly or indirectly. In such case the sale, exchange or disposition of ordinary shares would be subject to Israeli tax, to
the extant applicable.
In
addition, pursuant to the Convention Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Israel with Respect
to Taxes on Income, as amended (the “United States- Israel Tax Treaty”), the sale, exchange or disposition of ordinary shares
by a person who qualifies as a resident of the U.S. within the meaning of the United States-Israel Tax Treaty and who is entitled to
claim the benefits afforded to such person by the United States- Israel Tax Treaty (a “Treaty United States Resident”) generally
will not be subject to the Israeli capital gains tax unless such Treaty United States Resident holds, directly or indirectly, shares
representing 10% or more of our voting power during any part of the twelve- month period preceding such sale, exchange or disposition,
subject to certain conditions or if the capital gains from such sale are considered as business income attributable to a permanent establishment
of the U.S. resident in Israel. However, under the United States-Israel Tax Treaty, such “Treaty United States Resident”
would be permitted to claim a credit for such taxes against the U.S. federal income tax imposed with respect to such sale, exchange or
disposition, subject to the limitations in U.S. laws applicable to foreign tax credits.
The
income tax rate applicable to real capital gain (capital gain less inflationary surplus) derived by an Israeli individual from the sale
of our ordinary shares, is 25%. However, if such shareholder is considered a “Substantial Shareholder” (as defined below)
at the time of sale or at any time during the preceding 12-month period, such gain will be taxed at the rate of 30%.
Real capital gains derived
by a shareholder who is a dealer or trader in securities, or to whom such income is otherwise taxable as ordinary business income instead
of capital gain which, are taxed in Israel at the marginal tax rates applicable to business income (up to 50% for individuals, including
Excess Tax). With respect to the above mentioned, VAT implication may be applicable. A “substantial shareholder” is defined
as someone who alone, or together with another person, holds, directly or indirectly, at least 10% in one or all of any of the means
of control in the corporation (including, among other things, the right to receive profits of the company, voting rights, the right to
receive the company’s liquidation proceeds and the right to appoint a director). With respect to Israeli tax resident corporate
investors, capital gains tax at the regular corporate rate will be imposed on such taxpayers on the sale of traded shares.
Either
the purchaser, the Israeli stockbrokers or financial institution through which the shares are held is obliged, subject to the above mentioned
exemptions, to withhold tax in the amount of consideration (applicable to individual) paid upon the sale of securities (or the Real Capital
Gain realized on the sale applicable company, if known) at the Israeli corporate tax rate (23% in 2018 and thereafter) or 25% in case
the seller is an individual.
At
the sale of securities traded on a stock exchange a detailed return, including a computation of the tax due, must be filed and an advanced
payment must be paid on January 31 and June 30 of every tax year in respect of sales of securities made within the previous six months.
However, if all tax due was withheld at source according to applicable provisions of the Ordinance and regulations promulgated thereunder
the aforementioned return need not be filed and no advance payment must be paid. Capital gain is also reportable on the annual income
tax return.
Excess
Tax
Individuals who are subject
to tax in Israel, are also subject to an additional tax on annual income exceeding NIS 651,600 in 2020 at a rate of 3%, including, but
not limited to, income derived from dividends, interest and capital gain.
Taxation
of Dividends
Israeli
tax resident individuals or non-Israeli resident individuals are generally subject to Israeli income tax on the receipt of dividends
paid on our ordinary Shares at the rate of 25% or 30%, if such recipient is a “substantial shareholders” at the time receiving
the dividend or on any date in the 12 months preceding such date, unless a lower tax rate is provided in a tax treaty between Israel
and the shareholder’s country of residence and if a certificate for a reduce withholding tax rate would be provided in advance
from the Israeli Tax Authority.
Payers
of dividends on our common shares, including the Israeli stockbroker effectuating the transaction, or the financial institution through
which the securities are held, are generally required, subject to any of the foregoing exemptions, reduced tax rates and the demonstration
of a shareholder regarding his, her or its foreign residency, and subject to a certificate for a reduced withholding tax rate from the
Israeli tax authority, to withhold tax upon the distribution of dividend at the rate of 25%, so long as the shares are registered with
a Nominee Company (for corporations and individuals).
