ITEM
1. Business
Introduction
We
were
formed on April 26, 2007, as a blank check corporation for the purpose of
acquiring, through a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock
purchase, reorganization or similar business combination, one or more operating
businesses, which we refer to as our initial business combination. Our efforts
in identifying a prospective target business will not be limited to a particular
industry although we initially intend to focus our search for a target business
in the healthcare industry.
The
healthcare industry encompasses all healthcare service companies, including
among others, managed care companies, hospitals, healthcare system companies,
physician groups, diagnostic service companies, medical device companies and
other healthcare-related entities.
A
registration statement for our initial public offering was declared effective
on
October 3, 2007. On October 9, 2007, we sold 12,000,000 units in our initial
public offering, and on October 15, 2007, the underwriters for our initial
public offering purchased an additional 1,800,000 units pursuant to an
over-allotment option. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and
one
warrant. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of our common
stock at a price of $7.50 commencing on the later of our consummation of a
business combination or January 3, 2009, provided in each case that there is
an
effective registration statement covering the shares of common stock underlying
the warrants in effect. The warrants expire on October 3, 2012, unless earlier
redeemed. Simultaneously with the consummation of our initial public offering,
we completed a private placement of 3,250,000 warrants, which we refer to as
the
sponsors’ warrants, at a price of $1.00 per warrant, generating gross proceeds
of $3,250,000. The sponsors’ warrants were purchased by (i) Kanders &
Company, Inc., Ivy Healthcare Capital II, L.P., and Fieldpoint Capital, L.L.C.,
each of which is an affiliate of certain officers and directors of the Company;
and (ii) Robert W. Pangia, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Dennis W.
O’Dowd and Virgilio Rene Veloso, each of which is an existing stockholder of
the
Company. The sponsors’ warrants are identical to the warrants included in the
units sold in our initial public offering except that if we call the warrants
for redemption, the sponsors’ warrants will not be redeemable by us so long as
they are held by these purchasers or their permitted transferees. The purchasers
of the sponsors’ warrants have agreed that these warrants will not be
transferred, assigned or sold by them (except in limited situations) until
after
we have completed our initial business combination. In addition, Kanders &
Company, Robert W. Pangia, Ivy Healthcare Capital II, L.P., Dennis W. O’Dowd,
Virgilio Rene Veloso and Fieldpoint Capital LLC have agreed to purchase an
aggregate of 1,000,000 units, which we refer to as the co-investment units,
at a
price of $10.00 per unit ($10.0 million in the aggregate) in a private placement
that will occur immediately prior to the consummation of our initial business
combination.
We
received net proceeds of approximately $135.3 million from our initial
public offering (including proceeds from the exercise by the underwriters of
their over-allotment option) and sale of the sponsors’ warrants. Of those net
proceeds, approximately $3.99 million is attributable to the portion of the
underwriters’ discount which has been deferred until our consummation of a
business combination. The net proceeds were deposited into a trust account
and
will be part of the funds distributed to our public stockholders in the event
we
are unable to complete a business combination. Unless and until a business
combination is consummated, the proceeds held in the trust account will not
be
available to us. For a more complete discussion of our financial information,
see the section appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K entitled
“Selected Financial Data.”
Business
Strategy
Our
efforts in identifying a prospective target business will not be limited to
a
particular industry, although we intend to focus our search for target
businesses in the healthcare industry. Accordingly, although our management’s
expertise is primarily in the healthcare industry, if we are presented with
an
opportunity in another industry that would be in our stockholders’ best
interests, we may pursue that opportunity. We have not established any specific
time or monetary amounts that would cause us to shift our focus from the
healthcare industry. Rather, we will consider all potentially attractive
business opportunities that we locate or are presented to us.
We
believe the healthcare industry represents an attractive environment for our
management team to complete a business combination which will serve as a
platform for future growth. According to publicly available information from
the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, spending on healthcare
in
the United States was approximately $2.1 trillion in 2006, or approximately
16.0% of the 2006 United States gross domestic product, or GDP. A report by
the
CMS, Office of the Actuary National Health Statistics Group, ‘‘National Health
Expenditure Projections 2007-2017’’, indicates that national healthcare spending
is projected to grow on average 6.7% per year through 2017, when it is expected
to reach nearly $4.3 trillion. As evidenced by the projected increase in
healthcare spending as a percentage of GDP from 16.0% in 2006 to an expected
19.5% in 2017 (set forth in the same report), we anticipate that the United
States will continue to spend substantially, and at an accelerated rate, on
healthcare products and services, driven largely by demographic trends and
rapid
advancement in technology.
Healthcare
Industry Trends
We
believe that the healthcare industry represents an attractive target for our
investment focus based on several key trends driving growth, including:
•
|
Demographic
Shift to an Elderly Population.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau publication ‘‘65+ in the United
States: 2005,’’ the size of the elderly population, the segment with the
largest per capita usage of healthcare services, is increasing more
rapidly than the rest of the population in the United States. According
to
this report, due to the aging baby boomer generation, the percentage
of
the U.S. population aged 65 and older is expected to grow from 12.4%
in
2000 to 13.0% in 2010 and to 19.6% by 2030. By 2050, the population
segment aged 65 and older will total approximately 80 million individuals.
In addition, according to the National Center for Health Statistics
of the
Centers for Disease Control (‘‘Health, United States, 2006’’), the average
life expectancy in the United States increased from 75.4 years in
1990 to
77.8 years in 2004. We believe that as life expectancy increases,
the
industry will experience increased demand for medical products that
help
the elderly maintain an active lifestyle. Those over 65 years old
have
generated the highest healthcare costs compared to any other demographic
group and are expected to be a major contributor to an increasing
level of
expenditure for healthcare products and services.
|
•
|
Rapid
Development of New Healthcare Technologies and Services
.
New medical devices, therapeutics and services are being developed
at an
accelerated rate, driven by advancements in new biomaterials, genomics
and
proteomics, and information technology. Our management believes that
the
rapid pace of innovation will continue to expand the scope, practice
and
delivery of medicine and, in the process, create new market entrants,
leaders and opportunities.
|
•
|
Consumerism.
Our management believes that individual consumers, once passive
participants in the healthcare process, have become increasingly
proactive
in recent years, driving increased demand for services and leading
to
additional spending. They are challenging health plans that deny
treatments, opting for plans that provide enhanced choices, demanding
information about providers and quality of care, demonstrating a
readiness
to comparison shop on the basis of price and paying out-of-pocket
for
cosmetic and other elective procedures. Our management believes that
consumerism is driving opportunity via expanded reimbursement coverage
for
goods and services and, in some instances, increased willingness
by
consumers to pay out of pocket for goods and services that enhance
quality
of life.
|
•
|
Increasing
Level of Merger and Acquisition Activity.
The mergers and acquisitions environment in the healthcare industry
remains strong, driven by efforts to fill gaps in product pipelines,
expand geographic reach, strengthen patent positions and consolidate
fragmented markets. According to Thomson Financial, 927 transactions
were
completed in 2004 for an aggregate value of $95.7 billion. In 2006,
1,049
transactions were completed which more than doubled the aggregate
value to
a record $197.4 billion. Our management believes that the dynamics
driving
healthcare merger and acquisition activity will continue and, therefore,
the industry will present opportunities to identify and consummate
an
attractive business combination.
|
However,
as indicated above, we are not restricted from consummating a business
combination in a different industry and are not required to first seek a target
business in the healthcare industry. If an opportunity outside the healthcare
industry was presented to us that we determined was in our stockholders’ best
interests, we could pursue that opportunity. Accordingly, it is possible that
we
will not even consider a target business in the healthcare industry. If we
consummate a business combination in an industry other than the healthcare
industry, the foregoing favorable industry trends would not apply to us
following the business combination.
Potential
Healthcare Investment Themes
Although
we will consider target businesses across the healthcare industry, we intend
to
concentrate our search for an acquisition candidate within the following target
sectors of the healthcare industry:
•
|
Medical
Devices, Products and Healthcare Diagnostics.
Frost & Sullivan estimates that in 2005 the United States medical
device and product market generated $80.3 billion of revenue according
to
‘‘Standard & Poor’s Healthcare Products & Supplies Survey.’’
Demographic shifts, advanced technologies, increased investment in
research and development, and the potential to address the clinical
shortcomings of drug therapeutics are all driving growth. Large medical
device companies with established distribution networks are contributing
to the demand for acquisitions of smaller companies with innovative
technologies capable of generating new revenue streams and/or preserving
existing market share.
|
•
|
Healthcare
Services. According to CMS ‘‘National Health Expenditure Projections
2007-2017,’’ the United States spent $660.2 billion on physician and
clinical, dental and other personal services, or professional services,
and an additional $177.6 billion on nursing home and home healthcare
in
2006. These levels are projected to rise to $743.1 billion for
professional services and $198.5 billion for nursing home and home
healthcare in 2008. By 2017, professional services will account for
$1.30
trillion and nursing home healthcare another $336.5 billion of U.S.
healthcare spending. Although professional services spending fell
in 2005
and 2006 due to slower growth in government and private reimbursement,
over time, labor costs are projected to rise, driven by physician
and
nursing supply shortages and a shift in demographics, according to
‘‘Standard & Poor’s Managed Care Survey’’ (April 19, 2007) and
‘‘Standard & Poor’s Facilities Survey’’ (December 28, 2006). An aging
population, increased specialization and decreased exposure to Medicaid
are expected to boost nursing and home healthcare revenue.
|
Competitive
Strengths
We
believe we have the following competitive strengths:
Status
as a public company
We
believe our structure will make us an attractive business combination partner
to
private target businesses. As an existing public company, we offer a target
business an alternative to the traditional initial public offering through
a
merger or other business combination. In this situation, the owners of the
target business would exchange their shares of stock in the target business
for
shares of our stock. We believe target businesses will find this method to
be
less expensive, with greater certainty of becoming a public company than the
typical initial public offering process. In an initial public offering, there
are typically expenses incurred in marketing, roadshow and public reporting
efforts that will likely not be present to the same extent in connection with
a
business combination with us. Furthermore, once a proposed business combination
is approved by our stockholders and the transaction is consummated, the target
business will have effectively become public, whereas an initial public offering
is always subject to the underwriters’ ability to complete the offering, as well
as general market conditions, that could prevent the offering from occurring.
Once public, we believe the target business would have greater access to capital
and additional means of creating management incentives that are better aligned
with stockholders’ interests than it would as a private company. It can offer
further benefits by augmenting a company’s profile among potential new customers
and vendors and aid in attracting talented employees.
Notwithstanding
the foregoing, certain features of our structure may have a negative impact
on
our ability to consummate a business combination, including:
•
|
our
obligation to seek stockholder approval of our initial business
combination or obtain necessary financial information may delay the
completion of a transaction;
|
•
|
our
obligation to convert into cash up to 30% of our shares of common
stock
held by our public stockholders who vote against our initial business
combination and exercise their conversion rights may reduce the resources
available to us for our initial business combination;
|
•
|
our
outstanding warrants, and the future dilution they potentially represent,
may not be viewed favorably by certain target businesses; and
|
•
|
the
requirement to acquire an operating business that has a fair market
value
equal to at least 80% of the balance of the trust account at the
time of
the acquisition (excluding deferred underwriting discounts and commissions
of $3.45 million, or $3.99 million if the underwriters’ over-allotment
option is exercised in full) could require us to acquire the assets
of
several operating businesses at the same time, all of which sales
would be
contingent on the closings of the other sales, which could make it
more
difficult to consummate our initial business combination.
|
Strong
Financial position
With
a
trust account of approximately $132.3 million at December 31, 2007 (excluding
the $3.99 deferred underwriting fee and the additional $10.0 million we will
receive from the co-investment), we offer a target business a variety of options
such as providing the owners of a target business with shares in a public
company and a public means to sell such shares, providing capital for the
potential growth and expansion of its operations or strengthening its balance
sheet by having significant cash resources or reducing its debt ratio. Because
we are able to consummate a business combination using the cash proceeds of
our
initial public offering and the private placement of the sponsors’ warrants and
co-investment units, our capital stock, debt or a combination of the foregoing,
we have the flexibility to use the most efficient combination that will allow
us
to tailor the consideration to be paid to the target business to reflect the
needs of the parties. However, if our initial business combination requires
us
to use substantially all of our cash to pay the purchase price, because we
will
not know how many stockholders may exercise their conversion rights, we may
either need to reserve part of the trust account for possible payment upon
their
conversion, or we may need to arrange third party financing to help fund our
initial business combination in case a larger percentage of stockholders
exercise their conversion rights than we expect. Since we have no specific
business combination under consideration, we have not taken any steps to secure
third party financing. Accordingly, our flexibility in structuring a business
combination will be subject to these contingencies.
Management
Expertise
Our
management team possesses a substantial level of healthcare industry public
market, private equity and capital raising experience as investors, operators
and managers. Collectively, our officers and directors have over 100 years
of
experience in structuring, negotiating, managing and consummating merger and
acquisitions.
Ivy
Capital Partners
,
the
General Partner of Ivy Healthcare Capital, L.P. and Ivy Healthcare Capital
II,
L.P., which we refer to collectively as Ivy Capital Partners, is an affiliate
of
each of Robert W. Pangia, our Chief Executive Officer, Russell F. Warren, M.D.,
the Chairman of our Board of Directors, and Russell F. Warren, Jr., a member
of
our Board of Directors. Ivy Capital Partners is a healthcare-focused private
equity firm based in Montvale, New Jersey that invests in companies, and manages
such companies as a result of its officers’ and directors’ board positions with
such companies, within the medical device, life sciences and healthcare services
sectors, with particular experience in the orthopedic industry (which
encompasses all companies that provide orthopedic services and products such
as
orthopedic implants and prostheses). We believe that Ivy Capital Partners’
in-depth knowledge of the healthcare industry increases its ability to source
and create transactions, conduct effective due diligence, recruit seasoned
management teams, partner with senior managers at its portfolio companies to
design ways of growing and improving their business, and provide access to
a
network of resources that strengthen operational excellence to maximize
investment returns. Ivy Capital Partners believes that industry specialization
and knowledge improves its risk-adjusted returns by allowing the firm to
identify and capitalize upon emerging medical product and service trends. For
each of its investments, Ivy Capital Partners seeks to fully understand the
general industry and company-specific risks and opportunities by utilizing
its
broad network of healthcare industry experts, investment operations and clinical
experience. This approach to due diligence reflects the firm’s conviction that
long-term value creation is dependent upon detailed industry and operational
knowledge. Ivy Capital Partners’ track record is based on the depth, breadth and
experience of its investment team. Russell F. Warren, Jr. co-founded and was
the
CEO of Professional Sports Care Management, Inc., which he helped develop into
the largest chain of physical rehabilitation clinics in the New York tri-state
region. Professional Sports Care Management completed an initial public offering
in 1994 and was sold to HealthSouth in 1996. In 1997, Mr. Warren co-founded
Ivy
Realty and, through numerous acquisitions, built a commercial real estate
portfolio valued in excess of $1.2 billion. From 1987 to 1996, Robert W. Pangia
served as Executive Vice President and Director of Investment Banking at Paine
Webber Incorporated, where he oversaw all of the investment bank’s mergers and
acquisitions and corporate finance activities. Mr. Pangia currently acts as
a
director of Biogen Idec, a Nasdaq-listed biotechnology company, and was formerly
a director at Icos Corporation, a biotechnology company that was acquired by
Eli
Lilly and Company, and Athena Neurosciences, a research-based pharmaceutical
company. Russell F. Warren, M.D. is Surgeon-in-Chief Emeritus of the Hospital
for Special Surgery and has published over 250 peer-reviewed scientific
articles. Dr. Warren has patented a number of his inventions to treat orthopedic
conditions in the knee and shoulder and, for the past 20 years, has served
as
the team doctor for the New York Giants football team. To date, Ivy Capital
Partners has funded 17 portfolio companies with four of these companies
providing liquidity opportunities for their investors.
Kanders
& Company
,
an
affiliate of each of Warren B. Kanders, a member of our Board of Directors,
Philip A. Baratelli, our Chief Financial Officer, and Gary M. Julien, our Vice
President of Corporate Development, is a private investment firm based in
Stamford, Connecticut, that utilizes a private equity approach to building
public companies. The firm’s public market investment strategy provides public
and private companies, either entire entities or divisions, with strategic
insights and capital for enhancing operating discipline and catalyzing long-term
growth, both organically and via carefully selected acquisition opportunities.
The firm’s principals believe that the public markets provide an ideal forum to
support growth initiatives for operating businesses. The firm has significant
experience building public companies within a variety of industries including
healthcare, aerospace and defense, industrial manufacturing and consumer
markets. Kanders & Company’s owner and President, Warren B. Kanders was,
from 1996 to Armor Holdings, Inc.’s sale to a wholly-owned subsidiary of BAE
Systems plc on July 31, 2007, Chairman, CEO and largest shareholder of the
New
York Stock Exchange-listed company, Armor Holdings, Inc., a manufacturer and
supplier of military vehicles, armored vehicles and safety and survivability
products and systems serving aerospace & defense, public safety, homeland
security and commercial markets. Since 1996, Armor Holdings has grown from
approximately $11.0 million in revenue to estimated revenue of approximately
$3.5 billion in 2007, through both organic growth and the completion of over
30
acquisitions, including the $803 million acquisition of Stewart & Stevenson
Services, Inc. which closed in May 2006. In 2006, Armor Holdings was listed
as
number three on FORTUNE Magazine’s ‘‘100 Fastest-Growing Companies.’’ In 2005,
Armor Holdings was awarded ‘‘Corporate/Strategic Firm of the Year’’ by The
M&A Advisor, a national award reflecting its leadership and expertise in
corporate mergers and acquisitions in the middle market. Based on the $88.00
per
share price of the BAE Systems acquisition of Armor Holdings, the performance
of
Armor Holdings’ stock price during Mr. Kanders’ investment period generated a
31.4% annual rate of return, making it a leading performer among all companies
listed on the NYSE during this period in terms of stock price appreciation.
Prior to his service with Armor Holdings, from October 1992 to May 1996, Mr.
Kanders served as Founder and Vice Chairman of the Board of Benson Eyecare
Corporation, a distributor of eyecare products and services. In 1992, Benson
Eyecare Corporation was the highest performing stock in terms of stock
appreciation on the American Stock Exchange and posted positive returns every
year prior to its sale in 1996.
Warren
B.
Kanders, through Kanders & Company, is sponsoring a new blank check company,
Kanders Acquisition Company, Inc., which has been formed and provided with
initial start-up funding. It is anticipated that Kanders Acquisition Company,
Inc., in connection with a potential business combination, may seek a target
business that is engaged in any industry; provided, however, it will not seek
a
target business in the healthcare industry unless and until we have completed
our initial business combination or have liquidated. In addition, Mr. Kanders
has been named a director and officer of, and Messrs. Baratelli and Julien
have
been named officers of, Kanders Acquisition Company, Inc. The ability of Messrs.
Kanders, Baratelli and Julien to present business opportunities to Kanders
Acquisition Company, Inc.will be subject to their pre-existing obligations
to
present to us certain business combination opportunities in accordance with
the
criteria set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Established
Deal Sourcing Network
Our
management team has built and maintained a broad network of professional
contacts which we intend to utilize to identify and build a scalable
growth-oriented business. These established relationships include, among others,
healthcare industry entrepreneurs, executive officers and board members at
public and private healthcare companies, business brokers, private equity and
venture capital firms, consultants, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants
and prominent physicians and researchers at leading U.S. hospitals and private
practices. We believe this network of professional relationships will be of
significant assistance in helping us identify potential business combination
targets. However, in each of these cases, our ability to benefit from these
extensive relationships will be limited because our officers and non-independent
directors have agreed until the earliest of our consummation of a business
combination, our liquidation or until such time as he ceases to be an officer
or
director of us to present to us for our consideration, prior to presentation
to
any other person or entity, any business opportunity to acquire a privately
held
operating business, if, and only if, (i) the target entity has a fair market
value between 80% of the balance in the trust account (excluding deferred
underwriting discounts and commissions) and $500 million, the target entity’s
principal business operations are in the healthcare industry and the opportunity
is to acquire substantially all of the assets or 50.1% or greater of the voting
securities of the target entity or (ii) the target entity’s principal business
operations are outside of the healthcare industry and the opportunity to acquire
such target entity is presented by a third party to one of our officers or
non-independent directors expressly for consideration by us. With respect to
all
business opportunities, including those described in clause (i), but excluding
those described in clause (ii) above, the obligation of our officers and
non-independent directors to present a business opportunity to us which may
be
reasonably required to be presented to us under Delaware law is subject to
any
pre-existing fiduciary or other obligations the officer or non-independent
director may owe to another entity. Our Board of Directors has adopted
resolutions renouncing any interest in or expectancy to be presented any
business opportunity outside of those described in clauses (i) and (ii) above
(as qualified by the immediately preceding sentence) that comes to the attention
of any of our officers or non-independent directors. Neither this agreement
by
our officers and non-independent directors nor the resolutions may be amended
or
rescinded in any way except upon prior approval by the holders of a majority
of
our outstanding shares of common stock.
In
addition, although we do not expect our independent directors to present
business opportunities to us, they may become aware of business opportunities
that may be appropriate for presentation to us. In such instances they may
determine to present these business opportunities to other entities with which
they are or may be affiliated, in addition to, or instead of, presenting them
to
us.
