TORONTO, Nov. 30, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --
Discovery Silver Corp. (TSX-V: DSV, OTCQX: DSVSF)
(“Discovery” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce results from
its Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA” or “the Study”) on its
100%-owned Cordero silver project (“Cordero” or “the Project”)
located in Chihuahua State, Mexico.
Study highlights include (all figures are in
USD unless otherwise noted):
-
Excellent project economics: Base Case after-tax
NPV5% of $1.2 B (C$1.5 B) and IRR of 38% (Ag - $22.00/oz, Au -
$1,600/oz, Pb - $1.00/lb and Zn - $1.20/lb).
-
Exceptional silver price leverage: Upside Case
after-tax NPV5% of $1.9 B (C$2.4 B) and IRR of 55% (Ag - $27.50/oz,
Au - $1,880/oz, Pb - $1.10/lb and Zn - $1.45/lb based on one-year
trailing 90th percentile prices).
-
Large-scale, high-margin, long mine life asset:
16-year mine life with average annual production of 26 Moz AgEq at
an AISC of $12.35/oz AgEq.
-
Low capital intensity: initial development capex
of $368 M; attractive NPV-to-capex ratio of 3.2x.
-
Rapid payback: post-tax payback of 2.0 years for
Base Case and 1.4 years for Upside Case.
-
Technically robust study: 99% of tonnes processed
in the PEA mine plan are in the Measured & Indicated category;
process design and metallurgical recovery estimates are based on
the Company’s comprehensive 2021 metallurgical testwork
program.
-
Silver-dominant revenues: silver represents +60%
of the net smelter return in the first five years of the mine life
and +50% of the net smelter return over the life of mine, in-line
with the senior/mid-tier silver producer group.
Taj Singh, President and CEO, states: “With
annual AgEq production averaging more than 26 Moz over a +15-year
mine life we believe this PEA clearly positions Cordero as a Tier 1
silver asset. This impressive scale of production is achieved
through modest development capex of $368 M and returns excellent
margins with AISC averaging less than $12.50/AgEq oz over the life
of the mine. These costs highlight the benefits of existing local
infrastructure, excellent metallurgy, and a straight-forward open
pit mine with excellent grades and a low strip ratio.
“Importantly, the outstanding metrics
demonstrated in the PEA are supported by a mine plan with more than
99% of tonnes in the Measured and Indicated category, and a simple
and conventional process design based on our detailed metallurgical
testwork program completed earlier this year. This provides us with
a huge head start as we look ahead to the delivery of a
Prefeasibility Study on Cordero in 2022.”
PEA
SUMMARY:
Study support:
-
The Study is based on the updated Mineral Resource Estimate
(“Resource”) press released on October 20, 2021 (see Appendices for
Resource details), and the Company’s comprehensive metallurgical
testwork program described in our press release dated September 7,
2021.
-
The PEA project team was led by Ausenco Engineering Canada Inc.
(“Ausenco”), an industry leader in cost-effective design and
construction. Ausenco was supported by AGP Mining Consultants Inc.
(“AGP”) and Knight Piésold and Co. (USA) (“Knight Piésold”).
Project Economics:
Sensitivity of the Project’s expected after-tax
NPV, IRR and payback at different commodity price assumptions is
outlined in the table below:
|
Units |
Base Case |
Upside Case |
Base Case +15% |
Base Case -15% |
After-Tax NPV (5% discount rate) |
(US$ M) |
$1,160 |
|
$1,889 |
|
$1,692 |
|
$622 |
|
Internal Rate of Return |
(%) |
|
38.2 |
% |
|
54.6 |
% |
|
49.9 |
% |
|
25.2 |
% |
Payback |
(yrs) |
|
2.0 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
3.5 |
|
-
Base Case price assumptions: Ag = $22.00/oz, Au = $1,600/oz, Pb =
$1.00/lb, Zn = $1.20/lb
- Upside Case
price assumptions: Ag = $27.50/oz, Au = $1,880/oz, Pb = $1.10/lb,
Zn = $1.45/lb based on one-year trailing 90th percentile
prices
After-Tax Free Cash Flow:
A chart summarizing the expected annual and
cumulative after-tax free cash flow (“FCF”) over the life-of-mine
(“LOM”) is provided below:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/d1131062-ffa4-4091-b528-d23ac46806b3
Production & Costs:
Annual production over the LOM is expected to
average 26 Moz AgEq with production averaging over 33 Moz AgEq when
fully ramped up (Years 5 – 12); this positions Cordero as one of
the largest silver mines globally.
|
Units |
Year 1 – 4 |
Year 5 - 12 |
Year 13 -16 |
LOM |
AgEq Produced - Average |
(Moz) |
29 |
33 |
9 |
26 |
AgEq Payable - Average |
(Moz) |
26 |
29 |
8 |
23 |
AgEq Produced - Total |
(Moz) |
117 |
265 |
37 |
426 |
AgEq Payable - Total |
(Moz) |
104 |
230 |
32 |
372 |
All-In Sustaining Cost (AISC) |
(US$/AgEq oz) |
$11.64 |
$11.77 |
$18.88 |
$12.35 |
Note – LOM production/payable totals include
production from Year -1. AgEq Produced is metal recovered in
doré/concentrate. AgEq Payable is metal payable from
doré/concentrate and incorporates metal payment terms outlined in
the Concentrate Terms section below. See Technical Disclosure
section for AgEq and AISC calculation methodology.
LOM Production & AISC:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/dc1da013-9e05-4a0a-a7af-78b58ef8af4a
Note – Au/Pb/Zn production is shown on an
AgEq basis based on: Ag = $22/oz, Au = $1,600/oz, Pb = $1.00/lb and
Zn = $1.20/lb
OPERATIONS:
Mining:
The mine plan incorporates accelerated stripping
as well as stockpiling of low-grade material in order to optimize
the grade profile over the LOM.
-
The mine plan was completed by AGP and is based on a detailed mine
design that incorporates mining dilution, safety berms and haul
roads.
-
Mining rates over the life of the mine are relatively steady at 60
to 70 Mtpa.
-
The ultimate pit contains 719 Mt in total consisting of 228 Mt of
mill feed and 491 Mt of waste for an average strip ratio of 2.2:1.
The strip ratio is relatively even over the LOM.
-
Pit slope designs were based on an assessment by Knight Piésold
that was supported by two geotechnical coreholes in the North
Corridor and logging of core from two exploration coreholes in the
South Corridor.
Processing:
Processing was broken into two phases to
optimize the capital efficiency of the project.
-
Phase 1 throughput (Year -1 to Year 4)
-
Oxides: mined during the preproduction period and are crushed
through the Phase 1 crushing plant and stacked on the heap leach
from Year -1 to Year 3 at a throughput rate of 5 Mtpa. After Year 3
the Phase 1 crushing plant is dedicated to processing higher-value
sulphide material with remaining oxide material processed as
uncrushed ‘run-of-mine’ (“ROM”) material via heap leaching.
-
Sulphides: crushing, grinding and flotation circuit is constructed
in Year -1 and processing occurs at a nameplate rate of 7.2 Mtpa
from Year 1 to Year 4. During this period the mine plan focuses on
high-grade material from the Pozo de Plata zone.