Under
the U.S.-Israel Tax Treaty, the maximum Israeli tax and withholding tax on dividends paid to a holder of ordinary shares who is a resident
of the U.S. is generally 25%, but is reduced to 12.5% if the dividends are paid to a U.S. corporation that holds in excess of 10% of
the voting rights of a company during the company’s taxable year preceding the distribution of the dividend and the portion of
the company’s taxable year in which the dividend was distributed as well as during the previous tax year, provided than not more
than 25% of the gross income for such preceding year (if any) consists of certain types of interest or dividends and if a certificate
for a reduced withholding tax rate is obtained in advance from the Israeli tax authority.
A
non-resident of Israel who has dividend income derived from or accrued in Israel, from which full tax was withheld at the source, is
generally exempt from the duty to file tax returns in Israel in respect of such income, provided such income was not derived from a business
conducted in Israel by the taxpayer and the taxpayer has no other taxable sources of income in Israel with respect to which a tax return
is required to be filed.
U.S.
Federal Income Tax Considerations
TO
ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT CIRCULAR 230, PROSPECTIVE HOLDERS OF ORDINARY SHARES ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT: (A) ANY
DISCUSSION OF U.S. FEDERAL TAX ISSUES IN THIS MEMORANDUM IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE RELIED UPON, AND CANNOT BE RELIED UPON, BY
HOLDERS OF ORDINARY SHARES FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON SUCH HOLDERS UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
OF 1986, AS AMENDED (THE “CODE”); (B) SUCH DISCUSSION IS WRITTEN IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROMOTION OR MARKETING OF THE TRANSACTIONS
OR MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN; AND (C) PROSPECTIVE HOLDERS OF ORDINARY SHARES SHOULD SEEK ADVICE BASED ON THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES
FROM AN INDEPENDENT TAX ADVISOR.
The
following discussion applies only to a holder of our ordinary shares who qualifies as a “U.S. holder”. For purposes of this
discussion a “U.S. holder” is a beneficial owner of our ordinary shares that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
●
|
an
individual who is a U.S. citizen or U.S. resident alien;
|
|
●
|
a
corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that was created or organized under the
laws of the U.S., any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
|
|
●
|
an
estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
|
|
●
|
a
trust (i) if a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more “United
States persons” (as defined in the Code) have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (ii) if the
trust has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a “United States person.”
|
This discussion is based on
current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the Code, current and proposed Treasury regulations
promulgated under the Code, and administrative and judicial decisions as of the date of this report, all of which are subject to change
or differing interpretation, possibly on a retroactive basis. This discussion does not address any aspect of state, local or non-U.S.
tax laws. Except where noted, this discussion addresses only those holders who hold our shares as capital assets. This discussion does
not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to U.S. holders entitled to special
treatment under U.S. federal income tax laws, for example, financial institutions, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations and
broker/dealers, and it does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to any particular shareholder
based on the shareholder’s individual circumstances. In particular, this discussion does not address the potential application
of the alternative minimum tax, or the special U.S. federal income tax rules applicable in special circumstances, including to U.S. holders
who:
|
●
|
have
elected mark-to-market accounting;
|
|
●
|
hold
our ordinary shares as part of a straddle, hedge or conversion transaction with other investments;
|
|
●
|
own
directly, indirectly or by attribution at least 10% of our voting power;
|
|
●
|
are
tax exempt entities;
|
|
●
|
are
persons who acquire shares in connection with employment or other performance of services; and
|
|
●
|
have
a functional currency that is not the U.S. dollar.
|
Additionally,
this discussion does not consider the tax treatment of partnerships or persons who hold ordinary shares through a partnership or other
pass-through entity or the possible application of U.S. federal gift or estate taxes.
EACH
PROSPECTIVE SHAREHOLDER IS URGED TO CONSULT ITS TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES TO SUCH HOLDER OF OWNERSHIP AND
DISPOSITION OF OUR SHARES, AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES THAT MAY ARISE UNDER THE LAWS OF ANY OTHER RELEVANT FOREIGN, STATE, LOCAL,
OR OTHER TAXING JURISDICTION.