Effecting
a Business Combination
General
We
are
not presently engaged in, and we will not engage in, any operations for an
indefinite period of time. We intend to utilize the cash proceeds of our initial
public offering and the private placement of the sponsors’ warrants and
co-investment units, our capital stock, debt or a combination of the foregoing
as the consideration to be paid in a business combination. While substantially
all of the net proceeds of our initial public offering and the private placement
of the sponsors’ warrants are allocated to completing a business combination,
the proceeds are not otherwise designated for more specific purposes.
Accordingly, there is no current basis for stockholders to evaluate the specific
merits or risks of one or more target businesses. If we engage in a business
combination with a target business using our capital stock and/or debt financing
as the consideration to fund the combination, proceeds from our initial public
offering and the private placement of the sponsors’ warrants will then be used
to undertake additional acquisitions or to fund the operations of the target
business on a post-combination basis. We may engage in a business combination
with a company that does not require significant additional capital but is
seeking a public trading market for its shares, and which wants to merge with
an
already public company to avoid the uncertainties associated with undertaking
its own public offering. These uncertainties include time delays, compliance
and
governance issues, significant expense, a possible loss of voting control,
and
the risk that market conditions will not be favorable for an initial public
offering at the time the offering is ready to be sold. We may seek to effect
a
business combination with more than one target business, although our limited
resources may serve as a practical limitation on our ability to do so.
We
are
currently in the process of identifying and evaluating potential target
businesses for our initial business combination. We have not entered into any
definitive business combination agreement. Accordingly, we cannot assure you
that we will be able to locate or enter into a business combination with a
target business on favorable terms or at all.
We
do not
anticipate consummating a business combination with an entity that is affiliated
with any of our officers, directors or founders and have not given any
consideration towards entering into such a transaction. We also do not
anticipate consummating a business combination with any entity that our
management has had discussions with regarding a possible business combination
through their other business activities or with an entity that is either a
portfolio company of, or has otherwise received a financial investment from,
an
investment banking firm (or an affiliate thereof) that is affiliated with our
management team. However, we are not restricted from entering into such
transactions and may do so if we determine that such a transaction is in our
stockholders’ best interests. If we determine to enter into such a transaction,
we would only do so if we obtain an opinion from an independent investment
banking firm that is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority,
or
FINRA, indicating that the business combination is fair to our public
stockholders from a financial point of view. We expect that any such opinion
would be included in our proxy soliciting materials furnished to our
stockholders in connection with the business combination, and that such
independent investment banking firm will be a consenting expert. As the opinion
will likely be addressed to our Board of Directors for their use in evaluating
the transaction, we do not anticipate that our stockholders will be entitled
to
rely on such opinion. However, as the opinion will be attached to, and
thoroughly described in, our proxy soliciting materials, we believe investors
will be provided with sufficient information in order to allow them to properly
analyze the transaction. Accordingly, whether the independent investment banking
firm allows stockholders to rely on their opinion will not be a factor in
determining which firm to hire.
Prior
to
completion of a business combination, we will seek to have all vendors,
prospective target businesses or other entities, which we refer to as potential
contracted parties or a potential contracted party, that we engage execute
agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind
in or
to any monies held in the trust account for the benefit of our public
stockholders. In the event that a potential contracted party was to refuse
to
execute a waiver, we will execute an agreement with that entity only if our
management first determines that we would be unable to obtain, on a reasonable
basis, substantially similar services or opportunities from another entity
willing to execute a waiver. Examples of instances where we may engage a third
party that refused to execute a waiver would be the engagement of a third party
consultant whose particular expertise or skills are believed by management
to be
superior to those of other consultants that would agree to execute a waiver
or a
situation in which management does not believe it would be able to find a
provider of required services willing to provide the waiver. If a potential
contracted party refuses to execute a waiver, then Kanders & Company and Ivy
Capital Partners will be liable to cover the potential claims made by such
party
for services rendered and goods sold, in each case to us, but only if, and
to
the extent, that the claims would otherwise reduce the proceeds in the trust
account payable to our public stockholders in the event of a liquidation.
However, if a potential contracted party executes a valid and enforceable
waiver, then Kanders & Company and Ivy Capital Partners will have no
liability as to any claimed amounts owed to a contracted party.
Subject
to the requirement that a target business or businesses have a collective fair
market value of at least 80% of the balance in the trust account (excluding
deferred underwriting discounts and commissions of $3.99 million) at the time
of
our initial business combination, we have virtually unrestricted flexibility
in
identifying and selecting one or more prospective target businesses. Although
our management will assess the risks inherent in a particular target business
with which we may combine, we cannot assure you that this assessment will result
in our identifying all risks that a target business may encounter. Furthermore,
some of those risks may be outside of our control, meaning that we can do
nothing to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely impact
a target business.
Sources
of target businesses
We
anticipate that target business candidates will be brought to our attention
from
various unaffiliated sources, including healthcare industry entrepreneurs,
executives and board members at public and private healthcare companies,
business brokers, private equity and venture capital firms, consultants,
investment bankers, attorneys, accountants, prominent physicians and researchers
at leading U.S. hospitals and private practices. Target businesses may be
brought to our attention by such unaffiliated sources as a result of being
solicited by us through calls, mailings or the Internet. These sources may
also
introduce us to target businesses they think we may be interested in on an
unsolicited basis, since many of these sources will have read this Annual Report
on Form 10-K and know what types of businesses we are targeting. Our officers
and directors, as well as their affiliates, may also bring to our attention
target business candidates that they become aware of through their business
contacts as a result of formal or informal inquiries or discussions they may
have, as well as attending trade shows or conventions. While we do not presently
anticipate engaging the services of professional firms or other individuals
that
specialize in business acquisitions on any formal basis, we may engage these
firms or other individuals in the future, in which event we may pay a finder’s
fee, consulting fee or other compensation to be determined in an arm’s length
negotiation based on the terms of the transaction. In no event, however, will
any of our existing officers, directors or stockholders, or any entity with
which they are affiliated, be paid any finder’s fee, consulting fee or other
compensation prior to, or for any services they render in order to effectuate,
the consummation of a business combination. Our management has experience in
evaluating transactions, particularly in the healthcare industry, but will
retain advisors as necessary to assist in its due diligence and evaluation
efforts. If we become aware of a potential business combination outside of
the
healthcare industry, we may determine to retain consultants and advisors with
experience in such industries to assist in the evaluation of such business
combination and in our determination of whether or not to proceed with such
a
business combination.
Selection
of a target business and structuring of a business combination
Subject
to the requirement that our initial business combination be with one or more
target businesses with a collective fair market value that is at least 80%
of
the balance in the trust account (excluding deferred underwriting discounts
and
commissions of $3.99 million) at the time of such business combination, our
management will have virtually unrestricted flexibility in identifying and
selecting a prospective target business.
We
will
seek to acquire a business whose operations can be improved and enhanced with
our capital resources and where there are significant opportunities for growth
both organically and through a targeted acquisition program. We intend to focus
our search primarily in the United States, although we will also evaluate
international investment opportunities should we find such opportunities
attractive.
We
have
identified the following criteria and guidelines that we believe are important
in evaluating prospective target businesses in the healthcare industry. We
will
use these criteria and guidelines in evaluating acquisition opportunities.
However, we may decide to enter into a business combination with a target
business that does not meet these criteria and guidelines.
•
|
An
experienced management team with a proven track record of executing
on its
business plan, driving revenue growth and enhancing profitability;
|
•
|
An
established company with a history of strong operating and financial
results;
|
•
|
A
high-quality product offering which is or has the potential to become
the
standard of care in a large, underserved and growing market;
|
•
|
A
compelling business model with clearly defined performance execution
milestones;
|
•
|
A
leading market provider with sustainable competitive advantages that
cannot be easily replicated (e.g. strong patent and trade secret
positions
or lowest-cost and highest quality service providers);
|
•
|
Strong
free cash flow generation with recurring revenue streams;
|
•
|
A
diversified customer and supplier base;
|
•
|
Viable
opportunities for targeted industry consolidation; and
|
•
|
Significant
potential for returns in excess of our cost of capital on our acquisition
investment.
|
In
analyzing prospective target businesses outside of the healthcare industry,
we
will generally use the same criteria and guidelines except for those
specifically related to the healthcare industry set forth above.
These
criteria are not intended to be exhaustive. Any evaluation relating to the
merits of a particular business combination may be based, to the extent
relevant, on the above factors as well as other considerations deemed relevant
by our management to our business objective. In evaluating a prospective target
business, we expect to conduct an extensive due diligence review which will
encompass, among other things, meetings with incumbent management and employees,
document reviews, interviews of customers and suppliers, inspection of
facilities, as well as review of financial and other information which will
be
made available to us.
The
time
required to select and evaluate a target business and to structure and complete
a business combination, and the costs associated with this process, are not
currently ascertainable with any degree of certainty. Any costs incurred with
respect to the identification and evaluation of a prospective target business
with which a business combination is not ultimately completed will result in
our
incurring losses and will reduce the funds we can use to complete another
business combination. We will not pay any finders or consulting fees to members
of our management team, or any of their respective affiliates, for services
rendered to or in connection with a business combination.
Fair
market value of target business or businesses
The
initial target business or businesses with which we combine must have a
collective fair market value equal to at least 80% of the balance in the trust
account (excluding deferred underwriting discounts and commissions of $3.99
million) at the time of the business combination. If we acquire less than 100%
of one or more target businesses in our initial business combination, the
aggregate fair market value of the portion or portions we acquire must equal
at
least 80% of the balance in the trust account (excluding deferred underwriting
discounts and commissions as described above) at the time of the initial
business combination. We would acquire less than 100% of a business or
businesses if the transaction was still beneficial to our stockholders
notwithstanding the fact that we would not be acquiring the entire business
or
businesses. In no event, however, will we acquire less than a controlling
interest in a target business (meaning not less than 50% of the voting
securities of the target business). We may seek to consummate a business
combination with an initial target business or businesses with a collective
fair
market value in excess of 80% of the balance in the trust account. However,
we
may need to obtain additional financing, in addition to the $10.0 million we
will receive from the co-investment private placement, to consummate such a
business combination and have not taken any steps to obtain any such financing.
In
contrast to many other companies with business plans similar to ours that must
combine with one or more target businesses that have a fair market value equal
to 80% or more of the acquirer’s net assets, we will not combine with a target
business or businesses unless the fair market value of such entity or entities
meets a minimum valuation threshold of 80% of the amount in the trust account
(excluding deferred underwriting discounts and commissions of $3.99 million)
at
the time of our initial business combination. We have used this criterion to
provide investors and our management team with greater certainty as to the
fair
market value that a target business or businesses must have in order to qualify
for a business combination with us. The determination of net assets requires
an
acquirer to have deducted all liabilities from total assets to arrive at the
balance of net assets. Given the on-going nature of legal, accounting,
stockholder meeting and other expenses that will be incurred immediately before
and at the time of a business combination, the balance of an acquirer’s total
liabilities may be difficult to ascertain at a particular point in time with
a
high degree of certainty. Accordingly, we have determined to use the valuation
threshold of 80% of the amount in the trust account (excluding deferred
underwriting discounts and commissions of $3.99 million) at the time of the
initial business combination for the fair market value of the target business
or
businesses with which we combine so that our management team will have greater
certainty when selecting, and our investors will have greater certainty when
voting to approve or disapprove a proposed combination with, a target business
or businesses that will meet the minimum valuation criterion for our initial
business combination.
The
fair
market value of a target business or businesses will be determined by our Board
of Directors based upon one or more standards generally accepted by the
financial community (such as actual and potential sales, the values of
comparable businesses, earnings and cash flow and/or book value). If our board
is not able to independently determine that the target business has a sufficient
fair market value to meet the threshold criterion, we will obtain an opinion
from an unaffiliated, independent investment banking firm which is a member
of
FINRA with respect to the satisfaction of such criterion. We expect that any
such opinion would be included in our proxy soliciting materials furnished
to
our stockholders in connection with a business combination, and that such
independent investment banking firm will be a consenting expert. As the opinion
will likely be addressed to our Board of Directors for their use in evaluating
the transaction, we do not anticipate that our stockholders will be entitled
to
rely on such opinion. However, as the opinion will be attached to, and
thoroughly described in, our proxy soliciting materials, we believe investors
will be provided with sufficient information in order to allow them to properly
analyze the transaction. Accordingly, whether the independent investment banking
firm allows stockholders to rely on their opinion will not be a factor in
determining which firm to hire. We will not be required to obtain an opinion
from an investment banking firm as to the fair market value of the business
if
our Board of Directors independently determines that the target business or
businesses has sufficient fair market value to meet the threshold criterion.
Lack
of business diversification
While
we
may seek to effect business combinations with more than one target business,
our
initial business combination must be with one or more target businesses whose
collective fair market value is at least equal to 80% of the balance in the
trust account (excluding deferred underwriting discounts and commissions of
$3.99 million) at the time of such business combination, as discussed above.
Consequently, we expect to complete only a single business combination, although
this may entail a simultaneous combination with several operating businesses
at
the same time. At the time of our initial business combination, we may not
be
able to acquire more than one target business because of various factors,
including complex accounting or financial reporting issues and the need to
close
all of the transactions simultaneously. For example, we may need to present
pro
forma financial statements reflecting the operations of several target
businesses as if they had been combined historically.
A
simultaneous combination with several target businesses also presents logistical
issues such as the need to coordinate the timing of negotiations, proxy
statement disclosure and closings. In addition, if conditions to closings with
respect to one or more of the target businesses are not satisfied, the fair
market value of the businesses, collectively, could fall below the required
fair
market value threshold of 80% of the balance in the trust account (excluding
deferred underwriting discounts and commissions of $3.99 million) at the time
of
the business combination.
Accordingly,
while it is possible that we may attempt to effect our initial business
combination with more than one target business, we are more likely to choose
a
single target business if all other factors appear equal. This means that for
an
indefinite period of time, the prospects for our success may depend entirely
on
the future performance of a single business. Unlike other entities that have
the
resources to complete business combinations with multiple entities in one or
several industries, it is probable that we will not have the resources to
diversify our operations and mitigate the risks of being in a single line of
business. By consummating a business combination with only a single entity,
our
lack of diversification may:
•
|
subject
us to negative economic, competitive and regulatory developments,
any or
all of which may have a substantial adverse impact on the particular
industry in which we operate after a business combination, and
|
•
|
cause
us to depend on the marketing and sale of a single product or limited
number of products or services.
|
If
we
complete a business combination structured as a merger in which the
consideration is our stock, we would have a significant amount of cash available
to make add-on acquisitions following our initial business combination.
Limited
ability to evaluate the target business’ management
Although
we intend to closely scrutinize the management of a prospective target business
when evaluating the desirability of effecting a business combination with that
business, we cannot assure you that our assessment of the target business’
management will prove to be correct. In addition, we cannot assure you that
the
future management will have the necessary skills, qualifications or abilities
to
manage a public company. Furthermore, the future role of members of our
management team, if any, in the target business cannot presently be stated
with
any certainty. While it is possible that one or more of our current directors
may remain associated in some capacity, whether as a director or otherwise,
with
us following a business combination, we cannot assure you that any of them
will
devote their full efforts to our affairs subsequent to a business combination.
Moreover, we cannot assure you that members of our management team will have
significant experience or knowledge relating to the operations of the particular
target business.
Following
a business combination, we may seek to recruit additional managers to supplement
the incumbent management of the target business. We cannot assure you that
we
will have the ability to recruit additional managers, or that additional
managers will have the requisite skills, knowledge or experience necessary
to
enhance the incumbent management.
Opportunity
for stockholder approval of business combination
Prior
to
the completion of our initial business combination, we will submit the
transaction to our stockholders for approval, even if the nature of the
acquisition is such as would not ordinarily require stockholder approval under
Delaware state law. In connection with our initial business combination, we
will
also submit to our stockholders for approval a proposal to amend our amended
and
restated certificate of incorporation to provide for our corporate life to
continue perpetually following the consummation of our initial business
combination. Any vote to extend our corporate life to continue perpetually
following the consummation of our initial business combination will be taken
only if such business combination is approved. We will only consummate our
initial business combination if stockholders vote both in favor of such business
combination and our amendment to extend our corporate life.
In
connection with seeking stockholder approval of our initial business
combination, we will furnish our stockholders with proxy solicitation materials
prepared in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
which, among other matters, will include a description of the operations of
the
target business and audited historical financial statements of the business.
In
connection with the vote required for our initial business combination, all
of
our founders, including all of our officers and directors, have agreed to vote
their founders’ common stock in accordance with the majority of the shares of
common stock voted by the public stockholders. Our founders have also agreed
that they will vote any shares they purchase in the open market in, or after,
our initial public offering in favor of our initial business combination. We
will proceed with our initial business combination only if a majority of the
shares of common stock voted by the public stockholders are voted in favor
of
such business combination and an amendment to our certificate of incorporation
to provide for our perpetual existence is approved by holders of a majority
of
our outstanding shares of common stock and public stockholders owning less
than
30% of the shares sold in our initial public offering both vote against the
business combination and exercise their conversion rights.
Conversion
rights
At
the
time we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination, we will
offer each public stockholder the right to have their shares of common stock
converted to cash if the stockholder votes against such business combination
and
such business combination is approved and completed. Our founders will not
have
conversion rights with respect to any shares of common stock owned by them,
directly or indirectly, whether included in or underlying the founders’ units or
purchased by them in our initial public offering or in the aftermarket. The
actual per-share conversion price will be equal to the aggregate amount then
on
deposit in the trust account, before payment of deferred underwriting discounts
and commissions and including accrued interest, net of any interest income
on
the trust account balance previously released to us to pay our tax obligations
and net of interest income of up to $2.1 million previously released to us
to
fund our working capital requirements (calculated as of two business days prior
to the consummation of the proposed business combination), divided by the number
of shares sold in our initial public offering. The initial per-share conversion
price would be approximately $9.77 per share, or $0.23 less than the per-unit
offering price of $10.00.
An
eligible stockholder may request conversion at any time after the mailing to
our
stockholders of the proxy statement and prior to the vote taken with respect
to
a proposed initial business combination at a meeting held for that purpose,
but
the request will not be granted unless the stockholder votes against our initial
business combination and such business combination is approved and completed.
Additionally, we may require public stockholders, whether they are a record
holder or hold their shares in ‘‘street name,’’ to either tender their
certificates to our transfer agent at any time through the vote on our initial
business combination or to deliver their shares to the transfer agent
electronically using Depository Trust Company’s DWAC (Deposit/Withdrawal At
Custodian) System, at the holder’s option. The proxy solicitation materials that
we will furnish to stockholders in connection with the vote for a proposed
initial business combination will indicate whether we are requiring stockholders
to satisfy such certification and delivery requirements. Accordingly, a
stockholder would have from the time we send out our proxy statement through
the
vote on such business combination to deliver his shares if he wishes to seek
to
exercise his conversion rights. This time period varies depending on the
specific facts of each transaction. However, as the delivery process can be
accomplished by the stockholder, whether or not he is a record holder or his
shares are held in ‘‘street name,’’ in a matter of hours by simply contacting
the transfer agent or his broker and requesting delivery of his shares through
the DWAC System, we believe this time period is sufficient for an average
investor. Traditionally, in order to perfect conversion rights in connection
with a blank check company’s business combination, a holder could simply vote
against a proposed business combination and check a box on the proxy card
indicating such holder was seeking to convert. After the business combination
was approved, the company would contact such stockholder to arrange for him
to
deliver his certificate to verify ownership. As a result, the stockholder then
had an ‘‘option window’’ after the consummation of the business combination
during which he could monitor the price of the stock in the market. If the
price
rose above the conversion price, he could sell his shares in the open market
before actually delivering his shares to the company for cancellation. Thus,
the
conversion right, to which stockholders were aware they needed to commit before
the stockholder meeting, would become a ‘‘put’’ right surviving past the
consummation of the business combination until the converting holder delivered
his certificate. The requirement for physical or electronic delivery prior
to
the meeting ensures that a converting holder’s election to convert is
irrevocable once the business combination is approved.
If
a
stockholder votes against our initial business combination but fails to properly
exercise his, her or its conversion rights, the stockholder will not have his,
her or its shares of common stock converted to his, her or its pro rata share
of
the trust account. Any request for conversion, once made, may be withdrawn
at
any time prior to the vote taken with respect to the proposed business
combination. Furthermore, if a stockholder delivers his certificate for
conversion and subsequently decides prior to the meeting not to elect
conversion, he may simply request that the transfer agent return the certificate
(physically or electronically). It is anticipated that the funds to be
distributed to stockholders entitled to convert their shares who elect
conversion will be distributed promptly after completion of our initial business
combination. Public stockholders who convert their stock into their pro rata
share of the trust account will still have the right to exercise any warrants
they still hold.
We
will
not complete our proposed initial business combination if public stockholders
owning 30% or more of the shares sold in our initial public offering exercise
their conversion rights. We have set the conversion percentage at 30% in order
to reduce the likelihood that a small group of investors holding a block of
our
stock will be able to stop us from completing our initial business combination
that may otherwise be approved by a majority of our public stockholders. The
initial conversion price will be approximately $9.77 per share. As this amount
is lower than the $10.00 per unit offering price and it may be less than the
market price of the common stock on the date of conversion, there may be a
disincentive on the part of public stockholders to exercise their conversion
rights.
