UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
001-10824
(Commission File Number)
Borland Software Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-2895440
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
8310 NORTH CAPITAL OF TEXAS HIGHWAY, BUILDING 2, SUITE 100
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78731
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (512) 340-2200
Former address: 8303 N. MO-PAC EXPRESSWAY, SUITE A-300, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78759
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES
þ
NO
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
þ
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
YES
o
NO
þ
The number of shares of the registrants common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding
as of April 30, 2009, the most recent practicable date prior to the filing of this report, was
73,115,736.
BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except par value and share amounts, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As Adjusted)
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
93,942
|
|
|
$
|
108,132
|
|
Investments, at fair value
|
|
|
40,653
|
|
|
|
59,575
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,044 and $1,174, respectively
|
|
|
39,133
|
|
|
|
33,159
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
5,643
|
|
|
|
7,642
|
|
Assets of discontinued operation
|
|
|
3,734
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
|
|
2,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
185,046
|
|
|
|
211,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $18,185 and $30,663, repectively
|
|
|
7,943
|
|
|
|
8,494
|
|
Intangible
assets, net of accumulated amortization of $47,280 and $45,236, respectively
|
|
|
22,452
|
|
|
|
24,520
|
|
Non current assets of discontinued operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,734
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,676
|
|
|
|
4,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
219,117
|
|
|
$
|
251,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
3,997
|
|
|
$
|
5,045
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
13,731
|
|
|
|
13,956
|
|
Accrued restructuring
|
|
|
2,707
|
|
|
|
3,990
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
50,583
|
|
|
|
40,720
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operation
|
|
|
5,611
|
|
|
|
4,208
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
2,444
|
|
|
|
5,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
79,073
|
|
|
|
73,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior notes, net of discount of $16,436, and $24,513, respectively
|
|
|
98,548
|
|
|
|
134,787
|
|
Accrued restructuring
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
911
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
2,038
|
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
16,532
|
|
|
|
17,157
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,382
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
5,751
|
|
|
|
5,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
202,518
|
|
|
|
236,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock; $.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; 0 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized (2009: 94,652,702 issued and
73,115,736 outstanding; 2008: 94,552,738 issued and 73,015,772 outstanding)
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
717,616
|
|
|
|
717,141
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(567,527
|
)
|
|
|
(569,415
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
6,188
|
|
|
|
7,330
|
|
Treasury stock at cost, (2009 and 2008: 21,536,966 shares)
|
|
|
(140,409
|
)
|
|
|
(140,409
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
16,599
|
|
|
|
15,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
219,117
|
|
|
$
|
251,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As Adjusted)
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License and other revenues
|
|
$
|
13,724
|
|
|
$
|
18,537
|
|
Service revenues
|
|
|
21,326
|
|
|
|
27,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
35,050
|
|
|
|
46,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of license and other revenues
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
Cost of service revenues
|
|
|
5,918
|
|
|
|
8,864
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
8,792
|
|
|
|
11,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
26,258
|
|
|
|
34,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
20,128
|
|
|
|
33,061
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
10,564
|
|
|
|
11,787
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
32,236
|
|
|
|
46,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(5,978
|
)
|
|
|
(11,893
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
1,752
|
|
Interest expense (includes non-cash debt discount amortization of $1,627 for 2009 and $2,007 for
2008)
|
|
|
(2,883
|
)
|
|
|
(3,658
|
)
|
Gain on debt repurchase
|
|
|
9,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
(13,217
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
1,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1,598
|
|
|
$
|
(14,491
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operation of discontinued operations
(net of applicable taxes of $0 for 2009 and $242 for 2008)
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
$
|
(10,728
|
)
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations (net of applicable
tax of $0 for 2009)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
$
|
(10,728
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,888
|
|
|
$
|
(25,219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
72,953
|
|
|
|
72,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
73,010
|
|
|
|
72,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As Adjusted)
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,888
|
|
|
$
|
(25,219
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(1,174
|
)
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
Fair market value adjustment for
available-for-sale securities, net of
tax
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
746
|
|
|
$
|
(23,429
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands, unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As Adjusted)
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,888
|
|
|
$
|
(25,219
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used
in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of assets
|
|
|
2,984
|
|
|
|
3,353
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
1,579
|
|
Provision for accounts receivable allowance
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,300
|
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Write-off of fixed assets
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Amortization of debt discount
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
2,007
|
|
Gain on debt repurchase
|
|
|
(9,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(3,243
|
)
|
|
|
3,741
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
1,195
|
|
|
|
(806
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(688
|
)
|
|
|
(2,691
|
)
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(1,004
|
)
|
|
|
506
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
(1,371
|
)
|
|
|
(2,394
|
)
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
5,107
|
|
|
|
824
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(1,239
|
)
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(4,212
|
)
|
|
|
(5,273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Simunication, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,970
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of discontinued operations
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of long-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,101
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments
|
|
|
(7,065
|
)
|
|
|
(26,600
|
)
|
Sales and maturities of short-term investments
|
|
|
26,050
|
|
|
|
19,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
19,038
|
|
|
|
(1,048
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of convertible senior notes, net
|
|
|
(27,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Lessor financed capital expenditures
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock and others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(26,888
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(2,128
|
)
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(14,190
|
)
|
|
|
(4,263
|
)
|
Beginning cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
108,132
|
|
|
|
90,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
93,942
|
|
|
$
|
86,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Description of the Company
Borland Software Corporation (the Company) is the leading vendor of Open Application
Lifecycle Management (ALM) solutions. The Companys Open ALM Platform provides process-driven
integration across all lifecycle assets, activities and tools so that its customers can
collaborate, share information and track the entire software development lifecycle from planning to
delivery.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements at March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008, and for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, are unaudited and have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP)
for interim financial information and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not
include all financial information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial
statements and certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted.
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the
same basis as the annual consolidated financial statements and in the opinion of management,
reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments (except as discussed
below), necessary for a fair statement of the Companys financial position at March 31, 2009 and
its results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full fiscal
year ending December 31, 2009.
Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. The results of operations for interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any subsequent quarter or for the full
year. The condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in
conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 6, 2009.
Credit Risks
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk
consist principally of cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and trade accounts
receivable. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our
investment portfolio. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio.
We place our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments in a variety of financial
instruments, including but not limited to government and corporate securities, time deposits and
money market funds. These securities are generally classified as available-for-sale and
consequently are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value with unrealized gains or losses
reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of estimated taxes.
The Company offers credit terms on the sale of the software products to distributors, retail
dealers and certain end-user customers. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its
customers financial condition and, generally, requires no collateral from our customers. The
Company maintains an allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable based upon the expected
collectability of all accounts receivable. A specific bad debt reserve of up to 100% of the invoice
value is provided for balances deemed uncollectable. A reserve is established for all other
accounts based on the age of the invoices. Delinquent account balances are written-off after
management has determined that the likelihood of collection is not probable. As of March 31, 2009,
the Company had one single customer that represents greater than 10% of total accounts receivable,
net of allowances, and 10% of total revenues.
7
Reclassification and Correction of Previously Issued Financial Statements
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB)
Statement of Position No. Accounting Principles Board (APB) 14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)
(FSP
APB 14-1), which impacts the accounting treatment of the Companys 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes
due February 15, 2012 (the Senior Notes). Upon adopting the provisions of FSP APB 14-1, the
Company retroactively applied its provisions and restated its condensed consolidated financial
statements for prior periods. Refer to Note 5 of the Notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements for additional details and the impacts of retroactive application of FSP APB 14-1 on the
Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
Certain prior year amounts were reclassified to conform to the current year presentation,
including reclassifications related to discontinued operations of the Companys CodeGear division,
which was sold on June 30, 2008. Refer to Note 6 of the Notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements for additional information regarding CodeGear.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and as reported in the Companys Form 10-Q for such
period, management identified certain accounting errors related to the December 31, 2007 financial
statements. Although these adjustments together with other adjustments recorded in the first
quarter of 2008 related to the 2007 year are not considered material to the loss from continuing
operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 and net loss for the year ended December 31, 2007,
when aggregated, as assessed during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, these amounts were expected to
be material to the full year loss from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2008.
As a result the Company revised its unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for
the three months ended March 31, 2008. These adjustments increased the net loss for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 by approximately $966,000, and were included in the condensed
consolidated financial statements presented in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1 which amends SFAS 141(R) by establishing a
model to account for certain pre-acquisition contingencies. Under the FSP, an acquirer is required
to recognize at fair value an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that
arises from a contingency if the acquisition-date fair value of that asset or liability can be
determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition-date fair value cannot be determined,
then the acquirer should follow the recognition criteria in SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for
Contingencies,
and FASB Interpretation No. 14,
Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 5.
FSP FAS 141(R)-1 is effective for the Company beginning
April 1, 2009. This FSP will be applied to future transactions as appropriate.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly
, (FSP FAS 157-4). FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional guidance
for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157), and emphasizes that even if there has been a significant decrease in the volume
and level of activity for the asset or liability and regardless of the valuation technique(s) used,
the objective of a fair value measurement remains the same. This FSP is effective for the Company
beginning April 1, 2009. This FSP is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
, (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2). FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2
provides guidance to determine whether the holder of an investment in a debt security for which
changes in fair value are not regularly recognized in earnings should recognize a loss in earnings
when the investment is impaired. This FSP also improves the presentation and disclosure of
other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the consolidated financial
statements. This FSP is effective for the Company beginning April 1, 2009. This FSP is not expected
to have a material impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP APB 14-1, which impacts the accounting treatment for
convertible debt instruments that allow for either mandatory or optional cash settlements. FSP APB
14-1 impacts the accounting associated with the Companys outstanding Senior Notes in the amount of
$115.0 million par value. Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP APB 14-1, which
impacts the accounting treatment of the Senior Notes since they allow for either mandatory or
optional cash settlements. FSP APB 14-1 requires the Company to separately account for the
liability (debt) and equity (conversion option) components of the Senior Notes in a manner that
reflects the Companys non-convertible debt borrowing rate, resulting in additional non-cash
interest expense based on the market rate for similar debt instruments without the conversion
feature. Upon the original issuance of the debt instruments in 2007, the Company recorded the net
debt obligation as long-term debt in accordance with applicable accounting standards at that time.
To adopt FSP APB 14-1, effective January 1, 2009, the Company estimated the fair value, as of
the date of issuance, of the Senior Notes as if they were issued without the conversion options.
The difference between the fair value and the principal amounts of the Senior Notes was
$46.0 million. This amount was retrospectively applied to the Companys financial statements from
the issuance date of the Senior Notes in 2007, and was retrospectively recorded as debt discount
and as a component of stockholders equity. The discount is being amortized until the Senior Notes
mature in February 2012, resulting in a non-cash increase to interest expense in historical and
future periods. Refer to Note 5 of the Notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for
additional details.
8
In June 2008, FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 08-4,
Transition Guidance for Conforming Changes to
Issue No. 98-5
(EITF No. 08-4). Per EITF No. 08-4, conforming changes made to EITF Issue No.
98-5, Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently
Adjustable Conversion Ratios, that result from EITF Issue No. 00-27, Application of Issue No. 98-5
to Certain Convertible Instruments, and SFAS No. 150,
Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments
with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity
, is effective beginning after January 1, 2009.
Since the Companys convertible debt instruments fall outside of the scope of this pronouncement,
it had no impact over the condensed consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets
(FSP No. 142-3). FSP No. 142-3 amends the guidance in FASB Statement No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
, for estimating useful lives of recognized intangible assets
and requires additional disclosures related to renewing or extending the terms of a recognized
intangible asset. In estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset, FSP No. 142-3
requires companies to consider their historical experience in renewing or extending similar
arrangements together with the assets intended use, regardless of whether the arrangements have
explicit renewal or extension provisions. FSP No. 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008, and is to be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the
effective date. The disclosure requirements are applied prospectively to all intangible assets. The
Company adopted this FSP effective January 1, 2009. This FSP will be applied prospectively to
intangible assets acquired after the effective date.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations
,
a revision of SFAS
No. 141
(SFAS
141 (R)).
Under SFAS 141(R), an acquiring entity is required to recognize all the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with
limited exceptions. SFAS 141(R) changes the accounting treatment for certain specific items,
including acquisition costs, acquired contingent liabilities, restructuring costs, deferred tax
asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date. SFAS 141(R) is
effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2009. SFAS 141(R) will be applied as appropriate to
future business combinations and the impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements will
depend on the assets and liabilities acquired.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
. SFAS No. 157
clarifies the definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
expands the disclosures related to fair value measurements that are included in a companys
financial statements. SFAS No. 157 does not expand the use of fair value measurements in financial
statements. It emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement and not an entity-specific
measurement, and that it should be based on an exchange transaction in which a company sells an
asset or transfers a liability. SFAS No. 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy in which
observable market data would be considered the highest level, while fair value measurements based
on an entitys own assumptions would be considered the lowest level. The Company has applied
SFAS 157 to all financial assets and liabilities that are being measured and reported at fair value
on a recurring basis value effective January 1, 2008. In accordance with FSP FAS 157-2, Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 157, (FSP FAS 157-2) the Company elected to defer application of SFAS
No. 157 to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value
in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis until January 1, 2009. The adoption
of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2009 did not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. See
Note 3 for information and related disclosure regarding our fair value measurements.
NOTE 2. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Under the provisions of SFAS No. 128,
Earnings per Share
(SFAS 128), the Company computes
basic net income (loss) per share by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by
dividing net income (loss) for the period by the weighted-average number of common and potentially
dilutive shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive shares, which consist of
incremental shares issuable upon unexercised stock options that are in the money, unvested
restricted stock and Employee Stock Purchase Plan awards, and shares issuable upon conversion of
our Senior Notes (described in Note 5 below), are included in the earnings per share computation in
the periods in which net income is reported, to the extent such shares are dilutive.