Taxation
of Distributions Paid on Ordinary Shares
Subject
to the description of the passive foreign investment company rules below, a U.S. holder will be required to include in gross income as
ordinary income from sources outside of the U.S. the amount of any distribution paid on ordinary shares, including any Israeli taxes
withheld from the amount paid, to the extent the distribution is paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits as determined
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Distributions in excess of these earnings and profits will be applied against and will reduce the
U.S. holder’s basis in the ordinary shares and, to the extent in excess of this basis, will be treated as gain from the sale or
exchange of ordinary shares. We do not expect to maintain calculations of our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles
and, therefore, U.S. holder should expect that the entire amount of any distribution generally will be reported as dividend income.
On
December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or the TCJA. The TCJA provides a 100% deduction for the
foreign-source portion of dividends received from “specified 10-percent owned foreign corporations” by U.S. corporate holders,
subject to a one-year holding period. No foreign tax credit, including Israeli withholding tax (or deduction for foreign taxes paid with
respect to qualifying dividends) would be permitted for foreign taxes paid or accrued with respect to a qualifying dividend. Deduction
would be unavailable for “hybrid dividends.” The dividend received deduction enacted under the TCJA may not apply to dividends
from a passive foreign investment company, as discussed below.
Certain
dividend income may be eligible for a reduced rate of taxation. Dividend income will be taxed to a non-corporate holder at the applicable
long-term capital gains rate if the dividend is received from a “qualified foreign corporation,” and the shareholder of such
foreign corporation holds such stock for more than 60 days during the 121 day period that begins on the date that is 60 days before the
ex-dividend date for the stock. The holding period is tolled for any days on which the shareholder has reduced his risk of loss with
respect to the stock. A “qualified foreign corporation” is either a corporation that is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive
income tax treaty with the U.S. or a corporation whose stock, the shares of which are with respect to any dividend paid by such corporation,
is readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States (including, for this purpose, ADSs traded on a securities
market in the United States with respect to the foreign corporation’s shares). However, a foreign corporation will not be treated
as a “qualified foreign corporation” if it is a passive foreign investment company (as discussed below) for the year in which
the dividend was paid or the preceding year. Distributions of current or accumulated earnings and profits paid in foreign currency to
a U.S. holder will be includible in the income of a U.S. holder in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate
in effect on the day the distribution is received by the U.S. holder (or, in the case of ADSs, on the day the distribution is received
by the depository). A U.S. holder that receives a foreign currency distribution and converts the foreign currency into U.S. dollars subsequent
to receipt will have foreign exchange gain or loss based on any appreciation or depreciation in the value of the foreign currency against
the U.S. dollar, which will generally be U.S. source ordinary income or loss.
As
described above, we will generally be required to withhold Israeli income tax from any dividends paid to holders who are not residents
of Israel. See “- Israeli Tax Considerations—Taxation of Dividends” above.
With
respect to certain non-corporate U.S. Holders, including individual U.S. Holders, dividends may be taxed at the lower capital gain rates
applicable to “qualified dividend income,” provided (1) our ordinary shares are readily tradable on an established securities
market in the United States (such as Nasdaq), (2) we are neither a PFIC nor treated as such with respect to you (as discussed above)
for either the taxable year in which the dividend was paid or the preceding taxable year, (3) certain holding period requirements are
met and (4) you are not under an obligation to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property.
As discussed above under “Passive foreign investment company,” there is a significant risk that we will be a PFIC for U.S.
federal income tax purposes, and, as a result, the qualified dividend rate may be unavailable with respect to dividends we pay.
The
amount of any distribution paid in a currency other than U.S. dollars will be equal to the U.S. dollar value of such currency on the
date such distribution is includible in your income, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars at that
time. The amount of any distribution of property other than cash will be the fair market value of such property on the date of distribution.
Any
dividends will constitute foreign source income for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. If the dividends are taxed as qualified dividend
income (as discussed above), the amount of the dividend taken into account for purposes of calculating the foreign tax credit limitation
will in general be limited to the gross amount of the dividend, multiplied by the reduced tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income
and divided by the highest tax rate normally applicable to dividends. The limitation on foreign taxes eligible for credit is calculated
separately with respect to specific classes of income. For this purpose, dividends distributed by us with respect to our ordinary shares
will generally constitute “passive category income” but could, in the case of certain U.S. Holders, constitute “general
category income.”
