Table of Contents
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark
One)
|
|
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
|
|
OR
|
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
Commission
File Number 000-51281
TENNESSEE
COMMERCE BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
Tennessee
|
|
62-1815881
|
(State or other
jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
of incorporation
or organization)
|
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
|
|
381
Mallory Station Road, Suite 207 Franklin,
Tennessee
|
|
37067
|
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(615) 599-2274
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
Not
Applicable
(Former name,
former address and former fiscal year if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark
whether registrant (1) has filed reports required to be filed by Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate
Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter)
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer
o
|
|
Accelerated
filer
x
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller
reporting company
o
|
(Do not check if
a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
x
As of May 06, 2009
there were 4,733,712 shares of common stock, $0.50 par value per share, issued
and outstanding.
Table of Contents
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
TENNESSEE COMMERCE
BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31,
2009 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2008
(Dollars in thousands except share data)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due
from financial institutions
|
|
$
|
5,754
|
|
$
|
5,260
|
|
Federal funds
sold
|
|
25
|
|
35,538
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
5,779
|
|
40,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
available for sale
|
|
100,013
|
|
101,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
1,103,942
|
|
1,036,725
|
|
Allowance for
loan losses
|
|
(15,424
|
)
|
(13,454
|
)
|
Net loans
|
|
1,088,518
|
|
1,023,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and
equipment, net
|
|
2,230
|
|
2,330
|
|
Accrued interest
receivable
|
|
8,689
|
|
8,115
|
|
Restricted
equity securities
|
|
2,152
|
|
1,685
|
|
Income tax
receivable
|
|
5,832
|
|
4,430
|
|
Other assets
|
|
61,921
|
|
36,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,275,134
|
|
$
|
1,218,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
23,258
|
|
$
|
24,217
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
1,072,049
|
|
1,044,926
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
1,095,307
|
|
1,069,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
15,153
|
|
|
|
Federal funds
purchased
|
|
20,479
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest
payable
|
|
3,268
|
|
3,315
|
|
Accrued dividend
payable
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
Short-term
borrowings
|
|
10,000
|
|
10,000
|
|
Accrued bonuses
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
Deferred tax
liability
|
|
8,404
|
|
8,695
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
1,095
|
|
1,069
|
|
Long-term
subordinated debt
|
|
23,198
|
|
23,198
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
1,177,092
|
|
1,116,337
|
|
Shareholders
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock,
1,000,000 shares authorized; 30,000 shares of $0.50 par value Fixed Rate
Cumulative Perpetual, Series A issued and outstanding at March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively
|
|
15,000
|
|
15,000
|
|
Common stock,
$0.50 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008; 4,731,696 and 4,731,696 shares issued and outstanding
at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively
|
|
2,366
|
|
2,366
|
|
Common stock
warrant
|
|
453
|
|
453
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
60,037
|
|
59,946
|
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
20,520
|
|
23,180
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
(334
|
)
|
802
|
|
Total
shareholders equity
|
|
98,042
|
|
101,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,275,134
|
|
$
|
1,218,084
|
|
(1) The balance
sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information
and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements.
See accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
TENNESSEE COMMERCE
BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands, except share data)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including
fees
|
|
$
|
17,896
|
|
$
|
16,382
|
|
Securities
|
|
1,555
|
|
1,033
|
|
Federal funds
sold
|
|
5
|
|
71
|
|
Total interest
income
|
|
19,456
|
|
17,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
9,129
|
|
9,744
|
|
Other
|
|
487
|
|
280
|
|
Total interest
expense
|
|
9,616
|
|
10,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income
|
|
9,840
|
|
7,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for
loan losses
|
|
8,514
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income after provision for loan losses
|
|
1,326
|
|
5,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges
on deposit accounts
|
|
43
|
|
24
|
|
Securities gains
(losses)
|
|
418
|
|
30
|
|
(Loss) gain on
sale of loans
|
|
(360
|
)
|
566
|
|
Other
|
|
(74
|
)
|
(93
|
)
|
Total
non-interest income
|
|
27
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and
employee benefits
|
|
2,349
|
|
2,284
|
|
Occupancy and
equipment
|
|
410
|
|
360
|
|
Data processing
fees
|
|
304
|
|
285
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
390
|
|
375
|
|
Other
|
|
1,480
|
|
840
|
|
Total
non-interest expense
|
|
4,933
|
|
4,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income
before income taxes
|
|
(3,580
|
)
|
2,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax
(benefit) expense
|
|
(1,364
|
)
|
870
|
|
Net (loss)
income
|
|
(2,216
|
)
|
1,375
|
|
Preferred stock
dividends and accretion
|
|
(444
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)
income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(2,660
|
)
|
$
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
share (EPS):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
$
|
(0.56
|
)
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
(0.56
|
)
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
4,731,696
|
|
4,729,718
|
|
Diluted
|
|
4,731,696
|
|
4,890,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
TENNESSEE COMMERCE
BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
Common
|
|
Common
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
Retained
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except share data)
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock
|
|
Capital
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
2,362
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
45,024
|
|
$
|
15,426
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
$
|
63,121
|
|
Comprehensive
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
Other
comprehensive income, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains
on securities available for sale during the period, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
stock options to purchase 43,350 common shares and related tax benefit
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
2,366
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
45,110
|
|
$
|
16,801
|
|
$
|
652
|
|
$
|
64,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
$
|
2,366
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
$
|
59,946
|
|
$
|
23,180
|
|
$
|
802
|
|
$
|
101,747
|
|
Comprehensive
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,660
|
)
|
|
|
(2,660
|
)
|
Unrealized gains
on securities available for sale during the period, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,136
|
)
|
(1,136
|
)
|
Common stock
warrant accretion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
$
|
2,366
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
$
|
60,037
|
|
$
|
20,520
|
|
$
|
(334
|
)
|
$
|
98,042
|
|
See accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
TENNESSEE COMMERCE
BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
(2,216
|
)
|
$
|
1,375
|
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
122
|
|
86
|
|
Deferred loan
fees
|
|
41
|
|
(135
|
)
|
Provision for
loan losses
|
|
8,514
|
|
1,600
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
Deferred income
tax
|
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
Net amortization
of investment securities
|
|
22
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Gain on sales of
securities
|
|
(418
|
)
|
(30
|
)
|
Change in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest
receivable
|
|
(574
|
)
|
(459
|
)
|
Accrued interest
payable
|
|
(47
|
)
|
381
|
|
Other assets
|
|
(2,613
|
)
|
(3,988
|
)
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
(502
|
)
|
1,422
|
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities
|
|
(2,397
|
)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of
securities available for sale
|
|
(39,989
|
)
|
(23,947
|
)
|
Proceeds from
sales of securities available for sale
|
|
19,428
|
|
12,292
|
|
Proceeds from
maturities, prepayments and calls of securities available for sale
|
|
20,402
|
|
13,979
|
|
Net change in
loans
|
|
(73,802
|
)
|
(71,378
|
)
|
Purchase of BOLI
investment
|
|
(24,341
|
)
|
|
|
Purchases of
FHLB Stock
|
|
(467
|
)
|
(411
|
)
|
Net purchases of
premises and equipment
|
|
(22
|
)
|
(107
|
)
|
Net cash used by
investing activities
|
|
(98,791
|
)
|
(69,572
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in
deposits
|
|
26,164
|
|
46,496
|
|
Net change in
federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements
|
|
20,479
|
|
14,175
|
|
Proceeds from
FHLB advances and other long-term debt
|
|
15,153
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
dividends and accretion expense
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from
exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Excess tax
benefit from option exercises
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Net cash
provided by financing activities
|
|
61,819
|
|
60,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
(35,019
|
)
|
(8,805
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
40,798
|
|
14,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
5,779
|
|
$
|
6,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during
period for interest
|
|
$
|
9,663
|
|
$
|
9,643
|
|
Cash paid during
period for income taxes
|
|
1,568
|
|
183
|
|
See accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
TENNESSEE COMMERCE
BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements (unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands,
except per share data, throughout these Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (unaudited))
Note 1 Basis of
Presentation
Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
(the Corporation) is the bank holding company for Tennessee Commerce Bank
(the Bank). In March 2005, the Corporation formed a wholly owned
subsidiary, Tennessee Commerce Bank Statutory Trust I (the Trust I). In
June 2008, the Corporation formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Tennessee
Commerce Bank Statutory Trust II (the Trust II). In July 2008, the
corporation formed a wholly owned subsidiary, TCB Commercial Assets Services.