9
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per
share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As Adjusted)
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
1,598
|
|
|
$
|
(14,491
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
(10,728
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,888
|
|
|
$
|
(25,219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding, basic (excluding unvested
restricted stock)
|
|
|
72,953
|
|
|
|
72,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options, restricted stock awards and ESPP shares
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share -
weighted-average shares and assumed conversions
|
|
|
73,010
|
|
|
|
72,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations basic
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
Discontinued operations basic
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share basic
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations diluted
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
Discontinued operations diluted
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The diluted net income per share for the three months ended March 31, 2009 includes 57,000 of
weighted average incremental shares related to restricted stock and Employee Stock Purchase Plan
awards. The diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share for the three months
ended March 31, 2008, due to the net losses from continuing operations.
Approximately 10.1 million and 12.3 million weighted average shares of common stock,
respectively related unexercised stock options, and 62,500 and 216,000 unvested weighted average
restricted common shares, respectively, were excluded from the net income (loss) per share
computation for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 because such impact would be
antidilutive due to being out-of-the-money.
Additionally, the Company excluded 26.5 million and 31.4 million, respectively, of dilutive
shares issuable upon conversion of the Senior Notes, calculated using the if converted method,
from the dilutive net income (loss) per share computation for the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008 as their effects would have been antidilutive. See Note 5 of the condensed consolidated
financial statements for information on the Senior Notes.
10
NOTE 3. INVESTMENTS IN MARKETABLE SECURITIES AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following tables summarize the Companys investments in available-for-sale debt securities
as of March 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
$
|
13,084
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(62
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,023
|
|
U.S. government debt securities
|
|
|
27,476
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
27,564
|
|
Equity instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,560
|
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
(109
|
)
|
|
$
|
40,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
$
|
27,152
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(250
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,902
|
|
U.S. government debt securities
|
|
|
32,363
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,604
|
|
Equity instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
59,515
|
|
|
$
|
352
|
|
|
$
|
(292
|
)
|
|
$
|
59,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities included in short-term investments above are summarized by their
contractual maturities as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated Fair
|
|
Due in
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Less than one year
|
|
$
|
40,560
|
|
|
$
|
40,653
|
|
|
$
|
59,515
|
|
|
$
|
59,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
40,560
|
|
|
$
|
40,653
|
|
|
$
|
59,515
|
|
|
$
|
59,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value
Measurements
(SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value
and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The Company has applied SFAS 157
to all financial assets and liabilities that are being measured and reported at fair value on a
recurring basis value effective January 1, 2008. In accordance with FSP FAS 157-2,
Effective Date
of FASB Statement No. 157
, (FSP FAS 157-2) the Company elected to defer application of SFAS
No. 157 to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value
in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis until January 1, 2009. The adoption
of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2009 did not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Under SFAS 157, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability (
i.e.
, the exit price) in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. This standard establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in
measuring fair value that minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring the use of
observable market data when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would
use in pricing the asset or liability based on active market data. Unobservable inputs are inputs
that reflect the Companys assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances.
The fair value hierarchy is broken down into the three input levels summarized below:
|
|
|
Level 1 Valuations are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities and readily accessible by the Company at the reporting date. Examples of assets
and liabilities utilizing Level 1 inputs are: most U.S. Government securities; certain other
sovereign government obligations; and exchange-traded equity securities and listed
derivatives.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuations based on inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1
that are observable for asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Examples of
assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs are: U.S. agency securities; municipal
bonds; corporate bonds; and certain residential and commercial mortgage-related instruments
(including loans, securities and derivatives).
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable. Examples of assets and
liabilities utilizing Level 3 inputs are: certain residential and commercial
mortgage-related instruments; real estate and private equity investments; and long-dated or
complex Over-the-counter derivatives.
|
11
The Company measures its available-for-sale securities at fair value on a recurring basis.
Available-for-sale securities include money market funds, corporate debt securities, U.S.
government debt securities and asset-backed securities. Where possible, the Company utilizes quoted
market prices to measure fair value and such items are classified as Level 1 in the hierarchy and
include some equity securities and U.S. government bonds. When quoted market prices for identical
assets are unavailable, varying valuation techniques are used. Such assets are classified as Level
2 in the hierarchy and typically include asset-backed securities, corporate debt securities and
other U.S. government debt securities.
The following tables provide the fair value measurements of applicable assets by level within
the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement at Reporting Date Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
|
Value at
|
|
|
for Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
Description
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds (1)
|
|
$
|
42,463
|
|
|
$
|
42,463
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Corporate debt securities (2)
|
|
|
13,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,023
|
|
U.S. government debt securities (2)
|
|
|
27,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,564
|
|
Equity instruments (2)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
83,116
|
|
|
$
|
42,529
|
|
|
$
|
40,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement at Reporting Date Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
|
Value at
|
|
|
for Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
Description
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds (1)
|
|
$
|
60,006
|
|
|
$
|
60,006
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Corporate debt securities (2)
|
|
|
26,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,902
|
|
U.S. government debt securities (2)
|
|
|
32,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,604
|
|
Equity instruments (2)
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
119,581
|
|
|
$
|
60,075
|
|
|
$
|
59,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Included in cash and cash equivalents on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Included in short-term investments in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
NOTE 4. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following table summarizes intangible assets at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Category
|
|
Useful Lives
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Acquired Developed Technology
|
|
3 7 years
|
|
$
|
47,836
|
|
|
$
|
36,847
|
|
|
$
|
10,989
|
|
|
$
|
47,860
|
|
|
$
|
35,637
|
|
|
$
|
12,223
|
|
Maintenance Agreements
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
11,300
|
|
|
|
4,753
|
|
|
|
6,547
|
|
|
|
11,300
|
|
|
|
4,215
|
|
|
|
7,085
|
|
Tradenames and Trademarks
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
Customer Relationships
|
|
3 7 years
|
|
|
9,075
|
|
|
|
4,435
|
|
|
|
4,640
|
|
|
|
9,075
|
|
|
|
4,203
|
|
|
|
4,872
|
|
Other
|
|
1 3 years
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
69,732
|
|
|
$
|
47,280
|
|
|
$
|
22,452
|
|
|
$
|
69,756
|
|
|
$
|
45,236
|
|
|
$
|
24,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
The Company does not maintain any indefinite live intangible assets. During the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded total amortization expense of $2.1 million and
$2.2 million, respectively, of which $1.9 million and $2.1 million were recorded to cost of
revenues. The estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets at March 31,
2009, is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
5,496
|
|
2010
|
|
|
6,692
|
|
2011
|
|
|
5,483
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,542
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 5. CONVERTIBLE SENIOR NOTES
In February 2007, the Company issued 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes due February 15, 2012 (the
Senior Notes), for an aggregate principal amount of $200.0 million in a private offering for
resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to SEC Rule 144A under the Securities Act of
1933. The Senior Notes bear interest at 2.75% per annum. Interest is payable semiannually in
arrears on February 15 and August 15, of each year. The Company received proceeds of approximately
$194.2 million after the initial purchaser fees and the offering expenses of approximately $5.8
million were deducted. The fees and interest expense related to the offering are being recorded in
interest expense over the term of the Notes using the effective interest method. Immediately
following issuance of the Senior Notes, the Company used approximately $30.0 million of the net
proceeds to repurchase approximately 5.9 million shares of the Companys common stock. During 2008,
following authorization by the Companys Board of Directors, the Company redeemed $40.7 million of
the outstanding Senior Notes for consideration of $30.0 million in cash, comprised of $0.2 million
in accrued interest and $29.8 million in principal. The redeemed Senior Notes were retired and are
no longer outstanding.
On February 27, 2009, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the use of up to
approximately $36.0 million of its available cash to repurchase a portion of its outstanding Senior
Notes with an aggregate principal par value of $159.3 million in open market or privately
negotiated transactions. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company repurchased
$44.3 million of the outstanding Senior Notes for consideration of $27.5 million in cash, comprised
of $0.1 million in accrued interest and $27.4 million in principal. The redeemed Senior Notes were
retired and are no longer outstanding.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP APB 14-1, which impacts the accounting
treatment of the Companys Senior Notes since they allow for either mandatory or optional cash
settlements. FSP APB 14-1 requires the Company to separately account for the liability (debt) and
equity (conversion option) components of the Senior Notes in a manner that reflects the Companys
non-convertible debt borrowing rate, resulting in additional non-cash interest expense based on the
market rate for similar debt instruments without the conversion feature. Upon the original
issuance of the debt instruments in 2007, the Company recorded the net debt obligation as long-term
debt in accordance with applicable accounting standards at that time. To adopt FSP APB 14-1,
effective January 1, 2009, the Company estimated the fair value, as of the date of issuance, of the
Senior Notes as if they were issued without the conversion options. The difference between the fair
value and the principal amounts of the Senior Notes was $46.0 million. This amount was
retrospectively applied to the Companys financial statements from the issuance date of the Senior
Notes in 2007, and was retrospectively recorded as debt discount and as a component of
shareholders equity. The discount is being amortized until the Senior Notes mature in February
2012, resulting in a non-cash increase to interest expense in historical and future periods.
13
The following tables reflect the Companys previously reported amounts, along with the
adjusted amounts as required by FSP APB 14-1 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSP APB 14-1 Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated
|
|
As restated for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Issuance
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Operations
|
|
correction of
|
|
|
Debt Discount
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
errors (1)
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(1,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,007
|
)
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
(3,658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(12,572
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,007
|
)
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
(14,491
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(10,728
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10,728
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(23,300
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,007
|
)
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
|
(25,219
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
Loss per share from discontinued operation basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share
|
|
|
72,751
|
|
|
|
72,751
|
|
|
|
72,751
|
|
|
|
72,751
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
As previously reported in the Company Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the
Company revised its condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 to correct certain accounting errors. For additional details, refer to Note 1
of the Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements in the Company Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSP APB 14-1 Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassify Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount and
|
|
|
Debt Discount and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Issuance
|
|
|
Issuance Cost
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Deferred Tax
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheets (unaudited) (a)
|
|
As Reported
|
|
|
Costs to APIC
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Repurchase
|
|
|
Effect (1)
|
|
|
As Restated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets non current
|
|
$
|
5,185
|
|
|
$
|
(1,411
|
)
|
|
$
|
652
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
(492
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,112
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
252,982
|
|
|
$
|
(1,411
|
)
|
|
$
|
652
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
(492
|
)
|
|
$
|
251,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities current
|
|
$
|
5,863
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(492
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,371
|
|
Convertible senior notes, net
|
|
$
|
159,300
|
|
|
$
|
(46,027
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,472
|
|
|
$
|
7,042
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
134,787
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
261,537
|
|
|
$
|
(46,027
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,472
|
|
|
$
|
7,042
|
|
|
$
|
(492
|
)
|
|
$
|
236,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
$
|
672,525
|
|
|
$
|
44,616
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
717,141
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
$
|
(548,731
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13,820
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,864
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(569,415
|
)
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
(8,555
|
)
|
|
$
|
44,616
|
|
|
$
|
(13,820
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,864
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,377
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Approximately $9.7 million was recorded to noncurrent deferred tax liabilities. The Company
records a valuation allowance against majority of its net deferred tax assets. As a result of the
valuation allowance, the net deferred tax impact is zero.
|
14
The following tables provide additional information about the Companys Senior Notes that are
subject to FSP APB 14-1 (dollars in thousands, except for conversion prices):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
Carrying amount of the equity component
|
|
$
|
44,617
|
|
Principal amount of the liability component
|
|
|
114,984
|
|
Unamortized discount of the liability component
|
|
|
16,436
|
|
Net carrying amount of the liability component
|
|
|
98,548
|
|
Remaining amortization period of discount
|
|
35 months
|
|
Conversion price
|
|
$
|
6.38
|
|
Number of shares to be issued upon conversion
|
|
|
18,036,701
|
|
Effective interest rate on liability component
|
|
|
8.46%
|
|
Non-cash interest cost recognized for 2009 period (a)
|
|
|
1,797
|
|
Cash interest recognized for 2009 period (a)
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Carrying amount of the equity component
|
|
$
|
44,617
|
|
Principal amount of the liability component
|
|
|
159,300
|
|
Unamortized discount of the liability component
|
|
|
24,513
|
|
Net carrying amount of the liability component
|
|
|
134,787
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Interest cost relates to both the contractual interest coupon and amortization of the
discount on the liability component. Non cash interest costs recognized consists of $1.6
million for debt discount amortization and $0.2 million for debt issuance costs amortization.
|
Conversion Process and Other Terms of the Senior Notes
On or after November 11, 2011, holders of the outstanding Senior Notes will have the right to
convert their Senior Notes. Upon conversion, the Company will deliver a number of shares of its
common stock equal to the conversion rate for each $1,000 of principal amount of Senior Notes
converted, unless prior to the date of such conversion the Company has obtained stockholder
approval to settle conversions of the Senior Notes in cash and shares of its common stock. If such
approval is obtained, any Senior Notes converted after approval will be convertible into (i) cash
equal to the lesser of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes to be converted and the
total conversion value and (ii) shares of the Companys common stock for the remainder, if any, of
the total conversion value. In addition, following specified corporate transactions, the Company
will increase the conversion rate for holders who elect to convert their Senior Notes in connection
with such corporate transactions, provided that in no event may the shares issued upon conversion,
as a result of adjustment or otherwise, result in the issuance of
more than approximately 22.5 million shares.
Holders may convert their Senior Notes prior to maturity if: (1) the price of the Companys
common stock reaches $8.29 during periods of time as specified in the agreement, (2) specified
corporate transactions occur or (3) the trading price of the Senior Notes falls below a certain
threshold.
Each $1,000 of principal of the Senior Notes will initially be convertible into 156.8627
shares of the Companys common stock, which is the equivalent of $6.38 per share and, based on the
Senior Notes outstanding as of March 31, 2009, with an aggregate principal par value of $115.0
million, would result in the issuance of an aggregate of approximately 26.5 million shares. The
number of shares issuable upon conversion is subject to adjustment under the following
circumstances: (1) during any fiscal quarter beginning after March 31, 2007, if the last reported
sale price of the Companys common stock for at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive
trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediate preceding fiscal quarter is greater or
equal to 130% of the applicable conversion price on the last day of such preceding fiscal quarter;
(2) during the five business day period after any ten consecutive trading day period in which the
trading price per Senior Notes for each day of that ten consecutive trading day period was less
than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of the Companys common stock and the
conversion rate for such day; and (3) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions.