-
Phase 2 throughput (Year 5+)
-
Sulphides: two identical crushing, grinding and flotation circuits
from Y5 onwards with total throughput of 14.4 Mtpa
Annual Throughput (Mt/a)
|
PHASE 1 |
PHASE 2 |
Year -1 |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5+ |
Oxides / Heap Leach (Crushed) |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
- |
- |
Sulphides / Milling |
- |
5.8 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
10.8 |
14.4 |
Total Tonnes |
5.0 |
10.8 |
12.2 |
12.2 |
10.8 |
14.4 |
-
Process design
-
Oxides: three-stage crushing (targeted crush size of 8 mm),
agglomeration, heap leaching and refining in Year -1 to Year 3 and
ROM dump leaching and refining in Year 4 to Year 6 to produce Ag-Au
doré bars
-
Sulphides: three-stage crushing, grinding (targeted grind size of
200 micron) and flotation to produce Pb and Zn concentrates
Head grades:
The mine plan focuses on feeding higher grades
to the mill earlier in the mine life:
-
Year 1 – 4: processing of higher-grade oxide
material from the South Corridor and sulphide material
predominantly from the Pozo de Plata zone
-
Year 5 – 12: processing of higher-grade sulphides
from the NE Extension and the South Corridor
-
Year 13 – 16: processing of lower-grade material
stockpiled during Year 1 to Year 12
HEAD GRADES
|
UNIT
|
PHASE 1 |
PHASE 2 |
LOM
|
Year 1 – 4 |
Year 5 – 12 |
Year 13 – 16 |
Oxides |
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes processed |
(Mt) |
25 |
4 |
- |
29 |
Ag |
(g/t) |
37 |
29 |
- |
36 |
Au |
(g/t) |
0.08 |
0.05 |
- |
0.08 |
AgEq |
(g/t) |
43 |
33 |
- |
42 |
Sulphides |
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes processed |
(Mt) |
31 |
115 |
52 |
199 |
Ag |
(g/t) |
57 |
32 |
13 |
31 |
Au |
(g/t) |
0.26 |
0.07 |
0.04 |
0.09 |
Pb |
(%) |
0.80 |
0.50 |
0.17 |
0.46 |
Zn |
(%) |
0.80 |
0.92 |
0.34 |
0.75 |
AgEq |
(g/t) |
118 |
88 |
34 |
80 |
Note – Phase 1 and LOM Oxide tonnes/grades
include tonnes processed on the heap leach in Year -1
Recoveries:
-
Oxides: recoveries were based on coarse bottle
roll tests and preliminary results from column leach tests
completed in 2021. Recoveries average 56% for Ag and 63% for Au for
crushed feed and 36% for Ag and 35% for Au for uncrushed ROM
feed.
-
Sulphides: recoveries were based on the 2021
metallurgical test program which included lock-cycle tests and
examined metal recoveries to the silver-lead concentrate and the
silver-zinc concentrate at varying head grades for each of the
major geological rock types at Cordero. Metal recoveries to the two
concentrates are summarized below:
SULPHIDE RECOVERIES (weighted
average)
|
PHASE 1 |
PHASE 2 |
LOM
|
Year 1 – 4 |
Year 5 – 12 |
Year 13 – 16 |
Ag |
92% |
83% |
67% |
84% |
Au |
19% |
19% |
19% |
19% |
Pb |
90% |
86% |
69% |
86% |
Zn |
85% |
86% |
74% |
85% |
Tailings Management Facility
(TMF):
-
The TMF design was completed by Knight Piésold and is based on a
conventional thickened tailings dam facility of downstream
construction type.
-
The TMF is located directly west of the open pit. The design
incorporates five dam lifts over the LOM.
-
Total capacity of the TMF is 179M m3 (252 Mt); this is
significantly greater than the estimated volume requirement of 142M
m3 based on the PEA mine plan.
-
An evaluation of using a dry-stacked tailings facility will be
completed as part of pre-feasibility work.
CONCENTRATE TERMS:
Metal Payable:
-
Cordero is expected to produce clean, highly saleable concentrates
with minimal penalty elements as established in the 2021
metallurgical test program.
-
Industry standard payables and deductions were applied to the Pb
and Zn concentrates as per the table below. A metallurgical balance
summary is included in the Appendices.
-
Approximately 85% of the Ag reports to the Pb concentrate where
higher payabilities are received.
|
Ag |
Au |
Pb |
Zn |
Pb Concentrate |
|
|
|
|
Average concentrate grade LOM |
2,900 g/t |
1.6 g/t |
52 |
% |
- |
|
Payable metal |
95 |
% |
95 |
% |
95 |
% |
- |
|
Minimum deduction |
50 g/t |
1 g/t |
3 units |
- |
|
Zn Concentrate |
|
|
|
|
Average concentrate grade LOM |
300 g/t |
0.5 g/t |
- |
|
51 |
% |
Payable metal |
70 |
% |
70 |
% |
- |
|
85 |
% |
Deduction |
3 oz/t |
1 g/t |
- |
|
- |
|
Treatment/Refining Charges:
- Treatment and
refining charges were based on a review of spot and recent
benchmark pricing and are summarized as follows:
PARAMETER |
UNITS |
PEA COST |
SPOT |
2021 BENCHMARK |
TREATMENT/REFINING CHARGES |
|
|
|
|
Treatment charge – Pb con |
$/dmt |
$100 |
~$60 |
$140 |
Treatment charge – Zn con |
$/dmt |
$200 |
~$80 |
$160 |
Ag refining charge – Pb con |
$/oz |
$1.00 |
~$0.75 |
$1.50 |
Concentrate Transportation:
-
Transportation costs assume trucking of the concentrate via
containers to the international port at Guaymas, Sonora, and then
shipping via ocean freight to Asia.
-
Estimated transportation costs (trucking, port handling and ocean
freight) are $128/wmt for Pb concentrate and $116/wmt for Zn
concentrate.
CAPITAL
EXPENDITURES:
Initial Capital (for
parallel processing of crushed oxides and sulphides)
-
Year -2: construction of on-site infrastructure,
power line and the heap leach circuit with capacity of 5 Mtpa to
process oxide/transition material (includes a three-stage oxide
crushing circuit, heap leach pad/ponds and Merrill Crowe
plant).
-
Year -1: first sulphide circuit with a capacity of
7.2 Mtpa (includes sulphide crushing circuit, ball mill and
flotation plant) and construction of the TMF including the initial
dam lift.
Expansion Capital (to
expand plant to 14.4 Mtpa sulphides only)
-
Year 3: addition of second sulphide circuit to
expand processing rate to 14.4 Mtpa by the addition of a ball mill
and flotation circuit creating two parallel sulphide circuits. The
crushing circuit previously used for oxides will be dedicated to
sulphides from Year 4 onwards and will not require
repurposing.
-
Year 8: expand flotation circuit with additional
flotation cells, cyclones, filters and thickeners to accommodate
the higher zinc grades from Year 9 to Year 11.
Sustaining Capital
-
TMF: the tailings dam will be completed in five
lifts over the LOM at a total capital cost of $110 M ($15 M initial
capex plus $95 M of sustaining capex).
-
Other: additional sustaining capex totals $113 M
over the LOM and includes sustaining capital for the process plant
and mobile equipment and replacements/refurbishments of
infrastructure assets.