As of March 31, 2009, the Bank, the Trust I, the Trust II and TCB
Commercial Assets Services were the only subsidiaries of the Corporation. The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Corporation, the Bank and TCB Commercial Assets Services, Inc. The Trust I
and the Trust II are not consolidated in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46(R) (revised December 2003),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. Material intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated.
The unaudited
consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2009 and for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of Regulation S-X as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),
and in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring adjustments, to present fairly the information included therein. They
do not include all the information and notes required by generally accepted
accounting principles for complete financial statements. Operating results for
the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto included in the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
Note 2 Earnings per
Share of Common Stock
The factors used in the
earnings per share computation follow:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(2,660
|
)
|
$
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
common shares outstanding
|
|
4,731,696
|
|
4,729,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings
per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.56
|
)
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(2,660
|
)
|
$
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
common shares outstanding for basic earnings per common share
|
|
4,731,696
|
|
4,729,718
|
|
Add: Dilutive
effects of assumed exercises of stock options (1)
|
|
|
|
160,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares
and dilutive potential common shares
|
|
4,731,696
|
|
4,890,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings
per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.56
|
)
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
(1)
All of the warrant and options were excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share in 2009 because they were
anti-dilutive.
7
Table of Contents
Note 3 Stock
Compensation
On January 1, 2006,
the Corporation adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123(R)), which addresses the accounting
for share-based payment transactions in which a company receives employee
services in exchange for equity instruments. SFAS No. 123(R) eliminates
the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions, as the
Corporation formerly did, using the intrinsic value method as prescribed by
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees, and generally requires that such transactions be accounted for
using a fair-value-based method and recognized as expense in the accompanying
consolidated statement of income.
The Corporation adopted
SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method which requires
the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006. The
accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the periods ended March 31,
2009 reflects the impact of adopting SFAS No. 123(R). In accordance with
the modified prospective method, the consolidated financial statements for
prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact
of SFAS No. 123(R).
Stock-based compensation
expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of
stock-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest. Stock-based
compensation expense recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of
income for the periods ended March 31, 2009 included any compensation
expense for stock-based payment awards vesting during the period based on the
grant date fair value estimated in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R). As
stock-based compensation expense recognized in the accompanying statement of
income for the period ended March 31, 2009 is based on awards ultimately
expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS No. 123(R) requires
forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in
subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
For the three months
ended March 31, 2009, the Corporation granted options to purchase 150,000
shares of Corporation common stock and there were 163,600 non-vested options
outstanding prior to that period. There was $68 stock-based expense recognized
for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
8
Table of Contents
A summary of the activity
in the Corporations stock-based compensation plan is as follows:
|
|
Number
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Contractual
Remaining
Term
(in years)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (1)
|
|
Stock-based
awards outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
833,070
|
|
$
|
13.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
150,000
|
|
5.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
restricted stock granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
forfeited or expired
|
|
(17,250
|
)
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
awards outstanding at March 31, 2009
|
|
965,820
|
|
$
|
12.81
|
|
5.70
|
|
$
|
(4,955
|
)
|
Stock-based
awards outstanding and expected to vest at March 31, 2009
|
|
965,820
|
|
$
|
12.81
|
|
5.70
|
|
$
|
(4,955
|
)
|
Options
exercisable at March 31, 2009
|
|
653,820
|
|
$
|
11.71
|
|
4.08
|
|
$
|
(2,635
|
)
|
(1)
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the
difference between the exercise price of each option and the closing price per
share of Corporation common stock of $7.68 for the outstanding options to
purchase 965,820 shares of Corporation common stock and exercisable options to
purchase 653,820 shares of Corporation common stock at March 31, 2009.
|
|
Number
|
|
Shares of
restricted stock outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
10,079
|
|
Shares of
restricted stock granted
|
|
|
|
Options
forfeited or expired
|
|
|
|
Restricted
stock-based awards outstanding at March 31, 2009
|
|
10,079
|
|
Restricted
stock-based awards outstanding and expected to vest at March 31, 2009
|
|
10,079
|
|
Restricted stock
exercisable at March 31, 2009
|
|
2,016
|
|
The estimated fair values
are computed using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, using the
following weighted-average assumptions as of the grant date shown below:
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
3.27
|
%
|
Expected option
life
|
|
5 years
|
|
3.5 years
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
0.0
|
%
|
The Corporation granted
options to purchase 150,000 shares of Corporation common stock in the first
quarter of 2009 and in the first quarter of 2008. The options granted in 2009
had an estimated fair value of $2.28. The options granted in 2008 had an
estimated fair value of $4.45. The options granted in 2007 had an estimated
fair value of $5.75. The options granted during 2005 were granted in July, August and
November and had an estimated fair value of $3.96, $4.07 and $4.26,
respectively. The weighted average fair value of options granted during the
year was $4.45 for 2008, $5.75 for 2007, $4.03 for 2005, $2.23 for 2004 and
$2.29 for 2003. No options were granted in 2006.
9
Table of Contents
Note 4 Federal Home
Loan Advances and Trust Preferred Securities
In October 2008, the
Bank was approved for funding advances in an aggregate amount of $30,000 with
terms from one to 100 days from The Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (FHLB),
based on a collateral standard. The Banks available advance is based on 150%
of eligible one-to-four family loans as collateral. The Bank is also required
to maintain a minimum required capital stock balance that is based upon its
total assets.
In March 2005, the
Trust I issued and sold 8,000 of its fixed/floating rate capital securities,
with a liquidation amount of $1 per capital security, to First Tennessee Bank
National Association. The securities pay a fixed rate of 6.73% payable
quarterly for the first five years and a floating rate based on a three-month
LIBOR rate plus 1.98% thereafter. At the same time, the Corporation issued to
the Trust I $8,248 of fixed/floating rate junior subordinated deferrable
interest debentures due 2035. The Corporation guarantees the payment of
distributions and payments for redemptions or liquidation of the capital
securities. The fixed/floating rate capital securities qualify as Tier I
Capital for the Corporation under current regulatory definitions subject to
certain limitations.
The debentures pay a
fixed rate of 6.73% payable quarterly for the first five years and a floating
rate based on a three-month LIBOR rate plus 1.98% thereafter. The distributions
on the capital securities are accounted for as interest expense by the
Corporation. Interest payments on the debentures and the corresponding
distributions on the capital securities may be deferred at any time at the
election of the Corporation for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods (five
years). The capital securities and debentures are redeemable at any time
commencing after June 2010 at par. The Corporation reports as liabilities
the subordinated debentures issued by the Corporation and held by the Trust I.
In June 2008, the
Trust II issued and sold 14,500 of its floating rate capital securities, with a
liquidation amount of $1 per capital security, in a private placement. The
securities pay a floating rate per annum, reset quarterly, equal to the prime
rate of interest published in
The Wall
Street Journal
on the first business day of each distribution period
plus 50 basis points (but in no event greater than 8.0% or less than 5.75%). At
the same time, the Corporation issued to the Trust II $14,950 of floating rate
junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures due 2038. The Corporation
guarantees the payment of distributions and payments for redemptions or
liquidation of the capital securities. The floating rate capital securities
qualify as Tier I Capital for the Corporation under current regulatory
definitions subject to certain limitations.
The debentures pay a
floating rate per annum, reset quarterly, equal to the prime rate of interest published
in
The Wall Street Journal
on the
first business day of each distribution period plus 50 basis points (but in no
event greater than 8.0% or less than 5.75%). The distributions on the capital
securities are accounted for as interest expense by the Corporation. Interest
payments on the debentures and the corresponding distributions on the capital
securities may be deferred at any time at the election of the Corporation for
up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods (five years). The capital securities and
debentures are redeemable at any time commencing after June 2013 at par.
The Corporation reports as liabilities the subordinated debentures issued by
the Corporation and held by the Trust II.
Note 5 New Accounting
Standards
In April 2008, the
FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 142-3, Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors
an entity should consider in developing renewal or extension assumptions used
in determining the useful life of recognized intangible assets under FASB
Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This new
guidance applies prospectively to intangible assets that are acquired
individually or with a group of other assets in business combinations and asset
acquisitions. FSP 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. Early
adoption is prohibited. The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact, if
any, that FSP 142-3 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the
FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 161 (SFAS
161), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS
161 requires companies with derivative instruments to disclose information that
should enable financial-statement users to understand how and why a company
uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged
items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and how derivative instruments
and related hedged items affect a companys financial position, financial
performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15,
2008. The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS 161
will have on its consolidated financial statements.