The Company evaluated the embedded conversion feature in accordance with SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 133), and concluded that the
embedded conversion feature contained within the agreement should not be accounted for separately
because the conversion feature is indexed to the Companys common stock and is classified as
stockholders equity. Additionally, the Company evaluated the terms of the Senior Notes for a
beneficial conversion feature in accordance with FASB Emerging Issue Task Force (EITF) No. 98-5,
Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently
Adjustable Conversion Ratios
and EITF No. 00-27,
Application of Issue 98-5 to Certain Convertible
Instruments
, and concluded that there was no beneficial conversion feature at the commitment date
based on the conversion rate of the Senior Notes relative to the commitment date stock price.
15
Based on SFAS 128 and EITF No. 04-08,
Accounting Issues Related to Certain Features of
Contingently Convertible Debt and the Effect on Diluted Earnings per Share
, the dilutive effect of
the common shares issuable upon conversion of the Senior Notes would normally be reflected in the
diluted earnings per share calculation. However, due to the net share settlement feature, the
Senior Notes do not qualify as an Instrument C under EITF No. 90-19,
Accounting for Derivative
Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own Stock
. Therefore, the
Company uses the if-converted method for calculating diluted earnings per share. Using the
if-converted method, the shares issuable upon conversion of the Senior Notes were anti-dilutive
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. Accordingly, the impact has been excluded from
the computation of diluted earnings per share as discussed in further detail in Note 2.
NOTE 6. DISPOSITIONS AND ACQUISITIONS
Dispositions
The Company accounts for its discontinued operations under the provisions of SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS 144). Accordingly, it
classifies results of operations and the related charges for discontinued operations as income
(loss) from operations of discontinued operations, net of applicable taxes in the accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. For comparative purposes, the Company restated all
prior periods presented in the Form 10-Q to reflect the reclassifications on a consistent basis.
On June 30, 2008, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the assets (excluding
accounts receivable), operations and certain liabilities of its Integrated Development Environment
(IDE) tools business to Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. (Embarcadero) for $20.7 million in cash,
including post closing adjustments (CodeGear Asset Sale). The assets and operations were
previously included in the Companys CodeGear division.
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company also entered into several ancillary
agreements, including (i) a patent assignment agreement, assigning 34 patents which pertain solely
or substantially to the CodeGear business; (ii) a patent license agreement, providing for a
non-exclusive license to the Companys patents that were not assigned, which license was restricted
to a certain field of use; (iii) a technology cross-license agreement, which provides for licenses
to and from Embarcadero and the Company for software and tools used in both the CodeGear and the
Companys retained business; (iv) a services agreement which obligates Embarcadero to provide
software license management application services to the Company following the closing; (v) the
sublease of the Companys facilities previously used in the CodeGear business; and (vi) a
transition services agreement to provide services to Embarcadero to assist with the transition of
the CodeGear business. The Company evaluated the above arrangements and concluded they do not
involve significant continuing involvement. In addition, no amounts of the purchase consideration
were ascribed to the ancillary agreements as amounts exchanged under these agreements were deemed
to be at fair value.
Discontinued operations are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
12,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operation of discontinued operations
(net of applicable taxes of $0
for 2009 and $242 for 2008)
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
(10,728
|
)
|
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations (net of applicable
tax of $0 for 2009)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
$
|
(10,728
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
The following table sets forth the assets and liabilities of the CodeGear discontinued
operations included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet of the Company (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Deposits due to Borland from lessor
|
|
$
|
3,734
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets of discontinued operation
|
|
|
3,734
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits due to Borland from lessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets of discontinued operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued restructuring
|
|
|
4,233
|
|
|
|
4,162
|
|
Deposits due to subtenant from Borland
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operation
|
|
|
5,611
|
|
|
|
4,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
Deposits due to subtenant from Borland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operation
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits on leased facilities and accrued restructuring are related to a subleased facility
that was previously used in the CodeGear business. The lease will terminate on March 31, 2010.
Acquisitions
The Company accounted for acquisitions that took place prior to 2009 in accordance with SFAS
No. 141,
Business Combinations
(SFAS 141).The results of operations attributable to acquisitions
are included in the condensed consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.
On January 2, 2008, the Company executed a Share Purchase Agreement to purchase all of the
outstanding shares of Simunication, Inc. (Simunication) for approximately $2.4 million, including
$450,000 million of assumed liabilities. Simunication was a Canadian-based provider of leading edge
software simulation technology for global organizations that develop software for external or
internal use. The Company funded this acquisition with available cash. Pro forma financial
information has not been provided as the acquisition did not have a material impact on the
Companys results of operations.
The purchase price of the transaction was allocated to the acquired assets and assumed
liabilities based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition, including identifiable
intangible assets, with the remaining amount being recorded as goodwill. The estimated fair value
of the net assets acquired was approximately $2.0 million, of which approximately $1.8 million was
allocated to acquired developed technology. The acquired developed technology is being amortized
over seven years.
NOTE 7. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES
The Company accounts for its restructuring activities in accordance with SFAS No. 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,
SFAS No. 112,
Employers
Accounting for Postemployment Benefitsan amendment of FASB Statement No. 5 and 43,
and SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 100,
Restructuring and Impairment Charges,
as applicable.
The following table summarizes the Companys restructuring activity for the three months ended
March 31, 2009, which was related to the FY 2008 and FY 2007 restructuring plans (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008 Restructuring
|
|
|
FY 2007 Restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance,
|
|
|
Severance,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits and Other
|
|
|
Benefits and Other
|
|
|
Facilities (1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Accrual at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,810
|
|
|
$
|
868
|
|
|
$
|
2,223
|
|
|
$
|
4,901
|
|
Additions/adjustments to accrual
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
Payments and adjustments for non-cash write-offs
|
|
|
(2,592
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
(3,014
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual at March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
585
|
|
|
$
|
809
|
|
|
$
|
1,889
|
|
|
$
|
3,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Facilities accruals represent the net present value of the Companys remaining lease payments
less anticipated sublease rental income plus lease incentives for prospective tenants and
other costs. The Company utilizes qualified third party consultants to evaluate current
market conditions and determine future estimates which serve as the basis for managements
assumptions.
|
17
Of the $3.3 million in our restructuring accrual at March 31, 2009, $2.7 million was in our
short-term accrual and $0.6 million was in our long-term accrual. The long-term accrual is related
to facility operating leases.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded net restructuring
expenses of $1.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, to continuing operations.
The restructuring charges relating to operating leases have been recorded, net of assumed
sublease income and present value factors. Substantially all of these restructuring costs have or
will require the outlay of cash, although the timing of lease payments relating to leased
facilities over the next five years will be unchanged by the restructuring actions. The following
are descriptions of each of the separate restructuring actions taken. Additionally, upon the sale
of the Companys CodeGear division on June 30, 2008, the Company reclassified approximately
$5.2 million in facilities related restructuring liabilities to liabilities of the discontinued
operation. Included in the liabilities of discontinued operation at March 31, 2009 is $4.2 million
of restructuring liabilities.
FY 2008
In December 2008, the Companys Board of Directors approved a worldwide reduction in force of
118 employees, or approximately fifteen percent of our full-time regular work force prior to the
reduction. The workforce reduction actions were primarily in the United States, Canada, and Europe,
and to a lesser degree in other international locations. SFAS 112 and SFAS 88 require accrual for
severance expenses prior to notification for termination benefits that are contractual, or required
by regional labor laws, or under a substantive plan if they are probable and reasonably estimable.
The Company recorded $1.4 million in applicable severance expenses related to this action in the
first quarter of 2009 based on the date of employee notification. The FY 2008 restructuring plan
did not include any consolidations or closures of facilities. During the three months ended March
31, 2009, the Company paid $2.6 million in severance to the terminated employees.
FY 2007
In December 2007, the Company announced a worldwide reduction in workforce in response to
changing market conditions and as a part of its efforts to reduce costs. The worldwide reduction in
workforce involved approximately 90 employees, or approximately eight percent of total headcount
prior to the reduction, and the closing of facilities in approximately six locations. The workforce
reduction and facility actions were primarily in the United States and Europe, and to a lesser
degree in other international locations. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company
paid $334,000 in rent and other fees for its restructured facilities and $21,000 in severance to
terminated employees related to this action.
NOTE 8. INCOME TAXES
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded income tax expense of
$385,000 and $1.3 million, respectively, related to continuing operations. The non-U.S. income tax
provision is based on the Companys estimated annualized
foreign effective tax rate plus foreign income withholding taxes incurred. The U.S. tax is
based on the Companys actual results for the quarter.
The effective tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, differ from
applying the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to the pre-tax loss principally because the Company
does not currently benefit from the operating losses incurred in the U.S. and the fact that the
Company incurs withholding and income taxes in a number of foreign jurisdictions. The Company also
provides U.S. taxes on the un-remitted earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries.
At March 31, 2009, gross unrecognized tax benefits of between $7.7 and $8.0 million relate to
tax positions and interest for which it is reasonably possible that audits will be closed or the
statute of limitations will expire in various foreign jurisdictions within the next twelve months.
18
NOTE 9. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company follows the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R). The Company currently
has in effect certain stock purchase plans, stock award plans, and equity incentive plans as
described in Note 12 in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2008. There have been no material changes to such plans.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
Total stock-based compensation expense associated with the Companys employee stock-based
compensation plans under SFAS 123R for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, is presented
in the table below (in thousands). The information excludes stock-based compensation expense
related to the CodeGear division for all periods presented, consistent with the presentation of
discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (see Note 6).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008 (Restated)
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
|
$
|
1,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
Stock option activity during the three months ended March 31, 2009, was as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term (Years)
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
10,128
|
|
|
$
|
5.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,207
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(1,835
|
)
|
|
|
4.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
$
|
4.53
|
|
|
|
7.25
|
|
|
$
|
118,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
8,865
|
|
|
$
|
5.24
|
|
|
|
6.70
|
|
|
$
|
72,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
5,154
|
|
|
$
|
7.81
|
|
|
|
4.82
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value
(the difference between the Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of the first
quarter of 2009 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options on such
date) that option holders would have received had all option holders exercised their options on
March 31, 2009.
The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options issued during the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $0.21 and $1.03, respectively.
As of March 31, 2009, the Company expects to recognize $4.7 million of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to stock options over a weighted-average period of approximately 3.11
years.
The Company estimates the fair value of share-based payment awards granted using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model at the date of grant. The weighted-average assumptions used for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Expected life
|
|
6.25 years
|
|
|
4.66 years
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.67
|
%
|
|
|
2.46
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
51.5
|
%
|
|
|
48.5
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
19
Restricted Stock
Unvested restricted stock awards as of December 31, 2008, and changes during the three months
ended March 31, 2009, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
62,613
|
|
|
$
|
6.43
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
|
|
9.79
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
162,500
|
|
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $15,800 for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 related to restricted stock awards. As of March 31, 2009, there was $79,000 in
unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock awards. The
Company expects to recognize that cost over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.44 years.
NOTE 10. SEGMENT REPORTING AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,
establishes
standards for reporting information about operating segments in a companys financial statements.
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial
information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or
decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The
Companys chief operating decision maker, (CODM), is its Chief Executive Officer.
On June 30, 2008, the Company completed the sale of all of the assets (excluding accounts
receivable), operations and certain liabilities of its CodeGear division (see Note 6). In
accordance with SFAS 144, the financial results of the Companys CodeGear division have been
reclassified as discontinued operations in its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for
all periods presented. Following the disposition, the Company operates in one operating and
reportable segment.
Enterprise-wide disclosures
The Company has various wholly-owned subsidiaries, which develop, market, and/or distribute
its products in foreign countries. In certain international markets not covered by its
international subsidiaries, the Company generally sells through independent distributors. For the
geographic disclosures, inter-company transactions are recorded at either cost or applicable
transfer price, as appropriate. Inter-company transactions and balances are eliminated upon
consolidation. The geographical summary results of the Companys operation for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Total revenues from unaffiliated customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
$
|
23,218
|
|
|
$
|
24,428
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
7,547
|
|
|
|
10,880
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
4,285
|
|
|
|
10,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
35,050
|
|
|
|
46,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
The geographical summary of the Companys long- lived assets at March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Long-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
$
|
28,403
|
|
|
$
|
30,574
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
Long-lived assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets:
|
|
|
30,395
|
|
|
|
36,748
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
3,676
|
|
|
|
4,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
$
|
34,071
|
|
|
$
|
40,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On May 5, 2009, Borland entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement)
with Bentley Merger Sub, Inc. (Merger Sub), a Delaware corporation,Micro Focus International plc,
a company organized under the laws of England and Wales (PLC) and Micro Focus (US), Inc., a
Delaware corporation (Parent and together with Merger Sub and PLC, Micro Focus), pursuant to
which Merger Sub is to merge with and into Borland (the Merger). As a result of the Merger, the
separate corporate existence of Merger Sub will cease and Borland will continue as the surviving
corporation. At the effective time of the Merger, each share of common stock of Borland (other
than shares owned by Borland and Micro Focus and any dissenting shares) will be converted into the
right to receive$1.00 per share and outstanding options to acquire Borland common stock having a
per-share exercise price of less than $1.00 that are fully vested at the closing shall be converted
into the right to receive $1.00 cash less the exercise price of such option. The aggregate value
of the Merger is approximately $75 million. The boards of directors of both companies have
unanimously approved the Merger.
The Merger is expected to be completed late in the second quarter or early in the third
quarter of 2009. The proposed transaction is subject to the approval of Borlands stockholders,
the approval of PLCs shareholders and other customary conditions to closing, including (i)
Borlands production of evidence that immediately prior to the Effective Time it has cash and cash
equivalents of not less than $122,500,000 in the aggregate, and (ii) not more than the holders of
10% of Borlands outstanding shares of common stock have
exercised dissenters rights. Either party will have a right to terminate the Merger
Agreement if the Merger is not closed on or prior to November 5, 2009.
