- Additional Proxy Soliciting Materials (definitive) (DEFA14A)
12 12월 2008 - 5:25AM
Edgar (US Regulatory)
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. __)
Filed by the Registrant
þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
o
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as Permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
|
Foundry Networks, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
þ
|
|
No fee required.
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 011(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the
Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Date Filed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
On
December 11, 2008, the Company and the members of its Board of Directors entered a Memorandum of
Understanding (the MOU) with plaintiff in the matter of Doug Edrington v. Bobby R., Johnson Jr.,
et. al. originally filed on July 23, 2008 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the
County of Santa Clara.
In connection with, and pursuant to, the MOU, the Company is providing below supplemental
disclosures to those set forth in its definitive revised proxy materials (the Revised Proxy
Materials) filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2008
and relating to the rescheduled special meeting of stockholders of the Company to be held for the
purpose of, among other things, adopting the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 21,
2008 (the Merger Agreement), among Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., Falcon Acquisition Sub,
Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Brocade, and the Company as amended by Amendment No. 1 to
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 7, 2008.
Opinion of Merrill Lynch.
The Companys disclosures contained in the Revised Proxy Materials under
the section entitled Proposal No.1 The Merger Opinion of Merrill Lynch beginning on page 36
of the Revised Proxy Materials are supplemented as follows:
Opinion of Merrill Lynch
Comparable Public Trading Multiples Analysis
The subsection entitled
Comparable Public Trading Multiples Analysis
on pages 38-39 of the
Revised Proxy Materials makes reference to eight publicly traded networking companies that Merrill
Lynch deemed to be relevant to its analysis of us. The subsection also makes reference to the full
ranges of multiples from which Merrill Lynch determined relevant ranges of multiples for such
companies. The multiples for each company from which such relevant ranges were derived, which are
based on publicly available information and research analyst estimates, are set forth in the table
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
CY2009 Enterprise Value/EBITDA
|
|
CY2009 Share Price/Cash EPS
|
Cisco Systems, Inc.
|
|
|
7.2x
|
|
|
|
12.0x
|
|
Juniper Networks, Inc.
|
|
|
6.3x
|
|
|
|
12.5x
|
|
F5 Networks, Inc.
|
|
|
6.5x
|
|
|
|
12.9x
|
|
Riverbed Technology, Inc.
|
|
|
5.8x
|
|
|
|
15.4x
|
|
Blue Coat Systems, Inc.
|
|
|
4.0x
|
|
|
|
7.3x
|
|
Aruba Networks, Inc.
|
|
|
4.3x
|
|
|
|
10.6x
|
|
Extreme Networks, Inc.
|
|
|
4.2x
|
|
|
|
11.0x
|
|
SonicWALL, Inc.
|
|
|
2.4x
|
|
|
|
13.9x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Max
|
|
|
7.2x
|
|
|
|
15.4x
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
5.1x
|
|
|
|
12.0x
|
|
Median
|
|
|
5.0x
|
|
|
|
12.3x
|
|
Min
|
|
|
2.4x
|
|
|
|
7.3x
|
|
Comparable Transaction Analysis
The subsection entitled
Comparable Transaction Analysis
on page 39 of the Revised Proxy Materials
makes reference to ten precedent transactions in the networking industry which Merrill Lynch deemed
to be relevant to its analysis of us. The subsection also makes reference to the full ranges of
multiples from which Merrill Lynch determined relevant ranges for such transactions. The multiples
for each transaction from which such relevant ranges were derived, which are based on publicly
available information and research analyst estimates, are set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value/
|
Announced
|
|
Acquirer
|
|
Target
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Form of Consideration
|
|
NTM EBITDA
|
04/21/08
|
|
Blue Coat Systems, Inc.
|
|
Packeteer, Inc.
|
|
$
|
192.6
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
19.5
|
x*
|
09/23/07
|
|
Arris Group, Inc.
|
|
CCOR, Inc.
|
|
|
638.0
|
|
|
Cash/Stock
|
|
|
11.3
|
x
|
06/27/07
|
|
CommScope, Inc.