10
Table of Contents
In December 2007,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations (SFAS 141R). SFAS
141R clarifies the definitions of both a business combination and a business.
All business combinations will be accounted for under the acquisition method
(previously referred to as the purchase method). This standard defines the
acquisition date as the only relevant date for recognition and measurement of
the fair value of consideration paid. SFAS 141R requires the acquirer to
expense all acquisition related costs. SFAS 141R will also require acquired
loans to be recorded net of the allowance for loan losses on the date of
acquisition. SFAS 141R defines the measurement period as the time after the
acquisition date during which the acquirer may make adjustments to the provisional
amounts recognized at the acquisition date. This period cannot exceed one year,
and any subsequent adjustments made to provisional amounts are done
retrospectively and restate prior period data. The provisions of this statement
are effective for business combinations during fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. The Corporation has not determined the impact that SFAS 141R will have on
its financial position and results of operations and believes that such
determination will not be meaningful until the Corporation enters into a
business combination.
Note 6 Fair Value
Measurement
The Bank has an
established process for determining fair values, in accordance with SFAS No. 157.
Fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If listed
prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon internally
developed models or processes that use primarily market-based or
independently-sourced market data, including interest rate yield curves, option
volatilities and third party information. Valuation adjustments may be made to
ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments
include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality (for financial assets
reflected at fair value), the Banks creditworthiness (for financial
liabilities reflected at fair value), liquidity and other unobservable
parameters that are applied consistently over time as follows:
·
|
Credit valuation
adjustments are necessary when the market price (or parameter) is not
indicative of the credit quality of the counterparty;
|
|
|
·
|
Debit valuation
adjustments are necessary to reflect the credit quality of the Bank in the
valuation of liabilities measured at fair value;
|
|
|
·
|
Liquidity valuation
adjustments are necessary when the Bank may not be able to observe a recent
market price for a financial instrument that trades in inactive (or less
active) markets or to reflect the cost of exiting larger- than-normal
market-size risk positions; and
|
|
|
·
|
Unobservable parameter
valuation adjustments are necessary when positions are valued using
internally developed models that use as their basis unobservable parameters
that is, parameters that must be estimated and are, therefore, subject to
management judgment to substantiate the model valuation. These financial
instruments are normally traded less actively.
|
The methods described
above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable
value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Bank believes
its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market
participants, the use of different methodologies, or assumptions, to determine
the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different
estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
Valuation
Hierarchy
SFAS No.157 establishes a
three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The
valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation
of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are
defined as follows:
·
|
Level 1 inputs to the
valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical
assets or liabilities in active markets.
|
|
|
·
|
Level 2 inputs to the
valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term
of the financial instrument.
|
|
|
·
|
Level 3 inputs to the
valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value
measurement.
|
A financial instruments
categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of
input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Below is a description of the valuation
methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the
general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.
11
Table
of Contents
Assets
Securities
Available for Sale -
Available-for-sale securities are
recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Where quoted prices are
available in an active market, securities are classified within level 1 of the
valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid government
bonds, federal funds sold and certain other products. Fair value
measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices
are not available, securities would generally be classified within level 2, and
fair value would be determined by matrix pricing, which is a mathematical
technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying
exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but relying on the
securities relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. In certain cases
where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the
valuation, securities are classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the entire Banks
available-for-sale securities were valued using matrix pricing and were
classified within level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. At March 31,
2009, the Bank had no securities classified within level 3.
Servicing
Assets -
All separately recognized servicing assets and
servicing liabilities are initially measured at fair value. Subsequent
measurement methods include the amortization method, whereby servicing assets
or servicing liabilities are amortized over the period of estimated net
servicing income or net servicing loss, or the fair value method, whereby
servicing assets or servicing liabilities are measured at fair value at each
reporting date and changes in fair value are reported in earnings in the period
in which they occur. Because of the unique nature of the Banks servicing
assets, quoted market prices may not be available. If no quoted market prices
are available, the amortization method is used. The Bank assesses servicing
assets or servicing liabilities for impairment or increased obligation based on
the fair value at each reporting date. At March 31,
2009, the Bank had servicing assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Interest-Only
Strips -
When the Bank sells loans to others, it may hold
interest-only strips, which is an interest that continues to be held by the
transferor in the securitized receivable. It may also obtain servicing assets
or assume servicing liabilities that are initially measured at fair value. Gain
or loss on sale of the receivables depends in part on both (a) the
previous carrying amount of the financial assets involved in the transfer,
allocated between the assets sold and the interests that continue to be held by
the transferor based on their relative fair value at the date of transfer, and (b) the
proceeds received. To obtain fair values, quoted market prices are used if
available. However, quotes are generally not available for interests that
continue to be held by the transferor, so the Bank generally estimates fair
value based on the future expected cash flows estimated using managements best
estimates of the key assumptions credit losses and discount rates
commensurate with the risks involved. At March 31, 2009, the Bank had
interest-only strips measured at fair value on a recurring basis classified
within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Impaired
Loans
A loan is considered to be impaired when it is
probable the Bank will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments
due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
Individually identified impaired loans are measured based on the present value
of expected payments using the loans original effective rate as the discount
rate, the loans observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral
if the loan is collateral dependent. If the recorded investment in the impaired
loan exceeds the measure of fair value, a valuation allowance may be
established as a component of the allowance for loan losses. At March 31,
2009, the Bank had impaired loans measured on a nonrecurring basis classified
within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Other
Assets
Included in other assets are certain assets carried at fair value, including
repossessions and other real estate owned (OREO). The carrying amount is
based on an observable market price or appraisal value. The Bank reflects these
assets within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. At March 31,
2009, the Bank had repossessions and OREO measured at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The
Bank also includes bank owned life insurance (BOLI) within other assets,
carried at a cash surrender value. At March 31, 2009, the Bank had
BOLI measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis classified within level 3
of the valuation hierarchy.
Inventory
Repossessed assets are resold
at retail prices as soon as practicable. If a repossession of the Bank is
not resold within the six month holding period allowed by Tennessee law, it is
purchased by a subsidiary of the Corporation. It is held as inventory and
carried at fair market value. The sole purpose of the subsidiary is the resale
of assets reposed by the Bank. At March 31, 2009, the subsidiary had
inventory measured at fair value on a recurring basis classified within level 3
of the valuation hierarchy.
Liabilities
Recourse
Obligations
- The maximum extent of the Banks recourse obligations
on loans transferred is 10% of the amount transferred adjusted for any early
payoffs or terminations, based on the Banks payment history on loans of the
type transferred. At March 31, 2009, the Bank had recourse
obligations measured at fair value on a recurring basis classified within level
3 of the valuation hierarchy.
12
Table of Contents
The following table
presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of March 31,
2009, by caption on the consolidated balance sheets and by SFAS No. 157
valuation hierarchy (as described above):
Assets
and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31,
2009
|
|
Total
carrying
value in the
consolidated
balance
|
|
Quoted
market
prices in an
active
market
|
|
Internal
models with
significant
observable
market
parameters
|
|
Internal
models with
significant
unobservable
market
parameters
|
|
|
|
sheet
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Securities
available for sale
|
|
100,013
|
|
|
|
100,013
|
|
|
|
Servicing assets
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
Interest-only
strips
|
|
4,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,430
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
24,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,341
|
|
Total
assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
128,980
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
100,013
|
|
$
|
28,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recourse
obligations
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
Total
liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
The Corporation may be
required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market that were
recognized at fair value below the cost at the end of the period. The following
table presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of March 31,
2009, by caption on the consolidated balance sheets and by SFAS No. 157
valuation hierarchy (as described above):
Assets
and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of March 31,
2009
|
|
Total
carrying
value in the
consolidated
balance
|
|
Quoted
market
prices in an
active
market
|
|
Internal
models with
significant
observable
market
parameters
|
|
Internal
models with
significant
unobservable
market
parameters
|
|
|
|
sheet
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
24,342
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
24,342
|
|
Inventory
|
|
5,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,550
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
16,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
46,676
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
46,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Changes
in level 3 fair value measurements
The table below includes
a roll-forward of the balance sheet amounts for the first quarter of 2009
(including the change in fair value) for financial instruments classified by
the Bank within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy for assets and liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis. When a determination is made to
classify a financial instrument within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the
determination is based upon the significance of the unobservable factors to the
overall fair value measurement. However, since level 3 financial instruments
typically include, in addition to the unobservable or level 3 components,
observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be
validated to external sources), the gains and losses in the table below include
changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part of the valuation
methodology.