The Merger Agreement contains a no-shop provision pursuant to which Borland is restricted in
its ability to solicit, initiate, encourage or facilitate an acquisition proposal from a third
party. Borland is permitted to provide information and participate in discussions with respect to
acquisition proposals that the Board of Directors determines in good faith, after consultation with
its outside legal counsel, are superior or reasonably likely to be superior to the terms of the
Merger. Borland is obligated to provide Micro Focus with notification of any acquisition proposal
or inquiry and Borlands intention to take any action with respect to an acquisition proposal.
The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights. Upon the termination of the Merger
Agreement under specified circumstances, Borland may be required to pay Micro Focus a termination
fee of $3.0 million. Borland will be obligated to reimburse the expenses of Micro Focus in
connection with the Merger, up to $1.5 million, under certain circumstances if Borlands
stockholders do not approve the Merger. Borlands aggregate obligation to pay a termination fee
and reimburse the expenses of Micro Focus will in no event exceed $3.0 million. Micro Focus will
be obligated to reimburse the expenses of Borland in connection with the Merger, up to $1.5
million, under certain circumstances if Micro Focuss shareholders do not approve the Merger. The
Merger Agreement also includes other representations, warranties, covenants and conditions that are
customary for transactions of this type.
Important Additional Information about the Proposed Merger
All parties desiring details regarding the Merger are urged
to review the definitive agreement as filed by us on May 6, 2009 in a Current Report on Form 8-K, which is
available on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at
http://www.sec.gov
. In connection with
the proposed transaction, Borland will file with the SEC a proxy statement, and Borland plans to file with the SEC
other documents regarding the proposed transaction. INVESTORS AND SECURITY HOLDERS ARE ADVISED TO READ THE PROXY
STATEMENT AND OTHER FILED DOCUMENTS CAREFULLY WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT
INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION . Shareholders will be able to obtain a free-of-charge copy of the proxy
statement (when available) and other relevant documents filed with the SEC from the SEC’s website at
http://www.sec.gov
. Shareholders will also be able to obtain a free-of-charge copy of the proxy statement and
other relevant documents (when available) by directing a request by mail or telephone to Borland, 8310 North Capital of
Texas Highway, Building 2 Suite 100, Austin, TX 78731, Attention: Investor Relations, Telephone:
(512) 340-1364, or from Borland’s website,
http://www.borland.com
. Borland and certain of its
directors, executive officers and other members of management and employees may, under the rules of the SEC, be deemed
to be “participants” in the solicitation of proxies from shareholders of Borland in favor of the proposed
merger. Information regarding Borland’s directors and executive officers is contained in Borland’s annual
proxy statement filed with the SEC on April 8, 2009. Additional information regarding the interests of such
potential participants will be included in the proxy statement and the other relevant documents filed with the SEC
(when available).
21
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
, the terms the Company, we, our, and us refer to
Borland Software Corporation on a consolidated basis.
Forward-Looking Statements
The statements made throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical
facts are forward-looking statements and accordingly, involve estimates, projections, goals,
forecasts, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ
materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements may relate to, but are not limited to, revenues, composition of revenues, cash flows,
earnings, margins, costs, expenses, strategy, research and development, customer service and
relationships, demand for our products, market and technological trends in the software industry,
licenses, developments in technology, the pending acquisition of the
Company by Micro Focus effects of the sale of our CodeGear assets, effects of and
timeframe for company restructuring actions, effects of our offering of Convertible Senior Notes,
effects of new accounting pronouncements, product quality, competition, sales, cash resources,
stock price, new management and personnel, interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates,
financial systems, internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures and various economic
and business trends. Generally, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of words
such as expect, estimate, project, budget, forecast, anticipate, goal, intend,
plan, may, will, could, should, believes, predicts, potential, continue and
similar expressions or the negative or other variations thereof. These forward-looking statements
involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Examples of such risks and uncertainties are described
under Risk Factors and elsewhere in this report, as well as in our other filings with the SEC or
in materials incorporated by reference herein or therein. You should be aware that the occurrence
of any of these risks and uncertainties may cause our actual results to differ materially from
those anticipated in our forward-looking statements and have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition. New factors may emerge from time to time,
and it may not be possible for us to predict new factors, nor can we assess the potential effect of
any new factors on us.
These forward-looking statements are found in various places throughout this Form 10-Q,
including the financial statement footnotes. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which, unless otherwise indicated, speak only as of the date they were
made. We do not undertake any obligation to update or release publicly any revisions to these
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-Q,
except as required by law.
Overview
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB)
Statement of Position No. Accounting Principles Board (APB) 14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)
(FSP
APB 14-1), which impacts the accounting treatment of our convertible senior notes. Upon adopting
the provisions of FSP APB 14-1, the Company retroactively applied its provisions and restated its
condensed consolidated financial statements for prior periods. Refer to Note 5 of the Notes to the
condensed consolidated financial statements for additional details and the impacts of retroactive
application of FSP APB 14-1 on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
On June 30, 2008, we completed the sale of our CodeGear division as further described below
(see also Note 6 of the Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements). In accordance with
SFAS 144, the financial results for our CodeGear division for all periods presented have been
reclassified as discontinued operations in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. In
addition, certain immaterial errors as discussed in Note 1 of the Notes to condensed consolidated
financial statements have been corrected in the comparative data for the three months ended March
31, 2008.
Following the disposition of the Companys CodeGear division, we now operate under one
reporting segment. Our single segment focuses on our Open Application Lifecycle Management
solutions, or ALM, which represents the segment of the ALM market in which vendors solutions are
flexible enough to support a customers specific processes, tools and platforms. Open ALM is a new,
customer-centric approach to helping IT organizations transform software delivery into a managed,
efficient and predictable business process. We are a leading vendor of Open ALM solutions. Our
solutions address five critical ALM processes: project & portfolio management, requirements
definition & management, lifecycle quality management, software change management and model driven
development. Open ALM products include Tempo, TeamFocus, CaliberRM, Caliber DefineIT, SilkCentral
Test Manager, SilkPerformer, SilkTest, Gauntlet, Together and StarTeam. We also offer services
aimed at streamlining the path to software process improvement, including technical support,
consulting and education services. Our Deployment Products Group, or DPG, includes our VisiBroker
and AppServer products. Our deployment products are application middleware for high-performance,
low-latency, transaction-intensive applications.
22
Impact of the Economic Climate on Our Operating Results and Market Capitalization
We have experienced declines in our revenue over the past several quarters, as shown by our
results above and the analysis below. We believe the continued deterioration of the global economy
has contributed to our performance. In addition, the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against
certain of the functional currencies of our significant subsidiaries also negatively impacted our
revenues, although this impact was partially offset by similar reductions in operating expenses.
The strength of the global economy has recently been in decline due to several factors, including
difficulties in the residential real estate and mortgage markets, volatility in fuel and other
energy costs and problems in the financial services and credit markets. We believe such
macroeconomic factors affect the budgeting and purchasing behavior of our customers. In addition,
we believe that the declines in our stock price and market capitalization have been adversely
impacted by our performance and the global economy as well. We have engaged in cost cutting and
cost saving initiatives with a goal of minimizing the impact of these factors to our overall
results. However, we cannot predict when the economy, our operating results or our stock price may
improve. Uncertainty about future economic conditions also makes it difficult for us to forecast
operating results and to make decisions about future costs and investments.
Summary of Key Financial Results
The following is a summary of our key financial results for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
Total revenues decreased 24% to $35.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
from $46.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
License and other revenues decreased 26% to $13.7 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009, from $18.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues decreased 23% to $21.3 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009, from $27.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Hewlett Packard that provides them
with software licenses, related maintenance and support during 2009. In addition, the
agreement gives them the right to resell Borlands ALM products. The revenue for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 was approximately $6.6 million. Total revenue and cash receipts
related to the software, maintenance and support sale are expected to be approximately $18
million in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit as a percentage of revenue is relatively flat for the three months ended
March 31, 2009, and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses decreased 30% to $32.2 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009, from $46.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $1.9 million, compared to a net
loss of $25.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased $33.1 million to $134.6
million as of March 31, 2009, from $167.7 million as of December 31, 2008 due primarily to
$27.5 million of cash used to repurchase $44.3 million of our outstanding Senior Notes.
Refer to Note 5 of the Notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
Results of Operations
The following table presents our total revenues and the absolute dollar and percentage change
from the comparable prior year period (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total Rev
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total Rev
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
License and other revenues
|
|
$
|
13,724
|
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
$
|
18,537
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
$
|
(4,813
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
%)
|
Service revenues
|
|
|
21,326
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
27,522
|
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
(6,196
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
35,050
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
46,059
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
(11,009
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
We derive revenues from the license of our software and the sale of related services. We had
one customer representing more than 10% of our total revenues in the three months ended March 31,
2009.
On March 31, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Hewlett Packard that provides them with
software licenses, related maintenance and support. In addition, the agreement gives them the
right to resell Borlands ALM products. The revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was
approximately $6.6 million. Total revenue and cash receipts related to the software, maintenance
and support sale are expected to be approximately $18 million in 2009.
Revenues by Product
We have two major product categories: the ALM product group includes products such as Tempo,
TeamFocus, Caliber, Together, Silk and Gauntlet; and the Deployment Product Group (DPG) consists
of VisiBroker, AppServer and other products.
The following table presents revenues by product group (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
ALM
|
|
|
DPG
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
ALM
|
|
|
DPG
|
|
|
Total
|
|
License and other revenues
|
|
$
|
10,171
|
|
|
$
|
3,553
|
|
|
$
|
13,724
|
|
|
$
|
9,415
|
|
|
$
|
9,122
|
|
|
$
|
18,537
|
|
Service revenues
|
|
|
17,564
|
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
21,326
|
|
|
|
22,972
|
|
|
|
4,550
|
|
|
|
27,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
27,735
|
|
|
$
|
7,315
|
|
|
$
|
35,050
|
|
|
$
|
32,387
|
|
|
$
|
13,672
|
|
|
$
|
46,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License and Other Revenues
License and other revenues represent amounts for license fees and royalties earned for
granting customers the right to use and distribute our software products. Although revenue
recognition for software licenses may be affected by numerous aspects of a contract, for the
majority of our customer contracts, we recognize software license revenue upon shipment of the
product. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, license and other revenues decreased $4.8
million or 26% as compared to the same period in the prior year, principally driven by decreases in
DPG license and other revenues. DPG license and other revenues decreased 61% or $5.6 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same
period in the prior year due to large deals in the year ago quarter
that were not repeated this quarter. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in
ALM license and other revenues of $0.8 million.
As of March 31, 2009, sales order backlog for license revenues was insignificant.
Service Revenues
Service revenues represent amounts earned for technical support, which includes call support,
maintenance and upgrades and for consulting and education services for our software products. For
the three months ended March 31, 2009, services revenue decreased to $21.3 million from $27.5
million, representing a 23% decrease as compared to the same period in the prior year.
The following table presents our service revenues (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total Rev
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total Rev
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
Technical support
|
|
$
|
17,999
|
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
$
|
20,901
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
$
|
(2,902
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
%)
|
Consulting and
education
|
|
|
3,327
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
6,621
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
(3,294
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total services revenues
|
|
$
|
21,326
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
$
|
27,522
|
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
$
|
(6,196
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, technical support revenue decreased to $18.0
million from $20.9 million, representing a 14% decrease as compared to the same period in the prior
year. The decrease was due to the decline in support revenues for our Caliber, Together, and Silk
products.
24
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, consulting and education services revenues
decreased to $3.3 million from $6.6 million, representing a 50% decrease as compared to the same
period in the prior year. The decrease was primarily attributable to the lower consulting
revenues for ALM products due to lower volume of license transactions.
As of March 31, 2009, sales order backlog was insignificant.
International Revenues
International revenues represented 44% and 58% of total revenues for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The following table presents our total revenues by country
and the absolute dollar and percentage change from the comparable prior year period (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
19,772
|
|
|
$
|
19,429
|
|
|
$
|
343
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Japan
|
|
|
2,783
|
|
|
|
8,366
|
|
|
|
(5,583
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
%)
|
All other countries
|
|
|
12,495
|
|
|
|
18,264
|
|
|
|
(5,769
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
35,050
|
|
|
$
|
46,059
|
|
|
$
|
(11,009
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The revenues from the United States accounted for greater than 10% of total revenues in the
three months ended March 31, 2009. No single country, other than the United States and Japan
accounted for revenues greater than 10% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Regional Revenues
The following table presents our total revenues by region and the absolute dollar and the
percentage change from the comparable prior year period (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
Americas
|
|
$
|
23,218
|
|
|
$
|
24,428
|
|
|
$
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
%)
|
Europe, Middle East
and Africa
|
|
|
7,547
|
|
|
|
10,880
|
|
|
|
(3,333
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
%)
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
4,285
|
|
|
|
10,751
|
|
|
|
(6,466
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
35,050
|
|
|
$
|
46,059
|
|
|
$
|
(11,009
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Americas operations include our activities in the United States as well as subsidiaries in
Brazil and Canada. Our Europe, Middle East and Africa, or EMEA operations include activities of our
subsidiaries and branch offices in France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United
Kingdom. Our Asia Pacific or APAC operations include activities of our subsidiaries and branch
offices in Japan, Singapore, Australia and India.
Americas.
Revenues in our Americas region decreased 5% to $23.2 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2009, from $24.4 million in the same period in the prior year. The decrease is
primarily attributable to lower ALM service revenues for the quarter ended March 31,
2009.
EMEA.
Revenues in our EMEA region decreased 31% to $7.5 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2009, from $10.9 million in the same period in the prior year. Of the overall decrease in
revenues, EMEAs license revenues decreased $1.2 million and service revenues decreased $2.1
million.
APAC.
Revenues in our APAC region decreased 60% to $4.3 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2009, from $10.7 million in the same period in the prior year primarily attributable to a
$6.3 million decrease in license and other revenues. This decrease was due primarily to large deals
in the year-ago quarter that were not repeated this quarter.