If
Israeli withholding taxes apply to any dividends paid to you with respect to our ordinary shares, subject to certain conditions and limitations,
such withholding taxes may be treated as foreign taxes eligible for credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability. Instead of
claiming a credit, you may elect to deduct such taxes in computing taxable income, subject to applicable limitations. If a refund of
the tax withheld is available under the applicable laws of Israel or under the Israel-U.S. income tax treaty (the “Treaty”),
the amount of tax withheld that is refundable will not be eligible for such credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability (and
will not be eligible for the deduction against your U.S. federal taxable income). The rules relating to the determination of the foreign
tax credit are complex, and you should consult your tax advisor regarding the availability of a foreign tax credit in your particular
circumstances, including the effects of the Treaty.
Special
rules, described below, apply if we are a passive foreign investment company.
Taxation
of the Disposition of Ordinary Shares
Subject
to the description of the passive foreign investment company rules below, upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of our ordinary
shares, a U.S. holder will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the U.S. holder’s basis
in the ordinary shares, which is usually the cost of those shares, and the amount realized on the disposition. Capital gain from the
sale, exchange or other disposition of ordinary shares held more than one year is long-term capital gain and is eligible for a reduced
rate of taxation for non-corporate holders. In general, gain realized by a U.S. holder on a sale, exchange or other disposition of ordinary
shares generally will be treated as U.S. source income for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. A loss realized by a U.S. holder on the
sale, exchange or other disposition of ordinary shares is generally allocated to U.S. source income. However, regulations require the
loss to be allocated to foreign source income to the extent certain dividends were received by the taxpayer within the 24-month period
preceding the date on which the taxpayer recognized the loss. The deductibility of a loss realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition
of ordinary shares is subject to limitations for both corporate and individual shareholders.
A
U.S. holder that uses the cash method of accounting calculates the U.S. dollar value of the proceeds received from a sale of ordinary
shares as of the date that the sale settles, and will generally have no additional foreign currency gain or loss on the sale, while a
U.S. holder that uses the accrual method of accounting is required to calculate the value of the proceeds of the sale as of the trade
date and may therefore realize foreign currency gain or loss, unless the U.S. holder has elected to use the settlement date to determine
its proceeds of sale for purposes of calculating this foreign currency gain or loss. In addition, a U.S. holder that receives foreign
currency upon disposition of our ordinary shares and converts the foreign currency into U.S. dollars subsequent to receipt will have
foreign exchange gain or loss based on any appreciation or depreciation in the value of the foreign currency against the U.S. dollar,
which will generally be U.S. source ordinary income or loss.
Tax
Consequences if we are a Passive Foreign Investment Company
Special federal income tax
rules apply to the timing and character of income received by a U.S. holder of a PFIC. We will be a PFIC if either 75% or more of our
gross income in a tax year is passive income or the average percentage of our assets (by value) that produce or are held for the production
of passive income in a tax year is at least 50%. The IRS has indicated that cash balances, even if held as working capital, are considered
to be assets that produce passive income. Therefore, any determination of PFIC status will depend upon the sources of our income, and
the relative values of passive and non- passive assets, including goodwill. Furthermore, because the goodwill of a publicly-traded corporation
is largely a function of the trading price of its shares, the valuation of that goodwill is subject to significant change throughout
each year. A determination as to a corporation’s status as a PFIC must be made annually. We believe we may be a PFIC during 2020
and although we have not determined whether we will be a PFIC in 2021, or in any subsequent year, our operating results for any such
years may cause us to be a PFIC. Although we may not be a PFIC in any one year, the PFIC taint remains with respect to those years in
which we were or are a PFIC and the special PFIC taxation regime will continue to apply.