If
a vote
on our initial business combination is held and the business combination is
not
approved, we may continue to try to consummate an initial business combination
with a different target until October 3, 2009. If our initial business
combination is not approved or completed for any reason, then public
stockholders voting against our initial business combination who exercised
their
conversion rights would not be entitled to convert their shares of common stock
into a pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust
account. In such case, if we have required public stockholders to tender their
certificates prior to the meeting, we will promptly return such certificates
to
the tendering public stockholder. Public stockholders would be entitled to
receive their pro rata share of the aggregate amount on deposit in the trust
account only in the event that the initial business combination they voted
against was duly approved and subsequently completed, or in connection with
our
liquidation.
Liquidation
if no business combination
Our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that we will continue
in existence only until October 3, 2009. This provision may not be amended
except in connection with the consummation of our initial business combination.
If we have not completed a business combination by such date, our corporate
existence will cease except for the purposes of winding up our affairs and
liquidating, pursuant to Section 278 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
This has the same effect as if our Board of Directors and stockholders had
formally voted to approve our dissolution pursuant to Section 275 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law. Accordingly, limiting our corporate existence
to a specified date as permitted by Section 102(b)(5) of the Delaware General
Corporation Law removes the necessity to comply with the formal procedures
set
forth in Section 275 (which would have required our Board of Directors and
stockholders to formally vote to approve our dissolution and liquidation and
to
have filed a certificate of dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State).
Instead, we will notify the Delaware Secretary of State in writing on the
termination date that our corporate existence is ceasing, and include with
such
notice payment of any franchise taxes then due to or assessable by the state.
We
view this provision terminating our corporate life by October 3, 2009 as an
obligation to our stockholders and will not take any action to amend or waive
this provision to allow us to survive for a longer period of time except in
connection with the consummation of our initial business combination.
If
we are
unable to complete a business combination by October 3, 2009, as soon as
practicable thereafter, we will adopt a plan of distribution in accordance
with
Section 281(b) of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Section 278 provides
that our existence will continue for at least three years after our expiration
for the purpose of prosecuting and defending suits, whether civil, criminal
or
administrative, by or against us, and of enabling us gradually to settle and
close our business, to dispose of and convey our property, to discharge our
liabilities and to distribute to our stockholders any remaining assets, but
not
for the purpose of continuing the business for which we were organized. Our
existence will continue automatically even beyond the three-year period for
the
purpose of completing the prosecution or defense of suits begun prior to the
expiration of the three-year period, until such time as any judgments, orders
or
decrees resulting from such suits are fully executed. Section 281(b) will
require us to pay or make reasonable provision for all then-existing claims
and
obligations, including all contingent, conditional, or unmatured contractual
claims known to us, and to make such provision as will be reasonably likely
to
be sufficient to provide compensation for any then-pending claims and for claims
that have not been made known to us or that have not arisen but that, based
on
facts known to us at the time, are likely to arise or to become known to us
within 10 years after such date. Under Section 281(b), the plan of distribution
must provide for all of such claims to be paid in full or make provision for
payments to be made in full, as applicable, if there are sufficient assets.
If
there are insufficient assets, the plan must provide that such claims and
obligations be paid or provided for according to their priority and, among
claims of equal priority, ratably to the extent of legally available assets.
Any
remaining assets will be available for distribution to our stockholders.
However, because we are a blank check company, rather than an operating company,
and our operations will be limited to searching for prospective target
businesses to acquire, the only likely claims to arise would be from our vendors
and service providers (such as accountants, lawyers, investment bankers, etc.)
and potential target businesses. As described below, we will seek to have all
vendors, service providers and prospective target businesses execute agreements
with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind they may have
in
or to any monies held in the trust account. As a result, the claims that could
be made against us will be limited, thereby lessening the likelihood that any
claim would result in any liability extending to the trust. We therefore believe
that any necessary provision for creditors will be reduced and should not have
a
significant impact on our ability to distribute the funds in the trust account
to our public stockholders. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you of this fact
as
there is no guarantee that vendors, service providers and prospective target
businesses will execute waiver agreements. Nor is there any guarantee that,
even
if they execute waiver agreements with us, they will not seek recourse against
the trust account. A court could also conclude that waiver agreements are not
legally enforceable. As a result, if we liquidate, the per-share distribution
from the trust account could be less than $9.77 due to claims or potential
claims of creditors. We will distribute to all of our public stockholders,
in
proportion to their respective equity interests, an aggregate sum equal to
the
amount in the trust account, inclusive of any interest and the deferred
underwriting discounts and commissions, plus any remaining net assets outside
of
the trust account (subject to our obligations under Delaware law to provide
for
claims of creditors as described below).
We
anticipate notifying the trustee of the trust account to begin liquidating
the
assets in the trust account promptly after such date and anticipate it will
take
no more than 10 business days to effectuate such distribution. Our founders
have
waived their rights to participate in any liquidation distribution with respect
to their founders’ common stock. There will be no distribution from the trust
account with respect to our warrants, which will expire worthless. We will
pay
the costs of liquidation from our remaining assets outside of the trust account.
If such funds are insufficient, Kanders & Company and Ivy Capital Partners
have agreed to advance us the funds necessary to complete such liquidation
(currently anticipated to be no more than approximately $15,000) and have agreed
not to seek repayment of such expenses.
If
we are
unable to complete our initial business combination and expend all of the net
proceeds of our initial public offering, other than the proceeds deposited
in
the trust account, and without taking into account interest, if any, earned
on
the trust account, the initial per-share liquidation price would be
approximately $9.77, or $0.23 less than the per-unit offering price of $10.00.
The per share liquidation price includes $3.99 million in deferred underwriting
discounts and commissions that would also be distributable to our public
stockholders.
The
proceeds deposited in the trust account could, however, become subject to the
claims of our creditors (which could include vendors and service providers
we
have engaged to assist us in any way in connection with our search for a target
business and that are owed money by us, as well as target businesses themselves)
which could have higher priority than the claims of our public stockholders.
Kanders & Company and Ivy Capital Partners have agreed that they will be
liable to pay debts and obligations to target businesses or vendors or other
entities that are owed money by us for services rendered or contracted for
or
products sold to us in excess of the net proceeds of our initial public offering
not held in the trust account but only if, and to the extent, that the claims
would otherwise reduce the amount in the trust account payable to our public
stockholders in the event of a liquidation, and only if such a vendor or
prospective target business does not execute such a valid and enforceable
waiver. We cannot assure you, however, that they would be able to satisfy those
obligations. Accordingly, the actual per-share liquidation price could be less
than $9.77, plus interest, due to claims of creditors. Additionally, if we
are
forced to file a bankruptcy case or an involuntary bankruptcy case is filed
against us which is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account could
be subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in our bankruptcy
estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over the claims
of our stockholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the trust
account, we cannot assure you we will be able to return to our public
stockholders at least approximately $9.77 per share.
Our
public stockholders will be entitled to receive funds from the trust account
only in the event of the expiration of our corporate existence and our
liquidation or if they seek to convert their respective shares into cash upon
our initial business combination which the stockholder voted against and which
is completed by us. In no other circumstances will a stockholder have any right
or interest of any kind to or in the trust account.
If
we are
forced to file a bankruptcy case or an involuntary bankruptcy case is filed
against us which is not dismissed, any distributions received by stockholders
could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy laws as
either a ‘‘preferential transfer’’ or a ‘‘fraudulent conveyance.’’ As a result,
a bankruptcy court could seek to recover all amounts received by our
stockholders. Furthermore, because we intend to distribute the proceeds held
in
the trust account to our public stockholders promptly after October 3, 2009,
this may be viewed or interpreted as giving preference to our public
stockholders over any potential creditors with respect to access to or
distributions from our assets. Furthermore, our board may be viewed as having
breached their fiduciary duties to our creditors and/or may have acted in bad
faith, and thereby exposing itself and our company to claims of punitive
damages, by paying public stockholders from the trust account prior to
addressing the claims of creditors. We cannot assure you that claims will not
be
brought against us for these reasons.
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
Our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation sets forth certain
requirements and restrictions relating to our initial public offering that
apply
to us until the consummation of a business combination. Specifically, our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides, among other things,
that:
•
|
prior
to the consummation of our initial business combination, we shall
submit
the proposed business combination to our public stockholders for
approval
regardless of whether the proposed business combination is of a type
which
normally would require stockholder approval under the Delaware General
Corporation Law; in the event that a majority of the shares held
by public
stockholders present and entitled to vote at the meeting to approve
our
initial business combination are voted for the approval of the business
combination and an amendment to our certificate of incorporation
to
provide for our perpetual existence is approved, we will consummate
the
business combination; provided that we will not consummate the business
combination if the holders of 30% or more of the shares sold in our
initial public offering vote against the business combination and exercise
their conversion rights;
|
•
|
in
the event that our initial business combination is approved and is
consummated, any public stockholder holding shares of common stock
issued
in our initial public offering who voted against the business combination
may, contemporaneously with such vote, demand that we convert his,
her or
its shares into cash; if so demanded, the corporation shall, promptly
after consummation of the business combination, convert such shares
into
cash;
|
•
|
in
the event that we do not consummate a business combination prior
to
October 3, 2009, all amounts in the trust account (including deferred
underwriting discounts and commissions) plus any other net assets
outside
of the trust account not used for or reserved to pay obligations
and
claims or such other corporate expenses relating to or arising from
our
liquidation, shall be distributed on a pro rata basis to our public
stockholders; only public stockholders shall be entitled to receive
liquidating distributions and we will pay no liquidating distributions
with respect to any other shares of capital stock;
|
•
|
a
public stockholder shall be entitled to receive distributions from
the
trust account only in the event of our liquidation or in the event
he, she
or it demands conversion in connection with a vote against our initial
business combination; in no other circumstances shall a public stockholder
have any right or interest of any kind in or to the trust account;
|
•
|
unless
and until we have consummated our initial business combination, we
may not
consummate any other business combination, whether by merger, capital
stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization
or other
similar business combination or transaction or otherwise;
|
•
|
we
will continue in existence only until October 3, 2009; if we have
not
completed a business combination by such date, our corporate existence
will cease except for the purposes of winding up our affairs and
liquidating; we will not take any action to amend or waive this provision
to allow us to survive for a longer period of time except in connection
with the consummation of our initial business combination;
|
•
|
we
will consummate our initial business combination only if (i) our
initial
business combination is approved by a majority of the votes cast
by our
public shareholders at a duly held stockholders meeting, (ii) an
amendment
to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to provide
for
our perpetual existence is approved by holders of a majority of our
outstanding shares of common stock, and (iii) we have confirmed that
we
have sufficient cash resources to pay both (x) the consideration
required
to close our initial business combination, and (y) the cash due to
public
stockholders who vote against our initial business combination and
who
exercise their conversion rights; and
|
•
|
the
Board of Directors may not in any event issue any securities convertible
into common stock, shares of common stock or preferred stock prior
to our
initial business combination that participates in or is otherwise
entitled
in any manner to any of the proceeds in the trust account or votes
as a
class with the common stock on our initial business combination.
|
We
view
these provisions, which are contained in Article Seventh of our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation, as obligations to our stockholders and
will not take any action to amend or waive these provisions.
Competition
In
identifying, evaluating and selecting a target business for a business
combination, we may encounter intense competition from other entities having
a
business objective similar to ours including other blank check companies,
private equity groups and leveraged buyout funds, and operating businesses
seeking strategic acquisitions. Many of these entities are well established
and
have extensive experience identifying and effecting business combinations
directly or through affiliates. Moreover, many of these competitors possess
greater financial, technical, human and other resources than us. Our ability
to
acquire larger target businesses will be limited by our available financial
resources. This inherent limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the
acquisition of a target business. Furthermore:
•
|
our
obligation to seek stockholder approval of our initial business
combination or obtain necessary financial information may delay the
completion of a transaction;
|
•
|
our
obligation to convert into cash up to 30% of our shares of common
stock
held by our public stockholders who vote against our initial business
combination and exercise their conversion rights may reduce the resources
available to us for our initial business combination;
|
•
|
our
outstanding warrants, and the future dilution they potentially represent,
may not be viewed favorably by certain target businesses; and
|
•
|
the
requirement to acquire an operating business that has a fair market
value
equal to at least 80% of the balance of the trust account at the
time of
the acquisition (excluding deferred underwriting discounts and commissions
of $3.99 million) could require us to acquire the assets of several
operating businesses at the same time, all of which sales would be
contingent on the closings of the other sales, which could make it
more
difficult to consummate our initial business
combination.
|
Administrative
Services Agreement
We
have
agreed to pay Kanders & Company, Inc., an affiliate of each of Warren B.
Kanders, a member of our board of directors, Philip A. Baratelli, our Chief
Financial Officer, and Gary M. Julien, our Vice President, Corporate
Development, and Ivy Capital Partners, an affiliate of each of Robert W. Pangia,
our Chief Executive Officer, Russell F. Warren M.D., the Chairman of our board
of directors, and Russell F. Warren, Jr., a member of our board of directors,
an
aggregate monthly fee of $10,000 for office space, secretarial support and
administrative and general services. This arrangement was agreed to by us for
our benefit and is not intended to provide Messrs. Kanders, Baratelli, Julien,
Pangia, Warren, M.D. or Warren, Jr. compensation in lieu of a salary or other
remuneration. We believe such fees are at least as favorable as we could have
obtained from an unaffiliated person. Upon completion of our initial business
combination or our liquidation, we will cease paying these monthly
fees.
Facilities
We
currently maintain our executive offices at One Paragon Drive, Suite 125,
Montvale, New Jersey 07645. We also maintain an office at One Landmark Square,
22
nd
Floor,
Stamford, Connecticut 06901. The cost for these offices is included in the
aggregate $10,000 per-month fee described above that Ivy Capital Partners and
Kanders & Company, Inc. charge us for office space, secretarial support and
administrative and general services. We believe, based on rents and fees for
similar services in Montvale, New Jersey and Stamford, Connecticut metropolitan
areas, that the fee charged by Ivy Capital Partners and Kanders & Company,
Inc. is at least as favorable as we could have obtained from an unaffiliated
person. We consider our current office space adequate for our current
operations.
Employees
We
currently have three executive officers. These individuals are not obligated
to
devote any specific number of hours to our matters and intend to devote only
as
much time as they deem necessary to our affairs. The amount of time they will
devote in any time period will vary based on whether a target business has
been
selected for the business combination and the stage of the business combination
process the company is in. Accordingly, once management locates a suitable
target business to acquire, they will spend more time investigating such target
business and negotiating and processing the business combination (and
consequently spend more time on our affairs) than they would prior to locating
a
suitable target business. We do not intend to have any full time employees
prior
to the consummation of our initial business combination.
Executive
Officers of the Registrant
Pursuant
to General Instruction G(3), the information regarding our executive officers
called for by Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K is hereby included in Part I of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The
executive officers of our Company as of March 14, 2008 are as follows:
Robert
W. Pangia, 56,
has
served as our Chief Executive Officer since our inception. Mr. Pangia has 30
years of experience in the investment banking and private equity businesses
with
a particular emphasis on working with healthcare and technology companies.
In
February 2002, Mr. Pangia co-founded Ivy Capital Partners, the General Partner
of Ivy Healthcare Capital L.P. and Ivy Healthcare Capital II L.P., to take
advantage of a pipeline of investment opportunities in the orthopedic sector
of
the healthcare market. To date, Ivy Capital Partners has funded 17 portfolio
companies in the healthcare market. From 1997 to February 2003, Mr. Pangia
worked as a private merchant banker. From 1987 until 1996, Mr. Pangia worked
at
PaineWebber Incorporated, a wealth management services provider where he served
as Executive Vice President and Director of Investment Banking. He also held
a
number of senior management positions including; Member of the Board of
Directors of PaineWebber Incorporated, member of the firm’s executive and
operating committees and Chairman of the firm’s equity commitment committee.
From 1977 to 1986, Mr. Pangia worked as an investment banker for Kidder, Peabody
& Co. Inc., and from 1986 to 1987, Mr. Pangia was a Managing Director in the
investment banking division of Drexel Burnham Lambert. Mr. Pangia is currently
serving as a director for two Ivy portfolio companies: Gentis, Inc., a
privately-held company that has developed a proprietary implant for restoring
the normal function of a degenerated intervertebral disc and Auriga Medical
Products, GmbH, a distributor of orthopedics products in Northern Germany.
In
addition, Mr. Pangia is currently a director of Biogen Idec Inc., a
Nasdaq-listed biotechnology company, and McAfee, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange
listed supplier of computer security solutions. Mr. Pangia was formerly a
Director of Icos Corporation, a biotechnology company that was acquired by
Eli
Lilly and Company, Athena Neurosciences, a research-based pharmaceutical
company, Ryan Beck Corporation, a financial services firm providing investment
banking and equity research services to companies in a variety of industries,
and Scandius BioMedical, Inc., a previous portfolio company of Ivy Healthcare
Capital L.P. that was acquired by Covidien Ltd. On November 13, 2007, Mr. Pangia
received an A.B. from Brown University and an M.B.A. with distinction from
the
Columbia University Graduate School of Business.
Philip
A. Baratelli, 40,
has
served as our Chief Financial Officer since our inception. Since August 2007,
Mr. Baratelli has served as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
of
Kanders Acquisition Company, Inc., a blank check company formed with the purpose
of acquiring a business not limited to a particular industry. Since February
2007, Mr. Baratelli has served as Chief Financial Officer for Kanders &
Company, Inc., a private investment firm principally owned and controlled by
Mr.
Warren B. Kanders that makes investments in and provides consulting services
to
public and private entities, and Clarus Corporation, a publicly-held company,
formerly a provider of software solutions and currently seeking to redeploy
its
assets through the acquisition of a target business. From June 2001 to February
2007, Mr. Baratelli was the Corporate Controller and Treasurer of Armor
Holdings, Inc., a manufacturer and supplier of military vehicles, armored
vehicles and safety and survivability products and systems serving aerospace
& defense, public safety, homeland security and commercial markets. From
February 1998 to February 2001, Mr. Baratelli was employed by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in various positions ranging from Associate to Senior
Associate. From 1991 to 1997, Mr. Baratelli worked for Barnett Banks, Inc.
in
various finance and credit analysis positions. Mr. Baratelli received a B.S.
from Florida State University and a Bachelor of Business Administration in
accounting from the University of North Florida in 1995. Mr. Baratelli is a
Certified Public Accountant.
Gary
M. Julien
,
38, has
served as our Vice President, Corporate Development since our inception. Since
August 2007, Mr. Julien has served as Vice President, Corporate Development
of
Kanders Acquisition Company, Inc. a blank check company formed with the purpose
of acquiring a business not limited to a particular industry. Since January
2007, Mr. Julien has served as Vice President, Corporate Development for Kanders
& Company and Clarus Corporation, where his primary responsibilities include
sourcing, negotiating and consummating acquisitions, investments and related
transactions. From January 2003 to December 2006, Mr. Julien was Vice President,
Corporate Development for Armor Holdings, Inc. where he oversaw all mergers,
acquisitions and divestitures for the company, executing 15 transactions during
this period. From March 2002 through January 2003, Mr. Julien founded and was
President of Sequent Capital Advisors, a financial advisory firm focused on
secondary transactions in the private equity and venture capital market. From
1998 to March 2002, Mr. Julien was Director of Corporate Development for Global
Crossing Ltd., a developer and owner of a global fiber optic telecommunications
network, where he led and supported several mergers and acquisitions, joint
ventures and minority investments. Mr. Julien began his career at Turner
Broadcasting and worked at Bear Stearns in equity research while attending
graduate business school. He received a B.S. from the Newhouse School of
Communications at Syracuse University and an M.B.A. with honors from the
Columbia University Graduate School of Business.
Available
Information
Our
Internet address is www.highlandscorp.com. We make available free of charge
on
or through our Internet website our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those
reports, and the proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders as
soon
as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with,
or
furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed
with respect to our equity securities under section 16(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are also available on our Internet website.
All of the foregoing materials are located at the ‘‘Investor Relations’’ tab.
The information found on our website shall not be deemed incorporated by
reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this report into
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under
such Acts.
Materials
we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission may be read and copied
at
the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street,
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of
the
Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room by calling the
Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Securities and
Exchange Commission also maintains an Internet website that contains reports,
proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that
file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.
In addition, you may request a copy of any such materials, without charge,
by
submitting a written request to: Highlands Acquisition Corp., c/o the Secretary,
One Paragon Drive, Suite 125, Montvale, New Jersey 07645.
Information
on our Internet website does not constitute a part of this Annual Report on
Form
10-K.
ITEM
1A. Risk Factores
RISK
FACTORS
We
are a recently formed development stage company with no operating history and
no
revenues, and you have no basis on which to evaluate our ability to achieve
our
business objective.
We
are a
recently formed development stage company with limited operating results.
Because we lack an operating history, you have no basis upon which to evaluate
our ability to achieve our business objective of completing a business
combination with one or more target businesses. We have no plans, arrangements
or understandings with any prospective target business concerning a business
combination and may be unable to complete a business combination. If we fail
to
complete a business combination, we will never generate any operating revenues.
We
may not be able to consummate a business combination within the required time
frame, in which case, we would be forced to liquidate our assets.
Pursuant
to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, we have until October
3, 2009 in which to complete a business combination. If we fail to consummate
a
business combination within the required time frame, our corporate existence
will, in accordance with our amended and restated certificate of incorporation,
cease except for the purposes of winding up our affairs and liquidating. The
foregoing requirements are set forth in Articles Sixth and Seventh of our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation and may not be eliminated
except in connection with, and upon consummation of, a business combination.