Three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Fair value, January
1, 2009
|
|
$
|
5,460
|
|
$
|
444
|
|
Total realized
and unrealized gains/losses included in income
|
|
(1,138
|
)
|
36
|
|
Purchases,
issuances and settlements, net
|
|
24,645
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Transfers in
and/or out of level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value,
March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
28,967
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
Total unrealized
gains included in income related to financial assets and liabilities still on
the consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
13
Table
of Contents
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Forward-Looking
Statements
Certain statements
contained in this report may not be based on historical facts and are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended. These forward-looking statements may be identified by reference to
a future period or by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as expect,
anticipate, believe, estimate, foresee, may, might, will, intend,
could, would, plan, target, forecast or future or conditional verb
tenses and variations or negatives of such terms. These forward-looking
statements include, without limitation, those relating to our operating
results, vesting of stock-based awards, recently adopted accounting standards,
fair value measurements, allowance and provision for loan losses, business bank
strategy, managements review of the loan portfolio, loan classifications, loan
commitments, interest rate risk, earning assets, economic value of equity
model, loan sale transactions, tax rates, liquidity, capital resources,
inflation, internal control over financial reporting, off-balance sheet
arrangements and our future growth and profitability. We caution you not to
place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this report
because actual results could differ materially from those indicated in such
forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors. These factors
include, but are not limited to, changes in economic conditions, competition
for loans, mortgages and other financial services and products, changes in
interest rates, concentrations within our loan portfolio, our ability to
maintain credit quality, the effectiveness of our risk monitoring systems,
changes in consumer preferences, the ability of our borrowers to repay loans,
the availability of and costs associated with maintaining and/or obtaining
adequate and timely sources of liquidity, changes in our operating strategy,
our ability to meet regulatory capital adequacy requirements, our ability to
collect amounts due under loan agreements and to attract deposits, our ability
to attract, train and retain qualified personnel, the geographic concentration
of our assets, our ability to operate and integrate new technology, our ability
to provide market competitive products and services, our ability to diversify
revenue, our ability to fund growth with lower cost liabilities, laws and
regulations affecting financial institutions in general and other factors
detailed from time to time in our press releases and filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to update
these forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of changes or
unanticipated events, circumstances or results that occur after the date of
this report.
Overview
(Dollars in thousands,
except per share data, throughout this Item 2, including tabular information)
The results of
operations, before charges for preferred dividends, for the quarter ended March 31,
2009 compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2008 reflected a 261.16%
decrease in net income and a 264.29% decrease in diluted earnings per share.
The decrease in earnings resulted partially from additional expenses
attributable to the provision for loan losses.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, net loss was $2,660, a
decrease of $4,012 or 291.78% compared to net income of $1,375 for the same
period in 2008. Diluted earnings per share decreased $0.84 per share or 300.00%
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same period in
2008. The three months ended March 31, 2009 reflected a continuation of
our banks trend of asset growth, increasing by $57,050 or 4.68% from
$1,218,084 at December 31, 2008 to $1,275,134 at March 31, 2009. Net
loans increased by 6.38% or $65,247 from December 31, 2008 to March 31,
2009, while total deposits increased by 2.45% or $26,164 during that same
period.
14
Table
of Contents
Corporation
Overview
Tennessee Commerce
Bancorp, Inc., headquartered in Franklin, Tennessee, is the bank holding
company for Tennessee Commerce Bank (the Bank). Organized in January 2000,
Tennessee Commerce Bank has a focused strategy that serves the banking needs of
small to medium-sized businesses, entrepreneurs and professionals in the
Nashville metropolitan statistical area, or the Nashville MSA, as well as the
funding needs of certain national and regional equipment vendors and financial
services companies. We call this strategy our business bank strategy.
We primarily conduct business from a single location in the Cool Springs
commercial area of Franklin, Tennessee, 15 miles south of Nashville. We
also operate three loan production offices - in Birmingham, Alabama,
Minneapolis, Minnesota and Atlanta, Georgia.
We offer a full range of
competitive retail and commercial banking services to local customers in the
Nashville MSA. Our deposit services include a broad offering of checking
accounts, savings accounts, money market investment accounts, certificates of
deposits and retirement accounts. Lending services include consumer
installment loans, various types of mortgage loans, personal lines of credit,
home equity loans, credit cards, real estate construction loans, commercial
loans to small and medium-sized businesses and professionals, and letters of
credit. We issue VISA credit cards and are a merchant depository for cardholder
drafts under VISA credit cards. We also offer check cards and debit
cards. We offer our local customers free courier services, access to
third-party automated teller machines, or ATMs, and state-of-the-art electronic
banking. We have trust powers but do not have a trust department.
Our
Business Strategy
We execute our business
bank strategy by combining the personal service and appeal of a community
banking institution with the sophistication of a larger bank. We believe
this strategy distinguishes us from our competitors in efforts to attract loans
and deposits of local small to medium-sized businesses and national and
regional equipment vendors and financial services companies. Further, the
rapid growth within the Nashville MSA has left many business owners without
significant banking relationships. We seek to take advantage of this
opportunity.
We do not compete based
on the traditional definition of convenience and currently have no plans to
develop a comprehensive branch bank network. For us, convenience is
created by technology and by a free courier service for local customers which
transports deposits directly from the business location to the bank. We
conduct business primarily from a single banking office with no teller line,
drive-through window or extended banking hours. We compete by providing
responsive and personalized service to meet customer needs. We provide
free electronic banking and cash management tools and on-site training for
business customers. We compete for consumer business by providing
superior products, attractive deposit rates, free internet banking services and
access to a third-party regional ATM network.
The business bank
strategy is highlighted by differences between the financial statements of our
bank and more traditional financial institutions. The business bank model
creates a high degree of leverage. By avoiding the investment and
maintenance costs of a typical branch network, we are able to maintain earning
assets at a higher level than peer institutions. Management targets a
minimum earning asset ratio of 95%
.
At March 31,
2009, we had an earning asset ratio of 94.10%.
The business bank model
is also highly efficient. We primarily target the non-retail (service,
manufacturing and professional) sector of the commercial market, which is
characterized by lower levels of transactions and processing costs. The
commercial customer mix and the strategic outsourcing of non-customer
functions, such as data processing, information technology and internal audit,
allow us to operate with a small, highly-trained staff. Management
targets a minimum asset per employee ratio of $10,000 compared to the average
ratio of approximately $3,643 assets per employee for Tennessee banks at the
end of the fourth quarter of 2008. At March 31, 2009, our assets per
employee were $15,002.
In addition to our
Nashville MSA focus, we have developed expertise in indirect lending that
allows us to access a national market. Our indirect lending transactions are
fixed-rate monthly installment loans originated through a third-party equipment
vendor or financial services company. Our national market lending is divided
into two programs based on loan size. In the first program, through an
established network of vendors and financial services companies, we have
opportunities to finance business asset secured loan transactions nationally
for middle-market and investment grade companies. In the second program, a
different network of vendors and financial services companies located in
Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, California
,
Minnesota and
Michigan partner with us in financing smaller transactions (generally $150 or
less per transaction). Both national market programs provide geographic and
collateral diversity for our portfolio.
15
Table
of Contents
Comparison
of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and March 31,
2008
Net
Income
- Net loss for the three months ended March 31,
2009 was $2,660, a decrease of $4,030 or 293.45% compared to net income of
$1,375 for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The decrease is
attributable to a 19.04% increase in non-interest expense from $4,144 for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 to $4,933 for the same period in 2009,
as well as an increase in the provision for loan losses of 432.13% from $1,600
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to $8,514 for the same period in
2009. We experienced an increase of $789
in operating expense which was the result of our overall growth, including a
$145 increase in FDIC assessment at March 31, 2009 compared to the same
date in 2008, as well as an additional accrual expense for the FDIC one-time
assessment fee of $275 to be paid in the third quarter of 2009.
Further, during the quarter ending March 31, 2009, we
made a dividend payment to the U.S. Department of Treasury in an amount equal
to $444 with respect to shares of our Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred
Stock, Series A.