25
Cost of revenues
The following table presents cost of revenues and the absolute dollar and percentage changes
from the comparable prior year period (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
Cost of license and other revenues
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of license and
other revenues
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service revenues
|
|
$
|
5,918
|
|
|
$
|
8,864
|
|
|
$
|
(2,946
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of service revenues
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles
|
|
$
|
1,929
|
|
|
$
|
2,100
|
|
|
$
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of License and Other Revenues
Cost of license and other revenues consist primarily of variable costs including royalties
paid to third-party vendors, production costs and product packaging costs. Cost of license and
other revenues increased $268,000 from $677,000 to $945,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2009 as compared to the same period in the prior year. Costs of licensing and other revenues tend
to fluctuate with changes in product mix. Cost of license and other revenues increased primarily
due to costs incurred in connection with a product distributorship arrangement in Brazil which
began in the second quarter of 2008. These costs were partially offset by a decrease of cost
associated with the manufacturing of our products in 2009.
Cost of Service Revenues
Cost of service revenues consists primarily of employee salaries and benefits, third-party
contractor costs and related expenses incurred in providing technical support and consulting and
education services. Cost of service revenues decreased $2.9 million from $8.9 million to $5.9
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in the prior year.
The cost of services as a percentage of service revenues decreased to 28% from 32% in prior period
due to improved resource utilization.
Amortization of Acquired Intangibles
Amortization of acquired intangibles consists of the amortization of acquired developed
technology, maintenance agreements and customer relationships. Amortization of acquired intangibles
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $1.9 million and $2.1 million, respectively.
Operating Expenses
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
The following table presents our selling, general and administrative expenses and the absolute
dollar and percentage change from the comparable prior year period (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
20,128
|
|
|
$
|
33,061
|
|
|
$
|
(12,933
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily consist of employee salaries and
benefits, sales commissions, marketing programs, professional fees, facilities and equipment costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $12.9 million from $33.1 million to $20.1
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in the prior year.
As a percentage of total revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from 72%
to 57% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in the prior year.
The decrease was primarily due to reduced employee compensation, outside services, and benefits and
other employee related expenses. These reductions are attributable to our ongoing restructuring
activities combined with continued optimization of our back-office operations and infrastructure.
26
Research and Development Expenses
The following table presents our research and development expenses and the absolute dollar and
percentage change from the comparable prior year period (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
$
|
10,564
|
|
|
$
|
11,787
|
|
|
$
|
(1,223
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses primarily consist of employee salaries, benefits, and
related costs of our engineering staff, external engineering costs, and facilities and equipment
costs. Research and development expenses decreased by $1.2 million from $11.8 million to $10.6
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in the prior year.
The decrease in research and development expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as
compared to the prior year period is primarily attributable to reduced employee compensation.
Impairment of Goodwill, Restructuring, Amortization of Other Intangibles, and Acquisition-Related
Expenses
Impairment of Goodwill
: During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company recorded
non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $13.3 million as a result of an impairment test performed in
anticipation of the CodeGear Asset Sale. This amount was reclassified as loss from discontinued
operations in June 30, 2008 as discussed in Note 6 of the Notes to the condensed consolidated
financial statements. All of the remaining goodwill balances were written off in the third and
fourth quarter of 2008.
The following table summarizes our restructuring, amortization of other intangibles and
acquisition-related expenses and the absolute dollar and percentage change from the comparable
prior year period (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
$
|
1,397
|
|
|
$
|
1,249
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Other charges
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,544
|
|
|
$
|
1,463
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring:
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded a net
expense of $1.4 million which is primarily related to accruals for employees notified of their
termination in the first quarter of 2009.
The total restructuring charges and related cash outlays are based on our current estimates,
which may change materially if significant fluctuations in foreign currencies occur, if further
consolidations are required or if actual lease-related expenditures or sublease income differ from
amounts currently expected. We review the status of our restructuring activities quarterly and, if
appropriate, record changes in estimates related to our restructuring obligations in current
operations. As a result of our 2008 restructuring activities, we expect to realize annualized
savings of $12.0 to $14.0 million.
Because the cost benefits related to our restructuring activities are derived from
managements estimates, which are based on currently available information, our restructurings may
not achieve the cost savings anticipated within the timetable or at the level currently
contemplated. Please see Note 7 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for more details
on our restructuring actions.
Other charges.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we incurred $119,000 of
amortization expense, respectively, related to non-compete agreements and trade names, compared to
$142,000 in the comparable prior year period.
27
Interest Income, Interest Expense, Gain on Debt Repurchase and Other Income, net
The following table presents our interest income, interest expense and other expense, net and
the absolute dollar and percentage change from the comparable prior year period ( in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
745
|
|
|
$
|
1,752
|
|
|
$
|
(1,007
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
%)
|
Interest expense (includes
non-cash debt discount
amortization of $1,627 for 2009
and $2,007 for 2008)
|
|
|
(2,883
|
)
|
|
|
(3,658
|
)
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
(21
|
%)
|
Gain on debt repurchase
|
|
|
9,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,961
|
|
|
$
|
(1,324
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,285
|
|
|
|
-701
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
-3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income consists primarily of interest earned on cash and cash equivalents. The
decrease in interest income in the three month periods ended March 31, 2009, as compared to the
same period in the prior year was primarily attributable to lower average invested cash balances
and lower interest rates. Interest expense consists primarily of interest expense related to the
Senior Notes (see Note 5 of the Notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements). Interest expense for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 included non-cash debt discount amortization of $1.6
million and $2.0 million, respectively.
Other expense, net consists primarily of foreign exchange transaction gains and losses. Other
income, net for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, primarily represents net foreign
currency gains and losses resulting from fluctuations in the U.S. dollar versus the foreign
currencies in which we conduct business.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company repurchased $44.3 million of the
outstanding Senior Notes for consideration of $27.5 million in cash, comprised of $0.1 million in
accrued interest and $27.4 million in principal. The Company recorded a gain of $9.9 million upon
the repurchase of its Senior Notes.
Income Taxes
The following table presents our income taxes and the absolute dollar and percentage change
from the comparable prior year periods (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
|
$
|
1,274
|
|
|
$
|
(889
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage of total revenues
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On a consolidated basis, we generated a pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations of
$2.0 million and $(13.2) million in the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The decrease in our income tax provision in the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to
the same period in the prior year was largely due to a decrease in the allocation of non-U.S.
pre-tax profits subject to foreign taxes and discrete tax In the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008, substantially all of our tax provision related to non-U.S. taxes.
Our effective tax rate is primarily dependent on the location of taxable profits, if any, and
the utilization of our net operating loss carry forwards in certain jurisdictions. Our tax rate is
also affected by the imposition of withholding taxes on revenues regardless of our profitability.
28
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008 (Restated)
|
|
|
|
(in Thousands)
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(4,212
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,273
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
19,038
|
|
|
|
(1,048
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(26,888
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(2,128
|
)
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(14,190
|
)
|
|
|
(4,263
|
)
|
Beginning cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
108,132
|
|
|
|
90,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
93,942
|
|
|
$
|
86,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities.
Net cash used in operating activities in the three
months ended March 31, 2009, was $4.2 million, compared to $5.3 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2008. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, our operating activities were
impacted by net income of $1.9 million, which was offset by non-cash adjustments of approximately
$4.9 million. Non-cash adjustments consisted primarily of gains on repurchase of our Senior Notes
of $9.9 million, which was partially offset by depreciation and amortization expenses of $3.0
million, amortization of debt discount upon adoption of FSP APB 14-1 of
$1.6 million, and stock-based compensation of $477,000. Additionally, our operating activities
were impacted by changes in operating assets and liabilities of $1.2 million, primarily due to
severance payments during 2009, partially offset by an increase in our restructuring accrual.
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities.
Net cash provided by investing activities
during the three months ended March 31, 2009, was $19.0 million, compared to a use of cash of $1.0
million in the three months ended March 31, 2008. Cash provided during the three months ended March
31, 2009 was primarily driven by $19.0 million in net sales of investment securities. Cash used in
the three months ended March 31, 2008 primarily consisted of $2.0 million cash used in the
acquisition of Simunication and purchases of property and equipment of $570,000, partially offset
by $1.5 million of cash received from net sale of investment securities.
Net
cash used in financing activities.
Net cash used in financing activities
during the three months ended March 31, 2009, was $26.9 million compared to $29,000 in the three
months ended March 31, 2008. Cash used in financing activities in the current year primarily
consists of $27.4 million of cash to repurchase $44.3 million of our outstanding Senior Notes.
Currency.
A portion of our business is conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The
functional currency for all of our foreign operations is the local currency of the country in which
we have established business operations. Both revenues and operating expenses in each of those
countries are largely denominated in local currencies, which mitigate a portion of the exposure
related to fluctuations in local currencies against the U.S. dollar.
The weakening of the U.S. Dollar against the Euro, the United Kingdom Pound Sterling, the
Australian and Singapore dollars and the Japanese Yen could harm our financial condition. We cannot
predict currency exchange rate fluctuations and there can be no assurance that foreign currency
exchange rates will not have a material adverse impact on our future cash flows and operating
results. As of March 31, 2009, there are no outstanding foreign exchange contracts. Refer to Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk for additional discussion of
foreign currency risk.
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Leases and Long Term Debt Obligations.
We lease our offices and operating facilities and
certain furniture and equipment under various operating leases.
29
At March 31, 2009, future minimum lease payments and contractual sublease rental income under
non-cancelable leases, lessor financed capital expenditure and future principal and interest
payments under the Senior Notes outstanding were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
thereafter
|
|
|
Other (e)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Operating leases (a)
|
|
$
|
5,371
|
|
|
$
|
5,875
|
|
|
$
|
4,663
|
|
|
$
|
3,936
|
|
|
$
|
3,720
|
|
|
$
|
10,064
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,629
|
|
Restructured operating leases (b)
|
|
|
4,737
|
|
|
|
2,627
|
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,239
|
|
Non-current income tax payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,016
|
|
|
|
17,016
|
|
Convertible senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,984
|
|
Interest payments (c)
|
|
|
1,581
|
|
|
|
3,162
|
|
|
|
3,162
|
|
|
|
1,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,486
|
|
Lessor financed capital expediture (f)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross commitments
|
|
|
11,764
|
|
|
|
11,772
|
|
|
|
9,368
|
|
|
|
122,094
|
|
|
|
4,857
|
|
|
|
10,358
|
|
|
|
17,016
|
|
|
|
187,229
|
|
Sublease rental income (d)
|
|
|
(1,056
|
)
|
|
|
(414
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,461
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net commitments
|
|
$
|
10,708
|
|
|
$
|
11,358
|
|
|
$
|
9,241
|
|
|
$
|
121,967
|
|
|
$
|
4,730
|
|
|
$
|
9,748
|
|
|
$
|
17,016
|
|
|
$
|
184,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
The Company leases its facilities under various cancellable and non-cancellable operating
leases. The payments for operating leases represent the Companys commitments under the
non-cancellable leases, which expire at various times through 2021.
|
|
(b)
|
|
The restructured operating leases represent total lease commitments that are not associated
with continuing operations and include facilities exited under the Companys restructuring
plans. All of these facilities are located in California.
|
|
(c)
|
|
The interest payments are based on a fixed rate of 2.75%.
|
|
(d)
|
|
The sublease rental income represents the future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable
operating subleases of facilities in the Companys various world-wide locations.
|
|
(e)
|
|
Represents the non-current tax payable obligation under FIN 48 (including interest and
penalties). We are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of payments in
individual years beyond 12 months due to uncertainties in the timing of tax audit outcomes.
|
|
(f)
|
|
Lessor financed capital
expenditure at an interest rate of 10%.
|
Rent expense is recorded straight-line over the term of the respective leases. Lease
incentives are amortized on a straight line basis over the lease term against rent expense in
accordance with FAS 13 and FASB Technical Bulletin No. 88-1,
Issues Relating to Accounting for
Leases
. Rent expense, net, for all operating leases was $1.3 million and $2.1 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in rent expense from the prior
year periods relates to facility exits under our restructuring initiatives.
FIN 48 Liability.
As of March 31, 2009, the liability for uncertain tax positions, net of
offsetting tax benefits associated with the correlative effects of potential transfer pricing
adjustments, state income taxes, and interest deductions is $17.0 million, of which none is
expected to be paid within one year. The balance of $17.0 million is recorded in other long-term
liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.
As part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in
material transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial
partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance, variable interest or
special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating
off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of March 31,
2009, we are not involved in any material unconsolidated transactions.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. The application of GAAP requires us to make
estimates that affect our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and
related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Changes in these accounting estimates are
reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Accordingly, actual results could differ
significantly from the estimates made by us. To the extent there are material differences between
these estimates and actual results, our future financial statement presentation of our financial
condition or results of operations will be affected.
We describe our significant accounting policies in Note 2 of the Notes to consolidated
financial statements and we discuss our critical accounting policies and estimates in MD&A in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
30
There have been no material changes to the critical accounting policies disclosed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the SEC on
March 6, 2009, except for the following:
|
|
|
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP APB 14-1, which impacts the
accounting treatment of our Senior Notes since they allow for either mandatory or optional
cash settlements. FSP APB 14-1 requires the Company to separately account for the liability
(debt) and equity (conversion option) components of the Senior Notes in a manner that
reflects the Companys non-convertible debt borrowing rate, resulting in additional
non-cash interest expense based on the market rate for similar debt instruments without the
conversion feature. Upon the original issuance of the debt instruments in 2007, the
Company recorded the net debt obligation as long-term debt in accordance with applicable
accounting standards at that time. To adopt FSP APB 14-1, effective January 1, 2009, the
Company estimated the fair value, as of the date of issuance, of the Senior Notes as if
they were issued without the conversion options. The difference between the fair value and
the principal amounts of the Senior Notes was $46.0 million. This amount was
retrospectively applied to the Companys financial statements from the issuance date of
Senior Notes in 2007, and was retrospectively recorded as debt discount and as a component
of shareholders equity. The discount is being amortized until the Senior Notes mature in
February 2012, resulting in a non-cash increase to interest expense in historical and
future periods.
|
Effect of New Accounting Pronouncements
For information regarding the effect of new accounting pronouncements, refer to Note 1 of our
Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risks relating to our operations result primarily from changes in interest rates and
foreign currency exchange rates, as well as credit risk concentrations. To address the foreign
currency exchange rate risk we enter into various foreign currency forward exchange contracts as
described below. We do not use financial instruments for trading purposes.