DESCRIPTION (all in US$
millions)
|
INITIAL CAPITAL |
EXPANSION CAPITAL |
SUSTAINING LOM CAPEX
|
TOTAL
LOM CAPEX
|
Year -2 |
Year -1 |
Year 3 |
Year 8 |
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining |
$26 |
$1 |
|
|
$7 |
$33 |
Infrastructure |
$34 |
$9 |
$10 |
|
$16 |
$69 |
Heap Leach + Oxide Plant |
$71 |
$1 |
|
|
$4 |
$76 |
Sulphide Processing Plant |
|
$95 |
$51 |
$23 |
$30 |
$199 |
Tailings Facility (TMF) |
|
$15 |
|
|
$95 |
$110 |
Indirects |
$22 |
$30 |
$17 |
$6 |
$4 |
$78 |
Owners Costs |
$6 |
|
|
|
|
$6 |
Closure (net of Salvage Value) |
|
|
|
|
$22 |
$22 |
Contingency |
$28 |
$30 |
$16 |
$6 |
$29 |
$110 |
Capital Expenditures - Subtotals
|
$187 |
$181 |
$94
|
$35
|
$208
|
$704 |
$368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRE-SULPHIDE OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$121 |
|
|
|
|
Mining Costs |
|
($110) |
|
|
|
|
Process + G&A Costs |
|
($27) |
|
|
|
|
Operating Cash Flow for Year -1 |
|
($16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET FUNDING REQUIREMENT |
$384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING COST
ASSUMPTIONS:
Mining:
-
Mining is assumed to be completed by contract mining; estimated
mining costs were based on contractor quotes for Cordero received
by AGP
Processing and G&A
Costs:
-
Processing costs for the heap leach and mill/flotation, and G&A
costs were developed by Ausenco from first principles.
-
Sulphide processing costs benefit from a conventional flotation
process design and low power costs. The targeted coarse grind size
of 200 micron alleviates the need for a SAG mill.
-
G&A costs estimates are based on a small camp and
administration office at site. The majority of the work force will
be Mexican nationals commuting daily from the local town of Parral.
Parral is 25 km south of Cordero and has a population of
approximately 100,000. It is the regional government centre in the
southern part of Chihuahua State and has a well-established service
industry that supports numerous local mining operations.
PARAMETER |
UNITS |
PEA COST |
OPERATING COSTS |
|
|
Mining – Mill Feed |
$/t mined |
$2.16 |
Mining – Waste |
$/t mined |
$2.04 |
Processing – Heap leach crushed |
$/t stacked |
$3.84 |
Processing – Heap leach ROM |
$/t stacked |
$1.39 |
Processing – Milling (7.2 Mtpa) |
$/t milled |
$7.01 |
Processing – Milling (14.4 Mtpa) |
$/t milled |
$6.57 |
Site G&A (14.4 Mtpa) |
$/t milled |
$0.86 |
OPPORTUNITIES:
Work completed during the preparation of the PEA
outlined a number of opportunities that have the potential to
improve the economic and ESG performance of the project:
-
Mine life extension: there are over 300 Mt of
Sulphide Resource that sit outside the PEA design pit but within
the Resource pit shell. These resources as summarized below have
the potential to extend the mine life and/or increase production
levels at higher commodity prices.
Class
|
Tonnes
|
Grade |
Contained Metal |
Ag |
Au |
Pb |
Zn |
AgEq |
Ag |
Au |
Pb |
Zn |
AgEq |
(Mt) |
(g/t) |
(g/t) |
(%) |
(%) |
(g/t) |
(Moz) |
(koz) |
(Mlb) |
(Mlb) |
(Moz) |
Measured |
33 |
15 |
0.06 |
0.21 |
0.42 |
38 |
16 |
63 |
151 |
306 |
40 |
Indicated |
187 |
16 |
0.04 |
0.23 |
0.45 |
40 |
94 |
221 |
952 |
1,869 |
238 |
M&I |
220 |
16 |
0.04 |
0.23 |
0.45 |
39 |
110 |
284 |
1,103 |
2,175 |
278 |
Inferred |
106 |
14 |
0.03 |
0.19 |
0.38 |
34 |
48 |
97 |
445 |
897 |
117 |
Note – the full Resource
is provided in the Appendix; further details can be found in the
Company’s October 21, 2021, press release.
-
Coarser grind size: metallurgical test work
suggests higher recoveries may be achieved at coarse grind sizes
(greater than the 200 micron used in the PEA). An evaluation of
coarse particle flotation will be completed as part of the 2022
Prefeasibility Study (“PFS”). Coarse particle flotation has the
potential to further reduce operating costs and water
consumption.
-
Dry stack tailings: an evaluation of using dry
stacked tailings to improve ESG performance will be completed as
part of the PFS.
TECHNICAL
DISCLOSURE:
-
Inferred material, representing 0.9% of the mill feed, is included
in the total mill feed. Inferred resources are considered too
speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to
them that would enable them to be categorized as reserves.
-
Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability.
-
Readers are cautioned that the PEA is preliminary in nature and
that there is no certainty the estimates utilized in the PEA will
be realized.
-
A full technical report will be prepared in accordance with NI
43-101 and will be filed on SEDAR within 45 days of this press
release.
-
AgEq is calculated based on the following commodity prices: Ag -
$22.00/oz, Au - $1,600/oz, Pb - $1.00/lb and Zn - $1.20/lb.
-
All-in Sustaining cost (AISC) is calculated as: [Operating costs
(mining, processing and G&A) + Royalties + Concentrate
Transportation + Treatment & Refining Charges + Concentrate
Penalties + Sustaining Capital (includes capital for TMF dams lifts
with capacity for less than five years) + Closure Costs] / Payable
AgEq ounces
APPENDIX:
An appendix with the following supporting
information can be found at the end of the release or the following
link: Appendices
Appendix A - Mineral Resource Estimate
Appendix B – After-Tax NPV/IRR/Payback
Sensitivities
Appendix C - Pit Optimisation Parameters
Appendix D - LOM Mine Plan Summary
Appendix E - LOM Process Throughput Summary
Appendix F - Simplified Process Flowsheets
Appendix G – Metallurgical Balance Summary
Appendix H - Long Sections / Cross Sections
Appendix I - Site Layout
Appendix J - LOM Production & Cash Flow
Schedule
About
Discovery:
Discovery’s flagship project is its 100%-owned
Cordero project, one of the world’s largest silver deposits. The
PEA completed in November 2021 demonstrates that Cordero has the
potential to be developed into a highly capital efficient mine that
offers the combination of margin, size and scaleability. Cordero is
located close to infrastructure in a prolific mining belt in
Chihuahua State, Mexico. Continued exploration and project
development at Cordero is supported by an industry leading balance
sheet with cash of over C$75 million. Discovery was a recipient of
the 2020 TSX Venture 50 award and the 2021 OTCQX Best 50 award.