We
may not be able to find suitable target businesses within the required time
frame. In addition, our negotiating position and our ability to conduct adequate
due diligence on any potential target may be reduced as we approach the deadline
for the consummation of a business combination.
If
we are forced to liquidate before a business combination and distribute the
trust account, our public stockholders may receive less than $10.00 per share
and our warrants will expire worthless.
If
we are
unable to complete a business combination within the required time frame and
are
forced to liquidate our assets, the per-share liquidation distribution may
be
less than $10.00 because of the expenses of our initial public offering, our
general and administrative expenses and the anticipated costs of seeking a
business combination. Furthermore, there will be no distribution with respect
to
our outstanding warrants, which will expire worthless, if we liquidate before
the completion of a business combination.
If
we are unable to consummate a business combination, our public stockholders
will
be forced to wait the full 24 months before receiving liquidation distributions.
We
have
24 months from October 3, 2007 in which to complete a business combination.
We
have no obligation to return funds to public stockholders prior to the
expiration of such 24-month period unless we consummate a business combination
prior thereto and only then in cases where public stockholders have sought
conversion of their shares. Only after the expiration of this full time period
will public stockholders be entitled to liquidation distributions if we are
unable to complete a business combination. Accordingly, public stockholders
funds may be unavailable to them until such date.
You
will not be entitled to protections normally afforded to investors of blank
check companies.
Since
the
net proceeds of our initial public offering are intended to be used to complete
a business combination with a target business that has not been identified,
we
may be deemed to be a ‘‘blank check’’ company under the United States securities
laws. However, since our securities are listed on the American Stock Exchange,
a
national securities exchange, and we have net tangible assets in excess of
$5.0
million because of the consummation of our initial public offering and have
filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, including an audited balance sheet
demonstrating this fact, we are exempt from rules promulgated by the SEC to
protect investors in blank check companies such as Rule 419. Accordingly, our
stockholders will not be afforded the benefits or protections of those rules
such as completely restricting the transferability of our securities, requiring
us to complete a business combination within 18 months of the effective date
of
our initial registration statement and restricting the use of interest earned
on
the funds held in the trust account. Because we are not subject to Rule 419,
our
units are immediately tradable, we are entitled to withdraw a certain amount
of
interest earned on the funds held in the trust account prior to the completion
of a business combination and we have a longer period of time to complete such
a
business combination than we would if we were subject to such rule.
Because
there are numerous companies with a business plan similar to ours seeking to
effectuate a business combination and because of our limited resources and
structure, it may be more difficult for us to consummate a business combination.
In
identifying, evaluating and selecting a target business for a business
combination, we expect to encounter intense competition from other entities
having a business objective similar to ours including other blank check
companies, private equity groups, venture capital funds, leveraged buyout funds,
and operating businesses seeking strategic acquisitions. Many of these entities
are well-established and have extensive experience identifying and effecting
business combinations directly or through affiliates. Moreover, many of these
competitors possess greater financial, technical, human and other resources
than
us which will give them a competitive advantage in pursuing the acquisition
of
certain target businesses. Furthermore:
•
our
obligation to seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination
or
obtain necessary financial information may delay the completion of a
transaction;
•
our
obligation to convert into cash up to 30% minus one share of the shares of
common stock held by our public stockholders who vote against the business
combination and exercise their conversion rights may reduce the resources
available to us for a business combination;
•
our
outstanding warrants, and the future dilution they potentially represent, may
not be viewed favorably by certain target businesses; and
•
the
requirement to acquire an operating business that has a fair market value equal
to at least 80% of the balance of the trust account at the time of the
acquisition (excluding deferred underwriting discounts and commissions) could
require us to acquire the assets of several operating businesses at the same
time, all of which sales would be contingent on the closings of the other sales,
which could make it more difficult to consummate the business combination.
Any
of
these factors may place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully
negotiating a business combination and, because we are subject to competition
from entities seeking to consummate a business plan similar to ours, we cannot
assure you that we will be able to effectuate a business combination within
the
required time period.
If
the net proceeds of our initial public offering not being held in the trust
account plus the interest earned on the funds held in the trust account that
may
be available to us are insufficient to allow us to operate for at least the
next
24 months, we may be unable to complete a business combination.
We
believe that the funds available to us outside of the trust account, plus the
interest earned on the funds held in the trust account that may be available
to
us, will be sufficient to allow us to operate for at least the next 24 months,
assuming that a business combination is not consummated during that time.
However, we cannot assure you that our estimates will be accurate. We could
use
a portion of the funds available to us to pay fees to consultants to assist
us
with our search for a target business. We could also use a portion of the funds
as a down payment or to fund a ‘‘no-shop’’ provision (a provision in letters of
intent designed to keep target businesses from ‘‘shopping’’ around for
transactions with other companies on terms more favorable to such target
businesses) with respect to a particular proposed business combination. If
we
entered into a letter of intent where we paid for the right to receive
exclusivity from a target business and were subsequently required to forfeit
the
funds whether as a result of our breach or otherwise), we might not have
sufficient funds to continue searching for, or conduct due diligence with
respect to, a target business.
If
we do not conduct an adequate due diligence investigation of a target business
with which we combine, we may be required to subsequently take write-downs
or
write-offs, restructuring, and impairment or other charges that could have
a
significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations
and our stock price, which could cause you to lose some or all of your
investment.
We
must
conduct a due diligence investigation of the target businesses we intend to
acquire. Intensive due diligence is time consuming and expensive due to the
operations, accounting, finance and legal professionals who must be involved
in
the due diligence process. Even if we conduct extensive due diligence on a
target business with which we combine, we cannot assure you that this diligence
will reveal all material issues that may affect a particular target business,
or
that factors outside the control of the target business and outside of our
control will not later arise. If our diligence fails to identify issues specific
to a target business, industry or the environment in which the target business
operates, we may be forced to later write-down or write-off assets, restructure
our operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in our
reporting losses. Even though these charges may be non-cash items and not have
an immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this
nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about us or our common
stock. In addition, charges of this nature may cause us to violate net worth
or
other covenants to which we may be subject as a result of assuming pre-existing
debt held by a target business or by virtue of our obtaining post-combination
debt financing.
A
decline in interest rates could limit the amount available to fund our search
for a target business or businesses and complete a business combination since
we
will depend on interest earned on the trust account to fund our search, to
pay
our tax obligations and to complete our initial business combination.
Of
the
net proceeds of our initial public offering, only $500,000 has been made
available to us initially outside the trust account to fund our working capital
requirements. We will depend on sufficient interest being earned on the proceeds
held in the trust account to provide us with additional working capital of
up to
$2.1 million which we will need to identify one or more target businesses and
to
complete our initial business combination, as well as the funds required to
pay
any tax obligations that we may owe. While we are entitled to have released
to
us for such purposes certain interest earned on the funds in the trust account,
a substantial decline in interest rates may result in our having insufficient
funds available with which to structure, negotiate or close an initial business
combination. In such event, we would need to borrow funds from our founders
to
operate or may be forced to liquidate. Our founders are under no obligation
to
advance funds in such circumstances.
If
third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in trust could be
reduced and the per-share liquidation price received by stockholders may be
less
than approximately $9.77 per share.
Our
placing of funds in the trust account may not protect those funds from third
party claims against us. Although we will seek to have all vendors and service
providers we engage and prospective target businesses we negotiate with, execute
agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind
in or
to any monies held in the trust account for the benefit of our public
stockholders, there is no guarantee that they will execute waiver agreements.
Furthermore, there is no guarantee that, even if an entity executes a waiver
agreement with us, it will not seek recourse against the trust account. Nor
is
there any guarantee that a court would uphold the validity of a waiver
agreement.
Accordingly,
the proceeds held in trust could be subject to claims which could take priority
over those of our public stockholders and, as a result, the per-share
liquidation price could be less than approximately $9.77 due to claims of
creditors. If we liquidate before the completion of a business combination
and
distribute the proceeds held in the trust account to our public stockholders,
Kanders & Company and Ivy Capital Partners have agreed that they will be
liable to ensure that the proceeds in the trust account are not reduced by
the
claims of target businesses or claims of vendors or other entities that are
owed
money by us for services rendered or contracted for or products sold to us,
but
only if a vendor or prospective target business does not execute a valid and
enforceable waiver. Because we will seek to have all vendors and prospective
target businesses execute waiver agreements with us waiving any right, title,
interest or claim of any kind they may have in or to any monies held in the
trust account, we believe the likelihood of Kanders & Company and Ivy
Capital Partners having any such obligations is minimal. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, we have reviewed their financial information and believe they will
be
able to satisfy any indemnification obligations that may arise. However, we
cannot assure you that they will be able to satisfy those obligations.
Therefore, we cannot assure you that the per-share distribution from the trust
account, if we liquidate, will not be less than approximately $9.77, plus
interest, due to such claims.
Additionally,
if we are forced to file a bankruptcy case or an involuntary bankruptcy case
is
filed against us which is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account
could be subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in our
bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority
over
the claims of our stockholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete
the
trust account, we cannot assure you we will be able to return to our public
stockholders at least approximately $9.77 per share.
Our
stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against us to the
extent of distributions received by them.
If
we are
unable to complete a business combination within the required time period,
our
corporate existence will cease except for the purposes of winding up our affairs
and liquidating pursuant to Section 278 of the Delaware General Corporation
Law,
in which case we will as promptly as practicable thereafter adopt a plan of
distribution in accordance with Section 281(b) of the Delaware General
Corporation Law. Section 278 provides that our existence will continue for
at
least three years after its expiration for the purpose of prosecuting and
defending suits, whether civil, criminal or administrative, by or against us,
and of enabling us gradually to settle and close our business, to dispose of
and
convey our property, to discharge our liabilities and to distribute to our
stockholders any remaining assets, but not for the purpose of continuing the
business for which we were organized. Our existence will continue automatically
even beyond the three-year period for the purpose of completing the prosecution
or defense of suits begun prior to the expiration of the three-year period,
until such time as any judgments, orders or decrees resulting from such suits
are fully executed. Section 281(b) will require us to pay or make reasonable
provision for all then-existing claims and obligations, including all
contingent, conditional, or unmatured contractual claims known to us, and to
make provisions as will be reasonably likely to be sufficient to provide
compensation for any then-pending claims and for claims that have not been
made
known to us or that have not arisen but that, based on facts known to us at
the
time, are likely to arise or to become known to us within 10 years after the
date of dissolution. Accordingly, we would be required to provide for any
creditors known to us at that time or those that we believe could be potentially
brought against us within the subsequent 10 years prior to distributing the
funds held in the trust to stockholders. However, because we are a blank check
company, rather than an operating company, and our operations will be limited
to
searching for prospective target businesses to acquire, the only likely claims
to arise would be from our vendors that we engage after the consummation of
our
initial public offering (such as accountants, lawyers, investment bankers,
etc.)
and potential target businesses. We intend to have all vendors that we engage
after the consummation of our initial public offering and prospective target
businesses execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or
claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the trust account. Accordingly,
we
believe the claims that could be made against us should be limited, thereby
lessening the likelihood that any claim would result in any liability extending
to the trust. However, we cannot assure you that we will properly assess all
claims that may be potentially brought against us. As a result, our stockholders
could potentially be liable for any claims to the extent of distributions
received by them (but no more) and any liability of our stockholders may extend
well beyond the third anniversary of the date of distribution. Accordingly,
we
cannot assure you that third parties will not seek to recover from our
stockholders amounts owed to them by us.
If
we are
forced to file a bankruptcy case or an involuntary bankruptcy case is filed
against us which is not dismissed, any distributions received by stockholders
could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy laws as
either a ‘‘preferential transfer’’ or a ‘‘fraudulent conveyance.’’ As a result,
a bankruptcy court could seek to recover all amounts received by our
stockholders. Furthermore, because we intend to distribute the proceeds held
in
the trust account to our public stockholders promptly after 24 months from
October 3, 2007, this may be viewed or interpreted as giving preference to
our
public stockholders over any potential creditors with respect to access to
or
distributions from our assets. Furthermore, our board may be viewed as having
breached their fiduciary duties to our creditors and/or may have acted in bad
faith, and thereby exposing itself and our company to claims of punitive
damages, by paying public stockholders from the trust account prior to
addressing the claims of creditors. We cannot assure you that claims will not
be
brought against us for these reasons.
An
effective registration statement may not be in place when a warrant holder
desires to exercise warrants, thus precluding such warrant holder from being
able to exercise warrants and causing the warrants to expire worthless.
No
warrant will be exercisable and we will not be obligated to issue shares of
common stock unless, at the time a holder seeks to exercise a warrant, we have
a
registration statement under the Securities Act in effect covering the shares
of
common stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants and a current prospectus
relating to the common stock. Under the terms of the warrant agreement, we
have
agreed to use our best efforts to have a registration statement in effect
covering shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants as of
the
date the warrants become exercisable and to maintain a current prospectus
relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants until the
expiration of the warrants. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able
to do so. We will not be required to net cash settle the warrants if we do
not
maintain a current prospectus. In such event, the warrants held by public
stockholders may have no value, the market for such warrants may be limited,
such warrants may expire worthless and, as a result, an investor may have paid
the full unit price solely for the shares of common stock included in the units.
A
warrant holder will only be able to exercise a warrant if the issuance of common
stock upon the exercise has been registered or qualified or is deemed exempt
under the securities laws of the state of residence of the holder of the
warrants.
No
warrants will be exercisable and we will not be obligated to issue shares of
common stock unless the common stock issuable upon an exercise has been
registered or qualified or deemed to be exempt under the securities laws of
the
state of residence of the holder of the warrants. At the time that the warrants
become exercisable, we expect to continue to be listed on a national securities
exchange, which would provide an exemption from registration in every state.
Accordingly, we believe holders in every state will be able to exercise their
warrants as long as our prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon
exercise of the warrants is current. However, we cannot assure you of this
fact.
If the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrant is not qualified
or
exempt from qualification in the jurisdictions in which the holders of the
warrants reside, the warrants may be deprived of any value, the market for
the
warrants may be limited and they may expire worthless if they cannot be sold.
We
have been advised that certain provisions contained in our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation may not be enforceable under Delaware law. This
could reduce or eliminate the protection afforded to our stockholders by such
provisions.
Our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains certain requirements
and restrictions that will apply to us until the consummation of our initial
business combination. Specifically, our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation provides, among other things, that:
•
|
prior
to the consummation of any business combination, we shall submit
the
business combination to our public stockholders for approval regardless
of
whether the business combination is of a type which normally would
require
stockholder approval under the Delaware General Corporation Law;
in the
event that a majority of the shares held by public stockholders present
and entitled to vote at the meeting to approve the business combination
are voted for the approval of the business combination and an amendment
to
our certificate of incorporation to provide for our perpetual existence
is
approved we will consummate the business combination; provided that
we
will not consummate any business combination if the holders of 30%
or more
of the shares sold in our initial public offering vote against the
business combination and exercise their conversion rights;
|
•
|
upon
consummation of our initial public offering, we delivered, or cause
to be
delivered, for deposit into the trust account $134,830,000, comprised
of
(i) $131,580,000 of the net proceeds, including $3,990,000 in deferred
underwriting discounts and commissions, and (ii) $3,250,000 of the
proceeds from our issuance and sale in a private placement of 3,250,000
sponsors’ warrants issued to certain of our officers and directors or
affiliates of our officers and directors;
|
•
|
in
the event that a business combination is approved and is consummated,
any
public stockholder holding shares of common stock issued in our initial
public offering who voted against the business combination may,
contemporaneously with such vote, demand that we convert his, her
or its
shares into cash; if so demanded, we shall, promptly after consummation
of
the business combination, convert such shares into cash;
|
•
|
in
the event that we do not consummate a business combination within
the
required time period, all amounts in the trust account (including
deferred
underwriting discounts and commissions) plus any other net assets
outside
of the trust account not used for or reserved to pay obligations
and
claims or other corporate expenses relating to or arising from our
liquidation, shall be distributed on a pro rata basis to our public
stockholders; only public stockholders shall be entitled to receive
liquidating distributions and we will pay no liquidating distributions
with respect to any other shares of capital stock;
|
•
|
a
public stockholder shall be entitled to receive distributions from
the
trust account only in the event of our liquidation or in the event
he, she
or it demands conversion in connection with a vote against a business
combination; in no other circumstances shall a public stockholder
have any
right or interest of any kind in or to the trust account;
|
•
|
unless
and until we have consummated an initial business combination, we
may not
consummate any other business combination, whether by merger, capital
stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization
or other
similar business combination or transaction or otherwise;
|
•
|
we
will continue in existence only until October 3, 2009; if we have
not
completed a business combination by such date, our corporate existence
will cease except for the purposes of winding up our affairs and
liquidating; we will not take any action to amend or waive this provision
to allow us to survive for a longer period of time except in connection
with the consummation of our initial business combination;
|
•
|
we
will consummate our initial business combination only if (i) the
initial
business combination is approved by a majority of votes cast by our
public
shareholders at a duly held stockholders meeting, (ii) an amendment
to our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation to provide for
our
perpetual existence is approved by holders of a majority of our
outstanding shares of common stock, and (iii) we have confirmed that
we
have sufficient cash resources to pay both (x) the consideration
required
to close our initial business combination, and (y) the cash due to
public
stockholders who vote against the business combination and who exercise
their conversion rights; and
|
•
|
our
Board of Directors may not in any event issue any securities convertible
into common stock, shares of common stock or preferred stock prior
to an
initial business combination that participates in or is otherwise
entitled
in any manner to any of the proceeds in the trust account or votes
as a
class with the common stock on an initial business combination.
|
Our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that until the
consummation of our initial business combination, the above requirements and
restrictions will not be amended. We have been advised that such provisions
limiting our ability to amend our certificate of incorporation may not be
enforceable under Delaware law. Accordingly, if an amendment were proposed
and
approved, it could reduce or eliminate the protection afforded to our public
stockholders by these requirements and restrictions. However, we view these
provisions as obligations to our stockholders and have agreed not to take any
action to amend or waive these provisions.
Since
we have not yet selected a particular industry or target business with which
to
complete a business combination, you will be unable to currently ascertain
the
merits or risks of the industry or business in which we may ultimately operate.
Although
we intend to focus our search for target businesses in the healthcare industry,
we may consummate a business combination with a company in any industry and
are
not limited to any particular type of business. Accordingly, there is no current
basis for you to evaluate the possible merits or risks of the particular
industry in which we may ultimately operate or the target business which we
may
ultimately acquire. If we complete a business combination with an entity in
an
industry characterized by a high level of risk, we may be affected by the
currently unascertainable risks of that industry. Although our management will
endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular industry or target
business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all
of
the significant risk factors. Even if we properly assess those risks, some
of
them may be outside of our control or ability to affect. We also cannot assure
you that an investment in our securities will not ultimately prove to be less
favorable to our stockholders than a direct investment, if an opportunity were
available, in a target business.
Your
only opportunity to evaluate and affect the investment decision regarding a
potential business combination will be limited to voting for or against the
business combination submitted to our stockholders for approval.
Your
only
opportunity to evaluate and affect the investment decision regarding a potential
business combination will be limited to voting for or against the business
combination submitted to our stockholders for approval. In addition, a proposal
that you vote against could still be approved if a sufficient number of public
stockholders vote for the proposed business combination. Alternatively, a
proposal that you vote for could still be rejected if a sufficient number of
public stockholders vote against the proposed business combination.
We
may not seek an opinion from an unaffiliated third party as to the fair market
value of the target business we acquire or that the price we are paying for
the
business is fair to our stockholders from a financial point of view.
We
may
not seek an opinion from an unaffiliated third party that the target business
we
select has a fair market value in excess of at least 80% of the balance in
the
trust account (excluding deferred underwriting discounts and commissions).
We
are only required to obtain an opinion if (i) our Board of Directors is not
able
to independently determine that the target business has a sufficient fair market
value to meet the threshold criterion or (ii) we are acquiring a target business
that is an affiliate of a member of our management team. We are also not
required to obtain an opinion from an unaffiliated third party indicating that
the price we are paying is fair to our stockholders from a financial point
of
view unless the target is affiliated with our officers, directors, founders
or
their affiliates. If no opinion is obtained, our stockholders will be relying
on
the judgment of our Board of Directors.
We
may issue shares of our capital stock or debt securities to complete a business
combination. Issuance of our capital stock would reduce the equity interest
of
our stockholders and may cause a change in control of our ownership, while
the
issuance of debt securities may have a significant impact on our ability to
utilize our available cash.
Our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of
up
to 50,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.0001 per share, and 1,000,000
shares of preferred stock, par value $.0001 per share. There are 12,250,000
authorized but unissued shares of our common stock available for issuance (after
appropriate reservation for the issuance of the shares upon full exercise of
our
outstanding warrants, including the founders’ warrants and sponsors’ warrants
but without taking into account the 1,000,000 co-investment units) and all
of
the 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock available for issuance. We may issue
a
substantial number of additional shares of our common or preferred stock, or
a
combination of common and preferred stock, to complete a business combination.