Foreign Currency Risk
A portion of our business is conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The
functional currency for all of our foreign operations is the local currency of the country in which
we have established business operations. Both revenues and operating expenses in each of those
countries are largely denominated in local currencies, which mitigate a portion of the exposure
related to fluctuations in local currencies against the U.S. dollar. However, our financial results
could still be adversely affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or
weak economic conditions in foreign markets.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded net realized and unrealized foreign
exchange gains of $177,000 included as part of other expense, in our Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations related to financial instruments denominated in foreign currencies. The
foreign exchange gains were generated primarily from fluctuations in the Euro, the United Kingdom
Pound Sterling and the Brazilian Real versus the U.S. dollar. It is uncertain whether these
currency trends will continue. In the future we may experience foreign exchange losses on our
inter-company receivables and payables to the extent that we have not mitigated our exposure
utilizing foreign currency forward exchange contracts. Foreign exchange losses could have a
material adverse effect on our operating results and cash flows.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2009, we had $6.1 million in unrealized foreign
currency gains in accumulated other comprehensive income in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets, in part, due to foreign currency movements on our long-term inter-company balances
and currency translation adjustments arising from converting our foreign operations to U.S.
dollars. As of March 31, 2009, we had $11.8 million, $4.5 million, $1.3 million, and $879,000 in
long-term inter-company receivable balances that will be settled in Singapore dollars, Indian
Rupees, Brazilian Real, and Australian dollars, respectively and $2.7 million in long-term
inter-company payable balances that will be settled in Euros.
Interest Rate Risk
The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing
income without significantly increasing risk. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest
rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio. We do not use derivative financial instruments
in our investment portfolio. Our investment strategy to achieve this objective is by investing
available funds in a portfolio of cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments in a
variety of securities, including but not limited to government and corporate securities, time
deposits and money market funds. These securities are classified as available-for-sale and
consequently are recorded on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with
unrealized gains or losses reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss), net of estimated tax.
Short-term investments
. At March 31, 2009, our cash and cash equivalents consisted primarily
of commercial paper. Short-term investments consist of marketable securities, including but not
limited to corporate notes, corporate bonds and medium-term notes in large U.S. institutions and
governmental agencies. Our marketable securities that are classified as short-term investments will
mature in less than one year from March 31, 2009. These securities are classified as
available-for-sale and are recorded at their estimated fair value.
31
At March 31, 2009, our short term investment balance was $40.6 million. A hypothetical
increase of 25 basis points in interest rates would reduce our marketable securities balance by
approximately $20,900. Actual results may differ from this estimate.
Credit Risks
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk
consist principally of cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and trade accounts
receivable. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our
investment portfolio. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio.
We place our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments in a variety of financial
instruments, including but not limited to government and corporate securities, time deposits and
money market funds. These securities are generally classified as available-for-sale and
consequently are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value with unrealized gains or losses
reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of estimated taxes.
The Company offers credit terms on the sale of the software products to distributors, retail
dealers and certain end-user customers. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its
customers financial condition and, generally, requires no collateral from our customers. The
Company maintains an allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable based upon the expected
collectability of all accounts receivable. A specific bad debt reserve of up to 100% of the invoice
value is provided for balances deemed uncollectable. A reserve is established for all other
accounts based on the age of the invoices. Delinquent account balances are written-off after
management has determined that the likelihood of collection is not probable. As of March 31, 2009,
the Company had one single customer that represents greater than 10% of total accounts receivable,
net of allowances, and 10% of total revenues.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Our Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) are those controls
and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to our management, including the Chief Financial Officer, who is our Principal Financial Officer,
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures
pursuant to the Exchange Act rules as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based upon
this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of
March 31, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide a reasonable level
of assurance that the financial information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or
submit under the Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately within
the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended March 31, 2009, which our management concluded have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
32
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we are involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings,
consisting of intellectual property, commercial, employment and other matters, which arise in the
ordinary course of business. In accordance with SFAS 5,
Accounting for Contingencies
we record a
liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss
can be reasonably estimated. These accruals are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect
the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other information
and events pertaining to a particular case. Litigation is inherently unpredictable; however, we
believe that we have valid defenses with respect to the legal matters pending against us, as well
as adequate accruals for any probable and estimable losses. If an unanticipated unfavorable ruling
or settlement were to occur in any of these matters in a particular period, our liquidity and
financial condition could be adversely impacted, as well as our results of operations and cash
flows.
From time to time, we receive notices from third-parties claiming infringement by our products
of third-party patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights, disputing royalties, or
disputing other commercial arrangements. Regardless of the merit of any such claim, responding to
these claims could be time consuming and expensive, and may require us to enter into licensing or
royalty agreements which may not be offered or available on terms acceptable to us. If a successful
claim is made against us, our business could be materially and adversely affected. We expect that
our software products will increasingly be subject to such claims as the number of products and
competitors in our industry segment increases, the functionality of products overlap and industry
participants become more aggressive in protecting their patents.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves many risks, some of which are
beyond our control. The following discussion highlights some of these risks. Additional risks and
uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our
business operations or results. If any of these risks actually occur, our business operations or
results could be harmed. Risk Factors that have been added or have materially changed since the
filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, are identified with
an *.
Risks relating to the Proposed Merger *
There is no guarantee that the proposed acquisition of us by Micro Focus
will close.
As described in Note 11, “Subsequent Events,”
to our unaudited consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q, and as previously announced by us on May 6,
2009, we entered into an agreement with Micro Focus International plc (“Micro Focus”) pursuant to which
Micro Focus will acquire all the outstanding shares of us in a cash merger transaction. There are factors that may
cause the proposed transaction not to close. These factors include, but are not limited to, (1) the occurrence of
any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the merger agreement with Micro
Focus; (2) the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against us and others following
announcement of the transaction or the merger agreement; and (3) the inability to complete the merger due to the
failure to satisfy conditions to completion of the merger. There are also risks relating to the proposed transaction,
including the potential disruption of current plans and operations and the potential difficulties in employee retention
as a result of the merger. We will file a proxy statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to
the proposed merger that will provide additional important information about the proposed transaction and the
associated risks. Information on how to obtain a free-of-charge copy is provided in Note 11 above.
Risks Relating to Our Business
We have evolved our business to focus on the enterprise market for application lifecycle
management, or ALM, software solutions, which is a complex and evolving market. If we are unable to
successfully achieve our strategic goals, our operating results could be harmed. The recent sale of
the CodeGear assets could increase this risk.
We have been in the process of evolving our business over the last few years to focus on Open
ALM as our core business. ALM is a relatively new and evolving market. These factors make it
difficult for us to predict our likelihood of success. There is a limited history upon which to
base assumptions as to our probability of success and we are in the process of developing and
implementing new products, solutions and sales and marketing strategies. The change in the primary
focus of our business from IDE to Open ALM has involved significant changes in our go-to-market
strategy, our sales and services organizations and sales cycles and our marketing strategies. If we
are not able to successfully develop and implement our new strategies, our business and operating
results will be harmed.
We sold substantially all of the CodeGear assets to Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. on June 30,
2008. While we believe this will enable us to focus on Open ALM as our core business, as a result
of the sale, we will no longer have the revenue stream or the profit contribution from the CodeGear
business. If we are not able to achieve the goals of our Open ALM business, our operating results
and financial condition may be harmed.
33
Our success is dependent upon our ability to develop effective products which meet our customers
complex and evolving needs and to integrate our products into effective ALM solutions.
We produce and sell a broad portfolio of products to manage the software development process.
The market for these products is characterized by continuous technological advancement, evolving
industry standards and changing customer requirements. Our customers use a wide variety of
constantly changing hardware, software and operating platforms. While we plan to continue to invest
resources to develop products for new or emerging software and hardware platforms in the server,
desktop, mobile and other environments that may develop, there is a risk that a new hardware or
software platform for which we do not provide products could rapidly grow in popularity. In
particular, we believe that this risk is substantial for particular proprietary platforms and
languages for which we may not be given economically feasible access or access at all. As a result,
we may not be in a position to develop products for such platforms or may be late in doing so. If
we fail to introduce new products that address the needs of emerging market segments or if our new
products do not achieve market acceptance as a result of delays in development or other factors,
our future growth and revenue opportunity could suffer.
A significant portion of our research and development focus is on integrating our existing and
recently acquired products into cohesive ALM solutions. Managing our development activities as we
gain experience in the evolving ALM market is complex and involves a number of risks. We may not be
successful in designing and marketing new products, integrating products into cohesive solutions or
providing the necessary enhancements or features to address the sophisticated and varied needs of
our customers. To be successful in this market, we will also need to be able to compete with
several large and well-established companies with more experience and resources.
We may not be able to compete successfully against current and potential competitors.
Our markets are intensely competitive. In the market for comprehensive software development
solutions, we face competition from some of the largest software providers in the world. For
example, IBM, Microsoft, Sun Microsystems, Hewlett-Packard, Computer Associates and others provide
or have stated they intend to provide comprehensive enterprise software development and integration
solutions. Traditionally, we have partnered with some of these competitors to offer a broader
solution to their or our customer base; however, as our partners and business strategy change, a
larger market overlap may develop and some or all of these partnering arrangements could be
adversely affected or terminated. Most of these competitors have substantially greater financial,
management, marketing and technical resources than we have. In addition, many of our competitors
have well established relationships with our current and potential customers, extensive knowledge
of the market, substantial experience in selling enterprise solutions, strong professional services
and technical support offerings and extensive product development, sales and marketing resources.
As a result of their greater resources and established relationships, these competitors may be more
successful than we are at developing and marketing products and solutions in our markets.
Our inability to forecast our revenue pipeline or convert revenue pipeline into contracts,
especially given our focus on enterprise customers, could increase fluctuations in our revenue and
financial results.
We use a pipeline system, a common industry practice, to forecast sales and trends in our
business. Our sales personnel monitor the status of all potential transactions, including the
estimated closing date and potential dollar amount of each transaction. We aggregate these
estimates periodically to generate a sales pipeline and then evaluate the pipeline to identify
trends in our business. This pipeline analysis and related estimates of revenue may differ
significantly from actual revenues in a particular reporting period. When customers delay
purchasing decisions, reduce the amount of their purchases or cancel their purchases altogether, it
will reduce the rate of conversion of the pipeline into contracts and our revenues will be harmed.
In addition, because a substantial portion of our software license contracts close in the latter
part of a quarter, we may not be able to adjust our cost structure to respond to a variation in the
conversion of the pipeline into contracts in a timely manner. Our inability to respond to a
variation in the pipeline or in the conversion of the pipeline into contracts in a timely manner,
or at all, could cause us to plan or budget inaccurately and thereby could adversely affect our
results of operations and financial condition.
A significant portion of our business involves licenses of our software that are made directly
to large enterprises. These large transactions involve multiple elements and tend to be lengthy and
unpredictable. Sales to enterprise customers generally require substantial time, effort and money
as we aim to establish relationships and educate them about our solutions. Also, sales to
enterprise customers generally require an extensive sales effort throughout many levels within the
customers organization and often require final approval by several layers of the customers
executives. These factors substantially extend the sales cycle and increase the uncertainty of
whether a sale will be made in any particular quarter, or at all. We have experienced and expect to
continue to experience delays and uncertainties in our sales cycles as well as increased up-front
expenses in connection with our enterprise sales efforts. The timing of the execution of enterprise
volume licenses could cause our results of operations to vary significantly from quarter to
quarter, especially when we anticipate certain transactions will close in a particular quarter.
Further, industry buying patterns suggest that larger transactions are frequently deferred until
later in the quarter, creating increased difficulty in quarterly forecasting. If a sale is never
completed despite months or even years of selling efforts, we will have expended substantial time,
money and resources during the pre-sales effort without generating any revenue to offset these
expenses. Finally, due to the complexity and time commitment necessary to pursue each of these
transactions, we focus on a small number of proposed sales at any time and if we fail to complete
any of these sales, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be negatively
affected.
34
Adverse global economic conditions could adversely affect our customers and, in turn, our operating
results.
Uncertainty about future economic conditions makes it difficult for us to forecast operating
results and to make decisions about future investments. The strength of the global economy has
recently been increasingly uncertain due to several factors, including difficulties in the
residential real estate and mortgage markets, volatility in fuel and other energy costs and
problems in the financial services and credit markets. Such macroeconomic factors affect the
budgeting and purchasing behavior of our customers. If economic growth is slowed or uncertain, many
customers may delay or reduce technology purchases. This could result in reductions in sales of our
products and services, longer sales cycles, slower adoption of new technologies and increased price
competition. Any of these events would likely harm our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
The complexity of accounting regulations and related interpretations and policies, particularly
those related to revenue recognition, could limit our ability to predict our revenue and materially
affect our financial results for a given period.
Although we use standardized agreements designed to meet current revenue recognition criteria
under generally accepted accounting principles, we must often negotiate and revise terms and
conditions of these standardized agreements, particularly in multi-product license and services
transactions. As our transactions have increased in complexity, particularly with the sale of
larger, multi-product licenses, negotiation of mutually acceptable terms and conditions may require
us to defer recognition of revenue on such licenses. We believe that we are in compliance with
Statement of Position 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition
, and related interpretations; however,
more complex, multi-product license transactions require additional accounting analysis to account
for them accurately. Errors in such analysis in any period could lead to unanticipated changes in
our revenue accounting practices and may affect the timing of revenue recognition, which could
adversely affect our financial results for any given period. If we discover that we have
interpreted and applied revenue recognition rules differently than prescribed by generally accepted
accounting principles in the U.S, we could be required to devote significant management resources,
and incur the expense associated with an audit, restatement or other examination of our
consolidated financial statements.
Our failure to implement systems to meet the requirements and manage the large service projects
necessary for our enterprise may result in delays in recognizing revenue on these projects and thus
could harm our profit and adversely affect our results of operations.
Our enterprise business focuses on large, complex professional services agreements. Our
inability to structure and manage services agreements may result in unanticipated changes to the
timing of our services revenue. In addition, if we bundle services together with our license
agreements, this may also affect the timing of recognizing our license revenue. We may need to
implement new systems or upgrade current systems to manage these large, complex services
agreements. If we fail to make appropriate changes to our existing systems or if our services
agreements lead to unanticipated changes to the timing of revenue recognition, our results of
operations could be harmed.