On Behalf of the Board of Directors,
Taj Singh, M.Eng, P.Eng, CPA,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
For further information contact:
Forbes Gemmell, CFA
VP Corporate Development & Investor Relations
Phone: 416-613-9410
Email: forbes.gemmell@discoverysilver.com
Website: www.discoverysilver.com
Qualified
Person
The PEA for the Company’s Cordero project as
summarized in this release was completed by Ausenco with support
from by AGP and Knight Piésold. A full technical report supporting
the PEA will be prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 and will be
filed on SEDAR within 45 days of this press release. The scientific
and technical content of this press release was reviewed and
approved by Taj Singh, P Eng., President & CEO, who is a
"Qualified Person" as defined by National Instrument 43-101 -
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI
43-101").
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS:
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture
Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of
this release.
This news release is not for distribution to United States
newswire services or for dissemination in the United
States.
This news release does not constitute an offer
to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any
sale of any of the securities in any jurisdiction in which such
offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful, including any of the
securities in the United States of America. The securities have not
been and will not be registered under the United States Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”) or any state securities
laws and may not be offered or sold within the United States or to,
or for account or benefit of, U.S. Persons (as defined in
Regulation S under the 1933 Act) unless registered under the 1933
Act and applicable state securities laws, or an exemption from such
registration requirements is available.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements
This news release may include forward-looking
statements that are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties.
All statements within this news release, other than statements of
historical fact, are to be considered forward looking. Although
Discovery believes the expectations expressed in such
forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions,
such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual
results or developments may differ materially from those described
in forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those described in
forward-looking statements include fluctuations in market prices,
including metal prices, continued availability of capital and
financing, and general economic, market or business conditions.
There can be no assurances that such statements will prove accurate
and, therefore, readers are advised to rely on their own evaluation
of such uncertainties. Discovery does not assume any obligation to
update any forward-looking statements except as required under
applicable laws.
APPENDIX A – MINERAL RESOURCE
ESTIMATE
SULPHIDE RESOURCE
(assumed to be processed via mill/flotation)
NSR $/t
cut-off
|
Class
|
Tonnes
|
Grade |
Contained Metal |
Ag |
Au |
Pb |
Zn |
AgEq |
Ag |
Au |
Pb |
Zn |
AgEq |
(Mt) |
(g/t) |
(g/t) |
(%) |
(%) |
(g/t) |
(Moz) |
(koz) |
(Mlb) |
(Mlb) |
(Moz) |
$7.25/t
|
Measured |
128 |
22 |
0.08 |
0.31 |
0.52 |
52 |
89 |
328 |
881 |
1,470 |
212 |
Indicated |
413 |
19 |
0.05 |
0.28 |
0.51 |
47 |
255 |
707 |
2,543 |
4,663 |
625 |
M&I |
541 |
20 |
0.06 |
0.29 |
0.51 |
48 |
344 |
1,035 |
3,424 |
6,132 |
837 |
Inferred |
108 |
14 |
0.03 |
0.19 |
0.38 |
34 |
49 |
99 |
451 |
909 |
119 |
OXIDE/TRANSITION
RESOURCE (assumed to be processed by heap
leaching)
NSR $/t
cut-off
|
Class
|
Tonnes
|
Grade |
Contained Metal |
% Oxide / %
Trans
|
Ag |
Au |
AgEq |
Ag |
Au |
AgEq |
(Mt) |
(g/t) |
(g/t) |
(g/t) |
(Moz) |
(koz) |
(Moz) |
$4.78/t
|
Measured |
23 |
20 |
0.06 |
25 |
15 |
43 |
19 |
92% / 8% |
Indicated |
75 |
19 |
0.05 |
23 |
45 |
125 |
56 |
87% / 13% |
M&I |
98 |
19 |
0.05 |
23 |
60 |
168 |
74 |
88% / 12% |
Inferred |
35 |
16 |
0.04 |
20 |
18 |
44 |
22 |
63% / 37% |
SUPPORTING TECHNICAL DISCLOSURE FOR
RESOURCE:
- Mineral resources that are not
mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
- AgEq for the Sulphide Resource is
calculated as Ag + (Au x 16.07) + (Pb x 32.55) + (Zn x 35.10);
these factors are based on commodity prices of Ag - $24.00/oz, Au -
$1,800/oz, Pb - $1.10/lb, Zn - $1.20/lb and assumed recoveries of
Ag – 84%, Au – 18%, Pb – 87% and Zn – 88%.
- AgEq for the Oxide/Transition
Resource is calculated as Ag + (Au x 87.5); this factor is based on
commodity prices of Ag - $24.00/oz and Au - $1,800/oz and assumed
recoveries of Ag – 60% and Au – 70%.
- The Resource is constrained by a
pit optimisation based on the following commodity prices: Ag -
$24.00/oz, Au - $1,800/oz, Pb - $1.10/lb, Zn - $1.20/lb. Additional
parameters for the pit constraint are provided in the Company’s
October 20, 2021, press release.
- Individual metals are reported at
100% of in-situ grade.
- The effective date of the Resource
is October 20, 2021, and is based on drilling through July
2021.
- There are no known legal,
political, environmental or other risks that could materially
affect the potential development of the Resource.
- A full technical report supporting
the Resource will be prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 and will
be filed on SEDAR within 45 days of the October 20, 2021, Resource
press release.
APPENDIX B: AFTER-TAX NPV / IRR /
PAYBACK SENSITIVITIES
Sensitivity of the Project’s NPV, IRR and payback at different
Ag and Zn price assumptions is outlined in the table below. For
these sensitivities the Au and Pb prices have been fixed at
$1,600/oz and $1.00/lb respectively. The Base Case scenario for the
PEA is highlighted in grey below and assumes Ag - $22.00/oz, Au -
$1,600/oz, Pb - $1.00/lb and Zn - $1.20/lb.