The issuance of additional shares of our common stock or any number of shares
of
our preferred stock:
•
|
may
significantly reduce the equity interest of our stockholders;
|
•
|
may
subordinate the rights of holders of common stock if we issue preferred
stock with rights senior to those afforded to our common stock;
|
•
|
may
cause a change in control if a substantial number of our shares of
common
stock are issued, which may affect, among other things, our ability
to use
our net operating loss carry forwards, if any, and could result in
the
resignation or removal of our present officers and directors;
|
•
|
may,
in certain circumstances, have the effect of delaying or preventing
a
change of control of us; and
|
•
|
may
adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common stock.
|
Similarly,
if we issue debt securities, it could result in:
•
|
default
and foreclosure on our assets if our operating revenues after a business
combination are insufficient to repay our debt obligations;
|
•
|
acceleration
of our obligations to repay the indebtedness even if we make all
principal
and interest payments when due if we breach certain covenants that
require
the maintenance of certain financial ratios or reserves without a
waiver
or renegotiation of that covenant;
|
•
|
our
immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if any,
if the
debt security is payable on demand; and
|
•
|
our
inability to obtain necessary additional financing if the debt security
contains covenants restricting our ability to obtain such financing
while
the debt security is outstanding.
|
The
value
of your investment in us may decline if any of these events occur.
Resources
could be wasted in researching acquisitions that are not consummated, which
could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire
or
merge with another business.
It
is
anticipated that the investigation of each specific target business and the
negotiation, drafting, and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure
documents, and other instruments will require substantial management time and
attention and substantial costs for accountants, attorneys and others. If a
decision is made not to complete a specific business combination, the costs
incurred up to that point for the proposed transaction likely would not be
recoverable. Furthermore, even if an agreement is reached relating to a specific
target business, we may fail to consummate the business combination for any
number of reasons including those beyond our control, such as that public
stockholders owning 30% or more of our shares vote against the business
combination and opt to have us convert their shares for a pro rata share of
the
trust account even if a majority of our stockholders approve the business
combination. Any such event will result in a loss to us of the related costs
incurred which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate
and acquire or merge with another business.
Our
ability to successfully effect a business combination will be totally dependent
upon the efforts and time commitments of our management team, and our ability
to
be successful after a business combination may be dependent upon the efforts
of
our management team and key personnel who may join us following a business
combination.
Our
ability to successfully effect a business combination is dependent upon the
efforts of our management team. We believe that our success depends on the
continued service and time commitments of these individuals, at least until
we
have consummated a business combination. We cannot assure you that these
individuals will remain with, or devote sufficient time to, us for the immediate
or foreseeable future. In addition, these individuals are engaged in, or
anticipate, in the future, becoming engaged in, several other business endeavors
and none of them is required to commit any specified amount of time to our
affairs. If the other business endeavors of these individuals require them
to
devote substantial amounts of time, it could limit their ability to devote
time
to our affairs, including the time necessary to identify potential business
combinations and monitor the related due diligence, and could have a negative
impact on our ability to consummate a business combination. We cannot assure
you
that any conflicts of interest that these individuals may have in allocating
management time among various business activities, including identifying
potential business combinations and monitoring the related due diligence, will
be resolved in our favor. We do not have employment agreements with, or key-man
insurance on the life of, any of our officers. The unexpected loss of the
services of one or more members of our management team could have a detrimental
effect on us.
The
role
of our management team and key personnel from the target business cannot
presently be ascertained. Although some of our management team may remain with
the target business in senior management or advisory positions following a
business combination, it is likely that some or all of the management of the
target business will remain in place. While we intend to closely scrutinize
any
individuals we engage after a business combination, we cannot assure you that
our assessment of these individuals will prove to be correct. These individuals
may be unfamiliar with the requirements of operating a public company which
could cause us to have to expend time and resources helping them become familiar
with such requirements. This could be expensive and time-consuming and could
lead to various regulatory issues which may adversely affect our operations.
Our
key personnel may negotiate employment or consulting agreements in connection
with a particular business combination. These agreements may provide for them
to
receive compensation following a business combination and as a result, may
cause
them to have conflicts of interest in determining whether a particular business
combination is the most advantageous.
Our
key
personnel will be able to remain with the company after the consummation of
a
business combination only if they are able to negotiate employment or consulting
agreements in connection with the business combination. Such negotiations would
take place simultaneously with the negotiation of the business combination
and
could provide for such individuals to receive compensation in the form of cash
payments and/or our securities for services they would render to the company
after the consummation of the business combination. The personal and financial
interests of such individuals may influence their motivation in identifying
and
selecting a target business. However, we believe the ability of such individuals
to remain with the company after the consummation of a business combination
will
not be the determining factor in our decision as to whether or not we will
proceed with any potential business combination.
Some
of our officers and directors are now, and our other officers and directors
may
in the future become, affiliated with entities engaged in business activities
similar to those intended to be conducted by us and accordingly, have or may
have fiduciary or other obligations to these other entities which could create
conflicts of interest, including in determining to which entity a particular
business opportunity should be presented.
Some
of
our officers and directors are currently affiliated with entities engaged in
business activities similar to those intended to be conducted by us, including
Clarus Corporation, a publicly traded company with no current operating
business, net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $223 million and
approximately $85 million of cash and cash equivalents. Additionally, our
officers and directors may in the future become affiliated with entities,
including, among others, ‘‘blank check’’ companies, public companies, hedge
funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds and other investment vehicles
and capital pools, which may be engaged in business activities similar to those
intended to be conducted by us. In order to minimize potential conflicts of
interest which may arise from multiple corporate affiliations, our officers
and
directors have agreed, pursuant to agreements with us and Citigroup Global
Markets Inc., that they will not organize or become involved in any other blank
check company with a focus on acquiring a target business in the healthcare
industry until we consummate our initial business combination. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, our officers and directors are not restricted from (i) investing
in, or acquiring, directly or indirectly, the securities of any company listed
on a national securities exchange (including, without limitation, NASDAQ),
even
if such company is engaged in the healthcare industry, (ii) organizing,
promoting or becoming involved with blank check companies that do not have
a
focus of acquiring a target business in the healthcare industry or (iii)
organizing, promoting or becoming involved with other investment vehicles having
a business plan of acquiring a healthcare business with which they do not have
a
pre-existing disclosed relationship. Warren B. Kanders, through Kanders &
Company, sponsored Kanders Acquisition Company, Inc., a new blank check company.
Mr. Kanders has been named a director and officer of, and Messrs. Baratelli
and
Julien have been named officers of, such new blank check company. Accordingly,
there may be circumstances where a potential target business may be presented
to
another entity prior to its presentation to us, which could have a negative
impact on our ability to successfully consummate a business combination.
The
obligation of our officers and directors to present a business opportunity
to us
which may be reasonably required to be presented to us under Delaware law is
limited and may be subject to pre-existing fiduciary or other obligations that
our officers and directors may owe to other companies. Consequently, we cannot
assure you that our officers and directors will ever present a business
combination opportunity to us.
In
order
to minimize potential conflicts of interest which may arise from multiple
affiliations, our officers and non-independent directors have agreed, until
the
earliest of our consummation of a business combination, our liquidation or
until
such time as he ceases to be a director or officer, to present to us for our
consideration, prior to presentation to any other person or entity, any business
opportunity to acquire a privately held operating business, if, and only if
(i)
the target entity has a fair market value between 80% of the balance in the
trust account (excluding deferred underwriting discounts and commissions) and
$500 million, the target entity’s principal business operations are in the
healthcare industry and the opportunity is to acquire substantially all of
the
assets or 50.1% or greater of the voting securities of the target entity or
(ii)
the target entity’s principal business operations are outside of the healthcare
industry and the opportunity to acquire such target entity is presented by
a
third party to one of our officers or non-independent directors expressly for
consideration by us. With respect to all business opportunities, including
those
described in clause (i), but excluding those described in clause (ii) above,
the
obligation of our officers and non-independent directors to present a business
opportunity to us which may be reasonably required to be presented to us under
Delaware law is subject to any pre-existing fiduciary or other obligations
that
the officer or non-independent director may owe to another entity. Our Board
of
Directors has adopted resolutions renouncing any interest in or expectancy
to be
presented any business opportunity outside of those described in clauses (i)
and
(ii) above (as qualified by the immediately preceding sentence) that comes
to
the attention of any of our officers or non-independent directors. Neither
this
agreement by our officers and non-independent directors nor the resolutions
may
be amended or rescinded in any way except upon prior approval by the holders
of
a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock.
Certain
of our officers and non-independent directors are executive officers and/or
directors of other companies. As a result, with respect to all business
opportunities, including those described in clause (i), but excluding those
described in clause (ii) above, the obligation of our officers and
non-independent directors to present a business opportunity to us which may
be
reasonably required to be presented to us under Delaware law is subject to
the
pre-existing fiduciary or other obligations that our officers and
non-independent directors may owe to such other companies. Consequently,
we
cannot assure you that our officers and non-independent directors will ever
present a business combination opportunity to us.
In
addition, although we do not expect our independent directors to present
business opportunities to us, they may become aware of business opportunities
that may be appropriate for presentation to us. In such instances they may
determine to present these business opportunities to other entities with
which
they are or may be affiliated, in addition to, or instead of, presenting
them to
us.
One
of our directors, who is also a member of our Investment Committee, and two
of
our officers who will be involved in the evaluation of a potential business
combination for us are also a director and officers of a new blank check
company
and, if we reject a potential business combination, such new blank check
company
could be offered such potential business combination.
Mr.
Kanders is a director of our company and a member of our Investment Committee
and Messrs. Baratelli and Julien are officers of our company, as such, each
will
be involved in identifying and evaluating prospective acquisition candidates,
selecting potential target businesses, and structuring, negotiating and
consummating an acquisition. Mr. Kanders is also a principal stockholder
of the
sponsor of, and a director and officer of, Kanders Acquisition Company, Inc.
a
new blank check company and Messrs. Baratelli and Julien are also officers
of
such new blank check company that may, subject to, among other things, market
conditions, move forward with an initial public offering of its securities.
This
new blank check company has agreed that it will not seek or acquire a target
business in the healthcare industry unless and until we have completed our
initial business combination or have liquidated. If a potential business
combination is presented to us and we decide not to proceed with such business
combination for any reason, such business combination could be presented
by
Messrs. Kanders, Baratelli or Julien to the new blank check company for which
they serve as a director or an officer, as applicable.
The
founders have waived their rights to participate in liquidation distributions
with respect to the founders’ common stock and founders’ warrants and sponsors’
warrants and, therefore, our officers and directors may have a conflict of
interest in determining whether a particular target business is appropriate
for
a business combination.
The
founders have waived their right to receive distributions with respect to
the
founders’ common stock upon our liquidation if we are unable to consummate a
business combination. Accordingly, the founders’ common stock and founders’
warrants, as well as the sponsors’ warrants, and any other warrants purchased by
our officers or directors will be worthless if we do not consummate a business
combination. The personal and financial interests of our directors and officers
who own founders’ common stock or warrants (or are affiliated with owners of
these securities) may influence their motivation in timely identifying and
selecting a target business and completing a business combination. Consequently,
our directors’ and officers’ discretion in identifying and selecting a suitable
target business may result in a conflict of interest when determining whether
the terms, conditions and timing of a particular business combination are
appropriate and in our stockholders’ best interest.
The
American Stock Exchange may delist our securities from quotation on its exchange
which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our securities and
subject us to additional trading restrictions.
Our
securities are listed on the American Stock Exchange, a national securities
exchange, however we cannot assure you that our securities will continue
to be
listed on the American Stock Exchange in the future prior to a business
combination. Additionally, in connection with our business combination, it
is
likely that the American Stock Exchange will require us to file a new initial
listing application and meet its initial listing requirements as opposed
to its
more lenient continued listing requirements. We cannot assure you that we
will
be able to meet those initial listing requirements at that time.
If
the
American Stock Exchange delists our securities from trading on its exchange,
we
could face significant material adverse consequences, including:
•
|
a
limited availability of market quotations for our securities;
|
•
|
a
reduced liquidity with respect to our securities;
|
•
|
a
determination that our common stock is a ‘‘penny stock’’ which will
require brokers trading in our common stock to adhere to more stringent
rules, possibly resulting in a reduced level of trading activity
in the
secondary trading market for our common stock;
|
•
|
a
limited amount of news and analyst coverage for our company; and
|
•
|
a
decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional
financing in the future.
|
We
may only be able to complete one business combination with the proceeds of
our
initial public offering and the private placement of the sponsors’ warrants,
which will cause us to be solely dependent on a single business which may
have a
limited number of products or services.
Our
business combination must be with one or more target businesses having an
aggregate fair market value of at least 80% of the balance in the trust account
(excluding deferred underwriting discounts and commissions) at the time of
such
acquisition. However, we may not be able to acquire more than one target
business because of various factors, including the existence of complex
accounting issues and the requirement that we prepare and file pro forma
financial statements with the SEC that present operating results and the
financial condition of several target businesses as if they had been operated
on
a combined basis. By consummating a business combination with only a single
entity, our lack of diversification may subject us to numerous economic,
competitive and regulatory developments. Further, we would not be able to
diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks
or
offsetting of losses, unlike other entities which may have the resources
to
complete several business combinations in different industries or different
areas of a single industry. Accordingly, the prospects for our success may
be:
•
|
solely
dependent upon the performance of a single business, or
|
•
|
dependent
upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited
number of
products, processes or services.
|
This
lack
of diversification may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and
regulatory developments, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse
impact upon the particular industry in which we may operate subsequent to
a
business combination.
Alternatively,
if we determine to simultaneously acquire several businesses and such businesses
are owned by different sellers, we will need for each of the sellers to agree
that our purchase of its business is contingent on the simultaneous closings
of
the other business combinations, which may make it more difficult for us,
and
delay our ability, to complete the business combination. With multiple business
combinations, we could also face additional risks, including additional burdens
and costs with respect to possible multiple negotiations and due diligence
investigations (if there are multiple sellers) and the additional risks
associated with the subsequent assimilation of the operations and services
or
products of the acquired companies in a single operating business. If we
are
unable to adequately address these risks, it could negatively impact our
profitability and results of operations.
We
will likely seek to effect our initial business combination with one or more
privately-held companies, which may present certain challenges to us including
the lack of available information about these companies.
In
pursuing our acquisition strategy, we will likely seek to effect our initial
business combination with one or more privately-eld companies. By definition,
very little public information exists about these companies, and we could
be
required to make our decision on whether to pursue a potential initial business
combination on the basis of limited information.
The
ability of our stockholders to exercise their conversion rights may not allow
us
to effectuate the most desirable business combination or optimize our capital
structure.
When
we
seek stockholder approval of any business combination, we will offer each
public
stockholder (but not our founders or Mr. Kanders with respect to the shares
of
common stock underlying the 500,000 units his affiliate purchased in our
initial
public offering) the right to have his, her or its shares of common stock
converted to cash if the stockholder votes against the business combination
and
the business combination is approved and completed. A public stockholder
must
both vote against the business combination and then exercise his, her or
its
conversion rights to receive a pro rata portion of the aggregate amount then
on
deposit in the trust account. Accordingly, if our business combination requires
us to use substantially all of our cash to pay the purchase price, because
we
will not know how many stockholders may exercise such conversion rights,
we may
either need to reserve part of the trust account for possible payment upon
conversion, or we may need to arrange third party financing to help fund
our
business combination in case a larger percentage of public stockholders exercise
their conversion rights than we expect. Since we have no specific business
combination under consideration, we have not taken any steps to secure third
party financing. Therefore, we may not be able to consummate a business
combination that requires us to use all of the funds held in the trust account
as part of the purchase price, or we may end up having a leverage ratio that
is
not optimal for our business combination. This may limit our ability to
effectuate the most attractive business combination available to us.
We
may proceed with a business combination even if public stockholders owning
4,139,999 of the shares sold in our initial public offering exercise their
conversion rights. This requirement may make it easier for us to have a business
combination approved over stockholder dissent.
We
may
proceed with a business combination as long as public stockholders owning
less
than 30% of the shares sold in our initial public offering both vote against
the
business combination and exercise their conversion rights. Accordingly, public
stockholders holding up to
4,139,999
shares
of
our common stock may both vote against the business combination and exercise
their conversion rights and we could still consummate a proposed business
combination. We have set the conversion percentage at 30% in order to reduce
the
likelihood that a small group of stockholders holding a block of our stock
will
be able to stop us from completing a business combination that is otherwise
approved by a large majority of our public stockholders. However, this may
have
the effect of making it easier for us to have a business combination approved
over a stockholder dissent. While there are a few other offerings similar
to
ours which include conversion provisions greater than 20%, the 20% threshold
is
common for offerings similar to ours. Because we permit a larger number of
stockholders to exercise their conversion rights, it will reduce the requirement
to consummate an initial business combination with a target business which
you
may vote against, making it easier for us to have a business combination
approved over stockholder dissent, and you may not receive the full amount
of
your original investment upon exercise of your conversion rights.
Our
business combination may require us to use substantially all of our cash
to pay
the purchase price. In such a case, because we will not know how many
stockholders may exercise such conversion rights, we may need to arrange
third
party financing to help fund our business combination in case a larger
percentage of stockholders exercise their conversion rights than we expect.
Additionally, even if our business combination does not require us to use
substantially all of our cash to pay the purchase price, if a significant
number
of stockholders exercise their conversion rights, we will have less cash
available to use in furthering our business plans following a business
combination and may need to arrange third party financing. We have not taken
any
steps to secure third party financing for either situation. We cannot assure
you
that we will be able to obtain such third party financing on terms favorable
to
us or at all.
Our
founders, including our officers and directors, control a substantial interest
in us and thus may influence certain actions requiring a stockholder vote.
Our
founders (including all of our officers and directors) collectively own
approximately 23.3% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock.
None
of our founders, officers, directors or their affiliates has indicated any
intention to purchase additional units or shares of common stock from persons
in
the open market or in private transactions. However, if a significant number
of
stockholders vote, or indicate an intention to vote, against a proposed business
combination, our founders, officers, directors or their affiliates could
make
such purchases in the open market or in private transactions in order to
influence the vote. In addition, Kanders & Company and Robert. W. Pangia,
Ivy Healthcare Capital II, L.P., Dennis O’Dowd, Virgilio Rene Veloso and
Fieldpoint Capital LLC, (collectively referred to as the “Ivy Affiliates”) have
agreed to purchase 1,000,000 units from us in a private placement that will
occur immediately prior to the consummation of our initial business combination.
The holders of these units may vote the shares of common stock included therein
in any manner they choose (except they have agreed to vote such shares in
favor
of our initial business combination in connection with a vote on our proposed
initial business combination). Accordingly, they may be able to effectively
influence the outcome of all matters requiring approval by our stockholders,
including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate
transactions other than approval of our initial business combination.
Warren
B.
Kanders, Russell F. Warren, Jr., two members of our Board of Directors, and
our
founders have entered into a stockholders agreement that will continue to
be in
effect for a period of three years after our initial business combination.
If a
party to the agreement or an affiliate thereof is nominated to serve as a
director, all of the parties to the agreement have agreed to vote in favor
of
the nominee. Since the parties to the agreement currently hold or have voting
control over approximately 23% of our outstanding common stock, and will
be
purchasing the co-investment units, these parties will have significant
influence in electing our directors.
Our
Board
of Directors is and will be divided into three classes, each of which will
generally serve for a term of three years with only one class of directors
being
elected in each year. It is unlikely that there will be an annual meeting
of
stockholders to elect new directors prior to the consummation of a business
combination, in which case all of the current directors will continue in
office
until at least the consummation of the business combination. If there is
an
annual meeting, as a consequence of our ‘‘staggered’’ Board of Directors, only a
minority of the Board of Directors will be considered for election and our
founders, because of their ownership position, will have considerable influence
regarding the outcome. Accordingly, our founders will continue to exert control
at least until the consummation of a business combination.
Our
outstanding warrants may have an adverse effect on the market price of our
common stock and make it more difficult to effect a business combination.
We
have
issued warrants to purchase 13,800,000 shares of common stock as part of
the
units sold in our initial public offering. We also have sold the founders’
warrants as part of the founders’ units to purchase 3,450,000 shares of common
stock, the sponsors’ warrants to purchase 3,250,000 shares of common stock and
may sell 1,000,000 co-investment units, which include 1,000,000 co-investment
warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock. To the extent we issue
shares of common stock to effect a business combination, the potential for
the
issuance of a substantial number of additional shares upon exercise of these
warrants could make us a less attractive acquisition vehicle in the eyes
of a
target business. These warrants, when exercised, will increase the number
of
issued and outstanding shares of our common stock and reduce the value of
the
shares issued to complete the business combination. Accordingly, our warrants
may make it more difficult to effectuate a business combination or increase
the
cost of acquiring the target business. Additionally, the sale, or even the
possibility of a sale, of the shares underlying the warrants could have an
adverse effect on the market price for our securities or on our ability to
obtain future financing. If and to the extent these warrants are exercised,
you
may experience a substantial dilution of your holdings.
If
our founders or the purchasers of the sponsors’ warrants or co-investment units
exercise their registration rights, it may have an adverse effect on the
market
price of our common stock and the existence of these rights may make it more
difficult to effect a business combination.