|
|
Andrew Corporation
|
|
|
2,631.6
|
|
|
Cash/Stock
|
|
|
9.7
|
x
|
04/26/07
|
|
Mitel Networks Corp./Francisco Partners
|
|
Inter-Tel, Inc.
|
|
|
515.3
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
8.0
|
x
|
01/04/07
|
|
Cisco Systems, Inc.
|
|
IronPort Systems, Inc.
|
|
|
830.0
|
|
|
Cash/Stock
|
|
NA
|
|
12/19/06
|
|
LM Ericsson AB
|
|
Redback Networks, Inc.
|
|
|
1,885.8
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
32.8
|
x*
|
11/14/06
|
|
Motorola, Inc.
|
|
Netopia, Inc.
|
|
|
177.1
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
14.3
|
x
|
08/23/06
|
|
International Business Machine Corp.
|
|
Internet Security Systems, Inc.
|
|
|
1,067.8
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
14.2
|
x
|
11/14/05
|
|
Gores Group LLC & Tennenbaum Capital Partners LLC
|
|
Enterasys Networks, Inc.
|
|
|
270.9
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
11.2
|
x
|
04/26/05
|
|
Juniper Networks, Inc.
|
|
Peribit Networks, Inc.
|
|
|
337.0
|
|
|
Cash/Stock
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Max
|
|
|
14.3
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
11.5
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
11.3
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Min
|
|
|
8.0
|
x
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Denotes multiple excluded from the max, mean, median and min statistic.
|
General
The last paragraph on page 41 of the Revised Proxy Materials makes reference to terms of the
engagement letter between Merrill Lynch and us. Under the terms of the engagement letter between
Merrill Lynch and us, Merrill Lynch agreed to provide financial advisory services to us, including
an opinion as to the fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration to be received
pursuant to the merger by holders of shares of our common stock, and we agreed to pay Merrill Lynch
a customary fee, which
is contingent upon completion of the merger, of $15.8 million plus 0.60% of
any dividend declared by us.
Opinion of Houlihan Lokey.
The Companys disclosures contained in the Revised Proxy Materials
under the section entitled Proposal No. 1 The Merger Opinion of
Houlihan Lokey beginning on page 42 of the Revised Proxy Materials are supplemented as follows:
Opinion of Houlihan Lokey
Selected Companies Analysis
The subsection entitled Selected Companies Analysis on pages 45-46 of the Revised Proxy Materials
makes reference to fifteen publicly traded companies that Houlihan Lokey selected as part of its
analysis. At the bottom of page 46, the same subsection also makes reference to a range of selected
multiples that Houlihan Lokey derived from its selected companies analysis. Differences in such
multiples for a particular company relative to the multiples determined by Merrill Lynch for the
same company may arise from, among other things, the dates of each of the Houlihan Lokey and
Merrill Lynch analyses, and the methodologies and sources of publicly available information used by
each of them. These multiples are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CY2008
|
|
CY2009
|
|
CY2008
|
|
CY2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
Enterprise
|
|
Share Price/
|
|
Share Price/
|
Company
|
|
Value/Revenue
|
|
Value/Revenue
|
|
Value/EBITDA
|
|
Value/EBITDA
|
|
2008 EPS
|
|
2009 EPS
|
3Com Corporation
|
|
|
0.6x
|
|
|
|
0.5x
|
|
|
|
4.0x
|
*
|
|
|
3.8x
|
*
|
|
|
6.5x
|
*
|
|
|
6.8x
|
*
|
Adtran, Inc.
|
|
|
1.5x
|
|
|
|
1.5x
|
|
|
|
5.8x
|
|
|
|
5.9x
|
|
|
|
12.2x
|
|
|
|
11.9x
|
|
Alcatel-Lucent
|
|
|
0.4x
|
*
|
|
|
0.4x
|
*
|
|
|
5.2x
|
|
|
|
4.4x
|
|
|
|
24.8x
|
|
|
|
8.5x
|
*
|
Aruba Networks, Inc.
|
|
|
0.6x
|
|
|
|
0.5x
|
|
|
|
9.6x
|
|
|
|
4.1x
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
11.3x
|
|
Blue Coat Systems, Inc.