|
Ag ($/oz) |
$18.00 |
$20.00 |
$22.00 |
$25.00 |
$30.00 |
|
|
NPV
(5%) |
IRR |
Payback |
NPV
(5%) |
IRR |
Payback |
NPV
(5%) |
IRR |
Payback |
NPV
(5%) |
IRR |
Payback |
NPV
(5%) |
IRR |
Payback |
|
|
(US$M) |
(%) |
(yrs) |
(US$M) |
(%) |
(yrs) |
(US$M) |
(%) |
(yrs) |
(US$M) |
(%) |
(yrs) |
(US$M) |
(%) |
(yrs) |
Zn
($/lb)
|
$1.05 |
$715 |
27.2 |
% |
3.3 |
$866 |
31.5 |
% |
2.7 |
$1,016 |
35.8 |
% |
2.2 |
$1,238 |
42.0 |
% |
1.8 |
$1,607 |
52.5 |
% |
1.4 |
$1.10 |
$765 |
28.2 |
% |
3.2 |
$915 |
32.4 |
% |
2.6 |
$1,064 |
36.6 |
% |
2.1 |
$1,286 |
42.8 |
% |
1.8 |
$1,655 |
53.2 |
% |
1.4 |
$1.20 |
$863 |
30.0 |
% |
3.1 |
$1,013 |
34.1 |
% |
2.5 |
$1,160 |
38.2 |
% |
2.0 |
$1,382 |
44.3 |
% |
1.7 |
$1,751 |
54.5 |
% |
1.4 |
$1.30 |
$961 |
31.7 |
% |
2.9 |
$1,109 |
35.8 |
% |
2.3 |
$1,257 |
39.7 |
% |
2.0 |
$1,478 |
45.7 |
% |
1.7 |
$1,848 |
55.8 |
% |
1.4 |
$1.45 |
$1,105 |
34.2 |
% |
2.7 |
$1,253 |
38.1 |
% |
2.2 |
$1,401 |
42.0 |
% |
1.9 |
$1,622 |
47.8 |
% |
1.6 |
$1,992 |
57.8 |
% |
1.3 |
APPENDIX C - PIT OPTIMISATION
PARAMETERS:
The PEA mine plan was based on a pit
optimization that utilised the following parameters:
PARAMETER |
UNITS |
Ag |
Au |
Pb |
Zn |
COMMODITY PRICES |
$/oz or $/lb |
$ |
20.00 |
|
$ |
1,600 |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
ROYALTY |
% |
|
0.5 |
% |
|
0.5 |
% |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
PIT SLOPE ASSUMPTIONS |
Five sectors were modeled based on core logging and two
geotechnical holes with inter-ramp angles ranging from
40o to 59o |
PROCESS RECOVERIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Heap Leach (Oxide/Transition) |
% |
|
60 |
% |
|
70 |
% |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Flotation (Sulphide) |
|
|
|
|
|
Breccia – Volcanic |
|
|
|
|
|
Recovery to Pb concentrate |
% |
|
79 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
91 |
% |
|
- |
|
Recovery to Zn concentrate |
% |
|
11 |
% |
|
7 |
% |
|
- |
|
|
88 |
% |
Breccia – Sedimentary |
|
|
|
|
|
Recovery to Pb concentrate |
% |
|
75 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
89 |
% |
|
- |
|
Recovery to Zn concentrate |
% |
|
9 |
% |
|
4 |
% |
|
- |
|
|
86 |
% |
Volcanic |
|
|
|
|
|
Recovery to Pb concentrate |
% |
|
70 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
85 |
% |
|
- |
|
Recovery to Zn concentrate |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
- |
|
|
81 |
% |
Sedimentary |
|
|
|
|
|
Recovery to Pb concentrate |
% |
|
70 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
83 |
% |
|
- |
|
Recovery to Zn concentrate |
% |
|
10 |
% |
|
5 |
% |
|
- |
|
|
89 |
% |
METAL PAYABLE |
|
|
|
|
|
Dore (Heap Leach) |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
99.9 |
% |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Concentrate (Flotation) |
|
|
|
|
|
Pb concentrate |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
95 |
% |
|
95 |
% |
|
- |
|
Zn concentrate |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
70 |
% |
|
- |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING COSTS |
|
Base |
Per 10m below 1550m elev. |
|
Mining cost – Mill Feed |
$/t mined |
$ |
1.54 |
|
+$
|
0.024
|
|
|
Mining cost - Waste |
$/t mined |
$ |
1.64 |
|
+$
|
0.024
|
|
|
Processing cost – Heap leach (14,000 tpd) |
$/t stacked |
$ |
3.92 |
|
|
|
|
Processing cost – Flotation (40,000 tpd) |
$/t milled |
$ |
6.39 |
|
|
|
|
G&A (40,000 tpd) |
$/t milled |
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TREATMENT/REFINING CHARGES |
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment charge – Pb con |
$/dmt |
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
|
Treatment charge – Zn con |
$/dmt |
$ |
200 |
|
|
|
|
Ag refining charge – Pb con |
$/oz |
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
APPENDIX D - LOM MINE PLAN
SUMMARY
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/8166015b-ee80-4827-b8e3-23bacc987d76
APPENDIX E - LOM PROCESS THROUGHPUT
SUMMARY
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/8166015b-ee80-4827-b8e3-23bacc987d76
APPENDIX F - SIMPLIFIED PROCESS
FLOWSHEETS
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/b88056d2-d72a-4018-bf8f-b849b808fdc9
PHASE
1:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/885c2668-aea9-4dea-ba22-ed401e1821c3
PHASE
2:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/cb701e57-5f13-428e-8935-165e82a05cea
APPENDIX G – METALLURGICAL BALANCE
SUMMARY
|
UNITS
|
PHASE 1 |
PHASE 2 |
LOM |
Years 1 - 4 |
Years 5 - 12 |
Years 13 - 16 |
Ag |
Au |
Pb |
Zn |
Ag |
Au |
Pb |
Zn |
Ag |
Au |
Pb |
Zn |
Ag |
Au |
Pb |
Zn |
MET BALANCE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average head grade |
g/t or
% |
57 |
|
0.26 |
|
0.80 |
|
0.80 |
|
32 |
|
0.07 |
|
0.50 |
|
0.92 |
|
13 |
|
0.04 |
|
0.17 |
|
0.34 |
|
31 |
|
0.09 |
|
0.46 |
|
0.75 |
|
Recovered to Pb Con |
% |
81 |
% |
13 |
% |
90 |
% |
6 |
% |
71 |
% |
13 |
% |
86 |
% |
6 |
% |
56 |
% |
13 |
% |
69 |
% |
3 |
% |
73 |
% |
13 |
% |
86 |
% |
5 |
% |
Recovered to Zn Con |
% |
12 |
% |
6 |
% |
3 |
% |
85 |
% |
12 |
% |
6 |
% |
3 |
% |
86 |
% |
11 |
% |
6 |
% |
3 |
% |
74 |
% |
12 |
% |
6 |
% |
3 |
% |
85 |
% |
Tailings |
% |
7 |
% |
81 |
% |
7 |
% |
9 |
% |
17 |
% |
81 |
% |
11 |
% |
8 |
% |
33 |
% |
81 |
% |
28 |
% |
22 |
% |
16 |
% |
81 |
% |
11 |
% |
10 |
% |
Total |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONCENTRATE GRADES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pb Concentrate |
g/t or % |
3,490 |
|
2.5 |
|
54 |
% |
- |
|
2,802 |
|
1.1 |
|
52 |
% |
- |
|
2,657 |
|
2.1 |
|
43 |
% |
- |
|
2,939 |
|
1.6 |
|
52 |
% |
- |
|
Zn Concentrate |
g/t or % |
524 |
|
1.3 |
|
- |
|
52 |
% |
254 |
|
0.3 |
|
- |
|
51 |
% |
285 |
|
0.5 |
|
- |
|
50 |
% |
298 |
|
0.5 |
|
- |
|
51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APPENDIX H - LONG SECTIONS / CROSS
SECTIONS:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/5771cce0-8ad4-46df-8646-38d597111fd2
LONG SECTION A-A’ (looking
NW)
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/3c5a9654-d929-49f3-aa0e-7848e33ba990
LONG SECTION B-B’ (looking
NW)
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/f6c7f47c-cba9-4350-971d-2811424eae5e
CROSS SECTION C-C’ (looking
NE)
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/15065795-2109-4f47-9c2b-bd5929581770
CROSS SECTION D-D’ (looking
NE)
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/bf7ee835-3444-44b1-8cd4-5cb9f9c9d951
CROSS SECTION E-E’ (looking
NE)
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/1b503900-7edc-4827-9b5d-7372bc5ebe8d
APPENDIX I - SITE
LAYOUT:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/a92066eb-ca65-4ac8-91f5-fba03c554b65
APPENDIX J – PRODUCTION & CASH FLOW
SCHEDULE:
|
Units |
Total/Avg |
Y-2 |
Y-1 |
Y1 |
Y2 |
Y3 |
Y4 |
Y5 |
Y6 |
Y7 |
Y8 |
Y9 |
Y10 |
Y11 |
Y12 |
Y13 |
Y14 |
Y15 |
Y16 |
Y17+ |
MINING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineralized Material Mined |
mt |
|
228 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Waste Mined |
mt |
|
491 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
49 |
|
|
49 |
|
|