If
we are classified as a PFIC, a special tax regime would apply to both (a) any “excess distribution” by us (generally, the
U.S. holder’s ratable share of distributions in any year that are greater than 125% of the average annual distributions received
by such U.S. holder in the three preceding years or its holding period, if shorter) and (b) any gain recognized on the sale or other
disposition of your ordinary shares. Under this special regime, any excess distribution and recognized gain would be treated as ordinary
income and the federal income tax on such ordinary income would be determined as follows: (i) the amount of the excess distribution or
gain would be allocated ratably over the U.S. holder’s holding period for our ordinary shares; (ii) U.S. federal income tax would
be determined for the amounts allocated to the first year in the holding period in which we were classified as a PFIC and for all subsequent
years (except the year in which the excess distribution was received or the sale occurred) by applying the highest applicable tax rate
in effect in the year to which the income was allocated; (iii) an interest charge would be added to this tax, calculated by applying
the underpayment interest rate to the tax for each year determined under the preceding sentence from the due date of the income tax return
for such year to the due date of the return for the year in which the excess distribution or sale occurs; and (iv) amounts allocated
to a year prior to the first year in the U.S. holder’s holding period in which we were classified as a PFIC or to the year in which
the excess distribution or the disposition occurred would be taxed as ordinary income but without the imposition of an interest charge.
A
U.S. holder may generally avoid the PFIC “excess distribution” regime by electing to treat his PFIC shares as a “qualified
electing fund.” If a U.S. holder elects to treat PFIC shares as a qualified electing fund, also known as a “QEF Election,”
the U.S. holder must include annually in gross income (for each year in which PFIC status is met) his pro rata share of the PFIC’s
ordinary earnings and net capital gains, whether or not such amounts are actually distributed to the U.S. holder. A U.S. holder may make
a QEF Election with respect to a PFIC for any taxable year in which he was a shareholder. A QEF Election is effective for the year in
which the election is made and all subsequent taxable years of the U.S. holder. Procedures exist for both retroactive elections and the
filing of protective statements. A U.S. holder making the QEF Election must make the election on or before the due date, as extended,
for the filing of the U.S. holder’s income tax return for the first taxable year to which the election will apply.
A
QEF Election is made on a shareholder-by-shareholder basis. A U.S. holder must make a QEF Election by completing Form 8621, Return by
a Shareholder of a Passive Foreign Investment Company or Qualified Electing Fund, and attaching it to the holder’s timely filed
U.S. federal income tax return.
Alternatively,
a U.S. holder may also generally avoid the PFIC regime by making a so-called “mark-to-market” election. Such an election
may be made by a U.S. holder with respect to ordinary shares owned at the close of such holder’s taxable year, provided that we
are a PFIC and the ordinary shares are considered “marketable stock.” The ordinary shares will be marketable stock if they
are regularly traded on a national securities exchange that is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the national
market system established pursuant to section 11A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or an equivalent regulated and supervised foreign
securities exchange.
If
a U.S. holder were to make a mark-to-market election with respect to ordinary shares, such holder generally will be required to include
in its annual gross income the excess of the fair market value of the PFIC shares at year-end over such shareholder’s adjusted
tax basis in the ordinary shares. Such amounts will be taxable to the U.S. holder as ordinary income, and will increase the holder’s
tax basis in the ordinary shares. Alternatively, if in any year, a United States holder’s tax basis exceeds the fair market value
of the ordinary shares at year-end, then the U.S. holder generally may take an ordinary loss deduction to the extent of the aggregate
amount of ordinary income inclusions for prior years not previously recovered through loss deductions and any loss deductions taken will
reduce the shareholder’s tax basis in the ordinary shares. Gains from an actual sale or other disposition of the ordinary shares
with a “mark-to-market” election will be treated as ordinary income, and any losses incurred on an actual sale or other disposition
of the ordinary shares will be treated as an ordinary loss to the extent of any prior “unreversed inclusions” as defined
in Section 1296(d) of the Code.
The
mark-to-market election is made on a shareholder-by-shareholder basis. The mark-to-market election is made by completing Form 8621, Return
by a Shareholder of a Passive Foreign Investment Company or Qualified Electing Fund, and attaching it to the holder’s timely filed
U.S. federal income tax return for the year of election. Such election is effective for the taxable year for which made and all subsequent
years until either (a) the ordinary shares cease to be marketable stock or (b) the election is revoked with the consent of the IRS.
In
view of the complexity of the issues regarding our treatment as a PFIC, U.S. shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors
for guidance as to our status as a PFIC.
Information
Reporting and Back-Up Withholding
U.S.
holders generally are subject to information reporting requirements with respect to dividends paid in the U.S. on ordinary shares. Existing
regulations impose information reporting and back-up withholding on dividends paid in the U.S. on ordinary shares and on proceeds from
the disposition of ordinary shares unless the U.S. holder provides IRS Form W-9 or otherwise establishes an exemption.