Our
founders are entitled to demand that we register the resale of the founders’
common stock and warrants at any time commencing 30 days after we consummate
a
business combination. Additionally, purchasers of the sponsors’ warrants are
entitled to demand that we register the resale of their warrants and underlying
shares of common stock at any time commencing 30 days after we consummate
a
business combination. The purchasers of the co-investment units are entitled
to
demand that we register the resale of their co-investment units and underlying
securities at any time commencing 30 days after we consummate a business
combination. We will bear the cost of registering these securities. If such
individuals exercise their registration rights with respect to all of their
securities, then there will be an additional 4,450,000 shares of common stock
and 7,700,000 warrants (as well as 7,700,000 shares of common stock underlying
the warrants) eligible for trading in the public market. The presence of
these
additional securities trading in the public market may have an adverse effect
on
the market price of our common stock. In addition, the existence of these
rights
may make it more difficult to effectuate a business combination or increase
the
cost of acquiring the target business, as the stockholders of the target
business may be discouraged from entering into a business combination with
us or
will request a higher price for their securities because of the potential
negative effect the exercise of such rights may have on the trading market
for
our common stock.
If
we effect a business combination with a company located outside of the United
States, we would be subject to a variety of additional risks that may negatively
impact our operations.
We
may
effect a business combination with a company located outside of the United
States. If we did, we would be subject to any special considerations or risks
associated with companies operating in the target business’ home jurisdiction,
including any of the following:
•
|
rules
and regulations or currency conversion or corporate withholding
taxes on
individuals;
|
•
|
tariffs
and trade barriers;
|
•
|
regulations
related to customs and import/export matters;
|
•
|
tax
issues, such as tax law changes and variations in tax laws as compared
to
the United States;
|
•
|
currency
fluctuations and exchange controls;
|
•
|
challenges
in collecting accounts receivable;
|
•
|
cultural
and language differences;
|
•
|
employment
regulations;
|
•
|
crime,
strikes, riots, civil disturbances, terrorist attacks and wars;
and
|
•
|
deterioration
of political relations with the United States.
|
We
cannot
assure you that we would be able to adequately address these additional risks.
If we were unable to do so, our operations might suffer.
If
we effect a business combination with a company located outside of the United
States, the laws applicable to such company will likely govern all of our
material agreements and we may not be able to enforce our legal rights.
If
we
effect a business combination with a company located outside of the United
States, the laws of the country in which such company operates will govern
almost all of the material agreements relating to its operations. We cannot
assure you that the target business will be able to enforce any of its material
agreements or that remedies will be available in this new jurisdiction. The
system of laws and the enforcement of existing laws in such jurisdiction
may not
be as certain in implementation and interpretation as in the United States.
The
inability to enforce or obtain a remedy under any of our future agreements
could
result in a significant loss of business, business opportunities or capital.
Additionally, if we acquire a company located outside of the United States,
it
is likely that substantially all of our assets would be located outside of
the
United States and some of our officers and directors might reside outside
of the
United States. As a result, it may not be possible for investors in the United
States to enforce their legal rights, to effect service of process upon our
directors or officers or to enforce judgments of United States courts predicated
upon civil liabilities and criminal penalties of our directors and officers
under Federal securities laws.
If
we are deemed to be an investment company, we may be required to institute
burdensome compliance requirements and our activities may be restricted,
which
may make it difficult for us to complete a business combination.
A
company
that, among other things, is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily,
or
proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting,
owning,
trading or holding certain types of securities would be deemed an investment
company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Since we will invest the
proceeds held in the trust account, it is possible that we could be deemed
an
investment company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we do not believe that
our
anticipated principal activities will subject us to the Investment Company
Act
of 1940. To this end, the proceeds held in trust may be invested by the trustee
only in United States ‘‘government securities’’ within the meaning of Section
2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 having a maturity of 180 days
or
less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7
promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940. By restricting the
investment of the proceeds to these instruments, we intend to meet the
requirements for the exemption provided in Rule 3a-1 promulgated under the
Investment Company Act of 1940.
If
we are
nevertheless deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company
Act
of 1940, we may be subject to certain restrictions that may make it more
difficult for us to complete a business combination, including:
•
|
restrictions
on the nature of our investments; and
|
•
|
restrictions
on the issuance of securities.
|
In
addition, we may have imposed upon us certain burdensome requirements,
including:
•
|
registration
as an investment company;
|
•
|
adoption
of a specific form of corporate structure; and
|
•
|
reporting,
record keeping, voting, proxy, compliance policies and procedures
and
disclosure requirements and other rules and regulations.
|
Compliance
with these additional regulatory burdens would require additional expense
for
which we have not allotted.
Because
we must furnish our stockholders with target business financial statements,
we
may not be able to complete a business combination with some prospective
target
businesses.
We
will
provide stockholders with audited financial statements of the prospective
target
business as part of the proxy solicitation materials sent to stockholders
to
assist them in assessing the target business. In all likelihood, these financial
statements will need to be prepared in accordance with United States generally
accepted accounting principles. We cannot assure you that any particular
target
business identified by us as a potential acquisition candidate will have
financial statements prepared in accordance with United States generally
accepted accounting principles or that the potential target business will
be
able to prepare its financial statements in accordance with United States
generally accepted accounting principles. To the extent that this requirement
cannot be met, we may not be able to acquire the proposed target business.
These
financial statement requirements may limit the pool of potential target
businesses with which we may combine.
Compliance
with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will require substantial financial and
management resources and may increase the time and costs of completing an
acquisition.
Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we evaluate and report
on
our system of internal controls and requires that we have such system of
internal controls audited beginning with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the
year ending December 31, 2008. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our
internal controls, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny, civil or criminal
penalties and/or stockholder litigation. Any inability to provide reliable
financial reports could harm our business. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
also requires that our independent registered public accounting firm report
on
management’s evaluation of our system of internal controls. A target company may
not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding
adequacy of their internal controls. The development of the internal controls
of
any such entity to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase
the time and costs necessary to complete any such acquisition. Furthermore,
any
failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties
encountered in the implementation of adequate controls over our financial
processes and reporting in the future, could harm our operating results or
cause
us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. Inferior internal controls
could
also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information,
which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our stock.
Risks
Related to the Healthcare Industry
Business
combinations with companies with operations in the healthcare industry entail
special considerations and risks. If we are successful in completing a business
combination with a target business with operations in the healthcare industry,
we will be subject to, and possibly adversely affected by, the following
risks:
The
healthcare industry’s highly competitive market and our inability to compete
effectively could adversely affect our business prospects and results of
operations.
Our
target businesses may operate in highly competitive markets against both
large
and small companies. Our target business may not be able to offer products
similar to, or more desirable than, those of our competitors or at a price
comparable to that of our competitors. Compared to our target business, many
of
the competitors may have:
•
greater
financial and other resources;
•
more
widely accepted products;
•
a
larger number of endorsements from healthcare professionals;
•
a
larger product portfolio;
•
superior ability to maintain new product flow;
•
greater
research and development and technical capabilities;
•
patent
portfolios that may present an obstacle to the conduct of our business;
•
stronger name recognition;
•
larger
sales and distribution networks; and
•
international manufacturing facilities that enable them to avoid the
transportation costs and foreign import duties associated with shipping our
products manufactured in the United States to international customers.
Accordingly,
we may be at a competitive disadvantage with respect to our competitors.
These
factors may materially impair our ability to develop and sell our products
following our business combination.
If
our target business cannot develop or license new products or product
enhancements or find new applications for existing products, we will not
remain
competitive.
Companies
operating in the healthcare market must continually develop innovative new
products before the competition renders those products obsolete. Our success
and
our ability to increase revenues following a business combination will depend,
in part, on our ability to develop, license, acquire and distribute new and
innovative products, enhance our existing products with new technology and
find
new applications for our existing products. However, we may not be successful
in
developing or introducing new products, enhancing existing products or finding
new applications for our existing products. We also may not be successful
in
manufacturing, marketing and distributing products in a cost-effective manner,
establishing relationships with marketing partners, obtaining coverage and
satisfactory reimbursement for our future products or product enhancements
or
obtaining required regulatory clearances and approvals in a timely fashion
or at
all. If we fail to keep pace with continued new product innovation or
enhancement or fail to successfully commercialize our new or enhanced products,
our competitive position, financial condition and results of operations could
be
materially and adversely affected.
In
addition, if any of our new or enhanced products contain undetected errors
or
defects, especially when first introduced, or if new applications that we
develop for existing products do not work as planned, our ability to market
these and other products could be substantially delayed, and we could ultimately
become subject to product liability litigation, resulting in lost revenues,
potential damage to our reputation and/or delays in regulatory clearance.
In
addition, obtaining approval and acceptance of our products by physicians,
physical therapists and other professionals that recommend and prescribe
our
products could be adversely affected.
Sales
revenue may decline if third-party distributors and independent sales
representatives do not dedicate a sufficient level of marketing energy and
focus
to the products produced by our target business.
Companies
in the healthcare industry often utilize third-party distributors and
independent sales representatives to distribute product. These third-party
distributors and independent sales representatives maintain the relationships
with the hospitals, doctors, and other healthcare professionals that purchase,
use and recommend the use of products and services. Some of the independent
sales representatives that sell our target business’ product may also sell our
competitors’ products. These sales representatives may not dedicate the
necessary effort to market and sell our products. If we fail to attract and
retain third-party distributors and skilled independent sales representatives
or
fail to adequately train and monitor the efforts of the third-party distributors
and sales representatives that market and sell our products, or if our existing
third-party distributors and independent sales representatives choose not
to
carry our products, our results of operations and future growth could be
adversely affected.
If
we are required to obtain governmental approval of our products, the production
of our products could be delayed and we could be required to engage in a
lengthy
and expensive approval process that may not ultimately be successful.
Unanticipated
problems may arise in connection with the development of new products or
technologies, and many such efforts may ultimately be unsuccessful. In addition,
the testing or marketing of products may require obtaining government approvals,
which may be a lengthy and expensive process with an uncertain outcome. Delays
in commercializing products may result in the need to seek additional capital,
potentially diluting the interests of investors. These various factors may
result in abrupt advances and declines in the price of our securities and,
in
some cases, may have a broad effect on the prices of securities of companies
in
the healthcare industry generally.
Healthcare
reform, managed care and buying groups have exerted downward pressure on
the
prices of healthcare products and services.
Healthcare
reform and the healthcare industry’s response to rising costs have resulted in a
significant expansion of managed care organizations and buying groups. This
growth of managed care and the advent of buying groups in the United States
has
caused a shift toward coverage and payments based on more cost-effective
treatment alternatives. Buying groups enter into preferred supplier arrangements
with one or more manufacturers of medical products in return for price discounts
to members of these buying groups. Our target business’ failure to obtain new
preferred supplier commitments from major group purchasing organizations
or its
failure to retain existing preferred supplier commitments could adversely
affect
the company’s sales and profitability.
Healthcare
products are subject to recalls even after receiving FDA or foreign regulatory
clearance or approval.
Products
and therapeutics are subject to ongoing reporting regulations that require
companies to report to the FDA or similar governmental authorities in other
countries if a product causes, or contributes to, death or serious injury,
or if
it malfunctions and would be likely to cause, or contribute to, death or
serious
injury if the malfunction were to recur. The FDA and similar governmental
authorities in other countries have the authority to require a company to
recall
its product in the event of material deficiencies or defects. In addition,
companies with a defective product may voluntarily recall their product even
in
the absence of government intervention. Any recall would divert managerial
and
financial resources and could harm our target business’ reputation with its
customers and with the healthcare professionals that use, prescribe and
recommend our products. Our target business could have product recalls that
result in significant costs to us in the future, and such recalls could have
a
material adverse effect on our business.
Companies
who lose patent protection or inadvertently reveal trade secrets may lose
market
share to competitors and may not be able to operate profitably.
Companies
in the healthcare industry rely upon a combination of patents, trade secrets,
copyrights, trademarks, license agreements and contractual provisions to
establish and protect the intellectual property rights in their products
and the
processes for the development, manufacture and marketing of their products.
If
non-patented trade secrets are revealed to the public, our competitors could
utilize the information to create their own products that incorporate our
target
business’ intellectual property. In addition, our target business’ patents could
be circumvented, invalidated or declared unenforceable. Any proceedings before
the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office could result in adverse decisions as
to the
priority of our inventions and the narrowing or invalidation of claims in
issued
patents. We could also incur substantial costs in any such proceedings. In
addition, our target business may hold patent and other intellectual property
licenses from third parties for some of our business’ products and on
technologies that are necessary in the design and manufacture of some of
our
business’ products. The loss of such licenses could prevent us from
manufacturing, marketing and selling these products, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business.
Patent
litigation may affect a healthcare company’s operational and financial results
even if the company ultimately prevails.
Litigation
involving patents and other intellectual property rights is common in the
healthcare industry, and healthcare companies have used intellectual property
litigation in an attempt to gain a competitive advantage. Our target business
may become a party to lawsuits involving patents or other intellectual property.
Such litigation is costly and time consuming. If our target business loses
any
of these proceedings, a court or a similar foreign governing body could
invalidate or render unenforceable our owned or licensed patents, require
us to
pay significant damages, seek licenses and/or pay ongoing royalties to third
parties, require us to redesign our products, or prevent us from manufacturing,
using or selling our products, any of which would have a material adverse
effect
on our business and results of operations and financial condition.
Our
target business may expand into new markets through the development of new
products and our expansion may not be successful.
Our
target business may attempt to expand into new markets through the development
of new product applications based on the company’s existing specialized
technology and design capabilities. These efforts could require it to make
substantial investments, including significant research, development,
engineering and capital expenditures for new, expanded or improved manufacturing
facilities which would divert resources from other aspects of its business.
Expansion into new markets may be costly and may not result in any benefit
to
our target business. Specific risks in connection with expanding into new
markets include the failure of customers in new markets to accept our products
and price competition in new markets. Such expansion efforts into new markets
could be unsuccessful.
Consolidation
in the healthcare industry could have an adverse effect on our revenues and
results of operations.
Many
healthcare companies are consolidating to create larger companies. As the
healthcare industry consolidates, competition to provide products and services
to industry participants will become more intense. In addition, many of our
potential target business’ customers are also consolidating, and these customers
and other industry participants may try to use their purchasing power to
negotiate price concessions or reductions for the products that our target
business manufactures and markets. If our target business is forced to reduce
its prices because of consolidation in the healthcare industry, the company’s
revenues could decrease, and its business, financial condition and results
of
operations could be adversely affected.
Companies
in the healthcare industry are often subject to environmental and health
and
safety requirements, and may be liable for contamination or other harm caused
by
hazardous materials that they use.
Companies
in the healthcare industry often utilize hazardous materials to manufacture
their products. These materials are subject to federal, state, local and
foreign
environmental requirements, including regulations governing the use,
manufacture, handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials and related
occupational health and safety regulations. Our target business could incur
liability as a result of any contamination or injury and could also be held
responsible for costs relating to any contamination of its facilities and
third-party waste disposal sites. Our target business could incur significant
expenses in the future relating to any failure to comply with environmental
laws. Any such future expenses or liability could have a material adverse
effect
on our financial condition. The enactment of stricter laws or regulations,
the
stricter interpretation of existing laws and regulations or the requirement
to
undertake the investigation or remediation of currently unknown environmental
contamination at our target company’s business or third party sites might
require it to make additional expenditures, which could be material.
Changes
in government regulation of health insurance could negatively affect our
business prospects.
Several
states have recently enacted or are considering legislative initiatives intended
to provide healthcare insurance for all individuals. Similarly, some of the
leading candidates running for President of the United States in the Democratic
and Republican parties have announced that they intend to make healthcare
insurance reform a major part of their respective platforms. It is too early
to
understand the specific provisions that are being proposed or assess the
likelihood that they will be enacted. Nonetheless, there may be legislative
or
regulatory changes at the state or federal level that could negatively affect
(i) our ability to make an acquisition or (ii) after an acquisition, the
business prospects of such an acquisition. If we are unable to comply with
governmental regulations affecting the healthcare industry, it could negatively
affect our operations.
There
is
extensive government regulation of certain healthcare businesses as well
as
various proposals at the federal government level to reform the healthcare
system. Changes to the existing regulatory framework and/or implementation
of
various reform initiatives could adversely affect certain sections of the
healthcare industry. If we are unable to adhere to these requirements, it
could
result in the imposition of penalties and fines against us, and could also
result in the imposition of restrictions on our business and operations.
Furthermore, the costs of compliance also could have a material adverse effect
on our profitability and operations.
ITEM
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
ITEM
2. Properties
We
currently maintain our executive offices at One Paragon Drive, Suite 125,
Montvale, New Jersey 07645. We also maintain an office at One Landmark Square,
22nd Floor, Stamford, Connecticut 06901. The cost for these offices is included
in the aggregate $10,000 per-month fee described above that Kanders &
Company and Ivy Capital Partners charge us for office space, utilities and
administrative services. We believe, based on rents and fees for similar
services in the Montvale, New Jersey and Stamford, Connecticut metropolitan
areas, that the fee charged by Kanders & Company and Ivy Capital Partners is
at least as favorable as we could have obtained from an unaffiliated person.
We
consider our current office space adequate for our current operations.
ITEM
3. Legal Proceedings
There
are
no material legal proceedings pending nor, to our knowledge, threatened against
us.
ITEM
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
PART
II
ITEM
5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Our
equity securities trade on the American Stock Exchange. Each of our units
consists of one share of common stock and one warrant and trades on the American
Stock Exchange under the symbol “HIA.U.” On October 17, 2007, the warrants and
common stock underlying our units began to trade separately on the American
Stock Exchange under the symbols “HIA.WS” and “HIA,” respectively. Each warrant
entitles the holder to purchase one share of our common stock at a price
of
$7.50 commencing on the later of our consummation of a business combination
or
January 3, 2009, provided in each case that there is an effective registration
statement covering the shares of common stock underlying the warrants in
effect.
The warrants expire on October 3, 2012, unless earlier redeemed.
The
following table sets forth, for the fourth quarter of the year ended December
31, 2007, the high and low sales price of our units, common stock and warrants
as reported on the American Stock Exchange. Prior to October 9, 2007, there
was
no established public trading market for our securities.
Quarter
Ended
|
|
Units
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
Quarter ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
10.07
|
|
$
|
9.66
|
|
$
|
9.20
|
|
$
|
8.96
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
First
Quarter of the year ending December 31, 2008 (through March 10,
2008)
|
|
$
|
9.85
|
|
$
|
9.45
|
|
$
|
9.15
|
|
$
|
9.00
|
|
$
|
0.77
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
Performance
Graph
Set
forth
below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change in the cumulative
total stockholder return on our common stock to the cumulative total return
of
the Down Jones Industrial Average Index and the S&P 500 Index for the period
commencing on October 18, 2007 and ending on December 31, 2007 (the “Measuring
Period”). The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock
and each index was $100 on October 18, 2007. The yearly change in cumulative
total return is measured by dividing (1) the sum of (i) the cumulative amount
of
dividends for the Measuring Period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and (ii)
the
change in share price between the begining and end of the Measuring Period,
by
(2) the share price at the beginning of the Measuring Period.
|
|
10/18/07
|
|
10/25/07
|
|
11/01/07
|
|
11/08/07
|
|
11/15/07
|
|
11/23/07
|
|
11/29/07
|
|
12/06/07
|
|
12/03/17
|
|
12/20/07
|
|
12/27/07
|
|
12/31/07
|
|
Highlands
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
100.44
|
|
|
100.55
|
|
|
100.11
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
101.10
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
99.12
|
|
|
99.45
|
|
|
99.01
|
|
|
100.55
|
|
|
100.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P
500
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
98.33
|
|
|
97.95
|
|
|
95.76
|
|
|
94.23
|
|
|
93.55
|
|
|
95.43
|
|
|
97.87
|
|
|
96.64
|
|
|
94.81
|
|
|
95.86
|
|
|
95.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dow Jones
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
98.44
|
|
|
97.69
|
|
|
95.52
|
|
|
94.39
|
|
|
93.46
|
|
|
95.84
|
|
|
98.06
|
|
|
97.33
|
|
|
95.37
|
|
|
96.19
|
|
|
95.51
|
|
Stockholders
On
March
13, 2008, there were approximately 1 holders of record of our units,
approximately 12 holders of record of our warrants and
approximately 11 holders of record of our common stock. Such numbers do not
include beneficial owners holding shares, warrants or units through nominee
names.
Dividends
Except
for the .15-for-1 stock dividend that was effected on July 16, 2007 and the
.20-for-1 stock dividend that was effected on October 3, 2007, we have not
paid
any dividends on our common stock to date and we do not intend to pay cash
dividends prior to the consummation of a business combination. After we complete
a business combination, the payment of dividends will depend on our revenues
and
earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial condition. The
payment of dividends after a business combination will be within the discretion
of our then-board of directors. Our board of directors currently intends
to
retain any earnings for use in our business operations and, accordingly,
we do
not anticipate the board declaring any dividends in the foreseeable future.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
All
information in this Item has been adjusted to reflect (i) a .15-for-1 stock
dividend that was effected on July 16, 2007 and (ii) a .20-for-1 stock dividend
that was effected on October 3, 2007.
On
May 1,
2007, Highland Equity LLC purchased 1,683,600 of our units for an aggregate
purchase price of $12,200 in a private placement.
On
May 1,
2007, Fieldpoint Capital, L.L.C. purchased 695,548 of our units for an aggregate
purchase price of $5,040.20 in a private placement.
On
May 1,
2007, Ivy Healthcare Capital II, L.P. purchased 680,242 of our units for
an
aggregate purchase price of $4,929.29 in a private placement.