47 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
47 |
|
|
46 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
44 |
|
|
40 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Total Material Mined |
mt |
|
719 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
72 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
65 |
|
|
65 |
|
|
65 |
|
|
65 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
63 |
|
|
61 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Mining Rate |
ktpd
|
|
137 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
157 |
|
|
206 |
|
|
192 |
|
|
186 |
|
|
186 |
|
|
186 |
|
|
186 |
|
|
171 |
|
|
181 |
|
|
175 |
|
|
121 |
|
|
62 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Strip Ratio |
w:o |
|
2.2 |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROCESSING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRUSHED OXIDES / HEAP LEACH: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heap Leach Crushed Tonnes |
mt |
|
20 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
5 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Stacked Grades: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ag |
g/t |
|
42 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
58 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Au |
g/t |
|
0.09 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
AgEq |
g/t |
|
48 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
64 |
|
|
46 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
ROM OXIDES / HEAP LEACH: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heap Leach ROM Tonnes |
mt |
|
9 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
5 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Stacked Grades: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ag |
g/t |
|
24 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
18 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
44 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Au |
g/t |
|
0.06 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
AgEq |
g/t |
|
28 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
23 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
SULPHIDES / FLOTATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Milling Rate |
ktpd |
|
36 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
16 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
-- |
|
Sulphide Tonnes Processed |
mt |
|
199 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
6 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
-- |
|
Mill Head Grade: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ag |
g/t |
|
31 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
62 |
|
|
63 |
|
|
61 |
|
|
48 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
37 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
-- |
|
Au |
g/t |
|
0.09 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
-- |
|
Pb |
% |
|
0.46 |
% |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
0.74 |
% |
|
1.04 |
% |
|
0.91 |
% |
|
0.62 |
% |
|
0.46 |
% |
|
0.52 |
% |
|
0.39 |
% |
|
0.39 |
% |
|
0.66 |
% |
|
0.67 |
% |
|
0.53 |
% |
|
0.37 |
% |
|
0.17 |
% |
|
0.16 |
% |
|
0.16 |
% |
|
0.16 |
% |
|
-- |
|
Zn |
% |
|
0.75 |
% |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
0.92 |
% |
|
0.79 |
% |
|
0.74 |
% |
|
0.77 |
% |
|
0.86 |
% |
|
0.92 |
% |
|
0.79 |
% |
|
0.81 |
% |
|
1.33 |
% |
|
1.15 |
% |
|
0.90 |
% |
|
0.62 |
% |
|
0.36 |
% |
|
0.34 |
% |
|
0.34 |
% |
|
0.34 |
% |
|
-- |
|
AgEq |
g/t |
|
80 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
132 |
|
|
155 |
|
|
143 |
|
|
107 |
|
|
87 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
78 |
|
|
78 |
|
|
119 |
|
|
106 |
|
|
84 |
|
|
62 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
-- |
|
Lead Concentrate – Recovery: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ag |
% |
|
73 |
% |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
81 |
% |
|
82 |
% |
|
82 |
% |
|
77 |
% |
|
71 |
% |
|
71 |
% |
|
70 |
% |
|
70 |
% |
|
79 |
% |
|
72 |
% |
|
67 |
% |
|
66 |
% |
|
56 |
% |
|
56 |
% |
|
56 |
% |
|
56 |
% |
|
-- |
|
Au |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
-- |
|
Pb |
% |
|
86 |
% |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
91 |
% |
|
90 |
% |
|
90 |
% |
|
85 |
% |
|
87 |
% |
|
85 |
% |
|
85 |
% |
|
89 |
% |
|
88 |
% |
|
87 |
% |
|
84 |
% |
|
69 |
% |
|
69 |
% |
|
69 |
% |
|
69 |
% |
|
-- |
|
Zinc Concentrate – Recovery: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ag |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
11 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
11 |
% |
|
11 |
% |
|
11 |
% |
|
11 |
% |
|
-- |
|
Au |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
-- |
|
Zn |
% |
|
85 |
% |
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
86 |
% |
|
86 |
% |
|
85 |
% |
|
84 |
% |
|
86 |
% |
|
86 |
% |
|
86 |
% |
|
86 |
% |
|
88 |
% |
|
88 |
% |
|
87 |
% |
|
81 |
% |
|
74 |
% |
|
74 |
% |
|
74 |
% |
|
74 |
% |
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRODUCTION PROFILE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
METAL PRODUCED: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ag – Oxides |
moz |
|
17 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
5 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Au – Oxides |
koz |
|
42 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
8 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
AgEq – Oxides Metal Produced |
moz |
|
20 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
6 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Ag – Sulphides |
moz |
|
167 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
11 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
-- |
|
Au – Sulphides |
koz |
|
113 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
6 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
-- |
|
Pb – Sulphides |
mlbs |
|
1,727 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
84 |
|
|
149 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
132 |
|
|
123 |
|
|
145 |
|
|
106 |
|
|
105 |
|
|
187 |
|
|
187 |
|
|
145 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
-- |
|
Zn – Sulphides |
mlbs |
|
2,773 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
100 |
|
|
108 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
154 |
|
|
235 |
|
|
251 |
|
|
215 |
|
|
221 |
|
|
369 |
|
|
320 |
|
|
248 |
|
|
159 |
|
|
84 |
|
|
79 |
|
|
79 |
|
|
51 |
|
|
-- |
|
AgEq – Sulphides Metal Produced |
moz |
|
405 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
20 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
47 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
-- |
|
Ag – Total |
moz |
|
185 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
5 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
-- |
|
Au – Total |
koz |
|
155 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
8 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
-- |
|
Pb – Total |
mlbs |
|
1,727 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
84 |
|
|
149 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