|
|
|
1.2x
|
|
|
|
0.9x
|
|
|
|
6.7x
|
|
|
|
6.6x
|
|
|
|
13.3x
|
|
|
|
8.6x
|
*
|
Brocade Communications
Systems, Inc.
|
|
|
0.7x
|
|
|
|
0.6x
|
|
|
|
2.3x
|
*
|
|
|
1.7x
|
*
|
|
|
6.5x
|
*
|
|
|
6.4x
|
*
|
Cisco Systems, Inc.
|
|
|
2.2x
|
|
|
|
2.1x
|
|
|
|
6.7x
|
|
|
|
6.6x
|
|
|
|
11.0x
|
|
|
|
10.8x
|
|
Citrix Systems, Inc.
|
|
|
2.4x
|
|
|
|
2.2x
|
|
|
|
9.1x
|
|
|
|
8.2x
|
|
|
|
15.2x
|
|
|
|
13.8x
|
|
Extreme Networks, Inc.
|
|
|
0.5x
|
*
|
|
|
0.5x
|
*
|
|
|
17.2x
|
|
|
|
9.1x
|
|
|
|
21.6x
|
|
|
|
15.1x
|
|
F5 Networks, Inc.
|
|
|
2.6x
|
|
|
|
2.4x
|
|
|
|
9.2x
|
|
|
|
8.0x
|
|
|
|
21.2x
|
|
|
|
13.4x
|
|
Juniper Networks, Inc.
|
|
|
2.1x
|
|
|
|
1.9x
|
|
|
|
8.0x
|
|
|
|
6.0x
|
|
|
|
14.5x
|
|
|
|
13.0x
|
|
Nortel Networks Corporation
|
|
|
0.3x
|
*
|
|
|
0.3x
|
*
|
|
|
3.7x
|
*
|
|
|
3.6x
|
*
|
|
NEG
|
|
|
17.9x
|
|
Riverbed Technology, Inc.
|
|
|
1.6x
|
|
|
|
1.4x
|
|
|
|
12.3x
|
|
|
|
9.0x
|
|
|
|
21.2x
|
|
|
|
16.8x
|
|
SonicWALL, Inc.
|
|
|
0.7x
|
|
|
|
0.7x
|
|
|
|
6.6x
|
|
|
|
5.8x
|
|
|
|
17.1x
|
|
|
|
14.4x
|
|
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
|
|
|
0.8x
|
|
|
|
0.8x
|
|
|
|
6.3x
|
|
|
|
5.2x
|
|
|
|
12.8x
|
|
|
|
10.9x
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
1.4x
|
|
|
|
1.3x
|
|
|
|
8.5x
|
|
|
|
6.6x
|
|
|
|
16.8x
|
|
|
|
13.2x
|
|
Median
|
|
|
1.3x
|
|
|
|
1.2x
|
|
|
|
7.3x
|
|
|
|
6.3x
|
|
|
|
15.2x
|
|
|
|
13.5x
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Denotes multiple excluded from mean and median statistics
|
Selected Transactions Analysis
The subsection entitled Selected Transactions Analysis on page 47 of the Revised Proxy Materials
makes reference to 15 precedent transactions, as to which Houlihan
Lokey reviewed publicly available information and data as part of its analysis. At the bottom of
page 47 of the Revised Proxy Materials, the same subsection also makes reference to a range of
selected multiples that Houlihan Lokey derived from its selected transactions analysis. Differences
in such multiples and transaction values for a particular transaction relative to the multiples and
transaction values determined by Merrill Lynch for the same transaction may arise from, among other
things, the methodologies and sources of publicly available information used by each of them.
These multiples are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Value/ LTM
|
|
Value/ NTM
|
|
Value/ LTM
|
|
Value/ NTM
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target
|
|
Value
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Revenue
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
Blue Coat Systems,
Inc.
|
|
Packeteer, Inc.
|
|
$
|
190.2
|
|
|
1.3x
|
|
1.1x
|
|
NM
|
|
14.2
|
x
|
Aastra Technologies Limited
|
|
Telefonaktiebolaget LM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ericssons Enterprise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communication Business
|
|
$
|
138.6
|
|
|
0.3
|
x
|
NA
|
|
3.5
|
x
|
NA
|
|
Arris Group, Inc.
|
|
CCOR, Inc.