On
May 1,
2007, Robert W. Pangia purchased 266,995 of our units for an aggregate purchase
price of $1,934.75 in a private placement.
On
May 1,
2007, Dennis W. O’Dowd purchased 27,210 of our units for an aggregate purchase
price of $197.17 in a private placement.
On
May 1,
2007, Leslie D. Michelson purchased 20,700 of our units for an aggregate
purchase price of $150 in a private placement.
On
May 1,
2007, William V. Campbell purchased 20,700 of our units for an aggregate
purchase price of $150 in a private placement.
On
May 1,
2007, William F. Owens purchased 20,700 of our units for an aggregate purchase
price of $150 in a private placement.
On
May 1,
2007, Michael A. Henning purchased 20,700 of our units for an aggregate purchase
price of $150 in a private placement.
On
May 1,
2007, Virgilio Rene Veloso purchased 13,605 of our units for an aggregate
purchase price of $98.59 in a private placement.
On
October 9, 2007, simultaneously with the consummation of our initial public
offering, we completed a private placement of 3,250,000 warrants at a price
of
$1.00 per warrant, generating gross proceeds of $3,250,000. These warrants
were
purchased by (i) Kanders & Company, Inc., Ivy Healthcare Capital II, L.P.,
and Fieldpoint Capital, L.L.C., each of which is an affiliate of certain
officers and directors of our company; and (ii) Robert W. Pangia, our Chief
Executive Officer, Dennis W. O’Dowd and Virgilio Rene Veloso, each of which was
an existing stockholder of our company. The warrants sold in the private
placement are identical to the warrants included in the units sold in our
initial public offering, except that, if we call the warrants for redemption,
the warrants sold in the private placement will not be redeemable by us so
long
as they are held by these purchasers or their permitted transferees. The
purchasers of the warrants sold in the private placement have agreed that
these
warrants will not be transferred, assigned or sold by them (except in limited
situations) until after we have completed our initial business combination.
The
proceeds from the sale of the warrants in the private placement were deposited
into the trust account with the net proceeds from our initial public
offering.
The
sales
of the above securities were deemed to be exempt from the registration under
the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), in reliance on
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving
a
public offering. In each such transaction, the purchaser represented its
intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view
to
or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof and appropriate legends
were affixed to the instruments representing such securities issued in such
transactions.
Recent
Purchases of Our Registered Equity Securities
We
did
not purchase any shares of our common stock during the Company’s fourth quarter
of 2007.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
We
have
no compensation plans under which equity securities are authorized for
issuance.
Use
of Proceeds from our Initial Public Offering
On
October 9, 2007, we closed our initial public offering of 12,000,000 units
with
each unit consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant, each to
purchase one share of our common stock at a price of $7.50 per share. On
October
15, 2007 the underwriters purchased an additional 1,800,000 units pursuant
to an
over-allotment option. All of the units registered were sold at an offering
price of $10.00 per unit and generated gross proceeds of $138,000,000. The
securities sold in our initial public offering were registered under the
Securities Act of 1933 on a registration statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-143599).
The SEC declared the registration statement effective on October 3, 2007.
Citigroup Global Market Inc. and William Smith Securities, acted as underwriters
of the offering.
We
received net proceeds of approximately $131.3 million from our initial public
offering (including proceeds from the exercise by the underwriters of their
over-allotment option). The net proceeds plus approximately $3.99 million
attributable to the deferred underwriters’ discount were deposited into a trust
account and will be part of the funds distributed to our public stockholders
in
the event we are unable to complete a business combination. The net proceeds
deposited into the trust account remain on deposit in the trust account and
earned $1.4 million in interest through December 31, 2007.
ITEM
6. Selected Financial Data
The
following table summarizes the relevant financial data for our business and
should be read with our financial statements, which are included in this
report.
We have not had any significant operations to date, so only balance sheet
data
is presented.
Balance
Sheet Data:
|
|
As
of
December
31, 2007
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
269,314
|
|
Cash
held in trust
|
|
$
|
132,258,345
|
|
Cash
held in trust from underwriter
|
|
$
|
3,990,000
|
|
Working
capital
|
|
$
|
132,017,877
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
136,644,242
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
$
|
4,626,365
|
|
Value
of common stock which may be redeemed for cash ($9.77 per
share)
|
|
$
|
40,448,990
|
|
Stockholders’
equity
|
|
$
|
91,568,887
|
|
ITEM
7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Financial
Statements and footnotes thereto contained in this report.
Forward
Looking Statements
This
report contains certain forward-looking statements, including information
about
or related to our future results, certain projections and business trends.
Assumptions relating to forward-looking statements involve judgments with
respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market
conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or
impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control.
When
used in this report, the words "estimate," "project," "intend," "believe,"
"expect" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. Although we believe that our assumptions underlying the
forward-looking statements are reasonable, any or all of the assumptions
could
prove inaccurate, and we may not realize the results contemplated by the
forward-looking statements. Management decisions are subjective in many respects
and susceptible to interpretations and periodic revisions based upon actual
experience and business developments. In light of the significant uncertainties
inherent in the forward-looking information included in this report, you
should
not regard the inclusion of such information as our representation that we
will
achieve any strategy, objectives or other plans. The forward-looking statements
contained in this report speak only as of the date of this report, and we
have
no obligation to update publicly or revise any of these forward-looking
statements.
These
and
other statements, which are not historical facts, are based largely upon
our
current expectations and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks
and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
contemplated by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties
include, among others, our ability to effect a merger, capital stock exchange,
asset acquisition or other similar business combination with one or more
operating businesses (“Business Combination”) and the risks and uncertainties
set forth in the section headed "Risk Factors" of Part I, Item 1A of this
Report
and described in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations" of Part II of this Report. We cannot assure you
that
we will be successful in our efforts to consummate a Business Combination
or
that any such Business Combination will result in our future profitability.
Overview
We
were
formed on April 26, 2007 to serve as a vehicle to effect a Business Combination.
Our efforts in identifying a prospective target business are not limited
to a
particular industry, although we intend to focus our search for target
businesses in the healthcare industry. The healthcare industry encompasses
all
healthcare service companies, including, among others, managed care companies,
hospitals, healthcare system companies, physician groups, diagnostic service
companies, medical device companies and other healthcare-related entities.
We
intend to utilize cash derived from the proceeds of our recently completed
public offering, our capital stock, debt or a combination of cash, capital
stock
and debt, in effecting a business combination.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
Deferred
Income Taxes
—
Deferred income taxes are provided for the differences between bases of assets
and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes. A valuation
allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to
the
amount expected to be realized.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
-
The
fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities that qualify as financial
instruments under SFAS No. 107 “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instrument”, approximate their carrying amounts presented in the balance sheet
at December 31, 2007.
The
Company accounts for derivative instruments, if any, in accordance with SFAS
No.
133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” as amended
(“SFAS 133”), which establishes accounting and reporting standards for
derivative instruments. We do not currently have any derivative
instruments.
Results
of Operations
Interest
Income
For
the
period from April 26, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2007, we had interest
income of $1,418,345. The average yield during this period was 4.65%. Due
to the
recent decline in interest rates, we expect our 2008 interest average yield
to
decline. On March 19, 2008, our yield on investments was 3.12%.
Operating
Expenses
For
the
period from April 26, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2007, we had formation
and general and administrative expenses of $1,000 and $218,424, respectively,
primarily consisting of Delaware franchise taxes, legal expenses, administrative
services fee, directors and officers liability insurance, and formation
costs.
Income
Before Provision for Income Taxes
For
the
period from April 26, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2007, income before
provision for income taxes was $1,198,921 from interest income and formation
and
general and administrative expenses discussed above.
Income
Taxes
For
the
period from April 26, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2007, income tax expense
was $479,000, consisting of $371,000 in federal taxes and $108,000, in state
income taxes. The trustee of the trust account will distribute funds to us
to
pay any taxes resulting from interest accrued on the funds held in the trust
account of the funds held in the trust account.
Net
Income
For
the
period from April 26, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2007, net income was
$656,921, due to the factors discussed above.
Financial
Condition and Liquidity
On
October 9, 2007 we consummated our initial public offering of 12,000,000
units
and the private placement of 3,250,000 warrants (the “Sponsors’ Warrants”) to
our founders and affiliates of our founders and on October 15, 2007 we closed
on
the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option for an additional
1,800,000 units, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds from our initial public
offering (including the over-allotment option) and the private placement
of the
Sponsors’ Warrants of $141,250,000. We paid or incurred a total of $5,320,000 in
underwriting discounts and commissions (not including $3,990,000 which was
deferred by the underwriters until completion of a Business Combination)
and
approximately $667,000 for other costs and expenses related to our initial
public offering. After deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions
and
the offering expenses, the total net proceeds, including $3,250,000 from
the
sale of the Sponsor’ Warrants to us, from the offering were approximately
$135,263,000 (including $3.99 million in deferred underwriters commission),
and
an amount of $134,830,000 was deposited into a trust account (the “Trust
Account”) at Morgan Stanley with Continental Stock Transfer & Trust as
trustee. We intend to use substantially all of the net proceeds of our initial
public offering and the private placement of the Sponsors’ Warrants to acquire a
target business, including identifying and evaluating prospective acquisition
candidates, selecting the target business, and structuring, negotiating and
consummating the business combination. To the extent that our capital stock
is
used in whole or in part as consideration to effect a business combination,
the
proceeds held in the Trust Account, as well as any other net proceeds not
expended, will be used to finance the operations of the target business.
We
believe we will have sufficient available funds outside of the Trust Account
to
operate through October 3, 2009, assuming that a business combination is
not
consummated during that time.
We
expect
our primary liquidity requirements during this period to include:
•
$950,000 of expenses for the search for target businesses and for the legal,
accounting and other third-party expenses attendant to the due diligence
investigations, structuring and negotiating of a business combination;
•
$330,000 of expenses for the due diligence and investigation of a target
business by our officers, directors and existing stockholders;
•
$195,000 of expenses in legal and accounting fees relating to our Security
and
Exchange Commission (“SEC “) reporting obligations;
•
$240,000 for the administrative fee payable to Kanders & Company and Ivy
Capital Partners, each an affiliate of certain of our officers and directors,
($10,000 per month for twenty four months); and
•
$885,000 for general working capital that will be used for miscellaneous
expenses and reserves, including approximately $150,000 for director and
officer
liability insurance premiums.
We
do not
believe we will need to raise additional funds following our initial public
offering in order to meet the expenditures required for operating our business.
However, we may need to raise additional funds through a private offering
of
debt or equity securities if funds are required to consummate a business
combination that is presented to us. We would only consummate such a financing
simultaneously with the consummation of a business combination.
Commencing
on October 3, 2007 and ending upon the consummation of a business combination
or
our liquidation, we began incurring a fee from Kanders & Company and Ivy
Capital Partners, of $10,000 per month for office space, administrative and
support services. In addition, in April 2007, Kanders & Company and Ivy
Capital Partners advanced an aggregate of $100,000 to us for payment on our
behalf of offering expenses. These loans were repaid following our initial
public offering from the proceeds of the offering
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Warrants
issued in conjunction with our initial public offering are equity linked
derivatives and accordingly represent off-balance sheet arrangements. The
warrants meet the scope exception paragraph 11(a) of Financial Accounting
Standards (FAS) 133 and are accordingly not accounted for as derivatives
for
purposes of FAS 133, but instead are accounted for as equity. See Note 2
to the
financial statements for more information.
Contractual
Obligations
We
do not
have any long-term debt, capital lease obligations, operating lease obligations,
purchase obligations or other long-term liabilities.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
July
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB
Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”), which provides criteria for
the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax
position. A tax benefit from an uncertain position may be recognized only
if it
is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable based on its
technical merits. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a
material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” (SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007
and
interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating
the effect of the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on its consolidated financial
statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB No. 115,” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS
159 allows a company to irrevocably elect fair value as the initial and
subsequent measurement attribute for certain financial assets and financial
liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis, with changes in fair value
recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007 and will be applied prospectively. The Company is
currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on
its
consolidated financial statements.
The
Company does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective,
accounting standards if currently adopted would have a material effect on
the
accompanying financial statements.
ITEM
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
To
date,
our efforts have been limited to organizational activities and activities
relating to our initial public offering and the identification of a target
business; we have neither engaged in any operations nor generated any revenues.
As the proceeds from our initial public offering held in trust have been
invested in short-term investments, our only market risk exposure relates
to
fluctuation in short-term interest rates.
As
of
December 31, 2007, approximately $132.2 million (excluding $3.99 million
of
deferred underwriting discounts and commissions) was held in trust for the
purposes of consummating a business combination. The proceeds held in trust
(including approximately $3.99 million of deferred underwriting discounts
and
commissions) have been invested in a money market fund that invests solely
in
short-term securities issued or guaranteed by the United States Government.
As
of December 31, 2007, the effective annualized interest rate payable on our
investment was approximately 4.51%. Assuming no other changes in our holdings
as
of December 31, 2007, a 1.0% decrease in the underlying interest rate payable
on
our investment as of December 31, 2007 would result in a decrease of
approximately $816,000, after tax, in the interest earned on our investment
for
the following twelve month period, and a corresponding decrease in our net
increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations, if any, for that
period. Given our limited risk in our exposure to money market funds and
treasury bills, we do not view the interest rate risk to be
significant.
We
have
not engaged in any hedging activities since our inception on April 26, 2007.
We
do not expect to engage in any hedging activities with respect to the market
risk to which we are exposed.
ITEM
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
Index
to Financial Statements
|
Page
|
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated
Financial
Statements
|
52
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet -December 31, 2007
|
53
|
|
|
Statements
of Income - Period Ended December 31, 2007
|
54
|
|
|
Statements
of Stockholders' Equity - Period Ended December 31, 2007
|
55
|
|
|
Statements
of Cash Flows - Period Ended December 31, 2007
|
56
|
|
|
Notes
to Financial Statements
|
57
|
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To
the
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
We
have
audited the accompanying balance sheet of Highlands Acquisition Corp. (a
corporation in the development stage) as of December 31, 2007, and the related
statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the period from
April 26, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2007. These financial statements
are
the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining,
on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Highlands Acquisition Corp. as
of
December 31, 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
the
period from April 26, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2007 in conformity with
United States generally accepted accounting principles.
McGLADREY
& PULLEN, LLP
New
York,
New York
March
19,
2008
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
(a
corporation in the development stage)
BALANCE
SHEET
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
269,314
|
|
Cash
held in trust
|
|
|
132,258,345
|
|
Cash
held in trust from underwriter
|
|
|
3,990,000
|
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
66,585
|
|
Deferred
tax asset
|
|
|
59,998
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
136,644,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$
|
10,945
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
84,238
|
|
Accrued
offering costs
|
|
|
2,335
|
|
Income
taxes payable
|
|
|
538,847
|
|
Deferred
underwriting fee
|
|
|
3,990,000
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
4,626,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock, subject to possible conversion of shares at conversion
value
|
|
|
40,448,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
(Note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
equity
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $.0001 par value Authorized 1,000,000 shares; none issued
and
outstanding
|
|
|
-
|
|
Common
stock, $.0001 par value Authorized 50,000,000 shares
Issued
and outstanding 17,250,000 shares
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
90,847,090
|
|
Income
accumulated during the development stage
|
|
|
720,072
|
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
91,568,887
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
136,644,242
|
|
See
Notes to Financial Statements.
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
(a
corporation in the development stage)
STATEMENT
OF INCOME
For
the period April 26, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2007
Interest
income
|
|
$
|
1,418,345
|
|
General
and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(219,424
|
)
|
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
1,198,921
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
478,849
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
720,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income per common share – basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
|
|
8,006,627
|
|
See
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
(a
corporation in the development stage)
STATEMENT
OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For
the period April 26, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2007
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Additional
paid-in
capital
|
|
Income
Accumulated
During
the
Development Stage
|
|
Stockholders’
Equity
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Issuance
of units to Founders on May 1, 2007 at approximately $0.007 per
unit
|
|
|
3,450,000
|
|
$
|
345
|
|
$
|
24,655
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
Sale
of Private Placement Warrants on October 9, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,250,000
|
|
Sale
of 13,800,000 units at $10 per unit through public offering (net
of
underwriter’s discount and offering expenses) including 4,139,999 shares
subject to possible conversion on October 9, 2007.
|
|
|
13,800,000
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
128,021,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,022,805
|
|
Proceeds
subject to possible conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,448,990
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(40,448,990
|
)
|
Net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720,072
|
|
|
720,072
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
17,250,000
|
|
$
|
1,725
|
|
$
|
90,847,090
|
|
$
|
720,072
|
|
$
|
91,568,887
|
|
See
Notes to Financial Statements
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
(a
corporation in the development stage)
STATEMENT
OF CASH FLOWS
For
the period April 26, 2007 (inception) to December 31, 2007
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
720,072
|
|
Adjustment
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Income
earned on trust account
|
|
|
(1,418,345
|
)
|
Increase
in prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(66,585
|
)
|
Increase
in deferred taxes
|
|
|
(59,998
|
)
|
Increase
in accounts payable
|
|
|
10,945
|
|
Increase
in accrued expenses
|
|
|
15,035
|
|
Increase
in income taxes payable
|
|
|
538,847
|
|
Increase
in franchise tax payable
|
|
|
69,203
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(190,826
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
placed in trust account
|
|
|
(134,830,000
|
)
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(134,830,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of units to public
|
|
|
138,000,000
|
|
Proceeds
from private placement of warrants
|
|
|
3,250,000
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of units to Founders
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Proceeds
from borrowings under notes payable to affiliates
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Payments
of notes payable to affiliates
|
|
|
(100,000
|
)
|
Payment
of offering costs
|
|
|
(5,984,860
|
)
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
135,290,140
|
|
Net
increase in cash
|
|
|
269,314
|
|
Cash
at beginning of period
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cash
at end of period
|
|
$
|
269,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of noncash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual
of offering costs
|
|
$
|
2,335
|
|
Accrual
of deferred underwriting fee
|
|
$
|
3,990,000
|
|
See
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
(a
corporation in the development stage)
Notes
to Financial Statements
1.
Organization and Business Operations
The
Company was incorporated in Delaware on April 26, 2007 for the purpose of
effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase,
reorganization or other similar business combination with one or more operating
businesses (“Business Combination”).
At
December 31, 2007, the Company’s operations relate to the Company’s formation
and initial public offering (“the Offering”) described in Note 2
below.
The
registration statement for the Offering was declared effective on October 3,
2007. The Company consummated the Offering on October 9, 2007 and the
underwriters exercised their over-allotment option on October 10, 2007 and
consummated it on October 15, 2007. The Company received net proceeds of
approximately $131,273,000, including $3,250,000 of proceeds from the private
placement (“the Private Placement”) sale of 3,250,000 warrants (the “Sponsor
Warrants”) to certain affiliates of the Company. The Sponsor Warrants are
identical to the warrants sold in the Offering, except (i) if the Company calls
its warrants for redemption, the Sponsors’ Warrants will not be redeemable by
the Company as long as they are still held by the initial purchasers or their
permitted transferees and (ii) the initial purchasers have agreed that the
Sponsors’ Warrants will not be sold or transferred by them (subject to limited
exceptions) until after the completion of the Company’s initial Business
Combination.
The
Company’s management has broad discretion with respect to the specific
application of the net proceeds of the Offering and the Private Placement,
although substantially all of the net proceeds of the Offering are intended
to
be generally applied toward consummating a Business Combination. There is no
assurance that the Company will be able to successfully affect a Business
Combination. Upon the closing of the Offering, (including the exercise of the
over-allotment option by the underwriters) and the Private Placement, an
aggregate of $134,830,000, including $3,990,000 of the underwriters’ discounts
and commissions as described in Note 2, was deposited in a trust account (“Trust
Account”) and invested in United States “government securities” within the
meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 having a
maturity of 180 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions
under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940 until
the
earlier of (i) the consummation of an initial Business Combination or (ii)
liquidation of the Company. At December 31, 2007, the funds are invested in
money market funds. The placing of funds in the Trust Account may not protect
those funds from third party claims against the Company. Although the Company
will seek to have all vendors, providers of financing, prospective target
businesses or other entities it engages, execute agreements with the Company
waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies
held
in the Trust Account, there is no guarantee that they will execute such
agreements. Two of the Company’s affiliates have agreed that they will be liable
under certain circumstances to ensure that the proceeds in the Trust Account
are
not reduced by the claims of target businesses or vendors, providers of
financing, service providers or other entities that are owed money by the
Company for services rendered to or contracted for or products sold to the
Company. There can be no assurance that they will be able to satisfy those
obligations. The net proceeds not held in the Trust Account may be used to
pay
for business, legal and accounting due diligence on prospective acquisitions
and
continuing general and administrative expenses. Additionally, up to an aggregate
of $2,100,000 of interest earned on the Trust Account balance may be released
to
the Company to fund working capital requirements and additional funds may be
released to fund tax obligations.
The
Company, after signing a definitive agreement for the acquisition of a target
business, is required to submit such transaction for stockholder approval.
In
the event that stockholders owning 30% or more of the shares sold in the
Offering vote against the Business Combination and exercise their conversion
rights described below, the Business Combination will not be consummated. All
of
the Company’s stockholders prior to the Offering (the “Founders”), have agreed
to vote their founding shares of common stock in accordance with the vote of
the
majority of the shares voted by all other stockholders of the Company (“Public
Stockholders”) with respect to any Business Combination and in favor of an
amendment to our certificate of incorporation to provide for the Company’s
perpetual existence.