Prospective investors should
consult their tax advisors concerning the effect, if any, of these Treasury regulations on an investment in ordinary shares. Back-up
withholding is not an additional tax. The amount of any back-up withholding will be allowed as a credit against a holder’s U.S.
federal income tax liability and may entitle the holder to a refund, provided that specified required information is furnished to the
IRS on a timely basis.
Documents
on Display
We file reports and other
information with the SEC under the Exchange Act and the regulations thereunder applicable to foreign private issuers. You may inspect
and copy reports and other information filed by us with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference facilities described below. Although
as a foreign private issuer we are not required to file periodic information as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies, we generally
announce publicly our interim and year-end results promptly on a voluntary basis and will file that periodic information with the SEC
under cover of Form 6-K. As a foreign private issuer, we are also exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing
and content of proxy statements, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and other provisions
in Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
You can review our SEC filings
by accessing the SEC’s internet site at http://www.sec.gov.
We
also maintain a website at http://www.xtlbio.com, but information contained on our website does not constitute a part of this report
and is not incorporated by reference into this report.
ITEM
11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk.
The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing our income from investments and minimizing
our market risk. We invest in bank deposits and marketable securities in accordance with our investment policy. As of December 31, 2020,
our portfolio of financial instruments consists of cash and cash equivalents, short-term bank deposits with multiple institutions and
marketable securities. The average duration of all of our investments held as of December 31, 2020, was less than one year. Due to the
short-term nature of these investments, we believe we have no material exposure to interest rate risk arising from our investments.
Foreign
Currency and Inflation Risk. We hold most of our cash, cash equivalents and bank deposits in U.S. dollars. While a substantial amount
of our operating expenses are in U.S. dollars, we incur a portion of our expenses in New Israeli Shekels. In addition, we also pay for
some of our services and supplies in the local currencies of our suppliers, as our head office is located in Israel. As a result, we
are exposed to the risk that the U.S. dollar will be devalued against the New Israeli Shekel or other currencies, and as a result our
financial results could be harmed if we are unable to guard against currency fluctuations in Israel or other countries in which services
and supplies are obtained in the future. Accordingly, we may enter into currency hedging transactions to decrease the risk of financial
exposure from fluctuations in the exchange rates of currencies. The Company’s treasury risk management policy is to hold NIS-denominated
cash and cash equivalents and short-term deposits in the amount of the anticipated NIS-denominated liabilities for six consecutive months
from time to time and this in line with the directives of the Company’s Board. These measures, however, may not adequately protect
us from the adverse effects of inflation in Israel. In addition, we are exposed to the risk that the rate of inflation in Israel will
exceed the rate of devaluation of the New Israeli Shekel in relation to the dollar or that the timing of any devaluation may lag behind
inflation in Israel.
As of December 31, 2020,
had the Group’s functional currency weakened by 10% against the NIS with all other variables remaining constant, post-tax loss
for the year would have been $242 thousand higher (2019- post-tax loss approximately $233 thousand higher; 2018 - post-tax profit approximately
$289 thousand lower), mainly as a result of exchange rate changes on translation of other accounts receivable and exchange rate changes
on NIS-denominated cash and cash equivalents.
Credit
Risk. Credit risks are managed at the Group level. The Group has no significant concentrations of credit risk. The Group has a policy
to ensure collection through sales of its products to wholesalers with an appropriate credit history and through retail sales in cash
or by credit card.
Liquidity
Risk. Cash flow forecasting is performed by the Group’s management both in the entities of the Group and aggregated by the
Group. The Group’s management monitors rolling forecasts of the Group’s liquidity requirements to ensure it has sufficient
cash to meet operations. The Group currently does not use credit facilities. Forecasting takes into consideration several factors such
as raising capital to finance operations and certain liquidity ratios that the Group strives to achieve.
Surplus
cash held to finance operating activities is invested in interest bearing current accounts, time deposits and other similar channels.
These channels were chosen by reference to their appropriate maturities or liquidity to provide sufficient cash balances to the Group
as determined by the abovementioned forecasts.
ITEM
12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Not
applicable.