We have recently made changes to our executive officers and management. There may be an adjustment
period which could cause inefficiencies in the management of our business and our operations. *
On December 31, 2008, Tod Nielsen, our former President and Chief Executive Officer resigned
and Erik E. Prusch, who was originally hired as our Chief Financial Officer, was appointed as our
Acting President and Chief Executive Officer, in accordance with our succession plan. We had a
succession plan in place and the Chairman of our Board took on additional oversight duties until
May 5, 2009, when Mr. Prusch was confirmed as our President and Chief Executive Officer. We
appointed a new Chief Financial Officer in March 2009. We also restructured other management
positions in January and February related to our cost cutting efforts described below. These
changes included departures of our former Senior Vice President of Research & Development in
January 2009 and our former Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in February 2009.
We promoted from within to fill these roles. Prior to these changes, in the third quarter of 2008,
we hired a new Senior Vice President of Worldwide Field Operations. We believe we have a qualified
leadership team in place for the company. However, it may take some transition time for the new
management team to learn to work together effectively. There can be no assurance that the changes
in management will lead to an improvement in our ability to execute our business and there is a
risk that our operations may be adversely affected. If our operations are adversely impacted, our
business and financial condition may be harmed.
We are in the process of making changes to our financial reporting systems, which may impact our
ability to comply with our financial reporting and accounting obligations.
We are continuing to implement changes in financial reporting systems both in the US and in
our international regions. While we have taken measures aimed at protecting data and keeping
accurate records, there can be no assurance the transition will be done without causing errors,
delays or inefficiencies. If we fail to staff our accounting and finance function adequately or
maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting, we may be unable to report our
financial results accurately or in a timely manner and our business, results of operations and
financial condition may suffer.
35
We are in the process of implementing plans for reducing expenses and if we fail to achieve the
results we expect, there will be a negative effect on our financial condition.
We implemented restructuring plans during 2007 and 2008, which included the consolidation of
certain office locations, reductions in capital expenditures, reduction in discretionary spending,
reduction in the work force and other cost cutting measures. We may not be able to realize the cost
savings we anticipate from these measures. For example, we may not be able to exit facilities with
long term leases. The reduction in work force has also involved organization changes and efficiency
in our operations may be impacted during the transition period. If we are not able to implement
these measures as planned, further cost reduction efforts may be necessary. Our plans to reduce
expenses may not be completed in a timely manner, which would impair our long-term goal to achieve
sustainable profitability and positive cash flow.
Our common stock has declined over the past two years. If our stock price does not increase, we may
not attract as many investors. In addition, we may be at risk for satisfying the minimum listing
requirements of the Nasdaq Global Market. *
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol BORL. As of May 1,
2009, our 52 week low in our stock price was $0.25. In order for our common stock to continue to be
listed on the Nasdaq Global Market, we must satisfy various listing maintenance standards
established by Nasdaq, including the requirement that to maintain a minimum closing bid price of
$1.00 per share. Nasdaq has waived this requirement until July19, 2009. After the expiration of the
waiver, if our stock price does not stabilize above $1.00 per share, we could risk delisting.
Delisting would limit our ability to attract investors and, more importantly, we would risk
triggering the redemption right of the holders of our 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2012 (the
Senior Notes). If holders exercised their redemption right, we would need to repurchase all of
the outstanding principal and interest on the Senior Notes, which was $115.4 million (par value) as
of March 31, 2009. After redeeming the Senior Notes, we may not have sufficient operating cash. In
such event, we would likely seek to obtain additional financing and/or seek shareholder approval
for a reverse stock split, however there can be no guarantee that we would be able to obtain
financing on favorable terms or at all or that we would obtain shareholder approval. In such
circumstances, our financial condition would be harmed.
In addition, while our stock price remains low, because of the trading volatility often
associated with low-priced stocks, many brokerage firms and institutional investors have internal
policies and practices that either prohibit them from investing in low-priced stocks or tend to
discourage individual brokers from recommending low-priced stocks to their customers. It is also a
factor that most brokerage houses do not permit or favor lower-priced stocks to be used as
collateral for margin accounts for retail investors. The brokerage commissions on the purchase or
sale of lower priced stocks may also represent a higher percentage of the price than the brokerage
commission on higher priced stocks. Our financial condition could be adversely impacted if our
stock price does not increase and stabilize.
We and our prior independent registered public accounting firm previously determined that we had a
material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. There can be no assurance that
a material weakness will not arise in the future. As a result, current and potential stockholders
could lose confidence in our financial reporting and that would harm our business and the trading
price of our stock.
Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to evaluate and determine
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, we reported material weaknesses in our internal control
over financial reporting. We have since remediated these deficiencies and continue to spend time
and resources to ensure compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. As reported
in Section 9A of this Form 10-K, management concluded that our internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008. However, considering that we have and will
continue to evolve our business in a changing marketplace, we are continuing to implement changes
in our ERP systems and will continue to make corresponding changes in our financial reporting
processes, there can be no assurance that material weaknesses will not arise in the future.
Should we or our independent registered public accounting firm, determine in future fiscal
periods that we have a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, the
reliability of our financial reports may be impacted, and our results of operations or financial
condition may be harmed and the price of our common stock may decline.
In prior periods, we were unable to timely file our annual and quarterly reports as required by the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and our continued inability to file these reports on time could
result in your not having access to important information about us and the delisting of our common
stock from the Nasdaq Stock Market.
We were late in filing our Quarterly Reports on Forms 10-Q for the fiscal quarters ended March
31, 2006, June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006. As a result, during the periods in which these
reports were late, we were not in compliance with the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq
Stock Market and, in some cases, with the SECs rules and regulations under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. We are required to comply with these rules as a condition of the continued listing of
our stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market.
36
Although we are not currently late with respect to any annual or quarterly report, there can
be no assurance that we will be able to file all such reports in the future in a timely manner. If
we are unable to timely file these reports in the future, it may impede your access to important
information about us. This could cause us to incur substantial expenses, including an increase in
the interest rate under our Senior Notes issued in February 2007. Further, in the case of a
prolonged delay in filing, our common stock could be delisted from the Nasdaq Stock Market.
Delisting could result in our common stock no longer being traded on any securities exchange or
over-the-counter market and could impact its liquidity and price. In addition, if we were delisted,
we would be in default under the Senior Notes, which would cause the Senior Notes to become
immediately due and payable.
If we are unable to maintain revenue levels for our deployment, or application middleware,
products, our financial results may be harmed.
We currently have a portion of our revenue attributable to our deployment products, which we
also call our application middleware products. These products are mature products and we primarily
rely on new sales to existing customers, maintenance agreements with existing customers, compliance
purchases through customer audits and sales through existing independent software vendors and
original equipment manufacturers partners to generate revenue. We have experienced weakness and
fluctuations in revenue from these products in the past and believe they will continue to be
subject to commoditization. Our deployment products are generally based on older standards and
technologies, which are used in a decreasing number of industries, networks and applications. We
devote little marketing resources to these products and primarily rely on the effectiveness of the
sales force and compliance teams to work with customers and partners to generate sales. There have
been many changes in the sales force over the past several quarters, especially in Europe where we
have historically generated a significant amount of revenue from our deployment products. If we are
unable to maintain effective sales programs for our deployment products, or if existing customers
migrate away from our deployment products, our business, results of operations and financial
condition could suffer.
Because competition for qualified technical and management personnel is intense, we may not be able
to recruit or retain qualified personnel, which could harm our business.
We believe our ability to successfully manage and grow our business and to develop new
products depends, in large part, on our ability to recruit and retain qualified employees,
particularly highly skilled software engineers, sales personnel and management personnel.
Competition for qualified technical and management personnel is intense and in the past some of our
competitors have utilized their greater resources to provide substantial signing bonuses and other
inducements to lure key personnel away from us. We have implemented various cost cutting efforts,
which makes it challenging to retain key people and recruit new talent, as needed. In addition,
since our stock price has declined over the past year, our ability to use equity as a tool to
recruit and retain employees has been limited.
Consolidation in our industry or fluctuation in our stock price may impede our ability to compete
effectively.
Consolidation continues to occur among companies that compete in our markets. Additionally,
some of the largest software and hardware providers in the world have sought to expand their
software and services offerings through acquisitions in the software development, deployment and
integration space. If large providers, who have significantly greater financial, management,
marketing and technical resources than we have, are successful in increasing their offerings in the
software development market, our business will be subject to significant pressure and our ability
to compete effectively harmed. Additionally, changes resulting from these and other consolidations
may harm our competitive position, particularly as certain products, when offered as part of a
bundled suite, are offered for free or are given away to sell more hardware, infrastructure
components or information technology services.
As the trend toward consolidation continues, we may encounter increased competition for
attractive acquisition targets and may have to pay higher prices for those businesses or
technologies we seek to acquire. In addition, we have seen a recent decline in our stock price,
which will in turn make it more difficult for us to use stock as a currency for the acquisition of
strategic businesses or technologies. This will put pressure on our ability to seek out potential
acquisition targets which may impede our growth and our ability to compete effectively.
We depend on technologies licensed to us by third-parties and the loss of or inability to maintain
these licenses could prevent or delay sales or shipments of certain of our products.
We depend on licenses from third-party suppliers for some elements of our products. If any of
our third-party licenses were terminated or were not renewed, or if these third-parties failed to
notify us in a timely manner of any new or updated technology, we might not be able to ship such
products as planned or provide support for such products, including upgrades. We would then have to
seek an alternative to the third-partys technology and, in some cases, an alternative may not
exist. This could result in delays in releasing and/or shipping our products, increased costs by
having to secure unfavorable royalty arrangements or reduced functionality of our products, which
in turn could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
37
Failure to manage our international operations could harm our results.
A substantial portion of our revenues are generated from international sales. In addition, a
significant portion of our operations consist of activities outside the United States. We now have
research and development facilities in several domestic and international locations, and we
currently have a direct sales force in approximately sixteen countries around the world. We have a
complicated corporate structure, and historically have had geographically dispersed operational
controls. In particular, we rely on personnel in our international locations to properly account
for and manage our international operations, which introduce inherent difficulties in management
and control. Given this, we have and may continue to experience difficulty in efficiently and
effectively managing our dispersed and complicated organization. As a result, our results of
operations may suffer. In addition, we are subject to other risks inherent in doing business
internationally, including:
|
|
|
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
|
the difficulty of staffing and managing an organization spread over various countries
and continents;
|
|
|
|
|
potentially reduced or less certain protection for intellectual property rights than is
available under the laws of the United States;
|
|
|
|
|
longer payment cycles in some countries and greater difficulty in collecting accounts
receivable;
|
|
|
|
|
restrictions on the expatriation of currency; foreign taxes, export restrictions,
tariffs, duties and other trade barriers;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory requirements and resulting costs;
|
|
|
|
|
differing cultures and business practices not consistent with our regulatory obligations
in the United States;
|
|
|
|
|
compliance with various conflicting laws and regulations, including employment laws, and
resulting costs; and
|
|
|
|
|
war, threats of war, terrorist activity or political or economic instability in certain
parts of the world.
|
One or more of these risks could harm our future research operations and international sales.
If we are unable to manage these risks of doing business internationally, our business, results of
operations and financial condition could suffer.
Bundling arrangements or product give-aways by our competitors, including available, cost-free
development technologies, may diminish demand for our products or pressure us to reduce our prices.
Some of our competitors, particularly those that are primarily hardware vendors or platform
providers, generate a substantially greater proportion of their sales in markets in which we do not
directly compete. We believe a number of these competitors view sales of software application
lifecycle technologies as important to enhancing the functionality and demand for their core
products. As a result, these companies often bundle software products that compete with our
offerings, with products such as application servers, work stations, personal computers, operating
systems databases and information technology services. When competitors do so, the effective price
for their software products that compete with our software development platform/solutions are often
heavily discounted or offered at no charge. This has required us to reduce the price of our
products and related services in certain circumstances, sometimes to no avail. Similarly, industry
alliances and arrangements exist or may be formed in the future under which our competitors ally
with companies in markets in which we do not compete to bundle products. These arrangements may
also result in lower effective prices for our competitors products than for our products, putting
pressure on our business and diminishing our competitive position.
Our future success depends upon enhancing existing relationships and establishing new technology
alliances.
The market for enterprise software application development and deployment solutions is broad,
and our products and solutions must integrate with a wide variety of technologies. To be
successful, we must continue to establish and enhance strategic alliances with a wide variety of
companies in the software development ecosystem. Many of these companies have competitive products
or have stated a desire to move broadly into the software development lifecycle space. In addition,
many of these companies are competitive with one another and approach partnering with us
cautiously. This has made it difficult in some cases to establish or enhance desired relationships
or achieve intended objectives. We currently have a number of important strategic alliances and
technology relationships with industry leaders. Where we have established working relationships,
our allies may choose to terminate their arrangements with us where no binding contractual
arrangements exist. The failure to develop or maintain our strategic alliances and technology
relationships or our allies decision to opt out of their arrangements with us may impede our
ability to introduce new products or enter new markets, and consequently harm our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
38
Our products may contain unknown defects that could result in a loss of revenues, decreased market
acceptance, injury to our reputation and product liability claims.
Software products occasionally contain errors or defects, especially when they are first
introduced or when new versions are released. We cannot be certain that our products are currently
or will be completely free of defects and errors. We could lose revenue as a result of product
defects or errors, including defects contained in third-party products that enable our products to
work. In addition, the discovery of a defect or error in a new version or product may result in the
following consequences, among others:
|
|
|
delayed shipping of the product;
|
|
|
|
|
delay in or failure to ever achieve market acceptance;
|
|
|
|
|
diversion of development resources; damage to our reputation;
|
|
|
|
|
product liability claims; and
|
|
|
|
|
increased service and warranty costs
|
We believe our ALM and DPG products are critical to our customers and a defect or error in our
products could result in a significant disruption to their businesses. Due to the nature of our
complex solutions, there is also the risk that our current products will not prove scalable without
substantial effort. If we are unable to develop products that are free of defects or errors or if
our products are not able to scale across an enterprise or are perceived to be too complex to scale
across an enterprise, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed.