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
19,456
|
|
$
|
17,486
|
|
11.27
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
9,616
|
|
10,024
|
|
(4.07
|
)
|
Net interest
income
|
|
9,840
|
|
7,462
|
|
31.87
|
|
Provision for
loan losses
|
|
8,514
|
|
1,600
|
|
432.13
|
|
Net interest
after provision for loan losses
|
|
1,326
|
|
5,862
|
|
(77.38
|
)
|
Non-interest
income
|
|
27
|
|
527
|
|
(94.88
|
)
|
Non-interest
expense
|
|
4,933
|
|
4,144
|
|
19.04
|
|
Net income
before taxes
|
|
(3,580
|
)
|
2,245
|
|
(259.47
|
)
|
Income tax
expense
|
|
(1,364
|
)
|
870
|
|
(256.78
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
(2,616
|
)
|
1,375
|
|
(261.16
|
)
|
Preferred
dividends and discount accretion
|
|
(444
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(2,660
|
)
|
$
|
1,375
|
|
(293.45
|
)%
|
Provision
for Loan Losses
- The provision for loan losses for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 was $8,514, an increase of $6,914, or
432.13%, above the provision of $1,600 expensed in the same period in
2008. This increase was primarily a result of normal charge-offs and
$2,700 in write-downs of other real estate to appraised values
.
At March 31, 2009, the loan loss reserve of $15,424
was 1.40% of gross loans of $1,103,942.
Non-interest
Income
- Non-interest income decreased by 94.88% or $500,
from $527 in the quarter ended March 31, 2008 to $27 for the same period
in 2009. The decrease was primarily a result of lower gains on loan
sales. The net loss on loan sales was $360 and $566 for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
We earned $14 in mortgage
origination fees during the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to
$12 earned during the same period in 2008, an increase of $2 or 1.67%. We
recognized $418 on the sale of securities in the three months ended March 31,
2009 compared with $30 for the same period in 2008.
We lost $360 on loan sale
transactions in the three months ended March 31, 2009, a 163.60% decrease
compared to $566 earned during the same period in 2008. This decrease was
primarily as a result of timing differences as well as regulatory and economic
uncertainties. Management will continue to consider loan sale transactions if
the opportunity for a reasonable return is available.
Non-interest
Expense
- Non-interest expense for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 was $4,933, an increase of $789 or 19.04%, over the $4,144
expensed in the same period in 2008. Approximately 40.56% of the increase
was a result of increases in FDIC assessments.
At March 31, 2009, the Bank had 85 full-time employees compared
with 64 full-time employees at March 31, 2008. Approximately 8.23% of the
increase in non-interest expense was attributable to the increased number of
full-time employees.
16
Table of Contents
Net
Interest Income
- Net interest income for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 was $9,840 compared to $7,462 for the same
period in 2008, a gain of $2,378 or 31.87%. The increase in net interest
income was largely attributable to strong loan growth. The average net
loan balance increased by 27.44% or $226,548 from $825,528 for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 to $1,052,076 for the same period in 2009. Loan
growth was accompanied by an increase in average interest bearing deposits from
$827,232 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to $1,054,630 for the
same period in 2009, an increase of $227,398 or 27.49%.
The following table
outlines the components of net interest income for the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 and identifies the impact of changes in
volume and rate:
|
|
March 31, 2009 change from
March 31, 2008 due to:
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
Rate
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
4,073
|
|
$
|
(2,559
|
)
|
$
|
1,514
|
|
Securities
(taxable) (1)
|
|
518
|
|
4
|
|
522
|
|
Federal funds
sold
|
|
15
|
|
(81
|
)
|
(66
|
)
|
Total interest
income
|
|
4,606
|
|
(2,636
|
)
|
1,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits (other
than demand)
|
|
2,317
|
|
(2,932
|
)
|
(615
|
)
|
Federal funds
purchased
|
|
43
|
|
(38
|
)
|
5
|
|
Subordinated
debt
|
|
248
|
|
(46
|
)
|
202
|
|
Total interest
expense
|
|
2,608
|
|
(3,016
|
)
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income
|
|
$
|
1,998
|
|
$
|
380
|
|
$
|
2,378
|
|
(1)
Unrealized (loss) gain
of $(94) and $715 is excluded from yield calculation for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Net
Interest Margin
- The net interest margin increased from
3.30% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to 3.39% for the same
period in 2009 because of a lower average yield from the loan portfolio that
was offset by a larger decrease in our cost for deposits. Interest income
increased by $1,970 or 11.27%, from $17,486 during the three months ended March 31,
2008 to $19,456 during the same period in 2009. The increase was primarily a
result of increased loan volume. Average earning assets increased from
$909,622 in the three months ended March 31, 2008 to $1,176,360 in the
same period in 2009, an increase of $266,738 or 29.32%. The increase in
earning assets was primarily a result of loan growth. Average loan balances
increased by $226,548 or 27.44% for the quarter ending March 31, 2009,
from the same quarter in 2008. The average yield on earning assets
decreased from 7.74% in the three months ended March 31, 2008 to 6.71% in
the same period in 2009. The decrease in the cost of funds, as a percentage of
average balances, was primarily a result of decreases in short-term interest
rates paid on deposits that support our loan growth. Between March 31,
2008 and March 31, 2009, the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee, or
FOMC, lowered the federal funds rate by 200 basis points.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense decreased from $10,024 in the
three months ended March 31, 2008 to $9,616 in the three months ended March 31,
2009. While average interest earning liabilities increased by $261,572 or
30.90%, the cost of funds decreased from 4.62% in the three months ended March 31,
2008 to 3.45% during the same three months in 2009, resulting in the $408, or
4.07%, decrease in interest expense.
Income
Taxes
- Our effective tax rate for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 was 38.10% compared to 38.75% for the three months ended March 31,
2008. Management anticipates that tax rates in future periods will approximate
the rates paid in 2008.
Efficiency
Ratio
- Our efficiency ratio, the ratio of non-interest
expense to total revenues, for the three months ending March 31, 2009 and
2008 was 49.99% and 51.87%, respectively, a decrease of 188 basis points. The
following table reflects the calculation of the efficiency ratio:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Non-interest
expense
|
|
$
|
4,933
|
|
$
|
4,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income
|
|
9,840
|
|
7,462
|
|
Non-interest
income
|
|
27
|
|
527
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
$
|
9,867
|
|
$
|
7,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency Ratio
|
|
49.99
|
%
|
51.87
|
%
|
17
Table of Contents
Average
Balance Sheets, Net Interest Income, and Changes in Interest Income and
Interest Expense
The table below shows the
average daily balances of each principal category of our assets, liabilities
and shareholders equity, and an analysis of net interest income, and the
change in interest income and interest expense segregated into amounts
attributable to changes in volume and changes in rates for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. The table is presented on a tax
equivalent basis, as applicable.
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
2009
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Interest
|
|
Rate
|
|
Balance
|
|
Interest
|
|
Rate
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest earning
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
(taxable) (1)
|
|
$
|
114,115
|
|
$
|
1,555
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
$
|
76,070
|
|
$
|
1,033
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
Loans
(2) (3)
|
|
1,052,076
|
|
17,896
|
|
6.90
|
%
|
825,558
|
|
16,382
|
|
7.98
|
%
|
Federal funds
sold
|
|
10,169
|
|
5
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
8,024
|
|
71
|
|
3.56
|
%
|
Total interest
earning assets
|
|
1,176,360
|
|
19,456
|
|
6.71
|
%
|
909,652
|
|
17,486
|
|
7.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due
from banks
|
|
5,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net fixed assets
and equipment
|
|
2,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest
and other assets
|
|
56,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,241,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
939,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits (other
than demand)
|
|
$
|
1,054,630
|
|
$
|
9,129
|
|
3.51
|
%
|
$
|
827,232
|
|
$
|
9,744
|
|
4.74
|
%
|
Federal funds
purchased
|
|
20,328
|
|
35
|
|
0.70
|
%
|
3,939
|
|
30
|
|
3.06
|
%
|
Subordinated
debt
|
|
33,198
|
|
452
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
15,413
|
|
250
|
|
6.52
|
%
|
Total interest
bearing liabilities
|
|
1,108,156
|
|
9,616
|
|
3.52
|
%
|
846,584
|
|
10,024
|
|
4.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
bearing demand deposits
|
|
21,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
11,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
equity
|
|
100,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,241,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
939,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest
Spread
|
|
3.19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
2.98
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest
Margin
|
|
3.39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Unrealized
(loss) gain of $(94) and $715 is excluded from yield calculation for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
(2)
Non-accrual
loans are included in average loan balances and loan fees of $1,974 and $816
are included in interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
(3)
Loans
are presented net of allowance for loan loss.
18
Table of Contents
Comparison
of Financial Condition at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
Assets
-
Total assets at March 31, 2009 were $1,275,134, an increase of
$57,050, or 4.68%, over total assets of $1,218,084 at December 31, 2008.