|
|
$
|
655.4
|
|
|
2.4
|
x
|
2.1
|
x
|
15.2
|
x*
|
10.8
|
x
|
CommScope, Inc.
|
|
Andrew Corporation
|
|
$
|
2,838.9
|
|
|
1.3
|
x
|
1.2
|
x
|
12.9
|
x
|
10.8
|
x
|
Mitel Networks
Corporation
|
|
Inter-Tel, Inc.
|
|
$
|
466.0
|
|
|
1.0
|
x
|
1.0
|
x
|
9.6
|
x
|
7.3
|
x
|
Silver Lake Partners
and Texas Pacific
Group, Inc.
|
|
Avaya, Inc.
|
|
$
|
7,371.0
|
|
|
1.4
|
x
|
1.4
|
x
|
13.6
|
x
|
10.4
|
x
|
Cisco Systems, Inc.
|
|
IronPort Systems, Inc.
|
|
$
|
830.0
|
|
|
8.3
|
x*
|
6.4
|
x*
|
NA
|
|
NA
|
|
Telefonaktiebolaget
LM Ericsson
|
|
Redback Networks, Inc.
|
|
$
|
1,900
|
|
|
7.8
|
x*
|
5.8
|
x*
|
NM
|
|
25.1
|
x*
|
Motorola, Inc.
|
|
Netopia, Inc.
|
|
$
|
181.4
|
|
|
1.7
|
x
|
1.3
|
x
|
NM
|
|
17.2
|
x*
|
International
Business Machines Corp.
|
|
Internet Security Systems, Inc.
|
|
$
|
1,058.6
|
|
|
3.1
|
x
|
2.9
|
x
|
12.3
|
x
|
11.7
|
x
|
Brocade
Communications
Systems, Inc.
|
|
McDATA Corp.
|
|
$
|
653.3
|
|
|
1.0
|
x
|
0.9
|
x
|
4.7
|
x
|
3.5
|
x
|
Alcatel SA
|
|
Lucent Technologies, Inc.
|
|
$
|
14,617.6
|
|
|
1.6
|
x
|
1.5
|
x
|
8.3
|
x
|
8.9
|
x
|
Cisco Systems, Inc.
|
|
Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.
|
|
$
|
5,324.0
|
|
|
2.7
|
x
|
2.3
|
x
|
12.3
|
x
|
9.8
|
x
|
Gores Group LLC and
Tennenbaum Capital
Partners LLC
|
|
Enterasys Networks, Inc.
|
|
$
|
276.2
|
|
|
0.8
|
x
|
0.8
|
x
|
NM
|
|
12.8
|
x
|
Juniper Networks, Inc.
|
|
Peribit Networks, Inc.
|
|
$
|
337.0
|
|
|
10.0
|
x*
|
NA
|
|
NA
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
Value/ LTM
|
|
Value/ NTM
|
|
Value/ LTM
|
|
Value/ NTM
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target
|
|
Value
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Revenue
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
1.6x
|
|
1.5x
|
|
9.7x
|
|
10.0x
|
|
|
|
|
Median
|
|
1.4x
|
|
1.3x
|
|
11.0x
|
|
10.6x
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Denotes multiple excluded from mean and median statistics
|
Other Matters
The first paragraph on page 49 of the Revised Proxy Materials makes reference to terms of the
engagement letter between Houlihan Lokey and us. Under the terms of the engagement letter between
Houlihan Lokey and us, Houlihan Lokey was engaged by us to provide an opinion to the board of
directors regarding the fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration to be received
by the holders of our common stock (other than Brocade, Falcon Acquisition Sub, Inc. and their
respective affiliates). We agreed to pay Houlihan Lokey a customary fee of $850,000, a portion of
which was payable upon Houlihan Lokeys engagement and the balance of which was payable upon the
delivery of Houlihan Lokeys opinion. None of the fees payable to Houlihan Lokey are contingent
upon the successful completion of the merger.
***
Foundry Networks (MM) (NASDAQ:FDRY)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 1월(1) 2025 으로 2월(2) 2025
Foundry Networks (MM) (NASDAQ:FDRY)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 2월(2) 2024 으로 2월(2) 2025