132 |
|
|
123 |
|
|
145 |
|
|
106 |
|
|
105 |
|
|
187 |
|
|
187 |
|
|
145 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
-- |
|
Zn – Total |
mlbs |
|
2,773 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
100 |
|
|
108 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
154 |
|
|
235 |
|
|
251 |
|
|
215 |
|
|
221 |
|
|
369 |
|
|
320 |
|
|
248 |
|
|
159 |
|
|
84 |
|
|
79 |
|
|
79 |
|
|
51 |
|
|
-- |
|
AgEq – Total Metal Produced |
moz |
|
426 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
6 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
47 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
-- |
|
METAL PAYABLE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ag – Oxides |
moz |
|
17 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
5 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Au – Oxides |
koz |
|
42 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
8 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
AgEq – Oxides Metal Payable |
moz |
|
20 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
6 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Ag – Sulphides |
moz |
|
148 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
10 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
-- |
|
Au – Sulphides |
koz |
|
41 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
2 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
-- |
|
Pb – Sulphides |
mlbs |
|
1,626 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
80 |
|
|
141 |
|
|
123 |
|
|
124 |
|
|
116 |
|
|
136 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
99 |
|
|
176 |
|
|
177 |
|
|
136 |
|
|
94 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
-- |
|
Zn – Sulphides |
mlbs |
|
2,340 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
84 |
|
|
91 |
|
|
84 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
198 |
|
|
212 |
|
|
181 |
|
|
186 |
|
|
312 |
|
|
271 |
|
|
209 |
|
|
134 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
-- |
|
AgEq – Sulphides Metal Payable |
moz |
|
352 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
18 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
-- |
|
Ag – Total |
moz |
|
165 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
5 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
-- |
|
Au – Total |
koz |
|
83 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
8 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
-- |
|
Pb – Total |
mlbs |
|
1,626 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
80 |
|
|
141 |
|
|
123 |
|
|
124 |
|
|
116 |
|
|
136 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
99 |
|
|
176 |
|
|
177 |
|
|
136 |
|
|
94 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
-- |
|
Zn – Total |
mlbs |
|
2,340 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
84 |
|
|
91 |
|
|
84 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
198 |
|
|
212 |
|
|
181 |
|
|
186 |
|
|
312 |
|
|
271 |
|
|
209 |
|
|
134 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
67 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
-- |
|
AgEq – Total Metal Payable |
moz |
|
372 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
6 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OXIDE REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ag Revenue |
US$mm |
$ |
376 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
112 |
|
$ |
74 |
|
$ |
67 |
|
$ |
68 |
|
$ |
22 |
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Au Revenue |
US$mm |
$ |
67 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
13 |
|
$ |
17 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
$ |
13 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Gross Revenue – Oxides |
US$mm |
$ |
443 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
126 |
|
$ |
91 |
|
$ |
82 |
|
$ |
81 |
|
$ |
27 |
|
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Treatment & Refining Charges |
US$mm |
$ |
18 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Net Revenue - Oxides |
US$mm |
$ |
425 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
121 |
|
$ |
87 |
|
$ |
78 |
|
$ |
78 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
$ |
32 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
SULPHIDE REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ag Revenue |
US$mm |
$ |
3,250 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
212 |
|
$ |
275 |
|
$ |
264 |
|
$ |
292 |
|
$ |
261 |
|
$ |
249 |
|
$ |
225 |
|
$ |
220 |
|
$ |
345 |
|
$ |
274 |
|
$ |
200 |
|
$ |
158 |
|
$ |
78 |
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
-- |
|
Au Revenue |
US$mm |
$ |
66 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
16 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
-- |
|
Pb Revenue |
US$mm |
$ |
1,626 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
80 |
|
$ |
141 |
|
$ |
123 |
|
$ |
124 |
|
$ |
116 |
|
$ |
136 |
|
$ |
100 |
|
$ |
99 |
|
$ |
176 |
|
$ |
177 |
|
$ |
136 |
|
$ |
94 |
|
$ |
36 |
|
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
-- |
|
Zn Revenue |
US$mm |
$ |
2,808 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
101 |
|
$ |
110 |
|
$ |
101 |
|
$ |
156 |
|
$ |
238 |
|
$ |
255 |
|
$ |
217 |
|
$ |
224 |
|
$ |
375 |
|
$ |
325 |
|
$ |
251 |
|
$ |
160 |
|
$ |
84 |
|
$ |
80 |
|
$ |
80 |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
-- |
|
Gross Revenue – Sulphides |
US$mm |
$ |
7,751 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
396 |
|
$ |
541 |
|
$ |
502 |
|
$ |
577 |
|
$ |
616 |
|
$ |
641 |
|
$ |
544 |
|
$ |
544 |
|
$ |
903 |
|
$ |
782 |
|
$ |
588 |
|
$ |
414 |
|
$ |
200 |
|
$ |
191 |
|
$ |
191 |
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
-- |
|
Treatment & Refining Charges |
US$mm |
$ |
780 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
43 |
|
$ |
39 |
|
$ |
51 |
|
$ |
64 |
|
$ |
68 |
|
$ |
57 |
|
$ |
58 |
|
$ |
96 |
|
$ |
84 |
|
$ |
65 |
|
$ |
44 |
|
$ |
22 |
|
$ |
21 |
|
$ |
21 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
-- |
|
Total Penalties |
US$mm |
$ |
33 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
-- |
|
Net Revenue - Sulphides |
US$mm |
$ |
6,938 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
362 |
|
$ |
497 |
|
$ |
461 |
|
$ |
524 |
|
$ |
550 |
|
$ |
570 |
|
$ |
485 |
|
$ |
484 |
|
$ |
803 |
|
$ |
695 |
|
$ |
520 |
|
$ |
368 |
|
$ |
177 |
|
$ |
168 |
|
$ |
168 |
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
-- |
|
Net Revenue - Total |
US$mm |
$ |
7,364 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
121 |
|
$ |
449 |
|
$ |
575 |
|
$ |
539 |
|
$ |
550 |
|
$ |
581 |
|
$ |
573 |
|
$ |
485 |
|
$ |
484 |
|
$ |
803 |
|
$ |
695 |
|
$ |
520 |
|
$ |
368 |
|
$ |
177 |
|
$ |
168 |
|
$ |
168 |
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING COSTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNIT COSTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mine (Includes Rehandling Costs) |
US$/t Moved |
$ |
2.23 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
$ |
1.92 |
|
$ |
1.91 |
|
$ |
1.88 |
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