Loan growth was the primary reason for the increase, offset by a decrease in
cash and cash equivalents. At March 31, 2009, net loans equaled
$1,088,518, up $65,247, or 6.38%, over the December 31, 2008 total net
loans of $1,023,271. The cash and cash equivalents balance decreased by $35,019
between December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009, as funds were used to
fund loans made in the first quarter of 2008.
Our business bank model
of operation generally results in a higher level of earning assets than our
peer banks.
Earning assets are defined as
assets that earn interest income and include short-term investments, the
investment portfolio and net loans. We generally maintain a higher level
of earning assets than our peer banks because fewer assets are allocated to
facilities, cash and due from bank accounts used for transaction
processing. Earning assets at March 31, 2009 were $1,188,556 or
93.21% of total assets of $1,275,134. Earning assets at December 31,
2008 were $1,160,099, or 95.24% of total assets of $1,218,084.
Loans
- We had total net loans of $1,088,518 at March 31, 2009. The following
table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio at March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008:
|
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
December 31,
2008
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
202,034
|
|
$
|
181,638
|
|
1 to 4 family
residential
|
|
38,257
|
|
37,822
|
|
Other
|
|
172,771
|
|
171,150
|
|
Commercial,
financial and agricultural
|
|
635,943
|
|
589,518
|
|
Consumer
|
|
3,628
|
|
3,572
|
|
Other
|
|
51,309
|
|
53,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
1,103,942
|
|
1,036,725
|
|
Less: allowance
for loan losses
|
|
(15,424
|
)
|
(13,454
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
$
|
1,088,518
|
|
$
|
1,023,271
|
|
The following table sets
forth the percentage composition of our loan portfolio by type at March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
December 31,
2008
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
18.30
|
%
|
17.52
|
%
|
1 to 4 family
residential
|
|
3.46
|
|
3.65
|
|
Other
|
|
15.65
|
|
16.51
|
|
Commercial,
financial and agricultural
|
|
57.61
|
|
56.86
|
|
Consumer
|
|
0.33
|
|
0.34
|
|
Other
|
|
4.65
|
|
5.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
19
Table of Contents
The following table sets
forth the composition of our commercial loan portfolio by source at March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
December 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
%
|
|
Amount
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct funding
|
|
$
|
304,539
|
|
47.89
|
%
|
$
|
267,542
|
|
45.38
|
%
|
Indirect
funding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large
|
|
153,756
|
|
24.18
|
|
148,538
|
|
25.20
|
|
Small
|
|
177,648
|
|
27.93
|
|
173,438
|
|
29.42
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
635,943
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
$
|
589,518
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Management periodically
reviews our loan portfolio, particularly non-accrual and renegotiated
loans. The review may result in a determination that a loan should be
placed on a non-accrual status for income recognition. When a loan is
classified as non-accrual, any unpaid interest is reversed against current
income. Interest is included in income thereafter only to the extent
received in cash. The loan remains in a non-accrual classification until
such time as the loan is brought current, when it may be returned to accrual
classification.
The following table
presents information regarding non-accrual, past due and restructured loans at March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
December 31,
2008
|
|
Non-accrual
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
202
|
|
186
|
|
Amount
|
|
$
|
24,342
|
|
$
|
11,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans
which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal and interest
payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
39
|
|
51
|
|
Amount
|
|
$
|
9,605
|
|
$
|
18,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans defined as
troubled debt restructurings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
1
|
|
3
|
|
Amount
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
$
|
668
|
|
As of March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008, there were no loans classified for regulatory
purposes as doubtful or substandard that are not disclosed in the above table,
which (i) represent or result from trends or uncertainties which
management reasonably expects will materially impact future operating results,
liquidity or capital resources, or (ii) represent material credits about
which management is aware of any information that causes management to have
serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the loan
repayment terms. During the three months ended March 31, 2009,
non-performing loans decreased as a result of the restructuring of only one
credit in a total amount of $124.
20
Table of Contents
Allowance
for Loan Losses
- The maintenance of an adequate allowance for loan losses, or ALL, is one of
the fundamental concepts of risk management for every financial institution.
Management is responsible for ensuring that controls are in place to ensure the
adequacy of the loan loss reserve in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, our stated policies and procedures, and regulatory
guidance.
It is managements intent
to maintain an ALL that is adequate to absorb current and estimated losses
which are inherent in a loan portfolio. The historical loss ratio (net
charge-offs as a percentage of average loans) was 0.61% for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 0.11% for the three months ended March 31,
2008. The ALL as a percentage of the outstanding loans at the end of the period
was 1.40% at March 31, 2009 and 1.28% at March 31, 2008.
An analysis of our
allowance for loan loss and net charge-offs is furnished in the following table
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and the same period ended March 31,
2008:
|
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
March 31,
2008
|
|
Allowance for
loan losses at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
13,454
|
|
$
|
10,321
|
|
Charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
2,218
|
|
150
|
|
1 to 4 family
residential
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
Commercial,
financial and agricultural
|
|
3,897
|
|
742
|
|
Consumer
|
|
7
|
|
17
|
|
Total
Charge-offs
|
|
6,670
|
|
909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 to 4 family
residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial,
financial and agricultural
|
|
126
|
|
22
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recoveries
|
|
126
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Charge-offs
|
|
6,544
|
|
887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for
loans charged to expense
|
|
8,514
|
|
1,600
|
|
Allowance for
loan losses at end of period
|
|
$
|
15,424
|
|
$
|
11,034
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
March 31,
2008
|
|
Net charge-offs
as a percentage of average total loans outstanding during the period
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending allowance
for loan losses as a percentage of total loans outstanding at end of the
period
|
|
1.40
|
%
|
1.28
|
%
|
The allowance for loan
losses is established by charges to operations based on managements evaluation
of the loan portfolio, past due loan experience, collateral values, current
economic conditions and other factors considered necessary to maintain the
allowance at an adequate level.
21
Table of Contents
Securities
- The securities portfolio at March 31,
2009 was $100,013 compared to $101,290 at December 31, 2008. We view
the securities portfolio as a source of income and liquidity. The
securities portfolio was 7.84% of total assets at March 31, 2009 and 8.32%
of total assets at December 31, 2008.
Liabilities
-
We depend on a growing deposit base to
fund loan and other asset growth. We compete for local deposits by offering
attractive products with premium rates. We also obtain funding in the
wholesale deposit market which is accessed by means of an electronic bulletin
board. This electronic market links banks and acquirers of funds to
credit unions, school districts, labor unions and other organizations with
excess liquidity. The process is highly efficient and the average rate is
generally less than rates paid in the local market. Wholesale deposits are
categorized as Purchased time deposits on the detail of deposits shown in the
table below.
Deposits
and Funding
Total deposits at March 31, 2009 were $1,095,307, up $26,164 or 2.45% over
the December 31, 2008 total deposits of $1,069,143. Total average
deposits during the three months ended March 31, 2009 were $1,076,378, an
increase of $223,391, or 26.19% over the total average deposits of $852,987
during the three months ended March 31, 2008. Average non-interest bearing
deposits decreased by $4,007, or 15.56%, from $25,755 in the three months ended
March 31, 2008, to $21,748 in the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Utilizing a combination
of funding sources from the pledging of investment securities and the Federal
Home Loan Bank (FHLB), this funding portfolio has a weighted average maturity
of one month and a weighted average rate of 0.26%. This strategy was primarily
executed to reduce overnight liquidity risk and to mitigate interest rate
sensitivity on the balance sheet. At March 31, 2009, the maximum available
advance was $17,654 with an outstanding principle balance of $15,153. At December 31,
2008, there was no outstanding principle balance. At March 31, 2009, the
total capital stock balance was 2,152 shares with a value of $2,152.
The following table sets
forth average deposit balances for the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008 and the average rates paid on those balances:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Average
Rate
Paid (1)
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Average
Rate
Paid (1)
|
|
Types of
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
|
$
|
21,747
|
|
|
%
|
$
|
25,755
|
|
|
%
|
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
|
6,890
|
|
0.15
|
|
6,991
|
|
1.33
|
|
Money market
accounts
|
|
47,681
|
|
0.72
|
|
86,381
|
|
2.57
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
9,621
|
|
2.55
|
|
6,012
|
|
2.69
|
|
IRA accounts
|
|
33,032
|
|
4.15
|
|
22,856
|
|
5.13
|
|
Purchased time
deposits
|
|
525,810
|
|
3.96
|
|
362,832
|
|
5.09
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
431,597
|
|
3.29
|
|
342,160
|
|
4.99
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
1,076,378
|
|
|
|
$
|
852,987
|
|
|
|
(1)
Rate is annualized
Short-Term
Debt
We
have a $15,000 line of credit with First Tennessee Bank, National Association.