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
(a
corporation in the development stage)
Notes
to Financial Statements—(Continued)
With
respect to a Business Combination which is approved and consummated, any Public
Stockholder who voted against the Business Combination may demand that the
Company convert his or her shares. The per share conversion price will equal
the
amount in the Trust Account, calculated as of two business days prior to the
consummation of the proposed Business Combination, divided by the number of
shares of common stock held by Public Stockholders at the consummation of the
Offering. Accordingly, Public Stockholders holding 4,139,999 shares sold in
the
Offering may seek conversion of their shares in the event of a Business
Combination. Accordingly, a portion of the net proceeds of the Offering has
been
classified as common stock subject to possible conversion of shares on the
accompanying balance sheet. Such Public Stockholders are entitled to receive
their per share interest in the Trust Account computed without regard to the
shares of common stock held by the Founders prior to the consummation of the
Offering.
The
Company’s Certificate of Incorporation provides that the Company will continue
in existence only until 24 months from October 3, 2007. If the Company has
not
completed a Business Combination by such date, its corporate existence will
cease and it will dissolve and liquidate for the purposes of winding up its
affairs. In the event of liquidation, it is likely that the per share value
of
the residual assets remaining available for distribution (including Trust
Account assets) will be less than the initial public offering price per share
in
the Offering (assuming no value is attributed to the Warrants contained in
the
Units sold in the Offering).
Development
Stage Company
–
The
Company complies with the reporting requirements of SFAS No. 7, “Accounting and
Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises.”
Concentration
of Credit Risk
—
The
Company maintains cash in a bank deposit account which, at times, exceeds
federally insured (FDIC) limits. The Company has not experienced any losses
on
this account.
Deferred
Income Taxes
—
Deferred income taxes are provided for the differences between bases of assets
and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes. A valuation
allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the
amount expected to be realized.
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
(a
corporation in the development stage)
Notes
to Financial Statements—(Continued)
Net
Income Per Common Share
–
Income
per common share is based on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding. The Company complies with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” which
requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share on the face
of the statement of operations. Basic income per share excludes dilution and
is
computed by dividing income available to holders of Common Stock by the
weighted-average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted income per
share reflects the potential share dilution that could occur if Warrants were
to
be exercised or otherwise resulted in the issuance of Common Stock that then
shared in the earnings of the entity.
The
following table details the net income per share computations on a basic and
diluted basis for the year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator
for basic and diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
720,072
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per share weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
8,006,627
|
|
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of shares issuable under warrants outstanding, based on the treasury
stock
method
|
|
|
-
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
8,066,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
Other
contingent shares:
The
dilutive effect of shares issuable does not include 13,800,000 Public Warrants
that are not exercisable until later of the completion of our initial business
combination or January 3, 2009. Furthermore, 3,450,000 Founders Warrants and
3,250,000 Sponsor warrants are also excluded from the dilutive effect since
they
are not exercisable until the Public Warrants are exercisable and, in addition
with respect to the Founders Warrants, our Common Stock price equals or exceeds
$14.25 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period.
Use
of Estimates
—
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
- The
fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities that qualify as financial
instruments under SFAS No. 107 “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instrument”, approximate their carrying amounts presented in the balance sheet
at December 31, 2007.
The
Company accounts for derivative instruments, if any, in accordance with SFAS
No.
133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” as amended
(“SFAS 133”), which establishes accounting and reporting standards for
derivative instruments. We do not currently have any derivative
instruments.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
—
In
July
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB
Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”), which provides criteria for
the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax
position. A tax benefit from an uncertain position may be recognized only if
it
is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable based on its
technical merits. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a
material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
(a
corporation in the development stage)
Notes
to Financial Statements—(Continued)
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” (SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and
interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating
the effect of the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on its consolidated financial
statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB No. 115,” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS
159 allows a company to irrevocably elect fair value as the initial and
subsequent measurement attribute for certain financial assets and financial
liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis, with changes in fair value
recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007 and will be applied prospectively. The Company is
currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its
consolidated financial statements.
The
Company does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective,
accounting standards if currently adopted would have a material effect on the
accompanying financial statements.
2.
Initial Public Offering
On
October 9, 2007, the Company sold 12,000,000 units (“Units”) in the Offering at
a price of $10 per Unit. The Offering generated net proceeds of approximately
$114,600,000, which, together with $3,450,000 in deferred underwriters discounts
and commissions, was placed in the Trust Account. On October 10, 2007, the
underwriters exercised the full amount of their over-allotment option for an
additional 1,800,000 Units, which closed on October 15, 2007. The exercise
of
the over-allotment generated additional net proceeds of approximately
$16,740,000, which, together with $540,000 in deferred underwriters discounts
and commissions, was placed in the Trust Account. After consummation of the
Offering (including the exercise of the over-allotment option by the
underwriters) and the Private Placement, an aggregate amount of $134,830,000
was
deposited in the Trust Account, which consisted of aggregate net proceeds of
approximately $128,030,000 from the Offering and the over-allotment, plus
$3,990,000 in deferred underwriting discounts and commissions and $3,250,000
of
proceeds from the Private Placement, but net of the proceeds from the offering
held outside the Trust Account. Each Unit consists of one share of the Company’s
common stock , par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”) and one warrant
to purchase one share of Common Stock (“Warrants”). Each Warrant will entitle
the holder to purchase from the Company one share of Common Stock at an exercise
price of $7.50 commencing on the later of the completion of an initial Business
Combination and 15 months from the October 3, 2007 and expiring five years
from
October 3, 2007. The Company may redeem all of the Warrants, at a price of
$.01
per Warrant upon 30 days’ notice while the Warrants are exercisable, only in the
event that the last sale price of the Common Stock is at least $14.25 per share
for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period ending on the third
day
prior to the date on which notice of redemption is given. In accordance with
the
warrant agreement relating to the Warrants sold and issued in the Offering,
the
Company is only required to use its best efforts to maintain the effectiveness
of the registration statement covering the Warrants. The Company will not be
obligated to deliver securities, and there are no contractual penalties for
failure to deliver securities, if a registration statement is not effective
at
the time of exercise. Additionally, in the event that a registration is not
effective at the time of exercise, the holder of a Warrant shall not be entitled
to exercise such Warrant and in no event (whether in the case of a registration
statement not being effective or otherwise) will the Company be required to
net
cash settle the warrant exercise. Consequently, the Warrants may expire
unexercised and unredeemed.
In
connection with the Offering and over-allotment, the Company paid Citigroup
Global Markets Inc. and William Smith Securities, the underwriters of the
Offering, an underwriting discount of 7% of the gross proceeds of the Offering,
of which 3% of the gross proceeds ($3,990,000) is held in the Trust Account
and
payable only upon the consummation of a business combination. This amount is
included in deferred underwriting fee on the accompanying balance sheet. The
underwriters have waived their right to receive such payment upon the Company’s
liquidation if it is unable to complete a Business Combination. Additionally,
Kanders & Company, an affiliate of Warren B. Kanders, one of the Company’s
directors, purchased 500,000 Units in the Offering. The Company received the
entire aggregate gross proceeds from this purchase and the underwriters did
not
receive any underwriting discounts or commissions on these
Units.
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
(a
corporation in the development stage)
Notes
to Financial Statements—(Continued)
Simultaneously
with the consummation of the Offering, certain of the Company’s affiliates
purchased the Sponsor’s Warrants at a purchase price of $1.00 per Sponsor
Warrant, in a private placement. The proceeds of $3,250,000 were placed in
the
Trust Account. The Sponsors’ Warrants are identical to the Warrants underlying
the Units sold in the Offering except that if the Company calls the Warrants
for
redemption, the Sponsors’ Warrants will not be redeemable by the Company as long
as they are still held by the initial purchasers or their permitted transferees.
The purchasers have agreed that the Sponsors’ Warrants will not be sold or
transferred by them subject to (limited exceptions), until after the completion
of an initial Business Combination. The purchase price of the Private Placement
Warrants approximates the fair value of such warrants.
The
Founders and the holders of the Sponsors’ Warrants and Co-Investment Units (as
described in Note 4 below) will be entitled to registration rights with respect
to their securities pursuant to an agreement signed prior to the effective
date
of the Offering. At any time and from time to time on or after the date that
is
30 days after the Company consummates a Business Combination, the holders of
a
majority-in-interest of the Founders’ Units (and underlying securities), the
Sponsors’ Warrants (and underlying securities) or the Co-Investment Units (and
underlying securities) may make a written demand that the Company register
such
securities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Company is not
obligated to effect more than an aggregate of two such demand registrations.
In
addition, such holders have certain “piggy back” registration rights on
registration statements filed subsequent to the Company’s consummation of a
Business Combination. The Company will bear the expenses incurred in connection
with the filing of any such registration statements.
3.
Notes Payable, Affiliates of Stockholders
The
Company issued unsecured promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount
of
$100,000 to two affiliates of the Founders on April 30, 2007. The notes were
non-interest bearing and were payable on the earlier of April 30, 2008 or the
consummation of the Offering. Due to the short-term nature of the notes, the
fair value of the notes approximated their carrying amount. On October 9, 2007,
the Company repaid the notes in full.
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
(a
corporation in the development stage)
Notes
to Financial Statements—(Continued)
4.
Income Taxes
The
Company’s provision for income taxes reflects the application of federal, state
and city statutory rates to the Company’s income before taxes. The Company’s
effective tax rate was [ %] for the period from April 26, 2007 (date of
inception) to December 31, 2007.
Components
of the provision for income taxes are as follows:
|
|
As
of
December 31, 2007
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
370,945
|
|
State
|
|
|
107,904
|
|
Total
Current
|
|
$
|
478,849
|
|
The
following is a summary of the items that caused recorded income taxes to differ
from income taxes computed using the statutory federal income tax rate of 34%
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
As
of
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computed
“expected” income tax expense
|
|
|
34.00
|
%
|
State
income taxes, net of federal income taxes
|
|
|
5.94
|
%
|
Total
income tax expense
|
|
|
39.94
|
%
|
Deferred
income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between
the financial reporting carrying amounts and tax bases of existing assets and
liabilities and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Significant
components of the Company’s existing deferred income tax assets and liabilities
as of December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
As
of
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized
start up costs
|
|
$
|
59,998
|
|
Total
Deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
59,998
|
|
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
(a
corporation in the development stage)
Notes
to Financial Statements—(Continued)
5.
Commitments and Related Party Transactions
The
Company presently occupies office space provided by two affiliates of certain
of
the Founders. Such affiliates have agreed that, until the Company consummates
a
Business Combination, it will make such office space, as well as certain office
and secretarial services, available to the Company, as may be required by the
Company from time to time. The Company has agreed to pay such affiliates an
aggregate amount of $10,000 per month for such services commencing on the
effective date of the Offering. The accompanying statement of income includes
$30,000 of expense related to this agreement.
Pursuant
to letter agreements that the Founders entered into with the Company and the
underwriters, the Founders waived their right to receive distributions with
respect to their founding shares upon the Company’s liquidation.
Certain
of the Company’s affiliates have agreed to purchase a total of 1,000,000 units
(“Co-Investment Units”) at a price of $10 per unit (an aggregate price of
$10,000,000) from the Company in a private placement that will occur immediately
prior to the Company’s consummation of a Business Combination. These
Co-Investment Units will be identical to the units sold in the Offering. The
purchasers have agreed that the Co-Investment Units will not be sold,
transferred, or assigned (subject to limited exceptions) until at least one
year
after the completion of the Business Combination.
The
Founders and the holders of the Sponsors’ Warrants (or underlying securities)
and the holders of the Co-Investment Units (or underlying securities) will
be
entitled to registration rights with respect to their securities pursuant to
an
agreement signed prior to the effective date of the Offering. For a description
of such registration rights agreement see Part II, Item 8, Note 2 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
6.
Preferred Stock
The
Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with such
designations, voting and other rights and preferences as may be determined
from
time to time by the Board of Directors. The agreement with the underwriters
prohibits the Company, prior to a Business Combination, from issuing preferred
stock which participates in the proceeds of the Trust Account or which votes
as
a class with the Common Stock on a Business Combination.
7.
Common Stock
Effective
July 16, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a unit dividend of
0.15 units for each outstanding unit. Effective October 3, 2007, the Company’s
Board of Directors authorized a unit dividend of 0.2 units for each outstanding
unit. All references in the accompanying financial statements to the number
of
shares of common stock have been retroactively restated to reflect these
transactions.
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
(a
corporation in the development stage)
Notes
to Financial Statements—(Continued)
8.
Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
The
following table presents summarized unaudited quarterly results of operations
for the Company for fiscal year 2007. We believe all necessary adjustments
have
been included in the amounts stated below to present fairly the following
selected information when read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial
Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere herein. Future quarterly
operating results may fluctuate depending on a number of factors. Results of
operations for any particular quarter are not necessarily indicative of results
of operations for a full year or any other quarter.
|
|
Fiscal
2007
|
|
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(7,455
|
)
|
$
|
727,527
|
|
$
|
720,072
|
|
Basic
earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
ITEM
9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
None.
ITEM
9A(T). Controls and Procedures
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The
Company's management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with
the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, its principal executive officer and principal financial officer,
respectively of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2007, pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Such disclosure controls and procedures are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company is
accumulated and communicated to management on a basis that permits timely
decisions regarding disclosure. Based upon that evaluation, the Company's Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2007 are
effective.
Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
This
annual report does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding
internal control over financial reporting or an attestation report of the
registrant’s registered public accounting firm due to a transition period
established by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for newly public
companies.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There
have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting
that
have come to management’s attention during the fiscal quarter ended December 31,
2007 evaluation that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
ITEM
9B. Other information
Not
applicable.
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
PART
III OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information
regarding executive officers is included in Part I of this Form 10-K as
permitted by General Instruction G(3).
We
have
adopted a code of ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees.
We have filed a copy of our code of ethics as an exhibit to the registration
statement in connection with our initial public offering. You may review
this
document by accessing our public filings at the SEC’s web site
www.sec.gov
.
In
addition, a copy of the code of ethics will be provided without charge upon
request to us in writing at One Paragon Drive, Suite 125, Montvale, New Jersey
07645. We intend to disclose any amendments or waivers of certain provisions
of
our code of ethics in a Current Report on Form 8-K.
On
February 11, 2008, William V. Campbell resigned as a Class B director of
Highlands Acquisition Corp. Mr. Campbell’s resignation was due to other time
commitments, and was not a result of any disagreement with us.
On
February 27, 2008, we received a warning letter from the American Stock Exchange
(“Amex”) that we were not in compliance with Sections 121(A)(1) and
802(a) of the Amex Company Guide because our board of directors is no
longer comprised of a majority of directors who are independent. Amex
gave us until May 27, 2008 to regain compliance with the requirements set
forth in such sections. We are actively seeking an independent director to
fill
the vacancy on our board of directors caused by the resignation of William
V. Campbell, one of our independent directors, on February 11, 2008, and
will continue to seek to fill such vacancy with an independent director prior
to
May 27, 2008 so as to comply with Sections 121(A)(1) and 802(a) of the Amex
Company Guide.
Other
information required by Item 10, including information regarding directors,
membership and function of the audit committee, including the financial
expertise of its members, and Section 16(a) compliance, appearing under the
captions "Election of Directors", "Information Regarding Board of Directors
and
Committees" and "Other Matters" in our Proxy Statement used in connection with
our 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM
11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The
information set forth under the caption "Executive Compensation" in our Proxy
Statement used in connection with our 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,
is
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM
12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The
information set forth under the caption "Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management" in our Proxy Statement used in connection
with
our 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM
13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
The
information set forth under the caption "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions" in our Proxy Statement used in connection with our 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The
information set forth under the caption "Principal Accountant Fees and Services"
in our Proxy Statement used in connection with our 2008 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, is incorporated herein by reference.
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
ITEM
15: EXHIBITS
(a)
Exhibits:
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
3.1
|
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.*
|
3.2
|
|
By-Laws.**
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen
Unit Certificate.**
|
4.2
|
|
Specimen
Common Stock Certificate.**
|
4.3
|
|
Specimen
Warrant Certificate.**
|
4.4
|
|
Form
of Warrant Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust
Company and the Registrant.***
|
10.1
|
|
Form
of Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Citigroup Global Markets
Inc.
and Russell F. Warren, M.D.**
|
10.2
|
|
Form
of Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Citigroup Global Markets
Inc.
and Robert W. Pangia.**
|
10.3
|
|
Form
of Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Citigroup Global Markets
Inc.
and Philip A. Baratelli.**
|
10.4
|
|
Form
of Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Citigroup Global Markets
Inc.
and Gary M. Julien.**
|
10.5
|
|
Form
of Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Citigroup Global Markets
Inc.
and Warren B. Kanders.**
|
10.6
|
|
Form
of Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Citigroup Global Markets
Inc.
and Russell F. Warren, Jr.**
|
10.7
|
|
Form
of Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Citigroup Global Markets
Inc.
and Leslie D. Michelson.**
|
10.8
|
|
Form
of Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Citigroup Global Markets
Inc.
and William V. Campbell.**
|
10.9
|
|
Form
of Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Citigroup Global Markets
Inc.
and William Forrester Owens.**
|
10.10
|
|
Form
of Letter Agreement among the Registrant, Citigroup Global Markets
Inc.
and Michael A. Henning.**
|
10.11
|
|
Form
of Investment Management Trust Agreement between Continental Stock
Transfer & Trust Company and the Registrant.**
|
10.12
|
|
Form
of Escrow Agreement between the Registrant, Continental Stock Transfer
& Trust Company and the Initial Stockholders.**
|
10.13
|
|
Form
of Letter Agreement between Kanders & Company Inc., Ivy Capital
Partners Management, LLC and Registrant regarding administrative
support.**
|
10.14
|
|
Form
of Promissory Note issued to each of Kanders & Company Inc. and Ivy
Capital Partners Management, LLC.**
|
10.15
|
|
Form
of Registration Rights Agreement among the Registrant and the Initial
Stockholders.**
|
10.16
|
|
Form
of Sponsors’ Warrant Subscription Agreements among the Registrant,
Graubard Miller and each of Kanders & Company, Ivy Healthcare Capital
II, L.P., Robert W. Pangia, Dennis W. O’Dowd, Virgilio Rene Veloso and
Fieldpoint Capital, LLC.**
|
10.17
|
|
Form
of Co-Investment Subscription Agreements among the Registrant and
each of
Kanders & Company Inc., Healthcare Capital II, L.P., Robert W. Pangia,
Dennis W. O’Dowd, Virgilio Rene Veloso and Fieldpoint Capital,
LLC.**
|
10.18
|
|
Form
of Letter Agreement of Highland Equity LLC, Fieldpoint Capital, LLC
and
Ivy Healthcare Capital II, L.P.***
|
14
|
|
Form
of Code of Ethics.**
|
24.1
|
|
Power of Attorney
(included on the Signature page hereto).
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
32.1
|
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.2
|
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
99.1
|
|
Form
of Audit Committee Charter. **
|
99.2
|
|
Form
of Nominating Committee Charter **
|
________________
*
|
Previously
filed as an Exhibit to Highlands Acquisition Corp.’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on October 10, 2007, and incorporated
herein by reference.
|
**
|
Previously
filed in connection with amendment number 1 to Highland Acquisition
Corp.’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-143599), filed
with the Commission on August 7, 2007, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
***
|
Previously
filed in connection with amendment number 2 to Highland Acquisition
Corp.’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-143599), filed
with the Commission on August 31, 2007, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act
of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
HIGHLANDS
ACQUISITION CORP.
|
|
|
Dated:
March 24, 2008
|
/s/
Philip A. Baratelli
|
|
Philip
A. Baratelli,
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
POWER
OF ATTORNEY
Each
of
the undersigned officers and directors of Highlands Acquisition Corp. hereby
severally constitute and appoint each of Robert W. Pangia and Philip A.
Baratelli, and each of them individually, as true and lawful attorneys-in-fact
for the undersigned, in any and all capacities, with full power of substitution,
to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to
file
the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact full power and authority to do and perform each and every
act
and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the foregoing,
as
fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact may lawfully do
or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has
been
signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities
and on the dates indicated below.
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Robert W. Pangia
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
March
24, 2008
|
Robert
W. Pangia
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Philip A. Baratelli
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
March
24, 2008
|
Philip
A. Baratelli
|
|
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Russell F. Warren, M.D.
|
|
Chairman
of the Board
|
|
March
24, 2008
|
Russell
F. Warren, M.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Warren B. Kanders
|
|
Director
|
|
March
24, 2008
|
Warren
B. Kanders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Russell F. Warren, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
March
24, 2008
|
Russell
F. Warren, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
Highlands
Acquisition Corp.
/
s/
Leslie D. Michelson
|
|
Director
|
|
March
24, 2008
|
Leslie
D. Michelson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
William F. Owens
|
|
Director
|
|
March
24, 2008
|
Willam
F. Owens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Michael A. Henning
|
|
Director
|
|
March
24, 2008
|
Michael
A. Henning
|
|
|
|
|
Highlands Acquisitions (AMEX:HIA)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 4월(4) 2024 으로 5월(5) 2024
Highlands Acquisitions (AMEX:HIA)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 5월(5) 2023 으로 5월(5) 2024