$ |
1.97 |
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
$ |
2.06 |
|
$ |
2.16 |
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
$ |
1.86 |
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
-- |
|
Processing – Crushed Oxide Heap Leach |
US$/t Stacked |
$ |
3.84 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
3.84 |
|
$ |
3.84 |
|
$ |
3.84 |
|
$ |
3.84 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Processing – ROM Oxide Heap Leach |
US$/t Stacked |
$ |
1.34 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
$ |
1.44 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Processing – Sulphide |
US$/t Milled |
$ |
6.59 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
7.13 |
|
$ |
7.01 |
|
$ |
7.01 |
|
$ |
6.58 |
|
$ |
6.47 |
|
$ |
6.47 |
|
$ |
6.47 |
|
$ |
6.47 |
|
$ |
6.57 |
|
$ |
6.57 |
|
$ |
6.57 |
|
$ |
6.57 |
|
$ |
6.57 |
|
$ |
6.57 |
|
$ |
6.57 |
|
$ |
6.57 |
|
|
-- |
|
Site G&A Costs |
US$/t Processed |
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
-- |
|
OPERATING COSTS INCURED: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mine (Includes Rehandling Costs) |
US$mm |
$ |
1,602 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
110 |
|
$ |
147 |
|
$ |
133 |
|
$ |
128 |
|
$ |
136 |
|
$ |
135 |
|
$ |
136 |
|
$ |
131 |
|
$ |
143 |
|
$ |
144 |
|
$ |
107 |
|
$ |
62 |
|
$ |
32 |
|
$ |
17 |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
-- |
|
Processing – Crushed Oxide Heap Leach |
US$mm |
$ |
77 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
19 |
|
$ |
19 |
|
$ |
19 |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Processing – ROM Oxide Heap Leach |
US$mm |
$ |
12 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
Processing – Sulphides |
US$mm |
$ |
1,309 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
41 |
|
$ |
50 |
|
$ |
50 |
|
$ |
71 |
|
$ |
93 |
|
$ |
93 |
|
$ |
93 |
|
$ |
93 |
|
$ |
95 |
|
$ |
95 |
|
$ |
95 |
|
$ |
95 |
|
$ |
95 |
|
$ |
95 |
|
$ |
95 |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
-- |
|
Site G&A Costs |
US$mm |
$ |
194 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
-- |
|
Total Operating Costs |
US$mm |
$ |
3,193 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
136 |
|
$ |
218 |
|
$ |
213 |
|
$ |
208 |
|
$ |
226 |
|
$ |
246 |
|
$ |
242 |
|
$ |
236 |
|
$ |
248 |
|
$ |
251 |
|
$ |
214 |
|
$ |
169 |
|
$ |
139 |
|
$ |
124 |
|
$ |
122 |
|
$ |
122 |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
-- |
|
NSR - Government |
US$mm |
$ |
18 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
-- |
|
Concentrate Transportation |
US$mm |
$ |
527 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
21 |
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
$ |
34 |
|
$ |
42 |
|
$ |
46 |
|
$ |
38 |
|
$ |
38 |
|
$ |
64 |
|
$ |
58 |
|
$ |
46 |
|
$ |
31 |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
-- |
|
Total Costs |
US$mm |
$ |
3,738 |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
137 |
|
$ |
240 |
|
$ |
244 |
|
$ |
236 |
|
$ |
261 |
|
$ |
289 |
|
$ |
290 |
|
$ |
275 |
|
$ |
287 |
|
$ |
317 |
|
$ |
273 |
|
$ |
216 |
|
$ |
171 |
|
$ |
139 |
|
$ |
137 |
|
$ |
137 |
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
-- |
|
CASH COSTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co-Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Cash Costs |
US$/oz AgEq |
$ |
8.34 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
9.82 |
|
$ |
7.52 |
|
$ |
7.84 |
|
$ |
8.22 |
|
$ |
8.34 |
|
$ |
8.27 |
|
$ |
9.56 |
|
$ |
10.04 |
|
$ |
6.12 |
|
$ |
6.01 |
|
$ |
6.34 |
|
$ |
7.39 |
|
$ |
13.61 |
|
$ |
14.07 |
|
$ |
14.07 |
|
$ |
14.40 |
|
|
-- |
|
Total Cash Costs |
US$/oz AgEq |
$ |
12.07 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
12.57 |
|
$ |
10.29 |
|
$ |
10.55 |
|
$ |
11.47 |
|
$ |
12.10 |
|
$ |
12.31 |
|
$ |
13.52 |
|
$ |
14.06 |
|
$ |
10.17 |
|
$ |
10.13 |
|
$ |
10.63 |
|
$ |
11.50 |
|
$ |
17.91 |
|
$ |
18.34 |
|
$ |
18.34 |
|
$ |
18.67 |
|
|
-- |
|
All-in Sustaining Costs |
US$/oz AgEq |
$ |
12.35 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
$ |
12.98 |
|
$ |
11.40 |
|
$ |
10.76 |
|
$ |
11.65 |
|
$ |
12.20 |
|
$ |
12.64 |
|
$ |
13.65 |
|
$ |
14.24 |
|
$ |
10.27 |
|
$ |
10.21 |
|
$ |
10.74 |
|
$ |
11.66 |
|
$ |
18.24 |
|
$ |
19.12 |
|
$ |
18.69 |
|
$ |
19.85 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial/Expansion Capex |
US$mm |
$497 |
$187 |
$181 |
-- |
-- |
$94 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
$35 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|
Sustaining Capex (incl. Closure net of Salvage) |
US$mm |
$208 |
-- |
-- |
$9 |
$31 |
$6 |
$36 |
$3 |
$10 |
$3 |
$4 |
$31 |
$3 |
$3 |
$3 |
$3 |
$31 |
$3 |
$7 |
$22 |
Total Capital Expenditures |
US$mm |
$704 |
$187 |
$181 |
$9 |
$31 |
$99 |
$36 |
$3 |
$10 |
$3 |
$39 |
$31 |
$3 |
$3 |
$3 |
$3 |
$31 |
$3 |
$7 |
$22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FREE CASH FLOW VALUATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue |
US$mm |
$7,364 |
-- |
$121 |
$449 |
$575 |
$539 |
$550 |
$581 |
$573 |
$485 |
$484 |
$803 |
$695 |
$520 |
$368 |
$177 |
$168 |
$168 |
$108 |
-- |
Operating Expenses |
US$mm |
($3,193) |
-- |
($136) |
($218) |
($213) |
($208) |
($226) |
($246) |
($242) |
($236) |
($248) |
($251) |
($214) |
($169) |
($139) |
($124) |
($122) |
($122) |
($80) |
-- |
Royalties + Concentrate Transportation |
US$mm |
($545) |
-- |
($1) |
($23) |
($31) |
($28) |
($35) |
($43) |
($48) |
($39) |
($39) |
($66) |
($59) |
($47) |
($31) |
($16) |
($15) |
($15) |
($10) |
-- |
EBITDA |
US$mm |
$3,625 |
-- |
($16) |
$209 |
$331 |
$303 |
$289 |
$292 |
$284 |
$210 |
$196 |
$485 |
$422 |
$304 |
$198 |
$37 |
$32 |
$32 |
$19 |
-- |
Capital Expenditures |
US$mm |
($704) |
($187) |
($181) |
($9) |
($31) |
($99) |
($36) |
($3) |
($10) |
($3) |
($39) |
($31) |
($3) |
($3) |
($3) |
($3) |
($31) |
($3) |
($7) |
($22) |
Pre-Tax Free Cash Flow |
US$mm |
$2,921 |
($187) |
($198) |
$200 |
$300 |
$204 |
$253 |
$289 |
$274 |
$207 |
$157 |
$455 |
$419 |
$301 |
$195 |
$34 |
$1 |
$29 |
$12 |
($22) |
Mining Tax |
US$mm |
(273) |
-- |
-- |
($16) |
($25) |
($23) |
($22) |
($22) |
($21) |
($16) |
($15) |
($36) |
($32) |
($23) |
($15) |
($3) |
($2) |
($2) |
($1) |
-- |
Income Tax Payable |
US$mm |
(784) |
-- |
-- |
($9) |
($68) |
($64) |
($51) |
($62) |
($58) |
($46) |
($47) |
($120) |
($110) |
($82) |
($52) |
($8) |
-- |
($4) |
($2) |
-- |
Post-Tax Free Cash Flow |
US$mm |
$1,864 |
($187) |
($198) |
$175 |
$207 |
$117 |
$180 |
$205 |
$195 |
$145 |
$95 |
$299 |
$277 |
$196 |
$127 |
$23 |
($2) |
$22 |
$8 |
($22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax |
Post-Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPV (5%) |
US$mm |
$1,858 |
$1,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRR |
% |
50.3% |
38.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payback |
Yrs |
1.6 |
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discovery Silver (TSXV:DSV)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 11월(11) 2024 으로 12월(12) 2024
Discovery Silver (TSXV:DSV)
과거 데이터 주식 차트
부터 12월(12) 2023 으로 12월(12) 2024