The outstanding principal balance on this line of credit at March 31, 2009
was $10,000, and this line of credit was paid on the maturity date of April 30,
2009. A $10,000 line of credit with a qualified investor replaced the First
Tennessee Bank line of credit.
Subordinated
Debt
- In March 2005,
we formed a financing subsidiary, Tennessee Commerce Statutory Trust I, a
Delaware statutory trust, or the Trust I. In March 2005, the Trust I
issued and sold 8,000 of the Trust Is fixed/floating rate capital securities,
with a liquidation amount of $1 per capital security, to First Tennessee Bank,
National Association. At the same time, we issued to Trust I $8,248 of
fixed/floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures due
2035. The debentures pay a 6.73% fixed rate payable quarterly for the first
five years and a floating rate based on a three-month LIBOR rate plus a margin
thereafter.
In April 2008, we
formed a financing subsidiary, Tennessee Commerce Statutory Trust II, a
Delaware statutory trust, or the Trust II. In June 2008, the Trust II
issued and sold 14,500 of the Trust IIs floating rate capital securities, with
a liquidation amount of $1 per capital security, in a private placement. At the
same time, we issued to Trust II $14,950 of floating rate junior subordinated
deferrable interest debentures due 2038. The debentures pay a floating rate per
annum, reset quarterly, equal to the prime rate of interest published in
The Wall
Street Journal
on the first
business day of each distribution period plus 50 basis points (but in no event
greater than 8.0% or less than 5.75%).
In accordance with FASB
Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003) Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, neither the Trust I nor the Trust II is
consolidated. We report as liabilities the subordinated debentures issued by us
and held by the Trust I and Trust II.
22
Table of Contents
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We are a party to
financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of
business to meet the financing needs of our customers. At March 31, 2009,
we had unfunded loan commitments outstanding of $155,591 and standby letters
of credit and financial guarantees of $10,691. Those instruments involve, to
varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in
the balance sheet. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments
reflect the extent of our involvement in those particular financial
instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments and
conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments.
Because these commitments
generally have fixed expiration dates and many will expire without being drawn
upon, the total commitment level does not necessarily represent future cash
requirements. If needed, we can liquidate federal funds sold or securities
available for sale or borrow and purchase federal funds from other financial
institutions, where we have available federal fund lines at March 31, 2009
totaling $68,853.
Liquidity/
Capital Resources
Liquidity
- Of primary importance to depositors,
creditors and regulators is the ability to have readily available funds sufficient
to repay fully maturing liabilities. We are subject to general FDIC
guidelines, which do not require a minimum level of liquidity. Liquidity
requirements can be met through short-term borrowings or the disposition of
short-term assets which are generally matched to correspond to the maturity of
liabilities. Management believes our liquidity ratios meet the general FDIC
guidelines and we have identified multiple sources to provide adequate
liquidity. Management does not know of any trends or demands that are
reasonably likely to result in our liquidity increasing or decreasing in a
material manner.
Capital
Resources
-
Our objective is to maintain a level of capitalization that is sufficient to
take advantage of profitable growth opportunities while meeting regulatory
requirements. To continue to grow, we must increase capital by generating
earnings, issuing equities, borrowing funds or a combination of those
activities.
The Federal Reserve Board
has adopted capital guidelines governing the activities of bank holding
companies. These guidelines require the maintenance of an amount of
capital based on risk-adjusted assets so that categories of assets with
potentially higher credit risk will require more capital backing than assets
with lower risk. In addition, banks and bank holding companies are
required to maintain capital to support, on a risk-adjusted basis, certain
off-balance sheet activities such as loan commitments.
The capital guidelines
classify capital into two tiers, referred to as Tier I and Tier II.
Under risk-based capital requirements, total capital consists of Tier I
capital which is generally common shareholders equity less goodwill and Tier
II capital which is primarily a portion of the allowance for loan losses and
certain preferred stock and qualifying debt instruments. In determining
risk-based capital requirements, assets are assigned risk-weights of 0% to
100%, depending primarily on the regulatory assigned levels of credit risk
associated with such assets. Off-balance sheet items are considered in the
calculation of risk-adjusted assets through conversion factors established by
the regulators. The framework for calculating risk-based capital requires banks
and bank holding companies to meet the regulatory minimums of 4% Tier I
and 8% total risk-based capital. In 1990, regulators added a leverage
computation to the capital requirements, comparing Tier I capital to total
average assets less goodwill.
The Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 established five capital
categories for banks and bank holding companies. The bank regulators adopted
regulations defining these five capital categories in September 1992.
Under these regulations, each bank is classified into one of the five
categories based on its level of risk-based capital as measured by Tier I
capital, total risk-based capital, Tier I leverage ratios and its
supervisory ratings.
23
Table of Contents
At March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008, the Banks and our risk-based capital ratios and
the minimums for capital adequacy were considered well-capitalized under the
Federal Reserve Boards prompt corrective action guidelines were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
be considered
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
for capital
|
|
well-
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
adequacy
|
|
capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 leverage
ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee
Commerce Bank
|
|
8.98
|
%
|
9.26
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
5.00
|
%
|
Tennessee
Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
9.76
|
%
|
10.62
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 core
capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee
Commerce Bank
|
|
9.36
|
%
|
9.79
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
6.00
|
%
|
Tennessee
Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
10.16
|
%
|
11.20
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to
risk-weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee
Commerce Bank
|
|
10.61
|
%
|
11.01
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tennessee
Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
11.40
|
%
|
12.42
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
n/a
|
|
Based solely on our
analysis of federal banking regulatory categories, on March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, we the Bank were within the well capitalized categories under the
regulations.
Impact
of Inflation and Changing Prices
- The financial statements and related financial data
presented herein have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles which require the measurement of financial position and
operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the
changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time and resulting from
inflation. The impact of inflation on operations of the Bank is reflected in
increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial companies, almost all of the
assets and liabilities of the Bank are monetary in nature. As a result,
interest rates have a more significant impact on the Banks performance than
the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily
move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the price of goods and
services.
24
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Like all financial
institutions, we are subject to market risk from changes in interest rates.
Interest rate risk is inherent in the balance sheet because of the mismatch
between the maturities of rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities.
If rates are rising, and the level of rate sensitive liabilities exceeds the
level of rate sensitive assets, the net interest margin will be negatively
impacted. Conversely, if rates are falling, and the level of rate sensitive
liabilities is greater than the level of rate sensitive assets, the impact on
the net interest margin will be favorable. Managing interest rate risk is
further complicated by the fact that all rates do not change at the same pace,
in other words, short-term rates may be rising while longer term rates remain
stable. In addition, different types of rate sensitive assets and rate
sensitive liabilities react differently to changes in rates.
To manage interest rate
risk, we must take a position on the expected future trend of interest rates.
Rates may rise, fall or remain the same. The Banks asset liability committee
develops its view of future rate trends and strives to manage rate risk within
a targeted range by monitoring economic indicators, examining the views of
economists and other experts, and understanding the current status of our
balance sheet. Our annual budget reflects the anticipated rate environment for
the next twelve months. The asset liability committee conducts a quarterly
analysis of the rate sensitivity position and reports its results to the Banks
board of directors.
The asset liability
committee uses a computer model to analyze the maturities of rate sensitive
assets and liabilities. The model measures the gap which is defined as the
difference between the dollar amount of rate sensitive assets re-pricing during
a period and the volume of rate sensitive liabilities re-pricing during the
same period. Gap is also expressed as the ratio of rate sensitive assets
divided by rate sensitive liabilities. If the ratio is greater than one, the
dollar value of assets exceeds the dollar value of liabilities, and the balance
sheet is asset sensitive. Conversely, if the value of liabilities exceeds the
value of assets, the ratio is less than one and the balance sheet is liability
sensitive. Our internal policy requires management to maintain the gap within
a range of 0.75 to 1.25.
The model measures
scheduled maturities in periods of three months, four to 12 months, one to five
years and over five years. The chart below illustrates our rate sensitive
position at March 31, 2009. Management uses the one-year gap as the
appropriate time period for setting strategy.