Third-party claims of intellectual property infringement may subject us to costly litigation or
settlement terms or limit the sales of our products.
From time to time, we receive notices claiming that we have infringed a third-partys patent
or other intellectual property right. We expect that software products in general will increasingly
be subject to these claims as the number of products and competitors increase, the functionality of
products overlap and as the patenting of software functionality becomes more widespread. Further,
the receipt of a notice alleging infringement may require in some situations a costly opinion of
counsel be obtained to prevent an allegation of intentional infringement. Regardless of its merits,
responding to any claim can be time consuming and costly and divert the efforts of our technical
and management personnel. In the event of a successful claim against us, we may be required to pay
significant monetary damages, including treble damages if we are held to have willfully infringed,
discontinue the use and sale of the infringing products, expend significant resources to develop
non-infringing technology and/or enter into royalty and licensing agreements that might not be
offered or be available on acceptable terms. If a successful claim was made against us and we
failed to commercially develop or license a substitute technology, our business, results of
operations and financial condition could be harmed. In addition, we may not have insurance coverage
for these types of claims or our insurance coverage for these types of claims may not be adequate.
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, we may lose valuable assets.
As a software company, our intellectual property rights are among our most valuable assets. We
rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark, trade secrets, confidentiality agreements
and other contractual arrangements and other methods to protect our intellectual property rights,
but these measures may provide only limited protection. The protective steps we have taken may be
inadequate to deter misappropriations of our intellectual property rights. In addition, it may be
possible for an unauthorized third-party to reverse-engineer or decompile our software products. We
may be unable to detect the unauthorized use of, or take appropriate steps to enforce, our
intellectual property rights, particularly in certain international markets, making
misappropriation of our intellectual property more likely. Litigation may be necessary to protect
our intellectual property rights, and such litigation can be time consuming and expensive.
Our debt obligations expose us to risks that could adversely affect our business, operating results
and financial
condition. *
In February 2007, we issued an aggregate principal amount of $200,000,000 in 2.75% Convertible
Senior Notes (the Senior Notes) due in 2012. We have repurchased a portion of our Senior Notes
and the aggregate principal amount outstanding as of March 31, 2009 was $115 million. The level of
our indebtedness, among other things, could:
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a portion of our expected cash flow or our existing cash to
service our indebtedness, which would reduce the amount of our cash available for other
purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures and research and development
expenditures;
|
|
|
|
|
make it difficult for us to incur additional debt or obtain any necessary financing in
the future for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service, acquisitions or general
corporate purposes;
|
39
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business; limit our
ability to sell ourselves or engage in other strategic transactions;
|
|
|
|
|
make us more vulnerable in the event of a downturn in our business; or
|
|
|
|
|
place us at a possible competitive disadvantage relative to less leveraged competitors
and competitors that have greater access to capital resources.
|
If we experience a decline in revenue due to any of the factors described in this section
entitled Risk Factors, or otherwise, we could have difficulty paying amounts due on our
indebtedness. Although the Senior Notes mature in 2012, the holders of the Senior Notes may require
us to repurchase their Senior Notes prior to maturity under certain circumstances, including
specified fundamental changes such as the sale of a majority of the voting power of the Company. If
we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow or otherwise obtain funds necessary to make required
payments, or if we fail to comply with the various requirements of the Senior Notes, we would be in
default, which would permit the holders of our indebtedness to accelerate the maturity of the
indebtedness and could cause defaults under any other indebtedness that we may have outstanding at
such time. Any default under our indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our business,
operating results and financial condition.
Conversion of the Senior Notes would dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders. *
The terms of the Senior Notes permit the holders to convert the Senior Notes into shares of
our common stock at anytime on or after November 15, 2011 or before such time under certain
conditions, as described below. The Senior Notes are convertible into our common stock initially at
a conversion price of $6.38 per share, which if all Senior Notes outstanding as of March 31, 2009
were converted, would result in an aggregate of approximately 18.0 million shares of our common
stock being issued upon conversion, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified events,
provided that the total number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion, as may be
adjusted for fundamental changes or otherwise, may not exceed
approximately 22.5 million shares.
The conversion of some or all of the Senior Notes will dilute the ownership interest of our
existing stockholders. Any sales in the public market of the common stock issuable upon conversion
could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock.
Each $1,000 of principal of the Senior Notes is initially convertible on or after November 15,
2011 into 156.86 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified
events. However we may seek to obtain stockholder approval to settle conversions of the Senior
Notes in cash and shares of common stock, which approval would require the vote of a majority of
shares of our common stock at a stockholder meeting duly called and convened in accordance with our
organizational documents, applicable law and the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.
In addition, holders may convert their Senior Notes prior to November 15, 2011, if: (1) the
price of our common stock reaches $8.29 during specific periods of time, (2) specified corporate
transactions occur or (3) the trading price of the Senior Notes falls below a certain threshold. As
a result, although the Senior Notes mature in 2012, the holders may require us to convert the
Senior Notes prior to maturity. As of the date this Form 10-Q was filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, none of the conditions allowing holders of the Senior Notes to convert prior
to November 15, 2011 had occurred.
Under the terms of the Senior Notes, events that we do not control may trigger redemption rights
that, if exercised, may have an adverse effect on our liquidity.
Holders of the Senior Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase the Senior Notes
upon the occurrence of a fundamental change of Borland, including some types of change of control
transactions. We may not have sufficient funds to repurchase the Senior Notes in cash or to make
the required repayment at such time or have the ability to arrange necessary financing on
acceptable terms. In addition, upon conversion of the Senior Notes, if we have received approval
from our stockholders to settle conversions of the Senior Notes in cash and shares of our common
stock, we will be required to make cash payments to the holders of the Senior Notes equal to the
lesser of the principal amount of the Senior Notes being converted and the conversion value of
those Senior Notes. Such payments could be significant, and we may not have sufficient funds to
make them at such time. Our failure to repurchase the Senior Notes or pay cash in respect of
conversions when required would result in an event of default.
Our rights plan and our ability to issue additional preferred stock could harm the rights of our
common stockholders.
In October 2001, we adopted our stockholder rights plan and currently each share of our
outstanding common stock is associated with one right. Each right entitles the registered
stockholder to purchase 1/1,000 of a share of our Series D Junior Participating Preferred Stock at
an exercise price of $80.00.
40
The rights only become exercisable in certain limited circumstances following the tenth day
after a person or group announces acquisition of or tender offers for 15% or more of our common
stock. For a limited period of time following the announcement of any such acquisition or offer,
the rights are redeemable by us at a price of $0.01 per right. If the rights are not redeemed, each
right will then entitle the holder to purchase common stock having the value of twice the
then-current exercise price. For a limited period of time after the exercisability of the rights,
each right, at the discretion of our board of directors, may be exchanged for either 1/1,000 share
of Series D Junior Participating Preferred Stock or one share of common stock. The rights expire on
December 19, 2011.
Pursuant to our restated certificate of incorporation, our board of directors has the
authority to issue up to 850,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock and to determine the
powers, preferences and rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions granted to or
imposed upon any wholly unissued shares of undesignated preferred stock and to fix the number of
shares constituting any series and the designation of such series, without the consent of our
stockholders. The preferred stock could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend and other
rights superior to those of the holders of common stock.
The issuance of Series D Junior Participating Preferred Stock or any preferred stock
subsequently issued by our board of directors, under some circumstances, could have the effect of
delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control. For example, an issuance of shares of our
preferred stock could:
|
|
|
adversely affect the voting power of the stockholders of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
make it more difficult for a third-party to gain control of us;
|
|
|
|
|
discourage bids for our common stock at a premium;
|
|
|
|
|
limit or eliminate any payments the stockholders of our common stock could expect to
receive upon our liquidation; or
|
|
|
|
|
otherwise adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
|
Specifically, some provisions may deter tender offers for shares of common stock, which may be
attractive to stockholders, or deter purchases of large blocks of common stock, thereby limiting
the opportunity for stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of common stock over the
then-prevailing market prices.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws might discourage, delay or prevent a
change of control of our company or changes in our management and, therefore, depress the trading
price of our common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could discourage, delay or
prevent a change in control of our company or changes in our management that our stockholders may
deem advantageous. These provisions:
|
|
|
authorize the issuance of blank check preferred stock by our board that could increase
the number of outstanding shares and discourage a takeover attempt;
|
|
|
|
|
limit the ability of our stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders;
|
|
|
|
|
prohibit stockholder action by written consent, which requires all stockholder actions
to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
|
provide that our board is expressly authorized to amend our bylaws, or enact such other
bylaws as in their judgment may be advisable; and
|
|
|
|
|
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our board or for
proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.
|
In addition, certain of our named executive officers and certain other executives have entered
into change of control severance agreements, which were approved by our compensation committee.
These agreements would likely increase the costs that an acquirer would face in purchasing us and
may thereby act to discourage such a purchase.
41
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
The shares shown as repurchased in the table below were surrendered by Borland employees in
order to meet minimum tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of an installment
of their restricted stock awards. Below is a summary of these transactions for the three months
ended March 31, 2009:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Maximum Number (or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Shares (or Units)
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value) of
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) that May Yet
|
|
|
|
of Shares (or Units)
|
|
|
per share
|
|
|
Publicly Announced
|
|
|
Be Purchased Under the Plans
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
(or Unit)
|
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
|
or Programs (1)
|
|
Beginning dollar value
available to be
repurchased as of
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
59,332
|
|
January 1, 2009
January 31, 2009 (2)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2009
February 28, 2009 (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
March 31, 2009 (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares repurchased
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
59,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending dollar value available
to be repurchased under
the Discretionary Program
as of March 31, 2009 (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
59,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
In September 2001, our Board of Directors authorized the use of up to $30 million to
repurchase shares of our outstanding common stock under a discretionary stock repurchase
program (Discretionary Program). In February 2004, our Board of Directors authorized an
additional $30 million of repurchases under the Discretionary Program, which was announced in
our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on
February 4, 2004. In May 2005, our Board of Directors authorized an additional $75 million of
repurchases under the Discretionary Program, which was announced in our Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the SEC on May 20, 2005. No shares were repurchased through our Discretionary
Program during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Consists of shares of restricted stock surrendered by Borland employees in order to meet tax
withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of an installment of their restricted
stock awards.
|
42
ISSUER REPURCHASES OF CONVERTIBLE SENIOR NOTES
On February 27, 2009, the Companys Board of Directors of authorized the Company to use up to
approximately $36.0 million of its available cash to repurchase a portion of its outstanding 2.75%
Convertible Senior Notes due February 15, 2012 in open market or privately negotiated transactions.
As of March 31, 2009, the Company used approximately $27.4 million of its available cash to
repurchase $44.3 million of outstanding Senior Notes through privately negotiated transactions or
open market purchases. Below is a summary of these transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Maximum Number (or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Shares (or Units)
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value) of
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) that May Yet
|
|
|
|
of Shares (or Units)
|
|
|
per share
|
|
|
Publicly Announced
|
|
|
Be Purchased Under the Plans
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased (a)
|
|
|
(or Unit) (b)
|
|
|
Plans or Programs (c )
|
|
|
or Programs (d)
|
|
January 1, 2009
January 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2009
February 28, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2009
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
44,316
|
|
|
$
|
618.09
|
|
|
|
44,316
|
|
|
$
|
8,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares repurchased
|
|
|
44,316
|
|
|
$
|
618.09
|
|
|
|
44,316
|
|
|
$
|
8,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Senior Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $44,316,000 were repurchased by the
Company.
|
|
(b)
|
|
The average price the Company paid for the repurchase of the Senior Notes was $618.09 per
every $1,000 of Senior Notes repurchased.
|
|
(c)
|
|
The Company used approximately $27.4 million of available cash to repurchase the Senior
Notes. The Board authorized the Company to use up to $36.0 million for the repurchase.
|
|
(d)
|
|
The Board authorized $36.0 million for the repurchase of the Senior Notes. After the
repurchase in March 2009, approximately $8.6 million is still available for future
repurchases.
|
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the quarter ended March
31, 2009.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
43
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits
Except as so indicated in Exhibits 31.2, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2, the following exhibits are filed as
part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
Form
|
|
Date
|
|
Number
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Borland Software
Corporation.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
08/09/05
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Borland Software Corporation.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
08/09/05
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
Stockholder Rights Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2001,
between Borland Software Corporation and Mellon Investor
Services, L.L.C.
|
|
8-A
|
|
10/31/01
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate of Borland Software Corporation.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
05/13/02
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
Certification of Erik E. Prusch, Chief Executive Officer of
Borland Software Corporation, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
Certification of Thomas P. Wilkas, Principal Financial
Officer of Borland Software Corporation, pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
Certification of Erik E. Prusch, Chief Executive Officer of
Borland Software Corporation, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. +
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
Certification of Thomas P. Wilkas, Principal Financial
Officer of Borland Software Corporation, pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. +
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
+
|
|
The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 and Exhibit 32.2 that accompany this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Borland Software Corporation under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 whether made before or after the
date of this Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.
|
A copy of any exhibit will be furnished (at a reasonable cost) to any of our stockholders upon
receipt of a written request. Such request should be sent to Borland Software Corporation, 8310
North Capital of Texas Highway, Building 2, Suite 100, Austin, Texas USA 78731, Attn: Corporate
Secretary.
44
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on the
14th day of May 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
|
/s/ ERIK E. PRUSCH
|
|
|
Erik E. Prusch
|
|
|
(Chief Executive Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS P. WILKAS
|
|
|
Thomas P. Wilkas
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)
|
|
45
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
Certification of Erik E. Prusch, Chief Executive Officer of
Borland Software Corporation, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
Certification of Thomas P. Wilkas, Principal Financial Officer of
Borland Software Corporation, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
Certification of Erik E. Prusch, Chief Executive Officer of
Borland Software Corporation, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350. +
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
Certification of Thomas P. Wilkas, Principal Financial Officer of
Borland Software Corporation, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350. +
|
46
Borland (NASDAQ:BORL)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 5월(5) 2024 으로 6월(6) 2024
Borland (NASDAQ:BORL)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 6월(6) 2023 으로 6월(6) 2024