25
Table of Contents
Rate Sensitivity Gap
Analysis
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
4-12
|
|
1-5
|
|
Over
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating
|
|
Months
|
|
Months
|
|
Years
|
|
5 years
|
|
Total
|
|
Maturities
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Earnings Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds
sold
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government
agencies
|
|
|
|
45,813
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
53,717
|
|
99,783
|
|
Mortgage-backed
and corporate debt securities
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
72
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
|
45,837
|
|
72
|
|
387
|
|
53,718
|
|
100,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
283,477
|
|
147,027
|
|
288,541
|
|
327,099
|
|
111,515
|
|
1,203,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest
earning assets
|
|
283,502
|
|
192,864
|
|
288,613
|
|
327,486
|
|
182,669
|
|
1,275,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,154
|
|
71,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
283,502
|
|
$
|
192,864
|
|
$
|
288,613
|
|
$
|
327,486
|
|
$
|
182,669
|
|
$
|
1,275,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
checking
|
|
$
|
3,126
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
4,688
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
7,814
|
|
Money market and
savings
|
|
31,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,179
|
|
|
|
59,956
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
|
293,374
|
|
558,098
|
|
152,807
|
|
|
|
1,004,279
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
34,903
|
|
293,374
|
|
558,098
|
|
185,674
|
|
|
|
1,072,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds
purchased
|
|
20,479
|
|
|
|
15,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,632
|
|
Short term
borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Subordinated
long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,198
|
|
23,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest
bearing liabilities
|
|
55,382
|
|
293,374
|
|
583,251
|
|
185,674
|
|
23,198
|
|
1,140,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,212
|
|
36,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,042
|
|
98,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
55,382
|
|
$
|
293,374
|
|
$
|
583,251
|
|
$
|
185,674
|
|
$
|
157,452
|
|
$
|
1,275,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate sensitive
gap by period
|
|
$
|
228,120
|
|
$
|
(100,510
|
)
|
$
|
(294,638
|
)
|
$
|
141,812
|
|
$
|
88,317
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Gap
|
|
|
|
$
|
127,610
|
|
$
|
(167,028
|
)
|
$
|
(25,216
|
)
|
$
|
63,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative gap
as a percentage of total assets
|
|
|
|
10.01
|
%
|
(13.10
|
)%
|
(1.98
|
)%
|
4.95
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate sensitive
assets / rate sensitive liabilities (cumulative)
|
|
5.12
|
|
1.37
|
|
0.82
|
|
0.98
|
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
26
Table of Contents
From March 31, 2008
to March 31, 2009, the FOMC decreased interest rates by 200 basis points.
Management has positioned the balance sheet to be essentially neutral for asset
and liability sensitivity. At March 31, 2009, our one-year gap was 0.82.
The interest rate risk
model that defines the gap position also performs a rate shock test of the
balance sheet using an earnings simulation model and an economic value of
equity model. The rate shock test measures the impact on the net interest
margin and the economic value of equity of an immediate shift in interest rates
in either direction.
Our earnings simulation
model measures the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income.
To limit interest rate risk, we have a guideline for our earnings at risk which
sets a limit on the variance of net interest income to less than a
5% percent decline for a 100-basis point change up or down in rates from
managements flat interest rate forecast over the next twelve months. At March 31,
2009, we were in compliance with this guideline.
Our economic value of
equity model measures the extent that estimated economic values of our assets,
liabilities and off-balance sheet items will change as a result of interest
rate changes. To help limit interest rate risk, we have a guideline stating
that for an instantaneous 100-basis point increase or decrease in interest
rates, the economic value of equity will not decrease by more than 10% from the
base case. At March 31, 2009, we were in compliance with this guideline.
The above analysis may
not on its own be an entirely accurate indicator of how net interest income or
net interest margin will be affected by changes in interest rates. Income
associated with interest-earning assets and costs associated with
interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by changes in
interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest
rates may have a significant impact on net interest income. Interest rates on
certain types of assets and liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in
general market rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind
changes in general market rates. The asset liability committee develops its
view of future rate trends by monitoring economic indicators, examining the
views of economists and other experts, and understanding the current status of
our balance sheet and conducts a quarterly analysis of the rate sensitivity
position. The results of the analysis are reported to the Banks board of
directors.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act),
that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in
the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We carried out an evaluation,
under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of these
disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure in the reports that we
file or submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Exchange
Act.
Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting
There were no changes in
our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31,
2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
27
Table of Contents
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS.
There were no material
changes to our risk factors included in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2009.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS.
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Charter of Tennessee
Commerce Bancorp, Inc., as amended(1)
|
3.2
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment
to the Charter of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.(2)
|
3.3
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment
to the Charter, as amended, of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.(3)
|
3.4
|
|
|
Bylaws of Tennessee
Commerce Bancorp, Inc.(1)
|
3.5
|
|
|
Amendment to Bylaws of
Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.(4)
|
4.1
|
|
|
Shareholders
Agreement(1)
|
4.2
|
|
|
Form of Stock
Certificate(5)
|
4.3
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of
June 20, 2008, between Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. and
Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee(6)
|
4.4
|
|
|
Amended and Restated
Declaration of Trust, dated as of June 20, 2008, among Tennessee
Commerce Bancorp, Inc., as sponsor, Wilmington Trust Company, as
institutional and Delaware trustee, and Arthur F. Helf, H. Lamar Cox and Michael
R. Sapp, as administrators(7)
|
4.5
|
|
|
Guarantee Agreement,
dated as of June 20, 2008, between Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
and Wilmington Trust Company(6)
|
31.1
|
|
|
Certification of Chief
Executive Officer of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
31.2
|
|
|
Certification of Chief
Financial Officer of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
32.1
|
|
|
Certification of Chief
Executive Officer of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
32.2
|
|
|
Certification of Chief
Financial Officer of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
(1)
|
|
Previously filed as an
exhibit to Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.s Registration Statement on
Form 10, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 29, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Previously filed as an
exhibit to Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.s Annual Report on
Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 16, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Previously filed as an
exhibit to Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 23, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Previously filed as an
exhibit to Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 5, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Previously filed as an
exhibit to Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.s Registration Statement on
Form S-8, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 31, 2007 (Registration No. 333-148415), and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Previously filed as an
exhibit to Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.s Current Report on
Form-8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 23, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Previously filed as an
exhibit to Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.s Current Report on
Form-8-K/A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 30, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
28
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
Tennessee Commerce
Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
May 11, 2009
|
|
/s/ Frank Perez
|
(Date)
|
Frank Perez
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
Table of Contents
INDEX OF
EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Charter of Tennessee
Commerce Bancorp, Inc., as amended(1)
|
3.2
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment
to the Charter of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.(2)
|
3.3
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment
to the Charter, as amended, of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.(3)
|
3.4
|
|
|
Bylaws of Tennessee
Commerce Bancorp, Inc.(1)
|
3.5
|
|
|
Amendment to Bylaws of
Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.(4)
|
4.1
|
|
|
Shareholders
Agreement(1)
|
4.2
|
|
|
Form of Stock
Certificate(5)
|
4.3
|
|
|
Indenture, dated as of
June 20, 2008, between Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. and
Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee(6)
|
4.4
|
|
|
Amended and Restated
Declaration of Trust, dated as of June 20, 2008, among Tennessee
Commerce Bancorp, Inc., as sponsor, Wilmington Trust Company, as
institutional and Delaware trustee, and Arthur F. Helf, H. Lamar Cox and
Michael R. Sapp, as administrators(7)
|
4.5
|
|
|
Guarantee Agreement,
dated as of June 20, 2008, between Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
and Wilmington Trust Company(6)
|
31.1
|
|
|
Certification of Chief
Executive Officer of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
31.2
|
|
|
Certification of Chief
Financial Officer of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
32.1
|
|
|
Certification of Chief
Executive Officer of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
32.2
|
|
|
Certification of Chief
Financial Officer of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
(1)
|
|
Previously filed as an
exhibit to Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.s Registration Statement on
Form 10, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 29, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Previously filed as an
exhibit to Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.s Annual Report on
Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 16, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Previously filed as an
exhibit to Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 23,
2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Previously filed as an
exhibit to Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 5, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Previously filed as an
exhibit to Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.s Registration Statement on
Form S-8, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 31, 2007 (Registration No. 333-148415), and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Previously filed as an
exhibit to Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.s Current Report on
Form-8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 23, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Previously filed as an
exhibit to Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc.s Current Report on
Form-8-K/A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 30, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
Tennessee Commerce Bancorp (TN) (MM) (NASDAQ:TNCC)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 6월(6) 2024 으로 7월(7) 2024
Tennessee Commerce Bancorp (TN) (MM) (NASDAQ:TNCC)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 7월(7) 2023 으로 7월(7) 2024